1
|
Calvo-Schimmel A, Qanungo S, Newman SD, Sterba KR. Supportive care interventions and quality of life in advanced disease prostate cancer survivors: An integrative review of the literature. Can Oncol Nurs J 2021; 31:412-429. [PMID: 34786460 PMCID: PMC8565435 DOI: 10.5737/23688076314412429] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Supportive care interventions can improve quality of life and health outcomes of advanced prostate cancer survivors. Despite the high prevalence of unmet needs, supportive care for this population is sparse. METHODS The databases PubMed, SCOPUS, CINAHL, and ProQuest were searched for relevant articles. Data were extracted, organized by thematic matrix, and categorized according to the seven domains of the Supportive Care Framework for Cancer Care. RESULTS The search yielded 1678 articles, of which 18 were included in the review and critically appraised. Most studies were cross-sectional with small, non-diverse samples. Supportive care interventions reported for advanced prostate cancer survivors are limited with some positive trends. Most outcomes were symptom-focused and patient self-reported (e.g., anxiety, pain, self-efficacy) evaluated by questionnaires or interview. Interventions delivered in group format reported improvements in more outcomes. CONCLUSIONS Additional supportive care intervention are needed for men with advanced prostate cancer. Because of their crucial position in caring for cancer patients, nurse scientists and clinicians must partner to research and develop patient-centered, culturally relevant supportive care interventions that improve this population's quality of life and health outcomes. Efforts must concentrate on sampling, domains of needs, theoretical framework, guidelines, and measurement instruments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Suparna Qanungo
- Department of Nursing Operating, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina
| | - Susan D Newman
- Department of Nursing Operating, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina
| | - Katherine R Sterba
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Calvo-Schimmel A, Qanungo S, Newman SD, Sterba KR. Intervention en soins de soutien auprès de survivants du cancer prostatique avancé : Revue intégrative de la littérature. Can Oncol Nurs J 2021; 31:430-450. [PMID: 34786461 PMCID: PMC8565449 DOI: 10.5737/23688076314430450] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Contexte Pour les survivants du cancer prostatique avancé, les interventions en soins de soutien peuvent améliorer la qualité de vie et les résultats cliniques. Même si ces patients ont très fréquemment des besoins non satisfaits, peu de soins de soutien leur sont prodigués. Méthodologie Les bases de données PubMed, SCOPUS, CINAHL et ProQuest ont été interrogées à la recherche d’articles pertinents. Les données ont été extraites, organisées par élément thématique et classées selon les sept domaines du Cadre des soins de soutien pour les soins en oncologie. Résultats La recherche a permis de relever 1 678 articles, dont 18 ont été inclus dans la revue et ont fait l’objet d’une évaluation critique. La plupart des études étaient transversales avec de petits échantillons non diversifiés. Les interventions en soins de soutien rapportées pour les survivants du cancer prostatique avancé sont limitées, mais tendent à être positives. La plupart des critères étaient axés sur les symptômes déclarés par les patients (ex. anxiété, douleur, auto-efficacité), et évalués au moyen de questionnaires ou d’entretiens. Les interventions réalisées en groupe ont donné de meilleurs résultats. Conclusions Les hommes atteints d’un cancer prostatique avancé ont besoin d’interventions supplémentaires en soins de soutien. En raison de leur rôle essentiel dans les soins aux patients cancéreux, les chercheurs en sciences infirmières et les infirmières cliniciennes doivent faire équipe pour trouver et élaborer des interventions en soins de soutien axées sur le patient et adaptées à la culture qui améliorent la qualité de vie et les résultats cliniques. Il faut centrer les efforts sur l’échantillonnage, les domaines des besoins, le cadre théorique, les lignes directrices et les instruments de mesure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alejandra Calvo-Schimmel
- Collège des sciences infirmières, Université de médecine de la Caroline du Sud, Charleston, Caroline du Sud
| | - Suparna Qanungo
- Département des opérations en sciences infirmières, Université de médecine de la Caroline du Sud, Charleston, Caroline du Sud
| | - Susan D Newman
- Département des opérations en sciences infirmières, Université de médecine de la Caroline du Sud, Charleston, Caroline du Sud
| | - Katherine R Sterba
- Département des sciences de santé publique, Université de médecine de la Caroline du Sud, Charleston, Caroline du Sud
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kozaris R, Hanske J, von Landenberg N, Berg S, Roghmann F, Brock M, Noldus J, Müller G. Psychosocial Distress in the Early Recovery Period after Radical Prostatectomy. Urol Int 2021; 106:891-896. [PMID: 34619681 DOI: 10.1159/000519483] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2021] [Accepted: 08/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aimed to evaluate psychosocial distress in the context of continence and oncological outcome during the early recovery period after radical prostatectomy (RP) for prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS Retrospectively collected data from 587 patients who underwent inpatient rehabilitation after RP in 2016 and 2017 were analyzed. Psychosocial distress (measured by using a Questionnaire on Stress in Cancer Patients [QSC-R10]) and continence status (urine loss on a 24-h pad test and urine volume on uroflowmetry) were evaluated at the beginning (T1) and end (T2) of a 3-week inpatient rehabilitation. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to identify predictors for high distress (QSC-R10 score ≥15). RESULTS The median patient age was 65 years. At the start of rehabilitation, 204 patients (34.8%) demonstrated high distress. Psychosocial distress decreased significantly (p < 0.001) from a median of 11.0 at T1 (median 16 days after surgery) to a median of 6.0 at T2 (median 37 days after surgery). Complete continence increased significantly (p < 0.001) from 39.0% at T1 to 58.9% at T2. The median urine volume increased significantly (p < 0.001) from 161 mL at T1 to 230 mL at T2. Often, distress is higher in younger patients, whereas incontinence is higher in older patients. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified age ≤69 years (p = 0.001) and tumor stage ≥pT3 (p = 0.006) as independent predictors of high distress. CONCLUSIONS Distress and incontinence decreased significantly during the 3 weeks of inpatient rehabilitation after RP. Patient age ≤69 years and tumor stage ≥pT3 are independent predictors of high psychosocial distress.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raphael Kozaris
- Department of Urology, Marien Hospital Herne, Ruhr-University Bochum, Herne, Germany
| | - Julian Hanske
- Department of Urology, Marien Hospital Herne, Ruhr-University Bochum, Herne, Germany.,Department of Urology, Stiftungsklinikum Proselis, Recklinghausen, Germany
| | | | - Sebastian Berg
- Department of Urology, Marien Hospital Herne, Ruhr-University Bochum, Herne, Germany
| | - Florian Roghmann
- Department of Urology, Marien Hospital Herne, Ruhr-University Bochum, Herne, Germany
| | - Marko Brock
- Department of Urology, Marien Hospital Herne, Ruhr-University Bochum, Herne, Germany.,Department of Urology, Stiftungsklinikum Proselis, Recklinghausen, Germany
| | - Joachim Noldus
- Department of Urology, Marien Hospital Herne, Ruhr-University Bochum, Herne, Germany
| | - Guido Müller
- Department of Urology, Marien Hospital Herne, Ruhr-University Bochum, Herne, Germany.,Center for Urological Rehabilitation, Kliniken Hartenstein, Bad Wildungen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Rogers SN, Allmark C, Bekiroglu F, Edwards RT, Fabbroni G, Flavel R, Highet V, Ho MWS, Humphris GM, Jones TM, Khattak O, Lancaster J, Loh C, Lowe D, Lowies C, Macareavy D, Moor J, Ong TK, Prasai A, Roland N, Semple C, Spencer LH, Tandon S, Thomas SJ, Schache A, Shaw RJ, Kanatas A. Improving quality of life through the routine use of the patient concerns inventory for head and neck cancer patients: main results of a cluster preference randomised controlled trial. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2021; 278:3435-3449. [PMID: 33346856 PMCID: PMC7751263 DOI: 10.1007/s00405-020-06533-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2020] [Accepted: 11/27/2020] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The patient concerns inventory (PCI) is a prompt list allowing head and neck cancer (HNC) patients to discuss issues that otherwise might be overlooked. This trial evaluated the effectiveness of using the PCI at routine outpatient clinics for one year after treatment on health-related QOL (HRQOL). METHODS A pragmatic cluster preference randomised control trial with 15 consultants, 8 'using' and 7 'not using' the PCI intervention. Patients treated with curative intent (all sites, disease stages, treatments) were eligible. RESULTS Consultants saw a median (inter-quartile range) 16 (13-26) patients, with 140 PCI and 148 control patients. Of the pre-specified outcomes, the 12-month results for the mean University of Washington Quality of Life (UW-QOLv4) social-emotional subscale score suggested a small clinical effect of intervention of 4.6 units (95% CI 0.2, 9.0), p = 0.04 after full adjustment for pre-stated case-mix. Results for UW-QOLv4 overall quality of life being less than good at 12 months (primary outcome) also favoured the PCI with a risk ratio of 0.83 (95% CI 0.66, 1.06) and absolute risk 4.8% (- 2.9%, 12.9%) but without achieving statistical significance. Other non-a-priori analyses, including all 12 UWQOL domains and at consultant level also suggested better HRQOL with PCI. Consultation times were unaffected and the number of items selected decreased over time. CONCLUSION This novel trial supports the integration of the PCI approach into routine consultations as a simple low-cost means of benefiting HNC patients. It adds to a growing body of evidence supporting the use of patient prompt lists more generally.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simon N. Rogers
