Total gastrectomy for advanced cancer. A worthwhile palliative procedure

Current standards of surgical management of gastric cancer: an appraisal

PURPOSE

Gastric cancer (GC) is the fifth most common malignancy worldwide and portends a grim prognosis due to a lack of appreciable improvement in 5-year survival. We aimed to analyze the available literature and summarize the current standards of surgical care for curative and palliative intent treatment of GC.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic search on the PubMed database for studies on the management of GC.

RESULTS

Endoscopic resection is an acceptable treatment option for T1a tumors. The role of optimal resection margin for GC remains unclear. D2 lymph node dissection remains the standard of care with splenectomy needed selectively for splenic hilum involvement. A distal pancreatic resection should be avoided. The advantage of bursectomy and omentectomy in GC surgery is not clear. Multi-visceral resection may be considered for locally advanced GC in carefully selected patients. Minimally invasive approaches are non-inferior to open surgery. Surgery should be abandoned prior even in metastatic GC within the frame of multimodal therapy approach.

CONCLUSION

Various trials have conclusively shown improved patient outcomes when well-established surgical standards are followed.

Peri-operative Outcomes and Survival Following Palliative Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Many patients with gastric cancer present with late stage disease. Palliative gastrectomy remains a contentious intervention aiming to debulk tumour and prevent or treat complications such as gastric outlet obstruction, perforation and bleeding.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review of the literature for all papers describing palliative resections for gastric cancer and reporting peri-operative or survival outcomes. Data from peri-operative and survival outcomes were meta-analysed using random effects modelling. Survival data from patients undergoing palliative resections, non-resective surgery and palliative chemotherapy were also combined. This study was registered with the PROSPERO database (CRD42019159136).

RESULTS

One hundred and twenty-eight papers which included 58,675 patients contributed data. At 1 year, there was a significantly improved survival in patients who underwent palliative gastrectomy when compared to non-resectional surgery and no treatment. At 2 years following treatment, palliative gastrectomy was associated with significantly improved survival compared to chemotherapy only; however, there was no significant improvement in survival compared to patients who underwent non-resectional surgery after 1 year. Palliative resections were associated with higher rates of overall complications versus non-resectional surgery (OR 2.14; 95% CI, 1.34, 3.46; p < 0.001). However, palliative resections were associated with similar peri-operative mortality rates to non-resectional surgery.

CONCLUSION

Palliative gastrectomy is associated with a small improvement in survival at 1 year when compared to non-resectional surgery and chemotherapy. However, at 2 and 3 years following treatment, survival benefits are less clear. Any survival benefits come at the expense of increased major and overall complications.

Palliative Gastrectomy and Survival in Patients With Metastatic Gastric Cancer: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of a Large Population-Based Study

OBJECTIVES

The role of palliative gastrectomy in the management of metastatic gastric cancer remains inadequately clarified.

METHODS

We analyzed patients with metastatic gastric cancer enrolled in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registry from January 2004 to December 2012. Propensity score (PS) analysis with 1:1 matching and the nearest neighbor matching method was performed to ensure well-balanced characteristics of the groups of patients who undergone gastrectomy and those without gastrectomy. Data were analyzed by Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards regression models to evaluate the overall survival and cancer-specific survival rates with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

In general, receiving any kind of gastrectomy was associated with an improvement in survival in the multivariate analyses (hazard ratio [HR]os = 0.64, 95% CI = 0.59-0.70, HRcss = 0.63, 95% CI = 0.57-0.68) and PS matching (PSM) analyses (HRos = 0.63, 95% CI = 0.56-0.70, HRcss = 0.62, 95% CI = 0.55-0.70). After PSM, palliative gastrectomy was found to be associated with remarkably improved survival for patients with stage M1 with only 1 metastasis but not associated with survival of patients with stage M1 with extensive metastasis (≥2 metastatic sites).

DISCUSSION

The results obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database suggest that patients with metastatic gastric cancer might benefit from palliative gastrectomy on the basis of chemotherapy. However, a PSM cohort study of this kind still has a strong selection bias and cannot replace a properly conducted randomized controlled trial.

Efficacy of palliative radiotherapy and chemo-radiotherapy for unresectable gastric cancer demonstrating bleeding and obstruction

BACKGROUND

Bleeding and obstruction are common localized symptoms in patients with unresectable gastric cancer. Although there are several reports about surgical and endoscopic therapies for gastric cancer, there are few regarding palliative radiation therapy.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed data for 23 gastric cancer patients who underwent palliative radiation between April 2006 and March 2014, with either localized bleeding (n = 18) or upper gastric obstruction (n = 10).

RESULTS

The median (range) total dose and fraction (Fr) of radiotherapy (RT) were 42 (18-60) Gy and 20 (9-30) Fr, respectively. The response rates were 88.8% (bleeding) and 80% (obstruction). The median event-free survival times of the bleeding and obstruction groups from the start of radiation were 103 and 104 days, respectively. Adverse events with RT and chemo-radiotherapy (CRT) were grade 2 nausea (n = 4) and grade 2 esophagitis (n = 3) and grade 2 neutropenia (n = 3). In univariate analysis, the antrum as the gastric primary site (p = 0.063) and peritoneal metastasis (p = 0.054) occurred more frequently in the non-responders (n = 4) than the responders (n = 19).

Radiation Therapy for Gastric Cancer Bleeding

Aims and Background

To evaluate the outcome of palliative radiotherapy (RT) for patients with gastric cancer bleeding.

Methods

A retrospective review of 30 patients with gastric cancer bleeding who underwent palliative RT was conducted. Twenty-three patients who received a dose of ≥30 Gy in 10 fractions were eligible. The palliative effect was evaluated both in a subjective and objective manner. Subjective symptomatic relief of bleeding was determined and an objective response was evaluated by identifying the amount of transfused packed red blood cells (PRBC) and the mean hemoglobin (Hb) level of patients before and after RT.

Results

Subjective symptom relief was observed in 21 patients. The number of transfused PRBC units was 2 to 25 (median, 6) during the month before RT and 0 to 16 (median, 0) during the month after RT ( P <0.001). The average level of Hb increased from 9.1 ± 1.6 g/dL to 10.6 ± 1.6 g/dL ( P <0.001). In 9 patients whose laboratory findings were available for ≥3 months after RT, the mean Hb at one, two, and three months after RT was 10.7 ± 1.7 g/dL ( P = 0.004), 10.5 ± 1.0 g/dL ( P = 0.039), and 9.9 ± 1.0 g/dL ( P = 0.164), respectively. The median number of transfused PRBC units decreased from 6 to 0 during the three months after RT.

Conclusion

RT may be an effective treatment for gastric cancer bleeding when other modalities are not feasible. In this study, 91% of the patients experienced symptomatic palliation with an elevated Hb level and a decreased number of transfusions after RT.

Heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy and gastrectomy for gastric cancer in the U.S.: the time is now

Peritoneal metastasis is a common final pathway in patients with gastric adenocarcinoma. Microscopic evidence of early peritoneal dissemination of gastric cancer is present in a substantial proportion of patients presumed to have localized disease. Prognosis is poor even for patients with microscopic and low-volume peritoneal carcinomatosis highlighting the need for a more effective treatment strategy. Treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis with intraperitoneal chemotherapy has been evaluated in gastric cancer and is associated with improved survival in selected patients. We hypothesize that removal of the primary tumor combined with treatment of low-volume peritoneal metastasis may improve survival in patients with gastric cancer. Our group is investigating the role of heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy administered at time of gastrectomy in patients with gastric adenocarcinoma and metastasis limited to the peritoneum. To date, trials dedicated to the study of regional therapy for peritoneal metastasis due to gastric cancer have originated primarily in Asian centers. Although the incidence of gastric cancer is relatively low in the United States, mortality rates are high and the need is real for prospective study of intraperitoneal chemotherapy in patients with this deadly disease.

Enteral Stenting in 21 Patients with Malignant Gastroduodenal Obstruction

Placement of an enteral stent is emerging as an effective alternative to surgery for symptomatic relief in patients with malignant gastric outflow and duodenal obstruction. We report experience in a series of patients who had the Wallstent enteral prosthesis inserted. 21 consecutive patients with inoperable obstruction, median age 75 years, had twenty-three procedures for insertion of the Wallstent under fluoroscopic guidance. Stent implantation was successful in 18 patients (86%), all of whom gained relief from nausea and vomiting. There were no short-term complications. Median survival after the procedure was four months (longest ten months), and no deaths were related to insertion. The efficacy and lack of complications in this series support use of the endoscopically placed stent for palliative management of malignant upper gastrointestinal obstruction.

The effect of the gastrectomy on survival in patients with metastatic gastric cancer: a study of ASMO

AIM

To investigate the role of surgical resection of primary tumor on overall survival (OS) in advanced gastric cancer patients at the time of diagnosis.

PATIENTS & METHODS

The survival rates of metastatic gastric cancer patients whose gastric primary tumor was resected at time of diagnosis were compared with metastatic gastric cancer patients whose primary tumor was nonresected.

RESULTS

The median progression-free survival and OS in operated and nonoperated group were 10 versus 6, 14 versus 9 months, respectively (p < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, gastric resection of primary tumor, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, second-line chemotherapy had a significant effect on OS (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.52 [95% CI: 0.38-0.71], HR: 0.57 [95% CI: 0.42-0.78], HR: 1.48 [1.09-2.01]; p ≤ 0.001, p = 0.001 and p = 0.012, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Subpopulations of patients with metastatic gastric cancer might benefit from surgical removal of primary tumor.

Role of Surgery in the Management for Gastric Cancer with Synchronous Distant Metastases

Optimal treatment of patients with gastric cancer with synchronous distant metastases is palliative chemotherapy. However, occasionally gastrectomy should be selected due to control bleeding from tumors, perforation, or obstruction. The aim of this study is to evaluate the survival benefits of non-curative gastrectomy for patients with synchronous distant metastasis. Total 78 gastric cancer patients with synchronous distant metastasis treated in our hospital between 2003 and 2012 were enrolled in this study. Of these, 74 patients (95 %) received S1 based chemotherapy. During the treatment, 37 patients (47.4 %) underwent palliative gastrectomy because of bleeding from tumors (n = 15), tumor perforation (n = 6), and obstruction (n = 16). Survival benefits were compared in resected and non-resected patients, retrospectively. The two groups were clinicopathologically similar. Palliative gastrectomy was performed safely (morbidity: 10.8 % and mortality: 0) in resection group. However, resection showed survival benefits only in 13 patients (16.7 %) with single metastasis and without peritoneal metastasis. Their 2-year survival rate was 40 % and their median survival was 19 months. Non-curative gastrectomy with precise surgical techniques followed careful postoperative nutrition management may improve survival only for patients with a single metastatic site, except for peritoneal dissemination.

Gastrectomy in advanced gastric cancer effectively palliates symptoms and may improve survival in select patients

BACKGROUND

The role of gastrectomy in the face of incurable gastric cancer is evolving. We sought to evaluate our experience with incomplete (i.e., R2) gastrectomy in advanced gastric cancer.

METHODS

We reviewed 210 locally advanced or metastatic gastric cancers (1992-2008). Patient characteristics and outcomes were compared between three groups: gastrectomy (N = 99), exploration without resection (N = 66), and no surgery (N = 45).

RESULTS

Clinicopathologic characteristics were similar between groups. Symptoms successfully resolved after gastrectomy in 48 % with a complication rate of 32 % and mortality of 6 %. Overall median survival for all patients was 6.2 months: 10.0 months after gastrectomy, 4.1 months after exploration without resection, and 5.3 months for no surgery (p < 0.001). Perioperative complications were the only predictor of symptom resolution following resection (OR = 0.175). Resolution of symptoms (p < 0.001, Hazards Ratio (HR) = 0.09) and preoperative nausea/vomiting (p = 0.017, HR = 0.55) improved survival, while linitis plastica (p = 0.035, HR = 4.05) and spindle cell morphology (p = 0.011, HR = 1.98) were predictors of poor survival in patients undergoing resection.

CONCLUSIONS

Gastrectomy in the setting of advanced gastric cancer may be useful in up to half of patients with an acceptable perioperative mortality rate. Symptom resolution offers a potential survival advantage but is dependent upon a complication-free course, so should only be considered selectively.

The role of non-curative surgery in incurable, asymptomatic advanced gastric cancer

Background

Although general agreement exists on palliative surgery with intent of symptom palliation in advanced gastric cancer (AGC), the role of non-curative surgery for incurable, asymptomatic AGC is hotly debated. We aim to clarify the role of non-curative surgery in patients with incurable, asymptomatic AGC under the first-line chemotherapy.

Methods

A total of 737 patients with incurable, asymptomatic advanced gastric adenocarcinoma between January 2008 and May 2012 at the Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center were retrospectively analyzed, comprising 414 patients with non-curative surgery plus first-line chemotherapy, and 323 patients with first-line chemotherapy only. The clinicopathologic data, survival, and prognosis were evaluated, with propensity score adjustment for selection bias.

Results

The median overall survival (OS) outcomes significantly favored non-curative surgery group over first-line chemotherapy only group in entire population (28.00 versus 10.37 months, P = 0.000), stage 4 patients (23.87 versus 10.37 months, P = 0.000), young patients (28.70 versus 10.37 months, P = 0.000) and elderly patients (23.07 versus 10.27 months, P = 0.031). The median OS advantages of non-curative surgery over first-line chemotherapy only were also maintained when the analyses were restricted to single organ metastasis (P = 0.001), distant lymph node metastasis (P = 0.002), peritoneal metastasis (P = 0.000), and multi-organ metastasis (P = 0.010). Significant OS advantages of non-curative surgery over chemotherapy only were confirmed solid by multivariate analyses before and after adjustment on propensity score (P = 0.000). Small subsets of patients with surgery of single metastatic lesion after previous curative gastrectomy, and with surgery of both primary and single metastatic sites showed sound median OS.

