A phase II study of irinotecan in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Review of New Advances with Focus on Targeted Therapy and Immunotherapy

With an expected incidence of more than 1 million cases by 2025, liver cancer remains a problem for world health. With over 90% of cases, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most prevalent kind of liver cancer. In this review, we presented the range of experimental therapeutics for patients with advanced HCC, the successes and failures of new treatments, areas for future development, the evaluation of dose-limiting toxicity in different drugs, and the safety profile in patients with liver dysfunction related to the underlying chronic liver disease. In addition to the unmet demand for biomarkers to guide treatment decisions and the burgeoning fields of immunotherapy and systemic therapy in hepatocellular carcinoma, the development of old and new drugs, including their failures and current advancements, has been reviewed. This review aims to evaluate the updated optimal clinical treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinomas in clinical practice, mainly through targeted therapy. Although surgical treatment can significantly enhance the survival probability of early and intermediate-stage patients, it is unsuitable for most HCC patients due to a lack of donors. Due to their severe toxicity, the few first-line anti-HCC drugs, such as sorafenib, are often reserved for advanced HCC patients for whom other therapies have failed. The second-line drugs are usually alternatives for patients with intolerance or resistance. Consequently, the ongoing growth of possible preclinical drugs and studies on miRNAs, lncRNAs, and numerous other signaling pathway targets for developing novel drugs may introduce additional treatment prospects for HCC.

Role of 5-methylcytosine in determining the prognosis, tumor microenvironment, and applicability of precision medicine in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma

Background: 5-methylcytosine has a profound impact on the development and progression of hepatocellular carcinoma. The aim of this study was to investigate the usefulness of 5-methylcytosine in determining the prognosis, tumor microenvironment, and applicability of precision medicine in hepatocellular carcinoma.

Methods: We collected data of seven hepatocellular carcinoma cohorts (The Cancer Genome Atlas, International Cancer Genome Consortium, GSE14520, GSE6764, GSE9843, GSE63898, GSE76427). An unsupervised clustering method was used to identify novel subtypes of hepatocellular carcinoma based on the expression 5-methylcytosine gene signatures. The 5-methylcytosine score was determined using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator method based on the differential expression of genes in the identified subtypes. Subsequently, we investigated the association between 5-methylcytosine-based clusters (according to the 5-methylcytosine score) and clinical outcomes, immunophenotypes, classical molecular subtypes, and therapeutic opportunities in hepatocellular carcinoma. Finally, we examined the sensitivity of patients with high 5-methylcytosine score to drugs.

Results: We identified two hepatocellular carcinoma-specific, 5-methylcytosine-based subtypes (clusters 1 and 2). Cluster 1 exhibited significantly higher 5-methylcytosine scores versus cluster 2. The 5-methylcytosine-based subtypes accurately predicted classical molecular subtypes, immunophenotypes, prognosis, and therapeutic opportunities for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Cluster 1 (high 5-methylcytosine score) was characterized by lower anticancer immunity and worse prognosis versus cluster 2 (low 5-methylcytosine score). Moreover, cluster 1 (high 5-methylcytosine score) exhibited low sensitivity to cancer immunotherapy, but high sensitivity to radiotherapy and targeted therapy with lenvatinib.

Conclusion: The novel 5-methylcytosine-based subtypes (according to the 5-methylcytosine score) may reflect the prognosis, tumor microenvironment, and applicability of precision medicine in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

Phytochemicals as an Alternative or Integrative Option, in Conjunction with Conventional Treatments for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Simple Summary

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is globally ranked as the sixth most diagnosed cancer, and the second most deadly cancer. To worsen matters, there are only limited therapeutic options currently available; therefore, it is necessary to find a reservoir from which new HCC treatments may be acquired. The field of phytomedicine may be the solution to this problem, as it offers an abundance of plant-derived molecules, which show capabilities of being effective against HCC proliferation, invasion, migration, and metastasis. In our review, we collect and analyze current evidence regarding these promising phytochemical effects on HCC, and delve into their potential as future chemotherapies. Additionally, information on the signaling behind these numerous phytochemicals is provided, in an attempt to understand their mechanisms. This review makes accessible the current body of knowledge pertaining to phytochemicals as HCC treatments, in order to serve as a reference and inspiration for further research into this subject.

Abstract

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most abundant form of liver cancer. It accounts for 75–85% of liver cancer cases and, though it ranks globally as the sixth most common cancer, it ranks second in cancer-related mortality. Deaths from HCC are usually due to metastatic spread of the cancer. Unfortunately, there are many challenges and limitations with the latest HCC therapies and medications, making it difficult for patients to receive life-prolonging care. As there is clearly a high demand for alternative therapy options for HCC, it is prudent to turn to plants for the solution, as their phytochemicals have long been used and revered for their many medicinal purposes. This review explores the promising phytochemical compounds identified from pre-clinical and clinical trials being used either independently or in conjunction with already existing cancer therapy treatments. The phytochemicals discussed in this review were classified into several categories: lipids, polyphenols, alkaloids, polysaccharides, whole extracts, and phytochemical combinations. Almost 80% of the compounds failed to progress into clinical studies due to lack of information regarding the toxicity to normal cells and bioavailability. Although large obstacles remain, phytochemicals can be used either as an alternative or integrative therapy in conjunction with existing HCC chemotherapies. In conclusion, phytochemicals have great potential as treatment options for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Prognosis and personalized treatment prediction in TP53-mutant hepatocellular carcinoma: an in silico strategy towards precision oncology

TP53 mutation is one of the most common genetic changes in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). It is of great clinical significance to tailor specialized prognostication approach and to explore more therapeutic options for TP53-mutant HCCs. In this study, a total of 1135 HCC patients were retrospectively analyzed. We developed a random forest-based prediction model to estimate TP53 mutational status, tackling the problem of limited sample size in TP53-mutant HCCs. A multi-step process was performed to develop robust poor prognosis-associated signature (PPS). Compared with previous established population-based signatures, PPS manifested superior ability to predict survival in TP53-mutant patients. After in silico screening of 2249 drug targets and 1770 compounds, we found that three targets (CANT1, CBFB and PKM) and two agents (irinotecan and YM-155) might have potential therapeutic implications in high-PPS patients. The results of drug targets prediction and compounds prediction complemented each other, presenting a comprehensive view of potential treatment strategy. Overall, our study has not only provided new insights into personalized prognostication approaches, but also thrown light on integrating tailored risk stratification with precision therapy.

