Non-corticosteroid immunosuppressive medications for steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome in children

Clinical analysis of sirolimus therapy in children with refractory nephrotic syndrome

To investigate the clinical efficacy of sirolimus in treating children with refractory nephrotic syndrome, the clinical data for 22 children from the Children's Hospital of Hebei Province were analyzed retrospectively. There were 16 boys and six girls, and the treatment period was from September 2015 to April 2021. There were two patients with steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome (SDNS), six patients with frequently relapsing nephrotic syndrome (FRNS), and 14 patients with steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome (SRNS). All patients were defined as having refractory nephrotic syndrome. There were 12 patients (including nine SRNS patients and three FRNS patients) with minimal change disease (MCD), three patients (three SRNS patients) with focal segmental glomerular sclerosis (FSGS), one FRNS patient with mesangial proliferative glomerulonephritis (MsPGN), and six patients without a kidney biopsy. Compared with levels before sirolimus treatment, 24-hour urine protein (24-h UP), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), urea (Ur) and serum creatinine (SCr) levels were significantly lower (all p < 0.05). Moreover, albumin (Alb) was significantly increased (p < 0.05), and there were no significant differences in total cholesterol (TC), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), triglyceride (TG), immunoglobulin A (IgA), immunoglobulin G (IgG) or immunoglobulin M (IgM) (all p > 0.05) at the first follow-up. Sirolimus is effective as the first treatment of some children with refractory nephrotic syndrome, but its long-term efficacy and adverse reactions still require follow-up.

Daily compared with alternate-day levamisole in pediatric nephrotic syndrome: an open-label randomized controlled study

BACKGROUND

Levamisole is less expensive and has a better toxicity profile compared to other steroid sparing agents used in nephrotic syndrome. It has a plasma half-life of 2.0 to 5.6 hours, but is conventionally administered on alternate days. We aimed to assess whether daily levamisole is safe and more effective than standard alternate-day therapy in maintaining remission in children with frequently relapsing or steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome (FR/SDNS).

METHODS

An open-label randomized controlled trial was conducted in children with FR/SDNS. Group A received daily while Group B received alternate-day levamisole (2-3 mg/kg/dose) for 12 months. Prednisolone was tapered off by 3 months. Patients were monitored for relapses, further steroid requirement, and adverse effects.

RESULTS

A total of 190 children with FR/SDNS (94 in Group A and 96 in Group B) were analyzed. Sustained remission for 12 months was observed in 36% of Group A and 27% of Group B patients (p = 0.18). Numbers completing 12 months in the study were 67% in Group A and 56% in Group B (p = 0.13). Time to first relapse, persistent FR/SDNS, and withdrawal due to poor compliance were statistically similar in both groups, while relapse rate and cumulative steroid dosage were significantly lower in Group A compared to Group B (p = 0.03 and p = 0.02, respectively). The incidence of adverse effects was comparable in both groups, with reversible leucopenia and hepatic transaminitis being the commonest.

CONCLUSIONS

Daily levamisole therapy was not superior to alternate-day therapy in maintaining sustained remission over 12 months. Nevertheless, relapse rate and cumulative steroid dosage were significantly lower without increased adverse effects.

Efficacy and safety of oral cyclophosphamide versus mycophenolate mofetil in childhood nephrotic syndrome: an open-label comparative study

INTRODUCTION

There is a scarcity of research comparing the efficacy of cyclophosphamide and mycophenolate mofetil in childhood nephrotic syndrome. The aim was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of oral cyclophosphamide (CYC) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in children with steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome in terms of the proportion of children who have been off steroids for at least 6 months without proteinuria (responders).

METHODS

This open-label retrospective-prospective comparative study was conducted in a pediatric nephrology clinic of a referral center for children between 1 and 18 years of age with FR/SD nephrotic syndrome. Group A consisted of patients who received oral cyclophosphamide (100, 25% female) at a dose of 2-2.5 mg/kg once daily for a period of 8-12 weeks. Group B consisted of patients who received oral mycophenolate mofetil (n = 61, 18% female) (dose: 800-1200 mg/m2) for at least 12 months. Responders were defined as children who were off steroids for at least 6 months along with absence of proteinuria.

RESULTS

In the CYC group, 50% of the patients were responders, whereas 54% of the patients in the MMF group were responders (p = 0.614). The time to first relapse with CYC was 7 months (IQR 5.25-11) compared to 7 months (IQR 3.5-12) with MMF (p = 0.092). The relapse rate in the CYC group was 1.77 relapses per patient-year compared to 1.295 relapses per patient-year in the MMF group. The difference in relapse rate was significant (-0.474; 95% CI, 0.09 to 0.86 relapses/person-year) (p value = 0.009). Multivariate analysis revealed that an age of less than 5 years at the start of treatment was a significant factor for a better response to MMF (p value = 0.039, OR = 2.988, CI -1.055-8.468).

CONCLUSIONS

The efficacy of MMF was similar to that of CYC in terms of response (6 months without steroids) in children with FR/SD nephrotic syndrome. MMF showed a favorable response in terms of the frequency of relapse and treatment failure. REGISTRATION OF THE STUDY WITH CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRY OF INDIA: ( http://ctri.nic.in ;CTRI/2021/06/034421) (Dt: 28/06/2021).

Timing of relapse as a key indicator of steroid-sparing requirements in childhood idiopathic nephrotic syndrome

BACKGROUND

Managing children with frequent relapses or steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome poses challenges due to recurrent relapses necessitating prolonged steroid exposure, thus increasing susceptibility to long-term complications. Identifying those at risk of poor response to steroid therapy may be helpful to guide timely intervention with steroid-sparing agents. This study aimed to identify factors associated with steroid-sparing agent needs in children with frequent relapses or steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome.

METHODS

A retrospective multicenter cohort study was conducted by reviewing the medical records of children with idiopathic nephrotic syndrome treated between 2006 and 2023. Cox proportional regression analyzed prognostic factors for steroid-sparing agent requirements in children with frequent relapses or steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome. The time-to-event analysis utilizing the Kaplan-Meier estimate examined the proportion of children needing steroid-sparing agents after diagnosis.

