Predictive values of serum tumour markers tetranectin, OVX1, CASA and CA125 in patients with a pelvic mass

Tetranectin positive expression in tumour tissue leads to longer survival in Danish women with ovarian cancer. Results from the 'Malova' ovarian cancer study

The primary objective of this study was to analyse Tetranectin (TN) expression in tumour tissues and TN serum concentration in 758 women with epithelial ovarian tumours. The second was to evaluate, whether TN tissue expression levels correlate with clinico-pathological parameters and prognosis of the disease. Using tissue arrays we analysed the expression levels in tissues from 166 women with borderline ovarian tumours (BOTs) and 592 women with ovarian cancer (OC). A panel of three antibodies was used for immunohistochemistry: a polyclonal and two monoclonal antibodies. Serum TN was measured using the polyclonal antibody A-371. Univariate survival analyses stratified for chemotherapy showed that positive tissue TN as demonstrated by the polyclonal antibody indicated a significantly longer overall survival (OS) (p = 0.0001) as well as cancer specific survival (CSS) (p < 0.0001). High serum TN was likewise found to imply longer OS (p < 0.0001) and CSS (p < 0.0001), whereas tissue staining with the two monoclonal antibodies failed to demonstrate any significant correlation with either survival type. Univariate Kaplan-Meier survival analysis performed on all OC cases showed a significantly longer OS (p = 0.0009) and CSS (p = 0.0006) for women with TN positive tumour tissue and in women with high serum TN levels (p < 0.0001 for both). However, in the multivariate Cox regression analysis, only serum TN was found to be an independent prognostic factor for OS (p = 0.01) and not for CSS (p = 0.08). In conclusion, our results predict that a positive TN expression of both tumour tissue and serum points to a more favourable outcome for OC patients.

Genomic and proteomic biomarkers for cancer: a multitude of opportunities

Biomarkers are molecular indicators of a biological status, and as biochemical species can be assayed to evaluate the presence of cancer and therapeutic interventions. Through a variety of mechanisms cancer cells provide the biomarker material for their own detection. Biomarkers may be detectable in the blood, other body fluids, or tissues. The expectation is that the level of an informative biomarker is related to the specific type of disease present in the body. Biomarkers have potential both as diagnostic indicators and monitors of the effectiveness of clinical interventions. Biomarkers are also able to stratify cancer patients to the most appropriate treatment. Effective biomarkers for the early detection of cancer should provide a patient with a better outcome which in turn will translate into more efficient delivery of healthcare. Technologies for the early detection of cancer have resulted in reductions in disease-associated mortalities from cancers that are otherwise deadly if allowed to progress. Such screening technologies have proven that early detection will decrease the morbidity and mortality from cancer. An emerging theme in biomarker research is the expectation that panels of biomarker analytes rather than single markers will be needed to have sufficient sensitivity and specificity for the presymptomatic detection of cancer. Biomarkers may provide prognostic information of disease enabling interventions using targeted therapeutic agents as well as course-corrections in cancer treatment. Novel genomic, proteomic and metabolomic technologies are being used to discover and validate tumor biomarkers individually and in panels.

Biomarker discovery in ovarian cancer

Ovarian cancer is a leading cause of gynecologic cancer death among women. Tumors diagnosed early (in stage I) have a cure rate approaching 90%. However, because specific symptoms and screening tools are lacking, most ovarian cancers are very advanced when finally diagnosed. CA125 expression and pelvic ultrasonography are of limited efficacy in screening, and the search for new, complementary ovarian cancer biomarkers continues. New technology and research techniques have allowed the identification of over 100 possible tumor markers, many of which are still being evaluated for clinical relevance and several of which have entered clinical trials. Here, we review the methods of biomarker discovery, address the significance and functions of newly identified ovarian cancer tumor markers, and provide further insight into the future of ovarian cancer biomarkers.

Preoperative serum tetranectin, CA125 and menopausal status used as single markers in screening and in a risk assessment index (RAI) in discriminating between benign and malignant ovarian tumors

OBJECTIVES

To improve the poor survival in ovarian cancer (OC) patients, the research has been focused on new OC markers. One aim is to find markers to identify the cancers in early preclinical stages by screening. Another aim is to find new diagnostic markers, which may select patients at high risk for OC for quick referral to highly specialized centers in gynecologic oncology. These aims were addressed in the present study by evaluating serum tetranectin (TN) and serum CA125 on a large number of pre- and postmenopausal women with ovarian tumors and controls.

METHODS

The potential ability of the markers to discriminate between the four groups (208 benign ovarian tumor, 153 borderline ovarian tumor (BOT), 445 OC and 1333 age matched controls) in OC screening was examined. We also constructed a risk assessment index (RAI) for discrimination between tumor groups based on these variables and menopausal status.

