1
|
Hoffmann M, Jeitziner MM, Riedl R, Mueller G, Peer A, Bachlechner A, Heindl P, Burgsteiner H, Schefold JC, von Lewinski D, Eller P, Pieber T, Sendlhofer G, Amrein K. Effects of an online information tool on post-traumatic stress disorder in relatives of intensive care unit patients: a multicenter double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial (ICU-Families-Study). Intensive Care Med 2023; 49:1317-1326. [PMID: 37870597 PMCID: PMC10622355 DOI: 10.1007/s00134-023-07215-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2023] [Accepted: 08/27/2023] [Indexed: 10/24/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Intensive care unit (ICU) hospitalization is challenging for the family members of the patients. Most family members report some level of anxiety and depression, sometimes even resulting in post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). An association has been reported between lack of information and PTSD. This study had three aims: to quantify the psychological burden of family members of critically ill patients, to explore whether a website with specific information could reduce PTSD symptoms, and to ascertain whether a website with information about intensive care would be used. METHOD A multicenter double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial was carried out in Austria and Switzerland. RESULTS In total, 89 members of families of critically ill patients (mean age 47.3 ± 12.9 years, female n = 59, 66.3%) were included in the study. 46 relatives were allocated to the intervention website and 43 to the control website. Baseline Impact of Event Scale (IES) score was 27.5 ± 12.7. Overall, 50% showed clinically relevant PTSD symptoms at baseline. Mean IES score for the primary endpoint (~ 30 days after inclusion, T1) was 24 ± 15.8 (intervention 23.9 ± 17.9 vs. control 24.1 ± 13.5, p = 0.892). Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS - Deutsch (D)) score at T1 was 12.2 ± 6.1 (min. 3, max. 31) and did not differ between groups. Use of the website differed between the groups (intervention min. 1, max. 14 vs. min. 1, max. 3; total 1386 "clicks" on the website, intervention 1021 vs. control 365). Recruitment was prematurely stopped in February 2020 due to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). CONCLUSION Family members of critically ill patients often have significant PTSD symptoms and online information on critical illness did not result in reduced PTSD symptoms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Magdalena Hoffmann
- Research Unit for Safety and Sustainability in Healthcare, c/o Division of Plastic, Aesthetic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
- Division of Endocrinology and Diabetology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
- Executive Department for Quality and Risk Management, University Hospital of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Marie-Madlen Jeitziner
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Bern, Inselspital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
- Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Nursing Science, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
| | - Regina Riedl
- Institute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and Documentation, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Gerhard Mueller
- Department of Nursing Science and Gerontology, Institute of Nursing Science, UMIT TIROL - Private University of Health Sciences and Health Technology, Hall in Tyrol, Austria
| | - Andreas Peer
- Division of Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | | | - Patrik Heindl
- Department of Intensive Care, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - Harald Burgsteiner
- Institute for Digital Media Education, University College of Teacher Education Styria, Graz, Austria
| | - Joerg C Schefold
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Bern, Inselspital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | | | - Philipp Eller
- Intensive Care Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Thomas Pieber
- Research Unit for Safety and Sustainability in Healthcare, c/o Division of Plastic, Aesthetic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Gerald Sendlhofer
- Research Unit for Safety and Sustainability in Healthcare, c/o Division of Plastic, Aesthetic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
- Executive Department for Quality and Risk Management, University Hospital of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Karin Amrein
- Division of Endocrinology and Diabetology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Vanhanen M, Meriläinen M, Ala-Kokko T, Kyngäs H, Kaakinen P. Intensive care professionals' perceptions of the quality of counselling provided in the ICU: A cross-sectional study. Nurs Crit Care 2023; 28:1004-1011. [PMID: 35635243 DOI: 10.1111/nicc.12782] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2020] [Revised: 04/18/2022] [Accepted: 05/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Intensive care professionals (ICPs) have a key role in counselling adult intensive care unit (ICU) patients and their family members. The counselling provided to ICU patients and their family members can be described based on the content, implementation, benefits, and resources. AIMS The study had two specific aims: first, to assess ICPs' perceptions of the quality of counselling provided to ICU patients and their family members; and second, to explore which factors ICPs feel is associated with the quality of counselling. STUDY DESIGN A cross-sectional survey of ICPs working in adult ICUs in Finnish university hospitals. Data were collected using the Counselling Quality Instrument. The data were analysed by descriptive statistics and chi-square and t-test statistical methods. RESULTS A total of 182 ICPs returned the questionnaire, reflecting a response rate of 18.6%. Most of the respondents were nurses (97%) and the mean age was 42 years. The ICPs reported having adequate time for patient- (77%) and family-centered (73%) counselling, but only 47% felt that their units had the appropriate facilities. There were statistically significant differences between patient- and family-centered counselling and the ICP's self-assessed competence (p < .001), goal-oriented counselling (p < .001), and atmosphere during counselling (p < .001). ICPs' attitudes towards counselling impacted how these professionals assessed patients' and family members' confidence, along with patient recovery (p < .001). CONCLUSIONS This study confirms that the provision of high-quality counselling has beneficial effects; however, it also indicates that there is a need for training that considers each ICP's professional experience and patient- and family-centered factors, which may differ from one another. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE According to ICPs, the quality of counselling can be enhanced by empowering ICPs to improve counselling and providing appropriate ICU facilities for counselling, such as a private room for family members.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Minna Vanhanen
