Efficacy and safety of aripiprazole or bupropion augmentation and switching in patients with treatment-resistant depression or major depressive disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

OBJECTIVES

To report the first and largest systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCT) to evaluate the efficacy and safety of aripiprazole or bupropion augmentation and switching in patients with treatment-resistant depression (TRD) or major depressive disorder(MDD).

METHODS

We conducted a systematic literature retrieval via PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane until April 2023 for RCT, which evaluated the efficacy and safety of aripiprazole or bupropion augmentation and switching for patients with TRD or MDD. Outcomes measured were changes in the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), response and remission rate, and serious adverse events.

RESULTS

Five RCTs, including 4480 patients, were included for meta-analysis. Among them, two RCTs were rated as "high risk" in three aspects (allocation concealment, blinding of participants and personnel and blinding of outcome assessment) because of the non-blind method, and the quality evaluation of the remaining works of literature was "low risk". Augmentation treatment with Aripiprazole (A-ARI) was associated with a significant higher response rate compared with augmentation treatment with bupropion (A-BUP) (RR: 1.15; 95% CI: 1.05, 1.25; P = 0.0007; I2 = 23%). Besides, A-ARI had a significant higher remission rate compared with switching to bupropion (S-BUP) (RR: 1.22; 95% CI: 1.00, 1.49; P = 0.05; I2 = 59%) and A-BUP had a significant higher remission rate compared with S-BUP (RR: 1.20; 95% CI: 1.06, 1.36; P = 0.0004; I2 = 0%). In addition, there was no significant difference in remission rate(RR: 1.05; 95% CI: 0.94, 1.17; P = 0.42; I2 = 33%), improvement of MADRS(WMD: -2.07; 95% CI: -5.84, 1.70; P = 0.28; I2 = 70%) between A-ARI and A-BUP. No significant difference was observed in adverse events and serious adverse events among the three treatment strategies.

CONCLUSIONS

A-ARI may be a better comprehensive antidepressant treatment strategy than A-BUP or S-BUP for patients with TRD or MDD. More large-scale, multi-center, double-blind RCTs are needed to further evaluated the efficacy and safety of aripiprazole or bupropion augmentation and switching treatment strategies.

Preventive effect of aripiprazole once-monthly on relapse into mood episodes in bipolar disorder: A multicenter, one-year, retrospective, mirror image study

BACKGROUND

We conducted a one-year, retrospective, mirror-image study to investigate the clinical effectiveness and safety of aripiprazole once monthly (AOM) in patients with bipolar disorder (BD). We compared pre-treatment conditions with outcomes after 12 months of AOM treatment.

METHODS

Seventy-five bipolar patients were recruited from 12 hospitals in Korea. We included 75 patients with BD who had received at least three AOM treatments from September 2019 to September 2022 and had accessible electronic medical record (EMRs) for the year before and after the baseline visit.

RESULTS

The overall number of mood episodes significantly decreased from a mean of 1.5 ± 1.2 episodes pre-AOM to 0.5 ± 1.2 episodes post-AOM. Manic episodes significantly decreased from 0.8 ± 0.8 episodes pre-AOM to 0.2 ± 0.5 episodes post-AOM, and depressive episodes significantly decreased from 0.5 ± 0.8 episodes pre-AOM to 0.2 ± 0.6 episodes post-AOM (p = 0.017). Moreover, the number of psychiatric medications and pills and the proportion of patients treated with complex polypharmacy were significantly decreased post-AOM.

LIMITATIONS

The small sample size was insufficient to fully represent the entire population of individuals with BD, and potential selection bias was introduced due to only including subjects who received AOM three or more times.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study suggest that AOM can reduce mood episode relapse and may be clinically beneficial in the treatment of BD patients, potentially reducing issues associated with polypharmacy in some individuals.

Clinical Experience on the Use of a Single-day, Two-injection Start Initiation Regimen of Aripiprazole Once Monthly in Patients With Schizophrenia in Spain: SaTISfy Study

OBJECTIVE

The two-injection start (TIS) initiation regimen was recently approved for aripiprazole once monthly 400 mg (AOM400), with potential benefits in adherence. The SaTISfy study described in this article analyzed Spanish psychiatrists' perspectives on hospitalization lengths of stay, schizophrenia management, and the use of AOM400-TIS.

METHODS

The authors describe an ecological study of aggregated data collected using a 41-question survey. Fifty psychiatrists were asked to provide their perceptions of their patients with schizophrenia and treatment with AOM400.

RESULTS

The psychiatrists reported that lack of treatment adherence was the main reason for hospitalization for 58.3% of their patients diagnosed with schizophrenia. Aripiprazole, in any formulation, was the most commonly prescribed therapeutic option, being prescribed for a mean (SD) of 2.5 (0.9) out of 5 patients, while 98% of psychiatrists chose AOM400-TIS for patients who failed to adhere to previous treatments. Patients with schizophrenia, regardless of their treatment, were hospitalized for an average of 17.7 (3.93) days versus patients with schizophrenia treated with AOM400-TIS, who were hospitalized for an average of 14.2 (4.18) days, a reduction of 3.5 (3.86) days. Patients treated with AOM400-TIS showed a reduction of 5 (4.18) days compared with the mean national duration of hospitalization for acute patients in psychiatry units in Spain (19.18 d). The surveyed psychiatrists reported that AOM400-TIS improved safety and tolerability. Most of the psychiatrists were satisfied with the administration and results of AOM400-TIS. Most of the psychiatrists (90%) also reported that fewer health care resources were consumed with AOM400-TIS, mainly due to a reduction in hospitalization days and in the use of concomitant medications.

CONCLUSIONS

AOM400-TIS was considered to have a positive impact on the duration of hospitalization and thus on the use of health care resources. There was a positive perception of adherence, safety, and tolerability with the use of AOM400-TIS in patients with schizophrenia.

Group-Based Trajectory Modeling to Identify Patterns of Antipsychotic-Associated Weight Gain Among Children and Adolescents

PURPOSE/BACKGROUND

Antipsychotic-associated weight gain (AAWG) is a common adverse effect of second-generation antipsychotic (SGA) medications among children and adolescents. This study applied group-based trajectory modeling to identify latent trajectories of AAWG among children and adolescents and associated risk factors.

PROCEDURES

This was a retrospective analysis of the IQVIA Ambulatory EMR-US database from 2016 to 2021. The cohort consisted of patients aged 6 to 19 years who were SGA naive and received at least 90 days of continuous SGA prescriptions. Group-based trajectory modeling was used to identify latent trajectories of AAWG development during a 24-month period since SGA initiation, and multinomial logistic regression analysis was conducted to examine the risk factors associated with the identified AAWG trajectories.

FINDINGS/RESULTS

A total of 16,262 patients were included. Group-based trajectory modeling identified the following 4 distinctive AAWG trajectories: persistent severe weight gain (4.2%), persistent moderate weight gain (20.1%), minor weight change (69.6%), and gradual weight loss (6.1%). Compared with the minor weight change group, younger age (12-17 vs 5-11: odds ratio [OR], 0.634; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.521-0.771), lower baseline body mass index z -score (OR, 0.216; 95% CI, 0.198-0.236), and receiving olanzapine as the initial SGA (olanzapine vs aripiprazole: OR, 1.686; 95% CI, 1.673-1.699) were more likely to follow severe weight gain trajectories. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curves for comparing severe weight gain versus minor weight change groups and moderate weight vs minor weight change groups in the multinomial regression model were 0.91 and 0.8, respectively.

IMPLICATIONS/CONCLUSIONS

A quarter of pediatric SGA recipients experienced persistent weight gain during the SGA treatment. The risk of having persistent AAWG can be predicted using patient characteristics collected before SGA initiation and the initial SGA agent.

Cannabinoid treatment for the symptoms of autism spectrum disorder

INTRODUCTION

Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a neurodevelopmental disorder affecting approximately 3% of school-age children. The core symptoms are deficits in social communication and restricted and repetitive patterns of behavior. Associated problems in cognition, language, behavior, sleep and mood are prevalent. Currently, no established pharmacological treatment exists for core ASD symptoms. Risperidone and aripiprazole are used to manage associated irritability, but their effectiveness is limited and adverse events are common.

AREAS COVERED

This mini-review summarizes existing scientific literature and ongoing clinical trials concerning cannabinoid treatment for ASD. Uncontrolled case series have documented improvements in both core ASD symptoms and related behavioral challenges in children treated with cannabis extracts rich in cannabidiol (CBD). Placebo-controlled studies involving CBD-rich cannabis extracts and/or pure CBD in children with ASD have demonstrated mixed efficacy results. A similar outcome was observed in a placebo-controlled study of pure CBD addressing social avoidance in Fragile X syndrome. Importantly, these studies have shown relatively high safety and tolerability.