Conclusions

There is a role for non-curative surgery plus first-line chemotherapy for incurable, asymptomatic AGC, in terms of survival. Randomized controlled trials are warranted to fill a gap in knowledge about the value of metastectomy and patient selection strategies.

Clinical significance of palliative gastrectomy on the survival of patients with incurable advanced gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Palliative gastrectomy for patients with advanced gastric cancer remains controversial. The objective of the present meta-analysis was to analyze survival outcomes and establish a consensus on whether palliative gastrectomy is suitable for patients with incurable advanced gastric cancer and which type of patients should be selected to receive palliative gastrectomy.

Methods

A literature search was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library. The results for overall survival in the meta-analysis are expressed as hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

Results

Of 1647 articles and abstracts reviewed, 14 studies with 3003 patients were eligible for the final analysis. The meta-analysis revealed that palliative gastrectomy is associated with a significantly improvement in overall survival (HR 0.56; 95%CI 0.39–0.80; p < 0.002) compared that of patients treated without palliative gastrectomy. An improvement in survival was also observed in patients with stage M1 gastric cancer who received palliative gastrectomy (HR 0.62; 95%CI 0.49–0.78; p < 0.0001), especially those with peritoneal dissemination (HR = 0.76, 95%CI 0.63–0.92), liver metastasis (HR = 0.41, 95%CI 0.30–0.55), or distant lymph-node metastasis (HR = 0.36, 95%CI 0.23–0.59). Combined hepatic resection may be beneficial for patients who under palliative gastrectomy (HR 0.30; 95%CI 0.15–0.61; p = 0.0008). The overall survival of patients who underwent palliative gastrectomy combined with chemotherapy was significantly improved (HR 0.63; 95%CI 0.47–0.84; p = 0.002).

Conclusions

From the results of the meta-analysis, palliative gastrectomy for patients with incurable advanced gastric cancer may be associated with longer survival, especially for patients with stage M1 gastric cancer. Combined hepatic resection for patients with liver metastasis and chemotherapy may be beneficial factors compared to simple palliative gastrectomy.

The clinical value of non-curative resection followed by chemotherapy for incurable gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

The clinical value of a non-curative resection for gastric cancer is still controversial. We analyzed the clinical outcomes of patients who underwent non-curative gastric resection.

METHODS

Data from a total of 178 patients who underwent non-curative resection for advanced gastric cancer at Seoul St. Mary's hospital were reviewed. Factors related to the incurability were classified as peritoneal metastasis (P), liver metastasis (H), extra-abdominal metastasis (X), direct adjacent organ invasion that was unresectable (T). The clinicopathologic data, survival, and quality of life of patients were evaluated.

RESULTS

The overall median survival time was 12.1 months, and that for the patients with gastrectomy with chemotherapy was 14.3 months. Operation-related complications occurred in 20 patients (11.2 %). Five patients (2.8 %) died of postoperative complications within 30 days, and 43 patients (24.2 %) had symptoms and signs of gastric outlet obstruction or uncontrolled bleeding. The mean duration of postoperative hospital stay was 15.9 days for those symptomatic patients, and the symptom-relieved period was 8.6 months.

CONCLUSIONS

There might be a role for non-curative resection followed by chemotherapy for incurable gastric cancer, in terms of survival, and this treatment approach should be carefully considered because of the high mortality rate associated with the disease. A large, randomized, prospective study is warranted to prove the benefit of non-curative resection in patients with incurable gastric cancer.

Palliative resection for advanced gastric and junctional adenocarcinoma: which patients will benefit from surgery?

BACKGROUND

Whereas palliative chemotherapy offers a median survival of approximately 10 months in advanced gastric and junctional adenocarcinoma (AGJA), the survival impact of primary tumor resection is controversial. Our purpose was to identify which AGJA patients benefit from palliative resection.

METHODS

In 3,202 AGJA patients scheduled for surgery in 21 French centers between 1997 and 2010, prognostic factors were identified in palliative group and the impact of each combination of these factors on survival was studied.

RESULTS

Surgery was defined as palliative due to solid organ metastasis (5.6 %), localized (4.6 %) or diffuse (2.3 %) peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC), or incomplete tumoral resection (12.8 %). Median survival of AGJA patients resected with a palliative intent (n = 677) was longer than in nonresected patients (n = 532; 11.9 vs. 8.5 months, P < 0.001). Multivariable analyses identified ASA score III-IV (P < 0.001) as a predictor of postoperative mortality and solid organ metastasis (P = 0.009), localized PC (P = 0.004), diffuse PC (P = 0.046), and signet ring cell histology (SRC; P = 0.02) as predictors of survival. Only ASA I-II patients with incomplete resection without metastasis or PC, one site solid organ metastasis without PC, or localized PC without SRC had a survival benefit after palliative surgery with median survivals from 12.0 to 18.3 months. Nonresected ASA I-II patients with same risk factors had median survivals from 3.5 to 8.8 months (P < 0.05 for each).

CONCLUSIONS

In AGJA, patient and tumor-related factors should be used to select candidates for palliative surgery in association with chemotherapy.

A systematic review of surgery for non-curative gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

Most gastric cancer patients present with advanced stage disease precluding curative surgical treatment. These patients may be considered for palliative resection or bypass in the presence of major symptoms; however, the utility of surgery for non-curative, asymptomatic advanced disease is debated and the appropriate treatment strategy unclear.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the non-curative surgical literature to better understand the limitations and benefits of non-curative surgery for advanced gastric cancer.

METHODS

A literature search for non-curative surgical interventions in gastric cancer was conducted using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases from 1 January 1985 to 1 December 2009. All abstracts were independently rated for relevance by a minimum of two reviewers. Outcomes of interest were procedure-related morbidity, mortality, and survival.

RESULTS

Fifty-nine articles were included; the majority were retrospective, single institution case series. Definitions describing the treatment intent for gastrectomy were incomplete in most studies. Only five were truly performed with relief of symptoms as the primary indication for surgery, while the majority were considered non-curative or not otherwise specified. High rates of procedure-related morbidity and mortality were demonstrated for all surgeries across the majority of studies and treatment-intent categories. Median and 1-year survival were poor, and values ranged widely within surgical approaches and across studies.

CONCLUSIONS

A lack of transparent documentation of disease burden and symptoms limits the surgical literature in non-curative gastric cancer. Improved survival is not evident for all patients receiving non-curative gastrectomy. Further prospective research is required to determine the optimal intervention for palliative gastric cancer patients.

Nonpalliative surgical resection for gastric cancer patients with distant metastasis

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to determine the influence of clinicopathological and treatment factors on survival in gastric cancer patients with distant metastasis after gastrectomy.

