Risk factors for failure of immediate breast reconstruction with prosthesis after total mastectomy for breast cancer

Effects of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy on Autologous and Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Literature

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is a standard modality of treatment for breast cancer. The exposure of patients to drugs that effect the cells and processes involved in healing prior to reconstructive surgical procedures is a source of concern for reconstructive surgeons. The reported effects of NAC on autologous and tissue expander to implant-based breast reconstruction vary from study to study and have not been comprehensively reviewed on a large scale. There is also significant variation from study to study regarding which outcomes are evaluated. The primary aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to evaluate the effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) on common and significant outcomes including total complication, reconstruction loss, and SSI (Surgical Site Infection) rates in breast reconstruction. The second aim of this study is to evaluate whether NAC has differing effects on implant-based reconstruction compared with autologous flap reconstruction. A systematic review of the literature published from 1991 to 2019 in the PubMed and Scopus library database was performed to identify studies reporting outcomes of breast reconstruction in patients receiving NAC. A meta-analysis was then performed. Primary outcomes reviewed included overall complication rates, SSI rates, and total loss of reconstruction (flap necrosis or premature tissue expander or implant removal). Outcomes were analyzed using a random effects model and chi-square statistical test. Our literature search yielded 22 manuscripts with a total of 3680 patients that fit our inclusion criteria, of which 12 reported on reconstruction loss, 14 reported on SSI rates, and 10 reported on overall complication rates. There was no significant difference in overall breast reconstruction loss rate (OR 1.30, P = .35), complication rate (OR 1.21, P = .06), and rate of SSI (OR 1.28, P = .85) between NAC vs. non-NAC groups. In patients undergoing autologous flap reconstruction there were no significant differences in complication (23.4% vs. 17.7%, P = 0.076), loss of reconstruction (3.1% vs. 4.4%, P = .393), or SSI (5.3% vs. 3.4%, P = .108) rates in patients who were treated with NAC compared to those who were not. Likewise, in patients undergoing TE/implant-based reconstruction there were no significant differences in complication (19.6 vs. 24.2 P = .069), loss of reconstruction (17.4% vs. 13.3%, P = .072), or SSI (7.9% vs. 5.1%, P = .073) rates in patients who were treated with NAC compared to those who were not. NAC was not associated with any significant differences in overall complication, reconstruction loss, or SSI rates in patients receiving implant-based or autologous flap breast reconstruction. Additionally, the lack of effect of NAC on overall complication, reconstruction loss or SSI rates did not differ with or depend on the type of reconstruction.

Factors Associated with Reconstruction in Patients Undergoing Mastectomy

Postmastectomy reconstruction has been shown to be oncologically safe, but few studies have investigated factors influencing the type of reconstruction chosen, if at all. Records of female patients with stages 0 to 3 breast cancer undergoing mastectomy at a large academic institution between January 2010 and March 2018 were reviewed. Nine hundred sixty patients were included in this cohort; 784 patients had reconstruction. Younger age, earlier disease stage, private insurance, no history of diabetes, and bilateral mastectomy (BM) were associated with reconstruction. On multivariate analysis, younger age, BM, private insurance, and earlier disease stage predicted reconstruction. Of reconstruction patients, 453 had implants. Race, BMI, and later disease stage influenced the type of reconstruction; on multivariate analysis, higher BMI and later disease stage predicted flap reconstruction. Younger age, BM, private insurance, and earlier disease stage were associated with reconstruction, but the type of reconstruction was affected primarily by BMI and disease stage.

Does Long-Term Exposure to Gel-Filled Silicone Implants Increase the Risk of Relapse after Breast Cancer?

Background

An increased risk of cancer and autoimmune diseases associated with gel-filled silicone implants, debated by FDA experts since 1991, has given rise to a profusion of literature on the subject. However, such effects have not been adequately investigated in patients with breast cancer. In a previous report we compared 146 breast cancer patients with gel-filled silicone implants for breast reconstruction to 146 control patients in whom no reconstruction had been performed. The observed results were reassuring, as the evolution of the disease after 10 years was better in the reconstruction group than in the control group. We now report the end results of this study with a median follow-up of 13 years after the breast reconstruction (range, 10-20 years).

Method

The relative risks of detrimental events were estimated with Cox's Proportional Hazards Model, with stratification according to age at diagnosis.

Results

The risks of locoregional recurrences and distant metastasis were significantly lower in the BR group than in the control group. The risks of death, of a second breast cancer and of a second primary cancer at a site other than the breast were not significantly different between the two groups of patients.

Conclusion

Long-term follow-up of patients exposed to gel-filled silicone implants confirms the absence of detrimental effects after breast cancer. The power of our study is, however, below that required to detect a very slight increase in the risks studied.

Patient determinants as independent risk factors for postoperative complications of breast reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Breast reconstruction is an essential component in the treatment of breast cancer. Postoperative complications after breast reconstruction are common and affect patient satisfaction. Determining independent risk factors using patient characteristics could be advantageous for patient assessment and counseling.

METHODS

We retrospectively enrolled 623 consecutive patients who underwent reconstruction with a deep inferior epigastric perforator flap (DIEP), latissimus dorsi flap (LD), lateral thoracodorsal flap (LTDF), or tissue expander with a secondary implant (EXP) in this study. Information on demographic and perioperative factors was collected, as well as information on all postoperative complications. Logistic regression was used to analyze associations between possible patient-related risk factors and postoperative complications.

