[Improvement of the treatment of patients with spastic movement disorder after stroke]

BACKGROUND

Spastic movement disorder (SMD) develops in up to 43% of cases as a sequela of stroke. In the event of a functionally relevant or daily life impairing SMD or to avoid an impending complication, the medicinal treatment of a focal, multifocal and segmental increase in muscle tone with botulinum neurotoxin A (BoNT-A) is recommended; however, treatment data reveal a lack of guideline-conform treatment with BoNT‑A in Germany.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the reported expert meeting was to discuss solutions to the incorrect treatment and undertreatment of patients with SMD and to formulate consensus recommendations to improve the care situation.

METHODS

At a consensus meeting held in April 2022, eight experts from the fields of neurology, physical medicine and rehabilitation discussed the causes for the incorrect treatment and undertreatment and formulated consensus solution approaches.

RESULTS

Possible reasons for the current incorrect treatment and undertreatment in SMD management in Germany include insufficient awareness of SMD among physicians, a lack of treatment capacities, a lack of information transfer in discharge management as well as staff shortages in the specialized inpatient and outpatient SMD treatment centers. The committee therefore recommended a patient pathway in which affected patients with SMD are provided with correctly implemented BoNT‑A treatment in combination with physical measures.

CONCLUSION

The recommended treatment pathway for use in stroke patients is intended to close gaps in care and thus ensure guideline-conform treatment of post-stroke SMD.

Transition of patients with recently diagnosed Dementia from inpatient to outpatient setting- a scoping review

INTRODUCTION

After being diagnosed with dementia, patients need a medical professional to empathetically address their fears and get initial questions answered. This scoping review therefore addresses how patients newly diagnosed with dementia are cared for in the general practitioner (GP) setting and how the communication between different healthcare professionals and the GP is handled.

METHODS

The scoping review was conducted based on the PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews checklist. After developing a search algorithm, literature searches were performed in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, PsychInfo, GeroLit and Cinahl using defined search criteria, such as a focus on qualitative study designs. After the removal of duplicates, title/abstract and full text screening was carried out.

RESULTS

Final data extraction included 10 articles out of 12,633 records. Strategies regarding the post-acute care of newly diagnosed patients included providing clarity and comfort to the patients and giving support and information both pre- and post-diagnosis. Care efforts were focused on advanced care planning and deprescribing. Involving people with dementia and their caregivers in further care was seen as crucial to provide them with the support needed. GPs emphasised the importance of listening to concerns, as well as ensuring wishes are respected, and autonomy is maintained. All studies found communication between the GP setting and other healthcare professionals regarding post-acute care to be inadequate. Lack of information sharing, clinical notes and recommendations for the GP setting resulted in inefficient provision of support, as GPs feel limited in their ability to act.

DISCUSSION

Sharing necessary information with the GP setting could promote patient-centred care for people living with dementia and facilitate appropriate and timely resource allocation and effective healthcare collaboration between the settings, for example, by defining clear care pathways and clarifying roles and expectations.

Transitional Care Model in Germany: Findings from an economic analysis of a randomized controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

The statutory discharge management system in German hospitals does not provide adequate transitional care for geriatric patients. The American Transitional Care Model (TCM), where a qualified professional supports the patient for a period before, during, and after discharge, could help to address this problem. In this study, we compared both approaches from an economic perspective. Our research questions were: (1) How do treatment costs per person differ when geriatric patients are supported according to the TCM compared with routine discharge management? (2) What are the intervention costs?

METHODS

The present economic analysis was part of a randomized controlled trial conducted at a hospital in Germany. In this study, geriatric patients in the intervention group received care according to TCM and those in the control group received routine care. We obtained data from the hospital and a health insurance company. In a cost-cost analysis, we compared the treatment costs per patient incurred in both study groups. In cases where higher costs occurred in the intervention group, we also conducted a cost-utility analysis, using the 12-Item Short Form Survey questionnaire to collect quality-of-life data for the Quality Adjusted Life Years calculation. Intervention costs were calculated on the basis of staff salaries, working hours, and the cost of acquiring the necessary equipment.

