Clinicopathologic significance of the K-ras gene codon 12 point mutation in stomach cancer. An analysis of 140 cases

Mutational landscape of K-Ras substitutions at 12th position-a systematic molecular dynamics approach

K-Ras is a small GTPase and acts as a molecular switch by recruiting GEFs and GAPs, and alternates between the inert GDP-bound and the dynamic GTP-bound forms. The amino acid at position 12 of K-Ras is a hot spot for oncogenic mutations (G12A, G12C, G12D, G12R, G12S, and G12V), disturbing the active fold of the protein, leading to cancer development. This study aimed to investigate the potential conformational changes induced by these oncogenic mutations at the 12^th position, impairing GAP-mediated GTP hydrolysis. Comprehensive computational tools (iStable, FoldX, SNPeffect, DynaMut, and CUPSAT) were used to evaluate the effect of these six mutations on the stability of wild type K-Ras protein. The docking of GTP with K-Ras was carried out using AutoDock4.2, followed by molecular dynamics simulations. Furthermore, on comparison of binding energies between the wild type K-Ras and the six mutants, we have demonstrated that the G12A and G12V mutants exhibited the strongest binding efficiency compared to the other four mutants. Trajectory analyses of these mutations revealed that G12A encountered the least deviation, fluctuation, intermolecular H-bonds, and compactness compared to the wildtype, which was supported by the lower Gibbs free energy value. Our study investigates the molecular dynamics simulations of the mutant K-Ras forms at the 12^th position, which expects to provide insights about the molecular mechanisms involved in cancer development, and may serve as a platform for targeted therapies against cancer. Communicated by Ramaswamy H. Sarma.

Regulation of RhoB Gene Expression during Tumorigenesis and Aging Process and Its Potential Applications in These Processes

RhoB, a member of the Ras homolog gene family and GTPase, regulates intracellular signaling pathways by interfacing with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), Ras, and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/Akt to modulate responses in cellular structure and function. Notably, the EGFR, Ras, and PI3K/Akt pathways can lead to downregulation of RhoB, while simultaneously being associated with an increased propensity for tumorigenesis. Functionally, RhoB, part of the Rho GTPase family, regulates intracellular signaling pathways by interfacing with EGFR, RAS, and PI3K/Akt/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), and MYC pathways to modulate responses in cellular structure and function. Notably, the EGFR, Ras, and PI3K/Akt pathways can lead to downregulation of RhoB, while simultaneously being associated with an increased propensity for tumorigenesis. RHOB expression has a complex regulatory backdrop consisting of multiple histone deacetyltransferase (HDACs 1 and 6) and microRNA (miR-19a, -21, and -223)-mediated mechanisms of modifying expression. The interwoven nature of RhoB’s regulatory impact and cellular roles in regulating intracellular vesicle trafficking, cell motion, and the cell cycle lays the foundation for analyzing the link between loss of RhoB and tumorigenesis within the context of age-related decline in RhoB. RhoB appears to play a tissue-specific role in tumorigenesis, as such, uncovering and appreciating the potential for restoration of RHOB expression as a mechanism for cancer prevention or therapeutics serves as a practical application. An in-depth assessment of RhoB will serve as a springboard for investigating and characterizing this key component of numerous intracellular messaging and regulatory pathways that may hold the connection between aging and tumorigenesis.

Establishment and characterization of 6 novel patient-derived primary pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma cell lines from Korean pancreatic cancer patients

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas are among the most malignant neoplasms and have very poor prognosis. Our understanding of various cancers has recently improved the survival of patients with cancer, except for pancreatic cancers. Establishment of primary cancer cell lines of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas will be useful for understanding the molecular mechanisms of this disease.

METHODS

Eighty-one surgically resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas were collected. Six novel pancreatic cancer cell lines, AMCPAC01-06, were established and histogenetic characteristics were compared with their matched tissues. The clinicopathologic and molecular characteristics of the cell lines were investigated by KRAS and TP53 sequencing or SMAD4 and p53 immunohistochemistry. Xenografts using AMCPAC cell lines were established.

RESULTS

From the 81 pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas, six (7.4% success rate) patient-derived primary cell lines were established. The six AMCPAC cell lines showed various morphologies and exhibited a wide range of doubling times. AMCPAC cell lines contained mutant KRAS in codons 12, 13, or 61 and TP53 in exon 5 as well as showed aberrant p53 (5 overexpression and 1 total loss) or DPC4 (all 6 intact) expression. AMCPAC cell lines demonstrated homology for the KRAS mutation and p53 expression compared with matched primary cancer tissues, but showed heterogeneous DPC4 expression patterns.

CONCLUSIONS

The novel AMCPAC01-06 cell lines established in this study may contribute to the understanding of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas. Trial registration Retrospectively registered.

Cetuximab-induced insulin-like growth factor receptor I activation mediates cetuximab resistance in gastric cancer cells

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and insulin‑like growth factor receptor‑I (IGF‑IR) are frequently overexpressed in gastric cancer cells. However, these cells are resistant to the anti‑EGFR monoclonal antibody cetuximab. The aim of the present study was to determine whether cetuximab resistance in gastric cancer cells resulted from activation of the IGF‑IR signaling pathway by cetuximab. The results demonstrated that EGFR phosphorylation was markedly inhibited in gastric cancer cell lines (SGC7901 and MGC803) which possessed functional K‑ras and BRAF following treatment with cetuximab. However, cetuximab treatment did not diminish cell viability; by contrast, IGF‑IR activation was observed. Knockdown of IGF‑IR or the use of an IGF‑IR inhibitor were found to increase the sensitivity of gastric cancer cells to cetuximab. Furthermore, cetuximab induced phosphorylation of the non‑receptor tyrosine kinase c‑steroid receptor co‑activator (Src). Treatment of gastric cancer cells with a Src inhibitor was shown to significantly reduce cetuximab‑induced phosphorylation of IGF‑IR as well as Src, which resulted in enhanced sensitivity to cetuximab treatment. In conclusion, the results of the present study demonstrated that cetuximab‑induced IGF‑IR activation was involved in cetuximab resistance in gastric cancer cells and that Src was an important mediator for IGF‑IR activation.

