A phase II study of paclitaxel-ifosfamide-cisplatin combination in advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma

Distinct patterns of angiogenic factor expression as a predictive factor of response to chemotherapy in stage IIIA non-small-cell lung cancer patients

The expression of various angiogenic factors was assessed in tumour samples of patients with stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and further evaluated in terms of response to induction paclitaxel-ifosfamide-cisplatin chemotherapy. Freshly isolated lung tumour specimens obtained by bronchoscopy from 70 stage IIIA NSCLC chemotherapy-naïve patients were sampled and analysed for vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR)-1, VEGFR-2 and VEGFR-3. Microvessel density was assessed through evaluating the angiogenic markers CD34 and CD105. Immunostaining scores were calculated by multiplying the percentage of labeled cells by the intensity of staining for each examined parameter. The overall mean immunostaining score value from all NSCLC samples was 7.83, 5.56 and 15.86 for VEGFR-1, VEGFR-2 and VEGFR-3, respectively. The overall mean value of the endothelial antigen CD34 was 16.29, whereas the expression of the CD105 antigen in endothelial cells yielded a multivariate distribution. Patients who responded to chemotherapy expressed significantly higher VEGFR-1 and VEGFR-3 mean values compared with non-responders (P<0.001). No significant difference was noted in VEGFR-2 mean values between these two groups (P=0.06). The CD34 mean value was significantly higher in responders (P<0.001), whereas there was no significant difference in CD105 expression between the two groups (P=0.07). Angiogenic marker expression proved to be a potential predictive factor of response to chemotherapy in stage III NSCLC. which merits further investigation.

BRCA1-IRIS inactivation overcomes paclitaxel resistance in triple negative breast cancers

Introduction

Intrinsic or acquired chemoresistance is a major problem in oncology. Although highly responsive to chemotherapies such as paclitaxel, most triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients develop chemoresistance. Here we investigate the role of BRCA1-IRIS as a novel treatment target for TNBCs and their paclitaxel-resistant recurrences.

Methods

We analyzed the response of BRCA1-IRIS overexpressing normal mammary cells or established TNBC cells silenced from BRCA1-IRIS to paclitaxel in vitro and in vivo. We analyzed BRCA1-IRIS downstream signaling pathways in relation to paclitaxel treatment. We also analyzed a large cohort of breast tumor samples for BRCA1-IRIS, Forkhead box class O3a (FOXO3a) and survivin expression. Finally, we analyzed the effect of BRCA1-IRIS silencing or inactivation on TNBCs formation, maintenance and response to paclitaxel in an orthotopic model.

Results

We show that low concentrations of paclitaxel triggers BRCA1-IRIS expression in vitro and in vivo, and that BRCA1-IRIS activates two autocrine signaling loops (epidermal growth factor (EGF)/EGF receptor 1 (EGFR)-EGF receptor 2 (ErbB2) and neurogulin 1 (NRG1)/ErbB2-EGF receptor 3 (ErbB3), which enhances protein kinase B (AKT) and thus survivin expression/activation through promoting FOXO3a degradation. This signaling pathway is intact in TNBCs endogenously overexpressing BRCA1-IRIS. These events trigger the intrinsic and acquired paclitaxel resistance phenotype known for BRCA1-IRIS-overexpressing TNBCs. Inactivating BRCA1-IRIS signaling using a novel inhibitory mimetic peptide inactivates these autocrine loops, AKT and survivin activity/expression, in part by restoring FOXO3a expression, and sensitizes TNBC cells to low paclitaxel concentrations in vitro and in vivo. Finally, we show BRCA1-IRIS and survivin overexpression is correlated with lack of FOXO3a expression in a large cohort of primary tumor samples, and that BRCA1-IRIS overexpression-induced signature is associated with decreased disease free survival in heavily treated estrogen receptor alpha-negative patients.

Conclusions

In addition to driving TNBC tumor formation, BRCA1-IRIS overexpression drives their intrinsic and acquired paclitaxel resistance, partly by activating autocrine signaling loops EGF/EGFR-ErbB2 and NRG1/ErbB2-ErbB3. These loops activate AKT, causing FOXO3a degradation and survivin overexpression. Taken together, this underscores the need for BRCA1-IRIS-specific therapy and strongly suggests that BRCA1-IRIS and/or signaling loops activated by it could be rational therapeutic targets for advanced TNBCs.

