1
|
Alharbi AS, Yousef AA, Alharbi SA, Al-Shamrani A, Alqwaiee MM, Almeziny M, Said YS, Alshehri SA, Alotaibi FN, Mosalli R, Alawam KA, Alsaadi MM. Application of aerosol therapy in respiratory diseases in children: A Saudi expert consensus. Ann Thorac Med 2021; 16:188-218. [PMID: 34012486 PMCID: PMC8109687 DOI: 10.4103/atm.atm_74_21] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2021] [Accepted: 02/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
The Saudi Pediatric Pulmonology Association (SPPA) is a subsidiary of the Saudi Thoracic Society (STS), which consists of a group of Saudi experts with well-respected academic and clinical backgrounds in the fields of asthma and other respiratory diseases. The SPPA Expert Panel realized the need to draw up a clear, simple to understand, and easy to use guidance regarding the application of different aerosol therapies in respiratory diseases in children, due to the high prevalence and high economic burden of these diseases in Saudi Arabia. This statement was developed based on the available literature, new evidence, and experts' practice to come up with such consensuses about the usage of different aerosol therapies for the management of respiratory diseases in children (asthma and nonasthma) in different patient settings, including outpatient, emergency room, intensive care unit, and inpatient settings. For this purpose, SPPA has initiated and formed a national committee which consists of experts from concerned specialties (pediatric pulmonology, pediatric emergency, clinical pharmacology, pediatric respiratory therapy, as well as pediatric and neonatal intensive care). These committee members are from different healthcare sectors in Saudi Arabia (Ministry of Health, Ministry of Defence, Ministry of Education, and private healthcare sector). In addition to that, this committee is representing different regions in Saudi Arabia (Eastern, Central, and Western region). The subject was divided into several topics which were then assigned to at least two experts. The authors searched the literature according to their own strategies without central literature review. To achieve consensus, draft reports and recommendations were reviewed and voted on by the whole panel.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adel S. Alharbi
- Department of Pediatrics, Prince Sultan Military City, Ministry of Defence, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Abdullah A. Yousef
- Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
- Department of Pediatrics, King Fahd Hospital of the University, Khobar, Saudi Arabia
| | - Saleh A. Alharbi
- Department of Pediatrics, Umm Al-Qura University, Mecca, Saudi Arabia
- Department of Pediatrics, Dr. Soliman Fakeeh Hospital, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Abdullah Al-Shamrani
- Department of Pediatrics, Prince Sultan Military City, Ministry of Defence, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Mansour M. Alqwaiee
- Department of Pediatrics, Prince Sultan Military City, Ministry of Defence, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Mohammed Almeziny
- Department of Pharmacy, Prince Sultan Military Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Yazan S. Said
- Department of Pediatrics, King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
| | - Saleh Ali Alshehri
- Department of Emergency, Pediatric Emergency Division, Prince Sultan Medical Military City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Faisal N. Alotaibi
- Department of Pediatrics, Prince Sultan Military City, Ministry of Defence, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Rafat Mosalli
- Department of Pediatrics, Umm Al Qura University, Makkah, Saudi Arabia
- Department of Pediatrics, International Medical Center, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Khaled Ali Alawam
- Department of Respiratory Therapy Sciences, Inaya Medical College, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Muslim M. Alsaadi
- Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine and King Khalid University Hospital, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Amirav I, Newhouse MT. Transmission of coronavirus by nebulizer: a serious, underappreciated risk. CMAJ 2020; 192:E346. [PMID: 32392488 DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.75066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/01/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Israel Amirav
- Pediatric respirologist, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta.; Dana-Dwek Childrens' Hospital, Tel Aviv Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
O'Brien F, Clapham D, Krysiak K, Batchelor H, Field P, Caivano G, Pertile M, Nunn A, Tuleu C. Making Medicines Baby Size: The Challenges in Bridging the Formulation Gap in Neonatal Medicine. Int J Mol Sci 2019; 20:E2688. [PMID: 31159216 PMCID: PMC6600135 DOI: 10.3390/ijms20112688] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2019] [Revised: 05/17/2019] [Accepted: 05/24/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
The development of age-appropriate formulations should focus on dosage forms that can deliver variable yet accurate doses that are safe and acceptable to the child, are matched to his/her development and ability, and avoid medication errors. However, in the past decade, the medication needs of neonates have largely been neglected. The aim of this review is to expand on what differentiates the needs of preterm and term neonates from those of the older paediatric subsets, in terms of environment of care, ability to measure and administer the dose (from the perspective of the patient and carer, the routes of administration, the device and the product), neonatal biopharmaceutics and regulatory challenges. This review offers insight into those challenges posed by the formulation of medicinal products for neonatal patients in order to support the development of clinically relevant products.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fiona O'Brien
- School of Pharmacy, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, 111 St Stephens Green Dublin 2, Ireland.
| | | | - Kamelia Krysiak
- School of Pharmacy, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, 111 St Stephens Green Dublin 2, Ireland.
| | - Hannah Batchelor
- College of Medical and Dental Sciences, Institute of Clinical Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK.
| | - Peter Field
- University College London School of Pharmacy, 29-39 Brunswick Square, London WC1N 1AX, UK.
| | - Grazia Caivano
- Chiesi Farmaceutici S.p.A. Largo Francesco Belloli 11/A-43122 Parma, Italy.
| | - Marisa Pertile
- Chiesi Farmaceutici S.p.A. Largo Francesco Belloli 11/A-43122 Parma, Italy.
| | - Anthony Nunn
- Department of Women's and Children's Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool Women's Hospital, Liverpool L8 7SS, UK.
| | - Catherine Tuleu
- University College London School of Pharmacy, 29-39 Brunswick Square, London WC1N 1AX, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Gardiner MA, Wilkinson MH. Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Breath-Enhanced to Conventional Nebulizers in the Treatment of Children with Acute Asthma. J Pediatr 2019; 204:245-249.e2. [PMID: 30392872 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2018.08.083] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2018] [Revised: 08/03/2018] [Accepted: 08/31/2018] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare the efficacy of a breath-enhanced and a conventional jet nebulizer in the treatment of children with moderate to severe acute asthma. STUDY DESIGN We enrolled subjects between 6 and 18 years of age presenting to the emergency department (ED) with acute asthma and an initial forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) <70% of predicted. We excluded patients with chronic disease, who required immediate resuscitation, or failed spirometry. Subjects were randomized to breath-enhanced or conventional jet delivery of a 5-mg albuterol treatment. Our primary outcome was change in FEV1, and secondary outcomes included change in clinical asthma scores, ED length of stay, disposition, and side effects. Student t test and multivariable linear regression were used to evaluate the primary outcome. RESULTS In total, 497 patients were assessed for eligibility with 118 enrolled and 107 subjects available for analysis of the primary outcome. Improvement in FEV1 was significantly greater with conventional jet nebulizer (mean ΔFEV1 +13.8% vs +9.1%, P = .04). This difference remained significant after adjustment for baseline differences. Subgroup analysis of 57 subjects with spirometry meeting American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society guidelines yielded similar results (mean ΔFEV1 +14.5% vs +8.5%, P=.03). There were no significant differences in clinical asthma scores, ED length of stay, disposition, or side effects. CONCLUSIONS Albuterol delivered via conventional jet nebulizer resulted in significantly greater improvement in FEV1 than albuterol delivered by breath-enhanced nebulizer, without significant differences in clinical measures. Conventional jet nebulizers may deliver albuterol to children with acute asthma more effectively than breath-enhanced nebulizers. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02566902.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mike A Gardiner
- Department of Pediatrics, University of California, San Diego, Rady Children's Hospital-San Diego, La Jolla, CA.