RESULTS

Smoking was associated with the highest number of early overall complications [odds ratio (OR) 2.05, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.25-3.37, P=0.0005], followed by body mass index (BMI) (OR 1.07, 95% CI 1.01-1.13, P=0.017). High BMI was associated with the highest number of late overall postoperative complications (OR 1.06, 95% CI 1.00-1.11, P=0.042), followed by history of radiotherapy (OR 1.66, 95% CI 1.01-2.74, P=0.046). When the risk factors were combined, the risk for postoperative complications rose exponentially.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results provide evidence that patients should cease smoking and overweight patients should lose weight before undergoing breast reconstruction. Additionally, if the patient has received radiotherapy, the reconstruction method should be carefully chosen. High BMI, history of radiotherapy, and smoking are independent risk factors for many types of both early and late postoperative complications in breast reconstructive surgery. Combining these risk factors multiplies the risk of postoperative complications.

Blood loss and duration of surgery are independent risk factors for complications after breast reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Complications after breast reconstructive surgery are common, and they can be caused by a wide range of factors. The aim of the present study was to identify independent perioperative risk factors for postoperative complications after breast reconstruction.

METHODS

A retrospective study was performed of 623 consecutive breast cancer patients who had undergone deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap, latissimus dorsi (LD) flap, lateral thoracodorsal flap (LTDF), or tissue expander with secondary implant (EXP). Data on demography, perioperative parameters, and complications were collected. Logistic regression models adjusted to the reconstruction method and to confounding demographic factors were used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

Increased blood loss for each 10-ml step increased the risk for overall early complications (p = 0.017), early seroma (p = 0.037), early resurgery (p = 0.010), late local overall complications (p = 0.024), and late fat necrosis (p = 0.031). Longer duration of surgery for each 10-minute step increased the risk of overall early complications (p = 0.019), but, in the univariate model, there was an increased risk for nine different types of complications (p = 0.004-0.029). There was no association between the experience of the surgeon performing the procedure and the frequency of complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Duration of surgery and blood loss during surgery are independent risk factors for postoperative complications, and should be minimised. Further research is needed to establish the association between the experience of the surgeon and the occurrence of complications.

A retrospective review of the incidence of various complications in different delayed breast reconstruction methods

BACKGROUND

Breast reconstruction is a common standard procedure in many centres after breast cancer surgery. The aim of the present study was to investigate and compare the incidence of various complications in different reconstruction methods.

METHOD

Six hundred and eighty-five patients were retrospectively classified into five groups: (1) Deep inferior epigastric perforator flap (DIEP), (2) latissimus dorsi flap (LD), (3) lateral thoracodorsal flap (LTDF), (4) expander with secondary implant (EXP), and (5) direct implant (DI). Demographic and perioperative data, the incidence of complications, and follow-up data were collected.

RESULTS

There was a significant difference between groups regarding overall early complications (p < 0.001). The DIEP group had the highest incidence of overall complications (50.0%) (p < 0.05). DIEP also had the highest incidence of fat necrosis (18.3%), skin necrosis (22.1%), and incidence of reoperation for complications (26.9%) compared to the other reconstruction methods. In the entire group of patients, the overall incidence of late complications (occurring >30 days after surgery) that needed surgical corrections was 54.7%. The incidence of late complications was 46.2% for DIEP, 66.4% for LD, 74.8% for LTDF, 44.9% for EXP, and 62.9% for DI. The DIEP group had higher incidences of late local complications (fat necrosis, skin necrosis, haematoma, seroma, and wound rupture combined), and scars requiring treatment than the other reconstruction methods.

CONCLUSION

Meticulous registration of incidence of different complications in five different breast reconstruction methods revealed high complication rates with all methods. The differences in incidence of complications were related to the operation method used. Based on these results, careful individual planning of a breast reconstruction is mandatory.

A systematic review of complications of implant-based breast reconstruction with prereconstruction and postreconstruction radiotherapy

PURPOSE

To conduct a systematic review of the literature to assess outcomes data on complications associated with implant-based breast reconstruction performed before or after chest wall radiation to assist in guiding the decision-making process for reconstruction of the irradiated breast.

METHODS

Studies from a PubMed search that met predetermined inclusion criteria were identified and included. Complications of interest were low- and high-grade capsular contractures, minor and major complications, reconstruction failure rates, and reconstruction completion rates. Pooled complication rates were calculated.

RESULTS

A total of 26 articles were included in the study after screening 1,006 publications, with 14 studies presenting data on prereconstruction radiation and 23 studies presenting data on postreconstruction radiation. Complication rates evaluated in patients exposed to radiation before or after implant reconstruction were not significantly different. Reconstruction failure rates were similar at 19 and 20 % for pre- and postreconstruction radiation patients, respectively. Completion rates were similar at 83 and 80 % for pre- and postreconstruction radiation patients, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Review of the current literature suggests similar overall success and failure rates with radiotherapy provided both before and after reconstruction. Failure rates in both groups of patients are clinically significant when considering implant reconstruction in the setting of radiation.

