Fluorescence and Intraoperative Ultrasound as Surgical Adjuncts for Brain Metastases Resection: What Do We Know? A Systematic Review of the Literature

(1) Background: brain metastases (BMs) are the most common neoplasm of the central nervous system; despite the high incidence of this type of tumour, to date there is no universal consensus on the most effective treatment in patients with BMs, even if surgery still plays a primary role. Despite this, the adjunct systems that help to reach the GTR, which are well structured for other tumour forms such as ultrasound and fluorescence systems, are not yet well employed and standardised in surgical practice. The aim of this review is to provide a picture of the current state-of-art of the roles of iOUS and intraoperative fluorescence to better understand their potential roles as surgical tools. (2) Methods: to reach this goal, the PubMed database was searched using the following string as the keyword: (((Brain cerebral metastasis [MeSH Major Topic])OR (brain metastasis, [MeSH Major Topic])) AND ((5-ala, [MeSH Terms]) OR (Aminolevulinicacid [All fields]) OR (fluorescein, [MeSH Terms]) OR (contrast enhanced ultrasound [MeSH Terms])OR ((intraoperative ultrasound. [MeSH Terms]))) AND (english [Filter]) AND ((english [Filter]) AND (2010:2022 [pdat])) AND (english [Filter]). (3) Results: from our research, a total of 661 articles emerged; of these, 57 were selected. 21 of these included BMs generically as a secondary class for comparisons with gliomas, without going deeply into specific details. Therefore, for our purposes, 36 articles were considered. (4) Conclusions: with regard to BMs treatment and their surgical adjuncts, there is still much to be explored. This is mainly related to the heterogeneity of patients, the primary tumour histology and the extent of systemic disease; regardless, surgery plays a paramount role in obtaining a local disease control, and more standardised surgical protocols need to be made, with the aim of optimizing the use of the available surgical adjuncts and in order to increase the rate of GTR.

Treatments for brain metastases from EGFR/ALK-negative/unselected NSCLC: A network meta-analysis

More clinical evidence is needed regarding the relative priority of treatments for brain metastases (BMs) from EGFR/ALK-negative/unselected non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were searched. Overall survival (OS), central nervous system progression-free survival (CNS-PFS), and objective response rate (ORR) were selected for Bayesian network meta-analyses. We included 25 eligible randomized control trials (RCTs) involving 3,054 patients, investigating nine kinds of treatments for newly diagnosed BMs and seven kinds of treatments for previously treated BMs. For newly diagnosed BMs, adding chemotherapy, EGFR-TKIs, and other innovative systemic agents (temozolomide, nitroglycerin, endostar, enzastaurin, and veliparib) to radiotherapy did not significantly prolong OS than radiotherapy alone; whereas radiotherapy + nitroglycerin showed significantly better CNS-PFS and ORR. Surgery could significantly prolong OS (hazard ratios [HR]: 0.52, 95% credible intervals: 0.41-0.67) and CNS-PFS (HR: 0.32, 95% confidence interval: 0.18-0.59) compared with radiotherapy alone. For previously treated BMs, pembrolizumab + chemotherapy, nivolumab + ipilimumab, and cemiplimab significantly prolonged OS than chemotherapy alone. Pembrolizumab + chemotherapy also showed better CNS-PFS and ORR than chemotherapy. In summary, immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based therapies, especially ICI-combined therapies, showed promising efficacies for previously treated BMs from EGFR/ALK-negative/unselected NSCLC. The value of surgery should also be emphasized. The result should be further confirmed by RCTs.

Radiotherapy for brain metastasis and long-term survival

Patients with brain metastases (BM) can benefit from radiotherapy (RT), although the long-term benefits of RT remain unclear. We searched a Korean national health insurance claims database and identified 135,740 patients with newly diagnosed BM during 2002-2017. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to evaluate survival according to RT modality, which included whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) and/or stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). The 84,986 eligible patients were followed for a median interval of 6.6 months, and 37,046 patients underwent RT (43.6%). After the PSM, patients who underwent RT had significantly better overall survival after 1 year (42.4% vs. 35.3%, P < 0.001), although there was no significant difference at 2.6 years, and patients who did not undergo RT had better survival after 5 years. Among patients with BM from lung cancer, RT was also associated with a survival difference after 1 year (57.3% vs. 32.8%, P < 0.001) and a median survival increase of 3.7 months. The 1-year overall survival rate was significantly better for SRS than for WBRT (46.4% vs. 38.8%, P < 0.001). Among Korean patients with BM, especially patients with primary lung cancer, RT improved the short-term survival rate, and SRS appears to be more useful than WBRT in this setting.

How to handle oligometastatic disease in nonsmall cell lung cancer

Patients with nonsmall cell lung cancer and limited metastatic disease have been defined as oligometastatic if local ablative therapy of all lesions is amenable. Evidence from different clinical retrospective series suggests that this subgroup harbours better prognosis than other stage IV patients. However, most reports have included patients with inconsistent numbers of metastases in different locations treated by a variety of invasive and noninvasive therapies. As long as further results from randomised clinical trials are awaited, treatment decision follows an interdisciplinary debate in each individual case. Surgery and radiotherapy should capture a dominant role in the treatment course offering the option of a curative-intended local therapy in combination with a systemic therapy based on an interdisciplinary decision. This review summarises the current treatment standard in oligometastatic lung cancer with focus on an ablative therapy for both lung primary and distant metastases in prognostically favourable locations.

Management of brain metastases: history and the present

Brain metastases are significant causes of morbidity or mortality for patients with metastatic cancer. With the application of novel systematic therapy and improvement of overall survival, the prevalence of brain metastases is increasing. The paradigm of treatment for brain metastases evolved rapidly during the last 30 years due to the development of technology and emergence of novel therapy. Brain metastases used to be regarded as the terminal stage of cancer and left life expectancy to only 1 month. The application of whole brain radiotherapy for patients with brain metastases increased the life expectancy to 4–6 months in the 1980s. Following studies established surgical resection followed by the application of whole brain radiotherapy the standard treatment for patients with single metastasis and good systematic performance. With the development of stereotactic radiosurgery, stereotactic radiosurgery plus whole brain radiotherapy provides an alternative modality with superior neurocognitive protection at the cost of overall survival. In addition, stereotactic radiosurgery combined with whole brain radiotherapy may offer a promising modality for patients with numerous multiple brain metastases who are not eligible for surgical resection. With the advancing understanding of molecular pathway and biological behavior of oncogenesis and tumor metastasis, novel targeted therapy including tyrosine-kinase inhibitors and immunotherapy are applied to brain metastases. Clinical trials had revealed the efficacy of targeted therapy. Furthermore, the combination of targeted therapy and radiotherapy or chemotherapy is the highlight of current investigation. Advancement in this area may further change the treatment paradigm and offer better modality for patients who are not suitable for surgical resection or radiosurgery.

Single Brain Metastases from Breast Cancer: Remarks on Clinical Pattern and Treatment

Thirty-four breast cancer patients with single brain metastases were reviewed: 9 underwent surgical removal only and 25 surgical removal and radiotherapy. A longer survival was seen in patients who underwent surgical removal and radiotherapy, with a mean survival of 28 months. In the 9 patients who did not receive whole brain radiotherapy, the mean survival was 15 months and there was an higher frequency of brain relapse.

Surgical Management of Cerebral Metastases from Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Aims and Background

The objective of the study was to assess the efficacy of surgical resection of solitary brain metastasis in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer.