EXPERT OPINION

While current clinical data suggest the potential of CBD and CBD-rich cannabis extract in managing core and behavioral deficits in ASD, it is prudent to await the results of ongoing placebo-controlled trials before considering CBD treatment for ASD.

Influence of CYP2C19, CYP2D6, and ABCB1 Gene Variants and Serum Levels of Escitalopram and Aripiprazole on Treatment-Emergent Sexual Dysfunction: A Canadian Biomarker Integration Network in Depression 1 (CAN-BIND 1) Study

OBJECTIVES

Treatment-emergent sexual dysfunction is frequently reported by individuals with major depressive disorder (MDD) on antidepressants, which negatively impacts treatment adherence and efficacy. We investigated the association of polymorphisms in pharmacokinetic genes encoding cytochrome-P450 drug-metabolizing enzymes, CYP2C19 and CYP2D6, and the transmembrane efflux pump, P-glycoprotein (i.e., ABCB1), on treatment-emergent changes in sexual function (SF) and sexual satisfaction (SS) in the Canadian Biomarker Integration Network in Depression 1 (CAN-BIND-1) sample.

METHODS

A total of 178 adults with MDD received treatment with escitalopram (ESC) from weeks 0-8 (Phase I). At week 8, nonresponders were augmented with aripiprazole (ARI) (i.e., ESC + ARI, n = 91), while responders continued ESC (i.e., ESC-Only, n = 80) from weeks 8-16 (Phase II). SF and SS were evaluated using the sex effects (SexFX) scale at weeks 0, 8, and 16. We assessed the primary outcomes, SF and SS change for weeks 0-8 and 8-16, using repeated measures mixed-effects models.

RESULTS

In ESC-Only, CYP2C19 intermediate metabolizer (IM) + poor metabolizers (PMs) showed treatment-related improvements in sexual arousal, a subdomain of SF, from weeks 8-16, relative to CYP2C19 normal metabolizers (NMs) who showed a decline, F(2,54) = 8.00, p < 0.001, q = 0.048. Specifically, CYP2C19 IM + PMs reported less difficulty with having and sustaining vaginal lubrication in females and erection in males, compared to NMs. Furthermore, ESC-Only females with higher concentrations of ESC metabolite, S-desmethylcitalopram (S-DCT), and S-DCT/ESC ratio in serum demonstrated more decline in SF (r = -0.42, p = 0.004, q = 0.034) and SS (r = -0.43, p = 0.003, q = 0.034), respectively, which was not observed in males. ESC-Only females also demonstrated a trend for a correlation between S-DCT and sexual arousal change in the same direction (r = -0.39, p = 0.009, q = 0.052).

CONCLUSIONS

CYP2C19 metabolizer phenotypes may be influencing changes in sexual arousal related to ESC monotherapy. Thus, preemptive genotyping of CYP2C19 may help to guide selection of treatment that circumvents selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor-related sexual dysfunction thereby improving outcomes for patients. Additionally, further research is warranted to clarify the role of S-DCT in the mechanisms underlying ESC-related changes in SF and SS. This CAN-BIND-1 study was registered on clinicaltrials.gov (Identifier: NCT01655706) on 27 July 2012.

Aripiprazole and its adverse effects in the form of impulsive-compulsive behaviors: A systematic review of case reports

Aripiprazole is an efficacious treatment for both the positive and negative symptoms of schizophrenia and is also commonly used as a mood stabilizer. It is associated with better tolerability compared with other antipsychotics. However, there are reports of patients who experience problem gambling, hypersexuality, obsessive-compulsive symptoms, and other impulsive and/or compulsive behaviors as a result of aripiprazole administration and/or dosage increase. We aimed to do a systematic review of case reports published in this regard. After screening more than 6000 titles and abstracts in ten scientific search engines, we found 35 related records comprising 59 cases. The majority of cases (n = 42, 71.18%) were male, the mean age was 33.83 years (± 13.40), and the average daily dose of aripiprazole was 11.63 mg (± 6.94). The results of our review showed that the most frequently published impulsivity adverse effect of aripiprazole is gambling, followed by hypersexuality, obsessive-compulsive symptoms/disorder, problem eating, trichotillomania, problem shopping, and kleptomania. These symptoms were experienced both by patients who had previous problems in these areas and those who did not. In the majority of cases, the symptoms appeared within 30 days after aripiprazole administration started and ceased within 30 days of its discontinuation and/or dose decrease. Clinicians should be aware of impulsivity adverse effects, monitor them, and educate both patients and the family about them.

Comparative efficacy, tolerability and acceptability of intravenous racemic ketamine with intranasal esketamine, aripiprazole and lithium as augmentative treatments for treatment-resistant unipolar depression: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Intravenous racemic ketamine is a promising treatment for treatment-resistant depression. However, its clinical utility compared with intranasal esketamine and the other well-studied conventional pharmacological interventions (i.e., aripiprazole and lithium) as augmentative treatments for treatment-resistant unipolar depression in adults remains unclear. Therefore, we aimed to compare the efficacy, tolerability and acceptability of intravenous racemic ketamine with intranasal esketamine, aripiprazole and lithium under such conditions.

METHODS

The Cochrane Library, PubMed, CINHAL and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were systematically searched from their inception to 10 May 2023. Randomised controlled trials evaluating these drugs were included. A random-effects network meta-analysis was also performed.

RESULTS

In the primary analysis, all four drugs were significantly more effective than placebo. In addition, intravenous racemic ketamine was significantly more effective and acceptable than intranasal esketamine and aripiprazole. Intravenous racemic ketamine was not significantly different from placebo in tolerability, whereas intranasal esketamine and aripiprazole were significantly less tolerable than placebo. Lithium did not differ significantly from intravenous racemic ketamine in efficacy, tolerability and acceptability.

LIMITATIONS

The sample size of patients treated with intravenous racemic ketamine was small.

CONCLUSIONS

Intravenous racemic ketamine may be a better augmentative treatment for treatment-resistant unipolar depression than intranasal esketamine and aripiprazole. Whether intravenous racemic ketamine or lithium is superior is unclear currently. A larger head-to-head trial of intravenous racemic ketamine versus conventional augmentative treatments for treatment-resistant unipolar depression is needed.

Effect of aripiprazole on promoting cognitive function and enhancing clinical efficacy in patients with first-episode depression on escitalopram: A randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVES

To explore the effect of escitalopram combined with aripiprazole on cognitive function in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD), and to evaluate the clinical efficacy of the combination therapy.

METHOD

A total of 70 patients with first-episode MDD were randomly divided into the study group or the control group, receiving escitalopram combined with aripiprazole (5 mg/day) or escitalopram monotherapy respectively for 8 weeks. The severity of illness was assessed by using the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAMD) at baseline, at the end of 4th and 8th week, and cognitive function was assessed by using the THINC integrated tool (THINC-it), the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST), and the Continuous Performance Test (CPT). Rating Scale for Extrapyramidal Side Effects (RSESE) was applied to assess adverse reactions.

RESULTS

The average HAMD-17 and HAMA scores decreased over time in both the control and the study groups, but the reductions were not statistically different between two groups with the passage of time. In WCST, total number of response (TR) of the study group decreased relative to the baseline at the end of the eighth week, but the control group did not significantly change during whole eight weeks. Perseverative errors (PE) in the control group eventually decreased at the end of Week 8 compared to that at Week 4, but in the study group, it was a continuous trend of decrease. In CPT, the decrease of leakage responses (LR) in the study group was higher than that of the control group in 2-digit number, and LR of the control group was higher than that of the study group at the end of Week 8 in 4-digit number. The downtrend of LR in 4-digit number kept for the whole period in study group, while in the control group, the LR did not decrease significantly until the end of Week 8 compared to that at baseline.

CONCLUSION

Escitalopram combined with a low-dose of aripiprazole, and escitalopram monotherapy could both enhance cognitive function of MDD patients, while the improvements of combination therapy might happen relatively earlier. The combined use of escitalopram and aripiprazole might be more beneficial to the domains of executive function (EF) and continuous attention compared to escitalopram monotherapy. There was no significant differences between two treatment options in alleviating depressive and anxiety symptoms.

Aripiprazole and Other Third-Generation Antipsychotics as a Risk Factor for Impulse Control Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Increasing evidence suggests an association between third-generation antipsychotics (TGAs) and impulse control disorders (ICDs). This is thought to be due to their partial agonism of dopamine receptors. However, neither the relative nor absolute risks of ICDs in those prescribed TGAs are well established. To inform clinical practice, this systematic review and meta-analysis summarizes and quantifies the current evidence for an association.

METHODS

An electronic search of Medline, PsychINFO, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Clinical Trials Database was undertaken from database inception to November 2022. Three reviewers screened abstracts and reviewed full texts for inclusion. A random-effects meta-analysis was conducted with eligible studies.