METHODS

From 1990 to 2002, 111 gastric cancer patients with distant metastasis underwent nonpalliative gastrectomy at the Department of Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, China. Variables including demographic data, clinicopathological characteristics, and type of surgery were analyzed for survival by using univariate and multivariate methods.

RESULTS

The median overall survival for all patients was 11.8 months. The overall survival at one-, three-, and five-year was 48.5%, 12.4%, and 5.8%, respectively. Univariate analysis demonstrated that five-year survival of patients without liver metastasis was significantly longer than that of those with liver metastasis (5.3% versus 0%, p = .006). But, multivariate analysis showed that the status of liver metastasis, as well as the other variables including gender, age, location of tumor, Borrmann type, depth of tumor invasion, lymph node involvement, peritoneal dissemination, number of metastatic sites, pathological differentiation, and types of gastrectomy, was not an independent prognostic factor associated with survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term survival for gastric cancer patients with distant metastasis is very poor after gastrectomy. The multivariate analysis failed to determine the independent factors of improved survival. So, only highly selected candidates should be considered for management with surgical resection.

Morbidity and mortality after non-curative gastrectomy for gastric cancer in elderly patients

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

This study examined the surgical outcome of non-curative resection in elderly patients with gastric cancer.

METHODS

The study reviewed 278 patients who underwent non-curative resection for advanced gastric cancer. The clinicopathological features of elderly patients (≥ 75 years, n = 257) and younger patients (<75 years, n = 21) were compared.

RESULTS

Although no difference was observed in terms of preoperative performance, there were distinct differences in terms of albumin level, presence of symptoms, and the rate of comorbidities between the two groups. The postoperative morbidity and mortality rate did not differ between the two groups. Age, preoperative performance status, preoperative transfusion, and presence of comorbidity were not independent predictors of postoperative complications. However, the extent of gastric resection and combined resection were closely related to postoperative complications in patients with non-curative gastrectomy.

CONCLUSIONS

In a setting of non-curative resection for gastric cancer, age was not a limiting factor. Rather, the risk of postoperative morbidity should be considered carefully in total gastrectomy and combined resection.

Non-curative gastric resection for patients with stage 4 gastric cancer--a single center experience and current review of literature

PURPOSE

The majority of patients with gastric cancer present with an advanced stage and, therefore, may not be eligible for curative treatment. The role of non-curative gastric resection in situations other than emergency treatment for life threatening tumor-related complications is still under discussion.

METHODS

Data from 290 consecutive patients with advanced gastric cancer who were treated in our hospital were analyzed. A total of 48 patients underwent primary non-curative gastric resection.

RESULTS

The overall survival in the non-curatively resected group was 15 months and 6 months for non-resected patients, respectively (p < 0.001). The incidence of tumor-related complications which required intervention was 63% in non-resected patients as compared to 12% in patients who underwent primary non-curative resection. Younger age, less than three tumor locations, and chemotherapy have been identified as prognostic factors for improved survival by univariate analysis. D3 lymph node involvement and chemotherapy were independent prognostic factors in the multivariate analysis. Peritoneal carcinosis did not significantly influence survival in resected patients. Non-curative resection in combination with chemotherapy resulted in longer overall survival than resection alone.

CONCLUSIONS

Primary non-curative gastric resection can reduce the incidence of severe tumor-related complications and can prolong overall survival in selected subgroups. In particular, younger patients with no more than two tumor locations should be considered for this procedure.

Outcome of palliative total gastrectomy for stage IV proximal gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

A few studies have investigated the outcome of palliative total gastrectomy (PTG) in stage IV proximal gastric cancer. In this study, we tried to summarize the outcome of PTG in stage IV proximal gastric cancer.

METHODS

Between January 1991 and January 2005, complete clinical data of 197 patients with stage IV proximal gastric cancer undergoing PTG, 642 patients undergoing curative total gastrectomy (CTG), 152 nonsurgical patients, 102 patients undergoing explorative laparotomy, and 78 patients undergoing jejunostomy were enrolled in this study. Survival rates, median survival, complication rates, and mortality were analyzed.

RESULTS

The 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year survival rates were 61.3%, 8.9%, and 6.4% in the PTG group, respectively, and 92.3%, 58.5%, and 48.9% in the CTG group, respectively (P < .05). The median survival periods in the PTG, no surgery, laparotomy, and jejunostomy groups were 16.4, 5.5, 4.7, and 5.8 months, respectively. The median survival in the PTG group was significantly longer than that in the other 3 groups (P < .05). The postoperative complication rate and mortality rate were, respectively, 24.3% and 3.0% in the PTG group and 13.5% and 2.3% in the CTG group (P > .05).

CONCLUSIONS

PTG for stage IV proximal gastric cancer when compared with no surgery, laparotomy, and jejunostomy is associated with prolonged survival time and improved quality of life. However, despite the feasibility and safety of PTG, patients with stage IV proximal gastric cancer who are suitable for this treatment should be selected, and thoughtful preparation should be made in the perioperative period.

Enteral stents for malignant gastric outlet obstruction

Malignant gastric outlet obstruction (GOO) is a commonly encountered entity, defined as the inability of the stomach to empty because of mechanical obstruction at the level of either the stomach or the proximal small bowel. In this article, current literature on GOO is reviewed with a focus on enteral stents to include symptoms and diagnosis, stent and nonstent treatment, types of enteral stents, indications and contraindications to stent placement, and technical and clinical success rates. In comparison with gastrojejunostomy, enteral stent placement is better suited for patients with a shorter life expectancy and/or those who are poor surgical candidates.

Palliative treatment of malignant gastroduodenal obstruction with metallic stent: prospective comparison of covered and uncovered stents

BACKGROUND

The placement of self-expandable metallic stents (SEMS) is known to be effective palliative treatment of malignant gastroduodenal obstruction. There are two types of SEMS--covered and uncovered--each with its own advantages and disadvantages. This study was conducted to compare between the clinical outcomes of covered and uncovered stents in patients with malignant gastroduodenal obstruction.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The study was conducted prospectively from January 1998 to June 2007 and 154 patients were included. All had symptomatic gastroduodenal obstruction and were not candidates for curative operation. Seventy patients received covered SEMS, while the other 84 received uncovered SEMS. We compared technical and clinical success rates, tumour ingrowth rate, stent migration rate, stent patency time and patient survival in both SEMS groups.

RESULTS

The technical and clinical success rates of the covered and uncovered stent groups did not differ. Stent migration was more frequent in the covered stent group than in the uncovered group (17.1% versus 0%; p=0.0001). Tumour ingrowth was more frequent in the uncovered stent group than in the covered group (16.6% versus 2.9%; p=0.0066). Stent re-intervention rate, stent patency time and patient survival did not differ between groups.

CONCLUSION

Covered and uncovered stent insertions are technically feasible and effective palliative treatment of malignant gastroduodenal obstruction. Covered stents can reduce the risk of tumour ingrowth, whereas uncovered stents are effective in preventing stent migration. However, covered stents did not differ from uncovered stents in regard to other clinical outcomes.