Docetaxel-Ifosfamide Combination in Patients with Advanced Breast Cancer Failing Prior Anthracycline- Based Regimens: Results of a Phase I-II Study

The established clinical activity of docetaxel and ifosfamide as single agents in anthracycline pre-treated breast cancer, led us to conduct a phase I-II study to define the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), and clinical activity of the docetaxel+ifosfamide combination in this setting. Patients with histologically confirmed metastatic breast cancer, after failure on prior anthracycline-based chemotherapy, were treated at successive dose levels (DLs) in cohorts of 3-6 with escalated doses of docetaxel 70-100 mg/m(2) over 1 h on day 1 followed by ifosfamide 5-6 g/m(2) divided over days 1+2 (2.5-3.0 g/m(2)/day over 1 h), every 21 days. G-CSF was added once dose-limiting neutropenia was encountered at a certain DL and planned to be incorporated prophylactically in subsequent higher DLs. Between March 1997 and December 2002, 65 patients with a median age of 57 years (range, 32-72) and performance status (WHO) of 1 (range, 0-2) were treated at 5 DLs as follows; 21 in phase I DLs (DL1: 3, DL2: 6, DL3: 3, DL4: 6, and DL5: 3) and the remaining 44 were treated at DL4 (total of 50 patients at DL4), which was defined as the level for phase II testing. All patients were assessable for toxicity and 62 for response. DLT (with the addition of G-CSF after DL2) was reached at DL5 with 2/3 initial patients developing febrile neutropenia. Clinical response rates (RRs), on an intention-to-treat basis, in phase II were: 56%; (95% CI, 42.2-69.7%); 4 CRs, 24 PRs, 10 SD and 12 PD. The median response duration was 7 mo (3-24 mo), median TTP 6.5 mo (0.1-26 mo), and median OS 13 mo (0.1-33 mo). Grade 3/4 toxicities included: neutropenia in 72% of patients, with 60% developing grade 4 neutropenia (<or=7 days) and in 10% of these febrile neutropenia, while no grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia was observed. Other toxicities included peripheral neuropathy grade 2 only in 10%, grade 1/2 reversible CNS toxicity in 16%, no renal toxicity, grade 2 myalgias in 8%, grade 3 diarrhea in 8%, skin/nail toxicity in 14%, and grade 2 fluid retention in 2% of patients. One patient in the study treated at phase II died as a result of acute liver failure after the first cycle. The present phase I-II study has determined the feasibility, defined the MTD and demonstrated the encouraging activity of the docetaxel-ifosfamide combination in the phase II part of the study. Therefore, future randomized phase III studies versus single-agent docetaxel or combinations of the latter with other active agents are warranted.

Evaluation of the paclitaxel-ifosfamide-cisplatin (TIP) combination in relapsed and/or metastatic cervical cancer

Background:

Recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer represents an aggressive malignancy with a high rate of locoregional and distant failure. Therefore, we evaluated the three-drug combination of paclitaxel–ifosfamide–cisplatin (TIP).

Methods:

Systemic chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced metastatic/relapsed cervical cancer and a World Health Organization (WHO) performance status (PS) of 0–2 were eligible. TIP chemotherapy doses were paclitaxel 175 mg m⁻² on day 1, ifosfamide 2.5 g m⁻² on days 1+2, and cisplatin 40 mg m⁻² on days 1+2, with prophylactic granulocyte-colony stimulating factor.

