1
|
Georgopoulou GA, Papasotiriou M, Ntrinias T, Savvidaki E, Goumenos DS, Papachristou E. Impact of bisphosphonate treatment on bone mineral density after kidney transplant. World J Transplant 2024; 14:92335. [PMID: 39295981 PMCID: PMC11317859 DOI: 10.5500/wjt.v14.i3.92335] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2024] [Revised: 03/04/2024] [Accepted: 07/02/2024] [Indexed: 07/31/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mineral bone disease is associated with chronic kidney disease and persists after kidney transplantation. Immunosuppressive treatment contributes to the pathogenesis of this disease. Bisphosphonate treatments have shown positive but indefinite results. AIM To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of bisphosphonate treatment on post kidney transplantation bone mineral density (BMD). METHODS We included kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) whose BMD was measured after the operation but before the initiation of treatment and their BMD was measured at least one year later. We also evaluated the BMD of KTRs using two valid measurements after transplantation who received no treatment (control group). RESULTS Out of 254 KTRs, 62 (39 men) were included in the study. Bisphosphonates were initiated in 35 KTRs in total (20 men), 1.1 ± 2.4 years after operation and for a period of 3.9 ± 2.3 years while 27 (19 men) received no treatment. BMD improved significantly in KTRs who received bisphosphonate treatments (from -2.29 ± 1.07 to -1.66 ± 1.09, P < 0.0001). The control group showed a non-significant decrease in BMD after 4.2 ± 1.4 years of follow-up after surgery. Kidney function was not affected by bisphosphonate treatment. In KTRs with established osteoporosis, active treatment had a similar and significant effect on those with osteopenia or normal bone mass. CONCLUSION In this retrospective study of KTRs receiving bisphosphonate treatment, we showed that active treatment is effective in preventing bone loss irrespective of baseline BMD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Marios Papasotiriou
- Department of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, University Hospital of Patras, Patras 26504, Greece
| | - Theodoros Ntrinias
- Department of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, University Hospital of Patras, Patras 26504, Greece
| | - Eirini Savvidaki
- Department of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, University Hospital of Patras, Patras 26504, Greece
| | - Dimitrios S Goumenos
- Department of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, University Hospital of Patras, Patras 26504, Greece
| | - Evangelos Papachristou
- Department of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, University Hospital of Patras, Patras 26504, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Jaikaransingh V. Bone health and fracture prevention after kidney transplantation. J Clin Transl Endocrinol 2024; 36:100345. [PMID: 38737624 PMCID: PMC11081796 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcte.2024.100345] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2024] [Revised: 04/21/2024] [Accepted: 04/24/2024] [Indexed: 05/14/2024] Open
Abstract
Changes in bone health and strength are common after kidney transplantation and can lead to an increased risk of fracture. This has implications for morbidity, mortality and renal allograft survival. This review will focus on the changes that occur in bone health and fracture risk after kidney transplantation and examine the evidence available to guide diagnostic and therapeutic decisions with the aim of fracture prevention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vishal Jaikaransingh
- University of Florida College of Medicine – Jacksonville, Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, United States
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Marx D, Anglicheau D, Caillard S, Moulin B, Kochman A, Mischak H, Latosinska A, Bienaimé F, Prié D, Marquet P, Perrin P, Gwinner W, Metzger J. Urinary collagen peptides: Source of markers for bone metabolic processes in kidney transplant recipients. Proteomics Clin Appl 2023:e2200118. [PMID: 37365945 DOI: 10.1002/prca.202200118] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2022] [Revised: 04/21/2023] [Accepted: 06/06/2023] [Indexed: 06/28/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) are at an increased risk of fractures. Total urinary hydroxyproline excretion served as marker for bone resorption (BR) but was replaced by β-CrossLaps (CTX), a C-terminal collagen α-1(I) chain (COL1A1) telopeptide. We investigated the low-molecular-weight urinary proteome for peptides associated with changes in bone metabolism after kidney transplantation. METHODS Clinical and laboratory data including serum levels of CTX in 96 KTR from two nephrology centers were correlated with signal intensities of urinary peptides identified by capillary electrophoresis mass spectrometry. RESULTS Eighty-two urinary peptides were significantly correlated with serum CTX levels. COL1A1 was the predominant peptide source. Oral bisphosphonates were administered for decreased bone density in an independent group of 11 KTR and their effect was evaluated on the aforementioned peptides. Study of the peptides cleavage sites revealed a signature of Cathepsin K and MMP9. Seventeen of these peptides were significantly associated with bisphosphonate treatment, all showing a marked reduction in their excretion levels compared to baseline. DISCUSSION This study provides strong evidence for the presence of collagen peptides in the urine of KTR that are associated with BR and that are sensitive to bisphosphonate treatment. Their assessment might become a valuable tool to monitor bone status in KTR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Marx
