A phase II trial of high-dose cisplatin and dacarbazine. Lack of efficacy of high-dose, cisplatin-based therapy for metastatic melanoma

Assessment of Functionality in Elderly Patients When Determining Appropriate Treatment for Nonmelanoma Skin Cancers

BACKGROUND

The treatment of nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC) in the elderly population is a source of significant debate. Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) is a highly effective treatment option yet not every patient with a cutaneous malignancy that meets appropriate use criteria (AUC) should be treated with surgery.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to use the Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) scale to categorize the functional status of patients aged 75 years and older who required treatment of NMSC. The authors wanted to see whether functionality played a role on the treatment selection.

METHODS

Patients aged 75 years and older presenting for biopsy of a suspected NMSC that met AUC for MMS were included in the study. Trained medical assistants used the KPS scale to assess patient functionality. Treatment modality was recorded once the biopsy confirmed the NMSC.

RESULTS

A cohort of 203 subjects met inclusion criteria for the study. There was a statistically significant difference in utilization of surgical treatments between high and low functionality patients (p = .03).

CONCLUSION

Dermatologists consider patient functionality when selecting a treatment for NMSC and use less invasive modalities for patients with poor functional status, even when the tumor meets AUC.

The history and future of chemotherapy for melanoma

Melanoma is considered a chemotherapy-resistant cancer, but in reality there are several chemotherapy drugs with significant single-agent activity. Response rates to combination regimens are reproducibly higher than with standard dacarbazine, but of the randomized trials comparing combination regimens with dacarbazine, none were of sufficient size to detect a realistic effect on survival. Similarly, adjuvant chemotherapy has not had a realistic test in melanoma. Response to chemotherapy is associated reproducibly with better survival rates suggesting that regimens with higher response rates are needed. Recent observations suggest that combining antiangiogenic agents with either dacarbazine or temozolomide can double response rates. These combinations are worthy of further investigation and might serve as a foundation on which to build a combination regimen that improves overall survival in metastatic melanoma patients.

Drug-induced hypomagnesaemia : scope and management

Nearly 50 medications have been implicated as inducing hypomagnesaemia, sometimes based on insufficient data regarding clinical significance and frequency of occurrence. In fact, clinical effects attributed to hypomagnaesemia have been reported in only 17 of these drugs. A considerable amount of literature relating to individual drugs has been published, yet a comprehensive overview of this issue is not available and the hypomagnesaemic effect of a drug could be either overemphasised or under-rated. In addition, there are neither guidelines regarding treatment, prevention and monitoring of drug-induced hypomagnesaemia nor agreement as to what serum level of magnesium may actually be defined as 'hypomagnesaemia'. By compiling data from published papers, electronic databases, textbooks and product information leaflets, we attempted to assess the clinical significance of hypomagnesaemia induced by each drug. A practical approach for managing drug-induced hypomagnesaemia, incorporating both published literature and personal experience of the physician, is proposed. When drugs classified as inducing 'significant' hypomagnesaemia (cisplatin, amphotericin B, ciclosporin) are administered, routine magnesium monitoring is warranted, preventive treatment should be considered and treatment of hypomagnesaemia should be initiated with or without overt clinical manifestations. In drugs belonging to the 'potentially significant' category, among which are amikacin, gentamicin, laxatives, pentamidine, tobramycin, tacrolimus and carboplatin, magnesium monitoring is justified when either of the following occurs: clinical manifestations are apparent; persistent hypokalaemia, hypocalcaemia or alkalosis are present; other precipitating factors for hypomagnesaemia coexist; or treatment is with more than one potentially hypomagnesaemic drug. No preventive treatment is required and treatment should be initiated only if hypomagnesaemia is accompanied by symptoms or clinically significant relevant laboratory findings. In those drugs whose hypomagnesaemic effect is labelled as 'questionable', including furosemide and hydrochlorothiazide, routine monitoring and treatment are not required.