KRAS and BRAF mutation analysis in colorectal adenocarcinoma specimens with a low percentage of tumor cells

Background and Objective

The rapid development of molecular biology techniques allows for the introduction of real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) methods with a limit of mutation detection at 1 % in a background of wild-type DNA. Analysis of KRAS mutations in codons 12, 13, and 61, together with analysis of BRAF mutations in codon 600, are predictive biomarkers for anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) treatment in colorectal cancer. Our aim was to compare PCR methods for KRAS mutations and BRAF mutation analysis using DNA isolated from tissue samples previously evaluated for presence of tumor cells using a quantitative scale and the percentage of tumor cells (PTC) scale. We addressed the question of whether a low number of tumor cells can be qualified for somatic mutation testing.

Results

Our study showed that PTC as low as 10 % was good enough to detect KRAS G12D, G13D, and Q61L mutations in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) material. Furthermore, our results indicate that up to 20 % of colorectal cancer may carry mutations in the KRAS codon 61 and BRAF codon 600, which suggests the value of these mutation analyses because patients carrying them are unlikely to respond to cetuximab or panitumumab. A low level of KRAS somatic mutation detection has not been studied in depth in the context of clinical outcomes in patients; therefore, we compared new PCR methods, (KRBR-RT 50 Entrogen; ViennaLab StripAssay) and re-evaluated KRAS and BRAF status in patients with relapse after targeted therapy.

Conclusions

The importance of molecular results was confirmed by clinical observation of a patient with relapse who had qualified for targeted therapy with KRAS WT status (but was diagnosed by less sensitive single-stranded conformation polymorphisms method). Interestingly, during anti-EGFR treatment, it came to the selection of cells with KRAS G12C mutation which were present from the beginning in the tumor but at a low level (detected by PCR methods) only and led consequently to the metastasis. Taking into consideration the limit of detection, labor time, and assay cost, the real-time PCR method seems to be very promising especially for FFPE material with the PTC below 15 %.

Gastric cancer pathology and underlying molecular mechanisms

The development of gastric adenocarcinoma is a complex multistep process involving multiple genetic alterations. Based on pathology, four different macroscopic types and at least two major histological types, intestinal and diffuse, have been described. Most gastric cancer (GC) show genetic instability, either microsatellite instability or chromosomal instability, which is considered an early event in gastric carcinogenesis. Molecular studies of alterations of single genes have provided evidence that intestinal and diffuse type GC evolve via different genetic pathways. Recent results from high-throughput whole-genome expression or copy number studies have demonstrated extensive genetic diversity between cases and within individual GC. Sets of commonly up- or downregulated microRNAs have been identified in GC and might be useful in the near future to identify pathways of GC progression. Results from detailed molecular and/or pathological GC studies, although promising, still have limited clinical utility in predicting survival and stratifying GC patients for appropriate treatment.

Utilizing protein structure to identify non-random somatic mutations

Background

Human cancer is caused by the accumulation of somatic mutations in tumor suppressors and oncogenes within the genome. In the case of oncogenes, recent theory suggests that there are only a few key “driver” mutations responsible for tumorigenesis. As there have been significant pharmacological successes in developing drugs that treat cancers that carry these driver mutations, several methods that rely on mutational clustering have been developed to identify them. However, these methods consider proteins as a single strand without taking their spatial structures into account. We propose an extension to current methodology that incorporates protein tertiary structure in order to increase our power when identifying mutation clustering.

Results

We have developed iPAC (identification of Protein Amino acid Clustering), an algorithm that identifies non-random somatic mutations in proteins while taking into account the three dimensional protein structure. By using the tertiary information, we are able to detect both novel clusters in proteins that are known to exhibit mutation clustering as well as identify clusters in proteins without evidence of clustering based on existing methods. For example, by combining the data in the Protein Data Bank (PDB) and the Catalogue of Somatic Mutations in Cancer, our algorithm identifies new mutational clusters in well known cancer proteins such as KRAS and PI3KC α. Further, by utilizing the tertiary structure, our algorithm also identifies clusters in EGFR, EIF2AK2, and other proteins that are not identified by current methodology. The R package is available at: http://www.bioconductor.org/packages/2.12/bioc/html/iPAC.html.

Conclusion

Our algorithm extends the current methodology to identify oncogenic activating driver mutations by utilizing tertiary protein structure when identifying nonrandom somatic residue mutation clusters.

KRAS and BRAF mutations are rare and related to DNA mismatch repair deficiency in gastric cancer from the East and the West: results from a large international multicentre study

Background:

Inhibitors of the epidermal growth factor (EGFR) signaling pathway have a major role in the treatment of KRAS wild-type colorectal cancer patients. The EGFR pathway has been shown to be activated in gastric cancer (GC). However, published data on KRAS and BRAF mutation status is limited in GC and has not been compared between GC from different geographic regions.

Methods:

The prevalence of KRAS and BRAF mutations was established in 712 GC: 278 GC from the United Kingdom, 230 GC from Japan and 204 GC from Singapore. The relationship between KRAS/BRAF mutation status, DNA mismatch repair (MMR) status, clinicopathological variables and overall survival was analysed.

Results:

Overall, 30 (4.2%) GC carried a KRAS mutation. In total, 5.8% of the UK GC, 4% of Japan GC and 1.5% of Singapore GC were KRAS mutant. KRAS mutant GC had fewer lymph node metastases in the UK cohort (P=0.005) and were more frequent in elderly patients in the Japan cohort (P=0.034). KRAS mutations were more frequent in MMR-deficient GC in the UK and the Japanese cohort (P<0.05). A BRAF mutation was only detected in a single Japanese GC.

Conclusions:

This large multicentre study demonstrated that KRAS mutations and DNA MMR deficiency have a role in a small subgroup of GC irrespective of country of origin, suggesting that this subgroup of GC may have developed along a common pathway. Further studies need to establish whether concomitant mutations or amplifications of other EGFR signalling pathway genes may contribute to the activation of this pathway in GC.

Molecular targeted therapies in advanced gastric cancer: does tumor histology matter?

