1
|
Duffy L, Lewis G, Marston L, Kendrick T, Kessler D, Moore M, Wiles N, Lewis G. Clinical factors associated with relapse in depression in a sample of UK primary care patients who have been on long-term antidepressant treatment. Psychol Med 2024; 54:951-961. [PMID: 37753652 DOI: 10.1017/s0033291723002659] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/28/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This paper investigates whether age of onset of depression, duration of the last episode, number of episodes, and residual symptoms of depression and anxiety are associated with depression relapse in primary care patients who have been on long-term maintenance antidepressant treatment and no longer meet ICD10 criteria for depression. METHODS An observational cohort using data from ANTLER (N = 478), a double-blind placebo-controlled trial. The primary outcome was time to relapse using the retrospective CIS-R. Participants were followed for 12 months. RESULTS Primary outcome was available for 468 participants. Time to relapse in those with more than five previous episodes of depression was shorter, hazard ratio (HR) 1.84 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.23-2.75) compared to people with two episodes; HR 1.57 (95% CI 1.01-2.43) after adjustment. The residual symptoms of depression at baseline were also associated with increased relapse: HR 1.05 (95% CI 1.01-1.09) and HR 1.06 (95% CI 1.01-1.12) in the adjusted model. There was evidence of reduced rate of relapse in older age of onset group: HR 0.86 (95% CI 0.78-0.95); HR attenuated after adjustment HR 0.91 (95% CI 0.81-1.02). There was no evidence of an association between duration of the current episode and residual anxiety symptoms with relapse. CONCLUSIONS The number of previous episodes and residual symptoms of depression were associated with increased likelihood of relapse. These factors could inform joint decision making when patients are considering tapering off maintenance antidepressant treatment or considering other treatments to prevent relapse.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Larisa Duffy
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, 6th Floor Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London W1 T 7NF, UK
| | - Gemma Lewis
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, 6th Floor Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London W1 T 7NF, UK
| | - Louise Marston
- Research Dept. of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, UCL Medical School, Upper 3rd Floor, Royal Free Campus, Rowland Hill Street, London, NW3 2PF, UK
- Priment Clinical Trials Unit, University College London, UCL Medical School, Upper 3rd Floor, Royal Free Campus, Rowland Hill Street, London, NW3 2PF, UK
| | - Tony Kendrick
- Primary Care Research Centre, School of Primary Care, Population Sciences and Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Aldermoor Health Centre, Southampton SO16 5ST, UK
| | - David Kessler
- Centre for Academic Mental Health, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Michael Moore
- Primary Care Research Centre, School of Primary Care, Population Sciences and Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Aldermoor Health Centre, Southampton SO16 5ST, UK
| | - Nicola Wiles
- Centre for Academic Mental Health, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Glyn Lewis
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, 6th Floor Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London W1 T 7NF, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Davis K, Kessler D, Lemke D, Doughty C. Applied Improvisation: Putting Behavioral Skills Center Stage in Simulation-Based Team Training. Simul Healthc 2024:01266021-990000000-00108. [PMID: 38421367 DOI: 10.1097/sih.0000000000000785] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/02/2024]
Abstract
SUMMARY STATEMENT Behavioral skills, sometimes referred to as nontechnical skills or team-based skills, are fundamental to simulation-based team training. These skills should be afforded the same deliberate practice and development as clinical knowledge and procedural skills in health care education. Applied improvisation, the use of theater games designed to improve individual and team performance, is gaining traction in health care education to train behavioral skills. Simulation educators are experts in experiential learning with debriefing and therefore well poised to incorporate applied improvisational exercises into team training activities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kasey Davis
- From the Division of Critical Care Medicine (K.D.), Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX; Division of Emergency Medicine (D.K.), Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY; Division of Emergency Medicine (D.L., C.D.), Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX; and Simulation Center (K.D., D.L., C.D.), Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, TX
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Rai D, Webb D, Lewis A, Cotton L, Norris JE, Alexander R, Baldwin DS, Brugha T, Cochrane M, Del Piccolo MC, Glasson EJ, Hatch KK, Kessler D, Langdon PE, Leonard H, MacNeill SJ, Mills N, Morales MV, Morgan Z, Mukherjee R, Realpe AX, Russell A, Starkstein S, Taylor J, Turner N, Thorn J, Welch J, Wiles N. Sertraline for anxiety in adults with a diagnosis of autism (STRATA): study protocol for a pragmatic, multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled randomised controlled trial. Trials 2024; 25:37. [PMID: 38212784 PMCID: PMC10782796 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-023-07847-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2023] [Accepted: 11/30/2023] [Indexed: 01/13/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are commonly prescribed to manage anxiety in adults with an autism diagnosis. However, their effectiveness and adverse effect profile in the autistic population are not well known. This trial aims to determine the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the SSRI sertraline in reducing symptoms of anxiety and improving quality of life in adults with a diagnosis of autism compared with placebo and to quantify any adverse effects. METHODS STRATA is a two-parallel group, multi-centre, pragmatic, double-blind, randomised placebo-controlled trial with allocation at the level of the individual. It will be delivered through recruiting sites with autism services in 4 regional centres in the United Kingdom (UK) and 1 in Australia. Adults with an autism diagnosis and a Generalised Anxiety Disorder Assessment (GAD-7) score ≥ 10 at screening will be randomised 1:1 to either 25 mg sertraline or placebo, with subsequent flexible dose titration up to 200 mg. The primary outcome is GAD-7 scores at 16 weeks post-randomisation. Secondary outcomes include adverse effects, proportionate change in GAD-7 scores including 50% reduction, social anxiety, obsessive-compulsive symptoms, panic attacks, repetitive behaviours, meltdowns, depressive symptoms, composite depression and anxiety, functioning and disability and quality of life. Carer burden will be assessed in a linked carer sub-study. Outcome data will be collected using online/paper methods via video call, face-to-face or telephone according to participant preference at 16, 24 and 52 weeks post-randomisation, with brief safety checks and data collection at 1-2, 4, 8, 12 and 36 weeks. An economic evaluation to study the cost-effectiveness of sertraline vs placebo and a QuinteT Recruitment Intervention (QRI) to optimise recruitment and informed consent are embedded within the trial. Qualitative interviews at various times during the study will explore experiences of participating and taking the trial medication. DISCUSSION Results from this study should help autistic adults and their clinicians make evidence-based decisions on the use of sertraline for managing anxiety in this population. TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN, ISRCTN15984604 . Registered on 08 February 2021. EudraCT 2019-004312-66. ANZCTR ACTRN12621000801819. Registered on 07 April 2021.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dheeraj Rai
- Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
- NIHR Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, Bristol, UK.
- Avon & Wiltshire Partnership Mental Health NHS Trust, Bath, UK.
| | - Doug Webb
- Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- Bristol Trials Centre, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Amanda Lewis
- Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- Bristol Trials Centre, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Leonora Cotton
- Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- Bristol Trials Centre, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Jade Eloise Norris
- Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- Bristol Trials Centre, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Regi Alexander
- Hertfordshire Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Hatfield, UK
| | - David S Baldwin
- Clinical and Experimental Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | | | - Madeleine Cochrane
- Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- Bristol Trials Centre, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | | | - Emma J Glasson
- Telethon Kids Institute, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
- Discipline of Psychiatry, Medical School, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
| | - Katherine K Hatch
- Discipline of Psychiatry, Medical School, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
| | - David Kessler
- Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- NIHR Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, Bristol, UK
| | - Peter E Langdon
- Centre for Research in Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
- Coventry and Warwickshire Partnership NHS Trust, Coventry, UK
| | - Helen Leonard
- Telethon Kids Institute, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
- Discipline of Psychiatry, Medical School, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
| | - Stephanie J MacNeill
- Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- NIHR Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, Bristol, UK
- Bristol Trials Centre, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Nicola Mills
- Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- NIHR Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, Bristol, UK
| | - Maximiliano Vazquez Morales
- Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- Bristol Trials Centre, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | | | - Raja Mukherjee
- Surrey and Borders Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Leatherhead, UK
| | - Alba X Realpe
- Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- NIHR Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, Bristol, UK
- Bristol Trials Centre, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Ailsa Russell
- Centre for Applied Autism Research, Department of Psychology, University of Bath, Bath, UK
| | - Sergio Starkstein
- Discipline of Psychiatry, Medical School, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
| | - Jodi Taylor
- Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- Bristol Trials Centre, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Nicholas Turner
- Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- Bristol Trials Centre, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Joanna Thorn
- Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- Bristol Trials Centre, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Jack Welch
- Dorset County Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Dorchester, UK
| | - Nicola Wiles
- Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- NIHR Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, Bristol, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Stefanidis D, Cook D, Kalantar-Motamedi SM, Muret-Wagstaff S, Calhoun AW, Lauridsen KG, Paige JT, Lockey A, Donoghue A, Hall AK, Patocka C, Palaganas J, Gross IT, Kessler D, Vermylen J, Lin Y, Aebersold M, Chang TP, Duff J, Kolbe M, Rutherford-Hemming T, Decker S, Collings A, Toseef Ansari M. Society for Simulation in Healthcare Guidelines for Simulation Training. Simul Healthc 2024; 19:S4-S22. [PMID: 38240614 DOI: 10.1097/sih.0000000000000776] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/23/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Simulation has become a staple in the training of healthcare professionals with accumulating evidence on its effectiveness. However, guidelines for optimal methods of simulation training do not currently exist. METHODS Systematic reviews of the literature on 16 identified key questions were conducted and expert panel consensus recommendations determined using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology. OBJECTIVE These evidence-based guidelines from the Society for Simulation in Healthcare intend to support healthcare professionals in decisions on the most effective methods for simulation training in healthcare. RESULTS Twenty recommendations on 16 questions were determined using GRADE. Four expert recommendations were also provided. CONCLUSIONS The first evidence-based guidelines for simulation training are provided to guide instructors and learners on the most effective use of simulation in healthcare.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dimitrios Stefanidis
- From the Department of Surgery (D.S., S.-M.K.-M.), Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN; Department of Internal Medicine (D.C.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Department of Surgery (S.M.-W.), Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Department of Pediatrics (A.W.C.), University of Louisville School of Medicine and Norton Children's Medical Group, Louisville, KY; Department of Medicine (K.G.L.), Randers Regional Hospital, Randers, Denmark; Research Center for Emergency Medicine (K.G.L.), Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark; Department of Surgery (J.T.P.), LSU Health New Orleans School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA; Emergency Department (A.L.), Calderdale and Huddersfield NHS Trust, Halifax; School of Human and Health Sciences (A.L.), University of Huddersfield, Huddersfield, UK; Critical Care Medicine and Pediatrics (A.D.), University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA; Department of Emergency Medicine (A.K.H.), University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; Department of Emergency Medicine (C.P.), Cumming School of Medicine University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada; Department of Health Professions Education (J.P.), School of Healthcare Leadership, MGH Institute of Health Professions, Boston, MA; Department of Pediatrics (I.T.G.), Section of Emergency Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT; Department of Emergency Medicine (D.K.), Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY,; Department of Medicine and Medical Education (J.V.), Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; KidSIM Simulation Research Program (Y.L.), Alberta Children's Hospital, Calgary, Canada; University of Michigan School of Nursing (M.A.), Ann Arbor, MI; Las Madrinas Simulation Center, Children's Hospital (T.C.), University South California, Los Angeles, CA; Department of Pediatrics (J.D.), University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada; Simulation Center (M.K.), University Hospital Zurich, ETH Zurich, Switzerland; Department of Nursing (T.R.-H.), University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC; Department of Nursing (S.D.), Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, TX; Department of Surgery (A.C.), University of Louisville, Louisville, KY; and Independent Methodologist (M.T.A.), Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Warbrick LA, Dunn BD, Moran PA, Campbell J, Kessler D, Marchant K, Farr M, Ryan M, Parkin M, Sharpe R, Turner K, Sylianou M, Sumner G, Wood E. Non-randomised feasibility study of training workshops for Talking Therapies service high-intensity therapists to optimise depression and anxiety outcomes for individuals with co-morbid personality difficulties: a study protocol. Pilot Feasibility Stud 2023; 9:170. [PMID: 37798752 PMCID: PMC10552316 DOI: 10.1186/s40814-023-01394-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2023] [Accepted: 09/11/2023] [Indexed: 10/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The NHS Talking Therapies for Anxiety and Depression programme ('TTad'; formerly Improving Access to Psychological Therapies 'IAPT') delivers high-intensity cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) to over 200,000 individuals each year for common mental health problems like depression and anxiety. More than half of these individuals experience comorbid personality difficulties, who show poorer treatment outcomes. TTad therapists report feeling unskilled to work with clients with personality difficulties, and enhancing the training of TTad therapists may lead to improved treatment outcomes for individuals presenting with secondary personality difficulties alongside depression and anxiety. METHODS This is a pre-post non-randomised mixed-method feasibility study, exploring the feasibility and acceptability of a 1-day training workshop for high-intensity (HI) CBT therapists. The workshop is focused on understanding and assessing personality difficulties and adapting HICBT treatments for anxiety and depression to accommodate client needs. The feasibility and acceptability of the workshop and the evaluation procedures will be investigated. It will be examined to what extent the workshop provision leads to improvements in therapist skills and confidence and explored to what extent the training has the potential to enhance clinical outcomes for this client group. DISCUSSION This feasibility study will provide data on the acceptability and feasibility of delivering brief therapist training to adapt usual HICBT to optimise care for individuals with secondary personality difficulties seeking treatment in TTad services for a primary problem of depression and/or anxiety. The study will also evaluate proof of concept that such an approach has the potential to improve clinical outcomes for those with secondary personality difficulties and report any possible harms identified. The study will inform the design of a future randomised controlled trial designed to test the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the training. TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN81104604 . Submitted on 6th June 2022. Registration date: 3rd January 2023.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura A Warbrick
- Mood Disorders Centre, University of Exeter, Exeter, EX4 4QQ, UK.
- College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
| | - Barnaby D Dunn
- Mood Disorders Centre, University of Exeter, Exeter, EX4 4QQ, UK
- College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Paul A Moran
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - John Campbell
- College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - David Kessler
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Katie Marchant
- Mood Disorders Centre, University of Exeter, Exeter, EX4 4QQ, UK
| | - Michelle Farr
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- The National Institute for Health and Care Research Applied Research Collaboration West (NIHR ARC West) at University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Mary Ryan
- Mood Disorders Centre, University of Exeter, Exeter, EX4 4QQ, UK
| | - Megan Parkin
- Royal Devon University Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Tiverton, UK
| | | | - Katrina Turner
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | | | - Gemma Sumner
- Everyturn Mental Health, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
| | - Emma Wood
- Everyturn Mental Health, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Auerbach MA, Whitfill T, Montgomery E, Leung J, Kessler D, Gross IT, Walsh BM, Fiedor Hamilton M, Gawel M, Kant S, Janofsky S, Brown LL, Walls TA, Alletag M, Sessa A, Arteaga GM, Keilman A, Van Ittersum W, Rutman MS, Zaveri P, Good G, Schoen JC, Lavoie M, Mannenbach M, Bigham L, Dudas RA, Rutledge C, Okada PJ, Moegling M, Anderson I, Tay KY, Scherzer DJ, Vora S, Gaither S, Fenster D, Jones D, Aebersold M, Chatfield J, Knight L, Berg M, Makharashvili A, Katznelson J, Mathias E, Lutfi R, Abu-Sultaneh S, Burns B, Padlipsky P, Lee J, Butler L, Alander S, Thomas A, Bhatnagar A, Jafri FN, Crellin J, Abulebda K. Factors Associated With Improved Pediatric Resuscitative Care in General Emergency Departments. Pediatrics 2023:e2022060790. [PMID: 37416979 DOI: 10.1542/peds.2022-060790] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/02/2023] [Indexed: 07/08/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To describe the quality of pediatric resuscitative care in general emergency departments (GEDs) and to determine hospital-level factors associated with higher quality. METHODS Prospective observational study of resuscitative care provided to 3 in situ simulated patients (infant seizure, infant sepsis, and child cardiac arrest) by interprofessional GED teams. A composite quality score (CQS) was measured and the association of this score with modifiable and nonmodifiable hospital-level factors was explored. RESULTS A median CQS of 62.8 of 100 (interquartile range 50.5-71.1) was noted for 287 resuscitation teams from 175 emergency departments. In the unadjusted analyses, a higher score was associated with the modifiable factor of an affiliation with a pediatric academic medical center (PAMC) and the nonmodifiable factors of higher pediatric volume and location in the Northeast and Midwest. In the adjusted analyses, a higher CQS was associated with modifiable factors of an affiliation with a PAMC and the designation of both a nurse and physician pediatric emergency care coordinator, and nonmodifiable factors of higher pediatric volume and location in the Northeast and Midwest. A weak correlation was noted between quality and pediatric readiness scores. CONCLUSIONS A low quality of pediatric resuscitative care, measured using simulation, was noted across a cohort of GEDs. Hospital factors associated with higher quality included: an affiliation with a PAMC, designation of a pediatric emergency care coordinator, higher pediatric volume, and geographic location. A weak correlation was noted between quality and pediatric readiness scores.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Erin Montgomery
- Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | - James Leung
- McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - David Kessler
- Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York
| | - Isabel T Gross
- Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | | | | | - Marcie Gawel
- Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Shruti Kant
- University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Stephen Janofsky
- UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Linda L Brown
- The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Theresa A Walls
- Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania and Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Michelle Alletag
- University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Anna Sessa
- Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, New Hampshire
| | - Grace M Arteaga
- Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Ashley Keilman
- University of Washington and Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, Washington
| | | | - Maia S Rutman
- Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, New Hampshire
| | - Pavan Zaveri
- The George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, District of Columbia
| | - Grace Good
- Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania and Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | | | - Meghan Lavoie
- Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania and Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Mark Mannenbach
- Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, Minnesota
| | | | | | | | - Pamela J Okada
- University of Texas, Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Michelle Moegling
- Case Western Reserve University and UH Rainbow Babies and Children's Hospital, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Ingrid Anderson
- Case Western Reserve University and UH Rainbow Babies and Children's Hospital, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Khoon-Yen Tay
- Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania and Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | | | | | - Stacy Gaither
- The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Daniel Fenster
- Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Derick Jones
- Mayo Clinic Health System, Albert Lea and Austin, Minnesota
| | | | | | - Lynda Knight
- Stanford Medicine Children's Health, Palo Alto, California
| | - Marc Berg
- Stanford Medicine Children's Health, Palo Alto, California
| | | | | | | | - Riad Lutfi
- Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | | | - Brian Burns
- University of Washington and Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, Washington
| | | | - Jumie Lee
- The Lundquist Institute, Torrance, California
| | - Lucas Butler
- Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - Sarah Alander
- Geisinger Commonwealth School of Medicine, Scranton, Pennsylvania; and
| | - Anita Thomas
- University of Washington and Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, Washington
| | | | | | - Jason Crellin
- Geisinger Commonwealth School of Medicine, Scranton, Pennsylvania; and
| | - Kamal Abulebda
- Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Lewis NV, Gregory A, Feder GS, Angill-Williams A, Bates S, Glynn J, Halliwell G, Hawcroft C, Kessler D, Lawton M, Leach R, Millband S, Pitt K, Zammit S, Malpass A. Trauma-specific mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for women with post-traumatic stress disorder and a history of domestic abuse: intervention refinement and a randomised feasibility trial (coMforT study). Pilot Feasibility Stud 2023; 9:112. [PMID: 37400911 DOI: 10.1186/s40814-023-01335-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2022] [Accepted: 06/07/2023] [Indexed: 07/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Women who have experienced domestic violence and abuse (DVA) are at increased risk of developing post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and complex PTSD (CPTSD). In 2014-2015, we developed a prototype trauma-specific mindfulness-based cognitive therapy curriculum (TS-MBCT) for the treatment of PTSD in a DVA population. This study aimed to refine the prototype TS-MBCT and evaluate the feasibility of conducting a randomised controlled trial (RCT) testing its effectiveness and cost-effectiveness. METHODS Intervention refinement phase was informed by evidence synthesis from a literature review, qualitative interviews with professionals and DVA survivors, and a consensus exercise with experts in trauma and mindfulness. We tested the refined TS-MBCT intervention in an individually randomised parallel group feasibility trial with pre-specified progression criteria, a traffic light system, and embedded process and health economics evaluations. RESULTS The TS-MBCT intervention consisted of eight group sessions and home practice. We screened 109 women in a DVA agency and recruited 20 (15 TS-MBCT, 5 self-referral to National Health Service (NHS) psychological treatment), with 80% follow-up at 6 months. Our TS-MBCT intervention had 73% uptake, 100% retention, and high acceptability. Participants suggested recruitment via multiple agencies, and additional safety measures. Randomisation into the NHS control arm did not work due to long waiting lists and previous negative experiences. Three self-administered PTSD/CPTSD questionnaires produced differing outcomes thus a clinician administered measure might work better. We met six out of nine feasibility progression criteria at green and three at amber targets demonstrating that it is possible to conduct a full-size RCT of the TS-MBCT intervention after making minor amendments to recruitment and randomisation procedures, the control intervention, primary outcomes measures, and intervention content. At 6 months, none of the PTSD/CPTSD outcomes ruled out a clinically important difference between trial arms indicating that it is reasonable to proceed to a full-size RCT to estimate these outcomes with greater precision. CONCLUSIONS A future RCT of the coMforT TS-MBCT intervention should have an internal pilot, recruit from multiple DVA agencies, NHS and non-NHS settings, have an active control psychological treatment, use robust randomisation and safety procedures, and clinician-administered measures for PTSD/CPTSD. TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN64458065 11/01/2019.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natalia V Lewis
- NIHR Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust and University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK.
