1
|
Vaidakis D, Papapanou M, Siristatidis CS. Autologous platelet-rich plasma for assisted reproduction. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2024; 4:CD013875. [PMID: 38682756 PMCID: PMC11057220 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd013875.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/01/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Autologous platelet-rich plasma (PRP) consists of plasma and a concentrate of platelets extracted from fresh whole blood of the person being treated. Research has suggested that intrauterine or intraovarian infusion/injection of PRP before embryo transfer may improve endometrial receptivity and response to ovarian stimulation in women undergoing assisted reproduction. We compared these interventions to standard treatment, placebo, or other interventions (mechanical or pharmacological). OBJECTIVES To assess the effectiveness and safety of intrauterine and intraovarian infusion/injection of platelet-rich plasma in infertile women undergoing assisted reproductive technology cycles. SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Gynaecology and Fertility Group's Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, and the Epistemonikos database in January 2023. We also searched the reference lists of relevant articles and contacted the trial authors and experts in the field for any additional trials. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated the application of PRP in the uterine cavity, ovaries, or both versus no intervention, placebo, or any other intervention (either mechanical or pharmacological) in women undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We followed standard methodological procedures recommended by Cochrane, including use of the updated risk of bias tool (RoB 2). The primary outcomes were live birth (or ongoing pregnancy) and miscarriage. The secondary outcomes were clinical pregnancy, complications of the procedure, multiple pregnancy, ectopic pregnancy, fetal growth restriction, preterm delivery, and fetal abnormality. We estimated the average effect of the interventions by fitting a Der Simonian-Laird's random-effects meta-analysis model. We reported pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We restricted the primary analyses to trials at low risk of bias for the outcomes and performed sensitivity analyses that included all studies. MAIN RESULTS We included 12 parallel-group RCTs that recruited a total of 1069 women. We identified three different comparison groups. Using GRADE, we assessed the certainty of evidence as very low for almost all outcomes. Intrauterine injection/infusion of platelet-rich plasma versus no intervention or placebo Nine studies evaluated intrauterine PRP versus no intervention or placebo. Eight included women with at least two or three previous implantation failures. Only one was assessed at low risk of bias for each outcome. This study provided very low-certainty evidence about the effect of intrauterine PRP injection versus no intervention on live birth (OR 1.10, 95% CI 0.38 to 3.14; 94 women) and miscarriage (OR 0.96, 95% CI 0.13 to 7.09; 94 women). If the likelihood of live birth following no intervention is assumed to be 17%, then the likelihood following intrauterine PRP would be 7% to 40%; and if the risk of miscarriage following no intervention is 4%, then the risk following intrauterine PRP would be 1% to 24%. When we analyzed all studies (regardless of risk of bias), we found very low-certainty evidence about the effect of intrauterine PRP compared with placebo or no intervention on live birth or ongoing pregnancy (OR 2.38, 95% CI 1.16 to 4.86; I² = 54%; 6 studies, 564 women) and miscarriage (OR 1.54, 95% CI 0.59 to 4.01; I² = 0%; 5 studies, 504 women). The study at low risk of bias provided very low-certainty evidence about the effect of intrauterine PRP compared with no intervention on clinical pregnancy (OR 1.55, 95% CI 0.64 to 3.76; 94 women) and ectopic pregnancy (OR 2.94, 95% CI 0.12 to 73.95; 94 women). The synthesis of all studies provided very low-certainty evidence about the effect of intrauterine PRP compared with placebo or no intervention on clinical pregnancy (OR 2.22, 95% CI 1.50 to 3.27; I² = 24%; 9 studies, 824 women), multiple pregnancy (OR 2.68, 95% CI 0.81 to 8.88; I² = 0%; 2 studies, 240 women), and ectopic pregnancy (OR 2.94, 95% CI 0.12 to 73.95; 1 study, 94 women; very low-certainty evidence). Intrauterine infusion of PRP may increase the risk of preterm delivery compared with no intervention (OR 8.02, 95% CI 1.72 to 37.33; 1 study, 120 women; low-certainty evidence). No studies reported pain, infection, allergic reaction, fetal growth restriction, or fetal abnormality. Intrauterine infusion of platelet-rich plasma versus intrauterine infusion of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor Two RCTs evaluated intrauterine PRP versus intrauterine granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF); both included women with thin endometrium, and neither was judged at low risk of bias for any