Role of Systemic Therapy and Future Directions for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is an aggressive tumor that often arises in the setting of liver cirrhosis. Although early-stage disease is often amenable for surgical resection, transplant, or locoregional therapies, many patients are diagnosed at an advanced stage or have poor liver reserve. Systemic therapy is the mainstay of treatment for these patients. At present, the only approved therapy for the treatment of advanced disease is the tyrosine multikinase inhibitor sorafenib. Candidacy for treatment is based on liver reserve. Novel agents for the treatment of this disease are urgently needed. In this article, we review systemic therapy trials and upcoming data for the treatment of HCC.

Oncolytic Virus-Based Immunotherapies for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma is highly refractory cancer which is resistant to conventional chemotherapy and radiotherapy, carrying a dismal prognosis. Although many anticancer drugs have been developed for treating HCC, sorafenib is the only effective treatment, but it only prolongs survival duration for about 3 months. Recently, oncolytic virotherapy has shown promising results in treating HCCs and the effects can be more enhanced by adopting immune modulatory molecules. This review discusses the current status of treating HCC and the effective strategy of oncolytic virus-based immunotherapy for the treatment of HCCs.

Dasatinib synergises with irinotecan to suppress hepatocellular carcinoma via inhibiting the protein synthesis of PLK1

BACKGROUND

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common types of malignant tumour and has poor prognosis. Currently, systematic chemotherapy is the only approach to prolong survival. Thus the development of new treatment regimens is urgently needed to improve the therapeutic efficacy. Our study intended to assess the combination of dasatinib and irinotecan against HCC and made an effort to develop a potential medical choice for advanced HCC patients.

METHODS

We used SRB colorimetric assay and clonogenic assay to assess antitumour effect in vitro and HCC xenograft model to assess antitumour effect in vivo. We applied flow cytometry and western blotting to explore the mechanism of the combined therapy. Knockdown and overexpression of PLK1 are also applied for validation.

RESULTS

We confirmed that dasatinib has synergistic effect with irinotecan (or SN38) on HCC both in vitro and in vivo. The effect is due to arisen apoptosis rate of HCC cells that is accompanied by mitochondria dysfunction. The enhanced antitumour efficacy of SN38 could be explained by additional inhibition of PLK1, which is triggered by dasatinib. Unlike existed PLK1 inhibitors, dasatinib does not inhibit PLK1 activity in a direct way. Instead, we found that dasatinib reduces PLK1 level by interfering with its protein synthesis progress. We validated that this kind of downregulation of PLK1 level has a key role in the synergistic effect of the two agents.

CONCLUSIONS

Dasatinib is able to reinforce the anti-HCC efficacy of irinotecan/SN38 by downregulation of PLK1 synthesis. The combination of the two agents might be a potential medical choice for HCC therapy.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC): beyond sorafenib-chemotherapy

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common primary liver cancer with poor prognosis. The incidence of HCC and HCC-related deaths have increased over the last several decades. However, the treatment options for advanced HCC are very limited. Sorafenib remains the only drug approved for systemic treatment for advanced HCC. However, prior to sorafenib era conventional cytotoxic chemotherapies have been studied in advanced HCC. In this review, clinical studies of systemic chemotherapy for advanced HCC will be summarized and discussed.

Development and application of micro-polysaccharide drug carriers incorporating doxorubicin and superparamagnetic iron oxide for bimodality treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma

In this study, we demonstrated a novel polyelectrolyte microparticle, doxorubicin(DOX)-superparamagnetic iron oxide (SPIO)-chondroitin sulfate (CS)/chitosan (CHI)microparticles (MPs), as a drug delivery system for hepatic cancer treatment. We also investigated the properties of these microparticles through composition determination, formulation tests, in vitro study, and in vivo study. The results showed that our DOX-SPIO-CS/CHI MPs had an average diameter of 1.43±0.54μm and exhibited a spherical shape. The encapsulation efficiency of this drug carrier was approximately 31±8.07%, according to our spectroscopic determination. The results of release profile test revealed the sustained-release behavior of DOX-SPIO-CS/CHI MPs, which released 51.5% of DOX within 48h of the testing period. According to the results of a cell viability assay and an animal study, the DOX-SPIO-CS/CHI MPs exhibited stronger cytotoxicity than did free DOX when it was administered to Hep G2 and Huh-6 human liver cancer cell lines in vitro and to nude mice of Hep G2/Huh-6-bearing mice model in vivo.

Gefitinib Synergizes with Irinotecan to Suppress Hepatocellular Carcinoma via Antagonizing Rad51-Mediated DNA-Repair

Chemotherapy is the only choice for most of the advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients, while few agents were available, making it an urgent need to develop new chemotherapy strategies. A phase II clinical trial suggested that the efficacy of irinotecan in HCC was limited due to dose-dependent toxicities. Here, we found that gefitinib exhibited synergistic activity in combination with SN-38, an active metabolite of irinotecan, in HCC cell lines. And the enhanced apoptosis induced by gefitinib plus SN-38 was a result from caspase pathway activation. Mechanistically, gefitinib dramatically promoted the ubiquitin–proteasome-dependent degradation of Rad51 protein, suppressed the DNA repair, gave rise to more DNA damages, and ultimately resulted in the synergism of these two agents. In addition, the increased antitumor efficacy of gefitinib combined with irinotecan was further validated in a HepG2 xenograft mice model. Taken together, our data demonstrated for the first time that the combination of irinotecan and gefitinib showed potential benefit in HCC, which suggests that Rad51 is a promising target and provides a rationale for clinical trials investigating the efficacy of the combination of topoisomerase I inhibitors and gefitinib in HCC.