RESULTS

The intervention group consisted of 109 geriatric patients, the control group of 119. The average quality-of-life score was slightly higher in the intervention group, but the difference was not significant. On average, the intervention group was less expensive. However, for individual cost types (e.g., rehabilitation), the intervention group incurred higher costs than the control group. The differences between the study groups were not significant for all cost types (p > 0.05). Intervention costs were estimated to be approximately 800 euros per patient.

DISCUSSION

The TCM approach leads to savings. However, the quantum of savings will depend on intervention costs, which vary in practice. After outlier exclusion, an unfavorable incremental cost-effectiveness ratio is observed for the TCM approach.

CONCLUSION

From an economic perspective, TCM in its present form provides no additional value to patient care compared with routine discharge management. However, we see an urgent need to optimize the existing discharge management system to ensure better transitional care for those affected. Therefore, we recommend that different TCM components should be tested in further studies to address the questions that could not be clarified in the present study.

Quality of Care Transition During Hospital Discharge, Patient Safety, and Weight Regain After Bariatric Surgery: a Cross-Sectional Study

PURPOSE

Bariatric surgery is established as the gold standard in the treatment of severe obesity. However, a significant proportion of patients experience a substantial weight regain afterwards. Previous research focused predominantly on patients' personal factors. Yet, critical discharge process factors that contribute to patient's adherence after surgical interventions are rarely examined. This study investigated whether high quality of care transitions in discharge management influences weight regain and the likelihood of experiencing adverse patient safety incidents.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A cross-sectional study with 578 patients after bariatric surgery was conducted. Participants answered a standardized assessment on the quality of care transition from hospital to home-, surgery-, and nutrition-related characteristics as well as patient safety incidents.

RESULTS

Significant weight regain was observed 24 months after surgery. The association between time since surgery and weight regain was weaker in patients with high quality of care transitions (B = 2.27, p < .001). Higher quality of care transition was also significantly related to a lower likelihood of unplanned hospital readmissions (OR = 0.67) and fewer medication complications (OR = 0.48) after surgery.

CONCLUSION

This study sheds first light on the key influence of high quality of care transitions after bariatric surgery. Improvement efforts into effective discharge processes may establish smoother care transitions and help patients to assume responsibility and compliance with behavioral recommendations after surgery. Moreover, adverse patient safety incidents are less frequent after high quality care transitions indicating both high quality of health services for patients and reducing costs for the health care system.

How to fall into a new routine: factors influencing the implementation of an admission and discharge programme in hospitals and general practices

INTRODUCTION

The VESPEERA programme is a multifaceted programme to enhance information transfer between general practice and hospital across the process of hospital admission, stay and discharge. It was implemented in 7 hospitals and 72 general practices in Southern Germany. Uptake was heterogeneous and overall low. A process evaluation aimed at identifying factors associated with the implementation of the VESPEERA programme.

METHODS

This was a qualitative study using semi-structured interviews in a purposeful sample of health workers in hospitals and general practices in the VESPEERA programme. Qualitative framework analysis using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research was performed and revealed the topic of previous and new routines to be protruding. Inductive content analysis was used for in-depth examination of stages in the process of staying in a previous or falling into a new routines.

RESULTS

Thirty-six interviews were conducted with 17 participants from general practices and 19 participants from hospitals. The interviewees were in different stages of the implementation process at the time of the interviews. Four stages were identified: Stage 1,'Previous routine and tension for change', describes the situation in which VESPEERA was to be implemented and the factors leading to the decision to participate. In stage 2,'Adoption of the VESPEERA programme', factors that influenced whether individuals decided to employ the innovation are relevant. Stage 3 comprises 'Determinants for falling into and staying in the new VESPEERA-routine' relates to actual implementation and finally, in stage 4, the participants reflect on the success of the implementation.