Update on breast reconstruction techniques and indications

Breast reconstruction is considered as part of the breast cancer treatment when a mastectomy is required. Implants or expanders are the most frequent techniques used for the reconstructions. Expander provides usually a better symmetry. A contralateral mastoplasty often is required to improve the symmetry. The nipple areola complex, which can be preserved in certain conditions, is usually removed and can be reconstructed in a second stage under local anesthesia. In case of radical mastectomy and/or radiotherapy, a musculocutaneous flap, such as rectus abdominis or latissimus dorsi autologous flaps, is required. When microsurgical facilities are available, free or perforator flaps respecting the muscle are preferred to decrease the donor site complications. In situ carcinomas or prophylactic mastectomy can be reconstructed immediately as well as invasive carcinoma according to the recent literature. Locally advanced breast cancer can be reconstructed after complete oncologic treatment. Radiotherapy of the thoracic wall is proposed in case of lymph node metastases, raising the discussion about the technique choice and the timing of the reconstruction. Plastic surgery procedures can improve the cosmetic results of the conservative surgery, also extending its indications and reducing both mastectomy and reexcision rates. Oncoplasty techniques are becoming more and more sophisticated, requiring the skill of trained plastic surgeons. Numerous publications confirm the psychosocial benefit resulting from the breast reconstruction.

Complications in immediate breast reconstruction after mastectomy

Objectives: Immediate post-mastectomy breast reconstruction (IBR) is a procedure that has proven advantages, but it also entails risks. The aim of this study was to identify risk factors for reconstruction failure.

Methods: A review was made of all the IBR carried out at a general hospital from 2002 to 2009. Retrospective information was obtained about postoperative complications and the characteristics of patients and treatments applied. The minimum follow-up period was 9 months. Cox's regression analysis was performed on the variables related to the reconstruction failure requiring the removal of the prosthesis, with an explanatory model in which all the study variables were introduced and a predictive model that contained only the variables known before the intervention.

Results: A total of 115 IRB interventions carried out on 112 women with breast cancer were analyzed. The mean follow-up period was 25.5 months. In sixty cases (52.2 percent), there were no complications; in sixteen cases (13.9 percent) minor complications appeared, and in 39 (33.9 percent) the complications were moderate. In twenty-six cases (22.6 percent), a reconstruction failure occurred. Cox's regression model revealed that the reconstruction failures were related to the patient's age (Hazard Ratio 1.08), to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (HR 6.24) and to postoperative tamoxifen (HR 3.10). The predictive model included the age of the patient (HR 1.05) and the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (HR 5.11).

Conclusions: A significant proportion of the patients receiving IBR developed reconstruction failure. Multivariate analysis identified three variables related to this complication, two of which were known before the intervention.

A review of the surgical management of breast cancer: plastic reconstructive techniques and timing implications

The oncologic management of breast cancer has evolved over the past several decades from radical mastectomy to modern-day preservation of chest and breast structures. The increased rate of mastectomies over recent years made breast reconstruction an integral part of the breast cancer management. Plastic surgery now offers patients a wide variety of reconstruction options from primary closure of the skin flaps to performance of microvascular and autologous tissue transplantation. Well-coordinated partnerships between surgical oncologists, plastic surgeons, and patients address concerns of tumor control, cosmesis, and patients' wishes. The gamut of breast reconstruction options is reviewed, particularly noting state-of-the-art techniques, as well as the advantages and disadvantages of various timing modalities.

Survival benefit with radiation therapy in node-positive breast carcinoma patients

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Postoperative radiation therapy (RT) has been the subject of discussion, especially in patients with one to three positive lymph nodes (< or = 3 pN+) in the axillary dissection. The authors investigated whether postoperative RT provides a survival benefit for pT1-2 pN+ breast cancer patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients included were selected from the SEER database (NCI--Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results, release 2000; n = 24,410) and the UZ Brussel database (1984-2002; n = 1,011) according to the following criteria: women aged 25-95, no previous cancer, unilateral pT1-pT2 breast tumors, total mastectomy (ME) or breast-conserving surgery (BCS), postoperative RT, and an axillary dissection showing at least one pathologic lymph node.

RESULTS

The overall survival (OS) of patients in the SEER and UZ Brussel databases who received postoperative RT was identical. However, patients in the SEER database who did not receive RT had a significantly worse outcome (p < 0.0001). After ME or BCS, all patients (SEER and UZ Brussel) who had > or = 4 pN+ and received RT had comparable outcomes after 15 years. The 15-year OS in the subgroup with ME and < or = 3 pN+ nodes was 57.0% and 46.6% (p = 0.0004) with RT (UZ Brussel) and without RT (SEER), respectively. For BCS and < or = 3 pN+, the same significant difference in OS at 15 years was seen: 63.8% after RT (UZ Brussel) and 60.4% without RT (SEER; p = 0.0029).

CONCLUSION

RT provides a survival benefit in patients with < or = 3 or > or = 4 pN+; the indication for postoperative RT should therefore be adapted in future consensus meetings.

Variation in physician-patient discussion of breast reconstruction

BACKGROUND

For women with early stage breast cancer, physician-patient discussion of breast reconstruction is an essential step in their participation in the decision-making process for their treatments. This study examines sociodemographic variation of physician-patient discussion of breast reconstruction and explores the impact of this discussion on the use of breast reconstruction.

METHODS

We used data from the Los Angeles Women's Study, a population-based study of women 50 years and older with breast cancer. Bivariate and multivariate logistic regression models were used to estimate the impact of patient and hospital characteristics on self-reported receipt of physician-patient discussion and use of breast reconstruction.

RESULTS

Of 315 post-mastectomy women, 81% and 27% reported physician-patient discussion and use of breast reconstruction, respectively. In multivariable analysis, women with an annual income <$20,000 were less likely to have physician-patient discussion than women with annual income > or =$40,000 (OR = 0.23, 95% CI 0.07-0.82). Among the subset of women with physician-patient discussion, chest wall radiation, a known characteristic associated with higher rates of reconstruction complications, became an additional significant negative predictor of reconstruction.