Immunotoxin targeting glypican-3 regresses liver cancer via dual inhibition of Wnt signalling and protein synthesis

Glypican-3 is a cell surface glycoprotein that associates with Wnt in liver cancer. We develop two antibodies targeting glypican-3, HN3 and YP7. The first antibody recognizes a functional epitope and inhibits Wnt signalling, whereas the second antibody recognizes a C-terminal epitope but does not inhibit Wnt signalling. Both are fused to a fragment of Pseudomonas exotoxin A (PE38) to create immunotoxins. Interestingly, the immunotoxin based on HN3 (HN3-PE38) has superior antitumor activity as compared with YP7 (YP7-PE38) both in vitro and in vivo. Intravenous administration of HN3-PE38 alone, or in combination with chemotherapy, induces regression of Hep3B and HepG2 liver tumour xenografts in mice. This study establishes glypican-3 as a promising candidate for immunotoxin-based liver cancer therapy. Our results demonstrate immunotoxin-induced tumour regression via dual mechanisms: inactivation of cancer signalling via the antibody and inhibition of protein synthesis via the toxin.

MicroRNA-200a/b influenced the therapeutic effects of curcumin in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) cells

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) play an essential role in regulating gene expression in normal and malignant cells. Expression of the microRNA-200 (miR-200) family has been correlated with malignancy in cancers. However, whether miR-200a/b plays a role in curcumin-mediated treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is unknown. We performed miRNA array analyses in two different HCC cell lines (HepG2 and HepJ5). The expression patterns of miR-200 family members were assessed with real-time PCR. We overexpressed miR-200 family members using a lentiviral system and selected stably transduced clones with antibiotics. The anticancer effects of curcumin on J5-200a, J5-200b, and J5-control cells were assessed by MTT assay, flow cytometry cell cycle analysis, and TUNEL assay. We found that HepG2 cells, which were more resistant to curcumin treatment than HepJ5 cells, expressed higher levels of miR-200a/b. The MTT assay revealed that the overexpression of miR-200a/b in HepJ5 cells conferred enhanced resistance to curcumin treatment compared with the control cells. By cell cycle analysis and TUNEL assay, we found that apoptosis was increased dramatically in J5-control cells compared with J5-200a and J5-200b cells after curcumin treatment. Finally, we evaluated the levels of Bcl-2, Bax, and Bad, and found a decrease of Bcl-2 levels and increase of Bad levels in the J5-control cells treated with curcumin. The expression levels of miR-200a/b might determine the therapeutic efficacy of curcumin on HCC cells.

A phase I study of continuous hepatic arterial infusion of Irinotecan in patients with locally advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

PURPOSE

Aim of this phase I study was to identify the maximum tolerated dose and dose limiting toxicity of continuous infusion of Irinotecan through a port-a-cath placed in the hepatic artery in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and cirrhosis to explore new strategies in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Response rate and time-to-progression were analysed.

METHODS

Irinotecan was delivered as a five-day continuous infusion every 21 days, with increases of 2.5mg/m(2)/day every three patients, starting from 7.5mg/m(2)/day. Dose limiting toxicity corresponded to one patient in each triplet developing G4 haematological or G3 non-haematological toxicity, confirmed in two triplets. Twenty-eight patients (17 Child-Pugh A, 11 B) received treatment and tumour response was assessed after three courses completed by 22 patients.

RESULTS

Dose limiting toxicity was G3 diarrhoea in two patients, reached at 27.5mg/m(2)/day and the recommended dose was set at 25mg/m(2)/day. Nineteen of 30 patients experienced adverse events related to porth-a-cath placement and one died from liver ischemia and sepsis. Median time-to-progression was 11.3 months.

CONCLUSION

Intrarterial infusion of Irinotecan is feasible in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma on cirrhosis at a recommended dose of 25mg/m(2)/day, with no major adverse drug-related events, but with some concerns about the insertion and management of the intra-arterial device.

Systemic therapy in hepatocellular carcinoma

Many potential systemic therapies are being investigated for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The incidence of this malignancy is rising sharply and the vast majority of patients present at advanced stages. Although the earlier dismal results with cytotoxic chemotherapies made way for the development of locoregional therapies that provided improved overall survival, truly personalized therapy will require the selection of phenotypically similar stages of disease and populations, an understanding of the complex molecular and genetic pathways leading to HCC, and a keen understanding of the pathobiology of cirrhosis. Only then will we understand how to offer a particular patient at a specific stage of disease the appropriate therapy to truly prolong survival.

Role of bile salt in regulating Mcl-1 phosphorylation and chemoresistance in hepatocellular carcinoma cells

Background

Glycochenodeoxycholate (GCDA) is one of the major human bile salts. Bile salts stimulate cell survival and proliferation through the mitogen-activated protein kinase, but the downstream signaling mechanism(s) remains enigmatic. Mcl-1 is an antiapoptotic molecule of the Bcl2 family that is extensively overexpressed in tumor tissues of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Results

Here we found that exposure of HepG2 cells to GCDA results in activation of ERK1 and ERK2 and phosphorylation of Mcl-1 in a PD98059 (MEK inhibitor)-sensitive manner. GCDA stimulates Mcl-1 phosphorylation in cells expressing WT but not T163A Mcl-1 mutant, indicating that GCDA-induced Mcl-1 phosphorylation occurs exclusively at the T163 site in its PEST region. GCDA-induced Mcl-1 phosphorylation at T163 enhances the half-life of Mcl-1. Treatment of HepG2 cells with GCDA facilitates Mcl-1 dissociation from Mule (a physiological Mcl-1 ubiquitin E3 ligase). Specific depletion of Mcl-1 from HepG2 cells by RNA interference increases sensitivity of HepG2 cells to chemotherapeutic drugs (i.e. cisplatin and irinotecan). In addition to activation of the ERK/Mcl-1 survival pathway, GCDA can also induce dose-dependent apurinic/apyrimidinic (AP) sites of DNA lesions, which may partially neutralize its survival activity.