CONCLUSIONS

The individuals and organisations participating in the VESPEERA programme were in different stages of a process from the previous to the new routine, which were characterised by different determinants of implementation. In all stages, organisational factors were main determinants of implementation, but different factors emerged in different implementation stages. A low distinction between decision-making power and executive, as well as available resources, were beneficial for the implementation of the innovation.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

DRKS00015183 on DRKS / Universal Trial Number (UTN): U1111-1218-0992.

[Discharge management in German hospitals for cognitively impaired, older people-a scoping review]

BACKGROUND

In German hospitals approximately 40% of all patients over the age of 65 years are cognitively impaired (MmkB). After discharge from hospital it is particularly important for MmkB that the transition to domestic life is organized as seamlessly and as well-coordinated as possible.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to determine the existing evidence on discharge management (EM) in MmkB and people with dementia (MmD). Furthermore, the study examined the necessity of an intersectoral concept for MmkB.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Based on a scoping review a total of 102 publications were identified, of which 6 articles were finally used for the evaluation.

RESULTS

The article provides an overview of the current care of MmkB in acute care hospitals in Germany. General information on EM in hospitals was given in three of the six publications included. Information on special discharge and care management for MmkB and MmD was contained in five out of six papers.

DISCUSSION

The article illustrates significant gaps in the hospital care for older MmkB, in particular at the interface of discharge management and demonstrates the need for new care models. To what extent these new care models can be structurally, procedurally and systemically embedded in the standard care and financed, is an open and unexplored question.

Chemoprophylaxis, diagnosis, treatments, and discharge management of COVID-19: An evidence-based clinical practice guideline (updated version)

The novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is the cause of a rapidly spreading illness, coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), affecting more than seventeen million people around the world. Diagnosis and treatment guidelines for clinicians caring for patients are needed. In the early stage, we have issued "A rapid advice guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) infected pneumonia (standard version)"; now there are many direct evidences emerged and may change some of previous recommendations and it is ripe for develop an evidence-based guideline. We formed a working group of clinical experts and methodologists. The steering group members proposed 29 questions that are relevant to the management of COVID-19 covering the following areas: chemoprophylaxis, diagnosis, treatments, and discharge management. We searched the literature for direct evidence on the management of COVID-19, and assessed its certainty generated recommendations using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. Recommendations were either strong or weak, or in the form of ungraded consensus-based statement. Finally, we issued 34 statements. Among them, 6 were strong recommendations for, 14 were weak recommendations for, 3 were weak recommendations against and 11 were ungraded consensus-based statement. They covered topics of chemoprophylaxis (including agents and Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) agents), diagnosis (including clinical manifestations, reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), respiratory tract specimens, IgM and IgG antibody tests, chest computed tomography, chest x-ray, and CT features of asymptomatic infections), treatments (including lopinavir-ritonavir, umifenovir, favipiravir, interferon, remdesivir, combination of antiviral drugs, hydroxychloroquine/chloroquine, interleukin-6 inhibitors, interleukin-1 inhibitors, glucocorticoid, qingfei paidu decoction, lianhua qingwen granules/capsules, convalescent plasma, lung transplantation, invasive or noninvasive ventilation, and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO)), and discharge management (including discharge criteria and management plan in patients whose RT-PCR retesting shows SARS-CoV-2 positive after discharge). We also created two figures of these recommendations for the implementation purpose. We hope these recommendations can help support healthcare workers caring for COVID-19 patients.

Supporting elderly people with cognitive impairment during and after hospital stays with intersectoral care management: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

The sectorization of health-care systems leads to inefficient treatment, especially for elderly people with cognitive impairment. The transition from hospital care to primary care is insufficiently coordinated, and communication between health-care providers is often lacking. Consequences include a further deterioration of health, higher rates of hospital readmissions, and institutionalization. Models of collaborative care have shown their efficacy in primary care by improving patient-related outcomes. The main goal of this trial is to compare the effectiveness of a collaborative care model with usual care for people with cognitive impairment who have been admitted to a hospital for treatment due to a somatic illness. The aim of the intervention is to improve the continuity of treatment and care across the transition between the in-hospital and adjoining primary care sectors.