RESULTS

Medical records of 121 children (85 males) diagnosed with idiopathic nephrotic syndrome at a median age of 4.5 years (range 1.3-12.8) were reviewed over a median follow-up of 3.7 years (range 1.0-15.0). Time to subsequent relapse post-frequent relapses or steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome diagnosis (at 3-month threshold) emerged as the sole significant predictor of steroid-sparing agent requirement, adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) = 2.26, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.26-4.05. Kaplan-Meier analysis indicated that an earlier first relapse (< 3 months) led to earlier steroid-sparing agent requirement (log-rank p = 0.005). Children who relapsed within 3 months post-frequent relapses or steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome diagnosis exhibited a higher frequency of relapses, a greater incidence of steroid-related adverse events, and were more likely to develop steroid dependency.

CONCLUSIONS

Early subsequent relapse following diagnosis of frequent relapses or steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome was linked to earlier requirement of steroid-sparing agent therapy. Further prospective research is necessary to confirm this observation.

Corticosteroid therapy for nephrotic syndrome in children

BACKGROUND

In nephrotic syndrome, protein leaks from the blood into the urine through the glomeruli, resulting in hypoproteinaemia and generalised oedema. While most children with nephrotic syndrome respond to corticosteroids, 80% experience a relapsing course. Corticosteroids have reduced the death rate to around 3%; however, corticosteroids have well-recognised potentially serious adverse events such as obesity, poor growth, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, osteoporosis, cataracts, glaucoma and behavioural disturbances. This is an update of a review first published in 2000 and updated in 2002, 2005, 2007, 2015 and 2020.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this review was to assess the benefits and harms of different corticosteroid regimens in children with steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome (SSNS). The benefits and harms of therapy were studied in two groups of children: 1) children in their initial episode of SSNS and 2) children who experience a relapsing course of SSNS.

SEARCH METHODS

We contacted the Information Specialist and searched the Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Register of Studies up to 9 July 2024 using search terms relevant to this review. Studies in the Register are identified through searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE, conference proceedings, the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) Search Portal, and ClinicalTrials.gov.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) performed in children (one to 18 years) during their initial or subsequent episode of SSNS, comparing different durations, total doses or other dose strategies using any corticosteroid agent.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Summary estimates of effects were obtained using a random-effects model, and results were expressed as risk ratios (RR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) for dichotomous outcomes and mean difference (MD) and 95% CI for continuous outcomes. Confidence in the evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.

MAIN RESULTS

In this 2024 update, we included five new studies, resulting in 54 studies randomising 4670 children. Risk of bias methodology was often poorly performed, with only 31 studies and 28 studies respectively assessed to be at low risk for random sequence generation and allocation concealment. Ten studies were at low risk of performance bias (blinding of participants and personnel), and 12 studies were at low risk of detection bias (blinding of outcome assessment); nine of these studies were placebo-controlled RCTs. Twenty-seven studies (fewer than 50%) were at low risk for attrition bias, and 26 studies were at low risk for reporting bias (selective outcome reporting). In studies at low risk of selection bias evaluating children in their initial episode of SSNS, there is little or no difference in the number of children with frequent relapses when comparing two months of prednisone with three months or more (RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.83 to 1.10; 755 children, 5 studies; I2 = 0%; high certainty evidence) or when comparing three months with five to seven months of therapy (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.74 to 1.33; 376 children, 3 studies; I2 = 35%; high certainty evidence). In analyses of studies at low risk of selection bias, there is little or no difference in the number of children with any relapse by 12 to 24 months when comparing two months of prednisone with three months or more (RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.81 to 1.06; 808 children; 6 studies; I2 = 47%) or when comparing three months with five to seven months of therapy (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.70 to 1.11; 377 children, 3 studies; I2 = 53%). Little or no difference was noted in adverse events between the different treatment durations. Amongst children with relapsing SSNS, four small studies (177 children) utilising lower doses of prednisone compared with standard regimens found little or no differences between groups in the numbers with relapse (RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.85 to 1.20; I2 = 0%). A fifth study (117 children) reported little or no difference between two weeks and four weeks of alternate-day prednisone after remission with daily prednisone. A recent large, well-designed study with 271 children found that administering daily prednisone compared with alternate-day prednisone or no prednisone during viral infection did not reduce the risk of relapse. In contrast, four previous small studies in children with frequently relapsing disease had reported that daily prednisone during viral infections compared with alternate-day prednisone or no treatment reduced the risk of relapse.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There are four well-designed studies randomising 823 children, which have demonstrated that there is no benefit of prolonging prednisone therapy beyond two to three months in the first episode of SSNS. Small studies in children with relapsing disease have identified no differences in efficacy using lower induction doses or shorter durations of prednisone therapy. Large, well-designed studies are required to confirm these findings. While previous small studies had suggested that changing from alternate-day to daily prednisone therapy at the onset of infection reduced the likelihood of relapse, a much larger and well-designed study found no reduction in the number relapsing when administering daily prednisone at the onset of infection.

Immunosuppressive agents for frequently relapsing/steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome in children: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Aim

This study aimed to systematically compare the efficacy of various immunosuppressive agents in treating pediatric frequently relapsing or steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome (FRSDNS).

Methods

We conducted systematic searches of PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and the Web of Science up to May 23, 2023. Outcome measures included relapses within 1 year, mean cumulative exposure to corticosteroids, patients with treatment failure at 1 year, relapse-free survival during 1 year, and adverse events. The quality of the included studies was evaluated using the modified Jadad scale, the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS), and the modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS).

Results

Rituximab was found to be the most likely (92.44%) to be associated with the fewest relapses within 1 year and was also most likely (99.99%) to result in the lowest mean cumulative exposure to corticosteroids. Rituximab had the highest likelihood (45.98%) of being associated with the smallest number of patients experiencing treatment failure at 1 year. CsA was most likely (57.93%) to achieve the highest relapse-free survival during 1 year, followed by tacrolimus (26.47%) and rituximab (30.48%). Rituximab showed no association with serious side effects and had comparable adverse effects to ofatumumab and tacrolimus.