RESULTS

A total of 392 abstracts were retrieved, 214 remained after duplicates were removed. Fifteen full texts were reviewed, of which 8 were included. All 8 studies found that TGAs were associated with increased probability of ICDs. Risk of bias was high or critical in 7 of 8 studies. Three studies were included in the pooled analysis for the primary outcome, 2 with data on each of aripiprazole, cariprazine, and brexpiprazole. Exposure to TGAs versus other antipsychotics was associated with an increase in ICDs (pooled odds ratio, 5.54; 2.24-13.68). Cariprazine and brexpiprazole were significantly associated with ICDs when analyzed individually. Aripiprazole trended toward increased risk, but very wide confidence intervals included no effect.

CONCLUSIONS

Third-generation antipsychotics were associated with increased risk of ICDs in all studies included and pooled analysis. However, the risk of bias is high, confidence intervals are wide, and the quality of evidence is very low for all TGAs examined.

Long-Acting Injectable Second-Generation Antipsychotics vs Placebo and Their Oral Formulations in Acute Schizophrenia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized-Controlled-Trials

BACKGROUND AND HYPOTHESIS

Long-acting injectable antipsychotic drugs (LAIs) are mainly used for relapse prevention but could also be advantageous for acutely ill patients with schizophrenia.

STUDY DESIGN

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized-controlled-trials (RCTs) comparing the second-generation long-acting injectable antipsychotics (SGA-LAIs) olanzapine, risperidone, paliperidone, and aripiprazole with placebo or their oral counterparts in acutely ill patients with schizophrenia. We analyzed 23 efficacy and tolerability outcomes, with the primary outcome being overall symptoms of schizophrenia. The results were obtained through random effects, pairwise meta-analyses, and subgroup tests. The study quality was assessed using the Cochrane-Risk-of-Bias-Tool version-1.

STUDY RESULTS

Sixty-six studies with 16 457 participants were included in the analysis. Eleven studies compared second-generation long-acting injectable antipsychotics (SGA-LAIs) with a placebo, 54 compared second-generation oral antipsychotics (SGA-orals) with a placebo, and one compared an SGA-LAI (aripiprazole) with its oral formulation. All 4 SGA-LAIs reduced overall symptoms more than placebo, with mean standardized differences of -0.66 (95% CI: -0.90; -0.43) for olanzapine, -0.64 (-0.80; -0.48) for aripiprazole, -0.62 (-0.76; -0.48) for risperidone and -0.42 (-0.53; -0.31) for paliperidone. The side-effect profiles of the LAIs corresponded to the patterns known from the oral formulations. In subgroup tests compared to placebo, some side effects were less pronounced under LAIs than under their oral formulations.

CONCLUSIONS

SGA-LAIs effectively treat acute schizophrenia. Some side effects may be less frequent than under oral drugs, but due to the indirect nature of the comparisons, this finding must be confirmed by RCTs comparing LAIs and orals head-to-head.

Safety outcomes of antipsychotics classes in drug-naïve patients with first-episode schizophrenia: A nationwide cohort study in South Korea

INTRODUCTION

Given the similar efficacies across antipsychotic medications for schizophrenia, understanding their safety profiles, particularly concerning receptor-binding differences, is crucial for optimal drug selection, especially for patients with first episode schizophrenia. We aimed to compare the safety outcomes of second-generation antipsychotics.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study with new user active comparator design using a nationwide claims database in South Korea. Participants were drug-naïve adult patients with first-episode schizophrenia. Three representative drugs with different pharmacologic profiles were compared: risperidone, olanzapine, and aripiprazole. Propensity scores were used to match the study groups, and the Cox proportional hazard model was used to calculate hazard ratios. Sensitivity analyses were performed in various epidemiological settings. Seventeen safety outcomes, including neuropsychiatric, cardiometabolic and gastrointestinal events, were assessed, with upper-respiratory-tract infection as a negative control outcome.

RESULTS

A total of 1044, 2078, and 3634 participants were matched for olanzapine vs. risperidone, olanzapine vs. aripiprazole, and risperidone vs. aripiprazole comparisons, respectively. For parkinsonism, there was a significant difference in outcomes between the risperidone and aripiprazole groups (HR 1.80 [95% CI 1.13-2.91]), with consistent sensitivity analysis results. There were no significant differences in other neuropsychiatry outcomes or in the risk of cardiometabolic and gastrointestinal outcomes between any of the comparative group pairs.

CONCLUSIONS

The risk of drug-induced parkinsonism was significantly higher with risperidone than with aripiprazole. Although olanzapine is known for its metabolic risk, there were no significant differences in risk between the other pairs.

Differentiating the third generation of antipsychotics: a focus on lumateperone's similarities and differences

The development of atypical antipsychotics has evolved to include newer pharmacodynamic properties. Lumateperone, aripiprazole, brexpiprazole, and cariprazine are all dopamine-2 receptor partial agonists with varying receptor affinities. This review aims to compare the clinical and pharmacodynamic differences among these four atypical antipsychotics, all of which are unique when compared to first- and second-generation antipsychotics. For consideration is further delineating these agents as being third-generation antipsychotics. PubMed searches were conducted to compile preclinical and clinical studies derived from animal models and human subjects. Information gathered included pharmacological mechanisms, clinical efficacy, future-oriented clinical approaches, and adverse effects. Efficacy for the shared indications of these drugs seems comparable. Differences among these drugs lie more in their adverse effect profiles. For example, lumateperone was found to have the lowest rate of weight gain while brexpiprazole was found to have the highest rate of weight gain associated with increased appetite. Aripiprazole had the lowest rates of extrapyramidal symptoms not including akathisia while cariprazine had the highest. All four agents reviewed have a variety of receptor affinities, which likely generates a variety of different adverse effects. This suggests that in any given patient, clinicians may see differential clinical effects.

Aripiprazole 2-month ready-to-use 960 mg (Ari 2MRTU): review of its possible role in schizophrenia therapy

Most patients with schizophrenia need life-long treatment. There is therefore a continued need for effective and tolerable treatment options. A 2-monthly LAI formulation of aripiprazole, Aripiprazole 2-Month Ready-to-Use 960 mg (Ari 2MRTU 960) has recently been approved in the US. Here, the possible role in therapy for this new treatment option is discussed in a narrative review. PubMed was searched for literature on long-acting injectables with a focus on patient-reported outcomes and real-world evidence on extended injection intervals (2-3 months). Dopamine D2 partial agonists, one of which is aripiprazole, exhibit favorable tolerability and safety properties. Additionally, there are many advantages in using long-acting injectable formulations such as enhanced treatment persistence and stability of patients as well as reduced rates of relapses, hospitalizations, and death. Some of these advantages become more pronounced with longer injection intervals. Additional advantages of longer injection intervals are more room for non-medication-related communication between healthcare professionals and patients, patient and physician preferences, reduced caregiver burden, and easier transitioning from inpatient to outpatient treatment. Taken together, since aripiprazole may be a good treatment choice for many patients based on its favorable safety and tolerability profile, and given the advantages of LAI treatment over oral treatment and the advantages of reduced dosing frequency, Ari 2MRTU 960 may become an important treatment option for many clinically stable patients with schizophrenia.

A Case of Neuroleptic Malignant Syndrome in the Context of Lithium Toxicity and Aripiprazole Use

OBJECTIVE

Neuroleptic malignant syndrome (NMS) is a rare life-threatening condition that providers should be cognizant of when prescribing dopamine-receptor antagonists. Atypical antipsychotic agents were initially considered to have a lower risk of inducing the development of NMS compared with conventional antipsychotic. Considerable evidence, however, has suggested that atypical antipsychotics are associated with NMS, including the partial dopamine agonist, aripiprazole. There is growing evidence that other psychotropics, including lithium, cause this condition. Here, the authors present a case of a patient who developed NMS from lithium and aripiprazole and provide a literature review of reported NMS cases with either psychotropic.

METHOD AND RESULTS

The authors report the case of 60-year-old male patient who developed NMS over a hospital course during which both aripiprazole and lithium were prescribed. In addition, a literature review was performed and a summary of cases of NMS induced by either lithium and/or aripiprazole is provided.

CONCLUSIONS

This case adds to the growing body of literature of aripiprazole and lithium-induced NMS. Only 2 other cases are reported where concomitant aripiprazole and lithium use lead to NMS. Interestingly, our patient did develop lithium toxicity during hospitalization, but the NMS diagnosis occurred after lithium toxicity resolved. This varies from the other 2 cases where NMS developed despite lithium levels always being therapeutic. Unfortunately, there are more questions than answers surrounding this rare complication involving these 2 psychotropics and clinical vigilance is warranted when using these psychotropics especially in cases where aripiprazole and lithium are used in combination.

