1
|
Summary and Analysis of Relevant Evidence for Nondrug Nursing Programs in Neonatal Operational Pain Management. Emerg Med Int 2022; 2022:7074500. [PMID: 35669169 PMCID: PMC9167008 DOI: 10.1155/2022/7074500] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2022] [Accepted: 04/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To summarize the relevant evidence for nondrug nursing programs in neonatal operational pain management. Methods Computer search for the literature on neonatal procedural pain from 2015 to 2020 in Up To Date, JBI, NICE, SIGN, RNAO, NGC, PubMed, Cochrane Library, CNKI, and Wanfang database was conducted. All literature works that may meet the inclusion criteria were independently evaluated by two researchers to determine the quality grade of the articles. Results Finally, 9 literature works were extracted, including 4 guidelines, 3 systematic reviews, and 2 evidence summaries. The relevant contents of the literature were extracted and summarized, and 20 pieces of the best evidence were obtained. Conclusion Breast feeding, sweetener, Kangaroo mother care, sensory stimulation, nonnutritive sucking, and other nondrug nursing programs can reduce the neonatal operational pain, which has guiding significance in neonatal operational pain management.
Collapse
|
2
|
McNair C, Campbell-Yeo M, Johnston C, Taddio A. Nonpharmacologic Management of Pain During Common Needle Puncture Procedures in Infants: Current Research Evidence and Practical Considerations: An Update. Clin Perinatol 2019; 46:709-730. [PMID: 31653304 DOI: 10.1016/j.clp.2019.08.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
Infants undergo painful procedures involving skin puncture as part of routine medical care. Pain from needle puncture procedures is suboptimally managed. Numerous nonpharmacologic interventions are available that may be used for these painful procedures, including swaddling/containment, pacifier/non-nutritive sucking, rocking/holding, breastfeeding and breastmilk, skin-to-skin care, sweet tasting solutions, music therapy, sensorial saturation, and parental presence. Adoption these interventions into routine clinical practice is feasible and should be a standard of care in quality health care for infants. This review summarizes the epidemiology of pain from common needle puncture procedures in infants, the effectiveness of nonpharmacologic interventions, implementation considerations, and unanswered questions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carol McNair
- Nursing and Child Health Evaluative Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children, 555 University Avenue, Toronto M5G 1X8, Canada
| | - Marsha Campbell-Yeo
- Department of Pediatrics, IWK Health Centre, School of Nursing, Faculty of Health Professions, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Celeste Johnston
- Ingram School of Nursing, McGill University, Montreal, Canada; IWK Health Centre, 5850/5980 University Avenue, Halifax B3K 6R8, Canada
| | - Anna Taddio
- Clinical, Social and Administrative Pharmacy, Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Child Health Evaluative Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children, 144 College Street, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3M2, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Taddio A, Riddell RP, Ipp M, Moss S, Baker S, Tolkin J, Malini D, Feerasta S, Govan P, Fletcher E, Wong H, McNair C, Mithal P, Stephens D. Relative effectiveness of additive pain interventions during vaccination in infants. CMAJ 2016; 189:E227-E234. [PMID: 27956393 DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.160542] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2016] [Accepted: 08/22/2016] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Vaccine injections can cause acute pain and distress in infants, which can contribute to dissatisfaction with the vaccination experience and vaccine hesitancy. We sought to compare the effectiveness of additive pain interventions administered consistently during vaccine injections in the first year of life. METHODS We conducted a multicentre, longitudinal, double-blind, add-on, randomized controlled trial. Healthy infants were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 levels of pain management for all vaccine injections at 2, 4, 6 and 12 months: (i) placebo control; (ii) parent-directed video education about infant soothing; (iii) the video plus sucrose administered orally or (iv) the video plus sucrose plus liposomal lidocaine applied topically. All infants benefit from injection techniques that minimize pain. We used a double-dummy design; hence all parents watched a video (active psychological intervention or placebo) and all infants received oral solution (sucrose or placebo) and topical cream (lidocaine or placebo). We assessed infant distress during 3 phases - preinjection (baseline), vaccine injection (needle), and 1 minute postinjection (recovery) - using the Modified Behavioural Pain Scale (range 0-10). We compared scores between groups and across infant ages using a mixed-model repeated-measures analysis. RESULTS A total of 352 infants participated in the study, from Jan. 17, 2012, to Feb. 2, 2016. Demographics did not differ among intervention groups (p > 0.05). Baseline pain scores did not differ among intervention groups (p = 0.4), but did differ across ages (p < 0.001). Needle pain scores differed among groups (p = 0.003) and across ages (p < 0.001). The mean (± standard deviation) needle score was 6.3 (± 0.8) in the video-sucrose-lidocaine group compared with 6.7 (± 0.8) in each of the other groups. There were no other between-group differences. Recovery scores did not differ among groups (p = 0.98), but did differ across ages (p < 0.001). INTERPRETATION Only liposomal lidocaine provided consistent analgesia within an additive pain intervention regimen during vaccinations in infants. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, no. NCT01503060.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Taddio
- Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy (Taddio, Fletcher, Wong, McNair, Mithal), University of Toronto; Child Health Evaluative Sciences (Taddio), The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ont.; Department of Psychology (Pillai Riddell), York University, North York, Ont.; Department of Psychiatry (Pillai Riddell) and Paediatrics (Ipp), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Pediatricians (Moss, Baker, Tolkin, Malini, Feerasta, Govan), North York, Ont.; Biostatistics and Data Analysis Unit (Stephens), The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ont.
