1
|
Lahoti A, Yu C, Brar PC, Dalgo A, Gourgari E, Harris R, Kamboj MK, Marks S, Nandagopal R, Page L, Raman V, Reynolds DG, Sarafoglou K, Terrell C, Stanley TL. An endocrine perspective on menstrual suppression for adolescents: achieving good suppression while optimizing bone health. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab 2021; 34:1355-1369. [PMID: 34388330 DOI: 10.1515/jpem-2020-0539] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2020] [Accepted: 07/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Suppression of menstruation and/or ovarian function in adolescent girls may be desired for a variety of reasons. Numerous medical options exist. The choice of the appropriate modality for an individual patient depends on several factors based on differences in the efficacy of achieving menstrual suppression as well as in their side effect profiles. Adolescence is also a period of bone mass accrual in girls, and several of these modalities may negatively influence peak bone mass. This review focuses on the efficacy of achieving menstrual suppression and the effect on bone health of the various options through an overview of the current literature and also highlights areas in need of further research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amit Lahoti
- Pediatric Endocrine Division, Le Bonheur Children's Hospital and University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Christine Yu
- Section of Adult and Pediatric Endocrinology, Diabetes, & Metabolism, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Preneet Cheema Brar
- Division of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Austin Dalgo
- Center for Bioethics and Health Equity, Le Bonheur Children's Hospital and University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Evgenia Gourgari
- Pediatric Endocrinology Division, Department of Pediatrics, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Rebecca Harris
- Division of Endocrinology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Manmohan K Kamboj
- Section of Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics, Nationwide Children's Hospital at The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Seth Marks
- Section of Pediatric Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Pediatrics and Child Health, Children's Hospital HSC Winnipeg, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| | - Radha Nandagopal
- Department of Medical Education and Clinical Sciences, Elson S. Floyd College of Medicine, Washington State University, Spokane, WA, USA
| | - Laura Page
- Division of Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | | | - Danielle G Reynolds
- Diabetes and Endocrinology Center, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Kyriakie Sarafoglou
- Division of Pediatric Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota Masonic Children's Hospital, Minneapolis, MN, USA.,Department of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology, University of Minnesota College of Pharmacy, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Carrie Terrell
- Division of General Obstetrics, Gynecology, Midwifery and Family Planning at the University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Takara L Stanley
- Pediatric Endocrine Unit and Metabolism Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Shawe J, Mulnier H, Nicholls P, Lawrenson R. Use of hormonal contraceptive methods by women with diabetes. Prim Care Diabetes 2008; 2:195-199. [PMID: 19019754 DOI: 10.1016/j.pcd.2008.10.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2008] [Revised: 10/15/2008] [Accepted: 10/16/2008] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND METHODOLOGY This study sought to establish use of hormonal contraception in UK women aged between 15 and 44 years with type 1 or type 2 diabetes compared with comparison groups with no diabetes. A cross sectional study design was used to compare 947 cases of type 1 diabetes and 365 cases of type 2 diabetes with comparison groups matched for age. Subjects were selected from the General Practice Research Database (GPRD). RESULTS Women with diabetes were less likely to use hormonal contraception than women without diabetes--type 1 RR 0.83 (95% CI 0.59-0.93), type 2 RR 0.60 (95% CI 0.42-0.83). Women with type 1 diabetes were more likely to be prescribed a combined pill than a progestogen only pill (POP), but were significantly more likely to be prescribed the POP than were women without diabetes RR 1.65 (95% CI 1.26-2.13). Women with type 2 diabetes were less likely to be prescribed a combined oral contraceptive RR 0.39 (95% CI 0.24-0.62). The injectable contraceptive Depo Provera was significantly more likely to be given to women with diabetes than the comparison group--type 1 RR 1.56 (95% CI 1.12-2.11), type 2 RR 3.57 (95% CI 2.15-5.60). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS The study highlighted significant variation in prescribing of hormonal contraception to women with type 1 and type 2 diabetes in comparison to those without diabetes. It is now recognised that hormonal contraception is a safe and effective option for women with uncomplicated diabetes. Possibly there are significant numbers of young women with poorly controlled diabetes or other risk factors for cardiovascular disease that have influenced clinicians in avoiding the use of hormonal contraception. Paradoxically it is these women who are at most risk from unplanned pregnancy.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Adolescent
- Adult
- Case-Control Studies
- Contraception, Postcoital
- Contraceptive Agents, Female/adverse effects
- Contraceptive Agents, Female/therapeutic use
- Contraceptives, Oral, Combined/therapeutic use
- Contraceptives, Oral, Hormonal/therapeutic use
- Cross-Sectional Studies
- Databases as Topic
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
- Female
- Humans
- Medical Records Systems, Computerized
- Medroxyprogesterone Acetate/therapeutic use
- Practice Patterns, Physicians'
- Progesterone Congeners/therapeutic use
- United Kingdom
- Women's Health
- Young Adult
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jill Shawe
- University of Surrey, Stag Hill, Guildford GU2 7TE, UK.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
A three-year longitudinal evaluation of the forearm bone density of users of etonogestrel- and levonorgestrel-releasing contraceptive implants. Reprod Health 2007; 4:11. [PMID: 17997844 PMCID: PMC2200638 DOI: 10.1186/1742-4755-4-11] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2007] [Accepted: 11/12/2007] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The aim of this study was to evaluate bone mineral density (BMD) at baseline and at 18 and 36 months of use of etonogestrel (ENG)-and levonorgestrel (LNG)-releasing contraceptive implants. This is a continuation of a previous study in which BMD was evaluated at baseline and at 18 months of use. Methods A total of 111 women, 19–43 years of age, wererandomly allocated to use one of the two implants. At 36 months of follow-up, only 36 and 39 women were still using the ENG- and LNG-releasing implants, respectively. BMD was evaluated at the distal and at the ultra-distal radius of the non-dominant forearm using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Results There was no difference in the BMD of users of either implant at 18 and at 36 months. BMD was significantly lower at 18 and at 36 months at the distal radius in both groups of users compared to pre-insertion values; however, no difference was found at the ultra-distal radius. Conclusion Women 19–43 years of age using either one of these two contraceptive implants for 36 months had lower BMD values at the distal radius compared to pre-insertion values; however, no difference was found at the ultra-distal radius.
Collapse
|
5
|
Pateder DB, Khanna AJ, Lieberman IH. Vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty for the management of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. Orthop Clin North Am 2007; 38:409-18; abstract vii. [PMID: 17629988 DOI: 10.1016/j.ocl.2007.03.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
Osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures have previously been treated nonoperatively given the tremendous morbidity associated with open fixation in elderly patients who often have multiple medical comorbidities. With the advent of percutaneous vertebral augmentation techniques, these fractures can now be stabilized using minimally invasive surgical techniques while maintaining a relatively safe risk profile. Vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty provide immediate pain relief in the great majority of patients who have painful, osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. The balloon used in kyphoplasty may allow for improved height restoration, cavity creation, and decreased cement extravasation rates. The authors discuss the procedural steps, advantages and disadvantages, and results of each technique, recognizing that prospective, randomized controlled studies are necessary to objectively compare the two techniques.
Collapse
|