1
|
Emmert M, Rohrbacher S, Meier F, Heppe L, Drach C, Schindler A, Sander U, Patzelt C, Frömke C, Schöffski O, Lauerer M. The elicitation of patient and physician preferences for calculating consumer-based composite measures on hospital report cards: results of two discrete choice experiments. THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS : HEPAC : HEALTH ECONOMICS IN PREVENTION AND CARE 2024; 25:1071-1085. [PMID: 38102524 PMCID: PMC11283427 DOI: 10.1007/s10198-023-01650-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2023] [Accepted: 11/14/2023] [Indexed: 12/17/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The calculation of aggregated composite measures is a widely used strategy to reduce the amount of data on hospital report cards. Therefore, this study aims to elicit and compare preferences of both patients as well as referring physicians regarding publicly available hospital quality information METHODS: Based on systematic literature reviews as well as qualitative analysis, two discrete choice experiments (DCEs) were applied to elicit patients' and referring physicians' preferences. The DCEs were conducted using a fractional factorial design. Statistical data analysis was performed using multinomial logit models RESULTS: Apart from five identical attributes, one specific attribute was identified for each study group, respectively. Overall, 322 patients (mean age 68.99) and 187 referring physicians (mean age 53.60) were included. Our models displayed significant coefficients for all attributes (p < 0.001 each). Among patients, "Postoperative complication rate" (20.6%; level range of 1.164) was rated highest, followed by "Mobility at hospital discharge" (19.9%; level range of 1.127), and ''The number of cases treated" (18.5%; level range of 1.045). In contrast, referring physicians valued most the ''One-year revision surgery rate'' (30.4%; level range of 1.989), followed by "The number of cases treated" (21.0%; level range of 1.372), and "Postoperative complication rate" (17.2%; level range of 1.123) CONCLUSION: We determined considerable differences between both study groups when calculating the relative value of publicly available hospital quality information. This may have an impact when calculating aggregated composite measures based on consumer-based weighting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Emmert
- Faculty of Law, Business and Economics, Institute for Healthcare Management and Health Sciences, University of Bayreuth, Prieserstraße 2, 95444, Bayreuth, Germany.
| | - Stefan Rohrbacher
- Faculty of Law, Business and Economics, Institute for Healthcare Management and Health Sciences, University of Bayreuth, Prieserstraße 2, 95444, Bayreuth, Germany
| | - Florian Meier
- Department of Management and Economics, SRH Wilhelm Löhe University of Applied Sciences, 90763, Fürth, Germany
| | - Laura Heppe
- School of Business and Economics, Chair of Health Care Management, Friedrich-Alexander-University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Lange Gasse 20, 90403, Nuremberg, Germany
| | - Cordula Drach
- School of Business and Economics, Chair of Health Care Management, Friedrich-Alexander-University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Lange Gasse 20, 90403, Nuremberg, Germany
| | - Anja Schindler
- Department of Information and Communication, Faculty for Media, Information and Design, University of Applied Sciences and Arts, Hannover, Germany
| | - Uwe Sander
- Department of Information and Communication, Faculty for Media, Information and Design, University of Applied Sciences and Arts, Hannover, Germany
| | - Christiane Patzelt
- Department of Information and Communication, Faculty for Media, Information and Design, University of Applied Sciences and Arts, Hannover, Germany
| | - Cornelia Frömke
- Department of Information and Communication, Faculty for Media, Information and Design, University of Applied Sciences and Arts, Hannover, Germany
| | - Oliver Schöffski
- School of Business and Economics, Chair of Health Care Management, Friedrich-Alexander-University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Lange Gasse 20, 90403, Nuremberg, Germany
| | - Michael Lauerer
- Faculty of Law, Business and Economics, Institute for Healthcare Management and Health Sciences, University of Bayreuth, Prieserstraße 2, 95444, Bayreuth, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kast K, Carl L. Transition from hospital to nursing home: Discharge planners as a potential lever for quality improvements? Z Gerontol Geriatr 2024:10.1007/s00391-024-02325-0. [PMID: 39017717 DOI: 10.1007/s00391-024-02325-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2024] [Accepted: 06/06/2024] [Indexed: 07/18/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Public reporting is supposed to be helpful in differentiating between well and poorly performing nursing homes; however, hospital patients often have difficulties to deal with quality information. Discharge planners (DP) can support them in comparing quality and, by influencing patients' decision, lead to better provision of care in nursing homes. OBJECTIVE This study investigated the choice behavior of DP, their use of quality information and the potential to impact the decision-making of patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS A total of 70 DP from German hospitals with a geriatric department participated in an online survey. They were asked about information preferences and tools used for nursing home searches. In addition, they assessed quality information items from the new German quality reporting on a Likert scale. To test their comprehension participants were given a case scenario of a typical patient, were shown nursing homes displayed based on a medical comparison portal navigator (AOK-Pflegenavigator) and were asked to select nursing homes in a 3-round experiment. RESULTS When looking for a nursing home, DP primarily rely on internal nursing home directories (n = 62; 92.5%). The 3 preferred criteria for decision are: distance to the family (n = 55; 28.80%), bed availability (n = 51; 26.7%) and wishes of patients/relatives (n = 41; 21.47%). The consent score for public reporting was 46.28% and the comprehension ratio was 82.24%. DISCUSSION The DP do not advise hospital patients on the performance of nursing homes and rely on the decision-making of patients. This results in a lack of impact on patients' decisions and consequently in a loss of potential for public reporting to lead to better care in nursing homes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristina Kast
- Department of Healthcare Management, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Lange Gasse 20, 90403, Nürnberg, Germany.