- Faculty of Health and Social Care, Edge Hill University, Ormskirk, Liverpool, L39 4QP UK
- Liverpool Head and Neck Centre, Liverpool University Hospital Aintree, Liverpool, UK
| | - Christine Allmark
- Leeds Teaching Hospitals and St James Institute of Oncology, Leeds Dental Institute and Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds, UK
| | - Fazilet Bekiroglu
- Liverpool Head and Neck Centre, Liverpool University Hospital Aintree, Liverpool, UK
| | - Rhiannon Tudor Edwards
- Centre for Health Economics and Medicines Evaluation (CHEME), School of Health Sciences, College of Human Sciences, Ardudwy Hall, Normal Site, Bangor University, Bangor, Wales UK
| | - Gillon Fabbroni
- Leeds Teaching Hospitals and St James Institute of Oncology, Leeds Dental Institute and Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds, UK
| | | | - Victoria Highet
- Liverpool Head and Neck Clinical Trials, Clinical Sciences Building, University Hospital Aintree, Liverpool, UK
| | - Michael W. S. Ho
- Leeds Teaching Hospitals and St James Institute of Oncology, Leeds Dental Institute and Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds, UK
| | - Gerald M. Humphris
- School of Medicine, Medical & Biological Sciences, North Haugh, St Andrews, UK
| | - Terry M. Jones
- Liverpool Head and Neck Centre, University of Liverpool, Cancer Research Centre, University of Liverpool, 200 London Road, Liverpool, L3 9GA UK
| | - Owais Khattak
- Liverpool Head and Neck Centre, Liverpool University Hospital Aintree, Liverpool, UK
| | - Jeffrey Lancaster
- Liverpool Head and Neck Centre, Liverpool University Hospital Aintree, Liverpool, UK
| | - Christopher Loh
- Liverpool Head and Neck Centre, Liverpool University Hospital Aintree, Liverpool, UK
| | | | - Cher Lowies
- Liverpool Head and Neck Clinical Trials, Clinical Sciences Building, University Hospital Aintree, Liverpool, UK
| | - Dominic Macareavy
- Chair of the Head and Neck Patient and Carer Research Forum, Liverpool Head and Neck Centre, Liverpool University Hospital Aintree, Liverpool, UK
| | - James Moor
- Leeds Teaching Hospitals and St James Institute of Oncology, Leeds Dental Institute and Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds, UK
| | - T. K. Ong
- Leeds Teaching Hospitals and St James Institute of Oncology, Leeds Dental Institute and Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds, UK
| | - A. Prasai
- Leeds Teaching Hospitals and St James Institute of Oncology, Leeds Dental Institute and Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds, UK
| | - Nicholas Roland
- Liverpool Head and Neck Centre, Liverpool University Hospital Aintree, Liverpool, UK
| | - Cherith Semple
- Institute of Nursing and Health Research, Ulster University, Shore Road, Belfast, Newtownabbey, Co, BT37 0QB Antrim, Belfast UK
- South Eastern Health and Social Care Upper Newtownards Road, Belfast, BT16 1RH UK
| | - Llinos Haf Spencer
- Centre for Health Economics and Medicines Evaluation (CHEME), School of Health Sciences, College of Human Sciences, Ardudwy Hall, Normal Site, Bangor University, Bangor, Wales UK
| | - Sank Tandon
- Liverpool Head and Neck Centre, Liverpool University Hospital Aintree, Liverpool, UK
| | - Steven J. Thomas
- Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department, Bristol University, Lower Maudlin Street, Bristol, UK
| | - Andrew Schache
- Liverpool Head and Neck Centre, Liverpool University Hospital Aintree, Liverpool, UK
| | - Richard J. Shaw
- Liverpool Head and Neck Centre, Liverpool University Hospital Aintree, Liverpool, UK
| | - Anastasios Kanatas
- Leeds Teaching Hospitals and St James Institute of Oncology, Leeds Dental Institute and Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
O'Connor SR, Flannagan C, Parahoo K, Steele M, Thompson S, Jain S, Kirby M, Brady N, Maguire R, Connaghan J, McCaughan EM. Efficacy, Use, and Acceptability of a Web-Based Self-management Intervention Designed to Maximize Sexual Well-being in Men Living With Prostate Cancer: Single-Arm Experimental Study. J Med Internet Res 2021; 23:e21502. [PMID: 34309580 PMCID: PMC8367143 DOI: 10.2196/21502] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2020] [Revised: 09/16/2020] [Accepted: 03/11/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Sexual dysfunction is a frequent side effect associated with different prostate cancer treatment approaches. It can have a substantial impact on men and their partners and is associated with increased psychological morbidity. Despite this, sexual concerns are often not adequately addressed in routine practice. Evidence-based web-based interventions have the potential to provide ongoing information and sexual well-being support throughout all stages of care. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study is to examine the efficacy of a web-based self-management intervention designed to maximize sexual well-being in men living with prostate cancer and explore user perspectives on usability and acceptability. METHODS We used a single-arm study design, and participants were provided with access to the 5-step intervention for a period of 3 months. The intervention content was tailored based on responses to brief screening questions on treatment type, relationship status, and sexual orientation. Efficacy was assessed by using two-tailed, paired sample t tests for comparing the mean differences between pre- and postintervention measurements for exploring the participants' self-reported knowledge and understanding, sexual satisfaction, and comfort in discussing sexual issues. Usability and acceptability were determined based on the program use data and a postintervention survey for exploring perceived usefulness. RESULTS A total of 109 participants were recruited for this study. Significant postintervention improvements at follow-up were observed in the total scores (out of 20) from the survey (mean 12.23/20 points, SD 2.46 vs mean 13.62/20, SD 2.31; t88=9.570; P=.001) as well as in individual item scores on the extent to which the participants agreed that they had sufficient information to manage the impact that prostate cancer had on their sex life (mean 2.31/4 points, SD 0.86 vs mean 2.57/4, SD 0.85; t88=3.660; P=.001) and had the potential to have a satisfying sex life following treatment (mean 2.38/4 points, SD 0.79 vs mean 3.17/4, SD 0.78; t88=7.643; P=.001). The median number of intervention sessions was 3 (range 1-11), and intervention sessions had a median duration of 22 minutes (range 8-77). Acceptable usability scores were reported, with the highest result observed for the question on the extent to which the intervention provided relevant information. CONCLUSIONS This study provides evidence on the efficacy of a tailored web-based intervention for maximizing sexual well-being in men living with prostate cancer. The results indicate that the intervention may improve one's self-perceived knowledge and understanding of how to manage sexual issues and increase self-efficacy or the belief that a satisfactory sex life could be achieved following treatment. The findings will be used to refine the intervention content before testing as part of a larger longitudinal study for examining its effectiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sean R O'Connor
- Centre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom
| | - Carrie Flannagan
- Institute of Nursing & Health Research, Ulster University, Newtownabbey, United Kingdom
| | - Kader Parahoo
- Institute of Nursing & Health Research, Ulster University, Newtownabbey, United Kingdom
| | - Mary Steele
- Centre for Clinical and Community Applications of Health Psychology, Faculty of Social and Human Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | | | - Suneil Jain
- Centre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom.,Clinical Oncology, Northern Ireland Cancer Centre, Belfast, United Kingdom
| | - Michael Kirby
- Faculty of Health and Human Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, United Kingdom.,The Prostate Centre, London, United Kingdom
| | - Nuala Brady
- Northern Health and Social Care Trust, Antrim, United Kingdom
| | - Roma Maguire
- Department of Computer and Information Sciences, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - John Connaghan
- Department of Computer and Information Sciences, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Eilis M McCaughan
- Institute of Nursing & Health Research, Ulster University, Newtownabbey, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Bulotiene G, Pociute K. Interventions for Reducing Suicide Risk in Cancer Patients: A Literature Review. EUROPES JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY 2019; 15:637-649. [PMID: 33680150 PMCID: PMC7909181 DOI: 10.5964/ejop.v15i3.1741] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2018] [Accepted: 11/20/2018] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
The suicide risk of people diagnosed with cancer is two times higher than the general population. The number of cases of diagnosed cancer is estimated to rise by 70% over the next two decades. Evidence-based prevention strategies are necessary to protect this vulnerable group of individuals. The purpose of this review was to find out the risk factors of suicide and which types of interventions can serve as prevention strategies. Psychosocial interventions, pharmacotherapy and physical activity can play a preventive role in reducing psychosocial and physical risk factors, such as mental disorders, poor social support, poor performance status and pain. Further research is needed to develop effective suicide prevention strategies for cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giedre Bulotiene
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, National Cancer Institute, Vilnius, Lithuania
| | - Kamile Pociute