It is increasingly recognized that gastric cancer is a heterogeneous disease which may be divided into subgroups based on histological, anatomical, epidemiological and molecular classifications. Distinct molecular drivers and tumor biology, and thus different treatment targets and predictive biomarkers, may be implicated in each subtype. However, there is little evidence in the literature regarding the correlation among these different classifications, and particularly the molecular aberrations present in each subtype. In this review, we approach advanced gastric cancer (AGC) by presenting aberrant molecular pathways and their potential therapeutic targets in gastric cancer according to histological and anatomical classification, dividing gastric cancer into proximal nondiffuse, distal nondiffuse and diffuse disease. Several pathways are involved predominantly, although not exclusively, in different subtypes. This may help to explain the disappointing results of many published AGC trials in which study populations were heterogeneous regardless of clinicopathological characteristics of the primary tumor. Histological and anatomical classification may provide insights into tumor biology and facilitate selection of an enriched patient population for targeted agents in future studies and in the clinic. However, some molecular pathways implicated in gastric cancer have not been studied in correlation with histological or anatomical subtypes. Further studies are necessary to confirm the suggestion that such classification may predict tumor biology and facilitate selection of an enriched patient population for targeted agents in future studies and in the clinic.

Targeted therapy in the management of advanced gastric cancer: are we making progress in the era of personalized medicine?

BACKGROUND

Gastric cancer is one of the leading causes of cancer death. With greater understanding of the molecular basis of carcinogenesis, targeted agents have led to a modest improvement in the outcome of advanced gastric cancer (AGC) patients.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We conducted an overview of the published evidence regarding the use of targeted therapy in AGC patients. Thus far, the human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER) pathway, angiogenic pathway, and phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase (PI3K)-Akt-mammalian target of rapamycin pathway have emerged as potential avenues for targeted therapy in AGC patients. The promising efficacy results of the Trastuzumab for Gastric Cancer trial led to the approved use of trastuzumab-based therapy as first-line treatment for patients with HER-2+ AGC. On the other hand, the Avastin® in Gastric Cancer trial evaluating bevacizumab in combination with chemotherapy did not meet its primary endpoint of a longer overall survival duration despite a significantly higher response rate and longer progression-free survival time in patients in the bevacizumab arm. Phase III data are awaited for other targeted agents, including cetuximab, panitumumab, lapatinib, and everolimus.

CONCLUSION

Recent progress in targeted therapy development for AGC has been modest. Further improvement in the outcome of AGC patients will depend on the identification of biomarkers in different patient populations to facilitate the understanding of gastric carcinogenesis, combining different targeted agents with chemotherapy, and unraveling new molecular targets for therapeutic intervention.

Molecular assessment of c-H-ras p21 expression in Helicobacter pylori-mediated gastric carcinogenesis

Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection plays a significant role in causing gastric cancer; the exact molecular mechanisms of gastric carcinogenesis have not yet been fully determined. Therefore, this study was planned to examine the role of c-H-ras p21 expression in H. pylori infection at different stages of disease progression from precursor lesions to gastric carcinoma. This study was carried out in 200 patients, consisting of normal gastric mucosa (n = 20), mucosa with chronic gastritis (n = 63), intestinal metaplasia (n = 20), dysplasia (n = 11), and gastric adenocarcinoma (n = 86), in which the H. pylori status have been analysed. The expression of c-H-ras p21 was studied at mRNA as well as protein level using RT-PCR and western blotting, respectively. The localization of c-H-ras p21 was also studied semiquantitatively by immunohistochemistry. The RT-PCR and western blotting results of c-H-ras p21 mRNA and protein expressions were significantly increased in chronic gastritis, intestinal metaplasia, dysplasia, and gastric adenocarcinoma patients, respectively. Immunohistochemical study also showed the increased expression of c-H-ras p21 in the similar way. Overexpression of c-H-ras p21 might be due to H-ras mutation at codon 12 of ras gene family in H. pylori infection. The rate of expression of ras p21 was higher in the H. pylori-infected precursor lesions, chronic gastritis 49/56 (87.5%), intestinal metaplasia 16/17 (94%), and dysplasia 9/11(82%) whereas in the case of H. pylori negative cases these groups, show 12.5, 5.9, and 18.2%, respectively. The data suggested that H. pylori infection may increase the expression of c-H-ras p21 early in the process of gastric carcinogenesis.

Anti-HER agents in gastric cancer: from bench to bedside

Despite some advances in the past few years, the search for effective treatment modalities for advanced gastric and gastro-esophageal junction cancer is far from over. Available data clearly demonstrate that the development of new drugs will have little, if any, chance of success if it is not guided by in-depth knowledge of disease biology. However, using biologic agents to target key molecular pathways, such as those regulated by human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER) family members, may be effective. Indeed, the positive results achieved by the anti-HER2 agent trastuzumab in a phase III trial in HER2-positive patients support this approach. Many new anti-HER molecules are now under evaluation for the treatment of gastric and gastro-esophageal junction cancer, but so far attempts to identify reliable predictive factors from phase I and II trials have produced inconclusive results. In addition, large phase III trials are still being conducted in molecularly unselected populations. Refining patient selection is essential to maximize the benefit of targeted agents, to avoid significant toxicities and for the development of alternative therapeutic approaches in patients who have nonresponsive disease.

Retrospective analyses of cisplatin-based doublet combination chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer

BACKGROUNDS

Cisplatin-based chemotherapy, in combination with fluoropyrimidines or taxanes, have demonstrated efficacy against advanced gastric cancer (AGC). This retrospective study was performed with the data obtained from our cancer chemotherapy registry and eight another cancer centers.

METHODS

In 2008, a total of 283 AGC patients were treated with cisplatin-based doublet chemotherapy in the first-line setting: capecitabine plus cisplatin (XP, n = 77), S-1 plus cisplatin (SP, n = 97), taxanes (docetaxel, paclitaxel) plus cisplatin (TP, n = 72), and 5-fluorouracil plus platinum (FP, n = 37). The primary endpoint of this study was overall survival (OS) and the secondary endpoints were safety, response rate and progression-free survival (PFS).

RESULTS

The median age was 54 years with a range of 28-78 years and median delivered number of chemotherapy cycles were XP: 4, SP: 5, TP: 5 and FP: 5, respectively. Objective tumor responses (38%; 95% CI, 32-43%) were 40% for XP, 42% for SP, 36% for DP, and 24% for FP. The estimated median PFS was 4.5 months (95% CI, 3.6-5.4 months) and the median OS was 12.3 months (95% CI, 10.8-13.7 months). No statistically significant difference was found between each regimen used as first-line chemotherapy. At multivariate analysis, independent prognostic parameters for OS were prior gastrectomy, peritoneal dissemination, performance status and hemoglobin level

CONCLUSION

All of the cisplatin-based doublet chemotherapy regimens appear to be active as first-line chemotherapy for AGC. With better patient selection according to clinical parameters and molecular markers, clinical outcomes of AGC patients in first-line setting can be improved.