- Department of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, Nouvel Hôpital Civil, Strasbourg, France
- INSERM UMR-S1109, FMTS, Strasbourg, France
- Hospital of Sélestat, Sélestat, France
| | - Dany Anglicheau
- INSERM U1151, Paris, France
- Department of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, Necker Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France
- Medical Faculty, Paris University, Paris, France
| | - Sophie Caillard
- Department of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, Nouvel Hôpital Civil, Strasbourg, France
- INSERM UMR-S1109, FMTS, Strasbourg, France
| | - Bruno Moulin
- Department of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, Nouvel Hôpital Civil, Strasbourg, France
- INSERM UMR-S1109, FMTS, Strasbourg, France
| | - Audrey Kochman
- Department of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, Nouvel Hôpital Civil, Strasbourg, France
| | | | | | - Frank Bienaimé
- INSERM U1151, Paris, France
- Department of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, Necker Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France
- Department of Physiology, Necker Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France
| | - Dominique Prié
- INSERM U1151, Paris, France
- Department of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, Necker Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France
- Department of Physiology, Necker Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France
| | - Pierre Marquet
- Pharmacology & Transplantation, INSERM U1248, Université de Limoges, Limoges, France
| | - Peggy Perrin
- Department of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, Nouvel Hôpital Civil, Strasbourg, France
- INSERM UMR-S1109, FMTS, Strasbourg, France
| | - Wilfried Gwinner
- Department of Nephrology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Laurent MR, Goemaere S, Verroken C, Bergmann P, Body JJ, Bruyère O, Cavalier E, Rozenberg S, Lapauw B, Gielen E. Prevention and Treatment of Glucocorticoid-Induced Osteoporosis in Adults: Consensus Recommendations From the Belgian Bone Club. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2022; 13:908727. [PMID: 35757436 PMCID: PMC9219603 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2022.908727] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2022] [Accepted: 05/02/2022] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Glucocorticoids are effective immunomodulatory drugs used for many inflammatory disorders as well as in transplant recipients. However, both iatrogenic and endogenous glucocorticoid excess are also associated with several side effects including an increased risk of osteoporosis and fractures. Glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis (GIOP) is a common secondary cause of osteoporosis in adults. Despite availability of clear evidence and international guidelines for the prevention of GIOP, a large treatment gap remains. In this narrative review, the Belgian Bone Club (BBC) updates its 2006 consensus recommendations for the prevention and treatment of GIOP in adults. The pathophysiology of GIOP is multifactorial. The BBC strongly advises non-pharmacological measures including physical exercise, smoking cessation and avoidance of alcohol abuse in all adults at risk for osteoporosis. Glucocorticoids are associated with impaired intestinal calcium absorption; the BBC therefore strongly recommend sufficient calcium intake and avoidance of vitamin D deficiency. We recommend assessment of fracture risk, taking age, sex, menopausal status, prior fractures, glucocorticoid dose, other clinical risk factors and bone mineral density into account. Placebo-controlled randomized controlled trials have demonstrated the efficacy of alendronate, risedronate, zoledronate, denosumab and teriparatide in GIOP. We suggest monitoring by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and vertebral fracture identification one year after glucocorticoid initiation. The trabecular bone score might be considered during DXA monitoring. Extended femur scans might be considered at the time of DXA imaging in glucocorticoid users on long-term (≥ 3 years) antiresorptive therapy. Bone turnover markers may be considered for monitoring treatment with anti-resorptive or osteoanabolic drugs in GIOP. Although the pathophysiology of solid organ and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation-induced osteoporosis extends beyond GIOP alone, the BBC recommends similar evaluation, prevention, treatment and follow-up principles in these patients. Efforts to close the treatment gap in GIOP and implement available effective fracture prevention strategies into clinical practice in primary, secondary and tertiary care are urgently needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michaël R. Laurent