- Bristol Medical School (PHS), University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK.
| | - Alison Gregory
- Bristol Medical School (PHS), University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK
| | - Gene S Feder
- NIHR Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust and University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK
- Bristol Medical School (PHS), University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK
| | | | - Sophie Bates
- Bristol Medical School (PHS), University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK
| | - Joel Glynn
- Bristol Medical School (PHS), University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK
| | - Gemma Halliwell
- Bristol Medical School (PHS), University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK
| | - Claire Hawcroft
- Bristol Medical School (PHS), University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK
| | - David Kessler
- NIHR Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust and University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK
- Bristol Medical School (PHS), University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK
| | - Michael Lawton
- Bristol Medical School (PHS), University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK
| | - Rwth Leach
- NIHR Clinical Research Network (CRN), Bristol Medical School (PHS), University of Bristol, Oakfield House, Bristol, BS8 2BN, UK
| | - Sarah Millband
- Bristol Medical School (PHS), University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK
| | - Katherine Pitt
- Bristol Medical School (PHS), University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK
| | - Stan Zammit
- NIHR Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust and University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK
- Bristol Medical School (PHS), University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK
- Division of Psychological Medicine and Clinical Neurosciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, CF24 4HQ, UK
| | - Alice Malpass
- Bristol Medical School (PHS), University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Baloescu C, Rucki AA, Chen A, Zahiri M, Ghoshal G, Wang J, Chew R, Kessler D, Chan DKI, Hicks B, Schnittke N, Shupp J, Gregory K, Raju B, Moore C. Machine Learning Algorithm Detection of Confluent B-Lines. Ultrasound Med Biol 2023:S0301-5629(23)00173-4. [PMID: 37365065 DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2023.05.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2023] [Revised: 05/02/2023] [Accepted: 05/26/2023] [Indexed: 06/28/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE B-lines are a ring-down artifact of lung ultrasound that arise with increased alveolar water in conditions such as pulmonary edema and infectious pneumonitis. Confluent B-line presence may signify a different level of pathology compared with single B-lines. Existing algorithms aimed at B-line counting do not distinguish between single and confluent B-lines. The objective of this study was to test a machine learning algorithm for confluent B-line identification. METHODS This study used a subset of 416 clips from 157 subjects, previously acquired in a prospective study enrolling adults with shortness of breath at two academic medical centers, using a hand-held tablet and a 14-zone protocol. After exclusions, random sampling generated a total of 416 clips (146 curvilinear, 150 sector and 120 linear) for review. A group of five experts in point-of-care ultrasound blindly evaluated the clips for presence/absence of confluent B-lines. Ground truth was defined as majority agreement among the experts and used for comparison with the algorithm. RESULTS Confluent B-lines were present in 206 of 416 clips (49.5%). Sensitivity and specificity of confluent B-line detection by algorithm compared with expert determination were 83% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.77-0.88) and 92% (95% CI: 0.88-0.96). Sensitivity and specificity did not statistically differ between transducers. Agreement between algorithm and expert for confluent B-lines measured by unweighted κ was 0.75 (95% CI: 0.69-0.81) for the overall set. CONCLUSION The confluent B-line detection algorithm had high sensitivity and specificity for detection of confluent B-lines in lung ultrasound point-of-care clips, compared with expert determination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cristiana Baloescu
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
| | | | - Alvin Chen
- Philips Research North America, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | | | | | - Jing Wang
- Philips Research North America, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Rita Chew
- Philips Research North America, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - David Kessler
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians & Surgeons, New York, NY, USA
| | - Daniela K I Chan
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA; Center for Regenerative Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Bryson Hicks
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA; Center for Regenerative Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Nikolai Schnittke
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA; Center for Regenerative Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Jeffrey Shupp
- Departments of Surgery, Biochemistry and Molecular & Cellular Biology, Georgetown University School of Medicine | Medstar Health, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Kenton Gregory
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA; Center for Regenerative Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | | | - Christopher Moore
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Tallon D, Thomas L, Brabyn S, Ching BCF, Hahn JS, Jude B, X Logan M, Burrage A, Fox F, Gilbody S, Lanham P, Lewis G, Li J, MacNeill SJ, Nazareth I, Parrott S, Peters TJ, Shafran R, Turner K, Williams C, Kessler D, Wiles N. Integrated therapist and online CBT for depression in primary care (INTERACT): study protocol for a multi-centre randomised controlled trial. Trials 2023; 24:421. [PMID: 37340500 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-023-07396-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2023] [Accepted: 05/19/2023] [Indexed: 06/22/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) is an effective treatment for depression. Self-directed online CBT interventions have made CBT more accessible at a lower cost. However, adherence is often poor and, in the absence of therapist support, effects are modest and short-term. Delivering CBT online using instant messaging is clinically and cost-effective; however, most existing platforms are limited to instant messaging sessions, without the support of between-session "homework" activities. The INTERACT intervention integrates online CBT materials and 'high-intensity' therapist-led CBT, delivered remotely in real-time. The INTERACT trial will evaluate this novel integration in terms of clinical and cost-effectiveness, and acceptability to therapists and clients. METHODS Pragmatic, two parallel-group multi-centre individually randomised controlled trial, with 434 patients recruited from primary care practices in Bristol, London and York. Participants with depression will be identified via General Practitioner record searches and direct referrals. INCLUSION CRITERIA aged ≥ 18 years; score ≥ 14 on Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II); meeting International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10) criteria for depression. EXCLUSION CRITERIA alcohol or substance dependency in the past year; bipolar disorder; schizophrenia; psychosis; dementia; currently under psychiatric care for depression (including those referred but not yet seen); cannot complete questionnaires unaided or requires an interpreter; currently receiving CBT/other psychotherapy; received high-intensity CBT in the past four years; participating in another intervention trial; unwilling/unable to receive CBT via computer/laptop/smartphone. Eligible participants will be randomised to integrated CBT or usual care. Integrated CBT utilises the standard Beckian intervention for depression and comprises nine live therapist-led sessions, with (up to) a further three if clinically appropriate. The first session is 60-90 min via videocall, with subsequent 50-min sessions delivered online, using instant messaging. Participants allocated integrated CBT can access integrated online CBT resources (worksheets/information sheets/videos) within and between sessions. Outcome assessments at 3-, 6-, 9- and 12-month post-randomisation. The primary outcome is the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II) score at 6 months (as a continuous variable). A nested qualitative study and health economic evaluation will be conducted. DISCUSSION If clinically and cost-effective, this model of integrated CBT could be introduced into existing psychological services, increasing access to, and equity of, CBT provision. TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN, ISRCTN13112900. Registered on 11/11/2020. Currently recruiting participants. Trial registration data are presented in Table 1.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Debbie Tallon
- Bristol Medical School, Centre for Academic Mental Health, Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Oakfield House, Oakfield Grove, Bristol, BS8 2BN, UK.
| | - Laura Thomas
- Bristol Medical School, Centre for Academic Mental Health, Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Oakfield House, Oakfield Grove, Bristol, BS8 2BN, UK
| | - Sally Brabyn
- ARRC 208, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, YO10 5DF, UK
| | - Brian Chi Fung Ching
- UCL Division of Psychiatry, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, WIT 7BN, UK
| | - Jane Sungmin Hahn
- UCL Division of Psychiatry, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, WIT 7BN, UK
| | - Berry Jude
- UCL Division of Psychiatry, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, WIT 7BN, UK
| | - Mekeda X Logan
- UCL Division of Psychiatry, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, WIT 7BN, UK
| | - Alex Burrage
- Bristol Medical School, Centre for Academic Mental Health, Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Oakfield House, Oakfield Grove, Bristol, BS8 2BN, UK
| | - Fiona Fox
- Bristol Medical School, Centre for Academic Mental Health, Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Oakfield House, Oakfield Grove, Bristol, BS8 2BN, UK
| | - Simon Gilbody
- Mental Health & Addiction Research Group, University of York & Hull York Medical School, York, UK
| | - Paul Lanham
- Public and Patient Involvement Representative, London, UK
| | - Glyn Lewis
- UCL Division of Psychiatry, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, WIT 7BN, UK
| | - Jinshuo Li
- Department of Health Sciences, Seebohm Rowntree Building, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK
| | - Stephanie J MacNeill
- Bristol Medical School, Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Irwin Nazareth
- Department of Primary Care & Population Health, University College London, Royal Free Site, Rowland Hill Street, London, NW3, UK
| | - Steve Parrott
- Department of Health Sciences, Seebohm Rowntree Building, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK
| | - Tim J Peters
- Bristol Dental School, University of Bristol, Lower Maudlin Street, Bristol, BS21 2LY, UK
| | - Roz Shafran
- Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health London, University College London, London, WC1N 1EH, UK
| | - Katrina Turner
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, Bristol Medical School, Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK
| | - Chris Williams
- Clarice Pears Building, University of Glasgow, 90 Byres Road, Glasgow, G12 8TA, UK
- Five Areas Ltd, 1 Aurora Avenue, Clydebank, G81 1BF, UK
| | - David Kessler
- Bristol Medical School, Centre for Academic Mental Health, Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Oakfield House, Oakfield Grove, Bristol, BS8 2BN, UK
| | - Nicola Wiles
- Bristol Medical School, Centre for Academic Mental Health, Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Oakfield House, Oakfield Grove, Bristol, BS8 2BN, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
O'Connor RC, Worthman CM, Abanga M, Athanassopoulou N, Boyce N, Chan LF, Christensen H, Das-Munshi J, Downs J, Koenen KC, Moutier CY, Templeton P, Batterham P, Brakspear K, Frank RG, Gilbody S, Gureje O, Henderson D, John A, Kabagambe W, Khan M, Kessler D, Kirtley OJ, Kline S, Kohrt B, Lincoln AK, Lund C, Mendenhall E, Miranda R, Mondelli V, Niederkrotenthaler T, Osborn D, Pirkis J, Pisani AR, Prawira B, Rachidi H, Seedat S, Siskind D, Vijayakumar L, Yip PSF. Gone Too Soon: priorities for action to prevent premature mortality associated with mental illness and mental distress. Lancet Psychiatry 2023; 10:452-464. [PMID: 37182526 DOI: 10.1016/s2215-0366(23)00058-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2022] [Revised: 02/17/2023] [Accepted: 02/28/2023] [Indexed: 05/16/2023]
Abstract
Globally, too many people die prematurely from suicide and the physical comorbidities associated with mental illness and mental distress. The purpose of this Review is to mobilise the translation of evidence into prioritised actions that reduce this inequity. The mental health research charity, MQ Mental Health Research, convened an international panel that used roadmapping methods and review evidence to identify key factors, mechanisms, and solutions for premature mortality across the social-ecological system. We identified 12 key overarching risk factors and mechanisms, with more commonalities than differences across the suicide and physical comorbidities domains. We also identified 18 actionable solutions across three organising principles: the integration of mental and physical health care; the prioritisation of prevention while strengthening treatment; and the optimisation of intervention synergies across social-ecological levels and the intervention cycle. These solutions included accessible, integrated high-quality primary care; early life, workplace, and community-based interventions co-designed by the people they should serve; decriminalisation of suicide and restriction of access to lethal means; stigma reduction; reduction of income, gender, and racial inequality; and increased investment. The time to act is now, to rebuild health-care systems, leverage changes in funding landscapes, and address the effects of stigma, discrimination, marginalisation, gender violence, and victimisation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rory C O'Connor
- Suicidal Behaviour Research Laboratory, School of Health & Wellbeing, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
| | | | - Marie Abanga
- Hope for the Abused and Battered, Douala, Cameroon
| | | | | | - Lai Fong Chan
- Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, National University of Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Helen Christensen
- Faculty of Medicine & Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney and the Black Dog Institute, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Jayati Das-Munshi
- Department of Psychological Medicine, King's College London, London, UK; Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Neuroscience, and Centre for Society and Mental Health, King's College London, London, UK; South London and Maudsley NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - James Downs
- Royal College of Psychiatrists, UK and Faculty of Wellbeing, Education, and Language Studies, Open University, Milton Keynes, UK
| | | | | | - Peter Templeton
- The William Templeton Foundation for Young People's Mental Health, Cambridge, UK
| | - Philip Batterham
- Centre for Mental Health Research, College of Health and Medicine, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia
| | | | | | - Simon Gilbody
- York Mental Health and Addictions Research Group, University of York, York, UK
| | - Oye Gureje
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Research and Training in Mental Health, Neuroscience, Drug and Alcohol Abuse, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria
| | - David Henderson
- Department of Psychiatry, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Ann John
- Swansea University Medical School, Swansea University, Swansea, UK
| | | | - Murad Khan
- Brain & Mind Institute, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan
| | - David Kessler
- Bristol Population Health Science Institute, Centre for Academic Mental Health, Centre for Academic Primary Care, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Olivia J Kirtley
- Center for Contextual Psychiatry, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - Brandon Kohrt
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Alisa K Lincoln
- Institute for Health Equity and Social Justice Research, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Crick Lund
- Health Services and Population Research Department, King's College London, London, UK; Centre for Global Mental Health, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Emily Mendenhall
- Edmund A Walsh School of Foreign Service, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Regina Miranda
- Hunter College, Department of Psychology, The Graduate Center, City University of New York, New York, NY, USA
| | - Valeria Mondelli
- Department of Psychological Medicine, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Thomas Niederkrotenthaler
- Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Suicide Research & Mental Health Promotion Unit, Center for Public Health, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - David Osborn
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London and Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Jane Pirkis
- Centre for Mental Health, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Anthony R Pisani
- University of Rochester Center for the Study and Prevention of Suicide, SafeSide Prevention, Rochester, NY, USA
| | | | | | - Soraya Seedat
- Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, SAMRC Genomics of Brain Disorders Unit, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Dan Siskind
- Queensland Brain Institute, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | | | - Paul S F Yip
- Hong Kong Jockey Club Centre for Suicide Research and Prevention, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Asaki SY, Kessler D, Nayak A, Kim JJ, Miyake CY. Atrioventricular Nodal Ablation Is Not an Effective Treatment Strategy in Catecholaminergic Polymorphic Ventricular Tachycardia. Tex Heart Inst J 2023; 50:493264. [PMID: 37268281 DOI: 10.14503/thij-22-7974] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/04/2023]
Abstract
Catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia is a rare but lethal heritable arrhythmia syndrome associated with both atrial and ventricular arrhythmias. Treatment includes antiarrhythmics, sympathetic denervation, and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators. The use of atrioventricular nodal ablation as a treatment strategy to prevent ventricular arrhythmias in catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia was not found in the literature. This report describes a teenager with a presenting rhythm of atrial and ventricular fibrillation and cardiac arrest. Her clinical arrhythmia was predominantly atrial dysrhythmias, which delayed her diagnosis of catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia. Before her diagnosis, she underwent atrioventricular nodal ablation in an effort to prevent ventricular arrhythmias, which was ultimately ineffective. This report highlights the importance of recognizing atrial arrhythmias in catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia and provides evidence that atrioventricular nodal ablation is not an effective treatment strategy for this disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Yukiko Asaki
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, Texas Children's Hospital, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | | | - Aarushi Nayak
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, Texas Children's Hospital, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Jeffrey J Kim
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, Texas Children's Hospital, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Christina Y Miyake
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, Texas Children's Hospital, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
- Department of Molecular Physiology and Biophysics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Rogers JP, Oldham MA, Fricchione G, Northoff G, Ellen Wilson J, Mann SC, Francis A, Wieck A, Elizabeth Wachtel L, Lewis G, Grover S, Hirjak D, Ahuja N, Zandi MS, Young AH, Fone K, Andrews S, Kessler D, Saifee T, Gee S, Baldwin DS, David AS. Evidence-based consensus guidelines for the management of catatonia: Recommendations from the British Association for Psychopharmacology. J Psychopharmacol 2023; 37:327-369. [PMID: 37039129 PMCID: PMC10101189 DOI: 10.1177/02698811231158232] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 25.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/12/2023]
Abstract
The British Association for Psychopharmacology developed an evidence-based consensus guideline on the management of catatonia. A group of international experts from a wide range of disciplines was assembled. Evidence was gathered from existing systematic reviews and the primary literature. Recommendations were made on the basis of this evidence and were graded in terms of their strength. The guideline initially covers the diagnosis, aetiology, clinical features and descriptive epidemiology of catatonia. Clinical assessments, including history, physical examination and investigations are then considered. Treatment with benzodiazepines, electroconvulsive therapy and other pharmacological and neuromodulatory therapies is covered. Special regard is given to periodic catatonia, malignant catatonia, neuroleptic malignant syndrome and antipsychotic-induced catatonia. There is attention to the needs of particular groups, namely children and adolescents, older adults, women in the perinatal period, people with autism spectrum disorder and those with certain medical conditions. Clinical trials were uncommon, and the recommendations in this guideline are mainly informed by small observational studies, case series and case reports, which highlights the need for randomised controlled trials and prospective cohort studies in this area.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan P Rogers
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
- South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Mark A Oldham
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Gregory Fricchione
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Georg Northoff
- Mind, Brain Imaging and Neuroethics Research Unit, The Royal's Institute of Mental Health Research, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Jo Ellen Wilson
- Veterans Affairs, Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center, Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, Nashville, TN, USA
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | | | - Andrew Francis
- Penn State Medical School, Hershey Medical Center, PA, USA
| | - Angelika Wieck
- Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
- Institute of Population Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Lee Elizabeth Wachtel
- Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Glyn Lewis
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | - Sandeep Grover
- Department of Psychiatry, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, CH, India
| | - Dusan Hirjak
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Niraj Ahuja
- Regional Affective Disorders Service, Cumbria, Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle, UK
| | - Michael S Zandi
- Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK
- National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK
| | - Allan H Young
- South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, UK
| | - Kevin Fone
- School of Life Sciences, Queen's Medical Centre, The University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | | | - David Kessler
- Centre for Academic Mental Health, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Tabish Saifee
- National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK
| | - Siobhan Gee
- Pharmacy Department, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK
| | - David S Baldwin
- Clinical Neuroscience, Clinical and Experimental Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Anthony S David
- Institute of Mental Health, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Depression is characterised by a heightened self-focus, which is believed to be associated with differences in emotion and reward processing. However, the precise relationship between these cognitive domains is not well understood. We examined the role of self-reference in emotion and reward processing, separately and in combination, in relation to depression. METHODS Adults experiencing varying levels of depression (n = 144) completed self-report depression measures (PHQ-9, BDI-II). We measured self, emotion and reward processing, separately and in combination, using three cognitive tasks. RESULTS When self-processing was measured independently of emotion and reward, in a simple associative learning task, there was little association with depression. However, when self and emotion processing occurred in combination in a self-esteem go/no-go task, depression was associated with an increased positive other bias [b = 3.51, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.24-5.79]. When the self was processed in relation to emotion and reward, in a social evaluation learning task, depression was associated with reduced positive self-biases (b = 0.11, 95% CI 0.05-0.17). CONCLUSIONS Depression was associated with enhanced positive implicit associations with others, and reduced positive learning about the self, culminating in reduced self-favouring biases. However, when self, emotion and reward processing occurred independently there was little evidence of an association with depression. Treatments targeting reduced positive self-biases may provide more sensitive targets for therapeutic intervention and potential biomarkers of treatment responses, allowing the development of more effective interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jie Sui
- School of Psychology, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - David Kessler
- Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Marcus R Munafò
- School of Psychological Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit at the University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- National Institute of Health Research Biomedical Research Centre at the University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust and the University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Gross IT, Clapper TC, Ramachandra G, Thomas A, Ades A, Walsh B, Kreuzer F, Elkin R, Wagner M, Whitfill T, Chang TP, Duff JP, Deutsch ES, Loellgen RM, Palaganas JC, Fayyaz J, Kessler D, Calhoun AW. Setting an Agenda: Results of a Consensus Process on Research Directions in Distance Simulation. Simul Healthc 2023; 18:100-107. [PMID: 36989108 DOI: 10.1097/sih.0000000000000663] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The COVID-19 pandemic forced rapid implementation and refinement of distance simulation methodologies in which participants and/or facilitators are not physically colocated. A review of the distance simulation literature showed that heterogeneity in many areas (including nomenclature, methodology, and outcomes) limited the ability to identify best practice. In April 2020, the Healthcare Distance Simulation Collaboration was formed with the goal of addressing these issues. The aim of this study was to identify future research priorities in the field of distance simulation using data derived from this summit. METHODS This study analyzed textual data gathered during the consensus process conducted at the inaugural Healthcare Distance Simulation Summit to explore participant perceptions of the most pressing research questions regarding distance simulation. Participants discussed education and patient safety standards, simulation facilitators and barriers, and research priorities. Data were qualitatively analyzed using an explicitly constructivist thematic analysis approach, resulting in the creation of a theoretical framework. RESULTS Our sample included 302 participants who represented 29 countries. We identified 42 codes clustered within 4 themes concerning key areas in which further research into distance simulation is needed: (1) safety and acceptability, (2) educational/foundational considerations, (3) impact, and (4) areas of ongoing exploration. Within each theme, pertinent research questions were identified and categorized. CONCLUSIONS Distance simulation presents several challenges and opportunities. Research around best practices, including educational foundation and psychological safety, are especially important as is the need to determine outcomes and long-term effects of this emerging field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isabel T Gross
- From the Department of Pediatrics (I.T.G., T.W.), Section of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Weill Cornell Medicine NewYork-Presbyterian Simulation Center (T.C.C.), Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Department of Pediatric Intensive Care (G.R.), Krishna Institute of Medical Science, Secunderabad, India; Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine (A.T.), Department of Pediatrics, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, WA; Division of Neonatology (A.A.), Department of Pediatrics, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA; Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine (B.W.), Department of Pediatrics, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA; Faculty of Medicine (F.K.), Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany; Department of Emergency Medicine (R.E., D.K.), Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY; Division of Neonatology (M.W.), Pediatric Intensive Care and Neuropediatrics, Department of Pediatrics, Comprehensive Center for Pediatrics, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Emergency Medicine (T.W.), Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Division of Emergency Medicine (T.P.C.), Department of Medical Education, Children's Hospital Los Angeles & Keck School of Medicine at University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; Division of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine (J.P.D.), Department of Pediatrics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada; Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine (E.S.D.), Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA; Department of Pediatric Emergency Medicine (R.M.L.), Astrid Lindgren Children's Hospital, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine (J.C.P.), Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Department of Pediatric Emergency Medicine (J.F.), The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada; and Department of Pediatrics (A.W.C.), University of Louisville and Norton Children's Hospital, Louisville, KY
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Domalpally A, Whittier SA, Pan Q, Dabelea DM, Darwin CH, Knowler WC, Lee CG, Luchsinger JA, White NH, Chew EY, Gadde KM, Culbert IW, Arceneaux J, Chatellier A, Dragg A, Champagne CM, Duncan C, Eberhardt B, Greenway F, Guillory FG, Herbert AA, Jeffirs ML, Kennedy BM, Levy E, Lockett M, Lovejoy JC, Morris LH, Melancon LE, Ryan DH, Sanford DA, Smith KG, Smith LL, St.Amant JA, Tulley RT, Vicknair PC, Williamson D, Zachwieja JJ, Polonsky KS, Tobian J, Ehrmann DA, Matulik MJ, Temple KA, Clark B, Czech K, DeSandre C, Dotson B, Hilbrich R, McNabb W, Semenske AR, Caro JF, Furlong K, Goldstein BJ, Watson PG, Smith KA, Mendoza J, Simmons M, Wildman W, Liberoni R, Spandorfer J, Pepe C, Donahue RP, Goldberg RB, Prineas R, Calles J, Giannella A, Rowe P, Sanguily J, Cassanova-Romero P, Castillo-Florez S, Florez HJ, Garg R, Kirby L, Lara O, Larreal C, McLymont V, Mendez J, Perry A, Saab P, Veciana B, Haffner SM, Hazuda HP, Montez MG, Hattaway K, Isaac J, Lorenzo C, Martinez A, Salazar M, Walker T, Hamman RF, Nash PV, Steinke SC, Testaverde L, Truong J, Anderson DR, Ballonoff LB, Bouffard A, Bucca B, Calonge BN, Delve L, Farago M, Hill JO, Hoyer SR, Jenkins T, Jortberg BT, Lenz D, Miller M, Nilan T, Perreault L, Price DW, Regensteiner JG, Schroeder EB, Seagle H, Smith CM, VanDorsten B, Horton ES, Munshi M, Lawton KE, Jackson SD, Poirier CS, Swift K, Arky RA, Bryant M, Burke JP, Caballero E, Callaphan KM, Fargnoli B, Franklin T, Ganda OP, Guidi A, Guido M, Jacobsen AM, Kula LM, Kocal M, Lambert L, Ledbury S, Malloy MA, Middelbeek RJ, Nicosia M, Oldmixon CF, Pan J, Quitingon M, Rainville R, Rubtchinsky S, Seely EW, Sansoucy J, Schweizer D, Simonson D, Smith F, Solomon CG, Spellman J, Warram J, Kahn SE, Fattaleh B, Montgomery BK, Colegrove C, Fujimoto W, Knopp RH, Lipkin EW, Marr M, Morgan-Taggart I, Murillo A, O’Neal K, Trence D, Taylor L, Thomas A, Tsai EC, Dagogo-Jack S, Kitabchi AE, Murphy ME, Taylor L, Dolgoff J, Applegate WB, Bryer-Ash M, Clark D, Frieson SL, Ibebuogu U, Imseis R, Lambeth H, Lichtermann LC, Oktaei H, Ricks H, Rutledge LM, Sherman AR, Smith CM, Soberman JE, Williams-Cleaves B, Patel A, Nyenwe EA, Hampton EF, Metzger BE, Molitch ME, Johnson MK, Adelman DT, Behrends C, Cook M, Fitzgibbon M, Giles MM, Heard D, Johnson CK, Larsen D, Lowe A, Lyman M, McPherson D, Penn SC, Pitts T, Reinhart R, Roston S, Schinleber PA, Wallia A, Nathan DM, McKitrick C, Turgeon H, Larkin M, Mugford M, Abbott K, Anderson E, Bissett L, Bondi K, Cagliero E, Florez JC, Delahanty L, Goldman V, Grassa E, Gurry L, D’Anna K, Leandre F, Lou P, Poulos A, Raymond E, Ripley V, Stevens C, Tseng B, Olefsky JM, Barrett-Connor E, Mudaliar S, Araneta MR, Carrion-Petersen ML, Vejvoda K, Bassiouni S, Beltran M, Claravall LN, Dowden JM, Edelman SV, Garimella P, Henry RR, Horne J, Lamkin M, Janesch SS, Leos D, Polonsky W, Ruiz R, Smith J, Torio-Hurley J, Pi-Sunyer FX, Lee JE, Hagamen S, Allison DB, Agharanya N, Aronoff NJ, Baldo M, Crandall JP, Foo ST, Luchsinger JA, Pal C, Parkes K, Pena MB, Rooney ES, Van Wye GE, Viscovich KA, de Groot M, Marrero DG, Mather KJ, Prince MJ, Kelly SM, Jackson MA, McAtee G, Putenney P, Ackermann RT, Cantrell CM, Dotson YF, Fineberg ES, Fultz M, Guare JC, Hadden A, Ignaut JM, Kirkman MS, Phillips EO, Pinner KL, Porter BD, Roach PJ, Rowland ND, Wheeler ML, Aroda V, Magee M, Ratner RE, Youssef G, Shapiro S, Andon N, Bavido-Arrage C, Boggs G, Bronsord M, Brown E, Love Burkott H, Cheatham WW, Cola S, Evans C, Gibbs P, Kellum T, Leon L, Lagarda M, Levatan C, Lindsay M, Nair AK, Park J, Passaro M, Silverman A, Uwaifo G, Wells-Thayer D, Wiggins R, Saad MF, Watson K, Budget M, Jinagouda S, Botrous M, Sosa A, Tadros S, Akbar K, Conzues C, Magpuri P, Ngo K, Rassam A, Waters D, Xapthalamous K, Santiago JV, Brown AL, Das S, Khare-Ranade P, Stich T, Santiago A, Fisher E, Hurt E, Jones T, Kerr M, Ryder L, Wernimont C, Golden SH, Saudek CD, Bradley V, Sullivan E, Whittington T, Abbas C, Allen A, Brancati FL, Cappelli S, Clark JM, Charleston JB, Freel J, Horak K, Greene A, Jiggetts D, Johnson D, Joseph H, Loman K, Mathioudakis N, Mosley H, Reusing J, Rubin RR, Samuels A, Shields T, Stephens S, Stewart KJ, Thomas L, Utsey E, Williamson P, Schade DS, Adams KS, Canady JL, Johannes C, Hemphill C, Hyde P, Atler LF, Boyle PJ, Burge MR, Chai L, Colleran K, Fondino A, Gonzales Y, Hernandez-McGinnis DA, Katz P, King C, Middendorf J, Rubinchik S, Senter W, Crandall J, Shamoon H, Brown JO, Trandafirescu G, Powell D, Adorno E, Cox L, Duffy H, Engel S, Friedler A, Goldstein A, Howard-Century CJ, Lukin J, Kloiber S, Longchamp N, Martinez H, Pompi D, Scheindlin J, Violino E, Walker EA, Wylie-Rosett J, Zimmerman E, Zonszein J, Orchard T, Venditti E, Wing RR, Jeffries S, Koenning G, Kramer MK, Smith M, Barr S, Benchoff C, Boraz M, Clifford L, Culyba R, Frazier M, Gilligan R, Guimond S, Harrier S, Harris L, Kriska A, Manjoo Q, Mullen M, Noel A, Otto A, Pettigrew J, Rockette-Wagner B, Rubinstein D, Semler L, Smith CF, Weinzierl V, Williams KV, Wilson T, Mau MK, Baker-Ladao NK, Melish JS, Arakaki RF, Latimer RW, Isonaga MK, Beddow R, Bermudez NE, Dias L, Inouye J, Mikami K, Mohideen P, Odom SK, Perry RU, Yamamoto RE, Anderson H, Cooeyate N, Dodge C, Hoskin MA, Percy CA, Enote A, Natewa C, Acton KJ, Andre VL, Barber R, Begay S, Bennett PH, Benson MB, Bird EC, Broussard BA, Bucca BC, Chavez M, Cook S, Curtis J, Dacawyma T, Doughty MS, Duncan R, Edgerton C, Ghahate JM, Glass J, Glass M, Gohdes D, Grant W, Hanson RL, Horse E, Ingraham LE, Jackson M, Jay P, Kaskalla RS, Kavena K, Kessler D, Kobus KM, Krakoff J, Kurland J, Manus C, McCabe C, Michaels S, Morgan T, Nashboo Y, Nelson JA, Poirier S, Polczynski E, Piromalli C, Reidy M, Roumain J, Rowse D, Roy RJ, Sangster S, Sewenemewa J, Smart M, Spencer C, Tonemah D, Williams R, Wilson C, Yazzie M, Bain R, Fowler S, Temprosa M, Larsen MD, Brenneman T, Edelstein SL, Abebe S, Bamdad J, Barkalow M, Bethepu J, Bezabeh T, Bowers A, Butler N, Callaghan J, Carter CE, Christophi C, Dwyer GM, Foulkes M, Gao Y, Gooding R, Gottlieb A, Grimes KL, Grover-Fairchild N, Haffner L, Hoffman H, Jablonski K, Jones S, Jones TL, Katz R, Kolinjivadi P, Lachin JM, Ma Y, Mucik P, Orlosky R, Reamer S, Rochon J, Sapozhnikova A, Sherif H, Stimpson C, Hogan Tjaden A, Walker-Murray F, Venditti EM, Kriska AM, Weinzierl V, Marcovina S, Aldrich FA, Harting J, Albers J, Strylewicz G, Eastman R, Fradkin J, Garfield S, Lee C, Gregg E, Zhang P, O’Leary D, Evans G, Budoff M, Dailing C, Stamm E, Schwartz A, Navy C, Palermo L, Rautaharju P, Prineas RJ, Alexander T, Campbell C, Hall S, Li Y, Mills M, Pemberton N, Rautaharju F, Zhang Z, Soliman EZ, Hu J, Hensley S, Keasler L, Taylor T, Blodi B, Danis R, Davis M, Hubbard* L, Endres** R, Elsas** D, Johnson** S, Myers** D, Barrett N, Baumhauer H, Benz W, Cohn H, Corkery E, Dohm K, Gama V, Goulding A, Ewen A, Hurtenbach C, Lawrence D, McDaniel K, Pak J, Reimers J, Shaw R, Swift M, Vargo P, Watson S, Manly J, Mayer-Davis E, Moran RR, Ganiats T, David K, Sarkin AJ, Groessl E, Katzir N, Chong H, Herman WH, Brändle M, Brown MB, Altshuler D, Billings LK, Chen L, Harden M, Knowler WC, Pollin TI, Shuldiner AR, Franks PW, Hivert MF. Association of Metformin With the Development of Age-Related Macular Degeneration. JAMA Ophthalmol 2023; 141:140-147. [PMID: 36547967 PMCID: PMC9936345 DOI: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2022.5567] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2022] [Accepted: 10/29/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Importance Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is a leading cause of blindness with no treatment available for early stages. Retrospective studies have shown an association between metformin and reduced risk of AMD. Objective To investigate the association between metformin use and age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Design, Setting, and Participants The Diabetes Prevention Program Outcomes Study is a cross-sectional follow-up phase of a large multicenter randomized clinical trial, Diabetes Prevention Program (1996-2001), to investigate the association of treatment with metformin or an intensive lifestyle modification vs placebo with preventing the onset of type 2 diabetes in a population at high risk for developing diabetes. Participants with retinal imaging at a follow-up visit 16 years posttrial (2017-2019) were included. Analysis took place between October 2019 and May 2022. Interventions Participants were randomly distributed between 3 interventional arms: lifestyle, metformin, and placebo. Main Outcomes and Measures Prevalence of AMD in the treatment arms. Results Of 1592 participants, 514 (32.3%) were in the lifestyle arm, 549 (34.5%) were in the metformin arm, and 529 (33.2%) were in the placebo arm. All 3 arms were balanced for baseline characteristics including age (mean [SD] age at randomization, 49 [9] years), sex (1128 [71%] male), race and ethnicity (784 [49%] White), smoking habits, body mass index, and education level. AMD was identified in 479 participants (30.1%); 229 (14.4%) had early AMD, 218 (13.7%) had intermediate AMD, and 32 (2.0%) had advanced AMD. There was no significant difference in the presence of AMD between the 3 groups: 152 (29.6%) in the lifestyle arm, 165 (30.2%) in the metformin arm, and 162 (30.7%) in the placebo arm. There was also no difference in the distribution of early, intermediate, and advanced AMD between the intervention groups. Mean duration of metformin use was similar for those with and without AMD (mean [SD], 8.0 [9.3] vs 8.5 [9.3] years; P = .69). In the multivariate models, history of smoking was associated with increased risks of AMD (odds ratio, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.05-1.61; P = .02). Conclusions and Relevance These data suggest neither metformin nor lifestyle changes initiated for diabetes prevention were associated with the risk of any AMD, with similar results for AMD severity. Duration of metformin use was also not associated with AMD. This analysis does not address the association of metformin with incidence or progression of AMD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amitha Domalpally
