The role of systemic high-dose cytarabine in the treatment of central nervous system leukemia. Clinical results in 46 patients

Novel Therapeutic Approaches in Neoplastic Meningitis

Central nervous system (CNS) metastasis from systemic cancers can involve the brain parenchyma, leptomeninges, or the dura. Neoplastic meningitis (NM), also known by different terms, including leptomeningeal carcinomatosis and carcinomatous meningitis, occurs due to solid tumors and hematologic malignancies and is associated with a poor prognosis. The current management paradigm entails a multimodal approach focused on palliation with surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy, which may be administered systemically or directly into the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). This review focuses on novel therapeutic approaches, including targeted and immunotherapeutic agents under investigation, that have shown promise in NM arising from solid tumors.

Malignant Meningitis Associated with Hydrocephalus

Malignant meningitis (MM) is the diffuse involvement of the leptomeninges by infiltrating cancer cells, most frequently from lung and breast cancers. This review is aimed to discuss the current advances in the diagnosis and management of MM, along with management of MM-associated hydrocephalus. We reviewed the literature using PubMed and Google Scholar search engines, focusing on various recent randomized controlled trials and clinical trials on MM. Given the hallmark multifocal involvement, the clinical symptoms and signs are also random and asymmetric. There are three important pillars for establishing a diagnosis of MM: clinical examination, neuroimaging, and CSF cytological findings. Several factors should be considered in decision-making, including performance status, neurological findings (clinical, MRI, and CSF flow dynamic), and evaluation of the primary tumor (nature and systemic dissemination). Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) working group recommended the objective assessment of disease for evaluating the progression and response to therapy. Pillars of current management are mainly focal irradiation and intrathecal or systemic chemotherapy. Symptomatic hydrocephalus is managed with a ventriculoperitoneal shunt, lumboperitoneal shunt, or endoscopic third ventriculostomy as palliative procedures, providing significant improvement in performance scores in the limited survival time of patients with MM. Studies using novel therapeutic approaches, such as new biological or cytotoxic compounds, are ongoing. Despite the use of all the combinations, the overall prognosis remains grim; therefore, decision-making for treatment should predominantly be based on attaining an optimal quality of life.

Leptomeningeal Carcinomatosis: Molecular Landscape, Current Management, and Emerging Therapies

Leptomeningeal carcinomatosis is a devastating consequence of late-stage cancer, and despite multimodal treatment, remains rapidly fatal. Definitive diagnosis requires identification of malignant cells in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), or frank disease on MRI. Therapy is generally palliative and consists primarily of radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy, which is administered intrathecally or systemically. Immunotherapies and novel experimental therapies have emerged as promising options for decreasing patient morbidity and mortality. In this review, the authors discuss a refined view of the molecular pathophysiology of leptomeningeal carcinomatosis, current approaches to disease management, and emerging therapies.

CNS Involvement in a Patient with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia

Inspite of medication compliance, some chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients will relapse/progress into an accelerated phase or blast crisis. Central nervous system (CNS) involvement is a rare manifestation of such a relapse. Here, we report a case of 23-year-old female who was diagnosed with CML in the accelerated phase and subsequently treated with imatinib. She developed early relapse in her CNS, and her treatment was switched to dasatinib and intrathecal chemotherapy with cytarabine and methotrexate. Her CNS disease went into remission, and she underwent matched unrelated donor (MUD) hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT). We discuss various mechanisms of treatment failure, importance of vigilance for symptoms and signs of treatment failure/relapse, indications for use of different tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), and management of blast crises in CML.

Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Presenting Initially as Spinal Cord Compression: When Chemotherapy Alone Is Enough

Spinal cord compression (SCC) is a rare initial presentation and complication of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) with nearly all reported cases occurring in the pediatric population. We report a 38-year-old previously healthy man who presented with acute on chronic lower back pain, gait instability, urinary retention, and severe thrombocytopenia. Radiologic examination revealed two soft tissue masses of the thoracic spine associated with compression fractures causing spinal canal narrowing and cord compression. Bone marrow biopsy confirmed the diagnosis of ALL. Immediate initiation of high-dose corticosteroids and systemic chemotherapy resolved the patient's symptoms without radiation therapy or surgical intervention. After two courses of chemotherapy, the patient achieved complete remission in the bone marrow. Rapid administration of chemotherapy alone in this case resulted in a complete resolution of SCC. Given the rarity of this complication in adults, no standardized treatment has been established. The success of this case recommends chemotherapy as the initial management of SCC in chemotherapy-naïve ALL.