RESULTS

Highly significant differences in both TN and CA125 levels were found between all the four groups as well as between the different FIGO stages of OC patients. A very high probability of having OC or a benign tumor, respectively, was predicted by the RAI.

CONCLUSIONS

In the case-control part of the study, we found that TN and CA125 deserve to be validated on pre-clinical samples by inclusion in future marker panels. The RAI is also a potential new candidate for a diagnostic tool for selecting patients at high risk for having OC; hence it deserves further evaluation in a prospective clinical study.

Epitomics: serum screening for the early detection of cancer on microarrays using complex panels of tumor antigens

Efforts toward the development of early detection assays for cancers have traditionally depended on single biomarker molecules. Current technologies have been disappointing and have not resulted in diagnostic tests suitable for clinical practice. Using a high-throughput cloning method, a panel of epitopes/antigens that react with autoantibodies to tumor proteins in the serum of patients with ovarian cancer have been isolated. Discovery of biomarker panels was directed in an unbiased fashion by cloning a large panel of epitopes or tumor antigens, rather than individual biomarkers without a previous notion of their function. The binding properties of these serum antitumor antibodies on microarrays and advanced bioinformatics tools led to a panel of diagnostic antigens. The sequences that were identified using this new technology will lead to the discovery of novel disease-related proteins that have diagnostic value for the presymptomatic detection of cancer. It has been demonstrated that this approach can detect these autoantibodies in the sera of Stage I ovarian cancer patients. There are numerous advantages of employing serum antibodies as the analytes, not the least of which is the ability to rapidly adapt these assays to standard clinical platforms. This technology of global epitope/antigen profiling is referred to as 'epitomics'.

Paraneoplastic cerebellar degeneration in a woman with ovarian cancer

BACKGROUND

A 52-year-old white female presented with sudden onset of light-headedness followed by diplopia, horizontal vertigo and severe nystagmus with oscillopsia. She had previously been in good health. MRI of the brain was normal. Lumbar puncture revealed monocytic pleocytosis. During her initial admission, the patient improved to some degree and was discharged with a possible diagnosis of viral meningitis. After a few weeks, the patient's condition worsened and further evaluation was initiated. Examination revealed an unsteady widespread gait, severe nystagmus and mild dysarthria. A general and gynecological examination was otherwise unremarkable.

INVESTIGATIONS

General physical and gynecological examinations, MRI of the brain, lumbar punctures, electroencephalogram, transvaginal ultrasound, mammogram, tumor markers, anti-neuronal antibodies, colonoscopy, whole-body positron emission tomography scan, laparoscopy and biopsies.

DIAGNOSIS

Stage IIIC endometrioid adenocarcinoma of the ovary with paraneoplastic cerebellar degeneration.

MANAGEMENT

Tumor cytoreduction, plasmapheresis, total abdominal hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, bilateral pelvic and para-aortic lymph-node dissection, total omentectomy, carboplatin and paclitaxel chemotherapy, rehabilitation, and speech therapy.

Cancer-associated serum antigen level: a novel prognostic indicator for survival in patients with recurrent ovarian carcinoma

The aim was to examine the value of the pretherapeutic serum cancer-associated serum antigen (CASA) level as a prognostic factor for survival in patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian carcinoma. Serum levels of CASA and cancer antigen (CA)125 were prospectively determined in 70 consecutive patients with recurrent ovarian cancer before the start of second-line chemotherapy. Univariate and multivariate analyses of survival were performed. The median level of serum CASA was 6.5 U/mL (range: 0.2-1437 U/mL). Univariate analysis showed that patients with a CASA level >10.0 U/mL had significantly shorter survival than patients with CASA level < or =10.0 U/mL (P= 0.002). Using different CASA cutoff levels (6.0, 6.5, and 10.0 U/mL), multivariate Cox analyses identified CASA as an independent prognostic factor for survival at every cutoff level. The strongest prognostic function for CASA was found at a cutoff level of 10.0 U/mL (>10 vs < or =10 U/mL; hazard ratio, 2.7; 95% confidence interval, 1.6-4.7; P < 0.001). The pretreatment CA125 level was not found to be significantly associated with survival by any of the cutoffs (35, 65, 132, and 339 U/mL). A pretreatment elevated level of the tumor marker CASA is an adverse prognostic factor for survival in patients with ovarian cancer relapse.

Risk of Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Recurrence in Patients With Rising Serum CA-125 Levels Within the Normal Range

Purpose

To evaluate the risk of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) recurrence in patients with rising serum cancer antigen 125 (CA-125) levels that remain below the upper limit of normal (< 35 U/mL).

