1
|
Morel T, Nguyen-Soenen J, Thompson W, Fournier JP. Development and validation of search filters to retrieve medication discontinuation articles in Medline and Embase. Health Info Libr J 2024; 41:156-165. [PMID: 38013506 DOI: 10.1111/hir.12516] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2022] [Revised: 08/08/2023] [Accepted: 11/10/2023] [Indexed: 11/29/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Medication discontinuation studies explore the outcomes of stopping a medication compared to continuing it. Comprehensively identifying medication discontinuation articles in bibliographic databases remains challenging due to variability in terminology. OBJECTIVES To develop and validate search filters to retrieve medication discontinuation articles in Medline and Embase. METHODS We identified medication discontinuation articles in a convenience sample of systematic reviews. We used primary articles to create two reference sets for Medline and Embase, respectively. The reference sets were equally divided by randomization in development sets and validation sets. Terms relevant for discontinuation were identified by term frequency analysis in development sets and combined to develop two search filters that maximized relative recalls. The filters were validated against validation sets. Relative recalls were calculated with their 95% confidences intervals (95% CI). RESULTS We included 316 articles for Medline and 407 articles for Embase, from 15 systematic reviews. The Medline optimized search filter combined 7 terms. The Embase optimized search filter combined 8 terms. The relative recalls were respectively 92% (95% CI: 87-96) and 91% (95% CI: 86-94). CONCLUSIONS We developed two search filters for retrieving medication discontinuation articles in Medline and Embase. Further research is needed to estimate precision and specificity of the filters.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Morel
- Département de Médecine Générale, Nantes Université, Nantes, France
- SPHERE-UMR INSERM 1246, Nantes Université, Université de Tours, Nantes, France
| | - Jérôme Nguyen-Soenen
- Département de Médecine Générale, Nantes Université, Nantes, France
- SPHERE-UMR INSERM 1246, Nantes Université, Université de Tours, Nantes, France
| | - Wade Thompson
- Department of Anesthesiology, Pharmacology, and Therapeutics, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Jean-Pascal Fournier
- Département de Médecine Générale, Nantes Université, Nantes, France
- SPHERE-UMR INSERM 1246, Nantes Université, Université de Tours, Nantes, France
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Japelj N, Horvat N, Knez L, Kos M. Deprescribing: An umbrella review. ACTA PHARMACEUTICA (ZAGREB, CROATIA) 2024; 74:249-267. [PMID: 38815201 DOI: 10.2478/acph-2024-0011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/04/2024] [Indexed: 06/01/2024]
Abstract
This umbrella review examined systematic reviews of deprescribing studies by characteristics of intervention, population, medicine, and setting. Clinical and humanistic outcomes, barriers and facilitators, and tools for deprescribing are presented. The Medline database was used. The search was limited to systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in English up to April 2022. Reviews reporting deprescribing were included, while those where depre-scribing was not planned and supervised by a healthcare professional were excluded. A total of 94 systematic reviews (23 meta--analyses) were included. Most explored clinical or humanistic outcomes (70/94, 74 %); less explored attitudes, facilitators, or barriers to deprescribing (17/94, 18 %); few focused on tools (8/94, 8.5 %). Reviews assessing clinical or humanistic outcomes were divided into two groups: reviews with deprescribing intervention trials (39/70, 56 %; 16 reviewing specific deprescribing interventions and 23 broad medication optimisation interventions), and reviews with medication cessation trials (31/70, 44 %). Deprescribing was feasible and resulted in a reduction of inappropriate medications in reviews with deprescribing intervention trials. Complex broad medication optimisation interventions were shown to reduce hospitalisation, falls, and mortality rates. In reviews of medication cessation trials, a higher frequency of adverse drug withdrawal events underscores the importance of prioritizing patient safety and exercising caution when stopping medicines, particularly in patients with clear and appropriate indications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nuša Japelj
- 1University of Ljubljana Faculty of Pharmacy, Department of Social Pharmacy 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Nejc Horvat
- 1University of Ljubljana Faculty of Pharmacy, Department of Social Pharmacy 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Lea Knez
- 1University of Ljubljana Faculty of Pharmacy, Department of Social Pharmacy 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
- 2University Clinic Golnik 4204 Golnik, Slovenia
| | - Mitja Kos
- 1University of Ljubljana Faculty of Pharmacy, Department of Social Pharmacy 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Konzett V, Kerschbaumer A, Smolen JS, Kristianslund EK, Provan SA, Kvien TK, Aletaha D. Definition of rheumatoid arthritis flare based on SDAI and CDAI. Ann Rheum Dis 2024; 83:169-176. [PMID: 37890977 DOI: 10.1136/ard-2023-224742] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2023] [Accepted: 10/02/2023] [Indexed: 10/29/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To develop and validate definitions for disease flares in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) based on the quantitative Simplified and Clinical Disease Activity Indices (SDAI, CDAI). METHODS We analysed RA treatment courses from the Norwegian disease-modifying antirheumatic drug registry (NOR-DMARD) and the Vienna RA cohort. In a receiver operating curve analysis, we determined flare definitions for absolute changes in SDAI and CDAI based on a semiquantitative patient anchor. NOR-DMARD was sampled into an 80%-training cohort for cut point derivation and a 20%-test cohort for internal validation. The definitions were then externally validated in the independent Vienna RA cohort and tested regarding their performance on longitudinal, content, face, and construct validity. RESULTS We analysed 4256 treatment courses from NOR-DMARD and 2557 from the Vienna RA cohort. The preliminary definitions for absolute changes in SDAI and CDAI for flare are an increase of 4.7 and 4.5, respectively. The definitions performed well in the test and external validation cohorts, and showed clinical face and construct validity, as flares significantly impact both functional ( ∆ Health Assessment Questionnaire flare vs no-flare +0.43; p<0.001) and structural ( ∆ modified Sharp Score 43% higher after flare; p<0.001) disease outcomes, and reflect consistent worsening across all disease core sets, both patient reported and objective. CONCLUSION We here provide novel definitions for flare in RA based on SDAI and CDAI, validated in two large independent real-world cohorts. In times of highly effective medications for RA, and consideration of their tapering, these definitions will be useful for guiding decision making in clinical practice and designing clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victoria Konzett
- Department of Medicine III, Division of Rheumatology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Andreas Kerschbaumer
- Department of Medicine III, Division of Rheumatology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Josef S Smolen
- Department of Medicine III, Division of Rheumatology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Eirik Klami Kristianslund
- Center for Treatment of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Diseases (REMEDY), Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Sella A Provan
- Center for Treatment of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Diseases (REMEDY), Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Tore K Kvien
- Center for Treatment of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Diseases (REMEDY), Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Daniel Aletaha
- Department of Medicine III, Division of Rheumatology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Meng CF, Rajesh DA, Jannat-Khat DP, Jivanelli B, Bykerk V. The Gap in Knowledge about Tapering Targeted Therapy being used as Monotherapy in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Systematic Review. Curr Rheumatol Rev 2024; 20:46-56. [PMID: 37641998 DOI: 10.2174/1573397119666230828160108] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2023] [Revised: 07/24/2023] [Accepted: 08/04/2023] [Indexed: 08/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Up to 30% of patients with RA are being treated with biologic (b)-disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) as monotherapy. Monotherapy with Interleukin (IL)-6 inhibitors(i) and Janus-kinase (JAK)-i has been shown to be effective. Whether patients can taper targeted therapy (bDMARDs and JAK-i) used as monotherapy (targeted monotherapy) is unknown. OBJECTIVE To determine the feasibility of tapering of targeted monotherapy in patients with controlled RA. METHODS We conducted a literature search in Medline, Embase and Cochrane Library for prospective studies reporting remission outcomes after tapering targeted monotherapy in RA patients, from 1/2014 - 8 /2021. RESULTS 5 randomized studies which met our inclusion criteria, evaluating tapering of monotherapy with tumor necrosis factor-inhibitors, tocilizumab, abatacept and baricitinib in RA. Studies were heterogeneous. Three trials studied early RA. Three studies gradually tapered therapy, including 1 dose reduction study. Three studies tapered both biological and conventional-synthetic (cs)-DMARDs. No study compared stopping targeted monotherapy to continuing it. Remission rates were low 14-28% across all studies that stopped targeted monotherapy. The highest remission rate of 72% was reported by the dose reduction study. Trials that studied early RA reported remission rates after tapering ranging 27-72%. Trials tapering therapy in established RA reported rates of remission from 14-20%. CONCLUSION There is a crucial gap in published literature to inform on tapering targeted monotherapy in patients with RA. Stopping targeted monotherapy is unlikely to maintain disease control in RA. Dose reduction strategies and early treatment of disease may be associated with more successful tapering, and warrant future study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charis F Meng
- Division of Rheumatology, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, USA
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, USA
| | - Diviya A Rajesh
- Division of Rheumatology, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, USA
| | - Deanna P Jannat-Khat
- Division of Rheumatology, Epidemiology and Biostatistics CORE, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, USA
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, USA
| | - Bridget Jivanelli
- Kim Barrett Memorial Library, HSS Education Institute, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, USA
| | - Vivian Bykerk
- Division of Rheumatology, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ward MM, Madanchi N, Yazdanyar A, Shah NR, Constantinescu F. Prevalence and predictors of sustained remission/low disease activity after discontinuation of induction or maintenance treatment with tumor necrosis factor inhibitors in rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic and scoping review. Arthritis Res Ther 2023; 25:222. [PMID: 37986101 PMCID: PMC10659063 DOI: 10.1186/s13075-023-03199-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2023] [Accepted: 10/20/2023] [Indexed: 11/22/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To determine the prevalence of sustained remission/low disease activity (LDA) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) after discontinuation of tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi), separately in induction treatment and maintenance treatment studies, and to identify predictors of successful discontinuation. METHODS We performed a systematic literature review of studies published from 2005 to May 2022 that reported outcomes after TNFi discontinuation among patients in remission/LDA. We computed prevalences of successful discontinuation by induction or maintenance treatment, remission criterion, and follow-up time. We performed a scoping review of predictors of successful discontinuation. RESULTS Twenty-two induction-withdrawal studies were identified. In pooled analyses, 58% (95% confidence interval (CI) 45, 70) had DAS28 < 3.2 (9 studies), 52% (95% CI 35, 69) had DAS28 < 2.6 (9 studies), and 40% (95% CI 18, 64) had SDAI ≤ 3.3 (4 studies) at 37-52 weeks after discontinuation. Among patients who continued TNFi, 62 to 85% maintained remission. Twenty-two studies of maintenance treatment discontinuation were also identified. At 37-52 weeks after TNFi discontinuation, 48% (95% CI 38, 59) had DAS28 < 3.2 (10 studies), and 47% (95% CI 33, 62) had DAS28 < 2.6 (6 studies). Heterogeneity among studies was high. Data on predictors in induction-withdrawal studies were limited. In both treatment scenarios, longer duration of RA was most consistently associated with less successful discontinuation. CONCLUSIONS Approximately one-half of patients with RA remain in remission/LDA for up to 1 year after TNFi discontinuation, with slightly higher proportions in induction-withdrawal settings than with maintenance treatment discontinuation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael M Ward
- Intramural Research Program, National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Building 10CRC, Room 4-1339, 10 Center Drive, Bethesda, MD, 20892-1468, USA.