Leptomeningeal metastasis

Leptomeningeal metastasis (LM) results from dissemination of cancer cells to both the leptomeninges (pia and arachnoid) and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) compartment. Breast cancer, lung cancer, and melanoma are the most common solid tumors that cause LM. Recent approval of more active anticancer therapies has resulted in improvement in survival that is partly responsible for an increased incidence of LM. Neurologic deficits, once manifest, are mostly irreversible, and often have a significant impact on patient quality of life. LM-directed therapy is based on symptom palliation, circumscribed use of neurosurgery, limited field radiotherapy, intra-CSF and systemic therapies. Novel methods of detecting LM include detection of CSF circulating tumor cells and tumor cell-free DNA. A recent international guideline for a standardization of response assessment in LM may improve cross-trial comparisons as well as within-trial evaluation of treatment. An increasing number of retrospective studies suggest that molecular-targeted therapy, such as EGFR and ALK inhibitors in lung cancer, trastuzumab in HER2+ breast cancer, and BRAF inhibitors in melanoma, may be effective as part of the multidisciplinary management of LM. Prospective randomized trials with standardized response assessment are needed to further validate these preliminary findings.

Leptomeningeal metastasis from systemic cancer: Review and update on management

Leptomeningeal metastasis is an uncommon and typically late complication of cancer with a poor prognosis and limited treatment options. Diagnosis is often challenging, with nonspecific presenting symptoms ranging from headache and confusion to focal neurologic deficits, such as cranial nerve palsies. Standard diagnostic evaluation involves a neurologic examination, magnetic resonance imaging of the brain and spine with gadolinium, and cytologic evaluation of the cerebral spinal fluid. Therapy entails a multimodal approach focused on palliation with surgery, radiation, and/or chemotherapy, which may be administered systemically or directly into the cerebral spinal fluid. Limited trial data exist to guide treatment, and current regimens are based primarily on expert opinion. Although newer targeted and immunotherapeutic agents are under investigation and have shown promise, an improved understanding of the biology of leptomeningeal metastasis and treatment resistance as well as additional randomized controlled studies are needed to guide the optimal treatment of this devastating disease. Cancer 2018;124:21-35. © 2017 American Cancer Society.

Neurological Complications of the Leukemias Across the Ages

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Acute and chronic leukemias are heterogeneous diseases and can affect any part of the body upon initial discovery. Understanding the sequela of systemic involvement is key for proper diagnosis and treatment.

RECENT FINDINGS

Over the decades, new research has emerged regarding neurological complications of the myeloid or lymphoid leukemias. Central nervous system involvement usually confers a poor prognosis and requires emergent treatment. Standard of care still involves systemic therapy, intrathecal administration of chemotherapeutic agents, and cranial radiation. Treatment-related side effects can occur and need to be recognized by any practitioner involved with patient care. It is imperative to understand neurologic complications from leukemia to prevent delays and initiate necessary treatment to maintain neurologic and cognitive function.

Risk factors and clinical outcomes of acute myeloid leukaemia with central nervous system involvement in adults

BACKGROUND

Acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) with central nervous system (CNS) involvement in adults is uncommon, and studies of this subject are scant.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study to investigate the clinical aspects, cytogenetic abnormalities, molecular gene mutations and outcomes of adult AML patients with CNS involvement. Three hundred and ninety-five patients with newly diagnosed AML were reviewed.

RESULTS

Twenty (5.1%) patients had CNS involvement, including 7 (1.8%) with initial CNS disease and 4 (1%) who suffered an isolated CNS relapse. The patients with CNS involvement were younger, had higher leukocyte, platelet, and peripheral blast cell counts, FAB M4 morphology, and chromosome translocations involving 11q23 (11q23 abnormalities) more frequently than did the patients without CNS involvement. No differences in sex, haemoglobin levels, serum LDH levels, immunophenotype of leukaemia cells, or molecular gene mutations were observed between the two groups. Multivariate analyses showed that age ≤ 45 years (OR, 5.933; 95% CI, 1.82 to 19.343), leukocyte counts ≥ 50,000/μl (OR, 3.136; 95% CI, 1.083 to 9.078), and the presence of 11q23 abnormalities (OR, 5.548; 95% CI, 1.208 to 25.489) were significant predictors of CNS involvement. Patients with initial CNS disease had 5-year overall survival and relapse-free survival rates that were similar to those without initial CNS disease. However, three of four patients who suffered an isolated CNS relapse died, and their prognosis was as poor as that of patients who suffered a bone marrow relapse.