Survival benefit of non-curative gastrectomy for gastric cancer patients with synchronous distant metastasis

BACKGROUND

The prognosis for gastric cancer patients with distant metastasis is very poor. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the survival benefit of non-curative gastrectomy for gastric cancer patients with synchronous distant metastasis.

METHODS

From 1992 to 2002, 253 gastric cancer patients with synchronous distant metastasis underwent surgery at the Department of Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, China. The clinicopathological characteristics and survival were compared between resection and non-resection groups.

RESULTS

The 5-year survival rate was 6.5% for patients in resection group and 0% for patients in non-resection group (P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that liver metastasis, peritoneal dissemination, and non-resection were significantly associated with poor prognosis in gastric cancer patients with distant metastasis. The survival difference between resection and non-resection groups was only observed in patients with single peritoneal dissemination (P < 0.001), but were not in patients with single liver metastasis (P = 0.428), distant nodes involvement (P = 0.490) and multiple metastatic sites (P = 0.192), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggests that there were no survival benefit from non-curative gastrectomy for patients with single liver, distant nodes, or multiple sites metastasis. However, only patients with single peritoneal dissemination had survival benefit from non-curative resection. The value of non-curative resection should be evaluated by well-designed clinical trials.

Hepatoid adenocarcinoma of the stomach - a different histology for not so different gastric adenocarcinoma: a case report

Hepatoid adenocarcinoma is an extrahepatic tumor characterized by morphological similarities to hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatoid adenocarcinoma of the stomach is a cancer with an extremely poor prognosis with few cases reported. Here, we describe a 75-year-old Spanish man referred to our hospital with a history of abdominal pain, general fatigue, anorexia and sickness. Initial study revealed anemia, and computed tomography scan and abdominal ultrasonography showed multiple metastases to the liver with hepatocellular carcinoma characteristics in a liver with no cirrhotic change. Further study included a serum level of alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), which resulted markedly elevated, and a conclusive esophagogastroduodenoscopy describing an elevated tumour growing through the cardia and gastroesophageal junction with foci of necrosis and haemorrhage. Gastric biopsies of the tumor revealed poorly differenciated adenocarcinoma, with hepatoid differentiation. After a diagnosis of AFP-producing hepatoid adenocarcinoma of the stomach with multiple liver metastases was made, pallitive total gastrectomy, without liver resection, was performed. Patient recovered well after surgery, and entered into a palliative systemich chemotherapy protocol. Although this illness is recognized as having poor prognosis, the patient remains alive 8 months after the operation. Accurate diagnosis of hepatoid adenocarcinoma of the stomach is important, and should be suspected under certain circumstances. We describe this rare case of hepatoid adenocarcinoma of the stomach, and review the literature concerning the clinicopathological aspects.

Feasibility of self-expandable metallic stent plus chemotherapy for metastatic gastric cancer with pyloric stenosis

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Self-expandable metallic stent placement is accepted as palliative therapy for advanced gastric cancer with gastric outlet obstruction, but data are lacking for chemotherapy after self-expandable metallic stent insertion. This study retrospectively compared results between surgery plus chemotherapy and stenting plus chemotherapy for metastatic gastric cancer with pyloric stenosis.

METHODS

Subjects comprised 26 patients who received chemotherapy after surgery or endoscopic stenting for metastatic gastric cancer with pyloric stenosis between April 2000 and December 2007 in four Japanese hospitals. Patients were categorized into two groups: 15 patients who received chemotherapy after surgery for pyloric stenosis (Surgery group); and 11 patients who received chemotherapy after self-expandable metallic stent placement for pyloric stenosis (Stent group).

RESULTS

Median survival time and median time to treatment failure were 284 days and 226 days in the Surgery group and 337 days and 247 days in the Stent group, respectively. No significant differences were noted between survival and time to treatment failure. No significant differences were found in median oral intake rate (Surgery, 93.1%; Stent, 93.2%) or median hospital stay rate (Surgery, 24.6%; Stent, 23.7%) during survival. Response rate was 45.5% in the Surgery group and 50% in the Stent group, with no significant difference. Likewise, no significant differences were noted between groups for frequencies of toxicity or complications.

CONCLUSIONS

The present results suggest that chemotherapy after stenting is as effective and safe as chemotherapy after surgery. Stents may replace surgery in combination therapy with chemotherapy for metastatic gastric cancer with gastric outlet obstruction.

Clinicopathologic characteristics of gastric cancer patients who underwent noncurative gastrectomy with long-term survival

PURPOSE

To demonstrate clinicopathologic characteristics of gastric cancer patients who underwent noncurative gastrectomy with long-term survival.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 202 advanced gastric cancer patients who underwent noncurative gastrectomy.

RESULTS

The long-term survivors who survived for more than 3 years comprised four of 65 patients with a residual tumor in the peritoneum, one of 50 patients with a residual tumor from lymph node metastasis, three of 41 patients positive for the resected margin (M-factor) and 17 of 153 patients with free intraperitoneal cancer cells (Cy-factor). Multivariate analysis indicated that independent indicators affecting survival were lymph node metastasis and peritoneal metastasis in patients with the Cy-factor and histology in patients with the M-factor.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term survival can only be expected in patients with the Cy-factor who have neither macroscopic peritoneal metastasis nor lymph node metastasis or in patients with the M-factor who have a well-differentiated tumor.

Palliative management of gastric cancer

Advanced gastric cancer and its palliative treatment have a long and interesting history. Today, gastric adenocarcinoma is the second leading cause of cancer death worldwide. Unfortunately, many cases are not diagnosed until late stages of disease, which underscores the importance of the palliative treatment of gastric cancer. Palliative care is best defined as the active total care of patients whose disease is not responsive to curative treatment. Although endoscopy is the most useful method for securing the diagnosis of gastric adenocarcinoma, computed tomography may be useful to assess local and distant disease. The main indication for the institution of palliative care is the presence of advanced gastric cancer for which curative treatment is deemed inappropriate. The primary goal of palliative therapy of gastric cancer patients is to improve quality, not necessarily length, of life. Four main modalities of palliative therapy for advanced gastric cancer are discussed: resection, bypass, stenting, and chemotherapy. The choice of modality depends on a variety of factors, including individual patient prognosis and goals, and should be made on case-by-case basis. Future directions include the discovery and development of serum or stool tumor markers aimed at prevention, improving prognostication and stratification, and increasing awareness and education.

Palliative gastrectomy and chemotherapy for stage IV gastric cancer

PURPOSE

To investigate the value of palliative gastrectomy and chemotherapy in a large series of patients with stage IV gastric cancer.

METHODS

A total of 389 patients were identified in survival analysis. Among which, 183 cases received palliative gastrectomy (PG) and 206 cases received unresectable operation, 184 cases received palliative chemotherapy (PC) and 205 cases did not receive chemotherapy. The survival advantages of patients, based on treatments modality, were also analyzed in patients with liver metastasis, peritoneal dissemination and lymph node metastasis.