Results:

A total of 42 patients with recurrent/metastatic cervical cancer are evaluable for response and toxicity: median age: 56 (25–74) years; PS: 1 (0–2); histologies – squamous: 35, adenosquamous: 5, and adenocarcinoma: 2. Responses were overall response rate (RR): 62% (95% confidence interval (CI): 47.3–76.7%), with complete response (CR): 26% (95% CI: 12.7–39.3%), and partial response (PR): 36% (95% CI: 21.5–49.9%). Responses according to the relapse site were overall RR: 32% (95% CI: 13.7–50.3%) within previously irradiated pelvis vs 75% (95% CI: 57.7–92.3%) in extra-pelvic sites. Median time to progression (TTP) was 7 (range, 2–34+) months and median overall survival (OS) was 16.5 (range, 3–36+) months. Toxicities included grade 3–4 neutropenia: 83% (21% febrile neutropenia), grade 3–4 thrombocytopenia: 9%, no grade 3 neuropathy (35% grade 2), grade 2 asthenia/fatigue 15%, and no treatment-related deaths.

Conclusion:

TIP is an active regimen with acceptable toxicity in advanced/relapsed cervical cancer.

Docetaxel–ifosfamide combination in patients with HER2-non-overexpressing advanced breast cancer failing prior anthracyclines

The feasibility of the docetaxel-ifosfamide combination, as well as the definition of maximum tolerated doses (MTD) in a previous phase I study, led us to continue evaluating the regimen in an extended phase II study in patients with HER2-non-overexpressing, anthracycline pre-treated advanced breast cancer. Patients with histologically confirmed metastatic breast cancer failing prior anthracycline-based chemotherapy were treated with docetaxel 100 mg/m2 over 1 h on day 1 followed by ifosfamide 5 g/m2 divided over days 1 and 2 (2.5 g/m2/day over 1 h), and recycled every 21 days with prophylactic granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) administration from day 3-until a neutrophil count >10,000/microl. Between March 1999 and June 2002, 71 patients with a median age of 55 years (range, 28-72) and performance status (World Health Organization; WHO) of 1 (range, 0-2) were treated; all were assessable for toxicity and 70 patients for response. Clinical response rates (RRs), on an intention-to-treat basis were: 41/71 [58%; 95% CI, 46.5-69.5%]; 7 complete remissions (CRs), 34 partial remissions (PRs), 15 stable disease (SD) and 15 progressive disease (PD). The median response duration was 7.5 months (2-28 months), median time-to-progression (TTP) 6 months (0.1-30 months), and median overall survival (OS) 12 months (0.1-36 months). Grade 3/4 toxicities included; neutropenia in 63% of patients-with 52% developing grade 4 neutropenia (>or=7 days) and in 11% of these febrile neutropenia (FN), while no grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia was observed. Other toxicities included; peripheral neuropathy grade 2 only in 7%, grade 1/2 reversible central nervous system (CNS) toxicity in 11%, no renal toxicity, grade 2 myalgias in 7%, grade 3 diarrhea in 4%, skin/nail toxicity in 11%, and grade 1/2 fluid retention in 28% of patients. The present report has demonstrated encouraging activity of the docetaxel-ifosfamide combination in anthracycline-pretreated, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer. Therefore, future randomized phase III studies versus single-agent docetaxel or currently established combinations of the latter with other agents in this setting with established clinical activity, such as capecitabine or gemcitabine, will be warranted.

A phase I–II study of bi-weekly gemcitabine and irinotecan as second-line chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer after prior taxane + platinum-based regimens

PURPOSE

Treatment options in patients with recurrent non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remain limited as a result of poor activity of most agents after failure of platinum-based therapy. In the present phase I-II study, we evaluated the feasibility and efficacy of bi-weekly gemcitabine (GEM) + irinotecan (CPT-11) in patients with relapsed NSCLC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with advanced NSCLC, WHO-performance status (PS) </= 2, prior taxane/platinum-based chemotherapy were eligible. Chemotherapy was administered in a dose-escalated fashion in subgroups of 3-6 patients until dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was encountered as follows: CPT-11 150 or 180 mg/m(2) followed by GEM 1,200-1,800 mg/m(2), both on days 1 + 15, recycled every 28 days in four dose levels (DLs).