CONCLUSION

CNS involvement in adult patients with AML is rare. Three significant risk factors for CNS involvement including age ≤ 45 years, leukocyte counts ≥ 50,000/μl and the presence of 11q23 abnormalities were identified in this study. Future investigations to determine whether adult AML patients having these specific risk factors would benefit from CNS prophylactic therapy are necessary.

Carcinomatous meningitis: Leptomeningeal metastases in solid tumors

Leptomeningeal metastasis (LM) results from metastatic spread of cancer to the leptomeninges, giving rise to central nervous system dysfunction. Breast cancer, lung cancer, and melanoma are the most frequent causes of LM among solid tumors in adults. An early diagnosis of LM, before fixed neurologic deficits are manifest, permits earlier and potentially more effective treatment, thus leading to a better quality of life in patients so affected. Apart from a clinical suspicion of LM, diagnosis is dependent upon demonstration of cancer in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) or radiographic manifestations as revealed by neuraxis imaging. Potentially of use, though not commonly employed, today are use of biomarkers and protein profiling in the CSF. Symptomatic treatment is directed at pain including headache, nausea, and vomiting, whereas more specific LM-directed therapies include intra-CSF chemotherapy, systemic chemotherapy, and site-specific radiotherapy. A special emphasis in the review discusses novel agents including targeted therapies, that may be promising in the future management of LM. These new therapies include anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors erlotinib and gefitinib in nonsmall cell lung cancer, anti-HER2 monoclonal antibody trastuzumab in breast cancer, anti-CTLA4 ipilimumab and anti-BRAF tyrosine kinase inhibitors such as vermurafenib in melanoma, and the antivascular endothelial growth factor monoclonal antibody bevacizumab are currently under investigation in patients with LM. Challenges of managing patients with LM are manifold and include determining the appropriate patients for treatment as well as the optimal route of administration of intra-CSF drug therapy.

Primary CNS lymphoma: a clinician's guide

Primary CNS lymphoma is a high malignant disease of the brain which can lead rapidly to death if diagnosis and/or the start of treatment is delayed. The age at time of diagnosis is a strong factor influencing prognosis so that in younger patients <65 years of age long-term survival may be achieved in a substantial percentage of patients, while in elderly patients long-term survival is seen much more rarely. First-line therapy consists of high-dose methotrexate-based (poly)chemotherapy. This review provides an overview of clinical presentation, steps to diagnosis, detailed information about current treatment concepts and specific information for particular clinical situations.

Isolated extramedullary relapse in childhood acute lymphocytic leukemia

Although the vast majority of children with acute lymphocytic leukemia attain remission with modern therapies, an unacceptably high number will suffer a disease relapse. Both the duration of remission and the site of relapse are important prognostic factors. This review focuses on leukemic relapse isolated to sites outside the bone marrow (extramedullary sites). Data from cooperative study groups as well as large single institutions are reviewed with respect to the incidence of isolated extramedullary relapse as well as the outcome following relapse. The unique anatomic and physiologic properties of the testes and the central nervous system-the two most common sites of isolated extramedullary relapse-are discussed. Finally, the evolution of leukemia therapy is reviewed, bringing into focus the goals and challenges of future therapeutic endeavors.

Dasatinib crosses the blood-brain barrier and is an efficient therapy for central nervous system Philadelphia chromosome-positive leukemia

Although imatinib, a BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is used to treat acute Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph(+)) leukemia, it does not prevent central nervous system (CNS) relapses resulting from poor drug penetration through the blood-brain barrier. Imatinib and dasa-tinib (a dual-specific SRC/BCR-ABL kinase inhibitor) were compared in a preclinical mouse model of intracranial Ph(+) leukemia. Clinical dasatinib treatment in patients with CNS Ph(+) leukemia was assessed. In preclinical studies, dasatinib increased survival, whereas imatinib failed to inhibit intracranial tumor growth. Stabilization and regression of CNS disease were achieved with continued dasa-tinib administration. The drug also demonstrated substantial activity in 11 adult and pediatric patients with CNS Ph(+) leukemia. Eleven evaluable patients had clinically significant, long-lasting responses, which were complete in 7 patients. In 3 additional patients, isolated CNS relapse occurred during dasatinib therapy; and in 2 of them, it was caused by expansion of a BCR-ABL-mutated dasatinib-resistant clone, implying selection pressure exerted by the compound in the CNS. Dasatinib has promising therapeutic potential in managing intracranial leukemic disease and substantial clinical activity in patients who experience CNS relapse while on imatinib therapy. This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov as CA180006 (#NCT00108719) and CA180015 (#NCT00110097).