Conclusion

Our findings suggest that bile salt may function as a survival agonist and/or potential carcinogen in the development of HCC. Molecular approaches that inactivate Mcl-1 by blocking its T163 phosphorylation may represent new strategies for treatment of HCC.

Systemic therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: past, present, and future

BACKGROUND

Although approximately 80% of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) cases occur in developing countries, the incidence of HCC in Western countries is on the rise due to the impact of hepatitis C. Challenges in developing effective therapies include the inherent chemoresistance of HCC, the pharmacologic challenges presented by a diseased liver, the presentation of most patients at advanced stages, and the difficulty in adequately measuring radiological response. While responses to traditional chemotherapeutic agents have been documented, significant survival benefit is debatable.

METHODS

The authors review the results of published clinical trials of systemic therapy and immunotherapy that have impacted the present treatment of HCC.

RESULTS

With recent progress in the elucidation of HCC molecular pathways, targeted agents show promise. The multikinase inhibitor sorafenib has provided survival benefit in patients with advanced HCC and well-preserved liver function. Sunitinib, bevacizumab, epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors, and mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors have shown activity in small patient cohorts. Immunotherapy appears to be a promising approach that can result in the regression of bulky, invasive cancer in some patients.

CONCLUSIONS

New agents with a variety of mechanisms of activity offer promising therapeutic options for patients with advanced HCC.

Advanced hepatocellular carcinoma treated effectively with irinotecan via hepatic arterial infusion followed by proton beam therapy

We report a 48-year-old man with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated with hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) chemotherapy followed by proton beam therapy. The HCC lesion in this patient was 88 mm in diameter, with portal vein tumor thrombosis in the right lobe of the liver. He was first treated with 5-fluorouracil, cisplatin, and isovorin, administered by HAI, combined with interferon-alpha, and he was subsequently treated with epirubicin and mitomycin-C administered by HAI. However, no definite efficacy of either of these treatments was observed. Then, after 3 weeks' continuous administration of irinotecan by HAI, the tumor size decreased to 68 mm in diameter. However, 3 months after reduction of the tumor, the tumor had become enlarged to 100 mm in diameter and intrahepatic metastases were prominent. Angiographic findings indicated that the HCC was fed not only from the right hepatic artery but also from the left gastric and right and left subphrenic arteries. After rearrangement of the arteries, and 3 months' continuous HAI chemotherapy with irinotecan, plus hyperthermia, the tumor size had decreased to 50 mm in diameter. The reduction rate of the main tumor according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors was 43%; therefore, the efficacy of this treatment was judged as a partial response. Two months after reduction of the tumor, the patient's serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) level was elevated, and so docetaxel was administered by HAI instead of irinotecan. The liver tumors showed gradual enlargement during the administration of docetaxel, although the AFP level was suppressed. Proton beam therapy was instituted and the liver tumors showed necrosis after this therapy. The patient died of hepatic failure and distant metastases 6 years after the onset of HCC. As far as we know, this is the first case report of HCC treated effectively with irinotecan administered by HAI followed by proton beam therapy in which tumor suppression and the long-term survival of the patient were observed.

Management of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma in the era of targeted therapy

Systemic chemotherapy has had a disappointing track record in the management of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Single-agent doxorubicin produces a response rate of 10-15%, but without any survival benefit, and combination chemotherapy has also yielded unimpressive results. With recent advances in the knowledge of hepato-carcinogenesis, there has been encouraging development in the systemic therapy of advanced HCC patients, and particularly in the targeted therapy of advanced HCC. Among the newly identified targets, exciting results have been shown in targeting the anti-angiogenic pathway and the Raf/mitogen-activated protein kinase pathways. Bevacizumab, both as a single agent and in combination with other agents, has shown initial encouraging activity in treating advanced HCC. More recently, single-agent sorafenib, a putative multitargeted kinase inhibitor, has shown to prolong the overall survival of patients with advanced HCC in the pivotal phase III Sorafenib HCC Assessment Randomized Protocol (SHARP) and Oriental study. Currently, sorafenib is the only approved targeted therapy for patients with advanced HCC. In addition, however, promising early results have been reported for other molecular-targeted drugs including erlotinib and sunitinib. Future progress seems likely to depend on using controlled clinical trials to optimize synergistic combination treatments.

Review article: pharmacological therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma with sorafenib and other oral agents

BACKGROUND

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fifth most common malignancy worldwide. Unresectable disease patients have median survival of few months. There is a substantial need for novel treatments for patients with advanced HCC.

AIM

To provide an update review of mechanism of hepatocarcinigenesis and systemic therapies for HCC and the relevant role of Sorafenib in patients with advanced disease.

METHODS

A Medline search was performed to identify pertinent original research and review articles. Selected references in these articles were also evaluated.

RESULTS

Systemic chemotherapy for HCC has been quite ineffective. Preclinical studies demonstrated that Raf/MAPK-ERK kinase (MEK)/Extracellular signal regulated kinase (ERK) pathway has a role in HCC. HCC tumours are highly vascularized and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) augments HCC development and metastasis. Sorafenib blocks tumour cell proliferation by targeting Raf/MEK/ERK signalling and exerts an antiangiogenic effect by targeting VEGF receptors-2/3 and platelet derived growth factor receptor beta tyrosine kinases.

CONCLUSIONS

Currently available therapies are not effective for patients with advanced HCC. Sorafenib has demonstrated for the first time to prolong survival in patients with advanced HCC, and it is the new reference standard for systemic treatment in these patients.

Evolution of systemic therapy of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) commonly occurs in hepatitis B endemic areas, especially in Asian countries. HCC is highly refractory to cytotoxic chemotherapy. This resistance is partly related to its tumor biology, pharmacokinetic properties, and both intrinsic and acquired drug resistance. There is no convincing evidence thus far that systemic chemotherapy improves overall survival in advanced HCC patients. Other systemic approaches, such as hormonal therapy and immunotherapy, have also disappointing results. Recently, encouraging results have been shown in using sorafenib in the treatment of advanced HCC patients. In this review, we concisely summarize the evolution of developments in the systemic therapy of advanced HCC.

