1
|
Ibragimov K, Keane GP, Carreño Glaría C, Cheng J, Llosa AE. Haloperidol (oral) versus olanzapine (oral) for people with schizophrenia and schizophrenia-spectrum disorders. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2024; 7:CD013425. [PMID: 38958149 PMCID: PMC11220909 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd013425.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/04/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Schizophrenia is often a severe and disabling psychiatric disorder. Antipsychotics remain the mainstay of psychotropic treatment for people with psychosis. In limited resource and humanitarian contexts, it is key to have several options for beneficial, low-cost antipsychotics, which require minimal monitoring. We wanted to compare oral haloperidol, as one of the most available antipsychotics in these settings, with a second-generation antipsychotic, olanzapine. OBJECTIVES To assess the clinical benefits and harms of haloperidol compared to olanzapine for people with schizophrenia and schizophrenia-spectrum disorders. SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Schizophrenia study-based register of trials, which is based on monthly searches of CENTRAL, CINAHL, ClinicalTrials.gov, Embase, ISRCTN, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, PubMed and WHO ICTRP. We screened the references of all included studies. We contacted relevant authors of trials for additional information where clarification was required or where data were incomplete. The register was last searched on 14 January 2023. SELECTION CRITERIA Randomised clinical trials comparing haloperidol with olanzapine for people with schizophrenia and schizophrenia-spectrum disorders. Our main outcomes of interest were clinically important change in global state, relapse, clinically important change in mental state, extrapyramidal side effects, weight increase, clinically important change in quality of life and leaving the study early due to adverse effects. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We independently evaluated and extracted data. For dichotomous outcomes, we calculated risk ratios (RR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) and the number needed to treat for an additional beneficial or harmful outcome (NNTB or NNTH) with 95% CI. For continuous data, we estimated mean differences (MD) or standardised mean differences (SMD) with 95% CIs. For all included studies, we assessed risk of bias (RoB 1) and we used the GRADE approach to create a summary of findings table. MAIN RESULTS We included 68 studies randomising 9132 participants. We are very uncertain whether there is a difference between haloperidol and olanzapine in clinically important change in global state (RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.69 to 1.02; 6 studies, 3078 participants; very low-certainty evidence). We are very uncertain whether there is a difference between haloperidol and olanzapine in relapse (RR 1.42, 95% CI 1.00 to 2.02; 7 studies, 1499 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Haloperidol may reduce the incidence of clinically important change in overall mental state compared to olanzapine (RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.60 to 0.81; 13 studies, 1210 participants; low-certainty evidence). For every eight people treated with haloperidol instead of olanzapine, one fewer person would experience this improvement. The evidence suggests that haloperidol may result in a large increase in extrapyramidal side effects compared to olanzapine (RR 3.38, 95% CI 2.28 to 5.02; 14 studies, 3290 participants; low-certainty evidence). For every three people treated with haloperidol instead of olanzapine, one additional person would experience extrapyramidal side effects. For weight gain, the evidence suggests that there may be a large reduction in the risk with haloperidol compared to olanzapine (RR 0.47, 95% CI 0.35 to 0.61; 18 studies, 4302 participants; low-certainty evidence). For every 10 people treated with haloperidol instead of olanzapine, one fewer person would experience weight increase. A single study suggests that haloperidol may reduce the incidence of clinically important change in quality of life compared to olanzapine (RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.57 to 0.91; 828 participants; low-certainty evidence). For every nine people treated with haloperidol instead of olanzapine, one fewer person would experience clinically important improvement in quality of life. Haloperidol may result in an increase in the incidence of leaving the study early due to adverse effects compared to olanzapine (RR 1.99, 95% CI 1.60 to 2.47; 21 studies, 5047 participants; low-certainty evidence). For every 22 people treated with haloperidol instead of olanzapine, one fewer person would experience this outcome. Thirty otherwise relevant studies and several endpoints from 14 included studies could not be evaluated due to inconsistencies and poor transparency of several parameters. Furthermore, even within studies that were included, it was often not possible to use data for the same reasons. Risk of bias differed substantially for different outcomes and the certainty of the evidence ranged from very low to low. The most common risks of bias leading to downgrading of the evidence were blinding (performance bias) and selective reporting (reporting bias). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Overall, the certainty of the evidence was low to very low for the main outcomes in this review, making it difficult to draw reliable conclusions. We are very uncertain whether there is a difference between haloperidol and olanzapine in terms of clinically important global state and relapse. Olanzapine may result in a slightly greater overall clinically important change in mental state and in a clinically important change in quality of life. Different side effect profiles were noted: haloperidol may result in a large increase in extrapyramidal side effects and olanzapine in a large increase in weight gain. The drug of choice needs to take into account side effect profiles and the preferences of the individual. These findings and the recent inclusion of olanzapine alongside haloperidol in the WHO Model List of Essential Medicines should increase the likelihood of it becoming more easily available in low- and middle- income countries, thereby improving choice and providing a greater ability to respond to side effects for people with lived experience of schizophrenia. There is a need for additional research using appropriate and equivalent dosages of these drugs. Some of this research needs to be done in low- and middle-income settings and should actively seek to account for factors relevant to these. Research on antipsychotics needs to be person-centred and prioritise factors that are of interest to people with lived experience of schizophrenia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Khasan Ibragimov
- Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sante Publique (EHESP), Hautes Etudes en Sante Publique (EHESP), Paris, France
- Epicentre, Paris, France
| | | | | | - Jie Cheng
- Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Augusto Eduardo Llosa
- Epicentre, Paris, France
- Operational Centre Barcelona, Médecins Sans Frontières, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zaki HA, Shaban E, Bashir K, Iftikhar H, Zahran A, Salem EEDM, Elmoheen A. A Comparative Analysis Between Ketamine Versus Combination of Midazolam and Haloperidol for Rapid Safe Control of Agitated Patients in Emergency Department: A Systematic Review. Cureus 2022; 14:e26162. [PMID: 35891834 PMCID: PMC9302860 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.26162] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/21/2022] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
We aim to discuss the efficacy and adverse effects of using ketamine in agitated patients in the emergency department (ED) compared with the combination therapy of haloperidol with benzodiazepine. This systematic review followed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. An electronic search from PubMed/Medline, Cochrane library, and Google Scholar was conducted from their inception to 30th April 2022. We included agitated patients in ED who were given infusion with ketamine only. Our comparative group was patients infused with combined therapy of haloperidol and benzodiazepine. We did not include letters, case reports, abstracts, conference papers, appraisals, reviews, and studies where full text was unavailable. We did not put any language restrictions. Three studies were selected in our manuscript (one cohort and two randomized controlled trials). All three studies showed that ketamine was used to achieve sedation in less time than the other group. However, two studies reported significantly more adverse effects in ketamine-infused groups. We concluded that ketamine use is superior when its primary focus is to sedate the patient as quickly as possible, but it carries some side effects that should be considered. However, we still need more studies assessing the efficacy of ketamine in agitated patients presenting in the ED.
Collapse
|
3
|
Miller J. Managing acute agitation and aggression in the world of drug shortages. Ment Health Clin 2021; 11:334-346. [PMID: 34824958 PMCID: PMC8582771 DOI: 10.9740/mhc.2021.11.334] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2021] [Accepted: 06/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Acute agitation and aggression create safety risks for both patients and staff, often leading to psychiatric emergencies. Quick and appropriate treatment is necessary to achieve safe and effective outcomes. Unfortunately, there are several factors that hinder timely interventions, such as medication shortages and delay in staff preparedness. Ultimately, the goal of managing acute agitation and aggression in the clinical setting is to de-escalate the situation and prevent harm to patients and staff. This article will explore useful interventions in realizing treatment goals for the management of agitation and aggression in adults while navigating limitations faced in practice.