| | - Nima Madanchi
- Division of Rheumatology, Allergy, and Immunology, Department of Internal Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA
- Current address: Division of Rheumatology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Ali Yazdanyar
- Department of Emergency and Hospital Medicine, Lehigh Valley Hospital-Cedar Crest, Allentown, PA, USA
- Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
- Current address: Division of Hospital Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Nehal R Shah
- Division of Rheumatology, Allergy, and Immunology, Department of Internal Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Lillegraven S, Paulshus Sundlisæter N, Aga AB, Sexton J, Olsen IC, Lexberg ÅS, Madland TM, Fremstad H, Høili CA, Bakland G, Spada C, Haukeland H, Hansen IM, Moholt E, Uhlig T, Solomon DH, van der Heijde D, Kvien TK, Haavardsholm EA. Effect of tapered versus stable treatment with tumour necrosis factor inhibitors on disease flares in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in remission: a randomised, open label, non-inferiority trial. Ann Rheum Dis 2023; 82:1394-1403. [PMID: 37607809 PMCID: PMC10579188 DOI: 10.1136/ard-2023-224476] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2023] [Accepted: 07/31/2023] [Indexed: 08/24/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Many patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) require treatment with tumour necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) to reach remission. It is debated whether tapering of TNFi to discontinuation should be considered in sustained remission. The aim of ARCTIC REWIND TNFi was to assess the effect of tapering TNFi to withdrawal compared with stable treatment on the risk of disease activity flares in patients with RA in remission ≥1 year. METHODS This randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial was undertaken at nine Norwegian rheumatology departments. Patients with RA in remission ≥12 months on stable TNFi therapy were allocated by computer-based block-randomisation to tapering to discontinuation of TNFi or stable TNFi. Conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic co-medication was unchanged. The primary endpoint was disease flare during the 12-month study period (non-inferiority margin 20%), assessed in the per-protocol population. RESULTS Between June 2013 and January 2019, 99 patients were enrolled and 92 received the allocated treatment strategy. Eighty-four patients were included in the per-protocol population. In the tapering TNFi group, 27/43 (63%) experienced a flare during 12 months, compared with 2/41 (5%) in the stable TNFi group; risk difference (95% CI) 58% (42% to 74%). The tapering strategy was not non-inferior to continued stable treatment. The number of total/serious adverse events was 49/3 in the tapering group, 57/2 in the stable group. CONCLUSION In patients with RA in remission for more than 1 year while using TNFi, an increase in flare rate was reported in those who tapered TNFi to discontinuation. However, most regained remission after reinstatement of full-dose treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS EudraCT: 2012-005275-14 and clinicaltrials.gov: NCT01881308.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Siri Lillegraven
- REMEDY Center for treatment of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Diseases, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Nina Paulshus Sundlisæter
- REMEDY Center for treatment of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Diseases, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Anna-Birgitte Aga
- REMEDY Center for treatment of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Diseases, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Joseph Sexton
- REMEDY Center for treatment of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Diseases, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Inge Christoffer Olsen
- Department of Research Support for Clinical Trials, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | | | - Tor Magne Madland
- Department of Rheumatology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - Hallvard Fremstad
- Department of Rheumatology, Møre og Romsdal Hospital Trust, Ålesund, Norway
| | | | - Gunnstein Bakland
- Department of Rheumatology, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Cristina Spada
- Department of Rheumatology, Revmatismesykehuset AS, Lillehammer, Norway
| | - Hilde Haukeland
- Department of Rheumatology, Martina Hansens Hospital, Sandvika, Norway
| | | | - Ellen Moholt
- REMEDY Center for treatment of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Diseases, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Till Uhlig
- REMEDY Center for treatment of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Diseases, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Daniel H Solomon
- Division of Rheumatology, Division of Pharmacoepidemiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Désirée van der Heijde
- REMEDY Center for treatment of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Diseases, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Tore K Kvien
- REMEDY Center for treatment of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Diseases, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Espen A Haavardsholm
- REMEDY Center for treatment of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Diseases, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Chen F, Lang Y, Geng S, Wang X, Lu L, Ye S, Zhang L, Li T. The effective threshold dose of etanercept in patients with methotrexate-resistant rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Rheumatol 2023; 42:2777-2786. [PMID: 37415053 PMCID: PMC10497429 DOI: 10.1007/s10067-023-06659-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2023] [Revised: 05/17/2023] [Accepted: 06/01/2023] [Indexed: 07/08/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The therapy of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) was advanced by biological agents, yet costly. This study aims to identify the effective threshold dose of etanercept (ENT) and cost-effectiveness in methotrexate (MTX)-resistant RA in real world. METHODS Eligible patients had an inadequate response (DAS28-ESR > 3.2) to initial MTX monotherapy, and subsequently received etanercept. The effective cut-off value of cumulative dose was identified to maintain remission response (DAS28-ESR < 2.6) at month 24 by using restricted cubic splines. Remission rate, low disease activity (LDA) rate, glucocorticoid exposure, safety, and cost-effectiveness were compared between the saturated and non-saturated dose groups divided by the cut-off dose. RESULTS Seventy-eight (14.2%) of 549 enrolled patients were eligible, and 72 patients completed follow-up. The 2-year cumulative cut-off dose that maintained remission response at 24 months was 1975 mg. And the recommended threshold dosing strategy of etanercept was twice weekly (BIW) for the first 6 months, every week (QW) for the next 6 months, and every 2 weeks (Q2W) and every month (QM) for the second year. Greater net changes in DAS28-ESR score were observed in the ENT saturated dose group than in the non-saturated dose group (average change 0.569, 95%CI 0.236-0.901, p = 0.001). The proportion of patients achieving remission (27.8% vs 72.2%, p < 0.001) and LDA (58.3% vs 83.3%, p = 0.020) in the non-saturated group was both significantly lower than that in the saturated group at 24 months. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of the saturated group referred to the non-saturated group was 5791.2 $/QALY. CONCLUSIONS In refractory RA patients, the effective cumulative cut-off dose of etanercept for sustained remission at 24 months was calculated as 1975 mg, and receiving saturated dose was more effective and cost-effective than with non-saturated dose. Key Points • The effective cumulative cut-off dose of etanercept for sustained remission at 24 months in RA patients is calculated as 1975 mg. • Receiving saturated dose of etanercept is more effective and cost-effective than with non-saturated dose in refractory RA patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fangfang Chen
- Department of Rheumatology, Ren Ji Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
| | - Yitian Lang
- Department of Pharmacy, Huangpu Branch, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Shikai Geng
- Department of Rheumatology, Ren Ji Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
| | - Xiaodong Wang
- Department of Rheumatology, Ren Ji Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
| | - Liangjing Lu
- Department of Rheumatology, Ren Ji Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
| | - Shuang Ye
- Department of Rheumatology, Ren Ji Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
| | - Le Zhang
- Department of Rheumatology, Ren Ji Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
- Department of Pharmacy, Ren Ji Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
| | - Ting Li
- Department of Rheumatology, Ren Ji Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Uhrenholt L, Duch K, Christensen R, Dreyer L, Hauge EM, Schlemmer A, Taylor PC, Kristensen S. Predicting successful biologics tapering in patients with inflammatory arthritis: Secondary analyses based on the BIOlogical Dose OPTimisation (BIODOPT) trial. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2023; 89:3152-3164. [PMID: 37271939 DOI: 10.1111/bcp.15806] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2023] [Revised: 04/04/2023] [Accepted: 05/22/2023] [Indexed: 06/06/2023] Open
Abstract
AIMS To evaluate predictors for successful biologic tapering among patients with inflammatory arthritis using baseline characteristics from the BIODOPT trial. METHODS Adult patients with rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis or axial spondyloarthritis on stable biologic dose and in low disease activity ≥12 months were enrolled. Participants were randomized (2:1) to disease activity-guided biologic tapering or continuation of baseline biologic. Patients achieving successful tapering reduced their biologic dose by ≥50%, had no protocol deviations and were in low disease activity at 18 months. Modified Poisson regression with robust variance estimator was applied. RESULTS In total, 142 patients were randomized to tapering (n = 95) or control (n = 47). Successful tapering was achieved by 32 and 2%, respectively. Tapering group was the only statistically significant independent predictor for successful tapering, risk ratio (RR): 14.0 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.9 to 101.3, P = .009). However, higher Short Form Health Survey 36 mental component summary (SF-36 MCS) was observed to be a predictor of potential importance, RR: 1.06 (95% CI: 0.99 to 1.13, P = .097). When limiting the analyses to the tapering group only, none of the baseline variables were statistically significant independent predictors but SF-36 MCS was still considered to be of potential importance, RR: 1.05 (95% CI: 0.99 to 1.12, P = .098). CONCLUSION Successful tapering is a reachable target for 1 in 3 patients with inflammatory arthritis who are interested in reducing their biological therapy. No statistically significant predictors (besides allocation to tapering) were identified. Future research on mental health and tapering is encouraged.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Line Uhrenholt
- Center of Rheumatic Research Aalborg (CERRA), Department of Rheumatology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
- Section for Biostatistics and Evidence-Based Research, the Parker Institute, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Kirsten Duch
- Center of Rheumatic Research Aalborg (CERRA), Department of Rheumatology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
- Unit of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Robin Christensen
- Section for Biostatistics and Evidence-Based Research, the Parker Institute, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Research Unit of Rheumatology, Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Lene Dreyer
- Center of Rheumatic Research Aalborg (CERRA), Department of Rheumatology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Ellen-Margrethe Hauge
- Department of Rheumatology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Annette Schlemmer
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Rheumatology, Randers Regional Hospital, Randers, Denmark
| | - Peter C Taylor
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Salome Kristensen
- Center of Rheumatic Research Aalborg (CERRA), Department of Rheumatology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
