Sudden onset of blindness in patients treated with oral CCNU and low-dose cranial irradiation

Radiation-induced optic neuropathy: a review

Radiation is a commonly used treatment modality for head and neck as well as CNS tumours, both benign and malignant. As newer oncology treatments such as immunotherapies allow for longer survival, complications from radiation therapy are becoming more common. Radiation-induced optic neuropathy is a feared complication due to rapid onset and potential for severe and bilateral vision loss. Careful monitoring of high-risk patients and early recognition are crucial for initiating treatment to prevent severe vision loss due to a narrow therapeutic window. This review discusses presentation, aetiology, recent advances in diagnosis using innovative MRI techniques and best practice treatment options based on the most recent evidence-based medicine.

Late radiation injury to peripheral nerves

Although the peripheral nerve has often been considered as radioresistant, clinical practice demonstrates the occurrence of radiation-induced peripheral neuropathies. Because these complications appear late, usually several years after the course of radiotherapy, their occurrence is explained by improvement in the prognosis of several cancers. Their physiopathology is not fully understood. Compression by radio-induced fibrosis probably plays a central role but direct injury to nerves and blood vessels is probably also involved. The most frequent and best known form of postradiation neuropathy is brachial plexopathy, which may follow irradiation for breast cancer. Recent reports demonstrate that postradiation neuropathies show a great heterogeneity, particularly in the anatomical sites, but also in the clinical, electrophysiological, and neuroimaging features. The link with radiotherapy may be difficult for the clinician to establish. Patients with radiation-induced lumbosacral radiculoplexopathy may be misdiagnosed with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis as they often present with pure lower motor neuron syndrome, or with leptomeningeal metastases since nodular MRI enhancement of the nerve roots of the cauda equina and increased CSF protein content can be observed. From a pathophysiological perspective, radiation-induced neuropathy offers an interesting model for deciphering the mechanisms of peripheral neuropathies due to environmental factors. Recent developments show promising strategies for the prevention and treatment of these complications, which have a considerable impact on a patient's quality of life.

[Radiation-induced neuropathies: collateral damage of improved cancer prognosis]

INTRODUCTION

Because of the improvement of cancer prognosis, long-term damages of treatments become a medical and public health problem. Among the iatrogenic complications, neurological impairment is crucial to consider since motor disability and pain have a considerable impact on quality of life of long cancer survivors. However, radiation-induced neuropathies have not been the focus of great attention. The objective of this paper is to provide an updated review about the radiation-induced lesions of the peripheral nerve system.

STATE OF THE ART

Radiation-induced neuropathies are characterized by their heterogeneity in both symptoms and disease course. Signs and symptoms depend on the affected structures of the peripheral nerve system (nerve roots, nerve plexus or nerve trunks). Early-onset complications are often transient and late complications are usually progressive and associated with a poor prognosis. The most frequent and well known is delayed radiation-induced brachial plexopathy, which may follow breast cancer irradiation. Radiation-induced lumbosacral radiculoplexopathy is characterized by pure or predominant lower motor neuron signs. They can be misdiagnosed, confused with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) or with leptomeningeal metastases since nodular MRI enhancement of the nerve roots of the cauda equina and increased cerebrospinal fluid protein content can be observed. In the absence of specific markers of the link with radiotherapy, the diagnosis of post-radiation neuropathy may be difficult. Recently, a posteriori conformal radiotherapy with 3D dosimetric reconstitution has been developed to link a precise anatomical site to unexpected excess irradiation.

PERSPECTIVES AND CONCLUSION

The importance of early diagnosis of radiation-induced neuropathies is underscored by the emergence of new disease-modifying treatments. Although the pathophysiology is not fully understood, it is already possible to target radiation-induced fibrosis but also associated factors such as ischemia, oxidative stress and inflammation. A phase III trial evaluating the association of pentoxifylline, tocopherol and clodronate (PENTOCLO, NCT01291433) in radiation-induced neuropathies is now recruiting.

