Immunosuppressive treatment for multifocal motor neuropathy

Subcutaneous immunoglobulins in the treatment of chronic immune-mediated neuropathies

Intravenous immunoglobulins represent an established therapy for the treatment of chronic immune-mediated neuropathies, specifically chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathies (CIDPs) as well as multifocal motor neuropathies (MMNs). For the treatment of antibody deficiency syndromes, subcutaneous immunoglobulins (SCIgs) have represented a mainstay for decades. An emerging body of evidence suggests that SCIg might also exhibit clinical efficacy in CIDP and MMN. This article reviews the current evidence for clinical effectiveness, as well as safety of SCIg for the treatment of immune-mediated neuropathies, and addresses remaining open questions in this context. We conclude that despite the need for controlled long-term studies to demonstrate long-term efficacy of SCIg in immune-mediated neuropathies, SCIg may already represent a potential therapeutic alternative for selected patients.

Immunosuppressant and immunomodulatory treatments for multifocal motor neuropathy

BACKGROUND

Multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN) is characterised by progressive, predominantly distal, asymmetrical limb weakness and usually multiple partial motor nerve conduction blocks. Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) is beneficial but the role of immunosuppressive agents is uncertain. This is an update of a review first published in 2002 and previously updated in 2003, 2005, 2008 and 2011.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of immunosuppressive agents for the treatment of multifocal motor neuropathy.

SEARCH METHODS

On 22 September 2014 we searched the Cochrane Neuromuscular Disease Group Specialized Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE and LILACS for trials of MMN. We also searched two trials registers for ongoing studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We planned to include randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs. We considered prospective and retrospective case series and case reports in the Discussion.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors searched the titles and abstracts of the articles identified and extracted the data independently.

MAIN RESULTS

Only one RCT of an immunosuppressive or immunomodulatory agent has been performed in MMN. This study randomised 28 participants and showed that mycophenolate mofetil, when used with IVIg, did not significantly improve strength, function or reduce the need for IVIg. No serious adverse events were observed. The study was deemed at low risk of bias. We summarised the results of retrospective and prospective case series in the discussion.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

According to moderate quality evidence, mycophenolate mofetil did not produce significant benefit in terms of reducing need for IVIg or improving muscle strength in MMN. Trials of other immunosuppressants should be undertaken.

Immunosuppressant and immunomodulatory treatments for multifocal motor neuropathy

BACKGROUND

Multifocal motor neuropathy is characterised by progressive, predominantly distal, asymmetrical limb weakness and usually multiple partial motor nerve conduction blocks. Intravenous immunoglobulin is beneficial but the role of immunosuppressive agents is uncertain. This is an update of a review first published in 2002 and previously updated in 2003, 2005 and 2008.

OBJECTIVES

To provide the best available evidence from randomised controlled trials on the role of immunosuppressive agents for the treatment of multifocal motor neuropathy.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Neuromuscular Disease Group Specialized Register (4 October 2011), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (2011, Issue 3 in The Cochrane Library), MEDLINE (January 1966 to September 2011), EMBASE (January 1980 to September 2011), and LILACS (January 1982 to September 2011) for trials of multifocal motor neuropathy.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We planned to include randomised and quasi-randomised controlled trials. We considered prospective and retrospective case series and case reports in the Discussion.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors searched the titles and abstracts of the articles identified and extracted the data independently.

MAIN RESULTS

Only one randomised controlled trial of an immunosuppressive or immunomodulatory agent has been performed in multifocal motor neuropathy. This study randomised 28 participants and showed that mycophenolate mofetil, when used with intravenous immunoglobulin, did not significantly improve strength, function or reduce the need for intravenous immunoglobulin. No serious adverse events were observed. The study was deemed at low risk of bias. We summarised the results of retrospective and prospective case series in the discussion.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

According to moderate quality evidence, mycophenolate mofetil did not produce significant benefit in terms of reducing need for intravenous immunoglobulin or improving muscle strength. Trials of other immunosuppressants should be undertaken.

Inflammatory demyelinating neuropathies and neuropathies associated with monoclonal gammopathies: treatment update

This review focuses on recent data regarding inflammatory demyelinating neuropathies and neuropathies associated with monoclonal gammopathies. We describe both acute and chronic inflammatory neuropathies, and we discuss conditions ranging from mostly cell-mediated to antibody-mediated disorders. These diseases are characterized by proximal and distal sensory motor involvement. Treatments are based on immune-modulation and/or immune-suppression. Work-up sequence and therapeutical modes are discussed in the light of recently published data, with a special interest on new treatment modalities.

