1
|
Bernstein-Kurtycz LM, Dunham NT, Evenhuis J, Brown MB, Muneza AB, Fennessy J, Dennis PM, Lukas KE. Evaluating the effects of giraffe skin disease and wire snare wounds on the gaits of free-ranging Nubian giraffe. Sci Rep 2023; 13:1959. [PMID: 36737637 PMCID: PMC9898309 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-28677-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2022] [Accepted: 01/23/2023] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Giraffe skin disease (GSD), a condition that results in superficial lesions in certain giraffe (Giraffa spp.) populations, has emerged as a potential conservation threat. Preliminary findings suggested that individuals with GSD lesions move with greater difficulty which may in turn reduce their foraging efficiency or make them more vulnerable to predation. A current known threat to some giraffe populations is their mortality associated with entrapment in wire snares, and the morbidity and potential locomotor deficiencies associated with wounds acquired from snares. The goal of our study was to quantify the locomotor kinematics of free-ranging Nubian giraffe (G. camelopardalis camelopardalis) in Murchison Falls National Park (MFNP), Uganda, and compare spatiotemporal limb and neck angle kinematics of healthy giraffe to those of giraffe with GSD lesions, snare wounds, and both GSD lesions and snare wounds. The presence of GSD lesions did not significantly affect spatiotemporal limb kinematic parameters. This finding is potentially because lesions were located primarily on the necks of Nubian giraffe in MFNP. The kinematic parameters of individuals with snare wounds differed from those of healthy individuals, resulting in significantly shorter stride lengths, reduced speed, lower limb phase values, and increased gait asymmetry. Neck angle kinematic parameters did not differ among giraffe categories, which suggests that GSD neck lesions do not impair normal neck movements and range of motion during walking. Overall, MFNP giraffe locomotor patterns are largely conservative between healthy individuals and those with GSD, while individuals with snare wounds showed more discernible kinematic adjustments consistent with unilateral limb injuries. Additional studies are recommended to assess spatiotemporal limb kinematics of giraffe at sites where lesions are found predominantly on the limbs to better assess the potential significance of GSD on their locomotion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L M Bernstein-Kurtycz
- Division of Conservation and Science, Cleveland Metroparks Zoo, 4200 Wildlife Way, Cleveland, OH, 44109, USA.,Department of Biology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.,Little Rock Zoo, Little Rock, AR, USA
| | - N T Dunham
- Division of Conservation and Science, Cleveland Metroparks Zoo, 4200 Wildlife Way, Cleveland, OH, 44109, USA. .,Department of Biology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.
| | - J Evenhuis
- Department of Biology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.,College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA
| | - M B Brown
- Giraffe Conservation Foundation, P.O. Box 86099, Eros, Namibia.,Smithsonian National Zoo and Conservation Biology Institute, Front Royal, VA, 22630, USA.,Department of Biological Sciences Program in Ecology, Evolution, Ecosystems, and Society, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA
| | - A B Muneza
- Giraffe Conservation Foundation, P.O. Box 86099, Eros, Namibia
| | - J Fennessy
- Giraffe Conservation Foundation, P.O. Box 86099, Eros, Namibia
| | - P M Dennis
- Division of Conservation and Science, Cleveland Metroparks Zoo, 4200 Wildlife Way, Cleveland, OH, 44109, USA.,Department of Biology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.,Department of Veterinary Preventive Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - K E Lukas
- Division of Conservation and Science, Cleveland Metroparks Zoo, 4200 Wildlife Way, Cleveland, OH, 44109, USA.,Department of Biology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Domalpally A, Whittier SA, Pan Q, Dabelea DM, Darwin CH, Knowler WC, Lee CG, Luchsinger JA, White NH, Chew EY, Gadde KM, Culbert IW, Arceneaux J, Chatellier A, Dragg A, Champagne CM, Duncan C, Eberhardt B, Greenway F, Guillory FG, Herbert AA, Jeffirs ML, Kennedy BM, Levy E, Lockett M, Lovejoy JC, Morris LH, Melancon LE, Ryan DH, Sanford DA, Smith KG, Smith LL, St.Amant JA, Tulley RT, Vicknair PC, Williamson D, Zachwieja JJ, Polonsky KS, Tobian J, Ehrmann DA, Matulik MJ, Temple KA, Clark B, Czech K, DeSandre C, Dotson B, Hilbrich R, McNabb W, Semenske AR, Caro JF, Furlong K, Goldstein BJ, Watson PG, Smith KA, Mendoza J, Simmons M, Wildman W, Liberoni R, Spandorfer J, Pepe C, Donahue RP, Goldberg RB, Prineas R, Calles J, Giannella A, Rowe P, Sanguily J, Cassanova-Romero P, Castillo-Florez S, Florez HJ, Garg R, Kirby L, Lara O, Larreal C, McLymont V, Mendez J, Perry A, Saab P, Veciana B, Haffner SM, Hazuda HP, Montez MG, Hattaway K, Isaac J, Lorenzo C, Martinez A, Salazar M, Walker T, Hamman RF, Nash PV, Steinke SC, Testaverde L, Truong J, Anderson DR, Ballonoff LB, Bouffard A, Bucca B, Calonge BN, Delve L, Farago M, Hill JO, Hoyer SR, Jenkins T, Jortberg BT, Lenz D, Miller M, Nilan T, Perreault L, Price DW, Regensteiner JG, Schroeder EB, Seagle H, Smith CM, VanDorsten B, Horton ES, Munshi M, Lawton KE, Jackson SD, Poirier CS, Swift K, Arky RA, Bryant M, Burke JP, Caballero E, Callaphan KM, Fargnoli B, Franklin T, Ganda OP, Guidi A, Guido M, Jacobsen AM, Kula LM, Kocal M, Lambert L, Ledbury S, Malloy MA, Middelbeek RJ, Nicosia M, Oldmixon CF, Pan J, Quitingon M, Rainville R, Rubtchinsky S, Seely EW, Sansoucy J, Schweizer D, Simonson D, Smith F, Solomon CG, Spellman J, Warram J, Kahn SE, Fattaleh B, Montgomery BK, Colegrove C, Fujimoto W, Knopp RH, Lipkin EW, Marr M, Morgan-Taggart I, Murillo A, O’Neal K, Trence D, Taylor L, Thomas A, Tsai EC, Dagogo-Jack S, Kitabchi AE, Murphy ME, Taylor L, Dolgoff J, Applegate WB, Bryer-Ash M, Clark D, Frieson SL, Ibebuogu U, Imseis R, Lambeth H, Lichtermann LC, Oktaei H, Ricks H, Rutledge LM, Sherman AR, Smith CM, Soberman JE, Williams-Cleaves B, Patel A, Nyenwe EA, Hampton EF, Metzger BE, Molitch ME, Johnson MK, Adelman DT, Behrends C, Cook M, Fitzgibbon M, Giles MM, Heard D, Johnson CK, Larsen D, Lowe A, Lyman M, McPherson D, Penn SC, Pitts T, Reinhart R, Roston S, Schinleber PA, Wallia A, Nathan DM, McKitrick C, Turgeon H, Larkin M, Mugford M, Abbott K, Anderson E, Bissett L, Bondi K, Cagliero E, Florez JC, Delahanty L, Goldman V, Grassa E, Gurry L, D’Anna K, Leandre F, Lou P, Poulos A, Raymond E, Ripley V, Stevens C, Tseng B, Olefsky JM, Barrett-Connor E, Mudaliar S, Araneta MR, Carrion-Petersen ML, Vejvoda K, Bassiouni S, Beltran M, Claravall LN, Dowden JM, Edelman SV, Garimella P, Henry RR, Horne J, Lamkin M, Janesch SS, Leos D, Polonsky W, Ruiz R, Smith J, Torio-Hurley J, Pi-Sunyer FX, Lee JE, Hagamen S, Allison DB, Agharanya N, Aronoff NJ, Baldo M, Crandall JP, Foo ST, Luchsinger JA, Pal C, Parkes K, Pena MB, Rooney ES, Van Wye GE, Viscovich KA, de Groot M, Marrero DG, Mather KJ, Prince MJ, Kelly SM, Jackson MA, McAtee G, Putenney P, Ackermann RT, Cantrell CM, Dotson YF, Fineberg ES, Fultz M, Guare JC, Hadden A, Ignaut JM, Kirkman MS, Phillips EO, Pinner KL, Porter BD, Roach PJ, Rowland ND, Wheeler ML, Aroda V, Magee M, Ratner RE, Youssef G, Shapiro S, Andon N, Bavido-Arrage C, Boggs G, Bronsord M, Brown E, Love Burkott H, Cheatham WW, Cola S, Evans C, Gibbs P, Kellum T, Leon L, Lagarda M, Levatan C, Lindsay M, Nair AK, Park J, Passaro M, Silverman A, Uwaifo G, Wells-Thayer D, Wiggins R, Saad MF, Watson K, Budget M, Jinagouda S, Botrous M, Sosa A, Tadros S, Akbar K, Conzues C, Magpuri P, Ngo K, Rassam A, Waters D, Xapthalamous K, Santiago JV, Brown AL, Das S, Khare-Ranade P, Stich T, Santiago A, Fisher E, Hurt E, Jones T, Kerr M, Ryder L, Wernimont C, Golden SH, Saudek CD, Bradley V, Sullivan E, Whittington T, Abbas C, Allen A, Brancati FL, Cappelli S, Clark JM, Charleston JB, Freel J, Horak K, Greene A, Jiggetts D, Johnson D, Joseph H, Loman K, Mathioudakis N, Mosley H, Reusing J, Rubin RR, Samuels A, Shields T, Stephens S, Stewart KJ, Thomas L, Utsey E, Williamson P, Schade DS, Adams KS, Canady JL, Johannes C, Hemphill C, Hyde P, Atler LF, Boyle PJ, Burge MR, Chai L, Colleran K, Fondino A, Gonzales Y, Hernandez-McGinnis DA, Katz P, King C, Middendorf J, Rubinchik S, Senter W, Crandall J, Shamoon H, Brown JO, Trandafirescu G, Powell D, Adorno E, Cox L, Duffy H, Engel S, Friedler A, Goldstein A, Howard-Century CJ, Lukin J, Kloiber S, Longchamp N, Martinez H, Pompi D, Scheindlin J, Violino E, Walker EA, Wylie-Rosett J, Zimmerman E, Zonszein J, Orchard T, Venditti E, Wing RR, Jeffries S, Koenning G, Kramer MK, Smith M, Barr S, Benchoff C, Boraz M, Clifford L, Culyba R, Frazier M, Gilligan R, Guimond S, Harrier S, Harris L, Kriska A, Manjoo Q, Mullen M, Noel A, Otto A, Pettigrew J, Rockette-Wagner B, Rubinstein D, Semler L, Smith CF, Weinzierl V, Williams KV, Wilson T, Mau MK, Baker-Ladao NK, Melish JS, Arakaki RF, Latimer RW, Isonaga MK, Beddow R, Bermudez NE, Dias L, Inouye J, Mikami K, Mohideen P, Odom SK, Perry RU, Yamamoto RE, Anderson H, Cooeyate N, Dodge C, Hoskin MA, Percy CA, Enote A, Natewa C, Acton KJ, Andre VL, Barber R, Begay S, Bennett PH, Benson MB, Bird EC, Broussard BA, Bucca BC, Chavez M, Cook S, Curtis J, Dacawyma T, Doughty MS, Duncan R, Edgerton C, Ghahate JM, Glass J, Glass M, Gohdes D, Grant W, Hanson RL, Horse E, Ingraham LE, Jackson M, Jay P, Kaskalla RS, Kavena K, Kessler D, Kobus KM, Krakoff J, Kurland J, Manus C, McCabe C, Michaels S, Morgan T, Nashboo Y, Nelson JA, Poirier S, Polczynski E, Piromalli C, Reidy M, Roumain J, Rowse D, Roy RJ, Sangster S, Sewenemewa J, Smart M, Spencer C, Tonemah D, Williams R, Wilson C, Yazzie M, Bain R, Fowler S, Temprosa M, Larsen MD, Brenneman T, Edelstein SL, Abebe S, Bamdad J, Barkalow M, Bethepu J, Bezabeh T, Bowers A, Butler N, Callaghan J, Carter CE, Christophi C, Dwyer GM, Foulkes M, Gao Y, Gooding R, Gottlieb A, Grimes KL, Grover-Fairchild N, Haffner L, Hoffman H, Jablonski K, Jones S, Jones TL, Katz R, Kolinjivadi P, Lachin JM, Ma Y, Mucik P, Orlosky R, Reamer S, Rochon J, Sapozhnikova A, Sherif H, Stimpson C, Hogan Tjaden A, Walker-Murray F, Venditti EM, Kriska AM, Weinzierl V, Marcovina S, Aldrich FA, Harting J, Albers J, Strylewicz G, Eastman R, Fradkin J, Garfield S, Lee C, Gregg E, Zhang P, O’Leary D, Evans G, Budoff M, Dailing C, Stamm E, Schwartz A, Navy C, Palermo L, Rautaharju P, Prineas RJ, Alexander T, Campbell C, Hall S, Li Y, Mills M, Pemberton N, Rautaharju F, Zhang Z, Soliman EZ, Hu J, Hensley S, Keasler L, Taylor T, Blodi B, Danis R, Davis M, Hubbard* L, Endres** R, Elsas** D, Johnson** S, Myers** D, Barrett N, Baumhauer H, Benz W, Cohn H, Corkery E, Dohm K, Gama V, Goulding A, Ewen A, Hurtenbach C, Lawrence D, McDaniel K, Pak J, Reimers J, Shaw R, Swift M, Vargo P, Watson S, Manly J, Mayer-Davis E, Moran RR, Ganiats T, David K, Sarkin AJ, Groessl E, Katzir N, Chong H, Herman WH, Brändle M, Brown MB, Altshuler D, Billings LK, Chen L, Harden M, Knowler WC, Pollin TI, Shuldiner AR, Franks PW, Hivert MF. Association of Metformin With the Development of Age-Related Macular Degeneration. JAMA Ophthalmol 2023; 141:140-147. [PMID: 36547967 PMCID: PMC9936345 DOI: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2022.5567] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2022] [Accepted: 10/29/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Importance Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is a leading cause of blindness with no treatment available for early stages. Retrospective studies have shown an association between metformin and reduced risk of AMD. Objective To investigate the association between metformin use and age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Design, Setting, and Participants The Diabetes Prevention Program Outcomes Study is a cross-sectional follow-up phase of a large multicenter randomized clinical trial, Diabetes Prevention Program (1996-2001), to investigate the association of treatment with metformin or an intensive lifestyle modification vs placebo with preventing the onset of type 2 diabetes in a population at high risk for developing diabetes. Participants with retinal imaging at a follow-up visit 16 years posttrial (2017-2019) were included. Analysis took place between October 2019 and May 2022. Interventions Participants were randomly distributed between 3 interventional arms: lifestyle, metformin, and placebo. Main Outcomes and Measures Prevalence of AMD in the treatment arms. Results Of 1592 participants, 514 (32.3%) were in the lifestyle arm, 549 (34.5%) were in the metformin arm, and 529 (33.2%) were in the placebo arm. All 3 arms were balanced for baseline characteristics including age (mean [SD] age at randomization, 49 [9] years), sex (1128 [71%] male), race and ethnicity (784 [49%] White), smoking habits, body mass index, and education level. AMD was identified in 479 participants (30.1%); 229 (14.4%) had early AMD, 218 (13.7%) had intermediate AMD, and 32 (2.0%) had advanced AMD. There was no significant difference in the presence of AMD between the 3 groups: 152 (29.6%) in the lifestyle arm, 165 (30.2%) in the metformin arm, and 162 (30.7%) in the placebo arm. There was also no difference in the distribution of early, intermediate, and advanced AMD between the intervention groups. Mean duration of metformin use was similar for those with and without AMD (mean [SD], 8.0 [9.3] vs 8.5 [9.3] years; P = .69). In the multivariate models, history of smoking was associated with increased risks of AMD (odds ratio, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.05-1.61; P = .02). Conclusions and Relevance These data suggest neither metformin nor lifestyle changes initiated for diabetes prevention were associated with the risk of any AMD, with similar results for AMD severity. Duration of metformin use was also not associated with AMD. This analysis does not address the association of metformin with incidence or progression of AMD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amitha Domalpally
- Wisconsin Reading Center, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public and Health, Madison
| | - Samuel A. Whittier
- Wisconsin Reading Center, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public and Health, Madison
| | - Qing Pan
- Department of Statistics, George Washington University, Washington, DC
| | - Dana M. Dabelea
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Colorado School of Public Health, Denver
| | - Christine H. Darwin
- Department of Medicine, Ronald Reagan UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - William C. Knowler
- Diabetes Epidemiology and Clinical Research Section, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Christine G. Lee
- Division of Diabetes, Endocrinology, and Metabolic Diseases, National Institutes of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Jose A. Luchsinger
- Department of Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Neil H. White
- Division of Endocrinology & Diabetes, Department of Pediatrics, Washington University in St Louis School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Emily Y. Chew
- Division of Epidemiology and Clinical Applications–Clinical Trials Branch, National Eye Institute - National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Amber Dragg
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Crystal Duncan
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Frank Greenway
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | | | | | - Erma Levy
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Monica Lockett
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | | | - Donna H. Ryan
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | - Lisa L. Smith
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Janet Tobian
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | | | - Bart Clark
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Kirsten Czech
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | | | - Wylie McNabb
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Jose F. Caro
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Kevin Furlong
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | | | - Jewel Mendoza
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Marsha Simmons
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Wendi Wildman
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Renee Liberoni
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Constance Pepe
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | - Ronald Prineas
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Anna Giannella
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Patricia Rowe
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | | | | | - Rajesh Garg
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Olga Lara
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Carmen Larreal
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Jadell Mendez
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Arlette Perry
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Patrice Saab
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Bertha Veciana
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | | | - Kathy Hattaway
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Juan Isaac