- Clinic of Psychiatry, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Schlaeger JM, Weng LC, Huang HL, Tsai HH, Takayama M, Ngamkham S, Yao Y, Wilkie DJ. Pain Quality by Location in Outpatients with Cancer. Pain Manag Nurs 2019; 20:425-431. [PMID: 31160180 DOI: 10.1016/j.pmn.2019.04.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2018] [Revised: 03/21/2019] [Accepted: 04/24/2019] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ) pain quality descriptors have been analyzed to characterize the sensory, affective, and evaluative domains of pain, but have not been differentiated by pain location. AIM To examine MPQ pain quality descriptors by pain location in outpatients with lung or prostate cancer. DESIGN Cross sectional. SETTINGS Eleven oncology clinics or patients' homes. SUBJECTS 264 adult outpatients (80% male; mean age 62.2 ± 10.0 years, 85% White). METHODS Subjects completed a 100 mm visual analogue scale of pain intensity and MPQ clinic or home visit, marking sites where they had pain on a body outline and circling from 78 verbal descriptors those that described their pain. A researcher noted next to the descriptor spontaneous comments about sites feeling like a selected word and queried the subjects about any other words to obtain the site(s). RESULTS Pain quality descriptors were assigned to all 7 pain locations marked by ≥ 20% of 198 lung or 66 prostate cancer patients. Four pain locations were marked with pain quality descriptors significanlty (p < .05) more frequently for lung cancer (53% chest-aching, burning; 58% back-aching, stabbing; 48% head-aching, sharp; and 19% arms-aching, stabbing) than for prostate cancer, which had significantly more frequent pain locations in the abdomen (64%-aching, burning) and lower back/buttocks (55%-aching, burning). CONCLUSIONS This type of pain characterization is innovative and has the potential to help implement targeted treatments for patients with cancer and other chronic pain conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Judith M Schlaeger
- Department of Women, Children and Family Health Science, University of Illinois at Chicago College of Nursing, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Li-Chueh Weng
- Chang Gung University School of Nursing, College of Medicine, Taoyuan, Taiwan, ROC
| | - Hsiu-Li Huang
- National Taipei University of Nursing and Health Sciences, Department of Long-term Care, College of Health Technology, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
| | - Hsiu-Hsin Tsai
- Chang Gung University School of Nursing, College of Medicine, Taoyuan, Taiwan, ROC
| | - Miho Takayama
- Tokyo Ariake University of Medical and Health Sciences, Department of Acupuncture and Moxibustion, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Srisuda Ngamkham
- Boromarajonani College of Nursing Sawanpracharak Nakhonsawan, Paknampho, Maung, Nakhonsawan, Thailand
| | - Yingwei Yao
- Department of Biobehavioral Nursing Science, University of Florida College of Nursing, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Diana J Wilkie
- Department of Biobehavioral Nursing Science, University of Florida College of Nursing, Gainesville, Florida.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Skolarus TA, Metreger T, Wittmann D, Hwang S, Kim HM, Grubb RL, Gingrich JR, Zhu H, Piette JD, Hawley ST. Self-Management in Long-Term Prostate Cancer Survivors: A Randomized, Controlled Trial. J Clin Oncol 2019; 37:1326-1335. [PMID: 30925126 DOI: 10.1200/jco.18.01770] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE This randomized clinical trial compared a personally tailored, automated telephone symptom management intervention to improve self-management among long-term survivors of prostate cancer with usual care enhanced with a nontailored newsletter about symptom management. We hypothesized that intervention-group participants would have more confident symptom self-management and reduced symptom burden. METHODS A total of 556 prostate cancer survivors who, more than 1 year after treatment, were experiencing symptom burden were recruited from April 2015 to February 2017 across four Veterans Affairs sites. Participants were randomly assigned to intervention (n = 278) or usual care (n = 278) groups. We compared differences in the primary (symptom burden according to Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite-26 [EPIC], confidence in self-management) and secondary outcomes between groups using intent-to-treat analyses. We compared domain-specific changes in symptom burden from baseline to 5 and 12 months among the intervention group according to the primary symptom focus area (urinary, bowel, sexual, general) of participants. RESULTS Most of the prostate cancer survivors in this study were married (54.3%), were white (69.2%), were retired (62.4%), and underwent radiation therapy (56.7% v 46.2% who underwent surgery), and the mean age was 67 years. There were no baseline differences in urinary, bowel, sexual, or hormonal domain EPIC scores across groups. We observed higher EPIC scores in the intervention arm in all domain areas at 5 months, though differences were not statistically significant. No differences were found in secondary outcomes; however, coping appraisal was higher (2.8 v 2.6; P = .02) in intervention-arm patients at 5 months. In subgroup analyses, intervention participants reported improvement from baseline at 5 and 12 months in their symptom focus area domains. CONCLUSION This intervention was well received among veterans who were long-term survivors of prostate cancer. Although overall outcome differences were not observed across groups, the intervention tailored to symptom area of choice may hold promise to improve associated burden.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ted A Skolarus
- 1 Veterans Affairs Health Services Research and Development Center for Clinical Management Research, Veterans Affairs Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI.,2 University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Tabitha Metreger
- 1 Veterans Affairs Health Services Research and Development Center for Clinical Management Research, Veterans Affairs Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI
| | | | - Soohyun Hwang
- 3 University of North Carolina Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Hyungjin Myra Kim
- 1 Veterans Affairs Health Services Research and Development Center for Clinical Management Research, Veterans Affairs Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI.,2 University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Robert L Grubb
- 4 Medical University of South Carolina, Ralph H. Johnson Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Charleston, SC
| | - Jeffrey R Gingrich
- 5 Duke University, Durham Veterans Affairs Healthcare System, Durham, NC
| | - Hui Zhu
- 6 Case Western Reserve University, Louis Stokes Cleveland Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Cleveland, OH
| | - John D Piette
- 1 Veterans Affairs Health Services Research and Development Center for Clinical Management Research, Veterans Affairs Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI.,7 University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Sarah T Hawley
- 1 Veterans Affairs Health Services Research and Development Center for Clinical Management Research, Veterans Affairs Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI.,2 University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Schouten B, Avau B, Bekkering G(TE, Vankrunkelsven P, Mebis J, Hellings J, Van Hecke A. Systematic screening and assessment of psychosocial well-being and care needs of people with cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2019; 3:CD012387. [PMID: 30909317 PMCID: PMC6433560 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd012387.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Receiving a diagnosis of cancer and the subsequent related treatments can have a significant impact on an individual's physical and psychosocial well-being. To ensure that cancer care addresses all aspects of well-being, systematic screening for distress and supportive care needs is recommended. Appropriate screening could help support the integration of psychosocial approaches in daily routines in order to achieve holistic cancer care and ensure that the specific care needs of people with cancer are met and that the organisation of such care is optimised. OBJECTIVES To examine the effectiveness and safety of screening of psychosocial well-being and care needs of people with cancer. To explore the intervention characteristics that contribute to the effectiveness of these screening interventions. SEARCH METHODS We searched five electronic databases in January 2018: the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, and CINAHL. We also searched five trial registers and screened the contents of relevant journals, citations, and references to find published and unpublished trials. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomised controlled trials (NRCTs) that studied the effect of screening interventions addressing the psychosocial well-being and care needs of people with cancer compared to usual care. These screening interventions could involve self-reporting of people with a patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) or a semi-structured interview with a screening interventionist, and comprise a solitary screening intervention or screening with guided actions. We excluded studies that evaluated screening integrated as an element in more complex interventions (e.g. therapy, coaching, full care pathways, or care programmes). DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently extracted the data and assessed methodological quality for each included study using the Cochrane tool for RCTs and the Risk Of Bias In Non-randomised Studies - of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool for NRCTs. Due to the high level of heterogeneity in the included studies, only three were included in meta-analysis. Results of the remaining 23 studies were analysed narratively. MAIN RESULTS We included 26 studies (18 RCTs and 8 NRCTs) with sample sizes of 41 to 1012 participants, involving a total of 7654 adults with cancer. Two studies included only men or women; all other studies included both sexes. For most studies people with breast, lung, head and neck, colorectal, prostate cancer, or several of these diagnoses were included; some studies included people with a broader range of cancer diagnosis. Ten studies focused on a solitary screening intervention, while the remaining 16 studies evaluated a screening intervention combined with guided actions. A broad range of intervention instruments was used, and were described by study authors as a screening of health-related quality of life (HRQoL), distress screening, needs assessment, or assessment of biopsychosocial symptoms or overall well-being. In 13 studies, the screening was a self-reported