Methods and Study Design

We report a retrospective analysis of 32 patients with single brain metastasis surgically excised at our hospital. All but one patient underwent postoperative whole brain radiation therapy.

Results

The median survival of patients was 12.5 months postoperatively (mean, 17 months), and the overall 1-year survival was 53%. Thirteen patients had recurrence of brain metastasis: 6 of 13 underwent reoperation for the recurrent lesion, and 1 of the 6 patients had a third craniotomy. Baseline characteristics, which significantly influenced survival, included age less than 60 years, tumor histology (ie, adenocarcinoma), and treatment of the primary lung cancer. The analysis did not yield any significant differences between treatment modalities.

Conclusions

Our findings correspond well with those reported in the literature and suggest that surgical resection of single brain metastasis in patients with non-small cell lung cancer can improve survival over conservative management. Furthermore, surgical treatment of the primary tumor and the single brain metastasis, combined or not with radiotherapy and chemotherapy, represents an approach that merits further investigation with more patients and a prospective longitudinal design.

Characteristics and treatments of large cystic brain metastasis: radiosurgery and stereotactic aspiration

Brain metastasis represents one of the most common causes of intracranial tumors in adults, and the incidence of brain metastasis continues to rise due to the increasing survival of cancer patients. Yet, the development of cystic brain metastasis remains a relatively rare occurrence. In this review, we describe the characteristics of cystic brain metastasis and evaluate the combined use of stereotactic aspiration and radiosurgery in treating large cystic brain metastasis. The results of several studies show that stereotactic radiosurgery produces comparable local tumor control and survival rates as other surgery protocols. When the size of the tumor interferes with radiosurgery, stereotactic aspiration of the metastasis should be considered to reduce the target volume as well as decreasing the chance of radiation induced necrosis and providing symptomatic relief from mass effect. The combined use of stereotactic aspiration and radiosurgery has strong implications in improving patient outcomes.

Patients with single brain metastasis from non-small cell lung cancer equally benefit from stereotactic radiosurgery and surgery: a systematic review

Background

The appropriate treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with single brain metastasis (SBM) is still controversial. A systematic review was designed to evaluate the effectiveness of neurosurgery and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in patients with SBM from NSCLC.

Material/Methods

PUBMED, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, Web of Knowledge, Current Controlled Trials, Clinical Trials, and 2 conference websites were searched to select NSCLC patients with only SBM who received brain surgery or SRS. SPSS 18.0 software was used to analyze the mean median survival time (MST) and Stata 11.0 software was used to calculate the overall survival (OS).

Results

A total of 18 trials including 713 patients were systematically reviewed. The MST of the patients was 12.7 months in surgery group and 14.85 months in SRS group, respectively. The 1, 2, and 5 years OS of the patients were 59%, 33%, and 19% in surgery group, and 62%, 33%, and 14% in SRS group, respectively. Furthermore, in the surgery group, the 1 and 3 years OS were 68% and 15% in patients with controlled primary tumors, and 50% and 13% in the other patients with uncontrolled primary tumors, respectively. Interestingly, the 5-year OS was up to 21% in patients with controlled primary tumors.

Conclusions

There was no significant difference in MST or OS between patients treated with neurosurgery and SRS. Patients with resectable lung tumors and SBM may benefit from the resection of both primary lesions and metastasis.

The management of non-small cell lung cancer with oligometastases

In the absence of persuasive findings from the trials outlined earlier, the available evidence supports treating patients with a solitary site of M1 disease with induction chemotherapy followed by resection of all sites of disease as long as patients understand that this multimodality approach has not been proven to be superior to either surgery alone or chemotherapy alone.

Risk factors of brain metastases in completely resected pathological stage IIIA-N2 non-small cell lung cancer

Background

Brain metastases (BM) is one of the most common failures of locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC) after combined-modality therapy. The outcome of trials on prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) has prompted us to identify the highest-risk subset most likely to benefit from PCI. Focusing on patients with completely resected pathological stage IIIA-N2 (pIIIA-N2) NSCLC, we aimed to assess risk factors of BM and to define the highest-risk subset.

Methods

Between 2003 and 2005, the records of 217 consecutive patients with pIIIA-N2 NSCLC in our institution were reviewed. The cumulative incidence of BM was estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method, and differences between the groups were analyzed using log-rank test. Multivariate Cox regression analysis was applied to assess risk factors of BM.

Results

Fifty-three (24.4 %) patients developed BM at some point during their clinical course. On multivariate analysis, non-squamous cell cancer (relative risk [RR]: 4.13, 95 % CI: 1.86–9.19; P = 0.001) and the ratio of metastatic to examined nodes or lymph node ratio (LNR) ≥ 30 % (RR: 3.33, 95 % CI: 1.79–6.18; P = 0.000) were found to be associated with an increased risk of BM. In patients with non-squamous cell cancer and LNR ≥ 30 %, the 5-year actuarial risk of BM was 57.3 %.

Conclusions

In NSCLC, patients with completely resected pIIIA-N2 non-squamous cell cancer and LNR ≥ 30 % are at the highest risk for BM, and are most likely to benefit from PCI. Further studies are warranted to investigate the effect of PCI on this subset of patients.

Delayed surgical resections of brain metastases after gamma knife radiosurgery

Although brain metastases are one of the most frequently diagnosed sequelae of systemic malignancy, their optimal management still is not well defined. In that respect, the different diagnostic and therapeutic approaches of BMs patients is an issue for serious discussions. The treatment options include surgical excision, WBRT, radiosurgery, chemotherapy, immunotherapy, etc. Nowadays, the aforementioned treatment modalities are usually combined in different treatment schemes. More than one option is used for the same patient and combining these treatment modalities gives better results than when separately use them. The value of surgical excision of progressing brain metastases treated with gamma knife surgery (GKS) is not well investigated.With the present study, we aim to investigate the value of surgical excision of symptomatic brain lesions that have been previously treated with GKS.

Treatment strategy for metastatic brain tumors from renal cell carcinoma: selection of gamma knife surgery or craniotomy for control of growth and peritumoral edema

We retrospectively studied the efficacy of gamma knife surgery (GKS) for metastatic brain tumors from renal cell carcinoma (RCC). To evaluate the efficacy of GKS for control of peritumoral edema, we retrospectively studied 280 consecutive metastatic brain tumors (100 from lung cancers, 100 from breast cancers, and 80 from RCC) associated with peritumoral edema. In addition, this study included 11 patients with metastatic brain tumors from RCC who underwent direct surgery. The tumor growth control rate of GKS was 84.3%. The extent of edema of RCC metastases was significantly larger than those from lung and breast cancer. Primary site (renal or not renal) and delivered marginal dose (25 Gy or more) were significantly correlated with control of peritumoral edema. All tumors treated by direct surgery were more than 2 cm in maximum diameter. Peritumoral edema at surgery was extensive but disappeared within 1-3 months, and neurological symptoms also improved in many cases. Total removal of brain metastases from RCC was easy with little bleeding in most cases. Our results suggest that GKS is effective for growth control of metastatic brain tumors from RCC. Higher marginal dose such as 25 Gy or more is desirable to obtain peritumoral edema control, so GKS is not suitable for control of symptomatic peritumoral edema associated with relatively large tumors. Tumor removal of RCC metastases is relatively easy and rapidly reduces peritumoral edema. Treatment strategy for metastatic brain tumors from RCC depends on tumor size, number of tumors, and presence of symptomatic peritumoral edema.