| | - Lukas Carl
- Medical Valley EMN e. V., Henkestraße 91, 91052, Erlangen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Aggarwal A, Han L, Lewis D, Costigan J, Hubbard A, Taylor J, Rigg A, Purushotham A, van der Meulen J. Association of travel time, patient characteristics, and hospital quality with patient mobility for breast cancer surgery: A national population-based study. Cancer 2024; 130:1221-1233. [PMID: 38186226 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.35153] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2023] [Revised: 09/20/2023] [Accepted: 10/02/2023] [Indexed: 01/09/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This national study investigated hospital quality and patient factors associated with treatment location for breast cancer surgery. METHODS By using linked administrative data sets from the English National Health Service, the authors identified all women diagnosed between January 2, 2016, and December 31, 2018, who underwent breast-conserving surgery (BCS) or a mastectomy with or without immediate breast reconstruction. The extent to which patients bypassed their nearest hospital was investigated using a geographic information system (ArcGIS). Conditional logistic regressions were used to estimate the impact of travel time, hospital quality, and patient characteristics. RESULTS 22,622 Of 69,153 patients undergoing BCS, 22,622 (32.7%) bypassed their nearest hospital; and, of 23,536 patients undergoing mastectomy, 7179 (30.5%) bypassed their nearest hospital. Women who were younger, without comorbidities, or from rural areas were more likely to travel to more distant hospitals (p < .05). Patients undergoing BCS (odds ratio [OR], 1.85; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.36-2.50) or mastectomy (OR, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.14-2.02) were more likely to be treated at specialist breast reconstruction centers despite not undergoing the procedure. Patients receiving mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction were more likely to travel to hospitals employing surgeons who had a media reputation (OR, 2.41; 95% CI, 1.28-4.52). Patients undergoing BCS were less likely to travel to hospitals with shorter surgical waiting times (OR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.46-0.92). The authors did not observe a significant impact for research activity, hospital quality rating, breast re-excision rates, or the status as a multidisciplinary cancer center. CONCLUSIONS Patient choice policies may drive inequalities in the health care system without improving patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ajay Aggarwal
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
- Department of Oncology, Guy's and St Thomas' National Health Service Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Lu Han
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Daniel Lewis
- UK Department for Environment, Food, and Rural Affairs, Agriculture Ministry of the United Kingdom, London, UK
| | | | - Alison Hubbard
- Patient and Public Involvement Representative, Liverpool, UK
| | | | - Anne Rigg
- Department of Oncology, Guy's and St Thomas' National Health Service Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Arnie Purushotham
- Department of Breast Surgery, Guy's and St Thomas' National Health Service Foundation Trust, London, UK
- School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Jan van der Meulen
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Emmert M, Schindler A, Heppe L, Sander U, Patzelt C, Lauerer M, Nagel E, Frömke C, Schöffski O, Drach C. Referring physicians' intention to use hospital report cards for hospital referral purposes in the presence or absence of patient-reported outcomes: a randomized trial. THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS : HEPAC : HEALTH ECONOMICS IN PREVENTION AND CARE 2024; 25:293-305. [PMID: 37052802 PMCID: PMC10858825 DOI: 10.1007/s10198-023-01587-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2022] [Accepted: 03/28/2023] [Indexed: 06/19/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aims to determine the intention to use hospital report cards (HRCs) for hospital referral purposes in the presence or absence of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) as well as to explore the relevance of publicly available hospital performance information from the perspective of referring physicians. METHODS We identified the most relevant information for hospital referral purposes based on a literature review and qualitative research. Primary survey data were collected (May-June 2021) on a sample of 591 referring orthopedists in Germany and analyzed using structural equation modeling. Participating orthopedists were recruited using a sequential mixed-mode strategy and randomly allocated to work with HRCs in the presence (intervention) or absence (control) of PROs. RESULTS Overall, 420 orthopedists (mean age 53.48, SD 8.04) were included in the analysis. The presence of PROs on HRCs was not associated with an increased intention to use HRCs (p = 0.316). Performance expectancy was shown to be the most important determinant for using HRCs (path coefficient: 0.387, p < .001). However, referring physicians have doubts as to whether HRCs can help them. We identified "complication rate" and "the number of cases treated" as most important for the hospital referral decision making; PROs were rated slightly less important. CONCLUSIONS This study underpins the purpose of HRCs, namely to support referring physicians in searching for a hospital. Nevertheless, only a minority would support the use of HRCs for the next hospital search in its current form. We showed that presenting relevant information on HRCs did not increase their use intention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Emmert
- Faculty of Law, Business and Economics, Institute for Healthcare Management and Health Sciences, University of Bayreuth, Prieserstraße 2, 95444, Bayreuth, Germany.
| | - Anja Schindler
- Department of Information and Communication, Faculty for Media, Information and Design, University of Applied Sciences and Arts, Hannover, Germany
| | - Laura Heppe
- School of Business and Economics, Chair of Health Care Management, Friedrich-Alexander-University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Lange Gasse 20, 90403, Nuremberg, Germany
| | - Uwe Sander
- Department of Information and Communication, Faculty for Media, Information and Design, University of Applied Sciences and Arts, Hannover, Germany
| | - Christiane Patzelt
- Department of Information and Communication, Faculty for Media, Information and Design, University of Applied Sciences and Arts, Hannover, Germany
| | - Michael Lauerer
- Faculty of Law, Business and Economics, Institute for Healthcare Management and Health Sciences, University of Bayreuth, Prieserstraße 2, 95444, Bayreuth, Germany
| | - Eckhard Nagel
- Faculty of Law, Business and Economics, Institute for Healthcare Management and Health Sciences, University of Bayreuth, Prieserstraße 2, 95444, Bayreuth, Germany
| | - Cornelia Frömke
- Department of Information and Communication, Faculty for Media, Information and Design, University of Applied Sciences and Arts, Hannover, Germany
| | - Oliver Schöffski
- School of Business and Economics, Chair of Health Care Management, Friedrich-Alexander-University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Lange Gasse 20, 90403, Nuremberg, Germany
| | - Cordula Drach