CNS prophylaxis in lymphoma: Who to target and what therapy to use

The purpose of this article is to review the current data on the risk of CNS relapse in patients with lymphoma and the efficacy of CNS directed prophylactic therapy. CNS relapse occurred in 30-50% of those with Burkitt lymphoma and acute lymphoblastic leukaemia/lymphoma prior to the introduction of intensified regimens that include CNS prophylaxis. Most patients with AIDS-related-lymphoma receive a short course of intrathecal prophylaxis but a re-evaluation of type and targeting of CNS prophylaxis is needed. Patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) have a 5% overall risk of CNS relapse but a high risk sub-population can be identified on the basis of raised LDH and >1 extranodal site, testicular or primary breast involvement. CNS prophylaxis for selected patients with DLBCL may be justified by risk but its benefit is not yet proven. Intravenous methotrexate > or = 3 g/m(2) achieves therapeutic levels in CSF and parenchyma and in combination with intrathecal methotrexate would be a reasonable option for prophylaxis.

Leptomeningeal metastases from solid malignancy: a review

Leptomeningeal metastases (LMM) consist of diffuse involvement of the leptomeninges by infiltrating cancer cells. In solid tumors, the most frequent primary sites are lung and breast cancers, two tumors where the incidence of LMM is apparently increasing. Careful neurological examination is required to demonstrate multifocal involvement of the central nervous system (CNS), cranial nerves, and spinal roots, which constitute the clinical hallmark of the disease. Cerebro-spinal fluid (CSF) analysis is almost always abnormal but only a positive cytology or demonstration of intrathecal synthesis of tumor markers is diagnostic. T1-weighted gadolinium-enhanced sequence of the entire neuraxis (brain and spine) plays an important role in supporting the diagnosis, demonstrating the involved sites and guiding treatment. Radionuclide CSF flow studies detect CSF compartmentalization and are useful for treatment planning. Standard therapy relies mainly on focal irradiation and intrathecal or systemic chemotherapy. Studies using other therapeutic approaches such as new biological or cytotoxic compounds are ongoing. The overall prognosis remains grim and quality of life should remain the priority when deciding which treatment option to apply. However, a sub-group of patients, tentatively defined here, may benefit from an aggressive treatment.

Leptomeningeal metastasis: survival and prognostic factors in 155 patients

In this single-center retrospective study, 155 consecutive patients with leptomeningeal metastasis (LM) were analyzed for the prognostic role of patient- and therapy-related variables. Ten percent of the patients received radiotherapy alone, 32% had chemotherapy alone, 31% received radiochemotherapy, 17% had supportive therapy only, and 10% were not evaluable for therapy. Chemotherapy was systemic (17%), combined systemic and intrathecal (10%), or intrathecal only (35%). Clinical improvement was noted in 41% of the patients. Overall median survival time (MST) was 4.8 months. Survival varied considerably depending on the type of primary tumor in this largest published cohort of LM patients. Univariate Cox regression analysis revealed that age >60 and elevated cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) albumin or lactate levels were therapy-independent predictors of poor survival in the entire cohort as well as in the subgroup of patients with systemic primary tumors (n=105). The assessment of three therapy-independent parameters allows to group LM patients into groups of low, intermediate, and high risk of poor survival. Moreover, the application of systemic chemotherapy was a positive prognostic factor in patients with subarachnoid lesions detected by neuroimaging (RR 1.94, p=0.001) or with extra-CNS tumor deposits (RR 1.52, p=0.05). The results of this study suggest that systemic chemotherapy alone or in combination with other therapeutic modalities may improve outcome in patients with subarachnoid tumor cell deposits detectable by neuroimaging.

Leptomeningeal metastases

LM is an increasingly common neurologic complication of cancer with variable clinical manifestations. Although there are no curative treatments, currently available therapies can preserve neurologic function and potentially improve quality of life. Further research into the mechanisms of leptomeningeal metastasis will elucidate molecular and cellular pathways that may allow identification of potential targets to interrupt this process early or to prevent this complication. Animal models are needed to further define the pathophysiology of LM and to provide an experimental system to test novel treatments [242-245]. There is an urgent need to develop new drug-based or radiation-based treatments for patients with LM. Randomized clinical trials are the appropriate study design to determine the efficacy of new treatments for LM. However, surrogate markers for response must be developed to facilitate the identification of effective regimens. Survival is not the optimal end point for such studies as most patients who develop this complication already have advanced, incurable cancer. Prevention of or delay in neurologic progression is one objective that has been utilized in recent randomized trials in patients with LM, and this end point deserves further attention. Although the development of LM represents a poor prognostic marker in patients with cancer it is important for physicians to recognize the symptoms and signs of the disease and establish the diagnosis as early in the disease course as possible. This may provide an opportunity for effective intervention that can improve quality of life, prevent further neurologic deterioration and, for a subset of patients, improve survival.