RESULTS

Forty-nine patients entered the phase I and II part of the study (phase I: 12-phase II: 37 + 3 at DL-3), and 40 patients were evaluable for a response in phase II and all for toxicity: median age, 61 years (range 36-74); PS, 1 (0-2); gender, 43 males/6 females-histologies; adenocarcinoma, 25; squamous, 20; large cell, 4. Metastatic sites included lymph nodes, 38; bone, 5; liver, 4; brain, 3; lung nodules, 14; adrenals, 13; other, 3. All patients had prior taxane + platinum-based treatment, and 42 patients had prior docetaxel-ifosfamide-cisplatin/or-carboplatin regimens. DLT was observed at DL-4 and included 2/3 cases with grade 3 diarrhea-1/3 of these with febrile neutropenia. The recommended DL for phase II evaluation was DL3: GEM, 1,500 + CPT-11-180 mg/m(2). Objective responses in phase II were PR, 6/40 [15%; 95% confidence interval (CI), 5-31%]; stable disease, 16/40 (40%; 95% CI, 21-53%); and progressive disease, 18/40 (45%; 95% CI, 28.5-62.5%). The median time-to-progression was 4 months (range 1-12) and median survival 7 months (range 1.5-42 +), while 1-year survival was 20%. Grade 3/4 neutropenia was seen in 18% of patients (6% grade 4) and 6% incidence of febrile neutropenia. No Grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia were seen, grade 3 diarrhea in 6% of patients and grade 2 in 15% of patients, while other grade 3 non-hematologic toxicities were never encountered.

CONCLUSIONS

Bi-weekly GEM + CPT-11 is active and well tolerated in patients with advanced NSCLC failing prior taxane + platinum regimens, and represents an effective and convenient combination to apply in the palliative treatment of relapsed NSCLC particularly after failure of first-line docetaxel + platinum-based regimens.

A Phase II Study of the Docetaxel- Ifosfamide-Carboplatin Combination in Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

PURPOSE

In the present phase II study we evaluated the docetaxel-ifosfamide-carboplatin (DICb) combination in the outpatient setting in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with advanced NSCLC (stages IIIB/IV), WHO performance status (PS) <2, and no prior chemotherapy were eligible. Chemotherapy drug doses were: docetaxel: 80 mg/m2, ifosfamide: 3.5 g/m2, and carboplatin at a target area under the curve of 5 (based on Calvert's formula), all on day 1, followed by prophylactic G-CSF.

RESULTS

Fourty patients were entered and all are evaluable for response and toxicity: median age: 64 (48-72); PS: 1 (0-1); gender: 29 males/11 females; stages: IIIB: 13 (33%), IV: 27 (67%). Metastatic sites at diagnosis included: lymph nodes: 25; bone: 7; liver: 4; brain: 5; lung nodules: 13; adrenals: 6. Responses were as follows: 22/40 [55%; 95% confidence interval (CI), 54-81%] evaluable patients responded: 4 complete responses, 18 partial responses, 11 had stable disease, and 7 had progressive disease. The median response duration was 7 months (range 2-14 months), median time to progression 9 months (range 2-18 months) and median overall survival 11 months (range 3-46+ months). 1-year survival was 47.5%. Grade 3/4 toxicities included: neutropenia 28/40, with 12 developing grade 4 and 12% febrile neutropenia, thrombocytopenia grade 3: 3/40 and grade 4: 1/40, no grade 3 neuropathy, grade 1 CNS toxicity in 3, no renal toxicity, 8 grade 2 diarrhea and 4 grade 3 vomiting.

CONCLUSION

In the present phase II study the DICb combination yielded important activity and good tolerability in advanced NSCLC.

A Phase II Study of the Docetaxel–Carboplatin Chemotherapy Regimen in Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