van Esveld L, Cox JM, Kuijper TM, Bosch TM, Weel-Koenders AE. Cost-utility analysis of tapering strategies of biologicals in rheumatoid arthritis patients in the Netherlands. Ann Rheum Dis 2023; 82:1296-1306. [PMID: 37423648 DOI: 10.1136/ard-2023-224190] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2023] [Accepted: 06/21/2023] [Indexed: 07/11/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Current guidelines recommend tapering biological disease-modifying antirheumatoid drugs (bDMARDs) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) if the disease is under control. However, guidelines on tapering are lacking. Assessing cost-effectiveness of different tapering strategies might provide broader input for creating guidelines on how to taper bDMARDs in patients with RA. The aim of this study is to evaluate the long-term cost-effectiveness from a societal perspective of bDMARD tapering strategies in Dutch patients with RA, namely 50% dose reduction (tapering), discontinuation and a 50% dose reduction followed by discontinuation (de-escalation). METHODS Using a societal perspective, a Markov model with a life-time horizon of 30 years was used to simulate 3-monthly transitions between Disease Activity 28 (DAS28)-defined health states of remission (<2.6), low disease activity (2.63.2). Transition probabilities were estimated through literature search and random effects pooling. Incremental costs, incremental quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) and incremental net monetary benefits for each tapering strategy were compared with continuation. Deterministic, probabilistic sensitivity analyses and multiple scenario analyses were performed. RESULTS After 30 years, the ICERs were €115 157/QALY lost, €74 226/QALY lost and €67 137/QALY lost for tapering, de-escalation and discontinuation, respectively; mainly driven by bDMARD cost savings and a 72.8% probability of a loss in quality of life. This corresponds to a 76.1%, 64.3% and 60.1% probability of tapering, de-escalation and discontinuation being cost-effective, provided a willingness-to-accept threshold of €50 000/QALY lost. CONCLUSIONS Based on these analyses, the 50% tapering approach saved the highest cost per QALY lost.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Juul M Cox
- Hospital Pharmacy, Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, MaasstadLab Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Tessa M Bosch
- Hospital Pharmacy, Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, MaasstadLab Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Angelique Eam Weel-Koenders
- Rheumatology, Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
van der Togt CJT, Van den Bemt B, Aletaha D, Alten R, Chatzidionysiou K, Galloway J, Isaac J, Mulleman D, Verschueren P, Vulto AG, Welsing PMJ, Verhoef L, den Broeder AA. Points to consider for cost-effective use of biological and targeted synthetic DMARDs in inflammatory rheumatic diseases: results from an umbrella review and international Delphi study. RMD Open 2023; 9:rmdopen-2022-002898. [PMID: 36863753 PMCID: PMC9990692 DOI: 10.1136/rmdopen-2022-002898] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2022] [Accepted: 02/08/2023] [Indexed: 03/04/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To develop evidence-based points to consider for cost-effective use of biological and targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (b/tsDMARDs) in the treatment of inflammatory rheumatic diseases, specifically rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis and axial spondyloarthritis. METHODS Following EULAR procedures, an international task force was formed, consisting of 13 experts in rheumatology, epidemiology and pharmacology from seven European countries. Twelve strategies for cost-effective use of b/tsDMARDs were identified through individual and group discussion. For each strategy, PubMed and Embase were systematically searched for relevant English-language systematic reviews and, for six strategies, additionally for randomised controlled trials (RCTs). Thirty systematic reviews and 21 RCTs were included. Based on the evidence, a set of overarching principles and points to consider was formulated by the task force using a Delphi procedure. Level of evidence (1a-5) and grade (A-D) were determined for each point to consider. Individual voting on the level of agreement (LoA; between 0 (completely disagree) and 10 (completely agree)) was performed anonymously. RESULTS The task force agreed on five overarching principles. For 10 of 12 strategies, the evidence was sufficient to formulate one or more points to consider, leading to 20 in total, regarding response prediction, drug formulary use, biosimilars, loading doses, low-dose initial therapy, concomitant conventional synthetic DMARD use, route of administration, medication adherence, disease activity-guided dose optimisation and non-medical drug switching. Ten points to consider (50%) were supported by level 1 or 2 evidence. The mean LoA (SD) varied between 7.9 (1.2) and 9.8 (0.4). CONCLUSION These points to consider can be used in rheumatology practices and complement inflammatory rheumatic disease treatment guidelines to incorporate cost-effectiveness in b/tsDMARD treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Céleste J T van der Togt
- Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, The Netherlands .,Department of Rheumatology, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Bart Van den Bemt
- Department of Pharmacy, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.,Department of Pharmacy, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Daniel Aletaha
- Department of Rheumatology, Medical University of Vienna, Wien, Austria
| | - Rieke Alten
- Internal Medicine, Rheumatology, Schlosspark-Klinik GmbH, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - James Galloway
- Department of Rheumatology, King's College London, London, UK
| | - John Isaac
- Department of Rheumatology, Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
| | - Denis Mulleman
- Department of Rheumatology, University of Tours, Tours, France.,Service de Rhumatologie, CHRU Tours, Tours, France
| | - P Verschueren
- Rheumatology, KU Leuven University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Arnold G Vulto
- Department of Pharmacy, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Paco M J Welsing
- Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Lise Verhoef
- Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Alsaffar RM, Ali A, Rashid SM, Ahmad SB, Alkholifi FK, Kawoosa MS, Ahmad SP, Rehman MU. Zerumbone Protects Rats from Collagen-Induced Arthritis by Inhibiting Oxidative Outbursts and Inflammatory Cytokine Levels. ACS OMEGA 2023; 8:2982-2991. [PMID: 36713739 PMCID: PMC9878628 DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.2c05749] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2022] [Accepted: 12/22/2022] [Indexed: 05/25/2023]
Abstract
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is an immunocompromised disorder characterized by a marked increase in the synthesis of inflammatory molecules that stimulates the destruction of bones and cartilage. The conventional treatment modalities for RA are associated with adverse side effects and lack sensitivity, suggesting an immediate demand for alternate beneficial therapeutic remedies. The current study sought to understand more about zerumbone's anti-inflammatory properties in diagnosing collagen-induced arthritis (CIA) in experimental animals. The current study observed that zerumbone reduced clinical severity in CIA-induced animals compared to healthy animals. Zerumbone administration significantly decreased (p < 0.001) the concentration of SOD, CAT, GR, and GSH in treatment groups. Zerumbone administration drove down significantly (p < 0.001) the concentration of inflammatory cytokine molecules. Zerumbone was effective in bringing significant changes in levels of MPO, NO, LDH, MMP-8, and ELA. The therapeutic potential of zerumbone was found to be associated with reduced joint destruction and restored normal histology in the cartilage and tissue. Adsorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion, and toxicity studies were used to determine the druglike properties of zerumbone. ProTox-II studies revealed that zerumbone did not possess toxic properties like hepatotoxicity, immunotoxicity, carcinogenicity, mutagenicity, and cytotoxicity. Therefore, the present study evaluated the therapeutic properties of zerumbone in CIA animal models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rana M Alsaffar
- Department
of Pharmacology & Toxicology, College of Pharmacy, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, P.O. Box 173, Al-Kharj 11942, Saudi
Arabia
| | - Aarif Ali
- Division
of Veterinary Biochemistry, Faculty of Veterinary
Science and Animal Husbandry, SKUAST-Kashmir, Shuhama, Alusteng, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir 190006, India
| | - Shahzada Mudasir Rashid
- Division
of Veterinary Biochemistry, Faculty of Veterinary
Science and Animal Husbandry, SKUAST-Kashmir, Shuhama, Alusteng, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir 190006, India
| | - Sheikh Bilal Ahmad
- Division
of Veterinary Biochemistry, Faculty of Veterinary
Science and Animal Husbandry, SKUAST-Kashmir, Shuhama, Alusteng, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir 190006, India
| | - Faisal K Alkholifi
- Department
of Pharmacology & Toxicology, College of Pharmacy, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, P.O. Box 173, Al-Kharj 11942, Saudi
Arabia
| | - Majid Shafi Kawoosa
- Mycoplasma
Laboratory, Faculty of Veterinary Sciences
and Animal Husbandry, Shuhama, Alusteng, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir 190006, India
| | - Sheikh Parvaiz Ahmad
- Department
of Statistics, University of Kashmir, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir 190006, India
| | - Muneeb U Rehman
- Department
of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Kerschbaumer A, Sepriano A, Bergstra SA, Smolen JS, van der Heijde D, Caporali R, Edwards CJ, Verschueren P, de Souza S, Pope JE, Takeuchi T, Hyrich KL, Winthrop KL, Aletaha D, Stamm TA, Schoones JW, Landewé RBM. Efficacy of synthetic and biological DMARDs: a systematic literature review informing the 2022 update of the EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 2023; 82:95-106. [PMID: 36368906 DOI: 10.1136/ard-2022-223365] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 40.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2022] [Accepted: 10/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To update the evidence on efficacy of DMARDs (disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs) and inform the taskforce of the 2022 update of the European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR) recommendations for management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS This systematic literature review (SLR) investigated the efficacy of conventional synthetic (cs), biological (b), biosimilar and targeted synthetic (ts)DMARDs in patients with RA. Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane CENTRAL and Web of Science were used to identify all relevant articles published since the previous update in 2019 to 14 January 2022. RESULTS Of 8969 search results, 169 articles were selected for detailed review and 47 were finally included. Trials investigated the efficacy of csDMARDs, bDMARDs and tsDMARDs, DMARD switching, tapering and trials investigating different treatment strategies. The compounds investigated were csDMARDs (methotrexate (MTX), leflunomide, sulfasalazine, hydroxychloroquine), bDMARDs (abatacept, adalimumab, certolizumab-pegol, denosumab, etanercept, infliximab, levilimab, olokizumab, opineracept, rituximab, sarilumab, tocilizumab) and tsDMARDs (baricitinib, filgotinib, tofacitinib, upadacitinib). The efficacy of csDMARDs+ short-term glucocorticoids in early RA was confirmed and similar to bDMARD+MTX combination therapy. Interleukin-6 pathway inhibition was effective in trials on olokizumab and levilimab. Janus kinase inhibitor (JAKi) was efficacious in different patient populations. After insufficient response to JAKi, patients could respond to TNFi treatment. Tapering of DMARDs was feasible for a proportion of patients, who were able to taper therapy while remaining in low disease activity or remission. CONCLUSION The results of this SLR, together with one SLR on safety of DMARD and one on glucocorticoids, informed the taskforce of the 2022 update of the EULAR recommendations for pharmacological management of RA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andreas Kerschbaumer
- Department of Medicine III, Division of Rheumatology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Alexandre Sepriano
- CHRC Campus Nova Medical School, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal.,Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Sytske Anne Bergstra
- Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Josef S Smolen