outcome. We are uncertain about the effect of intrauterine PRP compared with intrauterine G-CSF on live birth (OR 0.88, 95% CI 0.43 to 1.81; 1 study, 132 women; very low-certainty evidence), miscarriage (OR 1.94, 95% CI 0.63 to 5.96; 1 study, 132 women; very low-certainty evidence), and clinical pregnancy (OR 1.24, 95% CI 0.66 to 2.35; 2 studies, 172 women; very low-certainty evidence). Neither study reported adverse outcomes other than miscarriage. Intraovarian injection of platelet-rich plasma versus no intervention One RCT evaluated PRP injection into both ovaries versus no intervention; it was judged at high risk of bias for the two outcomes it reported. We are uncertain about the effect of intraovarian PRP injection compared with no intervention on ongoing pregnancy (OR 1.09, 95% CI 0.33 to 3.63; 73 women; very low-certainty evidence) and clinical pregnancy (OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.31 to 2.60; 73 women; very low-certainty evidence). The study examined no safety outcomes. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS We are uncertain about the effect of intrauterine or intraovarian administration of PRP on outcomes of assisted reproduction technology in infertile women. The pooled results should be interpreted with caution. Only one of the 12 included studies was judged at low risk of bias. Other limitations of the included trials were failure to report live birth, poor reporting of methods, lack of prospective protocol registration, low precision due to the small number of enrolled participants, indirectness due to the specific subpopulations and settings studied, and insufficient or absent safety data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dennis Vaidakis
- Department of Basic and Clinical Sciences, Medical School, University of Nicosia, Nicosia, Cyprus
| | - Michail Papapanou
- Second Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Aretaieion University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
- Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine Working Group, Society of Junior Doctors, Athens, Greece
| | - Charalampos S Siristatidis
- Assisted Reproduction Unit, 2nd Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Alfitian J, Scheyerer MJ, Rohde A, Schick V, Kammerer T, Schier R. Omission of tranexamic acid does not increase the amount of perioperative blood transfusions in patients undergoing one-level spinal fusion surgery: a retrospective propensity score-matched noninferiority study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2022; 143:2943-2950. [PMID: 35708870 DOI: 10.1007/s00402-022-04494-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2021] [Accepted: 05/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Application of tranexamic acid (TXA) in spine surgery is very frequent even without signs of hyperfibrinolysis, although its beneficial blood-saving effects are offset by harmful adverse events such as thromboembolic incidents. Thus, we investigated whether in relatively less invasive spinal procedures such as one-level posterior spinal fusion, omission of TXA affects the requirement for blood transfusions. METHODS We conducted a retrospective propensity score-matched noninferiority study with 212 patients who underwent one-level posterior spine fusion and who were stratified according to whether they received TXA intraoperatively at our tertiary care center. The primary endpoint was the volume of transfused packed red cells. Testing for noninferiority or equivalence was performed by two one-sided testing procedure (TOST) with a priori defined noninferiority margins ([Formula: see text]). RESULTS After propensity score matching a total of five patients (11.6%) treated with TXA were transfused compared with five patients (11.6%) who did not receive TXA. The majority of patients (51.2%) had a risk-increasing condition. The risk difference (no TXA-TXA) of intraoperative transfusion was - 4.7% (CI 90% - 13.62 to 4.32%), and omitting TXA was noninferior ([Formula: see text] = [Formula: see text] 10%). The mean intergroup difference in transfused volume (no TXA-TXA) was - 23.26 ml intraoperatively (CI 90% - 69.34 to 22.83 ml) and - 46.51 ml overall (CI 90% - 181.12 to 88.1 ml), respectively, suggesting equivalence of TXA omission ([Formula: see text] = [Formula: see text] 300 ml). The hemoglobin decline between both groups was also equivalent (with [Formula: see text] = [Formula: see text] 1 g/dl) both on the first postoperative day ([Formula: see text] Hb = 0.02 g/dl, CI 90% - 0.53 to 0.56 g/dl) and at discharge ([Formula: see text] Hb = - 0.29 g/dl, CI 90% - 0.89 to 0.31 g/dl). CONCLUSION We demonstrated that requirement of transfusion is rare among one-level fusion surgery and the omission of TXA is noninferior with regard to blood transfusion in high-risk patients undergoing this procedure. Therefore, the prophylactic use of TXA cannot be recommended here, suggesting to focus on alternative blood conservation strategies, if necessary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonas Alfitian