RESULTS

The 1-year, 3-year, 5-year survival rate of those patients who were treated with PG + PC were 85.7% (96/112), 32.1% (36/112), and 8.9% (10/112), which were far better than those who were not. For those patients with liver metastasis, peritoneal dissemination, and/or N3 lymph node metastasis, survival advantages were also present if treated with this multimodality approach.

CONCLUSION

The survival time and palliative duration were significantly longer in patients after PG than after non-resection operations. Postoperative chemotherapy prolonged the survival time of patients after palliative surgery. PG combined with adjuvant chemotherapy may improve survival in patients with stage IV gastric cancer, even with liver metastasis, peritoneal dissemination, and lymph node metastasis.

Endoscopic stenting in patients with recurrent malignant obstruction after gastric surgery: uncovered versus simultaneously deployed uncovered and covered (double) self-expandable metal stents

BACKGROUND

Uncovered, rather than covered, metal stents are commonly used for palliation of malignant gastric outlet obstruction because of the low risk of stent migration, but tumor ingrowth risk is a major drawback. Few reports address malignant obstruction after gastric surgery.

OBJECTIVE

Our purpose was to compare the technical feasibility and clinical outcome of using an endoscopic uncovered self-expandable metal stent (SEMS) and simultaneous use of uncovered and covered SEMS (double SEMS) in patients with recurrent malignant obstruction after gastric surgery.

DESIGN

Retrospective study.

SETTING

Tertiary care, academic medical center, from August 2000 to June 2005.

PATIENTS

Twenty patients were included in the study. All patients had symptomatic obstruction with nausea, vomiting, and decreased oral intake.

INTERVENTION

Ten patients received uncovered SEMS; the other 10 received double SEMS.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

To compare tumor ingrowth and stent patency between the uncovered and the double-SEMS groups.

RESULTS

Technical and clinical successes were 10 of 10 and 8 of 10, respectively, in the uncovered SEMS group and 10 of 10 and 10 of 10, respectively, in the double SEMS group. Six of 10 patients (60%) with uncovered SEMS had tumor ingrowth compared with 1 of 10 patients with double SEMS, P = .057. Five of 10 patients (50%) with uncovered SEMS had very early restenosis, but no patients had early restenosis in the double SEMS group, P = .033. Stent patency was a median of 21.5 days (range, 7-217 days) in the uncovered SEMS group and 150 days (range 29-263 days) in the double SEMS group, P = .037. Survival duration was 109.5 days (range 29-280 days) and 150 days (range 29-263 days), respectively.

LIMITATIONS

This was a small retrospective study.

CONCLUSION

Simultaneous double stent placement seems to be technically feasible and effective for palliative treatment of recurrent malignant obstruction after gastric surgery. Double stent placement is important in preventing tumor ingrowth, especially very early restenosis, and prolongs stent patency. We suggest that this procedure be considered rather than uncovered stent alone as the primary choice for palliation of obstruction in such patients.

Results following resection for stage IV gastric cancer; are better outcomes observed in selected patient subgroups?

BACKGROUND

Patients who present with stage IV gastric cancer are not commonly managed with surgical resection as effective palliation can usually be accomplished with systemic chemotherapy, endoscopic stenting, or surgical bypass procedures. Given the inherent morbidity and mortality associated with gastrectomy, palliative resection for stage IV gastric cancer should be reserved for ideal surgical candidates who are most likely to benefit from the procedure. The purpose of this study is to review outcomes following resection for stage IV gastric cancer, and to identify criteria predictive of improved outcomes following gastrectomy in this setting.

METHODS

A retrospective review of a prospective GI oncology database was conducted. Sixty-three patients with stage IV gastric cancer managed with surgical resection between 1989 and 2001 were identified. Variables including demographic data, patterns of distant spread (ex: peritoneal, lymphatic, hematogenous), location of tumor, and type of gastrectomy were utilized to conduct survival analyses.

RESULTS

Actuarial survival for all patients at one and 3-year intervals was 52% and 12%, respectively. Improved survival was observed for patients of East Asian race (median survival 20 vs. 12 months, P < 0.05, students t-test) and age less than 60 years (median survival 15 vs. 12 months, P < 0.05). This trend was also illustrated by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Other variables including pattern of distant spread, location of tumor, and type of gastrectomy were not associated with a significant difference in survival. Both East Asian race and age less than 60 years were statistically significant predictors of improved survival when assessed by univariate regression analysis. When variables were analyzed in a multivariate regression analysis, Asian race and age <60 both lost their statistical significance as independent predictors of improved survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term survival for patients with stage IV gastric cancer who are managed with surgical resection is achievable. Patient specific variables including East Asian race and age less than 60 years appear to be associated with prolonged survival when assessed by comparison of means, Kaplan-Meier analysis, and univariate regression analysis. However, multivariate regression analysis failed to demonstrate these factors as independent predictors of improved outcome. In conclusion, highly selected acceptable risk surgical candidates with stage IV gastric cancer should be considered for management with surgical resection in clinically appropriate scenarios.

Self-expandable metallic stents for palliation of patients with malignant gastric outlet obstruction caused by stomach cancer

AIM: To ascertain clinical outcome and complications of self-expandable metal stents for endoscopic palliation of patients with malignant obstruction of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract.

METHODS: A retrospective review was performed throughout August 2000 to June 2005 of 53 patients with gastric outlet obstruction caused by stomach cancer. All patients had symptomatic obstruction including nausea, vomiting, and decreased oral intake. All received self-expandable metallic stents.

RESULTS: Stent implantation was successful in all 53 (100%) patients. Relief of obstructive symptoms was achieved in 43 (81.1%) patients. No immediate stent-related complications were noted. Seventeen patients had recurrent obstruction (tumor ingrowth in 14 patients, tumor overgrowth in 1 patient, and partial distal stent migration in 2 patients). The mean survival was 145 d. Median stent patency time was 187 d.

CONCLUSION: Endoscopic placement of self-expandable metallic stents is a safe and effective treatment for the palliation of patients with inoperable malignant gastric outlet obstruction caused by stomach cancer.

Local delivery system of immune modulating drug for unresectable adenocarcinoma: in vitro experimental study and in vivo animal study

The purpose of the study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a developed drug delivery system containing OK-432 through in vitro and animal study. An OK-432-impregnated polycarbonate/polyurethane stent membrane was used to develop a drug delivery system (DDS) enabling the locoregional release of OK-432. Polyethyleneglycol was used as a detergent and porosity generator. The stability of OK-432 in solvent, releasing kinetics of drug, and cytotoxicity of the DDS were evaluated. OK-432-impregnated DDS was implanted in mice in which a human adenocarcinoma cell line was injected and grown in their back. Flow cytometry and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay were used for quantifying the amount of drug. OK-432 exposed to phosphate-buffered saline and OK-432 exposed to N,N-dimethylacetamide showed similar results on dot graphs and histograms. However, OK-432 exposed to tetrahydrofurane showed different dot graphs and histograms, which means that the antigenicity of the drug was changed. The release rate of OK-432 was maintained at a constant level for 6 weeks. The local delivery of OK-432 was found to have an antitumor effect on a human adenocarcinoma cell line in an animal study, but no effect on this cell line in in vitro cell culture. Histologic examination showed minimal inflammatory reaction in surrounding tissue. Our study shows that local treatment using this OK-432 release system is safe and effective in reducing adenocarcinoma in a mouse model.

