Heparin versus placebo for acute coronary syndromes

Anticoagulation during and after acute coronary syndrome

Current antithrombotic therapy in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) comprises antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapy. Dual antiplatelet therapy composed of aspirin plus a third generation P2Y12 inhibitor (prasugrel or ticagrelor) represents the gold standard, while aspirin plus second generation P2Y12 inhibitor (clopidogrel) may be used as an alternative in the presence of contraindications for third generation P2Y12 inhibitors and/or a high risk of bleeding. Unfractionated heparin (UFH) has been the unchallenged mainstay in anticoagulation for ACS for many decades and is still widely used in patients with ACS treated interventionally. Novel alternative parenteral anticoagulant strategies include the low molecular weight heparin enoxaparin and the synthetic pentas-accharide fondaparinux. Both of these agents share advantages over UFH particularly in medically treated patients with ACS not scheduled for PCI. The direct parenteral factor IIa (thrombin) inhibitor bivalirudin, when used as sole anticoagulant in patients with ACS undergoing PCI, is as effective as the regimen of UFH plus GPIIb/IIIa inhibitor in NSTEMI and superior to the latter regimen in patients with STEMI. The novel approach of a long-term low dose factor Xa inhibition with rivaroxaban in the post ACS phase even further reduced cardiovascular mortality in a clinical trial but has yet to be established in daily clinical practice in the setting of third generation P2Y12 inhibitors. This review discusses currently clinically established anticoagulants for the treatment of ACS alongside with novel approaches such as rivaroxaban.

Heparin versus placebo for non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes

BACKGROUND

Non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTEACS) represent a spectrum of disease including unstable angina and non-ST segment myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). Despite treatment with aspirin, beta-blockers and nitroglycerin, unstable angina/NSTEMI is still associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Although evidence suggests that low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) is more efficacious compared to unfractionated heparin (UFH), there is limited data to support the role of heparins as a drug class in the treatment of NSTEACS. This is an update of a review last published in 2008.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effect of heparins (UFH and LMWH) compared with placebo for the treatment of patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes (unstable angina or NSTEMI).

SEARCH METHODS

For this update the Cochrane Heart Group Trials Search Co-ordinator searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials on The Cochrane Library (2013, Issue 12), MEDLINE (OVID, 1946 to January week 1 2014), EMBASE (OVID, 1947 to 2014 week 02), CINAHL (1937 to 15 January 2014) and LILACS (1982 to 15 January 2014). We applied no language restrictions.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized controlled trials of parenteral UFH or LMWH versus placebo in people with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes (unstable angina or NSTEMI).

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed quality of studies and independently extracted data.

MAIN RESULTS

There were no new included studies for this update. Eight studies (3118 participants) were included in this review. We found no evidence for difference in overall mortality between the groups treated with heparin and placebo (risk ratio (RR) = 0.84, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.36 to 1.98). Heparins compared with placebo, reduced the occurrence of myocardial infarction in patients with unstable angina and NSTEMI (RR = 0.40, 95% CI 0.25 to 0.63, number needed to benefit (NNTB) = 33). There was a trend towards more major bleeds in the heparin studies compared to control studies (RR = 2.05, 95% CI 0.91 to 4.60). From a limited data set, there appeared to be no difference between patients treated with heparins compared to control in the occurrence of thrombocytopenia (RR = 0.20, 95% CI 0.01 to 4.24). Assessment of overall risk of bias in these studies was limited as most of the studies did not give sufficient detail to allow assessment of potential risk of bias.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Compared with placebo, patients treated with heparins had a similar risk of mortality, revascularization, recurrent angina, and thrombocytopenia. However, those treated with heparins had a decreased risk of myocardial infarction and a higher incidence of minor bleeding. Overall, the evidence assessed in this review was classified as low quality according to the GRADE approach. The results presented in this review must therefore be interpreted with caution.

Cost-effectiveness of optimal use of acute myocardial infarction treatments and impact on coronary heart disease mortality in China

BACKGROUND

The cost-effectiveness of the optimal use of hospital-based acute myocardial infarction (AMI) treatments and their potential impact on coronary heart disease (CHD) mortality in China is not well known.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The effectiveness and costs of optimal use of hospital-based AMI treatments were estimated by the CHD Policy Model-China, a Markov-style computer simulation model. Changes in simulated AMI, CHD mortality, quality-adjusted life years, and total healthcare costs were the outcomes. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was used to assess projected cost-effectiveness. Optimal use of 4 oral drugs (aspirin, β-blockers, statins, and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors) in all eligible patients with AMI or unfractionated heparin in non-ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction was a highly cost-effective strategy (incremental cost-effectiveness ratios approximately US $3100 or less). Optimal use of reperfusion therapies in eligible patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction was moderately cost effective (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio ≤$10,700). Optimal use of clopidogrel for all eligible patients with AMI or primary percutaneous coronary intervention among high-risk patients with non-ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction in tertiary hospitals alone was less cost effective. Use of all the selected hospital-based AMI treatment strategies together would be cost-effective and reduce the total CHD mortality rate in China by ≈9.6%.