Conclusion

Rituximab may be the most favorable immunosuppressive agent for treating pediatric FRSDNS. Nephrologists should consider this drug, along with their clinical experience, patient characteristics, and cost considerations, when choosing a treatment approach.

State of the art in childhood nephrotic syndrome: concrete discoveries and unmet needs

Nephrotic syndrome (NS) is a clinical entity characterized by proteinuria, hypoalbuminemia, and peripheral edema. NS affects about 2-7 per 100,000 children aged below 18 years old yearly and is classified, based on the response to drugs, into steroid sensitive (SSNS), steroid dependent, (SDNS), multidrug dependent (MDNS), and multidrug resistant (MRNS). Forms of NS that are more difficult to treat are associated with a worse outcome with respect to renal function. In particular, MRNS commonly progresses to end stage renal failure requiring renal transplantation, with recurrence of the original disease in half of the cases. Histological presentations of NS may vary from minimal glomerular lesions (MCD) to focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) and, of relevance, the histological patterns do not correlate with the response to treatments. Moreover, around half of MRNS cases are secondary to causative pathogenic variants in genes involved in maintaining the glomerular structure. The pathogenesis of NS is still poorly understood and therapeutic approaches are mostly based on clinical experience. Understanding of pathogenetic mechanisms of NS is one of the 'unmet needs' in nephrology and represents a significant challenge for the scientific community. The scope of the present review includes exploring relevant findings, identifying unmet needs, and reviewing therapeutic developments that characterize NS in the last decades. The main aim is to provide a basis for new perspectives and mechanistic studies in NS.

[Efficacy and safety of low-dose rituximab in treatment of pediatric nephrotic syndrome: a prospective randomized controlled trial]

OBJECTIVES

To study the efficacy and safety of repeated application of rituximab (RTX) at a low dose (200 mg/m2) versus the recommended dose (375 mg/m2) for remission maintenance in frequently relapsing nephrotic syndrome (FRNS) or steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome (SDNS).

METHODS

A randomized controlled trial was conducted for 29 children with FRNS/SDNS who received systemic treatment in the Department of Nephrology, Anhui Provincial Children's Hospital, from September 2020 to December 2021. These children were divided into a recommended dose group (n=14) and a low dose group (n=15) using a random number table. The two groups were compared in terms of general characteristics, changes in CD19 expression after RTX treatment, number of relapses, glucocorticoid dose, adverse reactions of RTX, and hospital costs.

RESULTS

After RTX treatment, both the low dose group and the recommended dose group achieved B-lymphocyte depletion and had significant reductions in the number of relapses and glucocorticoid dose (P<0.05). The low dose group had a comparable clinical effect to the recommended dose group after RTX treatment (P>0.05), and the low dose group had a significant reduction in hospital costs for the second, third, and fourth times of hospitalization (P<0.05). There were no serious adverse reactions in either group during RTX treatment and late follow-up, and there was no significant difference in adverse reactions between the two groups (P>0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Repeated RTX treatment at a low dose has comparable clinical efficacy and safety to that at the recommended dose and can significantly reduce the number of FRNS/SDNS relapses and the amount of glucocorticoids used, with little adverse effect throughout the treatment cycle. Therefore, it holds promise for clinical application.

Therapeutic trials in difficult to treat steroid sensitive nephrotic syndrome: challenges and future directions

Steroid sensitive nephrotic syndrome is a common condition in pediatric nephrology, and most children have excellent outcomes. Yet, 50% of children will require steroid-sparing agents due to frequently relapsing disease and may suffer consequences from steroid dependence or use of steroid-sparing agents. Several steroid-sparing therapeutic agents are available with few high quality randomized controlled trials to compare efficacy leading to reliance on observational data for clinical guidance. Reported trials focus on short-term outcomes such as time to first relapse, relapse rates up to 1-2 years of follow-up, and few have studied long-term remission. Trial designs often do not consider inter-individual variability, and differing response to treatments may occur due to heterogeneity in pathogenic mechanisms, and genetic and environmental influences. Strategies are proposed to improve the quantity and quality of trials in steroid sensitive nephrotic syndrome with integration of biomarkers, novel trial designs, and standardized outcomes, especially for long-term remission. Collaborative efforts among international trial networks will help move us toward a shared goal of finding a cure for children with nephrotic syndrome.

Metabolomics Profiling of Nephrotic Syndrome towards Biomarker Discovery

Nephrotic syndrome (NS) is a kidney illness characterized by excessive proteinuria, hypoalbuminemia, edema, and hyperlipidemia, which may lead to kidney failure and necessitate renal transplantation. End-stage renal disease, cardiovascular issues, and mortality are much more common in those with NS. Therefore, the present study aimed to identify potential new biomarkers associated with the pathogenesis and diagnosis of NS. The liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (LC–MS) metabolomics approach was applied to profile the metabolome of human serum of patients with NS. A total of 176 metabolites were significantly altered in NS compared to the control. Arginine, proline, and tryptophan metabolism; arginine, phenylalanine, tyrosine, and tryptophan biosynthesis were the most common metabolic pathways dysregulated in NS. Furthermore, alanyl-lysine and isoleucyl-threonine had the highest discrimination between NS and healthy groups. The candidate biomarkers may lead to understanding the possible metabolic alterations associated with NS and serve as potential diagnostic biomarkers.