| | - Rebecca Pillai Riddell
- Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy (Taddio, Fletcher, Wong, McNair, Mithal), University of Toronto; Child Health Evaluative Sciences (Taddio), The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ont.; Department of Psychology (Pillai Riddell), York University, North York, Ont.; Department of Psychiatry (Pillai Riddell) and Paediatrics (Ipp), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Pediatricians (Moss, Baker, Tolkin, Malini, Feerasta, Govan), North York, Ont.; Biostatistics and Data Analysis Unit (Stephens), The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ont
| | - Moshe Ipp
- Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy (Taddio, Fletcher, Wong, McNair, Mithal), University of Toronto; Child Health Evaluative Sciences (Taddio), The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ont.; Department of Psychology (Pillai Riddell), York University, North York, Ont.; Department of Psychiatry (Pillai Riddell) and Paediatrics (Ipp), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Pediatricians (Moss, Baker, Tolkin, Malini, Feerasta, Govan), North York, Ont.; Biostatistics and Data Analysis Unit (Stephens), The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ont
| | - Steven Moss
- Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy (Taddio, Fletcher, Wong, McNair, Mithal), University of Toronto; Child Health Evaluative Sciences (Taddio), The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ont.; Department of Psychology (Pillai Riddell), York University, North York, Ont.; Department of Psychiatry (Pillai Riddell) and Paediatrics (Ipp), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Pediatricians (Moss, Baker, Tolkin, Malini, Feerasta, Govan), North York, Ont.; Biostatistics and Data Analysis Unit (Stephens), The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ont
| | - Stephen Baker
- Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy (Taddio, Fletcher, Wong, McNair, Mithal), University of Toronto; Child Health Evaluative Sciences (Taddio), The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ont.; Department of Psychology (Pillai Riddell), York University, North York, Ont.; Department of Psychiatry (Pillai Riddell) and Paediatrics (Ipp), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Pediatricians (Moss, Baker, Tolkin, Malini, Feerasta, Govan), North York, Ont.; Biostatistics and Data Analysis Unit (Stephens), The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ont
| | - Jonathan Tolkin
- Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy (Taddio, Fletcher, Wong, McNair, Mithal), University of Toronto; Child Health Evaluative Sciences (Taddio), The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ont.; Department of Psychology (Pillai Riddell), York University, North York, Ont.; Department of Psychiatry (Pillai Riddell) and Paediatrics (Ipp), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Pediatricians (Moss, Baker, Tolkin, Malini, Feerasta, Govan), North York, Ont.; Biostatistics and Data Analysis Unit (Stephens), The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ont
| | - Dave Malini
- Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy (Taddio, Fletcher, Wong, McNair, Mithal), University of Toronto; Child Health Evaluative Sciences (Taddio), The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ont.; Department of Psychology (Pillai Riddell), York University, North York, Ont.; Department of Psychiatry (Pillai Riddell) and Paediatrics (Ipp), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Pediatricians (Moss, Baker, Tolkin, Malini, Feerasta, Govan), North York, Ont.; Biostatistics and Data Analysis Unit (Stephens), The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ont
| | - Sharmeen Feerasta
- Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy (Taddio, Fletcher, Wong, McNair, Mithal), University of Toronto; Child Health Evaluative Sciences (Taddio), The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ont.; Department of Psychology (Pillai Riddell), York University, North York, Ont.; Department of Psychiatry (Pillai Riddell) and Paediatrics (Ipp), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Pediatricians (Moss, Baker, Tolkin, Malini, Feerasta, Govan), North York, Ont.; Biostatistics and Data Analysis Unit (Stephens), The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ont
| | - Preeya Govan
- Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy (Taddio, Fletcher, Wong, McNair, Mithal), University of Toronto; Child Health Evaluative Sciences (Taddio), The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ont.; Department of Psychology (Pillai Riddell), York University, North York, Ont.; Department of Psychiatry (Pillai Riddell) and Paediatrics (Ipp), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Pediatricians (Moss, Baker, Tolkin, Malini, Feerasta, Govan), North York, Ont.; Biostatistics and Data Analysis Unit (Stephens), The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ont
| | - Emma Fletcher
- Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy (Taddio, Fletcher, Wong, McNair, Mithal), University of Toronto; Child Health Evaluative Sciences (Taddio), The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ont.; Department of Psychology (Pillai Riddell), York University, North York, Ont.; Department of Psychiatry (Pillai Riddell) and Paediatrics (Ipp), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Pediatricians (Moss, Baker, Tolkin, Malini, Feerasta, Govan), North York, Ont.; Biostatistics and Data Analysis Unit (Stephens), The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ont
| | - Horace Wong
- Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy (Taddio, Fletcher, Wong, McNair, Mithal), University of Toronto; Child Health Evaluative Sciences (Taddio), The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ont.; Department of Psychology (Pillai Riddell), York University, North York, Ont.; Department of Psychiatry (Pillai Riddell) and Paediatrics (Ipp), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Pediatricians (Moss, Baker, Tolkin, Malini, Feerasta, Govan), North York, Ont.; Biostatistics and Data Analysis Unit (Stephens), The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ont
| | - Caitlin McNair
- Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy (Taddio, Fletcher, Wong, McNair, Mithal), University of Toronto; Child Health Evaluative Sciences (Taddio), The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ont.; Department of Psychology (Pillai Riddell), York University, North York, Ont.; Department of Psychiatry (Pillai Riddell) and Paediatrics (Ipp), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Pediatricians (Moss, Baker, Tolkin, Malini, Feerasta, Govan), North York, Ont.; Biostatistics and Data Analysis Unit (Stephens), The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ont