CONCLUSIONS

Lower income women are at risk of not receiving physician-patient discussion of breast reconstruction. Physician-patient discussion of breast reconstruction appears to decrease the use of breast reconstruction among women with clinical characteristics associated with higher rates of reconstruction complications and failure. This highlights the need for interventions to increase physician-patient discussion of breast reconstruction among lower income women.

Endoscopic latissimus dorsi flap harvesting

BACKGROUND

Immediate breast reconstruction using the latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous flap is a standard technique that allows for cosmetically acceptable results yet leaves a great scar on the donor site. To reduce the scars, we have been using a different surgical technique consisting of endoscopic harvesting of the latissimus dorsi pure muscular flap with a virtual cavity created by CO2 gas distention.

METHODS

Between May 1, 2001, and June 30, 2005, there were 52 patients who underwent latissimus dorsi endoscopic harvesting for an immediate breast reconstruction after a skin-sparing mastectomy.

RESULTS

The mean surgical endoscopic time was 64 minutes. There was one conversion to an open technique. We reported no deaths, but complications included 2 hematomas, 6 inflammatory syndromes, and 1 pulmonary embolism.

CONCLUSIONS

The endoscopic harvesting of the latissimus dorsi flap when performed with this mixed technique is feasible, reproducible, and permits a significant reduction of incision size and postoperative pain, with good aesthetic results.

A Prospective Assessment of Surgical Risk Factors in 400 Cases of Skin-Sparing Mastectomy and Immediate Breast Reconstruction with Implants to Establish Selection Criteria

BACKGROUND

Although attempts have been made to identify the risk factors leading to complications after combined skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate prosthetic breast reconstruction, hardly any criteria are available to preoperatively distinguish patients in whom such an eventful postoperative course may be expected. Therefore, the authors wanted to establish which factors increase the risk of surgical complications to such a level as to adjust their indications for immediate breast reconstruction after skin-sparing mastectomy.

METHODS

The authors prospectively studied the clinical relevance of six patient-related and nine procedure-related characteristics as potential risk factors for a complicated surgical outcome in 400 combined procedures in 309 patients by univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis. Risk factors that proved significantly correlated with loss of implant by both analyses were accepted as clinical selection criteria that distinguish potential candidates with an unacceptably high risk of such loss.

RESULTS

Mild complications occurred significantly more often in patients who were older than the mean age of 43 years and in breasts that were more than average sized or operated on by a fellow in oncologic surgery. Implants were lost significantly more often in patients who were obese or smoked and in breasts that were more than average sized.

CONCLUSIONS

The clinically relevant increase of risk of implant loss should lead to reluctance to perform combined skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate prosthetic breast reconstruction in obese patients who smoke (32 percent loss) and in those with more than average sized breasts (27 percent loss).

Breast reconstruction with alloplastic implants

This article reviews immediate and delayed breast reconstruction with prosthetic implants, and the effect of irradiation therapy. Despite widespread use of breast conserving surgery for early breast cancer, many breast cancer patients still undergo mastectomy. Some of these patients choose breast reconstruction. Over the last 30 years, techniques for breast reconstruction have evolved significantly with new alternative techniques and improved surgical devises. Immediate or delayed breast reconstruction with silicone prosthesis can be an excellent option. Implant reconstruction may be single or two stage procedures. Traditionally, small breasts with minimal ptosis are suited for single-stage reconstruction. Large breasts or inadequate skin require expanders followed by implants. Minimal excision mastectomy and biological spacers are allowing larger breast single stage reconstruction and improved aesthetics for two stage procedures. With recent studies suggesting survival advantage of post-mastectomy irradiation, many candidates for breast reconstruction are receiving radiotherapy, which complicates healing after breast reconstruction.

Complications analysis of 266 immediate breast reconstructions

The purpose of this study was to describe the complications of immediate breast reconstruction, to compare their rates with respect to the surgical procedure and to patient's characteristics, in order to improve surgical indications and patient information. We carried out a retrospective study of 266 immediate breast reconstructions (249 women) over a 12-year period (latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap with implant 61%, autologous latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap 15%, subpectoral implant 24%). Mean age was 48 and the median follow-up was seven years (2-14). The overall complication rate was 49% (128), and there were 10 reconstruction failures. The most frequent complications were dorsal seroma 26% (70), capsular contracture 10% (27), skin necrosis 8.3% (22), and haematoma 5.6% (15). The complication rate for immediate breast reconstruction with implant alone (39%) was lower than that associated with latissimus dorsi with or without implant (51%), but the difference was not significant (Chi-square: p=0.07). The risk factors for complications were smoking (skin necrosis, Fisher: p=0.02), obesity (infection, Fisher: p=0.004), and radiotherapy (capsular contracture, Chi-square: p=2.6 x 10(-5)). Smoking was found as the only risk factor of reconstruction failure (Fisher: p=0.015). Capsular contractures were more frequent when implants were used alone (25%) as well as when used along with a flap (6.8%) (Chi-square: p=2 x 10(-5)). Infections were also higher in the non-flap group than in the flap group (Fisher: p=0.02). In our opinion, latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap with or without an implant is a good compromise between complication risk and necessity of good cosmetic result requirement. These results have led us to delay or contraindicate reconstruction in the case of obesity or heavy smoking. In the case of probable post-operative radiotherapy, we prefer to delay the breast reconstruction.

New trends in breast cancer management: is the era of immediate breast reconstruction changing?