Protocol for an open-label, single-arm, multicentre clinical study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of rituximab in the first episode of paediatric idiopathic nephrotic syndrome

INTRODUCTION

Rituximab (RTX) effectively prevents relapses in patients with complicated steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome (SSNS). The 1-year relapse-free survival rate is approximately 30% in children after the first episode of SSNS treated with standardised corticosteroids. Whether the benefits of RTX extend to the first relapse are unknown. The efficacy and safety of RTX in the first episode of paediatric idiopathic nephrotic syndrome (RTXFIRPedINS) trial (NCT04783675) will assess its effect on the risk of subsequent relapse.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

RTXFIRPedINS is an open-label, single-arm, multicentre trial targeting patients aged 1-18 years with a first episode of SSNS. All patients will receive standardised corticosteroid treatment for 12 weeks. A sample size of 44 patients provides 80% power to detect a 20% increase in the 1-year relapse-free rate, assuming a dropout rate of 10%. After obtaining informed consent and screening, eligible patients will be treated with a single intravenous infusion of 375 mg/m² RTX within 1 week after achieving remission. Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole will be administered for 3 months after RTX administration to prevent Pneumocystis carinii infection. The follow-up period will be 1 year. The primary outcome is the 1-year relapse-free survival rate after RTX infusion. The secondary study outcomes are the number of days from the infusion of RTX to the occurrence of the first relapse, 6-month relapse-free survival rate, the B cell recovery time and treatment-related adverse events. Immunological factors will be studied as predictors of response.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This trial was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Children's Hospital of Fudan University and seven local ethics committees. We will publish our study results in peer-reviewed journals and present them at international scientific meetings.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT04783675.

Protective effects of rituximab on puromycin-induced apoptosis, loss of adhesion and cytoskeletal alterations in human podocytes

Podocytes are highly specialized cells playing a key role in the filtration function of the kidney. A damaged podocyte ultrastructure is associated with a reorganization of the actin cytoskeleton and accompanied with a loss of adhesion to the glomerular basement membrane leading to proteinuria in many forms of glomerular diseases, e.g. nephrotic syndrome. If the first-line therapy with glucocorticoids fails, alternative immunosuppressive agents are used, which are known to have the potential to stabilize the actin cytoskeleton. A new option for preventing relapses in steroid dependent nephrotic syndrome is the monoclonal antibody rituximab, which, in addition to its B-cell depleting effect, is assumed to have direct effects on podocytes. We here provide data on the non-immunological off-target effects of the immunosuppressant rituximab on podocyte structure and dynamics in an in vitro puromycin aminonucleoside model of podocyte injury. A conditionally immortalized human podocyte cell line was used. Differentiated podocytes were treated with puromycin aminonucleoside and rituximab. Our studies focussed on analyzing the structure of the actin cytoskeleton, cellular adhesion and apoptosis using immunofluorescence staining and protein biochemistry methods. Treatment with rituximab resulted in a stabilization of podocyte actin stress fibers in the puromycin aminonucleoside model, leading to an improvement in cell adhesion. A lower apoptosis rate was observed after parallel treatment with puromycin aminonucleoside and rituximab visualized by reduced nuclear fragmentation. Consistent with this data, Western-blot analyses demonstrated that rituximab directly affects the caspase pathways by inhibiting the activation of Caspases-8, -9 and -3, suggesting that rituximab may inhibit apoptosis. In conclusion, our results indicate an important role of the immunosuppressant rituximab in terms of stability and morphogenesis of podocytes, involving apoptosis pathways. This could help to improve therapeutical concepts for patients with proteinuria mediated by diseased podocytes.

Treatment-Associated Side Effects in Patients with Steroid-Dependent Nephrotic Syndrome

Introduction:Nephrotic syndrome is one of the most extensively studied pediatric diseases for a nephrologist. Treatment for patients suffering from it has greatly improved the prognosis and reduced the mortality rate to 3% or less. Steroid medication is the first line, but non-steroid immunosuppressive drugs are useful in limiting steroid side effects and maintaining long-term remission. Objective: The aim of the study is to choose the best treatment for each patient in order to minimize long-term effects of corticosteroid therapy, taking into account the child's age, gender and other factors to optimize the quality of life. Materials and methods:Materials and methods: This is a retrospective study of pediatric patients older than one year and younger than 18 years of age diagnosed with idiopathic corticosteroid nephrotic syndrome. Study participants were treated in the Department of Pediatric Nephrology of "M. S. Curie" Emergency Clinical Hospital for Children, Bucharest, Romania, between January 2013 and December 2020. Thirty-seven subjects with steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome from a total of 125 patients diagnosed with nephrotic syndrome were included in the present study. All study participants underwent clinical examination and laboratory tests and were regularly monitored. Results and discussion: Long-term corticosteroid therapy can lead to unwanted complications such as hypertension, short stature, behavior disturbances, or osteopenia. To minimize certain side effects, a second line steroid-sparing agents can be used due to their ability to induce complete remission and maintain it in patients with steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome. Conclusion: Our study describes the most frequent side effects encountered in the Department of Nephrology in patients with steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome. The purpose was to emphasize that pediatric patients' quality of life depends on limiting long-term corticosteroid treatment and preventing adverse reactions or complications.

"Clinical Efficacy of Mycophenolate Mofetil versus Levamisole Therapy in Frequently Relapsing and Steroid Dependent Childhood Nephrotic Syndrome" - A retrospective comparative analysis

BACKGROUND

Children with Frequently relapsing (FR) or Steroid dependent (SD) Nephrotic Syndrome (NS) often develop side effects of corticosteroids. Various steroid-sparing agents are in practice, but only a few studies exist so far which have compared the safety and efficacy of these two commonly used agents.

METHODS

We did a retrospective medical records review of children with FRNS or SDNS who had Levamisole or MMF as a steroid-sparing agent with a minimum follow-up period of 12 months. The aim was to compare the course of our patients on MMF and Levamisole. Our primary objective was to determine the number of children in sustained remission and those with the infrequently relapsing course on Levamisole and MMF and, the median time to relapse in months in the two groups. The secondary objective was to compare time to first relapse and number of relapses in FRNS and SDNS group children on MMF and Levamisole.