Collapse
|
4
|
Kim HK, Leonard JB, Corwell BN, Connors NJ. Safety and efficacy of pharmacologic agents used for rapid tranquilization of emergency department patients with acute agitation or excited delirium. Expert Opin Drug Saf 2021; 20:123-138. [PMID: 33327811 DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2021.1865911] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Introduction: Management of patients with acute agitation or aggressive behavior can pose a significant challenge to health-care providers in emergency departments. Areas covered: This article provides a comprehensive review of the pharmacologic properties, efficacy, and safety profiles of select intramuscular (IM) sedative agents (i.e., antipsychotics, benzodiazepines, and ketamine) for rapid tranquilization. Expert opinion: Using antipsychotics and benzodiazepines - whether a single agent or combined - will have similar efficacy in producing sedation. But there are differences in the time to sedation depending on which agent is used. Based upon the available studies, droperidol (5-10 mg IM) and midazolam (5-10 mg IM) have the fastest onset of sedation when either is used as a single agent. When combination therapy is used, using midazolam with an antipsychotic agent, instead of lorazepam, may result in faster sedative effect. QT prolongation and torsades de pointes are uncommon adverse drug effects of antipsychotic administration. Ketamine is often reserved as a second-line agent when antipsychotics and benzodiazepines fail to produce the desired tranquilization. However, ketamine (5 mg/kg IM) is more frequently associated with airway compromise requiring endotracheal intubation. A low-dose of ketamine (2 mg/kg IM) may reduce the risk of airway compromise while providing adequate sedation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hong K Kim
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine , Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - James B Leonard
- Maryland Poison Center, University of Maryland School of Pharmacy , Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Brian N Corwell
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine , Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Nicholas J Connors
- Department of Emergency Medicine, HCA Healthcare Trident Medical Center , Charleston, SC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Searles Quick VB, Herbst ED, Kalapatapu RK. Which Emergent Medication Should I Give Next? Repeated Use of Emergent Medications to Treat Acute Agitation. Front Psychiatry 2021; 12:750686. [PMID: 34950067 PMCID: PMC8688542 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.750686] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2021] [Accepted: 11/10/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Agitation is a common symptom encountered among patients treated in psychiatric emergency settings. While there are many guidelines available for initial management of the acutely agitated patient, there is a notable dearth of guidelines that delineate recommended approaches to the acutely agitated patient in whom an initial medication intervention has failed. This manuscript aims to fill this gap by examining evidence available in the literature and providing clinical algorithms suggested by the authors for sequential medication administration in patients with persistent acute agitation in psychiatric emergency settings. We discuss risk factors for medication-related adverse events and provide options for patients who are able to take oral medications and for patients who require parenteral intervention. We conclude with a discussion of the current need for well-designed studies that examine sequential medication options in patients with persistent acute agitation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Veronica B Searles Quick
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Ellen D Herbst
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Raj K Kalapatapu
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Helmy M, Zhang J, Wang H. Neurobiology and Neural Circuits of Aggression. ADVANCES IN EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY 2020; 1284:9-22. [DOI: 10.1007/978-981-15-7086-5_2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
|
7
|
Hirsch S, Steinert T. The Use of Rapid Tranquilization in Aggressive Behavior. DEUTSCHES ARZTEBLATT INTERNATIONAL 2020; 116:445-452. [PMID: 31431244 DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.2019.0445] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2018] [Revised: 04/16/2019] [Accepted: 04/16/2019] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Psychomotor agitation and aggressiveness in the context of mental illnessare medical emergencies. In a survey of six German psychiatric hospitals, 1.7 to 5 aggressive attacks per patient-year were reported. If talking to the patient has no calming effect, intervention with drugs is required. In this article, we review the evidence on tranquilizing drugs and discuss clinically relevant ethical and practical questions, e.g., with respect to involuntary medication. METHODS This review is based on pertinent articles retrieved by a selective search in MEDLINE, supplemented by a reference search. RESULTS The evidence for the treatment of psychomotor agitation with antipsychotic drugs and benzodiazepines is relatively good. Randomized, controlled trials and a number of Cochrane reviews are available. These publications, however, contain data only on patients who were able to give informed consent. Their findings are often not applicable to real-life emergencies, e.g., when the patient is intoxicated with alcohol or suffers from a pre-existing disease. Haloperidol has a relatively weak effect on aggression when given alone and can also cause side effects such as early dyskinesia and epileptic seizures. It should, therefore, no longer be used as monotherapy. On the other hand, haloperidol combined with benzodiazepines or promethazine and monotherapy with lorazepam, olanzapine, ziprasidone, or aripiprazole intramuscular are effective options for the treatment of aggressive psychomotor agitation. CONCLUSION All of these drugs, if accepted by the patient, can also have an additional, beneficial placebo effect, with the patient calming down more rapidly than could be explained on pharmacological grounds alone. It is, therefore, important in emergencies (as at other times) for the patient to be involved in treatment decisions to the greatest possible extent.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophie Hirsch
- South Württemberg Psychiatric Center (ZfP Südwürttemberg), Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy I, Ulm University, Ravensburg-Weissenau
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Zhou Y, Hua A, Zhou Q, Geng P, Chen F, Yan L, Wang S, Wen C. Inhibitory Effect of Lygodium Root on the Cytochrome P450 3A Enzyme in vitro and in vivo. DRUG DESIGN DEVELOPMENT AND THERAPY 2020; 14:1909-1919. [PMID: 32546958 PMCID: PMC7250706 DOI: 10.2147/dddt.s249308] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2020] [Accepted: 04/27/2020] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Purpose The aim of the present study was to investigate the interactions of the main components of Lygodium root (ie, p-coumaric acid, acacetin, apigenin, buddleoside and Diosmetin-7-O-β-D-glucopyranoside) with cytochrome P450 3A enzyme activity both in vitro and in vivo. Methods In vitro inhibition of drugs was assessed by incubating rat liver microsomes (RLMs) with a typical P450 3A enzyme substrate, midazolam, to determine their 50% inhibitory concentration (IC50) values. For the in vivo study, healthy male Sprague Dawley rats were consecutively administered acacetin or apigenin for 7 days at the dosage of 5 mg/kg after being randomly divided into 3 groups: Group A (control group), Group B (acacetin group) and Group C (apigenin group). Results Among the five main components of Lygodium root, only acacetin and apigenin showed inhibitory effects on the cytochrome P450 3A enzyme in vitro. The IC50 values of acacetin and apigenin were 58.46 μM and 8.20 μM, respectively. Additionally, the in vivo analysis results revealed that acacetin and apigenin could systemically inhibit midazolam metabolism in rats. The Tmax, AUC(0-t) and Cmax of midazolam in group B and group C were significantly increased (P<0.05), accompanied by a significant decrease in Vz/F and CLz/F (P<0.05). Conclusion Acacetin and apigenin could inhibit the activity of the cytochrome P450 3A enzyme in vitro and in vivo, indicating that herbal drug interactions might occur when taking Lygodium root and midazolam synchronously.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yunfang Zhou
- The Laboratory of Clinical Pharmacy, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, The People's Hospital of Lishui, Lishui, Zhejiang 323000, People's Republic of China
| | - Ailian Hua
- Department of Pharmacy, The First People's Hospital of Yuhang District, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 311100, People's Republic of China
| | - Quan Zhou
- The Laboratory of Clinical Pharmacy, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, The People's Hospital of Lishui, Lishui, Zhejiang 323000, People's Republic of China
| | - Peiwu Geng
- The Laboratory of Clinical Pharmacy, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, The People's Hospital of Lishui, Lishui, Zhejiang 323000, People's Republic of China
| | - Feifei Chen
- The Laboratory of Clinical Pharmacy, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, The People's Hospital of Lishui, Lishui, Zhejiang 323000, People's Republic of China
| | - Lianhe Yan
- The Laboratory of Clinical Pharmacy, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, The People's Hospital of Lishui, Lishui, Zhejiang 323000, People's Republic of China
| | - Shuanghu Wang
- The Laboratory of Clinical Pharmacy, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, The People's Hospital of Lishui, Lishui, Zhejiang 323000, People's Republic of China
| | - Congcong Wen