| | - Matthew H Wilkinson
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Texas at Austin, Dell Children's Medical Center of Central Texas, Austin, TX
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Al-Moamary MS, Alhaider SA, Alangari AA, Al Ghobain MO, Zeitouni MO, Idrees MM, Alanazi AF, Al-Harbi AS, Yousef AA, Alorainy HS, Al-Hajjaj MS. The Saudi Initiative for Asthma - 2019 Update: Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of asthma in adults and children. Ann Thorac Med 2019; 14:3-48. [PMID: 30745934 PMCID: PMC6341863 DOI: 10.4103/atm.atm_327_18] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
This is the fourth version of the updated guidelines for the diagnosis and management of asthma, developed by the Saudi Initiative for Asthma (SINA) group, a subsidiary of the Saudi Thoracic Society. The main objective of the SINA is to have guidelines that are up to date, simple to understand, and easy to use by healthcare workers dealing with asthma patients. To facilitate achieving the goals of asthma management, the SINA panel approach is mainly based on the assessment of symptom control and risk for both adults and children. The approach to asthma management is now more aligned for different age groups. The guidelines have focused more on personalized approaches reflecting better understanding of disease heterogeneity with integration of recommendations related to biologic agents, evidence-based updates on treatment, and role of immunotherapy in management. The medication appendix has also been updated with the addition of recent evidence, new indications for existing medication, and new medications. The guidelines are constructed based on the available evidence, local literature, and current situation at national and regional levels. There is also an emphasis on patient–doctor partnership in the management that also includes a self-management plan.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohamed S Al-Moamary
- Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Sami A Alhaider
- Department of Pediatrics, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Abdullah A Alangari
- Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Mohammed O Al Ghobain
- Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Mohammed O Zeitouni
- Department of Medicine, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Majdy M Idrees
- Respiratory Division, Department of Medicine, Prince Sultan Military Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Abdullah F Alanazi
- Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Adel S Al-Harbi
- Department of Pediatrics, Prince Sultan Military Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Abdullah A Yousef
- Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
| | - Hassan S Alorainy
- Department of Respiratory Care, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Mohamed S Al-Hajjaj
- Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Medicine, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Vincken W, Levy ML, Scullion J, Usmani OS, Dekhuijzen PNR, Corrigan CJ. Spacer devices for inhaled therapy: why use them, and how? ERJ Open Res 2018; 4:00065-2018. [PMID: 29928649 PMCID: PMC6004521 DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00065-2018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 59] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2018] [Accepted: 05/18/2018] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
We present an extensive review of the literature to date pertaining to the rationale for using a spacer/valved holding chamber (VHC) to deliver inhaled therapy from a pressurised, metered-dose inhaler, a discussion of how the properties of individual devices may vary according to their physical characteristics and materials of manufacture, the potential risks and benefits of ancillaries such as valves, and the evidence that they contribute tangibly to the delivery of therapy. We also reiterate practical recommendations for the correct usage and maintenance of spacers/VHCs, which we trust offer practical help and advice to patients and healthcare professionals alike.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Walter Vincken
- Respiratory Division, University Hospital Brussels (UZ Brussel), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | | | | | | | | | - Chris J Corrigan
- Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London/Guy's and St Thomas's NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Tanno LK, Haahtela T, Calderon MA, Cruz A, Demoly P. Implementation gaps for asthma prevention and control. Respir Med 2017; 130:13-19. [PMID: 29206628 DOI: 10.1016/j.rmed.2017.07.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2017] [Revised: 06/29/2017] [Accepted: 07/07/2017] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Asthma and allergic diseases can start in childhood and persist throughout life, but could also be manifested later, at any time for still misunderstood reasons. They are major chronic multifactorial respiratory diseases, for which prevention, early diagnosis and treatment is recognized as a priority for the Europe's public health policy and the United Nations. Given that allergy triggers (including infections, rapid urbanization leading to loss in biodiversity, pollution and climate changes) are not expected to change in a foreseeable future, it is imperative that steps are taken to develop, strengthen and optimize preventive and treatment strategies. Currently there are good treatments for asthma, several risk factors are known (e.g., allergies, rhinitis, tobacco smoke) and tools to control the disease have been developed. However, we are still uncertain how to prevent patients from developing asthma and allergic diseases. In this paper, we list the positive and negative experiences in this field as well as analyze the missing links in the process. This critical analysis will be the basis of setting-up an effective program for prevention and making, a process labeled as "implementation gaps".
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luciana K Tanno
- Hospital Sírio Libanês, São Paulo, Brazil; Division of Allergy, Department of Pulmonology, University Hospital of Montpellier, Montpellier, and Pierre Louis Institute of Epidemiology and Public Health, Sorbonne Universités, Paris, France.
| | - Tari Haahtela
- Skin and Allergy Hospital, Helsinki University Central Hospital, FI-00029 Helsinki, Finland
| | - Moises A Calderon
- Section of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Imperial College London, National Heart and Lung Institute, Royal Brompton Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Alvaro Cruz
- ProAR-Núcleo de Excelência em Asma da Universidade Federal da Bahia, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil
| | - Pascal Demoly
- Division of Allergy, Department of Pulmonology, University Hospital of Montpellier, Montpellier, and Pierre Louis Institute of Epidemiology and Public Health, Sorbonne Universités, Paris, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Carr TF, Kraft M. Management of Severe Asthma before Referral to the Severe Asthma Specialist. THE JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY. IN PRACTICE 2017; 5:877-886. [PMID: 28689838 PMCID: PMC5526085 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2017.04.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2017] [Revised: 04/18/2017] [Accepted: 04/20/2017] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
Severe asthma is associated with significant morbidity and can be challenging to assess and control, due to heterogeneity of disease, complexity of diagnosis, and impact of comorbidities. A structured approach to the assessment and management of severe asthma may be helpful to the practicing clinician. First, it is important to confirm a diagnosis of asthma. In patients who are either not responding to treatment, or who require high doses of medication to control symptoms, it is highly possible that disease mimickers or comorbidities are present and can inhibit therapeutic responsiveness. The assessment and management of common comorbidities of asthma may dramatically impact disease control and thus medication requirement. Determining medication adherence and optimizing drug dose and delivery may separate out truly severe asthmatics from those not using medications regularly or properly. Next, although true personalized medicine for severe asthma is not yet realized, for those individuals with severe asthma, phenotypic characteristics of each patient may guide which therapeutic options may be most effective for that patient. Finally, evaluation and management of severe asthma at a referral center can add additional phenotyping, therapeutic, and diagnostic strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tara F Carr
- Asthma and Airway Disease Research Center, University of Arizona, Tucson, Ariz.
| | - Monica Kraft
- Asthma and Airway Disease Research Center, University of Arizona, Tucson, Ariz
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Abstract
Respiratory emergencies are 1 of the most common reasons parents seek evaluation for the their children in the emergency department (ED) each year, and respiratory failure is the most common cause of cardiopulmonary arrest in pediatric patients. Whereas many respiratory illnesses are mild and self-limiting, others are life threatening and require prompt diagnosis and management. Therefore, it is imperative that emergency clinicians be able to promptly recognize and manage these illnesses. This article reviews ED diagnosis and management of foreign body aspiration, asthma exacerbation, epiglottitis, bronchiolitis, community-acquired pneumonia, and pertussis.
Collapse
|
10
|
Suau SJ, DeBlieux PMC. Management of Acute Exacerbation of Asthma and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in the Emergency Department. Emerg Med Clin North Am 2016; 34:15-37. [PMID: 26614239 DOI: 10.1016/j.emc.2015.08.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
Acute asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbations are the most common respiratory diseases requiring emergent medical evaluation and treatment. Asthma and COPD are chronic, debilitating disease processes that have been differentiated traditionally by the presence or absence of reversible airflow obstruction. Asthma and COPD exacerbations impose an enormous economic burden on the US health care budget. In daily clinical practice, it is difficult to differentiate these 2 obstructive processes based on their symptoms, and on their nearly identical acute treatment strategies; major differences are important when discussing anatomic sites involved, long-term prognosis, and the nature of inflammatory markers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Salvador J Suau
- Louisiana State University, University Medical Center of New Orleans, 2000 Canal Street, D&T 2nd Floor - Suite 2720, New Orleans, LA 70112, USA.