- School of Business and Economics, Chair of Health Care Management, Friedrich-Alexander-University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Lange Gasse 20, 90403, Nuremberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kirkegaard A, Mitchell L, Ball L, Williams LT. Developing the Quality in Nutrition Care Model for Dietitians (QUINCE-MOD) in primary care: A mixed-method survey of healthcare consumers and professionals. J Hum Nutr Diet 2023; 36:311-322. [PMID: 35822586 PMCID: PMC10087511 DOI: 10.1111/jhn.13065] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2022] [Revised: 05/16/2022] [Accepted: 06/24/2022] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Evidence-based models are effective tools for informing quality improvement activities in health care. The Quality in Nutrition Care (QUINCE) model is an evidence-based model that describes quality nutrition care in the primary care setting but has not been applied to primary care dietetics. The present study comprised two phases. In the first phase, the study aimed to evaluate and compare healthcare consumers and professional perspectives on the importance of the 10 statements to understand their relevance for dietetics care. In the second phase, the study aimed to test and enhance the QUINCE model using healthcare consumer and professional responses to statements that were identified as relevant to primary care dietetics in the first phase. METHODS Quantitative and qualitative data were collected using an online survey comprising statements describing quality dietetic care adapted from the complexity literature. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive statistical analysis to investigate statement importance as rated by participants using a six-point Likert scale. Qualitative content analysis was performed on the qualitative data using a deductive-inductive approach to identify patterns in the data. The QUINCE model was compared with identified patterns and modified as appropriate. RESULTS One hundred and fourteen consumers and 107 primary care professionals agreed on the importance of seven statements but expressed divergent views on the remaining three statements that addressed: (1) access to medical records; (2) access to performance and safety information; and (3) variation in care between dietitians. The QUINCE model was modified to produce the Quality in Nutrition Care Model for Dietitians (QUINCE-MOD) describing quality dietetic care in the primary care setting. CONCLUSIONS Consumers and professionals share views on some aspects of quality dietetic care but diverge on other aspects. The QUINCE-MOD is an evidence-based, complexity-informed model that describes components of quality relevant to primary care dietetics. The model should be applied at the practice level to reflect the unique perspective of quality at that level.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy Kirkegaard
- Menzies Health Institute of Queensland, Griffith University, Southport, QLD, Australia.,School of Health Sciences and Social Work, Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia
| | - Lana Mitchell
- Menzies Health Institute of Queensland, Griffith University, Southport, QLD, Australia.,School of Health Sciences and Social Work, Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia
| | - Lauren Ball
- Menzies Health Institute of Queensland, Griffith University, Southport, QLD, Australia.,School of Health Sciences and Social Work, Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia
| | - Lauren T Williams
- Menzies Health Institute of Queensland, Griffith University, Southport, QLD, Australia.,School of Health Sciences and Social Work, Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
de Cruppé W, Kummer MC, Geraedts M. [How do Surgical Patients Choose their Hospital? A Cross-sectional Study]. Zentralbl Chir 2023; 148:24-32. [PMID: 34587643 DOI: 10.1055/a-1555-3907] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Free hospital choice is promoted in health policy through public quality reporting. Previous studies on hospital choice mostly survey patients for specific elective procedures. This study examines all full inpatient surgical patients and compares them to those in other specialties. Research questions are: How many patients make their own decisions about the hospital? How much time do they have before admission? Where do they obtain information and what are their important decision criteria? MATERIALS AND METHODS This study evaluates cross-sectional primary data on hospital choice collected by questionnaire from 1925 consecutively hospitalised patients from 11 medical specialties and 3 levels of care, including 438 surgical patients from 6 general surgery departments. RESULTS Three quarters of surgical patients decide on the hospital themselves. Their own previous experience with the hospital is an important source of information and decision-making criterion for a good half of the patients, along with relatives and outpatient treatment providers as well as the hospital reputation. CONCLUSION Many surgical patients decide in favour of a hospital because of the trust they have built up through previous treatment in the hospital, which they experience as satisfactory. The professional quality of treatment is thus the greatest impact factor on patients, their relatives and outpatient treatment providers. It is important to actively and specifically address and clarify possible dissatisfaction on the part of the patient before discharge.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Werner de Cruppé
- Institut für Versorgungsforschung und Klinische Epidemiologie, Philipps-Universitat Marburg Fachbereich Medizin, Marburg, Germany
| | | | - Max Geraedts
- Medizin, Philipps-Universität Marburg Fachbereich Medizin, Marburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Timofeyev Y, Dremova O, Jakovljevic M. The impact of transparency constraints on the efficiency of the Russian healthcare system: systematic literature review. J Med Econ 2023; 26:95-109. [PMID: 36537319 DOI: 10.1080/13696998.2022.2160608] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
There is an ongoing debate among researchers and policy-makers on how to make transparency a powerful tool of healthcare systems. This study addresses how the availability and accessibility of information about medical services to the general population affects healthcare outcomes in Russia. A systematic review was conducted and reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviewing and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Transparency indicators of health facilities used in the world's most efficient healthcare systems are also reviewed. Although the increase of transparency in the Russian healthcare system is considered as a tool for improving its efficiency, very little has been done to improve the actual level of transparency. The existing institutional specifics of the Russian healthcare system impose serious restrictions on acceptable levels of transparency. In the reviewed empirical Russian studies, transparency is often viewed simplistically as either information available on the websites of medical organizations or issues related to the amount of accessible indicators of compulsory medical statistical reporting. The novelty of this study consists in (a) reviewing the most recent studies on the topic and (b) including studies in Russian in the analysis. We elaborate on general and specific policy implications for improving transparency-driven outcomes in the Russian healthcare system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Mihajlo Jakovljevic
- Institute of Advanced Manufacturing Technologies, Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University, St. Petersburg, Russia
- Institute of Comparative Economic Studies, Hosei University, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Global Health Economics and Policy, University of Kragujevac, Kragujevac, Serbia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Blanchette MA, Mior S, Thistle S, Stuber K. Developing key performance indicators for the Canadian chiropractic profession: a modified Delphi study. Chiropr Man Therap 2022; 30:31. [PMID: 35915502 PMCID: PMC9344626 DOI: 10.1186/s12998-022-00439-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2022] [Accepted: 06/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
The purpose of this study is to develop a list of performance indicators to assess the status of the chiropractic profession in Canada.
Method
We conducted a 4-round modified Delphi technique (March 2018–January 2020) to reach consensus among experts and stakeholders on key status indicators for the chiropractic profession using online questionnaires. During the first round, experts suggested indicators for preidentified themes. Through the following two rounds, the importance and feasibility of each indicator was rated on an 11-point Likert scale, and their related potential sources of data identified. In the final round, provincial stakeholders were recruited to rate the importance of the indicators within the 90th percentile and identified those most important to their organisation.