Gamma knife radiosurgery after stereotactic aspiration for large cystic brain metastases

OBJECTIVE

Several treatment options have proven effective for metastatic brain tumors, including surgery and stereotactic radiosurgery. Tumors with cystic components, however, are difficult to treat using a single method. We retrospectively assessed the outcome and efficacy of gamma knife radiosurgery (GKRS) for cystic brain metastases after stereotactic aspiration of cystic components to decrease the tumor volume.

METHODS

The study population consisted of 24 patients (13 males, 11 females; mean age, 58.3 years) with cystic metastatic brain tumors treated from January 2002 to August 2008. Non-small cell lung cancer was the most common primary origin. After Leksell stereotactic frame was positioned on each patient, magnetic resonance images (MRI)-guided stereotactic cyst aspiration and GKRS were performed (mean prescription dose : 20.2 Gy). After treatment, patients were evaluated by MRI every 3 or 4 months.

RESULTS

After treatment, 13 patients (54.2%) demonstrated tumor control, 5 patients (20.8%) showed local tumor progression, and 6 patients (25.0%) showed remote progression. Mean follow-up duration was 13.1 months. During this period, 10 patients (41.7%) died, but only 1 patient (4.2%) died from brain metastases. The overall median survival after these procedures was 17.8 months.

CONCLUSION

These results support the usefulness of GKRS after stereotactic cyst aspiration in patients with large cystic brain metastases. This method is especially effective for the patients whose general condition is very poor for general anesthesia and those with metastatic brain tumors located in eloquent areas.

Surgical technique for a cystic-type metastatic brain tumor: transformation to a solid-type tumor using hydrofiber dressing

BACKGROUND

Many metastatic brain tumors have a distinct border with normal brain tissue, which facilitates tumor removal. However, residual tumor tissue may be present after surgery when metastatic brain tumors are of cystic type. We have developed a method using hydrofiber dressing to transform cystic-type into solid-type tumors.

METHODS

Hydrofiber dressing is a sodium carboxymethylcellulose hydrocolloid polymer with high fluid-absorptive capacity. This material was originally used as a dressing for exudative wounds. Hydrofiber dressing was used for 8 patients with cystic-type metastatic brain tumor. Tumor removal was performed after hydrofiber dressing was inserted into the cyst cavity to transform the tumor into a solid-type tumor.

RESULTS

Transformation of cystic-type metastatic brain tumors into smaller solid-type tumors using hydrofiber dressing facilitated en bloc resection of tumor. The dressing also absorbed residual cyst fluid and was thus also effective in preventing intraoperative dissemination of tumor cells. This approach enabled ideal en bloc resection in all patients. There were no adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest hydrofiber dressing may be useful in surgery for cystic-type metastatic brain tumors.

Management of brain metastases: the indispensable role of surgery

Brain metastases are the most common neurological complication of systemic cancer and carry a very poor prognosis. The management of patients with brain metastases has become more important recently because of the increased incidence of these tumors and the prolonged patient survival times that have accompanied increased control of systemic cancer. In this article, we review the current perspectives on surgical treatment of brain metastases in terms of patient selection criteria, intraoperative adjuncts, whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT) as a postoperative adjuvant, reoperation for tumor recurrence, and resection of multiple and single metastases. Achieving the best outcome in treatment of brain metastasis requires the judicious and complementary use of surgical resection along with modalities such as whole-brain radiation therapy and stereotactic radiosurgery.

The elderly with synchronous non-small cell lung cancer and solitary brain metastasis: does palliative thoracic radiotherapy have a useful role?

We evaluated the prognosis associated with advanced age by comparing the clinical features of individuals 65 years of age and older to those of younger patients with single metastasis to the brain alone (SMBA) and simultaneous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and the potential role of palliative thoracic radiotherapy in this cohort of patients. Our 23-year experience included 72 consecutive (22 elderly and 50 non-elderly) people. Older patients predominantly presented with N0-N1 stage disease and coexisting illness. Univariate analysis showed that younger age (p=0.04) and operative removal of SMBA (p=0.01) were predictive of better survival. However, with multivariate analysis, resection of SMBA remained the sole predictor of prognosis. The application of NSCLC radiotherapy for palliation did not favorably alter outcome. In conclusion, elderly patients with simultaneous NSCLC and SMBA seem to fare less well than their younger counterparts. Moreover, the concurrent application of radiotherapy for palliation of the lung neoplasm was not prognostically advantageous.

Comparação entre tomografia computadorizada e mediastinoscopia na avaliação do envolvimento ganglionar mediastínico no carcinoma brônquico não de pequenas células

OBJETIVO: Avaliar o rendimento da tomografia computadorizada torácica, em relação à mediastinoscopia, na detecção de metástases ganglionares mediastinais em pacientes portadores de carcinoma brônquico analisando o rendimento dessa e identificando as regiões mais problemáticas. MATERIAIS E MÉTODOS: Analisamos 195 pacientes portadores de carcinoma brônquico, buscando-se comparar os achados entre tomografia computadorizada torácica e mediastinoscopia com biópsia. RESULTADOS: Em relação às metástases nodais mediastinais, 33,9% tinham doença metastática ganglionar peribrônquica e/ou hilar ipsilateral, 46,1% possuíam metástases mediastinais ipsilaterais e/ou subcarinais e 20% apresentavam doença metastática mediastinal e/ou hilar contralateral, escalênica ou supraclavicular. As regiões com melhores valores de sensibilidade foram traqueobrônquica direita, paratraqueal direita alta e paratraqueal esquerda alta. As regiões nodais com melhores resultados de especificidade foram paratraqueal esquerda alta, paratraqueal direita alta e regiões traqueobrônquicas. CONCLUSÃO: A tomografia computadorizada torácica mostrou-se importante ferramenta diagnóstica na detecção de anormalidades em gânglios mediastinais; entretanto, a natureza neoplásica desses gânglios deve ser conferida por mediastinoscopia, ou até mesmo por toracotomia, a fim de que a correta decisão quanto ao tratamento possa ser tomada.

Gamma Knife surgery for metastatic brain tumors from renal cell carcinoma

Object

The authors evaluated the results of Gamma Knife surgery (GKS) for the treatment of metastatic brain tumors from renal cell carcinoma (RCC).

Methods

The authors conducted a retrospective review of the clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes in 69 patients with metastatic brain tumors from RCC who underwent GKS at the authors’ institution. Fifty-one patients were men, and 18 were women. The mean patient age was 64.2 years (range 45–85 years).

The 69 patients underwent a total of 104 GKS procedures for treatment of 314 tumors. Eighteen patients received repeated GKS. Follow-up magnetic resonance (MR) imaging was used at a mean of 7.1 months after GKS to evaluate the change in 132 tumors after treatment. The mean prescription dose at the tumor margin was 21.8 Gy. The tumor growth control rate was 82.6%. Tumor volume and the delivered peripheral dose were significantly correlated with tumor growth control on univariate and multivariate analyses. Sixty (45.5%) of the 132 tumors assessed with MR imaging were associated with apparent peritumoral edema at the time of GKS. After treatment, peritumoral edema disappeared in 27 tumors, decreased in 13, was unchanged in 16, and progressed in four. Newly developed peritumoral edema after GKS was rare. The delivered peripheral dose was significantly correlated with control of peritumoral edema. The overall median survival time after GKS was 9.5 months. In this study, 34 patients died of systemic disease and 10 died of progressive brain metastases. Multivariate analysis showed that the number of lesions at the first GKS, the Karnofsky Performance Scale score at the first GKS, the recursive partitioning analysis classification, and the interval from diagnosis of RCC to brain metastasis were significantly correlated with survival time.