| | - Priyanjali Mithal
- Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy (Taddio, Fletcher, Wong, McNair, Mithal), University of Toronto; Child Health Evaluative Sciences (Taddio), The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ont.; Department of Psychology (Pillai Riddell), York University, North York, Ont.; Department of Psychiatry (Pillai Riddell) and Paediatrics (Ipp), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Pediatricians (Moss, Baker, Tolkin, Malini, Feerasta, Govan), North York, Ont.; Biostatistics and Data Analysis Unit (Stephens), The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ont
| | - Derek Stephens
- Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy (Taddio, Fletcher, Wong, McNair, Mithal), University of Toronto; Child Health Evaluative Sciences (Taddio), The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ont.; Department of Psychology (Pillai Riddell), York University, North York, Ont.; Department of Psychiatry (Pillai Riddell) and Paediatrics (Ipp), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Pediatricians (Moss, Baker, Tolkin, Malini, Feerasta, Govan), North York, Ont.; Biostatistics and Data Analysis Unit (Stephens), The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ont
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Abstract
Far more attention is now given to pain management in children in the emergency department (ED). When a child arrives, pain must be recognized and evaluated using a pain scale that is appropriate to the child's development and regularly assessed to determine whether the pain intervention was effective. At triage, both analgesics and non-pharmacological strategies, such as distraction, immobilization, and dressing should be started. For mild pain, oral ibuprofen can be administered if the child has not received it at home, whereas ibuprofen and paracetamol are suitable for moderate pain. For patients who still require pain relief, oral opioids could be considered; however, many EDs have now replaced this with intranasal fentanyl, which allows faster onset of pain relief and can be administered on arrival pending either intravenous access or definitive care. Intravenous opioids are often required for severe pain, and paracetamol or ibuprofen can still be considered for their likely opioid-sparing effects. Specific treatment should be used for patients with migraine. In children requiring intravenous access or venipuncture, non-pharmacological and pharmacological strategies to decrease pain and anxiety associated with needle punctures are mandatory. These strategies can also be used for laceration repairs and other painful procedures. Despite the gaps in knowledge, pain should be treated with the most up-to-date evidence in children seen in EDs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benoit Bailey
- Division of Emergency Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, CHU Sainte-Justine, 3175 Chemin de la Côte-Sainte-Catherine, Montréal, QC, H3T 1C5, Canada.
| | - Evelyne D Trottier
- Division of Emergency Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, CHU Sainte-Justine, 3175 Chemin de la Côte-Sainte-Catherine, Montréal, QC, H3T 1C5, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Abstract
Pain is common in children presenting to emergency departments with episodic illnesses, acute injuries, and exacerbation of chronic disorders. We review recognition and assessment of pain in infants and children and discuss the manifestations of pain in children with chronic illness, recurrent pain syndromes, and cognitive impairment, including the difficulties of pain management in these patients. Non-pharmacological interventions, as adjuncts to pharmacological management for acute anxiety and pain, are described by age and development. We discuss the pharmacological management of acute pain and anxiety, reviewing invasive and non-invasive routes of administration, pharmacology, and adverse effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Baruch S Krauss
- Division of Emergency Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, and Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Lorenzo Calligaris
- Institute for Maternal and Child Health, IRCCS Burlo Garofolo, Trieste, Italy
| | - Steven M Green
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Loma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda, CA, USA
| | - Egidio Barbi
- Institute for Maternal and Child Health, IRCCS Burlo Garofolo, Trieste, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Beirne PV, Hennessy S, Cadogan SL, Shiely F, Fitzgerald T, MacLeod F. Needle size for vaccination procedures in children and adolescents. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015:CD010720. [PMID: 26086647 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd010720.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hypodermic needles of different sizes (gauges and lengths) can be used for vaccination procedures. The gauge (G) refers to the outside diameter of the needle tubing. The higher the gauge number, the smaller diameter of the needle (eg a 25 G needle is 0.5 mm in diameter and is narrower than a 23 G needle (0.6 mm)). Many vaccines are recommended for injection into muscle (intramuscularly), although some are delivered subcutaneously (under the skin) and intradermally (into skin). Choosing an appropriate length and gauge of a needle may be important to ensure that a vaccine is delivered to the appropriate site and produces the maximum immune response while causing the least possible harm. There are some conflicting guidelines regarding the lengths and gauges of needles that should be used for vaccination procedures in children and adolescents. OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of using needles of different lengths and gauges for administering vaccines to children and adolescents on vaccine immunogenicity (the ability of the vaccine to elicit an immune response), procedural pain, and other reactogenicity events (adverse events following vaccine administration). SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library 2014, Issue 10), MEDLINE and MEDLINE in Progress via Ovid (1947 to November 2014), EMBASE via Ovid (1974 to November 2014), and CINAHL via EBSCOhost (1982 to November 2014). We also searched reference lists of articles and textbooks, the proceedings of vaccine conferences, and three clinical trial registers. SELECTION CRITERIA Randomised controlled trials evaluating the effects of using hypodermic needles of any gauge or length to administer any type of vaccine to people aged from birth to 24 years. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Three review authors independently extracted trial data and assessed the risk of bias. We contacted trial authors for additional information. We rated the quality of evidence using the GRADE system. MAIN RESULTS We included five trials involving 1350 participants. Data for the primary review outcomes were either absent (for the incidence of vaccine-preventable diseases) or limited (for procedural pain and crying). The available evidence was compromised by the use of surrogate immunogenicity outcomes, incomplete blinding of outcome assessors, and imprecision for some outcomes. The evidence from two small trials was insufficient to allow any confident statements to be made about the effects of the needles evaluated in the trials on vaccine immunogenicity and reactogenicity.The remaining three trials (1135 participants) contributed data to comparisons between 25 G 25 mm, 23 G 25 mm, and 25 G 16 mm needles. These trials involved infants predominantly aged two to six months undergoing intramuscular vaccination in the anterolateral thigh using the World Health Organization (WHO) injection technique (skin stretched flat, needle inserted at a 90° angle and up to the needle hub in healthy infants). The vaccines administered were combination vaccines containing diphtheria, tetanus, and whole-cell pertussis antigens (DTwP). In some trials, the vaccines also contained Haemophilus influenzae type b (DTwP-Hib) and hepatitis B (DTwP-Hib-HepB) antigen components.We found moderate quality evidence from one trial that there is probably little or no difference in immune response, defined in terms of the proportion of seroprotected infants, between using 25 G 25 mm, 23 G 25 mm, or 25 G 16 mm needles to administer a series of three doses of a DTwP-Hib vaccine at ages two, three, and four months (numbers of participants in analyses range from 309 to 402. Immune response to pertussis antigen not measured).25 mm needles (either 23 G or 25 G) probably lead to fewer severe local reactions (extensive redness and swelling) and fewer non-severe local reactions (any redness, swelling, tenderness or hardness (composite outcome)) after DTwP-Hib vaccination compared with 25 G 16 mm needles. We estimate that one fewer infant will experience a severe local reaction after the first vaccine dose for every 25 infants vaccinated with the longer rather than the shorter needle (number needed to treat (NNT) 25 (95% confidence interval (CI) 15 to 100)). We estimate that one fewer infant will experience a non-severe local reaction at 24 hours after the first, second, and third vaccine doses for every five to eight infants vaccinated with the longer rather than the shorter needle (NNTs range from 5 (95% CI 4 to 10) to 8 (95% CI 5 to 34)) (moderate quality evidence, one trial for first and second doses, two trials for third dose, numbers of participants in analyses range from 413 to 528).Using a wider gauge needle (23 G 25 mm) may slightly reduce procedural pain (low quality evidence) and probably leads to a slight reduction in the duration of crying time immediately after vaccination (moderate quality evidence) compared with a narrower gauge (25 G 25 mm) needle (one trial, 320 participants). The effects are probably not large enough to be of any clinical relevance. The 25 G 25 mm needle may produce a small reduction in the incidence of local reactions after each dose of a DTwP vaccine compared with the 23 G 25 mm needle, but the effect estimates are imprecise (low quality evidence, two trials, numbers of participants in analyses range from 100 to 459).The comparative effects of 23 G 25 mm, 25 G 25 mm, and 25 G 16 mm needles on the incidence of post-vaccination fever, persistent inconsolable crying, and other systemic events such as drowsiness, loss of appetite, and vomiting are uncertain due to the very low quality of the evidence. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Using 25 mm needles (either 23 G or 25 G) for intramuscular vaccination procedures in the anterolateral thigh of infants using the WHO injection technique probably reduces the occurrence of local reactions while achieving a comparable immune response to 25 G 16 mm needles. These findings are applicable to healthy infants aged two to six months receiving combination DTwP vaccines with a reactogenic whole-cell pertussis antigen component. These vaccines are predominantly used in developing countries. The applicability of the findings to vaccines with acellular pertussis components and other vaccines with different reactogenicity profiles is uncertain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul V Beirne
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College Cork, 4th Floor, Western Gateway Building, Western Road, Cork, Ireland
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Harrison D, Yamada J, Adams‐Webber T, Ohlsson A, Beyene J, Stevens B. Sweet tasting solutions for reduction of needle-related procedural pain in children aged one to 16 years. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015; 2015:CD008408. [PMID: 25942496 PMCID: PMC6779143 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd008408.pub3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Extensive evidence exists showing analgesic effects of sweet solutions for newborns and infants. It is less certain if the same analgesic effects exist for children one year to 16 years of age. This is an updated version of the original Cochrane review published in Issue 10, 2011 (Harrison 2011) titled Sweet tasting solutions for reduction of needle-related procedural pain in children aged one to 16 years. OBJECTIVES To determine the efficacy of sweet tasting solutions or substances for reducing needle-related procedural pain in children beyond one year of age. SEARCH METHODS Searches were run to the end of June 2014. We searched the following databases: the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE), Cochrane Methodology Register, Health Technology Assessment, the NHS Economic Evaluation Database, MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, and ACP Journal Club (all via OvidSP), and CINAH (via EBSCOhost). We applied no language restrictions. SELECTION CRITERIA Published or unpublished randomised controlled trials (RCT) in which children aged one year to 16 years, received a sweet tasting solution or substance for needle-related procedural pain. Control conditions included water, non-sweet tasting substances, pacifier, distraction, positioning/containment, breastfeeding, or no treatment. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Outcome measures included crying duration, composite pain scores, physiological or behavioral pain indicators, self-report of pain or parental or healthcare professional-report of the child's pain. We reported mean differences (MD), weighted mean difference (WMD), or standardized mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) using fixed-effect or random-effects models as appropriate for continuous outcome measures. We reported risk ratio (RR), risk difference (RD), and the number needed to treat to benefit (NNTB) for dichotomous outcomes. We used the I(2) statistic to assess between-study heterogeneity. MAIN RESULTS We included one unpublished and seven published studies (total of 808 participants); four more studies and 478 more participants than the 2011 review. Six trials included young children aged one to four years receiving sucrose or candy lollypops for immunisation pain compared with water or no treatment. Usual care included topical anaesthetics, upright parental holding, and distraction. All studies were well designed blinded RCTs, however, five of the six studies had a high risk of bias based on small sample sizes.Two studies included school-aged children receiving sweet or unsweetened chewing gum before, or before and during, immunisation and blood collection. Both studies, conducted by the same author, had a high risk of bias based on small sample sizes.Results for the toddlers/pre-school children were conflicting. Duration of cry, using a random-effects model, was not significantly reduced by sweet taste (six trials, 520 children, WMD -15 seconds, 95% CI -54 to 24, I(2) = 94%).Composite pain score at time of first needle was reported in four studies (n = 121 children). The scores were not significantly different between the sucrose and control group (SMD -0.26, 95% CI -1.27 to 0.75, I(2) = 86%).A Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Pain Scale score > 4 was significantly less common in the sucrose group compared to the control group in one study (n = 472, RR 0.55, 95% CI 0.45 to 0.67; RD -0.29, 95% CI -0.37 to -0.20; NNTB 3, 95% CI 3 to 5; tests for heterogeneity not applicable.For school-aged children, chewing sweet gum before needle-related painful procedures (two studies, n = 111 children) or during the procedures (two studies, n = 103 children) did not significantly reduce pain scores. A comparison of the Faces Pain Scale scores in children chewing sweet gum before the procedures compared with scores of children chewing unsweetened gum revealed a WMD of -0.15 (95% CI -0.61 to 0.30). Similar results were found when comparing the chewing of sweet gum with unsweetened gum during the procedure (WMD 0.23, 95% CI -0.28 to 0.74). The Colored Analogue Scale for children chewing sweet gum compared to unsweetened gum before the procedure was not significantly different (WMD 0.24 (-0.69 to 1.18)) nor was it different when children chewed the gum during the procedure (WMD 0.86 (95% CI -0.12 to 1.83)). There was no heterogeneity for any of these analyses in school-aged children (I(2) = 0%). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Based on the eight studies included in this systematic review update, two of which were subgroups of small numbers of eligible toddlers from larger studies, and three of which were pilot RCTs with small numbers of participants, there is insufficient evidence of the analgesic effects of sweet tasting solutions or substances during acutely painful procedures in young children between one and four years of age. Further rigorously conducted, adequately powered RCTs are warranted in this population. Based on the two studies by the same author, there was no evidence of analgesic effects of sweet taste in school-aged children. As there are other effective evidence-based strategies available to use in this age group, further trials are not warranted.Despite the addition of four studies in this review, conclusions have not changed since the last version of the review.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Denise Harrison
- University of OttawaSchool of Nursing401 Smyth RdOttawaONCanadaK1H 8L1
| | - Janet Yamada
- Ryerson UniversityDaphne Cockwell School of NursingTorontoONCanada
| | | | - Arne Ohlsson
- University of TorontoDepartments of Paediatrics, Obstetrics and Gynaecology and Institute of Health Policy, Management and EvaluationTorontoCanada
| | - Joseph Beyene
- McMaster UniversityClinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics1280 Main Street WestMDCL 3208HamiltonONCanadaL8S 4K1
| | - Bonnie Stevens
- The Hospital for Sick ChildrenNursing Research555 University AvenueTorontoONCanadaM5G 1X8
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Messerer B, Krauss-Stoisser B, Urlesberger B. [Non-pharmaceutical measures, topical analgesics and oral administration of glucose in pain management: Austrian interdisciplinary recommendations on pediatric perioperative pain management]. Schmerz 2015; 28:31-42. [PMID: 24550025 DOI: 10.1007/s00482-014-1391-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
Non-pharmaceutical procedures are increasingly being used in pediatric pain therapy in addition to pharmaceutical procedures and have a supporting function. This article describes the non-pharmaceutical procedures which have an influence on perioperative and posttraumatic pain in children and adolescents. Prerequisites for every adequate pain therapy are affection, imparting a feeling of security, distraction and the creation of a child-oriented environment. Topical analgesics are indicated for application to intact skin for surface anesthesia. For a safe use consideration must be given to the duration of application, the dose and the maximum area of skin treated in an age-dependent manner. For simple but painful procedures in premature infants, neonates and infants, pain can be effectively reduced by the oral administration of glucose. The positive effect is guaranteed particularly for the use in a once only pain stimulation. Non-nutritive sucking, swaddling, facilitated tucking and kangaroo mother care, for example can be used as supportive measures during slightly painful procedures. There is insufficient evidence for a pain reducing effect in older infants and small children. Physical therapeutic procedures can be used as accompanying measures for acute pain and are individually adapted. However, the limited amount of currently available data is insufficient to make a critical scientific assessment of the individual measures. The effects can, however, be observed in the daily routine practice. Psychological methods can facilitate coping with pain. In situations with mental and psychiatric comorbidities or psychosocial impairment, a psychologist should be consulted. Acupuncture and hypnosis are also a meaningful addition within the framework of multimodal pain therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B Messerer
- Universitätsklinik für Anästhesiologie und Intensivmedizin, Medizinische Universität Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 29, 8036, Graz, Österreich,
