1
|
Lenouvel E, Ullrich P, Siemens W, Dallmeier D, Denkinger M, Kienle G, Zijlstra GAR, Hauer K, Klöppel S. Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) with and without exercise to reduce fear of falling in older people living in the community. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2023; 11:CD014666. [PMID: 37965937 PMCID: PMC10646947 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd014666.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Fear of falling (FoF) is a lasting concern about falling that leads to an individual avoiding activities that he/she remains capable of performing. It is a common condition amongst older adults and may occur independently of previous falls. Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT), a talking therapy that helps change dysfunctional thoughts and behaviour, with and without exercise, may reduce FoF, for example, by reducing catastrophic thoughts related to falls, and modifying dysfunctional behaviour. OBJECTIVES To assess the benefits and harms of CBT for reducing FoF in older people living in the community, and to assess the effects of interventions where CBT is used in combination with exercise. SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, Issue 1, 2023), MEDLINE Ovid (from 1946 to 11 January 2023), Embase Ovid (from 1980 to 11 January 2023), CINAHL Plus (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature) (from 1982 to 11 January 2023), PsycINFO (from 1967 to 11 January 2023), and AMED (Allied and Complementary Medicine from 1985 to 11 January 2023). We handsearched reference lists and consulted experts for identifying additional studies. SELECTION CRITERIA This review included randomised controlled trials (RCTs), quasi-RCTs, and cluster-RCTs assessing CBT with and without exercise interventions compared to control groups with sham-treatment, or treatment as usual. We defined CBT as a collaborative, time-limited, goal-oriented, and structured form of speaking therapy. Included studies recruited community-dwelling older adults, with a mean population age of at least 60 years minus one standard deviation, and not defined by a specific medical condition. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. For continuous data, as assessed by single- or multiple-item questionnaires, we report the mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence interval (CI) when studies used the same outcome measures, and standardised mean difference (SMD) when studies used different measures for the same clinical outcome. For dichotomous outcomes, we reported the treatment effects as risk ratios (RR) with 95% CIs. We measured the primary outcome, FoF, immediately, up to, and more than six months after the intervention. We analysed secondary outcomes of activity avoidance, occurrence of falls, depression, and quality of life when measured immediately after the intervention. We assessed risk of bias for each included study, using the GRADE approach to assess the certainty of evidence. MAIN RESULTS We selected 12 studies for this review, with 11 studies included for quantitative synthesis. One study could not be included due to missing information. Of the 11 individual studies, two studies provided two comparisons, which resulted in 13 comparisons. Eight studies were RCTs, and four studies were cluster-RCTs. Two studies had multiple arms (CBT only and CBT with exercise) that fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The primary aim of 10 studies was to reduce FoF. The 11 included studies for quantitative synthesis involved 2357 participants, with mean ages between 73 and 83 years. Study total sample sizes varied from 42 to 540 participants. Of the 13 comparisons, three investigated CBT-only interventions while 10 investigated CBT with exercise. Intervention duration varied between six and 156 hours, at a frequency between three times a week and monthly over an eight- to 48-week period. Most interventions were delivered in groups of between five and 10 participants, and, in one study, up to 25 participants. Included studies had considerable heterogeneity, used different questionnaires, and had high risks of bias. CBT interventions with and without exercise probably improve FoF immediately after the intervention (SMD -0.23, 95% CI -0.36 to -0.11; 11 studies, 2357 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). The sensitivity analyses did not change the intervention effect significantly. Effects of CBT with or without exercise on FoF may be sustained up to six months after the intervention (SMD -0.24, 95% CI -0.41 to -0.07; 8 studies, 1784 participants; very low-certainty evidence). CBT with or without exercise interventions for FoF probably sustains improvements beyond six months (SMD -0.28, 95% CI -0.40 to -0.15; 5 studies, 1185 participants; moderate-certainty of evidence). CBT interventions for reducing FoF may reduce activity avoidance (MD -2.57, 95% CI -4.67 to -0.47; 1 study, 312 participants; low-certainty evidence), and level of depression (SMD -0.41, 95% CI -0.60 to -0.21; 2 studies, 404 participants; low-certainty evidence). We are uncertain whether CBT interventions reduce the occurrence of falls (RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.66 to 1.39; 5 studies, 1119 participants; very low-certainty evidence). All studies had a serious risk of bias, due to performance bias, and at least an unclear risk of detection bias, as participants and assessors could not be blinded due to the nature of the intervention. Downgrading of certainty of evidence also occurred due to heterogeneity between studies, and imprecision, owing to limited sample size of some studies. There was no reporting bias suspected for any article. No studies reported adverse effects due to their interventions. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS CBT with and without exercise interventions probably reduces FoF in older people living in the community immediately after the intervention (moderate-certainty evidence). The improvements may be sustained during the period up to six months after intervention (low-certainty evidence), and probably are sustained beyond six months (moderate-certainty evidence). Further studies are needed to improve the certainty of evidence for sustainability of FoF effects up to six months. Of the secondary outcomes, we are uncertain whether CBT interventions for FoF reduce the occurrence of falls (very low-certainty evidence). However, CBT interventions for reducing FoF may reduce the level of activity avoidance, and may reduce depression (low-certainty evidence). No studies reported adverse effects. Future studies could investigate different populations (e.g. nursing home residents or people with comorbidities), intervention characteristics (e.g. duration), or comparisons (e.g. CBT versus exercise), investigate adverse effects of the interventions, and add outcomes (e.g. gait analysis). Future systematic reviews could search specifically for secondary outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric Lenouvel
- University Hospital of Old Age Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Bern (UPD), Bern, Switzerland
- Graduate School for Health Science, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Phoebe Ullrich
- Geriatrisches Zentrum am Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, AGAPLESION Bethanien Krankenhaus, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, Thoraxklinik Heidelberg, Heidelberg University Hospital, Translational Lung Research Center Heidelberg (TLRC-H), German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Röntgenstraße 1, D-69126, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Waldemar Siemens
- Institute for Evidence in Medicine, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- Cochrane Germany, Cochrane Germany Foundation, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Dhayana Dallmeier
- AGAPLESION Bethesda Clinic Ulm, Research Unit on Ageing, Ulm, Germany
- Department of Epidemiology, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, USA
| | - Michael Denkinger
- Institute for Geriatric Research, University of Ulm Medical Center, Ulm, Germany
- AGAPLESION Bethesda Clinic Ulm, Geriatric Centre Ulm/Alb-Donau, Ulm, Germany
| | - Gunver Kienle
- Department of Medicine II, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany, Freiburg, Germany
| | - G A Rixt Zijlstra
- Care and Public Health Research Institute, Department of Health Services Research, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
- Public Health Service Flevoland (GGD Flevoland), Department of Health Policy & Research, Lelystad, Netherlands, Netherlands
- Health Care and Social Work Division, Windesheim University of Applied Sciences, Almere The Netherlands, Netherlands
| | - Klaus Hauer
- Geriatrisches Zentrum am Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, AGAPLESION Bethanien Krankenhaus, Heidelberg, Germany
- Robert Bosch Gesellschaft für Medizinische Forschung mbH, Stuttgart, Germany
| | - Stefan Klöppel
- University Hospital of Old Age Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Bern (UPD), Bern, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Costantini I, Paul E, Caldwell DM, López-López JA, Pearson RM. Protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials examining the effectiveness of early parenting interventions in preventing internalising problems in children and adolescents. Syst Rev 2020; 9:244. [PMID: 33076982 PMCID: PMC7574314 DOI: 10.1186/s13643-020-01500-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2020] [Accepted: 10/07/2020] [Indexed: 01/23/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Internalising problems, such as depression and anxiety, are common and represent an important economical and societal burden. The effectiveness of parenting interventions in reducing the risk of internalising problems in children and adolescents has not yet been summarised. The aims of this review are to assess the effectiveness of parenting interventions in the primary, secondary and tertiary prevention of internalising problems in children and adolescents and to determine which intervention components and which intervention aspects are most effective for reducing the risk of internalising problems in children and adolescents. METHODS Electronic searches in OVID SP versions of MEDLINE, EMBASE and PsycINFO; Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials; EBSCO version of ERIC and ClinicalTrials.gov have been performed to identify randomised controlled trials or quasi-randomised controlled trials of parenting interventions. At least two independent researchers will assess studies for inclusion and extract data from each paper. The risk of bias assessment will be conducted independently by two reviewers using the Cochrane Collaboration's Risk of Bias Assessment Tool. Statistical heterogeneity is anticipated given potential variation in participant characteristics, intervention type and mode of delivery, and outcome measures. Random effects models, assuming a common between-study variability, will be used to account for statistical heterogeneity. Results will be analysed using a network meta-analysis (NMA). If appropriate, we will also conduct a component-level NMA, where the 'active ingredients' of interventions are modelled using a network meta-regression approach. DISCUSSION Preventing and reducing internalising problems could have major beneficial effects at the economic and societal level. Informing policy makers on the effectiveness of parenting interventions and on which intervention's component is driving the effect is important for the development of treatment strategies. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION International Prospective Register for Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) number CRD42020172251.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ilaria Costantini