- Wisconsin Reading Center, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public and Health, Madison
| | - Samuel A. Whittier
- Wisconsin Reading Center, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public and Health, Madison
| | - Qing Pan
- Department of Statistics, George Washington University, Washington, DC
| | - Dana M. Dabelea
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Colorado School of Public Health, Denver
| | - Christine H. Darwin
- Department of Medicine, Ronald Reagan UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - William C. Knowler
- Diabetes Epidemiology and Clinical Research Section, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Christine G. Lee
- Division of Diabetes, Endocrinology, and Metabolic Diseases, National Institutes of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Jose A. Luchsinger
- Department of Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Neil H. White
- Division of Endocrinology & Diabetes, Department of Pediatrics, Washington University in St Louis School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Emily Y. Chew
- Division of Epidemiology and Clinical Applications–Clinical Trials Branch, National Eye Institute - National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Amber Dragg
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Crystal Duncan
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Frank Greenway
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | | | | | - Erma Levy
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Monica Lockett
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | | | - Donna H. Ryan
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | - Lisa L. Smith
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Janet Tobian
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | | | - Bart Clark
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Kirsten Czech
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | | | - Wylie McNabb
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Jose F. Caro
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Kevin Furlong
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | | | - Jewel Mendoza
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Marsha Simmons
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Wendi Wildman
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Renee Liberoni
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Constance Pepe
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | - Ronald Prineas
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Anna Giannella
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Patricia Rowe
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | | | | | - Rajesh Garg
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Olga Lara
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Carmen Larreal
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Jadell Mendez
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Arlette Perry
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Patrice Saab
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Bertha Veciana
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | | | - Kathy Hattaway
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Juan Isaac
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Carlos Lorenzo
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Monica Salazar
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Tatiana Walker
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Brian Bucca
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - B. Ned Calonge
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Lynne Delve
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Martha Farago
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - James O. Hill
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Tonya Jenkins
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Dione Lenz
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Marsha Miller
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Thomas Nilan
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - David W. Price
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | - Helen Seagle
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | | | - Medha Munshi
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | | | - Kati Swift
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Ronald A. Arky
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Om P. Ganda
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Ashley Guidi
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Mathew Guido
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Lyn M. Kula
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Margaret Kocal
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Lori Lambert
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Sarah Ledbury
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | | | | | - Jocelyn Pan
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | | | - Ellen W. Seely
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Dana Schweizer
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Fannie Smith
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | - James Warram
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Steven E. Kahn
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Basma Fattaleh
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Michelle Marr
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Anne Murillo
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Kayla O’Neal
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Dace Trence
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Lonnese Taylor
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - April Thomas
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Elaine C. Tsai
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | - Mary E. Murphy
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Laura Taylor
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | | | - Debra Clark
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Uzoma Ibebuogu
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Raed Imseis
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Helen Lambeth
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Hooman Oktaei
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Harriet Ricks
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Amy R. Sherman
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Clara M. Smith
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | - Avnisha Patel
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Michelle Cook
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Mimi M. Giles
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Deloris Heard
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Diane Larsen
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Anne Lowe
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Megan Lyman
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Samsam C. Penn
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Thomas Pitts
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Renee Reinhart
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Susan Roston
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Amisha Wallia
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | | | - Mary Larkin
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Kathy Abbott
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Ellen Anderson
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Laurie Bissett
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Kristy Bondi
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Jose C. Florez
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | - Elaine Grassa
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Lindsery Gurry
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Kali D’Anna
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Peter Lou
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Elyse Raymond
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Valerie Ripley
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Beverly Tseng
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Karen Vejvoda
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Javiva Horne
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Marycie Lamkin
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Diana Leos
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Rosa Ruiz
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Jean Smith
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | - Jane E. Lee
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Susan Hagamen
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | | | - Maria Baldo
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Sandra T. Foo
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Carmen Pal
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Kathy Parkes
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Mary Beth Pena
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | | | - Mary de Groot
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | | | - Susie M. Kelly
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Gina McAtee
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Paula Putenney
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | | | | | - Megan Fultz
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - John C. Guare
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Angela Hadden
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | | | - Kisha L Pinner
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Paris J. Roach
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | - Vanita Aroda
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Michelle Magee
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | - Sue Shapiro
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Natalie Andon
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Susan Cola
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Cindy Evans
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Peggy Gibbs
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Tracy Kellum
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Lilia Leon
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Milvia Lagarda
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | - Asha K. Nair
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Jean Park
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | - Gabriel Uwaifo
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Renee Wiggins
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Karol Watson
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Maria Budget
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Medhat Botrous
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Anthony Sosa
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Sameh Tadros
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Khan Akbar
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | - Kathy Ngo
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Amer Rassam
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Debra Waters
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | | | - Samia Das
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Tamara Stich
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Ana Santiago
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Edwin Fisher
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Emma Hurt
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Tracy Jones
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Michelle Kerr
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Lucy Ryder
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | | | | | - Emily Sullivan
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Caroline Abbas
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Adrienne Allen
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | | | | | - Janice Freel
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Alicia Greene
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Dawn Jiggetts
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Hope Joseph
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Kimberly Loman
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Henry Mosley
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - John Reusing
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Alafia Samuels
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Thomas Shields
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | - LeeLana Thomas
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Evonne Utsey
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Penny Hyde
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | - Mark R. Burge
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Lisa Chai
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Ateka Fondino
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Ysela Gonzales
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Patricia Katz
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Carolyn King
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | | | - Jill Crandall
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Harry Shamoon
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Janet O. Brown
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | - Elsie Adorno
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Liane Cox
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Helena Duffy
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Samuel Engel
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | | | - Jennifer Lukin
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Stacey Kloiber
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Helen Martinez
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Dorothy Pompi
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Elissa Violino
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | | | - Joel Zonszein
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Trevor Orchard
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Rena R. Wing
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Susan Jeffries
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Gaye Koenning
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - M. Kaye Kramer
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Marie Smith
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Susan Barr
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Miriam Boraz
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Lisa Clifford
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Rebecca Culyba
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Ryan Gilligan
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Susan Harrier
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Louann Harris
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Andrea Kriska
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Monica Mullen
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Alicia Noel
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Amy Otto
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | | | - Linda Semler
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | | | - Tara Wilson
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | - John S. Melish
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | - Mae K. Isonaga
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Ralph Beddow
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Lorna Dias
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Jillian Inouye
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Kathy Mikami
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Sharon K. Odom
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Mary A. Hoskin
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Carol A. Percy
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Alvera Enote
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Camille Natewa
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Kelly J. Acton
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Rosalyn Barber
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Shandiin Begay
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | - Evelyn C. Bird
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Brian C. Bucca
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Sherron Cook
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Jeff Curtis
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Tara Dacawyma
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Roberta Duncan
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Cyndy Edgerton
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Justin Glass
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Martia Glass
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Dorothy Gohdes
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Wendy Grant
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Ellie Horse
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Merry Jackson
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Priscilla Jay
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Karen Kavena
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - David Kessler
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | - Jason Kurland
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Cherie McCabe
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Sara Michaels
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Tina Morgan
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | - Steven Poirier
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | - Mike Reidy
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Debra Rowse
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Robert J. Roy
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | - Miranda Smart
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Darryl Tonemah
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | | | - Raymond Bain
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Sarah Fowler
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | - Tina Brenneman
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Solome Abebe
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Julie Bamdad
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Joel Bethepu
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Anna Bowers
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Nicole Butler
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | | | | | - Mary Foulkes
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Yuping Gao
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Robert Gooding
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | | | - Lori Haffner
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | - Steve Jones
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Tara L. Jones
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Richard Katz
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - John M. Lachin
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Yong Ma
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Pamela Mucik
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Robert Orlosky
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Susan Reamer
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - James Rochon
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Hanna Sherif
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - John Albers
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - R. Eastman
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Judith Fradkin
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Christine Lee
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Edward Gregg
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Ping Zhang
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Dan O’Leary
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Gregory Evans
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Matthew Budoff
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Chris Dailing
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Ann Schwartz
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Caroline Navy
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Lisa Palermo
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | | | | | - Sharon Hall
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Yabing Li
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Margaret Mills
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | - Zhuming Zhang
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Julie Hu
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Susan Hensley
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Lisa Keasler
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Tonya Taylor
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Barbara Blodi
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Ronald Danis
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Matthew Davis
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Larry Hubbard*
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Ryan Endres**
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | - Dawn Myers**
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Nancy Barrett
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Wendy Benz
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Holly Cohn
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Ellie Corkery
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Kristi Dohm
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Vonnie Gama
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Anne Goulding
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Andy Ewen
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | - Kyle McDaniel
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Jeong Pak
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - James Reimers
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Ruth Shaw
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Maria Swift
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Pamela Vargo
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Sheila Watson
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Jennifer Manly
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | - Ted Ganiats
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Kristin David
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Erik Groessl
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Naomi Katzir
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Helen Chong
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Ling Chen
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Maegan Harden
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Toni I. Pollin
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Paul W. Franks
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Buckman JEJ, Cohen ZD, O'Driscoll C, Fried EI, Saunders R, Ambler G, DeRubeis RJ, Gilbody S, Hollon SD, Kendrick T, Watkins E, Eley T, Peel AJ, Rayner C, Kessler D, Wiles N, Lewis G, Pilling S. Predicting prognosis for adults with depression using individual symptom data: a comparison of modelling approaches. Psychol Med 2023; 53:408-418. [PMID: 33952358 PMCID: PMC9899563 DOI: 10.1017/s0033291721001616] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2020] [Revised: 03/08/2021] [Accepted: 04/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aimed to develop, validate and compare the performance of models predicting post-treatment outcomes for depressed adults based on pre-treatment data. METHODS Individual patient data from all six eligible randomised controlled trials were used to develop (k = 3, n = 1722) and test (k = 3, n = 918) nine models. Predictors included depressive and anxiety symptoms, social support, life events and alcohol use. Weighted sum scores were developed using coefficient weights derived from network centrality statistics (models 1-3) and factor loadings from a confirmatory factor analysis (model 4). Unweighted sum score models were tested using elastic net regularised (ENR) and ordinary least squares (OLS) regression (models 5 and 6). Individual items were then included in ENR and OLS (models 7 and 8). All models were compared to one another and to a null model (mean post-baseline Beck Depression Inventory Second Edition (BDI-II) score in the training data: model 9). Primary outcome: BDI-II scores at 3-4 months. RESULTS Models 1-7 all outperformed the null model and model 8. Model performance was very similar across models 1-6, meaning that differential weights applied to the baseline sum scores had little impact. CONCLUSIONS Any of the modelling techniques (models 1-7) could be used to inform prognostic predictions for depressed adults with differences in the proportions of patients reaching remission based on the predicted severity of depressive symptoms post-treatment. However, the majority of variance in prognosis remained unexplained. It may be necessary to include a broader range of biopsychosocial variables to better adjudicate between competing models, and to derive models with greater clinical utility for treatment-seeking adults with depression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J. E. J. Buckman
- Research Department of Clinical, Educational & Health Psychology, Centre for Outcomes Research and Effectiveness (CORE), University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, London, UK
- iCope – Camden & Islington Psychological Therapies Services – Camden & Islington NHS Foundation Trust, St Pancras Hospital, London, UK
| | - Z. D. Cohen
- Department of Psychiatry, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - C. O'Driscoll
- Research Department of Clinical, Educational & Health Psychology, Centre for Outcomes Research and Effectiveness (CORE), University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, London, UK
| | - E. I. Fried
- Department of Clinical Psychology, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - R. Saunders
- Research Department of Clinical, Educational & Health Psychology, Centre for Outcomes Research and Effectiveness (CORE), University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, London, UK
| | - G. Ambler
- Statistical Science, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, London, UK
| | - R. J. DeRubeis
- Department of Psychology, School of Arts and Sciences, 425 S. University Avenue, Philadelphia PA, USA
| | - S. Gilbody
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, Seebohm Rowntree Building, Heslington, York, UK
| | - S. D. Hollon
- Department of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - T. Kendrick
- Primary Care, Population Sciences and Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Aldermoor Health Centre, Southampton, UK
| | - E. Watkins
- Department of Psychology, University of Exeter, Sir Henry Wellcome Building for Mood Disorders Research, Perry Road, Exeter, UK
| | - T.C. Eley
- Social, Genetic and Developmental Psychiatry Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - A. J. Peel
- Social, Genetic and Developmental Psychiatry Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - C. Rayner
- Social, Genetic and Developmental Psychiatry Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - D. Kessler
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, Bristol, UK
| | - N. Wiles
- Centre for Academic Mental Health, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Oakfield House, Bristol, UK
| | - G. Lewis
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, Maple House, London, UK
| | - S. Pilling
- Research Department of Clinical, Educational & Health Psychology, Centre for Outcomes Research and Effectiveness (CORE), University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, London, UK
- Camden & Islington NHS Foundation Trust, St Pancras Hospital, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Chapman N, Browning M, Baghurst D, Hotopf M, Willis D, Haylock S, Zakaria S, Speechley J, Withey J, Brooks E, Chan F, Pappa S, Geddes J, Insole L, Mohammed Z, Kessler D, Jones PB, Mansoori P. Setting national research priorities for difficult-to-treat depression in the UK between 2021-2026. J Glob Health 2022; 12:09004. [PMID: 36472926 PMCID: PMC9727823 DOI: 10.7189/jogh.12.09004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Difficult-to-treat depression (DTD) presents a substantial health care challenge, with around one-third of people diagnosed with a depressive episode in the UK finding that their symptoms persist following treatment. This study aimed to identify priority research questions (RQs) that could inform the development of new and improved treatments, interventions, and support for people with DTD. Methods Using an adapted Child Health and Nutrition Research Initiative (CHNRI) method, this national prioritisation exercise engaged 60 leading researchers and health care professionals in the UK, as well as 25 wider stakeholders with relevant lived experience to produce a ranked list of priority RQs in DTD. The final list of 99 distinct RQs was independently scored by 42 individuals against a list of five criteria: answerability, effectiveness, impact on health, deliverability, and equity. Results Highly ranked RQs covered a range of novel and existing treatments. The three highest scoring RQs included evaluation of psychological and pharmacological therapies (eg, behavioural activation, and augmentation therapies), as well as social interventions to reduce loneliness or increase support for people with DTD. Conclusions This exercise identified and prioritised 99 RQs that could inform future research and funding decisions over the next five years. The results of this research could improve treatment and support for people affected by DTD. It also serves as an example of ways in which the CHNRI method can be adapted in a collaborative manner to provide a more active role for patients, carers, and health care professionals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natalya Chapman
- National Institute for Health and Care Research Central Commissioning Facility, Twickenham, UK
| | - Michael Browning
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK,Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - David Baghurst
- National Institute for Health and Care Research Central Commissioning Facility, Twickenham, UK,National Institute for Health and Care Research Office for Clinical Research Infrastructure, Twickenham, UK
| | - Matthew Hotopf
- Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, Kings College London, London, UK,South London and the Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Debbie Willis
- National Institute for Health and Care Research Evaluation, Trials and Studies Coordinating Centre, Southampton, UK
| | - Stuart Haylock
- National Institute for Health and Care Research Central Commissioning Facility, Twickenham, UK
| | - Sana Zakaria
- National Institute for Health and Care Research Central Commissioning Facility, Twickenham, UK
| | - Jan Speechley
- National Institute for Health and Care Research Central Commissioning Facility, Twickenham, UK
| | - James Withey
- National Institute for Health and Care Research Central Commissioning Facility, Twickenham, UK
| | - Edmund Brooks
- National Institute for Health and Care Research Central Commissioning Facility, Twickenham, UK
| | - Fiona Chan
- National Institute for Health and Care Research Central Commissioning Facility, Twickenham, UK
| | - Sofia Pappa
- West London NHS Trust, London, UK,Department of Psychiatry, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - John Geddes
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Lisa Insole
- Cumbria, Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle, UK
| | - Zeid Mohammed
- Cumbria, Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle, UK
| | - David Kessler
- Centre for Academic Mental Health, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Peter B Jones
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge and NIHR ARC East of England, Cambridgeshire & Peterborough NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - Parisa Mansoori