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Carlos Lorenzo
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Monica Salazar
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Tatiana Walker
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Brian Bucca
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - B. Ned Calonge
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Lynne Delve
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Martha Farago
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - James O. Hill
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Tonya Jenkins
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Dione Lenz
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Marsha Miller
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Thomas Nilan
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - David W. Price
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | - Helen Seagle
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | | | - Medha Munshi
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | | | - Kati Swift
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Ronald A. Arky
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Om P. Ganda
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Ashley Guidi
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Mathew Guido
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Lyn M. Kula
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Margaret Kocal
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Lori Lambert
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Sarah Ledbury
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | | | | | - Jocelyn Pan
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | | | - Ellen W. Seely
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Dana Schweizer
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Fannie Smith
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | - James Warram
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Steven E. Kahn
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Basma Fattaleh
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Michelle Marr
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Anne Murillo
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Kayla O’Neal
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Dace Trence
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Lonnese Taylor
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - April Thomas
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Elaine C. Tsai
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | - Mary E. Murphy
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Laura Taylor
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | | | - Debra Clark
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Uzoma Ibebuogu
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Raed Imseis
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Helen Lambeth
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Hooman Oktaei
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Harriet Ricks
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Amy R. Sherman
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Clara M. Smith
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | - Avnisha Patel
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Michelle Cook
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Mimi M. Giles
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Deloris Heard
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Diane Larsen
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Anne Lowe
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Megan Lyman
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Samsam C. Penn
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Thomas Pitts
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Renee Reinhart
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Susan Roston
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Amisha Wallia
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | | | - Mary Larkin
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Kathy Abbott
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Ellen Anderson
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Laurie Bissett
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Kristy Bondi
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Jose C. Florez
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | - Elaine Grassa
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Lindsery Gurry
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Kali D’Anna
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Peter Lou
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Elyse Raymond
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Valerie Ripley
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Beverly Tseng
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Karen Vejvoda
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Javiva Horne
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Marycie Lamkin
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Diana Leos
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Rosa Ruiz
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Jean Smith
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | - Jane E. Lee
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Susan Hagamen
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | | | - Maria Baldo
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Sandra T. Foo
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Carmen Pal
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Kathy Parkes
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Mary Beth Pena
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | | | - Mary de Groot
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | | | - Susie M. Kelly
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Gina McAtee
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Paula Putenney
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | | | | | - Megan Fultz
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - John C. Guare
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Angela Hadden
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | | | - Kisha L Pinner
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Paris J. Roach
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | - Vanita Aroda
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Michelle Magee
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | - Sue Shapiro
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Natalie Andon
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Susan Cola
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Cindy Evans
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Peggy Gibbs
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Tracy Kellum
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Lilia Leon
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Milvia Lagarda
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | - Asha K. Nair
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Jean Park
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | - Gabriel Uwaifo
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Renee Wiggins
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Karol Watson
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Maria Budget
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Medhat Botrous
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Anthony Sosa
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Sameh Tadros
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Khan Akbar
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | - Kathy Ngo
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Amer Rassam
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Debra Waters
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | | | - Samia Das
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Tamara Stich
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Ana Santiago
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Edwin Fisher
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Emma Hurt
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Tracy Jones
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Michelle Kerr
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Lucy Ryder
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | | | | | - Emily Sullivan
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Caroline Abbas
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Adrienne Allen
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | | | | | - Janice Freel
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Alicia Greene
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Dawn Jiggetts
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Hope Joseph
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Kimberly Loman
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Henry Mosley
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - John Reusing
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Alafia Samuels
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Thomas Shields
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | - LeeLana Thomas
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Evonne Utsey
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Penny Hyde
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | - Mark R. Burge
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Lisa Chai
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Ateka Fondino
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Ysela Gonzales
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Patricia Katz
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Carolyn King
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | | | - Jill Crandall
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Harry Shamoon
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Janet O. Brown
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | - Elsie Adorno
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Liane Cox
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Helena Duffy
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Samuel Engel
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | | | - Jennifer Lukin
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Stacey Kloiber
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Helen Martinez
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Dorothy Pompi
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Elissa Violino
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | | | - Joel Zonszein
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Trevor Orchard
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Rena R. Wing
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Susan Jeffries
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Gaye Koenning
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - M. Kaye Kramer
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Marie Smith
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Susan Barr
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Miriam Boraz
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Lisa Clifford
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Rebecca Culyba
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Ryan Gilligan
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Susan Harrier
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Louann Harris
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Andrea Kriska
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Monica Mullen
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Alicia Noel
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Amy Otto
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | | | - Linda Semler
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | | | - Tara Wilson
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | - John S. Melish
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | - Mae K. Isonaga
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Ralph Beddow
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Lorna Dias
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Jillian Inouye
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Kathy Mikami
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Sharon K. Odom
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Mary A. Hoskin
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Carol A. Percy
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Alvera Enote
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Camille Natewa
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Kelly J. Acton
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Rosalyn Barber
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Shandiin Begay
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | - Evelyn C. Bird
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Brian C. Bucca
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Sherron Cook
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Jeff Curtis
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Tara Dacawyma
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Roberta Duncan
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Cyndy Edgerton
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Justin Glass
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Martia Glass
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Dorothy Gohdes
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Wendy Grant
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Ellie Horse
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Merry Jackson
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Priscilla Jay
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Karen Kavena
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - David Kessler
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | - Jason Kurland
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Cherie McCabe
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Sara Michaels
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Tina Morgan
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | - Steven Poirier
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | - Mike Reidy
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Debra Rowse
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Robert J. Roy
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | - Miranda Smart
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Darryl Tonemah
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | | | - Raymond Bain
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Sarah Fowler
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | - Tina Brenneman
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Solome Abebe
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Julie Bamdad
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Joel Bethepu
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Anna Bowers
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Nicole Butler
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | | | | | - Mary Foulkes
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Yuping Gao
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Robert Gooding
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | | | - Lori Haffner
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | - Steve Jones
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Tara L. Jones
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Richard Katz
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - John M. Lachin
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Yong Ma
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Pamela Mucik
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Robert Orlosky
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Susan Reamer
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - James Rochon
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Hanna Sherif
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - John Albers
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - R. Eastman
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Judith Fradkin
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Christine Lee
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Edward Gregg
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Ping Zhang
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Dan O’Leary
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Gregory Evans
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Matthew Budoff
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Chris Dailing
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Ann Schwartz
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Caroline Navy
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Lisa Palermo
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | | | | | - Sharon Hall
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Yabing Li
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Margaret Mills
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | - Zhuming Zhang
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Julie Hu