questionnaire, while in the remaining 13 studies an interventionist conducted the screening by interview or paper-pencil assessment. The interventional screenings in the studies were applied 1 to 12 times, without follow-up or from 4 weeks to 18 months after the first interventional screening. We assessed risk of bias as high for eight RCTs, low for five RCTs, and unclear for the five remaining RCTs. There were further concerns about the NRCTs (1 = critical risk study; 6 = serious risk studies; 1 = risk unclear).Due to considerable heterogeneity in several intervention and study characteristics, we have reported the results narratively for the majority of the evidence.In the narrative synthesis of all included studies, we found very low-certainty evidence for the effect of screening on HRQoL (20 studies). Of these studies, eight found beneficial effects of screening for several subdomains of HRQoL, and 10 found no effects of screening. One study found adverse effects, and the last study did not report quantitative results. We found very low-certainty evidence for the effect of screening on distress (16 studies). Of these studies, two found beneficial effects of screening, and 14 found no effects of screening. We judged the overall certainty of the evidence for the effect of screening on HRQoL to be very low. We found very low-certainty evidence for the effect of screening on care needs (seven studies). Of these studies, three found beneficial effects of screening for several subdomains of care needs, and two found no effects of screening. One study found adverse effects, and the last study did not report quantitative results. We judged the overall level of evidence for the effect of screening on HRQoL to be very low. None of the studies specifically evaluated or reported adverse effects of screening. However, three studies reported unfavourable effects of screening, including lower QoL, more unmet needs, and lower satisfaction.Three studies could be included in a meta-analysis. The meta-analysis revealed no beneficial effect of the screening intervention on people with cancer HRQoL (mean difference (MD) 1.65, 95% confidence interval (CI) -4.83 to 8.12, 2 RCTs, 6 months follow-up); distress (MD 0.0, 95% CI -0.36 to 0.36, 1 RCT, 3 months follow-up); or care needs (MD 2.32, 95% CI -7.49 to 12.14, 2 RCTs, 3 months follow-up). However, these studies all evaluated one specific screening intervention (CONNECT) in people with colorectal cancer.In the studies where some effects could be identified, no recurring relationships were found between intervention characteristics and the effectiveness of screening interventions. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS We found low-certainty evidence that does not support the effectiveness of screening of psychosocial well-being and care needs in people with cancer. Studies were heterogeneous in population, intervention, and outcome assessment.The results of this review suggest a need for more uniformity in outcomes and reporting; for the use of intervention description guidelines; for further improvement of methodological certainty in studies and for combining subjective patient-reported outcomes with objective outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bojoura Schouten
- Hasselt UniversityResearch Group Health Care, Faculty of Medicine and Life SciencesHasseltLimburgBelgium3500
| | - Bert Avau
- Belgian Red CrossCentre for Evidence‐Based PracticeMotstraat 42MechelenBelgium2800
- Belgian Centre for Evidence‐Based Medicine ‐ Cochrane BelgiumKapucijnenvoer 33, blok JLeuvenBelgium3000
| | - Geertruida (Trudy) E Bekkering
- Belgian Centre for Evidence‐Based Medicine ‐ Cochrane BelgiumKapucijnenvoer 33, blok JLeuvenBelgium3000
- KU LeuvenDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care ‐ Faculty of MedicineKapucijnenvoer 33 Blok J Bus 7001LeuvenBelgium3000
| | - Patrick Vankrunkelsven
- Belgian Centre for Evidence‐Based Medicine ‐ Cochrane BelgiumKapucijnenvoer 33, blok JLeuvenBelgium3000
- KU LeuvenDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care ‐ Faculty of MedicineKapucijnenvoer 33 Blok J Bus 7001LeuvenBelgium3000
| | - Jeroen Mebis
- Jessa HospitalDepartment of Medical OncologyHasseltBelgium
- Hasselt UniversityResearch Group Immunology and BiochemistryFaculty of Medicine and Life SciencesHasseltBelgium
| | - Johan Hellings
- Hasselt UniversityResearch Group Health Care, Faculty of Medicine and Life SciencesHasseltLimburgBelgium3500
- AZ DeltaRode‐Kruisstraat 20RoeselareBelgium
| | - Ann Van Hecke
- Ghent UniversityUniversity Centre for Nursing and Midwifery, Department of Public HealthDe Pintelaan 185GhentBelgium9000
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Ehlers SL, Davis K, Bluethmann SM, Quintiliani LM, Kendall J, Ratwani RM, Diefenbach MA, Graves KD. Screening for psychosocial distress among patients with cancer: implications for clinical practice, healthcare policy, and dissemination to enhance cancer survivorship. Transl Behav Med 2019; 9:282-291. [PMID: 30566662 PMCID: PMC6610173 DOI: 10.1093/tbm/iby123] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Accreditation standards are at the forefront of evolving healthcare systems, setting metrics for high-quality care. Healthcare outcomes (health, experience, cost, provider satisfaction/burn out) are becoming mutual goals of the patient, provider, payer, and healthcare system. Achieving high-quality outcomes in cancer care necessitates collaboration among interdisciplinary teams of clinical providers, administrators, patient advocates, caregivers, and researchers. Dissemination and implementation science provides necessary frameworks to organize the efforts of these implementation teams, inclusive of identifying facilitators and barriers to implementation of accreditation standards. Since 2015, cancer distress screening has been mandated for continued cancer center accreditation by the American College of Surgeon's Commission on Cancer. Cancer centers have thus become real world implementation laboratories. We present the current context of distress screening, highlighting prior research and key areas of future research. We consider multiple levels of cancer care delivery and the use of interdisciplinary teams to help cancer center teams adopt, implement, and maintain efficient distress screening programs. Finally, we present a case study to identify methods for successful implementation of distress screening at one cancer center and then describe efficiencies that can be introduced using elements from human factors engineering, e- and m-health screening platforms, and community partnerships.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shawna L Ehlers
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Mayo College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Kimberly Davis
- Departments of Oncology and Psychiatry, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Shirley M Bluethmann
- Department of Public Health Sciences, College of Medicine, The Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, PA, USA
| | - Lisa M Quintiliani
- Section of General Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Boston University, MA, USA
| | - Jeffrey Kendall
- Oncology Service Line, University of Minnesota Cancer Care, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Raj M Ratwani
- National Center for Human Factors in Healthcare, MedStar Health, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Michael A Diefenbach
- Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, Center for Health Innovation and Outcomes Research, Manhasset, NY, USA
| | - Kristi D Graves
- Department of Oncology, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Sanson-Fisher R, Hobden B, Watson R, Turon H, Carey M, Bryant J, Freund M. The new challenge for improving psychosocial cancer care: shifting to a system-based approach. Support Care Cancer 2018; 27:763-769. [PMID: 30543048 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-018-4568-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2018] [Accepted: 11/20/2018] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION There is a need to improve the psychosocial well-being of cancer patients. To date, intervention research has primarily focussed on improving psychosocial well-being through targeting singular aspects of care at the individual patient level. Sustainable, high-quality psychosocial care should address the issues faced by people diagnosed with cancer throughout the care pathway using a system-based approach. AIMS To examine the number of intervention trials attempting to improve psychosocial cancer care that have implemented a system-based approach. METHOD Five journals were selected and relevant studies across all years were extracted. Four criteria, argued to be essential characteristics of system-based change, were assessed: (1) establishing a culture change within the healthcare system/organisation, through designated leaders who endorse organisational goals; (2) adopting a multidisciplinary approach to change; (3) mapping the system and identifying points of leverage; and (4) measuring the impact of change and adapting establish feedback loops. RESULTS The search strategy returned 1174 citations, of which five met the inclusion criteria. Of the intervention studies identified, three met none of the four defined criteria for a systems-based intervention, one study met criterion 2 only, and one study met all four criteria, however, was not a rigorous study design. CONCLUSIONS This review of published psychosocial intervention trials in top-ranking psychosocial cancer care journals only found one study that met our criteria for evaluating system-based change. This is likely to be a consequence of the significant pragmatic and political barriers to conducting system-based intervention research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rob Sanson-Fisher
- Health Behaviour Research Collaborative, School of Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Health and Medicine, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia
- Priority Research Centre for Health Behaviour, Faculty of Health and Medicine, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton, NSW, Australia
| | - Breanne Hobden
- Health Behaviour Research Collaborative, School of Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Health and Medicine, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia.