Toxicity of treatment for neoplastic meningitis

Neoplastic seeding of the leptomeninges often signifies limited life expectancy. Still, patients are frequently offered aggressive multimodality therapies to palliate symptoms, and, one hopes, to prolong survival. Treatment modalities directed at the central nervous system (CNS) include radiotherapy, intra-cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) chemotherapy, standard systemic chemotherapy, and systemic high-dose chemotherapy. Because many of these modalities are used in combination, it is often difficult to discern which mode is the predominant cause of either acute or delayed complications. This review summarizes the incidence, clinical manifestations, laboratory findings, and pathology related to acute and delayed toxicity of treatment. It describes complications associated with radiotherapy, the use of an intraventricular implanted device (ie, Ommaya device), adverse effects of intra-CSF chemotherapy, and neurotoxicity, either associated with high-dose chemotherapy or manifested as delayed and chronic complications of combined therapies. All CNS-directed therapies are associated with a high rate of complications. The adverse effects of therapy profoundly affect the patient's quality of life, both at the acute phase of treatment and in late and chronic complications after therapy is completed. Intra-CSF chemotherapy is associated with a high rate of acute, reversible adverse effects that sometimes evolve into life-threatening medical conditions. Devastating delayed complications, mainly described as leukoencephalopathy, develop in more than 50% of patients who survive for extended periods and often lead to progressive loss of cognitive capacities. Careful assessment of the benefits and potential adverse reactions to a particular therapy regimen is mandated.

Treatment of mature B-ALL and high grade B-NHL in children

Burkitt Lymphoma and L3ALL are considered to be different forms of the same disease (B-cell disease). Tumour cells have similar cytological and immunological features and display the same non-random translocation involving c- myc on chromosome 8q24 and the gene of an immunoglobulin chain on chromosome 14, 2 or 22. Treatment outcome has greatly improved over the past 15 years as a result of multicentric national trials, especially in Europe, so that the disease has become curable in the majority of patients. Treatment is based on intensive polychemotherapy of short duration and adapted to tumour burden. The major drugs are cyclophosphamide, high-dose methotrexate and cytosine-arabinosine. CNS-directed therapy is essential. Supportive care is also important for the management of the acute treatment-related toxicity. A patient who remains for 1 year in complete remission can be considered as cured, because all relapses occur early within the first year after diagnosis.

Cytotoxicity of 2-chlorodeoxyadenosine and arabinosylcytosine in leukaemic lymphoblasts from paediatric patients: significance of cellular nucleoside transporter content

2-chlorodeoxyadenosine (2-CdA) and arabinosylcytosine (araC) are nucleoside drugs that are used to treat various leukaemias, although 2-CdA has not been tested extensively in children with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL). Nucleoside cytotoxicity depends on the conversion of these agents to 5'-phosphate derivatives, following drug entry into cells via nucleoside transport (NT) processes. This study compared es nucleoside transporter content, determined using a flow cytometric assay with SAENTA [5'-S-(2-aminoethyl)-N6-(4-nitrobenzyl)-5'-thioadenosine] fluorescein, and cytotoxicities of 2-CdA and araC in fresh lymphoblasts from previously untreated paediatric ALL patients and the human T-lymphoblast cell line, CCRF-CEM. Lymphoblast samples from individual patients ranged widely in sensitivity to both 2-CdA (IC50, 6 nmol/l to > 5 micromol/l; mean = 418 nmol/l; n = 8) and araC (IC50, 59 nmol/l to > 5 micromol/l; mean = 1050 nmol/l; n = 7), although IC50 values for the two drugs were correlated (r = 0.78, P = 0.032, n = 7). Cellular es nucleoside transporter content varied more than 35-fold among samples from 10 patients. The correlation between es nucleoside transporter content and drug sensitivity was statistically significant for araC (r = -0.93, P = 0.023, n = 5), but not for 2-CdA (r = -0.57, P = 0.23, n = 6). Exposure of CCRF-CEM cells to araC resulted in a substantial araC concentration-dependent increase in the relative survival of es transporter-deficient cells, whereas the increase was slight following exposure to 2-CdA. We conclude that, in ALL lymphoblasts, es nucleoside transporter content is a determinant of araC sensitivity and that a deficiency in NT may impart resistance to araC.