| | - Peter M C DeBlieux
- Louisiana State University, University Medical Center of New Orleans, 2000 Canal Street, D&T 2nd Floor - Suite 2720, New Orleans, LA 70112, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Muchão FP, Silva Filho LVRFD, Pastorino AC, Rodrigues JC. Metered-dose inhaler for asthma patients: knowledge and effects of a theoretical and practical guidance for pediatricians. EINSTEIN-SAO PAULO 2016; 9:337-42. [PMID: 26761102 DOI: 10.1590/s1679-45082011ao2115] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2011] [Accepted: 08/11/2011] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the effect of a theoretical and practical guidance on knowledge of pediatricians regarding the use of metered dose inhalers with spacers. To identify major deficiencies, correct them and train these physicians on the correct use of the devices. METHODS Pediatricians who participated in a theoretical-practical program focusing on the use of inhaler devices answered a questionnaire with five questions about the use of these devices before and after the program. A comparison of the scores obtained in the pre- and post-training tests was performed by Wilcoxon test for related samples, and a significance level of 0.05 was adopted. RESULTS Twenty pediatricians performed pre- and post-training tests. The performance of pediatricians in the post-training test was significantly better than baseline (p<0.001). CONCLUSION A brief orientation program for pediatricians significantly improved their knowledge on the use of metered-dose inhalers with spacers, which may translate into an improvement in quality and quantity of prescriptions of these devices in clinical practice. The questions with higher rates of errors in the pre-training test were the questions about the waiting time between two sprays in successive applications and about the correct way to attach the inhaler to the spacer, both with high levels of success in the post-training test.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fábio Pereira Muchão
- Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo - USP, São Paulo, SP, BR
| | | | - Antonio Carlos Pastorino
- Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo - USP, São Paulo, SP, BR
| | - Joaquim Carlos Rodrigues
- Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo - USP, São Paulo, SP, BR
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Al-Moamary MS, Alhaider SA, Idrees MM, Al Ghobain MO, Zeitouni MO, Al-Harbi AS, Yousef AA, Al-Matar H, Alorainy HS, Al-Hajjaj MS. The Saudi Initiative for Asthma - 2016 update: Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of asthma in adults and children. Ann Thorac Med 2016; 11:3-42. [PMID: 26933455 PMCID: PMC4748613 DOI: 10.4103/1817-1737.173196] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2015] [Accepted: 12/08/2015] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
This is an updated guideline for the diagnosis and management of asthma, developed by the Saudi Initiative for Asthma (SINA) group, a subsidiary of the Saudi Thoracic Society. The main objective of SINA is to have guidelines that are up to date, simple to understand and easy to use by nonasthma specialists, including primary care and general practice physicians. SINA approach is mainly based on symptom control and assessment of risk as it is the ultimate goal of treatment. The new SINA guidelines include updates of acute and chronic asthma management, with more emphasis on the use of asthma control in the management of asthma in adults and children, inclusion of a new medication appendix, and keeping consistency on the management at different age groups. The section on asthma in children is rewritten and expanded where the approach is stratified based on the age. The guidelines are constructed based on the available evidence, local literature, and the current situation in Saudi Arabia. There is also an emphasis on patient-doctor partnership in the management that also includes a self-management plan.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohamed S. Al-Moamary
- Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Sami A. Alhaider
- Department of Pediatrics, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Majdy M. Idrees
- Department of Medicine, Pulmonary Division, Prince Sultan Military Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Mohammed O. Al Ghobain
- Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Mohammed O. Zeitouni
- Department of Medicine, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Adel S. Al-Harbi
- Department of Pediatrics, Prince Sultan Military Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Abdullah A. Yousef
- Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, University of Dammam, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
| | - Hussain Al-Matar
- Department of Medicine, Imam Abdulrahman Al Faisal Hospital, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
| | - Hassan S. Alorainy
- Department of Respiratory Care, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Mohamed S. Al-Hajjaj
- Department of Medicine, Respiratory Division, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Albertson TE, Schivo M, Gidwani N, Kenyon NJ, Sutter ME, Chan AL, Louie S. Pharmacotherapy of critical asthma syndrome: current and emerging therapies. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol 2015; 48:7-30. [PMID: 24178860 DOI: 10.1007/s12016-013-8393-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
The critical asthma syndrome (CAS) encompasses the most severe, persistent, refractory asthma patients for the clinician to manage. Personalized pharmacotherapy is necessary to prevent the next acute severe asthma exacerbation, not just the control of symptoms. The 2007 National Asthma Education and Prevention Program Expert Panel 3 provides guidelines for the treatment of uncontrolled asthma. The patient's response to recommended pharmacotherapy is highly variable which risks poor asthma control leading to frequent exacerbations that can deteriorate into CAS. Controlling asthma symptoms and preventing acute exacerbations may be two separate clinical activities with their own unique demands. Clinicians must be prepared to use the entire spectrum of asthma medications available but must concurrently be aware of potential drug toxicities some of which can paradoxically worsen asthma control. Medications normally prescribed for COPD can potentially be useful in the CAS patient, particularly those with asthma-COPD overlap syndrome. Immunomodulation with drugs like omalizumab in IgE-mediated asthma syndromes is one important approach. New and emerging drugs address unique aspects of airway inflammation and biology but at a significant financial cost. The pharmacology and toxicities of the agents that may be used in the treatment of CAS to control asthma symptoms and prevent severe exacerbations are reviewed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T E Albertson
- Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA, 95817, USA,
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Albertson TE, Sutter ME, Chan AL. The acute management of asthma. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol 2015; 48:114-25. [PMID: 25213370 DOI: 10.1007/s12016-014-8448-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) or clinic with acute exacerbation of asthma (AEA) can be very challenging varying in both severity and response to therapy. High-dose, frequent or continuous nebulized short-acting beta2 agonist (SABA) therapy that can be combined with a short-acting muscarinic antagonist (SAMA) is the backbone of treatment. When patients do not rapidly clinically respond to SABA/SAMA inhalation, the early use of oral or parenteral corticosteroids should be considered and has been shown to impact the immediate need for ICU admission or even the need for hospital admission. Adjunctive therapies such as the use of intravenous magnesium and helium/oxygen combination gas for inhalation and for driving a nebulizer to deliver a SABA and or SAMA should be considered and are best used early in the treatment plan if they are likely to impact the patients' clinical course. The use of other agents such as theophylline, leukotriene modifiers, inhaled corticosteroids, long-acting beta2 agonist, and long-acting muscarinic antagonist currently does not play a major role in the immediate treatment of AEA in the clinic or the ED but is an important therapeutic option for physicians to be aware of and to consider initiating at the time of discharge from clinic, hospital, or ED to reduce later clinical worsening and readmission to the ED and hospital. A comprehensive summary is provided of the currently available respiratory pharmaceuticals approved for asthma and other airway syndromes. Clinicians must be prepared to use the entire spectrum of medications available for the treatment of acute asthma exacerbations and the agents that should be initiated to prevent worsening or additional exacerbations. They need to be familiar with the major potential drug toxicities associated with their use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy E Albertson
- Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University of California, Davis, PSSB 3400, 4150 V Street, Sacramento, CA, 95817, USA,
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Alangari AA. Corticosteroids in the treatment of acute asthma. Ann Thorac Med 2014; 9:187-92. [PMID: 25276236 PMCID: PMC4166064 DOI: 10.4103/1817-1737.140120] [Citation(s) in RCA: 91] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2013] [Accepted: 03/10/2014] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Asthma is a prevalent chronic disease of the respiratory system and acute asthma exacerbations are among the most common causes of presentation to the emergency department (ED) and admission to hospital particularly in children. Bronchial airways inflammation is the most prominent pathological feature of asthma. Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), through their anti-inflammatory effects have been the mainstay of treatment of asthma for many years. Systemic and ICS are also used in the treatment of acute asthma exacerbations. Several international asthma management guidelines recommend the use of systemic corticosteroids in the management of moderate to severe acute asthma early upon presentation to the ED. On the other hand, ICS use in the management acute asthma has been studied in different contexts with encouraging results in some and negative in others. This review sheds some light on the role of systemic and ICS in the management of acute asthma and discusses the current evidence behind their different ways of application particularly in relation to new developments in the field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abdullah A Alangari
- Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Chung KF, Wenzel SE, Brozek JL, Bush A, Castro M, Sterk PJ, Adcock IM, Bateman ED, Bel EH, Bleecker ER, Boulet LP, Brightling C, Chanez P, Dahlen SE, Djukanovic R, Frey U, Gaga M, Gibson P, Hamid Q, Jajour NN, Mauad T, Sorkness RL, Teague WG. International ERS/ATS guidelines on definition, evaluation and treatment of severe asthma. Eur Respir J 2013; 43:343-73. [DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00202013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2274] [Impact Index Per Article: 206.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
|
17
|
Abstract
Pediatric asthma is a disease that is managed across outpatient physicians, hospitalists, critical care physicians, and emergency department (ED) physicians. Scoring systems may facilitate a rapid assessment of the child with asthma in the ED. Short-acting beta agonists are still the mainstay of therapy for acute exacerbations along with corticosteroids and ipratropium bromide. ED providers must also know the indications for noninvasive ventilation and intubation. Most patients can be treated and discharged from the ED after acute exacerbation, and should be given a plan for going home that provides educational material and emergency scenarios to help prevent future acute incidents.
