Stereotactic radiotherapy for vestibular schwannoma

Hearing Function after CyberKnife for Vestibular Schwannoma: A Systematic Review

Introduction  CyberKnife (CK) radiosurgery is a treatment strategy for vestibular schwannoma (VS). Objectives  To evaluate hearing preservation (HP) after CK for VS. Data Synthesis  The study was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement, and it was registered at the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO, under number CRD42021250300). The inclusion criteria were based on the population, intervention, comparison, outcome, timing and study design (PICOTS) strategy: population - patients with VS; intervention - CK; Comparison - none; Outcome - serviceable HP defined by Gardner and Robertson as grades I or II, or by the American Academy of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery as classes A or B; timing - mean follow-up longer than 1 year; and study design - retrospective or prospective studies. The exclusion criteria were: studies not published in English; studies published before January 2000 and after October 2021; and studies only including patients with neurofibromatosis type 2 or submitted to a previous treatment. The PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, LILACS, and IBECS databases were used and last searched on October 27th, 2021. Statistical heterogeneity was assessed using I 2 statistics. The appraisal checklist was used to assess the risk of bias in the included studies. A total of 222 studies were analyzed, and 13 were included in the synthesis, which represents 493 participants with serviceable hearing before intervention. The mean HP rate after CK using a random effects model was of 68% (95% confidence interval [95%CI]: 59-76%) at a mean follow-up of 42.96 months. Conclusion  The longer follow-up period was associated with a lower HP rate after CK radiosurgery for VS in the qualitative synthesis.

Fractionated Stereotactic Radiotherapy Compared to Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Vestibular Schwannoma in Patients with Type 2 Neurofibromatosis

BACKGROUND

The use of radiotherapy (RT) for the treatment of vestibulocochlear schwannomas is standard in patients with type 2 neurofibromatosis (NF2). In the general population, fractionated RT (FRT) can achieve good results compared to single-dose radiosurgery (SRS). We aimed to assess whether this is true for NF2 patients as well.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included 34 patients and 54 lesions treated between 2010 and 2023 in a single university hospital.

RESULTS

Thirty-four patient charts were assessed. The median follow-up was 62.6 months (range, 7.1-135.8 months). Lesion size (median larger diameter, 2.5 cm) was correlated with the use of FRT (P > 0.001). Younger age also was correlated with FRT (P = 0.006). Median overall survival and progression-free survival (PFS) were not reached. The overall control rate was 76.5%, and the mean PFS was 49.8 months, compared with . 90.5% and 57.2 months, respectively, for SRS and 66.7% and 44.9 months, respectively, for FRT. There were no differences between the 2 groups in hearing loss, tinnitus, and facial palsy.

CONCLUSIONS

In the NF2 population, FRT may yield worse control rates than SRS. Whenever possible, it is preferable to not fractionate treatment for these patients. Nevertheless, the FRT results were still good. More and larger prospective trials are warranted.

Brazilian Society of Otology task force - Vestibular Schwannoma ‒ evaluation and treatment

OBJECTIVE

To review the literature on the diagnosis and treatment of vestibular schwannoma.

METHODS

Task force members were educated on knowledge synthesis methods, including electronic database search, review and selection of relevant citations, and critical appraisal of selected studies. Articles written in English or Portuguese on vestibular schwannoma were eligible for inclusion. The American College of Physicians' guideline grading system and the American Thyroid Association's guideline criteria were used for critical appraisal of evidence and recommendations for therapeutic interventions.

RESULTS

The topics were divided into 2 parts: (1) Diagnosis - audiologic, electrophysiologic tests, and imaging; (2) Treatment - wait and scan protocols, surgery, radiosurgery/radiotherapy, and systemic therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Decision making in VS treatment has become more challenging. MRI can diagnose increasingly smaller tumors, which has disastrous consequences for the patients and their families. It is important to develop an individualized approach for each case, which highly depends on the experience of each surgical team.

Upfront Radiosurgery vs a Wait-and-Scan Approach for Small- or Medium-Sized Vestibular Schwannoma: The V-REX Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

Current guidelines for treating small- to medium-sized vestibular schwannoma recommend either upfront radiosurgery or waiting to treat until tumor growth has been detected radiographically.

Objective

To determine whether upfront radiosurgery provides superior tumor volume reduction to a wait-and-scan approach for small- to medium-sized vestibular schwannoma.