The efficacy of the docetaxel-carboplatin combination chemotherapy was studied in various phase II studies. Based on these data we aimed to test the regimen in previously untreated patients with advanced advanced non-smoking lung cancer (NSCLC) with docetaxel 80 mg/m2 a standard dose of carboplatin at AUC = 5, in an attempt to define the efficacy and tolerability of the combination in an open-label phase II study. Patients with histologically confirmed advanced NSCLC stage IIIB and IV were candidates for the present study. Docetaxel was administered at 80 mg/m2 over 1 h by intravenous (IV) infusion followed by carboplatin AUC = 5 in 30 min IV infusion, both on day 1, and recycled every 21 days. Sixty patients received 263 courses of therapy in total; 231/263 (88%) were administered according to the planned doses, and 48/60 (80%) patients received chemotherapy without decrement of the dose; 32/263 (12%) of the courses were administered with a 10%-30% dose reduction. Complete responses (CR) were seen in 5 patients (8.3%) and partial responses (PR) in 16 patients (26.7%) for an overall response rate of 35%. Median duration of response was 7.5 months [95% confidence interval (CI)-7.1-7.9], time to progression (TIP) 11.5 months (95% CI-8.2-14.8), median overall survival (OS) 15.0 months (95% CI-10.8-19.2). One-year survival was 61.7%. Toxicity was acceptable; it was calculated according to the administered cycles and was mainly neutropenia: grade 3, 9% and grade 4, 2%; anemia: grade 3, 8%; nausea and vomiting: grade 3, 8%. The outpatient regimen of docetaxel-carboplatin is effective with acceptable toxicity in patients with advanced NSCLC.

Ifosfamide in non-small cell lung cancer

In recent years the role of chemotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has been well established. Ifosfamide is an old drug still considered an effective cytostatic agent in the treatment of NSCLC. As a single agent, it has showed a response rate of 20-25%. These results are improved when it is used in combination with cisplatin and mitomycin C. Moreover, in recent years, several new drugs like gemcitabine, taxanes and vinorelbine have been identified, and combinations of two or three drugs have been tested in patients with advanced NSCLC. This paper reviews the main studies recently conducted for the treatment of NSCLC, considering the results obtained by ifosfamide alone and in combination. Three-drug regimens including first-generation cytostatic agents achieve a response rate of about 40% and median survival of 10 months. In combinations with new drugs, ifosfamide shows an improvement in response rate (50%) with a median survival of more than 1 year. Open questions in the treatment of NSCLC are whether three-drug are better than two-drug combinations, and whether cisplatin is still required.

Phase I-II study of docetaxel and ifosfamide combination in patients with anthracycline pretreated advanced breast cancer

Given the established individual activity of docetaxel and ifosfamide in anthracycline pretreated advanced breast cancer, the present phase I-II study aimed to define the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), and activity of the docetaxel-ifosfamide combination in this setting. Cohorts of three to six patients with histologically confirmed metastatic breast cancer after prior anthracycline-based chemotherapy were treated at successive dose levels (DLs) with escalated doses of docetaxel 70-100 mg x m(-2) over 1 h on day 1 followed by ifosfamide 5-6 g x m(-2) divided over days 1 and 2 (2.5-3.0 g x m(-2) day(-1) over 1 h), and recycled every 21 days. G-CSF was added once dose-limiting neutropenia was encountered at a certain DL and planned to be incorporated prophylactically in subsequent higher DLs. In total, 56 patients with a median age of 54.5 (range, 32-72) years and performance status (WHO) of 1 (range, 0-2) were treated at five DLs as follows: 21 in phase I DLs (DL1: 3, DL2: 6, DL3: 3, DL4: 6, and DL5: 3) and the remaining 35 were treated at DL4 (total of 41 patients at DL4), which was defined as the level for phase II testing. All patients were assessable for toxicity and 53 for response. Dose-limiting toxicity (with the addition of G-CSF after DL2) was reached at DL5 with two out of three initial patients developing febrile neutropenia (FN). Clinical response rates, on an intention-to-treat basis, in phase II were: 53.6% (95% CI, 38.3-68.9%); three complete remissions, 19 partial remissions, seven stable disease, and 12 progressive disease. The median response duration was 7 months (3-24 months), median time to progression 6.5 month (0.1-26 month), and median overall survival 13 months (0.1-33 months). Grade 3/4 toxicities included time to progression neutropenia in 78% of patients-with 63% developing grade 4 neutropenia (<or=7 days) and in 12% of these FN, while no grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia was observed. Other toxicities included peripheral neuropathy grade 2 only in 12%, grade 1/2 reversible CNS toxicity in 17%, no renal toxicity, grade 2 myalgias in 10%, grade 3 diarrhoea in 10%, skin/nail toxicity in 17%, and grade 2 fluid retention in 2% of patients. One patient in the study treated at phase II died as a result of acute liver failure after the first cycle. In conclusion, the present phase I-II study determined the feasibility of the docetaxel-ifosfamide combination, defined the MTD and demonstrated the encouraging activity of the regimen in phase II, thus warranting further randomised phase III comparisons to single-agent docetaxel or combinations of the latter with other active agents.