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Bechard MA, Lemieux JR, Roth J, Watanabe Duffy K, Duffy CM, Aglipay MO, Jurencak R. Procedural pain and patient-reported side effects with weekly injections of subcutaneous methotrexate in children with rheumatic disorders. Pediatr Rheumatol Online J 2014; 12:54. [PMID: 25584042 PMCID: PMC4290103 DOI: 10.1186/1546-0096-12-54] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2014] [Accepted: 12/03/2014] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite the widespread use of subcutaneous methotrexate in treating pediatric rheumatic disorders, the amount of pain associated with the injections has not been quantified. Our study aims 1) to quantify the amount of pain associated with subcutaneous injections of methotrexate, 2) to explore predictors of pain, 3) to determine the frequency of patient-reported clinical adverse effects of methotrexate, and 4) identify coping strategies of patients and caregivers. METHODS Patients aged 4-17 years with rheumatologic diseases who were receiving weekly subcutaneous methotrexate injections for at least 4 weeks were invited to participate in this prospective cohort study. They were trained to use the Faces Pain Scale-Revised (FPS-R) and Faces, Legs, Arms, Cry, Consolability (FLACC) tools to rate pain associated with the injections. All patients underwent focused interviews exploring their experiences with methotrexate injections. RESULTS Forty-one patients consented to the study. The mean age was 11.2 years (SD = 3.9 years) and 68% were female. Most patients were diagnosed with JIA (73%). Mean duration of methotrexate therapy was 2.5 years (SD = 2.1 yrs). All but one of the patients used methotrexate 25 mg/ml solution for injection in 1 cc or 3 cc syringe with 30 gauge ½" needle. Median amount of pain was 2/10 on the FPS-R and 1/10 on the FLACC. Higher intensity of pain was significantly associated with presence of side effects (p = 0.004), but not duration of therapy (p = 0.20) or age (p = 0.24). Most participants (61%) experienced at least one adverse effect; nausea (56%) and vomiting (34%) were the most common symptoms reported. Patients and caregivers reported using ice (34%), comfort positions (51%), rewards (49%), reassurance (54%), distraction (51%), and analgesic medications (22%) to cope with the injections. CONCLUSION Subcutaneous injections of methotrexate are associated with a mild amount of pain. Presence of side effects may amplify the amount of perceived pain. Clinicians can apply this knowledge when counseling patients and family members about methotrexate therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Julie Rachelle Lemieux
- Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario Division of Rheumatology, 401 Smyth Road, Ottawa, K1H 8L1 Canada ,University of Ottawa, 451 Smyth Road, Ottawa, K1H 8M5 Canada
| | - Johannes Roth
- Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario Division of Rheumatology, 401 Smyth Road, Ottawa, K1H 8L1 Canada ,University of Ottawa, 451 Smyth Road, Ottawa, K1H 8M5 Canada
| | - Karen Watanabe Duffy
- Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario Division of Rheumatology, 401 Smyth Road, Ottawa, K1H 8L1 Canada ,University of Ottawa, 451 Smyth Road, Ottawa, K1H 8M5 Canada
| | - Ciaran Maire Duffy
- Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario Division of Rheumatology, 401 Smyth Road, Ottawa, K1H 8L1 Canada ,University of Ottawa, 451 Smyth Road, Ottawa, K1H 8M5 Canada
| | - Mary Ombac Aglipay
- Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario Division of Rheumatology, 401 Smyth Road, Ottawa, K1H 8L1 Canada ,University of Ottawa, 451 Smyth Road, Ottawa, K1H 8M5 Canada
| | - Roman Jurencak
- Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario Division of Rheumatology, 401 Smyth Road, Ottawa, K1H 8L1 Canada ,University of Ottawa, 451 Smyth Road, Ottawa, K1H 8M5 Canada
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Harrison D, Sampson M, Reszel J, Abdulla K, Barrowman N, Cumber J, Fuller A, Li C, Nicholls S, Pound CM. Too many crying babies: a systematic review of pain management practices during immunizations on YouTube. BMC Pediatr 2014; 14:134. [PMID: 24885559 PMCID: PMC4049389 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2431-14-134] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2013] [Accepted: 05/21/2014] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Early childhood immunizations, although vital for preventative health, are painful and too often lead to fear of needles. Effective pain management strategies during infant immunizations include breastfeeding, sweet solutions, and upright front-to-front holding. However, it is unknown how often these strategies are used in clinical practice. We aimed to review the content of YouTube videos showing infants being immunized to ascertain parents’ and health care professionals’ use of pain management strategies, as well as to assess infants’ pain and distress. Methods A systematic review of YouTube videos showing intramuscular injections in infants less than 12 months was completed using the search terms "baby injection" and "baby vaccine" to assess (1) the use of pain management strategies and (2) infant pain and distress. Pain was assessed by crying duration and pain scores using the FLACC (Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability) tool. Results A total of 142 videos were included and coded by two trained individual viewers. Most infants received one injection (range of one to six). Almost all (94%) infants cried before or during the injections for a median of 33 seconds (IQR = 39), up to 146 seconds. FLACC scores during the immunizations were high, with a median of 10 (IQR = 3). No videos showed breastfeeding or the use of sucrose/sweet solutions during the injection(s), and only four (3%) videos showed the infants being held in a front-to-front position during the injections. Distraction using talking or singing was the most commonly used (66%) pain management strategy. Conclusions YouTube videos of infants being immunized showed that infants were highly distressed during the procedures. There was no use of breastfeeding or sweet solutions and limited use of upright or front-to-front holding during the injections. This systematic review will be used as a baseline to evaluate the impact of future knowledge translation interventions using YouTube to improve pain management practices for infant immunizations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Denise Harrison
- Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, 401 Smyth Road, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L1, Canada.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Ali S, Chambers AL, Johnson DW, Craig WR, Newton AS, Vandermeer B, Curtis SJ. Paediatric pain management practice and policies across Alberta emergency departments. Paediatr Child Health 2014; 19:190-4. [PMID: 24855415 DOI: 10.1093/pch/19.4.190] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/08/2014] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Many children requiring acute care receive suboptimal analgesia. OBJECTIVES To describe paediatric pain management practices and policies in emergency departments (EDs) in Alberta. METHODS A descriptive survey was distributed to each of the EDs in Alberta. RESULTS A response rate of 67% (72 of 108) was obtained. Seventy-one percent (42 of 59) of EDs reported the use of a pain tool, 29.3% (17 of 58) reported mandatory pain documentation and 16.7% (10 of 60) had nurse-initiated pain protocols. Topical anesthetics were reported to be used for intravenous line insertion by 70.4% of respondents (38 of 54) and for lumbar puncture (LP) by 30.8% (12 of 39). According to respondents, infiltrated anesthetic was used for LP by 69.2% (27 of 39) of respondents, and oral sucrose was used infrequently for urinary catheterization (one of 46 [2.2%]), intravenous line insertion (zero of 54 [0%]) and LP (one of 39 [2.6%]). CONCLUSIONS Few Alberta EDs use policies and protocols to manage paediatric pain. Noninvasive methods to limit procedural pain are underutilized. Canadian paediatricians must advocate for improved analgesia to narrow this knowledge-to-practice gap.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samina Ali
- Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton; ; Women and Children's Health Research Institute, Edmonton
| | - Andrea L Chambers
- Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton
| | - David W Johnson
- Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta ; Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, Calgary, Alberta
| | - William R Craig
- Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton; ; Women and Children's Health Research Institute, Edmonton
| | - Amanda S Newton
- Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton; ; Women and Children's Health Research Institute, Edmonton
| | - Ben Vandermeer
- Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton
| | - Sarah J Curtis
- Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton; ; Women and Children's Health Research Institute, Edmonton
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Beirne PV, Shiely F, Hennessy S, Fitzgerald T, MacLeod F. Needle size for vaccination procedures in children and adolescents. THE COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS 2013. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd010720] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
|
13
|
Harrison D, Elia S, Royle J, Manias E. Pain management strategies used during early childhood immunisation in Victoria. J Paediatr Child Health 2013; 49:313-8. [PMID: 23489548 DOI: 10.1111/jpc.12161] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/20/2012] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
AIM The study aims to identify pain management practices used during scheduled childhood immunisation. METHODS A survey of members of the Australian Nurses Federation (Victorian Branch) Immunisation Nurses Special Interest Group. Questions included frequency of use of pain reduction strategies during immunisations for infants, toddlers and children, injection techniques and existence of an articulated pain management policy. RESULTS The survey was emailed to 274 Immunisation Nurses Special Interest Group members with registered email addresses, and 125 (46%) completed the survey. Nineteen respondents (15.2%) stated their main place of employment had a pain management policy during immunisations and 20 (16.0%) respondents were not sure. Distraction strategies were frequently used during immunisation for all age groups, with 95 (76.0%) replying that distraction was used often or always. Breastfeeding during immunisation for infants younger than 6 months was used occasionally (n = 54, 44.6%), often (n = 11, 9.1%) or never (n = 55, 45.5%) and was used even less frequently for infants aged 6-12 months. Sucrose or other sweet solutions were almost never used for infants prior to, or during, immunisation. As a reward, lollies were frequently given to children after immunisations. Topical anaesthetics were almost never used in any age groups. Over half the respondents used a rapid injection technique; 55 (44.7%) used a slow technique and four respondents aspirated the needle before injections. CONCLUSIONS Many distraction strategies were used during and following immunisation but sweet solutions, breastfeeding or topical anaesthetics were rarely used. Use of these strategies where feasible, should be facilitated in diverse settings where immunisations take place.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Denise Harrison
- Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Stevens B, Yamada J, Lee GY, Ohlsson A. Sucrose for analgesia in newborn infants undergoing painful procedures. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013:CD001069. [PMID: 23440783 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd001069.pub4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 87] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Administration of oral sucrose with and without non-nutritive sucking is the most frequently studied non-pharmacological intervention for procedural pain relief in neonates. OBJECTIVES To determine the efficacy, effect of dose and safety of oral sucrose for relieving procedural pain in neonates. SEARCH METHODS We used the standard methods of the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group. Electronic and manual searches were performed in November 2011 for published randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in MEDLINE (1950 to November 2011), EMBASE (1980 to 2011), CINAHL (1982 to November 2011) and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library). We did not impose language restrictions. SELECTION CRITERIA RCTs in which term, preterm, or both term and preterm neonates (postnatal age maximum of 28 days after reaching 40 weeks' postmenstrual age) received sucrose for procedural pain. Control conditions included no treatment, water, pacifier, positioning/containing or breastfeeding. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Main outcome measures were physiological, behavioural, or both pain indicators with or without composite pain scores. A mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) using the fixed-effect model was reported for continuous outcome measures. Trial quality was assessed as per The Cochrane Collaboration MAIN RESULTS Fifty-seven studies enrolling 4730 infants were included. Results from only a few studies could be combined in meta-analyses. When Premature Infant Pain Profile (PIPP) scores were pooled, sucrose groups had significantly lower scores at 30 seconds (weighted mean difference (WMD) -1.76; 95% CI -2.54 to - 0.97; 4 trials; 264 neonates] and 60 seconds (WMD -2.05; 95% CI -3.08 to -1.02; 3 trials' 195 neonates) post-heel lance. For retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) examinations, sucrose did not significantly reduce PIPP scores (WMD -0.65; 95% CI -1.88 to 0.59; 3 trials; 82 neonates). There were no differences in adverse effects between sucrose and control groups. Sucrose significantly reduced duration of total crying time (WMD -39 seconds; 95% CI -44 to -34; 2 trials; 88 neonates), but did not reduce duration of first cry during heel lance (WMD -9 seconds; 95% CI -20 to 2; 3 trials; 192 neonates). Oxygen saturation (%) was significantly lower in infants given sucrose during ROP examination compared to controls (WMD -2.6; 95% CI -4.9 to - 0.2; 2 trials; 62 neonates). Results of individual trials that could not be incorporated in meta-analyses supported these findings. The effects of sucrose on long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes are unknown. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Sucrose is safe and effective for reducing procedural pain from single events. An optimal dose could not be identified due to inconsistency in effective sucrose dosage among studies. Further investigation on repeated administration of sucrose in neonates and the use of sucrose in combination with other non-pharmacological and pharmacological interventions is needed. Sucrose use in extremely preterm, unstable, ventilated (or a combination of these) neonates needs to be addressed. Additional research is needed to determine the minimally effective dose of sucrose during a single painful procedure and the effect of repeated sucrose administration on immediate (pain intensity) and long-term (neurodevelopmental) outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bonnie Stevens
- Associate Chief of Nursing Research, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Kassab M, Foster JP, Foureur M, Fowler C. Sweet-tasting solutions for needle-related procedural pain in infants one month to one year of age. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; 12:CD008411. [PMID: 23235662 PMCID: PMC6369933 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd008411.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Administration of oral sucrose or glucose with and without non-nutritive sucking is frequently used as a non-pharmacological intervention for needle-related procedural pain relief in infants. OBJECTIVES To determine the effectiveness of sweet-tasting solutions for needle-related procedural pain in infants one month to one year of age compared with no treatment, placebo, other sweet-tasting solutions, or pharmacological or other non-pharmacological pain-relieving methods. SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2012); MEDLINE via Ovid (1966 to 2012); CINAHL via OVID (1982 to 2012). The World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform was also searched for any ongoing trials. Clinical trial registries, conference proceedings and references for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were also searched. An updated search was run to capture any new publications before finalising the review in April 2012 and no new included studies were identified. Two review authors (MK & JF) independently abstracted data and assessed quality using a standard form. Authors have been contacted for missing data. SELECTION CRITERIA Randomised-controlled trials using a sweet-tasting solution to treat pain in healthy term infants (gestational age 37 weeks and over), between one month and 12 months of age who required needle-related procedures. These procedures included but were not limited to: subcutaneous or intramuscular injections, venepuncture, and heel lance. Studies in which the painful procedure was circumcision, lumbar puncture or supra-pubic bladder aspiration were not included as they are more severe and painful than needle-related procedures. Control conditions included no treatment or placebo (water) or any other identical intervention (same appearance and consistency) without active ingredient, another sweet-tasting solution, a pharmacological pain-relieving method (e.g. paracetamol, topical anaesthetic cream), non-pharmacological pain-relieving method (e.g. distraction method, non-nutritive sucking). DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Assessment of trial quality, data extraction and synthesis of data were performed using standard methods of the Cochrane Pain, Palliative and Supportive Care Group. We report mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) using fixed-effect models as appropriate for continuous outcome measures. We planned to report risk ratio (RR) and risk difference (RD) for dichotomous outcomes. The Chi(2) test and I(2) statistic were used to assess between-study heterogeneity. MAIN RESULTS Sixty-five (65) studies were identified for possible inclusion in this review. Fourteen published RCTs with a total of 1551 participants met the inclusion criteria. Duration of cry was significantly reduced in infants who were administered a sweet-tasting solution [MD -13.47 (95% CI -16.80 to -10.15)], P < 0.00001 compared with water. However, there was considerable heterogeneity between the studies (I(2) = 94%) that we were unable to explain. Meta-analysis was not able to be undertaken for any of the other outcome measures, except for cry duration, because of differences in study design. However, most of the individual studies that measured pain found sucrose to significantly reduce pain compared with the control group. One study compared sucrose and Lidocaine-prilocaine cream and no significant difference was found between the two treatments for the outcomes pain and cry duration. Due to the differences between the studies, we were unable to identify the optimal concentration, volume or method of administration of sweet-tasting solutions in infants aged one to 12 months. Further large RCTs are needed. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS There is insufficient evidence to confidently judge the effectiveness of sweet-tasting solutions in reducing needle-related pain in infants (one month to 12 months of age). The treatments do, however, appear promising. Data from a series of individual trials are promising, as are the results from a subset meta-analysis of studies measuring duration of crying. Further well controlled RCTs are warranted in this population to determine the optimal concentration, volume, method of administration, and possible adverse effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manal Kassab
- Department of Maternal and Child Health / Faculty of Nursing, Jordan University of Science and Technology (JUST), Irbid, Jordan.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|