Design, Setting, and Participants

Randomized clinical trial of 100 patients with a newly diagnosed (<6 months) unilateral vestibular schwannoma and a maximal tumor diameter of less than 2 cm in the cerebellopontine angle as measured on magnetic resonance imaging. Participants were enrolled at the Norwegian National Unit for Vestibular Schwannoma from October 28, 2014, through October 3, 2017; 4-year follow-up ended on October 20, 2021.

Interventions

Participants were randomized to receive either upfront radiosurgery (n = 50) or to undergo a wait-and-scan protocol, for which treatment was given only upon radiographically documented tumor growth (n = 50). Participants underwent 5 annual study visits consisting of clinical assessment, radiological examination, audiovestibular tests, and questionnaires.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcome was the ratio between tumor volume at the trial end at 4 years and baseline (V4:V0). There were 26 prespecified secondary outcomes, including patient-reported symptoms, clinical examinations, audiovestibular tests, and quality-of-life outcomes. Safety outcomes were the risk of salvage microsurgery and radiation-associated complications.

Results

Of the 100 randomized patients, 98 completed the trial and were included in the primary analysis (mean age, 54 years; 42% female). In the upfront radiosurgery group, 1 participant (2%) received repeated radiosurgery upon tumor growth, 2 (4%) needed salvage microsurgery, and 45 (94%) had no additional treatment. In the wait-and-scan group, 21 patients (42%) received radiosurgery upon tumor growth, 1 (2%) underwent salvage microsurgery, and 28 (56%) remained untreated. For the primary outcome of the ratio of tumor volume at the trial end to baseline, the geometric mean V4:V0 was 0.87 (95% CI, 0.66-1.15) in the upfront radiosurgery group and 1.51 (95% CI, 1.23-1.84) in the wait-and-scan group, showing a significantly greater tumor volume reduction in patients treated with upfront radiosurgery (wait-and-scan to upfront radiosurgery ratio, 1.73; 95% CI, 1.23-2.44; P = .002). Of 26 secondary outcomes, 25 showed no significant difference. No radiation-associated complications were observed.

Conclusion and relevance

Among patients with newly diagnosed small- and medium-sized vestibular schwannoma, upfront radiosurgery demonstrated a significantly greater tumor volume reduction at 4 years than a wait-and-scan approach with treatment upon tumor growth. These findings may help inform treatment decisions for patients with vestibular schwannoma, and further investigation of long-term clinical outcomes is needed.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02249572.

Proton beam radiation therapy for vestibular schwannomas-tumor control and hearing preservation rates: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Proton beam therapy is considered, by some authors, as having the advantage of delivering dose distributions more conformal to target compared with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). Here, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of proton beam for VSs, evaluating tumor control and cranial nerve preservation rates, particularly with regard to facial and hearing preservation.

METHODS

We reviewed, using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) articles published between 1968 and September 30, 2022. We retained 8 studies reporting 587 patients.

RESULTS

Overall rate of tumor control (both stability and decrease in volume) was 95.4% (range 93.5-97.2%, p heterogeneity= 0.77, p<0.001). Overall rate of tumor progression was 4.6% (range 2.8-6.5%, p heterogeneity < 0.77, p<0.001). Overall rate of trigeminal nerve preservation (absence of numbness) was 95.6% (range 93.5-97.7%, I2 = 11.44%, p heterogeneity= 0.34, p<0.001). Overall rate of facial nerve preservation was 93.7% (range 89.6-97.7%, I2 = 76.27%, p heterogeneity<0.001, p<0.001). Overall rate of hearing preservation was 40.6% (range 29.4-51.8%, I2 = 43.36%, p heterogeneity= 0.1, p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

Proton beam therapy for VSs achieves high tumor control rates, as high as 95.4%. Facial rate preservation overall rates are 93%, which is lower compared to the most SRS series. Compared with most currently reported SRS techniques, proton beam radiation therapy for VSs does not offer an advantage for facial and hearing preservation compared to most of the currently reported SRS series.

Long-term growth patterns of vestibular schwannomas after stereotactic radiotherapy: delayed re-growth

Purpose

To determine the long-term outcomes of patients with vestibular schwannomas (VS) after stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) who experience delayed tumour regrowth.

Methods

We carried out a retrospective case series in tertiary university settings. We included patients with VS with initial response to SRS and delayed regrowth, assessing a database of 735 patients with VS and 159 patients who had SRS as sole treatment. Following SRS, all patients had clinical follow-up and serial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). We documented the post-SRS clinical assessment, pre- and post-SRS VS size as per MRI in predetermined time periods, response to treatment and rate of (re-) growth and the final outcome in each case.