Initiation of Aripiprazole Lauroxil Long-Acting Injectable in Adolescents During Hospitalization: A Case Series

Objective: The efficacy and safety of long-acting injectable (LAI) antipsychotics in the pediatric population is not well established due to limited evidence. This case series aims to describe off-label use of aripiprazole lauroxil (AL) LAI in adolescent inpatients, including findings on safety and readmission trends. Methods: This was a retrospective chart review of patients who were initiated on AL LAI while admitted at a county-based adolescent psychiatric unit between March 2021 and March 2023. Data comprised sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, such as psychiatric diagnoses, prior antipsychotic trials, and history of nonadherence. Other observations of interest included tolerability of AL LAI and time to readmission. Results: This analysis identified 12 adolescents who received AL LAI within a 2-year period. The mean age was 16 ± 1 years, and seven (58%) patients were female. There were varying primary psychiatric diagnoses, with the most common being bipolar disorder (25%), schizophrenia (17%), major depressive disorder with psychotic features (17%), and unspecified mood disorder (17%). Eleven (92%) patients had previously trialed at least one antipsychotic, with seven (58%) having exposure to oral aripiprazole before admission. Nonadherence was the driving factor for LAI consideration in all but one patient. AL LAI was well tolerated short term; one patient reported experiencing injection site pain, and one patient discontinued the LAI after discharge due to anxiety. Time to readmission ranged from 15 to 658 days for seven patients who were hospitalized again; two of the readmissions occurred within 1 month. Conclusion: This is the first case series to describe initiation of AL LAI at an inpatient adolescent psychiatric unit. Our study illustrates that AL LAI may hold potential as an acceptably tolerated treatment in adolescents with varying psychiatric diagnoses. Further studies are needed to evaluate long-term safety and effectiveness of AL LAI in youth.

Randomised controlled trials of antipsychotics for people with autism spectrum disorder: a systematic review and a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Despite unclear evidence to support the long-term use of antipsychotics to treat challenging (problem) behaviours in people with autism in the absence of a psychiatric disorder, this practice is common.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of all randomised controlled trials (RCTs) involving antipsychotics for people with autism of all ages, irrespective of the outcomes assessed. We searched seven databases and hand-searched ten relevant journals. Two authors independently screened titles, abstracts and full papers and extracted data using the Cochrane Handbook template. We conducted meta-analyses of outcomes and the rate of adverse events.

RESULTS

We included 39 papers based on 21 primary RCTs that recruited 1482 people with autism. No RCT assessed any psychiatric disorder outcome, such as psychoses or bipolar disorder. A meta-analysis of ten placebo-controlled RCTs showed a significantly improved Aberrant Behaviour Checklist-Irritability score in the antipsychotic group with an effect size of -6.45 [95% confidence interval (CI) -8.13 to -4.77] (low certainty). Pooled Clinical Global Impression data on 11 placebo-controlled RCTs showed an overall effect size of 0.84 (95% CI 0.48 to 1.21) (moderate certainty). There was a significantly higher risk of overall adverse effects (p = 0.003) and also weight gain (p < 0.00001), sedation (p < 0.00001) and increased appetite (p = 0.001) in the antipsychotic group.

CONCLUSIONS

There is some evidence for risperidone and preliminary evidence for aripiprazole to significantly improve scores on some outcome measures among children with autism but not adults or for any other antipsychotics. There is a definite increased risk of antipsychotic-related different adverse effects.

Efficacy and Safety of Aripiprazole in Borderline Personality Disorder: A Systematic Review

Aripiprazole is an atypical antipsychotic medication, and its use in treating borderline personality disorder (BPD) is debatable because it is not FDA-approved for treating BPD. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of aripiprazole in patients with BPD. On July 2, 2021, the protocol (CRD42021256647) was registered in PROSPERO. PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Ovid-Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, and Cochrane (CENTRAL) were searched without regard for language or publication date. We also searched trial registries on ClinicalTrials.gov and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform. Randomized clinical trials with adult patients diagnosed with BPD met the inclusion criteria. The Cochrane risk of bias for randomized trials (RoB-2) method was used to assess the quality of the included studies. We included two previously published randomized clinical trials. There were 76 patients with BPD, with 38, 12, and 26 assigned to the aripiprazole, olanzapine, and placebo groups, respectively. Most patients (88.16%) were females, with ages ranging from 22.1 to 28.14 yr. Aripiprazole has been proven to reduce anxiety, depression, anger, hostility, clinical severity, and obsessive-compulsive behavior, insecurity, melancholy, anxiety, aggressiveness/hostility, phobic anxiety, paranoid thinking, psychoticism, and somatization. The adverse effects were headache, insomnia, restlessness, tremor, and akathisia. The risk of bias was considerable in both trials, which is somewhat problematic considering that prejudice can lead to incorrect outcomes and conclusions. Aripiprazole has demonstrated encouraging outcomes in the treatment of patients with BPD. More randomized controlled studies are needed.

Antipsychotics and the risk of diabetes and death among adults with serious mental illnesses

BACKGROUND

Individuals with schizophrenia exposed to second-generation antipsychotics (SGA) have an increased risk for diabetes, with aripiprazole purportedly a safer drug. Less is known about the drugs' mortality risk or whether serious mental illness (SMI) diagnosis or race/ethnicity modify these effects.

METHODS

Authors created a retrospective cohort of non-elderly adults with SMI initiating monotherapy with an SGA (olanzapine, quetiapine, risperidone, and ziprasidone, aripiprazole) or haloperidol during 2008-2013. Three-year diabetes incidence or all-cause death risk differences were estimated between each drug and aripiprazole, the comparator, as well as effects within SMI diagnosis and race/ethnicity. Sensitivity analyses evaluated potential confounding by indication.

RESULTS

38 762 adults, 65% White and 55% with schizophrenia, initiated monotherapy, with haloperidol least (6%) and quetiapine most (26·5%) frequent. Three-year mortality was 5% and diabetes incidence 9.3%. Compared with aripiprazole, haloperidol and olanzapine reduced diabetes risk by 1.9 (95% CI 1.2-2.6) percentage points, or a 18.6 percentage point reduction relative to aripiprazole users' unadjusted risk (10.2%), with risperidone having a smaller advantage. Relative to aripiprazole users' unadjusted risk (3.4%), all antipsychotics increased mortality risk by 1.1-2.2 percentage points, representing 32.4-64.7 percentage point increases. Findings within diagnosis and race/ethnicity were generally consistent with overall findings. Only quetiapine's higher mortality risk held in sensitivity analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

Haloperidol's, olanzapine's, and risperidone's lower diabetes risks relative to aripiprazole were not robust in sensitivity analyses but quetiapine's higher mortality risk proved robust. Findings expand the evidence on antipsychotics' risks, suggesting a need for caution in the use of quetiapine among individuals with SMI.

Treatment with aripiprazole and N-acetylcysteine affects anaerobic cysteine metabolism in the hippocampus and reverses schizophrenia-like behavior in the neurodevelopmental rat model of schizophrenia

Preclinical and clinical studies have shown that the antipsychotic drug aripiprazole and the antioxidant N-acetylcysteine have unique biological properties. The aim of the study was to investigate, in a rat model of schizophrenia, the effects of chronic administration of these drugs on schizophrenia-like behaviors and anaerobic cysteine metabolism in the hippocampus (HIP). The schizophrenia-type changes were induced in Sprague-Dawley rats by repeated administration of the glutathione synthesis inhibitor l-butionine-(S,R)-sulfoximine in combination with the dopamine reuptake inhibitor GBR 12909 in the early postnatal period. Adult model rats were chronically treated with aripiprazole (0.3 mg·kg-1 , i.p.) or N-acetylcysteine (30 mg·kg-1 , orally), and their effects on schizophrenia-like behaviors were assessed using the social interaction test and novel object recognition test. In the HIP, the level of anaerobic cysteine metabolites, H2 S, and bound sulfane sulfur were determined by a fluorescence method, while the expression of H2 S-synthetizing enzymes: cystathionine β-synthase (CBS) and mercaptopyruvate sulfurtransferase (MST) by western blot. Long-term treatment with aripiprazole or N-acetylcysteine reversed social and cognitive deficits and reduced the exploratory behaviors. In the HIP of 16-day-old model pups, H2 S levels and MST protein expression were significantly decreased. In adult model rats, H2 S levels remained unchanged, bound sulfane sulfur significantly increased, and the expression of CBS and MST slightly decreased. The studied drugs significantly reduced the level of bound sulfane sulfur and the expression of tested enzymes. The reduction in bound sulfane sulfur level coincided with the attenuation of exploratory behavior, suggesting that modulation of anaerobic cysteine metabolism in the HIP may have therapeutic potential in schizophrenia.

Evidence-Based Recommendations for the Pharmacological Treatment of Women with Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorders

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Despite clear evidence that sex differences largely impact the efficacy and tolerability of antipsychotic medication, current treatment guidelines for schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSD) do not differentiate between men and women. This review summarizes the available evidence on strategies that may improve pharmacotherapy for women and provides evidence-based recommendations to optimize treatment for women with schizophrenia.