Pilot study of combination chemotherapy of S-1, a novel oral DPD inhibitor, and interferon-alpha for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with extrahepatic metastasis

BACKGROUND

To the authors' knowledge, there is no effective therapy for extrahepatic metastasis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). In a pilot study, the results of combination therapy of S-1, a novel oral dehydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) inhibitor, and interferon-alpha (IFN-alpha) are reported for HCC patients with extrahepatic metastasis.

METHODS

Twelve patients with extrahepatic metastasis of HCC were enrolled in the pilot study. S-1 was administered orally at a dose based on body surface area, twice daily after a meal, for 4 weeks. IFN-alpha was injected subcutaneously on Days 1, 3, and 5 of each week. One course consisted of consecutive administration for 28 days followed by 14 days rest.

RESULTS

An objective response was observed in 3 (25%) of 12 patients. The overall 1-year survival rate was 61.7%. Grade 3 leukocytopenia was observed in 1 patient (8.3%). No severe toxicity or treatment-related deaths were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination therapy of S-1 and IFN-alpha appears to be highly efficacious, with low toxicity in patients with extrahepatic metastases of HCC. The combination chemotherapy of oral S-1 and subcutaneous IFN-alpha is a potentially promising treatment strategy for advanced HCC with extrahepatic metastasis.

Activity and safety of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid in inoperable hepatocellular carcinoma: A phase II study

AIM: To improve the results of New therapeutic strategies in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We have conducted a phase II study with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD), 5-fluorouracil (5FU) and folinic acid (FA).

METHODS: Thirty-one patients with hystologically-confirmed, inoperable HCC, received combination chemotherapy with PLD 25 mg/mq on d 1, 5FU 1200 mg/mq in 48 h continuous infusion, and oral FA 30 mg on d 1 and 2 every 3 wk until disease progression or intolerable toxicity.

RESULTS: The median age was 65 years (range 41-82) and 28 patients were hepatitis C virus seropositive (90%). The majority of patients were Child-Pugh Class B (55%). Two patients showed a partial response (PR), and 16 had stable disease (SD). With a median follow-up of 14 mo, the median time to progression of all evaluable patients was 4 mo (95% CI 1.7-7). Median overall survival was 9 mo (95% CI 3-24 mo). After 1 year, 9 of 18 PR/SD patients were alive. Chemotherapy was well tolerated.

CONCLUSION: PLD/FU/FA combination seems capable of achieving durable stabilization of HCC. The manageable toxicity supports a role for combination with other anticancer agents.

Treatment of hepatocarcinoma

This article reviews the current developments and significant trends in the treatment of hepatocarcinoma (HCC). Prevention programs should be based on large vaccination campaigns and the use of immunologic or biologic molecules to delay the onset of HCC in already cirrhotic patients. Surgery remains the therapy of choice in patients with a small and limited number of tumor nodules. To date, no preoperative treatment has been proven useful. Adjuvant treatments involving systemic chemotherapy, intra-arterial infusion, or chemoembolization failed to improve survival, whereas immune therapy, retinoids, radiolabeled isotopes, and antiangiogenic agents seem promising. Such local treatments as percutaneous ethanol injection, cryotherapy, and radiofrequency are proposed for patients with limited hepatic function and should be combined with other treatment modalities to optimize their efficacy and limit their toxicity. Regional therapy should take a selective, subsegmental approach at intervals depending on tumor response and possibly combined with other treatment modalities. Systemic therapy with cytotoxic agents remains disappointing. Hormonal therapy with tamoxifen or antiandrogens has shown no efficacy and might even be detrimental. Further progress may be expected from targeted therapy.

Intraperitoneal chemotherapy with hydroxycamptothecin reduces peritoneal carcinomatosis: results of an experimental study

PURPOSE

We studied the efficacy and safety of intraperitoneal chemotherapy with hydroxycamptothecin (HCPT) for the treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis in animal model.

METHODS

Highly metastatic human hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) cell line HCCLM3 was injected into the peritoneal cavity of 30 nude mice to construct a model of intraperitoneal carcinomatosis, which were randomized into a treatment group and a control group of 15 mice in each group. The former received intraperitoneal injections of HCPT at the dose of 2 mg/kg body weight for 7 days every other week, on weeks 2, 4 and 6; and the latter received the same dose schedule treatment of 0.9% sodium chloride solution. The mice were observed for 8 weeks. Body weight changes, intraperitoneal carcinomatosis, hematological and biochemical parameters were evaluated.

RESULTS

On day 56, 14 mice in the treatment group were still alive, compared against 5 in the control group, and the mean survival time was 55 +/- 1 days [95% confidence interval (CI) 54-57 days] versus 43 +/- 4 days (95% CI 34-51 days) (P = 0.002). The tumor weight in the treatment group (0.8 +/- 0.8 g) was significantly smaller than the control group (2.0 +/- 0.8 g) (P = 0.00028). No bloody ascites or diffuse peritoneal carcinomatosis were observed in the treatment group, as compared with 4 mice (26.7%) that developed bloody ascites and 6 mice (40%) which developed diffuse peritoneal carcinomatosis in the control group (P < 0.001). The treatment group had a significantly lower peripheral white blood cell count [(3.18 +/- 1.72) x 10(9) l(-1)] than the control group [(5.08 +/- 2.03) x 10(9 )l(-1)] (P < 0.05), significantly lower serum alpha fetoprotein level (101.22 +/- 20.12 microg/l) than the control group (244.87 +/- 30.24 microg/l) (P < 0.05), and significantly lower serum gamma glutamyl transpeptidase level (12.45 +/- 2.26 U/l) than the control group (20.75 +/- 3.87 U/l) (P < 0.05). No obvious treatment related toxicities were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Intraperitoneal injection of HCPT could inhibit tumor progression, reduce the extent of peritoneal carcinomatosis and improve survival of tumor bearing mice.

