Slow advancement of enteral feed volumes to prevent necrotising enterocolitis in very low birth weight infants

Early and exclusive enteral nutrition in infants born very preterm

OBJECTIVE

To characterise the effects of early and exclusive enteral nutrition with either maternal or donor milk in infants born very preterm (280/7-326/7 weeks of gestation).

DESIGN

Parallel-group, unmasked randomised controlled trial.

SETTING

Regional, tertiary neonatal intensive care unit.

PARTICIPANTS

102 infants born very preterm between 2021 and 2022 (51 in each group).

INTERVENTION

Infants randomised to the intervention group received 60-80 mL/kg/day within the first 36 hours after birth. Infants randomised to the control group received 20-30 mL/kg/day (standard trophic feeding volumes).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome was the number of full enteral feeding days (>150 mL/kg/day) in the first 28 days after birth. Secondary outcomes included growth and body composition at the end of the first two postnatal weeks, and length of hospitalisation.

RESULTS

The mean birth weight was 1477 g (SD: 334). Half of the infants were male, and 44% were black. Early and exclusive enteral nutrition increased the number of full enteral feeding days (+2; 0-2 days; p=0.004), the fat-free mass-for-age z-scores at postnatal day 14 (+0.5; 0.1-1.0; p=0.02) and the length-for-age z-scores at the time of hospital discharge (+0.6; 0.2-1.0; p=0.002). Hospitalisation costs differed between groups (mean difference favouring the intervention group: -$28 754; -$647 to -$56 861; p=0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

In infants born very preterm, early and exclusive enteral nutrition increases the number of full enteral feeding days. This feeding practice may also improve fat-free mass accretion, increase length and reduce hospitalisation costs.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT04337710.

[Expert consensus on enteral nutrition management of preterm infants (2024)]

Providing adequate and balanced nutrition for preterm infants, especially extremely/very preterm infants, is the material basis for promoting their normal growth and development and improving long-term prognosis. Enteral nutrition is the best way to feed preterm infants. Previous systematic reviews have shown that using evidence-based standardized feeding management strategies can effectively promote the establishment of full enteral feeding, reduce the duration of parenteral nutrition, improve the nutritional outcomes of preterm infants, and not increase the risk of necrotizing enterocolitis or death. Based on relevant research in China and overseas, the consensus working group has developed 20 recommendations in 5 aspects including the goal of enteral nutrition, transitioning to enteral nutrition, stable growth period enteral nutrition, supplementation of special nutrients, and monitoring of enteral nutrition for preterm infants, using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation. The aim is to provide recommendations for healthcare professionals involved in the management of enteral nutrition for preterm infants, in order to improve the clinical outcomes of preterm infants.

Time to full enteral feeding and its predictors among very low birth weight (VLBW) neonates admitted to the neonatal intensive care units (NICU) in comprehensive specialized hospitals in Northwest Ethiopia

BACKGROUND

Time to full enteral feeding is the time when neonates start to receive all of their prescribed nutrition as milk feeds. Delayed to achieve full enteral feeding had resulted in short- and long-term physical and neurological sequelae. However, there are limited studies to assess the time to full enteral feeding and its predictors among very low birth-weight neonates in Ethiopia. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the time to full enteral feeding and its predictors among very low birth-weight neonates admitted to comprehensive specialized hospitals in Northwest Ethiopia.

METHODS

A multi-center institutional-based retrospective follow-up study was conducted among 409 VLBW neonates from March 1, 2019 to February 30, 2023. A simple random sampling method was used to select study participants. Data were entered into EpiData version 4.2 and then exported into STATA version 16 for analysis. The Kaplan-Meier survival curve together with the log-rank test was fitted to test for the presence of differences among groups. Proportional hazard assumptions were checked using a global test. Variables having a p- value < 0.25 in the bivariable Cox-proportional hazard model were candidates for multivariable analysis. An adjusted Hazard Ratio (AHR) with 95% Confidence Intervals (CI) was computed to report the strength of association, and variables having a P-value < 0.05 at the 95% confidence interval were considered statistically significant predictor variables.

RESULT

The median time to full enteral feeding was 10 (CI: 10-11) days. Very Low Birth-Weight (VLBW) neonates who received a formula feeding (AHR: 0.71, 95% CI: 0.53, 0.96), gestational age of 32-37 weeks (AHR: 1.66, 95% CI: 1.23, 2.23), without Necrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC) (AHR: 2.16, 95% CI: 1.65, 2.84), and single birth outcome (AHR: 1.42, 95% CI: 1.07, 1.88) were statistically significant variables with time to full enteral feeding.

CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS

This study found that the median time to full enteral feeding was high. Type of feeding, Necrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC), Gestational Age (GA) at birth, and birth outcome were predictor variables. Special attention and follow-up are needed for those VLBW neonates with NEC, had a GA of less than 32 weeks, and had multiple birth outcomes.

Is choline deficiency an unrecognized factor in necrotizing enterocolitis of preterm infants?

We undertook this review to determine if it is plausible that choline or phosphatidylcholine (PC) deficiency is a factor in necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) after two clinical trials found a dramatic and unexpected reduction in NEC in an experimental group provided higher PC compared to a control group. Sources and amounts of choline/PC for preterm infants are compared to the choline status of preterm infants at birth and following conventional nutritional management. The roles of choline/PC in intestinal structure, mucus, mesenteric blood flow, and the cholinergic anti-inflammatory system are summarized. Low choline/PC status is linked to prematurity/immaturity, parenteral and enteral feeding, microbial dysbiosis and hypoxia/ischemia, factors long associated with the risk of developing NEC. We conclude that low choline status exists in preterm infants provided conventional parenteral and enteral nutritional management, and that it is plausible low choline/PC status adversely affects intestinal function to set up the vicious cycle of inflammation, loss of intestinal barrier function and worsening tissue hypoxia that occurs with NEC. In conclusion, this review supports the need for randomized clinical trials to test the hypothesis that additional choline or PC provided parenterally or enterally can reduce the incidence of NEC in preterm infants. IMPACT STATEMENT: Low choline status in preterm infants who are managed by conventional nutrition is plausibly linked to the risk of developing necrotizing enterocolitis.

Probiotic supplementation and risk of necrotizing enterocolitis and mortality among extremely preterm infants-the Probiotics in Extreme Prematurity in Scandinavia (PEPS) trial: study protocol for a multicenter, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, and registry-based randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Extremely preterm infants, defined as those born before 28 weeks' gestational age, are a very vulnerable patient group at high risk for adverse outcomes, such as necrotizing enterocolitis and death. Necrotizing enterocolitis is an inflammatory gastrointestinal disease with high incidence in this cohort and has severe implications on morbidity and mortality. Previous randomized controlled trials have shown reduced incidence of necrotizing enterocolitis among older preterm infants following probiotic supplementation. However, these trials were underpowered for extremely preterm infants, rendering evidence for probiotic supplementation in this population insufficient to date.

METHODS

The Probiotics in Extreme Prematurity in Scandinavia (PEPS) trial is a multicenter, double-blinded, placebo-controlled and registry-based randomized controlled trial conducted among extremely preterm infants (n = 1620) born at six tertiary neonatal units in Sweden and four units in Denmark. Enrolled infants will be allocated to receive either probiotic supplementation with ProPrems® (Bifidobacterium infantis, Bifidobacterium lactis, and Streptococcus thermophilus) diluted in 3 mL breastmilk or placebo (0.5 g maltodextrin powder) diluted in 3 mL breastmilk per day until gestational week 34. The primary composite outcome is incidence of necrotizing enterocolitis and/or mortality. Secondary outcomes include incidence of late-onset sepsis, length of hospitalization, use of antibiotics, feeding tolerance, growth, and body composition at age of full-term and 3 months corrected age after hospital discharge.

DISCUSSION

Current recommendations for probiotic supplementation in Sweden and Denmark do not include extremely preterm infants due to lack of evidence in this population. However, this young subgroup is notably the most at risk for experiencing adverse outcomes. This trial aims to investigate the effects of probiotic supplementation on necrotizing enterocolitis, death, and other relevant outcomes to provide sufficiently powered, high-quality evidence to inform probiotic supplementation guidelines in this population. The results could have implications for clinical practice both in Sweden and Denmark and worldwide.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

( Clinicaltrials.gov ): NCT05604846.

Necrotizing enterocolitis: current understanding of the prevention and management

Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) is one of the diseases in neonates, with a high morbidity and mortality rate, especially in preterm infants. This review aimed to briefly introduce the latest epidemiology, susceptibility factors, and clinical diagnosis and presentation of NEC. We also organized new prevention strategies by risk factors according to different pathogeneses and then discussed new treatment methods based on Bell's staging and complications, and the classification of mild to high severity based on clinical and imaging manifestations. Such a generalization will help clinicians and researchers to gain a deeper understanding of the disease and to conduct more targeted classification, grading prevention, and exploration. We focused on prevention and treatment of the early and suspected stages of NEC, including the discovery of novel biomarkers and drugs to control disease progression. At the same time, we discussed its clinical application, future development, and shortcomings.