OBJECTIVE

Review of available literature on the topic of breast reconstruction and radiation is presented. Factors influencing the decision-making process in breast reconstruction are analyzed. New trends of immediate breast reconstruction are presented.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

New indications for postmastectomy radiation have caused a dramatic increase in the number of radiated patients presenting for breast reconstruction. The major studies and their impact on breast cancer management practice are analyzed. Unsatisfactory results of conventional immediate reconstruction techniques followed by radiotherapy led to a new treatment algorithm for these patients. If the need for postoperative radiation therapy is known, a delayed reconstruction should be considered. When an immediate reconstruction is still desired despite the certainty of postoperative radiotherapy, reconstructive options should be based on tissue characteristics and blood supply. Autologous tissue reconstruction options should be given a priority in an order reflecting superiority of vascularity and resistance to radiation: latissimus dorsi flap, free TRAM or pedicled TRAM without any contralateral components of tissue, pedicled TRAM/midabdominal TRAM, and perforator flap.

CONCLUSIONS

When the indications for postoperative radiotherapy are unknown, premastectomy sentinel node biopsy, delayed-immediate reconstruction, or delayed reconstruction is preferable.

Skin-Sparing Mastectomy and Immediate Breast Reconstruction by Use of Implants: An Assessment of Risk Factors for Complications and Cancer Control in 120 Patients

BACKGROUND

Combined skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate reconstruction by use of an implant is increasingly accepted as a therapy for patients with breast cancer or a hereditary risk of breast cancer. Because little and contradictory evidence regarding possible risk factors for postoperative complications is available, the authors retrospectively assessed 13 such factors. They also evaluated the oncological safety of the procedure.

METHODS

From July of 1996 through June of 2000, 174 skin-sparing mastectomies were combined with immediate breast reconstruction in 120 patients. The authors assessed the influence of five patient-related and eight breast-related characteristics on the incidence of a complicated postoperative course by univariate and multivariate analyses. Oncological safety was evaluated by observed recurrent disease and 5-year survival.

RESULTS

Severe complications were observed in 17 patients of the 120 patients (14 percent), or 19 of the 174 breasts (11 percent). The patient-related characteristics of age and being operated on unilaterally significantly increased the risk of complications. Resident plastic surgeons and previous breast-conserving therapy including radiotherapy significantly increased the risk of implant loss. The local relapse rate among patients operated on for cancer was 0.02. The actuarial 5-year survival rate among patients who underwent curative mastectomies was 0.96.

CONCLUSIONS

Combined skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate reconstruction by use of an implant is oncologically safe, but the risk of postoperative complications cannot be neglected. The authors' observations may offer guidance for adapting indication and treatment strategies for patients with breast cancer or increased hereditary risk of such cancer.

Envelope mastectomy and immediate reconstruction (EMIR), improving outcome without oncological compromise

AIM

To determine the long term oncological safety and aesthetic acceptability of envelope mastectomy and immediate reconstruction (EMIR).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective review of 71 cases was carried out. Oncological assessment was by clinical examination, mammography, ultrasound, and, where indicated, MRI scan. Aesthetic assessment was based on detailed clinical examination as well as subjective self-assessment of the outcome.

RESULTS

During follow-up (mean 48 months), there were three local recurrences, only one involving the nipple-areolar complex. The mean aesthetic score was 0.75 (out of 1), representing a good aesthetic outcome and patient satisfaction.

CONCLUSION

Nipple-areolar complex preservation is a safe option and EMIR produced a good aesthetic outcome, which is oncologically safe. Furthermore, it does not preclude post-operative radiotherapy.

Oncological aspects of breast reconstruction

Breast reconstruction has become increasingly popular over the past 20 years. There is concern that it may mask locoregional recurrence or that immediate reconstruction may compromise adjuvant treatments. We review available evidence regarding its oncological safety. The literature consists almost entirely of single institution, small retrospective reviews with variable follow-up and varying conclusions. Most reviews suggest that breast reconstruction does not adversely affect disease-free or overall survival and that there is no significant delay in presentation with recurrent disease. Three retrospective series compared chemotherapy delivery after immediate breast reconstruction with controls having mastectomy alone. No delay in chemotherapy delivery or effect on dose intensity was demonstrated. Irradiation of a prosthetic implant has been shown to increase the rate of capsular contracture; irradiation of autogenous tissue reconstruction is usually well tolerated.

Immediate Reconstruction After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: Effect on Adjuvant Treatment Starting and Survival

BACKGROUND

For patients treated with initial surgery, the safety of immediate breast reconstruction after mastectomy has been demonstrated. Some concerns exist after neoadjuvant chemotherapy because this sequence is proposed for patients with large tumors and for whom adjuvant therapies are considered cornerstones of treatment. In this study, we sought to determine whether reconstruction after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and mastectomy for large operable breast cancer affects the interval between surgery and adjuvant treatment and affects survival.

METHODS

A single-institution retrospective analysis was performed by using the database of the Institut Gustave-Roussy.

RESULTS

Forty-eight patients who had undergone mastectomy and immediate reconstruction (implant, 60%) followed by adjuvant chemotherapy were identified. They were compared with 181 patients who underwent mastectomy without reconstruction and with 32 patients who underwent mastectomy followed by delayed reconstruction (implant, 19%). No difference was found concerning the interval between surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy: 26 vs. 23 days for patients with immediate breast reconstruction and for patients treated with modified radical mastectomy followed or not by delayed reconstruction, respectively (P = .11). No difference was found concerning the onset of radiotherapy: 87 vs. 81 days (P = .22). Survival was not different in patients treated with immediate reconstruction compared with those with mastectomy alone.

