1
|
Jones AW, McKenzie JE, Osadnik CR, Stovold E, Cox NS, Burge AT, Lahham A, Lee JYT, Hoffman M, Holland AE. Non-pharmacological interventions for the prevention of hospitalisations in stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: component network meta-analysis. Hippokratia 2022. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd015153] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Arwel W Jones
- Respiratory Research@Alfred, Department of Immunology and Pathology; Monash University; Melbourne Australia
| | - Joanne E McKenzie
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine; Monash University; Melbourne Australia
| | | | - Elizabeth Stovold
- Population Health Research Institute; St George's, University of London; London UK
| | - Narelle S Cox
- Respiratory Research@Alfred, Department of Immunology and Pathology; Monash University; Melbourne Australia
- Institute for Breathing and Sleep; Melbourne Australia
| | - Angela T Burge
- Respiratory Research@Alfred, Department of Immunology and Pathology; Monash University; Melbourne Australia
- Institute for Breathing and Sleep; Melbourne Australia
- Department of Physiotherapy; Alfred Health; Melbourne Australia
| | - Aroub Lahham
- Respiratory Research@Alfred, Department of Immunology and Pathology; Monash University; Melbourne Australia
| | - Joanna YT Lee
- Respiratory Research@Alfred, Department of Immunology and Pathology; Monash University; Melbourne Australia
| | - Mariana Hoffman
- Respiratory Research@Alfred, Department of Immunology and Pathology; Monash University; Melbourne Australia
| | - Anne E Holland
- Respiratory Research@Alfred, Department of Immunology and Pathology; Monash University; Melbourne Australia
- Institute for Breathing and Sleep; Melbourne Australia
- Department of Physiotherapy; Alfred Health; Melbourne Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
van Schalkwyk MC, Bourek A, Kringos DS, Siciliani L, Barry MM, De Maeseneer J, McKee M. The best person (or machine) for the job: Rethinking task shifting in healthcare. Health Policy 2020; 124:1379-1386. [PMID: 32900551 DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2020.08.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2019] [Revised: 05/27/2020] [Accepted: 08/23/2020] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
Globally, health systems are faced with the difficult challenge of how to get the best results with the often limited number of health workers available to them. Exacerbating this challenge is the task of meeting ever-changing needs of service users and managing unprecedented technological advances. The process of matching skills to changing needs and opportunities is termed task shifting. It involves questioning health service goals, what health workers do, asking if it can be done in a better way, and implementing change. Task shifting in healthcare is often conceptualised as a process of transferring responsibility for 'simple' tasks from high-skilled but scarce health workers to those with less expertise and lower pay, and predominantly viewed as a means to reduce costs and promote efficiency. Here we present a position paper based on the work and expertise of the European Commission Expert Panel on Effective ways of Investing in Health. It contends that this is over simplistic, and aims to provide a new task shifting framework, informed by relevant evidence, and a series of recommendations. While far from comprehensive, there is a growing body of evidence that certain tasks traditionally undertaken by one type of health worker can be undertaken by others (or machines), in some cases to a higher standard, thus challenging the persistence of rigid professional boundaries. Task shifting has the potential to contribute to health systems strengthening when accompanied by adequate planning, resources, education, training and transparency.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- May Ci van Schalkwyk
- Department of Health Services Research & Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, United Kingdom
| | - Aleš Bourek
- Masaryk University Center for Healthcare Quality, Czech Republic
| | - Dionne Sofia Kringos
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Public Health and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Luigi Siciliani
- Department of Economics and Related Studies, University of York, York, United Kingdom
| | - Margaret M Barry
- Head of World Health Organization Collaborating Centre for Health Promotion Research, School of Health Sciences, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland
| | - Jan De Maeseneer
- Department of Public Health and Primary Health Care, Ghent University, Belgium
| | - Martin McKee
- Department of Health Services Research & Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, United Kingdom.