- Laboratory Animal Centre, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang 325027, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Spelten E, Thomas B, O'Meara PF, Maguire BJ, FitzGerald D, Begg SJ. Organisational interventions for preventing and minimising aggression directed towards healthcare workers by patients and patient advocates. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2020; 4:CD012662. [PMID: 32352565 PMCID: PMC7197696 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd012662.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Workplace aggression is becoming increasingly prevalent in health care, with serious consequences for both individuals and organisations. Research and development of organisational interventions to prevent and minimise workplace aggression has also increased. However, it is not known if interventions prevent or reduce occupational violence directed towards healthcare workers. OBJECTIVES To assess the effectiveness of organisational interventions that aim to prevent and minimise workplace aggression directed towards healthcare workers by patients and patient advocates. SEARCH METHODS We searched the following electronic databases from inception to 25 May 2019: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (Wiley Online Library); MEDLINE (PubMed); CINAHL (EBSCO); Embase (embase.com); PsycINFO (ProQuest); NIOSHTIC (OSH-UPDATE); NIOSHTIC-2 (OSH-UPDATE); HSELINE (OSH-UPDATE); and CISDOC (OSH-UPDATE). We also searched the ClinicalTrials.gov (www.ClinicalTrials.gov) and the World Health Organization (WHO) trials portals (www.who.int/ictrp/en). SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) or controlled before-and-after studies (CBAs) of any organisational intervention to prevent and minimise verbal or physical aggression directed towards healthcare workers and their peers in their workplace by patients or their advocates. The primary outcome measure was episodes of aggression resulting in no harm, psychological, or physical harm. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We used standard Cochrane methods for data collection and analysis. This included independent data extraction and 'Risk of bias' assessment by at least two review authors per included study. We used the Haddon Matrix to categorise interventions aimed at the victim, the vector or the environment of the aggression and whether the intervention was applied before, during or after the event of aggression. We used the random-effects model for the meta-analysis and GRADE to assess the quality of the evidence. MAIN RESULTS We included seven studies. Four studies were conducted in nursing home settings, two studies were conducted in psychiatric wards and one study was conducted in an emergency department. Interventions in two studies focused on prevention of aggression by the vector in the pre-event phase, being 398 nursing home residents and 597 psychiatric patients. The humour therapy in one study in a nursing home setting did not have clear evidence of a reduction of overall aggression (mean difference (MD) 0.17, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.00 to 0.34; very low-quality evidence). A short-term risk assessment in the other study showed a decreased incidence of aggression (risk ratio (RR) 0.36, 95% CI 0.16 to 0.78; very low-quality evidence) compared to practice as usual. Two studies compared interventions to minimise aggression by the vector in the event phase to practice as usual. In both studies the event was aggression during bathing of nursing home patients. In one study, involving 18 residents, music was played during the bathing period and in the other study, involving 69 residents, either a personalised shower or a towel bath was used. The studies provided low-quality evidence that the interventions may result in a medium-sized reduction of overall aggression (standardised mean difference (SMD -0.49, 95% CI -0.93 to -0.05; 2 studies), and physical aggression (SMD -0.85, 95% CI -1.46 to -0.24; 1 study; very low-quality evidence), but not in verbal aggression (SMD -0.31, 95% CI; -0.89 to 0.27; 1 study; very low-quality evidence). One intervention focused on the vector, the pre-event phase and the event phase. The study compared a two-year culture change programme in a nursing home to practice as usual and involved 101 residents. This study provided very low-quality evidence that the intervention may result in a medium-sized reduction of physical aggression (MD 0.51, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.91), but there was no clear evidence that it reduced verbal aggression (MD 0.76, 95% CI -0.02 to 1.54). Two studies evaluated a multicomponent intervention that focused on the vector (psychiatry patients and emergency department patients), the victim (nursing staff), and the environment during the pre-event and the event phase. The studies included 564 psychiatric staff and 209 emergency department staff. Both studies involved a comprehensive package of actions aimed at preventing violence, managing violence and environmental changes. There was no clear evidence that the psychiatry intervention may result in a reduction of overall aggression (odds ratio (OR) 0.85, 95% CI 0.63 to 1.15; low-quality evidence), compared to the control condition. The emergency department study did not result in a reduction of aggression (MD = 0) but provided insufficient data to test this. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS We found very low to low-quality evidence that interventions focused on the vector during the pre-event phase, the event phase or both, may result in a reduction of overall aggression, compared to practice as usual, and we found inconsistent low-quality evidence for multi-component interventions. None of the interventions included the post-event stage. To improve the evidence base, we need more RCT studies, that include the workers as participants and that collect information on the impact of violence on the worker in a range of healthcare settings, but especially in emergency care settings. Consensus on standardised outcomes is urgently needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evelien Spelten
- La Trobe Rural Health School, La Trobe University, Bendigo, Australia
| | - Brodie Thomas
- La Trobe Rural Health School, La Trobe University, Bendigo, Australia
| | - Peter F O'Meara
- Department of Emergency Health and Paramedic Practice, Monash University, McMahons Road, Australia
| | - Brian J Maguire
- School of Medical and Applied Sciences, Central Queensland University, Rockhampton, Australia
| | | | - Stephen J Begg
- La Trobe Rural Health School, La Trobe University, Bendigo, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Shirzad F, Hadi F, Mortazavi SS, Biglari M, Sari HN, Mohammadi Z, Atoofi MK, Shariat SV. First line in psychiatric emergency: pre-hospital emergency protocol for mental disorders in Iran. BMC Emerg Med 2020; 20:19. [PMID: 32178629 PMCID: PMC7074981 DOI: 10.1186/s12873-020-00313-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2019] [Accepted: 02/26/2020] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION This article is a report of designing a rapid and effective guide for paramedics who take care of patients in a pre-hospital setting to answer developing demands. METHODS The relevant literature was reviewed, and the topics were extracted. Then, the extracted items were discussed in an expert panel. Finally, items were discussed in a meeting including emergency technicians and emergency technical assistants to identify implementation problems. RESULTS Important topics for managing psychiatric patients were categorized at three levels: 1) Patient safety and security issues, 2) Patient status assessment and diagnosis, and 3) Patient management (medical, behavioral management, and referral to a treatment center). DISCUSSION This protocol can be a solution to improve emergency technician training. Such summarized protocols can be used for rapid review immediately before exposing a patient with an acute psychiatric condition. Due to specific cultural and different access to medicines in Iran, some issues are different.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fatemeh Shirzad
- Spiritual Health Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Fatemeh Hadi
- Mental Health Research Center, Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Seyede Salehe Mortazavi
- Spiritual Health Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
- School of Behavioral Sciences and Mental Health (Tehran Institute of Psychiatry), Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Maryam Biglari
- Preventive Medicine and Public Health Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Hassan Noori Sari
- Deputy of Technical and Operations of the Emergency Organization, Tehran, Iran
| | | | | | - Seyed Vahid Shariat
- Mental Health Research Center, School of Behavioral Sciences and Mental Health (Tehran Institute of Psychiatry), Tehran, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Ostinelli EG, Zangani C, Solmi M. Clozapine for persistent aggressive behaviour or agitation in people with schizophrenia. Hippokratia 2019. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd013493] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Edoardo G Ostinelli
- Università degli Studi di Milano; Department of Health Sciences; Via Antonio di Rudinì 8 Milan Italy 20142
| | - Caroline Zangani
- Università degli Studi di Milano; Department of Health Sciences; Via Antonio di Rudinì 8 Milan Italy 20142
| | - Marco Solmi
- University of Padua; Neurosciences Department; Padova PAdova Italy 35100
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Zareifopoulos N, Panayiotakopoulos G. Treatment Options for Acute Agitation in Psychiatric Patients: Theoretical and Empirical Evidence. Cureus 2019; 11:e6152. [PMID: 31890361 PMCID: PMC6913952 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.6152] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Acute agitation is a common presenting symptom in the emergency ward and is also dealt with on a routine basis in psychiatry. Usually a symptom of an underlying mental illness, it is considered urgent and immediate treatment is indicated. The practice of treating agitation on an acute care basis is also referred to as rapid tranquilization. A variety of psychotropic drugs and combinations thereof can be used. The decision is usually made based on availability and the clinician's experience, with the typical antipsychotic haloperidol (alone or in combination with antihistaminergic and anticholinergic drugs such as promethazine), the benzodiazepines lorazepam, diazepam and midazolam as well as a variety of atypical antipsychotics being used for this purpose. Haloperidol is associated with extrapyramidal symptoms (which can be controlled by co-administration of promethazine) and may control agitation without inducing sedation, while benzodiazepines have a more pronounced sedating activity. The atypical antipsychotics aripiprazole and ziprasidone are better tolerated, while olanzapine is also a powerful sedative. Clinical trials evaluating the efficacy of different treatment options have been conducted but they are extremely heterogenous and most have numerous methodological flaws, leading to a poor overall quality of evidence upon which guidelines for the appropriate treatment could be based. The combination of haloperidol and promethazine, which combines the sedative properties of the antihistamine with the more selective calming action of haloperidol (with a reduced risk of extrapyramidal effects compared to haloperidol alone because of the anticholinergic properties of promethazine) may be the best choice based on empirical evidence.