- Research Unit of Nursing Science and Health Management, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
- Oulu University of Applied Sciences, Oulu, Finland
| | - Merja Meriläinen
- Oulu University Hospital, Medical Research Center Oulu, Oulu, Finland
- Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland
| | - Tero Ala-Kokko
- Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland
- Research Group of Surgery, Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University of Oulu and Medical Research Center (MRC), Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland
| | - Helvi Kyngäs
- Research Unit of Nursing Science and Health Management, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
- Northern Ostrobothnia Hospital District, Oulu, Finland
| | - Pirjo Kaakinen
- Research Unit of Nursing Science and Health Management, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
- Medical Research Centre, Oulu, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Counselling offered to and needed by Finnish adult intensive care unit patients based on patients' records and memories. Intensive Crit Care Nurs 2023; 76:103395. [PMID: 36738534 DOI: 10.1016/j.iccn.2023.103395] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2022] [Revised: 01/13/2023] [Accepted: 01/17/2023] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Objectives of this study were to characterize the counselling (broadly defined) that Finnish adult intensive care unit patients received and needed during intensive care according to patients' records and memories. DESIGN SETTING The study was based on retrospective analysis of patient records and documented follow-up clinics, using a descriptive, qualitative approach and deductive-inductive content analysis. FINDINGS According to both the records and documented memories of 162 patients (56 women and 106 men aged 18-75 years; mean 50.8, median 53.5 years) patients' confidence in their own recovery, including feelings of safety and ability to participate, is enhanced by counselling during intensive care. They had strong memories of counselling that gave them knowledge about their medical conditions and procedures, symptoms, care, and psychological support. At follow-up, patients did not have such strong memories of lifestyle counselling that they received during intensive care. CONCLUSION Patients need counselling during an intensive care unit stay to improve their confidence in their recovery. The counselling strategy for intensive care should be documented, and patient memories collected during follow-up clinics, to help assessment of the quality of counselling provided in intensive care. IMPLICATIONS FOR CLINICAL PRACTICE Counselling during intensive care enhances patients' confidence in their own recovery. To assess the quality of counselling it is essential to recognize the types provided and needed. Appropriate documentation is crucial for evaluating intensive care unit patient counselling, and planning its continuity.
Collapse
|
4
|
Psychosoziale Angehörigenversorgung: Rahmenkonzept für Intensivstationen. Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed 2022; 117:600-606. [DOI: 10.1007/s00063-022-00966-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2022] [Accepted: 08/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
|
5
|
Stantz A, Emilio J, Ahmad S, Gajic O, Garrison G, Boswell C, Al Zahidy M. An Individualized Recovery Task Checklist Which Served as an Educational Instrument in a Critically Ill and Intubated COVID-19 Patient. J Prim Care Community Health 2022; 13:21501319221116249. [PMID: 35920044 PMCID: PMC9358336 DOI: 10.1177/21501319221116249] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
This case involves a patient with severe COVID-19 pneumonia and massive pulmonary
embolism requiring mechanical ventilation. His clinical course was complicated
by delirium likely triggered by his critical illness and failed initial
extubation, isolation from family, and escalating fear and desperation. In
hopeful preparation for subsequent successful extubation, a unique approach was
taken to decrease the risk of panic, delirium, and decompensation leading to
reintubation. As a means of orienting him to his treatment pathway and to
provide encouragement for continued recovery, an impromptu patient-directed
checklist was constructed. The recovery checklist, written in simplified
language, outlined the stages of severe illness that the patient had overcome
after his emergent intubation. The list also outlined the tasks he needed to
complete prior to hospital discharge. Unexpectedly, the checklist received a
great deal of engagement from both the patient and medical team and played an
important role in this patient’s successful recovery and rehabilitation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Joel Emilio
- Western State University College of Law, Irvine, CA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Nursing Interventions for Patient Empowerment during Intensive Care Unit Discharge: A Systematic Review. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2021; 18:ijerph182111049. [PMID: 34769569 PMCID: PMC8582948 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph182111049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2021] [Revised: 10/16/2021] [Accepted: 10/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Intensive care unit discharge is an important transition that impacts a patient's wellbeing. Nurses can play an essential role in this scenario, potentiating patient empowerment. A systematic review was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (the PRISMA Statement. Embase), PubMed/MEDLINE, CINAHL, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), CUIDEN Plus, and LILACS databases; these were evaluated in May 2021. Two independent reviewers analyzed the studies, extracted the data, and assessed the quality of evidence. Quality of the studies included was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. Of the 274 articles initially identified, eight randomized controlled trials that reported on nursing interventions had mainly focused on patients' ICU discharge preparation through information and education. The creation of ICU nurse-led teams and nurses' involvement in critical care multidisciplinary teams also aimed to support patients during ICU discharge. This systematic review provides an update on the clinical practice aimed at improving the patient experience during ICU discharge. The main nursing interventions were based on information and education, as well as the development of new nursing roles. Understanding transitional needs and patient empowerment are key to making the transition easier.