Chemotherapy and bio-chemotherapy in patients with advanced melanoma: combination therapy with a nitrosourea

The treatment of advanced melanoma is still disappointing. In a multicenter randomized clinical trial to compare a chemotherapy (CT) with or without low doses of IL-2 and IFN (Bio-CT), the participating centers chose whether or not to add a nitrosourea, carmustine (BCNU) to the therapy. The aim of the present paper is to report the clinical results of the patients (pts) treated in both arms with BCNU. One hundred and seventy-six pts with advanced melanoma were enrolled in the study from 27 centers and a total of 18 pts also received BCNU in 3 centers. No further changes to the protocol criteria were allowed. One patient refused the treatment. No complete responses were observed. Irrespectively of the treatment arm, 9/17 pts showed a partial response to therapy (53%) (5/9 in the CT and 4/8 in the BioCT arm). The most important adverse events observed were hematological: 12 pts presented grade 3 (6 pts) or grade 4 (6 pts) leukocytopenia and 9 pts had grade 4 thrombocytopenia, all of which resolved spontaneously. The addition of a nitrosourea to CT or Bio-CT appears to improve response rates compared to the same regimens without nitrosourea. Patient tolerability is acceptable. Further studies using this combination are warranted.

Amelanotic malignant melanomas of the oral mucosa

Oral amelanotic melanomas are rare and the prognosis is poorer than that of pigmented melanomas because of delays in establishing the correct diagnosis and in the initiation of treatment. Amelanotic forms are also thought to be biologically more aggressive than pigmented melanomas. We have seen three cases of oral amelanotic melanomas since 1970, in two of whom the diagnosis was long delayed. Two lesions were not pigmented but one had slight pigmentation. One patient simultaneously had both an amelanotic and a pigmented melanoma in the oral cavity. Lymph node metastases and distant metastases developed in all patients, two of whom eventually died of the disease. Early diagnosis by histological examination together with immunostaining with S100 and HMB-45 are the keys to improve survival for patients with amelanotic melanoma.

Comparison of the efficacy of two different dosage dacarbazine-based regimens and two regimens without dacarbazine in metastatic melanoma: a single-centre randomized four-arm study

The aim of this randomized four-arm phase III study was to evaluate whether there is a difference in activity between regimens containing dacarbazine and regimens without dacarbazine in metastatic melanoma, whether there is a dose-effect relationship for dacarbazine, and whether non-dacarbazine-containing aggressive regimens are in any way superior to non-aggressive ones. A total of 219 patients with metastatic cutaneous melanoma were included in this study; 196 of them were evaluable for activity. The patients were randomized into four treatment arms: arm A (standard dose dacarbazine arm), vincristine 1.4 mg/m2 on day 1, carmustine (BCNU) 60 mg/m2 on day 1, and dacarbazine 300 mg/m2 per 24 h on days 2-5; arm B (high-dose dacarbazine arm), vincristine and BCNU as in arm A and dacarbazine 600 mg/m2 per 24 h on days 2-5; arm C ('aggressive' regimen without dacarbazine), vindesine 3 mg/m2 on day 1, bleomycin 7 mg/m2 per 24 h on days 1-4, and cisplatin 30 mg/m2 per 24 h on days 5-8; arm D ('non-aggressive' regimen without dacarbazine), BCNU 100 mg/m2 on day 1 and procarbazine 90 mg/m2 per 24 h on days 1-10. The four arms were well balanced with regard to patient- and disease-related characteristics. On an intend-to-treat basis, the response rate was 11 out of 49 (22%) in arm A, nine out of 47 (19%) in arm B, 16 out of 63 (25%) in arm C and nine out of 60 (15%) in arm D. There was a large overlap between the 95% confidence intervals and no significant differences in the response rates between the four arms. Median survival in the four treatment arms was 4, 5, 6 and 4 months, respectively, again with no significant differences. Median survival for responders (8, 11, 10 and 13 months, respectively) in all four arms was significantly longer than in non-responders (4, 3, 5 and 4 months, respectively). Arms A, B and C were significantly more toxic compared with arm D, which was for all practical purposes devoid of toxicities. The efficacy of all four regimens thus appeared comparable both in terms of response rate and survival. Responders in all four arms achieved a survival benefit. There does not seem to be a dose-effect relationship for dacarbazine in metastatic melanoma. Chemotherapy from arm D, might be well suited for 'fragile' or elderly patients due to the lack of toxicity.