- National Institute for Health and Care Research Office for Clinical Research Infrastructure, Twickenham, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Kessler D, Dessie A, Kanjanauptom P, Vindas M, Ng L, Youssef MM, Birger R, Shaman J, Dayan P. Lack of Association Between a Quantified Lung Ultrasound Score and Illness Severity in Pediatric Emergency Department Patients With Acute Lower Respiratory Infections. J Ultrasound Med 2022; 41:3013-3022. [PMID: 35620855 DOI: 10.1002/jum.16023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2021] [Revised: 04/08/2022] [Accepted: 05/06/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Lung ultrasound (LUS) may help determine illness severity in children with acute lower respiratory tract infections (LRTI) but limited pediatric studies exist. Our objective was to determine the association between LUS findings and illness severity in children with LRTI. METHODS We conducted a prospective study of patients <20 years with LRTI. Trained investigators performed standardized LUS examinations of 12 regions. Blinded sonologists reviewed examinations for individual pathologic features and also calculated a Quantified Lung Ultrasound Score (QLUS). We defined focal severity as QLUS of ≥2 in ≥1 region, and diffuse severity as QLUS of ≥1 in ≥3 regions. The primary outcome was the Respiratory component of the Pediatric Early Warning Score (RPEWS), a 14-item scale measuring respiratory illness severity. Secondary outcomes included hospital admission, length of stay, supplemental oxygen, and antibiotic use. RESULTS We enrolled 85 patients with LRTIs, 46 (54%) whom were hospitalized (5.4% intensive care). Median RPEWS was 1 (interquartile range 2). Neither individual features on ultrasound nor total QLUS were associated with RPEWS, hospitalization, length of stay, or oxygen use. Mean RPEWS was similar for participants regardless of focal (1.46 versus 1.26, P = .57) or diffuse (1.47 versus 1.21, P = .47) severity findings, but those with focal or diffuse severity, or isolated consolidation, had greater antibiotic administration (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS In children with LRTI, neither individual features nor QLUS were associated with illness severity. Antibiotics were more likely in patients with either focal or diffuse severity or presence of consolidation on ultrasound.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Kessler
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York Presbyterian Morgan Stanley Children's Hospital, New York, New York, USA
| | - Almaz Dessie
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York Presbyterian Morgan Stanley Children's Hospital, New York, New York, USA
| | - Panida Kanjanauptom
- Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Marc Vindas
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York Presbyterian Morgan Stanley Children's Hospital, New York, New York, USA
| | - Lorraine Ng
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York Presbyterian Morgan Stanley Children's Hospital, New York, New York, USA
| | - Mariam M Youssef
- Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA
| | - Ruthie Birger
- Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA
| | - Jeff Shaman
- Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA
| | - Peter Dayan
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York Presbyterian Morgan Stanley Children's Hospital, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Boland M, Higgins A, Beecher C, Bracken P, Burn W, Cody A, Framer A, Gronlund TA, Horowitz M, Huff C, Jayacodi S, Keating D, Kessler D, Konradsson Geuken A, Lamberson N, Montagu L, Osborne B, Smith R, Cadogan C. Priorities for future research on reducing and stopping psychiatric medicines using a James Lind Alliance priority setting partnership: The PROTECT study protocol. HRB Open Res 2022; 5:72. [PMID: 37636245 PMCID: PMC10450262 DOI: 10.12688/hrbopenres.13649.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/04/2022] [Indexed: 08/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: There is a growing number of service users looking to discontinue use of psychiatric medicines. Tapering is the recommended approach for reducing and/or discontinuing the use of psychiatric medicines. This involves gradually reducing the dose over time to minimise the potential for withdrawal symptoms. However, many uncertainties exist regarding the process of reducing and stopping psychiatric medicines. This study will use a James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership to determine the Top 10 unanswered questions and uncertainties about reducing and stopping psychiatric medicines. Methods : The Priority Setting Partnership will be conducted using the James Lind Alliance methodology. It will involve seven stages: (i) creating an international Steering Group of representatives from key stakeholder groups that will include people with lived experience of taking and/or stopping psychiatric medicines, family members, carers/supporters and healthcare professionals, and identifying potential partners to support key activities (e.g. dissemination); (ii) gathering uncertainties about reducing and stopping psychiatric medicines from key stakeholders using an online survey; (iii) data processing and summarising the survey responses; (iv) checking the summary questions against existing evidence and verifying uncertainties; (v) shortlisting the questions using a second online survey; (vi) determining the Top 10 research questions through an online prioritisation workshop; (vii) disseminating results. Conclusions : This study will use a Priority Setting Partnership to generate a Top 10 list of research questions and uncertainties about reducing and stopping psychiatric medicines. This list will help to guide future research and deliver responsive and strategic allocation of research resources, with a view to ultimately improving the future health and well-being of individuals who are taking psychiatric medicines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miriam Boland
- School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Agnes Higgins
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Claire Beecher
- Evidence Synthesis Ireland and Cochrane Ireland, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - Pat Bracken
- Independent Consultant Psychiatrist, West Cork, Ireland
| | - Wendy Burn
- Past President of, Royal College of Psychiatrists, England, UK
- Consultant Psychiatrist, Leeds and York Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, England, UK
| | - Anne Cody
- Health Research Board, Dublin, Ireland
| | | | | | - Mark Horowitz
- Research and Development Department, Goodmayes Hospital, North East London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | | | | | - David Kessler
- Centre for Academic Mental Health, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, England, UK
| | - Asa Konradsson Geuken
- Section of Neuropharmacology and Addiction Research, Department of Pharmaceutical Biosciences, Uppsala University, Sweden, Sweden
- European Federation of Associations of Families of People with Mental Illness, Belgium, Belgium
| | - Nicole Lamberson
- Benzodiazepine Information Coalition, Utah, USA
- International Institute for Psychiatric Drug Withdrawal, United Kingdom, UK
- Inner Compass Initiative's The Withdrawal Project, United States, USA
| | - Luke Montagu
- Council for Evidence-based Psychiatry, United Kingdom, UK
| | - Brian Osborne
- Irish College of General Practitioners, Dublin, Ireland
| | | | - Cathal Cadogan
- School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Sawyer K, Fredman Stein K, Jacobsen P, Freeman TP, Blackwell AKM, Metcalfe C, Kessler D, Munafò MR, Aveyard P, Taylor GMJ. Acceptability of integrating smoking cessation treatment into routine care for people with mental illness: A qualitative study. Health Expect 2022; 26:108-118. [PMID: 36222067 PMCID: PMC9854288 DOI: 10.1111/hex.13580] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2022] [Revised: 07/28/2022] [Accepted: 07/29/2022] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Improving Access to Psychological Therapies (IAPTs) Services could offer smoking cessation treatment to improve physical and psychological outcomes for service users, but it currently does not. This study aimed to understand participants' views and experiences of receiving a novel smoking cessation intervention as part of the ESCAPE trial (intEgrating Smoking Cessation treatment As part of usual Psychological care for dEpression and anxiety). We used the Capability, Opportunity and Motivation Model of Behaviour (COM-B) to understand the (i) acceptability of the integrated smoking cessation treatment, (ii) views of psychological well-being practitioners' (PWPs) ability to deliver the smoking cessation treatment and (iii) positive and negative impacts of smoking cessation treatment. METHODS This was a qualitative study embedded within a feasibility randomized-controlled trial (ESCAPE) in primary care services in the United Kingdom (IAPT). Thirty-six participants (53% female) from both usual care and intervention arms of the ESCAPE trial, including both quitters and nonquitters, were interviewed using semi-structured interviews. Data were analysed using a framework approach to thematic analysis, using the COM-B as a theoretical frame. RESULTS Psychological Capability: Integrated smoking cessation treatment was acceptable and encouraged participants to reflect on their mental health. Some participants found it difficult to understand nicotine withdrawal symptoms. MOTIVATION Participants were open to change during the event of presenting to IAPT. Some described being motivated to take part in the intervention by curiosity, to see whether quitting smoking would help their mental health. Physical Opportunity: IAPT has a natural infrastructure for supporting integrated treatment, but there were some barriers such as session duration and interventions feeling segmented. Social Opportunity: Participants viewed PWPs as having good interpersonal skills to deliver a smoking cessation intervention. CONCLUSION People with common mental illness generally accepted integrated smoking cessation and mental health treatment. Smoking cessation treatment fits well within IAPT's structure; however, there are barriers to implementation. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION Before data collection, we consulted with people with lived experience of smoking and/or mental illness and lay public members regarding the aims, design and interview schedules. After analysis, two people with lived experience of smoking and mental illness individually gave feedback on the final themes and quotes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine Sawyer
- Department of Psychology, Addiction and Mental Health GroupUniversity of BathBathUK
| | - Kim Fredman Stein
- Department of Psychology, Addiction and Mental Health GroupUniversity of BathBathUK
| | - Pamela Jacobsen
- Department of Psychology, Addiction and Mental Health Group, Bath Centre for Mindfulness and CompassionUniversity of BathBathUK
| | - Tom P. Freeman
- Department of Psychology, Addiction and Mental Health GroupUniversity of BathBathUK
| | - Anna K. M. Blackwell
- Department of Psychology, Addiction and Mental Health GroupUniversity of BathBathUK
| | - Chris Metcalfe
- Bristol Randomised Trials Collaboration, Population Health SciencesBristol Medical SchoolBristolUK
| | - David Kessler
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, Centre for Academic Primary CareUniversity of BristolBristolUK
| | - Marcus R. Munafò
- MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, School of Psychological ScienceUniversity of BristolBristolUK
| | - Paul Aveyard
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health SciencesUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK
| | - Gemma M. J. Taylor
- Department of Psychology, Addiction and Mental Health GroupUniversity of BathBathUK
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Antidepressants are one of the most widely prescribed drugs in the global north. However, little is known about the health consequences of long-term treatment. AIMS This study aimed to investigate the association between antidepressant use and adverse events. METHOD The study cohort consisted of UK Biobank participants whose data was linked to primary care records (N = 222 121). We assessed the association between antidepressant use by drug class (selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and 'other') and four morbidity (diabetes, hypertension, coronary heart disease (CHD), cerebrovascular disease (CV)) and two mortality (cardiovascular disease (CVD) and all-cause) outcomes, using Cox's proportional hazards model at 5- and 10-year follow-up. RESULTS SSRI treatment was associated with decreased risk of diabetes at 5 years (hazard ratio 0.64, 95% CI 0.49-0.83) and 10 years (hazard ratio 0.68, 95% CI 0.53-0.87), and hypertension at 10 years (hazard ratio 0.77, 95% CI 0.66-0.89). At 10-year follow-up, SSRI treatment was associated with increased risks of CV (hazard ratio 1.34, 95% CI 1.02-1.77), CVD mortality (hazard ratio 1.87, 95% CI 1.38-2.53) and all-cause mortality (hazard ratio 1.73, 95% CI 1.48-2.03), and 'other' class treatment was associated with increased risk of CHD (hazard ratio 1.99, 95% CI 1.31-3.01), CVD (hazard ratio 1.86, 95% CI 1.10-3.15) and all-cause mortality (hazard ratio 2.20, 95% CI 1.71-2.84). CONCLUSIONS Our findings indicate an association between long-term antidepressant usage and elevated risks of CHD, CVD mortality and all-cause mortality. Further research is needed to assess whether the observed associations are causal, and elucidate the underlying mechanisms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Narinder Bansal
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, UK
| | - Mohammed Hudda
- Population Health Research Institute, St George's, University of London, UK
| | - Rupert A Payne
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, UK
| | - Daniel J Smith
- Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Royal Edinburgh Hospital, UK
| | - David Kessler
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, UK
| | - Nicola Wiles
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, UK
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Hobbs C, Beck M, Denham F, Pettitt L, Faraway J, Munafò MR, Sui J, Kessler D, Button KS. Relationship between change in social evaluation learning and mood in early antidepressant treatment: A prospective cohort study in primary care. J Psychopharmacol 2022; 37:303-312. [PMID: 36000259 PMCID: PMC10076340 DOI: 10.1177/02698811221116928] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Antidepressants are proposed to work by increasing sensitivity to positive versus negative information. Increasing positive affective learning within social contexts may help remediate negative self-schema. We investigated the association between change in biased learning of social evaluations about the self and others, and mood during early antidepressant treatment. METHOD Prospective cohort assessing patients recruited from primary care in South West England at four timepoints over the first 8 weeks of antidepressant treatment (n = 29). At each timepoint, participants completed self-report measures of depression (Beck Depression Inventory II (BDI-II) and Patient Health Questionnaire 9 (PHQ-9)), anxiety (Generalised Anxiety Disorder Questionnaire 7 (GAD-7)), and a computerised task measuring learning of social evaluations about the self, a friend and a stranger. RESULTS We did not find evidence that learning about the self was associated with a reduction in PHQ-9 (b = 0.08, 95% CI: -0.05, 0.20, p = 0.239) or BDI-II scores (b = 0.10, 95% CI: -0.18, 0.38, p = 0.469). We found some weak evidence that increased positive learning about the friend was associated with a reduction in BDI-II scores (b = 0.30, 95% CI: -0.02, 0.62, p = 0.069). However, exploratory analyses indicated stronger evidence that increased positive learning about the self (b = 0.18, 95% CI: 0.07, 0.28, p = 0.002) and a friend (b = 0.22, 95% CI: 0.10, 0.35, p = 0.001) was associated with reductions in anxiety. CONCLUSIONS Change in social evaluation learning was associated with a reduction in anxiety but not depression. Antidepressants may treat anxiety symptoms by remediating negative affective biases towards socially threatening information directed towards the self and close others. However, our findings are based on exploratory analyses within a small sample without a control group and are therefore at risk of type 1 errors and order effects. Further research with larger samples is required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Milly Beck
- Department of Psychology, University of Bath, Bath, UK
| | - Faye Denham
- Department of Psychology, University of Bath, Bath, UK
| | - Laura Pettitt
- Department of Psychology, University of Bath, Bath, UK
| | - Julian Faraway
- Department of Mathematical Sciences, University of Bath, Bath, UK
| | - Marcus R Munafò
- School of Psychological Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.,MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.,National Institute of Health Research Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust and the University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Jie Sui
- School of Psychology, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - David Kessler
- Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Sullivan SA, Kounali D, Morris R, Kessler D, Hamilton W, Lewis G, Lilford P, Nazareth I. Developing and internally validating a prognostic model (P Risk) to improve the prediction of psychosis in a primary care population using electronic health records: The MAPPED study. Schizophr Res 2022; 246:241-249. [PMID: 35843156 DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2022.06.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2021] [Revised: 05/17/2022] [Accepted: 06/25/2022] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND An accurate risk prediction algorithm could improve psychosis outcomes by reducing duration of untreated psychosis. OBJECTIVE To develop and validate a risk prediction model for psychosis, for use by family doctors, using linked electronic health records. METHODS A prospective prediction study. Records from family practices were used between 1/1/2010 to 31/12/2017 of 300,000 patients who had consulted their family doctor for any nonpsychotic mental health problem. Records were selected from Clinical Practice Research Datalink Gold, a routine database of UK family doctor records linked to Hospital Episode Statistics, a routine database of UK secondary care records. Each patient had 5-8 years of follow up data. Study predictors were consultations, diagnoses and/or prescribed medications, during the study period or historically, for 13 nonpsychotic mental health problems and behaviours, age, gender, number of mental health consultations, social deprivation, geographical location, and ethnicity. The outcome was time to an ICD10 psychosis diagnosis. FINDINGS 830 diagnoses of psychosis were made. Patients were from 216 family practices; mean age was 45.3 years and 43.5 % were male. Median follow-up was 6.5 years (IQR 5.6, 7.8). Overall 8-year psychosis incidence was 45.8 (95 % CI 42.8, 49.0)/100,000 person years at risk. A risk prediction model including age, sex, ethnicity, social deprivation, consultations for suicidal behaviour, depression/anxiety, substance abuse, history of consultations for suicidal behaviour, smoking history and prescribed medications for depression/anxiety/PTSD/OCD and total number of consultations had good discrimination (Harrell's C = 0.774). Identifying patients aged 17-100 years with predicted risk exceeding 1.0 % over 6 years had sensitivity of 71 % and specificity of 84 %. FUNDING NIHR, School for Primary Care Research, Biomedical Research Centre.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah A Sullivan
- Centre for Academic Mental Health, Bristol Medical School, Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK; National Institute for Health Research, Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
| | - Daphne Kounali
- Centre for Academic Mental Health, Bristol Medical School, Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK; National Institute for Health Research, Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
| | - Richard Morris
- National Institute for Health Research, Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK; Centre for Academic Primary Care, Bristol Medical School, Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
| | - David Kessler
- Centre for Academic Mental Health, Bristol Medical School, Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
| | | | - Glyn Lewis
- UCL Division of Psychiatry, Maple House, Tottenham Court Rd, London W1T 7NF, UK.
| | - Philippa Lilford
- Centre for Academic Mental Health, Bristol Medical School, Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
| | - Irwin Nazareth
- UCL Division of Psychiatry, Maple House, Tottenham Court Rd, London W1T 7NF, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Kounali D, Button KS, Lewis G, Gilbody S, Kessler D, Araya R, Duffy L, Lanham P, Peters TJ, Wiles N, Lewis G. How much change is enough? Evidence from a longitudinal study on depression in UK primary care. Psychol Med 2022; 52:1875-1882. [PMID: 33138872 PMCID: PMC9340848 DOI: 10.1017/s0033291720003700] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2019] [Revised: 07/03/2020] [Accepted: 07/20/2020] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II) and the Generalised Anxiety Disorder Assessment (GAD-7) are widely used in the evaluation of interventions for depression and anxiety. The smallest reduction in depressive symptoms that matter to patients is known as the Minimum Clinically Important Difference (MCID). Little empirical study of the MCID for these scales exists. METHODS A prospective cohort of 400 patients in UK primary care were interviewed on four occasions, 2 weeks apart. At each time point, participants completed all three questionnaires and a 'global rating of change' scale (GRS). MCID estimation relied on estimated changes in symptoms according to reported improvement on the GRS scale, stratified by baseline severity on the Clinical Interview Schedule (CIS-R). RESULTS For moderate baseline severity, those who reported improvement on the GRS had a reduction of 21% (95% confidence interval (CI) -26.7 to -14.9) on the PHQ-9; 23% (95% CI -27.8 to -18.0) on the BDI-II and 26.8% (95% CI -33.5 to -20.1) on the GAD-7. The corresponding threshold scores below which participants were more likely to report improvement were -1.7, -3.5 and -1.5 points on the PHQ-9, BDI-II and GAD-7, respectively. Patients with milder symptoms require much larger reductions as percentage of their baseline to endorse improvement. CONCLUSIONS An MCID representing 20% reduction of scores in these scales, is a useful guide for patients with moderately severe symptoms. If treatment had the same effect on patients irrespective of baseline severity, those with low symptoms are unlikely to notice a benefit. FUNDING Funding. National Institute for Health Research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daphne Kounali
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | | | - Gemma Lewis
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | - Simon Gilbody
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - David Kessler
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Ricardo Araya
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Larisa Duffy
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | - Paul Lanham
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Tim J. Peters
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Nicola Wiles
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Glyn Lewis
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Fawcett K, Stimell-Rauch M, Wagh A, Fenster D, Kessler D, DePeter K, Kim JW, Lame M, Sonnett M, Bregstein J. Pediatric Emergency Physicians’ Comfort Level Providing Urgent Care for Adults on Telemedicine During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Experience at an Academic Medical Center. Cureus 2022; 14:e26145. [PMID: 35891853 PMCID: PMC9303847 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.26145] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective: Our objectives were to assess the comfort level of pediatric emergency physicians (PEPs) providing urgent care to adult patients on telemedicine (APOTM) when redeployed during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, how it changed over time, and what resources were helpful. Materials and methods: We conducted a retrospective pre-post cross-sectional survey of PEPs providing urgent care to APOTM with COVID-19 symptoms during the COVID-19 surge from March 12, 2020, to June 12, 2020 (the "care period") at two academic pediatric emergency departments in New York City. A retrospective chart review was also conducted. We include data on demographics of PEPs and adult patients; comfort level of PEPs providing urgent care to APOTM with COVID-19 symptoms pre- and post-three-month care period and effective resources. Results: Sixty-five PEPs provided urgent care to 1515 APOTM with COVID-19 symptoms during the care period. Pre-pandemic, 22/43 (51%) of responders feared caring for APOTM; 6/43 (14%) were comfortable. At the end of the care period, 25/42 (58%) of the responders stated they were comfortable caring for these patients. Factors associated with increased comfort level were: increased volume of patients over time, treatment algorithms, group support via electronic communication, and real-time back-up by a general emergency medicine (GEM) physician. Reduced medicolegal liability was also cited. Conclusion: With minimal additional training and resources, PEPs can increase their comfort to provide urgent care to APOTM with COVID-19 symptoms. As future pandemics may disproportionately affect certain patient populations (adults versus pediatrics), interventions such as treatment algorithms, group support via emails and texts, and sub-specialty backup should be incorporated into redeployment plans for urgent care telemedicine programs. Future research is needed to determine the adaptability of other medical specialties to cross-cover a different specialty from their own if needed.
Collapse
|
26
|
Kubassova O, Boesen M, Pereira Da Costa C, O’lynn J, Patterson A, Kessler D. POS1127 USE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND CLOUD-BASED INFRASTRUCTURE TO IMPROVE THE SPEED AND ACCURACY OF ELIGIBILITY READS IN OSTEOARTHRITIS TRIALS. Ann Rheum Dis 2022. [DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2022-eular.3815] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
BackgroundThe Kellgren-Lawrence grading (KLG) system is used in clinical trials of osteoarthritis (OA) to define the structural severity of the disease as part of patient eligibility assessment. However, the use of KLG system has proven to be challenging due to considerable inter-reader variability[1], [2], which may result in recruitment of sub-optimal patient cohort or delays in patient recruitment.ObjectivesThe objective of this study was to determine the impact of an AI-assisted, cloud-based data management system on the rate of adjudication and the speed of OA patient recruitment.MethodsA total of 3855 bilateral fixed-flexion posteroanterior radiographs of the tibiofemoral joints from global multi-centre trials were included in this study. Two experienced readers performed an initial KLG assessment of both knees; the adjudication was performed by a third experienced reader. A cloud-based imaging data management system was deployed, the readers could access the data simultaneously and adjudication was automatically triggered.We quantified the adjudication rate and the distribution of disagreements in KLG scores provided by the initial readers. Furthermore, the delay in delivery time of the KLG reports to the recruiting site was recorded.Results48% (1836) of the initial reads required adjudication. Approximately 70% of the disagreements affected the conventional KLG 2-3 inclusion range of OA clinical trials. Use of the cloud-based data management allowed 41% of the reports to be delivered within 24 hours, if no adjudication was required vs an average of 5 days as estimated based on the readers’ prior experience.Table 1 provides details on the distribution of disagreements resulting in adjudication reads. Figure 1 shows the delivery time for KLG with and without adjudication.Table 1.Distribution of disagreements of initial reads resulting in an adjudication read being triggered.Disagreement triggering AdjudicationNumber of CasesPercentageKLG 0 – 171327.8%KLG 1 – 282031.9%KLG 2 – 348218.7%KLG 3 – 444617.4%Other1104.3%Total2569100%Figure 1.Time to deliver eligibility reportNehrer et al. showed that assisting the readers with AI generated KLG scoring reports, the agreement rate between readers for KLG assessment increased by 21% [2]. Adding to this, 30% of the adjudications (stemming from KLG 0 –1 disagreements between readers) could be avoided when using AI generated reports.ConclusionWe assess the rate of adjudication and speed of reporting of KLG of data from multi-centre OA clinical trials. Future work is planned to assess the effect of AI-assisted OA grading systems within our cloud-based data management system on reader agreement and recruitment speed in global clinical trials.References[1]D. J. Hunter et al., “OARSI Clinical Trials Recommendations: Knee imaging in clinical trials inosteoarthritis,” Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, vol. 23, no. 5. W.B. Saunders Ltd, pp. 698–715, 2015. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2015.03.012.[2]S. Nehrer et al., “Automated Knee Osteoarthritis Assessment Increases Physicians’ Agreement Rate and Accuracy: Data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative,” Cartilage, vol. 13, no. 1_suppl, pp. 957S-965S, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.1177/1947603519888793.Disclosure of InterestsOlga Kubassova Grant/research support from: Takeda, Lilly, Abbvie, Pfizer, Mikael Boesen Speakers bureau: Lilly, Novartis, Abbvie, Pfizer, Cristiano Pereira da Costa: None declared, Julia O’Lynn: None declared, Andrew Patterson: None declared, Dimitri Kessler: None declared
Collapse
|
27
|
Buckman JEJ, Saunders R, Stott J, Cohen ZD, Arundell LL, Eley TC, Hollon SD, Kendrick T, Ambler G, Watkins E, Gilbody S, Kessler D, Wiles N, Richards D, Brabyn S, Littlewood E, DeRubeis RJ, Lewis G, Pilling S. Socioeconomic Indicators of Treatment Prognosis for Adults With Depression: A Systematic Review and Individual Patient Data Meta-analysis. JAMA Psychiatry 2022; 79:406-416. [PMID: 35262620 PMCID: PMC8908224 DOI: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2022.0100] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
Importance Socioeconomic factors are associated with the prevalence of depression, but their associations with prognosis are unknown. Understanding this association would aid in the clinical management of depression. Objective To determine whether employment status, financial strain, housing status, and educational attainment inform prognosis for adults treated for depression in primary care, independent of treatment and after accounting for clinical prognostic factors. Data Sources The Embase, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and Cochrane (CENTRAL) databases were searched from database inception to October 8, 2021. Study Selection Inclusion criteria were as follows: randomized clinical trials that used the Revised Clinical Interview Schedule (CIS-R; the most common comprehensive screening and diagnostic measure of depressive and anxiety symptoms in primary care randomized clinical trials), measured socioeconomic factors at baseline, and sampled patients with unipolar depression who sought treatment for depression from general physicians/practitioners or who scored 12 or more points on the CIS-R. Exclusion criteria included patients with depression secondary to a personality or psychotic disorder or neurologic condition, studies of bipolar or psychotic depression, studies that included children or adolescents, and feasibility studies. Studies were independently assessed against inclusion and exclusion criteria by 2 reviewers. Data Extraction and Synthesis Data were extracted and cleaned by data managers for each included study, further cleaned by multiple reviewers, and cross-checked by study chief investigators. Risk of bias and quality were assessed using the Quality in Prognosis Studies (QUIPS) and Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) tools, respectively. This study followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses-Individual Participant Data (PRISMA-IPD) reporting guidelines. Main Outcomes and Measures Depressive symptoms at 3 to 4 months after baseline. Results This systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis identified 9 eligible studies that provided individual patient data for 4864 patients (mean [SD] age, 42.5 (14.0) years; 3279 women [67.4%]). The 2-stage random-effects meta-analysis end point depressive symptom scale scores were 28% (95% CI, 20%-36%) higher for unemployed patients than for employed patients and 18% (95% CI, 6%-30%) lower for patients who were homeowners than for patients living with family or friends, in hostels, or homeless, which were equivalent to 4.2 points (95% CI, 3.6-6.2 points) and 2.9 points (95% CI, 1.1-4.9 points) on the Beck Depression Inventory II, respectively. Financial strain and educational attainment were associated with prognosis independent of treatment, but unlike employment and housing status, there was little evidence of associations after adjusting for clinical prognostic factors. Conclusions and Relevance Results of this systematic review and meta-analysis revealed that unemployment was associated with a poor prognosis whereas home ownership was associated with improved prognosis. These differences were clinically important and independent of the type of treatment received. Interventions that address employment or housing difficulties could improve outcomes for patients with depression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua E. J. Buckman
- Centre for Outcomes Research and Effectiveness (CORE), Research Department of Clinical, Educational & Health Psychology, University College London, London, United Kingdom
- iCope Camden & Islington NHS Foundation Trust, St Pancras Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Rob Saunders
- Centre for Outcomes Research and Effectiveness (CORE), Research Department of Clinical, Educational & Health Psychology, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Joshua Stott
- Centre for Outcomes Research and Effectiveness (CORE), Research Department of Clinical, Educational & Health Psychology, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Laura-Louise Arundell
- Centre for Outcomes Research and Effectiveness (CORE), Research Department of Clinical, Educational & Health Psychology, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Thalia C. Eley
- Social, Genetic and Developmental Psychiatry Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Steven D. Hollon
- Department of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Tony Kendrick
- Primary Care, Population Sciences and Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Gareth Ambler
- Statistical Science, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Edward Watkins
- Department of Psychology, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom
| | - Simon Gilbody
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, United Kingdom
| | - David Kessler
- Centre for Academic Mental Health, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Nicola Wiles
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - David Richards
- Institute of Health Research, University of Exeter College of Medicine and Health, Exeter, United Kingdom
- Department of Health and Caring Sciences, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, Bergen, Norway
| | - Sally Brabyn
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, United Kingdom
| | | | - Robert J. DeRubeis
- University of Pennsylvania College of Arts and Sciences, Department of Psychology, Philadelphia
| | - Glyn Lewis
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Stephen Pilling
- Centre for Outcomes Research and Effectiveness (CORE), Research Department of Clinical, Educational & Health Psychology, University College London, London, United Kingdom
- Camden & Islington NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Clarke CS, Duffy L, Lewis G, Freemantle N, Gilbody S, Kendrick T, Kessler D, King M, Lanham P, Mangin D, Moore M, Nazareth I, Wiles N, Marston L, Hunter RM. Correction to: Cost-Utility Analysis of Discontinuing Antidepressants in England Primary Care Patients Compared with Long-Term Maintenance: The ANTLER Study. Appl Health Econ Health Policy 2022; 20:283. [PMID: 34893957 PMCID: PMC8847289 DOI: 10.1007/s40258-021-00708-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline S Clarke
- Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK.