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Susan Hensley
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Lisa Keasler
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Tonya Taylor
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Barbara Blodi
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Ronald Danis
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Matthew Davis
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Larry Hubbard*
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Ryan Endres**
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | - Dawn Myers**
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Nancy Barrett
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Wendy Benz
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Holly Cohn
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Ellie Corkery
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Kristi Dohm
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Vonnie Gama
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Anne Goulding
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Andy Ewen
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | - Kyle McDaniel
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Jeong Pak
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - James Reimers
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Ruth Shaw
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Maria Swift
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Pamela Vargo
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Sheila Watson
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Jennifer Manly
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | - Ted Ganiats
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Kristin David
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Erik Groessl
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Naomi Katzir
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Helen Chong
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Ling Chen
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Maegan Harden
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Toni I. Pollin
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Paul W. Franks
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Luke B, Brown MB, Wantman E, Schymura MJ, Browne ML, Fisher SC, Forestieri NE, Rao C, Nichols HB, Yazdy MM, Gershman ST, Sacha CR, Williams M, Ethen MK, Canfield MA, Doody KJ, Eisenberg ML, Baker VL, Williams C, Sutcliffe AG, Richard MA, Lupo PJ. The risks of birth defects and childhood cancer with conception by assisted reproductive technology. Hum Reprod 2022; 37:2672-2689. [PMID: 36112004 PMCID: PMC9960485 DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deac196] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2022] [Revised: 08/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
STUDY QUESTION Is there an association between fertility status, method of conception and the risks of birth defects and childhood cancer? SUMMARY ANSWER The risk of childhood cancer had two independent components: (i) method of conception and (ii) presence, type and number of birth defects. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY The rarity of the co-occurrence of birth defects, cancer and ART makes studying their association challenging. Prior studies have indicated that infertility and ART are associated with an increased risk of birth defects or cancer but have been limited by small sample size and inadequate statistical power, failure to adjust for or include plurality, differences in definitions and/or methods of ascertainment, lack of information on ART treatment parameters or study periods spanning decades resulting in a substantial historical bias as ART techniques have improved. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION This was a population-based cohort study linking ART cycles reported to the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting System (SART CORS) from 1 January 2004 to 31 December 2017 that resulted in live births in 2004-2018 in Massachusetts and North Carolina and live births in 2004-2017 in Texas and New York. A 10:1 sample of non-ART births were chosen within the same time period as the ART birth. Non-ART siblings were identified through the ART mother's information. Children from non-ART births were classified as being born to women who conceived with ovulation induction or IUI (OI/IUI) when there was an indication of infertility treatment on the birth certificate, and the woman did not link to the SART CORS; all others were classified as being naturally conceived. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS The study population included 165 125 ART children, 31 524 non-ART siblings, 12 451 children born to OI/IUI-treated women and 1 353 440 naturally conceived children. All study children were linked to their respective State birth defect registries to identify major defects diagnosed within the first year of life. We classified children with major defects as either chromosomal (i.e. presence of a chromosomal defect with or without any other major defect) or nonchromosomal (i.e. presence of a major defect but having no chromosomal defect), or all major defects (chromosomal and nonchromosomal), and calculated rates per 1000 children. Logistic regression models were used to generate adjusted odds ratios (AORs) and 95% CIs of the risk of birth defects by conception group (OI/IUI, non-ART sibling and ART by oocyte source and embryo state) with naturally conceived children as the reference, adjusted for paternal and maternal ages; maternal race and ethnicity, education, BMI, parity, diabetes, hypertension; and for plurality, infant sex and State and year of birth. All study children were also linked to their respective State cancer registries. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs of cancer by birth defect status (including presence of a defect, type and number of defects), and conception group. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE A total of 29 571 singleton children (2.0%) and 3753 twin children (3.5%) had a major birth defect (chromosomal or nonchromosomal). Children conceived with ART from autologous oocytes had increased risks for nonchromosomal defects, including blastogenesis, cardiovascular, gastrointestinal and, for males only, genitourinary defects, with AORs ranging from 1.22 to 1.85; children in the autologous-fresh group also had increased risks for musculoskeletal (AOR 1.28, 95% CI 1.13, 1.45) and orofacial defects (AOR 1.40, 95% CI 1.17, 1.68). Within the donor oocyte group, the children conceived from fresh embryos did not have increased risks in any birth defect category, whereas children conceived from thawed embryos had increased risks for nonchromosomal defects (AOR 1.20, 95% CI 1.03, 1.40) and blastogenesis defects (AOR 1.74, 95% CI 1.14, 2.65). The risk of cancer was increased among ART children in the autologous-fresh group (HR 1.31, 95% CI 1.08, 1.59) and non-ART siblings (1.34, 95% CI 1.02, 1.76). The risk of leukemia was increased among children in the OI/IUI group (HR 2.15, 95% CI 1.04, 4.47) and non-ART siblings (HR 1.63, 95% CI 1.02, 2.61). The risk of central nervous system tumors was increased among ART children in the autologous-fresh group (HR 1.68, 95% CI 1.14, 2.48), donor-fresh group (HR 2.57, 95% CI 1.04, 6.32) and non-ART siblings (HR 1.84, 95% CI 1.12, 3.03). ART children in the autologous-fresh group were also at increased risk for solid tumors (HR 1.39, 95% CI 1.09, 1.77). A total of 127 children had both major birth defects and cancer, of which 53 children (42%) had leukemia. The risk of cancer had two independent components: (i) method of conception (described above) and (ii) presence, type and number of birth defects. The presence of nonchromosomal defects increased the cancer risk, greater for two or more defects versus one defect, for all cancers and each type evaluated. The presence of chromosomal defects was strongly associated with cancer risk (HR 8.70 for all cancers and HR 21.90 for leukemia), further elevated in the presence of both chromosomal and nonchromosomal defects (HR 21.29 for all cancers, HR 64.83 for leukemia and HR 4.71 for embryonal tumors). Among the 83 946 children born from ART in the USA in 2019 compared to their naturally conceived counterparts, these risks translate into an estimated excess of 761 children with major birth defects, 31 children with cancer and 11 children with both major birth defects and cancer. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION In the SART CORS database, it was not possible to differentiate method of embryo freezing (slow freezing versus vitrification), and data on ICSI were only available in the fresh embryo ART group. In the OI/IUI group, it was not possible to differentiate type of non-ART treatment utilized, and in both the ART and OI/IUI groups, data were unavailable on duration of infertility. Since OI/IUI is underreported on the birth certificate, some OI/IUI children were likely included among the naturally conceived children, which will decrease the difference between all the groups and the naturally conceived children. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS The use of ART is associated with increased risks of major nonchromosomal birth defects. The presence of birth defects is associated with greater risks for cancer, which adds to the baseline risk in the ART group. Although this study does not show causality, these findings indicate that children conceived with ART, non-ART siblings, and all children with birth defects should be monitored more closely for the subsequent development of cancer. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) This project was supported by grant R01 HD084377 from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, or the National Institutes of Health, nor any of the State Departments of Health which contributed data. M.L.E. reports consultancy for Ro, Hannah, Dadi, Sandstone and Underdog; presidency of SSMR; and SMRU board member. The remaining authors report no conflict of interest. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER N/A.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Barbara Luke
- Correspondence address. Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology, Michigan State University, 965 Wilson Road, East Fee Hall, Room 628, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA. Tel: +1-517-353-1678; Fax: +1-517-353-1663; E-mail:
| | - Morton B Brown
- Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | | | - Maria J Schymura
- New York State Department of Health, New York State Cancer Registry, Albany, NY, USA,Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Albany, Rensselaer, NY, USA
| | - Marilyn L Browne
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Albany, Rensselaer, NY, USA,New York State Department of Health, Birth Defects Registry, Albany, NY, USA
| | - Sarah C Fisher
- New York State Department of Health, Birth Defects Registry, Albany, NY, USA
| | - Nina E Forestieri
- North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services, Birth Defects Monitoring Program, State Center for Health Statistics, Raleigh, NC, USA
| | - Chandrika Rao
- North Carolina Central Cancer Registry, Raleigh, NC, USA
| | - Hazel B Nichols
- Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Mahsa M Yazdy
- Massachusetts Department of Public Health, Massachusetts Center for Birth Defects Research and Prevention, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Susan T Gershman
- Massachusetts Department of Public Health, Massachusetts Cancer Registry, Office of Data Management and Outcomes Assessment, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Caitlin R Sacha
- Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA
| | - Melanie Williams
- Texas Department of State Health Services, Cancer Epidemiology and Surveillance Branch, Texas Health and Human Services, Austin, TX, USA
| | - Mary K Ethen
- Texas Department of State Health Services, Birth Defects Epidemiology and Surveillance Branch, Austin, TX, USA
| | - Mark A Canfield
- Texas Department of State Health Services, Birth Defects Epidemiology and Surveillance Branch, Austin, TX, USA
| | | | - Michael L Eisenberg
- Division of Male Reproductive Medicine and Surgery, Department of Urology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - Valerie L Baker
- Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Carrie Williams
- Policy, Practice, and Population Unit, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Alastair G Sutcliffe
- Policy, Practice, and Population Unit, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Melissa A Richard
- Department of Pediatrics, Section of Hematology-Oncology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Philip J Lupo
- Department of Pediatrics, Section of Hematology-Oncology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Beebeejaun MT, Brown MB, Hutter V, Kravitz L, McAuley WJ. The effect of dilution of fusidic acid cream and betamethasone dipropionate cream in complex extemporaneous mixes on formulation performance. Int J Pharm 2022; 624:121988. [PMID: 35803531 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2022.121988] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2022] [Revised: 07/01/2022] [Accepted: 07/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
The Aron regimen is an unconventional therapy which entails frequent applications of an extemporaneously prepared three component system (a topical antibiotic, a corticosteroid and an emollient), with the intention of decolonising the skin of S. aureus whilst treating atopic dermatitis. The impact of heavily diluting these topical medicinal products, to differing extents, on formulation performance is not well understood thus was investigated in this study. Following a single application of a range of compounded Aron mixes (fusidic acid and betamethasone dipropionate diluted to varying extents in an emollient base), significant reductions in the expected drug flux across silicone membrane, ex vivo percutaneous absorption and skin retention of both drugs relative to the marketed products were observed. This was attributed to a number of complex formulation effects making such changes difficult to predict in a clinical setting. Further investigations are required to evaluate the impact of frequent applications of the Aron mix to widespread areas on clinical efficacy, antimicrobial resistance and long term side effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M T Beebeejaun
- Centre for Research in Topical Drug Delivery and Toxicology, University of Hertfordshire, College Lane, Hatfield AL10 9AB, UK
| | - M B Brown
- MedPharm Ltd, Unit 3 Chancellor Court, 50 Occam Road, Surrey Research Park, Guildford GU2 7AB, UK
| | - V Hutter
- Centre for Research in Topical Drug Delivery and Toxicology, University of Hertfordshire, College Lane, Hatfield AL10 9AB, UK
| | - L Kravitz
- Centre for Research in Topical Drug Delivery and Toxicology, University of Hertfordshire, College Lane, Hatfield AL10 9AB, UK
| | - W J McAuley
- Centre for Research in Topical Drug Delivery and Toxicology, University of Hertfordshire, College Lane, Hatfield AL10 9AB, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Luke B, Brown MB, Ethen MK, Canfield MA, Watkins S, Wantman E, Doody KJ. Sixth grade academic achievement among children conceived with IVF: a population-based study in Texas, USA. J Assist Reprod Genet 2021; 38:1481-1492. [PMID: 33797677 DOI: 10.1007/s10815-021-02170-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2021] [Accepted: 03/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To compare academic achievement in reading and mathematics at the end of sixth grade and progress from third to sixth grade by children conceived with in vitro fertilization (IVF) to those conceived naturally. METHODS This was a retrospective population-based cohort study of IVF-conceived singleton and twin children who took the 3rd grade and 6th grade public school standardized reading and mathematics testing in Texas. RESULTS There were 6623 children with reading scores in both the third and sixth grades and 6374 children with mathematics scores in both the third and sixth grades. Mean (± SE) scaled test scores for IVF and control singleton children for reading were 1544.6 ± 3.4 and 1527.7 ± 1.9, respectively, in third grade and 1701.2 ± 3.6 and 1681.0 ± 2.0, respectively, in sixth grade; for mathematics, the scores were 1564.4 ± 3.7 and 1548.9 ± 2.1, respectively, in third grade and 1774.0 ± 4.2 and 1752.0 ± 2.3, respectively, in sixth grade. In multivariate models, singleton IVF children scored significantly higher than control children in reading and mathematics, averaging 17.7 ± 4.0 points and 20.1 ± 4.1 points higher, respectively, in reading in third and sixth grades and 17.8 ± 4.4 points and 25.0 ± 4.8 points higher, respectively, in mathematics in third and sixth grades. CONCLUSIONS Children conceived with IVF and aged 8-9 years and aged 10-12 years performed as well on third and sixth grade reading and mathematics assessments as their counterparts conceived naturally.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Barbara Luke
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology, College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, East Fee Hall, Room 628, 965 Wilson Road, East Lansing, MI, USA.