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Murphy LA, Harrington P, Taylor SJ, Teljeur C, Smith SM, Pinnock H, Ryan M. Clinical-effectiveness of self-management interventions in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: An overview of reviews. Chron Respir Dis 2017; 14:276-288. [PMID: 28774200 PMCID: PMC5720233 DOI: 10.1177/1479972316687208] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Self-management (SM) is defined as the provision of interventions to increase patients’ skills and confidence, empowering the individual to take an active part in their disease management. There is uncertainty regarding the optimal format and the short- and long-term benefits of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) SM interventions in adults. Therefore, a high-quality overview of reviews was updated to examine their clinical effectiveness. Sixteen reviews were identified, interventions were broadly classified as education or action plans, complex interventions with an SM focus, pulmonary rehabilitation (PR), telehealth and outreach nursing. Systematic review and meta-analysis quality and the risk of bias of underlying primary studies were assessed. Strong evidence was found that PR is associated with significant improvements in health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Limited to moderate evidence for complex interventions (SM focus) with limited evidence for education, action plans, telehealth interventions and outreach nursing for HRQoL was found. There was strong evidence that education is associated with a significant reduction in COPD-related hospital admissions, moderate to strong evidence that telehealth interventions and moderate evidence that complex interventions (SM focus) are associated with reduced health care utilization. These findings from a large body of evidence suggesting that SM, through education or as a component of PR, confers significant health gains in people with COPD in terms of HRQoL. SM supported by telehealth confers significant reductions in healthcare utilization, including hospitalization and emergency department visits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Linda A Murphy
- 1 Health Technology Assessment, Health Information and Quality Authority, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Patricia Harrington
- 1 Health Technology Assessment, Health Information and Quality Authority, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Stephanie Jc Taylor
- 2 Centre for Primary Care and Public Health, Blizard Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Conor Teljeur
- 1 Health Technology Assessment, Health Information and Quality Authority, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Susan M Smith
- 3 RCSI Department of General Practice, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Hilary Pinnock
- 4 Asthma UK Centre for Applied Research, Allergy and Respiratory Research Group, Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, University of Edinburgh, Scotland, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Máirín Ryan
- 1 Health Technology Assessment, Health Information and Quality Authority, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Polat Ü, Bayrak Kahraman B, Kaynak İ, Görgülü Ü. Relationship among health-related quality of life, depression and awareness of home care services in elderly patients. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2015; 16:1211-1219. [PMID: 26460275 DOI: 10.1111/ggi.12618] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/05/2015] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
AIMS The present descriptive study was carried out to determine the relationship between health-related quality of life, depression and awareness of home care services among elderly patients. METHODS Patients aged 65 years or older staying at the surgery and internal medicine clinics were included in the study. The "Patient Introduction Form," "Short Form-36 Quality of Life Questionnaire" and "Geriatric Depression Scale" were utilized in the collection of data. RESULTS In the present study, it was determined that only approximately half of elderly patients (54.9%) knew the concept of home care, most of them had not previously received home care and requested home care related to medical care. The mean scores were lower in some areas of the quality of life questionnaire in some factors that could influence home care awareness. These factors were determined as: female sex, history of falling, chronic illness, functionally, moderately or severely dependent, no previous receipt of home care and wishing to receive home care. CONCLUSIONS The home care requirement of elderly patients can be influenced by many physiological, psychological and social factors that can affect their quality of life. Thus, it is of utmost importance that medical professionals evaluate the quality of life of elderly individuals and its influencing factors. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2016; 16: 1211-1219.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ülkü Polat