Patients and Methods

All patients treated for EOC between September 1997 and March 2003 were identified and screened retrospectively for the following: (1) elevated serum CA-125 at time of diagnosis, (2) complete clinical and radiographic response (CR) to initial treatment with normalization of serum CA-125, (3) at least three serial serum CA-125 determinations that remained within the normal range, and (4) clinical and/or radiographic determination of disease status at the time of last follow-up or recurrence. For statistical analyses, univariate regression models were used to compare absolute and relative changes in CA-125 levels among patients with recurrent disease and those without EOC recurrence.

Results

A total of 39 patients satisfied study inclusion criteria; 22 patients manifested EOC recurrence at a median interval from complete response of 11 months. The median follow-up time from complete response to last contact was 32 months for the 17 patients in the no recurrence group. A relative increase in CA-125 of 100% (odds ratio [OR] = 23.7; 95% CI, 2.9 to 192.5; P = .003) was significantly predictive of recurrence. From baseline CA-125 nadir levels, an absolute increase in CA-125 of 5 U/mL (OR = 8.4; 95% CI, 2.2 to 32.6; P = .002) and 10 U/mL (OR = 71.2; 95% CI, 4.8 to > 999.9; P = .002) were also significantly associated with the likelihood of concurrent disease recurrence.

Conclusion

Among patients with EOC in complete clinical remission, a progressive low-level increase in serum CA-125 levels is strongly predictive of disease recurrence.

Multiplexed immunobead-based cytokine profiling for early detection of ovarian cancer

Early detection of ovarian cancer might improve clinical outcome. Some studies have shown the role of cytokines as a new group of tumor markers for ovarian cancer. We hypothesized that a panel comprised of multiple cytokines, which individually may not show strong correlation with the disease, might provide higher diagnostic power. To evaluate the diagnostic utility of cytokine panel, we used a novel multianalyte LabMAP profiling technology that allows simultaneous measurement of multiple markers. Concentrations of 24 cytokines (cytokines/chemokines, growth, and angiogenic factors) in combination with cancer antigen-125 (CA-125), were measured in sera of 44 patients with early-stage ovarian cancer, 45 healthy women, and 37 patients with benign pelvic tumors. Six markers, i.e., interleukin (IL)-6, IL-8, epidermal growth factor (EGF), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1), and CA-125, showed significant differences in serum concentrations between ovarian cancer and control groups. Out of this group, IL-6, IL-8, VEGF, EGF, and CA-125, were used in a classification tree analysis that resulted in 84% sensitivity at 95% specificity. The receiver operator characteristic curve created using the combination of markers produced sensitivities between 90% and 100% in the area of 80% to 90% specificity, whereas the receiver operator characteristic curve for CA-125 alone resulted in sensitivities of 70% to 80%. The classification tree analysis for discrimination of benign condition from ovarian cancer used CA-125, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), IL-6, EGF, and VEGF resulting in 86.5% sensitivity and 93.0% specificity. The presented data show that simultaneous testing of a panel of serum cytokines and CA-125 using LabMAP technology may present a promising approach for ovarian cancer detection.

Distribution of HER-2 overexpression in ovarian carcinoma tissue and its prognostic value in patients with ovarian carcinoma: from the Danish MALOVA Ovarian Cancer Study

BACKGROUND

The HER-2 (Human Epidermal Growth factor receptor-2, also known as c-erb-2/neu) protooncogene encodes a transmembrane receptor protein, M(r) 185,000. Studies have shown that the HER-2 oncogene is overexpressed in approximately 25-30% of ovarian carcinoma (OC) cases, but to the authors' knowledge, to date no consensus regarding overexpression and prognosis has been possible. The objective of the current study was first to analyze the presence of HER-2 overexpression in tissue from Danish OC patients and correlate the distribution of HER-2 overexpression with clinical and biochemical data and second to investigate the value of HER-2 overexpression as a prognostic marker in OC and to compare this value with the prognostic value of other biochemical markers.

METHODS

The study population was comprised of the first 181 patients diagnosed with epithelial OC who were included in the MALOVA study. The staining procedure for HER-2 overexpression was performed using the p185 antibody.

RESULTS

HER-2 overexpression was found in 95 of the 181 investigated cases (52.5%), in which 71 carcinomas (39.2%) were weakly positive (1+) and 24 carcinomas (13.3%) were moderately (2+) to intensely positive (3+). Increased HER-2 expression was found to be correlated with reduced survival. Significant differences in survival between patients with (1+, 2+, and 3+) and those without HER-2 overexpression were found for patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) Stage I, Stage III, and Stage III/IV OC (Stage I: P = 0.021; Stage III: P = 0.0078; and Stage III/IV: P = 0.0054). Multivariate survival analyses including all 181 OC patients demonstrated that HER-2 overexpression is a prognostic marker (P = 0.003) together with disease stage, serum tetranectin level, and patient age. For patients with Stage III OC, the only independent prognostic factors detected were HER-2 overexpression (P = 0.009) and serum tetranectin level (P <or= 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of the current study show that HER-2 overexpression has prognostic value both in univariate and multivariate survival analyses. Therefore, the clinical relevance of this observation should be established conclusively by therapy that targets HER-2 in a prospective Phase II clinical trial.

