Relationship between breast cancer and colorectal adenomatous polyps. A case-control study

Colorectal Cancer after Breast Cancer: Magnitude of Risk in Clinical Practice and in the Literature

Aims and background

The aim of our study was to estimate the incidence of second primary tumors among breast cancer patients from the Division of Oncology of Andosilla Hospital (Viterbo, Italy). In particular, we studied the relationship between breast and colorectal cancer.

Methods and Study Design

Eligible women were those with primary invasive breast cancer who had been treated and/or followed up at our division. We compared our data with those reported in the literature.

Results

Of 114 women with breast cancer, 21 (18.5%) developed multiple primary cancers, with colorectal cancer accounting for a quarter. We found a higher incidence of colorectal cancer than reported in the literature (5% vs 0.66–1%). At the moment we are not able to explain this difference.

Conclusions

Quite a few studies reported a link between breast and colorectal cancer, but the magnitude of the risk (standardized incidence ratio 1.3–2) does not justify a screening program for colorectal disease in breast cancer patients. However, considering that the risk is small but not negligible – along with the high incidence of colorectal adenomas described in breast cancer patients and the possible existence of common risk factors – we invite clinicians not to neglect the possibility of a colorectal cancer diagnosis in women who have had breast cancer.

The identification of specific methylation patterns across different cancers

Abnormal DNA methylation is known as playing an important role in the tumorgenesis. It is helpful for distinguishing the specificity of diagnosis and therapeutic targets for cancers based on characteristics of DNA methylation patterns across cancers. High throughput DNA methylation analysis provides the possibility to comprehensively filter the epigenetics diversity across various cancers. We integrated whole-genome methylation data detected in 798 samples from seven cancers. The hierarchical clustering revealed the existence of cancer-specific methylation pattern. Then we identified 331 differentially methylated genes across these cancers, most of which (266) were specifically differential methylation in unique cancer. A DNA methylation correlation network (DMCN) was built based on the methylation correlation between these genes. It was shown the hubs in the DMCN were inclined to cancer-specific genes in seven cancers. Further survival analysis using the part of genes in the DMCN revealed high-risk group and low-risk group were distinguished by seven biomarkers (PCDHB15, WBSCR17, IGF1, GYPC, CYGB, ACTG2, and PRRT1) in breast cancer and eight biomarkers (ZBTB32, OR51B4, CCL8, TMEFF2, SALL3, GPSM1, MAGEA8, and SALL1) in colon cancer, respectively. At last, a protein-protein interaction network was introduced to verify the biological function of differentially methylated genes. It was shown that MAP3K14, PTN, ACVR1 and HCK sharing different DNA methylation and gene expression across cancers were relatively high degree distribution in PPI network. The study suggested that not only the identified cancer-specific genes provided reference for individual treatment but also the relationship across cancers could be explained by differential DNA methylation.

Occurrence of cancer at multiple sites: towards distinguishing multigenesis from metastasis

Background

Occurrence of tumors at multiple sites is a hallmark of malignant cancers and contributes to the high mortality of cancers. The formation of multi-site cancers (MSCs) has conventionally been regarded as a result of hematogenous metastasis. However, some MSCs may appear as unusual in the sense of vascular dissemination pattern and therefore be explained by alternative metastasis models or even by non-metastatic independent formation mechanisms.

Results

Through literature review and incorporation of recent advance in understanding aging and development, we identified two alternative mechanisms for the independent formation of MSCs: 1) formation of separate tumors from cancer-initiating cells (CICs) mutated at an early stage of development and then diverging as to their physical locations upon further development, 2) formation of separate tumors from different CICs that contain mutations in some convergent ways. Either of these processes does not require long-distance migration and/or vascular dissemination of cancer cells from a primary site to a secondary site. Thus, we classify the formation of these MSCs from indigenous CICs (iCICs) into a new mechanistic category of tumor formation – multigenesis.

Conclusion

A multigenesis view on multi-site cancer (MSCs) may offer explanations for some "unusual metastasis" and has important implications for designing expanded strategies for the diagnosis and treatment of cancers.

Reviewers

This article was reviewed by Carlo C. Maley nominated by Laura F. Landweber and Razvan T. Radulescu nominated by David R. Kaplan. For the full reviews, please go to the Reviewers' comments section.