| | - Morton B Brown
- Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Mary K Ethen
- Birth Defects Epidemiology and Surveillance Branch, Texas Department of State Health Services, Austin, TX, USA
| | - Mark A Canfield
- Birth Defects Epidemiology and Surveillance Branch, Texas Department of State Health Services, Austin, TX, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Luke B, Brown MB, Wantman E, Forestieri NE, Browne ML, Fisher SC, Yazdy MM, Ethen MK, Canfield MA, Nichols HB, Oehninger S, Doody KJ, Sutcliffe AG, Williams C, Eisenberg ML, Baker VL, Sacha CR, Lupo PJ. Risks of nonchromosomal birth defects, small-for-gestational age birthweight, and prematurity with in vitro fertilization: effect of number of embryos transferred and plurality at conception versus at birth. J Assist Reprod Genet 2021; 38:835-846. [PMID: 33547526 PMCID: PMC8079460 DOI: 10.1007/s10815-021-02095-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2020] [Accepted: 01/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Excess embryos transferred (ET) (> plurality at birth) and fetal heartbeats (FHB) at 6 weeks' gestation are associated with reductions in birthweight and gestation, but prior studies have been limited by small sample sizes and limited IVF data. This analysis evaluated associations between excess ET, excess FHB, and adverse perinatal outcomes, including the risk of nonchromosomal birth defects. METHODS Live births conceived via IVF from Massachusetts, New York, North Carolina, and Texas included 138,435 children born 2004-2013 (Texas), 2004-2016 (Massachusetts and North Carolina), and 2004-2017 (New York) were classified by ET and FHB. Major birth defects were reported by statewide registries within the first year of life. Logistic regression was used to estimate adjusted odds ratios (AORs) and 95% CIs of the risks of a major nonchromosomal birth defect, small-for-gestational age birthweight (SGA), low birthweight (LBW), and preterm birth (≤36 weeks), by excess ET, and excess ET + excess FHB, by plurality at birth (singletons and twins). RESULTS In singletons with [2 ET, FHB =1] and [≥3 ET, FHB=1], risks [AOR (95% CI)] were increased, respectively, for major nonchromosomal birth defects [1.13 (1.00-1.27) and 1.18 (1.00-1.38)], SGA [1.10 (1.03-1.17) and 1.15 (1.05-1.26)], LBW [1.09 (1.02-1.13) and 1.17 (1.07-1.27)], and preterm birth [1.06 (1.00-1.12) and 1.14 (1.06-1.23)]. With excess ET + excess FHB, risks of all adverse outcomes except major nonchromosomal birth defects increased further for both singletons and twins. CONCLUSION Excess embryos transferred are associated with increased risks for nonchromosomal birth defects, reduced birthweight, and prematurity in IVF-conceived births.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Barbara Luke
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology, College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, 965 Wilson Road, East Fee Hall, Room 628, East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA.
| | - Morton B Brown
- Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | | | - Nina E Forestieri
- Birth Defects Monitoring Program, State Center for Health Statistics, North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services, Raleigh, NC, USA
| | - Marilyn L Browne
- Birth Defects Research Section, New York State Department of Health, Albany, NY, USA
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University at Albany, Rensselaer, NY, USA
| | - Sarah C Fisher
- Birth Defects Research Section, New York State Department of Health, Albany, NY, USA
| | - Mahsa M Yazdy
- Massachusetts Center for Birth Defects Research and Prevention, Massachusetts Department of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Mary K Ethen
- Massachusetts Center for Birth Defects Research and Prevention, Massachusetts Department of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Mark A Canfield
- Birth Defects Epidemiology and Surveillance Branch, Texas Department of State Health Services, Austin, TX, USA
| | - Hazel B Nichols
- Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | | | | | - Alastair G Sutcliffe
- UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Carrie Williams
- UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Michael L Eisenberg
- Division of Male Reproductive Medicine and Surgery, Department of Urology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - Valerie L Baker
- Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Caitlin R Sacha
- Massachusetts General Hospital Fertility Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Philip J Lupo
- Epidemiology Program, Texas Children's Cancer and Hematology Centers, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Luke B, Brown MB, Wantman E, Forestieri NE, Browne ML, Fisher SC, Yazdy MM, Ethen MK, Canfield MA, Watkins S, Nichols HB, Farland LV, Oehninger S, Doody KJ, Eisenberg ML, Baker VL. The risk of birth defects with conception by ART. Hum Reprod 2021; 36:116-129. [PMID: 33251542 PMCID: PMC8679367 DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deaa272] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2020] [Revised: 09/11/2020] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
STUDY QUESTION What is the association between ART conception and treatment parameters and the risk of birth defects? SUMMARY ANSWER Compared to naturally conceived singleton infants, the risk of a major nonchromosomal defect among ART singletons conceived with autologous oocytes and fresh embryos without use of ICSI was increased by 18%, with increases of 42% and 30% for use of ICSI with and without male factor diagnosis, respectively. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Prior studies have indicated that infertility and ART are associated with an increased risk of birth defects but have been limited by small sample size and inadequate statistical power, failure to differentiate results by plurality, differences in birth defect definitions and methods of ascertainment, lack of information on ART treatment parameters or study periods spanning decades resulting in a substantial historical bias as ART techniques have improved. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION This was a population-based cohort study linking ART cycles reported to the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting System (SART CORS) from 1 January 2004 to 31 December 2015 that resulted in live births from 1 September 2004 to 31 December 2016 in Massachusetts and North Carolina and from 1 September 2004 to 31 December 2015 for Texas and New York: these were large and ethnically diverse States, with birth defect registries utilizing the same case definitions and data collected, and with high numbers of ART births annually. A 10:1 sample of non-ART births were chosen within the same time period as the ART birth. Naturally conceived ART siblings were identified through the mother's information. Non-ART children were classified as being born to women who conceived with ovulation induction (OI)/IUI when there was an indication of infertility treatment on the birth certificate, but the woman did not link to the SART CORS; all others were classified as being naturally conceived. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS The study population included 135 051 ART children (78 362 singletons and 56 689 twins), 23 647 naturally conceived ART siblings (22 301 singletons and 1346 twins) and 9396 children born to women treated with OI/IUI (6597 singletons and 2799 twins) and 1 067 922 naturally conceived children (1 037 757 singletons and 30 165 twins). All study children were linked to their respective State birth defect registries to identify major defects diagnosed within the first year of life. We classified children with major defects as either chromosomal (i.e. presence of a chromosomal defect with or without any other major defect) or nonchromosomal (i.e. presence of a major defect but having no chromosomal defect), or all major defects (chromosomal and nonchromosomal). Logistic regression models were used to generate adjusted odds ratios (AORs) and 95% CI to evaluate the risk of birth defects due to conception with ART (using autologous oocytes and fresh embryos), and with and without the use of ICSI in the absence or presence of male factor infertility, with naturally conceived children as the reference. Analyses within the ART group were stratified by combinations of oocyte source (autologous, donor) and embryo state (fresh, thawed), with births from autologous oocytes and fresh embryos as the reference. Analyses limited to fresh embryos were stratified by oocyte source (autologous, donor) and the use of ICSI. Triplets and higher-order multiples were excluded. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE A total of 21 998 singleton children (1.9%) and 3037 twin children (3.3%) had a major birth defect. Compared to naturally conceived children, ART singletons (conceived from autologous oocytes, fresh embryos without the use of ICSI) had increased risks of a major nonchromosomal birth defect (AOR 1.18, 95% 1.05, 1.32), cardiovascular defects (AOR 1.20, 95% CI 1.03, 1.40), and any birth defect (AOR 1.18, 95% CI 1.09, 1.27). Compared to naturally conceived children, ART singletons conceived (from autologous oocytes, fresh embryos) with the use of ICSI, the risks were increased for a major nonchromosomal birth defect (AOR 1.30, 95% CI 1.16, 1.45 without male factor diagnosis; AOR 1.42, 95% CI 1.28, 1.57 with male factor diagnosis); blastogenesis defects (AOR 1.49, 95% CI 1.08, 2.05 without male factor; AOR 1.56, 95% CI 1.17, 2.08 with male factor); cardiovascular defects (AOR 1.28, 95% CI 1.10,1.48 without male factor; AOR 1.45, 95% CI 1.27, 1.66 with male factor); in addition, the risk for musculoskeletal defects was increased (AOR 1.34, 95% CI 1.01, 1.78 without male factor) and the risk for genitourinary defects in male infants was increased (AOR 1.33, 95% CI 1.08, 1.65 with male factor). Comparisons within ART singleton births conceived from autologous oocytes and fresh embryos indicated that the use of ICSI was associated with increased risks of a major nonchromosomal birth defect (AOR 1.18, 95% CI 1.03, 1.35), blastogenesis defects (AOR 1.65, 95% CI 1.08, 2.51), gastrointestinal defects (AOR 2.21, 95% CI 1.28, 3.82) and any defect (AOR 1.11, 95% CI 1.01, 1.22). Compared to naturally conceived children, ART singleton siblings had increased risks of musculoskeletal defects (AOR 1.32, 95% CI 1.04, 1.67) and any defect (AOR 1.15, 95% CI 1.08, 1.23). ART twins (conceived with autologous oocytes, fresh embryos, without ICSI) were at increased risk of chromosomal defects (AOR 1.89, 95% CI 1.10, 3.24) and ART twin siblings were at increased risk of any defect (AOR 1.26, 95% CI 1.01, 1.57). The 18% increased risk of a major nonchromosomal birth defect in singleton infants conceived with ART without ICSI (∼36% of ART births), the 30% increased risk with ICSI without male factor (∼33% of ART births), and the 42% increased risk with ICSI and male factor (∼31% of ART births) translates into an estimated excess of 386 major birth defects among the 68 908 singleton children born by ART in 2017. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION In the SART CORS database, it was not possible to differentiate method of embryo freezing (slow freezing vs vitrification), and data on ICSI was only available in the fresh embryo ART group. In the OI/IUI group, it was not possible to differentiate type of non-ART treatment utilized, and in both the ART and OI/IUI groups, data were unavailable on duration of infertility. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS The use of ART is associated with increased risks of a major nonchromosomal birth defect, cardiovascular defect and any defect in singleton children, and chromosomal defects in twins; the use of ICSI further increases this risk, the most with male factor infertility. These findings support the judicious use of ICSI only when medically indicated. The relative contribution of ART treatment parameters versus the biology of the subfertile couple to this increased risk remains unclear and warrants further study. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) This project was supported by grant R01 HD084377 from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, or the National Institutes of Health, nor any of the State Departments of Health which contributed data. E.W. is a contract vendor for SART; all other authors report no conflicts. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER N/A.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Barbara Luke
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and
Reproductive Biology, College of Human Medicine, Michigan State
University, East Lansing, MI, USA
| | - Morton B Brown
- Department of Biostatistics, School of Public
Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | | | - Nina E Forestieri
- North Carolina Department of Health and Human
Services, Birth Defects Monitoring Program, State Center for
Health Statistics, Raleigh, NC, USA
| | - Marilyn L Browne
- New York State Department of Health, Birth Defects
Research Section, Albany, NY, USA
| | - Sarah C Fisher
- New York State Department of Health, Birth Defects
Research Section, Albany, NY, USA
| | - Mahsa M Yazdy
- Massachusetts Department of Public Health,
Massachusetts Center for Birth Defects Research and Prevention,
Boston, MA, USA
| | - Mary K Ethen
- Texas Department of State Health Services, Birth
Defects Epidemiology and Surveillance Branch, Austin, TX, USA
| | - Mark A Canfield
- Texas Department of State Health Services, Birth