RESULTS

A total of 88 children (34% female) with diagnosis FR/SDNS (44 each) were included in the study. Thirty-nine patients took Levamisole, while forty-nine received MMF therapy. The median age of presentation at the relapsing course was 4.2 years. The proportion of children with sustained remission or infrequent relapsing (IFR) course on MMF was 73.6%, compared to 48.71% on Levamisole (p-value 0.015). Also, the median time to first relapse was 12 months (24, 1.5) and 4.5 months (24, 1) on respective medications.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical outcome was superior in the MMF group than Levamisole, especially in SDNS patients, and also MMF was more efficacious in maintaining sustained remission. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Interventions for minimal change disease in adults with nephrotic syndrome

BACKGROUND

Steroids have been used widely since the early 1970s for the treatment of adult-onset minimal change disease (MCD). Recently, newer agents have been used in adult MCD aiming to reduce the risk of adverse effects. The response rates to immunosuppressive agents in adult MCD are more variable than in children. The optimal agent, dose, and duration of treatment for the first episode of nephrotic syndrome, or for disease relapse(s) have not been determined. This is an update of a review first published in 2008.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to 1) evaluate the benefits and harms of different agents, including both immunosuppressive and non-immunosuppressive agents, in adults with MCD causing the nephrotic syndrome; and 2) evaluate the efficacy of interventions on 'time-to-remission' of nephrotic syndrome, in adults with MCD causing the nephrotic syndrome.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Register of Studies up to 21 July 2021 through contact with the Information Specialist using search terms relevant to this review. Studies in the Register are identified through searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE, conference proceedings, the International Clinical Trials Register (ICTRP) Search Portal and ClinicalTrials.gov.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs of any intervention for MCD with nephrotic syndrome in adults over 18 years were included. Studies comparing different types, routes, frequencies, and duration of immunosuppressive agents and non-immunosuppressive agents were assessed.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently assessed study quality and extracted data. Statistical analyses were performed using the random-effects model and results were expressed as a risk ratio (RR) for dichotomous outcomes, or mean difference (MD) for continuous data with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Confidence in the evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.

MAIN RESULTS

Fifteen RCTs (769 randomised participants) were identified; four studies evaluated different prednisolone regimens, eight studies evaluated the calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) (tacrolimus or cyclosporin), two studies evaluated enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium (EC-MPS) and one study evaluated levamisole. In all but two studies of non-corticosteroid agents, reduced-dose prednisolone was given with the treatment agent and the comparator was high-dose prednisolone. In the risk of bias assessment, 11 and seven studies were at low risk of bias for sequence generation and allocation concealment, respectively. No studies were at low risk of performance bias and eight studies were at low risk of detection bias. Thirteen, 10 and six studies were at low risk of attrition bias, reporting bias and other bias, respectively. Compared with no specific treatment, it is uncertain whether prednisolone increases the number with complete remission (1 study, 28 participants: RR 1.44, 95% CI 0.95 to 2.19), complete or partial remission (1 study, 28 participants: RR 1.38, 95% CI 0.98 to 1.95), subsequent relapse (1 study, 28 participants: RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.48 to 1.17), or reduces the adverse effects because the certainty of the evidence is very low. Compared with oral prednisolone alone, it is uncertain whether intravenous methylprednisolone and prednisolone increase the number with complete remission (2 studies, 35 participants: RR 1.76, 95% CI 0.17 to 18.32; I² = 90%), relapse (two studies, 19 participants. RR 1.18, 95% CI 0.65 to 2.15; I² = 0%) or adverse events because the certainty of the evidence is very low. Compared with prednisolone alone, CNIs with reduced-dose prednisolone or without prednisolone probably make little or no difference to the number achieving complete remission (8 studies; 492 participants: RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.93 to 1.05; I² = 0%), complete or partial remission (4 studies, 269 participants: RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.96 to 1.05; I² = 0%), or relapse (7 studies; 422 participants: RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.51 to 1.03; I² = 0%) (moderate certainty evidence), may reduce the risk of obesity or Cushing's Syndrome (5 studies; 388 participants: RR 0.11, 95% CI 0.02 to 0.59; I² = 45%) and the risk of acne (4 studies; 270 participants: RR 0.15, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.67; I² = 0%) (low certainty evidence); and had uncertain effects on diabetes or hyperglycaemia, hypertension, and acute kidney injury (AKI) (low certainty evidence). Compared with prednisolone alone, EC-MPS with reduced-dose prednisolone probably make little or no difference to the number undergoing complete remission at 4 weeks (1 study, 114 participants: RR 1.12, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.50), and at 24 weeks probably make little or no difference to the number undergoing complete remission (2 studies, 134 participants: RR 1.12, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.38; I² = 0%) (moderate certainty evidence), complete or partial remission (2 studies 134 participants: RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.75 to 1.12; I² = 0%), relapse (2 studies, 83 participants: RR 0.50, 95% CI 0.07 to 3.74; I² = 56%) (low certainty evidence); or to the adverse events of new-onset glucose intolerance, death, or AKI (low certainty evidence). One study (24 participants) compared levamisole and prednisolone with prednisolone in patients with relapsing disease. The authors identified no differences in mean relapse rate or adverse effects but no standard deviations were provided.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

This updated review has identified evidence for the efficacy and adverse effects of CNIs and EC-MPS with or without reduced-dose prednisolone compared with prednisolone alone for the induction of remission in adults with MCD and nephrotic syndrome with some reductions in steroid-associated adverse events. RCT data on the efficacy and adverse effects of rituximab in adults with MCD are awaited. Further, adequately powered RCTs are required to determine the relative efficacies of CNIs and EC-MPS and to evaluate these medications in patients with relapsing or steroid-resistant disease.

Update on the treatment of steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome

Steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome (SSNS) is a rare condition that develops primarily in preadolescent children after the age of 1 year. Since the 1950s, oral corticosteroids have been the mainstay of treatment of all children presenting with nephrotic syndrome, with most patients responding within 4 weeks to an oral course of prednisone (PDN). However, corticosteroids have important side effects and 60-80 % of patients relapse, developing frequently relapsing or steroid-dependent forms. For these reasons, many patients require second-line steroid-sparing immunosuppressive medications that have considerably improved relapse-free survival, while avoiding many PDN-related toxicities. Since most patients will eventually heal from their disease with a normal kidney function, the morbidity of SSNS is primarily related to side effects of drugs that are used to maintain prolonged remission. Therefore, treatment is essentially based on balancing the use of different drugs to achieve permanent remission with the lowest cumulative number of side effects. Treatment choice is based on the severity of SSNS, on patient age, and on drug tolerability. This review provides an update of currently available therapeutic strategies for SSNS.