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Oakfield House, Oakfield Grove, Bristol, BS8 2BP UK
| | - Elise Paul
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Oakfield House, Oakfield Grove, Bristol, BS8 2BP UK
| | - Deborah M. Caldwell
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Oakfield House, Oakfield Grove, Bristol, BS8 2BP UK
| | - José A. López-López
- Department of Basic Psychology & Methodology, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain
| | - Rebecca M. Pearson
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Oakfield House, Oakfield Grove, Bristol, BS8 2BP UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Pilkington K, Wieland LS. Self-care for anxiety and depression: a comparison of evidence from Cochrane reviews and practice to inform decision-making and priority-setting. BMC Complement Med Ther 2020; 20:247. [PMID: 32778171 PMCID: PMC7418416 DOI: 10.1186/s12906-020-03038-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2019] [Accepted: 07/27/2020] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Self-care refers to a range of activities and approaches undertaken by an individual to maintain health and manage ill-health which may include various complementary or alternative approaches. The purpose of this study was to identify the self-care approaches used by the general public for depression and anxiety, assess the usefulness of Cochrane reviews for informing decisions on self-care and highlight any gaps in the evidence. METHODS Searches were carried out for surveys of self-care for anxiety and/or depression and for Cochrane reviews and protocols of interventions with potential for use in self-care. Data was extracted from each review and Plain Language Summaries assessed for content, consistency and readability. Interventions reported in surveys and in Cochrane reviews were compared and effectiveness of each assessed. RESULTS Surveys from 10 countries reported a variety of self-care interventions, 17 of which appeared in 2 or more surveys and which included dietary supplements, herbal medicines, mind-body therapies and various forms of exercise. Twenty-two reviews and 5 protocols on potential self-care interventions were identified, the majority in depression. Twelve interventions were judged effective or promising, most with small effect sizes. Readability of summaries was highly variable: half were written at college/university level. Several commonly used approaches were not covered by Cochrane reviews. CONCLUSIONS This study has revealed the interventions currently used by the general public which are judged effective or promising based on Cochrane reviews. Some disparity is highlighted between interventions used in practice and the availability of reliable evidence, and in the presentation of effectiveness and safety. Being able to direct patients to reliable, accessible information is a positive step in ensuring effective patient-centered, evidence-informed care. Addressing gaps, ensuring consistency and increasing usability of evidence intended for the general public will support this goal.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karen Pilkington
- School of Health and Care Professions, University of Portsmouth, James Watson West, 2 King Richard 1st Road, Portsmouth, P01 2FR, UK.
| | - Lisa Susan Wieland
- Center for Integrative Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, 520 West Lombard Street, East Hall, Baltimore, MD, 21201, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Davies SR, Caldwell DM, Dawson S, Sampson SJ, Welton NJ, Wiles N, Kessler D, Miljanović M, Milunovic V, Peters T, Lewis G, Lopez-Lopez JA, Churchill R. Multimedia-delivered cognitive behavioural therapy versus face-to-face cognitive behavioural therapy for depression in adults. Hippokratia 2018. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd013184] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah R Davies
- University of Bristol; Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School; Canynge Hall 39 Whatley Road Bristol UK BS8 2PS
| | - Deborah M Caldwell
- University of Bristol; Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School; Canynge Hall 39 Whatley Road Bristol UK BS8 2PS
| | - Sarah Dawson
- University of Bristol; Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School; Canynge Hall 39 Whatley Road Bristol UK BS8 2PS
| | | | - Nicky J Welton
- University of Bristol; Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School; Canynge Hall 39 Whatley Road Bristol UK BS8 2PS
| | - Nicola Wiles
- University of Bristol; Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School; Canynge Hall 39 Whatley Road Bristol UK BS8 2PS
| | - David Kessler
- University of Bristol; Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School; Canynge Hall 39 Whatley Road Bristol UK BS8 2PS
| | - Maja Miljanović
- Agency for Quality and Accreditation in Health Care and Social Welfare; Zagreb Croatia
| | - Vibor Milunovic
- Clinical Hospital Merkur; Division of Hematology; Zagreb Croatia 10000
| | - Tim Peters
- University of Bristol; Academic Unit of Primary Health Care, Department of Community Based Medicine; Cotham Hill Bristol UK BS6 6JL
| | - Glyn Lewis
- UCL; UCL Division of Psychiatry; 67-73 Riding House St London UK W1W 7EJ
| | - Jose A Lopez-Lopez
- University of Bristol; Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School; Canynge Hall 39 Whatley Road Bristol UK BS8 2PS
| | - Rachel Churchill
- University of York; Centre for Reviews and Dissemination; York UK Y010 5DD
- University of York; Cochrane Common Mental Disorders Group; York - None - UK Y010 5DD
| |
Collapse
|