Results
The first round generated 307 preliminary indicators of which 42 were selected for the remaining rounds, and eleven were preferentially selected by most of the provincial stakeholders. Experts agreed the feasibility of all indicators was high, and that data could be collected through a combination of data obtained from professional liability insurance records and survey(s) of the general population, patients, and chiropractors.
Conclusions
A set of performance indicators to assess the status of the Canadian chiropractic profession emerged from a scientific and stakeholder consensus.
Collapse
|
9
|
Kovach CP, Gunzburger EC, Morrison JT, Valle JA, Doll JA, Waldo SW. Influence of Major Adverse Events on Procedural Selection for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Insights From the Veterans Affairs Clinical Assessment Reporting and Tracking Program. JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY FOR CARDIOVASCULAR ANGIOGRAPHY & INTERVENTIONS 2022; 1:100460. [PMID: 39132338 PMCID: PMC11307526 DOI: 10.1016/j.jscai.2022.100460] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2022] [Revised: 08/30/2022] [Accepted: 09/01/2022] [Indexed: 08/13/2024]
Abstract
Background Public reporting of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) outcomes has been associated with risk-averse attitudes, and pressure to avoid negative outcomes may hinder the care of high-risk patients referred for PCI in public reporting environments. It is unknown whether the occurrence of PCI-related major adverse events (MAEs) influences future case selection in nonpublic reporting environments. Here, we describe trends in PCI case selection among patients undergoing coronary angiography following MAEs in Veterans Affairs (VA) cardiac catheterization laboratories participating in a mandatory internal quality improvement program without public reporting of outcomes. Methods Patients who underwent coronary angiography between October 1, 2010, and September 30, 2018, were identified and stratified by VA 30-day PCI mortality risk. The association between MAEs and changes in the proportion of patients proceeding from coronary angiography to PCI within 14 days was assessed. Results A total of 251,526 patients and 913 MAEs were included in the analysis. For each prespecified time period of 1, 2, and 4 weeks following an MAE, there were no significant changes in the proportion of patients undergoing coronary angiography who proceeded to PCI within 14 days for the overall cohort and for each tercile of VA 30-day PCI mortality risk. Conclusions There were no deviations from routine PCI referral practices following MAEs in this analysis of VA cardiac catheterization laboratories. Nonpublic reporting environments and quality improvement programs may be influential in mitigating PCI risk-aversion behaviors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher P. Kovach
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Elise C. Gunzburger
- Center of Innovation, Rocky Mountain Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Aurora, Colorado
- Rocky Mountain Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Justin T. Morrison
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Javier A. Valle
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado
- Michigan Heart and Vascular Institute, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Jacob A. Doll
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
- Clinical Assessment Reporting and Tracking Program, Office of Quality and Patient Safety, Veterans Health Administration, Washington, DC
- Puget Sound Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Seattle, Washington
| | - Stephen W. Waldo
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado
- Center of Innovation, Rocky Mountain Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Aurora, Colorado
- Rocky Mountain Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Aurora, Colorado
- Clinical Assessment Reporting and Tracking Program, Office of Quality and Patient Safety, Veterans Health Administration, Washington, DC
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Affiliation(s)
- Ajay Aggarwal
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
- Guy's Cancer Centre, Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Trust, London, UK
- Institute of Cancer Policy, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Fiona M Walter
- Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Richard Sullivan
- Guy's Cancer Centre, Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Trust, London, UK
- Institute of Cancer Policy, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Jan van der Meulen
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Strumann C, Geissler A, Busse R, Pross C. Can competition improve hospital quality of care? A difference-in-differences approach to evaluate the effect of increasing quality transparency on hospital quality. THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS : HEPAC : HEALTH ECONOMICS IN PREVENTION AND CARE 2022; 23:1229-1242. [PMID: 34997865 PMCID: PMC9395484 DOI: 10.1007/s10198-021-01423-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2021] [Accepted: 12/09/2021] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
Public reporting on the quality of care is intended to guide patients to the provider with the highest quality and to stimulate a fair competition on quality. We apply a difference-in-differences design to test whether hospital quality has improved more in markets that are more competitive after the first public release of performance data in Germany in 2008. Panel data from 947 hospitals from 2006 to 2010 are used. Due to the high complexity of the treatment of stroke patients, we approximate general hospital quality by the 30-day risk-adjusted mortality rate for stroke treatment. Market structure is measured (comparatively) by the Herfindahl-Hirschman index (HHI) and by the number of hospitals in the relevant market. Predicted market shares based on exogenous variables only are used to compute the HHI to allow a causal interpretation of the reform effect. A homogenous positive effect of competition on quality of care is found. This effect is mainly driven by the response of non-profit hospitals that have a narrow range of services and private for-profit hospitals with a medium range of services. The results highlight the relevance of outcome transparency to enhance hospital quality competition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christoph Strumann
- Institute of Family Medicine, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Luebeck, Luebeck, Germany.