Idiopathic Nephrotic Syndrome in Pediatrics: An Up-to-date

BACKGROUND

Idiopathic or Primary Nephrotic Syndrome (INS) is a common glomerular disease in pediatric population, characterized by proteinuria, edema and hypoalbuminemia with variable findings in renal histopathology.

OBJECTIVE

This review aims to summarize current data on the etiopathogenesis diagnosis, protocols of treatment and potential therapeutic advances in INS.

METHODS

This narrative review searched for articles on histopathology, physiopathology, genetic causes, diagnosis and treatment of INS in pediatric patients. The databases evaluated were PubMed and Scopus.

RESULTS

INS is caused by an alteration in the permeability of the glomerular filtration barrier with unknown etiology. There are several gaps in the etiopathogenesis, response to treatment and clinical course of INS that justify further investigation. Novel advances include the recent understanding of the role of podocytes in INS and the identification of genes associated with the disease. The role of immune system cells and molecules has also been investigated. The diagnosis relies on clinical findings, laboratory exams and renal histology for selected cases. The treatment is primarily based on steroids administration. In case of failure, other medications should be tried. Recent studies have also searched for novel biomarkers for diagnosis and alternative therapeutic approaches.

CONCLUSION

The therapeutic response to corticosteroids still remains the main predictive factor for the prognosis of the disease. Genetic and pharmacogenomics tools may allow the identification of cases not responsive to immunosuppressive medications.

Comparison of rituximab, cyclophosphamide, and tacrolimus as first steroid-sparing agents for complicated relapsing/steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome in children: an evaluation of the health-related quality of life

INTRODUCTION

Frequently-relapsing/steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome (FRSDNS) leads to steroid toxicity impairing quality of life (QOL), thus prompting the use of steroid-sparing drugs.

METHODS

51 FRSDNS children not previously treated with steroid-sparing agents were randomized to receive rituximab, cyclophosphamide, or tacrolimus. Clinical findings and QOL were evaluated before and after treatment.

RESULTS

The mean relapse rate in all groups declined six months after treatment, however, 1-year relapse-free survival rate, number of relapses, and cumulative prednisolone dosage were lower with rituximab than with tacrolimus and cyclophosphamide. Cyclophosphamide group had twice frequency of infections compared to the other groups. At 1 year after treatment, total scores showed greater improvement with rituximab.

CONCLUSIONS

As first-line steroid-sparing agent, rituximab is more effective and safer than cyclophosphamide and tacrolimus in FRSDNS, and improve QOL.

Efficacy of rituximab versus tacrolimus in difficult-to-treat steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome: an open-label pilot randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Rituximab and tacrolimus are therapies reserved for patients with frequently relapsing or steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome who have failed conventional steroid-sparing agents. Given their toxicities, demonstrating non-inferiority of rituximab to tacrolimus may enable choice between these medications.

METHODS

This investigator-initiated, single-center, open-label, pilot randomized controlled trial examined the non-inferiority of two doses of intravenous (IV) rituximab given one-week apart to oral therapy with tacrolimus (1:1 allocation), in maintaining sustained remission over 12 months follow-up, in patients with difficult-to-treat steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome, defined as frequently relapsing or steroid-dependent disease that had failed ≥ 2 steroid-sparing strategies. Secondary outcomes included frequency of relapses, proportion with frequent relapses, time to relapse and frequent relapses, and adverse events (CTRI/2018/11/016342).

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics were comparable for 41 patients randomized to receive rituximab (n = 21) or tacrolimus (n = 20). While 55% of patients in each limb were in sustained remission at 1 year, non-inferiority of rituximab to tacrolimus was not demonstrated (mean difference 0%; 95% CI - 30.8%, 30.8%; non-inferiority limit - 20%; P = 0.50). Frequent relapses were more common in patients administered rituximab compared to tacrolimus (risk difference 30%, 95% CI 7.0, 53.0, P = 0.023). Both groups showed similar reductions in relapse rates and prednisolone use. Common adverse events were infusion-related with rituximab and gastrointestinal symptoms with tacrolimus.

CONCLUSIONS

Therapy with rituximab was not shown to be non-inferior to 12-months treatment with tacrolimus in maintaining remission in patients with difficult-to-treat steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome. Frequent relapses were more common with rituximab. While effective, both agents require close monitoring for adverse events. A higher resolution version of the Graphical abstract is available as Supplementary information.

Randomised controlled trial comparing rituximab to mycophenolate mofetil in children and young adults with steroid-dependent idiopathic nephrotic syndrome: study protocol

INTRODUCTION

Glucocorticoids induce remission in 90% of children with idiopathic nephrotic syndrome (INS). Some become steroid-dependent (SD) and require the addition of steroid sparing drugs such as calcineurin-inhibitors (CNI) or cyclophosphamide, to maintain remission. Considering the toxicity of these drugs, alternative interventions are needed for long-term treatment. The anti-CD20 antibody rituximab has shown promising steroid-sparing properties, with conflicting results in complicated forms of SD-INS. Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) resulted effective in maintaining free-steroid remission, however, studies are limited to few uncontrolled trials with reported different dose of MMF.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This open-label, two-parallel-arm, superiority controlled randomised clinical trial will enrol children with SD-INS maintained in remission with oral glucocorticoids or CNI. Children and young adults will be randomised to either MMF (1.200 mg/m²) or rituximab (375 mg/m²) infusion. After enrolment, glucocorticoids will be tapered until complete withdrawal. We will enrol 160 children and young adults to detect as significant at the two-sided p value of 0.01 with a power >0.8 a reduction in the risk of 1-year relapse (primary end-point). As secondary endpoints, we will compare the amount of glucocorticoids required to maintain complete remission at 6 and 24 months.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The trial was approved by the local ethics boards (Comitato Etico Regione Liguria CER Liguria https://www.portalericerca-liguria.it/). We will publish the study results at international scientific meetings.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS

NCT004585152.