An overview of current results with the gemcitabine and docetaxel combination as initial and salvage chemotherapy regimen in advanced non-small cell lung cancer

The activity of single-agent docetaxel in patients with platinum pretreated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has been established in two recent large randomized phase III trials, either against best supportive care or versus single-agent vinorelbine/ifosfamide. Moreover, single-agent gemcitabine has demonstrated significant activity and clinical benefit in platinum- and paclitaxel-pretreated advanced NSCLC. Combination regimens employing these two agents in various doses and schedules have recently been initiated. The gemcitabine/docetaxel combination with or without G-CSF support as salvage therapy of NSCLC pre-treated with platinum+/-paclitaxel-based regimens has been evaluated in four recently published phase II clinical studies and has been shown to represent a tolerable and active regimen in this setting, yielding a 10-33% response rate, thus, warranting randomized comparisons to single-agent gemcitabine or docetaxel, drugs currently recommended in second-line treatment of advanced NSCLC.

Phase II study of Taxol combined With ifosfamide and carboplatin in the treatment of stage IIIb-IV non-small-cell lung cancer

The objective of the present study was to evaluate the activity and the toxicity of an original combination of paclitaxel (Taxol), ifosfamide, and carboplatin in patients with stage IIIB-IV non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Sixty-one patients with previously untreated stage IIIB-IV NSCLC were enrolled by five institutions. Paclitaxel was given at the dose of 200 mg/m iv in 3 hours, ifosfamide (with mesna) at the dose of 3 g/m and carboplatin at an area under the curve 5, on day 1, every 21 days for a total of six cycles in responding or stabilized patients. Among the 59 patients evaluable for response, 2 complete remissions and 25 partial remissions were achieved for an overall response rate of 45.7% (95% CI = 32.7-59.2). According to an intention-to-treat analysis, the response rate was 44.2%. Thirteen patients had a stable disease, whereas 19 progressed. The median time to progression was 7.7 months (range: 1-18), whereas the median overall survival was 10 months (range: 1-30+). The 1-year survival rate was 43%. Hematologic toxicity was exceptionally mild, and peripheral neurologic toxicity of grade III was experienced by only three patients. There was one toxic death. This original triplet regimen based on paclitaxel, ifosfamide, and carboplatin has proved active, safe, and easy to deliver on an outpatient basis for patients with advanced NSCLC. Randomized studies both versus carboplatin-paclitaxel and other triplets are clearly warranted.

A phase I-II study of docetaxel-ifosfamide-cisplatin (DIP) combination chemotherapy regimen in advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer

In an attempt to develop more effective chemotherapy regimens in advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC), we evaluated docetaxel-ifosfamide-cisplatin (DIP) based on our previous experience with paclitaxel-ifosfamide-cisplatin. Patients with advanced NSCLC (stages III-IV), WHO-PS< or =2, no prior chemotherapy and unimpaired hematopoietic and organ function were eligible. Chemotherapy was administered in successive dose levels (DLs) and included docetaxel (80-100 mg/m2 day 1), ifosfamide (4-5 g/m2) and cisplatin (80-100 mg/m2), both divided over days 1 and 2 every 21 days. G-CSF (lenograstin) was administered from days 4-13. Fifty-five patients were accrued (phase I: 15; phase II: 40) and all are evaluable for response and toxicity: median age = 58 (40-72); PS = 1 (0-2); gender = 48 males, 7 females; stages IIIA = 8, IIIB = 19, IV = 28; and histologies were adenocarcinoma (29), squamous (20), large cell (6). Metastatic sites at diagnosis included lymph nodes (33), bone (8), liver (6), brain (6), lung nodules (9), adrenals (7) and soft tissue (1). The dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was reached at DL4 (Docetaxel: 100 mg/m2-Ifosfamide: 5 g/m2-Cisplatin: 100 mg/m2) consisting of 2 cases of febrile neutropenia (FN), and DL3 (Docetaxel: 100 mg/m2-Ifosfamide: 5 g/m2-Cisplatin: 80 mg/m2) was considered as the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended for further phase II testing. Among evaluable patients in phase II, 31/46 (67%; CI = 54-81%) responded; 4 were complete responses, 27 partial responses, 12 with stable disease and 3 with progressive disease. The median response duration was 7 months (2-21+), median time to progression (TTP) 8 months (1-23+) and median overall survival (OS) 13 months (2-23+). The 1-year survival was 57%. Grade (Gr) 3/4 toxicities included neutropenia 39/46 with 27 developing Gr4 (< or =7 days) and 20% FN managed successfully with broad-spectrum antibiotics, thrombocytopenia Gr3 3/46-Gr4 1/46, no Gr3 neuropathy, Gr1-2 CNS toxicity in 12, no renal toxicity, 15 Gr2 myalgias, 17 Gr2 diarrhea and 10 Gr3 vomiting. In the present phase I-II study, DIP appears highly active and tolerable in advanced NSCLC in the outpatient setting. Randomized comparisons to current standard 2-drug regimens will be warranted.