| | - Larisa Duffy
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | - Glyn Lewis
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | - Nick Freemantle
- Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, University College London, London, UK
| | - Simon Gilbody
- Department of Health Sciences and Hull York Medical School, University of York, York, UK
| | - Tony Kendrick
- Primary Care Population Sciences and Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - David Kessler
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Michael King
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | - Paul Lanham
- Patient and Public Involvement Collaborator, London, UK
| | - Derelie Mangin
- Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Michael Moore
- Primary Care Population Sciences and Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Irwin Nazareth
- Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Nicola Wiles
- Centre for Academic Mental Health, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Louise Marston
- Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Rachael Maree Hunter
- Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Clarke CS, Duffy L, Lewis G, Freemantle N, Gilbody S, Kendrick T, Kessler D, King M, Lanham P, Mangin D, Moore M, Nazareth I, Wiles N, Marston L, Hunter RM. Cost-Utility Analysis of Discontinuing Antidepressants in England Primary Care Patients Compared with Long-Term Maintenance: The ANTLER Study. Appl Health Econ Health Policy 2022; 20:269-282. [PMID: 34748164 PMCID: PMC8847280 DOI: 10.1007/s40258-021-00693-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/19/2021] [Indexed: 05/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Depression is a common mental health condition with considerable negative impact on health and well-being. Although antidepressants are recommended as first-line treatment, there is limited evidence regarding the cost effectiveness of long-term maintenance antidepressants for preventing relapse. OBJECTIVES Our objective was to calculate the mean incremental costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) over 12 months of discontinuing long-term antidepressant medication in well patients compared with maintenance, using patient-level trial data. METHODS We conducted a cost-utility analysis of 478 participants from 150 UK general practices recruited to a randomised, double-blind trial (ANTLER). QALYs were calculated from EQ-5D-5L and 12-Item Short Form survey (SF-12) results, with primary analysis using the EQ-5D-5L value set for England. Resource use was collected from primary care patient electronic medical records and self-completed questionnaires capturing mental-health-related resource use. Costs were calculated by applying standard UK unit costs to resource use. Adjustments were made for baseline variables. RESULTS Participants randomised to discontinuation had significantly worse utility scores at 3 months (- 0.032; 95% confidence interval [CI] - 0.053 to - 0.011) but no significant difference in QALYs (- 0.011; 95% CI - 0.026 to 0.003) or costs (£3.11; 95% CI - 41.28 to 47.50) at 12 months. The probability that discontinuation was cost effective compared with maintenance was 12.9% at a threshold of £20,000 per QALY gained. CONCLUSIONS Discontinuation of antidepressants was unlikely to be cost effective compared with maintenance for currently well patients on long-term antidepressants. However, this analysis provides no information on the wider impact of antidepressants. Our findings provide information on the potential impact of discontinuing long-term maintenance antidepressants and facilitate improving guidance for shared patient-clinician decision making. TRIAL REGISTRATION EudraCT number 2015-004210-26; ISRCTN number ISRCTN15969819.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline S Clarke
- Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK.
| | - Larisa Duffy
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | - Glyn Lewis
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | - Nick Freemantle
- Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, University College London, London, UK
| | - Simon Gilbody
- Department of Health Sciences and Hull York Medical School, University of York, York, UK
| | - Tony Kendrick
- Primary Care Population Sciences and Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - David Kessler
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Michael King
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | - Paul Lanham
- Patient and Public Involvement Collaborator, London, UK
| | - Derelie Mangin
- Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Michael Moore
- Primary Care Population Sciences and Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Irwin Nazareth
- Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Nicola Wiles
- Centre for Academic Mental Health, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Louise Marston
- Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Rachael Maree Hunter
- Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Buckman JEJ, Saunders R, Arundell LL, Oshinowo ID, Cohen ZD, O'Driscoll C, Barnett P, Stott J, Ambler G, Gilbody S, Hollon SD, Kendrick T, Watkins E, Eley TC, Skelton M, Wiles N, Kessler D, DeRubeis RJ, Lewis G, Pilling S. Life events and treatment prognosis for depression: A systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis. J Affect Disord 2022; 299:298-308. [PMID: 34920035 PMCID: PMC9113943 DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2021.12.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2021] [Revised: 11/10/2021] [Accepted: 12/12/2021] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate associations between major life events and prognosis independent of treatment type: (1) after adjusting for clinical prognostic factors and socio-demographics; (2) amongst patients with depressive episodes at least six-months long; and (3) patients with a first life-time depressive episode. METHODS Six RCTs of adults seeking treatment for depression in primary care met eligibility criteria, individual patient data (IPD) were collated from all six (n = 2858). Participants were randomized to any treatment and completed the same baseline assessment of life events, demographics and clinical prognostic factors. Two-stage random effects meta-analyses were conducted. RESULTS Reporting any major life events was associated with poorer prognosis regardless of treatment type. Controlling for baseline clinical factors, socio-demographics and social support resulted in minimal residual evidence of associations between life events and treatment prognosis. However, removing factors that might mediate the relationships between life events and outcomes reporting: arguments/disputes, problem debt, violent crime, losing one's job, and three or more life events were associated with considerably worse prognoses (percentage difference in 3-4 months depressive symptoms compared to no reported life events =30.3%(95%CI: 18.4-43.3)). CONCLUSIONS Assessing for clinical prognostic factors, social support, and socio-demographics is likely to be more informative for prognosis than assessing self-reported recent major life events. However, clinicians might find it useful to ask about such events, and if they are still affecting the patient, consider interventions to tackle problems related to those events (e.g. employment support, mediation, or debt advice). Further investigations of the efficacy of such interventions will be important.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua E J Buckman
- Centre for Outcomes Research and Effectiveness (CORE), Research Department of Clinical, Educational & Health Psychology, University College London, London WC1E 7HB, United Kingdom; iCope - Camden & Islington Psychological Therapies Services, Camden & Islington NHS Foundation Trust, 4St Pancras Way, London NW1 0PE, United Kingdom.
| | - Rob Saunders
- Centre for Outcomes Research and Effectiveness (CORE), Research Department of Clinical, Educational & Health Psychology, University College London, London WC1E 7HB, United Kingdom
| | - Laura-Louise Arundell
- Centre for Outcomes Research and Effectiveness (CORE), Research Department of Clinical, Educational & Health Psychology, University College London, London WC1E 7HB, United Kingdom
| | - Iyinoluwa D Oshinowo
- Centre for Outcomes Research and Effectiveness (CORE), Research Department of Clinical, Educational & Health Psychology, University College London, London WC1E 7HB, United Kingdom
| | - Zachary D Cohen
- Department of Psychiatry, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, United States
| | - Ciaran O'Driscoll
- Centre for Outcomes Research and Effectiveness (CORE), Research Department of Clinical, Educational & Health Psychology, University College London, London WC1E 7HB, United Kingdom
| | - Phoebe Barnett
- Centre for Outcomes Research and Effectiveness (CORE), Research Department of Clinical, Educational & Health Psychology, University College London, London WC1E 7HB, United Kingdom
| | - Joshua Stott
- Centre for Outcomes Research and Effectiveness (CORE), Research Department of Clinical, Educational & Health Psychology, University College London, London WC1E 7HB, United Kingdom
| | - Gareth Ambler
- Statistical Science, University College London, London WC1E 7HB, United Kingdom
| | - Simon Gilbody
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York YO10 5DD, United Kingdom
| | - Steven D Hollon
- Department of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 407817, United States
| | - Tony Kendrick
- Primary Care, Population Sciences and Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton SO16 5ST, United Kingdom
| | - Edward Watkins
- Department of Psychology, University of Exeter, Exeter, EX4 4QG, United Kingdom
| | - Thalia C Eley
- Social, Genetic and Developmental Psychiatry Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London SE5 8AF, United Kingdom
| | - Megan Skelton
- Social, Genetic and Developmental Psychiatry Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London SE5 8AF, United Kingdom
| | - Nicola Wiles
- Centre for Academic Mental Health, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Oakfield House, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - David Kessler
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Robert J DeRubeis
- School of Arts and Sciences, Department of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104-60185, United States
| | - Glyn Lewis
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London W1T 7NF, United Kingdom
| | - Stephen Pilling
- Centre for Outcomes Research and Effectiveness (CORE), Research Department of Clinical, Educational & Health Psychology, University College London, London WC1E 7HB, United Kingdom; Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust, St Pancras Hospital, 4St Pancras Way, London NW1 0PE United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Loades ME, Stallard P, Kessler D, Crawley E. Mental health screening in adolescents with CFS/ME. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2022; 31:1003-1005. [PMID: 33555428 PMCID: PMC9209357 DOI: 10.1007/s00787-021-01734-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2021] [Accepted: 01/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Maria E Loades
- Department of Psychology, University of Bath, Bath, BA2 7AY, England, UK.
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
| | | | - David Kessler
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Esther Crawley
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- Royal United Hospital, Bath, UK
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Archer C, Turner K, Kessler D, Mars B, Wiles N. Trends in the recording of anxiety in UK primary care: a multi-method approach. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2022; 57:375-386. [PMID: 34196743 PMCID: PMC8246441 DOI: 10.1007/s00127-021-02131-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2021] [Accepted: 06/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/05/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Anxiety disorders are common. Between 1998 and 2008, in the UK, GP recording of anxiety symptoms increased, but the recording of anxiety disorders decreased. We do not know whether such trends have continued. This study examined recent trends in the recording of anxiety and explored factors that may influence GPs' coding of anxiety. METHODS We used data from adults (n = 2,569,153) registered with UK general practices (n = 176) that contributed to the Clinical Practice Research Datalink between 2003 and 2018. Incidence rates and 95% confidence intervals were calculated for recorded anxiety symptoms and diagnoses and were stratified by age and gender. Joinpoint regression was used to estimate the years trends changed. In addition, in-depth interviews were conducted with 15 GPs to explore their views and management of anxiety. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed thematically. RESULTS The incidence of anxiety symptoms rose from 6.2/1000 person-years at risk (PYAR) in 2003 to 14.7/1000 PYAR in 2018. Between 2003 and 2008, the incidence of anxiety diagnoses fell from 13.2 to 10.1/1000 PYAR; markedly increasing between 2013 and 2018 to 15.3/1000 PYAR. GPs mentioned that they preferred using symptom codes to diagnostic codes to avoid assigning potentially stigmatising or unhelpful labels, and commented on a rise in anxiety in recent years, especially in young adults. CONCLUSION Recent increases in the recording of both anxiety diagnoses and symptoms may reflect increased presentation to primary care, especially in young adults. There is a clear need to understand the reasons for this, and this knowledge may be critical in the prevention and treatment of anxiety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charlotte Archer
- Bristol Medical School, Centre for Academic Mental Health, University of Bristol, Population Health Sciences, Bristol, BS8 2BN, UK.
| | - Katrina Turner
- grid.5337.20000 0004 1936 7603Bristol Medical School, Centre for Academic Mental Health, University of Bristol, Population Health Sciences, Bristol, BS8 2BN UK ,grid.410421.20000 0004 0380 7336The National Institute for Health Research, Applied Research Collaboration West (NIHR ARC West), University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - David Kessler
- grid.5337.20000 0004 1936 7603Bristol Medical School, Centre for Academic Mental Health, University of Bristol, Population Health Sciences, Bristol, BS8 2BN UK ,grid.511076.4NIHR Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, Bristol, UK
| | - Becky Mars
- grid.5337.20000 0004 1936 7603Bristol Medical School, Centre for Academic Mental Health, University of Bristol, Population Health Sciences, Bristol, BS8 2BN UK ,grid.511076.4NIHR Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, Bristol, UK
| | - Nicola Wiles
- grid.5337.20000 0004 1936 7603Bristol Medical School, Centre for Academic Mental Health, University of Bristol, Population Health Sciences, Bristol, BS8 2BN UK ,grid.511076.4NIHR Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, Bristol, UK
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Davies P, Ijaz S, Williams CJ, Kessler D, Lewis G, Wiles N. Pharmacological interventions for treatment-resistant depression in adults: a Cochrane Review. BJPsych advances 2021. [DOI: 10.1192/bja.2021.66] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
|
34
|
Abo AM, Alade KH, Rempell RG, Kessler D, Fischer JW, Lewiss RE, Raio CC, Marin JR. Credentialing Pediatric Emergency Medicine Faculty in Point-of-Care Ultrasound: Expert Guidelines. Pediatr Emerg Care 2021; 37:e1687-e1694. [PMID: 30624416 DOI: 10.1097/pec.0000000000001677] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
ABSTRACT As point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) becomes standard practice in pediatric emergency medicine (PEM), it is important to have benchmarks in place for credentialing PEM faculty in POCUS. Faculty must be systematically trained and assessed for competency in order to be credentialed in POCUS and granted privileges by an individual institution. Recommendations on credentialing PEM faculty are needed to ensure appropriate, consistent, and responsible use of this diagnostic and procedural tool. It is our intention that these guidelines will serve as a framework for credentialing faculty in PEM POCUS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alyssa M Abo
- From the Departments of Pediatrics and Emergency Medicine, George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC
| | - Kiyetta H Alade
- Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
| | - Rachel G Rempell
- Department of Pediatrics, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - David Kessler
- Departments of Pediatrics and Emergency Medicine, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY
| | - Jason W Fischer
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Resa E Lewiss
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Christopher C Raio
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Good Samaritan Hospital Medical Center, West Islip, NY
| | - Jennifer R Marin
- Departments of Pediatrics and Emergency Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Duffy L, Clarke CS, Lewis G, Marston L, Freemantle N, Gilbody S, Hunter R, Kendrick T, Kessler D, King M, Lanham P, Mangin D, Moore M, Nazareth I, Wiles N, Bacon F, Bird M, Brabyn S, Burns A, Donkor Y, Hunt A, Pervin J, Lewis G. Antidepressant medication to prevent depression relapse in primary care: the ANTLER RCT. Health Technol Assess 2021; 25:1-62. [PMID: 34842135 DOI: 10.3310/hta25690] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There has been a steady increase in the number of primary care patients receiving long-term maintenance antidepressant treatment, despite limited evidence of a benefit of this treatment beyond 8 months. OBJECTIVE The ANTidepressants to prevent reLapse in dEpRession (ANTLER) trial investigated the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of antidepressant medication in preventing relapse in UK primary care. DESIGN This was a Phase IV, double-blind, pragmatic, multisite, individually randomised parallel-group controlled trial, with follow-up at 6, 12, 26, 39 and 52 weeks. Participants were randomised using minimisation on centre, type of antidepressant and baseline depressive symptom score above or below the median using Clinical Interview Schedule - Revised (two categories). Statisticians were blind to allocation for the outcome analyses. SETTING General practices in London, Bristol, Southampton and York. PARTICIPANTS Individuals aged 18-74 years who had experienced at least two episodes of depression and had been taking antidepressants for ≥ 9 months but felt well enough to consider stopping their medication. Those who met an International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision, diagnosis of depression or with other psychiatric conditions were excluded. INTERVENTION At baseline, participants were taking citalopram 20 mg, sertraline 100 mg, fluoxetine 20 mg or mirtazapine 30 mg. They were randomised to either remain on their current medication or discontinue medication after a tapering period. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcome was the time, in weeks, to the beginning of the first depressive episode after randomisation. This was measured by a retrospective Clinical Interview Schedule - Revised that assessed the onset of a depressive episode in the previous 12 weeks, and was conducted at 12, 26, 39 and 52 weeks. The depression-related resource use was collected over 12 months from medical records and patient-completed questionnaires. Quality-adjusted life-years were calculated using the EuroQol-5 Dimensions, five-level version. RESULTS Between 9 March 2017 and 1 March 2019, we randomised 238 participants to antidepressant continuation (the maintenance group) and 240 participants to antidepressant discontinuation (the discontinuation group). The time to relapse of depression was shorter in the discontinuation group, with a hazard ratio of 2.06 (95% confidence interval 1.56 to 2.70; p < 0.0001). By 52 weeks, relapse was experienced by 39% of those who continued antidepressants and 56% of those who discontinued antidepressants. The secondary analysis revealed that people who discontinued experienced more withdrawal symptoms than those who remained on medication, with the largest difference at 12 weeks. In the discontinuation group, 37% (95% confidence interval 28% to 45%) of participants remained on their randomised medication until the end of the trial. In total, 39% (95% confidence interval 32% to 45%) of participants in the discontinuation group returned to their original antidepressant compared with 20% (95% confidence interval 15% to 25%) of participants in maintenance group. The health economic evaluation demonstrated that participants randomised to discontinuation had worse utility scores at 3 months (-0.037, 95% confidence interval -0.059 to -0.015) and fewer quality-adjusted life-years over 12 months (-0.019, 95% confidence interval -0.035 to -0.003) than those randomised to continuation. The discontinuation pathway, besides giving worse outcomes, also cost more [extra £2.71 per patient over 12 months (95% confidence interval -£36.10 to £37.07)] than the continuation pathway, although the cost difference was not significant. CONCLUSIONS Patients who discontinue long-term maintenance antidepressants in primary care are at increased risk of relapse and withdrawal symptoms. However, a substantial proportion of patients can discontinue antidepressants without relapse. Our findings will give patients and clinicians an estimate of the likely benefits and harms of stopping long-term maintenance antidepressants and improve shared decision-making. The participants may not have been representative of all people on long-term maintenance treatment and we could study only a restricted range of antidepressants and doses. Identifying patients who will not relapse if they discontinued antidepressants would be clinically important. TRIAL REGISTRATION Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN15969819 and EudraCT 2015-004210-26. FUNDING This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 25, No. 69. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Larisa Duffy
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | - Caroline S Clarke
- Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK.,PRIMENT Clinical Trials Unit, University College London, London, UK
| | - Gemma Lewis
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | - Louise Marston
- Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK.,PRIMENT Clinical Trials Unit, University College London, London, UK
| | - Nick Freemantle
- PRIMENT Clinical Trials Unit, University College London, London, UK.,Comprehensive Clinical Trials Unit, University College London, London, UK
| | - Simon Gilbody
- Department of Health and Social Care Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Rachael Hunter
- Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK.,PRIMENT Clinical Trials Unit, University College London, London, UK
| | - Tony Kendrick
- Primary Care Population Sciences and Medical Education, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - David Kessler
- Centre for Academic Mental Health, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Michael King
- Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK.,PRIMENT Clinical Trials Unit, University College London, London, UK
| | - Paul Lanham
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | - Dee Mangin
- Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.,Department of General Practice, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - Michael Moore
- Primary Care Population Sciences and Medical Education, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Irwin Nazareth
- Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK.,PRIMENT Clinical Trials Unit, University College London, London, UK
| | - Nicola Wiles
- Centre for Academic Mental Health, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Faye Bacon
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | - Molly Bird
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | - Sally Brabyn
- Department of Health and Social Care Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Alison Burns
- Centre for Academic Mental Health, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Yvonne Donkor
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | - Anna Hunt
- Primary Care Population Sciences and Medical Education, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Jodi Pervin
- Department of Health and Social Care Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Glyn Lewis
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Au-Yeung SK, Griffiths J, Roberts S, Edwards C, Yu LM, Bogacz R, Rendell J, Attenburrow MJ, Watson S, Chan F, Cipriani A, Cleare A, Harmer CJ, Kessler D, Evans J, Lewis G, Singh I, Simon J, Harrison PJ, Cowen P, Shanyinde M, Geddes J, Browning M. PAX-D: study protocol for a randomised placebo-controlled trial evaluating the efficacy and mechanism of pramipexole as add-on treatment for people with treatment resistant depression. Evid Based Ment Health 2021; 25:77-83. [PMID: 34810175 PMCID: PMC9046747 DOI: 10.1136/ebmental-2021-300282] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Introduction Clinical depression is usually treated in primary care with psychological therapies and antidepressant medication. However, when patients do not respond to at least two or more antidepressants within a depressive episode, they are considered to have treatment resistant depression (TRD). Previous small randomised controlled trials suggested that pramipexole, a dopamine D2/3 receptor agonist, may be effective for treating patients with unipolar and bipolar depression as it is known to influence motivational drive and reward processing. PAX-D will compare the effects of pramipexole vs placebo when added to current antidepressant medication for people with TRD. Additionally, PAX-D will investigate the mechanistic effect of pramipexole on reward sensitivity using a probabilistic decision-making task. Methods and analysis PAX-D will assess effectiveness in the short- term (during the first 12 weeks) and in the longer-term (48 weeks) in patients with TRD from the UK. The primary outcome will be change in self-reported depressive symptoms from baseline to week 12 post-randomisation measured using the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology Self-Report (QIDS-SR16). Performance on the decision-making task will be measured at week 0, week 2 and week 12. Secondary outcomes include anhedonia, anxiety and health economic measures including quality of life, capability, well-being and costs. PAX-D will also assess the adverse effects of pramipexole including impulse control difficulties. Discussion Pramipexole is a promising augmentation agent for TRD and may be a useful addition to existing treatment regimes. PAX-D will assess its effectiveness and test for a potential mechanism of action in patients with TRD. Trial registration number ISRCTN84666271
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Sophie Roberts
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Chloe Edwards
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Ly-Mee Yu
- Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford Nuffield, Oxford, UK
| | - Rafal Bogacz
- Brain Network Dynamics Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Jennifer Rendell
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.,Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Mary-Jane Attenburrow
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.,Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Stuart Watson
- Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.,Inpatient Services, Cumbria, Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Mental Health Trust, Northumberland, UK
| | | | - Andrea Cipriani
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.,Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Anthony Cleare
- Centre for Affective Disorders, Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, Bristol, UK
| | | | - David Kessler
- Bristol Medical School, Bristol Population Health Science Institute, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Jonathan Evans
- Bristol Medical School, Bristol Population Health Science Institute, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Glyn Lewis
- Division of Psychiatry, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, London, UK
| | - Ilina Singh
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Judit Simon
- Department of Health Economics, Medical University of Vienna, Wien, Austria
| | - Paul J Harrison
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.,Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Phil Cowen
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.,Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Milensu Shanyinde
- Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford Nuffield, Oxford, UK
| | - John Geddes
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.,Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Michael Browning
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.,Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Ingram J, Johnson D, O'Mahen HA, Law R, Culpin I, Kessler D, Beasant L, Evans J. 'Asking for help': a qualitative interview study exploring the experiences of interpersonal counselling (IPC) compared to low-intensity cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) for women with depression during pregnancy. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2021; 21:765. [PMID: 34763663 PMCID: PMC8588677 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-021-04247-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2021] [Accepted: 10/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Treating depression early in pregnancy can improve health outcomes for women and their children. Current low-intensity psychological therapy for perinatal depression is a supported self-help approach informed by cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) principles. Interpersonal counselling (IPC) may be a more appropriate low-intensity talking therapy for addressing the problems experienced by pregnant women with depression. A randomised feasibility trial (ADAGIO) has compared the acceptability of offering IPC for mild-moderate antenatal depression in routine NHS services compared to low-intensity CBT. This paper reports on a nested qualitative study which explored women's views and expectations of therapy, experiences of receiving IPC, and Psychological Wellbeing Practitioners (PWPs - junior mental health workers) views of delivering the low-intensity therapy. METHODS A qualitative study design using in-depth semi-structured interviews and focus groups. Thirty-two pregnant women received talking therapy within the ADAGIO trial; 19 contributed to the interview study from July 2019 to January 2020; 12 who had IPC and seven who had CBT. All six PWPs trained in IPC took part in a focus group or interview. Interviews and focus groups were recorded, transcribed, anonymised, and analysed using thematic methods. RESULTS Pregnant women welcomed being asked about their mental health in pregnancy and having the chance to have support in accessing therapy. The IPC approach helped women to identify triggers for depression and explored relationships using strategies such as 'promoting self-awareness through mood timelines', 'identifying their circles of support', 'developing communication skills and reciprocity in relationships', and 'asking for help'. PWPs compared how IPC differed from their prior experiences of delivering low-intensity CBT. They reported that IPC included a useful additional emotional component which was relevant to the perinatal period. CONCLUSIONS Identifying and treating depression in pregnancy is important for the future health of both mother and child. Low-intensity perinatal-specific talking therapies delivered by psychological wellbeing practitioners in routine NHS primary care services in England are acceptable to pregnant women with mild-moderate depression. The strategies used in IPC to manage depression, including identifying triggers for low mood, and communicating the need for help, may be particularly appropriate for the perinatal period. TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN 11513120. 02/05/2019.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jenny Ingram