Chemotherapy-induced neuropathy

Neurotoxic side effects of cancer therapy are second in frequency to hematological toxicity. Unlike hematological side effects that can be treated with hematopoietic growth factors, neuropathies cannot be treated and protective treatment strategies have not been effective. For the neurologist, the diagnosis of a toxic neuropathy is primarily based on the case history, the clinical and electrophysiological findings, and knowledge of the pattern of neuropathy associated with specific agents. In most cases, toxic neuropathies are length-dependent, sensory, or sensorimotor neuropathies often associated with pain. The platinum compounds are unique in producing a sensory ganglionopathy. Neurotoxicity is usually dependent on cumulative dose. Severity of neuropathy increases with duration of treatment and progression stops once drug treatment is completed. The platinum compounds are an exception where sensory loss may progress for several months after cessation of treatment ("coasting"). As more effective multiple drug combinations are used, patients will be treated with several neurotoxic drugs. Synergistic neurotoxicity has not been extensively investigated. Pre-existent neuropathy may influence the development of a toxic neuropathy. Underlying inherited or inflammatory neuropathies may predispose patients to developing very severe toxic neuropathies. Other factors such as focal radiotherapy or intrathecal administration may enhance neurotoxicity. The neurologist managing the cancer patient who develops neuropathy must answer a series of important questions as follows: (1) Are the symptoms due to peripheral neuropathy? (2) Is the neuropathy due to the underlying disease or the treatment? (3) Should treatment be modified or stopped because of the neuropathy? (4) What is the best supportive care in terms of pain management or physical therapy for each patient? Prevention of toxic neuropathies is most important. In patients with neuropathy, restorative approaches have not been well established. Symptomatic and other management are necessary to maintain and improve quality of life.

Neurotoxic complications of chemotherapy in patients with cancer: clinical signs and optimal management

Neurotoxic side effects of chemotherapy occur frequently and are often a reason to limit the dose of chemotherapy. Since bone marrow toxicity, as the major limiting factor in most chemotherapeutic regimens, can be overcome with growth factors or bone marrow transplantation, the use of higher doses of chemotherapy is possible, which increases the risk of neurotoxicity. Chemotherapy may cause both peripheral neurotoxicity, consisting mainly of a peripheral neuropathy, and central neurotoxicity, ranging from minor cognitive deficits to encephalopathy with dementia or even coma. In this article we describe the neurological adverse effects of the most commonly used chemotherapeutic agents. The vinca-alkaloids, cisplatin and the taxanes are amongst the most important drugs inducing peripheral neurotoxicity. These drugs are widely used for various malignancies such as ovarian and breast cancer, and haematological cancers. Chemotherapy-induced neuropathy is clearly related to cumulative dose or dose-intensities. Patients who already have neuropathic symptoms due to diabetes mellitus, hereditary neuropathies or earlier treatment with neurotoxic chemotherapy are thought to be more vulnerable for the development of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy. Methotrexate, cytarabine (cytosine arabinoside) and ifosfamide are primarily known for their central neurotoxic side effects. Central neurotoxicity ranges from acute toxicity such as aseptic meningitis, to delayed toxicities comprising cognitive deficits, hemiparesis, aphasia and progressive dementia. Risk factors are high doses, frequent administration and radiotherapy preceding methotrexate chemotherapy, which appears to be more neurotoxic than methotrexate as single modality. Data on management and neuroprotective agents are discussed. Management mainly consists of cumulative dose-reduction or lower dose-intensities, especially in patients who are at higher risk to develop neurotoxic side effects. None of the neuroprotective agents described in this article can be recommended for standard use in daily practise at this moment, and further studies are needed to confirm some of the beneficial effects described.

Melanoma-associated retinopathy: does autoimmunity prolong survival?

PURPOSE

To discuss the autoimmune basis of melanoma-associated retinopathy (MAR) and its implications for management and prognosis.

METHODS

An unusual history of a woman with melanoma-associated retinopathy is presented in detail. A review of published reports and a summary of 19 reported cases of MAR provide a basis for discussion.

RESULTS

This case report and other published reports highlight a number of points regarding MAR including the male predominance, prolonged survival in several patients and lack of response to immunosuppression.

CONCLUSIONS

Melanoma-associated retinopathy may prolong the survival of patients with metastatic melanoma through the autoimmune response. Therefore, treatment of visual symptoms with immunosuppression needs to be considered carefully.

Optic nerve sheath fenestration for a reversible optic neuropathy in radiation oncology

To the authors' knowledge, there is a paucity of published accounts of management of radiation-induced optic neuropathy (RION) by optic nerve sheath fenestration (ONSF) in the conventional medical literature. With higher doses of radiation being given by using conformal techniques, more radiation-induced optic neuritis and neuropathy will be identified. We report here the successful use of ONSF to restore vision to three consecutive patients with pending anterior RION, and the importance of early identification and intervention in these potentially reversible cases.