Gemcitabine and docetaxel as second-line chemotherapy for patients with nonsmall cell lung carcinoma who fail prior paclitaxel plus platinum-based regimens

BACKGROUND

Treatment options for patients with recurrent nonsmall cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) remain limited as a result of poor activity of older agents after platinum-based therapy. In the current Phase II study, the authors evaluated the combination of gemcitabine and docetaxel in patients with recurrent NSCLC.

METHODS

Patients with advanced NSCLC (Stage IIIB-IV), a World Health Organization performance status (PS) < or = 2, prior paclitaxel plus platinum-based chemotherapy, and unimpaired hematopoietic and organ function were eligible. Chemotherapy was administered as follows: gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) was administered on Days 1 and 8 followed by docetaxel 100 mg/m(2) on Day 8, and this regimen was recycled every 21 days. Prophylactic granulocyte-colony stimulating factor was administered on Days 10-14 or until the patient achieved a white blood cell count > or = 5000/microL.

RESULTS

Of 43 patients who were entered on the study, 41 patients were evaluable for response, and all were evaluable for toxicity. The median patient age was 63 years (range, 47-70 years), the median PS was 1 (range, 0-2), there were 38 male patients, and there were 5 female patients. Four patients had Stage IIIA disease, 17 patients had Stage IIIB disease, and 22 patients had Stage IV disease. Histologies included 19 patients with adenocarcinoma, 18 patients with squamous cell carcinoma, and 3 patients with large cell carcinoma. Metastatic sites included lymph nodes in 28 patients, bone in 6 patients, liver in 5 patients, brain in 5 patients, lung nodules in 8 patients, adrenals in 7 patients, and other sites in 3 patients. All patients had received prior paclitaxel plus platinum-based treatment; 28 patients had received prior paclitaxel, ifosfamide, and cisplatin. Objective responses were partial response (PR) in 14 of 43 patients [33%; 95% confidence interval [95%CI], 18.5-46.6%], stable disease (SD) in 16 of 43 patients (37%; 95% CI, 22.8-51.6%), and progressive disease (PD) in 13 of 43 patients (30%; 95% CI, 16.3-43.7%). The median time to disease progression was 6 months (range, 1.0-20.0+ months), and the median survival was 8.5 months (range, 1.5-20.0+ months). The 1-year survival rate was 28%. Grade 3-4 neutropenia was experienced by 53% of patients (30% Grade 4), with 14% of patients experiencing febrile neutropenia. Grade 3 thrombocytopenia was experienced by 7% of patients (no Grade 4), whereas other Grade 3 nonhematologic toxicities were never encountered.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of gemcitabine and docetaxel is active and is well tolerated in patients with advanced NSCLC who have failed prior taxane plus platinum chemotherapy. This regimen represents a tolerable and effective combination to apply in the palliative treatment of patients with recurrent NSCLC.