- Centre for Academic Child Health, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
| | - Debbie Johnson
- Centre for Academic Child Health, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | | | - Roslyn Law
- Anna Freud National Centre for Children and Families, London, UK
| | - Iryna Culpin
- Centre for Academic Mental Health, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1NU, UK
| | - David Kessler
- Centre for Academic Mental Health, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1NU, UK
| | - Lucy Beasant
- Centre for Academic Child Health, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Jonathan Evans
- Centre for Academic Mental Health, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1NU, UK
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Heravian A, Fortenko A, Olsen E, Greenwald P, Chang BP, Gutierrez CM, Kessler D. Virtual powers of observation: A telemedicine approach for the suspected COVID-19 patient. J Emerg Manag 2021; 18:45-48. [PMID: 34723346 DOI: 10.5055/jem.0528] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/10/2023]
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVES Prior to COVID-19, telemedicine and its applications to the emergency department (ED) had made significant inroads toward remote evaluation and care. During the local peak of the COVID-19 pandemic in New York City (NYC), there was a dramatic increase in telemedicine based patient encounters for suspected COVID-19 symptoms. In response, pathways were developed to promote a standardized telemedicine approach to remote evaluation and assessment of suspected COVID-19 patients. METHODS A pathway was developed and implemented at two academic EDs in NYC, which collectively had approximately 8,300 telemedicine visits for suspected COVID-19 from March 2020 to June 2020. A protocol was developed by an expert consensus panel of four board-certified emergency physicians and two pediatric emergency physicians, all with telemedicine training/administrative roles. RESULTS The pathway was initiated for any telehealth patient with suspected COVID-19 symptoms (cough, fever, shortness of breath, and bodyaches). A standardized history solicited known or suspected risk factors for worse prognosis, including age > 50, cardiovascular or lung disease, obesity, immunosuppression, and living alone, as well as a focused assessment of symptom severity and exercise tolerance. An exam at rest included visual counting of breaths along with instruction on palpation of radial pulse. Saturation was included if pulse oximetry was available. If exam at rest was reassuring, providers were instructed to repeat the respiratory assessment on exertion by having the patient walk in place briskly for 1 minute. Patients with severe illness defined by resting or exertional respiratory rate greater than 30 and/or oxygen saturation less than 90 percent were instructed to go to the ED. Patients with moderate illness defined by exertional metrics of respiratory rate less than 22, oxygen saturation greater than 94 percent, and heart rate less than 125 were discharged from the virtual urgent care visit with a repeat telehealth follow-up call at either 12 or 24 hours depending on the number of risk factors. Patients without risk factors and with reassuring respiratory assessment were discharged from the telemedicine encounter with reassurance and standard discharge precautions for escalation of care. CONCLUSION Designing and disseminating a standardized pathway helped to provide a framework to approach patients suspected of COVID-19 over telemedicine. Future work focusing on patient outcome data will help guide and refine any standardized telehealth approach to the COVID-19-suspected patient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anisa Heravian
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4446-7350
| | - Alexander Fortenko
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Weill Cornell University Medical Center, New York
| | - Erica Olsen
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York
| | - Peter Greenwald
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Weill Cornell University Medical Center, New York
| | - Bernard P Chang
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York
| | - Christie M Gutierrez
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York
| | - David Kessler
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Heravian A, Fortenko A, Olsen E, Greenwald P, Chang BP, Gutierrez CM, Kessler D. Virtual powers of observation: A telemedicine approach for the suspected COVID-19 patient. J Emerg Manag 2021; 18:45-48. [PMID: 34723346 DOI: 10.5055/jem.200044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVES Prior to COVID-19, telemedicine and its applications to the emergency department (ED) had made significant inroads toward remote evaluation and care. During the local peak of the COVID-19 pandemic in New York City (NYC), there was a dramatic increase in telemedicine based patient encounters for suspected COVID-19 symptoms. In response, pathways were developed to promote a standardized telemedicine approach to remote evaluation and assessment of suspected COVID-19 patients. METHODS A pathway was developed and implemented at two academic EDs in NYC, which collectively had approximately 8,300 telemedicine visits for suspected COVID-19 from March 2020 to June 2020. A protocol was developed by an expert consensus panel of four board-certified emergency physicians and two pediatric emergency physicians, all with telemedicine training/administrative roles. RESULTS The pathway was initiated for any telehealth patient with suspected COVID-19 symptoms (cough, fever, shortness of breath, and bodyaches). A standardized history solicited known or suspected risk factors for worse prognosis, including age > 50, cardiovascular or lung disease, obesity, immunosuppression, and living alone, as well as a focused assessment of symptom severity and exercise tolerance. An exam at rest included visual counting of breaths along with instruction on palpation of radial pulse. Saturation was included if pulse oximetry was available. If exam at rest was reassuring, providers were instructed to repeat the respiratory assessment on exertion by having the patient walk in place briskly for 1 minute. Patients with severe illness defined by resting or exertional respiratory rate greater than 30 and/or oxygen saturation less than 90 percent were instructed to go to the ED. Patients with moderate illness defined by exertional metrics of respiratory rate less than 22, oxygen saturation greater than 94 percent, and heart rate less than 125 were discharged from the virtual urgent care visit with a repeat telehealth follow-up call at either 12 or 24 hours depending on the number of risk factors. Patients without risk factors and with reassuring respiratory assessment were discharged from the telemedicine encounter with reassurance and standard discharge precautions for escalation of care. CONCLUSION Designing and disseminating a standardized pathway helped to provide a framework to approach patients suspected of COVID-19 over telemedicine. Future work focusing on patient outcome data will help guide and refine any standardized telehealth approach to the COVID-19-suspected patient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anisa Heravian
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4446-7350
| | - Alexander Fortenko
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Weill Cornell University Medical Center, New York
| | - Erica Olsen
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York
| | - Peter Greenwald
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Weill Cornell University Medical Center, New York
| | - Bernard P Chang
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York
| | - Christie M Gutierrez
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York
| | - David Kessler
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Mills HL, Higgins JP, Morris RW, Kessler D, Heron J, Wiles N, Davey Smith G, Tilling K. Detecting Heterogeneity of Intervention Effects Using Analysis and Meta-analysis of Differences in Variance Between Trial Arms. Epidemiology 2021; 32:846-854. [PMID: 34432720 PMCID: PMC8478324 DOI: 10.1097/ede.0000000000001401] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2020] [Accepted: 07/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with continuous outcomes usually only examine mean differences in response between trial arms. If the intervention has heterogeneous effects, then outcome variances will also differ between arms. Power of an individual trial to assess heterogeneity is lower than the power to detect the same size of main effect. METHODS We describe several methods for assessing differences in variance in trial arms and apply them to a single trial with individual patient data and to meta-analyses using summary data. Where individual data are available, we use regression-based methods to examine the effects of covariates on variation. We present an additional method to meta-analyze differences in variances with summary data. RESULTS In the single trial, there was agreement between methods, and the difference in variance was largely due to differences in prevalence of depression at baseline. In two meta-analyses, most individual trials did not show strong evidence of a difference in variance between arms, with wide confidence intervals. However, both meta-analyses showed evidence of greater variance in the control arm, and in one example, this was perhaps because mean outcome in the control arm was higher. CONCLUSIONS Using meta-analysis, we overcame low power of individual trials to examine differences in variance using meta-analysis. Evidence of differences in variance should be followed up to identify potential effect modifiers and explore other possible causes such as varying compliance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Harriet L. Mills
- From the Medical Research Council Integrative Epidemiology Unit, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Julian P.T. Higgins
- From the Medical Research Council Integrative Epidemiology Unit, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
- National Institute for Health Research Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust and University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Richard W. Morris
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - David Kessler
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
- National Institute for Health Research Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust and University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Jon Heron
- From the Medical Research Council Integrative Epidemiology Unit, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Nicola Wiles
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
- National Institute for Health Research Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust and University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - George Davey Smith
- From the Medical Research Council Integrative Epidemiology Unit, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Kate Tilling
- From the Medical Research Council Integrative Epidemiology Unit, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
- National Institute for Health Research Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust and University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Evans J, Ingram J, Law R, Taylor H, Johnson D, Glynn J, Hopley B, Kessler D, Round J, Ford J, Culpin I, O'Mahen H. Interpersonal counselling versus perinatal-specific cognitive behavioural therapy for women with depression during pregnancy offered in routine psychological treatment services: a phase II randomised trial. BMC Psychiatry 2021; 21:504. [PMID: 34649534 PMCID: PMC8518253 DOI: 10.1186/s12888-021-03482-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2020] [Accepted: 09/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Up to one in eight women experience depression during pregnancy. In the UK, low intensity cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) is the main psychological treatment offered for those with mild or moderate depression and is recommended during the perinatal period, however referral by midwives and take up of treatment by pregnant women is extremely low. Interpersonal Counselling (IPC) is a brief, low-intensity form of Interpersonal Psychotherapy (IPT) that focuses on areas of concern to service users during pregnancy. To improve psychological treatment for depression during pregnancy, the study aimed to assess the feasibility and acceptability of a trial of IPC for antenatal depression in routine NHS services compared to low intensity perinatal specific CBT. METHODS We conducted a small randomised controlled trial in two centres. A total of 52 pregnant women with mild or moderate depression were randomised to receive 6 sessions of IPC or perinatal specific CBT. Treatment was provided by 12 junior mental health workers (jMHW). The primary outcome was the number of women recruited to the point of randomisation. Secondary outcomes included maternal mood, couple functioning, attachment, functioning, treatment adherence, and participant and staff acceptability. RESULTS The study was feasible and acceptable. Recruitment was successful through scanning clinics, only 6 of the 52 women were recruited through midwives. 71% of women in IPC completed treatment. Women reported IPC was acceptable, and supervisors reported high treatment competence in IPC arm by jMHWs. Outcome measures indicated there was improvement in mood in both groups (Change in EPDS score IPC 4.4 (s.d. 5.1) and CBT 4.0 (s.d. 4.8). CONCLUSIONS This was a feasibility study and was not large enough to detect important differences between IPC and perinatal specific CBT. A full-scale trial of IPC for antenatal depression in routine IAPT services is feasible. TRIAL REGISTRATION This study has been registered with ISRCTN registry 11513120 . - date of registration 05/04/2018.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan Evans
- Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
| | - Jenny Ingram
- Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | | | - Hazel Taylor
- University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Debbie Johnson
- Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Joel Glynn
- Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Becky Hopley
- Psychology, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - David Kessler
- Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Jeff Round
- Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | | | - Iryna Culpin
- Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Heather O'Mahen
- Psychology, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Skapinakis P, Caldwell DM, Hollingworth W, Bryden P, Fineberg NA, Salkovskis P, Welton NJ, Baxter H, Kessler D, Churchill R, Lewis G. Pharmacological and Psychotherapeutic Interventions for Management of Obsessive-compulsive Disorder in Adults: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis. Focus (Am Psychiatr Publ) 2021; 19:457-467. [PMID: 35747299 DOI: 10.1176/appi.focus.19402] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Reprinted under Creative Commons CC-BY license.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Petros Skapinakis
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK (P Skapinakis, Prof G Lewis); Department of Psychiatry, University of Ioannina School of Medicine, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece (P Skapinakis); School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK (D M Caldwell, Prof W Hollingworth, P Bryden, N J Welton, H Baxter, D Kessler); Department of Postgraduate Medicine, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK, and Highly Specialised Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder and Body Dysmorphic Disorder Services, Hertfordshire Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust, Hertfordshire, UK (N A Fineberg); Department of Psychology, University of Bath, Bath, UK (Prof P Salkovskis); and Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, York, UK (Prof R Churchill)
| | - Deborah M Caldwell
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK (P Skapinakis, Prof G Lewis); Department of Psychiatry, University of Ioannina School of Medicine, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece (P Skapinakis); School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK (D M Caldwell, Prof W Hollingworth, P Bryden, N J Welton, H Baxter, D Kessler); Department of Postgraduate Medicine, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK, and Highly Specialised Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder and Body Dysmorphic Disorder Services, Hertfordshire Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust, Hertfordshire, UK (N A Fineberg); Department of Psychology, University of Bath, Bath, UK (Prof P Salkovskis); and Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, York, UK (Prof R Churchill)
| | - William Hollingworth
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK (P Skapinakis, Prof G Lewis); Department of Psychiatry, University of Ioannina School of Medicine, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece (P Skapinakis); School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK (D M Caldwell, Prof W Hollingworth, P Bryden, N J Welton, H Baxter, D Kessler); Department of Postgraduate Medicine, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK, and Highly Specialised Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder and Body Dysmorphic Disorder Services, Hertfordshire Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust, Hertfordshire, UK (N A Fineberg); Department of Psychology, University of Bath, Bath, UK (Prof P Salkovskis); and Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, York, UK (Prof R Churchill)
| | - Peter Bryden
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK (P Skapinakis, Prof G Lewis); Department of Psychiatry, University of Ioannina School of Medicine, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece (P Skapinakis); School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK (D M Caldwell, Prof W Hollingworth, P Bryden, N J Welton, H Baxter, D Kessler); Department of Postgraduate Medicine, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK, and Highly Specialised Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder and Body Dysmorphic Disorder Services, Hertfordshire Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust, Hertfordshire, UK (N A Fineberg); Department of Psychology, University of Bath, Bath, UK (Prof P Salkovskis); and Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, York, UK (Prof R Churchill)
| | - Naomi A Fineberg
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK (P Skapinakis, Prof G Lewis); Department of Psychiatry, University of Ioannina School of Medicine, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece (P Skapinakis); School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK (D M Caldwell, Prof W Hollingworth, P Bryden, N J Welton, H Baxter, D Kessler); Department of Postgraduate Medicine, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK, and Highly Specialised Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder and Body Dysmorphic Disorder Services, Hertfordshire Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust, Hertfordshire, UK (N A Fineberg); Department of Psychology, University of Bath, Bath, UK (Prof P Salkovskis); and Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, York, UK (Prof R Churchill)
| | - Paul Salkovskis
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK (P Skapinakis, Prof G Lewis); Department of Psychiatry, University of Ioannina School of Medicine, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece (P Skapinakis); School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK (D M Caldwell, Prof W Hollingworth, P Bryden, N J Welton, H Baxter, D Kessler); Department of Postgraduate Medicine, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK, and Highly Specialised Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder and Body Dysmorphic Disorder Services, Hertfordshire Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust, Hertfordshire, UK (N A Fineberg); Department of Psychology, University of Bath, Bath, UK (Prof P Salkovskis); and Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, York, UK (Prof R Churchill)
| | - Nicky J Welton
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK (P Skapinakis, Prof G Lewis); Department of Psychiatry, University of Ioannina School of Medicine, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece (P Skapinakis); School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK (D M Caldwell, Prof W Hollingworth, P Bryden, N J Welton, H Baxter, D Kessler); Department of Postgraduate Medicine, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK, and Highly Specialised Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder and Body Dysmorphic Disorder Services, Hertfordshire Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust, Hertfordshire, UK (N A Fineberg); Department of Psychology, University of Bath, Bath, UK (Prof P Salkovskis); and Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, York, UK (Prof R Churchill)
| | - Helen Baxter
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK (P Skapinakis, Prof G Lewis); Department of Psychiatry, University of Ioannina School of Medicine, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece (P Skapinakis); School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK (D M Caldwell, Prof W Hollingworth, P Bryden, N J Welton, H Baxter, D Kessler); Department of Postgraduate Medicine, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK, and Highly Specialised Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder and Body Dysmorphic Disorder Services, Hertfordshire Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust, Hertfordshire, UK (N A Fineberg); Department of Psychology, University of Bath, Bath, UK (Prof P Salkovskis); and Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, York, UK (Prof R Churchill)
| | - David Kessler
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK (P Skapinakis, Prof G Lewis); Department of Psychiatry, University of Ioannina School of Medicine, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece (P Skapinakis); School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK (D M Caldwell, Prof W Hollingworth, P Bryden, N J Welton, H Baxter, D Kessler); Department of Postgraduate Medicine, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK, and Highly Specialised Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder and Body Dysmorphic Disorder Services, Hertfordshire Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust, Hertfordshire, UK (N A Fineberg); Department of Psychology, University of Bath, Bath, UK (Prof P Salkovskis); and Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, York, UK (Prof R Churchill)
| | - Rachel Churchill
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK (P Skapinakis, Prof G Lewis); Department of Psychiatry, University of Ioannina School of Medicine, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece (P Skapinakis); School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK (D M Caldwell, Prof W Hollingworth, P Bryden, N J Welton, H Baxter, D Kessler); Department of Postgraduate Medicine, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK, and Highly Specialised Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder and Body Dysmorphic Disorder Services, Hertfordshire Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust, Hertfordshire, UK (N A Fineberg); Department of Psychology, University of Bath, Bath, UK (Prof P Salkovskis); and Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, York, UK (Prof R Churchill)
| | - Glyn Lewis
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK (P Skapinakis, Prof G Lewis); Department of Psychiatry, University of Ioannina School of Medicine, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece (P Skapinakis); School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK (D M Caldwell, Prof W Hollingworth, P Bryden, N J Welton, H Baxter, D Kessler); Department of Postgraduate Medicine, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK, and Highly Specialised Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder and Body Dysmorphic Disorder Services, Hertfordshire Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust, Hertfordshire, UK (N A Fineberg); Department of Psychology, University of Bath, Bath, UK (Prof P Salkovskis); and Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, York, UK (Prof R Churchill)
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Lewis G, Marston L, Duffy L, Freemantle N, Gilbody S, Hunter R, Kendrick T, Kessler D, Mangin D, King M, Lanham P, Moore M, Nazareth I, Wiles N, Bacon F, Bird M, Brabyn S, Burns A, Clarke CS, Hunt A, Pervin J, Lewis G. Maintenance or Discontinuation of Antidepressants in Primary Care. N Engl J Med 2021; 385:1257-1267. [PMID: 34587384 DOI: 10.1056/nejmoa2106356] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with depression who are treated in primary care practices may receive antidepressants for prolonged periods. Data are limited on the effects of maintaining or discontinuing antidepressant therapy in this setting. METHODS We conducted a randomized, double-blind trial involving adults who were being treated in 150 general practices in the United Kingdom. All the patients had a history of at least two depressive episodes or had been taking antidepressants for 2 years or longer and felt well enough to consider stopping antidepressants. Patients who had received citalopram, fluoxetine, sertraline, or mirtazapine were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to maintain their current antidepressant therapy (maintenance group) or to taper and discontinue such therapy with the use of matching placebo (discontinuation group). The primary outcome was the first relapse of depression during the 52-week trial period, as evaluated in a time-to-event analysis. Secondary outcomes were depressive and anxiety symptoms, physical and withdrawal symptoms, quality of life, time to stopping an antidepressant or placebo, and global mood ratings. RESULTS A total of 1466 patients underwent screening. Of these patients, 478 were enrolled in the trial (238 in the maintenance group and 240 in the discontinuation group). The average age of the patients was 54 years; 73% were women. Adherence to the trial assignment was 70% in the maintenance group and 52% in the discontinuation group. By 52 weeks, relapse occurred in 92 of 238 patients (39%) in the maintenance group and in 135 of 240 (56%) in the discontinuation group (hazard ratio, 2.06; 95% confidence interval, 1.56 to 2.70; P<0.001). Secondary outcomes were generally in the same direction as the primary outcome. Patients in the discontinuation group had more symptoms of depression, anxiety, and withdrawal than those in the maintenance group. CONCLUSIONS Among patients in primary care practices who felt well enough to discontinue antidepressant therapy, those who were assigned to stop their medication had a higher risk of relapse of depression by 52 weeks than those who were assigned to maintain their current therapy. (Funded by the National Institute for Health Research; ANTLER ISRCTN number, ISRCTN15969819.).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gemma Lewis
- From the Division of Psychiatry, Faculty of Brain Sciences (Gemma Lewis, L.D., M.K., P.L., F.B., M.B., Glyn Lewis), the Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health and Priment Clinical Trials Unit (L.M., R.H., I.N., C.S.C.), and the Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology (N.F.), University College London, London, the Department of Health Sciences and Hull York Medical School, University of York, York (S.G., S.B., J.P.), Primary Care Population Sciences and Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton (T.K., M.M., A.H.), and Population Health Sciences (D.K.) and the Centre for Academic Mental Health (N.W., A.B.), Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol - all in the United Kingdom; and the Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada (D.M.)
| | - Louise Marston
- From the Division of Psychiatry, Faculty of Brain Sciences (Gemma Lewis, L.D., M.K., P.L., F.B., M.B., Glyn Lewis), the Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health and Priment Clinical Trials Unit (L.M., R.H., I.N., C.S.C.), and the Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology (N.F.), University College London, London, the Department of Health Sciences and Hull York Medical School, University of York, York (S.G., S.B., J.P.), Primary Care Population Sciences and Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton (T.K., M.M., A.H.), and Population Health Sciences (D.K.) and the Centre for Academic Mental Health (N.W., A.B.), Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol - all in the United Kingdom; and the Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada (D.M.)
| | - Larisa Duffy
- From the Division of Psychiatry, Faculty of Brain Sciences (Gemma Lewis, L.D., M.K., P.L., F.B., M.B., Glyn Lewis), the Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health and Priment Clinical Trials Unit (L.M., R.H., I.N., C.S.C.), and the Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology (N.F.), University College London, London, the Department of Health Sciences and Hull York Medical School, University of York, York (S.G., S.B., J.P.), Primary Care Population Sciences and Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton (T.K., M.M., A.H.), and Population Health Sciences (D.K.) and the Centre for Academic Mental Health (N.W., A.B.), Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol - all in the United Kingdom; and the Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada (D.M.)
| | - Nick Freemantle
- From the Division of Psychiatry, Faculty of Brain Sciences (Gemma Lewis, L.D., M.K., P.L., F.B., M.B., Glyn Lewis), the Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health and Priment Clinical Trials Unit (L.M., R.H., I.N., C.S.C.), and the Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology (N.F.), University College London, London, the Department of Health Sciences and Hull York Medical School, University of York, York (S.G., S.B., J.P.), Primary Care Population Sciences and Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton (T.K., M.M., A.H.), and Population Health Sciences (D.K.) and the Centre for Academic Mental Health (N.W., A.B.), Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol - all in the United Kingdom; and the Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada (D.M.)
| | - Simon Gilbody
- From the Division of Psychiatry, Faculty of Brain Sciences (Gemma Lewis, L.D., M.K., P.L., F.B., M.B., Glyn Lewis), the Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health and Priment Clinical Trials Unit (L.M., R.H., I.N., C.S.C.), and the Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology (N.F.), University College London, London, the Department of Health Sciences and Hull York Medical School, University of York, York (S.G., S.B., J.P.), Primary Care Population Sciences and Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton (T.K., M.M., A.H.), and Population Health Sciences (D.K.) and the Centre for Academic Mental Health (N.W., A.B.), Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol - all in the United Kingdom; and the Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada (D.M.)