- University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
| | - Max Joseph Scheyerer
- University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany
| | - Axel Rohde
- University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany
| | - Volker Schick
- University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany
| | - Tobias Kammerer
- University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany
| | - Robert Schier
- University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Karjalainen TV, Silagy M, O'Bryan E, Johnston RV, Cyril S, Buchbinder R. Autologous blood and platelet-rich plasma injection therapy for lateral elbow pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2021; 9:CD010951. [PMID: 34590307 PMCID: PMC8481072 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd010951.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Autologous whole blood or platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injections are commonly used to treat lateral elbow pain (also known as tennis elbow or lateral epicondylitis or epicondylalgia). Based on animal models and observational studies, these injections may modulate tendon injury healing, but randomised controlled trials have reported inconsistent results regarding benefit for people with lateral elbow pain. OBJECTIVES To review current evidence on the benefit and safety of autologous whole blood or platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injection for treatment of people with lateral elbow pain. SEARCH METHODS We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and Embase for published trials, and Clinicaltrials.gov and the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) search portal for ongoing trials, on 18 September 2020. SELECTION CRITERIA We included all randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs comparing autologous whole blood or PRP injection therapy to another therapy (placebo or active treatment, including non-pharmacological therapies, and comparison between PRP and autologous blood) for lateral elbow pain. The primary comparison was PRP versus placebo. Major outcomes were pain relief (≥ 30% or ≥ 50%), mean pain, mean function, treatment success, quality of life, withdrawal due to adverse events, and adverse events; the primary time point was three months. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. MAIN RESULTS We included 32 studies with 2337 participants; 56% of participants were female, mean age varied between 36 and 53 years, and mean duration of symptoms ranged from 1 to 22 months. Seven trials had three intervention arms. Ten trials compared autologous blood or PRP injection to placebo injection (primary comparison). Fifteen trials compared autologous blood or PRP injection to glucocorticoid injection. Four studies compared autologous blood to PRP. Two trials compared autologous blood or PRP injection plus tennis elbow strap and exercise versus tennis elbow strap and exercise alone. Two trials compared PRP injection to surgery, and one trial compared PRP injection and dry needling to dry needling alone. Other comparisons include autologous blood versus extracorporeal shock wave therapy; PRP versus arthroscopic surgery; PRP versus laser; and autologous blood versus polidocanol. Most studies were at risk of selection, performance, and detection biases, mainly due to inadequate allocation concealment and lack of participant blinding. We found moderate-certainty evidence (downgraded for bias) to show that autologous blood or PRP injection probably does not provide clinically significant improvement in pain or function compared with placebo injection at three months. Further, low-certainty evidence (downgraded for bias and imprecision) suggests that PRP may not increase risk for adverse events. We are uncertain whether autologous blood or PRP injection improves treatment success (downgraded for bias, imprecision, and indirectness) or withdrawals due to adverse events (downgraded for bias and twice for imprecision). No studies measured health-related quality of life, and no studies reported pain relief (> 30% or 50%) at three months. At three months, mean pain was 3.7 points (0 to 10; 0 is best) with placebo and 0.16 points better (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.60 better to 0.29 worse; 8 studies, 523 participants) with autologous blood or PRP injection, for absolute improvement of 1.6% better (6% better to 3% worse). At three months, mean function was 27.5 points (0 to 100; 0 is best) with placebo and 1.86 points better (95% CI 4.9 better to 1.25 worse; 8 studies, 502 participants) with autologous blood or PRP injection, for absolute benefit of 1.9% (5% better to 1% worse), and treatment success was 121 out of 185 (65%) with placebo versus 125 out of 187 (67%) with autologous blood or PRP injection (risk ratio (RR) 1.00; 95% CI 0.83 to 1.19; 4 studies, 372 participants), for absolute improvement of 0% (11.1% lower to 12.4% higher). Regarding harm, we found very low-certainty evidence to suggest that we are uncertain