Neoplastic masquerade syndromes

Masquerade syndromes are classically defined as entities which emulate inflammatory conditions but which are in fact due to a neoplastic process. Careful history and examination in concert with appropriate ancillary investigations and histopathologic evaluation of tissue specimens are required in order to make the correct diagnosis. Many conditions may result in an appearance mimicking an inflammatory condition. The authors review neoplastic conditions which may be considered masquerades. The most common of these is primary intraocular lymphoma or primary central nervous system lymphoma, occurring predominately in older individuals. Diagnostic strategies, therapy, and prognosis are reviewed in detail. Other conditions that can be considered masquerade syndromes are reviewed as well, including lymphomatous and nonlymphomatous conditions, such as melanoma, retinoblastoma, juvenile xanthogranuloma, metastatic lesions, and paraneoplastic syndromes, among others.

Isolated recurrence of granulocytic sarcoma of the brain: successful treatment with surgical resection, intrathecal injection, irradiation and prophylactic systemic chemotherapy

We describe a 40-year-old male who developed an isolated recurrence of granulocytic sarcoma (GS) of the brain 2 years following successful treatment of acute myeloblastic leukemia (AML; M2). Computed tomography (CT) scans and magnetic resonance (MR) images demonstrated a homogeneously enhanced tumor mass in the left temporal lobe and massive peritumoral edema. There was no evidence of relapse in the bone marrow. The patient underwent an emergency surgical resection of the tumor. Five courses of injection with cytarabine and prednisolone through an Ommaya reservoir and whole brain irradiation (total 40 Gy) were performed. Furthermore, prophylactic systemic chemotherapy with cytarabine and etoposide was added. He has been in complete remission for 21 months. Our results, together with other reported cases, indicate that a favorable outcome could be obtained by intensive and combined treatment for an isolated recurrence of GS of the brain if the bone marrow remained in complete remission.

Intraventricular concentration times time (C x T) methotrexate and cytarabine for patients with recurrent meningeal leukemia and lymphoma

BACKGROUND

Intraventricular chemotherapy results in more uniform drug distribution within the subarachnoid space and allows for more flexible drug administration schedules. The authors report their experience with an intraventricular concentration times time (C x T) chemotherapy regimen for recurrent meningeal leukemia and lymphoma.

METHODS

Twenty-one patients (median age, 11.6 years) received C x T therapy for meningeal acute lymphoblastic leukemia (n = 18), Burkitt's lymphoma (n = 2), or undifferentiated leukemia (n = 1). Prior therapy included standard intrathecal (IT) methotrexate and cytarabine, cranial or craniospinal radiation (median, 24 Gy), and 0-5 experimental treatment modalities. C x T induction therapy consisted of 2 mg of intraventricular methotrexate administered daily for 3 days every 10 days, for 4 courses. Patients were then consolidated with 4 courses of alternating intraventricular cytarabine (15 mg/day) or methotrexate (2 mg/day) daily for 3 days every 2 weeks (2 courses of methotrexate and 2 courses of cytarabine). Maintenance therapy consisted of alternating monthly courses of C x T methotrexate or cytarabine.

RESULTS

Ninety-three percent of patients (14 of 15) who were evaluable for response achieved a complete remission in a median of 10 days (range, 2-40 days). Median remission duration was 15 months. Fourteen patients died of recurrent disease or systemic treatment-related complications; 2 patients are alive, off treatment, and in continuous complete remission for 59+ and 89+ months; 1 patient experienced a meningeal relapse at 24 months on C x T therapy but was reinduced with the C x T regimen, received craniospinal radiation, and is in remission at 142+ months; and 3 are alive with disease at 32+, 72+, and 81+ months. One patient was lost to follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

This regimen appears to be an effective and well-tolerated palliative treatment for patients with recurrent meningeal leukemia and lymphoma.

Leptomeningeal metastases: rationale for systemic chemotherapy or what is the role of intra-CSF-chemotherapy?

Malignant subarachnoid deposits complicate both primary central nervous system (CNS) tumors and systemic neoplasms. Although the pathophysiology of symptoms and signs can not be separated by the category of primary tumors that seeds the leptomeninges, the approach to therapy is not similar in primary CNS tumors and in systemic neoplasms. Standard therapy for subarachnoid seeding in primary CNS tumors include conventional or high doses of systemic chemotherapy with various combinations of radiotherapy given either to limited fields or to the whole neuroaxis. Direct administration of chemotherapy to the CSF is not being used. In contrast, whenever a systemic tumor seeds the subarachnoid space the standard approach includes intensive intra-CSF chemotherapy, radiotherapy to limited or extended CNS fields and various combinations of systemic chemotherapy. The published experience with the conventional therapy is reviewed and is critically analyzed. Evidence indicating that high dose systemic chemotherapy can replace intra-CSF treatment in some subgroups are also reviewed and the rationale for this approach is specified. Recent experience in which intra-CSF therapy was prospectively eliminated from the treatment protocol of leptomeningeal metastases of solid tumors reveals that the response rate and survival are similar to those obtained by protocols that differed only by the inclusion of intra-CSF chemotherapy. Patients who were treated by radiotherapy alone combined with systemic chemotherapy but without the intra-CSF therapy were spared the high rate of early and delayed complications directly related to intra-CSF therapy. Still, treatment outcome did not differ. Therefore, future research efforts and prospective clinical trials should investigate the best chemotherapeutic schedules and their sequencing with radiotherapy or with more intensive complementary systemic chemotherapy schemes. Newly designed drugs with long circulation time and improved CNS penetration may serve for this purpose.