Classical chemotherapy for metastatic melanoma

Despite a major effort in clinical research scrutinizing various treatment regimens for patients suffering from metastatic melanoma the prognosis for these patients still remains poor. The treatment options tested have ranged from monochemotherapy, polychemotherapeutic approaches including highly toxic regimens requiring autologous bone marrow rescue, immuno-modulatory therapies, e.g. defined cytokines such as interferon-alpha and interleukin-2 as well as vaccination therapy with dendritic cells or genetically modified tumour cells, and bio-chemotherapy. Although immuno-modulatory approaches are currently regarded as the most promising, to date no improved overall survival has been achieved by any of these measures especially if tested in large multicentre trials. The focus of this review will be on classical chemotherapy with emphasis on both cutaneous and uveal melanoma.

Phase III multicenter randomized trial of the Dartmouth regimen versus dacarbazine in patients with metastatic melanoma

PURPOSE

Several single-institution phase II trials have reported that the Dartmouth regimen (dacarbazine, cisplatin, carmustine, and tamoxifen) can induce major tumor responses in 40% to 50% of stage IV melanoma patients. This study was designed to compare the overall survival time, rate of objective tumor response, and toxicity of the Dartmouth regimen with standard dacarbazine treatment in stage IV melanoma patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this multicenter phase III trial, 240 patients with measurable stage IV melanoma were randomized to receive the Dartmouth regimen (dacarbazine 220 mg/m(2) and cisplatin 25 mg/m(2) days 1 to 3, carmustine 150 mg/m(2) day 1 every other cycle, and tamoxifen 10 mg orally bid) or dacarbazine 1, 000 mg/m(2). Treatment was repeated every 3 weeks. Patients were observed for tumor response, survival time, and toxicity.

RESULTS

Median survival time from randomization was 7 months; 25% of the patients survived > or = 1 year. There was no difference in survival time between the two treatment arms when analyzed on an intent-to-treat basis or when only the 231 patients who were both eligible and had received treatment were considered. Tumor response was assessable in 226 patients. The response rate to dacarbazine was 10.2% compared with 18.5% for the Dartmouth regimen (P =.09). Bone marrow suppression, nausea/vomiting, and fatigue were significantly more common in the Dartmouth arm.

CONCLUSION

There was no difference in survival time and only a small, statistically nonsignificant increase in tumor response for stage IV melanoma patients treated with the Dartmouth regimen compared with dacarbazine. Dacarbazine remains the reference standard treatment for stage IV melanoma.

Medical treatment of metastatic melanoma

The role of combination chemotherapy in the treatment of metastatic melanoma is still a matter of controversy because of the lack of prospective trials directly demonstrating increased response rates and improved survival compared with DTIC alone. Nevertheless, several three-drug regimens have reported response rates between 30% and 50% in single-institution studies. The duration of response medians of these regimens ranges between 6 and 9 months. However, the survival medians of 6 to 11 months are not substantially better than those of DTIC alone. However, survival at 1 and 2 years following initiation of therapy may more clearly demonstrate an impact of therapies for metastatic melanoma.

Phase II study of a short course of weekly high-dose cisplatin combined with long-term oral etoposide in metastatic malignant melanoma