whether withdrawal rates due to adverse events differed. Low-certainty evidence suggests that autologous blood or PRP injection may not increase adverse events compared with placebo injection. Withdrawal due to adverse events occurred in 3 out of 39 (8%) participants treated with placebo versus 1 out of 41 (2%) treated with autologous blood or PRP injection (RR 0.32, 95% CI 0.03 to 2.92; 1 study), for an absolute difference of 5.2% fewer (7.5% fewer to 14.8% more). Adverse event rates were 35 out of 208 (17%) with placebo versus 41 out of 217 (19%) with autologous blood or PRP injection (RR 1.14, 95% CI 0.76 to 1.72; 5 studies; 425 participants), for an absolute difference of 2.4% more (4% fewer to 12% more). At six and twelve months, no clinically important benefit for mean pain or function was observed with autologous blood or PRP injection compared with placebo injection. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Data in this review do not support the use of autologous blood or PRP injection for treatment of lateral elbow pain. These injections probably provide little or no clinically important benefit for pain or function (moderate-certainty evidence), and it is uncertain (very low-certainty evidence) whether they improve treatment success and pain relief > 50%, or increase withdrawal due to adverse events. Although risk for harm may not be increased compared with placebo injection (low-certainty evidence), injection therapies cause pain and carry a small risk of infection. With no evidence of benefit, the costs and risks are not justified.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Teemu V Karjalainen
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University; Monash-Cabrini Department of Musculoskeletal Health and Clinical Epidemiology, Cabrini Health, Melbourne, Australia
- Department of Surgery, Central Finland Hospital Nova, Jyvaskyla, Finland
| | - Michael Silagy
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University; Monash-Cabrini Department of Musculoskeletal Health and Clinical Epidemiology, Cabrini Health, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Edward O'Bryan
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University; Monash-Cabrini Department of Musculoskeletal Health and Clinical Epidemiology, Cabrini Health, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Renea V Johnston
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University; Monash-Cabrini Department of Musculoskeletal Health and Clinical Epidemiology, Cabrini Health, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Sheila Cyril
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University; Monash-Cabrini Department of Musculoskeletal Health and Clinical Epidemiology, Cabrini Health, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Rachelle Buchbinder
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University; Monash-Cabrini Department of Musculoskeletal Health and Clinical Epidemiology, Cabrini Health, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Vaidakis D, Sertedaki E, Karageorgiou V, Siristatidis CS. Autologous platelet-rich plasma for assisted reproduction. Hippokratia 2021. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd013875] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Dennis Vaidakis
- Department of Basic and Clinical Sciences; University of Nicosia; Nicosia Cyprus
| | | | - Vasilios Karageorgiou
- Second Department of Psychiatry; Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens; Athens Greece
| | - Charalampos S Siristatidis
- Assisted Reproduction Unit, 2nd Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology; Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens; Athens Greece
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
A humoral solution: Autologous blood products and tissue repair. Cell Immunol 2020; 356:104178. [PMID: 32861105 DOI: 10.1016/j.cellimm.2020.104178] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/29/2020] [Revised: 07/12/2020] [Accepted: 07/13/2020] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
Autologous blood-derived products (ABP) are the focus of growing scientific interest and are investigated and used for multiple medical indications. ABPs hold promise thanks to their availability, ease of preparation, and low risk of adverse allogenic reaction, hypersensitivity, and contamination. Compositional analysis of ABPs reveals a diverse mixture of cellular components, cytokines and growth factors that play roles in healing processes such as tissue proliferation and angiogenesis, modulation of the local environment through chemotaxis and regulation of inflammation and the extracellular matrix, as well as several immunomodulatory actions. Thus, the administration of ABP induces supraphysiological levels of components necessary for orchestrating reparative efforts in currently difficult-to-treat medical conditions. In this article, we review the variety of autologous blood-derived products, their composition, current clinical uses, regulatory climate, and mechanisms of action.