Conclusions

Gamma Knife surgery is effective for metastatic brain tumors from RCC. The disappearance rate of tumors is relatively low, but growth control is high. The delivered dose to the tumor margin is significantly correlated with the control of peritumoral edema. Gamma Knife surgery should be used as the initial treatment modality, if possible, even in patients with multiple metastases. Repeated GKS is recommended for newly developed brain metastases because of the low sensitivity of RCC to conventional radiation therapy.

Current treatment approaches to surgery for brain metastases

The role for surgical treatment of brain metastases continues to evolve. Data have demonstrated survival and quality-of-life benefits for surgical treatment of appropriate lesions in selected patients. With improvements in surgical technique, along with therapeutic improvements in the management of systemic cancers, more patients are now eligible for surgical resection. Selection of patients for surgical treatment depends on performance status, size, location, and number of brain lesions, as well as the status of systemic disease. Although surgery has traditionally been performed for patients with a single brain metastasis, an increasing number of patients with multiple brain metastases may also be treated surgically. Surgical techniques, such as image guidance, intraoperative ultrasound, functional neuronavigation, cortical mapping, and awake craniotomies, have expanded the scope of lesions that can be removed safely to optimize outcomes. Seizures, peritumoral edema, and venous thromboembolic disease all contribute significantly to surgical morbidity and mortality and thus require aggressive treatment around the time of the surgical procedure to improve the quality of life and maximize survival time.

Long-term survivors after gamma knife radiosurgery for brain metastases

BACKGROUND

Stereotactic radiosurgery, with or without whole-brain radiation therapy, has become a valued management choice for patients with brain metastases, although their median survival remains limited. In patients who receive successful extracranial cancer care, patients who have controlled intracranial disease are living longer. The authors evaluated all brain metastasis in patients who lived for > or = 4 years after radiosurgery to determine clinical and treatment patterns potentially responsible for their outcome.

METHODS

Six hundred seventy-seven patients with brain metastases underwent 781 radiosurgery procedures between 1988 and 2000. Data from the entire series were reviewed; and, if patients had > or = 4 years of survival, then they were evaluated for information on brain and extracranial treatment, symptoms, imaging responses, need for further care, and management morbidity. These long-term survivors were compared with a cohort who lived for < 3 months after radiosurgery (n = 100 patients).

RESULTS

Forty-four patients (6.5%) survived for > 4 years after radiosurgery (mean, 69 mos with 16 patients still alive). The mean age at radiosurgery was 53 years (maximum age, 72 yrs), and the median Karnofsky performance score (KPS) was 90. The lung (n = 15 patients), breast (n = 9 patients), kidney (n = 7 patients), and skin (melanoma; n = 6 patients) were the most frequent primary sites. Two or more organ sites outside the brain were involved in 18 patients (41%), the primary tumor plus lymph nodes were involved in 10 patients (23%), only the primary tumor was involved in 9 patients (20%), and only brain disease was involved in 7 patients (16%), indicating that extended survival was possible even in patients with multiorgan disease. Serial imaging of 133 tumors showed that 99 tumors were smaller (74%), 22 tumors were unchanged (17%), and 12 tumors were larger (9%). Four patients had a permanent neurologic deficit after brain tumor management, and six patients underwent a resection after radiosurgery. Compared with the patients who had limited survival (< 3 mos), long-term survivors had a higher initial KPS (P = 0.01), fewer brain metastases (P = 0.04), and less extracranial disease (P < 0.00005).

CONCLUSIONS

Although the expected survival of patients with brain metastases may be limited, selected patients with effective intracranial and extracranial care for malignant disease can have prolonged, good-quality survival. The extent of extracranial disease at the time of radiosurgery was predictive of outcome, but this does not necessarily mean that patients cannot live for years if treatment is effective.

High risk of brain metastases in surgically staged IIIA non-small-cell lung cancer patients treated with surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation

PURPOSE

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer mortality in the United States. We sought to review our experience with surgically staged IIIA (N2) non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), focusing on the patterns of failure in consecutively treated patients from 1988 to 2000.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The records of 177 patients were reviewed. Collected data included stage, histology, use of chemotherapy and radiation, initial and subsequent sites of failure, and survival. One hundred twenty-four patients have died; follow-up time is 35 months among the remaining patients.

RESULTS

The median survival from the time of surgery was 21.0 months, with a 3-year overall survival (OS) of 34%. Nodal downstaging to N0 disease correlated with OS and progression-free survival (PFS; P < .001). The most common site of recurrence was the brain. Thirty-four percent of patients recurred in the brain as their first site of failure, and 40% of patients developed brain metastases at some point in their course. In patients with nonsquamous histology and residual nodal involvement after neoadjuvant therapy, the risk of brain metastases was 53% at 3 years.

CONCLUSION

Patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy for N2-positive stage IIIA NSCLC enjoy an advantage in both OS and PFS if their lymph node status is downstaged to N(0). Because brain metastases constitute the most common site of failure in these patients, future studies focusing on prophylaxis of brain metastases may improve the outcome in patients with stage IIIA NSCLC.

Analysis of long-term outcomes and prognostic factors in patients with non—small cell lung cancer brain metastases treated by gamma knife radiosurgery

Object.The authors conducted a study to evaluate the long-term outcomes and prognostic factors for survival in a large series of patients treated by gamma knife surgery (GKS) for non—small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) brain metastases.

Methods.The study is based on the retrospective analysis of clinical and radiological records obtained during a 10-year period (1993–2003), concerning 836 lesions in 504 patients. The lesions were primary in 86% and recurrent 14% of the cases; they were solitary in 31%, single in 29%, and multiple in 40%. The mean follow-up period was 16 months (range 4–113 months). The most common histological types were adenocarcinoma (51%) and squamous cell carcinoma (27%). Dose planning parameters were as follows: mean target volume 6.2 cm3(range 0.06–22.5 cm3); mean prescription dose 21.4 Gy (range 15.5–28 Gy); and mean number of isocenters 6.7 (range one–18). Progression-free and actuarial survival curves were calculated using the Kaplan—Meier method. The main factors affecting survival were determined by unimultivariate analysis (log-rank test and Cox proportional hazard models).

Analysis of long-term outcomes seemed to confirm that GKS is a primary therapeutic option in these patients. The 1-year local tumor control rate was 94%. The overall median survival was 14.5 months, with extremely rewarding quality of life indices. The recursive partitioning analysis classification was the dominant prognostic factor.

Conclusions.Gamma knife surgery is a useful treatment for brain metastases from NSCLC.

Analysis of long-term outcomes and prognostic factors in patients with non—small cell lung cancer brain metastases treated by gamma knife radiosurgery

Object. The authors conducted a study to evaluate the long-term outcomes and prognostic factors for survival in a large series of patients treated by gamma knife surgery (GKS) for non—small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) brain metastases.