CONCLUSIONS

Immediate breast reconstruction does not delay the starting of adjuvant therapy and has no significant effect on local relapse-free or distant disease-free survival. Additional data are needed concerning the use of flap for this indication.

Radiotherapy for breast cancer in patients undergoing breast reconstruction or augmentation

Due to increasing indications for postmastectomy radiotherapy and a growing demand for breast reconstruction or augmentation, increasing numbers of patients are currently being exposed to both these treatments. In view of the wide range of available techniques for breast reconstruction, either prosthetic or autologous, and their various sequencing in relation to radiotherapy, physicians can be faced with numerous clinical situations requiring comprehensive knowledge of the topic. This review discusses physical, radiobiological and clinical aspects of combining breast reconstruction and radiotherapy. The available data indicate the feasibility of such combinations, although at the expense of increased risk of complications and less satisfactory cosmesis. Of the two methods of breast reconstruction: using autologous tissue or prosthesis, the former seems to provide better cosmesis and a lower risk of complications in conjunction with radiotherapy. To minimize the risk of unfavourable outcome, the techniques and timing of both breast reconstruction and radiotherapy should be given meticulous attention.

Reconstructions mammaires après mastectomie pour cancer du sein : quelles indications retenir ?

Post-mastectomy breast reconstruction represents a surgical option that may improve psychosocial outcome without modifying patients' survival. Psychosocial impact of used surgical technique and moment of realization of breast reconstruction remains unclear. However, complications are negatively related to patients' satisfaction. There is no guideline for BR indications. Therefore, a review of clinical and cosmetic outcomes of different breast reconstruction modalities was necessary. It permitted to propose a shared decision-making algorithm for the choice of moment and technique of BR according to the presence of radiotherapy that appears to be the main risk factor of clinical outcome of breast reconstruction. It also disclosed some limits in information reliability about clinical outcome of particular associations of breast reconstruction and radiotherapy. Proportion of women pursuing breast reconstruction, and particularly immediate breast reconstruction, is rising. Clinical surveys assessing relation between radiotherapy and clinical and psychosocial outcome of breast reconstruction are urgently expected.

Improving Recipient Vessel Exposure During Microvascular Breast Reconstruction

Microvascular tissue transfer has become the gold standard for breast reconstruction. The primary drawback to these procedures is the technical expertise required for microsurgical anastomosis. This problem is compounded by the difficulties in the exposure of recipient vessels deep within the axilla. Previous techniques used for exposure of these vessels are difficult to setup, provide less than optimal exposure, and have been associated with brachial plexus injuries. The authors retrospectively review their experience using the pediatric OMNI retractor for exposure of recipient vessels during microvascular breast reconstruction. Patient demographics, flap choice, recipient vessels, the incidence of neuropraxia/brachial plexopathy, and microvascular complications were analyzed. Patients in whom more traditional methods of vessel exposure were used (ie, Gelpi retractors, arm positioning, fish hooks; 517 reconstructions in 392 patients) were compared with patients in whom vessel exposure was performed using the pediatric OMNI retractor (699 reconstructions in 571 patients). No differences were noted in comorbid conditions or the incidence of microvascular complications. However, the use of the pediatric OMNI was associated with a significant reduction in operative time in unilateral reconstructions (6:23 +/- 0.05 h vs 7:48 +/- 0.05 h; P <0.01) and decreased incidence of brachial plexus injury (0.17% vs 3.3%; P <0.01). The authors think the decreased neuropraxia rate is the result of better exposure afforded by the pediatric OMNI retractor, which improves exposure and eliminates the need for excessive arm abduction or awkward positioning during the dissection and anastomosis of axillary recipient vessels.

Mastectomy by inverted drip incision and immediate reconstruction: data from 510 cases

BACKGROUND

Immediate reconstruction of the breast can be performed in selected cases after mastectomy for breast cancer or after prophylactic mastectomy in patients with a high risk of developing breast cancer. Despite the frequency with which these procedures are performed, data from large series of subpectoral implantation of silicone prostheses in combination with a skin-saving approach are lacking.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, data on complications and late surgical interventions in 356 patients who underwent 510 mastectomies with an inverted drip incision and immediate reconstruction (MIDIIR) were analyzed to determine potential prognostic factors of early complications.

RESULTS

In 82% of the MIDIIRs, the postoperative course was uneventful. In 18%, the complications were infection (32 cases), necrosis of the skin flap (29 cases), bleeding (31 cases), and protrusion of the prosthesis (20 cases), resulting in surgery in 9, 12, 15, and 20 cases, respectively. At the end of the follow-up period, 30 (6%) prostheses were definitively removed. Age, size of the prostheses, radiotherapy, previous lumpectomy, and indication for mastectomy were not significant factors for the prognosis of early complications.

CONCLUSIONS

With the right technique and indications, MIDIIR is a very safe procedure and should be one of the surgical treatments that can be offered in the overall management of patients with, or at high risk for, breast cancer.

Breast reconstructive techniques in cancer patients: which ones, when to apply, which immediate and long term risks?