K-ras mutation in the major duodenal papilla and gastric and colonic mucosa in patients with autoimmune pancreatitis

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic cancer occurs in some patients with autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP). Significant K-ras mutations are frequently detected in the pancreas of AIP patients. AIP may be a pancreatic lesion of IgG4-related systemic disease. Gastric and colonic cancer can occur during the follow up of AIP patients. We examined K-ras mutations in the major duodenal papilla and gastric and colonic mucosa of AIP patients.

METHODS

K-ras analysis and/or immunohistochemical study was performed on the tissues of the major duodenal papilla (n = 8), gastric mucosa (n = 5), colonic mucosa (n = 3), pancreas (n = 5), common bile duct (n = 5), and gallbladder (n = 4) of 12 AIP patients.

RESULTS

Significant K-ras mutations were detected in the major duodenal papilla of 4 of 8 cases [GAT (n = 4)], in the gastric mucosa of 2 of 4 cases [AGT (n = 2)], and in the colonic mucosa of 2 of 3 cases [GAT (n = 2)]. Significant K-ras mutations were detected in the pancreas of all 5 cases [GAT (n = 5), in the common bile duct of 4 cases (GAT (n = 2), TGT (n = 1), and GCT/TGT (n = 1)], and in the gallbladder epithelium of 3 cases [GAT (n = 1), GCT (n = 1), and GTT (n = 1)]. K-ras mutations were detected in the organs associated with IgG4-related fibroinflammation with abundant infiltration of T lymphocytes and forkhead box P3-positive cells.

CONCLUSIONS

Significant K-ras mutations were frequently detected in the major duodenal papilla and gastric and colonic mucosa of AIP patients. AIP patients may have risk factors for gastric and colonic cancer, but the mechanisms of K-ras mutation and its clinical implications are not clear.

Role of ES cell-expressed Ras (ERas) in tumorigenicity of gastric cancer

ERas, a unique member of the Ras family, was initially found only in embryonic stem (ES) cells, where it plays a crucial role in the transformation of transplanted ES cells to teratomas. ERas is involved in ES cell survival, and unlike other Ras family members, is constitutively active without any mutations. The aim of this study was to investigate the expression and role of ERas in human gastric cancer. To test whether ERas played a significant role in human cancer cells, we examined its expression and function in gastric cancer. ERas was expressed in gastric cancer cell lines at different levels. Induction of ERas expression activated the phosphatidylinositol 3 kinase (PI3K)/Akt axis and then enhanced anchorage-independent growth and ERas knockdown by siRNA suppressed cell invasion. Immunohistochemical analyses revealed that ERas was expressed in 38.7% (55/142) of human gastric carcinoma tissues, and its expression was significantly associated with metastasis to the liver (P < 0.0001) and lymph nodes (P < 0.05). ERas up-regulated transcription regulatory factors including ZFHX1A, ZFHX1B, and TCF3, which repress E-cadherin. These data suggest that ERas is activated in a significant population of gastric cancer, where it may play a crucial role in gastric cancer cell survival and metastases to liver via down-regulation of E-cadherin.

Clinical relevance of EGFR- and KRAS-status in colorectal cancer patients treated with monoclonal antibodies directed against the EGFR

The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) plays an important role in tumorigenesis and tumor progression of colorectal cancer (CRC). As a result, the EGFR has evolved as a relevant target in the treatment of metastatic CRC. KRAS serves as a mediator between extracellular ligand binding and intracellular transduction of signals from the EGFR to the nucleus. The presence of activating KRAS mutations has been identified as a potent predictor of resistance to EGFR-directed antibodies such as cetuximab or panitumumab. These agents should therefore be applied only in tumors with a wild-type status of the KRAS gene. Further parameters of resistance are lack of EGFR amplification, PTEN loss or BRAF mutation. However, they are less well studied or associated with less consistent data and therefore require prospective analyses before integration into clinical decision making. Future studies need to identify patterns of single or multiple mutations to further increase the power of patient selection for anti-EGFR therapy. While molecular parameters help to predict treatment efficacy upfront, skin toxicity has been accepted as an independent predictor of response during exposure to anti-EGFR therapy.

Cytogenetic and molecular aspects of gastric cancer: clinical implications

Gastric cancer is of major importance world-wide being the second most common cause of cancer-related death in the world. According to Lauren's histological classification gastric cancer is divided in two groups, the better differentiated intestinal carcinomas and the poorly differentiated diffuse-type cancers. The genetic changes underlying the initiation and progression of gastric cancer are not well defined. Gastric carcinogenesis is a multistep process involving a number of genetic and epigenetic factors. Although it has been proposed that different genetic pathways exist for differentiated and undifferentiated carcinomas, the two histological subtypes of gastric cancer share some common genetic alterations. Currently, tumor histology and pathologic stage are the major prognostic variables used in the clinical practice for gastric cancer patients. However, it is known that tumors with similar morphology may differ in biological aggressiveness, prognosis and response to treatment. Molecular genetic analysis of gastric cancer revealed a number of associations of certain genetic changes with pathological features, tumor biological behavior and prognosis of gastric cancer patients, suggesting that these genetic abnormalities might play an important role in gastric tumorigenesis. Increasing evidence suggests that the molecular genetic changes could be helpful in the clinical setting, contributing to prognosis and management of patients. Regarding epigenetic events in gastric tumorigenesis, a number of methylating markers have been proposed for risk assessment, prognostic evaluation and as therapeutic targets. However, further research is required in order to systematically investigate the genetic changes in gastric cancer estimating also their usefulness in the clinical practice. A good understanding of the genetic changes underlying gastric carcinogenesis may provide new perspectives for prognosis and screening of high risk individuals. Some of the genetic alterations could definitely improve tumor classification and management of gastric cancer patients. Also, based on molecular data identified in gastric cancer novel therapeutics might help to improve the treatment of this disease.