Collapse
|
13
|
Ostinelli EG, D'Agostino A, Shokraneh F, Salanti G, Furukawa TA. Acute interventions for aggression and agitation in psychosis: study protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis. BMJ Open 2019; 9:e032726. [PMID: 31601607 PMCID: PMC6797276 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032726] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Individuals with psychosis may access emergency services due to aggression and agitation. When the de-escalation technique fails to achieve tranquillisation, several pharmacological options are available. However, evidence on which intervention to prefer in terms of efficacy and tolerability to achieve resolution of the acute episode (ie, rapid tranquillisation) of aggression and agitation is currently fragmentary. METHODS AND ANALYSIS We will include all randomised controlled trials comparing drugs or drug combinations or placebo for aggression or agitation episodes in adult individuals with psychosis. We will include individuals with psychosis (eg, schizophrenia and related disorders, bipolar disorder with psychotic symptoms, psychotic depression) but not substance or medication-induced psychosis or psychosis due to another medical condition. Our primary outcomes are the change in aggression or agitation scores within few hours since the administration of the intervention (efficacy outcome) and the proportion of participants who dropped out due to adverse effects (tolerability outcome). We will retrieve relevant studies from the register of studies of the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group. Also, we will run additional searches on CENTRAL, Embase and PubMed to retrieve potentially eligible studies focusing on other psychiatric diagnoses than those in the schizophrenia spectrum. We will conduct a random-effects network meta-analysis (NMA) for primary and secondary outcomes. In case of rare events of dichotomous outcomes, a common-effect Mantel-Haenszel NMA will be used instead. We will use the surface under the cumulative ranking curve and the mean ranks to rank all available treatments. Local and global methods of evaluation of inconsistency will be employed. Quality of evidence contributing to network estimates of the main outcomes will also be assessed with Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION This study does not require ethical approval. We will disseminate our findings by publishing results in a peer-reviewed journal. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42019137945.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edoardo G Ostinelli
- Department of Health Sciences, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Armando D'Agostino
- Department of Health Sciences, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Farhad Shokraneh
- Cochrane Schizophrenia Group, Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, Institute of Mental Health, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Georgia Salanti
- Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Toshi A Furukawa
- Department of Health Promotion and Human Behavior and Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Graduate School of Medicine and School of Public Health, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Dib JE, Adams CE, Ikdais WH, Atallah E, Yaacoub HE, Merheb TJ, Kazour F, Tahan F, Haddad G, Zoghbi M, Azar J, Haddad C, Hallit S. Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial of haloperidol plus promethazine plus chlorpromazine versus haloperidol plus promethazine for rapid tranquilisation for agitated psychiatric patients in the emergency setting (TREC-Lebanon). F1000Res 2019; 8:1442. [PMID: 32528650 PMCID: PMC7262571 DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.19933.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/01/2019] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Agitated and aggressive behaviours are common in the psychiatric setting and rapid tranquilisation is sometimes unavoidable. A survey of Lebanese practice has shown that an intramuscular haloperidol, promethazine and chlorpromazine combination is a preferred form of treatment but there are no randomised trials of this triple therapy. Methods: This is a pragmatic randomised trial. Setting - the psychiatric wards of the Psychiatric Hospital of the Cross, Jal Eddib, Lebanon. Participants - any adult patient in the hospital who displays an aggressive episode for whom rapid tranquilisation is unavoidable, who has not been randomised before, for whom there are no known contraindications. Randomisation - stratified (by ward) randomisation and concealed in closed opaque envelope by independent parties. Procedure - if the clinical situation arises requiring rapid tranquilisation, medical residents overseeing the patient will open a TREC-Lebanon envelope in which will be notification of which group of treatments should be preferred [Haloperidol + Promethazine + Chlorpromazine (HPC) or Haloperidol + Promethazine (HP)], along with forms for primary, secondary and serious adverse effects. Treatment is not given blindly. Outcome - primary outcome is calm or tranquil at 20 minutes post intervention. Secondary outcomes are calm/tranquil at 40, 60 and 120 minutes post intervention, asleep, adverse effects, use of straitjacket and leaving the ward. Follow-up will be up to two weeks post randomisation. Discussion: Findings from this study will compare the HPC versus HP combination used in Lebanon's psychiatry emergency routine practice. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03639558. Registration date, August 21, 2018.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph E. Dib
- Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, NG1 1NU, UK
| | - Clive E. Adams
- Institution of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, UK
| | - Werner Henry Ikdais
- Psychiatric Hospital of the Cross, Deir Salib, Jal l Dib, Lebanon
- Faculty of Medicine and Medical Sciences, Holy Spirit University of Kaslik, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Elie Atallah
- Psychiatric Hospital of the Cross, Deir Salib, Jal l Dib, Lebanon
- Faculty of Sciences, Lebanese University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Hiba Edward Yaacoub
- Psychiatric Hospital of the Cross, Deir Salib, Jal l Dib, Lebanon
- School of Medicine, Lebanese American University, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Tony Jean Merheb
- Psychiatric Hospital of the Cross, Deir Salib, Jal l Dib, Lebanon
- School of Medicine, Lebanese American University, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Francois Kazour
- Psychiatric Hospital of the Cross, Deir Salib, Jal l Dib, Lebanon
- Faculty of Sciences, Lebanese University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
- Department of Psychology, Holy Spirit University of Kaslik, Beirut, Lebanon
- Faculty of Medicine, St Joseph's University, Beirut, Lebanon
- INSERM U930, équipe 4 “Troubles affectifs”, Université François-Rabelais de Tours, Tours, France
| | - Fouad Tahan
- Psychiatric Hospital of the Cross, Deir Salib, Jal l Dib, Lebanon
| | - Georges Haddad
- Psychiatric Hospital of the Cross, Deir Salib, Jal l Dib, Lebanon
- School of Medicine, Lebanese American University, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Marouan Zoghbi
- Psychiatric Hospital of the Cross, Deir Salib, Jal l Dib, Lebanon
- Faculty of Medicine, St Joseph's University, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Jocelyn Azar
- Psychiatric Hospital of the Cross, Deir Salib, Jal l Dib, Lebanon
- Faculty of Sciences, Lebanese University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
- School of Medicine, Lebanese American University, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Chadia Haddad
- Psychiatric Hospital of the Cross, Deir Salib, Jal l Dib, Lebanon
| | - Souheil Hallit
- Faculty of Medicine and Medical Sciences, Holy Spirit University of Kaslik, Beirut, Lebanon
- INSPECT-LB: Institut National de Sante Publique, Epidemiologie Clinique et Toxicologie, Beirut, Lebanon
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Briscoe S, Bethel A, Rogers M. Conduct and reporting of citation searching in Cochrane systematic reviews: A cross-sectional study. Res Synth Methods 2019; 11:169-180. [PMID: 31127978 PMCID: PMC7079050 DOI: 10.1002/jrsm.1355] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2018] [Revised: 04/04/2019] [Accepted: 05/14/2019] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Background The search for studies for a systematic review should be conducted systematically and reported transparently to facilitate reproduction. This study aimed to report on the conduct and reporting of backward citation searching (ie, checking reference lists) and forward citation searching in a cross section of Cochrane reviews. Citation searching uses the citation network surrounding a source study to identify additional studies. Methods Cochrane reviews were identified by searching the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews using the wildcard symbol and date limiting to the 3‐month period November 2016 to January 2017. Cochrane reviews thus identified were screened for mention of citation searching. Descriptive detail on the conduct and reporting of citation searching was captured in data extraction forms and described and evaluated. Results Two hundred fifteen Cochrane reviews were identified. One hundred seventy‐two reviews reported backward citation searching, and 18 reviews reported forward citation searching. Web of Science was the most frequently reported citation index. The studies used for backward citation searching consisted mainly of studies meeting the inclusion criteria. One‐third of reviews that reported forward citation searching used selected studies of importance. Reporting of citation searching was compliant with the Methodological Expectations of Cochrane Intervention Reviews (MECIR) standards, but full transparency requires additional detail that only a minority of reviews reported. Conclusion The conduct of backward citation searching was more uniform than forward citation searching. This might be due to lack of MECIR guidance for forward citation searching. Reporting was generally compliant with MECIR, but this is not always sufficient to ensure full transparency.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simon Briscoe
- Exeter HS&DR Evidence Synthesis Centre, College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Alison Bethel
- Evidence Synthesis Team, NIHR CLAHRC South West Peninsula, College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Morwenna Rogers