Breast reconstruction is considered as part of the breast cancer treatment when a mastectomy is required. The techniques available today, allow reconstruction of the breast even in almost all the cases even in poor local conditions. In 60-70% of the cases, the reconstruction can be performed with an implant inserted behind the pectoralis muscle. Special implants called expanders, are inflatable progressively in the postoperative course thanks to a reservoir located subcutaneously. They provide a progressive distention of the teguments and a more natural shape after substitution of the expander with a definitive implant. The symmetry is usually obtained thanks to a contralateral plastic surgery, which allows at the same time histological check up of the glandular tissue of the opposite breast. The nipple areolar complex is usually reconstructed in a second stage under local anesthesia, using local flaps for the nipple and a tattoo for the colour of the areola. In 30% of the cases, especially after radiotherapy when a salvage mastectomy is required, a flap reconstruction is preferred. The autologous tissue reconstruction with the rectus myocutaneous flap gives excellent cosmetic results and the most natural shape for the breast. But it is a more demanding technique requiring a good experience. In some occasions, the reconstruction with the latissimus flap can also be autologous but usually requires the addition of prosthesis. In most cases, the reconstruction can be performed immediately. The delayed reconstruction is usually preferred when the adjuvant chemotherapy should be delivered as soon as possible after the mastectomy. Complications of the reconstruction such as local necrosis or infections, leading to implant removal or revision of the flap could be detrimental to the patient in delaying the start of the chemotherapy. It is not recommended to reconstruct the breast immediately in case of locally advanced breast cancer. Partial breast reconstruction using plastic surgery procedures can also be performed in case of quadrantectomy in order to obtain a better cosmetic result. Local glandular flaps, as well as specific incisions according to the location of the tumor in the breast allow the reshaping of the breast even in case of large resection and, therefore, provide an opportunity to increase the number of conservative treatment indications, especially in case of in-situ carcinomas.

Immediate breast reconstruction after mastectomy for cancer

BACKGROUND

Immediate breast reconstruction after mastectomy has increased over the past decade following the unequivocal demonstration of its oncological safety and the availability of reliable methods of reconstruction. Broadly, it is undertaken in the treatment of breast cancer, after prophylactic mastectomy in high-risk patients, and in the management of treatment failure after breast-conserving surgery and radiotherapy. Immediate breast reconstruction can be achieved reliably with a variety of autogenous tissue techniques or prosthetic devices. Careful discussion and evaluation remain vital in choosing the correct technique for the individual patient.

METHODS

This review is based primarily on an English language Medline search with secondary references obtained from key articles.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

Immediate breast reconstruction is a safe and acceptable procedure after mastectomy for cancer; there is no evidence that it has untoward oncological consequences. In the appropriate patient it can be achieved effectively with either prosthetic or autogenous tissue reconstruction. Patient selection is important in order to optimize results, minimize complications and improve quality of life, while simultaneously treating the malignancy. Close cooperation and collaboration between the oncological breast and reconstructive surgeons is desirable in order to achieve these objectives.

Staged breast reconstruction with saline-filled implants in the irradiated breast: recent trends and therapeutic implications

A retrospective review was performed of one surgeon's experience with 40 consecutive patients who had undergone two-stage saline-filled implant breast reconstruction and radiation during the period from 1990 through 1997. A randomly selected group of 40 other two-stage saline-filled implant breast reconstructions from the same surgeon and time period served as controls. This review was undertaken because of the absence of specific information on the outcome of staged saline implant reconstructions in the radiated breast. Previously published reports on silicone gel implants and radiation have been contradictory. At the same time, the criteria for the use of radiation in the treatment of breast cancer have been expanded and the numbers of reconstruction patients who have been radiated are increasing dramatically. For example, in a 1985 report on immediate breast reconstruction, only 1 of 185 patients over a 6-year period underwent adjuvant radiation therapy, whereas in this review, there were 40 radiated breasts with saline-filled implants, 19 of which received adjuvant radiation therapy during their expansion. The study parameters included patient age, breast cup size, implant size, length of follow-up, number of procedures, coincident flap operations, Baker classification, complications, opposite breast procedures, pathologic stage, indications for and details about the radiation, and outcomes. The use of radiation in this review of reconstructed breasts can logically be divided into four groups: previous lumpectomy and radiation (n = 7), mastectomy and radiation before reconstruction (n = 9), mastectomy and adjuvant radiation during reconstruction/expansion (n = 19), and radiation after reconstruction (n = 5). The largest and most rapidly growing group of patients is of those receiving postmastectomy adjuvant radiation therapy. A total of 47.5 percent (19 of 40) of radiated breasts with saline implants ultimately needed the addition of, or replacement by, a flap. Ten percent of a control group with nonradiated saline implant reconstructions also had flaps, none as replacements. Fifty percent or more of both the radiated and control groups had contralateral surgery. Complications were far more common in the radiated group; for example, there were 32.5 percent capsular contractures compared with none in the control group. The control nonradiated implant-only group and the flap plus implant radiated group did well cosmetically. The radiated implant-only group was judged the worst. The increasing use of radiation after mastectomy has important implications for breast reconstruction. The possibility for radiation should be thoroughly investigated and anticipated preoperatively before immediate breast reconstruction. Patients with invasive disease, particularly with large tumors or palpable axillary lymph nodes, are especially likely to be encouraged to undergo postmastectomy radiation therapy. The indications for adjuvant radiation therapy have included four or more positive axillary lymph nodes, tumors 4 cm (or more) in diameter, and tumors at or near the margin of resection. More recently, some centers are recommending adjuvant radiation therapy for patients with as few as one positive lymph node or even in situ carcinoma close to the resection margin. The use of latissimus dorsi flaps after radiation has proven to be an excellent solution to postradiation tissue contracture, which can occur during breast expander reconstruction. The use of the latissimus flap electively with skin-sparing mastectomy preradiation is probably unwise, unless postmastectomy radiation is unlikely. Skin-sparing mastectomy with a latissimus flap thus should be preserved for patients unlikely to undergo adjuvant radiation therapy. Purely autologous reconstruction such as a TRAM flap is another option for these patients, either before or after radiation therapy.