Collapse
|
18
|
Abstract
Asthma continues to be one of the most common reasons for emergency department visits and a leading cause of hospitalization. Acute management involves severity-based treatment of bronchoconstriction and underlying airway inflammation. Optimal treatment has been defined and standardized through randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews, and consensus guidelines. Implementation of clinical practice guidelines may improve clinical, quality, and safety outcomes. Asthma morbidity is disproportionately high in poor, urban, and minority children. Children treated in emergency departments commonly have persistent chronic severity, significant morbidity, and infrequent follow-up and primary asthma care, and prescription of inhaled corticosteroids is appropriate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kyle A Nelson
- Emergency Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, 300 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, USA; Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, 25 Shattuck Street, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Cates CJ, Welsh EJ, Rowe BH. Holding chambers (spacers) versus nebulisers for beta-agonist treatment of acute asthma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; 2013:CD000052. [PMID: 24037768 PMCID: PMC7032675 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd000052.pub3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 69] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In acute asthma inhaled beta(2)-agonists are often administered by nebuliser to relieve bronchospasm, but some have argued that metered-dose inhalers with a holding chamber (spacer) can be equally effective. Nebulisers require a power source and need regular maintenance, and are more expensive in the community setting. OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of holding chambers (spacers) compared to nebulisers for the delivery of beta(2)-agonists for acute asthma. SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Airways Group Trial Register and reference lists of articles. We contacted the authors of studies to identify additional trials. Date of last search: February 2013. SELECTION CRITERIA Randomised trials in adults and children (from two years of age) with asthma, where spacer beta(2)-agonist delivery was compared with wet nebulisation. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently applied study inclusion criteria (one review author for the first version of the review), extracted the data and assessed risks of bias. Missing data were obtained from the authors or estimated. Results are reported with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). MAIN RESULTS This review includes a total of 1897 children and 729 adults in 39 trials. Thirty-three trials were conducted in the emergency room and equivalent community settings, and six trials were on inpatients with acute asthma (207 children and 28 adults). The method of delivery of beta(2)-agonist did not show a significant difference in hospital admission rates. In adults, the risk ratio (RR) of admission for spacer versus nebuliser was 0.94 (95% CI 0.61 to 1.43). The risk ratio for children was 0.71 (95% CI 0.47 to 1.08, moderate quality evidence). In children, length of stay in the emergency department was significantly shorter when the spacer was used. The mean duration in the emergency department for children given nebulised treatment was 103 minutes, and for children given treatment via spacers 33 minutes less (95% CI -43 to -24 minutes, moderate quality evidence). Length of stay in the emergency department for adults was similar for the two delivery methods. Peak flow and forced expiratory volume were also similar for the two delivery methods. Pulse rate was lower for spacer in children, mean difference -5% baseline (95% CI -8% to -2%, moderate quality evidence), as was the risk of developing tremor (RR 0.64; 95% CI 0.44 to 0.95, moderate quality evidence). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Nebuliser delivery produced outcomes that were not significantly better than metered-dose inhalers delivered by spacer in adults or children, in trials where treatments were repeated and titrated to the response of the participant. Spacers may have some advantages compared to nebulisers for children with acute asthma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher J Cates
- St George's, University of LondonPopulation Health Research InstituteCranmer TerraceLondonUKSW17 0RE
| | - Emma J Welsh
- St George's, University of LondonPopulation Health Research InstituteCranmer TerraceLondonUKSW17 0RE
| | - Brian H Rowe
- University of AlbertaDepartment of Emergency MedicineRoom 1G1.43 Walter C. Mackenzie Health Sciences Centre8440 112th StreetEdmontonABCanadaT6G 2B7
- University of AlbertaSchool of Public HeathEdmontonCanada
| | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Welsh E, Jahnke N, Remmington T, Smyth A, Cates C. 20 years of Cochrane Glancing backwards - moving ahead: a tale of two Cochrane review groups. Paediatr Respir Rev 2013; 14:165-7. [PMID: 23849333 DOI: 10.1016/j.prrv.2013.05.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Emma Welsh
- Cochrane Airways Group, St George's University of London, London.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Abstract
Recent literature on paediatric status asthmaticus (PSA) confirms an increasing percentage of admissions to paediatric intensive care units. PSA is a medical emergency that can be fatal and needs careful and prompt intervention. The severity of PSA is mainly determined by clinical judgement of signs and symptoms. Peak flow measurements and serial lung function measurements are not reliable in PSA. Validated clinically useful instruments are lacking. The three main factors that are involved in the pathophysiology of PSA, bronchoconstriction, mucus plugging and airway inflammation need to be addressed to optimise treatment. Initial therapies include supplementation of oxygen, repetitive administration of rapid acting β2-agonists, inhaled anticholinergics in combination with systemic glucocorticosteroids and intravenous magnesium sulphate. Additional treatment modalities may include methylxanthines, DNase, ketamine, sodium bicarbonate, heliox, epinephrine, non-invasive respiratory support, mechanical ventilation and inhalational anaesthetics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Muriel Koninckx
- Paediatric Intensive Care, Middelheim Ziekenhuis, Lindendreef 1, Antwerp, Belgium.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Rowe BH. Intravenous and inhaled MgSO4 for acute asthma. THE LANCET RESPIRATORY MEDICINE 2013; 1:276-7. [PMID: 24429139 DOI: 10.1016/s2213-2600(13)70097-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Brian H Rowe
- Department of Emergency Medicine and School of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada T6G 2B7.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Conner JB, Buck PO. Improving asthma management: the case for mandatory inclusion of dose counters on all rescue bronchodilators. J Asthma 2013; 50:658-63. [PMID: 23544966 PMCID: PMC3741013 DOI: 10.3109/02770903.2013.789056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Background Asthma remains a serious global health challenge. Poor control of asthma symptoms is due in part to incorrect use of oral inhaler devices that deliver asthma medications, such as poor inhalation technique or use of a metered dose inhaler (MDI) after the recommended number of doses is expelled. Objective To review published research on the potential for patients to overestimate or underestimate the amount of asthma rescue medication in MDIs without integrated dose-counting mechanisms. Methods We searched PubMed and EMBASE using search terms “dose counter and asthma” and “dose counter and metered dose inhaler” for English language publications up to July, 2012, with a manual search of references from relevant articles. Results Up to 40% of patients believe they are taking their asthma medication when they actually are activating an empty or nearly empty MDI. Device design makes it impossible for an MDI to cease delivering drug doses at an exact point, and the number of actuations in an MDI may be twice the nominal number of recommended medication doses. Once the recommended number of medication doses is expelled, remaining actuations deliver decreasing concentrations of active medication and increasing concentrations of propellants and excipients. This phenomenon, called “tail-off,” is particularly problematic when medications are formulated as suspensions, as are rescue medications to control acute bronchospasm. Reliable inhalation of rescue medication could reduce asthma-related morbidity. Conclusion By helping to ensure that patients receive accurate metered doses of asthma rescue medication to relieve bronchoconstriction, dose counters may help to improve asthma management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jill B Conner
- Global Medicines Group, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd, Kansas City, MO, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Bush A, Fleming L. 2012 and never been KISSed: we need to improve the care of children with asthma. PRIMARY CARE RESPIRATORY JOURNAL : JOURNAL OF THE GENERAL PRACTICE AIRWAYS GROUP 2013; 21:242-4. [PMID: 22836743 DOI: 10.4104/pcrj.2012.00062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
|
25
|
Adams JY, Sutter ME, Albertson TE. The patient with asthma in the emergency department. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol 2013; 43:14-29. [PMID: 21597902 DOI: 10.1007/s12016-011-8273-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
Asthma is a highly prevalent disease that presents commonly to the emergency department (ED) in acute exacerbation. Recent asthma treatment guidelines have added content dedicated to the management of acute exacerbations. Effective management of an exacerbation requires rapid assessment of severity through physical examination, measurement of peak expiratory flow rate, and response to initial treatment. Most therapies are directed at alleviating bronchospasm and decreasing airway inflammation. While inhaled short-acting beta-agonists, systemic corticosteroids, and supplemental oxygen are the initial and often only therapies required for patients with mild moderate exacerbations, high-dose beta agonists and inhaled anti-cholinergics should also be given to patients with severe exacerbations. Adjunctive therapy with intravenous magnesium and Heliox-driven nebulization of bronchodilators should be considered for patients presenting with severe and very severe exacerbations. Early recognition and appropriate management of respiratory failure are required to mitigate the risk of complications including death. Disposition should be determined based on serial assessments of the response to therapy over the first 4 h in the ED. Patients stable for discharge should receive medications, asthma education including a written asthma action plan, and should have follow-up scheduled for them by ED staff. Rapid implementation of evidence-based, multi-disciplinary care is required to ensure the best possible outcomes for this potentially treatable disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jason Y Adams
- Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, University of California Davis Medical Center, 4150 V Street, Sacramento, CA 95817, USA.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Abstract