Results

We identified six patients with good initial response but delayed VS regrowth at a faster rate than pre-SRS. The mean growth rate for these VS was 0.347 mm/month (range 0.04–0.78 mm/month) prior to treatment; the mean growth rate at the time of delayed re-growth was 0.48 mm/month (range 0.17–0.75 mm/month); this did not reach the level of statistical significance (p = 0.08). This regrowth occurred at a mean time of 42 months (range 36–66 months) post-SRS and stopped 22 months (mean, range 12–36 months) post regrowth detection in all cases.

Conclusions

Given that delayed post-SRS VS regrowth can occur in approximately 4% of the treated cases, it is important to continue close clinical and radiological follow-up. Despite this abnormal behaviour, VS do stop growing again; still, patients should be made aware of the possibility of this uncommon VS behaviour following SRS.

Vestibular Schwannoma: What We Know and Where We are Heading

Vestibular schwannoma (VS) is a Schwann cell-derived tumour arising from the vestibulocochlear nerve. Although benign, it represents a threat to intracranial structures due to mass effect and carries a small risk of malignant transformation. VS therefore represents an important healthcare burden. We review the literature regarding pathogenesis, risk factors, and diagnosis of VS. The current and future potential management strategies are also discussed. A narrative review of all relevant papers known to the authors was conducted. The majority of VS remain clinically stable and do not require interventional procedures. Nevertheless, various surgical techniques exist for removing VS, the most common of which are translabyrinthine and retrosigmoid approaches. Due to surgical risks such as hearing loss, facial nerve dysfunction, post-operative headache, and cerebrospinal fluid leakage, a "watch and rescan" approach is adopted for most patients. Radiotherapy is a useful alternative and has been shown to have a similar response for growth restriction. Due to the heterogeneous nature of VS, there is a lack of consensus regarding management of tumours that are too large for conservative management but too small to indicate surgery. Emerging biologic therapies, such as Bevacizumab, Everolimus, and Lapatinib, as well as anti-inflammatories like aspirin are promising potential treatments; however, long-term evidence of their efficacy is required. The knowledge base regarding VS continues to improve. With increased understanding of the pathogenesis of these tumors, we believe future work should focus on pharmacologic intervention. Biologic therapies aimed toward improved patient outcomes are particularly promising.

Stereotactic radiosurgery for management of vestibular schwannoma: a short review

Management options for newly diagnosed vestibular schwannoma (VS) include observation, surgery, or radiation. There are no randomized trials to guide management of patients with VS. This article is a short review of the role of stereotactic radiosurgery in management of newly diagnosed VS.

Radiosurgery treatment is associated with improved facial nerve preservation versus repeat resection in recurrent vestibular schwannomas

BACKGROUND

Vestibular schwannomas (VSs) are benign neoplasms of the Schwann cells of cranial nerve VIII, and treatment of VS typically involves surgical resection. However, tumor recurrence may necessitate reintervention, and secondary treatment modalities include repeat surgical resection or adjuvant radiosurgery. The purpose of this study is to examine the scientific literature in order to determine whether surgical resection or radiosurgery for recurrent VS results in better tumor control, hearing preservation, and preservation of facial nerve function.

METHODS

The PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases were searched for studies reporting on patients undergoing either radiosurgery or repeat surgical resection after primary surgical resection for recurrent VS. Statistical analyses were performed on the compiled data, primarily outcome data involving tumor control, hearing preservation, and preservation of facial nerve function.

RESULTS

We analyzed the data of 15 individual studies involving 359 total patients, and our results reveal that tumor control rates are comparable between adjuvant radiosurgery (91%, CI: 88-94%) and secondary resection (92%, CI 75-98%). However, adjuvant radiosurgery was shown to preserve good facial nerve function better (94%, CI 84-98%) compared to secondary surgical resection (56%, CI 41-69%).

CONCLUSION

With comparable tumor control rates and better preservation of good facial nerve function, this study suggests that secondary radiosurgery for recurrent VS is associated with both optimal tumor control and preservation of good facial nerve function.