Herbicide/pesticide effects on intestinal epithelial growth

The purpose of the present study was to examine the effects of some common herbicides and pesticides on the growth of normal intestinal and colonic epithelial cells. Preconfluent cultures of normal rat intestinal cells (IEC-6 cell line) and normal human colonic epithelial cells were treated with 0.05-50 microM doses of atrazine, diazinon, and endosulfan. After 3 days of treatment, the change in cell proliferation was quantified by cell counting or the MTT growth assay. Both intestinal and colonic epithelial cell cultures had increases in cell growth when treated with as little as 1.0 microM atrazine, diazinon, or endosulfan. The observed changes in both cultured intestinal and colonic cell growth rates were not due to the influence of the vehicle control dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO). That is, the treatment of the cell cultures with concentrations of DMSO as high as 0.5% for 3 days resulted in no change in cell growth compared with untreated control cultures. A consistent observation with all three of the compounds was that the highest doses (50 microM) had the least "proliferative potential" in stimulating either IEC-6 cell or human colonic epithelial cell growth. Within the concentration range used, none of the herbicides or pesticides caused a decrease in cell proliferation below that of the untreated control cultures. Overall, treatment of IEC-6 cell cultures with atrazine, diazinon, or endosulfan produced a biphasic growth response, whereas the same treatment in the human colonic epithelial cell cultures produced a more sustained level of growth over the same period. This culture system may provide the basis for an in vitro model to further study the cellular and molecular basis of the effects of herbicides and pesticides on intestinal epithelial proliferation.

Increased incidence of cancer in first degree relatives of women with double primary carcinomas of the breast and colon

Breast and colon cancer are among the most common cancers in the developed world. Several epidemiological studies suggest that the occurrence of one of these two cancers in a woman may predispose to the development of the other. The occurrence of both forms of cancer in the same woman may be because of chance or common susceptibility. In order to determine how frequently double primary cancers have a hereditary basis, we conducted a registry based study at a single Montreal hospital. Cancer rates in first degree relatives of patients with multiple primaries were compared with provincial age standardised incidence rates and relative risks (RRs) were estimated. In first degree relatives under 45 there was a total of 15 cancers observed, compared with 3.70 expected, giving an RR of 4.05 (95% CI: 2.27-6.68). The RR for colon cancer was significantly increased among male relatives. For relatives less than 45 years old at diagnosis, the RR for colon cancer was 66.7 (95% CI: 13.8-195) (three cases observed, 0.045 expected). For all ages the RR was 5.02 (95% CI: 2.04-10.5). The RR for breast cancer was 5.92 (95% CI: 1.91-13.8) for female relatives under 45 (five cases observed, 0.845 expected) and 2.14 (95% CI: 1.07-3.83) for breast cancer at any age. These results suggest that there may be genes that predispose to both breast and colon cancer in certain people.

Reproductive risk factors for colorectal adenomatous polyps (New York City, NY, United States)

Events of reproductive life, such as parity and age at menarche, have been found in some but not all studies to be associated with risk for colorectal cancer in females. Because adenomatous polyps (adenomas) are precursors of colorectal cancer, we investigated whether reproductive variables were associated with colorectal adenomas. We conducted a case-control study among patients examined in three colonoscopy practices in New York City (NY, United States) from 1986 to 1988. Adenoma cases (n = 128) were defined as women who had an adenoma detected at the index colonoscopy with no history of inflammatory bowel disease, adenomas, or cancer. Controls (n = 283) were women with a normal index colonoscopy and no history of inflammatory bowel disease, adenomas, or cancer. The adjusted odds ratio (OR) for the association of early menarche (age less than 13 years) with adenomas was 0.6 (95 percent confidence interval = 0.4-0.9). Parity, history of spontaneous or induced abortion, infertility, type of menopause, age at menopause, use of oral contraceptives, and use of menopausal hormone replacement therapy were not associated statistically significantly with adenoma risk, although some possible trends were observed. Our findings do not implicate reproductive events, nulliparity, or overexposure to estrogens or to menstrual cycles as mechanisms of increased risk for colorectal neoplasia.

Diet and adenomatous polyp risk

Studies of risk factors for colonic adenomatous polyps have been reported in greater numbers in 1993 than in all previous years combined. This explosion in interest in polyps has not arisen because polyps themselves cause serious illness. They are in the vast majority of cases asymptomatic. However, adenomas have become the surrogate for colon cancer in a number of phase III dietary intervention trials. These trials were undertaken at a time when very little was known of adenoma risk factors. Data accumulated in the past 18 months in general demonstrate a similarity in risk factors for cancer and polyp. Since it has also been recently established that polypectomy diminishes colon cancer risk, the adenomatous polyp has been established as an ethical and convenient surrogate for cancer of the colon. Prevention of colorectal cancer is the goal of all the above studies, and it is hoped that the dietary intervention trials currently under way will generate the data that will make prevention possible.