Asthma is the most common chronic disease in children in many low- and middle-income countries. In these settings, the burden of childhood asthma is increasing and is associated with severe disease. There are a number of challenges to providing optimal management of childhood asthma in such settings. These include under-diagnosis of childhood asthma, access to care, ability of healthcare workers to manage asthma, availability and affordability of inhaled therapy, environmental control of potential triggers, education of healthcare providers and of the public, and cultural or language issues. International and national guidelines for childhood asthma have been produced, but implementation remains a real challenge. Access to and affordability of essential inhaled asthma drugs, especially low-dose inhaled corticosteroids and short-acting bronchodilators, are major challenges to effective asthma control in many countries. A low-cost spacer made from a plastic bottle is effective for use with a metered-dose inhaler, but use must be included in asthma educational initiatives. Educational programs for healthcare personnel and for the public that are culturally and language appropriate are needed for effective implementation of asthma guidelines. Socioeconomic and structural barriers to care within health services remain obstacles to achieving optimal treatment of asthma for many children.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heather J Zar
- Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, Red Cross War Memorial Children's Hospital, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
| | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Mecklin M, Paassilta M, Korppi M. Salbutamol with metered dose inhalers with spacers - an established emergency treatment for preschool wheeze. Acta Paediatr 2012; 101:1161-3. [PMID: 22897230 DOI: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2012.02822.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
AIMS Metered dose inhalers (MDI) with spacers were implemented to treat preschool wheeze in the emergency room (ER) and hospital in 2006 in our children's hospital. The implementation at day time happened successfully within 4 months, but not at night time. The objective of the present study was to check the treatment mode, hospitalization rate and length of hospital stay (LOS) 4 years later. METHODS The present retrospective hospital chart review was identical to the review 4 years earlier, including data collection on treatment mode in 1- to-5-year-old preschool wheezers in the ER, on need of hospitalization, on treatment mode in hospital and on LOS. Both studies were performed during the same late-autumn and early-winter months. RESULTS In the ER, 96% of the children with preschool wheeze were treated with salbutamol using MDIs with spacers. Hospitalization rate was 51%, and all but one were treated with MDIs with spacers in hospital at both day and night time. Mean LOS was 2.48 days, being shorter than 4 years earlier. CONCLUSION Administration of salbutamol using MDI with spacer became an established emergency treatment of preschool wheeze within 4 years after the initial change from nebulizers to MDIs with spacers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Minna Mecklin
- Paediatric Research Centre, Tampere University, Finland
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Al-Moamary MS, Alhaider SA, Al-Hajjaj MS, Al-Ghobain MO, Idrees MM, Zeitouni MO, Al-Harbi AS, Al Dabbagh MM, Al-Matar H, Alorainy HS. The Saudi initiative for asthma - 2012 update: Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of asthma in adults and children. Ann Thorac Med 2012; 7:175-204. [PMID: 23189095 PMCID: PMC3506098 DOI: 10.4103/1817-1737.102166] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2012] [Accepted: 09/19/2012] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
This an updated guidelines for the diagnosis and management of asthma, developed by the Saudi Initiative for Asthma (SINA) group, a subsidiary of the Saudi Thoracic Society. The main objective of SINA is to have updated guidelines, which are simple to understand and easy to use by non-asthma specialists, including primary care and general practice physicians. This new version includes updates of acute and chronic asthma management, with more emphasis on the use of Asthma Control Test in the management of asthma, and a new section on "difficult-to-treat asthma." Further, the section on asthma in children was re-written to cover different aspects in this age group. The SINA panel is a group of Saudi experts with well-respected academic backgrounds and experience in the field of asthma. The guidelines are formatted based on the available evidence, local literature, and the current situation in Saudi Arabia. There was an emphasis on patient-doctor partnership in the management that also includes a self-management plan. The approach adopted by the SINA group is mainly based on disease control as it is the ultimate goal of treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohamed S. Al-Moamary
- Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Sami A. Alhaider
- Department of Pediatrics, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Mohamed S. Al-Hajjaj
- Respiratory Division, Department of Medicine, Medical College, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Mohammed O. Al-Ghobain
- Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Majdy M. Idrees
- Pulmonary Division, Department of Medicine, Military Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Mohammed O. Zeitouni
- Department of Medicine, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Adel S. Al-Harbi
- Department of Pediatrics, Military Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Maha M. Al Dabbagh
- Department of Pediatrics, King Fahd Armed Forces Hospital, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Hussain Al-Matar
- Department of Medicine, Imam Abdulrahman Al Faisal, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
| | - Hassan S. Alorainy
- Department of Respiratory Care, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Fassl BA, Nkoy FL, Stone BL, Srivastava R, Simon TD, Uchida DA, Koopmeiners K, Greene T, Cook LJ, Maloney CG. The Joint Commission Children's Asthma Care quality measures and asthma readmissions. Pediatrics 2012; 130:482-91. [PMID: 22908110 PMCID: PMC4074621 DOI: 10.1542/peds.2011-3318] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/27/2012] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES The Joint Commission introduced 3 Children's Asthma Care (CAC 1-3) measures to improve the quality of pediatric inpatient asthma care. Validity of the commission's measures has not yet been demonstrated. The objectives of this quality improvement study were to examine changes in provider compliance with CAC 1-3 and associated asthma hospitalization outcomes after full implementation of an asthma care process model (CPM). METHODS The study included children aged 2 to 17 years who were admitted to a tertiary care children's hospital for acute asthma between January 1, 2005, and December 31, 2010. The study was divided into 3 periods: preimplementation (January 1, 2005-December 31, 2007), implementation (January 1, 2008-March 31, 2009), and postimplementation (April 1, 2009-December 31, 2010) periods. Changes in provider compliance with CAC 1-3 and associated changes in hospitalization outcomes (length of stay, costs, PICU transfer, deaths, and asthma readmissions within 6 months) were measured. Logistic regression was used to control for age, gender, race, insurance type, and time. RESULTS A total of 1865 children were included. Compliance with quality measures before and after the CPM implementation was as follows: 99% versus 100%, CAC-1; 100% versus 100%, CAC-2; and 0% versus 87%, CAC-3 (P < .01). Increased compliance with CAC-3 was associated with a sustained decrease in readmissions from an average of 17% to 12% (P = .01) postimplementation. No change in other outcomes was observed. CONCLUSIONS Implementation of the asthma CPM was associated with improved compliance with CAC-3 and with a delayed, yet significant and sustained decrease in hospital asthma readmission rates, validating CAC-3 as a quality measure. Due to high baseline compliance, CAC-1 and CAC-2 are of questionable value as quality measures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Flory L. Nkoy
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Bryan L. Stone
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | | | - Tamara D. Simon
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; and
| | - Derek A. Uchida
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | | | - Tom Greene
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Lawrence J. Cook
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Papadopoulos NG, Arakawa H, Carlsen KH, Custovic A, Gern J, Lemanske R, Le Souef P, Mäkelä M, Roberts G, Wong G, Zar H, Akdis CA, Bacharier LB, Baraldi E, van Bever HP, de Blic J, Boner A, Burks W, Casale TB, Castro-Rodriguez JA, Chen YZ, El-Gamal YM, Everard ML, Frischer T, Geller M, Gereda J, Goh DY, Guilbert TW, Hedlin G, Heymann PW, Hong SJ, Hossny EM, Huang JL, Jackson DJ, de Jongste JC, Kalayci O, Aït-Khaled N, Kling S, Kuna P, Lau S, Ledford DK, Lee SI, Liu AH, Lockey RF, Lødrup-Carlsen K, Lötvall J, Morikawa A, Nieto A, Paramesh H, Pawankar R, Pohunek P, Pongracic J, Price D, Robertson C, Rosario N, Rossenwasser LJ, Sly PD, Stein R, Stick S, Szefler S, Taussig LM, Valovirta E, Vichyanond P, Wallace D, Weinberg E, Wennergren G, Wildhaber J, Zeiger RS. International consensus on (ICON) pediatric asthma. Allergy 2012; 67:976-97. [PMID: 22702533 PMCID: PMC4442800 DOI: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2012.02865.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 265] [Impact Index Per Article: 22.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/30/2012] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
Asthma is the most common chronic lower respiratory disease in childhood throughout the world. Several guidelines and/or consensus documents are available to support medical decisions on pediatric asthma. Although there is no doubt that the use of common systematic approaches for management can considerably improve outcomes, dissemination and implementation of these are still major challenges. Consequently, the International Collaboration in Asthma, Allergy and Immunology (iCAALL), recently formed by the EAACI, AAAAI, ACAAI, and WAO, has decided to propose an International Consensus on (ICON) Pediatric Asthma. The purpose of this document is to highlight the key messages that are common to many of the existing guidelines, while critically reviewing and commenting on any differences, thus providing a concise reference. The principles of pediatric asthma management are generally accepted. Overall, the treatment goal is disease control. To achieve this, patients and their parents should be educated to optimally manage the disease, in collaboration with healthcare professionals. Identification and avoidance of triggers is also of significant importance. Assessment and monitoring should be performed regularly to re-evaluate and fine-tune treatment. Pharmacotherapy is the cornerstone of treatment. The optimal use of medication can, in most cases, help patients control symptoms and reduce the risk for future morbidity. The management of exacerbations is a major consideration, independent of chronic treatment. There is a trend toward considering phenotype-specific treatment choices; however, this goal has not yet been achieved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N G Papadopoulos