Malignant duodenal obstructions: palliative treatment using self-expandable nitinol stents

PURPOSE

To assess the efficacy of fluoroscopic per oral placement of self-expandable nitinol stents in the palliative treatment of malignant duodenal obstructions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Under fluoroscopic guidance, 82 patients (56 male and 26 female; mean age, 62.3 y) with malignant duodenal obstructions were treated with per oral placement of four types of self-expandable nitinol stents. All patients presented with severe nausea and recurrent vomiting, and their obstructions were inoperable.

RESULTS

Technical success was achieved in 78 of 82 patients (95.1%). After stent placement, food intake capacity improved in 74 of 78 patients (94.9%). Stent migration occurred in one patient 4 days after placement. A covered stent was placed to cover the ampulla of Vater in 15 patients without external biliary drainage; three of them (20%) became jaundiced. During the mean follow-up period of 74.7 days (range, 9-374 d), eight patients developed recurrent obstructive symptoms caused by tumor ingrowth (n=2) or tumor overgrowth (n=6). They were successfully treated by additional stent placement. The primary stent patency rates were 97.0%, 79.8%, and 44.0% at 30-, 90-, and 180 days, respectively (mean patency, 228.2 d; 95% CI, 153.9-302.5).

CONCLUSIONS

Fluoroscopic per oral placement of self-expandable nitinol stents is an effective palliative treatment for malignant duodenal obstructions.

Role of radiation therapy in gastric adenocarcinoma

Outcomes in patients with gastric cancer in the United States remain disappointing, with a five-year overall survival rate of approximately 23%. Given high rates of local-regional control following surgery, a strong rationale exists for the use of adjuvant radiation therapy. Randomized trials have shown superior local control with adjuvant radiotherapy and improved overall survival with adjuvant chemoradiation. The benefit of adjuvant chemoradiation in patients who have undergone D2 lymph node dissection by an experienced surgeon is not known, and the benefit of adjuvant radiation therapy in addition to adjuvant chemotherapy continues to be defined.

In unresectable disease, chemoradiation allows long-term survival in a small number of patients and provides effective palliation. Most trials show a benefit to combined modality therapy compared to chemotherapy or radiation therapy alone.

The use of pre-operative, intra-operative, 3D conformal, and intensity modulated radiation therapy in gastric cancer is promising but requires further study.

The current article reviews the role of radiation therapy in the treatment of resectable and unresectable gastric carcinoma, focusing on current recommendations in the United States.

Is there a role for palliative gastrectomy in patients with stage IV gastric cancer?

Patients with metastatic gastric cancer are currently not considered operative candidates and are most often offered systemic therapy. Palliative resection of the primary tumor has been considered irrelevant to the outcome and has been recommended only for palliation of symptoms. We have examined the role of palliative gastrectomy and its impact on survival in patients with stage IV gastric cancer at initial diagnosis between 1990 and 2000. A total of 105 patients with stage IV disease were identified during this period; 81 of them (77.1%) had no resection, and 24 (22.9%) underwent palliative gastric resection. Mean survival in those without resection who received chemotherapy (with or without radiation) treatment was 5.9 months (95% confidence interval 4.2-7.6). For those with resection and adjuvant therapy, mean survival time was 16.3 months (95% confidence interval 4.3-28.8 months). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed significantly better survival in those with resection and adjuvant therapy (log-rank test, P = 0.01). Mortality and morbidity rates associated with palliative resection were 8.7% and 33.3%, respectively, which did not differ statistically from the 3.7% and 25.3% in patients who underwent curative gastrectomy during same period of time. However, the length of hospitalization (22 versus 16 days) was significantly higher compared with those without stage IV disease. These data suggest that palliative resection combined with adjuvant therapy may improve survival in a selected group of patients with stage IV gastric cancer. Palliative gastrectomy plus systemic therapy should be compared with systemic therapy alone in a randomized trial.

Current role of surgical therapy in gastric cancer

Surgery is currently the only potentially curative treatment for gastric cancer. Since the inception of the gastrectomy for cancer of the stomach, there has been debate over the bounds of surgical therapy, balancing potential long-term survival with perioperative morbidity and mortality. This review delineates the current role of surgery in preoperative staging, curative resection, and palliative treatment for gastric cancer.

Limited Gastric Resection

Despite recent advancements in the staging and treatment of gastric cancer, overall survival remains poor. Extended or radical resections, to include the entire stomach, regional lymph nodes,or contiguous organs, have thus been proposed to alter the course of this fatal disease; however, no prospective randomized trial has validated this approach in a Western center. Furthermore, there are other malignant tumors that occur in the stomach and that may be successfully treated with a limited, nonanatomic, or subtotal gastrectomy, or in the case of gastric lymphoma, without surgery at all. Palliative approaches to patients who have advanced gastric cancer, which should be conservative by nature, are also outlined.

Gastric cancer

Gastric cancer is one of the most common cancers and one of the most frequent causes of cancer-related deaths. The incidence, diagnostic studies, and therapeutic options have undergone important changes in the last decades, but the prognosis for gastric cancer patients remains poor, especially in more advanced stages. Surgery is the mainstay of treatment of this disease, even if it is associated with a high rate of locoregional and distant recurrence. There is ongoing debate regarding the role of adjuvant treatment In advanced disease, palliation of symptoms, rather than cure, is the primary goal of patient management. Several combination therapies have been developed and have been examined in phase III trials; however, in most cases, they have failed to demonstrate a survival advantage over the reference arm. This review summarizes the most important recommendations for the management of patients with gastric cancer.

Gastrectomy for gastric cancer: defining critical elements of patient selection and outcome assessment

In advanced gastric cancer, palliation of symptoms, rather than cure, is often the most appropriate goal of patient management. There are important differences among patients undergoing non-curative operations for gastric cancer. The literature to date is limited, in part, by imprecise use of the term palliative. In clinical decision-making, the potential benefits of proposed procedure must be balanced against the duration of hospitalization, treatment of complications, and requirements for additional palliation. Studies designed to measure palliative interventions would benefit from precise designations of palliative intent inpatients receiving non-curative operations.

Defining palliative surgery in patients receiving noncurative resections for gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

Effective palliation rather than cure is often the most appropriate goal in the management of patients with advanced gastric cancer. The literature to date is limited by the imprecise use of the term palliative and subsequent variable designation of patients into evaluable groups.