Dilemmas in establishing preterm enteral feeding: where do we start and how fast do we go?

Beginning and achieving full enteral nutrition is a key step in the care of preterm infants, particularly very low birth weight (VLBW) infants. As is true for many organ system-specific complications of prematurity, the gastrointestinal tract must complete in utero development ex utero while concurrently serving a physiologic role reserved for after completion of full term development. The preterm gut must assume the placental function of the interface between a source of energy, precursors for anabolism, and micronutrients, and the developing infant-through digestion and absorption of milk, instead of directly from the mother via the uteroplacental interface. The benefits of enteral nourishment in preterm infants are counterbalanced by gastrointestinal complications of prematurity: dysmotility leading to difficulty establishing and advancing feeds, and the risk of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC). Concern for these complications can prolong the need for parenteral nutrition with an associated increase in risk for central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) and parenteral nutrition (PN)-associated cholestasis or liver disease (PNALD). Thus, a daily issue facing neonatologists caring for preterm infants is how to optimally begin, advance, and reach full enteral nutrition sufficient to satisfy the nutrient, energy, and fluid requirements of VLBW infants while minimizing risk. In this perspective, we provide an overview of the approaches and supporting data for starting and advancing enteral feeds in preterm infants, particularly very low birth weight infants, and we discuss the significant gaps in knowledge that accompany current approaches. This framework recognizes the dilemmas of preterm feeding initiation and advancement and identifies areas of opportunity for further investigation.

European Consensus Guidelines on the Management of Respiratory Distress Syndrome: 2022 Update

Respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) care pathways evolve slowly as new evidence emerges. We report the sixth version of "European Guidelines for the Management of RDS" by a panel of experienced European neonatologists and an expert perinatal obstetrician based on available literature up to end of 2022. Optimising outcome for babies with RDS includes prediction of risk of preterm delivery, appropriate maternal transfer to a perinatal centre, and appropriate and timely use of antenatal steroids. Evidence-based lung-protective management includes initiation of non-invasive respiratory support from birth, judicious use of oxygen, early surfactant administration, caffeine therapy, and avoidance of intubation and mechanical ventilation where possible. Methods of ongoing non-invasive respiratory support have been further refined and may help reduce chronic lung disease. As technology for delivering mechanical ventilation improves, the risk of causing lung injury should decrease, although minimising time spent on mechanical ventilation by targeted use of postnatal corticosteroids remains essential. The general care of infants with RDS is also reviewed, including emphasis on appropriate cardiovascular support and judicious use of antibiotics as being important determinants of best outcome. We would like to dedicate this guideline to the memory of Professor Henry Halliday who died on November 12, 2022.These updated guidelines contain evidence from recent Cochrane reviews and medical literature since 2019. Strength of evidence supporting recommendations has been evaluated using the GRADE system. There are changes to some of the previous recommendations as well as some changes to the strength of evidence supporting recommendations that have not changed. This guideline has been endorsed by the European Society for Paediatric Research (ESPR) and the Union of European Neonatal and Perinatal Societies (UENPS).

Total Fluid Administration and Weight Loss during the First 2 Weeks in Infants Randomized to Early Enteral Feeding after Extremely Preterm Birth

BACKGROUND

Randomized trials have not reported the effects of the early progression of feeding volumes on fluid balance and neurodevelopment among infants born extremely preterm (≤28 weeks).

METHOD

Fluid, electrolyte, and neurodevelopment data of 60 extremely preterm infants randomly assigned to receive either 1 (early feeding group) or 4 days (late feeding group) of trophic feeding volumes at 20-24 mL/kg/day were analyzed.

RESULTS

Infants randomized to the early feeding group received less parenteral fluids, generated lower urine volumes, and had less excessive weight loss during the first 14 days after birth. The 7-point difference in cognitive scores and the 0.5 difference in weight-for-age z-scores favoring the early feeding group did not reach statistical significance.

CONCLUSIONS

In extremely preterm infants, early enteral feeding is associated with less total fluid administration and with less excessive weight loss during the first 2 weeks after birth. These short-term effects could have long-lasting benefits.