Hepatocellular carcinoma: molecular biology and therapy

Advanced and metastatic hepatocellular carcinomas (HCC) are challenging to treat, and no cytotoxic agents have impacted survival. The underlying liver cirrhosis that commonly accompanies HCC provides an additional challenge; indeed, functional scoring of cirrhosis and HCC is a critical component of patient evaluation. Currently, the molecular biology and pathogenesis of HCC are being increasingly investigated, which may lead to better understanding of the evolution of the disease, especially differing etiologies and identification of survival genes that may affect outcome. Early studies of targeted therapies in HCC have shown disease stabilization, and an increased understanding of the mechanism(s) of these novel agents combined with correlative studies may lead to the identification of an active agent or combination of agents that impacts the natural history of HCC.

Hepatocellular carcinoma: molecular biology and therapy

Advanced and metastatic hepatocellular carcinomas (HCC) are challenging to treat, and no cytotoxic agents have impacted survival. The underlying liver cirrhosis that commonly accompanies HCC provides an additional challenge; indeed, functional scoring of cirrhosis and HCC is a critical component of patient evaluation. Currently, the molecular biology and pathogenesis of HCC are being increasingly investigated, which may lead to better understanding of the evolution of the disease, especially differing etiologies and identification of survival genes that may affect outcome. Early studies of targeted therapies in HCC have shown disease stabilization, and an increased understanding of the mechanism(s) of these novel agents combined with correlative studies may lead to the identification of an active agent or combination of agents that impacts the natural history of HCC.

Gemcitabine plus oxaliplatin (GEMOX) in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)

BACKGROUND

New systemic therapies are needed to improve the prognosis of patients with advanced-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). In a Phase II trial involving previously untreated patients with advanced HCC, the more favorable schedule from a previous pilot study was evaluated.

METHODS

Thirty-four patients with previously untreated advanced-stage HCC were prospectively enrolled. The GEMOX regimen consisted of gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) on Day 1 and oxaliplatin 100 mg/m(2) on Day 2. The treatment was repeated every 2 weeks until disease progression or limiting toxicity.

RESULTS

Thirty-two patients were assessable for efficacy and 33 for toxicity. In all, 323 treatment cycles were administered. No toxic deaths occurred. Hematological grade 3-4 toxicity consisted of thrombocytopenia (27% of patients) and neutropenia (24%), including 2 febrile neutropenia and anemia (9%). Grade 3 oxaliplatin-induced neurotoxicity was observed in 3 (9%) patients. The overall response rate was 18% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 8-34) and disease stabilization was observed in 58% of patients (including 5 minor responses), giving a disease control rate of 76%. Median progression-free and overall survival times were, respectively, 6.3 months (95% CI: 4.3-10.1 months) and 11.5 months (95% CI: 8.5-14.3 months). Treatment was significantly more effective in patients with nonalcoholic cirrhosis than in those with alcoholic cirrhosis.

CONCLUSIONS

The GEMOX regimen seems to be well tolerated and active in advanced HCC, especially in patients with underlying nonalcoholic liver disease. A Phase II study of the GEMOX regimen plus cetuximab is ongoing.

Systemic Therapy of Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: How Hopeful Should We Be?

Worldwide, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fifth most common cancer and the third most common cause of cancer-related death. In the U.S., 18,510 new cancers of the liver and intrahepatic bile duct are expected in 2006, with an estimated 16,200 deaths. The incidence rates for HCC in the U.S. continued to rise steadily through 1998 and doubled during the period 1975-1995. Unresectable or metastatic HCC carries a poor prognosis, and systemic therapy with cytotoxic agents provides marginal benefit. A majority of HCC patients (>80%) presents with advanced or unresectable disease. Even for those with resected disease, the recurrence rate can be as high as 50% at 2 years. Because of the poor track record of systemic therapy in HCC, there has been a sense of nihilism for this disease in the oncology community for decades. However, with the arrival of newly developed molecularly targeted agents and the success of some of these agents in other traditionally challenging cancers, like renal cell carcinoma, there has recently been renewed interest in developing systemic therapy for HCC. This review attempts to concisely summarize the historical perspective and the current status of systemic therapy development in HCC.

Phase II Trial of Docetaxel Therapy in Patients with Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma

OBJECTIVES

We assessed the safety and efficacy of docetaxel, a microtubule inhibitor, in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

METHODS

HCC patients that were not suitable for local therapy, but who possessed measurable disease, good performance status and adequate organ function were eligible. Docetaxel was administered every 3 weeks at a dose of 100 mg/m(2) (or 75 mg/m(2) if transaminase levels were between 1.5 and 3.5 times the upper normal limit). Efficacy was assessed radiologically every three cycles of chemotherapy.

RESULTS

Fifteen patients were enrolled: 11 males and 4 females; their median age was 64 years (range, 42-72 years). Nine patients had underlying cirrhosis. Four patients had been surgically treated before relapse (liver resection in 3 cases and transplantation in 1), 3 had been treated with arterial chemoembolization and 1 with arterial chemotherapy (doxorubicin). A total of 57 cycles of docetaxel were delivered (median 3, range 1-6). Significant toxicity was observed: mostly grade 3-4 neutropenia and fatigue (6 and 4 patients, respectively). Treatment had to be stopped because of toxicity in 6 patients, all having underlying cirrhosis. An important partial response was obtained in 1 patient, a result that enabled liver transplantation; this patient is still alive after 34 months. Five patients had transient stable disease.

CONCLUSION

When used in this schedule, docetaxel does not appear to be safe and effective enough in patients with advanced HCC and cirrhosis.