- Department of Medicine III, Division of Rheumatology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | | | | | - Christopher John Edwards
- NIHR Southampton Clinical Research Facility, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Patrick Verschueren
- Department of Rheumatology, University Hospitals Leuven and Skeletal Biology and Engineering Research Centre, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Savia de Souza
- Patient Research Partner Network, European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Janet E Pope
- Schulich School of Medicine, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Tsutomu Takeuchi
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, Shinjuku-ku, Japan
| | - Kimme L Hyrich
- Centre for Epidemiology Versus Arthritis, The University of Manchester and NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester University NHS Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Kevin L Winthrop
- School of Public Health, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Daniel Aletaha
- Department of Medicine III, Division of Rheumatology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Tanja A Stamm
- Section for Outcomes Research, Centre for Medical Statistics, Informatics, and Intelligent Systems, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Arthritis and Rehabilitation, Vienna, Austria
| | - Jan W Schoones
- Walaeus Library, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Robert B M Landewé
- Amsterdam Rheumatology Center, AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Rheumatology, Zuyderland Medical Center, Heerlen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Gnjidic D, Johansson M, Meng DM, Farrell B, Langford A, Reeve E. Achieving sustainable healthcare through deprescribing. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2022; 10:ED000159. [PMID: 36194519 PMCID: PMC9811646 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.ed000159] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Danijela Gnjidic
- School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine and HealthThe University of SydneyNSWAustralia
| | | | - Dina Muscat Meng
- Cochrane Sustainable HealthcareCochrane Sweden and Cochrane Denmark, Cochrane
| | - Barbara Farrell
- Bruyere Research Institute, Ottawa and Department of Family MedicineUniversity of OttawaOttawaCanada
| | - Aili Langford
- School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine and HealthThe University of SydneyNSWAustralia
| | - Emily Reeve
- Clinical and Health SciencesUniversity of South AustraliaSAAustralia
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Hazlewood GS, Pardo JP, Barnabe C, Schieir O, Barber CEH, Proulx L, Richards DP, Tugwell P, Bansback N, Akhavan P, Bombardier C, Bykerk V, Jamal S, Khraishi M, Taylor-Gjevre R, Thorne JC, Agarwal A, Pope JE. Canadian Rheumatology Association Living Guidelines for the Pharmacological Management of Rheumatoid Arthritis With Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs. J Rheumatol 2022; 49:1092-1099. [PMID: 35840155 DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.220209] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/24/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To provide the initial installment of a living guideline that will provide up-to-date guidance on the pharmacological management of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in Canada. METHODS The Canadian Rheumatology Association (CRA) formed a multidisciplinary panel composed of rheumatologists, researchers, methodologists, and patients. In this first installment of our living guideline, the panel developed a recommendation for the tapering of biologic and targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (b/ts DMARD) therapy in patients in sustained remission using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) approach, including a health equity framework developed for the Canadian RA population. The recommendation was adapted from a living guideline of the Australia & New Zealand Musculoskeletal Clinical Trials Network. RESULTS In people with RA who are in sustained low disease activity or remission for at least 6 months, we suggest offering stepwise reduction in the dose of b/tsDMARD without discontinuation, in the context of a shared decision, provided patients are able to rapidly access rheumatology care and reestablish their medications if needed. In patients where rapid access to care or reestablishing access to medications is challenging, we conditionally recommend against tapering. A patient decision aid was developed to complement the recommendation. CONCLUSION This living guideline will provide contemporary RA management recommendations for Canadian practice. New recommendations will be added over time and updated, with the latest recommendation, evidence summaries, and Evidence to Decision summaries available through the CRA website (www.rheum.ca).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Glen S Hazlewood
- G.S. Hazlewood, MD, PhD, Associate Professor, C. Barnabe, MD, MSc, Professor, C.E.H. Barber, MD, PhD, Associate Professor, Departments of Medicine and Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, and Arthritis Research Canada, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada;
| | - Jordi Pardo Pardo
- J. Pardo Pardo, Ldo, Cochrane Musculoskeletal, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Cheryl Barnabe
- G.S. Hazlewood, MD, PhD, Associate Professor, C. Barnabe, MD, MSc, Professor, C.E.H. Barber, MD, PhD, Associate Professor, Departments of Medicine and Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, and Arthritis Research Canada, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Orit Schieir
- O. Schieir, PhD, Department of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Claire E H Barber
- G.S. Hazlewood, MD, PhD, Associate Professor, C. Barnabe, MD, MSc, Professor, C.E.H. Barber, MD, PhD, Associate Professor, Departments of Medicine and Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, and Arthritis Research Canada, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Laurie Proulx
- L. Proulx, B.Com, D.P. Richards, PhD, Canadian Arthritis Patient Alliance, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Dawn P Richards
- L. Proulx, B.Com, D.P. Richards, PhD, Canadian Arthritis Patient Alliance, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Peter Tugwell
- P. Tugwell, MD, Professor, Department of Medicine and School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Nick Bansback
- N. Bansback, PhD, Associate Professor, School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, and Arthritis Research Canada, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Pooneh Akhavan
- P. Akhavan, MD, MSc, Division of Rheumatology, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Claire Bombardier
- C. Bombardier, MD, Professor, Division of Rheumatology, Mount Sinai Hospital, and Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Vivian Bykerk
- V. Bykerk, MD, Professor, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA
| | - Shahin Jamal
- S. Jamal, MD, MSc, Clinical Associate Professor, Division of Rheumatology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Majed Khraishi
- M. Khraishi, MD, Clinical Professor, Department of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. Johns, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada
| | - Regina Taylor-Gjevre
- R. Taylor-Gjevre, MD, MSc, Professor, Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
| | - J Carter Thorne
- J.C. Thorne, MD, Assistant Professor, The Centre of Arthritis Excellence and The Arthritis Program Research Group, Newmarket, Ontario, Canada
| | - Arnav Agarwal
- A. Agarwal, MD, Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Janet E Pope
- J.E. Pope, MD, MPH, Professor, Dept of Medicine, Western University, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, London, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Tapering biologics in axial spondyloarthritis: A systematic literature review. Int Immunopharmacol 2022; 112:109256. [PMID: 36150228 DOI: 10.1016/j.intimp.2022.109256] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2022] [Revised: 09/10/2022] [Accepted: 09/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The emergence of biologics has improved the management of patients with rheumatic disease, mainly with spondyloarthritis (SpA). Sustained remission has become a reachable goal thanks to the treat to target strategy. Contrary to rheumatoid arthritis, data on biologic optimization among SpA patients in remission is scarce and still a subject of debate. The main objective of this systematic review was to provide the most up-to-date published literature regarding biologic tapering in axial spondyloarthritis. METHODS This systematic review followed the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews guidelines. Original articles from Pubmed and Scopus, published until December 20th 2021, and tackling tapering strategies of the biologics in patients with axial SpA were included RESULTS: Fourteen studies met the inclusion criteria. They were published between 2008 and 2020. The most studied molecules were Etanercept (ETN) (n = 13), Infliximab (IFX) (n = 6), Adalimumab (ADA) (n = 5), certolizumab pegol (CZP) (n = 2), Golimumab (n = 1) and ETN biosimilar. There are no studies published regarding anti-IL 17 tapering strategy. Patient-tailored dose reduction of anti TNF-α agents was successful in preserving stable low disease activity in most of the studies with remission rates ranging between 20.2 % and 93.7 %. Complete treatment discontinuation is associated with a high risk of flares. CONCLUSION To conclude, published data indicate that a progressive tapering strategy for anti TNF-α therapy is successful among axial SpA in sustained remission. However, further studies with more homogenized tapering strategies are needed in order to ascertain the specific implication of each subset for a better holistic approach.
Collapse
|
16
|
Welzel T, Oefelein L, Twilt M, Pfister M, Kuemmerle-Deschner JB, Benseler SM. Tapering of biological treatment in autoinflammatory diseases: a scoping review. Pediatr Rheumatol Online J 2022; 20:67. [PMID: 35964053 PMCID: PMC9375310 DOI: 10.1186/s12969-022-00725-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2022] [Accepted: 07/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Biological treatment and treat-to-target approaches guide the achievement of inactive disease and clinical remission in Autoinflammatory Diseases (AID). However, there is limited evidence addressing optimal tapering strategies and/or discontinuation of biological treatment in AID. This study evaluates available evidence of tapering biological treatment and explores key factors for successful tapering. METHODS A systematic literature search was conducted in Embase, MEDLINE, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials using the OVID platform (1990-08/2020). Bibliographic search of relevant reviews was also performed. Studies/case series (n ≥ 5) in AID patients aged ≤ 18 years with biological treatment providing information on tapering/treatment discontinuation were included. After quality assessment aggregated data were extracted and synthesized. Tapering strategies were explored. RESULTS A total of 6035 records were identified. Four papers were deemed high quality, all focused on systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (sJIA) (1 open-label randomized trial, 2 prospective, 1 retrospective observational study). Biological treatment included anakinra (n = 2), canakinumab (n = 1) and tocilizumab (n = 1). Strategies in anakinra tapering included alternate-day regimen. Canakinumab tapering was performed randomized for dose reduction or interval prolongation, whereas tocilizumab was tapered by interval prolongation. Key factors identified included early start of biological treatment and sustained inactive disease. CONCLUSION Tapering of biological treatment after sustained inactive disease should be considered. Guidance for optimal strategies is limited. Future studies may leverage therapeutic drug monitoring in combination with pharmacometric modelling to further enhance personalized "taper-to-target" strategies respecting individual patients and diseases aspects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tatjana Welzel
- Pediatric Rheumatology and autoinflammation reference center Tuebingen (arcT), Department of Pediatrics, Member of the European Reference Network for rare or low prevalence complex diseases, network Immunodeficiency, Autoinflammatory and Autoimmune Diseases (ERN RITA), University Children`s Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany. .,Pediatric Pharmacology and Pharmacometrics, Pediatric Rheumatology, University Children`s Hospital Basel (UKBB), University of Basel, Spitalstrasse 33, CH, 4031, Basel, Switzerland.