Defects Epidemiology and Surveillance Branch, Austin, TX, USA
| | | | - Hazel B Nichols
- Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of
Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill,
NC, USA
| | - Leslie V Farland
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Mel
and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of
Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | | | | | - Michael L Eisenberg
- Division of Male Reproductive Medicine and Surgery,
Department of Urology, Stanford University School of Medicine,
Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - Valerie L Baker
- Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and
Infertility, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins University
School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Luke B, Brown MB, Nichols HB, Schymura MJ, Browne ML, Fisher SC, Forestieri NE, Rao C, Yazdy MM, Gershman ST, Ethen MK, Canfield MA, Williams M, Wantman E, Oehninger S, Doody KJ, Eisenberg ML, Baker VL, Lupo PJ. Assessment of Birth Defects and Cancer Risk in Children Conceived via In Vitro Fertilization in the US. JAMA Netw Open 2020; 3:e2022927. [PMID: 33119107 PMCID: PMC7596575 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.22927] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Children with birth defects have a greater risk of developing cancer, but this association has not yet been evaluated in children conceived with in vitro fertilization (IVF). OBJECTIVE To assess whether the association between birth defects and cancer is greater in children conceived via IVF compared with children conceived naturally. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This cohort study of live births, birth defects, and cancer from Massachusetts, New York, North Carolina, and Texas included 1 000 639 children born to fertile women and 52 776 children conceived via IVF (using autologous oocytes and fresh embryos) during 2004-2016 in Massachusetts and North Carolina, 2004-2015 in New York, and 2004-2013 in Texas. Children were followed up for an average of 5.7 years (6 008 985 total person-years of exposure). Data analysis was conducted from April 1 to August 31, 2020. EXPOSURES Conception by IVF for state residents who gave birth to liveborn singletons during the study period. Birth defect diagnoses recorded by statewide registries. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Cancer diagnosis as recorded by state cancer registries. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs for birth defect-cancer associations separately in fertile and IVF groups. RESULTS A total of 1 000 639 children (51.3% boys; 69.7% White; and 38.3% born between 2009-2012) were in the fertile group and 52 776 were in the IVF group (51.3% boys; 81.3% White; and 39.6% born between 2009-2012). Compared with children without birth defects, cancer risks were higher among children with a major birth defect in the fertile group (hazard ratio [HR], 3.15; 95% CI, 2.40-4.14) and IVF group (HR, 6.90; 95% CI, 3.73-12.74). The HR of cancer among children with a major nonchromosomal defect was 2.07 (95% CI, 1.47-2.91) among children in the fertile group and 4.04 (95% CI, 1.86-8.77) among children in the IVF group. The HR of cancer among children with a chromosomal defect was 15.45 (95% CI, 10.00-23.86) in the fertile group and 38.91 (95% CI, 15.56-97.33) in the IVF group. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE This study found that among children with birth defects, those conceived via IVF were at greater risk of developing cancer compared with children conceived naturally.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Barbara Luke
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology, College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing
| | - Morton B. Brown
- Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
| | - Hazel B. Nichols
- Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
| | - Maria J. Schymura
- Bureau of Cancer Epidemiology, New York State Department of Health, Albany
| | - Marilyn L. Browne
- Birth Defects Research Section, New York State Department of Health, Albany
| | - Sarah C. Fisher
- Birth Defects Research Section, New York State Department of Health, Albany
| | - Nina E. Forestieri
- Birth Defects Monitoring Program, State Center for Health Statistics, North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services, Raleigh
| | - Chandrika Rao
- North Carolina Central Cancer Registry, State Center for Health Statistics, Division of Public Health, North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services, Raleigh
| | - Mahsa M. Yazdy
- Massachusetts Center for Birth Defects Research and Prevention, Massachusetts Department of Public Health, Boston
| | - Susan T. Gershman
- Massachusetts Cancer Registry, Massachusetts Department of Public Health, Boston
| | - Mary K. Ethen
- Birth Defects Epidemiology and Surveillance Branch, Texas Department of State Health Services, Austin
| | - Mark A. Canfield
- Birth Defects Epidemiology and Surveillance Branch, Texas Department of State Health Services, Austin
| | - Melanie Williams
- Cancer Epidemiology and Surveillance Branch, Texas Department of State Health Services, Austin
| | | | | | | | - Michael L. Eisenberg
- Division of Male Reproductive Medicine and Surgery, Department of Urology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California
| | - Valerie L. Baker
- Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Philip J. Lupo
- Epidemiology Program, Texas Children’s Cancer and Hematology Centers, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Farah HA, Brown MB, McAuley WJ. Correction to: Enhanced Follicular Delivery of Finasteride to Human Scalp Skin Using Heat and Chemical Penetration Enhancers. Pharm Res 2020; 37:151. [PMID: 32691269 DOI: 10.1007/s11095-020-02862-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
The article Enhanced Follicular Delivery of Finasteride to Human Scalp Skin Using Heat and Chemical Penetration Enhancers, written by Farah, Brown, and McAuley was originally published electronically on the publisher's internet portal on 31 May, 2020 without open access.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H A Farah
- Centre for Research in Topical Drug Delivery and Toxicology, University of Hertfordshire, College Lane, Hatfield, AL10 9AB, UK
| | - M B Brown
- MedPharm Ltd, Unit 3 Chancellor Court, 50 Occam Road, Surrey Research Park, Guildford, GU2 7AB, UK
| | - W J McAuley
- Centre for Research in Topical Drug Delivery and Toxicology, University of Hertfordshire, College Lane, Hatfield, AL10 9AB, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Luke B, Brown MB, Ethen MK, Canfield MA, Watkins S, Wantman E, Doody KJ. Third grade academic achievement among children conceived with the use of in vitro fertilization: a population-based study in Texas. Fertil Steril 2020; 113:1242-1250.e4. [PMID: 32409098 DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.01.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2019] [Revised: 01/07/2020] [Accepted: 01/09/2020] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate if there are differences in standardized testing results at the end of third grade between children conceived with the use of in vitro fertilization (IVF) and those conceived spontaneously. DESIGN Retrospective population-based cohort. SETTING Texas public school system. PATIENT(S) Singleton and twin children 8-9 years of age who took the third-grade public school standardized testing in Texas from 2012 to 2018. INTERVENTION(S) None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S) Standardized testing in reading and mathematics. RESULT(S) After exclusions, there were 6,970 IVF and 12,690 non-IVF children with reading scores and 6,973 IVF and 12,729 non-IVF children with mathematics scores. IVF children scored significantly higher in reading (singletons: 1,543 ± 2 vs. 1,525 ± 1; twins: 1,534 ± 2 vs. 1,504 ± 5 [mean ± SE]), and mathematics (singletons: 1,566 ± 2 vs. 1,550 ± 1; twins: 1,557 ± 2 vs. 1,529 ± 5). Children of mothers ≥30 years of age scored consistently higher than children of mothers 18-29 years of age. The differences were of similar magnitude between IVF and control children for older ages, but not significant for IVF. Within the IVF group, there were no significant differences between children born from fresh versus froze-thawed embryos. CONCLUSION(S) Children of ages 8-9 years who were conceived with the use of IVF performed as well on third-grade reading and math assessments as their counterparts who were conceived spontaneously. We also found consistent racial and ethnic differences, gender differences, and beneficial effects of older maternal age. Because we were not able to adjust adequately for socioeconomic status and other confounding factors, which may explain some of the observed differences, we conclude that there is no negative effect of IVF conception on academic achievement in third grade.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Barbara Luke
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology, College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan.
| | - Morton B Brown
- Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Mary K Ethen
- Birth Defects Epidemiology and Surveillance Branch, Texas Department of State Health Services, Austin, Texas
| | - Mark A Canfield
- Birth Defects Epidemiology and Surveillance Branch, Texas Department of State Health Services, Austin, Texas
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Luke B, Brown MB, Eisenberg ML, Callan C, Botting BJ, Pacey A, Sutcliffe AG, Baker VL. In vitro fertilization and risk for hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: associations with treatment parameters. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2020; 222:350.e1-350.e13. [PMID: 31629726 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.10.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2019] [Revised: 10/02/2019] [Accepted: 10/13/2019] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although in vitro fertilization has been associated with an increased risk for hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, the association of risk with in vitro fertilization treatment parameters is unclear. OBJECTIVE To evaluate risk for hypertensive disorders of pregnancy by maternal fertility status and in vitro fertilization treatment parameters. MATERIALS AND METHODS Women in 8 states who underwent in vitro fertilization resulting in a live birth during 2004-2013 were linked to their infant's birth certificates. A 10:1 sample of births from non-in vitro fertilization deliveries were selected for comparison. Those with an indication of infertility treatment on the birth certificate were categorized as subfertile and omitted from the study population; all others were categorized as fertile. The in vitro fertilization pregnancies were additionally categorized by oocyte source (autologous versus donor) and embryo state (fresh versus thawed). Both the fertile and in vitro fertilization births were limited to singletons only, and the in vitro fertilization pregnancies were limited to those using partner sperm. Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (including gestational hypertension and preeclampsia) were identified from the birth certificate, modeled using logistic regression, and reported as adjusted odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals. For analyses of in vitro fertilization pregnancies from autologous oocytes-fresh embryos, the reference group was fertile women (subgroup analysis 1). For analyses within the in vitro fertilization group, the reference group was autologous oocytes-fresh embryos (subgroup analysis 2). RESULTS The study population included 1,465,893 pregnancies (1,382,311 births to fertile women and 83,582 births to in vitro fertilization-treated women). Compared to fertile women, in vitro fertilization-treated women with autologous-fresh cycles were not at increased risk for hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (adjusted odds ratio, 1.04; 95% confidence interval, 0.99, 1.08). Among in vitro fertilization births (subgroup analysis 2), the risk for hypertensive disorders of pregnancy was increased for the autologous-thawed (adjusted odds ratio, 1.30; 95% confidence interval, 1.20, 1.40); donor-fresh (adjusted oddds ratio, 1.92; 95% confidence interval, 1.71, 2.15); and donor-thawed (adjusted odds ratio, 1.70; 95% confidence interval, 1.47, 1.96) groups. Excluding women with pregestational diabetes or chronic hypertension as well as adjusting for body mass index and infertility diagnoses did not substantially change the results. When stratified by <34 weeks (early-onset hypertensive disorders of pregnancy) versus ≥34 weeks (late-onset hypertensive disorders of pregnancy), only the donor-fresh group had an increased risk of early-onset hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, but the risks for all other oocyte source-embryo state groups compared to autologous-fresh were increased for late-onset hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. CONCLUSION The risk for hypertensive disorders of pregnancy is increased for in vitro fertilization-treated women in pregnancies conceived via frozen embryo transfer (with both autologous or donor oocyte) and fresh donor oocyte embryo transfer. No increase in risk was seen with autologous oocyte-fresh embryo transfers in vitro fertilization cycles. Excluding women with pregestational diabetes or chronic hypertension as well as adjusting for body mass index and infertility diagnoses did not substantially change the results.