Collapse
|
6
|
Jacob B, Kloss N, Böhle S, Kirschberg J, Zippelius T, Heinecke M, Matziolis G, Röhner E. Tranexamic acid is toxic on human chondrocytes, in vitro. J Orthop 2020; 20:1-5. [PMID: 32021047 PMCID: PMC6994788 DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2019.12.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2019] [Accepted: 12/11/2019] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
The aim of this study was to examine toxic effects of tranexamic acid (TXA) on the viability of human chondrocytes. Our hypothesis was that TXA damages human chondrocytes. Chondrocytes were cultured from donated human knee joints. TXA was added to these cultures. Toxicity were analyzed by using LDH und XTT Elisa assays, light microscopy and fluorescence microscopy. The results show that TXA damages human chondrocytes in vitro. We cannot recommend the use of TXA in hemiarthroplasty of the hip or unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in higher concentrations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Eric Röhner
- Orthopaedic Professorship of the University Hospital Jena, Orthopaedic Department of the Waldkliniken Eisenberg, 07607, Eisenberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Lu Q, Peng H, Zhou G, Yin D. Perioperative Blood Management Strategies for Total Knee Arthroplasty. Orthop Surg 2018; 10:8-16. [PMID: 29424017 PMCID: PMC6594499 DOI: 10.1111/os.12361] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2017] [Accepted: 11/24/2017] [Indexed: 01/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) often causes a significant amount of blood loss with an accompanying decline in hemoglobin and may increase the frequency of allogeneic blood transfusion rates. Unfortunately, allogeneic blood transfusions have associated risks including postoperative confusion, infection, cardiac arrhythmia, fluid overload, increased length of hospital stay, and increased mortality. Other than reducing the need for blood transfusions, reducing perioperative blood loss in TKA may also minimize intra-articular hemorrhage, limb swelling, and postoperative pain, and increase the range of motion during the early postoperative period. These benefits improve rehabilitation success and increase patients' postoperative satisfaction. Preoperative anemia, coupled with intraoperative and postoperative blood loss, is a major factor associated with higher rates of blood transfusion in TKA. Thus, treatment of preoperative anemia and prevention of perioperative blood loss are the primary strategies for perioperative blood management in TKA. This review, combined with current evidence, analyzes various methods of blood conservation, including preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative methods, in terms of their effectiveness, safety, and cost. Because many factors can be controlled to reduce blood loss and transfusion rates in TKA, a highly efficient, safe, and cost-effective blood management strategy can be constructed to eliminate the need for transfusions associated with TKA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qiang Lu
- Department of OrthopaedicsRenmin Hospital of Wuhan UniversityWuhanChina
| | - Hao Peng
- Department of OrthopaedicsRenmin Hospital of Wuhan UniversityWuhanChina
| | - Guan‐jin Zhou
- Department of Orthopaedics, Puai Hospital, Tongji Medical CollegeHuazhong University of Science and TechnologyWuhanChina
| | - Dong Yin
- Department of OrthopaedicsThe People’s Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous RegionNanningChina
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Lee AT, Barnes CR, Jain S, Pauldine R. High Dose, Prolonged Epsilon Aminocaproic Acid Infusion, and Recombinant Factor VII for Massive Postoperative Retroperitoneal Hemorrhage following Splenectomy. Case Rep Anesthesiol 2016; 2016:1630385. [PMID: 27957347 PMCID: PMC5121457 DOI: 10.1155/2016/1630385] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2016] [Revised: 10/11/2016] [Accepted: 10/18/2016] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
The antifibrinolytic agent ε-aminocaproic acid is used to decrease procedural blood loss in a variety of high risk surgeries. The utility of recombinant factor VII administration in massive hemorrhage has also been reported in a variety of settings, though the impact in a surgical context remains unclear. We describe the case of a patient who underwent massive open splenectomy and developed diffuse retroperitoneal bleeding on postoperative day one. Massive transfusion was initiated, but attempts to control hemorrhage with surgical and interventional radiology approaches were unsuccessful, as was recombinant factor VII administration. Commencement of a high dose aminocaproic acid infusion was followed by a prominent rise in fibrinogen levels and stabilization of the hemorrhage. Indications, dosages, and adverse effects of ε-aminocaproic acid as described in the literature are reviewed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alex T. Lee
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Christopher R. Barnes
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Shweta Jain
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Ronald Pauldine
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Llau JV, Acosta FJ, Escolar G, Fernández-Mondéjar E, Guasch E, Marco P, Paniagua P, Páramo JA, Quintana M, Torrabadella P. [Multidisciplinary consensus document on the management of massive haemorrhage (HEMOMAS document)]. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2015; 63:e1-e22. [PMID: 26688462 DOI: 10.1016/j.redar.2015.11.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2015] [Accepted: 05/17/2015] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Massive haemorrhage is common and often associated with high morbidity and mortality. We perform a systematic review of the literature, with extraction of the recommendations from the existing evidences because of the need for its improvement and the management standardization. From the results we found, we wrote a multidisciplinary consensus document. We begin with the agreement in the definitions of massive haemorrhage and massive transfusion, and we do structured recommendations on their general management (clinical assessment of bleeding, hypothermia management, fluid therapy, hypotensive resuscitation and damage control surgery), blood volume monitoring, blood products transfusion (red blood cells, fresh frozen plasma, platelets and their best transfusion ratio), and administration of hemostatic components (prothrombin complex, fibrinogen, factor VIIa, antifibrinolytic agents).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J V Llau
- Anestesia y Reanimación, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, España
| | - F J Acosta
- Anestesia y Reanimación, Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca, El Palmar, Murcia, España
| | - G Escolar
- Hemoterapia y Hematología, Hospital Clínic i Provincial de Barcelona, Barcelona, España
| | - E Fernández-Mondéjar
- Servicio de Cuidados Críticos y Urgencias, Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves; Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria ibs.Granada, Granada, España.