- Nursing Department, Gazi University Faculty of Health Sciences, Turkey
| | | | - İlknur Kaynak
- The Medical Intensive Care Unit, Ministry of Health, Ankara Numune Education and Research Hospital, Turkey
| | - Ümit Görgülü
- Neurology Department, Ministry of Health, Gaziantep Nizip Goverment Hospital, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kuna P, Ivanov Y, Trofimov VI, Saito T, Beckman O, Bengtsson T, Jorup C, Maltais F. Efficacy and safety of AZD3199 vs formoterol in COPD: a randomized, double-blind study. Respir Res 2013; 14:64. [PMID: 23731768 PMCID: PMC3691744 DOI: 10.1186/1465-9921-14-64] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2013] [Accepted: 05/24/2013] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND We investigated the efficacy and safety of AZD3199, a novel inhaled ultra-LABA, with the main aim of establishing a dose that would maintain 24-hour bronchodilation in patients with COPD. METHODS Patients (n = 329) were randomized to AZD3199 (200, 400 or 800 μg o.d.), formoterol (9 μg b.i.d.) or placebo via Turbuhaler® in a parallel group study. The primary objective of the study was to compare the clinical efficacy of three doses of AZD3199 inhaled once daily with 9 μg formoterol twice daily and placebo, over a 4-week treatment period in adults with moderate-to-severe COPD. After 4 weeks, peak (0-4 h) and trough (24-26 h) forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) were assessed as the primary efficacy outcome variables. RESULTS All AZD3199 doses significantly increased mean peak and trough FEV1 versus placebo (106-171 ml and 97-110 ml increases, respectively), but with no clear dose-response; the level of bronchodilation was comparable to or greater than that achieved with formoterol. Forced vital capacity (FVC) at peak bronchodilation also significantly increased with AZD3199 versus placebo (153-204 ml). COPD symptom scores and reliever use were reduced with AZD3199, while FEV1 reversibility was unaltered. Adverse events were mild-to-moderate, with no safety concerns identified. Drug exposure was dose-proportional, but lower than predicted from healthy volunteers. CONCLUSIONS All three doses of AZD3199 produced 24-hour bronchodilation, but with no clear dose-response, suggesting that doses of 200 μg or less may be sufficient to maintain bronchodilation over 24 hours in patients with COPD. No safety concerns were identified. Further studies are required to determine the once-daily AZD3199 dose for COPD. TRIAL REGISTRATION Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT00929708.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Piotr Kuna
- Barlicki University Hospital, Medical University of Lodz, Kopcińskiego 22, Lodz, 90-153 Łódź, ul., Poland
| | | | | | - Takefumi Saito
- National Hospital Organization Ibaraki-Higashi National Hospital, Naka-gun, Japan
| | | | | | | | - François Maltais
- Institut Universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec, Université Laval, Québec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Disseminating childhood home injury risk reduction information in Pakistan: results from a community-based pilot study. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2013; 10:1113-24. [PMID: 23502323 PMCID: PMC3709307 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph10031113] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2013] [Revised: 03/07/2013] [Accepted: 03/07/2013] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
Background: Most childhood unintentional injuries occur in the home; however, very little home injury prevention information is tailored to developing countries. Utilizing our previously developed information dissemination tools and a hazard assessment checklist tailored to a low-income neighborhood in Pakistan, we pilot tested and compared the effectiveness of two dissemination tools. Methods: Two low-income neighborhoods were mapped, identifying families with a child aged between 12 and 59 months. In June and July 2010, all enrolled households underwent a home hazard assessment at the same time hazard reduction education was being given using an in-home tutorial or a pamphlet. A follow up assessment was conducted 4–5 months later. Results: 503 households were enrolled; 256 received a tutorial and 247 a pamphlet. The two groups differed significantly (p < 0.01) in level of maternal education and relationship of the child to the primary caregiver. However, when controlling for these variables, those receiving an in-home tutorial had a higher odds of hazard reduction than the pamphlet group for uncovered vats of water (OR 2.14, 95% CI: 1.28, 3.58), an open fire within reach of the child (OR 3.55, 95% CI: 1.80, 7.00), and inappropriately labeled cooking fuel containers (OR 1.86, 95% CI: 1.07, 3.25). Conclusions: This pilot project demonstrates the potential utility of using home-visit tutorials to decrease home hazards in a low-income neighborhood in Pakistan. A longer-term randomized study is needed to assess actual effectiveness of the use of allied health workers for home-based injury education and whether this results in decreased home injuries.