[The use of intravenous immunoglobulins in neurology]

INTRODUCTION

In the past decade, intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIG) have been widely used and their administration has grown throughout the world. The current indications of IVIG in neurological diseases are discussed on the basis of the passed and current trials. Unlike other immuomodulatory agents, IVIG are well tolerated and have very few side effects and a good viral safety.

STATE OF ART

There is clinical evidence, based on controlled trials, for the effectiveness of IVIG in Guillain-Barré syndrome, chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy and multifocal neuropathy with conduction blocks. In myasthenia gravis, the IVIG are effective especially in myasthenic crisis, but their synergistic effect with other treatments, the steroid sparing effect, and their long-term effect are unknown. These issues need to be addressed in further controlled clinical trials. In dermatoploymyositis, IVIG are reserved for steroid resistant patients. There is actually no support or no significant clinical benefit for the routine use of IVIG in other neurological diseases.

PERSPECTIVES

Further controlled trials are warranted to assess the quality of life, the dose-finding effect and their long-term efficacy in order to improve clinical practices.

CONCLUSION

Routine use of IVIG should be reserved for diseases in which positive controlled trials are available. For the remaining dysimmune diseases, IVIG should be assess in comparison with the other available therapies, taking into consideration the age of the patients, the safety of the IVIG and, in our country, the economic aspect.

IVIg in idiopathic autoimmune neuropathies: analysis in the light of the latest results

High-dose intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) is effective in the treatment of idiopathic autoimmune neuropathies including Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS), chronic inflammatory demyelinating neuropathy (CIDP) and multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN), representing a useful option or, as in MMN, the gold standard for their treatment. In GBS, two randomised, controlled trials (RCT) showed that IVIg is at least as effective as plasma exchange (PE). IVIg may however be preferred due to its low number of contraindications and complications and the fact that it can be administered at any time, in any department, including patients with contraindications to PE, or in intensive care units. In CIDP, at least four RCTs have demonstrated the efficacy of IVIg in over 60% of CIDP patients, while two additional RCTs have shown a comparable effect to steroids and PE as initial treatment. As with PE, the effects of IVIg usually last a few weeks meaning that the majority of patients require periodic maintenance infusions. The lower cost and easier administration of oral steroids compared to IVIg may be partly compensated by the safer long-term profile of IVIg over steroids. In MMN, almost 80% of patients improve with IVIg, the efficacy of which has been confirmed by four RCTs, making of IVIg the first-choice therapy in MMN, for which steroids and PE are ineffective or even detrimental. Also in these patients, IVIg induces a rapid improvement that usually lasts only a few weeks and has to be maintained with periodic IVIg infusions for long periods of time, if not indefinitely.

Treatment of dysimmune neuropathies

Several therapies are currently used in dys-immune neuropathies including steroids,plasma exchange (PE), high-dose intravenous immunoglobulins(IVIg), and immuno-suppressive agents (IS). Even if there is substantial evidence that these treatments may improve the course of the neuropathy, their effectiveness is far from being complete and is sometime hampered by the occurrence of associated side effects. In Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS),IVIg and PE are similarly effective in accelerating the recovery but there is still little evidence that they can reduce mortality or long-term disability. Recent reports on the association of intravenous methylprednisolone or interferon-beta (IFN-beta) to IVIg did not result in significant further improvement. In chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy(CIDP) steroids, PE, and IVIG are initially similarly effective. The short-term effect of PE and IVIgand the side effects associated with the long-term use of steroids have prompted the use of several IS, interferon and,more recently, the anti-CD20 monoclonal-antibody Rituximab, but their efficacy has still to be proved in controlled studies. The recent identification of multifocal motor neuropathy(MMN) was shortly followed by the finding of an effective therapy. Almost 80% of patients respond toIVIg whose effect needs to be maintained with periodic infusions for long periods of time, and tends to decrease after several years. Also in this condition a number of immune modulating agents have been used to reduce the frequency or improve the effectiveness of IVIg,but their efficacy has not been sofar confirmed in randomized trials. Similar conclusions can be drawn for neuropathies associated with monoclonal gammopathies where only PE and IVIg have proved to be effective in controlled studies,while the promising initial results obtained with Rituximab in neuropathy associated IgM monoclonal gammopathy awaits confirmation from controlled trials.