| | | | - Reinhard Busse
- Department of Health Care Management, Berlin University of Technology, Berlin, Germany
| | - Christoph Pross
- Department of Health Care Management, Berlin University of Technology, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Woodfield MJ, Merry S, Hetrick SE. Clinician adoption of Parent–Child Interaction Therapy: A systematic review of implementation interventions. IMPLEMENTATION RESEARCH AND PRACTICE 2022; 3:26334895221082330. [PMID: 37091096 PMCID: PMC9924277 DOI: 10.1177/26334895221082330] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Parent–Child Interaction Therapy (PCIT) is a parent training intervention for childhood conduct problems, distinctive in its use of live clinician coaching of the parent–child dyad via a one-way mirror and discrete earpiece. However, despite a compelling evidence base, uptake of evidence-based parent training programmes such as PCIT by clinicians in routine care settings remains poor. This systematic review aimed to identify and synthesise implementation interventions that have sought to increase clinician adoption of PCIT in usual care settings. Methods We searched MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), PsycInfo (Ovid), CINAHL (EBSCO), Science Citation Index and Social Sciences Citation Index, and Web of Science Core Collection from inception to October 2020. Articles were included if they tested (by way of randomised controlled trials, controlled clinical trials, interrupted time series and controlled before and after trials) implementation interventions across any and all of the patient, clinician, clinic, system or policy domains. Two independent reviewers screened and selected studies, assessed risk of bias and extracted data – summarising implementation intervention components according to items from the Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) checklist ( Hoffmann et al., 2014 ). Results Of the 769 articles identified once duplicates were removed, 13 papers relating to three studies met the inclusion criteria – all were quantitative or mixed-methods examinations of the effectiveness of different PCIT clinician training or training-related consultation methods. A narrative description of interventions was provided, as quantitative synthesis was not possible. Conclusions Research attention has to date been focussed on the establishment of an evidence-base for PCIT's effectiveness, with relatively little attention to the dissemination, implementation and sustainment of this treatment. Those studies that do exist have focused on training methods and training-related expert consultation. Research attention could usefully turn to both adoption and sustainment of this effective treatment in usual care settings. Plain language summary In this review, we aimed to summarise what is already known about how to implement PCIT in community settings after clinicians have received training in the approach. While research relating to the implementation of other parent training programmes is interesting and informative, implementation efforts are most effective when tailored to a specific programme in a specific context. As such, it was important to review published studies relating to PCIT specifically. We identified three relevant studies, one of which is yet to publish its main implementation findings. The three studies have focused on how best to train clinicians in PCIT, including how best to provide post-training support from expert trainers. We concluded that a fruitful line for future research would be to focus on the post-training period, particularly how best to support clinicians to adopt and sustain PCIT in their practice. Systematic review registration The study was prospectively registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) on 01/10/2020 (CRD42020207118).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melanie J Woodfield
- The Werry Centre, Department of Psychological Medicine, University of Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Sally Merry
- The Werry Centre, Department of Psychological Medicine, University of Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Sarah E Hetrick
- The Werry Centre, Department of Psychological Medicine, University of Auckland, New Zealand
- Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Geraedts M, de Cruppé W. [Effects of statutory quality assurance in acute inpatient care]. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz 2022; 65:285-292. [PMID: 35122107 PMCID: PMC8888375 DOI: 10.1007/s00103-022-03489-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2021] [Accepted: 01/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Statutory quality assurance (QA) serves to ensure and further develop the quality of service provision. Particularly prominent in Germany's acute inpatient care are mandatory quality reports (QRs) and participation in external quality assessments (eQAs). Their effects have not yet been comprehensively evaluated. OBJECTIVES What are the effects of eQAs and QRs on the quality of care? MATERIALS AND METHODS Based on a selective literature review, international evidence on the effects of QA was compiled. This was supplemented by analyses of the quality reports of the Federal Office for Quality Assurance (BQS), the Institute for Applied Quality Improvement and Research in Health Care (AQUA), and the Institute for Quality Assurance and Transparency in Healthcare (IQTIG), which have been responsible for eQAs since 2001. RESULTS According to international literature, at most weak effects of these measures can be expected, especially on process quality. Studies from Germany mostly observe only uncontrolled temporal trends and partly show improved quality indicators. Only one controlled study each was able to show weak positive effects on outcome and process quality for eQAs and QRs, respectively. CONCLUSIONS There are no convincing evaluation results for either the QRs or the eQAs. Deficiencies in the addressee-oriented design of the QRs and the reported indicator results in terms of their validity, risk adjustment, and temporal availability can be cited as potential causes. Statutory QA should be revised by paying more attention to the prerequisites for successful performance feedback and by again creating room for an intrinsically motivated assessment of one's own quality of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Max Geraedts
- Institut für Versorgungsforschung und Klinische Epidemiologie, Fachbereich Medizin, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Karl-von-Frisch-Str. 4, 35043, Marburg, Deutschland.
| | - Werner de Cruppé
- Institut für Versorgungsforschung und Klinische Epidemiologie, Fachbereich Medizin, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Karl-von-Frisch-Str. 4, 35043, Marburg, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Geraedts M, Ebbeler D, Timmesfeld N, Kaps M, Berger K, Misselwitz B, Günster C, Dröge P, Schneider M. Quality Assurance Measures and Mortality After Stroke. DEUTSCHES ARZTEBLATT INTERNATIONAL 2021; 118:857-863. [PMID: 34730084 PMCID: PMC8948340 DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.m2021.0339] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2021] [Revised: 07/09/2021] [Accepted: 07/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Quality assurance for acute in-hospital care in Germany is based on compulsory comparisons between institutions, so-called external quality assurance (EQA). The effectiveness of EQA has not yet been adequately studied. The purpose of the QUASCH project, which is supported by the Innovation Fund of the Federal Joint Committee, is to investigate the association between EQA and health care outcomes, specifically with respect to stroke. METHODS The analyses were based on data from 379 825 patients insured by the AOK health insurance fund who were acutely admitted to a hospital because of stroke over the period 2007-2017. Data on 47 659 patients were derived from EQA documentation in the state of Hesse, in which stroke EQA had already been introduced in 2003; data on the remaining 332 166 patients were from other federal states, where 117 734 of these patients had been treated under EQA conditions. The association of EQA with mortality over the period of observation was analyzed by multivariate Cox regression, with the following covariates: age, sex, comorbidities, time period of occurrence, nursing care level, type of stroke, socio-economic deprivation in the region of origin, and treatment in a stroke unit. RESULTS Compared to treatment without EQA, mortality risk under EQA in the state of Hesse was significantly lower (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.93; 95% confidence interval: [0.92; 0.95]). The reduction in mortality risk with EQA was somewhat lower in the other federal states (HR: 0.96 [0.95; 0.97]). Treatment in a stroke unit was associated with a mortality risk that was lower still (HR: 0.86 [0.85; 0.87]). Mortality risk rose with age, comorbidities, and need for nursing care; it was lower in women and in persons whose stroke occurred in a later period. CONCLUSION Quality assurance measures are associated with lower mortality risk after stroke. The concentration of care in specially qualified institutions is associated with stronger effects than EQA alone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Max Geraedts