Oral cyclophosphamide therapy in 100 children with steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome: experience from a developing country

BACKGROUND

Oral cyclophosphamide (CYP) is an important therapeutic agent in treatment of steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome having a steroid-dependent (SD) or frequent relapsing (FR) course. This retrospective observational study aimed to determine response to oral CYP and factors associated with positive response in these patients.

METHODS

We studied 100 children (male; 75) with FR (19%) and SD (81%) NS treated with CYP in the Pediatric Nephrology clinic. Responders were defined as children in whom steroids were stopped for at least 6 months following CYP and factors affecting response were analysed. Relapse-free survival was estimated by Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

Median age at onset of NS was 3 years (IQR 2-5.2). Median age at CYP was 5.7 years (IQR 3.7-7.9). Fifty percent of patients were in the responder group at 6 months of CYP. Relapse-free survival post CYP therapy was 31% at 1 year, 11% at 2 years. Factors predicting good response were age at onset of NS > 3 years with 61.2% response at 6 months (p = 0.028) and older age at CYP initiation (> 5 years) with 61% response (p = 0.008). Multivariate regression analysis showed age at start of CYP > 5 years was an independent factor for good response (p = 0.044, OR = 2.903, CI -1.03 to 8.18).

CONCLUSIONS

Judicious selection of patients, especially with age of onset of NS more than 3 years and initiation of CYP after age of 5 years, can predict better response in this group of patents.

Practice variations in the management of childhood nephrotic syndrome in the Netherlands

Nephrotic syndrome in childhood is a common entity in the field of pediatric nephrology. The optimal treatment of children with nephrotic syndrome is often debated. Previously conducted studies have shown significant variability in nephrotic syndrome management, especially in the choice of steroid-sparing drugs. In the Netherlands, a practice guideline on the management of childhood nephrotic syndrome has been available since 2010. The aim of this study was to identify practice variations and opportunities to improve clinical practice of childhood nephrotic syndrome in the Netherlands. A digital structured survey among Dutch pediatricians and pediatric nephrologists was performed, including questions regarding the initial treatment, relapse treatment, kidney biopsy, additional immunosuppressive treatment, and supportive care. Among the 51 responses, uniformity was seen in the management of a first presentation and first relapse. Wide variation was found in the tapering of steroids after alternate day dosing. Most pediatricians and pediatric nephrologists (83%) would perform a kidney biopsy in case of steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome, whereas for frequent relapsing and steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome this was 22% and 41%, respectively. Variation was reported in the steroid-sparing treatment. Finally, significant differences were present in the supportive treatment of nephrotic syndrome.Conclusion: Substantial variation was present in the management of nephrotic syndrome in the Netherlands. Differences were identified in steroid tapering, use of steroid coverage during stress, choice of steroid-sparing agents, and biopsy practice. To promote guideline adherence and reduce practice variation, factors driving this variation should be assessed and resolved. What is Known: • National and international guidelines are available to guide the management of childhood nephrotic syndrome. • Several aspects of the management of childhood nephrotic syndrome, including the choice of steroid-sparing drugs and biopsy practice, are controversial and often debated among physicians. What is New: • Significant practice variation is present in the management of childhood nephrotic syndrome in the Netherlands, especially in the treatment of FRNS, SDNS, and SRNS. • The recommendation on the steroid treatment of a first episode of nephrotic syndrome in the KDIGO guideline leaves room for interpretation and is likely the cause of substantial differences in steroid-tapering practices among Dutch pediatricians and pediatric nephrologists.

Steroid Sensitive Nephrotic Syndrome: Revised Guidelines

JUSTIFICATION

Steroid sensitive nephrotic syndrome (SSNS) is one of the most common chronic kidney diseases in children. These guidelines update the existing Indian Society of Pediatric Nephrology recommendations on its management.

OBJECTIVE

To frame revised guidelines on diagnosis, evaluation, management and supportive care of patients with the illness.

PROCESS

The guidelines combine evidence-based recommendations and expert opinion. Formulation of key questions was followed by review of literature and evaluation of evidence by experts in two face-to-face meetings.

RECOMMENDATIONS

The initial statements provide advice for evaluation at onset and follow up and indications for kidney biopsy. Subsequent statements provide recommendations for management of the first episode of illness and of disease relapses. Recommendations on the use of immunosuppressive strategies in patients with frequent relapses and steroid dependence are accompanied by suggestions for step-wise approach and plan of monitoring. Guidance is also provided regarding the management of common complications including edema, hypovolemia and serious infections. Advice on immunization and transition of care is given. The revised guideline is intended to improve the management and outcomes of patients with SSNS, and provide directions for future research.

Pediatric idiopathic steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome: diagnosis and therapy -short version of the updated German best practice guideline (S2e) - AWMF register no. 166-001, 6/2020

Idiopathic nephrotic syndrome is the most frequent glomerular disease in children in most parts of the world. Children with steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome (SSNS) generally have a good prognosis regarding the maintenance of normal kidney function even in the case of frequent relapses. The course of SSNS is often complicated by a high rate of relapses and the associated side effects of repeated glucocorticoid (steroid) therapy. The following recommendations for the treatment of SSNS are based on the comprehensive consideration of published evidence by a working group of the German Society for Pediatric Nephrology (GPN) based on the systematic Cochrane reviews on SSNS and the guidelines of the KDIGO working group (Kidney Disease - Improving Global Outcomes).