Collapse
|
7
|
Benbassat J, Taragin MI. The effect of clinical interventions on hospital readmissions: a meta-review of published meta-analyses. Isr J Health Policy Res 2013; 2:1. [PMID: 23343012 PMCID: PMC3557155 DOI: 10.1186/2045-4015-2-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2012] [Accepted: 11/13/2012] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
UNLABELLED BACKGROUND The economic impact and ease of measurement of all-cause hospital readmission rates (HRR) have led to the current debate as to whether they are reducible, and whether they should be used as a publicly reported quality indicators of medical care. OBJECTIVE To assess the efficacy of broad clinical interventions in preventing HRR of patients with chronic diseases METHOD A meta-review of published systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of clinical interventions that have included HRR among the patients' outcomes of interest. MAIN FINDINGS Meta-analyses of RCTs have consistently found that, in the community, disease management programs significantly reduced HRR in patients with heart failure, coronary heart disease and bronchial asthma, but not in patients with stroke and in unselected patients with chronic disorders. Inhospital interventions, such as discharge planning, pharmacological consultations and multidisciplinary care, and community interventions in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases had an inconsistent effect on HRR. MAIN STUDY LIMITATION: Despite their economic impact and ease of measurement, HRR are not the most important outcome of patient care, and efforts aimed at their reduction may compromise patients' health by reducing also justified re-admissions. CONCLUSIONS The efficacy of inhospital interventions in reducing HRR is in need of further study. In patients with heart diseases and bronchial asthma, HRR may be considered as a publicly reported quality indicator of community care, provided that future research confirms that efforts to reduce HRR do not adversely affect other patients' outcomes, such as mortality, functional capacity and quality of life. Future research should also focus on the reasons for the higher efficacy of community interventions in patients with heart diseases and bronchial asthma than in those with other chronic diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jochanan Benbassat
- JDC Brookdale Institute, Health Policy Research Program, PO Box 3886, Jerusalem, 91037, Israel
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Reddel HK, Dennis SM, Middleton S, Van Schayck CP, Crockett AJ, Hasan I, Hermiz O, Vagholkar S, Marks GB, Zwar NA. A pragmatic cluster randomized controlled trial of early intervention for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease by practice nurse-general practitioner teams: Study Protocol. Implement Sci 2012; 7:83. [PMID: 22958678 PMCID: PMC3457839 DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-7-83] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2012] [Accepted: 08/29/2012] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) is a leading cause of disability, hospitalization, and premature mortality. General practice is well placed to diagnose and manage COPD, but there is a significant gap between evidence and current practice, with a low level of awareness and implementation of clinical practice guidelines. Under-diagnosis of COPD is a world-wide problem, limiting the benefit that could potentially be achieved through early intervention strategies such as smoking cessation, dietary advice, and exercise. General practice is moving towards more structured chronic disease management, and the increasing involvement of practice nurses in delivering chronic care. DESIGN A pragmatic cluster randomised trial will test the hypothesis that intervention by a practice nurse-general practitioner (GP) team leads to improved health-related quality of life and greater adherence with clinical practice guidelines for patients with newly-diagnosed COPD, compared with usual care. Forty general practices in greater metropolitan Sydney Australia will be recruited to identify patients at risk of COPD and invite them to attend a case finding appointment. Practices will be randomised to deliver either practice nurse-GP partnership care, or usual care, to patients newly-diagnosed with COPD.The active intervention will involve the practice nurse and GP working in partnership with the patient in developing and implementing a care plan involving (as appropriate), smoking cessation, immunisation, pulmonary rehabilitation, medication review, assessment and correction of inhaler technique, nutritional advice, management of psycho-social issues, patient education, and management of co-morbidities.The primary outcome measure is health-related quality of life, assessed with the St George's Respiratory Questionnaire 12 months after diagnosis. Secondary outcome measures include validated disease-specific and general health related quality of life measures, smoking and immunisation status, medications, inhaler technique, and lung function. Outcomes will be assessed by project officers blinded to patients' randomization groups. DISCUSSION This study will use proven case-finding methods to identify patients with undiagnosed COPD in general practice, where improved care has the potential for substantial benefit in health and healthcare utilization. The study provides the capacity to trial a new model of team-based assessment and management of newly diagnosed COPD in Australian primary care. TRIAL REGISTRATION ACTRN12610000592044\
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helen K Reddel
- Woolcock Institute of Medical Institute, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Sarah M Dennis
- Centre for Primary Health Care and Equity, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia
| | - Sandy Middleton
- National Centre for Clinical Outcomes Research, Australia, Australian Catholic University, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - CP Van Schayck
- Research School Caphri, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Alan J Crockett
- Discipline of General Practice, School of Population Health And Clinical Practice, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, 5005, South Australia
| | - Iqbal Hasan
- Centre for Primary Health Care and Equity, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia
| | - Oshana Hermiz
- Centre for Primary Health Care and Equity, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia
| | - Sanjyot Vagholkar
- General Practice Unit, Fairfield Hospital, South Western Sydney Local Health District/School of Public Health & Community Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia
| | - Guy B Marks
- Woolcock Institute of Medical Research, University of Sydney and Department of Respiratory Medicine, Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool, NSW, 2170, Australia
| | - Nicholas A Zwar
- School of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia
| |
Collapse
|