STUDY DESIGN

Between July 1985 and July 2001, 1,595 patients were entered into a prospective database after undergoing a resection for gastric adenocarcinoma. Patients who received a noncurative (R1/R2) resection were identified. A procedure was defined as palliative if it was performed explicitly to palliate symptoms or improve quality of life.

RESULTS

Three hundred seven patients received a noncurative gastric resection. The operation was palliative in 48% (147/307) and nonpalliative in 52% (160/307). Palliative operations included an esophageal anastomosis less frequently (46% versus 69%, p < 0.001) and had a less extensive lymphadenectomy performed compared with nonpalliative operations. Surgical intent did not alter operative morbidity (54%) or mortality (6%) significantly. The overall median survival after a noncurative gastric resection was 10.6 months and was independently associated with operations performed with explicit palliative indications (8.3 months [palliative] versus 13.5 months [nonpalliative], p < 0.001) and patient age > 65 years.

CONCLUSIONS

There are important differences among patients undergoing noncurative operations for gastric cancer. Studies designed to measure palliative interventions would benefit from precise designations of palliative intent in patients receiving noncurative operations.

Surgery for stage IV gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

Surgical treatment for stage IV gastric cancer is controversial.

METHODS

We analyzed the surgical experience with advanced gastric carcinoma in a tertiary referral center in Mexico City from 1995 through 2000. We analyzed surgical morbidity, mortality, and factors associated with prognosis. Survival was analyzed with the Kaplan-Meier method, and the curves were compared with the log-rank test. Significance was assigned at P <0.05.

RESULTS

Seventy-six cases were identified. Mean patient age was 56 +/- 14.5 years. Thirty-nine patients (51.3%) were women. Patients were grouped according to surgical procedure: group 1 underwent resection (40 patients), group 2 underwent bypass procedures (10 patients), and group 3 underwent either celiotomy and biopsy alone or jejunostomy placement (26 patients). Twenty patients (26%) developed operative complications, but most were minor. There was no difference in morbidity between surgical groups and no difference according to patient's age. Operative mortality was 2.6%. Good palliation of symptoms was significantly more common in group 1 patients (82%) than in group 2 patients (60%) (P = 0.0001). Median survival was 8 months (95% confidence interval 4 to 12) for the entire cohort and 13, 5, and 3 months for groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively (P = 0.00001 for group 1 vs groups 2 and 3).

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical resection for stage IV gastric cancer can be done with low operative mortality and acceptable morbidity rates, and it provides patients with good symptomatic relief. Advanced patient age is not a contraindication for surgical treatment.

Gastrectomy, peritonectomy, and perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy: the evolution of treatment strategies for advanced gastric cancer

Gastric cancer disseminates by hematogenous, lymphatic, and transcoelomic routes. For maximal containment of the malignant process, perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy is necessary in two groups of patients in whom the primary cancer can be resected. Those patients who have been resected for cure and have a high likelihood of microscopic residual disease require intraperitoneal chemotherapy. This includes all T3 and T4 patients, and patients with N2 nodes present. A series of randomized and nonrandomized clinical studies have established the benefits of perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy in this group of patients. Patients with stage IV disease who are able to undergo a palliative resection require these treatments if peritoneal seeding is observed. Systemic chemotherapy is largely ineffective for peritoneal seeding, while intraperitoneal chemotherapy is most likely to produce a response with small volume, surgically debulked carcinomatosis. In addition, intraperitoneal chemotherapy can eliminate the future development of debilitating ascites. Sufficient data are available from the gastric cancer literature to support the use of these combined treatments on a routine basis if the primary cancer is resectable and gastrointestinal function can be reestablished.

Palliation of metastatic gastric cancer: impact of preoperative symptoms and the type of operation on survival and quality of life

Patients with advanced, incurable gastric cancer may present with mild symptoms or require immediate therapeutic intervention. The influence of the intensity of preoperative symptoms on postoperative survival and quality of life (QoL) was evaluated in a palliative setting. In a historical cohort analysis of 492 patients with gastric cancer treated between 1992 and 2001, a total of 169 (34.4%) patients had incurable disease (i.e., pTxNxM1). Patients were classified as having major symptoms if they presented with upper gastrointestinal bleeding (i.e., hematemesis or bloody stools), gastric inlet or outlet obstruction (i.e., symptomatic and endoscopically proven stenosis), or perforation caused by the tumor. All other patients were defined as having minor symptoms. QoL was assessed prospectively using the EORTC questionnaire. The questionnaire was given to the patients before operation, before discharge, and 3 months after operation; and it was analyzed by the Mann-Whitney U-test. Survival, demographic data, and histopathologic characteristics were assessed and analyzed by the log-rank test and the chi(2) test, respectively. Of the 169 patients, 75 (44.3%) presented with major symptoms and 94 (55.7%) with minor symptoms. The distribution of patients undergoing resection or exploration was comparable for the two groups [major: 61 (81.5%)/14 (18.5%); minor: 77 (81.9%)/17 (18.1%)]. Despite comparable demographic and histopathologic characteristics with equal hospital mortality and morbidity (14.6% vs. 8.5%/49.3% vs. 40.4%), the median survival rates in two groups were 4 and 6 months, respectively ( p < 0.05). This was not influenced by the type of operation. QoL was not different in patients with major or minor symptoms before operation or 3 months thereafter. However, preoperative symptoms such as nausea/vomiting and melena were rated significantly higher in patients with major symptoms. In patients with incurable gastric cancer the preoperative intensity of symptoms has a significant impact on survival and QoL, which is not influenced by the operation. The necessity of surgery in patients with minor symptoms requires careful consideration.

Palliation of anastomotic obstructions in recurrent gastric carcinoma with the use of covered metallic stents: clinical results in 25 patients

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to investigate the technical feasibility and the clinical effectiveness of the placement of covered self-expandable metallic stents for the treatment of anastomotic obstructions in recurrent gastric carcinoma.

METHODS

With fluoroscopic guidance, covered stents were placed in 25 patients with recurrent gastric carcinoma for the palliation of obstructions at anastomotic sites (14 gastrojejunostomy, 11 esophagojejunostomy). All patients had severe nausea and recurrent vomiting before the stent placement.

RESULTS

Stent placement was technically successful in 24 patients (96%). After stent placement, symptoms improved in all 24 patients. During the follow-up of 2 to 65 weeks (mean, 13.7 weeks), stent migration occurred in 1 patient 16 days after the procedure. He needed percutaneous catheter drainage because of an abscess, which was followed by esophagojejunostomy site rupture during a second stent trial. Stricture recurred in 4 patients because of tumor overgrowth 10 to 55 weeks after the procedure; all patients underwent coaxial placement of a second stent and had good oral intake.

CONCLUSIONS

The placement of covered expandable metallic stents seems to be both technically feasible and an effective means for the palliation of anastomotic obstructions in recurrent gastric carcinoma. This procedure can be considered to be the primary choice for the palliation in those patients.