- Priority Research Centre for Health Behaviour, Faculty of Health and Medicine, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia.
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton, NSW, Australia.
| | - Rochelle Watson
- Health Behaviour Research Collaborative, School of Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Health and Medicine, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia
- Priority Research Centre for Health Behaviour, Faculty of Health and Medicine, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton, NSW, Australia
| | - Heidi Turon
- Health Behaviour Research Collaborative, School of Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Health and Medicine, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia
- Priority Research Centre for Health Behaviour, Faculty of Health and Medicine, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton, NSW, Australia
| | - Mariko Carey
- Health Behaviour Research Collaborative, School of Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Health and Medicine, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia
- Priority Research Centre for Health Behaviour, Faculty of Health and Medicine, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton, NSW, Australia
| | - Jamie Bryant
- Health Behaviour Research Collaborative, School of Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Health and Medicine, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia
- Priority Research Centre for Health Behaviour, Faculty of Health and Medicine, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton, NSW, Australia
| | - Megan Freund
- Health Behaviour Research Collaborative, School of Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Health and Medicine, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia
- Priority Research Centre for Health Behaviour, Faculty of Health and Medicine, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Carey M, Sanson-Fisher R, Clinton-McHarg T, Boyes A, Olver I, Oldmeadow C, Paul C, D'Este C, Henskens F. Examining variation across treatment clinics in cancer patients' psychological outcomes: results of a cross sectional survey. Support Care Cancer 2018; 26:3201-3208. [PMID: 29619554 PMCID: PMC6096527 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-018-4188-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2017] [Accepted: 03/28/2018] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The majority of research on psychological outcomes for cancer patients has focussed on the role of individual characteristics, and disease and treatment factors. There has been very little exploration of the potential contribution of the treatment clinic to these outcomes. This study explored whether there is variation among clinics in cancer patients' psychological outcomes. METHODS Cancer outpatients were recruited from 22 medical oncology and haematology clinics in Australia. Participants completed a pen and paper survey including the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), as well as sociodemographic, disease and treatment characteristics. RESULTS Of those eligible to participate, 4233 (82%) consented and 2811 (81% of consenters) returned the completed survey. There was no statistically significant variation in HADS depression scores across clinics. Some difference in anxiety scores derived from the HADS questionnaire between clinics (p = 0.03) was found with the percentage of between-clinic variation estimated to be 1.11%. However, once all demographic, disease and treatment predictors were adjusted for there was no statistical differences between clinics (percent of between-clinic variation = 0.53%; p = 0.1415). CONCLUSIONS Psychological outcomes were not found to vary between clinics. Other sources of variation including patient characteristics may over-ride between-clinic variability, if it exists.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mariko Carey
- Priority Research Centre for Health Behaviour, School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, W4 HMRI Building, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia.
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton, NSW, 2305, Australia.
| | - Robert Sanson-Fisher
- Priority Research Centre for Health Behaviour, School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, W4 HMRI Building, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton, NSW, 2305, Australia
| | - Tara Clinton-McHarg
- Priority Research Centre for Health Behaviour, School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, W4 HMRI Building, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton, NSW, 2305, Australia
| | - Allison Boyes
- Priority Research Centre for Health Behaviour, School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, W4 HMRI Building, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton, NSW, 2305, Australia
| | - Ian Olver
- Samson Institute for Health Research, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, 5001, Australia
| | | | - Christine Paul
- Priority Research Centre for Health Behaviour, School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, W4 HMRI Building, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton, NSW, 2305, Australia
| | - Catherine D'Este
- National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, Research School of Population Health, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, 2601, Australia
| | - Frans Henskens
- School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Wassersug R, Wibowo E. Non-pharmacological and non-surgical strategies to promote sexual recovery for men with erectile dysfunction. Transl Androl Urol 2017; 6:S776-S794. [PMID: 29238658 PMCID: PMC5715194 DOI: 10.21037/tau.2017.04.09] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2017] [Accepted: 03/30/2017] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Erectile dysfunction (ED), the most commonly reported sexual problem for men, reduces the quality of life for both patients and their partners. Even when physiologically effective, long-term adherence to ED treatments is poor. We review here the implication of having patients' partners involved in ED treatment, starting with treatment selection. We suggest that having partners engaged from the outset may promote an erotic association of the treatment with the partner, i.e., conceptually linking the aid to the sexual pleasure that the partner provides. We hypothesize that this erotic association should enhance the sexual aid's effectiveness and might potentially help improve long-term adherence. The primary focus of this review, though, is non-pharmacological and non-surgical options for maintaining sexual activity for men with ED. Though not ED treatments per se, anecdotal data suggest that these options may be effective for some patients and their partners in regaining a satisfying sex life. The aids discussed include external penile prostheses, penile sleeves, and penile support devices. These devices can allow men to participate in penetrative sexual intercourse despite moderate to severe ED. External penile prostheses can be personalized so they match in size and shape a man's normal full erection. Penile sleeves can similarly be customized with a lumen that fits best a patient's penis for optimal tactile stimulation. We review how multi-sensory integration can enhance sexual arousal for men who use such devices, allowing them to achieve orgasm despite intractable ED. Patients are not always advised within ED clinics about these options nor why and how they can facilitate non-erection dependent sexual recovery. Clinicians need to be aware of these devices and their positive attributes, so they can objectively counsel and encourage couples to explore their use as an alternative to more invasive treatments. The most commonly promoted non-medical ED aid offered to patients is the vacuum erection device. We discuss how erections achieved with the vacuum erection device have a "hinge effect", that is an underappreciated barrier to the effectiveness of the erection. With a hinged erection, the penis points downward rather than upward. We show how the normal kinematics of the penis during coitus is not strictly linear (i.e., not uniaxial; not just in-and-out), and is impeded by hinging. Positional adjustment, such as the receptive partner being on top, may help overcome this problem for some couples. Lastly, we suggest that, in the case where ED can be anticipated from a pending medical treatment, such as a prostatectomy, pre-habilitative approaches may potentially improve adherence to sexual aid use in the long-term. In conclusion, non-pharmacological and non-surgical options for sexual recovery are available. Scientific studies on the effectiveness of these interventions in restoring satisfying sex are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard Wassersug
- Australian Research Centre in Sex, Health and Society, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia
- Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Erik Wibowo
- British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Giesler JM, Keller B, Repke T, Leonhart R, Weis J, Muckelbauer R, Rieckmann N, Müller-Nordhorn J, Lucius-Hoene G, Holmberg C. Effect of a Website That Presents Patients' Experiences on Self-Efficacy and Patient Competence of Colorectal Cancer Patients: Web-Based Randomized Controlled Trial. J Med Internet Res 2017; 19:e334. [PMID: 29030329 PMCID: PMC5660297 DOI: 10.2196/jmir.7639] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2017] [Revised: 06/29/2017] [Accepted: 07/14/2017] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Patients often seek other patients’ experiences with the disease. The Internet provides a wide range of opportunities to share and learn about other people’s health and illness experiences via blogs or patient-initiated online discussion groups. There also exists a range of medical information devices that include experiential patient information. However, there are serious concerns about the use of such experiential information because narratives of others may be powerful and pervasive tools that may hinder informed decision making. The international research network DIPEx (Database of Individual Patients’ Experiences) aims to provide scientifically based online information on people’s experiences with health and illness to fulfill patients’ needs for experiential information, while ensuring that the presented information includes a wide variety of possible experiences. Objective The aim is to evaluate the colorectal cancer module of the German DIPEx website krankheitserfahrungen.de with regard to self-efficacy for coping with cancer and patient competence. Methods In 2015, a Web-based randomized controlled trial was conducted using a two-group between-subjects design and repeated measures. The study sample consisted of individuals who had been diagnosed with colorectal cancer within the past 3 years or who had metastasis or recurrent disease. Outcome measures included self-efficacy for coping