[Neurologic complications of chemotherapy]

INTRODUCTION

Neurotoxicity can be induced by the synergistic or additive effects of cytotoxic treatments, and nervous system exposure is related to routes and doses.

CURRENT KNOWLEDGE AND KEY POINTS

The improvements in treating systemic malignancy have been accompanied by reports of neurologic toxicity, which has an important impact on the quality of life and may even limit the use of the treatment.

PERSPECTIVES AND FUTURE PROJECTS

It demands out a continuous clinical evaluation to detect their appearance. When neurological complications are diagnosed later, they are rarely reversible. Neuroprotective agents are still being evaluated.

Dose-response tolerance of the visual pathways and cranial nerves of the cavernous sinus to stereotactic radiosurgery

As the number of patients treated with stereotactic radiosurgery increases, it becomes particularly important to define with precision adverse effects on distinct structures of the nervous system.

OBJECT

This study was designed to assess the dose-response tolerance of the visual pathways and cranial nerves after exposure of the cavernous sinus to radiation.

METHODS

A total of 66 sites in the visual system and 210 cranial nerves of the middle cranial fossa were investigated in 50 patients who had undergone gamma knife treatment for benign skull base tumors. The mean follow-up period was 40 months (range 24-60 months). Follow-up examinations consisted of neurological, neuroradiological, and neuroophthalmological evaluations. The actuarial incidence of optic neuropathy was zero for patients who received a radiation dose of less than 10 Gy, 26.7% for patients receiving a dose in the range of 10 to less than 15 Gy, and 77.8% for those who received doses of 15 Gy or more (p < 0.0001). Previously impaired vision improved in 25.8% and was unchanged in 51.5% of patients. No sign of neuropathy was seen in patients whose cranial nerves of the cavernous sinus received radiation doses of between 5 and 30 Gy. Because tumor control appeared to have been achieved in 98% of the patients, the deterioration in visual function cannot be attributed to tumor progression.

CONCLUSIONS

The structures of the visual pathways (the optic nerve, chiasm, and tract) exhibit a much higher sensitivity to single-fraction radiation than other cranial nerves, and their particular dose-response characteristics can be defined. In contrast, the oculomotor and trigeminal nerves have a much higher dose tolerance.

The safety of interstitial chemotherapy with BCNU-loaded polymer followed by radiation therapy in the treatment of newly diagnosed malignant gliomas: phase I trial

The results of a multi-institutional phase I trial evaluating the safety of surgically implanted biodegradable 1,3-bis(chloro-ethyl)-1-nitrosourea (BCNU) impregnated polymer as the initial therapy for malignant brain tumors are reported. This is the first study of locally delivered BCNU and standard external beam radiation therapy (XRT) given concurrently. Twenty-two patients were treated at three hospitals. The entry criteria were: single unilateral tumor focus larger than 1 cm3; age over 18 years; Karnofsky Performance Score (KPS) of at least 60 h; and an intra-operative diagnosis of malignant glioma. Twenty-one of twenty-two patients had glioblastoma multiforme. After surgery, seven or eight BCNU-loaded polyanhydride polymer discs (7.7 mg BCNU each) were placed in the resection cavity. Postoperatively, all patients received standard radiation therapy; none received additional chemotherapy in the first 6 months. Neurotoxicity, systemic toxicity, and survival were assessed. No perioperative mortality was seen. Neurotoxicity was equivalent to that occurring in other series of patients undergoing craniotomy and XRT without local chemotherapy. Systematically, no significant bone marrow suppression occurred, and there were no wound infections. Median survival in this group of older patients (mean age = 60) was 42 weeks, 8 patients survived 1 year, and 4 patients survived more than 18 months. Interstitial chemotherapy with BCNU-polymer with subsequent radiation therapy appears to be safe as an initial therapy. Several long-term survivors in this group of older patients with predominantly glioblastoma suggests efficacy in some patients. Dose escalation and efficacy trials are planned to further evaluate interstitial chemotherapy for the initial treatment of malignant gliomas.

Radiation optic neuropathy after megavoltage external-beam irradiation: analysis of time-dose factors

PURPOSE

To investigate the risk of radiation-induced optic neuropathy according to total radiotherapy dose and fraction size, based on both retrospective and prospectively collected data.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between October 1964 and May 1989, 215 optic nerves in 131 patients received fractionated external-beam irradiation during the treatment of primary extracranial head and neck tumors. All patients had a minimum of 3 years of ophthalmologic follow-up (range, 3 to 21 years). The clinical end point was visual acuity of 20/100 or worse as a result of optic nerve injury.