| | - E Guasch
- Anestesia y Reanimación, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, España
| | - P Marco
- Hemoterapia y Hematología, Hospital General de Alicante, Alicante, España
| | - P Paniagua
- Anestesia y Reanimación, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, España
| | - J A Páramo
- Hematología y Hemoterapia, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, España
| | - M Quintana
- Medicina Intensiva, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, España
| | - P Torrabadella
- Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos, Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Barcelona, España
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Llau JV, Acosta FJ, Escolar G, Fernández-Mondéjar E, Guasch E, Marco P, Paniagua P, Páramo JA, Quintana M, Torrabadella P. Multidisciplinary consensus document on the management of massive haemorrhage (HEMOMAS document). Med Intensiva 2015; 39:483-504. [PMID: 26233588 DOI: 10.1016/j.medin.2015.05.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2015] [Revised: 05/14/2015] [Accepted: 05/17/2015] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
Massive haemorrhage is common and often associated with high morbidity and mortality. We perform a systematic review of the literature, with extraction of the recommendations from the existing evidences because of the need for its improvement and the management standardization. From the results we found, we wrote a multidisciplinary consensus document. We begin with the agreement in the definitions of massive haemorrhage and massive transfusion, and we do structured recommendations on their general management (clinical assessment of bleeding, hypothermia management, fluid therapy, hypotensive resuscitation and damage control surgery), blood volume monitoring, blood products transfusion (red blood cells, fresh frozen plasma, platelets and their best transfusion ratio), and administration of hemostatic components (prothrombin complex, fibrinogen, factor VIIa, antifibrinolytic agents).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J V Llau
- Anestesia y Reanimación, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, España
| | - F J Acosta
- Anestesia y Reanimación, Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca, El Palmar, Murcia, España
| | - G Escolar
- Hemoterapia y Hematología, Hospital Clínic i Provincial de Barcelona, Barcelona, España
| | - E Fernández-Mondéjar
- Servicio de Cuidados Críticos y Urgencias, Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves; Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria ibs.Granada, Granada, España.