- Institute for Health Services Research and Clinical Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Philipps University of Marburg
| | - Dijana Ebbeler
- Institute for Health Services Research and Clinical Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Philipps University of Marburg
| | - Nina Timmesfeld
- Department of Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, Ruhr University Bochum
| | - Manfred Kaps
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Giessen/Marburg, Justus Liebig University of Giessen
| | - Klaus Berger
- Institute of Epidemiology and Social Medicine, Medical Faculty, Westphalian Wilhelms University of Münster
| | | | - Christian Günster
- Research Institute of the AOK [German public health insurance company], AOK Federal Association
| | - Patrik Dröge
- Research Institute of the AOK [German public health insurance company], AOK Federal Association
| | - Michael Schneider
- Institute for Health Services Research and Clinical Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Philipps University of Marburg
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Brouwers J, Cox B, Van Wilder A, Claessens F, Bruyneel L, De Ridder D, Eeckloo K, Vanhaecht K. The future of hospital quality of care policy: A multi-stakeholder discrete choice experiment in Flanders, Belgium. Health Policy 2021; 125:1565-1573. [PMID: 34689980 DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2021.10.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2021] [Revised: 09/04/2021] [Accepted: 10/10/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Collaboration between policymakers, patients and healthcare workers in hospital quality of care policy setting can improve the integration of new initiatives. The aim of this study was to quantify preferences for various characteristics of a future quality policy in a broad group of stakeholders. MATERIALS AND METHODS 450 policymakers, clinicians, nurses, patient representatives and hospital board members in Flanders (Belgium) participated in five discrete choice experiments (DCE) on quality control, quality improvement, inspection, patient incidents and transparency. For each DCE, various attributes and levels were defined from a literature review and interviews with 12 international quality and patient safety experts. RESULTS For the attributes with the highest relative importance, participants exhibited a strong preference for quality control by an independent national organization and coordination of quality improvement initiatives at the level of hospital networks. The individual hospital was chosen over the government for setting up an action plan following patient complaints. Respondents also strongly preferred mandatory reporting of severe patient incidents and transparency by publicly reporting quality indicators at the hospital level. CONCLUSIONS A future quality model should focus on a multicomponent approach with external quality control, improvement actions on hospital network level and public transparency. DCEs provide an opportunity to incorporate the attitudes and views for individual components of a new policy recommendation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonas Brouwers
- Leuven Institute for Healthcare Policy, KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Belgium; Department of Orthopaedics, University Hospitals Leuven, Belgium.
| | - Bianca Cox
- Leuven Institute for Healthcare Policy, KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Belgium
| | - Astrid Van Wilder
- Leuven Institute for Healthcare Policy, KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Belgium
| | - Fien Claessens
- Leuven Institute for Healthcare Policy, KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Belgium
| | - Luk Bruyneel
- Leuven Institute for Healthcare Policy, KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Belgium
| | - Dirk De Ridder
- Leuven Institute for Healthcare Policy, KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Belgium; Department of Quality Improvement, University Hospitals Leuven, Belgium
| | - Kristof Eeckloo
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Ghent University, Belgium; Strategic Policy Unit, Ghent University Hospital, Belgium
| | - Kris Vanhaecht
- Leuven Institute for Healthcare Policy, KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Belgium; Department of Quality Improvement, University Hospitals Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Textbook outcome (TBO) is a patient-oriented composite criterion achieved when all desired main health outcomes are realized. The aim was to assess the incidence and the independent factors associated with TBO following LT. METHODS This bicentric study included all patients who underwent their first elective liver-only LT between 2011 and 2015. TBO occurred when all the following criteria were fulfilled: no mortality within 90 days, no major complications within 90 days, no reintervention within 90 days (liver graft biopsy, radiological, endoscopic or surgical interventions, or retransplantation), no prolonged intensive care unit stay, and no prolonged hospital stay. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed to identify factors associated with TBO and to assess whether TBO is an independent factor associated with patient and graft survival. RESULTS The study population included 530 patients. TBO occurred in 176/530 (33%) patients. Independent factors associated with TBO included the balance of risk score, the use of an intraoperative temporary portacaval shunt, and duration of the operation. TBO was identified as an independent factor associated with graft survival but not patient survival. CONCLUSIONS TBO might be implemented in the patient-doctor decision-making regarding whether to proceed with LT and in the reporting of patient-level hospital performance related to LT.
Collapse
|
17
|
Kugler CM, De Santis KK, Rombey T, Goossen K, Breuing J, Könsgen N, Mathes T, Hess S, Burchard R, Pieper D. Perspective of potential patients on the hospital volume-outcome relationship and the minimum volume threshold for total knee arthroplasty: a qualitative focus group and interview study. BMC Health Serv Res 2021; 21:633. [PMID: 34210298 PMCID: PMC8249216 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-021-06641-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2020] [Accepted: 06/16/2021] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is performed to treat end-stage knee osteoarthritis. In Germany, a minimum volume threshold of 50 TKAs/hospital/year was implemented to ensure outcome quality. This study, embedded within a systematic review, aimed to investigate the perspectives of potential TKA patients on the hospital volume-outcome relationship for TKA (higher volumes associated with better outcomes). METHODS A convenience sample of adults with knee problems and heterogeneous demographic characteristics participated in the study. Qualitative data were collected during a focus group prior to the systematic review (n = 5) and during telephone interviews, in which preliminary results of the systematic review were discussed (n = 16). The data were synthesised using content analysis. RESULTS All participants (n = 21) believed that a hospital volume-outcome relationship exists for TKA while recognising that patient behaviour or the surgeon could also influence outcomes. All participants would be willing to travel longer for better outcomes. Most interviewees would choose a hospital for TKA depending on reputation, recommendations, and service quality. However, some would also choose a hospital based on the results of the systematic review that showed slightly lower mortality/revision rates at higher-volume hospitals. Half of the interviewees supported raising the minimum volume threshold even if this were to increase travel time to receive TKA. CONCLUSIONS Potential patients believe that a hospital volume-outcome relationship exists for TKA. Hospital preference is based mainly on subjective factors, although some potential patients would consider scientific evidence when making their choice. Policy makers and physicians should consider the patient perspectives when deciding on minimum volume thresholds or recommending hospitals for TKA, respectively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charlotte M Kugler
- Institute for Research in Operative Medicine, Witten/Herdecke University, Ostmerheimer Str. 200, 51109, Cologne, Germany.