| | - Lea Oefelein
- grid.488549.cPediatric Rheumatology and autoinflammation reference center Tuebingen (arcT), Department of Pediatrics, Member of the European Reference Network for rare or low prevalence complex diseases, network Immunodeficiency, Autoinflammatory and Autoimmune Diseases (ERN RITA), University Children`s Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Marinka Twilt
- grid.22072.350000 0004 1936 7697Rheumatology, Department of Pediatrics, Alberta Children`s Hospital, Cumming School of Medicine, Alberta Children’s Hospital Research Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB Canada
| | - Marc Pfister
- grid.412347.70000 0004 0509 0981Pediatric Pharmacology and Pharmacometrics, Pediatric Rheumatology, University Children`s Hospital Basel (UKBB), University of Basel, Spitalstrasse 33, CH 4031 Basel, Switzerland
| | - Jasmin B. Kuemmerle-Deschner
- grid.488549.cPediatric Rheumatology and autoinflammation reference center Tuebingen (arcT), Department of Pediatrics, Member of the European Reference Network for rare or low prevalence complex diseases, network Immunodeficiency, Autoinflammatory and Autoimmune Diseases (ERN RITA), University Children`s Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Susanne M. Benseler
- grid.22072.350000 0004 1936 7697Rheumatology, Department of Pediatrics, Alberta Children`s Hospital, Cumming School of Medicine, Alberta Children’s Hospital Research Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB Canada
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Kashiwado Y, Kiyohara C, Kimoto Y, Nagano S, Sawabe T, Oryoji K, Mizuki S, Nishizaka H, Yoshizawa S, Yoshizawa S, Tsuru T, Inoue Y, Ueda N, Ota SI, Suenaga Y, Miyamura T, Tada Y, Niiro H, Akashi K, Horiuchi T. Clinical course of patients with rheumatoid arthritis who continue or discontinue biologic therapy after hospitalization for infection: a retrospective observational study. Arthritis Res Ther 2022; 24:131. [PMID: 35650638 PMCID: PMC9158270 DOI: 10.1186/s13075-022-02820-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2021] [Accepted: 05/21/2022] [Indexed: 05/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Background To analyse the subsequent clinical course of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who either continued or discontinued biologic agents after hospitalization for infections. Methods We retrospectively reviewed the clinical records of 230 RA patients with 307 hospitalizations for infections under biologic therapy between September 2008 and May 2014 in 15 institutions for up to 18 months after discharge. The risks of RA flares and subsequent hospitalizations for infections from 61 days to 18 months after discharge were evaluated. Results Survival analyses indicated that patients who continued biologic therapy had a significantly lower risk of RA flares (31.4% vs. 60.6%, P < 0.01) and a slightly lower risk of subsequent infections (28.7% vs. 34.5%, P = 0.37). Multivariate analysis showed that discontinuation of biologic therapy, diabetes, and a history of hospitalization for infection under biologic therapy were associated with RA flares. Oral steroid therapy equivalent to prednisolone 5 mg/day or more and chronic renal dysfunction were independent risk factors for subsequent hospitalizations for infections. Conclusions Discontinuation of biologic therapy after hospitalization for infections may result in RA flares. Continuation of biologic therapy is preferable, particularly in patients without immunodeficiency. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13075-022-02820-y.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yusuke Kashiwado
- Department of Internal Medicine, Kyushu University Beppu Hospital, 4546 Tsurumibaru, Beppu, Oita, 874-0838, Japan
| | - Chikako Kiyohara
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Yasutaka Kimoto
- Department of Internal Medicine, Kyushu University Beppu Hospital, 4546 Tsurumibaru, Beppu, Oita, 874-0838, Japan
| | - Shuji Nagano
- Department of Rheumatology, Aso Iizuka Hospital, Iizuka, Japan
| | - Takuya Sawabe
- Department of Rheumatology, Hiroshima Red Cross Hospital & Atomic-bomb Survivors Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Kensuke Oryoji
- The Center for Rheumatic Diseases, Matsuyama Red Cross Hospital, Matsuyama, Japan
| | - Shinichi Mizuki
- The Center for Rheumatic Diseases, Matsuyama Red Cross Hospital, Matsuyama, Japan
| | - Hiroaki Nishizaka
- Department of Rheumatology, Kitakyushu Municipal Medical Center, Kitakyushu, Japan
| | - Seiji Yoshizawa
- Department of Rheumatology, Hamanomachi Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Shigeru Yoshizawa
- Department of Rheumatology, National Hospital Organization Fukuoka Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Tomomi Tsuru
- Department of Rheumatology, Med.Co. LTA PS Clinic, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Yasushi Inoue
- Department of Rheumatology, Japanese Red Cross Fukuoka Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Naoyasu Ueda
- Department of Rheumatology and Infection, Miyazaki Prefectural Miyazaki Hospital, Miyazaki, Japan
| | - Shun-Ichiro Ota
- Department of Rheumatology, Internal medicine and connective tissue disorders, Shimonoseki City Hospital, Shimonoseki, Japan
| | - Yasuo Suenaga
- Department of Rheumatology, Beppu Medical Center, NHO, Beppu, Japan
| | - Tomoya Miyamura
- Department of Internal Medicine and Rheumatology, National Hospital Organization Kyushu Medical Center, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Yoshifumi Tada
- Department of Rheumatology, Saga University Hospital, Saga, Japan
| | - Hiroaki Niiro
- Department of Medical Education, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Koichi Akashi
- Department of Medicine and Biosystemic Science, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Takahiko Horiuchi
- Department of Internal Medicine, Kyushu University Beppu Hospital, 4546 Tsurumibaru, Beppu, Oita, 874-0838, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
De-escalation of Anti-tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha Agents and Reduction in Adverse Effects: A Systematic Review. Biomedicines 2022; 10:biomedicines10051034. [PMID: 35625771 PMCID: PMC9139158 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines10051034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2022] [Revised: 04/20/2022] [Accepted: 04/27/2022] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: The long-term use of anti-TNF-α agents can lead to adverse effects, such as infections and immune-mediated cutaneous reactions. Whether de-escalation by dose reduction or interval lengthening reduces these adverse effects is uncertain. This systematic review aims to compare the incidence of infections and skin manifestations after anti-TNF-α dose de-escalation with standard dosing. Methods: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched from inception to 14 January 2022. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies comparing anti-TNF-α de-escalation strategies with standard dosing among patients with inflammatory conditions, that report on infections, skin manifestations, or both, were included. The risk of bias was assessed with the revised Cochrane risk-of bias tool (RCTs) or the Newcastle–Ottawa scale (non-RCTs). Results: Fourteen RCTs and six observational studies (or 2706 patients) were included. Eight RCTs had low risk of bias or some concerns. Four non-RCTs were of good methodological quality. The studies described patients with axial spondyloarthritis (8 studies, 780 patients), rheumatoid arthritis (7 studies, 1458 patients), psoriasis (3 studies, 332 patients), or inflammatory bowel disease (2 studies, 136 patients). De-escalation strategies included interval lengthening (12 studies, 1317 patients), dose reduction (6 studies, 1130 patients), or both (2 studies, 259 patients). Overall, the occurrence of infections and skin manifestations did not differ between standard treatment and de-escalation. The disappearance of infections or skin manifestations after de-escalation was only reported in two studies. The majority of studies focused on etanercept and adalimumab. Heterogeneity in reporting of infections and skin manifestations precluded meta-analysis. Conclusion: We found that anti-TNF-α de-escalation does not reduce infections or skin reactions. A de-escalation strategy should not be recommended for the sole purpose of reducing drug-related adverse effects. The meticulous documentation of adverse effects is recommended to further address this question. Registration: PROSPERO CRD42021252977.
Collapse
|
19
|
van der Leeuw MS, Messelink MA, Tekstra J, Medina O, van Laar JM, Haitjema S, Lafeber F, Veris-van Dieren JJ, van der Goes MC, den Broeder AA, Welsing PMJ. Using real-world data to dynamically predict flares during tapering of biological DMARDs in rheumatoid arthritis: development, validation, and potential impact of prediction-aided decisions. Arthritis Res Ther 2022; 24:74. [PMID: 35321739 PMCID: PMC8941811 DOI: 10.1186/s13075-022-02751-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2021] [Accepted: 02/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) are effective in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. However, as bDMARDs may also lead to adverse events and are expensive, tapering them is of great clinical interest. Tapering according to disease activity-guided dose optimization (DGDO) does not seem to affect long term remission rates, but flares are frequent during this process. Our objective was to develop a model for the prediction of flares during bDMARD tapering using data from routine care and to evaluate its potential clinical impact. Methods We used a joint latent class model to repeatedly predict the probability of a flare occurring within the next 3 months. The model was developed using longitudinal data on disease activity (DAS28) and other routine care data from two clinics. Predictive accuracy was assessed in cross-validation and external validation was performed with data from the DRESS (Dose REduction Strategy of Subcutaneous tumor necrosis factor inhibitors) trial. Additionally, we simulated the reduction in number of flares and bDMARD dose when implementing the model as a decision aid during bDMARD tapering in the DRESS trial. Results Data from 279 bDMARD courses were used for model development. The final model included two latent DAS28-trajectories, bDMARD type and dose, disease duration, and seropositivity. The area under the curve of the final model was 0.76 (0.69–0.83) in cross-validation and 0.68 (0.62–0.73) in external validation. In simulation of prediction-aided decisions, the mean number of flares over 18 months decreased from 1.21 (0.99–1.43) to 0.75 (0.54–0.96). The reduction in he bDMARD dose was mostly maintained, increasing from 54 to 64% of full dose. Conclusions We developed a dynamic flare prediction model, exclusively based on data typically available in routine care. Our results show that using this model to aid decisions during bDMARD tapering may significantly reduce the number of flares while maintaining most of the bDMARD dose reduction. Trial registration The clinical impact of the prediction model is currently under investigation in the PATIO randomized controlled trial (Dutch Trial Register number NL9798). Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13075-022-02751-8.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthijs S van der Leeuw
- Department of Rheumatology & Clinical Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Marianne A Messelink
- Department of Rheumatology & Clinical Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - Janneke Tekstra
- Department of Rheumatology & Clinical Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Ojay Medina
- Department of Digital Health, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Jaap M van Laar
- Department of Rheumatology & Clinical Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Saskia Haitjema
- Central Diagnostic Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Floris Lafeber
- Department of Rheumatology & Clinical Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Marlies C van der Goes
- Department of Rheumatology, Meander Medical Center, Maatweg 3, 3813 TZ, Amersfoort, The Netherlands
| | - Alfons A den Broeder
- Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Hengstdal 3, 6574 NA , Ubbergen, The Netherlands
| | - Paco M J Welsing
- Department of Rheumatology & Clinical Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
[Innovative strategies for treatment of rheumatoid arthritis]. Z Rheumatol 2022; 81:118-124. [PMID: 34997270 DOI: 10.1007/s00393-021-01144-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/05/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
Besides excellent guidelines and newly developed highly effective drugs, evidence-based strategic use of these new drugs has especially contributed to enormous advances in rheumatoid arthritis treatment, apparent especially since 2000. Currently, the treat-to-target (T2T) strategy has proven to be the most successful in several studies and systematic reviews. The target is to achieve remission, which should be reached and sustained for an optimal outcome (i.e. stable over a long time period). If the initial disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) treatment fails, the best strategy for continuing treatment is controversial, with swap or switch being open to debate (change within a class of drugs or change in the mechanism of action). Recent studies seem to indicate that switching to another mechanism of action is the most successful approach. A hotly discussed topic is the question whether DMARD treatment can or should be tapered when sustained remission has been achieved? Many patients wish for a reduction of drugs in cases of stable remission; however, the stable disease control might become destabilized by tapering. The main priority is the reduction or tapering of glucocorticoid treatment. When the decision for reduction of DMARD treatment is made together with the patient, a complete cessation bears a high risk of a flare, therefore, a careful step by step reduction of DMARD treatment should be preferred. In the case of a running combination, the question whether the conventional DMARD (mostly methotrexate), the biological (b)DMARD or targeted synthetic (ts)DMARD should be reduced first, must be decided on an individual basis. Most patients prefer to first reduce methotrexate and transfer to a monotherapy.