- Centre for Metabolic Bone Diseases, Department of Geriatrics, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Geriatrics, Imelda Hospital, Bonheiden, Belgium
| | - Stefan Goemaere
- Unit for Osteoporosis and Metabolic Bone Diseases, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Charlotte Verroken
- Unit for Osteoporosis and Metabolic Bone Diseases, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
- Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Pierre Bergmann
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, CHU Brugmann, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Jean-Jacques Body
- Department of Medicine, CHU Brugmann, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Olivier Bruyère
- WHO Collaborating Center for Public Health Aspects of Musculoskeletal Health and Ageing, Division of Public Health, Epidemiology and Health Economics, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium
| | - Etienne Cavalier
- Department of Clinical Chemistry, University of Liège, CHU de Liège, Liège, Belgium
| | - Serge Rozenberg
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Bruno Lapauw
- Unit for Osteoporosis and Metabolic Bone Diseases, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
- Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Evelien Gielen
- Centre for Metabolic Bone Diseases, Department of Geriatrics, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Gerontology and Geriatrics section, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University Hospitals Leuven and KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Jehn U, Kortenhorn A, Schütte-Nütgen K, Thölking G, Westphal F, Strauss M, Wennmann DO, Pavenstädt H, Suwelack B, Görlich D, Reuter S. The Influence of Parathyroidectomy on Osteoporotic Fractures in Kidney Transplant Recipients: Results from a Retrospective Single-Center Trial. J Clin Med 2022; 11:654. [PMID: 35160109 PMCID: PMC8836679 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11030654] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2021] [Revised: 01/24/2022] [Accepted: 01/26/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Kidney transplant (KTx) recipients are a high-risk population for osteoporotic fractures. We herein aim to identify the role of pre-transplant parathyroidectomy (PTX) and other modifiable factors associated with osteoporotic fractures in KTx recipients. We conducted a retrospective study involving 711 adult patients (4608 patient-years) who were transplanted at our center between January 2007 and June 2015. Clinical data were extracted from patients' electronic medical records. Different laboratory and clinical parameters for mineral bone disease (MBD) and osteoporosis, including medication, were evaluated. We chose fracture events unrelated to malignancies or adequate trauma as the primary endpoint. Osteoporotic fractures occurred in 47 (6.6%) patients (median 36.7 months, IQR 45.9) after KTx (fracture incidence of 10 per 1000 person-years). Prior to KTx, subtotal PTX was performed in 116 patients (16.3%, median time 4.2 years before KTx, IQR 5.0). Of the patients with fracture (n = 47), only one (2.2%) patient had previously undergone PTX. After adjusting for the known fracture risk factors MBD and osteoporosis, PTX remained a protective factor against fractures (HR 0.134, CI 0.018-0.991, p = 0.049). We observed a reduced risk for pathological fractures in KTx patients who underwent PTX, independent from elevated parathyroid hormone at the time of KTx or afterwards.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ulrich Jehn
- Department of Medicine D, Division of General Internal Medicine, Nephrology and Rheumatology, University Hospital of Muenster, 48149 Muenster, Germany; (A.K.); (K.S.-N.); (G.T.); (F.W.); (D.-O.W.); (H.P.); (B.S.); (S.R.)
| | - Anja Kortenhorn
- Department of Medicine D, Division of General Internal Medicine, Nephrology and Rheumatology, University Hospital of Muenster, 48149 Muenster, Germany; (A.K.); (K.S.-N.); (G.T.); (F.W.); (D.-O.W.); (H.P.); (B.S.); (S.R.)
| | - Katharina Schütte-Nütgen
- Department of Medicine D, Division of General Internal Medicine, Nephrology and Rheumatology, University Hospital of Muenster, 48149 Muenster, Germany; (A.K.); (K.S.-N.); (G.T.); (F.W.); (D.-O.W.); (H.P.); (B.S.); (S.R.)
| | - Gerold Thölking
- Department of Medicine D, Division of General Internal Medicine, Nephrology and Rheumatology, University Hospital of Muenster, 48149 Muenster, Germany; (A.K.); (K.S.-N.); (G.T.); (F.W.); (D.-O.W.); (H.P.); (B.S.); (S.R.)
| | - Florian Westphal
- Department of Medicine D, Division of General Internal Medicine, Nephrology and Rheumatology, University Hospital of Muenster, 48149 Muenster, Germany; (A.K.); (K.S.-N.); (G.T.); (F.W.); (D.-O.W.); (H.P.); (B.S.); (S.R.)