No duplicate KRAS mutation is identified on the same allele in gastric or colorectal cancer cells with multiple KRAS mutations

Codon 12 and 13 mutations in 170 colorectal cancer (CRC) and 66 gastric cancer (GC) specimens were analysed by an 'enriched' polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) method. All identified mutations were verified by direct sequencing of the second PCR products. Among the 170 CRC specimens, mutations were identified in 47 (28%) and 13 (7.6%) cases in codons 12 and 13, respectively. In the 66 GC specimens examined, however, mutations in codons 12 and 13 were only detected in two (3.0%) and one (1.5%) cases, respectively. Mutations in both codon 12 and 13 were found in 3/170 (1.8%) CRCs and 1/66 (1.5%) GCs. Duplicate mutations were never identified in the same allele, which was confirmed by direct sequencing of the second amplified products. The majority of colorectal and gastric cancer cells with KRAS mutations are homogeneous because they have the same KRAS mutation. A few colorectal or gastric cancers, however, showed heterogeneity, as verified by the fact that single mutations were identified in the same allele.

K-ras mutations and cell kinetics in Helicobacter pylori associated gastric intestinal metaplasia: a comparison before and after eradication in patients with chronic gastritis and gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

Helicobacter pylori related gastric intestinal metaplasia (IM) is considered to be a precancerous lesion.

AIMS

To identify the effects of H pylori eradication on K-ras mutations, cell kinetics in IM and histological changes in patients with and without gastric cancers in a one-year prospective study.

METHODS

Patients included group A (n = 39), chronic gastritis, and group B (n = 53), intestinal-type early gastric cancer patients who had all undergone endoscopic mucosal resection (n = 25) or surgical resection (n = 28). K-ras codon 12 mutations in IM were examined, followed by DNA sequencing analysis. Proliferating and apoptotic cells were detected with anti-Ki-67 antibody and using the TUNEL method, respectively.

RESULTS

The incidence of K-ras mutations in the cancer was only 3.8%. The mutant K-ras in IM was observed more frequently in group A (46.2%) than in group B patients (1.9%) (p<0.005). After eradication, the K-ras mutations significantly declined to 12.8% in group A (p<0.005). The mutation pattern of K-ras codon 12 before eradication was that GGT was mainly changed to AGT (50%) in group A. AGT transformation was not affected by treatment. Apoptosis in IM showed an increase after H pylori eradication in both groups (p<0.05 in group A) although no histological improvement in IM was observed. The monocyte score was significantly higher in group A than in group B (p<0.05); the score improved significantly after eradication.

CONCLUSIONS

K-ras mutations in IM do not always play a role in gastric carcinogenesis but cell kinetics, especially apoptosis, in IM may contribute to it. There are early events in K-ras mutations which are influenced by H pylori infection; some mutations may also be selected by eradication. These unstable K-ras mutations in IM may be related to lymphocyte infiltration caused by H pylori infection.

Deciphering the underlying genetic and epigenetic events leading to gastric carcinogenesis

Gastric cancer is a common aggressive malignancy. Although its incidence shows considerable variation among different countries, gastric cancer is still a major health problem worldwide. The causes of stomach cancer are not completely understood. What is clear is that gastric cancer is a multi-stage process involving genetic and epigenetic factors. This review is an in-depth study of the known genetic and epigenetic processes in the development of this tumor, and delineates possible approaches in gene and epigenetic therapy.

Cellular and molecular aspects of gastric cancer

Gastric cancer remains a global killer with a shifting burden from the developed to the developing world. The cancer develops along a multistage process that is defined by distinct histological and pathophysiological phases. Several genetic and epigenetic alterations mediate the transition from one stage to another and these include mutations in oncogenes, tumour suppressor genes and cell cycle and mismatch repair genes. The most significant advance in the fight against gastric caner came with the recognition of the role of Helicobacter pylori (H pylori) as the most important acquired aetiological agent for this cancer. Recent work has focussed on elucidating the complex host/microbial interactions that underlie the neoplastic process. There is now considerable insight into the pathogenesis of this cancer and the prospect of preventing and eradicating the disease has become a reality. Perhaps more importantly, the study of H pylori-induced gastric carcinogenesis offers a paradigm for understanding more complex human cancers. In this review, we examine the molecular and cellular events that underlie H pylori-induced gastric cancer.

Trend in incidence of gastric adenocarcinoma by tumor location from 1969-2004: a study in one referral center in Iran

AIM

In recent years several studies have shown increasing rate of upper gastric cancers regarding to decrease in distal gastric cancers. The aim of this study was to describe the trend of gastric cancers by location in Iran, which is one of the countries with high prevalence of gastric cancers.

METHODS

All registered cases of gastrectomy in Tehran Cancer Institute from 1969 through 2004 were re-evaluated clinicopathologically. The stomach was anatomically divided into the upper, middle, and lower third. The prevalence of gastric cancers in 5 year periods estimated by location and the changes trough the time was evaluated independently and in aspect of age and sex.

RESULTS

Over 36 years, the prevalence of cancers in the upper and middle third of the stomach have increased and that of the lower third has decreased. These changes were seen in both sexes and age groups under and over 50 and it was more significant in younger.

CONCLUSION

The results are the same as most previous reports in other countries. This can indicate different risk factors as well as confrontation with them. However in regard to few numbers of cases in this study, a population-based study is recommended for confirmation.

Pathology and molecular biology of gastric cancer

Several attempts to classify gastric cancer (GCA) have been made over the past decades. Most successful, and widely used, is the classification by Laurén, which distinguishes, by microscopical morphology alone, two main cancer pathogeneses, diffuse (DGCA) and intestinal (IGCA) subtypes, which appear clearly as dissimilar clinical and epidemiological entities. Here we review the main differences in epidemiology, histopathology, and molecular pathology of the two main subtypes of gastric carcinomas based on Laurén classification. In clinical practice, however, clinical staging, particularly in predicting the survival, still remains superior to all classifications of gastric cancer independent of cancer type. The existence of local precursor lesions or conditions of IGCA tumours, i.e. Helicobacter pylori gastritis, atrophic gastritis (AG), intestinal metaplasia (IM), adenoma, dysplasia, and intramucosal neoplasia, is firmly established. The links of DGCA with intestinal-type epithelium, AG or IM are poor, or do not exist. So far, H. pylori gastritis is the only universal precursor condition for DGCA. It implies that AG and achlorhydria are of minor significance and infrequent in the development of DGCA but are important steps in that of IGCA. Despite an increasing body of data, the overall view on molecular pathology of GCA remains fragmentary. No consistent differences in the molecular pathology of GCA subtypes to meet the Laurén classification have been established. With the exception of TP53, no gene mutation occurring regularly in both histological types of GCA has been reported. Chromosomal aberrations and loss of heterozygosity seem to be non-specific and do not follow any consistent route in the progression of GCA. Microsatellite instability is more commonly found in IGCA than in DGCA. The present epigenetic data suggest that most of the decrease (or loss) of gene expression may be explained by promoter hypermethylation which is more often found in IGCA. In DGCA specific genes such as CDH1 are more often hypermethylated. Compared with GCA, in premalignant condition lesions gene mutations and chromosomal aberrations are infrequent. Epigenetic dysregulation might also represent a major mechanism for altered gene expression in premalignant stages in gastric carcinogenesis.