- Department of Allergy, 2nd Pediatric Clinic, University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Chew KS, Kamarudin H, Hashim CW. A randomized open-label trial on the use of budesonide/formoterol (Symbicort®) as an alternative reliever medication for mild to moderate asthmatic attacks. Int J Emerg Med 2012; 5:16. [PMID: 22503137 PMCID: PMC3352303 DOI: 10.1186/1865-1380-5-16] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2011] [Accepted: 04/13/2012] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Conventionally, a nebulized short-acting β-2 agonist like salbutamol is often used as the reliever in acute exacerbations of asthma. However, recent worldwide respiratory outbreaks discourage routine use of nebulization. Previous studies have shown that combined budesonide/formoterol (Symbicort®, AstraZeneca) is effective as both a maintenance and reliever anti-asthmatic medication. METHODS We performed a randomized, open-label study from March until August 2011 to compare the bronchodilatory effects of Symbicort® vs. nebulized salbutamol in acute exacerbation of mild to moderate asthmatic attack in an emergency department. Initial objective parameters measured include the oxygen saturation, peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) and respiratory rate. During clinical reassessment, subjective parameters [i.e., Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and 5-point Likert scale of breathlessness] and the second reading of the objective parameters were measured. For the 5-point Likert scale, the patients were asked to describe their symptom relief as 1, much worse; 2, a little worse; 3, no change; 4, a little better; 5, much better. RESULTS Out of the total of 32 patients enrolled, 17 patients (53%) were randomized to receive nebulized salbutamol and 15 (47%) to receive Symbicort®. For both treatment arms, by using paired t- and Wilcoxon signed rank tests, it was shown that there were statistically significant improvements in oxygen saturation, PEFR and respiratory rate within the individual treatment groups (pre- vs. post-treatment). Comparing the effects of Symbicort® vs. nebulized salbutamol, the average improvement of oxygen saturation was 1% in both treatment arms (p = 0.464), PEFR 78.67 l/min vs. 89.41 l/min, respectively (p = 0.507), and respiratory rate 2/min vs. 2/min (p = 0.890). For subjective evaluation, all patients reported improvement in the VAS (average 2.45 cm vs. 2.20 cm), respectively (p = 0.765). All patients in both treatment arms reported either "a little better" or "much better" on the 5-point Likert scale, with none reporting "no change" or getting worse. CONCLUSION This study suggests that there is no statistical difference between using Symbicort® vs. nebulized salbutamol as the reliever for the first 15 min post-intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Keng Sheng Chew
- Emergency Medicine Department, School of Medical Sciences, Health Campus, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 16150 Kota Bharu, Kelantan, Malaysia
| | - Hamizah Kamarudin
- Emergency Medicine Department, School of Medical Sciences, Health Campus, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 16150 Kota Bharu, Kelantan, Malaysia
| | - Che Wan Hashim
- Respiratory and Medical Clinic, Kota Bharu Medical Centre, 16150 Kota Bharu, Malaysia
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Flor-Escriche X, Rodríguez-Mas M, Espiau M, Castán-Enseñat X, Vigatà-Reig JM, Poblet-Cortés R, Miravitlles M. Compliance with guidelines in the treatment of asthma exacerbations in primary care. Ther Adv Respir Dis 2011; 5:369-75. [PMID: 21921074 DOI: 10.1177/1753465811416698] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To describe the approach to asthma exacerbations in a primary care centre in comparison with current guidelines and to ascertain the resolution of the episodes. METHODS A cross-sectional, descriptive study was performed in asthmatic patients over 14 years old who were consulting for asthma exacerbations in a primary care centre during a 6-month period. The treatment given and the resolution obtained were evaluated. RESULTS One hundred and twenty-three asthma exacerbations were registered, corresponding to 96 patients. A total of 74% were mild exacerbations, 24.4% moderate and 1.6% severe. The severity of asthma correlated directly with the severity of exacerbations. The frequency of resolution was 98.4%, with an average duration of medical attention of 30 min (SD 16.5). According to guidelines, 60.2% of the mild exacerbations were well treated, as were 26.7% of the moderate exacerbations and none of the severe episodes. Peak expiratory flow was measured in 54.5% of patients. In 82 cases (66.6%) salbutamol was given with a large-volume spacer chamber. Treatment after discharge was correct in 27.3% of the mild and 23.3% of the moderate exacerbations. A total of 23 (23.9%) patients presented more than one exacerbation during the study period. CONCLUSIONS Most exacerbations seen in primary care are mild. Administration of salbutamol was sufficient for the resolution of these exacerbations. However, treatment after discharge was not compliant with guidelines in most cases. The primary care team was able to resolve most of the asthma exacerbations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xavier Flor-Escriche
- Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Equip d'Atenció Primària Chafarinas, SAP Muntanya, Barcelona, Spain.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Mecklin M, Paassilta M, Kainulainen H, Korppi M. Emergency treatment of obstructive bronchitis: change from nebulizers to metered dose inhalers with spacers. Acta Paediatr 2011; 100:1226-9. [PMID: 21401718 DOI: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2011.02267.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
AIM To evaluate how the change from drug nebulizers to metered dose inhalers (MDI) with spacers succeeded and influenced the hospitalization rate and the length of the emergency room (ER) and hospital stay in wheezing preschool-aged children. METHODS After educating and training the nurses and physicians, the use of MDIs with spacers was started on 1 November 2006 in the ER and acute wards of our hospital. All of the 1-to-5-year-old patients admitted for bronchial obstruction from 1 November 2004 to 28 February 2005 and from 1 November 2006 to 28 February 2007 were included in this retrospective hospital chart review. RESULTS In 2004-2005, 78% of the children were treated with salbutamol administered by nebulizers, and in 2006-2007, 84% with salbutamol administered by MDIs with spacers. The hospitalization rate was about 50% in both groups, and no difference was seen in the length of the hospital stay. The children treated with the MDIs with spacers stayed in the ER for a longer time. CONCLUSION The change from drug nebulizers to MDIs with spacers in the treatment of acute bronchial obstruction in 1-to-5-year-old children was successful after the staff was educated and trained.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Minna Mecklin
- Paediatric Research Centre, University of Tampere and Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
|
35
|
Rodrigo GJ, Plaza Moral V, Forns SB, Castro-Rodríguez JA, de Diego Damiá A, Cortés SL, Moreno CM, Nannini LJ, Neffen H, Salas J. [ALERTA 2 guidelines. Latin America and Spain: recommendations for the prevention and treatment of asmatic exacerbations. Spanish Pulmonology and Thoracic Surgery Society (SEPAR). Asthma Department of the Latinamerican Thoracic Association (ALAT)]. Arch Bronconeumol 2011; 46 Suppl 7:2-20. [PMID: 21320808 DOI: 10.1016/s0300-2896(10)70041-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Gustavo J Rodrigo
- Departamento de Emergencia, Hospital Central de las Fuerzas Armadas, Montevideo, Uruguay
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Abstract
Wheeze, a common symptom in pre-school children, is a continuous high-pitched sound, with a musical quality, emitting from the chest during expiration. A pragmatic clinical classification is episodic (viral) wheeze and multiple-trigger wheeze. Diagnostic difficulties include other conditions that give rise to noisy breathing which could be misinterpreted as wheeze. Most preschool children with wheeze do not need rigorous investigations. Primary prevention is not possible but avoidance of environmental tobacco smoke exposure should be strongly encouraged. Bronchodilators provide symptomatic relief in acute wheezy episodes but the evidence for using oral steroids is conflicting for children presenting to the Emergency Department [ED]. Parent initiated oral steroid courses cannot be recommended. High dose inhaled corticosteroids [ICS] used intermittently are effective in children with frequent episodes of moderately severe episodic (viral) wheeze or multiple-trigger wheeze, but this associated with short term effects on growth and cannot be recommended as a routine. Maintenance treatment with low to moderate continuous ICS in pure episodic (viral) wheeze is ineffective. Whilst low to moderate dose regular ICS work in multi-trigger wheeze, the medication does not modify the natural history of the condition. Even if there is a successful trial of treatment with ICS, a break in treatment should be given to see if the symptoms have resolved or continuous therapy is still required. Maintenance as well as intermittent Montelukast has a role in both episodic and multi trigger wheeze. Good multidisciplinary support and education is essential in managing this common condition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jayesh M Bhatt
- Consultant in Respiratory Paediatrics, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust (QMC campus), Nottingham, NG7 2UH.
| | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Pedersen SE, Hurd SS, Lemanske RF, Becker A, Zar HJ, Sly PD, Soto-Quiroz M, Wong G, Bateman ED. Global strategy for the diagnosis and management of asthma in children 5 years and younger. Pediatr Pulmonol 2011; 46:1-17. [PMID: 20963782 DOI: 10.1002/ppul.21321] [Citation(s) in RCA: 186] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2010] [Revised: 05/31/2010] [Accepted: 05/31/2010] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
Asthma is the most common chronic disease of childhood and the leading cause of childhood morbidity from chronic disease as measured by school absences, emergency department visits, and hospitalisation. During the past two decades, many scientific advances have improved our understanding of asthma and our ability to manage and control it effectively. However, in children 5 years and younger, the clinical symptoms of asthma are variable and non-specific. Furthermore, neither airflow limitation nor airway inflammation, the main pathologic hallmarks of the condition, can be assessed routinely in this age group. For this reason, to aid in the diagnosis of asthma in young children, a symptoms-only descriptive approach that includes the definition of various wheezing phenotypes has been recommended. In 1993, the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) was implemented to develop a network of individuals, organizations, and public health officials to disseminate information about the care of patients with asthma while at the same time assuring a mechanism to incorporate the results of scientific investigations into asthma care. Since then, GINA has developed and regularly revised a Global Strategy for Asthma Management and Prevention. Publications based on the Global Strategy for Asthma Management and Prevention have been translated into many different languages to promote international collaboration and dissemination of information. In this report, Global Strategy for Asthma Management and Prevention in Children 5 Years and Younger, an effort has been made to present the special challenges that must be taken into account in managing asthma in children during the first 5 years of life, including difficulties with diagnosis, the efficacy and safety of drugs and drug delivery systems, and the lack of data on new therapies. Approaches to these issues will vary among populations in the world based on socioeconomic conditions, genetic diversity, cultural beliefs, and differences in healthcare access and delivery. Patients in this age group are often managed by pediatricians and general practitioners routinely faced with a wide variety of issues related to childhood diseases.