| | - Markus Strauss
- Department of Medicine C, Division of Cardiology and Angiology, University Hospital of Muenster, 48149 Muenster, Germany;
| | - Dirk-Oliver Wennmann
- Department of Medicine D, Division of General Internal Medicine, Nephrology and Rheumatology, University Hospital of Muenster, 48149 Muenster, Germany; (A.K.); (K.S.-N.); (G.T.); (F.W.); (D.-O.W.); (H.P.); (B.S.); (S.R.)
| | - Hermann Pavenstädt
- Department of Medicine D, Division of General Internal Medicine, Nephrology and Rheumatology, University Hospital of Muenster, 48149 Muenster, Germany; (A.K.); (K.S.-N.); (G.T.); (F.W.); (D.-O.W.); (H.P.); (B.S.); (S.R.)
| | - Barbara Suwelack
- Department of Medicine D, Division of General Internal Medicine, Nephrology and Rheumatology, University Hospital of Muenster, 48149 Muenster, Germany; (A.K.); (K.S.-N.); (G.T.); (F.W.); (D.-O.W.); (H.P.); (B.S.); (S.R.)
| | - Dennis Görlich
- Institute of Biostatistics and Clinical Research, University of Muenster, 48149 Muenster, Germany;
| | - Stefan Reuter
- Department of Medicine D, Division of General Internal Medicine, Nephrology and Rheumatology, University Hospital of Muenster, 48149 Muenster, Germany; (A.K.); (K.S.-N.); (G.T.); (F.W.); (D.-O.W.); (H.P.); (B.S.); (S.R.)
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Afifi MK, Kenawy AS, El Demellawy HH, Azouz AA, Al-Otaibi T, Gheith O, ElMonem MA, AbdElhalim MS, Hussein RRS. Optimization of osteoporosis and osteopenia management among renal transplant recipients. FUTURE JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES 2021. [DOI: 10.1186/s43094-021-00378-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Osteoporosis and osteopenia occur frequently in renal transplant recipients due to long-term use of immune-suppressants including corticosteroids. Previous treatment options like bisphosphonates had acceptable but rather unsatisfactory results after transplant. The aim of the current study is to directly compare the efficacy of denosumab and oral ibandronate in late RTR with low bone mineral density.
Results
The study was conducted Iin Hamed Al-Essa Kidney transplant center, Kuwait, in 2020. The data of 52 denosumab and 48 ibandronate patients were collected at the baseline and after one year of treatment. Spine and hip T-score readings, side effects, and other laboratory results were analyzed to evaluate the use of both medications. The mean number of months after transplant was 25 (± 13.9) months. After one year of treatment, denosumab alleviated both spinal osteoporosis and osteopenia T-score values from −3.13 to −2.4 (p = 0.008) and from −1.9 to −1.5 (p = 0.015), respectively. Besides, it reduced hip osteoporosis and osteopenia insignificantly from −3.45 to −3.1 and from −1.5 to −1.3, respectively (p > 0.05). Ibandronate improved spinal osteopenia from −1.6 to −1.55 (p = 0.97) and failed to show any positive impact on other sites; the spinal osteoporosis changed from −2.8 to −3 and hip osteoporosis and osteopenia changed from −3.1 to −3.12 and from −1.4 to −1.45, respectively (p > 0.05). The use of ibandronate was more associated with gastrointestinal tract (GIT) side effects, while hypocalcemia episodes were significantly higher in the denosumab group.
Conclusion
Denosumab improved both spinal and hip T-score values in comparison with ibandronate in RTR. Close monitoring is required for denosumab patients to prevent the associated hypocalcemia.
