Patient compliance with aggressive multimodal therapy in locally advanced breast cancer

Adherence to intravenous chemotherapy in African American and white women with early-stage breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Adherence to intravenous chemotherapy offers survival and recurrence-free benefits for women diagnosed with early-stage breast cancer. However, previous studies have found that African American women are more likely to discontinue intravenous chemotherapy early, thus shortening their survival. Yet the existence of racial differences and predictors of adherence to chemotherapy treatment between African American and white women are largely understudied or inconsistent.

OBJECTIVE

The purposes of this study were to examine factors that influence the decision to adhere to chemotherapy in African American and white women diagnosed with early-stage breast cancer and to test for racial differences that may exist in this sample.

INTERVENTIONS/METHODS

The study recruited a convenience sample of 99 African American and white women. Factors examined were sociodemographic variables (age, race, access to healthcare), social support, religious coping, chemotherapy adverse effects, depression, breast cancer knowledge, health beliefs, cancer fatalism, and days from diagnosis to treatment. Data analyses included logistic regression modeling.

RESULTS

No racial differences in adherence to intravenous chemotherapy between African American and white women were found (χ = 2.627, P = .10). Days to treatment (odds ratio [OR], 0.982, P = .058), health insurance (OR, 0.121; P = .016), change in depression (OR, 0.935; P = .118), and symptom severity (OR, 0.950; P = .038) were independently associated with nonadherence to chemotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides emerging evidence of factors that may be potentially modified with interventions at the clinical setting.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

The findings can be used to spearhead future intervention studies that improve treatment decision making to chemotherapy adherence.

[Locally advanced (neglected) breast cancer: the reality? Relevance of two cases and reflection how to optimise the multidisciplinary approach]

The standard treatment for breast cancer patients with untreated locally advanced breast cancer is neo-adjuvant chemotherapy or hormonal treatment. In some cases, this treatment is followed by surgery and/or radiotherapy when the multidisciplinary approach is present. In some cases of patients presenting metastatic diseases, the radiotherapy is forgotten or proposed late when the local disease is extremely advanced with symptoms and decreased quality of life. Two cases of extremely advanced non operable T4 stage breast cancer are reported and the importance of multidisciplinary approach is discussed. The place and the right time of radiotherapy in this multidisciplinary strategy is reported.

Social Support and Patient Adherence to Medical Treatment: A Meta-Analysis

In a review of the literature from 1948 to 2001, 122 studies were found that correlated structural or functional social support with patient adherence to medical regimens. Meta-analyses establish significant average r-effect sizes between adherence and practical, emotional, and unidimensional social support; family cohesiveness and conflict; marital status; and living arrangement of adults. Substantive and methodological variables moderate these effects. Practical support bears the highest correlation with adherence. Adherence is 1.74 times higher in patients from cohesive families and 1.53 times lower in patients from families in conflict. Marital status and living with another person (for adults) increase adherence modestly. A research agenda is recommended to further examine mediators of the relationship between social support and health.

Prognoses of T4 breast cancer subsets

BACKGROUND

The relative prognoses of subsets of patients with T4 breast tumors, since the advent of neoadjuvant therapy, are unknown, although inflammatory carcinoma (T4d) is considered to have the worst prognosis.

METHODS

Subsets of T4 patients were analyzed for the incidence of distant metastases at presentation (M1; n = 263). T4M0 patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy (n = 126) were analyzed for relapse-free survival (RFS). T4d tumors with (Cut/CW+) and without (Cut/CW-) skin nodules, posterior fixation, or both were analyzed separately.

RESULTS

Fewer patients with T4d (Cut/CW-) tumors had distant metastases at presentation than T4d (Cut/CW+) patients or T4b and T4c patients (P =.001,.001, and.009, respectively). RFS was longer for T4b patients than for T4c patients (P =.018) or T4d (Cut/CW+) patients (P =.003). RFS of the T4d (Cut/CW+) patients was shorter than for T4d (Cut/CW-) patients (P =.050).

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of distant metastases at presentation was lowest, and RFS was longest, for patients with T4d tumors not grossly involving the skin or posterior structures. Patients whose tumors grossly invaded both skin and posterior structures (T4c) or those with T4d tumors grossly invading either most frequently presented with distant metastases and had the shortest RFS.

Patient compliance is critical for equivalent clinical outcomes for breast cancer treated by breast-conservation therapy

OBJECTIVE

To determine the compliance with a standard breast-conservation therapy (BCT) program in a predominantly indigent, minority population of patients with early breast cancer (stage I and II) served by a rural state institution in the South; to compare the clinical outcomes of this group with those reported in clinical trials; and to examine the socioeconomic factors that may have contributed to the rate of compliance.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Disease-free survival and overall survival in early breast cancer treated by BCT versus modified radical mastectomy are reported to be equivalent in prospective randomized trials. However, patients enrolled in clinical trials may not be representative of patients living in the various diverse communities that make up the United States. The authors' hypothesis is that patients enrolled in clinical trials at the national level may not be representative of indigent patients in the rural South and that clinical trial results may not be directly applicable.