Collapse
|
21
|
Avery JC, Whittle SL, Johnston RV, Grobler L, McKenzie BJ, Cyril S, van der Heijde D, Buchbinder R. Dose reduction and discontinuation of biologic and targeted synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) in people with axial spondyloarthritis and low disease activity. Hippokratia 2021. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd014836] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Jodie C Avery
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University; Monash-Cabrini Department of Musculoskeletal Health and Clinical Epidemiology; Cabrini Health; Melbourne Australia
- Adelaide Medical School, Robinson Research Institute; The University of Adelaide; North Adelaide Australia
| | - Samuel L Whittle
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University; Monash-Cabrini Department of Musculoskeletal Health and Clinical Epidemiology; Cabrini Health; Melbourne Australia
- Rheumatology Unit; Queen Elizabeth Hospital; Woodville South Australia
| | - Renea V Johnston
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University; Monash-Cabrini Department of Musculoskeletal Health and Clinical Epidemiology; Cabrini Health; Melbourne Australia
| | - Liesl Grobler
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University; Monash-Cabrini Department of Musculoskeletal Health and Clinical Epidemiology; Cabrini Health; Melbourne Australia
- Centre for Evidence-based Health Care, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences; Stellenbosch University; Cape Town South Africa
| | - Bayden J McKenzie
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University; Monash-Cabrini Department of Musculoskeletal Health and Clinical Epidemiology; Cabrini Health; Melbourne Australia
| | - Sheila Cyril
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University; Monash-Cabrini Department of Musculoskeletal Health and Clinical Epidemiology; Cabrini Health; Melbourne Australia
| | | | - Rachelle Buchbinder
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University; Monash-Cabrini Department of Musculoskeletal Health and Clinical Epidemiology; Cabrini Health; Melbourne Australia
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
van der Schoot LS, van den Reek JMPA, Grine L, Schots L, Kievit W, Lambert JLW, de Jong EMGJ. Dose reduction of the new generation biologics (IL-17 and IL-23 inhibitors) in psoriasis: study protocol for an international, pragmatic, multicenter, randomized, controlled, non-inferiority study-the BeNeBio study. Trials 2021; 22:707. [PMID: 34656148 PMCID: PMC8520290 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-021-05681-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2021] [Accepted: 10/04/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Psoriasis is a chronic immune-mediated inflammatory skin disease for which biologics are effective treatments. Dose reduction (DR) of the first generation biologics seems a promising way for more efficient use of expensive biologics. A substantial part of patients on tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alfa inhibitors and ustekinumab could successfully lower their dose, after following a tightly controlled DR strategy. The objective of this study is to assess whether controlled DR of interleukin (IL)-17 and IL-23 inhibitors in psoriasis patients with low disease activity is non-inferior (NI) to usual care (UC). METHODS This is an international, prospective, multicenter, pragmatic, randomized, non-inferiority trial. A total of 244 patients with stable low disease activity (Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) ≤ 5) for at least 6 months and using secukinumab, ixekizumab, brodalumab, guselkumab, risankizumab, or tildrakizumab in the standard dose, together with stable low disease activity, defined as a PASI ≤ 5 and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) ≤ 5 at the moment of inclusion, will be randomized 2:1 to DR or UC. In the DR group, dosing intervals will be prolonged stepwise to achieve 66% and 50% of the original dose. Disease activity is monitored every 3 months by PASI and DLQI. In case of disease flare (i.e., PASI and/or DLQI increase), treatment is adjusted to the previous effective dose. The primary outcome is the incidence proportion of persistent flares (PASI > 5 for ≥ 3 months), which will be compared between arms. Secondary outcomes include proportion of patients with successful DR, (course of) PASI and DLQI, serious adverse events (SAEs), health-related quality of life, costs, and pharmacokinetic profile. Outcomes of DR will be compared to UC. DISCUSSION With this study, we aim to assess whether DR of IL-17 and IL-23 inhibiting biologics can be achieved for psoriasis patients with low disease activity, without losing disease control. Reducing the dose may lead to more efficient use of biologics. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04340076 . Registered on April 9 2020.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lara S van der Schoot
- Radboud University Medical Center, Department of Dermatology, Rene Descartesdreef 1, 6525GL, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.,Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Juul M P A van den Reek
- Radboud University Medical Center, Department of Dermatology, Rene Descartesdreef 1, 6525GL, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.,Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Lynda Grine
- Department of Dermatology, Ghent University Hospital, C. Heymanslaan 10, 9000, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Lisa Schots
- Department of Dermatology, Ghent University Hospital, C. Heymanslaan 10, 9000, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Wietske Kievit
- Radboud University Medical Center, Department for Health Evidence, Geert Grooteplein 21, 6525EZ, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Jo L W Lambert
- Department of Dermatology, Ghent University Hospital, C. Heymanslaan 10, 9000, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Elke M G J de Jong
- Radboud University Medical Center, Department of Dermatology, Rene Descartesdreef 1, 6525GL, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. .,Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. .,Radboud University, Comeniuslaan 4, 6525HP, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Page MJ, Moher D, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, Shamseer L, Tetzlaff JM, Akl EA, Brennan SE, Chou R, Glanville J, Grimshaw JM, Hróbjartsson A, Lalu MM, Li T, Loder EW, Mayo-Wilson E, McDonald S, McGuinness LA, Stewart LA, Thomas J, Tricco AC, Welch VA, Whiting P, McKenzie JE. PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 2021; 372:n160. [PMID: 33781993 PMCID: PMC8005925 DOI: 10.1136/bmj.n160+10.1136/bmj.n160] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/26/2023]
Abstract
The methods and results of systematic reviews should be reported in sufficient detail to allow users to assess the trustworthiness and applicability of the review findings. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement was developed to facilitate transparent and complete reporting of systematic reviews and has been updated (to PRISMA 2020) to reflect recent advances in systematic review methodology and terminology. Here, we present the explanation and elaboration paper for PRISMA 2020, where we explain why reporting of each item is recommended, present bullet points that detail the reporting recommendations, and present examples from published reviews. We hope that changes to the content and structure of PRISMA 2020 will facilitate uptake of the guideline and lead to more transparent, complete, and accurate reporting of systematic reviews.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew J Page
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - David Moher
- Centre for Journalology, Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada; School of Epidemiology and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Patrick M Bossuyt
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Isabelle Boutron
- Université de Paris, Centre of Epidemiology and Statistics (CRESS), Inserm, F 75004 Paris, France
| | - Tammy C Hoffmann
- Institute for Evidence-Based Healthcare, Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Bond University, Gold Coast, Australia
| | - Cynthia D Mulrow
- University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, United States; Annals of Internal Medicine
| | - Larissa Shamseer
- Knowledge Translation Program, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, Toronto, Canada; School of Epidemiology and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| | | | - Elie A Akl
- Clinical Research Institute, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon; Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sue E Brennan
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Roger Chou
- Department of Medical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, United States
| | - Julie Glanville
- York Health Economics Consortium (YHEC Ltd), University of York, York, UK
| | - Jeremy M Grimshaw
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada; School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada; Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Asbjørn Hróbjartsson
- Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine Odense, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark; Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark; Open Patient data Explorative Network, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Manoj M Lalu
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Canada; Clinical Epidemiology Program, Blueprint Translational Research Group, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada; Regenerative Medicine Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Tianjing Li
- Department of Ophthalmology, School of Medicine, University of Colorado Denver, Denver, Colorado, United States; Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
| | - Elizabeth W Loder
- Division of Headache, Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States; Head of Research, The BMJ, London, UK
| | - Evan Mayo-Wilson
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Indiana University School of Public Health-Bloomington, Bloomington, Indiana, United States
| | - Steve McDonald
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Luke A McGuinness
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Lesley A Stewart
- Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, York, UK
| | - James Thomas
- EPPI-Centre, UCL Social Research Institute, University College London, London, UK
| | - Andrea C Tricco
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute of St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Epidemiology Division of the Dalla Lana School of Public Health and the Institute of Health Management, Policy, and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Queen's Collaboration for Health Care Quality Joanna Briggs Institute Centre of Excellence, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada
| | - Vivian A Welch
- Methods Centre, Bruyère Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; School of Epidemiology and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Penny Whiting
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Joanne E McKenzie
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Page MJ, Moher D, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, Shamseer L, Tetzlaff JM, Akl EA, Brennan SE, Chou R, Glanville J, Grimshaw JM, Hróbjartsson A, Lalu MM, Li T, Loder EW, Mayo-Wilson E, McDonald S, McGuinness LA, Stewart LA, Thomas J, Tricco AC, Welch VA, Whiting P, McKenzie JE. PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ : BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 2021. [DOI: 10.1136/bmj.n160 10.1136/bmj.n160] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
|
25
|
Page MJ, Moher D, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, Shamseer L, Tetzlaff JM, Akl EA, Brennan SE, Chou R, Glanville J, Grimshaw JM, Hróbjartsson A, Lalu MM, Li T, Loder EW, Mayo-Wilson E, McDonald S, McGuinness LA, Stewart LA, Thomas J, Tricco AC, Welch VA, Whiting P, McKenzie JE. PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 2021; 372:n160. [PMID: 33781993 PMCID: PMC8005925 DOI: 10.1136/bmj.n160] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3010] [Impact Index Per Article: 1003.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/04/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew J Page