RESULTS

Anterior ischemic optic neuropathy developed in five nerves (at mean and median times of 32 and 30 months, respectively, and a range of 2-4 years). Retrobulbar optic neuropathy developed in 12 nerves (at mean and median times of 47 and 28 months, respectively, and a range of 1-14 years). No injuries were observed in 106 optic nerves that received a total dose of < 59 Gy. Among nerves that received doses of > or = 60 Gy, the dose per fraction was more important than the total dose in producing optic neuropathy. The 15-year actuarial risk of optic neuropathy after doses of > or = 60 Gy was 11% when treatment was administered in fraction sizes of < 1.9 Gy, compared with 47% when given in fraction sizes of > or = 1.9 Gy. The data also suggest an increased risk of optic nerve injury with increasing age.

CONCLUSION

As there is no effective treatment of radiation-induced optic neuropathy, efforts should be directed at its prevention by minimizing the total dose, paying attention to the dose per fraction to the nerve, and using reduced-field techniques where appropriate to limit the volume of tissues that receive high-dose irradiation.

Ocular complications of systemic cancer chemotherapy

Cancer chemotherapy has changed rapidly in recent years. New agents are constantly being developed. Established agents are being used with increased frequency, in new combinations, at higher dosages, and via new routes of administration. Enhanced survival, as well as increased drug toxicity, has resulted. Ocular toxicity is not uncommon and can greatly impact on quality of life. Practitioners in all fields are increasingly caring for patients who are receiving cancer chemotherapy. The recognition of eye disease resulting from chemotherapy is essential to appropriate patient management. We provide a review of the rapidly growing body of literature on the ocular toxicity of systemic cancer chemotherapy with particular attention to context, clinical course, mechanism, prevention and treatment.

Fatal necrotizing encephalopathy complicating treatment of malignant gliomas with intra-arterial BCNU and irradiation: a pathological study

We describe the neuropathologic findings at autopsy in six patients who developed a progressive encephalopathy complicating the treatment of malignant gliomas with combined intra-arterial 1,3-bis(2-chloroethyl)-1-nitrosourea (BCNU) and cerebral irradiation. Four brains were free of tumor and one contained a microscopic focus of residual glioma. In only one case was there evidence of tumor progression. A disseminated process characterized by miliary foci of necrosis with mineralizing axonopathy was present in all cases, restricted to the internal carotid distribution of the perfused hemisphere and involving primarily though not exclusively the white matter, which was diffusely and severely edematous. This was combined in 3 cases with a histologically dissimilar, massive necrotizing leukoencephalopathy indistinguishable from pure radionecrosis. Much of the toxicity of this therapy is mediated by vascular injury, but the disseminated necrotizing lesion probably reflects, at least in part, direct neural damage.

Results of the treatment of children with recurrent gliomas with lomustine and vincristine

Gliomas comprise over 50% of all childhood brain tumors. Treatment of recurrent childhood gliomas has been disappointing and the effectiveness of therapy has been difficult to judge because of the variable natural history of the disease. Information gathered recently has suggested that treatment with [1-(2-chloroethyl)-3-cyclohexyl-1-nitrosourea)] (CCNU) and vincristine (VCR) after radiotherapy is effective in prolonging survival in children with newly diagnosed anaplastic gliomas. The authors have used these same drugs--CCNU (100 mg/m2) and VCR (1.5 mg/m2 up to a maximum dose of 2 mg)--in 6-week cycles for a maximum of eight cycles in children with recurrent gliomas. To date, 15 patients have been treated; five patients had malignant gliomas and ten low-grade gliomas. Three children showed improvement, five had stable disease, and seven had progressive disease. Of the five patients with malignant gliomas, four progressed within two cycles of treatment and one had stable disease for 7 months on treatment and then relapsed. Seven of ten children with low-grade gliomas benefitted from treatment and six remain in continuous remission a median of 16 months after initiation of therapy. Three of these children are off all therapy 21, 30, and 30 months after treatment, respectively. Therapy was well tolerated and toxicity consisted primarily of reversible bone marrow suppression. The authors conclude that CCNU and VCR chemotherapy is effective in children with recurrent low-grade gliomas and can result in relatively long-term disease stabilization. In limited experience of the authors, it is not of benefit in children with recurrent anaplastic lesions.