K-ras mutation influences macroscopic features of gastric carcinoma

INTRODUCTION

Gastric carcinoma is classified morphologically as type 1 to 4. Type 1 is defined as a polypoid tumor; types 2 and 3 are defined as ulcerated tumors with polypoid growth or gastric wall infiltration, respectively, and type 4 tumors are defined as flat. This morphological classification is important because biological characteristics differ between the four morphological types, but little is known about genetic differences between them.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One hundred eight gastric tumors were classified macroscopically as type 1 to 4. Tumoral DNA was microdissected from paraffin-embedded tissue sections. PCR amplification of exon 1 of a K-ras containing codons 12 and 13 was performed. K-ras amplicons were dot-blotted onto nylon filters and hybridized with radiolabeled oligomer primers.

RESULTS

A K-ras mutation was found in 20 of 108 gastric cancers. A significant relationship of K-ras mutation with polypoid cancer was found. The frequency of K-ras mutation was 6/14 (43%), 8/29 (28%), 2/11 (18%), and 4/54 (7%) in type 1 to 4 tumors, respectively. K-ras mutation was correlated with well-differentiated tumors. Of various types of K-ras mutations, 12 Asp often was seen in type 1 and 2 gastric cancers (well-demarcated, elevated tumors), while 12 Val and 12 Ser were often seen in type 3 and 4 cases (infiltrating carcinomas).

CONCLUSION

K-ras mutations occur prominently in type 1 and type 2 gastric cancers.

BRAF and KRAS mutations in stomach cancer

Ras proteins control signaling pathways that are key regulators of several aspects of normal cell growth and malignant transformation. BRAF, which encodes a RAF family member in the downstream pathway of RAS, is somatically mutated in a number of human cancers. The activating mutation of BRAF is known to play a role in tumor development. As there have been no data on the BRAF mutation in stomach cancer, we analysed the genomic DNAs from 319 stomach carcinomas for the detection of somatic mutations of BRAF. Overall, we detected BRAF mutations in seven stomach carcinomas (2.2%). Five of the seven BRAF mutations involved Val 599, the previously identified hotspot, but the substituted amino acid (V599 M) was different from the most common BRAF mutation (V599E). The remaining two mutations involved a conserved amino acid (D593G). One tumor had both BRAF and KRAS mutations. This is the first report on BRAF mutation in stomach cancer, and the data indicate that BRAF is occasionally mutated in stomach cancer, and suggest that alterations of RAS pathway both by RAS and BRAF mutations contribute to the pathogenesis of stomach cancer.

Mutational analysis of BRAF and K-ras in gastric cancers: absence of BRAF mutations in gastric cancers

Recently, BRAF mutations were found in a variety of human cancers. Interestingly, the most common of BRAF mutation (V599E) has not been identified in tumors with K-ras mutations. Whereas the majority of human cancer types has been screened for BRAF mutations, no detailed studies on gastric cancers have been investigated. Thus, we decided to investigate the incidence of BRAF mutations in gastric cancers, and the relationship between BRAF and K-ras mutations in such cancers. Three non-pathogenic BRAF polymorphisms and seven K-ras missense mutations were found in 66 gastric cancers and 16 gastric cancer cell lines. Although only 9% of our gastric cancer panels had K-ras mutations, the incidence of BRAF mutations was not high. Thus, BRAF mutations, which are present in a variety of other human cancers, do not seem to be involved in gastric cancer development.

ras Gene mutations and expression of Ras signal transduction mediators in gastric adenocarcinomas

OBJECTIVE

To investigate ras gene alteration in human gastric adenocarcinomas and its potential relationship to ras signal transduction mediators.

DESIGN

Genomic DNA from 104 gastric tumors were analyzed by sequencing of polymerase chain reaction-amplified products for the presence of ras mutations. All the samples were further investigated with the use of immunohistochemical analysis for ERK1 and ERK2.

SETTING

Tertiary care teaching hospital.

PATIENTS

Seventy patients from a Korean population and 34 from a Midwestern US population composed of white Americans and African Americans.

RESULTS

Fifteen tumors (14%) were positive for either H-ras or K-ras mutation: 9 (13%) of 70 Korean patients and 6 (18%) of 34 US patients. Seven (78%) of the 9 mutated tumors from Korean patients and all 6 (100%) from the US patients were intestinal-type lesions. Either ERK1 and/or ERK2 was overexpressed in 68 samples (65%). No association was established between ras mutations and overexpression of ERK1/2. However, the correlation between ERK1/2 and progression (early vs late) was statistically significant (P =.007).

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest that ras mutations are uncommon in gastric adenocarcinomas and that differing racial and/or geographic mechanisms may not underlie ras gene alteration. Most ras mutations were, however, observed in the group of intestinal-type samples, supporting the different genetic mechanisms of carcinogenesis between the intestinal- and diffuse-type tumors. It is noteworthy that enhanced ERK1/2 activity could be one of the characteristics of tumor invasiveness in gastric cancers.