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - David Moher
- Centre for Journalology, Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada; School of Epidemiology and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Patrick M Bossuyt
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Isabelle Boutron
- Université de Paris, Centre of Epidemiology and Statistics (CRESS), Inserm, F 75004 Paris, France
| | - Tammy C Hoffmann
- Institute for Evidence-Based Healthcare, Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Bond University, Gold Coast, Australia
| | - Cynthia D Mulrow
- University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, United States; Annals of Internal Medicine
| | - Larissa Shamseer
- Knowledge Translation Program, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, Toronto, Canada; School of Epidemiology and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| | | | - Elie A Akl
- Clinical Research Institute, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon; Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sue E Brennan
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Roger Chou
- Department of Medical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, United States
| | - Julie Glanville
- York Health Economics Consortium (YHEC Ltd), University of York, York, UK
| | - Jeremy M Grimshaw
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada; School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada; Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Asbjørn Hróbjartsson
- Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine Odense, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark; Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark; Open Patient data Explorative Network, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Manoj M Lalu
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Canada; Clinical Epidemiology Program, Blueprint Translational Research Group, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada; Regenerative Medicine Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Tianjing Li
- Department of Ophthalmology, School of Medicine, University of Colorado Denver, Denver, Colorado, United States; Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
| | - Elizabeth W Loder
- Division of Headache, Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States; Head of Research, The BMJ, London, UK
| | - Evan Mayo-Wilson
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Indiana University School of Public Health-Bloomington, Bloomington, Indiana, United States
| | - Steve McDonald
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Luke A McGuinness
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Lesley A Stewart
- Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, York, UK
| | - James Thomas
- EPPI-Centre, UCL Social Research Institute, University College London, London, UK
| | - Andrea C Tricco
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute of St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Epidemiology Division of the Dalla Lana School of Public Health and the Institute of Health Management, Policy, and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Queen's Collaboration for Health Care Quality Joanna Briggs Institute Centre of Excellence, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada
| | - Vivian A Welch
- Methods Centre, Bruyère Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; School of Epidemiology and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Penny Whiting
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Joanne E McKenzie
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Reduction of biologics in rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Rheumatol Int 2020; 40:1949-1959. [PMID: 32710197 DOI: 10.1007/s00296-020-04651-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2020] [Accepted: 07/11/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
The effects of dose reduction or spacing of all types of biologics in rheumatoid arthritis has not been consistently assessed in systematic reviews. We aimed to assess the effects of biologics reduction compared with dose maintenance in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in low disease activity or remission. We performed a systematic review with meta-analysis according to a previously registered protocol (PROSPERO registration: CRD42017069080); and searched MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Library and trial registers up to July, 2020. Two researchers selected, extracted and assessed the risk of bias of controlled trials that randomized patients to reduction/spacing or dose maintenance of biologics. Low disease activity, disability and other clinically important outcomes were summarized in random effect meta-analyses. We rated the certainty of evidence according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach. We included ten studies (n = 1331 patients), which assessed reduction or spacing of abatacept, adalimumab, certolizumab pegol, etanercept, or tocilizumab. Risk of bias was high in over half of trials, mainly due to lack of blinding. No statistically significant difference was found in low disease activity (RR = 0.90; 95% CI 0.78-1.04; I2 = 60%, very low certainty), and other outcomes. Subgroup analysis of blinded studies led to homogeneous results, which remained heterogeneous in open-label studies. Reduction or spacing biologics did not affect disease activity and other important outcome. Changes in the doses regimen should consider patient preferences, considering the low certainty of evidence.
Collapse
|
27
|
Zhang C. Flare-up of cytokines in rheumatoid arthritis and their role in triggering depression: Shared common function and their possible applications in treatment (Review). Biomed Rep 2020; 14:16. [PMID: 33269077 PMCID: PMC7694594 DOI: 10.3892/br.2020.1392] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2020] [Accepted: 05/31/2020] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Chronic illnesses are associated with an increased risk of depression and anxiety. Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic autoimmune disease that typically causes damage to the joints. RA extensively impacts patients, both physically and psychologically. Depression is a common comorbid disorder with RA, which leads to worsened health outcomes. There are several cytokines that are active in the joints of patients with RA. Inflammatory cytokines serve important roles in the key processes in the joints, which usually cause inflammation, articular damage and other comorbidities associated with RA. The key role of inflammatory cytokines could be attributed to their interactions within signaling pathways. In RA, IL-1, and the cytokines of TNF-α, IL-6 and IL-18 are primarily involved. Furthermore, depression is hypothesized to be strongly associated with systemic inflammation, particularly with dysregulation of the cytokine network. The present review summarizes the current state of knowledge on these two diseases from the perspective of inflammation and cytokines, and emphasizes the possible bridge between them by exploring the involvement of systemic cytokines in both conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chunhai Zhang
- Thyroid Surgery Department, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin 1300332, P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Pedersen L, Szecsi PB, Johansen PB, Bjerrum PJ. Evaluation of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring in the Clinical Management of Patients with Rheumatic Diseases: Data from a Retrospective Single-Center Cohort Study. Biologics 2020; 14:115-125. [PMID: 33162753 PMCID: PMC7643816 DOI: 10.2147/btt.s262511] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2020] [Accepted: 07/24/2020] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
Purpose Treatment of rheumatic diseases with tumor necrosis factor inhibitors leads to improved clinical outcomes. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) may assist in guiding clinical decisions. This study investigates the impact of TDM on clinical outcome, decision-making and biologics cost expenditure. Patients and Methods In a retrospective observational study of 306 patients with rheumatic diseases treated with four different tumor necrosis factor inhibitors, drug levels and antidrug antibodies were measured over a period of one year. Primary outcomes were the clinicians’ response to each TDM result and the clinical outcome two years after TDM initiation. Outcomes were compared between the 111 TDM-guided patients and the 195 empirically guided patients. Results Treatment change occurred in 55% of the patients in the TDM group, but in only 38% in the empirically guided group. In the TDM group, 89 (79.5%) patients were in remission or had low disease activity after two years follow-up compared to 128 (65.6%) patients in the empirical group. The average cost of biologics per patient per year was lower in the TDM group than in the empirical group for patients receiving infliximab, adalimumab or etanercept at baseline but not for golimumab. Conclusion TDM-guided decision-making is useful in rheumatic patients receiving TNFi and may optimize therapeutic decisions, leading to a better control of disease activity. Proactive TDM may support decisions on dose tapering, resulting in lower drug consumption and biologics cost expenditure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lise Pedersen
- Department of Clinical Biochemistry, University of Copenhagen, Holbæk Hospital, Holbæk, Denmark
| | - Pal Bela Szecsi
- Department of Clinical Biochemistry, University of Copenhagen, Holbæk Hospital, Holbæk, Denmark
| | - Per Birger Johansen
- Department of Rheumatology, University of Copenhagen, Holbæk Hospital, Holbæk, Denmark
| | - Poul Jannik Bjerrum
- Department of Clinical Biochemistry, University of Copenhagen, Holbæk Hospital, Holbæk, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Dose tapering of biologic agents in patients with rheumatoid arthritis-results from a cohort study in Germany. Clin Rheumatol 2020; 40:887-893. [PMID: 32822057 DOI: 10.1007/s10067-020-05316-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2020] [Revised: 07/19/2020] [Accepted: 08/04/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the association of demographic and clinical factors with the clinical decision of tapering biologic disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in daily practice. METHODS All RA patients receiving bDMARDs were documented by 14 rheumatologists when presenting in 9 specialized private practices. Statistical analyses employed multivariable logistic models for dose reduction with the covariates age, gender, disease duration until bDMARD start, smoking status, disease activity, comorbidity, functional capacity, radiographic damage, concomitant methotrexate (MTX) treatment, rheumatoid factor positivity, and glucocorticoid use. In the multivariable model (MVM), missing values were imputed. RESULTS Data of 586 RA patients on bDMARD treatment were available, 171 of which (29%) received a reduced dose. The highest rates of patients with dose reduction were seen for rituximab (67%) and infliximab (50%). The degree of dose reduction was most prominent for rituximab (57%). In the MVM, 6/11 covariates were significantly associated with dose reduction: age (odds ratio (OR) 1.03, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.01-1.05; P = 0.002), time between disease onset and bDMARD start (OR 1.03, 95% CI 1.01-1.06; P = 0.015), DAS 28 < 2.6 (OR 1.55, 95% CI 1.01-2.37; P = 0.045), MTX therapy (OR 1.52, 95% CI 1.03-2.25; P = 0.036), comorbidity (OR 1.20, 95% CI 1.01-1.42; P = 0.036), and glucocorticoid dose (OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.76-0.89; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION DAS 28 remission, concomitant MTX, and lower glucocorticoid doses were positively associated with dose tapering of bDMARDs in RA patients. While this could be expected, the reason for the association with age, comorbidity, and the time between disease onset and bDMARD start is less clear. Key points • In rheumatology practice, tapering of biologic disease modifying antirheumatic drugs is feasible in nearly 30% of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. • The degree of dose reduction may exceed 50% of the recommended dose. • In a multivariable model, concomitant methotrexate is positively associated with dose tapering of biologic disease modifying antirheumatic drugs.