Collapse
|
7
|
Cuzco C, Castro Rebollo P, Marín Pérez R, Núñez Delgado AI, Romero García M, Martínez Momblan MA, Estrada Reventós D, Martínez Estalella G, Delgado-Hito P. Mixed-method research protocol: Development and evaluation of a nursing intervention in patients discharged from the intensive care unit. Nurs Open 2021; 8:3666-3676. [PMID: 33955196 PMCID: PMC8510756 DOI: 10.1002/nop2.894] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2020] [Revised: 01/28/2021] [Accepted: 03/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
AIM (a) To understand patients' lived experience at intensive care unit (ICU) discharge and (b) to evaluate the impact of a nursing empowerment intervention (NEI) on patients' anxiety and depression levels at ICU discharge. DESIGN A mixed-methods approach will be applied. METHODS In the qualitative phase, the hermeneutic phenomenological method will be used. Participants will be patients from three university hospitals who will be selected by purposive sampling. Data will be gathered through in-depth interviews and analysed using content analysis. The qualitative data obtained will be employed to develop the nursing intervention. Subsequently, a multicenter, parallel-group, experimental pre-test/post-test design with a control group will be used to measure the effectiveness of the nursing empowerment intervention in the quantitative phase by means of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Simple random probabilistic sampling will include 172 patients in this phase.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cecilia Cuzco
- Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain.,Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, School of Nursing, Department of Fundamental and Medical-Surgical Nursing, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.,Biomedical Research Institute August Pi Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Hospital Clinic Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Pedro Castro Rebollo
- Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain.,Biomedical Research Institute August Pi Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Hospital Clinic Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.,School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | - Marta Romero García
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, School of Nursing, Department of Fundamental and Medical-Surgical Nursing, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.,Nursing Research Group (GRIN), Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL), l'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain
| | - M Antonia Martínez Momblan
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, School of Nursing, Department of Fundamental and Medical-Surgical Nursing, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Dolors Estrada Reventós
- Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain.,Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, School of Nursing, Department of Fundamental and Medical-Surgical Nursing, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.,Biomedical Research Institute August Pi Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Hospital Clinic Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Gemma Martínez Estalella
- Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain.,Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, School of Nursing, Department of Fundamental and Medical-Surgical Nursing, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.,Nursing Research Group (GRIN), Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL), l'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain
| | - Pilar Delgado-Hito
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, School of Nursing, Department of Fundamental and Medical-Surgical Nursing, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.,Nursing Research Group (GRIN), Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL), l'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Vlake JH, Van Bommel J, Wils EJ, Korevaar TIM, Hellemons ME, Schut AFC, Labout JAM, Schreuder LLH, Gommers D, Van Genderen ME. Effect of intensive care unit-specific virtual reality (ICU-VR) to improve psychological well-being and quality of life in COVID-19 ICU survivors: a study protocol for a multicentre, randomized controlled trial. Trials 2021; 22:328. [PMID: 33952318 PMCID: PMC8097671 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-021-05271-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2020] [Accepted: 04/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The SARS-CoV-2 outbreak has resulted in a tremendous increase in hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) admissions all over the world. Patients with severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) warranting ICU treatment usually have prolonged mechanical ventilation and are expected to be prone to develop psychological impairments, such as post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), anxiety and depression, which negatively impact quality of life. To date, no effective treatment strategy is available. In the current trial, we aim to assess the effect of an ICU-specific virtual reality (ICU-VR) intervention on psychological well-being and quality of life after COVID-19 ICU treatment. METHODS In this multicentre, randomized controlled trial, we aim to examine whether COVID-19-specific ICU-VR, offered 3 months after hospital discharge, improves psychological well-being and quality of life. Secondary