Inverse relationship between APC gene mutation in gastric adenomas and development of adenocarcinoma

Gastric cancer is common among the world, but genetic mechanisms of gastric carcinogenesis are not well understood. Gastric polypoid adenomas and flat dysplasias are regarded as precursor lesions. However, a detailed molecular study of these lesions has not been done to determine their role as precancerous lesions. We investigated mutations of the APC, beta-catenin, and K-ras genes, and microsatellite instability (MSI) status in 35 adenomas and 47 flat dysplasias without adenocarcinoma, 35 adenomas/dysplasias associated with adenocarcinomas, and 39 adenocarcinomas (20 diffuse type and 19 intestinal type). Somatic APC gene mutations were identified in 76% (59 of 78) of adenomas or flat dysplasias without associated adenocarcinoma, but in only 3% (1 of 30) of adenomas/dysplasias associated with adenocarcinoma, and in only 4% (3 of 69) of adenocarcinomas (P < 0.000001). No mutations of beta-catenin were found in adenocarcinomas, or adenomas/dysplasia without APC mutation. K-ras mutations were detected in 5% (4 of 82) of gastric adenomas/dysplasia without carcinoma, 3% (1 of 39) of adenocarcinomas without associated adenoma/dysplasia, and not in 32 adenocarcinomas with associated adenoma/dysplasia. High level of MSI (MSI-H) was more frequent in gastric adenoma/dysplasia associated with carcinoma (17%, 6 of 35) than in adenomas/dysplasia without carcinoma (3%, 2 of 75; P = 0.01). MSI-H was also more frequent in intestinal type adenocarcinoma (20%, 11 of 54) than in diffuse type (0%, 0 of 20; P = 0.03). APC gene mutations were present in six of nine (67%) of gastric adenomas/dysplasias with low level of MSI, but in none of the eight adenomas/dysplasia with MSI-H phenotype (P = 0.009). Our results indicate that somatic mutation of the APC gene plays an important role in the pathogenesis of gastric adenoma and dysplasia but has a limited role in neoplastic progression to adenocarcinoma. Gastric adenomas or dysplasias without APC mutations but with or without MSI may have a different biological behavior, and are precursors of intestinal-type of gastric adenocarcinomas.

K-ras mutation in helicobacter pylori-associated chronic gastritis in patients with and without gastric cancer

Mutations of an oncogene, K-ras, are associated with the development and progression of many types of human cancer. To elucidate the significance of K-ras mutations in gastric carcinogenesis, we examined K-ras mutations in gastric cancers and in Helicobacter pylori-associated chronic gastritis (H. pylori-CG), which is associated with an increased risk for the gastric cancer development. Specimens of gastric cancer and H. pylori-CG were obtained from 64 gastric cancer patients with H. pylori-CG, 99 cancer-free H. pylori-CG patients and 30 H. pylori-negative healthy subjects. K-ras mutations were examined by polymerase chain reaction-single strand conformation polymorphism (PCR-SSCP), followed by DNA sequencing analysis. K-ras mutations were detected in 4 of 48 (8.3%) gastric cancers, in 10 of 163 (6.1%) H. pylori-CG and none of the 30 H. pylori-negative healthy subjects. In the gastric cancer patients, mutated K-ras was detected in differentiated type cancers but not in any of the undifferentiated type cancers. K-ras mutations in H. pylori-CG were significantly more frequent in gastric cancer patients than in cancer-free patients (10.9% vs. 3.0%, p = 0.044). In addition, K-ras mutations in H. pylori-CG were significantly more frequent in patients with K-ras mutated gastric cancer than in patients with K-ras unmutated gastric cancer (50.0% vs. 3.7%, p = 0.037). These data suggest that the genetic mechanism(s) of carcinogenesis differs between the differentiated type and the undifferentiated type of gastric cancer and that K-ras mutations may be involved in the early stages of gastric carcinogenesis of the differentiated type.

Methylation of O(6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase gene is associated significantly with K-ras mutation, lymph node invasion, tumor staging, and disease free survival in patients with gastric carcinoma

BACKGROUND

O(6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) can remove O(6)alkylG DNA adducts. If they are not removed, then the adducts mispair with T during DNA replication, resulting in G-to-A mutation. Interrelations between MGMT gene inactivation by promoter methylation, K-ras mutation, and clinicopathologic features in patients with gastric carcinoma were studied.

METHODS

Surgically removed tumor tissues from 79 patients were analyzed with MGMT methylation by genomic DNA modification and methylation specific polymerase chain reaction analysis, K-ras mutation by mutant allele specific amplification, TNM classification according to the International Union Against Cancer system, and MGMT protein expression by immunohistochemistry.

RESULTS

MGMT-promoter methylation was found in 18 of 79 tumors. Among those 18 tumors, K-ras mutations were found in 33% and 11% of tumors at codons 12 and 13, respectively, corresponding to 20 times and 7 times greater rates of mutation compared with unmethylated tumors. MGMT methylation was associated significantly with lymph node invasion (P < 0.01), tumor stage (P < 0.03) and 5-year disease free survival (P < 0.02). MGMT protein expression was detected in intestinal metaplasia and adenocarcinoma samples, whereas no expression was detected in normal foveolar cells.

CONCLUSIONS

MGMT-promoter methylation in patients with gastric carcinoma was associated significantly with point mutations of K-ras at codons 12 and 13, lymph node invasion, tumor stage, and disease free survival. These associations indicate a significant role of MGMT methylation during gastric carcinogenesis.

DNA aneuploidy and high proliferative activity but not K-ras-2 mutations as independent predictors of clinical outcome in operable gastric carcinoma: results of a 5-year Gruppo Oncologico dell'Italia Meridonale (GDIM) prospective study

BACKGROUND

The prognostic value of DNA ploidy, S-phase fraction (SPF) and K-ras-2 mutations in gastric carcinoma (GC) has not yet been clearly defined. The aim of this study was to clarify the association between biomolecular variables, tumor characteristics, and clinical outcome in GC patients.

METHODS

Resected specimens from a consecutive series of 69 patients with GC who underwent potentially curative surgery were studied prospectively. DNA ploidy and SPF were assessed by flow cytometry on multiple frozen tumor samples, whereas K-ras-2 mutations were detected by polymerase chain reaction followed by single-strand conformation polymorphism. All the patients involved in this study were followed up for a mean of 95 months.