Immediate breast reconstruction after mastectomy for cancer

AIMS

The oncological, surgical and cosmetic results, patient satisfaction and psychological morbidity of immediate breast reconstruction following mastectomy for breast cancer were evaluated.

METHODS

From 1980 to 1994, 79 immediate breast reconstructions were performed in Malmö. From 1985 immediate breast reconstruction was performed in 21% of mastectomies among patients </=65 years. The most common indication for immediate reconstruction was extensive DCIS+/-multifocal invasive growth. In 61 cases permanent implants were used and in 18 expanders. The median volume in the permanent implants was 225 ml, compared with 380 ml in cases where expanders were used.

RESULTS

Post-operative complications requiring re-operation occurred in 13%. After introduction of the expander technique, no necrosis requiring explanation has occurred. Of the patients receiving radiotherapy, 71% developed capsular contracture (10/14). Four patients developed locoregional recurrence. Three-quarters of the patients had an acceptable to very satisfactory cosmetic result. Eight per cent were judged to have a Baker III-IV contracture. Of the patients, 85% were satisfied with the softness of the reconstructed breast and 76% stated the result to be in accordance with their expectations.

CONCLUSIONS

We find immediate breast reconstruction after mastectomy a safe operation with results comparable to those after late reconstruction and without an increased risk of recurrence. Immediate reconstruction with an implant is not recommended in cases where radiotherapy may be necessary.

Radiation tolerance of transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous-free flaps used in immediate breast reconstruction

The authors determine the effects of postoperative radiation therapy on flap and local control outcomes in patients who have undergone immediate transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM)-free flap reconstruction after modified radical mastectomy for locally advanced breast cancer. Details of surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy for 21 patients who had undergone immediate TRAM-free flap reconstruction after modified radical mastectomy were gathered retrospectively. The outcomes examined were flap complications, overall cosmesis, and local recurrence rate. Radiation therapy was indicated for large primary tumors (T3-T4), close or positive margins, or extensive nodal disease. With a mean follow-up interval of 19 months, there have been no flap complications or losses. Cosmesis was rated as excellent by 60% of patients, good by 30%, and fair by the remaining 10%. Three patients thought that radiation had improved cosmesis, one noted worse cosmesis, and the remainder thought it had no effect on cosmesis. The local control rate was 86%. Postreconstruction irradiation of TRAM-free flaps used in immediate reconstruction for locally advanced breast cancer appears safe and cosmetically acceptable.

Radiation therapy and breast reconstruction

Mastectomy will continue to play a substantial role in the treatment of breast cancer, because many women either are not candidates for or do not desire to have breast conservation. Many patients treated with mastectomy will desire reconstruction, and many of these will be advised to receive adjuvant radiotherapy, which has been shown to increase overall survival in certain high risk patients. There continues to be considerable controversy regarding the compatibility of radiation therapy and breast reconstruction due to increased complications and decreased cosmetic outcome. These can be minimized by careful modern surgical and radiation techniques, and in most cases the result is acceptable, including for reconstructions with prosthetic implants as well as autogenous myocutaneous flaps.

Local Management of Primary Breast Cancer

BACKGROUND: Various options are available for the local control of cancer in the breast -- mastectomy, conservation therapy, and mastectomy with reconstruction. METHODS: To evaluate the benefits and drawbacks of the available management options, the authors combine their extensive experience with a review of the literature on outcomes from these approaches. RESULTS: Conservation therapy provides survival outcomes similar to those from mastectomy. Differences in local recurrence rates can be minimized by close adherence to guidelines for patient selection, operative approach, and radiation technique. CONCLUSIONS: The role of the physician in selecting a local therapy for breast cancer has changed from one of informing the patient of the treatment to assessing the presence of medical contraindications to any of the treatments, educating the patients on each treatment approach, providing access to multidisciplinary consultation, and allowing the patient to choose an appropriate treatment approach.

Immediate breast reconstruction by prosthesis: a safe technique for extensive intraductal and microinvasive carcinomas

BACKGROUND

Immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) by prosthesis is frequently proposed after mastectomy. However, due to the morbidity of this operation, especially the early implant removal rate, its indications remain controversial.

METHODS

We have performed 141 IBR by prosthesis (saline or gel-filled implant, tissue expander) in a homogeneous population of patients with extensive intraductal or microinvasive carcinoma, diagnosed after an initial local excision. This prospective study was designed to assess the feasibility and morbidity of IBR for an "ideal" population, allowing wide cutaneous preservation, without preoperative or postoperative treatment.

RESULTS

The early prosthesis removal rate (< 2 months) was 0.7%, with only 2.1% of early surgical revisions and 3% of lymphoceles. Cutaneous complications (5%) were significantly correlated with the type of incision. Cosmetic results at 1 year were good or very good in 66% of cases, similar to the percentage observed after delayed reconstruction by prosthesis.

CONCLUSIONS

In this selected population, IBR by prosthesis did not induce any additional morbidity compared with mastectomy without reconstruction. IBR by prosthesis can be systematically proposed in cases of extensive intraductal or microinvasive carcinoma.