Comparative analysis of CA125, tissue polypeptide specific antigen, and soluble interleukin-2 receptor alpha levels in sera, cyst, and ascitic fluids from patients with ovarian carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The serum markers CA125, tissue polypeptide specific antigen (TPS), and soluble interleukin-2 receptor alpha (sIL-2Ralpha) concentrations were determined in sera, cyst, and ascitic fluids from patients with malignant and benign ovarian neoplasms.

METHODS

CA125, TPS, and sIL-2Ralpha concentrations were measured in sera, cyst, and ascitic fluids by immunoassays in 67 patients with carcinoma and in 32 patients with benign ovarian neoplasms.

RESULTS

CA125, TPS, and sIL-2Ralpha levels were elevated significantly in sera from patients who had ovarian carcinoma compared with patients who had benign neoplasms (P < 0.001). Patients who had International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) Stage III-IV disease had significantly higher serum levels for the markers studied compared with patients who had FIGO Stage I-II disease (P < 0.001 for CA125; P = 0.02 for TPS and sIL-2Ralpha). Concurrent measurement of CA125 and sIL-2Ralpha in sera identified 100% of ovarian carcinomas in FIGO Stage I-II. All patients with carcinoma demonstrated markedly higher levels of CA125 and TPS for both cyst and ascites compared with corresponding sera (P < 0.001). The level of sIL-2Ralpha was higher statistically in ascitic fluid compared with the level in serum (P < 0.001); however, its values in sera and cyst fluids were comparable. In ascitic fluid, the CA125 level was significantly higher in patients who had FIGO Stage III-IV disease compared with patients who had FIGO Stage I-II disease (P = 0.002), whereas such correlations were not found for TPS or sIL-2Ralpha. In cyst fluids, the levels of all studied markers were independent of the FIGO stage. In cyst fluids from patients with benign ovarian neoplasms, TPS and sIL-2Ralpha levels were significantly lower compared with the levels in patients with ovarian carcinoma (P < 0.001), whereas the values of CA125 were overlapping. CA125 and TPS concentrations were higher in cyst fluids compared with corresponding sera, whereas sIL-2Ralpha levels were comparable and low in cyst fluids and in the circulation of patients with benign neoplasms.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with ovarian carcinoma, TPS and CA125 concentrations were significantly higher in the place of their generation compared with the concentrations in blood circulation. sIL-2Ralpha values were higher in ascites compared with the values in corresponding sera, and its concentrations in sera and cyst fluids were comparable. The assessment of serum sIL-2Ralpha levels showed potential complementary value to CA125 for the detection of ovarian carcinoma in early FIGO stages; however, a 9% false positive rate limited the significance of cumulative value for a combination of these circulating markers.

The effect of ascites, mass volume, and peritoneal carcinomatosis on serum CA125 levels in patients with ovarian carcinoma

The aim of this study is to investigate the effects of ascites, ovarian mass volume, and peritoneal carcinomatosis on serum CA125 levels in patients with nonmucinous epithelial ovarian carcinoma. Serum CA125 levels were determined by a commercial enzyme immunoassay kit in a series of 98 patients with stage I-IV nonmucinous epithelial ovarian carcinoma. Amounts of ascites were determined in each patient with ascites. Ovarian mass volumes were calculated in 22 patients with stage I disease without ascites. Peritoneal carcinomatosis was detected in 35 ovarian cancer patients. Serum CA125 levels were compared among the patients with different clinical conditions. Serum CA125 levels were significantly higher in cases of ovarian cancer with ascites when compared with those without ascites (P < 0.01). Abnormal levels of serum CA125 were found in 80% of all patients; these abnormal levels were detected in 92% and 97% of the patients with ascites and with peritoneal carcinomatosis, respectively. A positive correlation between serum CA125 levels and ascites amounts was found in patients with ascites (P < 0.01, r = 0.74). However, there was no correlation between ovarian mass volumes and levels of serum CA125 in patients having stage I disease but no ascites (P = 0.5, r = 0.15). Our results showed that serum CA125 levels might be affected by the amount of ascites and the presence of peritoneal carcinomatosis but not with ovarian mass volume. However, these findings need to be confirmed in more and larger studies. These results may be beneficial in the management of ovarian carcinoma patients with elevated CA125 levels.