RESULTS

DNA aneuploidy was present in 72% of the cases (50 of 69), whereas 10% of these (5 out of 50) showed multiclonality. Mutations of K-ras-2 were detected in 8% of the tumors (5 of 63). Both DNA ploidy and SPF were associated with TNM stage (American Joint Committee on Cancer [AJCC] staging system) and node status. Moreover, DNA aneuploidy was significantly related to high SPF. K-ras-2 mutations were not associated with clinicopathologic variables or flow cytometric indicators. At univariate analysis, advanced TNM stage, node involvement, diffuse histotype, depth of invasion, DNA aneuploidy, and high SPF proved to be significantly related to quicker tumor relapse and to shorter overall patient survival. With multivariate analysis, DNA aneuploidy, high SPF, and depth of invasion were related to risk of tumor relapse and patient death, whereas diffuse histotype was independently related to patient risk of tumor relapse.

CONCLUSIONS

DNA ploidy and SPF, when associated with clinicopathologic staging, might be useful for the identification of GC patients who have different risks for death or relapse of disease.

K-ras codon 12 mutations in Barrett's oesophagus and adenocarcinomas of the oesophagus and oesophagogastric junction

BACKGROUND

Activation of the ras oncogene is commonly found in gastrointestinal tract cancers, but the role of ras in the development and progression of Barrett's oesophagus and associated cancers is uncertain.

METHODS

The frequency of K-ras codon 12 point mutations was assessed in 52 paraffin-embedded tissues from 44 patients with oesophageal pathology. The specimens were classified pathologically as follows: adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus or oesophagogastric junction (n = 23), Barrett's high-grade dysplasia (n = 5), low-grade dysplasia (n = 14), intestinal metaplasia (n = 4), normal oesophagus (n = 5) or normal stomach (n = 1). DNA was extracted from three consecutive sections of each paraffin block and mutations at bases 1 and 2 of K-ras codon 12 were identified using a novel restriction endonuclease-mediated selective polymerase chain reaction method.

RESULTS

Mutations were found in 7 of 23 (30.4%) adenocarcinomas and in 2 of 5 (40%) high-grade dysplasia specimens. No mutations were found in specimens of low-grade dysplasia, intestinal metaplasia without dysplasia, or normal oesophagus and stomach. There were no significant associations between the presence of mutations and clinicopathologic features in the patients with cancer. One patient who progressed from low-grade to high-grade dysplasia was found to have developed mutant K-ras in the course of this transformation.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that K-ras codon 12 mutations may occur frequently in patients with Barrett's oesophagus with high-grade dysplasia or adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus or oesophagogastric junction. K-ras mutation may be a late event in the Barrett's metaplasia-dysplasia-adenocarcinoma sequence.

Activation of c-K-ras mutations in human gastrointestinal tumors

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Ras genes are the most frequently detected oncogenes in human malignancies. Data regarding the frequency of c-K-ras mutations in esophageal, gastric, and small bowel tumors are limited and controversial.

METHODS

DNA was extracted from 262 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded sections of gastrointestinal samples and tumors, including Barrett's esophagus, esophageal squamous cell carcinomas and adenocarcinomas, and small and large bowel adenomas and adenocarcinomas. The presence of c-K-ras codon 12 mutations was determined using a nonradioactive polymerase chain reaction-based restriction fragment length polymorphism assay.

RESULTS

c-K-ras mutations were detected in 1 of 39 (2%) patients with Barrett's esophagus, 1 of 21 (5%) adenocarcinomas, 0 of 27 squamous cell carcinomas of the esophagus, and 1 of 32 (3%) gastric adenocarcinomas. It was also present in 8 of 20 (40%) and 10 of 28 (36%) small bowel adenomas and adenocarcinomas, respectively. Similar numbers were observed in 10 of 25 (40%) large bowel adenomas and 11 of 30 adenocarcinomas (37%). Mutations were not associated with age, gender, histology, grade, stage, location, or mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

The frequency of codon 12 c-K-ras mutations in small and large bowel tumors is approximately 10-fold higher than that of tumors in the upper gastrointestinal tract.

Intestinal and pancreatic metaplasia at the esophagogastric junction in patients without Barrett's esophagus

OBJECTIVES

A distinctive type of columnar epithelium with intestinal metaplasia is considered diagnostic for Barrett's esophagus. The neoplastic potential of pancreatic metaplasia at the esophagogastric junction is unknown. The aims of the present study were: 1) to characterize both forms of metaplasia at the esophagogastric junction, and to estimate their prevalence; 2) to investigate c-erbB-2 expression and K-ras mutations in pancreatic metaplasia; and 3) to study the relationship between metaplasia, inflammatory changes in the cardiac mucosa, and presence of H. pylori.

METHODS

A total of 76 esophagogastrectomy specimens of patients with a normally located squamocolumnar junction, were investigated immunohistochemically. K-ras mutations were evaluated using PCR.

RESULTS

Intestinal metaplasia in the cardia was found in 12% of patients: six complete-type, and three incomplete-type. Pancreatic metaplasia was demonstrated in 14% of patients, and neither c-erbB-2 expression nor K-ras mutations were found. Intestinal and pancreatic metaplasia were associated with mucosal inflammation. In contrast to generalized gastritis, isolated "carditis" was not associated with H. pylori infection.

CONCLUSIONS

When intestinal metaplasia occurs in a biopsy from the esophagogastric junction, it is not necessarily a marker for Barrett's esophagus. No indication was found that pancreatic metaplasia has neoplastic potential. Both forms of metaplasia reflect mucosal inflammation. Carditis may be a distinct inflammatory condition of the gastric mucosa that is not related to H. pylori infection.

Telomerase activity and its clinicopathological significance in gastric cancer

In order to assess the role of telomerase in development of malignant gastric cancer, we measured the telomerase activity in gastric cancer tissues and normal tissues obtained from 95 patients by employing recently developed sensitive PCR (polymerase chain reaction)-based telomerase assay (telomeric repeat amplification protocol, TRAP). We also investigated how telomerase activity related to other clinicopathological findings including DNA ploidy and K-RAS gene point mutation. The telomerase activity was present in 85 of the 95 gastric cancer tissues, whereas we detected no telomerase activity in any normal tissue. The incidence of telomerase activity in gastric cancer tissues was not correlated to age, sex, tumour stage, histological grade, DNA ploidy or K-RAS mutation. Disease-free or overall survival of patients having tumours with detectable telomerase activity was not significantly different from that of those without telomerase activity. These findings suggest that telomerase may play a key role in the establishment and progression of the gastric cancer and further studies will be needed to elucidate the biological role of telomerase in gastric cancer.