Collapse
|
38
|
[Application of a hospital audit to the use of nebulizers: the Case of the Hôtel-Dieu de France-Lebanon]. Rev Mal Respir 2010; 27:1049-54. [PMID: 21111275 DOI: 10.1016/j.rmr.2010.05.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2009] [Accepted: 05/05/2010] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
PROBLEM The aim of the study was to reduce the unjustified prescriptions of nebulised therapy, in order to comply with the international guidelines and to reduce healthcare costs. METHODS DESIGN We performed a controlled, prospective study to evaluate the impact of local guidelines aimed at improving doctors' behaviour on appropriateness and costs of implementation. BACKGROUND AND SETTING All the departments of a university hospital: medical and surgical wards, intensive care units, emergency rooms and one-day admission units. KEY MEASURE FOR CHANGE: Reduction in the number of inappropriate prescriptions of nebulised therapy. STRATEGIES FOR CHANGE Implementation included two educational presentations, posters displayed in all departments, emails sent to all doctors and residents, and reassessment of the prescription one week after. RESULTS Prior to the intervention, the rate of inappropriate prescriptions was 11.9% (42/358 of patients treated with nebulizers did not have an indication for this treatment and 3/19 of patients had an indication for nebulisation but were not treated); in the postintervention, the rate of inappropriate prescriptions was 14.6% (15.7% of patients without indication for treatment, but no patient with an indication for treatment untreated), reflecting a lack of significant impact of the intervention. CONCLUSIONS Simple presentation of clinical guidelines did not lead to a change in medical practices. Another approach is needed to improve this outcome effectively.
Collapse
|
39
|
Endpoints in respiratory diseases. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2010; 67 Suppl 1:49-59. [PMID: 21104409 DOI: 10.1007/s00228-010-0922-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2010] [Accepted: 10/10/2010] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
A wide range of outcome measures or endpoints has been used in clinical trials to assess the effects of treatments in paediatric respiratory diseases. This can make it difficult to compare treatment outcomes from different trials and also to understand whether new treatments offer a real clinical benefit for patients. Clinical trials in respiratory diseases evaluate three types of endpoints: subjective, objective and health-related outcomes. The ideal endpoint in a clinical trial needs to be accurate, precise and reliable. Ideally, the endpoint would also be measured with minimal risk and across all ages, easy to perform, and be inexpensive. As for any other disease, endpoints for respiratory diseases must be viewed in the context of the important distinction between clinical endpoints and surrogate endpoints. The association between surrogate endpoints and clinical endpoints must be clearly defined for any disease in order for them to be meaningful as outcome measures. The most common endpoints which are used in paediatric trials in respiratory diseases are discussed. For practical purposes, diseases have been separated into acute (bronchiolitis, acute viral-wheeze, acute asthma and croup) and chronic (asthma and cystic fibrosis). Further development of endpoints will enable clinical trials in children with respiratory diseases with the main objective of improving prognosis and safety.
Collapse
|
40
|
Montani D, Cavailles A, Bertoletti L, Botelho A, Cortot A, Taillé C, Marchand-Adam S, Pinot D, Chouaid C, Crestani B, Garcia G, Humbert M, L'huillier JP, Magnan A, Tillie-Leblond I, Chanez P. [Adult asthma exacerbations in questions]. Rev Mal Respir 2010; 27:1175-94. [PMID: 21163396 DOI: 10.1016/j.rmr.2010.10.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2009] [Accepted: 06/16/2010] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
In this article a French working party critically review the international literature to revise the definition, pathophysiology, treatment and cost of exacerbations of adult asthma. The various guidelines do not always provide a consistent definition of exacerbations of asthma. An exacerbation can be defined as deterioration of clinical and/or functional parameters lasting more than 24 hours, without return to baseline, requiring a change of treatment. No single clinical or functional criterion can be used as an early marker of an exacerbation. Innate and acquired immune mechanisms, modified by contact with infectious, irritant or allergenic agents, participate in the pathogenesis of exacerbations, which are accompanied by bronchial inflammation. In 2010, mortality is related to progression of exacerbations, often occurring before the patient seeks medical attention. The objective of treatment is to control asthma and prevent exacerbations. However, many factors can trigger exacerbations and often cannot be controlled. The efficacy of inhaled corticosteroids has been demonstrated on reduction of the number of exacerbations and the number of asthma-related deaths. This treatment is cost-effective, especially in terms of reduction of exacerbations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Montani
- Service de Pneumologie et de Réanimation Respiratoire, Hôpital Antoine-Béclère, Université Paris-Sud 11, AP-HP, 157 Rue de la Porte-de-Trivaux, 92140 Clamart, France.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Beta-Adrenergic Agonists. Pharmaceuticals (Basel) 2010; 3:1016-1044. [PMID: 27713285 PMCID: PMC4034018 DOI: 10.3390/ph3041016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2010] [Revised: 03/15/2010] [Accepted: 03/26/2010] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Inhaled β2-adrenoceptor (β2-AR) agonists are considered essential bronchodilator drugs in the treatment of bronchial asthma, both as symptoms-relievers and, in combination with inhaled corticosteroids, as disease-controllers. In this article, we first review the basic mechanisms by which the β2-adrenergic system contributes to the control of airway smooth muscle tone. Then, we go on describing the structural characteristics of β2-AR and the molecular basis of G-protein-coupled receptor signaling and mechanisms of its desensitization/ dysfunction. In particular, phosphorylation mediated by protein kinase A and β-adrenergic receptor kinase are examined in detail. Finally, we discuss the pivotal role of inhaled β2-AR agonists in the treatment of asthma and the concerns about their safety that have been recently raised.