- Evidence Synthesis Team, NIHR CLAHRC South West Peninsula, College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Essali A, Turkmani K, Aboudamaah S, AbouDamaah A, Diaa Aldeen MR, Marwa ME, AlMounayer N. Haloperidol discontinuation for people with schizophrenia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2019; 4:CD011408. [PMID: 31006114 PMCID: PMC6475523 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd011408.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Schizophrenia is a disabling serious mental illness that can be chronic. Haloperidol, one of the first generation of antipsychotic drugs, is effective in the treatment of schizophrenia but can have adverse side effects. The effects of stopping haloperidol in people with schizophrenia who are stable on their prescription are not well researched in the context of systematic reviews. OBJECTIVES To review the effects of haloperidol discontinuation in people with schizophrenia who are stable on haloperidol. SEARCH METHODS On 20 February 2015, 24 May 2017, and 12 January 2019, we searched the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group's Study-Based Register of Trials including trial registers. SELECTION CRITERIA We included clinical trials randomising adults with schizophrenia or related disorders who were receiving haloperidol, and were stable. We included trials that randomised such participants to either continue their current treatment with haloperidol or discontinue their haloperidol treatment. We included trials that met our selection criteria and reported usable data. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We independently checked all records retrieved from the search and obtained full reports of relevant records for closer inspection. We extracted data from included studies independently. All usable data were dichotomous, and we calculated relative risks (RR) and their 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) using a fixed-effect model. We assessed risk of bias within the included studies and used GRADE to create a 'Summary of findings' table. MAIN RESULTS We included five randomised controlled trials (RCTs) with 232 participants comparing haloperidol discontinuation with haloperidol continuation. Discontinuation was achieved in all five studies by replacing haloperidol with placebo. The trials' size ranged between 23 and 87 participants. The methods of randomisation, allocation concealment and blinding were poorly reported.Participants allocated to discontinuing haloperidol treatment were more likely to show no improvement in global state compared with those in the haloperidol continuation group (n = 49; 1 RCT; RR 2.06, 95% CI 1.33 to 3.20; very low quality evidence: our confidence in the effect estimate is limited due to relevant methodological shortcomings of included trials). Those who continued haloperidol treatment were less likely to experience a relapse compared to people who discontinued taking haloperidol (n = 165; 4 RCTs; RR 1.80, 95% CI 1.18 to 2.74; very low quality evidence). Satisfaction with treatment (measured as numbers leaving the study early) was similar between groups (n = 43; 1 RCT; RR 0.13, 95% CI 0.01 to 2.28; very low quality evidence).No usable mental state, general functioning, general behaviour or adverse effect data were reported by any of the trials. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS This review provides limited evidence derived from small, short-term studies. The longest study was for one year, making it difficult to generalise the results to a life-long disorder. Very low quality evidence shows that discontinuation of haloperidol is associated with an increased risk of relapse and a reduction in the risk of 'global state improvement'. However, participant satisfaction with haloperidol treatment was not different from participant satisfaction with haloperidol discontinuation as measured by leaving the studies early. Due to the very low quality of these results, firm conclusions cannot be made. In addition, the available studies did not report usable data regarding the adverse effects of haloperidol treatment.Considering that haloperidol is one of the most widely used antipsychotic drugs, it was surprising that only a small number of studies into the benefit and harm of haloperidol discontinuation were available. Moreover, the available studies did not report on outcomes that are important to clinicians and to people with schizophrenia, particularly adverse effects and social outcomes. Better designed trials are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adib Essali
- Counties Manukau HealthCommunity Mental HealthBuilding 6, 17 Lambie Drive,ManukauAucklandNew Zealand2241
| | - Khaled Turkmani
- Damascus UniversityFaculty of MedicineDamascusSyrian Arab Republic
| | | | - Alaa AbouDamaah
- Damascus UniversityDamascus Health UnitDamascusSyrian Arab Republic
| | | | | | - Nawar AlMounayer
- Damascus UniversityFaculty of MedicineDamascusSyrian Arab Republic
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Baldaçara L, Diaz AP, Leite V, Pereira LA, Dos Santos RM, Gomes Júnior VDP, Calfat ELB, Ismael F, Périco CAM, Porto DM, Zacharias CEK, Cordeiro Q, da Silva AG, Tung TC. Brazilian guidelines for the management of psychomotor agitation. Part 2. Pharmacological approach. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2019; 41:324-335. [PMID: 30843960 PMCID: PMC6804299 DOI: 10.1590/1516-4446-2018-0177] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2018] [Accepted: 09/18/2018] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
Objective: To present the essential guidelines for pharmacological management of patients with psychomotor agitation in Brazil. Methods: This is a systematic review of articles retrieved from the MEDLINE (PubMed), Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and SciELO databases published from 1997 to 2017. Other relevant articles in the literature were also used to develop these guidelines. The search strategy used structured questions formulated using the PICO model, as recommended by the Guidelines Project of the Brazilian Medical Association. Recommendations were summarized according to their level of evidence, which was determined using the Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine system and critical appraisal tools. Results: Of 5,362 articles retrieved, 1,731 abstracts were selected for further reading. The final sample included 74 articles that met all inclusion criteria. The evidence shows that pharmacologic treatment is indicated only after non-pharmacologic approaches have failed. The cause of the agitation, side effects of the medications, and contraindications must guide the medication choice. The oral route should be preferred for drug administration; IV administration must be avoided. All subjects must be monitored before and after medication administration. Conclusion: If non-pharmacological strategies fail, medications are needed to control agitation and violent behavior. Once medicated, the patient should be monitored until a tranquil state is possible without excessive sedation. Systematic review registry number: CRD42017054440.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leonardo Baldaçara
- Comissão de Emergências Psiquiátricas, Associação Brasileira de Psiquiatria, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.,Universidade Federal do Tocantins (UFT), Palmas, TO, Brazil.,Secretaria de Estado de Saúde do Tocantins, Palmas, TO, Brazil
| | - Alexandre P Diaz
- Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências da Saúde, Universidade do Sul de Santa Catarina (UNISUL), Palhoça, SC, Brazil
| | - Verônica Leite
- Comissão de Emergências Psiquiátricas, Associação Brasileira de Psiquiatria, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.,Secretaria de Estado de Saúde do Tocantins, Palmas, TO, Brazil.,Secretaria de Saúde do Município de Palmas, Palmas, TO, Brazil
| | - Lucas A Pereira
- Comissão de Emergências Psiquiátricas, Associação Brasileira de Psiquiatria, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.,Universidade Salvador (UNIFACS), Salvador, BA, Brazil.,Escola Bahiana de Medicina e Saúde Pública (EBMSP), Salvador, BA, Brazil.,Faculdade de Tecnologia e Ciências (FTC), Salvador, BA, Brazil
| | - Roberto M Dos Santos
- Comissão de Emergências Psiquiátricas, Associação Brasileira de Psiquiatria, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.,Hospital Universitário Lauro Wanderley, Universidade Federal da Paraíba (UFPB), João Pessoa, PB, Brazil.,Pronto Atendimento em Saúde Mental, João Pessoa, PB, Brazil
| | - Vicente de P Gomes Júnior
- Comissão de Emergências Psiquiátricas, Associação Brasileira de Psiquiatria, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.,Associação Psiquiátrica do Piauí (APPI), Teresina, PI, Brazil
| | - Elie L B Calfat
- Comissão de Emergências Psiquiátricas, Associação Brasileira de Psiquiatria, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.,Faculdade de Medicina da Santa Casa de São Paulo (FCMSCSP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil.,Centro de Atenção Integrada à Saúde Mental, Franco da Rocha, SP, Brazil
| | - Flávia Ismael
- Comissão de Emergências Psiquiátricas, Associação Brasileira de Psiquiatria, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.,Faculdade de Medicina do ABC, Santo André, SP, Brazil.,Coordenadoria de Saúde Mental, São Caetano do Sul, SP, Brazil.,Universidade de São Caetano do Sul, São Caetano do Sul, SP, Brazil
| | - Cintia A M Périco
- Comissão de Emergências Psiquiátricas, Associação Brasileira de Psiquiatria, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.,Faculdade de Medicina do ABC, Santo André, SP, Brazil.,Coordenadoria de Saúde Mental, São Bernardo do Campo, SP, Brazil
| | - Deisy M Porto
- Comissão de Emergências Psiquiátricas, Associação Brasileira de Psiquiatria, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.,Instituto de Psiquiatria de Santa Catarina, São José, SC, Brazil.,Coordenação Estadual de Saúde Mental, Florianópolis, SC, Brazil
| | - Carlos E K Zacharias
- Comissão de Emergências Psiquiátricas, Associação Brasileira de Psiquiatria, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.,Secretaria de Estado da Saúde de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.,Secretaria de Saúde do Município de Sorocaba, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Quirino Cordeiro
- Comissão de Emergências Psiquiátricas, Associação Brasileira de Psiquiatria, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.,Faculdade de Medicina da Santa Casa de São Paulo (FCMSCSP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil.,Coordenação-Geral de Saúde Mental, Álcool e Outras Drogas, Ministério da Saúde, Brazil
| | - Antônio Geraldo da Silva
- Asociación Psiquiátrica de América Latina (APAL)Asociación Psiquiátrica de América Latina (APAL).,ABP, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.,Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade do Porto/Conselho Federal de Medicina (CFM), Porto, Portugal
| | - Teng C Tung
- Comissão de Emergências Psiquiátricas, Associação Brasileira de Psiquiatria, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.,Instituto de Psiquiatria, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo (USP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Childers R, Vilke G. Ketamine for Acute Agitation. CURRENT EMERGENCY AND HOSPITAL MEDICINE REPORTS 2019. [DOI: 10.1007/s40138-019-00177-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
19
|
Bush SH, Tierney S, Lawlor PG. Clinical Assessment and Management of Delirium in the Palliative Care Setting. Drugs 2019; 77:1623-1643. [PMID: 28864877 PMCID: PMC5613058 DOI: 10.1007/s40265-017-0804-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 77] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Delirium is a neurocognitive syndrome arising from acute global brain dysfunction, and is prevalent in up to 42% of patients admitted to palliative care inpatient units. The symptoms of delirium and its associated communicative impediment invariably generate high levels of patient and family distress. Furthermore, delirium is associated with significant patient morbidity and increased mortality in many patient populations, especially palliative care where refractory delirium is common in the dying phase. As the clinical diagnosis of delirium is frequently missed by the healthcare team, the case for regular screening is arguably very compelling. Depending on its precipitating factors, a delirium episode is often reversible, especially in the earlier stages of a life-threatening illness. Until recently, antipsychotics have played a pivotal role in delirium management, but this role now requires critical re-evaluation in light of recent research that failed to demonstrate their efficacy in mild- to moderate-severity delirium occurring in palliative care patients. Non-pharmacological strategies for the management of delirium play a fundamental role and should be optimized through the collective efforts of the whole interprofessional team. Refractory agitated delirium in the last days or weeks of life may require the use of pharmacological sedation to ameliorate the distress of patients, which is invariably juxtaposed with increasing distress of family members. Further evaluation of multicomponent strategies for delirium prevention and treatment in the palliative care patient population is urgently required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shirley Harvey Bush
- Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada. .,Bruyère Research Institute (BRI), Ottawa, ON, Canada. .,Ottawa Hospital Research Institute (OHRI), Ottawa, ON, Canada. .,Bruyère Continuing Care, 43 Bruyère Street, Ottawa, ON, K1N 5C8, Canada.