| | - E Guasch
- Anestesia y Reanimación, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, España
| | - P Marco
- Hemoterapia y Hematología, Hospital General de Alicante, Alicante, España
| | - P Paniagua
- Anestesia y Reanimación, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, España
| | - J A Páramo
- Hematología y Hemoterapia, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, España
| | - M Quintana
- Medicina Intensiva, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, España
| | - P Torrabadella
- Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos, Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Barcelona, España
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Silagy M, O'Bryan E, Johnston RV, Buchbinder R. Autologous blood and platelet rich plasma injection therapy for lateral elbow pain. Hippokratia 2014. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd010951] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Silagy
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University; Monash Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Cabrini Hospital; Suite 41, Cabrini Medical Centre 183 Wattletree Road Malvern Victoria Australia 3144
| | - Edward O'Bryan
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University; Monash Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Cabrini Hospital; Suite 41, Cabrini Medical Centre 183 Wattletree Road Malvern Victoria Australia 3144
| | - Renea V Johnston
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University; Monash Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Cabrini Hospital; Suite 41, Cabrini Medical Centre 183 Wattletree Road Malvern Victoria Australia 3144
| | - Rachelle Buchbinder
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University; Monash Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Cabrini Hospital; Suite 41, Cabrini Medical Centre 183 Wattletree Road Malvern Victoria Australia 3144
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Ubezio G, Ghio M, Contini P, Bertorello R, Marino G, Tomasini A, Tripodi G. Bio-modulators in platelet-rich plasma: a comparison of the amounts in products from healthy donors and patients produced with three different techniques. BLOOD TRANSFUSION = TRASFUSIONE DEL SANGUE 2014; 12 Suppl 1:s214-20. [PMID: 23399357 PMCID: PMC3934217 DOI: 10.2450/2012.0128-12] [Citation(s) in RCA: 72] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2012] [Accepted: 10/01/2012] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Platelet-rich plasma consists of platelets concentrated in a small volume of plasma and constitutes a reservoir of bio-modulators potentially useful in tissue repair. The amounts of bio-modulators detectable in platelet-rich plasma prepared with various commercial or "in house" methods have been reported, but virtually all the analyses described have been performed on platelet-rich plasma derived from healthy donors. Since leucocyte contamination is technically unavoidable, we investigated whether platelet-rich plasma prepared from patients could contain different amounts of bio-modulators because of a possible activated status of the leucocytes. MATERIALS AND METHODS We evaluated platelet-rich plasma prepared with three different techniques (the commercial Vivostat and Biomet recover GPS II systems and an "in house" method) starting from whole blood from healthy donors and patients. Specifically, we compared the levels of sHLA-I, sFasL, platelet-derived growth factor, transforming growth factors-beta and vascular endothelial growth factor in the platelet-rich plasma releasates according to the method of preparation and to the immune system activation status of the subjects. RESULTS With the exception of sHLA-I levels, no differences were found in the surrogate indices of lymphocyte activation between healthy donors and patients. No significant differences were found in sHLA-I, sFasL, platelet-derived growth factor, transforming growth factors-beta and vascular endothelial growth factor levels detectable in platelet-rich plasma produced with the three different methods in either healthy donors or patients. DISCUSSION On the whole our findings indicate that the overall content of bio-modulators in autologous platelet-rich plasma is not influenced by T-lymphocyte activation status, at least in patients with uncomplicated femoral fractures. The amounts of sFasL and sHLA-I detected in all the platelet-rich plasma releasates studied were very small, far below the amounts detectable in all clinically available blood derivatives and absolutely insufficient to induce sHLA-I and/or sFasL mediated immunomodulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gianluca Ubezio
- Department of Internal Medicine, I.R.C.C.S. “A.O.U. San Martino-IST” and University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Massimo Ghio
- Department of Internal Medicine, I.R.C.C.S. “A.O.U. San Martino-IST” and University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Paola Contini
- Department of Internal Medicine, I.R.C.C.S. “A.O.U. San Martino-IST” and University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Roberta Bertorello
- Immunohaematology and Transfusion Medicine Unit, Santa Corona Hospital ASL2, Savona, Italy
| | - Gennaro Marino
- Immunohaematology and Transfusion Medicine Unit, Santa Corona Hospital ASL2, Savona, Italy
| | - Andrea Tomasini
- Immunohaematology and Transfusion Medicine Unit, Santa Corona Hospital ASL2, Savona, Italy
| | - Gino Tripodi
- Immunohematology and Transfusion Centre, Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Genoa, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Alberts M, Bandarenko N, Gaca J, Lockhart E, Milano C, Alexander S, Linder D, Lombard FW, Welsby IJ. Reduced use of allogeneic platelets through high-yield perioperative autologous plateletpheresis and reinfusion. Transfusion 2013; 54:1348-57. [DOI: 10.1111/trf.12463] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2013] [Revised: 08/21/2013] [Accepted: 08/22/2013] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Nicholas Bandarenko
- Department of Pathology; Division of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery; Duke University Medical Center; Durham North Carolina
| | - Jeffrey Gaca
- Department of Surgery; Division of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery; Duke University Medical Center; Durham North Carolina
| | - Evelyn Lockhart
- Department of Pathology; Division of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery; Duke University Medical Center; Durham North Carolina
| | - Carmelo Milano
- Department of Surgery; Division of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery; Duke University Medical Center; Durham North Carolina
| | | | | | - Frederick W. Lombard
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care; Duke University Medical Center; Durham North Carolina
| | - Ian J. Welsby
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care; Duke University Medical Center; Durham North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|