| | - Rachael Hunter
- From the Division of Psychiatry, Faculty of Brain Sciences (Gemma Lewis, L.D., M.K., P.L., F.B., M.B., Glyn Lewis), the Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health and Priment Clinical Trials Unit (L.M., R.H., I.N., C.S.C.), and the Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology (N.F.), University College London, London, the Department of Health Sciences and Hull York Medical School, University of York, York (S.G., S.B., J.P.), Primary Care Population Sciences and Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton (T.K., M.M., A.H.), and Population Health Sciences (D.K.) and the Centre for Academic Mental Health (N.W., A.B.), Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol - all in the United Kingdom; and the Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada (D.M.)
| | - Tony Kendrick
- From the Division of Psychiatry, Faculty of Brain Sciences (Gemma Lewis, L.D., M.K., P.L., F.B., M.B., Glyn Lewis), the Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health and Priment Clinical Trials Unit (L.M., R.H., I.N., C.S.C.), and the Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology (N.F.), University College London, London, the Department of Health Sciences and Hull York Medical School, University of York, York (S.G., S.B., J.P.), Primary Care Population Sciences and Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton (T.K., M.M., A.H.), and Population Health Sciences (D.K.) and the Centre for Academic Mental Health (N.W., A.B.), Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol - all in the United Kingdom; and the Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada (D.M.)
| | - David Kessler
- From the Division of Psychiatry, Faculty of Brain Sciences (Gemma Lewis, L.D., M.K., P.L., F.B., M.B., Glyn Lewis), the Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health and Priment Clinical Trials Unit (L.M., R.H., I.N., C.S.C.), and the Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology (N.F.), University College London, London, the Department of Health Sciences and Hull York Medical School, University of York, York (S.G., S.B., J.P.), Primary Care Population Sciences and Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton (T.K., M.M., A.H.), and Population Health Sciences (D.K.) and the Centre for Academic Mental Health (N.W., A.B.), Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol - all in the United Kingdom; and the Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada (D.M.)
| | - Dee Mangin
- From the Division of Psychiatry, Faculty of Brain Sciences (Gemma Lewis, L.D., M.K., P.L., F.B., M.B., Glyn Lewis), the Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health and Priment Clinical Trials Unit (L.M., R.H., I.N., C.S.C.), and the Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology (N.F.), University College London, London, the Department of Health Sciences and Hull York Medical School, University of York, York (S.G., S.B., J.P.), Primary Care Population Sciences and Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton (T.K., M.M., A.H.), and Population Health Sciences (D.K.) and the Centre for Academic Mental Health (N.W., A.B.), Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol - all in the United Kingdom; and the Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada (D.M.)
| | - Michael King
- From the Division of Psychiatry, Faculty of Brain Sciences (Gemma Lewis, L.D., M.K., P.L., F.B., M.B., Glyn Lewis), the Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health and Priment Clinical Trials Unit (L.M., R.H., I.N., C.S.C.), and the Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology (N.F.), University College London, London, the Department of Health Sciences and Hull York Medical School, University of York, York (S.G., S.B., J.P.), Primary Care Population Sciences and Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton (T.K., M.M., A.H.), and Population Health Sciences (D.K.) and the Centre for Academic Mental Health (N.W., A.B.), Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol - all in the United Kingdom; and the Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada (D.M.)
| | - Paul Lanham
- From the Division of Psychiatry, Faculty of Brain Sciences (Gemma Lewis, L.D., M.K., P.L., F.B., M.B., Glyn Lewis), the Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health and Priment Clinical Trials Unit (L.M., R.H., I.N., C.S.C.), and the Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology (N.F.), University College London, London, the Department of Health Sciences and Hull York Medical School, University of York, York (S.G., S.B., J.P.), Primary Care Population Sciences and Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton (T.K., M.M., A.H.), and Population Health Sciences (D.K.) and the Centre for Academic Mental Health (N.W., A.B.), Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol - all in the United Kingdom; and the Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada (D.M.)
| | - Michael Moore
- From the Division of Psychiatry, Faculty of Brain Sciences (Gemma Lewis, L.D., M.K., P.L., F.B., M.B., Glyn Lewis), the Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health and Priment Clinical Trials Unit (L.M., R.H., I.N., C.S.C.), and the Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology (N.F.), University College London, London, the Department of Health Sciences and Hull York Medical School, University of York, York (S.G., S.B., J.P.), Primary Care Population Sciences and Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton (T.K., M.M., A.H.), and Population Health Sciences (D.K.) and the Centre for Academic Mental Health (N.W., A.B.), Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol - all in the United Kingdom; and the Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada (D.M.)
| | - Irwin Nazareth
- From the Division of Psychiatry, Faculty of Brain Sciences (Gemma Lewis, L.D., M.K., P.L., F.B., M.B., Glyn Lewis), the Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health and Priment Clinical Trials Unit (L.M., R.H., I.N., C.S.C.), and the Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology (N.F.), University College London, London, the Department of Health Sciences and Hull York Medical School, University of York, York (S.G., S.B., J.P.), Primary Care Population Sciences and Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton (T.K., M.M., A.H.), and Population Health Sciences (D.K.) and the Centre for Academic Mental Health (N.W., A.B.), Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol - all in the United Kingdom; and the Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada (D.M.)
| | - Nicola Wiles
- From the Division of Psychiatry, Faculty of Brain Sciences (Gemma Lewis, L.D., M.K., P.L., F.B., M.B., Glyn Lewis), the Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health and Priment Clinical Trials Unit (L.M., R.H., I.N., C.S.C.), and the Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology (N.F.), University College London, London, the Department of Health Sciences and Hull York Medical School, University of York, York (S.G., S.B., J.P.), Primary Care Population Sciences and Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton (T.K., M.M., A.H.), and Population Health Sciences (D.K.) and the Centre for Academic Mental Health (N.W., A.B.), Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol - all in the United Kingdom; and the Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada (D.M.)
| | - Faye Bacon
- From the Division of Psychiatry, Faculty of Brain Sciences (Gemma Lewis, L.D., M.K., P.L., F.B., M.B., Glyn Lewis), the Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health and Priment Clinical Trials Unit (L.M., R.H., I.N., C.S.C.), and the Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology (N.F.), University College London, London, the Department of Health Sciences and Hull York Medical School, University of York, York (S.G., S.B., J.P.), Primary Care Population Sciences and Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton (T.K., M.M., A.H.), and Population Health Sciences (D.K.) and the Centre for Academic Mental Health (N.W., A.B.), Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol - all in the United Kingdom; and the Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada (D.M.)
| | - Molly Bird
- From the Division of Psychiatry, Faculty of Brain Sciences (Gemma Lewis, L.D., M.K., P.L., F.B., M.B., Glyn Lewis), the Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health and Priment Clinical Trials Unit (L.M., R.H., I.N., C.S.C.), and the Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology (N.F.), University College London, London, the Department of Health Sciences and Hull York Medical School, University of York, York (S.G., S.B., J.P.), Primary Care Population Sciences and Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton (T.K., M.M., A.H.), and Population Health Sciences (D.K.) and the Centre for Academic Mental Health (N.W., A.B.), Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol - all in the United Kingdom; and the Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada (D.M.)
| | - Sally Brabyn
- From the Division of Psychiatry, Faculty of Brain Sciences (Gemma Lewis, L.D., M.K., P.L., F.B., M.B., Glyn Lewis), the Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health and Priment Clinical Trials Unit (L.M., R.H., I.N., C.S.C.), and the Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology (N.F.), University College London, London, the Department of Health Sciences and Hull York Medical School, University of York, York (S.G., S.B., J.P.), Primary Care Population Sciences and Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton (T.K., M.M., A.H.), and Population Health Sciences (D.K.) and the Centre for Academic Mental Health (N.W., A.B.), Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol - all in the United Kingdom; and the Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada (D.M.)
| | - Alison Burns
- From the Division of Psychiatry, Faculty of Brain Sciences (Gemma Lewis, L.D., M.K., P.L., F.B., M.B., Glyn Lewis), the Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health and Priment Clinical Trials Unit (L.M., R.H., I.N., C.S.C.), and the Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology (N.F.), University College London, London, the Department of Health Sciences and Hull York Medical School, University of York, York (S.G., S.B., J.P.), Primary Care Population Sciences and Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton (T.K., M.M., A.H.), and Population Health Sciences (D.K.) and the Centre for Academic Mental Health (N.W., A.B.), Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol - all in the United Kingdom; and the Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada (D.M.)
| | - Caroline S Clarke
- From the Division of Psychiatry, Faculty of Brain Sciences (Gemma Lewis, L.D., M.K., P.L., F.B., M.B., Glyn Lewis), the Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health and Priment Clinical Trials Unit (L.M., R.H., I.N., C.S.C.), and the Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology (N.F.), University College London, London, the Department of Health Sciences and Hull York Medical School, University of York, York (S.G., S.B., J.P.), Primary Care Population Sciences and Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton (T.K., M.M., A.H.), and Population Health Sciences (D.K.) and the Centre for Academic Mental Health (N.W., A.B.), Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol - all in the United Kingdom; and the Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada (D.M.)
| | - Anna Hunt
- From the Division of Psychiatry, Faculty of Brain Sciences (Gemma Lewis, L.D., M.K., P.L., F.B., M.B., Glyn Lewis), the Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health and Priment Clinical Trials Unit (L.M., R.H., I.N., C.S.C.), and the Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology (N.F.), University College London, London, the Department of Health Sciences and Hull York Medical School, University of York, York (S.G., S.B., J.P.), Primary Care Population Sciences and Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton (T.K., M.M., A.H.), and Population Health Sciences (D.K.) and the Centre for Academic Mental Health (N.W., A.B.), Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol - all in the United Kingdom; and the Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada (D.M.)
| | - Jodi Pervin
- From the Division of Psychiatry, Faculty of Brain Sciences (Gemma Lewis, L.D., M.K., P.L., F.B., M.B., Glyn Lewis), the Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health and Priment Clinical Trials Unit (L.M., R.H., I.N., C.S.C.), and the Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology (N.F.), University College London, London, the Department of Health Sciences and Hull York Medical School, University of York, York (S.G., S.B., J.P.), Primary Care Population Sciences and Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton (T.K., M.M., A.H.), and Population Health Sciences (D.K.) and the Centre for Academic Mental Health (N.W., A.B.), Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol - all in the United Kingdom; and the Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada (D.M.)
| | - Glyn Lewis
- From the Division of Psychiatry, Faculty of Brain Sciences (Gemma Lewis, L.D., M.K., P.L., F.B., M.B., Glyn Lewis), the Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health and Priment Clinical Trials Unit (L.M., R.H., I.N., C.S.C.), and the Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology (N.F.), University College London, London, the Department of Health Sciences and Hull York Medical School, University of York, York (S.G., S.B., J.P.), Primary Care Population Sciences and Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton (T.K., M.M., A.H.), and Population Health Sciences (D.K.) and the Centre for Academic Mental Health (N.W., A.B.), Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol - all in the United Kingdom; and the Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada (D.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Buckman JEJ, Saunders R, Stott J, Arundell LL, O'Driscoll C, Davies MR, Eley TC, Hollon SD, Kendrick T, Ambler G, Cohen ZD, Watkins E, Gilbody S, Wiles N, Kessler D, Richards D, Brabyn S, Littlewood E, DeRubeis RJ, Lewis G, Pilling S. Role of age, gender and marital status in prognosis for adults with depression: An individual patient data meta-analysis. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci 2021; 30:e42. [PMID: 34085616 PMCID: PMC7610920 DOI: 10.1017/s2045796021000342] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2021] [Revised: 05/04/2021] [Accepted: 05/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
AIMS To determine whether age, gender and marital status are associated with prognosis for adults with depression who sought treatment in primary care. METHODS Medline, Embase, PsycINFO and Cochrane Central were searched from inception to 1st December 2020 for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of adults seeking treatment for depression from their general practitioners, that used the Revised Clinical Interview Schedule so that there was uniformity in the measurement of clinical prognostic factors, and that reported on age, gender and marital status. Individual participant data were gathered from all nine eligible RCTs (N = 4864). Two-stage random-effects meta-analyses were conducted to ascertain the independent association between: (i) age, (ii) gender and (iii) marital status, and depressive symptoms at 3-4, 6-8, and 9-12 months post-baseline and remission at 3-4 months. Risk of bias was evaluated using QUIPS and quality was assessed using GRADE. PROSPERO registration: CRD42019129512. Pre-registered protocol https://osf.io/e5zup/. RESULTS There was no evidence of an association between age and prognosis before or after adjusting for depressive 'disorder characteristics' that are associated with prognosis (symptom severity, durations of depression and anxiety, comorbid panic disorderand a history of antidepressant treatment). Difference in mean depressive symptom score at 3-4 months post-baseline per-5-year increase in age = 0(95% CI: -0.02 to 0.02). There was no evidence for a difference in prognoses for men and women at 3-4 months or 9-12 months post-baseline, but men had worse prognoses at 6-8 months (percentage difference in depressive symptoms for men compared to women: 15.08% (95% CI: 4.82 to 26.35)). However, this was largely driven by a single study that contributed data at 6-8 months and not the other time points. Further, there was little evidence for an association after adjusting for depressive 'disorder characteristics' and employment status (12.23% (-1.69 to 28.12)). Participants that were either single (percentage difference in depressive symptoms for single participants: 9.25% (95% CI: 2.78 to 16.13) or no longer married (8.02% (95% CI: 1.31 to 15.18)) had worse prognoses than those that were married, even after adjusting for depressive 'disorder characteristics' and all available confounders. CONCLUSION Clinicians and researchers will continue to routinely record age and gender, but despite their importance for incidence and prevalence of depression, they appear to offer little information regarding prognosis. Patients that are single or no longer married may be expected to have slightly worse prognoses than those that are married. Ensuring this is recorded routinely alongside depressive 'disorder characteristics' in clinic may be important.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J. E. J. Buckman
- Research Department of Clinical, Educational & Health Psychology, Centre for Outcomes Research and Effectiveness (CORE), University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, LondonWC1E 7HB, UK
- iCope – Camden & Islington NHS Foundation Trust, St Pancras Hospital, LondonNW1 0PE, UK
| | - R. Saunders
- Research Department of Clinical, Educational & Health Psychology, Centre for Outcomes Research and Effectiveness (CORE), University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, LondonWC1E 7HB, UK
| | - J. Stott
- Research Department of Clinical, Educational & Health Psychology, Centre for Outcomes Research and Effectiveness (CORE), University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, LondonWC1E 7HB, UK
| | - L.-L. Arundell
- Research Department of Clinical, Educational & Health Psychology, Centre for Outcomes Research and Effectiveness (CORE), University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, LondonWC1E 7HB, UK
| | - C. O'Driscoll
- Research Department of Clinical, Educational & Health Psychology, Centre for Outcomes Research and Effectiveness (CORE), University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, LondonWC1E 7HB, UK
| | - M. R. Davies
- Social, Genetic and Developmental Psychiatry Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, LondonSE5 8AF, UK
| | - T. C. Eley
- Social, Genetic and Developmental Psychiatry Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, LondonSE5 8AF, UK
| | - S. D. Hollon
- Department of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN37240, USA
| | - T. Kendrick
- Faculty of Medicine, Primary Care, Population Sciences and Medical Education, University of Southampton, SouthamptonSO16 5ST, UK
| | - G. Ambler
- Statistical Science, University College London, LondonWC1E 7HB, UK
| | - Z. D. Cohen
- Department of Psychiatry, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA
| | - E. Watkins
- Department of Psychology, University of Exeter, ExeterEX4 4QG, UK
| | - S. Gilbody
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, YorkYO10 5DD, UK
| | - N. Wiles
- Centre for Academic Mental Health, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Oakfield House, BristolBS8 2BN, UK
| | - D. Kessler
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, Bristol, UK
| | - D. Richards
- Institute of Health Research, University of Exeter College of Medicine and Health, ExeterEX1 2LU, UK
- Department of Health and Caring Sciences, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, Inndalsveien 28, 5063Bergen, Norway
| | - S. Brabyn
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, YorkYO10 5DD, UK
| | - E. Littlewood
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, YorkYO10 5DD, UK
| | - R. J. DeRubeis
- Department of Psychology, School of Arts and Sciences, 425 S. University Avenue, PhiladelphiaPA, 19104-60185, USA
| | - G. Lewis
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, LondonW1T 7NF, UK
| | - S. Pilling
- Research Department of Clinical, Educational & Health Psychology, Centre for Outcomes Research and Effectiveness (CORE), University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, LondonWC1E 7HB, UK
- Camden & Islington NHS Foundation Trust, 4 St Pancras Way, LondonNW1 0PE, UK
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Thiel F, Mualem I, Kessler D, Barkai E. Uncertainty Relation between Detection Probability and Energy Fluctuations. Entropy (Basel) 2021; 23:e23050595. [PMID: 34064881 PMCID: PMC8151696 DOI: 10.3390/e23050595] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2021] [Revised: 05/03/2021] [Accepted: 05/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
A classical random walker starting on a node of a finite graph will always reach any other node since the search is ergodic, namely it fully explores space, hence the arrival probability is unity. For quantum walks, destructive interference may induce effectively non-ergodic features in such search processes. Under repeated projective local measurements, made on a target state, the final detection of the system is not guaranteed since the Hilbert space is split into a bright subspace and an orthogonal dark one. Using this we find an uncertainty relation for the deviations of the detection probability from its classical counterpart, in terms of the energy fluctuations.
Collapse
|
46
|
O'Driscoll C, Buckman JEJ, Fried EI, Saunders R, Cohen ZD, Ambler G, DeRubeis RJ, Gilbody S, Hollon SD, Kendrick T, Kessler D, Lewis G, Watkins E, Wiles N, Pilling S. The importance of transdiagnostic symptom level assessment to understanding prognosis for depressed adults: analysis of data from six randomised control trials. BMC Med 2021; 19:109. [PMID: 33952286 PMCID: PMC8101158 DOI: 10.1186/s12916-021-01971-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2020] [Accepted: 03/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Depression is commonly perceived as a single underlying disease with a number of potential treatment options. However, patients with major depression differ dramatically in their symptom presentation and comorbidities, e.g. with anxiety disorders. There are also large variations in treatment outcomes and associations of some anxiety comorbidities with poorer prognoses, but limited understanding as to why, and little information to inform the clinical management of depression. There is a need to improve our understanding of depression, incorporating anxiety comorbidity, and consider the association of a wide range of symptoms with treatment outcomes. METHOD Individual patient data from six RCTs of depressed patients (total n = 2858) were used to estimate the differential impact symptoms have on outcomes at three post intervention time points using individual items and sum scores. Symptom networks (graphical Gaussian model) were estimated to explore the functional relations among symptoms of depression and anxiety and compare networks for treatment remitters and those with persistent symptoms to identify potential prognostic indicators. RESULTS Item-level prediction performed similarly to sum scores when predicting outcomes at 3 to 4 months and 6 to 8 months, but outperformed sum scores for 9 to 12 months. Pessimism emerged as the most important predictive symptom (relative to all other symptoms), across these time points. In the network structure at study entry, symptoms clustered into physical symptoms, cognitive symptoms, and anxiety symptoms. Sadness, pessimism, and indecision acted as bridges between communities, with sadness and failure/worthlessness being the most central (i.e. interconnected) symptoms. Connectivity of networks at study entry did not differ for future remitters vs. those with persistent symptoms. CONCLUSION The relative importance of specific symptoms in association with outcomes and the interactions within the network highlight the value of transdiagnostic assessment and formulation of symptoms to both treatment and prognosis. We discuss the potential for complementary statistical approaches to improve our understanding of psychopathology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C O'Driscoll
- Centre for Outcomes Research and Effectiveness (CORE), Research Department of Clinical, Educational & Health Psychology, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, London, WC1E 7HB, UK. ciaran.o'
| | - J E J Buckman
- Centre for Outcomes Research and Effectiveness (CORE), Research Department of Clinical, Educational & Health Psychology, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, London, WC1E 7HB, UK.
- iCope - Camden & Islington Psychological Therapies Services, Camden & Islington NHS Foundation Trust, St Pancras Hospital, London, NW1 0PE, UK.