METHODS

A retrospective review of 55 women with early-stage breast cancer treated from 1990 to 1995 was performed. Clinical data, compliance with treatment and clinical follow-up, and recurrence rates were examined. Statistical analysis performed include the Fisher exact test, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, and log-rank test.

RESULTS

Full compliance (defined as completion of the entire course of radiation therapy and clinical follow-up) with the BCT program was observed in only 36% of patients. Fifteen of the 35 noncompliant patients did not complete radiation therapy. A significantly higher local failure rate was observed: 8 of these 15 patients (53%) have had local failure. In contrast, patients who were either in full compliance with the BCT program or were deficient only in that they missed part of their clinical follow-up had local failure rates of 5% (1/20) and 10% (2/20), respectively. Age, race, stage of cancer, economic status (measured by availability of medical insurance), distance of patient's residence from the hospital, and education level were evaluated as potential predictors of compliance. None predicted patient compliance, although a trend toward higher compliance was noted in patients with a higher education level, as determined by literacy testing.

CONCLUSIONS

Compliance with the BCT protocol at the authors' institution was worse than reported in clinical trials, and noncompliance translated into a significant increase in the local failure rate. Factors examined suggest that literacy may play a role in predicting compliance. Although BCT should be discussed with all breast cancer patients, the judicious application of clinical trial data to an institution's local population is warranted.

Variations in breast cancer treatment by patient and provider characteristics

Guidelines for the optimal treatment of breast cancer have been publicized over the past 15 years, yet clinical practices continue to vary substantially in the United States. This article reviews the literature on variations in local and systemic treatment of breast cancer by patient and provider characteristics. Studies of local therapy have consistently demonstrated that older women are less likely than younger women to receive radiation therapy after breast-conserving surgery. Some studies have noted that black women are less likely than white women to receive breast-conserving surgery and less likely to receive radiation therapy after breast-conserving surgery. Rates of breast-conserving surgery vary three-fold among geographic regions and between teaching and non-teaching hospitals. Patients at smaller hospitals appear less likely to receive indicated radiation therapy. Patterns of systemic therapy have not been well described. Women over age 75 may not be receiving adequate hormonal therapy, but recent data are not available. Limited data suggest that rates of systemic therapy do not vary substantially by race or Hispanic ethnicity, but women without health insurance may not be receiving appropriate chemotherapy. Studies relating hospital and physician characteristics to the use of systemic therapy are sparse and inconclusive. In order to increase the proportion of women who receive optimal treatment for breast cancer and ensure greater equity, a more sophisticated understanding of variations in clinical practice will be required. These variations may arise from insufficient knowledge of or disagreement with guidelines among physicians, inadequate communication between physicians and patients, and individual preferences or clinical attributes of patients. Future studies will need to explore the dialogue between women and their physicians that leads to decisions about treatment of breast cancer.

Health locus of control among HIV-positive indigent women

The authors explored the multidimensional construct of health locus of control among 14 indigent HIV-positive women who attended one of two southwestern city health clinics. An exploratory survey design was used to compare the mean responses of the subjects on the Multidimensional Health Locus of Control (MHLC) Scales with established normative data. The women believed they had control over their health, yet felt powerful others and chance determine their health outcomes. These findings are drawn from high scores on both the Internal and External MHLC Scales. Findings imply that these women may not view themselves as having any control in the dichotomous world of acute and chronic illness. Authors recommend that nurses should encourage their patients to participate in the management of their health care.

A biobehavioral model of cancer stress and disease course

Approximately 1 million Americans are diagnosed with cancer each year and must cope with the disease and treatments. Many studies have documented the deteriorations in quality of life that occur. These data suggest that the adjustment process is burdensome and lengthy. There is ample evidence showing that adults experiencing other long-term stressors experience not only high rates of adjustment difficulties (e.g., syndromal depression) but important biologic effects, such as persistent downregulation of elements of the immune system, and adverse health outcomes, such as higher rates of respiratory tract infections. Thus, deteriorations in quality of life with cancer are underscored if they have implications for biological processes, such as the immune system, relating to disease progression and spread. Considering these and other data, a biobehavioral model of adjustment to the stresses of cancer is offered, and mechanisms by which psychological and behavioral responses may influence biological processes and, perhaps, health outcomes are proposed. Finally, strategies for testing the model via experiments testing psychological interventions are offered.