with cancer and patient competence. Participants were randomly assigned to either an intervention group that had immediate access to the colorectal cancer module for 2 weeks or to a waiting list control group. Outcome criteria were measured at baseline before randomization and at 2 weeks and 6 weeks Results The study randomized 212 persons. On average, participants were 54 (SD 11.1) years old, 58.8% (124/211) were female, and 73.6% (156/212) had read or heard stories of other patients online before entering the study, thus excluding any influence of the colorectal cancer module on krankheitserfahrungen.de. No intervention effects were found at 2 and 6 weeks after baseline. Conclusions The results of this study do not support the hypothesis that the website studied may increase self-efficacy for coping with cancer or patient competencies such as self-regulation or managing emotional distress. Possible explanations may involve characteristics of the website itself, its use by participants, or methodological reasons. Future studies aimed at evaluating potential effects of websites providing patient experiences on the basis of methodological principles such as those of DIPEx might profit from extending the range of outcome measures, from including additional measures of website usage behavior and users’ motivation, and from expanding concepts, such as patient competency to include items that more directly reflect patients’ perceived effects of using such a website. Trial Registration Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02157454; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02157454 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6syrvwXxi)
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jürgen M Giesler
- Section of Health Services Research and Rehabilitation Research, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Bettina Keller
- Institute of Public Health, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Tim Repke
- Institute of Public Health, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany.,Hasso-Plattner-Institute, Potsdam, Germany
| | - Rainer Leonhart
- Department of Psychology, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Joachim Weis
- Clinic for Oncological Rehabilitation, UKF Reha, Department of Psycho-Oncology, University Clinic Center, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Rebecca Muckelbauer
- Institute of Public Health, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Nina Rieckmann
- Institute of Public Health, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Jacqueline Müller-Nordhorn
- Institute of Public Health, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Christine Holmberg
- Institute of Public Health, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Rammant E, Bultijnck R, Sundahl N, Ost P, Pauwels NS, Deforche B, Pieters R, Decaestecker K, Fonteyne V. Rehabilitation interventions to improve patient-reported outcomes and physical fitness in survivors of muscle invasive bladder cancer: a systematic review protocol. BMJ Open 2017; 7:e016054. [PMID: 28592583 PMCID: PMC5726122 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016054] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2017] [Revised: 04/12/2017] [Accepted: 04/13/2017] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Survivors of muscle invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) experience physical and psychosocial side effects of cancer diagnosis and treatment. These negative side effects have a crucial impact on their health-related quality of life (HRQoL). To date, there is evidence that rehabilitation interventions such as physical activity and psychosocial support have a positive effect on the HRQoL of cancer survivors. Unfortunately, there are no specific guidelines for rehabilitation or survivorship programmes for MIBC survivors. Therefore, this systematic review aims to assess the effects of exercise-based and psychosocial rehabilitation interventions in MIBC survivors. METHODS AND ANALYSIS The approach of this review is consistent with the Cochrane methodology. Randomized controlled trials and non-randomised studies will be included. The population of interest is patients (≥18 years of age) with diagnosis of MIBC or high-risk non-MIBC for whom a radical cystectomy is indicated. There will be two eligible intervention types for inclusion: exercise-based and psychosocial rehabilitation interventions. The primary outcome measures are patient-reported outcomes (eg, HRQoL, fatigue and pain) and physical fitness. Studies will be identified independently by two review authors by searching the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science and the Physiotherapy Evidence Database. A third reviewer will be asked by disagreements. Risk of bias will be assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration tool and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Data will be summarised descriptively. If homogeneity of the studies is sufficient, meta-analysis will be undertaken. The broad scope of this review (ie, different interventions and study designs) is needed to have a comprehensive view on effective rehabilitation interventions. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Ethics approval is not required, as no primary data will be collected. Results will be disseminated through a peer-reviewed publication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elke Rammant
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Experimental Cancer Research, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Renée Bultijnck
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Experimental Cancer Research, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Nora Sundahl
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Experimental Cancer Research, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Piet Ost
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Experimental Cancer Research, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Nele S Pauwels
- Knowledge Center Ghent, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | | | - Ronny Pieters
- Department of Urology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | | | - Valérie Fonteyne
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Experimental Cancer Research, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
McCaughan E, Parahoo K, Hueter I, Northouse L, Bradbury I. Online support groups for women with breast cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017; 3:CD011652. [PMID: 28278559 PMCID: PMC6464660 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd011652.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Survival rates for women with a diagnosis of breast cancer continue to improve. However, some women may experience physical, psychological and emotional effects post diagnosis, throughout treatment and beyond. Support groups can provide opportunities for people to share their experiences and learn from others. As the number of online support groups increases, more and more women with breast cancer will likely access them. OBJECTIVES To assess effects of online support groups on the emotional distress, uncertainty, anxiety, depression and quality of life (QoL) of women with breast cancer. SEARCH METHODS We searched for trials in the Cochrane Breast Cancer Specialised Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; 2016, Issue 4), MEDLINE, Embase and PsycINFO on 2 May 2016, and we handsearched journals and reference lists. We also searched the World Health Organization's International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (WHO ICTRP) search portal and clinicaltrials.gov on 2 May 2016. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) assessing effects of online support groups on women with a diagnosis of breast cancer and women who have completed breast cancer treatment. We included studies comparing online support groups with a usual care group, and studies comparing two or more types of online support groups (without a usual care group). DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently extracted data and assessed risk of bias. We presented outcome data using mean differences (MDs) and standardised mean differences (SMDs) along with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and we used the fixed-effect model when appropriate. We assessed the quality of the body of evidence using the GRADE approach. MAIN RESULTS We included six studies (492 women) that assessed online support groups for women with breast cancer. Online support groups in these six trials lasted from six to 30 weeks. Women participated in these groups between 1.5 and 2.5 hours per week, and investigators conducted all studies in the USA. Participants were predominantly white and well educated and were moderate to high earners. Four studies compared an online support group versus a control group, and the other two compared a 'moderated' versus a 'peer-led' online support group, and a 'standard' versus an 'enhanced' online support group, respectively.None of the included studies measured 'emotional distress' or uncertainty. One study (78 women) for which data for analysis were missing reported no positive effects of online support on 'distress' and 'cancer-specific distress' versus support provided by a control group. Two studies measured anxiety: One study (72 women) found no difference in anxiety at the end of the intervention between the online support group and the control group (MD -0.40, 95% CI -6.42 to 5.62; low-quality evidence), and the second study (184 women) reported a reduction in anxiety levels at the end of the intervention when comparing the 'standard' support group (run by participants without prompting from health professionals) versus an 'enhanced' online support group (in which participants were specifically asked by the researcher to respond to one another's need for support).Five studies (414 women) measured depression. Three studies compared depression in the online support group with depression in the control group. Pooled data from two studies (120 women) showed a small to moderate reduction in depression in the online support group compared with control groups at the end of the intervention (SMD -0.37, 95% CI -0.75 to 0.00; very low-quality evidence). The third study, a pilot study (30 women), provided no data for analysis but reported no difference in depression between participants in support and control groups at the end of the intervention. Of the remaining two studies that measured depression, one study (60 women) provided no extractable data for comparison but reported no difference in depressive symptoms between a 'moderated' and a 'peer-led' support group; the other study (184 women) reported greater reduction in depression in the 'standard' support group than in the 'enhanced' online support group.Three studies measured quality of life. One pilot study (30 women) provided limited data for analysis but reported no change in quality of life at the end of the intervention. Only two studies (140 women) provided data for pooling and showed no positive effects on quality of life at four months post intervention compared with controls (SMD -0.11, 95% CI -0.47 to 0.24; very low-quality evidence). At 12 months post intervention, one study (78 women) reported that the intervention group did not attain better quality of life scores than the control group (MD -10.89, 95% CI -20.41 to -1.37; low-quality evidence).We found no data for subgroup analyses on stage of disease, treatment modality and types and doses of interventions. No studies measured adverse effects. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS This review did not find the evidence required to show whether participation in online support groups was beneficial for women with breast cancer, because identified trials were small and of low or very low quality. Large, rigorous trials with ethnically and economically diverse participants are needed to provide robust evidence regarding the psychosocial outcomes selected for this review.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eilis McCaughan