Collapse
|
12
|
Abstract
Abstract
An extensive study of Israeli orange and grapefruit juices has been carried out in the last 7 years (1966-1973). About 1000 samples of natural citrus juices were examined for a large number of analytical parameters. On the basis of statistical evaluation of the data of the first year and consideration of their ease of performance, 5 analytical parameters were selected: Brix, formol number, chloramine T number, total sugars, and chlorides. A multivariate normal test was performed under which adulteration or dilution of 15% or more is very likely to be detected at a 1 % level of significance. Analytical results obtained each subsequent year were integrated into multiyear results. Pasteurization of the juice and storage for 6 months did not affect the power of the method.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abraham Lifshitz
- Department of Biochemistry, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
| | - Yedael Stepak
- Department of Biochemistry, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
| | - Morton B Brown
- Department of Biochemistry, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Abstract
Abstract
Following a survey of lemon juice composition, the analytical data are given 2 different statistical treatments. On comparing these treatments, it is found that the specific test based on classical chi-square distribution is more powerful than that based on regression analysis. The analysis of free amino acids provides a method for the detection of adulteration of lemon juice, which is both efficient and difficult to circumvent.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Lifshitz
- Department of Biochemistry and Department of Statistics, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
| | - Y Stepak
- Department of Biochemistry and Department of Statistics, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
| | - M B Brown
- Department of Biochemistry and Department of Statistics, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Watkins JM, von Chamier M, Brown MB, Reyes L, Hayward LF. Prenatal infection with Mycoplasma pulmonis in rats exaggerates the angiotensin II pressor response in adult offspring. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 2019; 318:R338-R350. [PMID: 31850818 DOI: 10.1152/ajpregu.00194.2019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
Exposure to different stressors in utero is linked to adult diseases such as obesity and hypertension. In this study, the impact of prenatal infection (PNI) on adult body weight and cardiovascular function was evaluated using a naturally occurring rodent pathogen, Mycoplasma pulmonis (MP). Pregnant Sprague-Dawley rats were infected with MP on gestational day 14 and gave birth naturally. Adult PNI offspring weighed more than controls, but resting mean arterial pressure (MAP) was unchanged. Subcutaneous injection of angiotensin II (10 μg/kg) elicited a rise in MAP that was greater in both male and female PNI offspring compared with controls (P < 0.03). The accompanying reflex bradycardia was similar to the controls, suggesting that PNI induced baroreflex dysfunction. Subcutaneous nicotine administration, a potent cardiorespiratory stimulus, also elicited a transient rise in MAP that was generally greater in the PNI group, but the change in MAP from baseline was only significant in the PNI females compared with controls (P < 0.03). Elevated body weight and cardiovascular reactivity in the PNI offspring was associated with an increase in the ratio of hypothalamic corticotrophin-releasing hormone receptors type 1 to type 2 gene expression in both sexes compared with controls. These findings support previous studies demonstrating that PNI induces alterations in cardiovascular function and body weight. Yet, unlike previous studies utilizing other models of PNI (e.g., endotoxin), MP PNI did not induce resting hypertension. Thus, our study provides a foundation for future studies evaluating the cardiovascular risks of offspring exposed to microbial challenges in utero.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J M Watkins
- Department of Physiological Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - M von Chamier
- Department of Infectious Disease and Immunology, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - M B Brown
- Department of Infectious Disease and Immunology, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - L Reyes
- Department of Pathobiological Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin
| | - L F Hayward
- Department of Physiological Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Goutman SA, Brown MB, Cudkowicz M, Atassi N, Feldman EL. ALS/SURV: a modification of the CAFS statistic. Amyotroph Lateral Scler Frontotemporal Degener 2019; 20:576-583. [PMID: 31334681 PMCID: PMC6768708 DOI: 10.1080/21678421.2019.1643375] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2018] [Revised: 07/02/2019] [Accepted: 07/07/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
We present a composite endpoint that can be used in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) trials, which combines functional status (via the ALS functional rating scale) and survival, denoted ALS/SURV. ALS/SURV modifies and extends the combined assessment of function and survival (CAFS) score and assigns rankings to participants that withdraw or are lost to follow up in a way that does not disproportionately lower and skew ranks for those participants that reach study endpoint (either death or study completion). ALS/SURV has properties of: (1) ordering participants that completed the study from the shortest surviving participant to the last observed death followed by worst function to best function; (2) ordering participants withdrawing at time of withdrawal by their decline in functional status relative to all the participants still in the study; and (3) then maintaining this ordering at time of withdrawal relative to participants still in the study. These properties allow ALS/SURV to better account for participant drop out compared to CAFS. We derive and compare the rankings of participants from the ceftriaxone treatment trial for ALS/SURV and CAFS and demonstrate that ALS/SURV does not modify the ordering of participants that complete a study by the results of participants who withdraw. Additionally, ALS/SURV can be summarized as either median functional status or median survival along with interquartile range, thereby adding clinical meaning to the statistic. Finally, by applying normal deviates, confidence intervals can be computed and used to estimate power for future studies. In summary, the above properties support the role for ALS/SURV as a new ALS composite statistic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen A Goutman
- Department of Neurology, University of Michigan , Ann Arbor , MI , USA
- Program for Neurology Research and Discovery, University of Michigan , Ann Arbor , MI , USA
| | - Morton B Brown
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan , Ann Arbor , MI , USA and
| | - Merit Cudkowicz
- Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School , Boston , MA , USA
| | - Nazem Atassi
- Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School , Boston , MA , USA
| | - Eva L Feldman
- Department of Neurology, University of Michigan , Ann Arbor , MI , USA
- Program for Neurology Research and Discovery, University of Michigan , Ann Arbor , MI , USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Lager CJ, Esfandiari NH, Luo Y, Subauste AR, Kraftson AT, Brown MB, Varban OA, Meral R, Cassidy RB, Nay CK, Lockwood AL, Bellers D, Buda CM, Oral EA. Metabolic Parameters, Weight Loss, and Comorbidities 4 Years After Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass and Sleeve Gastrectomy. Obes Surg 2019; 28:3415-3423. [PMID: 29909517 DOI: 10.1007/s11695-018-3346-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is now the predominant bariatric surgery performed, yet there is limited long-term data comparing important outcomes between LSG and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). This study compares weight loss and impact on comorbidities of the two procedures. METHODS We retrospectively evaluated weight, blood pressure, hemoglobin A1c, cholesterol, and medication use for hypertension, diabetes, and hyperlipidemia at 1-4 years post-operatively in 380 patients who underwent RYGB and 334 patients who underwent LSG at the University of Michigan from January 2008 to November 2013. Follow-up rates from 714 patients initially were 657 (92%), 556 (78%), 507 (71%), and 498 (70%) at 1-4 years post-operatively. RESULTS Baseline characteristics were similar except for higher weight and BMI in LSG. There was greater weight loss with RYGB vs. LSG at all points. Hemoglobin A1c and total cholesterol improved more in RYGB vs. LSG at 4 years. There was greater remission of hypertension and discontinuation of all medications for hypertension and diabetes with RYGB at 4 years. CONCLUSIONS Weight loss, reduction in medications for hypertension and diabetes, improvements in markers of diabetes and hyperlipidemia, and remission rates of hypertension were superior with RYGB vs. LSG 4 years post-operatively. Choice of bariatric procedures should be tailored to surgical risk, comorbidities, and weight loss goals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Corey J Lager
- Division of Metabolism, Endocrinology, and Diabetes, Brehm Center for Diabetes, Michigan Medicine, 24 Frank Lloyd Wright Drive, Domino's Farm, Lobby C, Ann Arbor, MI, 48106, USA
| | - Nazanene H Esfandiari
- Division of Metabolism, Endocrinology, and Diabetes, Brehm Center for Diabetes, Michigan Medicine, 24 Frank Lloyd Wright Drive, Domino's Farm, Lobby C, Ann Arbor, MI, 48106, USA
| | - Yingying Luo
- Department of Endocrinology, Peking University People's Hospital, No. 11, Xizhimen South Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100044, China
| | - Angela R Subauste
- Division of Endocrinology, University of Mississippi, 2500 N State St, Jackson, MS, 39216, USA
| | - Andrew T Kraftson
- Division of Metabolism, Endocrinology, and Diabetes, Brehm Center for Diabetes, Michigan Medicine, 24 Frank Lloyd Wright Drive, Domino's Farm, Lobby C, Ann Arbor, MI, 48106, USA
| | - Morton B Brown
- School of Public Health, University of Michigan, 1415 Washington Heights, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA
| | - Oliver A Varban
- Division of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Michigan Medicine, 1500 E Medical Center Dr, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA
| | - Rasimcan Meral
- Division of Metabolism, Endocrinology, and Diabetes, Brehm Center for Diabetes, Michigan Medicine, 24 Frank Lloyd Wright Drive, Domino's Farm, Lobby C, Ann Arbor, MI, 48106, USA
| | - Ruth B Cassidy
- Division of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Michigan Medicine, 1500 E Medical Center Dr, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA
| | - Catherine K Nay
- Division of Metabolism, Endocrinology, and Diabetes, Brehm Center for Diabetes, Michigan Medicine, 24 Frank Lloyd Wright Drive, Domino's Farm, Lobby C, Ann Arbor, MI, 48106, USA
| | - Amy L Lockwood
- Division of Metabolism, Endocrinology, and Diabetes, Brehm Center for Diabetes, Michigan Medicine, 24 Frank Lloyd Wright Drive, Domino's Farm, Lobby C, Ann Arbor, MI, 48106, USA
| | - Darlene Bellers
- Division of Metabolism, Endocrinology, and Diabetes, Brehm Center for Diabetes, Michigan Medicine, 24 Frank Lloyd Wright Drive, Domino's Farm, Lobby C, Ann Arbor, MI, 48106, USA
| | - Colleen M Buda
- Division of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Michigan Medicine, 1500 E Medical Center Dr, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA
| | - Elif A Oral
- Division of Metabolism, Endocrinology, and Diabetes, Brehm Center for Diabetes, Michigan Medicine, 24 Frank Lloyd Wright Drive, Domino's Farm, Lobby C, Ann Arbor, MI, 48106, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Luke B, Brown MB, Eisenberg ML, Callan CM, Botting BJ, Pacey A, Sutcliffe AG, Baker VL. In vitro fertilization and gestational hypertension/preeclampsia risk: effect of diagnosis versus treatment parameters. Fertil Steril 2019. [DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.07.874] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
|
18
|
Watkins S, Brown MB, Luke B, Ethen MK, Canfield MA, Wantman E, Forestieri NE, Yazdy MM, Fisher SC, Browne ML, Nichols HB, Baker VL, Eisenberg ML, Oehninger SC, Doody KJ. Third grade academic achievement among children conceived with IVF: a population-based study in texas. Fertil Steril 2019. [DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.07.152] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
|
19
|