RECENT FINDINGS

We systematically searched PubMed and Embase for peer-reviewed studies on three topics: (1) sex differences in dose-adjusted antipsychotic serum concentrations, (2) hormonal augmentation therapy with estrogen and estrogen-like compounds to improve symptom severity, and (3) strategies to reduce antipsychotic-induced hyperprolactinemia. Based on three database studies and one RCT, we found higher dose-adjusted concentrations in women compared to men for most antipsychotics. For quetiapine, higher concentrations were specifically found in older women. Based on two recent meta-analyses, both estrogen and raloxifene improved overall symptomatology. Most consistent findings were found for raloxifene augmentation in postmenopausal women. No studies evaluated the effects of estrogenic contraceptives on symptoms. Based on two meta-analyses and one RCT, adjunctive aripiprazole was the best-studied and safest strategy for lowering antipsychotic-induced hyperprolactinemia. Evidence-based recommendations for female-specific pharmacotherapy for SSD consist of (1) female-specific dosing for antipsychotics (guided by therapeutic drug monitoring), (2) hormonal replacement with raloxifene in postmenopausal women, and (3) aripiprazole addition as best evidenced option in case of antipsychotic-induced hyperprolactinemia. Combining these strategies could reduce side effects and improve outcome of women with SSD, which should be confirmed in future longitudinal RCTs.

Towards precision dosing of aripiprazole in children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorder: Linking blood levels to weight gain and effectiveness

AIMS

Aripiprazole is one of the most commonly prescribed antipsychotic drugs to children and adolescents worldwide, but it is associated with serious side-effects, including weight gain. This study assessed the population pharmacokinetics of aripiprazole and its active metabolite and investigated the relationship between pharmacokinetic parameters and body mass index (BMI) in children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and behavioural problems. Secondary outcomes were metabolic, endocrine, extrapyramidal and cardiac side-effects and drug effectiveness.

METHODS

Twenty-four children and adolescents (15 males, 9 females) aged 6-18 years were included in a 24-week prospective observational trial. Drug plasma concentrations, side-effects and drug effectiveness were measured at several time points during follow-up. Relevant pharmacokinetic covariates, including CYP2D6, CYP3A4, CYP3A5 and P-glycoprotein (ABCB1) genotypes, were determined. Nonlinear mixed-effects modelling (NONMEM®) was used for a population pharmacokinetic analysis with 92 aripiprazole and 91 dehydro-aripiprazole concentrations. Subsequently, model-based trough concentrations, maximum concentrations and 24-h area under the curves (AUCs) were analysed to predict outcomes using generalized and linear mixed-effects models.

RESULTS

For both aripiprazole and dehydro-aripiprazole, one-compartment models best described the measured concentrations, with albumin and BMI as significant covariates. Of all the pharmacokinetic parameters, higher sum (aripiprazole plus dehydro-aripiprazole) trough concentrations best predicted higher BMI z-scores (P < .001) and higher Hb1Ac levels (P = .03) during follow-up. No significant association was found between sum concentrations and effectiveness.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicate a threshold with regard to safety, which suggests that therapeutic drug monitoring of aripiprazole could potentially increase safety in children and adolescents with ASD and behavioural problems.

Can brexpiprazole be switched safely in patients with schizophrenia and dopamine supersensitivity psychosis? A retrospective analysis in a real-world clinical practice

BACKGROUND

Several studies have reported that a switch to the dopamine partial agonist (DPA) aripiprazole (ARP), especially when the switch is abrupt, is likely to fail and sometimes worsen psychosis in schizophrenia patients already under high-dose antipsychotic treatment. Such a switching failure is speculated to be related to be the dopamine supersensitivity state. The risks of switching to the DPA brexpiprazole (BREX) have not been reported.

AIMS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the cases of 106 patients with schizophrenia to identify any factors related to the success or failure of switching to BREX.

RESULTS

The comparison between the patients with dopamine supersensitivity psychosis (n = 44) and those without (n = 62) revealed no significant difference in the switching failure judged at the sixth week. A comparison of the patients with successful switching (n = 80) and those who failed (n = 26) revealed that patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS) were significantly more likely to fail. A logistic regression analysis also revealed that patients with past failure of switching to ARP are likely to succeed in switching to BREX. The 2-year follow-up of the patients with successful switching to BREX suggested that the patients who were treated with BREX, even temporarily, experienced some improvement in their Global Assessment of Functioning and Clinical Global Impression-Severity scores.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, the results indicate that patients with schizophrenia can be switched more safely to BREX compared to ARP. However, the failure of switching to BREX could be higher in patients with TRS, and thus, starting BREX treatment in refractory patients warrants careful monitoring.

Antipsychotic-Related Prolactin Levels and Sexual Dysfunction in Mentally Ill Youth: A 3-Month Cohort Study

OBJECTIVE

Although these agents are used frequently, prospective data comparing serotonin/dopamine antagonists/partial agonists (SDAs) in youth regarding prolactin levels and sexual adverse effects (SeAEs) are scarce.

METHOD

Youth aged 4 to 17 years, SDA-naive (≤1 week exposure) or SDA-free for ≥4 weeks were followed for ≤12 weeks on clinician's-choice aripiprazole, olanzapine, quetiapine, or risperidone. Serum prolactin levels, SDA plasma levels, and rating scale-based SeAEs were assessed monthly.

RESULTS

Altogether, 396 youth (aged 14.0 ± 3.1 years, male participants = 55.1%, mood spectrum disorders = 56.3%, schizophrenia spectrum disorders = 24.0%, aggressive-behavior disorders = 19.7%; SDA-naive = 77.8%) were followed for 10.6 ± 3.5 weeks. Peak prolactin levels/any hyperprolactinemia/triple-upper-limit-of-normal-prolactin level were highest with risperidone (median = 56.1 ng/mL/incidence = 93.5%/44.5%), followed by olanzapine (median = 31.4 ng/mL/incidence = 42.7/76.4%/7.3%), quetiapine (median = 19.5 ng/mL/incidence = 39.7%/2.5%) and aripiprazole (median = 7.1 ng/mL/incidence = 5.8%/0.0%) (all p < .0001), with peak levels at 4 to 5 weeks for risperidone and olanzapine. Altogether, 26.8% had ≥1 newly incident SeAEs (risperidone = 29.4%, quetiapine = 29.0%, olanzapine = 25.5%, aripiprazole = 22.1%, p = .59). The most common SeAEs were menstrual disturbance = 28.0% (risperidone = 35.4%, olanzapine = 26.7%, quetiapine = 24.4% aripiprazole = 23.9%, p = .58), decreased erections = 14.8% (olanzapine = 18.5%, risperidone = 16.1%, quetiapine = 13.6%, aripiprazole = 10.8%, p = .91) and decreased libido = 8.6% (risperidone = 12.5%, olanzapine = 11.9%, quetiapine = 7.9%, aripiprazole = 2.4%, p = .082), with the least frequent being gynecomastia = 7.8% (quetiapine = 9.7%, risperidone = 9.2%, aripiprazole = 7.8%, olanzapine = 2.6%, p = 0.61), galactorrhea = 6.7% (risperidone = 18.8%, quetiapine = 2.4%, olanzapine = 0.0%, aripiprazole = 0.0%, p = .0008), and mastalgia = 5.8% (olanzapine = 7.3%, risperidone = 6.4%, aripiprazole = 5.7%, quetiapine = 3.9%, p = .84). Postpubertal status and female sex were significantly associated with prolactin levels and SeAEs. Serum prolactin levels were rarely associated with SeAEs (16.7% of all analyzed associations), except for the relationship between severe hyperprolactinemia and decreased libido (p = .013) and erectile dysfunction (p = .037) at week 4, and with galactorrhea at week 4 (p = .0040), week 12 (p = .013), and last visit (p < .001).

CONCLUSION

Risperidone, followed by olanzapine, was associated with the largest prolactin elevations, with little prolactin-elevating effects of quetiapine and, especially, aripiprazole. Except for risperidone-related galactorrhea, SeAEs did not differ significantly across SDAs, and only galactorrhea, decreased libido, and erectile dysfunction were associated with prolactin levels. In youth, SeAEs are not sensitive markers for significantly elevated prolactin levels.

Editorial: A Better Perspective on Antipsychotic-Related Hyperprolactinemia in Children and Adolescents

Antipsychotic-induced hyperprolactinemia is common in children and adolescents, but this quotidian presence in our clinics should neither reassure us nor make us complacent. The report by Koch and colleagues1 stands out against the landscape of trials describing the adverse effects of psychotropic medications in youth. It goes beyond the typical examination of adverse effects in most clinical trials. The authors followed children and adolescents aged 4 to 17 years who were dopamine-serotonin receptor antagonist naive (≤1-week exposure) or free, and serially evaluated not only serum prolactin concentrations but medication concentrations and side effects for 12 weeks after participants began aripiprazole, olanzapine, quetiapine, or risperidone. This report provides insights into the temporal course of adverse effects, examines differential tolerability among dopamine-serotonin receptor antagonists, links specific adverse effects-galactorrhea, decreased libido, and erectile dysfunction-with prolactin concentrations in youth, and focuses on the clinical aspects of hyperprolactinemia and related adverse effects in children and adolescents.