| | - Karina K De Santis
- Institute for Research in Operative Medicine, Witten/Herdecke University, Ostmerheimer Str. 200, 51109, Cologne, Germany.,Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology- BIPS, Department: Prevention and Evaluation, Achterstr. 30, 28359, Bremen, Germany
| | - Tanja Rombey
- Institute for Research in Operative Medicine, Witten/Herdecke University, Ostmerheimer Str. 200, 51109, Cologne, Germany
| | - Kaethe Goossen
- Institute for Research in Operative Medicine, Witten/Herdecke University, Ostmerheimer Str. 200, 51109, Cologne, Germany
| | - Jessica Breuing
- Institute for Research in Operative Medicine, Witten/Herdecke University, Ostmerheimer Str. 200, 51109, Cologne, Germany
| | - Nadja Könsgen
- Institute for Research in Operative Medicine, Witten/Herdecke University, Ostmerheimer Str. 200, 51109, Cologne, Germany
| | - Tim Mathes
- Institute for Research in Operative Medicine, Witten/Herdecke University, Ostmerheimer Str. 200, 51109, Cologne, Germany
| | - Simone Hess
- Institute for Research in Operative Medicine, Witten/Herdecke University, Ostmerheimer Str. 200, 51109, Cologne, Germany
| | - René Burchard
- Department of Trauma Surgery and Orthopaedics, Lahn-Dill-Kliniken, Rotebergstr. 2, 35683, Dillenburg, Germany.,Department of Health, Witten/Herdecke University, Alfred-Herrhausen-Straße 50, 58448, Witten, Germany.,School of Medicine, Univerity of Marburg, Baldingerstraße, 35032, Marburg, Germany
| | - Dawid Pieper
- Institute for Research in Operative Medicine, Witten/Herdecke University, Ostmerheimer Str. 200, 51109, Cologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Timmerman G, Baart A, den Bakker J. Cultivating quality awareness in corona times. MEDICINE, HEALTH CARE, AND PHILOSOPHY 2021; 24:189-204. [PMID: 33788079 PMCID: PMC8009932 DOI: 10.1007/s11019-021-10010-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/12/2021] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
The Covid-19 pandemic is a tragedy for those who have been hard hit worldwide. At the same time, it is also a test of concepts and practices of what good care is and requires, and how quality of care can be accounted for. In this paper, we present our Care-Ethical Model of Quality Enquiry (CEMQUE) and apply it to the case of residential care for older people in the Netherlands during the Covid-19 pandemic. Instead of thinking about care in healthcare and social welfare as a set of separate care acts, we think about care as a complex practice of relational caring, crossed by other practices. Instead of thinking about professional caregivers as functionaries obeying external rules, we think about them as practically wise professionals. Instead of thinking about developing external quality criteria and systems, we think about cultivating (self-)reflective quality awareness. Instead of abstracting from societal forces that make care possible but also limit it, we acknowledge them and find ways to deal with them. Based on these critical insights, the CEMQUE model can be helpful to describe, interrogate, evaluate, and improve existing care practices. It has four entries: (i) the care receiver considered from their humanness, (ii) the caregiver considered from their solicitude, (iii) the care facility considered from its habitability and (iv) the societal, institutional and scholarly context considered from the perspective of the good life, justice and decency. The crux is enabling all these different entries with all their different aspects to be taken into account. In Corona times this turns out to be more crucial than ever.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guus Timmerman
- Presence Foundation, Grebbeberglaan 15, 3527 VX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - Andries Baart
- Presence Foundation, Grebbeberglaan 15, 3527 VX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Optentia Research Focus Area, North-West University, Vanderbijlpark, South Africa
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Jan den Bakker
- Presence Foundation, Grebbeberglaan 15, 3527 VX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Bouzarjomehri H, Akbari-Sari A, Jaafari-Pooyan E, Herandi Y. Improving Transparency of Hospitals' Performance: Recommendations for Iran. Hosp Top 2021; 100:16-25. [PMID: 33823743 DOI: 10.1080/00185868.2021.1904803] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
Public reporting of hospitals' performance data is a growing trend. This transparency may improve patient choices, competition, and service quality. This study aims to provide recommendations to improve hospitals' transparency in Iran. A qualitative study designed with 18 semi-structured interviews. Recommendations were categorized into five main themes, including passing a comprehensive law on transparency to create political commitment, educating people and healthcare providers to create the culture, developing a simple and efficient structure to foster transparency, and monitoring and evaluating transparency. The most important issue is political commitment. If it exists, the rest of the obstacles can be solved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hossein Bouzarjomehri
- Academy of Medical Sciences of Islamic Republic of Iran, Tehran, Iran.,Department of Health Management and Economics, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Ali Akbari-Sari
- Department of Health Management and Economics, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Ebrahim Jaafari-Pooyan
- Department of Health Management and Economics, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Fekri O, Manukyan E, Klazinga N. Appropriateness, effectiveness and safety of care delivered in Canadian hospitals: a longitudinal assessment on the utility of publicly reported performance trend data between 2012-2013 and 2016-2017. BMJ Open 2020; 10:e035447. [PMID: 32554742 PMCID: PMC7304804 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035447] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To assess the utility of publicly reported performance trend results of Canadian hospitals (by hospital size/type and jurisdiction). DESIGN Longitudinal observational study. SETTING 489 hospitals in Canada between fiscal years 2012-2013 and 2016-2017. PARTICIPANTS Analysis focused on indicator results of individual Canadian hospitals. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOMES Eight outcome indicators of hospital performance: in-hospital mortality (2), readmissions (4) and adverse events (2). Performance trend outcomes of improving, weakening or no change over time. Comparators in performance by hospital size/type of above, below or same as average. RESULTS At the national level, between 2012-2013 and 2016-2017, Canadian hospitals largely reduced in-hospital mortality: hospital deaths (hospital standardised mortality ratio) -9%; hospital deaths following major surgery -11.1%. Conversely, readmission to hospital increased nationwide: medical 1.5%; obstetric 5%; patients aged 19 years and younger 4.6% and surgical 3%. In-hospital sepsis declined -7.1%. Approximately 10% of the 489 hospitals in this study had a trend of improving performance over time (n=49) in one or more indicators, and a similar number showed a weakening performance over time (n=52). Roughly half of the hospitals in this study (n=224) had no change in performance over time for at least four out of the eight indicators. No single hospital had an improving or weakening trend in more than two indicators. Teaching and larger-sized hospitals showed a higher ratio of improving performance compared with smaller-sized hospitals. CONCLUSIONS Analysis of Canadian hospital performance through eight indicators shows improvement of in-hospital mortality and in-hospital sepsis, but rising rates of readmissions. Subdividing the analysis by hospital size/type shows greater instances of improvement in teaching and larger-sized hospitals. There is no clear pattern of a particular province/territory with a significant number of hospitals with improving or weakening trends. The overall assessment of trends of improving and weakening as presented in this study can be used more systematically in monitoring progress.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Omid Fekri
- Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Edgar Manukyan
- Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Niek Klazinga
- Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
de Cordova PB, Pogorzelska-Maziarz M, Eckenhoff ME, McHugh MD. Public Reporting of Nurse Staffing in the United States. JOURNAL OF NURSING REGULATION 2020; 10:14-20. [PMID: 32015931 DOI: 10.1016/s2155-8256(19)30143-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
Extensive evidence supports the association between increased nurse staffing and improved quality of patient care. Public reporting or public disclosure of nurse staffing patterns aims to incentivize hospitals to improve staffing by making comparison data available for consumers as well as nurses and hospital administrators. Currently, eight states in the United States publicly report and disclose information on nurse staffing levels to the public. We review the available public reporting mechanisms by systematically categorizing and comparing states that report nurse staffing. We also discuss the implications for future state and federal policy with regard to publicly reporting or disclosing nurse staffing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pamela B de Cordova
- New Jersey Collaborating Center for Nursing, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Newark
| | | | - Myra Emma Eckenhoff
- Heart & Vascular ICU, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - Matthew D McHugh
- Center for Health Outcomes & Policy Research, University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Morain SR, Weinfurt K, Bollinger J, Geller G, Mathews DJ, Sugarman J. Ethics and Collateral Findings in Pragmatic Clinical Trials. THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS : AJOB 2020; 20:6-18. [PMID: 31896322 PMCID: PMC7027922 DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2020.1689031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/10/2023]
Abstract
Pragmatic clinical trials (PCTs) offer important benefits, such as generating evidence that is suited to inform real-world health care decisions and increasing research efficiency. However, PCTs also present ethical challenges. One such challenge involves the management of information that emerges in a PCT that is unrelated to the primary research question(s), yet may have implications for the individual patients, clinicians, or health care systems from whom or within which research data were collected. We term these findings as ?pragmatic clinical trial collateral findings,? or ?PCT-CFs?. In this article, we explore the ethical considerations associated with the identification, assessment, and management of PCT-CFs, and how these considerations may vary based upon the attributes of a specific PCT. Our purpose is to map the terrain of PCT-CFs to serve as a foundation for future scholarship as well as policy-making and to facilitate careful deliberation about actual cases as they occur in practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Gail Geller
- Johns Hopkins University
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
| | - Debra Jh Mathews
- Johns Hopkins University
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
| | - Jeremy Sugarman
- Johns Hopkins University
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Johnston S, Abelson J, Wong ST, Langton J, Hogel M, Burge F, Hogg W. Citizen perspectives on the use of publicly reported primary care performance information: Results from citizen-patient dialogues in three Canadian provinces. Health Expect 2019; 22:974-982. [PMID: 31074573 PMCID: PMC6803417 DOI: 10.1111/hex.12902] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2018] [Revised: 04/05/2019] [Accepted: 04/06/2019] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Performance measurement and reporting is proliferating in all sectors of the healthcare system, including primary care, despite a dearth of evidence on how the public uses reports on primary care performance. We explored how the public might use this information, to guide the development of effective reporting systems for primary care. METHODS We conducted six full-day deliberative dialogue sessions with a purposive sample of 56 citizen-patients across three Canadian provinces (British Columbia, Ontario and Nova Scotia). Participants identified how they would use publicly reported performance data. We conducted a thematic analysis of the data by region. RESULTS Common uses for primary care performance information emerged across all sessions. Participants most often discussed the utility of this information for community advocacy and participation in health system decision making. Similar barriers for using performance information to choose a primary care provider were identified in each region including the perceived lack of choice of providers and the high value placed on relationships with current providers. Finally, the value of public performance reporting in enhancing trust that people would receive good care was also a common theme. CONCLUSIONS Citizen-patient perspectives highlight that public reporting on primary care performance could promote the health system's responsiveness by enabling public engagement in decision making at the community level. The role of public reporting in promoting trust rather than empowering patient choice may reflect unique elements of the Canadian health system's context.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sharon Johnston
- Department of Family MedicineUniversity of OttawaOttawaOntarioCanada
- CT Lamont Primary Health Care Research CentreÉlisabeth Bruyère Research InstituteOttawaOntarioCanada
| | - Julia Abelson
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Centre for Health Economics and Policy AnalysisMcMaster UniversityHamiltonOntarioCanada
| | - Sabrina T. Wong
- Centre for Health Services and Policy ResearchUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverBritish ColumbiaCanada
- School of NursingUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverBritish ColumbiaCanada
| | - Julia Langton
- Centre for Health Services and Policy ResearchUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverBritish ColumbiaCanada
| | - Mathew Hogel
- CT Lamont Primary Health Care Research CentreÉlisabeth Bruyère Research InstituteOttawaOntarioCanada
| | - Fred Burge
- Department of Family MedicineDalhousie UniversityHalifaxNova ScotiaCanada
| | - William Hogg
- Department of Family MedicineUniversity of OttawaOttawaOntarioCanada
- CT Lamont Primary Health Care Research CentreÉlisabeth Bruyère Research InstituteOttawaOntarioCanada
| |
Collapse
|