METHODS/DESIGN

The trial is a longitudinal multisite randomized controlled trial with two arms (care as usual and intersectoral care management). Inclusion criteria at the time of hospital admission due to a somatic illness are age 70+ years, cognitive impairment (Mini Mental State Examination, MMSE ≤26), living at home, and written informed consent. Each participant will have a baseline assessment at the hospital and two follow-up assessments at home (3 and 12 months after discharge). The estimated sample size is n = 398 people with cognitive inmpairement plus their respective informal caregivers (where available). In the intersectoral care management group, specialized care managers will develop, implement, and monitor individualized treatment and care based on comprehensive assessments of the unmet needs of the patients and their informal caregivers. These assessments will occur at the hospital and in participants' homes. Primary outcomes are (1) activities of daily living, (2) readmission to the hospital, and (3) institutionalization. Secondary outcomes include (a) frailty, (b) delirium, (c) quality of life, (d) cognitive status, (e) behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia, (f) utilization of services, and (g) informal caregiver burden.

DISCUSSION

In the event of proving efficacy, this trial will deliver a proof of concept for implementation into routine care. The cost-effectiveness analyses as well as an independent process evaluation will increase the likelihood of meeting this goal. The trial will enable an in-depth analysis of mediating and moderating effects for different health outcomes at the interface between hospital care and primary care. By highlighting treatment and care, the study will provide insights into unmet needs at the time of hospital admission, and the opportunities and barriers to meeting those needs during the hospital stay and after discharge.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03359408 ; December 2, 2017.

[Physical medical aspects of early rehabilitation after proximal femoral fractures]

Proximal femoral fractures in old age are known as fragility fractures. They are the sequelae of osteoporosis and an expression of a general reduced capacity and an increase in sensory and functional deficits against the background of multimorbidity. They are often caused by reduced compensation strategies. Simultaneously, for many older people they represent a life event. Despite modern osteosynthesis techniques and less stressful anesthesia procedures, the occurrence of a proximal femoral fracture shakes the labile equilibrium of those affected. Proximal femoral fractures are associated with a high risk of mortality. Only some 50% of those affected achieve the pretraumatic functional level again. Therefore, a comprehensive, multiprofessional and interdisciplinary management of these patients is required. The rehabilitation has to start at the time of diagnosis and at the latest after the operation with a comprehensive interdisciplinary management. Pain and complaints during the rehabilitation have to be clarified and targeted, mostly multimodal interventions, must be included.

Discharge management strategies and post-discharge care interventions for depression - Systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Patients with depression require treatment continuity when discharged from inpatient care. Interventions aimed at optimizing transition into outpatient care may be effective in preventing symptom deterioration and readmission. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of care transition interventions for patients with depression after psychiatric hospitalization.

METHODS

Systematic review and random-effects meta-analysis of controlled trials. Primary outcomes were readmissions and symptoms of depression. The control condition was treatment as usual.

RESULTS

We included 16 publications reporting the results of 13 different studies. Studies were heterogeneous concerning patient selection and interventional approach. Effects on readmissions and depression symptoms were non-significant in meta-analysis of 8 studies/710 patients and 7 studies/592 patients, respectively. Overall risk ratio for readmission during follow-up was 0.65 (95% CI [0.42;1.01], p=0.06), standardized mean difference for depression symptoms was -0.09 (95% CI [-0.37;0.19], p=0.53). Subgroup analyses indicated no preference for a specific interventional strategy. Data point to considerable risk for selection and publication bias.

LIMITATIONS

Included studies are heterogeneous; subgroups are often small and may not attain the power to detect effects. Reasonable classification of interventions into groups of comparable approaches was a challenge and may be arbitrary in some cases.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review and meta-analysis could not identify any convincingly effective interventional transition approach for patients with depression after psychiatric hospitalization. Current evidence regarding discharge management for depression is limited, heterogeneous and potentially prone to bias. Interventions might be more appropriate for patients with other diagnoses than depression. Further high-quality randomized studies are required.