A biobehavioral model of cancer stress and disease course

Approximately 1 million Americans are diagnosed with cancer each year and must cope with the disease and treatments. Many studies have documented the deteriorations in quality of life that occur. These data suggest that the adjustment process is burdensome and lengthy. There is ample evidence showing that adults experiencing other long-term stressors experience not only high rates of adjustment difficulties (e.g., syndromal depression) but important biologic effects, such as persistent downregulation of elements of the immune system, and adverse health outcomes, such as higher rates of respiratory tract infections. Thus, deteriorations in quality of life with cancer are underscored if they have implications for biological processes, such as the immune system, relating to disease progression and spread. Considering these and other data, a biobehavioral model of adjustment to the stresses of cancer is offered, and mechanisms by which psychological and behavioral responses may influence biological processes and, perhaps, health outcomes are proposed. Finally, strategies for testing the model via experiments testing psychological interventions are offered.

Chemotherapy as predictor of compliance

Patient compliance with the increasingly complex adjuvant therapy protocols has always been of concern, particularly in the head and neck cancer population. The Head and Neck Intergroup recently concluded a phase III prospective randomized trial testing the addition of three courses of cisplatinum containing combination chemotherapy to standard treatment defined as surgery and postoperative radiotherapy for advanced stage III and IV squamous cell carcinoma. The chemotherapy was administered following the surgery prior to the postoperative radiotherapy. Variation from protocol is ranked retrospectively as minor acceptable, major acceptable, and major unacceptable. The incidence of major unacceptable variation from the protocol for radiotherapy immediately following the surgery was 15% vs. 19% in the population that completed all three courses of the chemotherapy (P < 0.10). However, for those patients that completed less than the three courses of chemotherapy, the incidence of major unacceptable variation in radiotherapy was 33% (P < 0.001). This observation was controlled for site, stage, performance status, age, sex, surgical margins and experience of participating institution. We conclude that compliance with a multicourse adjuvant chemotherapy regimen is predictive of subsequent compliance to radiotherapy in the head and neck cancer population.

Treatment compliance in childhood and adolescence

Experience reveals that there is significant noncompliance with self-administered medication, especially in chronic conditions such as cancer. Noncompliance transcends the boundary of disease categories and age group. However, this is most prevalent during the adolescent years when the process of transition from parental dependency to autonomy produces confusion as to who is responsible for administration of medication. Noncompliance can result in the misjudgment of efficacy of a drug or regimen that may necessitate additional tests, alteration of dose, treatment course, and hospitalization. Currently in the United States, a large percentage of pediatric cancer patients are treated according to research protocols. In a research setting, noncompliance can result in erroneous or inconsistent findings, potentially affecting investigational results. With the availability of venous access ports and sophisticated, yet easy-to-operate pumps, increasingly, it is possible to administer parenteral medications at home. This adds a new dimension to the self-administration of medication that previously concerned mainly oral therapy. Various factors concerning the patient, disease, health providers, and treatment characteristics determine how well a given regimen is adhered to. Because a significant number of determinants are involved, it is often not possible, with any degree of certainty, to identify noncompliers or to predict the level of patient adherence to the treatment. Major factors in any successful therapy include the availability of effective medications and compliance with therapy regimen. With the advent of more successful treatments for childhood and adolescent cancer, the compliance factor is gaining greater importance because therapy currently is given with curative, rather than palliative intent. The availability of questionnaires, tests, and devices can help, to some extent, examine the degree of patient compliance. Family and social support, individualized programs, reminders to reduce forgetfulness, personalized needs assessment, and education can reduce noncompliance. Compliance is a complex and multifaceted issue that is still poorly understood and requires further investigation.

Patient noncompliance with self-administered chemotherapy

The contribution of patient factors to nonadherence with self-administered cancer chemotherapy along with its prevalence was studied. Fifty-one patients with breast cancer enrolled in protocols that included the orally administered medications Cytoxan (cyclophosphamide) and/or prednisone were interviewed and assessed at five points in time over a 6-month period. Two summary measures of patient nonadherence derived by self-report were developed: (1) dosage, the overall percentage of drug missed during 26 weeks of treatment; and (2) behavioral, the percentage of behavioral events or prescribing occasions on which a criterion level of drug was missed. Twenty-two patients (43%) met criteria for noncompliance according to both behavioral and dosage definitions. Univariate analyses showed more nonadherence in the clinic and private community settings than in the academic setting. Stepwise multiple logistic regression analyses assessed the contribution of patient demographic, psychologic, and physical symptom factors on patient noncompliance. In the regression analyses patient noncompliance was associated with (1) treatment location, more nonadherence in the private community-based treatment sector than in the academic setting; and (2) income, more nonadherence among those having lower incomes. In assessing total dose requirements in clinical research trials, rates of patient nonadherence need to be considered, and treatment location controlled.