Therapeutic outcomes wide association scan of different antipsychotics in patients with schizophrenia: Randomized clinical trials and multi-ancestry validation

AIM

This study identified discrepant therapeutic outcomes of antipsychotics.

METHODS

A total of 5191 patients with schizophrenia were enrolled, 3030 as discovery cohort, 1395 as validation cohort, and 766 as multi-ancestry validation cohort. Therapeutic Outcomes Wide Association Scan was conducted. Types of antipsychotics (one antipsychotic vs other antipsychotics) were dependent variables, therapeutic outcomes including efficacy and safety were independent variables.

RESULTS

In discovery cohort, olanzapine related to higher risk of weight gain (AIWG, OR: 2.21-2.86), liver dysfunction (OR: 1.75-2.33), sedation (OR: 1.76-2.86), increased lipid level (OR: 2.04-2.12), and lower risk of extrapyramidal syndrome (EPS, OR: 0.14-0.46); risperidone related to higher risk of hyperprolactinemia (OR: 12.45-20.53); quetiapine related to higher risk of sedation (OR = 1.73), palpitation (OR = 2.87), increased lipid level (OR = 1.69), lower risk of hyperprolactinemia (OR: 0.09-0.11), and EPS (OR: 0.15-0.44); aripiprazole related to lower risk of hyperprolactinemia (OR: 0.09-0.14), AIWG (OR = 0.44), sedation (OR: 0.33-0.47), and QTc prolongation (β = -2.17); ziprasidone related to higher risk of increased QT interval (β range: 3.11-3.22), nausea (OR: 3.22-3.91), lower risk of AIWG (OR: 0.27-0.46), liver dysfunction (OR: 0.41-0.38), and increased lipid level (OR: 0.41-0.55); haloperidol related to higher risk of EPS (OR: 2.64-6.29), hyperprolactinemia (OR: 5.45-9.44), and increased salivation (OR: 3.50-3.68). Perphenazine related to higher risk of EPS (OR: 1.89-2.54). Higher risk of liver dysfunction in olanzapine and lower risk of hyperprolactinemia in aripiprazole were confirmed in validation cohort, and higher risk of AIWG in olanzapine and hyperprolactinemia in risperidone were confirmed in multi-ancestry validation cohort.

CONCLUSION

Future precision medicine should focus on personalized side-effects.

Safety and efficacy of aripiprazole 2-month ready-to-use 960 mg: secondary analysis of outcomes in adult patients with bipolar I disorder in a randomized, open-label, parallel-arm, pivotal study

OBJECTIVE

Aripiprazole 2-month ready-to-use 960 mg (Ari 2MRTU 960) is a new long-acting injectable antipsychotic formulation for administration every 2 months. A 32-week trial evaluated the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of Ari 2MRTU 960 in clinically stable adults with schizophrenia or bipolar I disorder (BP-I) (per DSM-5 criteria). This secondary analysis evaluated the safety and efficacy of Ari 2MRTU 960 in the subpopulation of patients with BP-I.

METHODS

Patients with BP-I were randomized to receive Ari 2MRTU 960 (n = 40) every 56 ± 2 days (4 injections scheduled) or aripiprazole once-monthly 400 mg (AOM 400; n = 41) every 28 ± 2 days (8 injections scheduled). Data were collected during August 2019-July 2020 across 16 US sites. Primary safety endpoints included reported adverse events (coded by the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities preferred term), injection site reactions (assessments included a Visual Analog Scale [VAS] to evaluate patient-reported injection-site pain), and motoric symptoms. Secondary endpoints for efficacy included change from baseline at Week 32 in the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS), Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), Clinical Global Impression - Bipolar Version (CGI-BP), and Subjective Well-being under Neuroleptic Treatment - Short Form (SWN-S) scores, and Clinical Global Impression - Improvement (CGI-I) at Week 32.

RESULTS

The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) was similar between Ari 2MRTU 960 (82.5% [33/40]) and AOM 400 (87.8% [36/41]; p = .5468). The most frequently reported TEAE was increased weight (Ari 2MRTU 960: 25.0% [10/40]; AOM 400: 26.8% [11/41]; p = 1). Injection-site pain was experienced by more patients in the Ari 2MRTU 960 group (25% [10/40]) versus the AOM 400 group (7.3% [3/41]; p = .0622). Mean (standard deviation [SD]) VAS scores for patient-reported injection-site pain following the last injection were 1.2 (2.07) for Ari 2MRTU 960 group and 1.3 (2.19) for AOM 400 (p = .9479) (VAS scale range 0-100 [no pain-extreme pain]). No notable improvement or decline from baseline was observed in motoric symptoms in either treatment group. Patients in both treatment groups remained clinically stable for the entire 32-week trial duration, with minimal difference between treatment groups in the least squares (LS) mean change from baseline at Week 32 in the YMRS Total (p = .8995), MADRS Total (p = .3185), and CGI-BP scores (p = .8485), and in mean CGI-I score (p = .7960). LS mean change from baseline in SWN-S score was greater for Ari 2MRTU 960 than for AOM 400 at Week 32 (p = .0169).

CONCLUSIONS

Ari 2MRTU 960 was well tolerated in patients with BP-I, with efficacy similar to AOM 400.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04030143.

Antidepressant Augmentation versus Switch in Treatment-Resistant Geriatric Depression

BACKGROUND

The benefits and risks of augmenting or switching antidepressants in older adults with treatment-resistant depression have not been extensively studied.

METHODS

We conducted a two-step, open-label trial involving adults 60 years of age or older with treatment-resistant depression. In step 1, patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to augmentation of existing antidepressant medication with aripiprazole, augmentation with bupropion, or a switch from existing antidepressant medication to bupropion. Patients who did not benefit from or were ineligible for step 1 were randomly assigned in step 2 in a 1:1 ratio to augmentation with lithium or a switch to nortriptyline. Each step lasted approximately 10 weeks. The primary outcome was the change from baseline in psychological well-being, assessed with the National Institutes of Health Toolbox Positive Affect and General Life Satisfaction subscales (population mean, 50; higher scores indicate greater well-being). A secondary outcome was remission of depression.

RESULTS

In step 1, a total of 619 patients were enrolled; 211 were assigned to aripiprazole augmentation, 206 to bupropion augmentation, and 202 to a switch to bupropion. Well-being scores improved by 4.83 points, 4.33 points, and 2.04 points, respectively. The difference between the aripiprazole-augmentation group and the switch-to-bupropion group was 2.79 points (95% CI, 0.56 to 5.02; P = 0.014, with a prespecified threshold P value of 0.017); the between-group differences were not significant for aripiprazole augmentation versus bupropion augmentation or for bupropion augmentation versus a switch to bupropion. Remission occurred in 28.9% of patients in the aripiprazole-augmentation group, 28.2% in the bupropion-augmentation group, and 19.3% in the switch-to-bupropion group. The rate of falls was highest with bupropion augmentation. In step 2, a total of 248 patients were enrolled; 127 were assigned to lithium augmentation and 121 to a switch to nortriptyline. Well-being scores improved by 3.17 points and 2.18 points, respectively (difference, 0.99; 95% CI, -1.92 to 3.91). Remission occurred in 18.9% of patients in the lithium-augmentation group and 21.5% in the switch-to-nortriptyline group; rates of falling were similar in the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In older adults with treatment-resistant depression, augmentation of existing antidepressants with aripiprazole improved well-being significantly more over 10 weeks than a switch to bupropion and was associated with a numerically higher incidence of remission. Among patients in whom augmentation or a switch to bupropion failed, changes in well-being and the occurrence of remission with lithium augmentation or a switch to nortriptyline were similar. (Funded by the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute; OPTIMUM ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02960763.).

Memantine/Aripiprazole Combination Alleviates Cognitive Dysfunction in Valproic Acid Rat Model of Autism: Hippocampal CREB/BDNF Signaling and Glutamate Homeostasis

Significant efforts are increasingly directed towards identifying novel therapeutic targets for autism spectrum disorder (ASD) with a rising role of aberrant glutamatergic transmission in the pathogenesis of ASD-associated cellular and behavioral deficits. This study aimed at investigating the role of chronic memantine (20 mg/kg/day) and aripiprazole (3 mg/kg/day) combination therapy in the management of prenatal sodium valproate (VPA)-induced autistic-like/cognitive deficits in male Wistar rats. Pregnant female rats received a single intraperitoneal injection of VPA (600 mg/kg) to induce autistic-like behaviors in their offspring. Prenatal VPA induced autistic-like symptoms (decreased social interaction and the appearance of stereotyped behavior) with deficits in spatial learning (in Morris water maze) and cognitive flexibility (in the attentional set-shifting task) in addition to decreased hippocampal protein levels of phosphorylated cAMP response element-binding protein (p-CREB), brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), and gene expression of glutamate transporter-1 (Glt-1) with a decline in GABA/glutamate ratio (both measured by HPLC). These were accompanied by the appearance of numerous neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs) with enhanced apoptosis in hippocampal sections. Memantine/aripiprazole combination increased the protein levels of p-CREB, BDNF, and Glt-1 gene expression with restoration of GABA/glutamate balance, attenuation of VPA-induced neurodegenerative changes and autistic-like symptoms, and improvement of cognitive performance. This study draws attention to the favorable cognitive effects of memantine/aripiprazole combination in autistic subjects which could be mediated via enhancing CREB/BDNF signaling with increased expression of astrocytic Glt-1 and restoration of GABA/glutamate balance, leading to inhibition of hippocampal NFTs formation and neuronal apoptosis.