| | - Sallyanne Tierney
- Bruyère Continuing Care, 43 Bruyère Street, Ottawa, ON, K1N 5C8, Canada
| | - Peter Gerard Lawlor
- Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.,Bruyère Research Institute (BRI), Ottawa, ON, Canada.,Ottawa Hospital Research Institute (OHRI), Ottawa, ON, Canada.,Bruyère Continuing Care, 43 Bruyère Street, Ottawa, ON, K1N 5C8, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Managing acutely aggressive or agitated people in a psychiatric setting: a survey in Lebanon. Med J Islam Repub Iran 2018; 32:60. [PMID: 30175086 PMCID: PMC6113581 DOI: 10.14196/mjiri.32.60] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2017] [Indexed: 01/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Violent patients constitute 10% of all psychiatric admissions. Treatment options and clinical practice interventions vary across the globe and no survey of practice in a Middle Eastern setting exists. Surveying treatments in Lebanon will show treatment interventions used in this part of the world and, most importantly, provide the treatment options that could potentially be used for clinical trials pertaining to emergency psychiatry. Methods: A survey of clinicians' opinions and practice was conducted between July and August 2017 at the largest psychiatric hospital in Lebanon. Results: Five of seven experienced psychiatrists provided opinions when interviewed of their preferred intervention when dealing with an emergency psychiatric episode. Whilst this varied in detail, there was a consistent view that there should first be verbal control, then use of medications, and finally physical restrain of the patient. A total of 39 emergency episodes (28 people) occurred in the one month (64% men in their 30s). Bipolar disorder was the most frequent single diagnosis behind the aggression (n=16, 41%; 12 people 43%) but the combined schizophrenia-like illnesses underlay 18 of the 39 episodes (46%; 13/28 people 46%). In clinical life, we found evidence of high family involvement, but little attempts made at initial verbal control in the hospital. All 39 episodes involved administration of pharmacological interventions. Medications were used in 29 of cases (74%) and non-medication interventions used in the remaining 10/39 (26%). Conclusion: This survey provides some evidence that clinicians' preferences may not fully reflect clinical practice but also that experienced clinicians are using several clearly effective techniques to manage these very difficult situations. However, as for other parts of the world, treatment in Lebanon has limited or no underpinning by evidence from well-designed, conducted and reported evaluative studies.
Collapse
|
21
|
Functions of medial hypothalamic and mesolimbic dopamine circuitries in aggression. Curr Opin Behav Sci 2018; 24:104-112. [PMID: 30746430 DOI: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2018.06.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
Aggression is a crucial survival behavior: it is employed to defend territory, compete for food and mating opportunities, protect kin, and resolve disputes. Although widely differing in its behavioral expression, aggression is observed across many species. The neural substrates of aggression have been investigated for nearly a century and two highly conserved circuitries emerge as critical substrates for generating and modulating aggression. One circuitry centers on the medial hypothalamus. Activity of the medial hypothalamic cells closely correlates with attacks and can bi-directionally modulate aggressive behaviors. The other aggression-related circuit involves the mesolimbic dopamine cells. Dopaminergic antagonists are the most commonly used treatment for suppressing human aggression in psychotic patients. Animal studies support essential roles of dopaminergic signaling in the nucleus accumbens in assessing the reward value of aggression and reinforcing the aggressive behaviors. In this review, we will provide an overview regarding the functions of medial hypothalamus and dopaminergic system in mediating aggressive behaviors and the potential interactions between these two circuitries.
Collapse
|
22
|
Ostinelli EG, Hussein M, Ahmed U, Rehman F, Miramontes K, Adams CE. Risperidone for psychosis-induced aggression or agitation (rapid tranquillisation). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2018; 4:CD009412. [PMID: 29634083 PMCID: PMC6494596 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd009412.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Aggressive, agitated or violent behaviour due to psychosis constitutes an emergency psychiatric treatment where fast-acting interventions are required. Risperidone is a widely accessible antipsychotic that can be used to manage psychosis-induced aggression or agitation. OBJECTIVES To examine whether oral risperidone alone is an effective treatment for psychosis-induced aggression or agitation. SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group's Study-Based Register of Trials (up to April 2017); this register is compiled by systematic searches of major resources (including AMED, BIOSIS CINAHL, Embase, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, PubMed, and registries of clinical trials) and their monthly updates, handsearches, grey literature, and conference proceedings. There are no language, date, document type, or publication status limitations for inclusion of records into the register. SELECTION CRITERIA Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing rapid use of risperidone and other drugs, combinations of drugs or placebo for people exhibiting aggression or agitation (or both) thought to be due to psychosis. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We independently inspected all citations from searches, identified relevant abstracts, and independently extracted data from all included studies. For binary data we calculated risk ratio (RR) and for continuous data we calculated mean difference (MD), all with 95% confidence intervals (CI) and used a fixed-effect model. We assessed risk of bias for the included studies and used the GRADE approach to produce a 'Summary of findings' tables. MAIN RESULTS The review now contains data from nine trials (total n = 582) reporting on five comparisons. Due to risk of bias, small size of trials, indirectness of outcome measures and a paucity of investigated and reported 'pragmatic' outcomes, evidence was graded as very-low quality. None of the included studies provided useable data on our primary outcome 'tranquillisation or asleep' by 30 minutes, repeated need for tranquillisation or any economic outcomes. Data were available for our other main outcomes of agitation or aggression, needing restraint, and incidence of adverse effects.Risperidone versus haloperidol (up to 24 hours follow-up)For the outcome, specific behaviour - agitation, no clear difference was found between risperidone and haloperidol in terms of efficacy, measured as at least 50% reduction in the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale - Psychotic Agitation Sub-score (PANSS-PAS) (RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.86 to 1.26; participants = 124; studies = 1; very low-quality evidence) and no effect was observed for need to use restraints (RR 2.00, 95% CI 0.43 to 9.21; participants = 28; studies = 1; very low-quality evidence). Incidence of adverse effects was similar between treatment groups (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.54 to 1.66; participants = 124; studies = 1; very low-quality evidence).Risperidone versus olanzapineOne small trial (n = 29) reported useable data for the comparison risperidone versus olanzapine. No effect was observed for agitation measured as PANSS-PAS endpoint score at two hours (MD 2.50, 95% CI -2.46 to 7.46; very low-quality evidence); need to use restraints at four days (RR 1.43, 95% CI 0.39 to 5.28; very-low quality evidence); specific movement disorders measured as Behavioural Activity Rating Scale (BARS) endpoint score at four days (MD 0.20, 95% CI -0.43 to 0.83; very low-quality evidence).Risperidone versus quetiapineOne trial reported (n = 40) useable data for the comparison risperidone versus quetiapine. Aggression was measured using the Modified Overt Aggression Scale (MOAS) endpoint score at two weeks. A clear difference, favouring quetiapine was observed (MD 1.80, 95% CI 0.20 to 3.40; very-low quality evidence). No evidence of a difference between treatment groups could be observed for incidence of akathisia after 24 hours (RR 1.67, 95% CI 0.46 to 6.06; very low-quality evidence). Two participants allocated to risperidone and one allocated to quetiapine experienced myocardial ischaemia during the trial.Risperidone versus risperidone + oxcarbazepineOne trial (n = 68) measured agitation using the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale - Excited Component.(PANSS-EC) endpoint score and found a clear difference, favouring the combination treatment at one week (MD 2.70, 95% CI 0.42 to 4.98; very low-quality evidence), but no effect was observed for global state using Clinical Global Impression - Improvement (CGI-I) endpoint score at one week (MD -0.20, 95% CI -0.61 to 0.21; very-low quality evidence). Incidence of extrapyramidal symptoms after 24 hours was similar between treatment groups (RR 1.59, 95% CI 0.49 to 5.14; very-low quality evidence).Risperidone versus risperidone + valproic acidTwo trials compared risperidone with a combination of risperidone plus valproic acid. No clear differences between the treatment groups were observed for aggression (MOAS endpoint score at three days: MD 1.07, 95% CI -0.20 to 2.34; participants = 54; studies = 1; very low-quality evidence) or incidence of akathisia after 24 hours: RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.28 to 2.03; participants = 122; studies = 2; very low-quality evidence). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Overall, results for the main outcomes show no real effect for risperidone. The only data available for use in this review are from nine under-sampled trials and the evidence available is of very low quality. This casts uncertainty on the role of risperidone in rapid tranquillisation for people with psychosis-induced aggression. High-quality pragmatic RCTs are feasible and are needed before clear recommendations can be drawn on the use of risperidone for psychosis-induced aggression or agitation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edoardo G Ostinelli