Graphical Abstract
Collapse
|
7
|
Tasnim N, Dutta P, Nayeem J, Masud P, Ferdousi A, Ghosh AS, Hossain M, Rajia S, Kubra KT, Sakibuzzaman M, Khan AT. Osteoporosis, an Inevitable Circumstance of Chronic Kidney Disease: A Systematic Review. Cureus 2021; 13:e18488. [PMID: 34692259 PMCID: PMC8526087 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.18488] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/04/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Nowadays, chronic kidney disease (CKD) and osteoporosis have become crucial health-related issues globally. CKD-induced osteoporosis is a systemic disease characterized by the disruption of mineral, hormone, and vitamin homeostasis that elevates the likelihood of fracture. Here, we review recent studies on the association of CKD and osteoporosis. In particular, we focus on the pathogenesis of CKD-associated osteoporosis, including the homeostasis and pathways of several components such as parathyroid hormone, calcium, phosphate, vitamin D, fibroblast growth factor, and klotho, as well as abnormal bone mineralization, remodeling, and turnover. In addition, we explore the diagnostic tools and possible therapeutic approaches for the management and prevention of CKD-associated osteoporosis. Patients with CKD show higher osteoporosis prevalence, greater fracture rate, increased morbidity and mortality, and an elevated occurrence of hip fracture. We also rule out that increased severity of CKD is related to a more severe condition of osteoporosis. Furthermore, supplements such as calcium and vitamin D as well as lifestyle modifications such as exercise and cessation of smoking and alcohol help in fracture prevention. However, new approaches and advancements in treatment are needed to reduce the fracture risk in patients with CKD. Therefore, further collaborative multidisciplinary research is needed in this regard.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nishat Tasnim
- Internal Medicine, Sacramento Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Mather, USA
| | - Priyata Dutta
- Internal Medicine, Mymensingh Medical College, Mymensingh, BGD
| | - Jannatun Nayeem
- Internal Medicine, Cumilla Medical College and Hospital, Cumilla, BGD
| | - Parisha Masud
- Internal Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, USA
| | - Afsana Ferdousi
- Internal Medicine, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA
| | - Ammy S Ghosh
- Internal Medicine, Institute of Applied Health Sciences, Chittagong, BGD
| | - Maksuda Hossain
- Biodesign Institute Center for Immunotherapy, Vaccines and Virotherapy, Arizona State University, Tempe, USA
| | - Sultana Rajia
- Internal Medicine, Sher-E Bangla Medical College, Barishal, BGD
| | - Khadija T Kubra
- Internal Medicine, Bangladesh Medical College and Hospital, Dhaka, BGD
| | - Md Sakibuzzaman
- Internal Medicine, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, USA.,Experimental Pathology (Cancer Biology), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA.,Internal Medicine, Sir Salimullah Medical College, Dhaka, BGD.,Neuroscience, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA
| | - Asma T Khan
- Division of Research & Academic Affairs, Larkin Community Hospital, South Miami, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Cianciolo G, Tondolo F, Barbuto S, Iacovella F, Zavatta G, Altieri P, Grandinetti V, Comai G, Cozzolino M, La Manna G. Denosumab-Induced Hypocalcemia and Hyperparathyroidism in de novo Kidney Transplant Recipients. Am J Nephrol 2021; 52:611-619. [PMID: 34518468 DOI: 10.1159/000518363] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2021] [Accepted: 07/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Denosumab represents a realistic treatment option to increase bone mineral density in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs). It is still unknown how and at what extent posttransplantation bone disease and graft function influence the effects of denosumab on mineral metabolism indexes. In this study, we analyze risk factors of hypocalcemia and parathyroid hormone (PTH) increase after denosumab administration in eighteen de novo KTRs and its management before and after this treatment. METHODS We conducted a monocentric, observational, prospective study on de novo KTRs. All KTRs enrolled received a single 60 mg subcutaneous dose of denosumab every 6 months. Before kidney transplantation, no patients were treated with calcio-mimetic. After kidney transplantation and before antiresorptive therapy, no patients were treated with calcio-mimetic drugs and/or vitamin D receptor agonists, while all patients received nutritional vitamin D supplementation (from 1,000 IU to 1,500 IU daily). RESULTS Hypocalcemia was related to the degree of lumbar osteoporosis (p = 0.047); the increase in the PTH level was correlated to baseline bone turnover markers (bone alkaline phosphatase, serum osteocalcin, and β-C-terminal telopeptide), the 25 OH status, and eGFR. The introduction of calcitriol, after the PTH increase, in addition to cholecalciferol was necessary to ensure an adequate control of serum calcium and PTH during a follow-up of 15 months. Following the treatment with denosumab, it was observed an improvement of areal bone mineral density both at lumbar and femoral sites with a mean percentual increase of 1.74% and 0.25%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Denosumab is an effective treatment for bone disease in KTRs. In our study, the increase in PTH is not a transient event but prolonged throughout the follow-up period and requires continuous supplementation therapy with calcitriol.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giuseppe Cianciolo