Efficacy and tolerance of second-generation antipsychotics in anorexia nervosa: A systematic scoping review

INTRODUCTION

Second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) are frequently prescribed for the treatment of resistant anorexia nervosa. However, few clinical trials have been conducted so far and no pharmacological treatment has yet been approved by the Food and Drug Administration. The aim of this paper is to conduct a systematic scoping review exploring the effectiveness and safety of atypical antipsychotics in anorexia nervosa (AN).

METHOD

We conducted a systematic scoping review of the effectiveness and tolerability of SGAs in the management of AN. We included articles published from January 1, 2000, through September 12, 2022 from the PubMed and PsycInfo databases and a complementary manual search. We selected articles about adolescents and adults treated for AN by four SGAs (risperidone, quetiapine, aripiprazole or olanzapine). This work complies with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis extension for scoping reviews (PRIMA-ScR) and was registered in the Open Science Framework (OSF) repository.

RESULTS

This review included 55 articles: 48 assessing the effectiveness of SGAs in AN and 7 focusing only on their tolerability and safety. Olanzapine is the treatment most frequently prescribed and studied with 7 randomized double-blind controlled trials. Other atypical antipsychotics have been evaluated much less often, such as aripiprazole (no randomized trials), quetiapine (two randomized controlled trials), and risperidone (one randomized controlled trial). These treatments are well tolerated with mild and transient adverse effects in this population at particular somatic risk.

DISCUSSION

Limitations prevent the studies both from reaching conclusive, reliable, robust, and reproducible results and from concluding whether or not SGAs are effective in anorexia nervosa. Nonetheless, they continue to be regularly prescribed in clinical practice. International guidelines suggest that olanzapine and aripiprazole can be interesting in severe or first-line resistant clinical situations.

Safety Profile of Aripiprazole During Pregnancy and Lactation: Report of 2 Cases

Aripiprazole, a second-generation antipsychotic (SGA) medication, is an efficacious treatment for schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. However, its effects on pregnancy and lactation are not yet fully documented. Despite aripiprazole being available since 2002, there is only limited information on the risks and benefits of this treatment during pregnancy. Most of the information is limited to populationbased studies examining malformation risk or case studies or small case series. The knowledge in this topic is still insufficient and there is a need to expand the literature. In this report, we present 2 cases exposed to aripiprazole during pregnancy and lactational period. In both our cases of aripiprazole exposure, no teratogenic effects were reported, and it was reassuring that the mothers did not develop gestational diabetes. However, both patients reported lactation failure. Keyword: Mental illness, antipsychotics, aripiprazole, pregnancy.

Aripiprazole-Associated Rhabdomyolysis in a 17-Year-Old Male

Rhabdomyolysis is a rare serious side effect of antipsychotic medication use. There are cases of rhabdomyolysis due to the use of clozapine, risperidone, olanzapine, and haloperidol in the literature. In this report, we describe a rhabdomyolysis case developed on the 13th day of using 2.5 mg /day aripiprazole in a 17-year-old male patient with a diagnosis of somatic symptom disorder. This case is one of the youngest in the literature to develop rhabdomyolysis after the use of aripiprazole. Moreover, this case is distinguished from the others with its low-dose, short-term and single antipsychotic use. In the child and adolescent age group, routine blood tests should be done before starting medication. Symptoms that appear to be nonspecific and that may be overlooked or may be thought to be caused by an existing psychiatric complaint should be carefully and thoroughly considered during follow-up.

Antipsychotic drug-aripiprazole against schizophrenia, its therapeutic and metabolic effects associated with gene polymorphisms

Second-generation antipsychotics are widely used for the treatment of schizophrenia. Aripiprazole (ARI) is classified as a third-generation antipsychotic drug with a high affinity for dopamine and serotonin receptors. It is considered a dopamine-system stabilizer without severe side effects. In some patients the response to ARI treatment is inadequate and they require an effective augmentation strategy. It has been found that the response to the drug and the risk of adverse metabolic effects can be related to gene polymorphisms. A reduced dose is recommended for CYP2D6 poor metabolizers; moreover, it is postulated that other polymorphisms including CYP3A4, CYP3A5, ABCB1, DRD2, and 5-HTRs genes influence the therapeutic effect of ARI. ARI can increase the levels of prolactin, C-peptide, insulin, and/or cholesterol possibly due to specific genetic variants. It seems that a pharmacogenetic approach can help predict drug response and improve the clinical management of patients with schizophrenia.

Case Report: A rare case of symptomatic bradycardia secondary to aripiprazole in a patient with bipolar disorder type I

It is well known that typical antipsychotic drugs have been implicated as a cause of ventricular arrhythmias and cardiac arrest; studies have shown that conventional antipsychotics increase the risk of hospitalization for ventricular arrhythmias or cardiac arrest nearly 2-fold. However, atypical antipsychotics are not associated with an increased risk of hospitalization for ventricular arrhythmias or cardiac arrest. The use of atypical antipsychotics increased since they were first discovered and now are the mainstay of treatment, but with their broad use, heart effects have been documented, such as prolonged QT interval. Clozapine has been linked to severe cardiac problems, and risperidone has been linked to an increased risk of ventricular arrhythmias and cardiac arrest. We present a case of a patient with bipolar disorder who presented with symptomatic bradycardia secondary to aripiprazole.

Agomelatine Monotherapy for Autism-A Case Report

ASD is commonly associated with a host of challenging behaviours. Pharmacotherapy is indicated if psycho-social and educational interventions fail. Atypical antipsychotics have the strongest evidence-base so far, with both risperidone and aripiprazole are FDA-approved. Unfortunately, their use is fraught with metabolic and neuro-hormonal side effects. Here, authors report on a case of ASD/mild ID with behavioural dyscontrol that failed multiple psychotropic trials and ultimately responded favourably to agomelatine monotherapy. This was achieved with excellent tolerability. This might open new venues in such complicated cases.

Role of the NRG1/ErbB4 and PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathways in the anti-psychotic effects of aripiprazole and sertindole in ketamine-induced schizophrenia-like behaviors in rats

Schizophrenia is a common mental disorder affecting patients' thoughts, behavior, and cognition. Recently, the NRG1/ErbB4 signaling pathway emerged as a candidate therapeutic target for schizophrenia. This study investigates the effects of aripiprazole and sertindole on the NRG1/ErbB4 and PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathways in ketamine-induced schizophrenia in rats. Young male Wistar rats received ketamine (30 mg/kg, intraperitoneally) for 5 consecutive days and aripiprazole (3 mg/kg, orally) or sertindole (2.5 mg/kg, orally) for 14 days. The proposed pathway was investigated by injecting LY294002 (a selective PI3K inhibitor) (25 μg/kg, intrahippocampal injection) 30 min before the drugs. Twenty-four hours after the last injection, animals were subjected to behavioral tests: the open field test, sucrose preference test, novel object recognition task, and social interaction test. Both aripiprazole and sertindole significantly ameliorated ketamine-induced schizophrenic-like behavior, as expected, because of their previously demonstrated antipsychotic activity. Besides, both drugs alleviated ketamine-induced oxidative stress and neurotransmitter level changes in the hippocampus. They also increased the gamma-aminobutyric acid and glutamate levels and glutamate decarboxylase 67 and parvalbumin mRNA expression in the hippocampus. Moreover, aripiprazole and sertindole increased the NRG1 and ErbB4 mRNA expression levels and PI3K, p-Akt, and mTOR protein expression levels. Interestingly, pre-injecting LY294002 abolished all the effects of the drugs. This study reveals that the antipsychotic effects of aripiprazole and sertindole are partly due to oxidative stress reduction as well as NRG1/ErbB4 and PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathways activation. The NRG1/ErbB4 and PI3K signaling pathways may offer a new therapeutic approach for treating schizophrenia in humans.