- Università degli Studi di MilanoDepartment of Health SciencesVia Antonio di Rudinì 8MilanItaly20142
| | - Mohsin Hussein
- The University of NottinghamQueens Medical CentreNottinghamUK
| | - Uzair Ahmed
- Rathbone Hospital, Mersey Care NHS Foundation TrustMental HealthLiverpoolUK
| | - Faiz‐ur Rehman
- Lytham Hospital, Lancashire Care NHS Foundation TrustLythamLancashireUK
| | | | - Clive E Adams
- The University of NottinghamCochrane Schizophrenia GroupInstitute of Mental HealthInnovation Park, Triumph Road,NottinghamUKNG7 2TU
| | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Ostinelli EG, Jajawi S, Spyridi S, Sayal K, Jayaram MB. Aripiprazole (intramuscular) for psychosis-induced aggression or agitation (rapid tranquillisation). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2018; 1:CD008074. [PMID: 29308601 PMCID: PMC6491326 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd008074.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND People experiencing psychosis may become aggressive. Antipsychotics, such as aripiprazole in intramuscular form, can be used in such situations. OBJECTIVES To evaluate the effects of intramuscular aripiprazole in the treatment of psychosis-induced aggression or agitation (rapid tranquillisation). SEARCH METHODS On 11 December 2014 and 11 April 2017, we searched the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group's Study-based Register of Trials which is based on regular searches of CINAHL, BIOSIS, AMED, Embase, PubMed, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and registries of clinical trials. SELECTION CRITERIA All randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that randomised people with psychosis-induced aggression or agitation to receive either intramuscular aripiprazole or another intramuscular intervention. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We independently inspected citations and, where possible, abstracts, ordered papers and re-inspected and quality assessed these. We included studies that met our selection criteria. At least two review authors independently extracted data from the included studies. We chose a fixed-effect model. We analysed dichotomous data using risk ratio (RR) and the 95% confidence intervals (CI). We analysed continuous data using mean differences (MD) and their CIs. We assessed risk of bias for included studies and used GRADE to create 'Summary of findings' tables. MAIN RESULTS Searching found 63 records referring to 21 possible trials. We could only include three studies, all completed over the last decade, with 885 participants, of which 707 were included for quantitative analyses in this systematic review. Due to limited comparisons, small size of trials and a paucity of investigated and reported 'pragmatic' outcomes, evidence was mostly graded as low or very low quality. No trials reported useful data for one of our primary outcomes of tranquil or asleep by 30 minutes. Economic outcomes were also not reported in the trials.When compared with placebo, fewer people in the aripiprazole group needed additional injections compared to the placebo group (2 RCTs, n = 382, RR 0.69, 95% CI 0.56 to 0.85, very low-quality evidence). Clinically important improvement in agitation at two hours favoured the aripiprazole group (2 RCTs, n = 382, RR 1.50, 95% CI 1.17 to 1.92, very low-quality evidence). The numbers of non-responders after the first injection also favoured aripiprazole (1 RCT, n = 263, RR 0.49, 95% CI 0.34 to 0.71, low-quality evidence). Although no effect was found, more people in the aripiprazole compared to the placebo group experienced adverse effects (1 RCT, n = 117, RR 1.51, 95% CI 0.93 to 2.46, very low-quality evidence).Aripiprazole required more injections compared to haloperidol (2 RCTs, n = 477, RR 1.28, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.63, very low-quality evidence), with no significant difference in agitation (2 RCTs, n = 477, RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.80 to 1.11, very low-quality evidence), and similar non-responders after first injection (1 RCT, n = 360, RR 1.18, 95% CI 0.78 to 1.79, low-quality evidence). Aripiprazole and haloperidol did not differ when taking into account the overall number of people that experienced at least one adverse effect (1 RCT, n = 113, RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.61 to 1.35, very low-quality evidence).Compared to aripiprazole, olanzapine was better at reducing agitation (1 RCT, n = 80, RR 0.77, 95% CI 0.60 to 0.99, low-quality evidence) and had a more favourable effect on global state change scores (1 RCT, n = 80, MD 0.58, 95% CI 0.01 to 1.15, low-quality evidence), both at two hours. No differences were found in terms of experiencing at least one adverse effect during the 24 hours after treatment (1 RCT, n = 80, RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.45 to 1.24, very low-quality evidence). However, participants allocated to aripiprazole experienced less somnolence (1 RCT, n = 80, RR 0.25, 95% CI 0.08 to 0.82, low-quality evidence). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS The available evidence is of poor quality but there is some evidence aripiprazole is effective compared to placebo and haloperidol, but not when compared to olanzapine. However, considering that evidence comes from only three studies, caution is required in generalising these results to real-world practice. This review firmly highlights the need for more high-quality trials on intramuscular aripiprazole in the management of people with acute aggression or agitation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edoardo G Ostinelli
- Università degli Studi di MilanoDepartment of Health SciencesVia Antonio di Rudinì 8MilanItaly20142
| | - Salwan Jajawi
- Rotherham, Doncaster and South Humber NHS TrustDepartment of PsychiatryRotherhamUK
| | - Styliani Spyridi
- Cyprus University of TechnologyDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences30 Archbishop Kyprianou StreetLemesosCyprus3036
- Psychiatry ‐ UK LLPPO Box 329DewsburyWest YorkshireUKWF13 9DN
| | - Kamlaj Sayal
- Cygnet Hospital DerbyWyvern Locked Rehabilitation Unit100 City GateLondon RoadDerbyUKDE24 8WZ
| | - Mahesh B Jayaram
- Melbourne Neuropsychiatry CentreDepartment of PsychiatryUniversity of MelbourneMelbourneAustralia
| | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Bush SH, Tierney S, Lawlor PG. Clinical Assessment and Management of Delirium in the Palliative Care Setting. Drugs 2017. [PMID: 28864877 DOI: 10.1007/s40265‐017‐0804‐3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Delirium is a neurocognitive syndrome arising from acute global brain dysfunction, and is prevalent in up to 42% of patients admitted to palliative care inpatient units. The symptoms of delirium and its associated communicative impediment invariably generate high levels of patient and family distress. Furthermore, delirium is associated with significant patient morbidity and increased mortality in many patient populations, especially palliative care where refractory delirium is common in the dying phase. As the clinical diagnosis of delirium is frequently missed by the healthcare team, the case for regular screening is arguably very compelling. Depending on its precipitating factors, a delirium episode is often reversible, especially in the earlier stages of a life-threatening illness. Until recently, antipsychotics have played a pivotal role in delirium management, but this role now requires critical re-evaluation in light of recent research that failed to demonstrate their efficacy in mild- to moderate-severity delirium occurring in palliative care patients. Non-pharmacological strategies for the management of delirium play a fundamental role and should be optimized through the collective efforts of the whole interprofessional team. Refractory agitated delirium in the last days or weeks of life may require the use of pharmacological sedation to ameliorate the distress of patients, which is invariably juxtaposed with increasing distress of family members. Further evaluation of multicomponent strategies for delirium prevention and treatment in the palliative care patient population is urgently required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shirley Harvey Bush
- Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada. .,Bruyère Research Institute (BRI), Ottawa, ON, Canada. .,Ottawa Hospital Research Institute (OHRI), Ottawa, ON, Canada. .,Bruyère Continuing Care, 43 Bruyère Street, Ottawa, ON, K1N 5C8, Canada.