Irinotecan as first-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a multicenter phase II study with dose adjustment according to baseline serum bilirubin level

This study assessed the clinical activity and safety of irinotecan (CPT-11) in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) using dose adjustment according to baseline serum bilirubin level. Patients with advanced HCC received CPT-11 at a dose of 350 mg/m(2) when total bilirubin level was 1.5 times upper limit of normal (ULN) (group A), or 200 mg/m(2) when total bilirubin level was between 1.51 and 3 ULN (group B). No objective response, one minor response and 12 disease stabilizations were observed in the 29 patients (group A, 23; group B, 6) enrolled. Median time to progression and overall survival were 3.1 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.0-4.0) and 7.4 months (95% CI: 3.9-12.0), respectively. Grade 3-4 adverse events (mostly neutropenia [47%], anaemia [24%], and diarrhoea [17%]) were more frequent in group A (74%) than in group B (33%) (P = 0.086). This study found favourable toxicity profile using dosage adjustment to the baseline total bilirubin level in patients with bilirubin level comprised between 1.51 and 3 ULN. However, the antitumour activity of single agent CPT-11 was not significant in advanced HCC.

Silibinin efficacy against human hepatocellular carcinoma

PURPOSE

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common recurrent malignancies, for which, currently, there is no effective therapy. Considering the antihepatotoxic activity of silibinin, a widely used drug and supplement for various liver disorders, together with its strong preventive and anticancer efficacy against various epithelial cancers, we investigated the efficacy of silibin against human HCC cells.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Silibinin effects were examined on growth, cytotoxicity, apoptosis, and cell cycle progression in two different HCC cell lines, HepG2 (hepatitis B virus negative; p53 intact) and Hep3B (hepatitis B virus positive; p53 mutated). At molecular level, cell cycle effects of silibinin were assessed by immunoblotting and in-bead kinase assays.

RESULTS

Silibinin strongly inhibited growth of both HepG2 and Hep3B cells with a relatively stronger cytotoxicity in Hep3B cells, which was associated with apoptosis induction. Silibinin also caused G1 arrest in HepG2 and both G1 and G2-M arrests in Hep3B cells. Mechanistic studies revealed that silibinin induces Kip1/p27 but decreases cyclin D1, cyclin D3, cyclin E, cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK)-2, and CDK4 levels in both cell lines. In Hep3B cells, silibinin also reduced the protein levels of G2-M regulators. Furthermore, silibinin strongly inhibited CDK2, CDK4, and CDC2 kinase activity in these HCC cells.

CONCLUSION

Together, these results for the first time identify the biological efficacy of silibinin against HCC cells, suggesting the importance of conducting further investigations in preclinical HCC models, especially on in vivo efficacy, to support the clinical usefulness of silibinin against hepatocellular carcinoma in addition to its known clinical efficacy as an antihepatotoxic agent.

The histone-deacetylase inhibitor SAHA potentiates proapoptotic effects of 5-fluorouracil and irinotecan in hepatoma cells

Treatment for advanced stages of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains unsatisfactory. While 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and irinotecan are first-line treatment options for other gastrointestinal tumors, their effect on HCCs is low. Histone-deacetylase inhibitors such as suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid (SAHA) have shown antitumoral activity at micromolar concentrations in a variety of human cancers in vitro and in vivo. Here, we investigated the effects of a combination of 5-FU, irinotecan and SAHA on growth inhibition and apoptosis induction in HCC cell lines. HepG2, Hep1B and MH-7777A hepatoma cell lines and human foreskin fibroblasts as non-transformed controls were incubated with 5-FU, irinotecan and SAHA either alone or in combination. While the single agents did not show any effects on growth of the cell lines, the combination of 5-FU and irinotecan (both 10 microM) led to a moderate increase in apoptosis and proliferation inhibition. Adding 1 microM SAHA increased the apoptosis rate in hepatoma cell lines up to 92% after 72 h, while fibroblasts showed no response (5.5% apoptosis). Induction of apoptosis was paralleled by loss of the mitochondrial transmembrane potential, downregulation of bcl-2 expression and activation of caspase 3 but not caspase 8. In summary, SAHA sensitized HCC cell lines for treatment with an otherwise ineffective combination of 5-FU and irinotecan and led to mitochondrial apoptosis induction. The use of the triple combination could optimize treatment results in vivo and needs further evaluation.

Systemic therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a review

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a common cause of cancer mortality worldwide. Whilst local treatments are useful in selected patients, they are not suitable for many with advanced disease. Here, we review phase II and III trials for systemic therapy of advanced disease, finding no strong evidence that any chemotherapy, hormonal therapy, or immunotherapy regimen trialled to date benefits survival in this setting. Many trials were inadequately powered, single centre, and enrolled highly selected patients. From this review, we cannot recommend any therapeutic approach in these patients outside of a clinical trial setting. Including an untreated control arm in clinical trials in HCC is still justified. Every effort should be made to enroll these patients into adequately powered trials, and promising phase II results must be tested in a multicentre phase III setting, preferably against a placebo control arm. Prevention of hepatitis B and C remains vital to decrease deaths from HCC.

Gemcitabine plus oxaliplatin for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma using two different schedules

BACKGROUND

New therapies are needed to improve the prognosis of patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Various gemcitabine-oxaliplatin combinations have been tested recently in patients with ovarian and pancreatic carcinoma, yielding interesting results with little toxicity. Therefore, the authors evaluated the activity and toxicity of two such combinations in patients with HCC.

METHODS

Twenty-one patients were enrolled prospectively in the study. Eleven patients received gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 on Day 1 and oxaliplatin 100 mg/m2 on Day 2 (GEMOX-1), and 10 patients received gemcitabine 1500 mg/m2 on Day 1 followed by oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 on Day 1 (GEMOX-2). Treatment was repeated every 2 weeks until disease progression developed or until unacceptable adverse effects occurred.