CONCLUSIONS

Optimal use of most standard hospital-based AMI treatment strategies, especially combined strategies, would be cost effective in China. However, because so many AMI deaths occur outside of the hospital in China, the overall impact on preventing CHD deaths was projected to be modest.

The non-anticoagulant heparin-like K5 polysaccharide derivative K5-N,OSepi attenuates myocardial ischaemia/reperfusion injury

Heparin and low molecular weight heparins have been demonstrated to reduce myocardial ischaemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury, although their use is hampered by the risk of haemorrhagic and thrombotic complications. Chemical and enzymatic modifications of K5 polysaccharide have shown the possibility of producing heparin-like compounds with low anticoagulant activity and strong anti-inflammatory effects. Using a rat model of regional myocardial I/R, we investigated the effects of an epimerized N-,O-sulphated K5 polysaccharide derivative, K5-N,OSepi, on infarct size and histological signs of myocardial injury caused by 30 min. ligature of the left anterior descending coronary artery followed by 1 or 24 h reperfusion. K5-N,OSepi (0.1-1 mg/kg given i.v. 15 min. before reperfusion) significantly reduced the extent of myocardial damage in a dose-dependent manner. Furthermore, we investigated the potential mechanism(s) of the cardioprotective effect(s) afforded by K5-N,OSepi. In left ventricular samples, I/R induced mast cell degranulation and a robust increase in lipid peroxidation, free radical-induced DNA damage and calcium overload. Markers of neutrophil infiltration and activation were also induced by I/R in rat hearts, specifically myeloperoxidase activity, intercellular-adhesion-molecule-1 expression, prostaglandin-E(2) and tumour-necrosis-factor-α production. The robust increase in oxidative stress and inflammatory markers was blunted by K5-N,OSepi, in a dose-dependent manner, with maximum at 1 mg/kg. Furthermore, K5-N,OSepi administration attenuated the increase in caspase 3 activity, Bid and Bax activation and ameliorated the decrease in expression of Bcl-2 within the ischaemic myocardium. In conclusion, we demonstrate that the cardioprotective effect of the non-anticoagulant K5 derivative K5-N,OSepi is secondary to a combination of anti-apoptotic and anti-inflammatory effects.

Adverse effects of heparin

All the adverse effects of heparins are related to their wide variety of biological activities, with bleeding being the most important safety issue, resulting directly from the potency of heparin as an anticoagulant. However, it is hard to define the bleeding risk, since it depends on numerous parameters including the indication, dosage, method, and duration of heparin application, the clinical study design and definition of bleeding as well as patient characteristics and determinants of bleeding such as type of surgery and co-medication. Nonbleeding complications of heparins are caused by binding of heparin molecules to proteins other than antithrombin and to cells, which is generally more pronounced with unfractionated heparin than with low-molecular-weight heparins. Accordingly, heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, the most severe nonbleeding adverse reaction, occurs about 10 times less with low-molecular-weight heparins than with unfractionated heparin. Frequent and therefore important adverse reactions of heparins are skin lesions resulting from delayed-type hypersensitivity reactions. All the other undesirable effects are discussed as well, but they are mostly clinically irrelevant.

Evaluation of bleeding risk in patients exposed to therapeutic unfractionated or low-molecular-weight heparin: a cohort study in the context of a quality improvement initiative

BACKGROUND

Bleeding associated with the use of unfractionated heparin (UFH) and low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) can be a serious complication of health-care management and should be the focus of quality improvement initiatives by institutions.

OBJECTIVE

To measure the incidence of bleeding with UFH and LMWH and evaluate associated risk factors.

METHODS

An observational cohort study was conducted at a secondary and tertiary care hospital in Canada. All adults receiving therapeutic doses of UFH or LMWH between April 2006 and March 2007, with the exception of cardiac surgery patients, were included. Bleeding episodes were classified per the GUSTO scale.

RESULTS

Of 3066 hospitalizations, the incidence of moderate or severe bleeding was 3.5%. Advanced age (OR 1.02, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.04; p < 0.001), female sex (OR 1.80, 95% CI 1.21 to 2.66; p = 0.003), UFH instead of LMWH (OR 4.72, 95% CI 2.17 to 10.30; p < 0.001), creatinine clearance (CrCl) (OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.84 to 0.95; p < 0.001, for a difference of 10 mL/min in CrCl), and supratherapeutic activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) (OR 3.88, 95% CI 2.25 to 6.69; p < 0.001 for >180 vs <90 seconds) were associated with a higher risk of bleeding in univariate analysis. In a multivariate model without aPTT, CrCl (OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.85 to 0.96; p < 0.001, for a difference of 10 mL/min in CrCl) and UFH (OR 2.35, 95% CI 1.11 to 4.98; p = 0.005) were significant predictors of bleeding. Among the bleeding episodes, 31% were in a postoperative context and 15% were following a puncture.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings show that CrCl and aPTT values, as well as the type of heparin used, are significant predictors of bleeding in patients receiving UFH or LMWH and that dosages should be adjusted to patient weight. The reason for all supratherapeutic aPTT levels should be sought and corrective measures taken immediately.