Meningeosis leukaemica in adult acute lymphoblastic leukaemia

This review addresses diagnosis of CNS involvement, incidence and treatment of CNS disease at time of diagnosis, prophylaxis and treatment of CNS relapse and risk factors for meningeal recurrence in adult acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL). At the time of diagnosis meningeosis leukaemica is present in about 6% (1-10%) of the adult ALL patients with a higher incidence in ALL subgroups T-ALL (8%) and B-ALL (13 %). With the invention of early additional CNS directed therapy it no longer represents an unfavourable prognostic factor. In the absence of prophylaxis meningeal relapses occur in approximately one third of adults with ALL. A literature review including more than 4000 adult ALL patients showed for the different prophylactic treatment approaches the following CNS relapse rates: intrathecal therapy alone 13% (8-19%), intrathecal therapy and CNS irradiation 15% (6-22%), high dose chemotherapy 14% (10-16%), high dose chemotherapy and intrathecal therapy 8% (2-16%) and high dose chemotherapy, intrathecal therapy together with CNS irradiation 5% (1-12%). It became obvious that the early onset of intrathecal therapy and CNS irradiation and the continuation of intrathecal administrations throughout maintenance are essential. The most favourable results where achieved with high dose chemotherapy combined with intrathecal therapy and/or CNS irradiation. The majority of treatment regimens in adult ALL already include high dose chemotherapy in order to reduce the risk of bone marrow relapse. The outcome of patients with CNS relapse is still poor. Although a remission can be induced in the majority of patients (> 60%) it is usually followed by a bone marrow relapse and the survival is poor (< 5-10%). Bone marrow transplantation might be in adults at present the only curative approach.

High-dose cytosine arabinoside and L-asparaginase in refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia: the Children's Cancer Group experience

PROBLEM

Therapy of children with relapsed acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) not achieving a second remission (CR2) after an initial reinduction attempt is problematic.

METHODS

52 children with ALL in first relapse received high-dose cytosine arabinoside and L-asparaginase (HDAraC/L-Asp) after failed attempts to achieve CR2. AraC was given at a dose of 3 gm/m2 q12 h x 4 on days 0-1 and 7-8. L-asparaginase was given IM 6,000 IU/m2 3 hours after completion of each 2-day cycle of AraC.

RESULTS

Of the 42 surviving to day 28, 22 (42% of all patients) achieved CR2. Ten died before day 28 (19%); four from leukemia and six from infections or toxicity (12% regimen-related mortality), There were 17 bacterial infections (three fatal), 17 invasive fungal infections (12 fatal), one fatal adenoviral infection, and one-non-fatal Pneumocystis pneumonia. One patient was surviving when lost to follow-up at four months and one patient survives over 5 years after transplant. Sixteen of the 22 patients who entered CR2 subsequently relapsed, five died of non-leukemic causes, and one was lost to follow-up. The median duration of second remission was 3 months (range 0.7 to 19 months).

CONCLUSIONS

HDAraC/L-Asp rescue reinduction for relapsed childhood ALL achieves CR2 in approximately 40% of patients who fail reinduction, but remissions are short for most patients and maintenance of CR2 remains unsatisfactory.