Collapse
|
30
|
Schlager L, Loiskandl M, Aletaha D, Radner H. Predictors of successful discontinuation of biologic and targeted synthetic DMARDs in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in remission or low disease activity: a systematic literature review. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2020; 59:324-334. [PMID: 31325305 DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/kez278] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2018] [Accepted: 05/29/2019] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To systematically review possible predictors of successful discontinuation of biologic or targeted synthetic DMARDs (b/tsDMARDs) in RA patients in remission or low disease activity. METHODS MEDLINE database and Cochrane Library were scanned for studies that discontinued b/tsDMARDs in remission/low disease activity and searched for predictors of successful discontinuation. Additionally, EULAR and ACR meeting abstracts were hand searched. RESULTS Thirty-four studies with a total of 5724 patients were included. Predictors of successful b/tsDMARD discontinuation were (number of studies): low disease activity (n = 13), better physical function (n = 6), low or absence of rheumatoid factor (n = 5) or ACPA (n = 3), low levels of CRP (n = 3) or ESR (n = 3), shorter disease duration (n = 3), low signals of disease activity by ultrasound (n = 3). Only one study with high risk of bias was identified on tsDMARD discontinuation. CONCLUSION Several predictors of successful bDMARD discontinuation were identified. Although studies are heterogeneous, these predictors may inform clinical decision making in patients who are considered for a potential bDMARD discontinuation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lukas Schlager
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine III, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Michaela Loiskandl
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine III, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Daniel Aletaha
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine III, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Helga Radner
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine III, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Vinson D, Molet-Benhamou L, Degboé Y, den Broeder A, Ibrahim F, Pontes C, Westhovens R, Závada J, Pham T, Barnetche T, Constantin A, Ruyssen-Witrand A. Impact of tapering targeted therapies (bDMARDs or JAKis) on the risk of serious infections and adverse events of special interest in patients with rheumatoid arthritis or spondyloarthritis: a systematic analysis of the literature and meta-analysis. Arthritis Res Ther 2020; 22:97. [PMID: 32349791 PMCID: PMC7191828 DOI: 10.1186/s13075-020-02188-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2019] [Accepted: 04/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To systematically review the impact of tapering targeted therapies (bDMARDs or JAKis) on the risk of serious infections and severe adverse events (SAEs) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) or axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) in remission or low disease activity (LDA) state. MATERIALS AND METHODS A meta-analysis based on a systematic review of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, until August 2019, as well as relevant databases of international conferences, was used to evaluate the risk difference (RD) at 95% confidence interval (95% CI) of incidence density of serious infections, SAEs, malignancies, cardiovascular adverse events (CV AEs), or deaths after tapering (dose reduction or spacing) compared to continuation of targeted therapies. RESULTS Of the 1957 studies initially identified, 13 controlled trials (9 RA and 4 SpA trials) were included in the meta-analysis. 1174 patient-years were studied in the tapering group (TG) versus 1086 in the usual care group (UC). There were 1.7/100 patient-year (p-y) serious infections in TG versus 2.6/100 p-y in UC (RD (95% CI) 0.01 (0.00 to 0.02), p = 0.13) and 7.4/100 p-y SAEs in TG versus 6.7/100 p-y in UC (RD 0.00 (- 0.02 to 0.02), p = 0.82). The risk of malignancies, CV AEs, or deaths did not differ between the tapering and the usual care groups. Subgroup analysis (RA and SpA) detected no significant differences between the two groups. CONCLUSION We could not show significant impact of tapering bDMARD or JAKi over continuation concerning the risk of serious infections, SAEs, malignancies, CV AEs, or deaths in RA and SpA patients in remission or LDA state.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Vinson
- Rheumatology Department, CHU Sainte Marguerite, 270 Boulevard de Sainte-Marguerite, 13009, Marseille, France.
| | | | - Y Degboé
- INSERM U1043, CPTP, Toulouse, France
| | - A den Broeder
- Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, 6500 GM, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - F Ibrahim
- Centre for Rheumatic Diseases, Department of Inflammation Biology, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, King's College London, Cutcombe Road, London, SE5 9RJ, UK
| | - C Pontes
- Department of Pharmacology, Therapeutics and Toxicology, Unitat docent Parc Taulí-Medical School-Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Sabadell, Barcelona, Spain
| | - R Westhovens
- Skeletal Biology and Engineering Research Center, Department of Development and Regeneration, Rheumatology University Hospitals Leuven, KULeuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - J Závada
- First Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Rheumatology and Department of Rheumatology, Charles University, Na Slupi 4, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - T Pham
- Rheumatology Department, CHU Sainte Marguerite, 270 Boulevard de Sainte-Marguerite, 13009, Marseille, France
| | - T Barnetche
- Rheumatology Department, Pellegrin Hospital, Bordeaux, France
| | - A Constantin
- Rheumatology Department, Hôpital Purpan, Toulouse, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Michielsens CAJ, Boers N, den Broeder N, Wenink MH, van der Maas A, Mahler EAM, Mulder MLM, van der Heijde D, van den Hoogen FHJ, Verhoef LM, den Broeder AA. Dose reduction and withdrawal strategy for TNF-inhibitors in psoriatic arthritis and axial spondyloarthritis: design of a pragmatic open-label, randomised, non-inferiority trial. Trials 2020; 21:90. [PMID: 31941544 PMCID: PMC6964104 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-019-4000-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2019] [Accepted: 12/16/2019] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) are effective in the treatment of patients with spondyloarthritis (SpA), including psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). However, these drugs come with some disadvantages such as adverse events, practical burden for patients and high costs. Dose optimisation of TNFi after patients have reached low disease activity (LDA) has been shown feasible and safe in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, data on TNFi dose optimisation in PsA and axSpA are scarce, especially pragmatic, randomised strategy studies. METHODS We developed an investigator-driven, pragmatic, open-label, randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial (DRESS-PS) to compare the effects of a disease activity-guided treat-to-target strategy with or without a tapering attempt in patients with SpA (PsA and axSpA combined), ≥ 16 years of age, who are being treated with TNFi, and have had at least 6 months of low disease activity. The primary outcome is the percentage of patients in LDA after 12 months of follow up. Patients are assessed at baseline, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months of follow up. Bayesian power analyses with a weakened prior based on a similar study performed in RA resulted in a sample size of 95 patients in total. DISCUSSION More knowledge on disease activity-guided treatment algorithms would contribute to better treatment choices and cost savings and potentially decrease the risk of side effects. In this article we elucidate some of our design choices on TNFi dose optimisation and its clinical and methodological consequences. TRIAL REGISTRATION Dutch Trial Register, NL6771. Registered on 27 November 2018 (CMO NL66181.091.18, 23 October 2018).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Celia A J Michielsens
- Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Hengstdal 3, 6574 NA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. .,Department of Rheumatic Diseases, Radboud Institute of Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | - Nadine Boers
- Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Hengstdal 3, 6574 NA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Nathan den Broeder
- Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Hengstdal 3, 6574 NA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Mark H Wenink
- Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Hengstdal 3, 6574 NA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Aatke van der Maas
- Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Hengstdal 3, 6574 NA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Elien A M Mahler
- Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Hengstdal 3, 6574 NA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Michelle L M Mulder
- Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Hengstdal 3, 6574 NA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.,Department of Rheumatic Diseases, Radboud Institute of Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Frank H J van den Hoogen
- Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Hengstdal 3, 6574 NA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.,Department of Rheumatic Diseases, Radboud Institute of Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Lise M Verhoef
- Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Hengstdal 3, 6574 NA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Alfons A den Broeder
- Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Hengstdal 3, 6574 NA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.,Department of Rheumatic Diseases, Radboud Institute of Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Halyabar O, Mehta J, Ringold S, Rumsey DG, Horton DB. Treatment Withdrawal Following Remission in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Paediatr Drugs 2019; 21:469-492. [PMID: 31673960 PMCID: PMC7301222 DOI: 10.1007/s40272-019-00362-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Early diagnosis and treatment of juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) with conventional and biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs have vastly improved outcomes for children with these diseases. Currently, a large proportion of children with JIA are able to achieve clinical inactive disease and remission. With this success, important questions have arisen about when medications can be stopped and how to balance the risks and benefits of continuing medications versus the potential for flare after stopping. AIM The aim was to conduct a systematic review of the available literature to summarize current evidence about medication withdrawal for JIA in remission. METHODS We conducted a systematic literature search in PubMed and Embase from 1990 to 2019. References were first screened by title and then independently screened by title and abstract by two authors. A total of 77 original papers were selected for full-text review. Data were extracted from 30 papers on JIA and JIA-associated uveitis, and the quality of the evidence was evaluated using National Institutes of Health (NIH)/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) tools. Studies on biochemical and radiologic biomarkers were also reviewed and summarized. RESULTS Most studies investigating treatment withdrawal in JIA have been observational and of poor or fair quality; interpretations of these studies have been limited by differences in study populations, disease and remission durations, the medications withdrawn, approaches to withdrawal, and definitions of disease outcomes. Overall the data suggest that flares are common after stopping JIA medications, particularly biologic medications. Clinical characteristics associated with increased risks of flare have not been consistently identified. Biochemical biomarkers and ultrasound findings have been shown to predict outcomes after stopping medications, but to date, no such predictor has been consistently validated across JIA populations. Studies have also not identified optimal strategies for withdrawing medication for well-controlled JIA. Promising withdrawal strategies include discontinuing methotrexate before biologic medications in children receiving combination therapy, dose reduction for children on biologics, and treat-to-target approaches to withdrawal. These and other strategies require further investigation in larger, high-quality studies. CONCLUSIONS The published literature on treatment withdrawal in JIA has varied in design and quality, yielding little conclusive evidence thus far on the management of JIA in remission. Given the importance of this question, international collaborative efforts are underway to study clinical and biologic predictors of successful medication withdrawal in JIA. These efforts may ultimately support the development of personalized approaches to withdrawing medication in children with JIA in remission.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olha Halyabar
- Department of Pediatrics, Boston Children’s
Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Jay Mehta
- Department of Pediatrics, Children’s Hospital of
Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Sarah Ringold
- Department of Pediatrics, Seattle Children’s
Hospital, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Dax G. Rumsey
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Alberta, Edmonton,
Alberta, Canada
| | - Daniel B. Horton
- Department of Pediatrics, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson
Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, USA,Rutgers Center for Pharmacoepidemiology and Treatment
Science, Institute for Health, Health Care Policy and Aging Research, New Brunswick,
NJ, USA,Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Rutgers
School of Public Health, Piscataway, NJ, USA
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
|