Methods. The study is based on the retrospective analysis of clinical and radiological records obtained during a 10-year period (1993–2003), concerning 836 lesions in 504 patients. The lesions were primary in 86% and recurrent 14% of the cases; they were solitary in 31%, single in 29%, and multiple in 40%. The mean follow-up period was 16 months (range 4–113 months). The most common histological types were adenocarcinoma (51%) and squamous cell carcinoma (27%). Dose planning parameters were as follows: mean target volume 6.2 cm3 (range 0.06–22.5 cm3); mean prescription dose 21.4 Gy (range 15.5–28 Gy); and mean number of isocenters 6.7 (range one–18). Progression-free and actuarial survival curves were calculated using the Kaplan—Meier method. The main factors affecting survival were determined by unimultivariate analysis (log-rank test and Cox proportional hazard models).

Analysis of long-term outcomes seemed to confirm that GKS is a primary therapeutic option in these patients. The 1-year local tumor control rate was 94%. The overall median survival was 14.5 months, with extremely rewarding quality of life indices. The recursive partitioning analysis classification was the dominant prognostic factor.

Conclusions. Gamma knife surgery is a useful treatment for brain metastases from NSCLC.

Long-Term Survival After Gamma Knife Radiosurgery for Primary and Metastatic Brain Tumors

In this paper, we studied factors related to long-term survival after gamma knife radiosurgery (GKS) for primary and metastatic brain tumors. We examined all cases of brain metastases and malignant glioma treated with GKS between September 1994 and December 1998. All patients with survival exceeding 2 years were studied retrospectively using prospectively acquired data. A total of 22 patients, with an average age of 56, were identified, which accounts for 11% of the total patients treated during this time interval. Seventeen of 22 are still alive with a mean follow-up of 48 months. Sixteen patients had metastatic tumors, whereas 6 had a malignant glioma. Thirteen of 15 patients with metastases had a controlled primary site, and the other 2 patients did not have a primary site identified. These 2 patients were among the 3 that died during the follow-up period. Fourteen patients developed symptomatic radiation necrosis by MRI criteria with 4 confirmed by biopsy. Quality-of-life factors were assessed in 20 of 22 patients using a modified Spitzer scale, which showed a high level of functioning in all of the long-term survivors (mean score 8.65 of 10), and only 1 patient had a Karnofsky Performance Score of less than 70. We conclude that radiosurgery provides a noninvasive and effective way of controlling brain tumors, while preserving quality of life.

The expanding role of neurosurgeons in the management of brain metastases

BACKGROUND

Brain metastases are the most common type of intracranial tumor. Until recently, whole brain fractionated radiation therapy (WBRT) was the mainstay of treatment, thereby confining the role of neurosurgeons to resection of an occasional solitary, accessible, and symptomatic brain metastasis. Median survival after surgery and radiation typically ranged from 5 to 11 months.

METHODS

We analyzed various demographic incidence reports and our series of brain metastasis patients treated with radiosurgery. During a 15-year interval (1987-2002), radiosurgery was performed on 5,032 patients of whom 1,088 (21.6%) had metastatic brain tumors.

RESULTS

In the United States, 266,820 to 533,640 new cases of brain metastases will be diagnosed in the year 2003. Evidence to date demonstrates that radiosurgery provides effective local tumor control for brain metastases. Important prognostic factors affecting patient survival include the absence of active systemic disease, the patient's preoperative performance status, age, and the number of metastases. Survival and local tumor control rates attained with radiosurgery are superior to those of either conventional surgery or WBRT. The morbidity associated with radiosurgery of brain metastasis is very low, and the mortality rate approaches zero.

CONCLUSIONS

Compelling evidence indicates that radiosurgery is an effective neurosurgical management strategy for intracranial brain metastases. Quite often, favorable tumor control and survival can be achieved without WBRT. With radiosurgery as a therapeutic option, neurosurgeons now have a vastly expanded armamentarium for treatment of patients with brain metastases. The large number of patients with brain metastases who require care by a neurosurgeon for optimal treatment has significant implications for both the patterns of neurosurgical training and practice in the United States.

Brain metastases treated with radiosurgery alone: an alternative to whole brain radiotherapy?

OBJECTIVE

Whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) provides benefit for patients with brain metastases but may result in neurological toxicity for patients with extended survival times. Stereotactic radiosurgery in combination with WBRT has become an important approach, but the value of WBRT has been questioned. As an alternative to WBRT, we managed patients with stereotactic radiosurgery alone, evaluated patients' outcomes, and assessed prognostic factors for survival and tumor control.

METHODS

One hundred seventy-two patients with brain metastases were managed with radiosurgery alone. One hundred twenty-one patients were evaluable with follow-up imaging after radiosurgery. The median patient age was 60.5 years (age range, 16-86 yr). The mean marginal tumor dose and volume were 18.5 Gy (range, 11-22 Gy) and 4.4 ml (range, 0.1-24.9 ml). Eighty percent of patients had solitary tumors.

RESULTS

The overall median survival time was 8 months. The median survival time in patients with no evidence of primary tumor disease or stable disease was 13 and 11 months. The local tumor control rate was 87%. At 2 years, the rate of local control, remote brain control, and total intracranial control were 75, 41, and 27%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, advanced primary tumor status (P = 0.0003), older age (P = 0.008), lower Karnofsky Performance Scale score (P = 0.01), and malignant melanoma (P = 0.005) were significant for poorer survival. The median survival time was 28 months for patients younger than 60 years of age, with Karnofsky Performance Scale score of at least 90, and whose primary tumor status showed either no evidence of disease or stable disease. Tumor volume (P = 0.02) alone was significant for local tumor control, whereas no factor affected remote or intracranial tumor control. Eleven patients developed complications, six of which were persistent. Nineteen (16.5%) of 116 patients in whom the cause of death was obtained died as a result of causes related to brain metastasis.

CONCLUSION

Brain metastases were controlled well with radiosurgery alone as initial therapy. We advocate that WBRT should not be part of the initial treatment protocol for selected patients with one or two tumors with good control of their primary cancer, better Karnofsky Performance Scale score, and younger age, all of which are predictors of longer survival.

The role of gamma knife radiosurgery in the treatment of primary and metastatic brain tumors

With the widespread diffusion of stereotactic radiosurgical procedures, GKR treatments have gained considerable momentum as a major therapeutic option for patients harboring primary or metastatic brain tumors. Present results in high grade gliomas indicate a potential palliative role of this technique. The overall low radiosensitivity of these oncotypes and their infiltrative nature-with the resulting problems in properly defining the tumor target-are still a major obstacle to further development of the approach. In this regard, useful contributions are expected from advances in molecular neurobiology and functional neuroimaging as shown by preliminary investigations with MR spectroscopy. Surgery maintains a dominant role in the therapeutic armamentarium for low grade gliomas. However, in unfavorable cases (unresectable tumors, recurrences), GKR seems to be an effective alternative to conventional radiochemotherapy. In grade 2 astrocytomas and specifically in grade 1 pilocytic forms, short-to-mid-term reported studies have documented encouraging 70 to 93% local tumor control rates, with minimal cerebral toxicity. Finally, during the last decade, GKR has become a primary treatment choice for patients harboring small-to-medium-size brain metastases, with reasonable life expectancy and no impending intracranial hypertension. Focal tumor responses are consistently elevated, even in the most radioresistant oncotypes (melanoma, renal carcinoma); median and actuarial survival rates are far better than with conventional radiation treatments and are comparable to those observed in accurately selected surgical-radiation series.