Adult acute leukemia

Untreated acute leukemia is a uniformly fatal disease with a median survival time shorter than 3 months. Current treatment strategies provide a significant increase in survival time for most patients, some of whom may be cured. The majority of patients with acute leukemia, however, ultimately die of the disease or complications of treatment. The effective treatment of acute leukemia requires (1) differentiation of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) from acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and recognition of clinically relevant subtypes; (2) identification of patients who are more likely or less likely than average to benefit from a conventional treatment; and (3) selection of therapy that provides a reasonable likelihood of response with acceptable risk of toxic effects. The diagnosis of acute leukemia is established in most cases by a bone marrow aspirate that demonstrates at least 30% blast cells. The traditional criteria to distinguish between AML and ALL rely on morphology and cytochemical reactions. Immunologic analysis of antigen expression and analysis for numerical or structural chromosomal abnormalities of leukemia cells are routinely feasible. Karyotypic analysis is of prognostic importance and should be performed on all diagnostic specimens of bone marrow aspirate. Immunophenotypic analysis may be useful to confirm the disease classification in selected cases. The importance of the routine immunophenotypic characterization of acute leukemia, however, is controversial. The subtypes that must be recognized because of the need for specific treatment include (a) acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL), which is the M3 subtype of AML, and (b) the L3 subtype or mature B-cell ALL. Induction therapy for acute leukemia is treatment intended to achieve induction of complete remission (CR). Complete remission is defined as the absence of morphologic evidence of leukemia after recovery of the peripheral blood cell counts. Failure to achieve CR may be attributed to death during chemotherapy-induced bone marrow hypoplasia or to drug resistance manifested either as failure to achieve hypoplasia or as persistent leukemia after recovery from hypoplasia. Postremission therapy is treatment administered in CR to prevent or delay relapse of the leukemia. However, the majority of patients have disease relapse. Intensification of therapy is a treatment strategy designed to overcome resistance to chemotherapy. Recent clinical trials of intensified induction or postremission therapy suggest improved outcome. However, the toxic effects of dose intensification can be substantial, limiting any potential benefit of this approach. Identification of prognostic factors may allow one to estimate the likelihood of an outcome, to determine an optimal treatment strategy. It is well established that age at the time of diagnosis, leukemia cell karyotype, and whether the leukemia is de novo or secondary are factors that influence treatment decisions. Patients with favorable prognostic factors should probably receive conventional therapy. Patients with unfavorable prognostic factors have shown little benefit from conventional therapy. In addition, factors that indicate poor outcome with conventional therapy are also predictive of poor outcome with intensified therapy. Consequently, these patients should be considered for investigational therapeutic strategies. The bias may be to counsel them to accept the potential increased morbidity of such treatment before there is definite evidence of the possibility of improved outcome. Induction chemotherapy for younger patients with AML (less than 55 years of age) in general consists of one or more courses of cytarabine (ara-C) and an anthracycline or an anthracycline derivative. Randomized trials have failed to confirm that treatment with either etoposide or high-dose ara-C induces disease remission. Patients with secondary AML, high levels of CD34 antigen expression, or an unfavorable karyotype, however, may benefit from ind

High-dose chemotherapy in adult acute myeloid leukemia: rationale and results

Preclinical studies and retrospective evaluations of clinical trials of a number of cytotoxic drugs have provided a rationale for the use of high doses of chemotherapy in adults with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). To maximize cure and remission rates at an acceptable cost in toxicity, many schedules and combinations of dose-intensive chemotherapy have been tested in recent years in patients with de novo disease, cytosine arabinoside (Ara-C) being the most extensively evaluated drug. In this article we review the principal results of both randomized and non-controlled studies. Our analysis indicates that high-dose Ara-C (HIDAC) used during induction results is no substantial benefit relative to conventional doses of drug. On the other hand, consolidation with HIDAC is a major advance in the treatment of this disease. In fact, in individuals less than 60 years of age and a favorable or intermediate-risk karyotype, HIDAC-based regimens have resulted in survival estimates comparable to those of autologous or allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. Yet, the role of HIDAC is irrelevant in younger individuals with an unfavorable cytogenetic pattern and detrimental in patients greater than 60 years of age. Since recently new cytotoxic agents have expanded the armamentarium of antileukemic drugs, well conducted randomized trials of dose intensive chemotherapy still need to be performed to optimize schedules and combinations of drugs in patients with AML.

Pharmacologic strategies for the treatment of meningeal malignancy

There have been significant strides in the treatment and prevention of meningeal cancer, particularly meningeal leukemia, during the past thirty years. These advantages are a direct result of innovative therapeutic approaches specifically designed to overcome the limitations of systemically administered chemotherapy. Such approaches include the administration of intrathecal chemotherapy by intralumbar or intraventricular injection, the administration of very high-dose systemic chemotherapy, and the administration of cranial or craniospinal irradiation. A better understanding of the central nervous system pharmacokinetics of commonly used anticancer agents has also resulted in improvements in the treatment of meningeal cancer. In this article, the clinical pharmacology of the most commonly used intrathecal agents and pharmacologic strategies for the treatment of meningeal cancer will be discussed. In addition, an overview of new agents for intrathecal administration and other novel CNS targeted therapies will be presented.