Gemcitabine and vinorelbine as second-line therapy in non-small-cell lung cancer after prior treatment with taxane+platinum-based regimens

Treatment options in patients with recurrent non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remain limited as a result of the poor activity of older agents after platinum-based therapy. The present phase II study aimed to evaluate the combination of gemcitabine and vinorelbine in patients with relapsed NSCLC after pretreatment with taxane+platinum-based regimens, since gemcitabine has demonstrated activity in that setting and the combination has been well tolerated in previous phase I/II studies. Patients with advanced NSCLC (stages III/IV), World Health Organization (WHO), Performance Status (PS) < or = 2, prior platinum+taxane-based chemotherapy and unimpaired haematopoietic and organ function were eligible. Chemotherapy was administered as follows: vinorelbine 25 mg/m(2) followed by gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2), both administered on days 1 and 8, recycled every 3 weeks. 40 patients were entered and 39 were evaluable for response and all 40 for toxicity: median age was 61 years (range 50-72 years), median PS=1 (range 0-2), gender ratio=37 males/3 females, stages at initial diagnoses were IIIA=2, IIIB=14, IV=24. Metastatic sites included: lymph nodes: 23, bone: 4, liver: 5, brain: 4, lung nodules: 9, adrenals: 8, pleural effusion: 4. 22 patients had prior paclitaxel/ifosfamide/cisplatin treatment. Objective responses were; partial response (PR): 9/40 (22.5%), stable disease (SD): 13/40 (32.5%) and progressive disease (PD) 18/40 (45%). The median time-to-progression (TTP) was 4.5 months (range 1-17 months) and median survival 7 months (range 2-17+ months). 1-year survival was 17%. Grade 3 neutropenia was seen in 33% of patients. There was no grade 4 neutropenia and no episodes of febrile neutropenia. No grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia or grade 3/4 other non-haematological toxicities were observed. The combination of gemcitabine/vinorelbine is active and well tolerated in patients with advanced NSCLC failing prior taxane/platinum therapy. This regimen represents a tolerable and effective combination to apply in the palliative treatment of relapsed NSCLC.

Phase II study of paclitaxel, ifosfamide, and cisplatin as second-line treatment in relapsed small-cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

The aim of the present phase II study was to evaluate the efficacy of the paclitaxel, ifosfamide, and cisplatin (PIC) combination in relapsed small-cell lung cancer (SCLC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eligible patients were those with SCLC who had progressed or relapsed after therapy with carboplatin and etoposide (with or without chest radiotherapy). The PIC regimen consisted of paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2) on day 1, ifosfamide 5 g/m(2) divided over days 1 and 2, and cisplatin 100 mg/m(2) divided over days 1 and 2; PIC was given every 21 days with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support.

RESULTS

Thirty-three patients (30 men and three women) were entered onto the study (median age, 62 years [range, 55 to 70 years]; median performance status, 1 [range, 0 to 2]). Metastatic sites at study entry included the lymph nodes (n = 13 patients), bone (n = 9), liver (n = 5), brain (n = 6), lung nodules (n = 8), adrenal glands (n = 9), and other (n = 2) Responses included eight complete remissions and 16 partial remissions (overall response rate, 73% [24 of 33 patients]). Five patients had stable disease and two had progressive disease. Median time to progression and overall survival were 21 and 28 weeks, respectively. The 1-year survival rate was 12%, with two patients alive without evidence of disease at 76 and 104 weeks since PIC initiation. Grade 3 and 4 toxicities included neutropenia in 30 patients (24 [73%] developed grade 4 neutropenia [ < 5 days]) and febrile neutropenia in six patients (18%); grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia was seen in nine patients (27%). No grade 3 neuropathy was observed; grade 1 or 2 CNS toxicity was seen in five patients, there was no renal toxicity, grade 2 myalgias were seen in nine patients, grade 2 diarrhea was seen in one patient, and grade 3 nausea or vomiting was seen in seven patients. There were no treatment-related deaths.

CONCLUSION

In the present phase II study, the PIC combination seemed highly active and tolerable in patients with relapsed SCLC when it was administered as second-line treatment. Given the present experience, an evaluation of the PIC regimen as front-line treatment of SCLC is planned.