Spector LG, Brown MB, Wantman E, Letterie GS, Toner JP, Doody K, Ginsburg E, Williams M, Koch L, Schymura MJ, Luke B. Association of In Vitro Fertilization With Childhood Cancer in the United States. JAMA Pediatr 2019; 173:e190392. [PMID: 30933244 PMCID: PMC6547076 DOI: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2019.0392] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE In vitro fertilization (IVF) is associated with birth defects and imprinting disorders. Because these conditions are associated with an increased risk of childhood cancer, many of which originate in utero, descriptions of cancers among children conceived via IVF are imperative. OBJECTIVE To compare the incidence of childhood cancers among children conceived in vitro with those conceived naturally. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS A retrospective, population-based cohort study linking cycles reported to the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinical Outcomes Reporting System from January 1, 2004, to December 31, 2012, that resulted in live births from September 1, 2004, to December 31, 2013, to the birth and cancer registries of 14 states, comprising 66% of United States births and 75% of IVF-conceived births, with follow-up from September 1, 2004, to December 31, 2014. The study included 275 686 children conceived via IVF and a cohort of 2 266 847 children, in which 10 births were randomly selected for each IVF birth. Statistical analysis was performed from April 1, 2017, to October 1, 2018. EXPOSURE In vitro fertilization. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Cancer diagnosed in the first decade of life. RESULTS A total of 321 cancers were detected among the children conceived via IVF (49.1% girls and 50.9% boys; mean [SD] age, 4.6 [2.5] years for singleton births and 5.9 [2.4] years for multiple births), and a total of 2042 cancers were detected among the children not conceived via IVF (49.2% girls and 50.8% boys; mean [SD] age, 6.1 [2.6] years for singleton births and 4.7 [2.6] years for multiple births). The overall cancer rate (per 1 000 000 person-years) was 251.9 for the IVF group and 192.7 for the non-IVF group (hazard ratio, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.00-1.36). The rate of hepatic tumors was higher among the IVF group than the non-IVF group (hepatic tumor rate: 18.1 vs 5.7; hazard ratio, 2.46; 95% CI, 1.29-4.70); the rates of other cancers did not differ between the 2 groups. There were no associations with specific IVF treatment modalities or indication for IVF. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE This study found a small association of IVF with overall cancers of early childhood, but it did observe an increased rate of embryonal cancers, particularly hepatic tumors, that could not be attributed to IVF rather than to underlying infertility. Continued follow-up for cancer occurrence among children conceived via IVF is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Logan G. Spector
- Division of Epidemiology/Clinical Research, Department of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis
| | - Morton B. Brown
- Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
| | | | | | - James P. Toner
- Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Kevin Doody
- Center for Assisted Reproduction, Bedford, Texas
| | - Elizabeth Ginsburg
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Melanie Williams
- Cancer Epidemiology and Surveillance Branch, Texas Department of State Health Services, Austin
| | - Lori Koch
- Illinois State Cancer Registry, Department of Human Services, Springfield
| | - Maria J. Schymura
- Bureau of Cancer Epidemiology and New York State Cancer Registry, New York State Department of Health, Albany
| | - Barbara Luke
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology, College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Caserta F, Brown MB, McAuley WJ. The use of heat and chemical penetration enhancers to increase the follicular delivery of erythromycin to the skin. Eur J Pharm Sci 2019; 132:55-62. [PMID: 30797027 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejps.2019.02.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2018] [Revised: 01/30/2019] [Accepted: 02/19/2019] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
The effect of heat on the follicular absorption of drugs into the skin has not previously been investigated. In comparison to drug delivery across the continuous stratum corneum (SC), follicular absorption is known to be relatively rapid and therefore the use of short durations of heat may be particularly useful for enhancing drug delivery to the hair follicles, as well as being practical for patients to use. In this study erythromycin has been used as a model drug and the combined use of heat and chemical penetration enhancers was found to be able to synergistically increase the penetration of erythromycin into human skin via the follicular route. Moreover durations of heat application as short as 10 min in combination with particular enhancer systems were found to be sufficient to significantly increase erythromycin delivery to the skin. Overall the data indicate that the use of heat with chemical penetration enhancers offers a potentially valuable strategy for delivering drugs via the follicular route.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Caserta
- Centre for Research in Topical Drug Delivery and Toxicology, University of Hertfordshire, College Lane, Hatfield AL10 9AB, UK
| | - M B Brown
- Centre for Research in Topical Drug Delivery and Toxicology, University of Hertfordshire, College Lane, Hatfield AL10 9AB, UK; MedPharm Ltd., Unit 3 Chancellor Court, 50 Occam Road, Surrey Research Park, Guildford GU2 7AB, UK
| | - W J McAuley
- Centre for Research in Topical Drug Delivery and Toxicology, University of Hertfordshire, College Lane, Hatfield AL10 9AB, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Luke B, Brown MB, Wantman E, Baker VL, Doody KJ, Seifer DB, Spector LG. Risk of severe maternal morbidity by maternal fertility status: a US study in 8 states. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2019; 220:195.e1-195.e12. [PMID: 30321527 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.10.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2018] [Revised: 10/05/2018] [Accepted: 10/07/2018] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Over the past 2 decades the characteristics of women giving birth in the United States and the nature of the births themselves have changed dramatically, with increases in older maternal age, plural births, cesarean deliveries, and conception from infertility treatment. OBJECTIVE We sought to evaluate the risk of severe maternal morbidity by maternal fertility status, and for in vitro fertilization pregnancies, by oocyte source and embryo state combinations. STUDY DESIGN Women in 8 states who underwent in vitro fertilization cycles resulting in a live birth during 2004 through 2013 were linked to their infant's birth certificates; a 10:1 sample of births from non-in vitro fertilization deliveries were selected for comparison; those with an indication of infertility treatment on the birth certificate were categorized as subfertile, all others were categorized as fertile. In vitro fertilization pregnancies were additionally categorized by oocyte source (autologous vs donor) and embryo state (fresh vs thawed). Maternal morbidity was identified from the birth certificate, modeled using logistic regression, and reported as adjusted odds ratios [95% confidence intervals]. The reference group was fertile women. RESULTS The study population included 1,477,522 pregnancies (1,346,118 fertile, 11,298 subfertile, 80,254 in vitro fertilization autologous-fresh, 21,964 in vitro fertilization autologous-thawed, 13,218 in vitro fertilization donor-fresh, and 4670 in vitro fertilization donor-thawed pregnancies): 1,420,529 singleton, 54,573 twin, and 2420 triplet+ pregnancies. Compared to fertile women, subfertile and the 4 groups of in vitro fertilization-treated women had increased risks for blood transfusion and third- or fourth-degree perineal laceration (subfertile, 1.58 [1.23-2.02] and 2.08 [1.79-2.43]; autologous-fresh, 1.33 [1.14-1.54] and 1.37 [1.26-1.49]; autologous-thawed, 1.94 [1.60-2.36] and 2.10 [1.84-2.40]; donor-fresh, 2.16 [1.69-2.75] and 2.11 [1.66-2.69]; and donor-thawed, 2.01 [1.38-2.92] and 1.28 [0.79-2.08]). Also compared to fertile women, the risk of unplanned hysterectomy was increased for in vitro fertilization-treated women in the autologous-thawed group (2.80 [1.96-4.00]), donor-fresh group (2.14 [1.33-3.44]), and the donor-thawed group (2.46 [1.33-4.54]). The risk of ruptured uterus was increased for in vitro fertilization-treated women in the autologous-fresh group (1.62 [1.14-2.29]). Among women with a prior birth, the risk of blood transfusion after a vaginal birth was increased for subfertile women (2.91 [1.38-6.15]), and women in all 4 in vitro fertilization groups (autologous-fresh, 1.93 [1.23-3.01]; autologous-thawed, 2.99 [1.78-5.02]; donor-fresh, 5.13 [2.39-11.02]; and donor-thawed, 5.20 [1.83-14.82]); the risk after a cesarean delivery was increased in the autologous-thawed group (1.74 [1.29-2.33]) and the donor-fresh group (1.62 [1.07-2.45]). Unplanned hysterectomy was increased in the autologous-thawed (2.31 [1.43-3.71]) and donor-thawed (2.45 [1.06-5.67]) groups. CONCLUSION The risks of severe maternal morbidity are increased for subfertile and in vitro fertilization births, particularly in pregnancies that are not from autologous, fresh cycles.
Collapse
|
22
|
Amrane S, Brown MB, Lobo RA, Luke B. Factors associated with short interpregnancy interval among women treated with in vitro fertilization. J Assist Reprod Genet 2018; 35:1595-1602. [PMID: 30030711 DOI: 10.1007/s10815-018-1261-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2018] [Accepted: 07/03/2018] [Indexed: 10/28/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate factors associated with interpregnancy interval (IPI) among women treated with in vitro fertilization (IVF). METHODS Women with at least two cycles of IVF between 2004 and 2013 were identified from the SART CORS database and grouped by age at first cycle, infertility diagnosis, IVF treatment parameters, and cycle 1 outcome (singleton or multiple live birth or no live birth, length of gestation, and birthweight). The distributions of IPIs (in months, 0-5, 6-11, 12-17, 18-23, and ≥ 24) were compared across these factors. IPI was fit as a function of these factors by a general linear model, separately for singleton and multiple live births and no live births at cycle 1. RESULTS The study included 93,546 women with two consecutive IVF cycles where the first cycle resulted in a clinical intrauterine pregnancy or a live birth. Among women with a live birth in cycle 1, there was a general pattern of longer IPI for younger women compared to older women. Women with a multiple birth waited longer before initiating a second cycle than women with a singleton birth. For women with no live birth in the first cycle, nearly three fourths initiated cycle 2 within 6 months, regardless of their age. Short (0-5 months) IPI was associated with preterm delivery, older maternal age, and use of donor oocytes. CONCLUSIONS Age of the mother, outcome of the first pregnancy, and treatment factors affect the length of the interpregnancy interval. Because short IPI has been associated with poor outcomes, women who are at risk for short IPI should be counseled about these outcome risks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Amrane
- Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility. Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, 1330 First Ave, Apt 403, New York, NY, 10021, USA.
| | - M B Brown
- Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - R A Lobo
- Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility. Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, 1330 First Ave, Apt 403, New York, NY, 10021, USA
| | - B Luke
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology, College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Goutman SA, Brown MB, Glass JD, Boulis NM, Johe K, Hazel T, Cudkowicz M, Atassi N, Borges L, Patil PG, Sakowski SA, Feldman EL. Long-term Phase 1/2 intraspinal stem cell transplantation outcomes in ALS. Ann Clin Transl Neurol 2018; 5:730-740. [PMID: 29928656 PMCID: PMC5989736 DOI: 10.1002/acn3.567] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2018] [Accepted: 03/25/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective Intraspinal human spinal cord‐derived neural stem cell (HSSC) transplantation is a potential therapy for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS); however, previous trials lack controls. This post hoc analysis compared ambulatory limb‐onset ALS participants in Phase 1 and 2 (Ph1/2) open‐label intraspinal HSSC transplantation studies up to 3 years after transplant to matched participants in Pooled Resource Open‐Access ALS Clinical Trials (PRO‐ACT) and ceftriaxone datasets to provide required analyses to inform future clinical trial designs. Methods Survival, ALSFRS‐R, and a composite statistic (ALS/SURV) combining survival and ALS Functional Rating Scale revised (ALSFRS‐R) functional status were assessed for matched participant subsets: PRO‐ACT n = 1108, Ph1/2 n = 21 and ceftriaxone n = 177, Ph1/2 n = 20. Results Survival did not differ significantly between cohorts: Ph1/2 median survival 4.7 years, 95% CI (1.2, ∞) versus PRO‐ACT 2.3 years (1.9, 2.5), P = 1.0; Ph1/2 3.0 years (1.2, 5.6) versus ceftriaxone 2.3 years (1.8, 2.8), P = 0.88. Mean ALSFRS‐R at 24 months significantly differed between Ph1/2 and both comparison cohorts (Ph1/2 30.1 ± 8.6 vs. PRO‐ACT 24.0 ± 10.2, P = 0.048; Ph1/2 30.7 ± 8.8 vs. ceftriaxone 19.2 ± 9.5, P = 0.0023). Using ALS/SURV, median PRO‐ACT and ceftriaxone participants died by 24 months, whereas median Ph1/2 participant ALSFRS‐Rs were 23 (P = 0.0038) and 19 (P = 0.14) in PRO‐ACT and ceftriaxone comparisons at 24 months, respectively, supporting improved functional outcomes in the Ph1/2 study. Interpretation Comparison of Ph1/2 studies to historical datasets revealed significantly improved survival and function using ALS/SURV versus PRO‐ACT controls. While results are encouraging, comparison against historical populations demonstrate limitations in noncontrolled studies. These findings support continued evaluation of HSSC transplantation in ALS, support the benefit of control populations, and enable necessary power calculations to design a randomized, sham surgery‐controlled efficacy study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen A Goutman
- Department of Neurology University of Michigan 109 Zina Pitcher Place 5017 AAT-BSRB Ann Arbor Michigan 48109
| | - Morton B Brown
- Department of Biostatistics University of Michigan 1415 Washington Heights M4039 SPH II Ann Arbor Michigan 48109
| | - Jonathan D Glass
- Department of Neurology Emory University School of Medicine 101 Woodruff Circle Atlanta Georgia 30322
| | - Nicholas M Boulis
- Department of Neurosurgery Emory University School of Medicine 101 Woodruff Circle WMB Room 6309 Atlanta Georgia
| | - Karl Johe
- Neuralstem, Inc. 20271 Goldenrod Lane Suite 2033 Germantown Maryland 20876
| | - Tom Hazel
- Neuralstem, Inc. 20271 Goldenrod Lane Suite 2033 Germantown Maryland 20876
| | - Merit Cudkowicz
- Department of Neurology Massachusetts General Hospital Harvard Medical School 165 Cambridge Street Boston Massachusetts 02114
| | - Nazem Atassi