Collapse
|
42
|
Turner TJ, Barnes H, Reid J, Garrubba M. Evidence for perinatal and child health care guidelines in crisis settings: can Cochrane help? BMC Public Health 2010; 10:170. [PMID: 20350326 PMCID: PMC3091544 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-170] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2009] [Accepted: 03/29/2010] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND It is important that healthcare provided in crisis settings is based on the best available research evidence. We reviewed guidelines for child and perinatal health care in crisis situations to determine whether they were based on research evidence, whether Cochrane systematic reviews were available in the clinical areas addressed by these guidelines and whether summaries of these reviews were provided in Evidence Aid. METHODS Broad internet searches were undertaken to identify relevant guidelines. Guidelines were appraised using AGREE and the clinical areas that were relevant to perinatal or child health were extracted. We searched The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews to identify potentially relevant reviews. For each review we determined how many trials were included, and how many were conducted in resource-limited settings. RESULTS Six guidelines met selection criteria. None of the included guidelines were clearly based on research evidence. 198 Cochrane reviews were potentially relevant to the guidelines. These reviews predominantly addressed nutrient supplementation, breastfeeding, malaria, maternal hypertension, premature labour and prevention of HIV transmission. Most reviews included studies from developing settings. However for large portions of the guidelines, particularly health services delivery, there were no relevant reviews. Only 18 (9.1%) reviews have summaries in Evidence Aid. CONCLUSIONS We did not identify any evidence-based guidelines for perinatal and child health care in disaster settings. We found many Cochrane reviews that could contribute to the evidence-base supporting future guidelines. However there are important issues to be addressed in terms of the relevance of the available reviews and increasing the number of reviews addressing health care delivery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tari J Turner
- Monash Institute of Health Services Research, Monash University, Locked Bag 29, Clayton 3168 Australia
- Centre for Clinical Effectiveness, Southern Health, Locked Bag 29, Clayton 3168 Australia
| | - Hayley Barnes
- previously of the Australasian Cochrane Centre, Monash University, Locked Bag 29, Clayton 3168 Australia
| | - Jane Reid
- Centre for Clinical Effectiveness, Southern Health, Locked Bag 29, Clayton 3168 Australia
| | - Marie Garrubba
- Centre for Clinical Effectiveness, Southern Health, Locked Bag 29, Clayton 3168 Australia
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Rotta ET, Amantéa SL, Froehlich PE, Becker A. Plasma concentrations of salbutamol in the treatment of acute asthma in a pediatric emergency. Could age be a parameter of influence? Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2010; 66:605-10. [PMID: 20195589 DOI: 10.1007/s00228-010-0787-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2009] [Accepted: 01/12/2010] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The objective was to determine if the plasma concentrations of salbutamol, obtained during inhalation treatment of infantile acute asthma, are influenced by age range and by the aerosol system used. METHOD A randomized clinical trial was conducted in 46 children (1-5 years of age) with a diagnosis of acute asthma crisis, established in an emergency room pediatric service. Twenty-five children received salbutamol using a pressurized metered-dose inhaler with spacer (50 microg/kg), and 21 children received salbutamol by nebulization (150 microg/kg),three times during a 1-h period. At the end of the treatment, one blood sample was drawn and the plasma was stored for later determination of salbutamol concentration (liquid chromatography). Salbutamol plasma concentrations were compared in two age groups (< or =2 years and >2 years of age). The type of device used (pressurized metered-dose inhaler or nebulizer) and the need of hospitalization were also tested. The Mann-Whitney U test was used with the level of significance set at 5% (P < 0.05). RESULTS No differences were detected regarding either the aerosol delivery system used or the need for hospitalization in relation to the plasma concentrations of salbutamol. However, higher plasma levels were found in patients >2 years vs patients < or =2 years [median (IQR): 9.40 (6.32-18.22) vs. 4.65 (2.77-10.10) ng/mL], demonstrating a significance difference (P = 0.05). CONCLUSION Salbutamol plasma concentrations were influenced by age group of the patients submitted to inhalation therapy, even with doses adjusted for body weight. After correcting for the differences in the biovailabilities of the delivery systems, the concentrations were independent of the aerosol delivery device used.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eloni T Rotta
- Pharmacy, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Hodder R, Lougheed MD, Rowe BH, FitzGerald JM, Kaplan AG, McIvor RA. Management of acute asthma in adults in the emergency department: nonventilatory management. CMAJ 2010; 182:E55-67. [PMID: 19858243 PMCID: PMC2817338 DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.080072] [Citation(s) in RCA: 80] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Rick Hodder
- Division of Pulmonary Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Nicolini G, Cremonesi G, Melani AS. Inhaled corticosteroid therapy with nebulized beclometasone dipropionate. Pulm Pharmacol Ther 2009; 23:145-55. [PMID: 19961948 DOI: 10.1016/j.pupt.2009.11.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2009] [Revised: 11/25/2009] [Accepted: 11/29/2009] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) are the most effective anti-inflammatory agents for the management of chronic persistent asthma and are therefore recommended as first-line antiasthmatic therapy in children and adults. In various settings, the administration of ICS via nebulizer rather than hand-held inhaler (HHI) may have certain advantages, as many patients with HHI fail to use these devices properly or efficiently. In particular, young children, the elderly, the acutely ill, and those with restricted dexterity may be unable to coordinate inhalation with actuation of the device or to generate sufficient inspiratory flow to operate breath-actuated devices effectively. Compliance with nebulized therapy may also be better than that with a pressurized metered-dose inhaler (pMDI) plus spacer. Systematic reviews conclude that there is no significant difference in clinical effects between nebulizers and HHI. Performance and clinical effect of nebulization are influenced by several technical aspects such as the nebulizer-drug combination, nebulizer type, output and lung deposition. Among the currently available ICS, nebulized beclometasone dipropionate (BDP) has been in clinical use for more than 35 years, and has demonstrated marked clinical efficacy and a favorable tolerability profile in children and adults with chronic persistent asthma. The clinical efficacy of nebulized beclometasone is discussed in the present review using data from 13 published studies, which included a total of 1250 patients. Three multicenter, randomized, double-blind studies showed that nebulized BDP is as effective as BDP via pMDI plus spacer in a 2:1 dose ratio. Controlled trials involving 497 adults and children demonstrated similar clinical efficacy between nebulized BDP and either nebulized fluticasone propionate or nebulized budesonide. In all these trials, treatment-related adverse effects were generally uncommon, most were mild-to-moderate in severity, and most were associated with the respiratory system. Meta-analyses show that BDP, like other inhaled corticosteroids, has no major influence on patient height, urinary cortisol concentration, or bone metabolism, thus suggesting the absence of growth retardation or any marked effect on adrenal function or the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis when used in the approved dose range. Overall, nebulized BDP appears to have a particularly important place in asthma therapy: as a general alternative to HHIs (e.g. in patients with poor HHI compliance); when patients such as children or the elderly are unable to operate HHIs because of poor hand-lung coordination, lack of cooperation, or low inspiratory flow rate; and when high dosages of ICS are required, such as in adults with severe, corticosteroid-dependent asthma.
Collapse
|
46
|
Rallo M, Bertone A, Bignamini E, Guala A. Lack of use of MDI device in acute asthma: an Italian survey. Pediatr Pulmonol 2009; 44:1244-5. [PMID: 19911360 DOI: 10.1002/ppul.21118] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
|
47
|
Al-Moamary MS, Al-Hajjaj MS, Idrees MM, Zeitouni MO, Alanezi MO, Al-Jahdali HH, Al Dabbagh M. The Saudi Initiative for Asthma. Ann Thorac Med 2009; 4:216-33. [PMID: 19881170 PMCID: PMC2801049 DOI: 10.4103/1817-1737.56001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2009] [Accepted: 09/02/2009] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
The Saudi Initiative for Asthma (SINA) provides up-to-date guidelines for healthcare workers managing patients with asthma. SINA was developed by a panel of Saudi experts with respectable academic backgrounds and long-standing experience in the field. SINA is founded on the latest available evidence, local literature, and knowledge of the current setting in Saudi Arabia. Emphasis is placed on understanding the epidemiology, pathophysiology, medications, and clinical presentation. SINA elaborates on the development of patient-doctor partnership, self-management, and control of precipitating factors. Approaches to asthma treatment in SINA are based on disease control by the utilization of Asthma Control Test for the initiation and adjustment of asthma treatment. This guideline is established for the treatment of asthma in both children and adults, with special attention to children 5 years and younger. It is expected that the implementation of these guidelines for treating asthma will lead to better asthma control and decrease patient utilization of the health care system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohamed S Al-Moamary
- Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Øymar K, Halvorsen T. Emergency presentation and management of acute severe asthma in children. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 2009; 17:40. [PMID: 19732437 PMCID: PMC2749010 DOI: 10.1186/1757-7241-17-40] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2009] [Accepted: 09/04/2009] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Acute severe asthma is one of the most common medical emergency situations in childhood, and physicians caring for acutely ill children are regularly faced with this condition. In this article we present a summary of the pathophysiology as well as guidelines for the treatment of acute severe asthma in children. The cornerstones of the management of acute asthma in children are rapid administration of oxygen, inhalations with bronchodilators and systemic corticosteroids. Inhaled bronchodilators may include selective b2-agonists, adrenaline and anticholinergics. Additional treatment in selected cases may involve intravenous administration of theophylline, b2-agonists and magnesium sulphate. Both non-invasive and invasive ventilation may be options when medical treatment fails to prevent respiratory failure. It is important that relevant treatment algorithms exist, applicable to all levels of the treatment chain and reflecting local considerations and circumstances.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Knut Øymar
- Department of Paediatrics, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Thomas Halvorsen
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
- Department of Paediatrics, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Kercsmar CM, McDowell KM. Love it or lev it: levalbuterol for severe acute asthma--for now, leave it. J Pediatr 2009; 155:162-4. [PMID: 19619747 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2009.03.062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2009] [Accepted: 03/31/2009] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
50
|
Baptist AP, Reddy RC. Inhaled corticosteroids for asthma: are they all the same? J Clin Pharm Ther 2009; 34:1-12. [PMID: 19125898 DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2710.2008.00970.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To assess similarities and differences among currently available inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) for treatment of asthma, with special emphasis on factors that may affect the relative safety of these medications. METHODS PubMed was searched for relevant reviews and original articles. Information from these studies was synthesized and critically assessed. RESULTS Differences in corticosteroid formulations and delivery systems can create variations in therapeutic efficacy. Chemical properties of the various corticosteroids may also affect their relative safety. Ciclesonide and beclomethasone dipropionate are administered as prodrugs activated by enzymes present in the lungs but not the oropharynx. Corticosteroid-specific adverse effects in the oropharynx are thus avoided, although formulation-specific effects may remain. Other adverse effects require systemic availability, either via the gastrointestinal tract or the lung. Once they enter the systemic circulation, all ICS are rapidly metabolized by the liver. Oral bioavailability of ICS such as fluticasone, ciclesonide and mometasone is minimal, as a result of their essentially complete first-pass metabolism in the liver. Ciclesonide also undergoes extrahepatic metabolism that eliminates it even more rapidly. Additionally, ciclesonide and mometasone exhibit very high levels of binding to serum proteins that reduces their ability to stimulate glucocorticoid receptors outside the lung. CONCLUSIONS Despite acting by similar mechanisms, currently available ICS and their delivery systems differ in ways that can potentially affect both safety and therapeutic effectiveness for individual patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A P Baptist
- Division of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|