objectives are, firstly, to examine the intra-group changes in psychological well-being and quality of life and the inter-group differences in psychological well-being and quality of life during follow-up, up to 12 months after hospital discharge, and secondly, to examine patients' satisfaction with and rating of ICU care and aftercare and patients' perspectives on ICU-VR. Eighty adult patients treated for COVID-19 in the mixed-surgical ICUs of four hospitals in Rotterdam, the Netherlands, will be included and randomized (1:1) to either early or late ICU-VR between June 29 and December 31, 2020. Patients randomized to early ICU-VR will receive the ICU-VR intervention during an outpatient clinic visit 3 months after hospital discharge, whereas patients randomized to late ICU-VR will receive ICU-VR 6 months after hospital discharge. Primary outcomes of this study are psychological well-being, assessed using the Impact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R) and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and quality of life, assessed using the European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) and RAND-36 questionnaires, up to 6 months after hospital discharge. DISCUSSION Currently, an effective treatment for psychological sequelae after ICU treatment for specific illnesses is unavailable. Results from this study will provide insight whether virtual reality is a modality that can be used in ICU aftercare to improve psychological well-being and quality of life, or satisfaction, after ICU treatment for specific illnesses such as COVID-19. TRIAL REGISTRATION This trial has been retrospectively registered on the Netherlands Trial Register on August 14, 2020 ( NL8835 ).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johan H. Vlake
- Department of Intensive Care, Erasmus MC, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Intensive Care, Franciscus Gasthuis & Vlietland, Kleiweg 500, 3045 PM Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jasper Van Bommel
- Department of Intensive Care, Erasmus MC, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Evert-Jan Wils
- Department of Intensive Care, Franciscus Gasthuis & Vlietland, Kleiweg 500, 3045 PM Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Tim I. M. Korevaar
- Department of Internal Medicine, Academic Centre for Thyroid Diseases, Erasmus MC, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Merel E. Hellemons
- Department of Pulmonology, Erasmus MC, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Anna F. C. Schut
- Department of Intensive Care, Ikazia Hospital, Montessoriweg 1, 3083 AN Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Joost A. M. Labout
- Department of Intensive Care, Maasstad Hospital, Maasstadweg 21, 3079 DZ Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Lois L. H. Schreuder
- Department of Intensive Care, Erasmus MC, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Diederik Gommers
- Department of Intensive Care, Erasmus MC, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Michel E. Van Genderen
- Department of Intensive Care, Erasmus MC, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Rehabilitation and Prevention of Hand Eczema. Contact Dermatitis 2021. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-36335-2_71] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
|
10
|
Rehabilitation and Prevention of Hand Eczema. Contact Dermatitis 2020. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-72451-5_71-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
|
11
|
Lewis SR, Pritchard MW, Schofield‐Robinson OJ, Evans DJW, Alderson P, Smith AF. Information or education interventions for adult intensive care unit (ICU) patients and their carers. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2018; 10:CD012471. [PMID: 30316199 PMCID: PMC6517066 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd012471.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND During intensive care unit (ICU) admission, patients and their carers experience physical and psychological stressors that may result in psychological conditions including anxiety, depression, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Improving communication between healthcare professionals, patients, and their carers may alleviate these disorders. Communication may include information or educational interventions, in different formats, aiming to improve knowledge of the prognosis, treatment, or anticipated challenges after ICU discharge. OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of information or education interventions for improving outcomes in adult ICU patients and their carers. SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and PsycINFO from database inception to 10 April 2017. We searched clinical trials registries and grey literature, and handsearched reference lists of included studies and related reviews. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs), and planned to include quasi-RCTs, comparing information or education interventions presented to participants versus no information or education interventions, or comparing information or education interventions as part of a complex intervention versus a complex intervention without information or education. We included participants who were adult ICU patients, or their carers; these included relatives and non-relatives, including significant representatives of patients. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently assessed studies for inclusion, extracted data, assessed risk of bias, and applied GRADE criteria to assess certainty of the evidence. MAIN RESULTS We included eight RCTs with 1157 patient participants and 943 carer participants. We found no quasi-RCTs. We identified seven studies that await classification, and three ongoing studies.Three studies designed an intervention targeted at patients, four at carers, and one at both patients and carers. Studies included varied information: standardised or tailored, presented once or several times, and that included verbal or written information, audio recordings, multimedia information, and interactive information packs. Five studies reported robust methods of randomisation and allocation concealment. We noted high attrition rates in five studies. It was not feasible to blind participants, and we rated all studies as at high risk of performance bias, and at unclear risk of detection bias because most outcomes required self reporting.We attempted to pool data statistically, however this was not always possible due to high levels of heterogeneity. We calculated mean differences (MDs) using data reported from individual study authors where possible, and narratively synthesised the results. We reported the following two comparisons.Information or education intervention versus no information or education intervention (4 studies)For patient anxiety, we did not pool data from three studies (332 participants) owing to unexplained substantial statistical heterogeneity and possible clinical or methodological differences between studies. One study reported less anxiety when an intervention was used (MD -3.20, 95% confidence interval (CI) -3.38 to -3.02), and two studies reported little or no difference between groups (MD -0.40, 95% CI -4.75 to 3.95; MD -1.00, 95% CI -2.94 to 0.94). Similarly, for patient depression, we did not pool data from two studies (160 patient participants). These studies reported less depression when an information or education intervention was used (MD -2.90, 95% CI -4.00 to -1.80; MD -1.27, 95% CI -1.47 to -1.07). However, it is uncertain whether information or education interventions reduce patient anxiety or depression due to very low-certainty evidence.It is uncertain whether information or education interventions improve health-related quality of life due to very low-certainty evidence from one study reporting little or no difference between intervention groups (MD -1.30, 95% CI -4.99 to 2.39; 143 patient participants). No study reported adverse effects, knowledge acquisition, PTSD severity, or patient or carer satisfaction.We used the GRADE approach and downgraded certainty of the evidence owing to study limitations, inconsistencies between results, and limited data from few small studies.Information or education intervention as part of a complex intervention versus a complex intervention without information or education (4 studies)One study (three comparison groups; 38 participants) reported little or no difference between groups in patient anxiety (tailored information pack versus control: MD 0.09, 95% CI -3.29 to 3.47; standardised general ICU information versus control: MD -0.25, 95% CI -4.34 to 3.84), and little or no difference in patient depression (tailored information pack versus control: MD -1.26, 95% CI -4.48 to 1.96; standardised general ICU information versus control: MD -1.47, 95% CI -6.37 to 3.43). It is uncertain whether information or education interventions as part of a complex intervention reduce patient anxiety and depression due to very low-certainty evidence.One study (175 carer participants) reported fewer carer participants with poor comprehension among those given information (risk ratio 0.28, 95% CI 0.15 to 0.53), but again this finding is uncertain due to very low-certainty evidence.Two studies (487 carer participants) reported little or no difference in carer satisfaction; it is uncertain whether information or education interventions as part of a complex intervention increase carer satisfaction due to very low-certainty evidence. Adverse effects were reported in only one study: one participant withdrew because of deterioration in mental health on completion of anxiety and depression questionnaires, but the study authors did not report whether this participant was from the intervention or comparison group.We downgraded certainty of the evidence owing to study limitations, and limited data from few small studies.No studies reported severity of PTSD, or health-related quality of life. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS We are uncertain of the effects of information or education interventions given to adult ICU patients and their carers, as the evidence in all cases was of very low certainty, and our confidence in the evidence was limited. Ongoing studies may contribute more data and introduce more certainty when incorporated into future updates of the review.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sharon R Lewis
- Royal Lancaster InfirmaryLancaster Patient Safety Research UnitPointer Court 1, Ashton RoadLancasterUKLA1 4RP
| | - Michael W Pritchard
- Royal Lancaster InfirmaryLancaster Patient Safety Research UnitPointer Court 1, Ashton RoadLancasterUKLA1 4RP
| | - Oliver J Schofield‐Robinson
- Royal Lancaster InfirmaryLancaster Patient Safety Research UnitPointer Court 1, Ashton RoadLancasterUKLA1 4RP
| | | | - Phil Alderson
- National Institute for Health and Care ExcellenceLevel 1A, City Tower,Piccadilly PlazaManchesterUKM1 4BD
| | - Andrew F Smith
- Royal Lancaster InfirmaryDepartment of AnaesthesiaAshton RoadLancasterLancashireUKLA1 4RP
| | | |
Collapse
|