- Ulster UniversityInstitute of Nursing and Health ResearchColeraineUKBT52 1SA
| | - Kader Parahoo
- Ulster UniversityInstitute of Nursing and Health ResearchColeraineUKBT52 1SA
| | - Irene Hueter
- Columbia UniversityStatistics Department1255 Amsterdam AvenueNew YorkNYUSA10027
| | - Laurel Northouse
- University of MichiganSchool of Nursing400 N.IngallsAnn ArborMichiganUSA48105
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
van Ee I, Hagedoorn M, Slaets J, Smits C. Patient navigation and activation interventions for elderly patients with cancer: A systematic review. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2016; 26. [DOI: 10.1111/ecc.12621] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/05/2016] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- I.B. van Ee
- Research Group Innovating with Older Adults; Centre of Expertise in Health Care and Social Work; Windesheim University of Applied Sciences; Zwolle The Netherlands
| | - M. Hagedoorn
- Health Sciences/Health Psychology; University Medical Center Groningen; Groningen The Netherlands
| | - J.P.J. Slaets
- Leyden Academy on Vitality and Ageing, Leiden/Department of Geriatrics; University Medical Center Groningen; Groningen The Netherlands
| | - C.H.M. Smits
- Research Group Innovating with Older Adults; Centre of Expertise in Health Care and Social Work; Windesheim University of Applied Sciences; Zwolle The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Schouten B, Bekkering GE, Vankrunkelsven P, Mebis J, Van Hoof E, Hellings J, Van Hecke A. Systematic screening and assessment of psychosocial well-being and care needs of people with cancer. THE COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS 2016. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd012387] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Bojoura Schouten
- Hasselt University; Research Group Health Care, Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences; Hasselt Limburg Belgium 3500
| | - Geertruida E Bekkering
- Belgian Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine - Cochrane Belgium; Kapucijnenvoer 33 Blok J Bus 7001 Leuven Belgium 3000
- KU Leuven; Department of Public Health and Primary Care - Faculty of Medicine; Kapucijnenvoer 33 Blok J Bus 7001 Leuven Belgium 3000
| | - Patrick Vankrunkelsven
- Belgian Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine - Cochrane Belgium; Kapucijnenvoer 33 Blok J Bus 7001 Leuven Belgium 3000
- KU Leuven; Department of Public Health and Primary Care - Faculty of Medicine; Kapucijnenvoer 33 Blok J Bus 7001 Leuven Belgium 3000
| | - Jeroen Mebis
- Jessa Hospital; Department of Medical Oncology; Hasselt Belgium
- Hasselt University; Research Group Immunology and Biochemistry; Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences Hasselt Belgium
| | - Elke Van Hoof
- Jessa Hospital; Department of Medical Oncology; Hasselt Belgium
| | - Johan Hellings
- Hasselt University; Research Group Health Care, Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences; Hasselt Limburg Belgium 3500
- Free University of Brussels; Department of Experimental and Applied Psychology, Faculty of Psychological and Educational Sciences; Brussels Belgium
| | - Ann Van Hecke
- Ghent University; University Centre for Nursing and Midwifery, Department of Public Health; De Pintelaan 185 Ghent Belgium 9000
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Dinh KT, Reznor G, Muralidhar V, Mahal BA, Nezolosky MD, Choueiri TK, Hoffman KE, Hu JC, Sweeney CJ, Trinh QD, Nguyen PL. Association of Androgen Deprivation Therapy With Depression in Localized Prostate Cancer. J Clin Oncol 2016; 34:1905-12. [PMID: 27069075 PMCID: PMC4966343 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2015.64.1969] [Citation(s) in RCA: 109] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) may contribute to depression, yet several studies have not demonstrated a link. We aimed to determine whether receipt of any ADT or longer duration of ADT for prostate cancer (PCa) is associated with an increased risk of depression. METHODS We identified 78,552 men older than age 65 years with stage I to III PCa using the SEER-Medicare-linked database from 1992 to 2006, excluding patients with psychiatric diagnoses within the prior year. Our primary analysis was the association between pharmacologic ADT and the diagnosis of depression or receipt of inpatient or outpatient psychiatric treatment using Cox proportional hazards regression. Drug data for treatment of depression were not available. Our secondary analysis investigated the association between duration of ADT and each end point. RESULTS Overall, 43% of patients (n = 33,882) who received ADT, compared with patients who did not receive ADT, had higher 3-year cumulative incidences of depression (7.1% v 5.2%, respectively), inpatient psychiatric treatment (2.8% v 1.9%, respectively), and outpatient psychiatric treatment (3.4% v 2.5%, respectively; all P < .001). Adjusted Cox analyses demonstrated that patients with ADT had a 23% increased risk of depression (adjusted hazard ratio [AHR], 1.23; 95% CI, 1.15 to 1.31), 29% increased risk of inpatient psychiatric treatment (AHR, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.17 to 1.41), and a nonsignificant 7% increased risk of outpatient psychiatric treatment (AHR, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.97 to 1.17) compared with patients without ADT. The risk of depression increased with duration of ADT, from 12% with ≤ 6 months of treatment, 26% with 7 to 11 months of treatment, to 37% with ≥ 12 months of treatment (P trend < .001). A similar duration effect was seen for inpatient (P trend < .001) and outpatient psychiatric treatment (P trend < .001). CONCLUSION Pharmacologic ADT increased the risk of depression and inpatient psychiatric treatment in this large study of elderly men with localized PCa. This risk increased with longer duration of ADT. The possible psychiatric effects of ADT should be recognized by physicians and discussed with patients before initiating treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathryn T Dinh
- Kathryn T. Dinh, Vinayak Muralidhar, and Brandon A. Mahal, Harvard Medical School; Gally Reznor, Brandon A. Mahal, Michelle D. Nezolosky, Toni K. Choueiri, Christopher J. Sweeney, and Paul L. Nguyen, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School; Quoc-Dien Trinh, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Karen E. Hoffman, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; and Jim C. Hu, Weill Cornell Medical College, James Buchanan Brady Foundation, New York, NY
| | - Gally Reznor
- Kathryn T. Dinh, Vinayak Muralidhar, and Brandon A. Mahal, Harvard Medical School; Gally Reznor, Brandon A. Mahal, Michelle D. Nezolosky, Toni K. Choueiri, Christopher J. Sweeney, and Paul L. Nguyen, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School; Quoc-Dien Trinh, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Karen E. Hoffman, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; and Jim C. Hu, Weill Cornell Medical College, James Buchanan Brady Foundation, New York, NY
| | - Vinayak Muralidhar
- Kathryn T. Dinh, Vinayak Muralidhar, and Brandon A. Mahal, Harvard Medical School; Gally Reznor, Brandon A. Mahal, Michelle D. Nezolosky, Toni K. Choueiri, Christopher J. Sweeney, and Paul L. Nguyen, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School; Quoc-Dien Trinh, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Karen E. Hoffman, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; and Jim C. Hu, Weill Cornell Medical College, James Buchanan Brady Foundation, New York, NY
| | - Brandon A Mahal
- Kathryn T. Dinh, Vinayak Muralidhar, and Brandon A. Mahal, Harvard Medical School; Gally Reznor, Brandon A. Mahal, Michelle D. Nezolosky, Toni K. Choueiri, Christopher J. Sweeney, and Paul L. Nguyen, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School; Quoc-Dien Trinh, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Karen E. Hoffman, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; and Jim C. Hu, Weill Cornell Medical College, James Buchanan Brady Foundation, New York, NY
| | - Michelle D Nezolosky
- Kathryn T. Dinh, Vinayak Muralidhar, and Brandon A. Mahal, Harvard Medical School; Gally Reznor, Brandon A. Mahal, Michelle D. Nezolosky, Toni K. Choueiri, Christopher J. Sweeney, and Paul L. Nguyen, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School; Quoc-Dien Trinh, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Karen E. Hoffman, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; and Jim C. Hu, Weill Cornell Medical College, James Buchanan Brady Foundation, New York, NY
| | - Toni K Choueiri
- Kathryn T. Dinh, Vinayak Muralidhar, and Brandon A. Mahal, Harvard Medical School; Gally Reznor, Brandon A. Mahal, Michelle D. Nezolosky, Toni K. Choueiri, Christopher J. Sweeney, and Paul L. Nguyen, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School; Quoc-Dien Trinh, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Karen E. Hoffman, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; and Jim C. Hu, Weill Cornell Medical College, James Buchanan Brady Foundation, New York, NY
| | - Karen E Hoffman
- Kathryn T. Dinh, Vinayak Muralidhar, and Brandon A. Mahal, Harvard Medical School; Gally Reznor, Brandon A. Mahal, Michelle D. Nezolosky, Toni K. Choueiri, Christopher J. Sweeney, and Paul L. Nguyen, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School; Quoc-Dien Trinh, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Karen E. Hoffman, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; and Jim C. Hu, Weill Cornell Medical College, James Buchanan Brady Foundation, New York, NY
| | - Jim C Hu
- Kathryn T. Dinh, Vinayak Muralidhar, and Brandon A. Mahal, Harvard Medical School; Gally Reznor, Brandon A. Mahal, Michelle D. Nezolosky, Toni K. Choueiri, Christopher J. Sweeney, and Paul L. Nguyen, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School; Quoc-Dien Trinh, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Karen E. Hoffman, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; and Jim C. Hu, Weill Cornell Medical College, James Buchanan Brady Foundation, New York, NY