RESULTS

All patients were assessable for response and toxicity. Four patients (19%) achieved objective responses (95% confidence interval, 13-26%), including 3 patients in the GEMOX-1 group and 1 patient in the GEMOX-2 group. Ten patients (48%) had stable disease, and 7 patients (33%) experienced disease progression. The median progression-free survival was 5 months, and the median overall survival was 12 months. Fifty-four percent of patients in the GEMOX-1 group and 50% of patients in the GEMOX-2 group had received previous systemic chemotherapy or cisplatin-based chemoembolization. Grade 3-4 hematologic toxicity, according to National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria, consisted of thrombocytopenia (GEMOX-1 vs. GEMOX-2, 18% vs. 40%) and neutropenia (0% vs. 30%). No Grade 3-4 nonhematologic toxicity was observed, except for 1 episode of Grade 3 diarrhea. Grade 1 neurotoxicity and Grade 2 neurotoxicity (specific scale), respectively, were observed in 4 patients and 7 patients receiving GEMOX-1 and in 7 patients and 1 patient receiving GEMOX-2.

CONCLUSIONS

Gemcitabine-oxaliplatin combination therapy is feasible in patients with advanced HCC. The GEMOX-1 regimen was tolerated better than the GEMOX-2 regimen. Currently, the GEMOX-1 regimen is being evaluated in a Phase II study in previously untreated patients with HCC.

Prospective randomised phase II study of gemcitabine at standard or fixed dose rate schedule in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma

The present randomised phase II study was an effort to evaluate single-agent gemcitabine as a first-line systemic treatment of Asian patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Gemcitabine was given via intravenous infusion at 1250 mg m(-2) on days 1 and 8 of 3-week cycles. Patients were randomised to receive gemcitabine as a 30-min intravenous infusion (standard schedule) or at a fixed dose rate (FDR) of 10 mg m(-2) min(-1). A total of 50 patients were enrolled in the study, of whom 48 received study therapy. One patient on standard schedule had a partial response, for an overall response rate of 2.1% (95% CI: 0.05-11.1%). The median time to progression and survival time were 46 and 97 days, respectively. The overall rates of Grade 3 or 4 haematological and nonhaematological toxicities were 39.6 and 64.6%, respectively, with no significant difference between the two treatment arms. There were no drug-related deaths and severe clinical toxicities were rare. Both schedules of gemcitabine were safe and toxicity was well manageable in this patient population. However, gemcitabine seems no more active than other cytotoxic agents when used alone for systemic treatment of advanced HCC.

Hepatocellular carcinoma: are we making progress?

Hepatocellular carcinoma is a very prevalent malignancy worldwide, with increasing incidence in the United States. Despite many available treatment options, the prognosis remains poor. Surgical resection or liver transplantation still represents the only potentially curative treatments for HCC. Until more effective systemic therapies are available, different localized treatment approaches will continue to be applied in the management of this disease. Although systemic chemotherapy has been disappointing, increased understanding of the tumor biology in HCC coupled with new drug development may lead to newer agents with novel mechanisms of action that are more efficacious. The poor treatment outcome and dismal prognosis make prevention of HCC an important strategy in controlling this aggressive type of malignancy. Vaccine programs for HBV are ongoing. Efforts are underway to develop a vaccine for HCV. Interferon therapy appears to decrease the risk of developing HCC in patients with hepatitis, especially those with HCV. A number of other approaches for decreasing risk in these patients as well as in those with alcoholic-related cirrhosis are currently being evaluated.

Topoisomerase I interactive agents

Increased insight into the mechanism of interaction of topoisomerase I interactive agents will maximize the therapeutic index and enhance the development of additional agents. Preclinical studies designed to elucidate mechanisms by which the topoisomerase I interactive agents induce cell death will be essential. The role of ABC transporters in resistance to topoisomerase I interactive agents has been recently appreciated and future studies should be directed at circumventing this resistance. The results of preclinical studies must be translated into the design of clinical trials so that these agents can be used rationally. In this regard results of preclinical studies have clearly pointed to the enhanced antitumor activity from protracted dosing of topoisomerase I interactive agents and results of clinical trials are now supporting these preclinical findings. Finally, investigators are trying to understand better the mechanism(s) of the dose-limiting toxicities observed with the currently available topoisomerase I interactive agents in an effort to enable the optimal dosing of these agents. Even though the first priority must be to determine the therapeutic potential of the currently available agents, it is reassuring to know that other topoisomerase I interactive agents are currently under development.

A phase II trial of gemcitabine in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND

There is no effective systemic therapy for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. A recent trial reported a moderate antitumor activity for gemcitabine among Asian patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. This led to our examination of the efficacy and tolerability of the drug in a population of U.S. patients.

METHODS

Thirty patients with measurable, unresectable, or metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma who had received at least one previous form of systemic therapy were enrolled. All patients were required to have adequate major organ function and performance status. Patients received gemcitabine (1000 mg/m(2) intravenously over 30 minutes weekly) for 3 consecutive weeks followed by a 1-week rest. Patients were assessed radiographically every 8 weeks.

RESULTS

All 30 patients were evaluable for response and toxicity. Ninety cycles of therapy were administered (median 2, range 1-8). No complete or partial responses were observed. Nine patients (30%) had stable disease (median duration 7.4 months, range 2-17). Median survival for all 30 patients was 6.9 months (95% confidence interval, 4.5-13.5) and the 1-year survival rate was 40%. Mild hematologic toxicity occurred. Two patients (7%) developed Grade 4 neutropenia and one patient (3%) experienced Grade 3 thrombocytopenia. There were no episodes of febrile neutropenia. One patient who had previously undergone orthotopic liver transplantation developed hemolytic-uremic syndrome that resolved with discontinuation of chemotherapy and plasmapheresis.

CONCLUSIONS

Although generally well tolerated, gemcitabine had minimal effect in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.

Systemic treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma

Systemic treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma is indicated in locally advanced or metastatic disease. Monochemotherapies have yielded unsatisfactory results with response rates of around 20% but survival is often not improved. Polychemotherapies may induce complete responses but have substantial toxicity and are limited to selected patients with preserved liver function. Hormonal treatment with tamoxifen is ineffective while megestrol has shown an improvement in quality of life. Octreotide can be given even in cases of impaired liver function, has also a favorable side effect profile and can lead to disease stabilization. Adjuvant therapy with interferon is indicated after successful liver resection or transplantation in patients with chronic viral hepatitis, the role of interferon in other indications or in combination with chemotherapy remains to be determined.