Successful treatment with stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastases of endometrial carcinoma: a case report and review of the literature

Brain metastases from endometrial carcinomas are rare and the treatment is usually difficult. Here, we report a patient with stage IV endometrial carcinoma whose brain metastases showed complete remission after stereotactic radiosurgery using a gamma-knife. A 48-year-old woman underwent removal of a single brain metastatic lesion, and one month later underwent hysterectomy for endometrioid-type G3, endometrial adenocarcinoma. After hysterectomy, a cranial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) demonstrated multiple brain metastases and the patient received two courses of stereotactic radiosurgery and six courses of chemotherapy. Complete response of the brain lesions was obtained, and she is well without recurrence 38 months after the second stereotactic radiosurgery.

Gamma knife radiosurgery for brain metastases: a primary therapeutic option

Object. The aim of this retrospective study was to assess the role of gamma knife radiosurgery (GKS) as a primary treatment for brain metastases by evaluating the results in particularly difficult cases such as oncotypes—which are unresponsive to radiation—cystic lesions, and highly critical locations such as the brainstem.

Methods. Treatment of 804 patients with 1307 solitary (29%), single (26%), and multiple (45%) brain metastases was evaluated. Treatment planning parameters were as follows: mean tumor volume 4.8 cm3 (range 0.01–21.5 cm3), mean prescription dose 20.6 Gy (range 12–29 Gy), and mean number of isocenters 6.5 (one–19). In unresponsive oncotypes such as melanoma and renal cell carcinoma, the mean target dosages were higher. Cystic metastatic lesions were initially stereotactically evacuated and then GKS was performed. Patients with brainstem metastases were treated with lower doses. Conventional radiotherapy was used in only a minority (14%) of selected cases. The overall median patient survival time was 13.5 months, and the 1-year actuarial local progression-free survival rate was 94%, with a mean palliation index and functional independence index of 53.8 and 52.5 weeks, respectively. The local tumor control rate was 93%, with a mean follow-up period of 14 months. In the overall series, and especially in the unresponsive oncotypes, systemic disease progression was the main limiting factor with regard to patient life expectancy.

Conclusions. Gamma knife radiosurgery seems to be the primary treatment option for patients harboring small-tomedium size (≤ 20-cm3) brain metastases with reasonable life expectancy and no impending intracranial hypertension. Results are better than with those obtained using whole-brain radiotherapy and comparable to the best selected surgery—radiation series, even in oncotypes unresponsive to therapeutic radiation, cystic tumors, and tumors located in the brain stem.

[Intracerebral radiotherapy under stereotaxic conditions]

Stereotactic radiosurgery is used for treating several brain diseases. Radiosurgery is a non-invasive alternative to surgery for brain metastases, and randomized trials are on going to assess the role of radiosurgery. Radiosurgery has been advocated for patients with small benign meningioma or with vestibular schwannoma, but there is no proof of efficacy and safety of radiosurgery in comparison with other treatments. Radiosurgery can obliterate 80-90% of small arteriovenous malformations, but no information exists on the survival of treated compared with untreated patients. The limited information available suggests that radiosurgery should be fully evaluated in well-designed prospective studies.

Brain metastases in locally advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma after multimodality treatment: risk factors analysis

BACKGROUND

Brain metastases (BM) are frequent sites of initial failure in patients with locally advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer (LAD-NSCLC) undergoing multimodality treatments (MMT). New treatment and follow-up strategies are needed to reduce the risk of BM and to diagnose them early enough for effective treatment.

METHODS

The incidence rate of BM as the first site of recurrence in 112 patients with LAD-NSCLC treated with the same MMT protocol was calculated. The influence of patient, disease, and treatment-related factors on the incidence of BM and on the time-to-brain recurrence (TBR) was analyzed.

RESULTS

BM as the first site of failure was observed in 25 cases (22% of the study population and 29% of all recurrences). In 18 of those cases, the brain was the exclusive site of recurrence. Median TBR was 9 months. The 2-year actuarial incidence of BM was 29%. Central nervous system (CNS) recurrence was more common in patients younger than 60 years (P = 0.006) and in whom bulky (> or = 2 cm) mediastinal lymph nodes were present (P = 0.02). TBR was influenced by age (P = 0.004) and by bulky lymph node disease (P = 0.003). Multivariate analysis confirmed the prognostic role of age, whereas the presence of clinical bulky mediastinal lymph nodes was of borderline significance.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study confirmed a high rate of BM in patients with LAD-NSCLC submitted to MMT. Most of these CNS recurrences were isolated and occurred within 2 years of initial diagnosis. Age younger than 60 years was associated with an increased risk of BM and reduced TBR, whereas the presence of clinical bulky mediastinal lymph nodes was of borderline significance. Although our data require further validation in future studies, our results suggest that additional trials on prophylactic cranial irradiation and on intensive radiologic follow-up should focus on these high-risk populations.

Risk factors affecting survival after brain metastases from non-small cell lung carcinoma: a follow-up study of 70 patients

OBJECT

The authors present their experience with the treatment of brain metastases from non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC).

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted in which records from 74 patients treated at the authors' institution between 1994 and 1999 were assessed. Survival and functional outcome were reviewed relative to individual patient variables. The median survival time was 12.9 months, with 1-, 2-, and 5-year survival milestones reached by 52.2%, 30.7%. and 18.1% of patients, respectively. Patients were stratified into groups composed of those with synchronous brain metastases (tumors diagnosed within 3 months of NSCLC) and metachronous brain metastases (tumors diagnosed 3 months after NSCLC). The median survival time and 5-year survival rate were 18 months and 28.9% for metachronous, compared with 9.9 months and 0% for synchronous brain metastases. In univariate analyses, the stage of brain metastases, an initial Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) score of 90 or less, and conservative therapy for NSCLC were associated with worse outcomes (p < 0.05). In analyses in which tumors were stratified by synchronous compared with metachronous brain metastases, a preoperative KPS score of 90 or less and radiation therapy (RT) alone for brain metastases were associated with worse outcomes in patients with metachronous brain metastases but not with synchronous tumors (p < 0.05). When stratified by preoperative KPS score, the synchronous brain metastases stage or treatment of brain metastases with RT alone were associated with worse outcome in patients with KPS scores of 100, but had no discernible effect on patients with KPS scores of 90 or less (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The tumor stage and preoperative KPS score were significantly associated with survival. Craniotomy plus RT significantly improved the prognosis in patients with metachronous brain metastases or those with a preoperative KPS score of 100.

What is the optimal therapy of brain metastases?

The conclusions of a symposium held in London in October 1999 and devoted to the optimal management of brain metastatic disease were: 1. Prognostic factors are: size and number of metastases (and the presence of mass effect); the status of the systemic cancer outside the central nervous system; performance/neurological status; the age of the patient; and the type of cancer. 2. Surgical management of the single, superficially located brain metastasis with symptomatic mass effect is recommended in good performance status patients. Many would follow this routinely by whole brain radiotherapy. 3. Whole brain radiotherapy is often not followed by durable control of the disease and carries morbidity; better management plans are required. In poor prognosis patients the delivery of radiotherapy may not always be indicated. 4. The current literature demonstrates that stereotactic radiosurgery can enhance the likelihood of sterilizing individual brain metastases compared with whole brain radiotherapy alone. 5. The results of questionnaire showed that the histological diagnosis and latency to onset made little difference to the opinion of neuroscience clinicians, who generally favoured stereotactic radiation therapy over whole brain radiotherapy (with or without a conventionally delivered boost) for all patients with less than four metastases. The opinions of oncologists differed. For bronchial and breast cancer patients, whole brain radiotherapy, with or without a boost, was favoured by the majority, particularly in oat cell cancer. However, with a long latency to 'isolated' brain metastasis, oncologists favoured focal radiation therapy. There was a strong preference amongst oncology experts to reserve stereotactic radiation therapy for apparently isolated brain metastasis; this opinion applied to bronchus and breast cancer, and also to melanoma. 6. Whole brain radiotherapy followed by positron emission tomography scanning to determine what viable metastatic disease remained (and potentially treatable by stereotactic/focal technology) was favoured by most of delegates who answered this question.