Local experience with radiosurgery for vestibular schwannomas and recommendations for management

INTRODUCTION

There are many treatment options for vestibular schwannomas (VSs), including radiosurgery. Previous studies have shown good outcomes for smaller tumours. We report the results of a seven-year cohort of patients with VS who were treated at our centre using a linear accelerator-based stereotactic radiosurgery system.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the case notes and magnetic resonance (MR) images of patients with VS treated with radiosurgery. Treatment was administered as either a single 13 Gy session or 25 Gy in five sessions. At our centre, only larger or higher Koos grade VSs, were routinely treated with hypofractionated radiosurgery. Tumour response and hearing were assessed using RECIST criteria and Gardner-Robertson scale, respectively. Other toxicities were assessed using physical examination and history-taking. Freedom from radiological progression was estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

46 patients received single-fraction radiosurgery and 31 received hypofractionated radiosurgery. Median follow-up duration was 40.6 months. 29 patients had prior surgery to remove the tumour (median size 1.68 cm3). One patient who had symptomatic increase in tumour size (> 20% in largest diameter) was treated conservatively and subsequently showed stable disease on MR imaging. Progression-free survival was 98.7%. Another patient had symptomatic oedema requiring ventriculoperitoneal shunt insertion. 11 patients had serviceable hearing before radiotherapy and 72.7% of them retained useful hearing (20.1 dB mean decline in pure tone average). Facial and trigeminal nerve functions and sense of equilibrium were preserved in > 90% of patients.

CONCLUSION

Radiosurgery is effective and safe for small VSs or as an adjunct therapy after microsurgery.

Stereotactic radiosurgery vs. fractionated radiotherapy for tumor control in vestibular schwannoma patients: a systematic review

Objective

Repeated controlled studies have revealed that stereotactic radiosurgery is better than microsurgery for patients with vestibular schwannoma (VS) <3 cm in need of intervention. In this systematic review we aimed to compare results from single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) to fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT) for patients with VS.

Data sources and eligibility criteria

We systematically searched MEDLINE, Web of Science, Embase and Cochrane and screened relevant articles for references. Publications from 1995 through 2014 with a minimum of 50 adult (>18 years) patients with unilateral VS, followed for a median of >5 years, were eligible for inclusion. After screening titles and abstracts of the 1094 identified articles and systematically reviewing 98 of these articles, 19 were included.

Intervention

Patients with unilateral VS treated with radiosurgery were compared to patients treated with fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy.

Results

No randomized controlled trial (RCT) was identified. None of the identified controlled studies comparing SRS with FSRT were eligible according to the inclusion criteria. Nineteen case series on SRS (n = 17) and FSRT (n = 2) were included in the systematic review. Loss of tumor control necessitating a new VS-targeted intervention was found in an average of 5.0% of the patients treated with SRS and in 4.8% treated with FSRT. Mean deterioration ratio for patients with serviceable hearing before treatment was 49% for SRS and 45% for FSRT, respectively. The risk for facial nerve deterioration was 3.6% for SRS and 11.2% for FSRT and for trigeminal nerve deterioration 6.0% for SRS and 8.4% for FSRT. Since these results were obtained from case series, a regular meta-analysis was not attempted.

Conclusion

SRS and FSRT are both noninvasive treatment alternatives for patients with VS with low rates of treatment failure in need of rescue therapy. In this selection of patients, the progression-free survival rates were on the order of 92–100% for both treatment options. There is a lack of high-quality studies comparing radiation therapy alternatives for patients with VS. Finally, 19 articles reported long-term tumor control after SRS, while only 2 articles reported long-term FSRT results, making effect estimates more uncertain for FSRT.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00701-017-3164-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Summary and consensus in 7th International Conference on acoustic neuroma: An update for the management of sporadic acoustic neuromas

Sporadic vestibular schwannoma (acoustic neuroma) is a benign tumor arising from cochleovestibular nerve. Nowadays, various specialties and medical centers are treating this disease, and the multidisciplinary collaboration is the trend. In an effort to promote a uniform standard for reporting clinical results, even for treatment indications, the mainly controversies were posed and discussed during the 7th International Conference on acoustic neuroma, and the agreement was summarized by the Committee of this conference. The main symptoms grading and tumor stage should note its name of classification for making them comparable. The goal of the modern managements for vestibular schwannoma is to improve the quality of life with lower mortality, lower morbidity and better neurological function preservation. The experience of surgical team and their preference might be a major factor for the outcome. Because of lacking of long-term follow-up large data after radiotherapy, and with the development of microsurgery, radiotherapy is now less recommended except for recurrent cases or elderly patients.