| | - Sallyanne Tierney
- Bruyère Continuing Care, 43 Bruyère Street, Ottawa, ON, K1N 5C8, Canada
| | - Peter Gerard Lawlor
- Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.,Bruyère Research Institute (BRI), Ottawa, ON, Canada.,Ottawa Hospital Research Institute (OHRI), Ottawa, ON, Canada.,Bruyère Continuing Care, 43 Bruyère Street, Ottawa, ON, K1N 5C8, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Ostinelli EG, Brooke‐Powney MJ, Li X, Adams CE. Haloperidol for psychosis-induced aggression or agitation (rapid tranquillisation). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017; 7:CD009377. [PMID: 28758203 PMCID: PMC6483410 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd009377.pub3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Haloperidol used alone is recommended to help calm situations of aggression or agitation for people with psychosis. It is widely accessible and may be the only antipsychotic medication available in limited-resource areas. OBJECTIVES To examine whether haloperidol alone is an effective treatment for psychosis-induced aggression or agitation, wherein clinicians are required to intervene to prevent harm to self and others. SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group's Study-Based Register of Trials (26th May 2016). This register is compiled by systematic searches of major resources (including AMED, BIOSIS CINAHL, Embase, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, PubMed, and registries of clinical trials) and their monthly updates, handsearches, grey literature, and conference proceedings, with no language, date, document type, or publication status limitations for inclusion of records into the register. SELECTION CRITERIA Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) involving people exhibiting aggression and/or agitation thought to be due to psychosis, allocated rapid use of haloperidol alone (by any route), compared with any other treatment. Outcomes of interest included tranquillisation or asleep by 30 minutes, repeated need for rapid tranquillisation within 24 hours, specific behaviours (threat or injury to others/self), adverse effects. We included trials meeting our selection criteria and providing useable data. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We independently inspected all citations from searches, identified relevant abstracts, and independently extracted data from all included studies. For binary data we calculated risk ratio (RR), for continuous data we calculated mean difference (MD), and for cognitive outcomes we derived standardised mean difference (SMD) effect sizes, all with 95% confidence intervals (CI) and using a fixed-effect model. We assessed risk of bias for the included studies and used the GRADE approach to produce 'Summary of findings' tables which included our pre-specified main outcomes of interest. MAIN RESULTS We found nine new RCTs from the 2016 update search, giving a total of 41 included studies and 24 comparisons. Few studies were undertaken in circumstances that reflect real-world practice, and, with notable exceptions, most were small and carried considerable risk of bias. Due to the large number of comparisons, we can only present a summary of main results.Compared with placebo, more people in the haloperidol group were asleep at two hours (2 RCTs, n=220, RR 0.88, 95%CI 0.82 to 0.95, very low-quality evidence) and experienced dystonia (2 RCTs, n=207, RR 7.49, 95%CI 0.93 to 60.21, very low-quality evidence).Compared with aripiprazole, people in the haloperidol group required fewer injections than those in the aripiprazole group (2 RCTs, n=473, RR 0.78, 95%CI 0.62 to 0.99, low-quality evidence). More people in the haloperidol group experienced dystonia (2 RCTs, n=477, RR 6.63, 95%CI 1.52 to 28.86, very low-quality evidence).Four trials (n=207) compared haloperidol with lorazepam with no significant differences with regard to number of participants asleep at one hour (1 RCT, n=60, RR 1.05, 95%CI 0.76 to 1.44, very low-quality of evidence) or those requiring additional injections (1 RCT, n=66, RR 1.14, 95%CI 0.91 to 1.43, very low-quality of evidence).Haloperidol's adverse effects were not offset by addition of lorazepam (e.g. dystonia 1 RCT, n=67, RR 8.25, 95%CI 0.46 to 147.45, very low-quality of evidence).Addition of promethazine was investigated in two trials (n=376). More people in the haloperidol group were not tranquil or asleep by 20 minutes (1 RCT, n=316, RR 1.60, 95%CI 1.18 to 2.16, moderate-quality evidence). Acute dystonia was too common in the haloperidol alone group for the trial to continue beyond the interim analysis (1 RCT, n=316, RR 19.48, 95%CI 1.14 to 331.92, low-quality evidence). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Additional data from new studies does not alter previous conclusions of this review. If no other alternative exists, sole use of intramuscular haloperidol could be life-saving. Where additional drugs are available, sole use of haloperidol for extreme emergency could be considered unethical. Addition of the sedating promethazine has support from better-grade evidence from within randomised trials. Use of an alternative antipsychotic drug is only partially supported by fragmented and poor-grade evidence. Adding a benzodiazepine to haloperidol does not have strong evidence of benefit and carries risk of additional harm.After six decades of use for emergency rapid tranquillisation, this is still an area in need of good independent trials relevant to real-world practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edoardo G Ostinelli
- Università degli Studi di MilanoDepartment of Health SciencesVia Antonio di Rudinì 8MilanItaly20142
| | - Melanie J Brooke‐Powney
- The University of ManchesterDepartment of Clinical Psychology2nd Floor, Zochonis BuildingBrunswick StreetManchesterUKM13 9PL
| | - Xue Li
- Systematic Review Solutions LtdNottinghamUK
| | - Clive E Adams
- The University of NottinghamCochrane Schizophrenia GroupInstitute of Mental HealthInnovation Park, Triumph Road,NottinghamUKNG7 2TU
| | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Du M, Wang X, Yin S, Shu W, Hao R, Zhao S, Rao H, Yeung W, Jayaram MB, Xia J. De-escalation techniques for psychosis-induced aggression or agitation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017; 4:CD009922. [PMID: 28368091 PMCID: PMC6478306 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd009922.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Aggression is a disposition, a willingness to inflict harm, regardless of whether this is behaviourally or verbally expressed and regardless of whether physical harm is sustained.De-escalation is a psychosocial intervention for managing people with disturbed or aggressive behaviour. Secondary management strategies such as rapid tranquillisation, physical intervention and seclusion should only be considered once de-escalation and other strategies have failed to calm the service user. OBJECTIVES To investigate the effects of de-escalation techniques in the short-term management of aggression or agitation thought or likely to be due to psychosis. SEARCH METHODS We searched Cochrane Schizophrenia Group's Study-Based Register of Trials (latest search 7 April, 2016). SELECTION CRITERIA Randomised controlled trials using de-escalation techniques for the short-term management of aggressive or agitated behaviour. We planned to include trials involving adults (at least 18 years) with a potential for aggressive behaviour due to psychosis, from those in a psychiatric setting to those possibly under the influence of alcohol or drugs and/or as part of an acute setting as well. We planned to include trials meeting our inclusion criteria that provided useful data. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We used the standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. Two review authors inspected all abstracts of studies identified by the search process. As we were unable to include any studies, we could not perform data extraction and analysis. MAIN RESULTS Of the 345 citations that were identified using the search strategies, we found only one reference to be potentially suitable for further inspection. However, after viewing the full text, it was excluded as it was not a randomised controlled trial. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Using de-escalation techniques for people with psychosis induced aggression or agitation appears to be accepted as good clinical practice but is not supported by evidence from randomised trials. It is unclear why it has remained such an under-researched area. Conducting trials in this area could be influenced by funding flow, ethical concerns - justified or not - anticipated pace of recruitment as well the difficulty in accurately quantifying the effects of de-escalation itself. With supportive funders and ethics committees, imaginative trialists, clinicians and service-user groups and wide collaboration this dearth of randomised research could be addressed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maolin Du
- Inner Mongolia Medical UniversitySchool of Public HealthJinshan Development District,HohhotInner MongoliaChina010110
| | - Xuemei Wang
- Inner Mongolia Medical UniversitySchool of Public HealthJinshan Development District,HohhotInner MongoliaChina010110
| | - Shaohua Yin
- Inner Mongolia Medical UniversitySchool of Public HealthJinshan Development District,HohhotInner MongoliaChina010110
| | - Wei Shu
- Inner Mongolia Medical UniversitySchool of Public HealthJinshan Development District,HohhotInner MongoliaChina010110
| | - Ruiqi Hao
- Inner Mongolia Medical UniversitySchool of Public HealthJinshan Development District,HohhotInner MongoliaChina010110
| | - Sai Zhao
- The Ingenuity Centre, The University of NottinghamSystematic Review Solutions LtdTriumph RoadNottinghamUKNG7 2TU
| | - Harish Rao
- Borough Road and Nunthorpe Medical GroupPsychiatryBorough RoadMiddlesbroughUKTS1 3RY
| | - Wan‐Ley Yeung
- Bridge House Community Mealth Health TeamBridge HouseBlam RoadLeedsUKLS10 2TP
| | - Mahesh B Jayaram
- Melbourne Neuropsychiatry CentreDepartment of PsychiatryUniversity of MelbourneMelbourneAustralia
| | - Jun Xia
- The Ingenuity Centre, The University of NottinghamSystematic Review Solutions LtdTriumph RoadNottinghamUKNG7 2TU
| | | |
Collapse
|