Non-small cell lung cancer with single brain metastasis: the role of surgical treatment

OBJECTIVE

The prognosis of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with brain metastasis is very poor, with median survival rate below 6 months, even if treated with palliative radio and/or chemotherapy. To assess the effectiveness of surgical treatment for this kind of patients we reviewed our experience.

METHODS

From January 1989 to October 1999, 30 patients (26 males and four females; mean age: 58.7 years) with NSCLC and single brain metastasis underwent surgical treatment of both primary lung cancer and secondary cerebral lesion. Patients (pts) were divided into two major groups. In group 1 (G1) 20 pts (18 males and two females) presented a synchronous brain metastasis. In group 2 (G2) 10 pts (eight males and two females) presented a metachronous brain metastasis during the follow-up period (range 3-24 months since the primary tumor). Patients selected in G1 had T1-2, N0-1 clinical staging, good 'performance status' (ECOG:0--1; Karnofsky index > 70%), age < 75 years. Craniotomy has always been the first approach. In G2 also patients with locally advanced tumors (T3 and/or N2) were included. Whole brain radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy was the post-operative choice treatment.

RESULTS

Histologic findings have shown: adenocarcinoma in 17 cases (12 in G1; five in G2), squamous cell carcinoma in 10 cases (six in G1; four in G2), large cell carcinoma in 2 (one in G1; one in G2) and large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma in one (G1). Survival analysis (Kaplan--Meier method) has shown an overall value of 80% at 1 year (95% in G1; 50% in G2), 41% at 2 years (47% in G1; 30% in G2) and 17% at 3 years (14% in G1; 20% in G2). Overall median survival is 23 months (23 in G1; 11 in G2); mean survival 27.8 months (30.3 months in G1; 22.8 months in G2). According to univariate analysis prognosis is definitively better in N0 tumors compared to N1-2 tumors and in adenocarcinoma cases compared to other histotypes (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

We can conclude that combined surgical therapy is, nowadays, the choice treatment for this kind of patients, even though restricted to selected cases. The knowledge of prognostic factors may optimize indications for surgery.

Pronostic factors of synchronous brain metastases from lung cancer

BACKGROUND

The prognosis of brain metastases (BM) from lung cancer is poor. The management of lung cancer with BM is not clear. This retrospective study attempts to determine their prognostic factors, and to better define the role of different treatments.

METHODS

We reviewed the clinical characteristics of 271 consecutive patients with synchronous brain metastases (SBM) from lung cancer (small-cell lung cancers and non-small-cell lung cancers), collected between January 1985 and May 1993. Data were available for all patients as well as follow-up information on all patients through to death. Patients had all undergone heterogeneous treatments. Each physician had chosen the appropriate treatment after collegiate discussion. Survival curves were compared using the log-rank test in univariate analysis, and Cox's Regression model in multivariate analysis. Statistical significance was defined as P<0.05.

RESULTS

249 patients were assessable. Treatments included: neurosurgical resection in 56 cases, brain irradiation in 87 cases, and chemotherapy in 126 cases. Median overall survival time from the date of histological diagnosis of SBM was 103 days (range, 1-1699). In multivariate analysis, prognostic factors for longer overall survival times were: absence of adrenal metastases (P=0.007), neurosurgical resection (P=0.028), chemotherapy (P=0.032) and brain irradiation (P=0.008). Moreover, risk factors of intracranial hypertension as cause of death were number of SBM and absence of neurosurgical resection.

CONCLUSIONS

These results and others suggest that patients with SBM from lung cancer be considered for carcinologic treatment, and not only for best supportive care. However, further studies are necessary to evaluate quality of life with or without carcinologic treatment.

Brain metastases and non-small cell lung cancer. Prognostic factors and correlation with survival after irradiation

A total of 250 patients with brain metastases from non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were treated with irradiation of their brain metastases. The median overall survival was 3.1 (95% CI: 2.7-3.5) months. 32/250 patients presenting with solitary brain metastasis underwent surgical resection. Their 1-year survival rate of 58% was significantly better than 89/250 patients with a solitary lesion but without surgery (14%, P=0.001). Patients with an absent or controlled primary tumor (101/250, 40.5%) had a 1-year survival rate of 26% as opposed to 11% for patients presenting with an active primary tumor (P=0.051). Patients presenting with metastases to the brain only showed a significant survival advantage over patients with extracranial metastases (1-year survival of 21% vs 6%, P=0.001). Karnofsky performance score, neurofunction status and response to steroids were also identified as prognostic factors. The total dose whole brain irradiation (WBI) was prognostic of significance with a 1-year survival of 35% for 30 Gy and boost, 23.5% for 30 Gy and 4% for the patients irradiated to a dose of 20 Gy WBI (P=0.001). When patients were grouped into the RTOG RPA (Recursive partitioning analysis) classes, patients within class I (73/250) had a 1-year survival of 28.5%, patients in class II (145/250) a survival of 14% at 1 year and patients into class III only a 6% 1-year survival rate. In a multivariate analysis, surgical resection, neurofunction class, metastatic extent and WBI dose remained significant prognostic factors. Although survival remains poor, there needs to be a continued interest in these patients, probably by participating in clinical trials.

Factors affecting the risk of brain metastases after definitive chemoradiation for locally advanced non-small-cell lung carcinoma

PURPOSE

As therapy for locally advanced non-small-cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) improves, brain metastases (BM) may become a greater problem. We analyzed our chemoradiation experience for patients at highest risk for the brain as the first failure site.

METHODS

Records for 150 consecutive patients with stage II/III NSCLC treated definitively with chemoradiation from June 1992 to June 1998 at the University of Pennsylvania were reviewed. Most patients (89%) received cisplatin, paclitaxel, or both. All had negative brain imaging before treatment. Posttreatment brain imaging was performed for suspicious symptoms. Incidence of BM was examined as a function of age, sex, histology, stage, performance status, weight loss, tumor location, surgery, radiation dose, initial radiation field, chemotherapy regimen, and chemotherapy timing.

RESULTS

Crude and 2-year actuarial rates of BM were 19% and 30%, respectively. Among pretreatment parameters, stage IIIB was associated with a higher risk of BM (P <.04) versus stage II/IIIA. Histology alone was not significant (P <.12), although patients with IIIB nonsquamous tumors had an exceptionally high 2-year BM rate of 42% (P <.01 v all others). Examining treatment-related parameters, crude and 2-year actuarial risk of BM were 27% and 39%, respectively, in patients receiving chemotherapy before radiotherapy and 15% and 20%, respectively, when radiotherapy was not delayed (P <.05). On multivariate analysis, timing of chemotherapy (P <.01) and stage IIIA versus IIIB (P <.01) remained significant.

CONCLUSION

Patients with later stage, nonsquamous NSCLC, particularly those receiving induction chemotherapy, have sufficiently common BM rates to justify future trials including prophylactic cranial irradiation.