The results of cytostatic therapy in metastatic melanoma are very disappointing. In phase II studies with high-dose cisplatin regimens, a remarkably high response rate was observed. In a phase I study with a short course of weekly cisplatin, combined with oral etoposide, we were able to reach, in most patients, a cisplatin dose intensity of 60 mg/m2/week. We performed a phase II study with this schedule in metastatic malignant melanoma. 15 consecutive patients were entered in the study. Treatment consisted of cisplatin 70 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, 15 and days 29, 36, 43 combined with oral etoposide 50 mg daily, days 1-15 and days 29-43. Patients with a response or stable disease continued treatment with oral etoposide 50 mg/m2 daily, days 1-21 every 4 weeks. All patients were evaluable for response and toxicity. The majority of the patients received six cycles of cisplatin with the planned cisplatin dose intensity of 60 mg/m2/week. A partial response was observed in 2 patients (13%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 2-44%) of, respectively, 22 and 12 weeks; stable disease was observed in 6 patients. Toxicity consisted mainly of alopecia and bone marrow suppression. 4 patients had tinnitus, one patient had neurotoxicity grade 1. The regimen studied has only limited activity in metastatic melanoma in spite of the high-dose intensity of cisplatin reached with this schedule.

Prognostic factors in patients with metastatic malignant melanoma. A multivariate analysis

BACKGROUND

Current methods to predict survival in patients with advanced, metastatic melanoma are limited. To determine clinical prognostic factors that accurately predict survival in patients with metastatic melanoma, a retrospective analysis was performed.

METHODS

Clinical, hematologic, and biochemical pretreatment parameters from 284 patients entered on 18 Phase I and II clinical trials were analyzed to determine their prognostic effect on survival. A multivariate parametric regression based on the Weibull distribution was derived to estimate survival.

RESULTS

Multivariate Weibull survival regression analysis showed that a simple model using the logarithm of the pretreatment values of lactate dehydrogenase and serum albumin, dichotomized as high and low, significantly and adequately predicted survival. A more complex multivariate model was also derived that involved the pretreatment platelet count, visceral organ involvement, and gender as additional factors. However, a larger study is needed to statistically validate such a model.

CONCLUSIONS

The pretreatment values of serum lactate dehydrogenase and albumin are independent prognostic factors for survival in patients with metastatic melanoma. These two factors can be used to estimate survival of patients with advanced, metastatic melanoma and should be considered when designing melanoma trials in which survival is an endpoint.

Chemotherapy for advanced malignant melanoma

Systemic chemotherapy for the treatment of metastatic melanoma remains disappointing. Nor new single agent has demonstrated promising results. The combination of cisplatin, decarbazine, carmustine, and tamoxifen appears to be one of the most active regimens with an overall response rate approaching 50%. In some patients, responses have been durable and exceed 3 years. Sequential small phase II trials suggest that tamoxifen is an important component in this combination. The efficacy of the combination of hormonal and chemotherapy, however, needs to be corroborated in a large multicenter phase II trial. In addition, further laboratory and clinical studies are needed to evaluate the role of tamoxifen. Biological response modifiers, such as interleukin-2 and alpha-interferon, have limited activity as single agents, but in combination with cytotoxic agents show some promise and merit further evaluation. Future research should focus on the development of more effective agents, and on the use of aggressive adjuvant and neoadjuvant chemotherapy in high-risk patients with locally advanced disease.

Immunotherapy with monoclonal antibodies in metastatic melanoma

Therapy for metastatic melanoma has been disappointing to date. Treatment with chemotherapy only uncommonly results in complete responses and rarely results in long-term survivors. The identification of human melanoma cell surface antigens has led to the development of an array of mouse monoclonal antibodies (MAb) for use in the diagnosis and therapy of patients with metastatic melanoma. Strategies utilizing MAbs based on immunologic approaches have been developed. Naked MAbs directed against glycoprotein surface antigens or conjugated to toxins or radionuclides have shown little biologic or clinical activity. However, phase I studies of MAb directed against glycolipid antigens have yielded objective tumor shrinkage with occasional complete responses. Severe toxicity has been seen infrequently. Possible anti-tumor mechanisms include complement activation and antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity utilizing natural killer cells or monocytes as effector cells. Strategies to enhance the anti-tumor effects of MAb, including combinations with cytotoxic agents and cytokines, have been introduced with limited success thus far. The development of a human IgG anti-mouse antibody has been seen in nearly all treated patients. A new generation of MAb engineered to overcome the immunogenicity of mouse MAb and to enhance immune effector function will soon enter clinical trials.