Randomized clinical trial to compare efficacy and safety of repeated courses of rituximab to single-course rituximab followed by maintenance mycophenolate-mofetil in children with steroid dependent nephrotic syndrome

Background

Approximately 30% of children with idiopathic nephrotic syndrome develop a complicated course with frequent relapses or steroid dependency. Rituximab, a B cell depleting monoclonal antibody, is a safe and effective alternative to steroids or other immunosuppressants for achieving and maintaining remission in this population at short term. Despite the good initial response relapses inevitably occur after regeneration of B lymphocytes, necessitating either repeat courses of rituximab or addition of another steroid-sparing immunosuppressant.

Methods

This is a prospective, single-center, open-label, two-parallel-arm randomized controlled phase III study among children with steroid dependent nephrotic syndrome who are maintained in remission with oral steroids. One hundred children will be randomized to either Rituximab and maintenance Mycophenolate mofetil (A) or repeated courses of prophylactic Rituximab only (B). In arm A, mycophenolate mofetil (1200 mg/m² per day) will be started 3 months after Rituximab administration. In arm B, Rituximab infusions will be administered at 0, 8 and 16 months if B cell count normalize at the given time points. Prednisolone will be discontinued in both groups 2 weeks following first course of rituximab. Primary aim is to evaluate the difference in 24-month relapse-free survival. Main secondary endpoints are cumulative prednisolone dose, frequency of relapses and changes in anthropometry. Circulating B lymphocyte populations will be studied as biomarkers or predictors of rituximab responsiveness and adverse events will be analysed.

Discussion

The study will provide evidence as to the comparative safety and efficacy of two alternative steroid-sparing therapeutic options in children suffering from steroid dependent nephrotic syndrome. The two-year study design will address the long-term results obtained with the alternative treatment protocols.

Trial registration

This trial was prospectively registered to the Clinicaltrial.gov (NCT03899103 dated 02/04/2019; https://clinicaltrials.gov/) and Clinical Trials Registry of India (CTRI/2019/04/018517 dated 09/04/2019).

Corticosteroid therapy for nephrotic syndrome in children

BACKGROUND

In nephrotic syndrome protein leaks from blood into the urine through the glomeruli resulting in hypoproteinaemia and generalised oedema. While most children with nephrotic syndrome respond to corticosteroids, 80% experience a relapsing course. Corticosteroids have reduced the death rate to around 3%. However, corticosteroids have well recognised potentially serious adverse effects such as obesity, poor growth, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, osteoporosis, and behavioural disturbances. This is an update of a review first published in 2000 and updated in 2002, 2005, 2007, and 2015.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this review was to assess the benefits and harms of different corticosteroid regimens in children with steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome (SSNS). The benefits and harms of therapy were studied in two groups of children 1) children in their initial episode of SSNS, and 2) children who experience a relapsing course of SSNS.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Register of Studies up to 30 May 2020 through contact with the Information Specialist using search terms relevant to this review. Studies in the Register are identified through searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE, conference proceedings, the International Clinical Trials Register (ICTRP) Search Portal and ClinicalTrials.gov.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) performed in children (one to 18 years) in their initial or subsequent episode of SSNS, comparing different durations, total doses or other dose strategies using any corticosteroid agent.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently assessed risk of bias and extracted data. Results were expressed as risk ratio (RR) or mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

MAIN RESULTS

In this 2020 review update 16 new included studies were identified providing a total of 48 included studies with 3941 randomised participants. Risk of bias methodology was often poorly performed with only 25 studies and 22 studies respectively assessed to be at low risk for random sequence generation and allocation concealment. Only nine studies (19%) were at low risk of bias for performance (blinding of participants and personnel) and 11 studies were at low risk of detection bias (blinding of outcome assessment); nine of these studies were placebo-controlled RCTs. Twenty-two studies (fewer than 50%) were at low risk for attrition bias and 23 studies were at low risk for reporting bias (selective outcome reporting). In seven studies, which evaluated children in their initial episode of SSNS and were at low risk of bias for selection bias, there is little or no difference in the number of children with frequent relapses when comparing two months of prednisone with three months or more (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.82 to 1.19; 585 participants, 4 studies; I2 = 0%) or when comparing three months with five to seven months of therapy (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.74 to 1.33; 376 participants, 3 studies; I2 = 35%; high certainty evidence). In analyses of eight studies at low risk of selection bias, there is little or no difference in the number of children with any relapse by 12 to 24 months when comparing two months of prednisone with three months or more (RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.78 to 1.06; 637 participants; 5 studies; I2 = 47%) or when comparing three months with five to seven months of therapy (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.70 to 1.11; 377 participants, 3 studies; I2 = 53%). Little or no difference was noted in adverse effects between the different treatment durations. Among children with relapsing SSNS, two small studies showed that time to remission did not differ between prednisone doses of 1 mg/kg compared with the conventional dose of 2 mg/kg (MD 0.71 days, 95% CI -0.43 to 1.86; 79 participants) and that the total prednisone dose administered was lower (MD -20.60 mg/kg, 95% CI -25.65 to -15.55; 20 participants). Two studies found little or no difference in the number with relapse at six months when comparing dosing by weight with dosing by surface area (RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.71 to 1.49; 146 participants). One study found a reduced risk of relapse with low daily dosing compared with alternate daily dosing (MD -0.90 number of relapses/year, 95% CI -1.33 to -0.47). Four studies found that in children with frequently relapsing disease, daily prednisone during viral infections compared with alternate-day prednisone or no treatment reduced the risk of relapse.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There are now four well designed studies randomising 823 children which have clearly demonstrated that there is no benefit of prolonging prednisone therapy beyond two to three months in the first episode of SSNS. Small studies in children with relapsing disease have identified no differences in the times to remission using half the conventional induction dose of 2 mg/kg or 60 mg/m2. It is imperative that a much larger study be carried out to confirm these findings. Lower dose prednisone therapy administered daily during an upper respiratory infection or other infection reduces the risk of relapse compared with continuing alternate-day prednisone or no prednisone based on four small studies. The results of a much larger RCT enrolling more than 300 children are awaited to determine the relative efficacies and adverse effects of using alternate-day compared with daily prednisone to prevent relapse in children with intercurrent infections.