Practice parameters for the management of single brain metastasis

Object

In January 1998 the Guidelines and Outcomes Committee of the American Association of Neurological Surgeons (AANS) issued a charge for the development of evidence-based practice parameters focusing on the treatment of patients with single metastasis to the brain. The charge was imposed in response to the significant controversy surrounding questions relating to the optimal management strategies for patients with single brain metastasis.

Methods

A team consisting of physicians from the AANS, the American Academy of Neurology, and the American Association of Therapeutic Radiation Oncology convened and the literature was reviewed. Methodically drawing from the best of Class I, II, and III levels of available evidence, authors sought to determine how the literature addressed and disposed of the question of the optimal management for an adult with a known history of cancer and a single meta-static brain lesion. Framing the question in this specific manner allowed researchers to focus directly on treatment issues, without having to consider diagnostic issues.

Conclusions

The results of the evidence-based analysis demonstrated that there was insufficient information to establish standards of care. Data from the literature does, however, support a guideline stating that surgical resection accompanied by whole brain radiation therapy is associated with the best survival rate. Additional lower-quality evidence supports an option for management with radiosurgery.

Survival of patients with synchronous brain metastases: an epidemiological study in southeastern Michigan

OBJECT

It has been suggested that synchronous brain metastases (that is, those occurring within 2 months of primary cancer diagnosis) are associated with a shorter survival time compared with metachronous lesions (those occurring more than 2 months after primary cancer diagnosis). In this study the authors used data obtained from the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program to determine the incidence of synchronous brain metastases and length of survival of patients in a defined population of southeastern Michigan residents.

METHODS

Data obtained in 2682 patients with synchronous brain metastases treated between 1973 and 1995 were reviewed. Study criteria included patients in whom at least one brain metastasis was diagnosed within 2 months of the diagnosis of primary cancer and those with an unknown primary source. The incidence per 100,000 population increased fivefold, from 0.69 in 1973 to 3.83 in 1995. The most frequent site for the primary cancer was the lung (75.4%). The second largest group (10.7%) consisted of patients in whom the primary site was unknown. The median length of survival was 3.2 months. There was no significant difference in the median survival of patients with primary lung/bronchus and those with an unknown primary site (3.3 months and 3.2 months, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who present with synchronous lesions have a poor prognosis, and the predominant cause of death, in more than 90% of cases, is related to systemic disease; however, despite poor median survival times, certain patients will experience prolonged survival.

Survival of patients with synchronous brain metastases: an epidemiological study in southeastern Michigan

Object

It has been suggested that synchronous brain metastases (that is, those occurring within 2 months of primary cancer diagnosis) are associated with a shorter survival time compared with metachronous lesions (those occurring greater than 2 months after primary cancer diagnosis). In this study the authors used data obtained from the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program to determine the incidence of synchronous brain metastases and length of survival of patients in a defined population of southeastern Michigan residents.

Methods

Data obtained in 2682 patients with synchronous brain metastases treated from 1973 to 1995 were reviewed. Study criteria included patients in whom at least one brain metastasis was diagnosed within 2 months of the diagnosis of primary cancer and those with an unknown primary source. The incidence per 100,000 increased fivefold, from 0.69 in 1973 to 3.83 in 1995. The most frequent site for the primary cancer was the lung (75.4%). The second largest group (10.7%) consisted of patients in whom the primary site was unknown. The median survival length was 3.3 months. There was no significant difference in the median survival in patients with primary lung/bronchus and those with an unknown primary site (3.2 months and 3.4 months, respectively).

Conclusions

Patients who present with synchronous lesions have a poor prognosis, and the predominant cause of death, in greater than 90% of cases, is related to systemic disease; however, despite poor median survival lengths, certain patients will experience prolonged survival.

Dose optimization and indication of Linac radiosurgery for brain metastases

PURPOSE

The authors have examined treatment effects of linear accelerator based radiosurgery for brain metastases. Optimal doses and indications were determined in an attempt to improve the quality of life for terminal cancer patients.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Ninety-two patients with 162 lesions were treated with Linac radiosurgery for brain metastases between April 1993 and September 1998. To determine prognostic factors, risk factors for recurrence, and appearance of new lesions, univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. To compare the local control between the high-dose (minimum dose > or =25 Gy: prescribed to the 50-80% isodose line) and low-dose (minimum dose <25 Gy) irradiated groups, matched-pairs analysis was performed.

RESULTS

Median survival time was 11 months. In univariate analysis, extracranial tumor activity (p<0.001) and Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) (p = 0.036) were two significant predictors of survival. In multivariate analysis, the status of an extracranial tumor was the single significant predictor of survival (p = 0.005). Minimum dose was the single most significant predictor of local recurrence in univariate, multivariate, and matched-pairs analyses (p<0.05). As to the appearance of new lesions, activity of extracranial tumors was a significant predictor (p<0.05). Side effects due to radiosurgery were experienced in 4 of 92 cases (4.3%).

CONCLUSIONS

We concluded that brain metastases patients should be irradiated with > or =25 Gy, when extracranial lesions are stable and longer survival is expected. Combined surgery and conventional radiation may have little advantage over radiosurgery alone when metastatic brain tumors are small and extracranial tumors are well controlled. When extracranial tumors are progressive, the rate of appearance of new lesions in other nonirradiated locations becomes higher. In such cases, careful follow-up is required and a combination with whole brain irradiation should be considered.

Stereotactic radiosurgery plus whole brain radiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone for patients with multiple brain metastases

PURPOSE

Multiple brain metastases are a common health problem, frequently diagnosed in patients with cancer. The prognosis, even after treatment with whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT), is poor with average expected survivals less than 6 months. Retrospective series of stereotactic radiosurgery have shown local control and survival benefits in case series of patients with solitary brain metastases. We hypothesized that radiosurgery plus WBRT would provide improved local brain tumor control over WBRT alone in patients with two to four brain metastases.

METHODS

Patients with two to four brain metastases (all < or =25 mm diameter and known primary tumor type) were randomized to initial brain tumor management with WBRT alone (30 Gy in 12 fractions) or WBRT plus radiosurgery. Extent of extracranial cancer, tumor diameters on MRI scan, and functional status were recorded before and after initial care.

RESULTS

The study was stopped at an interim evaluation at 60% accrual. Twenty-seven patients were randomized (14 to WBRT alone and 13 to WBRT plus radiosurgery). The groups were well matched to age, sex, tumor type, number of tumors, and extent of extracranial disease. The rate of local failure at 1 year was 100% after WBRT alone but only 8% in patients who had boost radiosurgery. The median time to local failure was 6 months after WBRT alone (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.5-8.5) in comparison to 36 months (95% CI, 15.6-57) after WBRT plus radiosurgery (p = 0.0005). The median time to any brain failure was improved in the radiosurgery group (p = 0.002). Tumor control did not depend on histology (p = 0.85), number of initial brain metastases (p = 0.25), or extent of extracranial disease (p = 0.26). Patients who received WBRT alone lived a median of 7.5 months, while those who received WBRT plus radiosurgery lived 11 months (p = 0.22). Survival did not depend on histology or number of tumors, but was related to extent of extracranial disease (p = 0.02). There was no neurologic or systemic morbidity related to stereotactic radiosurgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Combined WBRT and radiosurgery for patients with two to four brain metastases significantly improves control of brain disease. WBRT alone does not provide lasting and effective care for most patients.