Suicidality and psychotic episodes after starting aripiprazole: two case reports

Switching antipsychotic medication must be done carefully to ensure patient safety and a successful response. Here, we present two major psychotic decompensations that occurred following a switch to aripiprazole in two patients with schizophrenia. Mr. X was treated with paliperidone and experienced residual anxiety. Thus, a switch to aripiprazole was planned with risperidone and a gradual decrease in paliperidone. Initially, an increase in aripiprazole resulted in remission of his residual symptoms. However, two weeks later, he presented an anxiety relapse with persecutory ideas which required hospitalization. Mr. Y, who was treated for many years with risperidone, presented with a treatment resistant psychotic episode. A switch to aripiprazole enhanced his clinical condition. Despite the initial improvement, soon after discharge from the hospital, the patient presented psychotic symptoms requiring home intervention. Ultimately, the patient in the midst of a delusional recrudescence, had killed himself when the health care team arrived. A strong dopamine antagonist may lead to the development of dopaminergic upregulation. The addition of a partial agonist to these hypersensitive neurotransmitter pathways could explain these episodes. We agree with previous reports and recommend careful management when switching from strong dopamine antagonists to aripiprazole.

Are antipsychotics effective adjunctive Tx for patients with moderate-to-severe depression?

YES. Augmentation with second generation antipsychotics, especially aripiprazole and quetiapine, appears to be effective in patients with moderate-to-severe depression who have had a suboptimal response to a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor or a serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (strength of recommendation [SOR]: A, based on a systematic review of randomized controlled trials [RCTs] and an individual RCT). Augmenting antidepressant therapy with cariprazine, ziprasidone, or olanzapine also appears to improve depressive symptoms over the short term. All antipsychotics studied carried an increased likelihood of adverse effects that could lead to discontinuation (SOR: A, based on a systematic review of RCTs).

Case series on aripiprazole and dopamine supersensitivity psychosis

A potential link between switching to aripiprazole and worsening of psychosis was first reported in the early 2000s. There have since been numerous published case reports describing this phenomenon, but only recently has the concept of a theoretical aripiprazole-induced dopamine supersensitivity psychosis (DSP) caused by D2 receptor activation in patients undergoing a switch to aripiprazole appeared in the literature. There is less awareness in clinical practice of the possibility of inducing DSP with aripiprazole, which may be particularly severe in some patients. The objective of this article is to present four cases demonstrating rapid and dramatic onset of DSP during switching to aripiprazole. In each case, a patient with a Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.) diagnosis of schizophrenia experienced severe worsening of psychosis within 4-5 days of abrupt switching to aripiprazole from a full D2 antagonist. To our knowledge, this is the first case series characterizing the previously well-documented worsening of psychosis during switching to aripiprazole specifically as aripiprazole-induced DSP. We discuss clinical relevance, prevention and future directions. Careful cross-titration per clinical practice guidelines may reduce occurrence of DSP during aripiprazole switching or augmentation treatment.

Aripiprazole in youth with intellectual disabilities: A retrospective chart study

A retrospective chart study of patients on open-label aripiprazole treatment was conducted in the Netherlands to add to the knowledge of aripiprazole in children and young adults with mild and borderline intellectual disabilities (IDs). Fifty-three youths, mean age 14.7 ± 3.4 years and mean IQ 64.5 ±13.8, were included. Treatment responders were defined as "much improved" or "very much improved" based on the Clinical Global Impression -Improvement scale. For 83% of the patients, disruptive behavior was the main target symptom. The overall response rate was 30% after 1-4 weeks and 69% after 5-8 weeks. The 5-8 weeks responders showed a response rate of 64% at 22-26 weeks. Mild adverse events were observed in 53% of the patients of which fatigue and weight gain were the most common. Seven patients (13.2%) discontinued because of adverse events. In 53 children and young adults with mild and borderline IDs, aripiprazole was effective in both the short and the long term. No serious adverse events were observed.

A comparative study of olanzapine, aripiprazole and risperidone in the treatment of psychiatric and behavioral symptoms of Alzheimer's disease

To investigate the efficacy and safety of olanzapine, aripiprazole, and risperidone in the treatment of mental and behavioral symptoms of Alzheimer's Disease. A retrospective analysis was performed on the clinical data of 126 patients with Alzheimer's Disease from February 2018 to February 2020. The patients were divided into group A (aripiprazole, n=44), group B (olanzapine, n=42) and group C (risperidone, n=40) based on the treatment method. Remarkably differences at different time points among the three groups were observed (P<0.05). Significant differences in the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale scores of different time points and cross-group comparison among the three groups were detected (P<0.05). The time-point comparison of BEHAVE-AD scores among the three groups indicated a remarkable difference (P<0.05). After 4 weeks of treatment, the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale and BEHAVE-AD scores of group A were lower than those of groups B and C (P<0.05). The total incidence of adverse reactions in group A was remarkably lower than in groups B and C (P<0.05). Olanzapine, aripiprazole and risperidone are effective in treating Alzheimer's disease and aripiprazole, with a better safety profile and fewer adverse reactions, is more suitable for elderly patients.

Childhood dystonic reactions in the middle Black Sea region

Acute dystonic reactions are a worrying reason for presentation to the pediatric emergency department and the pediatric neurology clinic in childhood. It must be diagnosed and treated quickly. The aim of this study was to examine the clinical presentations, etiological factors, and prognosis of patients presenting to our regional tertiary pediatric neurology clinic with a diagnosis of acute dystonic reactions in children.Nine pediatric patients who were treated for acute dystonic reactions between May, 2018 and May, 2020 and had adequate follow-up were included in the study. Medical record data were reviewed age, gender, etiology, features of family, treatment, and results.Three of the patients were female and 6 were male. Their average age was 11 years (4-17). All patients were evaluated as a drug-induced acute dystonic reaction. Of the 9 patients, 5 were due to metoclopramide, 3 were due to risperidone, and 1 was due to aripiprazole. It was learned that a similar situation against other drugs developed in the family history of 3 patients. As a treatment, all of them were intramuscularly applied biperiden suitable for their weight and 30 minutes dramatic improvement was observed. Additional dose had to be administered in only 1 case. All cases were discharged for 24 hours. No problem was observed in their follow-up.Drug-induced acute dystonic reaction can be diagnosed and has a clinical picture that completely resolves when effective treatment is applied. However, it should not be forgotten that it can reach life-threatening dimensions clinically.

23-year-old woman • syncopal episode • sinus bradycardia • history of bipolar disorder • Dx?

► Syncopal episode ► Sinus bradycardia ► History of bipolar disorder.

Metabolic Effects of Aripiprazole and Olanzapine Multiple-Dose Treatment in a Randomised Crossover Clinical Trial in Healthy Volunteers: Association with Pharmacogenetics

Introduction

Aripiprazole and olanzapine are atypical antipsychotics. Both drugs can induce metabolic changes; however, the metabolic side effects produced by aripiprazole are more benign. The aim of the study was to evaluate if aripiprazole and olanzapine alter prolactin levels, lipid and glucose metabolism and hepatic, haematological, thyroid and renal function.

Methods

Twenty-four healthy volunteers received a daily oral dose of 10 mg aripiprazole and 5 mg olanzapine tablets for 5 days in a crossover randomised clinical trial and were genotyped for 51 polymorphisms in 18 genes by qPCR. Drug plasma concentrations were measured by LC–MS. The biochemical and haematological analyses were performed by enzymatic methods.

Results

Olanzapine induced hyperprolactinaemia but aripiprazole did not. Dopamine D3 receptor (DRD3) Ser/Gly and ATP binding cassette subfamily B member 1 (ABCB1) rs10280101, rs12720067 and rs11983225 polymorphisms and cytochrome P450 3A (CYP3A) phenotype had an impact on plasma prolactin levels. C-peptide concentrations were higher after aripiprazole administration and were influenced by catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) rs4680 and rs13306278 polymorphisms. Olanzapine and the UDP glucuronosyltransferase family 1 member A1 (UGT1A1) rs887829 polymorphism were associated with elevated glucose levels. CYP3A poor metabolizers had increased insulin levels. Volunteers’ weight decreased significantly during aripiprazole treatment and a tendency for weight gain was observed during olanzapine treatment. Triglyceride concentrations decreased as a result of olanzapine and aripiprazole treatment, and varied on the basis of CYP3A phenotypes and the apolipoprotein C-III (APOC3) rs4520 genotype. Cholesterol levels were also decreased and depended on 5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2A (HTR2A) rs6314 polymorphism. All hepatic enzymes, platelet and albumin levels, and prothrombin time were altered during both treatments. Additionally, olanzapine reduced the leucocyte count, aripiprazole increased free T4 and both decreased uric acid concentrations.

Conclusions

Short-term treatment with aripiprazole and olanzapine had a significant influence on the metabolic parameters. However, it seems that aripiprazole provokes less severe metabolic changes.

Trial Registration

Clinical trial registration number (EUDRA-CT): 2018-000744-26

Graphical Abstract

Electronic Supplementary Material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s12325-020-01566-w) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.