| | - Christopher J Sweeney
- Kathryn T. Dinh, Vinayak Muralidhar, and Brandon A. Mahal, Harvard Medical School; Gally Reznor, Brandon A. Mahal, Michelle D. Nezolosky, Toni K. Choueiri, Christopher J. Sweeney, and Paul L. Nguyen, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School; Quoc-Dien Trinh, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Karen E. Hoffman, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; and Jim C. Hu, Weill Cornell Medical College, James Buchanan Brady Foundation, New York, NY
| | - Quoc-Dien Trinh
- Kathryn T. Dinh, Vinayak Muralidhar, and Brandon A. Mahal, Harvard Medical School; Gally Reznor, Brandon A. Mahal, Michelle D. Nezolosky, Toni K. Choueiri, Christopher J. Sweeney, and Paul L. Nguyen, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School; Quoc-Dien Trinh, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Karen E. Hoffman, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; and Jim C. Hu, Weill Cornell Medical College, James Buchanan Brady Foundation, New York, NY
| | - Paul L Nguyen
- Kathryn T. Dinh, Vinayak Muralidhar, and Brandon A. Mahal, Harvard Medical School; Gally Reznor, Brandon A. Mahal, Michelle D. Nezolosky, Toni K. Choueiri, Christopher J. Sweeney, and Paul L. Nguyen, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School; Quoc-Dien Trinh, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Karen E. Hoffman, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; and Jim C. Hu, Weill Cornell Medical College, James Buchanan Brady Foundation, New York, NY.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Ljunggren C, Ströberg P. Improvement in sexual function after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: A rehabilitation program with involvement of a clinical sexologist. Cent European J Urol 2015; 68:214-20. [PMID: 26251748 PMCID: PMC4526602 DOI: 10.5173/ceju.2015.484] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2014] [Revised: 01/21/2015] [Accepted: 01/27/2015] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION To prospectively evaluate if the inclusion of a clinical sexologist in a penile and sexual rehabilitation program improves sexual function one year after prostate cancer surgery. MATERIAL AND METHODS Twelve months after da Vinci Radical Prostatectomy (dVRP) for prostate cancer, 28 fully potent (IIEF-5 >21) and sexually active men (ages 47-69 years, mean 61) who, in 2008, were enrolled in a prospectively monitored penile rehabilitation program (reference group) were compared with 79 fully potent (IIEF-5 >21) and sexually active men (ages 45-74 years, mean 61) enrolled in 2009 (study group); whose program differed by the inclusion of evaluation and treatment by a clinical sexologist. RESULTS Twelve months after dVRP, seventeen patients in the reference group (61%) were sexually active with regular penetrating sexual activity compared to sixty-six (84%) in the study group (p = 0.02). These findings were independent of whether they had undergone a nerve sparing or non-nerve sparing procedure. Almost 94% (74 patients) in the study group had at some time been able to perform penetrating sexual activity; 14 patients required additional visits to the clinical sexologist beyond the routine follow-up, 9 for short-term cognitive behavior therapy. CONCLUSIONS Inclusion of a clinical sexologist in a penile and sexual rehabilitation program appears to improve the ability to have regular sexual activity with penetrating sex one year after da Vinci Robotic Radical Prostatectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Peter Ströberg
- Department of Urology, Länssjukuset Ryhov, Jönköping, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Moore THM, King AJL, Evans M, Sharp D, Persad R, Huntley AL. Supportive care for men with prostate cancer: why are the trials not working? A systematic review and recommendations for future trials. Cancer Med 2015; 4:1240-51. [PMID: 25828811 PMCID: PMC4559035 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.446] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2014] [Revised: 02/05/2015] [Accepted: 02/11/2015] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Men with prostate cancer are likely to have a long illness and experience psychological distress for which supportive care may be helpful. This systematic review describes the evidence for effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of supportive care for men with prostate cancer, taking into account treatment pathway and components of interventions. MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, CENTRAL, and Psychinfo were searched from inception––July 2013 for randomized controlled trials and controlled trials. Two authors independently assessed risk of bias and extracted data. Twenty-six studies were included (2740 participants). Interventions were delivered pre and during (n = 12), short-term (n = 8), and longer term (18 months) (n = 5) after primary treatment. No interventions were delivered beyond this time. Few trials recruited ethnic minorities and none recruited men in same sex relationships. Intervention components included information, education, health professional discussion, homework, peer discussion, buddy support, cognitive behavioral therapy, cognitive restructuring, psychoeducation, Reiki and relaxation. Most interventions were delivered for 5–10 weeks. Risk of bias of trials was assessed as unclear for most domains due to lack of information. The majority of trials measuring quality of life and depression found no effect. Relatively few trials measured anxiety, coping skills and self-efficacy, and the majority found no effect. No cost data were available. Trials of supportive care for men with prostate cancer cover a range of interventions but are limited by population diversity, inconsistent measurement and reporting of outcomes, and inability to assess risk of bias. Recommendations on design and conduct of future trials are presented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Theresa Helen Mazzarello Moore
- Academic Unit of Primary Care, School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, Bristol, BS8 2PA, UK
| | - Anna Jyoti Louise King
- Academic Unit of Primary Care, School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, Bristol, BS8 2PA, UK
| | - Maggie Evans
- Academic Unit of Primary Care, School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, Bristol, BS8 2PA, UK
| | - Debbie Sharp
- Academic Unit of Primary Care, School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, Bristol, BS8 2PA, UK
| | - Raj Persad
- Academic Unit of Primary Care, School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, Bristol, BS8 2PA, UK
| | - Alyson Louise Huntley
- Academic Unit of Primary Care, School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, Bristol, BS8 2PA, UK
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Orom H, Nelson CJ, Underwood W, Homish DL, Kapoor DA. Factors associated with emotional distress in newly diagnosed prostate cancer patients. Psychooncology 2015; 24:1416-22. [PMID: 25631163 DOI: 10.1002/pon.3751] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2014] [Revised: 11/25/2014] [Accepted: 12/18/2014] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Early identification and intervention have been recommended for newly diagnosed prostate cancer patients who experience significant emotional distress; however, there is little empirical basis for designing or selecting interventions for these men. We sought to identify factors that are associated with distress in these men as a basis for identifying suitable intervention strategies. METHODS Using cross-sectional data and validated scales, we investigated the extent to which clinical, demographic, belief, and personality characteristics are associated with emotional distress assessed with the Distress Thermometer in 1425 men newly diagnosed with clinically localized prostate cancer (pretreatment). RESULTS Beliefs potentially amenable to psychoeducational interventions [low self-efficacy for decision-making (B =-0.11, p = 0.02), low confidence in cancer control (B =-0.03, p < 0.001), and masculine identity threat (B =-0.26, p = 0.001)] were associated with higher emotional distress, as well as personality factors [low optimism (B =-0.04, p = 0.052) and low resilience (B =-0.83, p < 0.001)]. CONCLUSIONS Findings provide a framework for the development of interventions for prostate cancer patients with elevated emotional distress. These may include improving provider communication about prostate cancer prognosis for those with low confidence in cancer control, providing decision-making support to increase decision-making self-efficacy, or referral to brief cognitive behavioral interventions to help patients reframe masculine identity threat or for those with low optimism or resilience reframe and adjust to the health threat.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heather Orom
- Department of Community Health and Health Behavior, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Christian J Nelson
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Willie Underwood
- Department of Urology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - D Lynn Homish
- Department of Community Health and Health Behavior, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Deepak A Kapoor
- Integrated Medical Professionals, PLLC, Melville, NY, USA.,Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Wenger LM, Oliffe JL, Bottorff JL. Psychosocial Oncology Supports for Men: A Scoping Review and Recommendations. Am J Mens Health 2014; 10:39-58. [PMID: 25389212 DOI: 10.1177/1557988314555361] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Although men's cancer experiences have received limited attention within the field of psychosocial oncology, increasing attention is being devoted to the development and evaluation of men-centered programs. This scoping review describes this emergent body of literature, detailing the focus, participation, and impact of interventions designed to help men with cancer build illness-specific knowledge, adapt to illness, manage side effects, distress, and uncertainty, sustain relationships, and more. Striving to build on existing knowledge, research gaps and opportunities are discussed, including a need for stronger methodologies, more tailored and targeted supports, attention to the experiences of men with nonprostate cancers, and the explicit integration of gender analyses in the research process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa M Wenger
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - John L Oliffe
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Joan L Bottorff
- University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus, Kelowna, British Columbia; Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|