- Nephrology, Dialysis and Renal Transplant Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy,
| | - Francesco Tondolo
- Nephrology, Dialysis and Renal Transplant Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Simona Barbuto
- Nephrology, Dialysis and Renal Transplant Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Francesca Iacovella
- Nephrology, Dialysis and Renal Transplant Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Guido Zavatta
- Division of Endocrinology and Diabetes Prevention and Care, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), Università Alma Mater Studiorum di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Paola Altieri
- Division of Endocrinology and Diabetes Prevention and Care, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), Università Alma Mater Studiorum di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Valeria Grandinetti
- Nephrology, Dialysis and Renal Transplant Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Giorgia Comai
- Nephrology, Dialysis and Renal Transplant Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Mario Cozzolino
- Department of Health Sciences, Renal Division, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Gaetano La Manna
- Nephrology, Dialysis and Renal Transplant Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Hara T, Hijikata Y, Matsubara Y, Watanabe N. Pharmacological interventions versus placebo, no treatment or usual care for osteoporosis in people with chronic kidney disease stages 3-5D. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2021; 7:CD013424. [PMID: 34231877 PMCID: PMC8262129 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd013424.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is an independent risk factor for osteoporosis and is more prevalent among people with CKD than among people who do not have CKD. Although several drugs have been used to effectively treat osteoporosis in the general population, it is unclear whether they are also effective and safe for people with CKD, who have altered systemic mineral and bone metabolism. OBJECTIVES To assess the efficacy and safety of pharmacological interventions for osteoporosis in patients with CKD stages 3-5, and those undergoing dialysis (5D). SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Register of Studies up to 25 January 2021 through contact with the Information Specialist using search terms relevant to this review. Studies in the Register are identified through searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE, conference proceedings, the International Clinical Trials Register (ICTRP) Search Portal and ClinicalTrials.gov. SELECTION CRITERIA Randomised controlled trials comparing any anti-osteoporotic drugs with a placebo, no treatment or usual care in patients with osteoporosis and CKD stages 3 to 5D were included. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently selected studies, assessed their quality using the risk of bias tool, and extracted data. The main outcomes were the incidence of fracture at any sites; mean change in the bone mineral density (BMD; measured using dual-energy radiographic absorptiometry (DXA)) of the femoral neck, total hip, lumbar spine, and distal radius; death from all causes; incidence of adverse events; and quality of life (QoL). Summary estimates of effect were obtained using a random-effects model, and results were expressed as risk ratios (RR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) for dichotomous outcomes, and mean difference (MD) for continuous outcomes. Confidence in the evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. MAIN RESULTS Seven studies involving 9164 randomised participants with osteoporosis and CKD stages 3 to 5D met the inclusion criteria; all participants were postmenopausal women. Five studies included patients with CKD stages 3-4, and two studies included patients with CKD stages 5 or 5D. Five pharmacological interventions were identified (abaloparatide, alendronate, denosumab, raloxifene, and teriparatide). All studies were judged to be at an overall high risk of bias. Among patients with CKD stages 3-4, anti-osteoporotic drugs may reduce the risk of vertebral fracture (RR 0.52, 95% CI 0.39 to 0.69; low certainty evidence). Anti-osteoporotic drugs probably makes little or no difference to the risk of clinical fracture (RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.79 to 1.05; moderate certainty evidence) and adverse events (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.98 to 1.00; moderate certainty evidence). We were unable to incorporate studies into the meta-analyses for BMD at the femoral neck, lumbar spine and total hip as they only reported the percentage change in the BMD in the intervention group. Among patients with severe CKD stages 5 or 5D, it is uncertain whether anti-osteoporotic drug reduces the risk of clinical fracture (RR 0.33, 95% CI 0.01 to 7.87; very low certainty evidence). It is uncertain whether anti-osteoporotic drug improves the BMD at the femoral neck because the certainty of this evidence is very low (MD 0.01, 95% CI 0.00 to 0.02). Anti-osteoporotic drug may slightly improve the BMD at the lumbar spine (MD 0.03, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.04, low certainty evidence). No adverse events were reported in the included studies. It is uncertain whether anti-osteoporotic drug reduces the risk of death (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.22 to 4.56; very low certainty evidence). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Among patients with CKD stages 3-4, anti-osteoporotic drugs may reduce the risk of vertebral fracture in low certainty evidence. Anti-osteoporotic drugs make little or no difference to the risk of clinical fracture and adverse events in moderate certainty evidence. Among patients with CKD stages 5 and 5D, it is uncertain whether anti-osteoporotic drug reduces the risk of clinical fracture and death because the certainty of this evidence is very low. Anti-osteoporotic drug may slightly improve the BMD at the lumbar spine in low certainty evidence. It is uncertain whether anti-osteoporotic drug improves the BMD at the femoral neck because the certainty of this evidence is very low. Larger studies including men, paediatric patients or individuals with unstable CKD-mineral and bone disorder are required to assess the effect of each anti-osteoporotic drug at each stage of CKD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takashi Hara
- Department of Healthcare Epidemiology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine/School of Public Health, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Yasukazu Hijikata
- Department of Healthcare Epidemiology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine/School of Public Health, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Yukiko Matsubara
- Department of Nephrology, Hiroshima University Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Norio Watanabe
- Department of Psychiatry, Soseikai General Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Torregrosa JV, Ferreira AC, Cucchiari D, Ferreira A. Bone Mineral Disease After Kidney Transplantation. Calcif Tissue Int 2021; 108:551-560. [PMID: 33765230 DOI: 10.1007/s00223-021-00837-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2021] [Accepted: 03/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Chronic kidney disease-mineral bone disorder (CKD-MBD) after kidney transplantation is a mix of pre-existing disorders and new alterations. The final consequences are reflected fundamentally as abnormal mineral metabolism (hypercalcemia, hypophosphatemia) and bone alterations [high or low bone turnover disease (as fibrous osteitis or adynamic bone disease), an eventual compromise of bone mineralization, decrease bone mineral density and bone fractures]. The major cause of post-transplantation hypercalcemia is the persistence of severe secondary hyperparathyroidism, and treatment options include calcimimetics or parathyroidectomy. On turn, hypophosphatemia is caused by both the persistence of high blood levels of PTH and/or high blood levels of FGF23, with its correction being very difficult to achieve. The most frequent bone morphology alteration is low bone turnover disease, while high-turnover osteopathy decreases in frequency after transplantation. Although the pathogenic mechanisms of these abnormalities have not been fully clarified, the available evidence suggests that there are a number of factors that play a very important role, such as immunosuppressive treatment, persistently high levels of PTH, vitamin D deficiency and hypophosphatemia. Fracture risk is four-fold higher in transplanted patients compared to general population. The most relevant risk factors for fracture in the kidney transplant population are diabetes mellitus, female sex, advanced age (especially > 65 years), dialysis vintage, high PTH levels and low phosphate levels, osteoporosis, pre-transplant stress fracture and high doses or prolonged steroids therapy. Treatment alternatives for CKD-MBD after transplantation include minimization of corticosteroids, use of calcium and vitamin D supplements, antiresorptives (bisphosphonates or Denosumab) and osteoformers (synthetic parathyroid hormone). As both mineral metabolism and bone disorders lead to increased morbidity and mortality, the presence of these changes after transplantation has to be prevented (if possible), minimized, diagnosed, and treated as soon as possible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Josep-Vicent Torregrosa
- Nephrology & Renal Transplant Department - Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain.
- Universidad de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
| | - Ana Carina Ferreira
- Nephrology Department, Centro Hospitalare, Universitário de Lisboa Central, Lisbon, Portugal
- Nova Medical School, Nova University, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - David Cucchiari
- Nephrology & Renal Transplant Department - Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Aníbal Ferreira
- Nephrology Department, Centro Hospitalare, Universitário de Lisboa Central, Lisbon, Portugal
- Nova Medical School, Nova University, Lisbon, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Palmer SC, Chung EYM, McGregor DO, Bachmann F, Strippoli GFM. Interventions for preventing bone disease in kidney transplant recipients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2019; 10:CD005015. [PMID: 31637698 PMCID: PMC6803293 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd005015.pub4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND People who have chronic kidney disease (CKD) have important changes to bone structure, strength, and metabolism. Children experience bone deformity, pain, and delayed or impaired growth. Adults experience limb and vertebral fractures, avascular necrosis, and pain. The fracture risk after kidney transplantation is four times that of the general population and is related to Chronic Kidney Disease-Mineral and Bone Disorder (CKD-MBD) occurring with end-stage kidney failure, steroid-induced bone loss, and persistent hyperparathyroidism after transplantation. Fractures may reduce quality of life and lead to being