Effectiveness of early enteral feeding on health outcomes in preterm infants: an overview of systematic reviews

Early enteral feeding is vital for the physical health of preterm infants. However, there is uncertainty regarding the effects of early enteral feeding on health outcomes in preterm infants. Hence, we aimed to synthesise evidence from systematic reviews (SRs) to evaluate the effects of early enteral feeding on health outcomes in preterm infants. We conducted a literature search in PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. SRs selection followed clear inclusion and exclusion criteria. Two reviewers reached a consensus for the inclusion of SRs. The certainty of evidence and the quality of reviews using the GRADE and AMSTAR tools, respectively. We included nine SRs in this review. The effectiveness of early enteral feeding on health outcomes in preterm infants is mainly divided into six primary outcomes: increase the weight gain, reduce the incidence of feed intolerance, shorten the duration of full enteral feeding, reduce the length of hospital stay, reduce the incidence of necrotizing enterocolitis, and decrease the mortality risk. The overall quality of the included SRs was high, whereas most of the evidence was of low or very low certainty. Our results show the impact of early enteral feeding on health outcomes in preterm infants. Although the currently available data indicate that early enteral feeding may improve the health outcomes of preterm infants, additional clinical observation and investigation are required to evaluate the long-term health outcomes of preterm infants who receive early enteral feeding.

Postoperative feeding in neonatal duodenal obstruction

Background

Findings from manometry studies and contrast imaging reveal functioning gastric physiology in newborns with duodenal atresia and stenosis. Stomach reservoir function should therefore be valuable in aiding the postoperative phase of gastric feeding. The aim of this study was therefore to compare the feasibility of initiating oral or large volume(s) gavage feeds vs small volume bolus feeds following operation for congenital duodenal anomalies.

Methods

Single-center electronic medical records of all babies with duodenal atresia and stenosis admitted to a university surgical center during January 1997–September 2021 were analyzed. A fast-fed group (FF) included newborns fed with oral or gavage feeds advanced at a rate of at least 2.5 ml/kg and then progressed more than once a day vs slow-fed group (SF) fed with gavage feeds at incremental rate less than 2.5 ml/kg/day for each time period of oral tolerance or by drip feeds. Total feed volume was limited to 120–150 ml/kg/day in the respective study cohort populations.

Results

Fifty-one eligible patients were recruited in the study - twenty-six in FF group and twenty-five in SF group. Statistically significant differences were observed in the (i) date of first oral feeds (POD 7.7 ± 3.2 vs 16.1 ± 7.7: p < 0.001), and (ii) first full feeds (POD 12.5 ± 5.3 vs 18.8 ± 9.7: p < 0.01) in FF vs SF study groups.

Conclusion

Initial feeding schedules with oral or incremental gavage-fed rates of at least 2.5 ml/kg in stepwise increments and multi-steps per day is wholly feasible in the postoperative feeding regimens of neonates with congenital duodenal disorders. Significant health benefits are thus achievable in these infants allowing an earlier time to acquiring full enteral feeding and their hospital discharge.

[Evidence-based standardized nutrition protocol can shorten the time to full enteral feeding in very preterm/very low birth weight infants]

OBJECTIVES

To investigate whether evidence-based standardized nutrition protocol can facilitate the establishment of full enteral nutrition and its effect on short-term clinical outcomes in very preterm/very low birth weight infants.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed on the medical data of 312 preterm infants with a gestational age of ≤32 weeks or a birth weight of <1 500 g. The standardized nutrition protocol for preterm infants was implemented in May 2020; 160 infants who were treated from May 1, 2019 to April 30, 2020 were enrolled as the control group, and 152 infants who were treated from June 1, 2020 to May 31, 2021 were enrolled as the test group. The two groups were compared in terms of the time to full enteral feeding, the time to the start of enteral feeding, duration of parenteral nutrition, the time to recovery to birth weight, the duration of central venous catheterization, and the incidence rates of common complications in preterm infants.

RESULTS

Compared with the control group, the test group had significantly shorter time to full enteral feeding, time to the start of enteral feeding, duration of parenteral nutrition, and duration of central venous catheterization and a significantly lower incidence rate of catheter-related bloodstream infection (P<0.05). There were no significant differences between the two groups in the mortality rate and the incidence rate of common complications in preterm infants including grade II-III necrotizing enterocolitis (P>0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Implementation of the standardized nutrition protocol can facilitate the establishment of full enteral feeding, shorten the duration of parenteral nutrition, and reduce catheter-related bloodstream infection in very preterm/very low birth weight infants, without increasing the risk of necrotizing enterocolitis.