| | - E I Fried
- Department of Clinical Psychology, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - R Saunders
- Centre for Outcomes Research and Effectiveness (CORE), Research Department of Clinical, Educational & Health Psychology, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, London, WC1E 7HB, UK
| | - Z D Cohen
- Department of Psychiatry, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - G Ambler
- Statistical Science, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, London, WC1E 7HB, UK
| | - R J DeRubeis
- School of Arts and Sciences, Department of Psychology, 425 S. University Avenue, Philadelphia, PA, 19104-60185, USA
| | - S Gilbody
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, Seebohm Rowntree Building, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK
| | - S D Hollon
- Department of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - T Kendrick
- Primary Care, Population Sciences and Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Aldermoor Health Centre, Southampton, SO16 5ST, UK
| | - D Kessler
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, Bristol, UK
| | - G Lewis
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, Maple House, London, W1T 7NF, UK
| | - E Watkins
- Department of Psychology, University of Exeter, Sir Henry Wellcome Building for Mood Disorders Research, Perry Road, Exeter, EX4 4QG, UK
| | - N Wiles
- Centre for Academic Mental Health, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Oakfield House, Bristol, UK
| | - S Pilling
- Centre for Outcomes Research and Effectiveness (CORE), Research Department of Clinical, Educational & Health Psychology, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, London, WC1E 7HB, UK
- Camden & Islington NHS Foundation Trust, St Pancras Hospital, 4 St Pancras Way, London, NW1 0PE, UK
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Buckman JEJ, Saunders R, O’Driscoll C, Cohen ZD, Stott J, Ambler G, Gilbody S, Hollon SD, Kendrick T, Watkins E, Wiles N, Kessler D, Chari N, White IR, Lewis G, Pilling S. Is social support pre-treatment associated with prognosis for adults with depression in primary care? Acta Psychiatr Scand 2021; 143:392-405. [PMID: 33548056 PMCID: PMC7610633 DOI: 10.1111/acps.13285] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2020] [Revised: 12/14/2020] [Accepted: 02/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Depressed patients rate social support as important for prognosis, but evidence for a prognostic effect is lacking. We aimed to test the association between social support and prognosis independent of treatment type, and the severity of depression, and other clinical features indicating a more severe illness. METHODS Individual patient data were collated from all six eligible RCTs (n = 2858) of adults seeking treatment for depression in primary care. Participants were randomized to any treatment and completed the same baseline assessment of social support and clinical severity factors. Two-stage random effects meta-analyses were conducted. RESULTS Social support was associated with prognosis independent of randomized treatment but effects were smaller when adjusting for depressive symptoms and durations of depression and anxiety, history of antidepressant treatment, and comorbid panic disorder: percentage decrease in depressive symptoms at 3-4 months per z-score increase in social support = -4.14(95%CI: -6.91 to -1.29). Those with a severe lack of social support had considerably worse prognoses than those with no lack of social support: increase in depressive symptoms at 3-4 months = 14.64%(4.25% to 26.06%). CONCLUSIONS Overall, large differences in social support pre-treatment were associated with differences in prognostic outcomes. Adding the Social Support scale to clinical assessments may be informative, but after adjusting for routinely assessed clinical prognostic factors the differences in prognosis are unlikely to be of a clinically important magnitude. Future studies might investigate more intensive treatments and more regular clinical reviews to mitigate risks of poor prognosis for those reporting a severe lack of social support.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua E. J. Buckman
- Centre for Outcomes Research and Effectiveness (CORE)Research Department of Clinical, Educational & Health PsychologyUniversity College LondonLondonUK,iCope – Camden & Islington Psychological Therapies Services – Camden & Islington NHS Foundation TrustLondonUK
| | - Rob Saunders
- Centre for Outcomes Research and Effectiveness (CORE)Research Department of Clinical, Educational & Health PsychologyUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| | - Ciaran O’Driscoll
- Centre for Outcomes Research and Effectiveness (CORE)Research Department of Clinical, Educational & Health PsychologyUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| | - Zachary D. Cohen
- Department of PsychiatryUniversity of California Los AngelesLos AngelesCAUSA
| | - Joshua Stott
- Centre for Outcomes Research and Effectiveness (CORE)Research Department of Clinical, Educational & Health PsychologyUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| | - Gareth Ambler
- Statistical ScienceUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| | - Simon Gilbody
- Department of Health SciencesUniversity of YorkYorkUK
| | | | - Tony Kendrick
- Primary Care, Population Sciences and Medical EducationFaculty of MedicineUniversity of SouthamptonSouthamptonUK
| | | | - Nicola Wiles
- Centre for Academic Mental HealthPopulation Health Sciences, Bristol Medical SchoolUniversity of BristolBristolUK
| | - David Kessler
- Centre for Academic Primary CareDepartment of Population Health ScienceBristol Medical SchoolUniversity of BristolBristolUK
| | - Nomsa Chari
- Division of PsychiatryUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| | | | - Glyn Lewis
- Division of PsychiatryUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| | - Stephen Pilling
- Centre for Outcomes Research and Effectiveness (CORE)Research Department of Clinical, Educational & Health PsychologyUniversity College LondonLondonUK,Camden & Islington NHS Foundation TrustSt Pancras HospitalLondonUK
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Buckman JEJ, Saunders R, Cohen ZD, Barnett P, Clarke K, Ambler G, DeRubeis RJ, Gilbody S, Hollon SD, Kendrick T, Watkins E, Wiles N, Kessler D, Richards D, Sharp D, Brabyn S, Littlewood E, Salisbury C, White IR, Lewis G, Pilling S. The contribution of depressive 'disorder characteristics' to determinations of prognosis for adults with depression: an individual patient data meta-analysis. Psychol Med 2021; 51:1068-1081. [PMID: 33849685 PMCID: PMC8188529 DOI: 10.1017/s0033291721001367] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2020] [Revised: 03/08/2021] [Accepted: 03/26/2021] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aimed to investigate general factors associated with prognosis regardless of the type of treatment received, for adults with depression in primary care. METHODS We searched Medline, Embase, PsycINFO and Cochrane Central (inception to 12/01/2020) for RCTs that included the most commonly used comprehensive measure of depressive and anxiety disorder symptoms and diagnoses, in primary care depression RCTs (the Revised Clinical Interview Schedule: CIS-R). Two-stage random-effects meta-analyses were conducted. RESULTS Twelve (n = 6024) of thirteen eligible studies (n = 6175) provided individual patient data. There was a 31% (95%CI: 25 to 37) difference in depressive symptoms at 3-4 months per standard deviation increase in baseline depressive symptoms. Four additional factors: the duration of anxiety; duration of depression; comorbid panic disorder; and a history of antidepressant treatment were also independently associated with poorer prognosis. There was evidence that the difference in prognosis when these factors were combined could be of clinical importance. Adding these variables improved the amount of variance explained in 3-4 month depressive symptoms from 16% using depressive symptom severity alone to 27%. Risk of bias (assessed with QUIPS) was low in all studies and quality (assessed with GRADE) was high. Sensitivity analyses did not alter our conclusions. CONCLUSIONS When adults seek treatment for depression clinicians should routinely assess for the duration of anxiety, duration of depression, comorbid panic disorder, and a history of antidepressant treatment alongside depressive symptom severity. This could provide clinicians and patients with useful and desired information to elucidate prognosis and aid the clinical management of depression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua E. J. Buckman
- Centre for Outcomes Research and Effectiveness (CORE), Research Department of Clinical, Educational & Health Psychology, University College London, LondonWC1E 7HB, UK
- iCope – Camden and Islington Psychological Therapies Services, Camden & Islington NHS Foundation Trust, 4 St Pancras Way, LondonNW1 0PE, UK
| | - Rob Saunders
- Centre for Outcomes Research and Effectiveness (CORE), Research Department of Clinical, Educational & Health Psychology, University College London, LondonWC1E 7HB, UK
| | - Zachary D. Cohen
- Department of Psychiatry, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA90095, USA
| | - Phoebe Barnett
- Centre for Outcomes Research and Effectiveness (CORE), Research Department of Clinical, Educational & Health Psychology, University College London, LondonWC1E 7HB, UK
| | - Katherine Clarke
- Centre for Outcomes Research and Effectiveness (CORE), Research Department of Clinical, Educational & Health Psychology, University College London, LondonWC1E 7HB, UK
| | - Gareth Ambler
- Statistical Science, University College London, LondonWC1E 7HB, UK
| | - Robert J. DeRubeis
- Department of Psychology, School of Arts and Sciences, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA19104-60185, USA
| | - Simon Gilbody
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, YorkYO10 5DD, UK
| | - Steven D. Hollon
- Department of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN37240, USA
| | - Tony Kendrick
- Primary Care, Population Sciences and Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Aldermoor Health Centre, SouthamptonSO16 5ST, UK
| | - Edward Watkins
- Department of Psychology, University of Exeter, ExeterEX4 4QG, UK
| | - Nicola Wiles
- Centre for Academic Mental Health, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Oakfield House, BristolBS8 2BN, UK
| | - David Kessler
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, Bristol, UK
| | - David Richards
- Institute of Health Research, University of Exeter College of Medicine and Health, ExeterEX1 2LU, UK
| | - Deborah Sharp
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, Bristol, UK
| | - Sally Brabyn
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, YorkYO10 5DD, UK
| | | | - Chris Salisbury
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, Bristol, UK
| | - Ian R. White
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, University College London, LondonWC1V 6LJ, UK
| | - Glyn Lewis
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, LondonW1T 7NF, UK
| | - Stephen Pilling
- Centre for Outcomes Research and Effectiveness (CORE), Research Department of Clinical, Educational & Health Psychology, University College London, LondonWC1E 7HB, UK
- Camden & Islington NHS Foundation Trust, 4 St Pancras Way, LondonNW1 0PE, UK
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Abi B, Albahri T, Al-Kilani S, Allspach D, Alonzi LP, Anastasi A, Anisenkov A, Azfar F, Badgley K, Baeßler S, Bailey I, Baranov VA, Barlas-Yucel E, Barrett T, Barzi E, Basti A, Bedeschi F, Behnke A, Berz M, Bhattacharya M, Binney HP, Bjorkquist R, Bloom P, Bono J, Bottalico E, Bowcock T, Boyden D, Cantatore G, Carey RM, Carroll J, Casey BCK, Cauz D, Ceravolo S, Chakraborty R, Chang SP, Chapelain A, Chappa S, Charity S, Chislett R, Choi J, Chu Z, Chupp TE, Convery ME, Conway A, Corradi G, Corrodi S, Cotrozzi L, Crnkovic JD, Dabagov S, De Lurgio PM, Debevec PT, Di Falco S, Di Meo P, Di Sciascio G, Di Stefano R, Drendel B, Driutti A, Duginov VN, Eads M, Eggert N, Epps A, Esquivel J, Farooq M, Fatemi R, Ferrari C, Fertl M, Fiedler A, Fienberg AT, Fioretti A, Flay D, Foster SB, Friedsam H, Frlež E, Froemming NS, Fry J, Fu C, Gabbanini C, Galati MD, Ganguly S, Garcia A, Gastler DE, George J, Gibbons LK, Gioiosa A, Giovanetti KL, Girotti P, Gohn W, Gorringe T, Grange J, Grant S, Gray F, Haciomeroglu S, Hahn D, Halewood-Leagas T, Hampai D, Han F, Hazen E, Hempstead J, Henry S, Herrod AT, Hertzog DW, Hesketh G, Hibbert A, Hodge Z, Holzbauer JL, Hong KW, Hong R, Iacovacci M, Incagli M, Johnstone C, Johnstone JA, Kammel P, Kargiantoulakis M, Karuza M, Kaspar J, Kawall D, Kelton L, Keshavarzi A, Kessler D, Khaw KS, Khechadoorian Z, Khomutov NV, Kiburg B, Kiburg M, Kim O, Kim SC, Kim YI, King B, Kinnaird N, Korostelev M, Kourbanis I, Kraegeloh E, Krylov VA, Kuchibhotla A, Kuchinskiy NA, Labe KR, LaBounty J, Lancaster M, Lee MJ, Lee S, Leo S, Li B, Li D, Li L, Logashenko I, Lorente Campos A, Lucà A, Lukicov G, Luo G, Lusiani A, Lyon AL, MacCoy B, Madrak R, Makino K, Marignetti F, Mastroianni S, Maxfield S, McEvoy M, Merritt W, Mikhailichenko AA, Miller JP, Miozzi S, Morgan JP, Morse WM, Mott J, Motuk E, Nath A, Newton D, Nguyen H, Oberling M, Osofsky R, Ostiguy JF, Park S, Pauletta G, Piacentino GM, Pilato RN, Pitts KT, Plaster B, Počanić D, Pohlman N, Polly CC, Popovic M, Price J, Quinn B, Raha N, Ramachandran S, Ramberg E, Rider NT, Ritchie JL, Roberts BL, Rubin DL, Santi L, Sathyan D, Schellman H, Schlesier C, Schreckenberger A, Semertzidis YK, Shatunov YM, Shemyakin D, Shenk M, Sim D, Smith MW, Smith A, Soha AK, Sorbara M, Stöckinger D, Stapleton J, Still D, Stoughton C, Stratakis D, Strohman C, Stuttard T, Swanson HE, Sweetmore G, Sweigart DA, Syphers MJ, Tarazona DA, Teubner T, Tewsley-Booth AE, Thomson K, Tishchenko V, Tran NH, Turner W, Valetov E, Vasilkova D, Venanzoni G, Volnykh VP, Walton T, Warren M, Weisskopf A, Welty-Rieger L, Whitley M, Winter P, Wolski A, Wormald M, Wu W, Yoshikawa C. Measurement of the Positive Muon Anomalous Magnetic Moment to 0.46 ppm. Phys Rev Lett 2021; 126:141801. [PMID: 33891447 DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.126.141801] [Citation(s) in RCA: 111] [Impact Index Per Article: 37.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2021] [Accepted: 03/25/2021] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
We present the first results of the Fermilab National Accelerator Laboratory (FNAL) Muon g-2 Experiment for the positive muon magnetic anomaly a_{μ}≡(g_{μ}-2)/2. The anomaly is determined from the precision measurements of two angular frequencies. Intensity variation of high-energy positrons from muon decays directly encodes the difference frequency ω_{a} between the spin-precession and cyclotron frequencies for polarized muons in a magnetic storage ring. The storage ring magnetic field is measured using nuclear magnetic resonance probes calibrated in terms of the equivalent proton spin precession frequency ω[over ˜]_{p}^{'} in a spherical water sample at 34.7 °C. The ratio ω_{a}/ω[over ˜]_{p}^{'}, together with known fundamental constants, determines a_{μ}(FNAL)=116 592 040(54)×10^{-11} (0.46 ppm). The result is 3.3 standard deviations greater than the standard model prediction and is in excellent agreement with the previous Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL) E821 measurement. After combination with previous measurements of both μ^{+} and μ^{-}, the new experimental average of a_{μ}(Exp)=116 592 061(41)×10^{-11} (0.35 ppm) increases the tension between experiment and theory to 4.2 standard deviations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B Abi
- University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - T Albahri
- University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - S Al-Kilani
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - D Allspach
- Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois, USA
| | - L P Alonzi
- University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | | | - A Anisenkov
- Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, Novosibirsk, Russia
| | - F Azfar
- University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - K Badgley
- Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois, USA
| | - S Baeßler
- University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - I Bailey
- Lancaster University, Lancaster, United Kingdom
| | - V A Baranov
- Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna, Russia
| | - E Barlas-Yucel
- University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois, USA
| | - T Barrett
- Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA
| | - E Barzi
- Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois, USA
| | - A Basti
- INFN, Sezione di Pisa, Pisa, Italy
- Università di Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | | | - A Behnke
- Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, Illinois, USA
| | - M Berz
- Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA
| | | | - H P Binney
- University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | | | - P Bloom
- North Central College, Naperville, Illinois, USA
| | - J Bono
- Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois, USA
| | - E Bottalico
- INFN, Sezione di Pisa, Pisa, Italy
- Università di Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - T Bowcock
- University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - D Boyden
- Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, Illinois, USA
| | - G Cantatore
- INFN, Sezione di Trieste, Trieste, Italy
- Università di Trieste, Trieste, Italy
| | - R M Carey
- Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - J Carroll
- University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - B C K Casey
- Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois, USA
| | - D Cauz
- INFN Gruppo Collegato di Udine, Sezione di Trieste, Udine, Italy
- Università di Udine, Udine, Italy
| | - S Ceravolo
- INFN, Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati, Frascati, Italy
| | | | - S P Chang
- Center for Axion and Precision Physics (CAPP)/Institute for Basic Science (IBS), Daejeon, Republic of Korea
- Department of Physics, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST), Daejeon, Republic of Korea
| | | | - S Chappa
- Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois, USA
| | - S Charity
- Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois, USA
| | - R Chislett
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - J Choi
- Center for Axion and Precision Physics (CAPP)/Institute for Basic Science (IBS), Daejeon, Republic of Korea
| | - Z Chu
- School of Physics and Astronomy, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - T E Chupp
- University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - M E Convery
- Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois, USA
| | - A Conway
- Department of Physics, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts, USA
| | - G Corradi
- INFN, Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati, Frascati, Italy
| | - S Corrodi
- Argonne National Laboratory, Lemont, Illinois, USA
| | - L Cotrozzi
- INFN, Sezione di Pisa, Pisa, Italy
- Università di Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - J D Crnkovic
- Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York, USA
- University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois, USA
- University of Mississippi, University, Mississippi, USA
| | - S Dabagov
- INFN, Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati, Frascati, Italy
| | | | - P T Debevec
- University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois, USA
| | | | - P Di Meo
- INFN, Sezione di Napoli, Napoli, Italy
| | | | - R Di Stefano
- INFN, Sezione di Napoli, Napoli, Italy
- Università di Cassino e del Lazio Meridionale, Cassino, Italy
| | - B Drendel
- Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois, USA
| | - A Driutti
- INFN, Sezione di Trieste, Trieste, Italy
- Università di Udine, Udine, Italy
- University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA
| | - V N Duginov
- Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna, Russia
| | - M Eads
- Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, Illinois, USA
| | - N Eggert
- Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA
| | - A Epps
- Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, Illinois, USA
| | - J Esquivel
- Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois, USA
| | - M Farooq
- University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - R Fatemi
- University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA
| | - C Ferrari
- INFN, Sezione di Pisa, Pisa, Italy
- Istituto Nazionale di Ottica-Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Pisa, Italy
| | - M Fertl
- Institute of Physics and Cluster of Excellence PRISMA+, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
- University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - A Fiedler
- Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, Illinois, USA
| | - A T Fienberg
- University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - A Fioretti
- INFN, Sezione di Pisa, Pisa, Italy
- Istituto Nazionale di Ottica-Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Pisa, Italy
| | - D Flay
- Department of Physics, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts, USA
| | - S B Foster
- Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - H Friedsam
- Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois, USA
| | - E Frlež
- University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - N S Froemming
- Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, Illinois, USA
- University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - J Fry
- University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - C Fu
- School of Physics and Astronomy, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - C Gabbanini
- INFN, Sezione di Pisa, Pisa, Italy
- Istituto Nazionale di Ottica-Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Pisa, Italy
| | - M D Galati
- INFN, Sezione di Pisa, Pisa, Italy
- Università di Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - S Ganguly
- Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois, USA
- University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois, USA
| | - A Garcia
- University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - D E Gastler
- Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - J George
- Department of Physics, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts, USA
| | | | - A Gioiosa
- INFN, Sezione di Pisa, Pisa, Italy
- Università del Molise, Campobasso, Italy
| | - K L Giovanetti
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, James Madison University, Harrisonburg, Virginia, USA
| | - P Girotti
- INFN, Sezione di Pisa, Pisa, Italy
- Università di Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - W Gohn
- University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA
| | - T Gorringe
- University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA
| | - J Grange
- Argonne National Laboratory, Lemont, Illinois, USA
- University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - S Grant
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - F Gray
- Regis University, Denver, Colorado, USA
| | - S Haciomeroglu
- Center for Axion and Precision Physics (CAPP)/Institute for Basic Science (IBS), Daejeon, Republic of Korea
| | - D Hahn
- Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois, USA
| | | | - D Hampai
- INFN, Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati, Frascati, Italy
| | - F Han
- University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA
| | - E Hazen
- Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - J Hempstead
- University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - S Henry
- University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - A T Herrod
- University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - D W Hertzog
- University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - G Hesketh
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - A Hibbert
- University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Z Hodge
- University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - J L Holzbauer
- University of Mississippi, University, Mississippi, USA
| | - K W Hong
- University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - R Hong
- Argonne National Laboratory, Lemont, Illinois, USA
- University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA
| | - M Iacovacci
- INFN, Sezione di Napoli, Napoli, Italy
- Università di Napoli, Napoli, Italy
| | | | - C Johnstone
- Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois, USA
| | - J A Johnstone
- Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois, USA
| | - P Kammel
- University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | | | - M Karuza
- INFN, Sezione di Trieste, Trieste, Italy
- University of Rijeka, Rijeka, Croatia
| | - J Kaspar
- University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - D Kawall
- Department of Physics, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts, USA
| | - L Kelton
- University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA
| | - A Keshavarzi
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - D Kessler
- Department of Physics, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts, USA
| | - K S Khaw
- School of Physics and Astronomy, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
- Tsung-Dao Lee Institute, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
- University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | | | - N V Khomutov
- Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna, Russia
| | - B Kiburg
- Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois, USA
| | - M Kiburg
- Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois, USA
- North Central College, Naperville, Illinois, USA
| | - O Kim
- Center for Axion and Precision Physics (CAPP)/Institute for Basic Science (IBS), Daejeon, Republic of Korea
- Department of Physics, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST), Daejeon, Republic of Korea
| | - S C Kim
- Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA
| | - Y I Kim
- Center for Axion and Precision Physics (CAPP)/Institute for Basic Science (IBS), Daejeon, Republic of Korea
| | - B King
- University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - N Kinnaird
- Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | | | - I Kourbanis
- Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois, USA
| | - E Kraegeloh
- University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - V A Krylov
- Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna, Russia
| | - A Kuchibhotla
- University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois, USA
| | | | - K R Labe
- Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA
| | - J LaBounty
- University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - M Lancaster
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - M J Lee
- Center for Axion and Precision Physics (CAPP)/Institute for Basic Science (IBS), Daejeon, Republic of Korea
| | - S Lee
- Center for Axion and Precision Physics (CAPP)/Institute for Basic Science (IBS), Daejeon, Republic of Korea
| | - S Leo
- University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois, USA
| | - B Li
- Argonne National Laboratory, Lemont, Illinois, USA
- School of Physics and Astronomy, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - D Li
- School of Physics and Astronomy, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - L Li
- School of Physics and Astronomy, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - I Logashenko
- Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, Novosibirsk, Russia
| | | | - A Lucà
- Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois, USA
| | - G Lukicov
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - G Luo
- Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, Illinois, USA
| | - A Lusiani
- INFN, Sezione di Pisa, Pisa, Italy
- Scuola Normale Superiore, Pisa, Italy
| | - A L Lyon
- Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois, USA
| | - B MacCoy
- University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - R Madrak
- Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois, USA
| | - K Makino
- Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA
| | - F Marignetti
- INFN, Sezione di Napoli, Napoli, Italy
- Università di Cassino e del Lazio Meridionale, Cassino, Italy
| | | | - S Maxfield
- University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - M McEvoy
- Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, Illinois, USA
| | - W Merritt
- Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois, USA
| | | | - J P Miller
- Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - S Miozzi
- INFN, Sezione di Roma Tor Vergata, Roma, Italy
| | - J P Morgan
- Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois, USA
| | - W M Morse
- Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York, USA
| | - J Mott
- Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois, USA
| | - E Motuk
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - A Nath
- INFN, Sezione di Napoli, Napoli, Italy
- Università di Napoli, Napoli, Italy
| | - D Newton
- University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - H Nguyen
- Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois, USA
| | - M Oberling
- Argonne National Laboratory, Lemont, Illinois, USA
| | - R Osofsky
- University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - J-F Ostiguy
- Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois, USA
| | - S Park
- Center for Axion and Precision Physics (CAPP)/Institute for Basic Science (IBS), Daejeon, Republic of Korea
| | - G Pauletta
- INFN Gruppo Collegato di Udine, Sezione di Trieste, Udine, Italy
- Università di Udine, Udine, Italy
| | - G M Piacentino
- INFN, Sezione di Roma Tor Vergata, Roma, Italy
- Università del Molise, Campobasso, Italy
| | - R N Pilato
- INFN, Sezione di Pisa, Pisa, Italy
- Università di Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - K T Pitts
- University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois, USA
| | - B Plaster
- University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA
| | - D Počanić
- University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - N Pohlman
- Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, Illinois, USA
| | - C C Polly
- Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois, USA
| | - M Popovic
- Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois, USA
| | - J Price
- University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - B Quinn
- University of Mississippi, University, Mississippi, USA
| | - N Raha
- INFN, Sezione di Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | | | - E Ramberg
- Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois, USA
| | - N T Rider
- Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA
| | - J L Ritchie
- Department of Physics, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA
| | - B L Roberts
- Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - D L Rubin
- Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA
| | - L Santi
- INFN Gruppo Collegato di Udine, Sezione di Trieste, Udine, Italy
- Università di Udine, Udine, Italy
| | - D Sathyan
- Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - H Schellman
- Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois, USA
| | - C Schlesier
- University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois, USA
| | - A Schreckenberger
- Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois, USA
- Department of Physics, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA
| | - Y K Semertzidis
- Center for Axion and Precision Physics (CAPP)/Institute for Basic Science (IBS), Daejeon, Republic of Korea
- Department of Physics, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST), Daejeon, Republic of Korea
| | - Y M Shatunov
- Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, Novosibirsk, Russia
| | - D Shemyakin
- Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, Novosibirsk, Russia
| | - M Shenk
- Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, Illinois, USA
| | - D Sim
- University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - M W Smith
- INFN, Sezione di Pisa, Pisa, Italy
- University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - A Smith
- University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - A K Soha
- Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois, USA
| | - M Sorbara
- INFN, Sezione di Roma Tor Vergata, Roma, Italy
- Università di Roma Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - D Stöckinger
- Institut für Kern-und Teilchenphysik, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - J Stapleton
- Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois, USA
| | - D Still
- Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois, USA
| | - C Stoughton
- Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois, USA
| | - D Stratakis
- Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois, USA
| | - C Strohman
- Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA
| | - T Stuttard
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - H E Swanson
- University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - G Sweetmore
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | | | - M J Syphers
- Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois, USA
- Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, Illinois, USA
| | - D A Tarazona
- Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA
| | - T Teubner
- University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | | | - K Thomson
- University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - V Tishchenko
- Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York, USA
| | - N H Tran
- Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - W Turner
- University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - E Valetov
- Lancaster University, Lancaster, United Kingdom
- Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA
- Tsung-Dao Lee Institute, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - D Vasilkova
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - V P Volnykh
- Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna, Russia
| | - T Walton
- Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois, USA
| | - M Warren
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - A Weisskopf
- Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA
| | - L Welty-Rieger
- Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois, USA
| | - M Whitley
- University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - P Winter
- Argonne National Laboratory, Lemont, Illinois, USA
| | - A Wolski
- University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - M Wormald
- University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - W Wu
- University of Mississippi, University, Mississippi, USA
| | - C Yoshikawa
- Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois, USA
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Taylor GMJ, Sawyer K, Kessler D, Munafò MR, Aveyard P, Shaw A. Views about integrating smoking cessation treatment within psychological services for patients with common mental illness: A multi-perspective qualitative study. Health Expect 2021; 24:411-420. [PMID: 33368996 PMCID: PMC8077097 DOI: 10.1111/hex.13182] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2020] [Revised: 10/09/2020] [Accepted: 11/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Tobacco smoking rates are significantly higher in people with common mental illness compared to those without. Smoking cessation treatment could be offered as part of usual outpatient psychological care, but currently is not. OBJECTIVE To understand patient and health care professionals' views about integrating smoking cessation treatment into outpatient psychological services for common mental illness. DESIGN Qualitative in-depth interviews, with thematic analysis. PARTICIPANTS Eleven Improving Access to Psychological Therapies (IAPT) psychological wellbeing practitioners (PWPs), six IAPT patients, and six stop smoking advisors were recruited from English smoking cessation, and IAPT services. RESULTS Patients reported psychological benefits from smoking, and also described smoking as a form of self-harm. Stop smoking advisors displayed therapeutic pessimism and stigmatizing attitudes towards helping people with mental illness to quit smoking. PWPs have positive attitudes towards smoking cessation treatment for people with common mental illness. PWPs and patients accept evidence that smoking tobacco may harm mental health, and quitting might benefit mental health. PWPs report expertise in helping people with common mental illness to make behavioural changes in the face of mood disturbances and low motivation. PWPs felt confident in offering smoking cessation treatments to patients, but suggested a caseload reduction may be required to deliver smoking cessation support in IAPT. CONCLUSIONS IAPT appears to be a natural environment for smoking cessation treatment. PWPs may need additional training, and a caseload reduction. Integration of smoking cessation treatment into IAPT services should be tested in a pilot and feasibility study. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION Service users and members of the public were involved in study design and interpretation of data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gemma M. J. Taylor
- Addiction and Mental Health Group (AIM)Department of PsychologyUniversity of BathBathUK
| | - Katherine Sawyer
- Addiction and Mental Health Group (AIM)Department of PsychologyUniversity of BathBathUK
| | - David Kessler
- Centre for Academic Primary CareBristol Medical SchoolUniversity of BristolBristolUK
| | - Marcus R. Munafò
- MRC Integrative Epidemiology UnitSchool of Psychological ScienceUniversity of BristolBristolUK
| | - Paul Aveyard
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health SciencesUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK
| | - Alison Shaw
- Centre for Academic Primary CareBristol Medical SchoolUniversity of BristolBristolUK
| |
Collapse
|