unable to work or contribute to community roles and responsibilities. Earlier versions of this review have found low certainty evidence for effects of treatment. This is an update of a review first published in 2005 and updated in 2007. OBJECTIVES This review update evaluates the benefits and harms of interventions for preventing bone disease following kidney transplantation. SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Register of Studies up to 16 May 2019 through contact with the Information Specialist using search terms relevant to this review. Studies in the Register are identified through searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE, conference proceedings, the International Clinical Trials Register (ICTRP) Search Portal and ClinicalTrials.gov. SELECTION CRITERIA RCTs and quasi-RCTs evaluating treatments for bone disease among kidney transplant recipients of any age were eligible. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two authors independently assessed trial risks of bias and extracted data. Statistical analyses were performed using random effects meta-analysis. The risk estimates were expressed as a risk ratio (RR) for dichotomous variables and mean difference (MD) for continuous outcomes together with the corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI). The primary efficacy outcome was bone fracture. The primary safety outcome was acute graft rejection. Secondary outcomes included death (all cause and cardiovascular), myocardial infarction, stroke, musculoskeletal disorders (e.g. skeletal deformity, bone pain), graft loss, nausea, hyper- or hypocalcaemia, kidney function, serum parathyroid hormone (PTH), and bone mineral density (BMD). MAIN RESULTS In this 2019 update, 65 studies (involving 3598 participants) were eligible; 45 studies contributed data to our meta-analyses (2698 participants). Treatments included bisphosphonates, vitamin D compounds, teriparatide, denosumab, cinacalcet, parathyroidectomy, and calcitonin. Median duration of follow-up was 12 months. Forty-three studies evaluated bone density or bone-related biomarkers, with more recent studies evaluating proteinuria and hyperparathyroidism. Bisphosphonate therapy was usually commenced in the perioperative transplantation period (within 3 weeks) and regardless of BMD. Risks of bias were generally high or unclear leading to lower certainty in the results. A single study reported outcomes among 60 children and adolescents. Studies were not designed to measure treatment effects on fracture, death or cardiovascular outcomes, or graft loss.Compared to placebo, bisphosphonate therapy administered over 12 months in transplant recipients may prevent fracture (RR 0.62, 95% CI 0.38 to 1.01; low certainty evidence) although the 95% CI included the possibility that bisphosphonate therapy might make little or no difference. Fracture events were principally vertebral fractures identified during routine radiographic surveillance. It was uncertain whether any other drug class decreased fracture (low or very low certainty evidence). It was uncertain whether interventions for bone disease in kidney transplantation reduce all-cause or cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction or stroke, or graft loss in very low certainty evidence. Bisphosphonate therapy may decrease acute graft rejection (RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.55 to 0.89; low certainty evidence), while it is uncertain whether any other treatment impacts graft rejection (very low certainty evidence). Bisphosphonate therapy may reduce bone pain (RR 0.20, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.93; very low certainty evidence), while it was very uncertain whether bisphosphonates prevent spinal deformity or avascular bone necrosis (very low certainty evidence). Bisphosphonates may increase to risk of hypocalcaemia (RR 5.59, 95% CI 1.00 to 31.06; low certainty evidence). It was uncertain whether vitamin D compounds had any effect on skeletal, cardiovascular, death, or transplant function outcomes (very low certainty or absence of evidence). Evidence for the benefits and harms of all other treatments was of very low certainty. Evidence for children and young adolescents was sparse. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Bisphosphonate therapy may reduce fracture and bone pain after kidney transplantation, however low certainty in the evidence indicates it is possible that treatment may make little or no difference. It is uncertain whether bisphosphonate therapy or other bone treatments prevent other skeletal complications after kidney transplantation, including spinal deformity or avascular bone necrosis. The effects of bone treatment for children and adolescents after kidney transplantation are very uncertain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suetonia C Palmer
- University of Otago ChristchurchDepartment of Medicine2 Riccarton AvePO Box 4345ChristchurchNew Zealand8140
| | - Edmund YM Chung
- Royal North Shore HospitalDepartment of Medicine48 Provincial RoadSydneyNSWAustralia2070
| | - David O McGregor
- Christchurch HospitalDepartment of NephrologyPrivate Bag 4710ChristchurchNew Zealand8001
| | - Friederike Bachmann
- Charité University Medicine BerlinDepartment of Nephrology and Medical Intensive CareCharitéplatz 1BerlinGermany10117
| | - Giovanni FM Strippoli
- University of BariDepartment of Emergency and Organ TransplantationBariItaly
- DiaverumMedical Scientific OfficeLundSweden
- Diaverum AcademyBariItaly
- The Children's Hospital at WestmeadCochrane Kidney and Transplant, Centre for Kidney ResearchWestmeadNSWAustralia2145
| | | |
Collapse
|