- Department of Neurology Massachusetts General Hospital Harvard Medical School 165 Cambridge Street Boston Massachusetts 02114
| | - Lawrence Borges
- Department of Neurosurgery Massachusetts General Hospital Harvard Medical School 15 Parkman Street Wand ACC 745 Boston Massachusetts 02114
| | - Parag G Patil
- Department of Neurology University of Michigan 109 Zina Pitcher Place 5017 AAT-BSRB Ann Arbor Michigan 48109.,Department of Neurosurgery University of Michigan 1500 E. Medical Center Drive SPC 5338 Ann Arbor Michigan 48109
| | - Stacey A Sakowski
- Program for Neurology Research and Discovery University of Michigan 109 Zina Pitcher Place 5017 AAT-BSRB Ann Arbor Michigan 48109
| | - Eva L Feldman
- Department of Neurology University of Michigan 109 Zina Pitcher Place 5017 AAT-BSRB Ann Arbor Michigan 48109.,Program for Neurology Research and Discovery University of Michigan 109 Zina Pitcher Place 5017 AAT-BSRB Ann Arbor Michigan 48109
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Lager CJ, Esfandiari NH, Subauste AR, Kraftson AT, Brown MB, Cassidy RB, Bellers D, Lockwood AL, Varban OA, Oral EA. Milestone Weight Loss Goals (Weight Normalization and Remission of Obesity) after Gastric Bypass Surgery: Long-Term Results from the University of Michigan. Obes Surg 2018; 27:1659-1666. [PMID: 28084587 DOI: 10.1007/s11695-016-2533-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Rates of weight normalization and obesity remission after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (GB) are unknown. This study evaluated weight loss, rates of achieving body mass index (BMI) <25 or 30 kg/m2, recidivism, and predictors of success following GB. METHODS We retrospectively studied weight and BMI at baseline, 2 and 6 months, and annually at 1-7 years in 219 patients undergoing GB at the University of Michigan from January 2008 to November 2010. RESULTS Follow-up was excellent for a population traditionally associated with high attrition rates with data availability of 157/219, 145/219, 144/219, 134/219, 123/219, 82/161, and 29/64 patients at 1-7 years, respectively. Mean baseline BMI was 47.0 kg/m2. Weight normalization (BMI <25 kg/m2) occurred in 2.3-6.8% of patients. More importantly, 47% of patients achieved remission of obesity (BMI <30 kg/m2) at some time point and 24% (52/219) at the last observed time point. BMI <30 kg/m2 was associated with a lower initial BMI and follow-up for more than 2 years. CONCLUSIONS Rates of weight normalization are low after GB; however, a large number of patients achieved BMI <30 kg/m2. While the percent total weight loss and excess weight loss are both quite high in the entire cohort and this is likely associated with significant health benefits, our results still underscore the need to address obesity with intensive clinical attention earlier in its course.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Corey J Lager
- Division of Metabolism, Endocrinology, and Diabetes, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Health Systems, Brehm Center for Diabetes, 1000 Wall Street, Room 5313, Ann Arbor, MI, 48105, USA
| | - Nazanene H Esfandiari
- Division of Metabolism, Endocrinology, and Diabetes, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Health Systems, Brehm Center for Diabetes, 1000 Wall Street, Room 5313, Ann Arbor, MI, 48105, USA
| | - Angela R Subauste
- Division of Endocrinology, University of Mississippi, 2500 N. State St., Jackson, MS, 39216, USA
| | - Andrew T Kraftson
- Division of Metabolism, Endocrinology, and Diabetes, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Health Systems, Brehm Center for Diabetes, 1000 Wall Street, Room 5313, Ann Arbor, MI, 48105, USA
| | - Morton B Brown
- Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, M4039 SPH II, 1415 Washington Heights, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA
| | - Ruth B Cassidy
- Division of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of General Surgery, University of Michigan, 1500 E Medical Center Dr SPC 5343, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA
| | - Darlene Bellers
- Division of Metabolism, Endocrinology, and Diabetes, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Health Systems, Brehm Center for Diabetes, 1000 Wall Street, Room 5313, Ann Arbor, MI, 48105, USA
| | - Amy L Lockwood
- Division of Metabolism, Endocrinology, and Diabetes, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Health Systems, Brehm Center for Diabetes, 1000 Wall Street, Room 5313, Ann Arbor, MI, 48105, USA
| | - Oliver A Varban
- Division of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of General Surgery, University of Michigan, 1500 E Medical Center Dr SPC 5343, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA
| | - Elif A Oral
- Division of Metabolism, Endocrinology, and Diabetes, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Health Systems, Brehm Center for Diabetes, 1000 Wall Street, Room 5313, Ann Arbor, MI, 48105, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Mersereau J, Stanhiser J, Coddington C, Jones T, Luke B, Brown MB. Patient and cycle characteristics predicting high pregnancy rates with single-embryo transfer: an analysis of the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology outcomes between 2004 and 2013. Fertil Steril 2017; 108:750-756. [DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.07.1167] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2017] [Revised: 07/08/2017] [Accepted: 07/27/2017] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
|
26
|
Ang L, Jaiswal M, Callaghan B, Raffel D, B Brown M, Pop-Busui R. Sudomotor dysfunction as a measure of small fiber neuropathy in type 1 diabetes. Auton Neurosci 2017; 205:87-92. [PMID: 28325598 DOI: 10.1016/j.autneu.2017.03.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2016] [Revised: 03/07/2017] [Accepted: 03/08/2017] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study evaluated whether measuring the electrochemical skin conductance (ESC), as an indirect measure of sudomotor function, may be also a reliable surrogate for early cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy (CAN). METHODS Longitudinal study included 37 type 1 diabetes (T1D) subjects (mean age 38±13years, duration 15±7years, HbA1c 7.9±1.1%, no known complications at baseline), and 40 age-matched healthy control (HC) subjects. Mean hands ESC (ESChands) and feet (ESCfeet) were measured with the SUDOSCAN (Impeto Medical, France). CAN was assessed with heart rate variability (HRV) studies (ANSAR Inc., PA), cardiovascular autonomic reflex tests (deep-breathing, Valsalva, postural test), and positron emission tomography with sympathetic analogue [11C]meta-hydroxyephedrine. Associations between measures of CAN and ESC were estimated using Spearman correlations. Longitudinal changes were analyzed using paired t-test. RESULTS At baseline, there were no differences between T1D and HC in ESChands (69±14 vs. 69±13μS; P=0.84) or ESCfeet (82±8 vs. 78±9μS; P=0.12), while some indices of HRV and Valsalva ratio were significantly lower in T1D vs. HC. T1D subjects experienced a significant decline in both ESChands and ESCfeet at 12months (mean change -7.2±11.6µS, P=0.0006; -2.8±7.3µS, P=0.023 respectively). No significant correlations were consistently found between ESC and measures of CAN at baseline or at 12months. CONCLUSION Comparing patients with T1D to controls, no differences in ESC were observed at baseline. The associations between ESC and established measures of CAN were inconsistent, which does not support ESC as a reliable surrogate for CAN. While both hands and feet ESC declined over time, the significance of this finding is unclear and warrants further reliability testing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lynn Ang
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Metabolism, Endocrinology and Diabetes, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, United States
| | - Mamta Jaiswal
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Metabolism, Endocrinology and Diabetes, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, United States
| | - Brian Callaghan
- Department of Neurology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, United States
| | - David Raffel
- Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, United States
| | - Morton B Brown
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, United States
| | - Rodica Pop-Busui
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Metabolism, Endocrinology and Diabetes, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Spencer AU, Yu S, Tracy TF, Aouthmany MM, Llanos A, Brown MB, Brown M, Shulman RJ, Hirschl RB, Derusso PA, Cox J, Dahlgren J, Strouse PJ, Groner JI, Teitelbaum DH. Parenteral Nutrition–Associated Cholestasis in Neonates: Multivariate Analysis of the Potential Protective Effect of Taurine. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 2017; 29:337-43; discussion 343-4. [PMID: 16107596 DOI: 10.1177/0148607105029005337] [Citation(s) in RCA: 66] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Neonates receiving parenteral nutrition (PN) are at risk for PN-associated cholestasis (PNAC); however, no preventive factors for PNAC have been clearly identified. Despite reports suggesting that taurine may prevent PNAC in neonates, such an effect of taurine has not yet been definitively demonstrated. We determined whether taurine supplementation reduces the incidence of PNAC in premature or critically ill neonates. METHODS This study was part of a prospective, randomized, multi-institutional trial designed to assess cholecystokinin vs placebo as a potential preventive therapy of PNAC. Taurine supplementation of PN varied between institutions. The presence or absence of taurine in PN was analyzed by multivariate analysis, with a primary outcome measure of serum conjugated bilirubin (CB) as a measure of PNAC. RESULTS Taurine reduced PNAC in premature infants (estimated maximum CB [95% confidence interval] 0.50 mg/dL [-0.17 to 1.18] for those receiving taurine, vs 3.45 mg/dL [1.79-5.11] for neonates not receiving taurine, approaching significance, p = .07). Taurine significantly reduced PNAC in infants with necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC; estimated maximum CB 4.04 mg/dL [2.85-5.23], NEC infants receiving taurine, vs 8.29 mg/dL [5.61-10.96], NEC infants not receiving taurine, p < .01). There were too few neonates with surgical anomalies to evaluate the effect of taurine in this group. CONCLUSIONS Within specific subgroups of neonatal patients, taurine supplementation does offer a very significant degree of protection against PNAC. Patients with NEC or severe prematurity are most likely to benefit substantially from taurine supplementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ariel U Spencer
- Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, and C.S. Mott Children's Hospital, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Luke B, Brown MB, Wantman E, Stern JE, Toner JP, Coddington CC. Increased risk of large-for-gestational age birthweight in singleton siblings conceived with in vitro fertilization in frozen versus fresh cycles. J Assist Reprod Genet 2016; 34:191-200. [PMID: 27909843 DOI: 10.1007/s10815-016-0850-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2016] [Accepted: 11/22/2016] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Children born from fresh in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles are at greater risk of being born smaller and earlier, even when limited to singletons; those born from frozen cycles have an increased risk of large-for-gestational age (LGA) birthweight (z-score ≥1.28). This analysis sought to overcome limitations in other studies by using pairs of siblings, and accounting for prior cycle outcomes, maternal characteristics, and embryo state and stage. METHODS Pairs of singleton births conceived with IVF and born between 2004 and 2013 were identified from the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting System database, matched for embryo stage (blastocyst versus non-blastocyst) and infant gender, categorized by embryo state (fresh versus frozen) in 1st and 2nd births (four groups). RESULTS The data included 7795 singleton pairs. Birthweight z-scores were 0.00-0.04 and 0.24-0.26 in 1st and 2nd births in fresh cycles, and 0.25-0.34 and 0.50-0.55 in frozen cycles, respectively. LGA was 9.2-9.8 and 14.2-15.4% in 1st and 2nd births in fresh cycles, and 13.1-15.8 and 20.8-21.0% in 1st and 2nd births in frozen cycles. The risk of LGA was increased in frozen cycles (1st births, adjusted odds ratios (AOR) 1.74, 95% CI 1.45, 2.08; and in 2nd births when the 1st birth was not LGA, AOR 1.70, 95% CI 1.46, 1.98 for fresh/frozen and 1.40, 1.11, 1.78 for frozen/frozen). CONCLUSIONS Our results with siblings indicate that frozen embryo state is associated with an increased risk for LGA. The implications of these findings for childhood health and risk of obesity are unclear, and warrant further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Barbara Luke
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology, College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, 965 Fee Road, East Fee Hall, Room 628, East Lansing, MI, USA.
| | - Morton B Brown
- Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | | | - Judy E Stern
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, NH, USA
| | - James P Toner
- Atlanta Center for Reproductive Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Charles C Coddington
- Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Duvernoy CS, Raffel DM, Swanson SD, Jaiswal M, Mueller G, Ibrahim ES, Pennathur S, Plunkett C, Stojanovska J, Brown MB, Pop-Busui R. Left ventricular metabolism, function, and sympathetic innervation in men and women with type 1 diabetes. J Nucl Cardiol 2016; 23:960-969. [PMID: 27146882 PMCID: PMC5103640 DOI: 10.1007/s12350-016-0434-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2015] [Revised: 01/29/2016] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In type I diabetes (T1DM), alterations in LV function may occur due to changes in innervation, metabolism, and efficiency. OBJECTIVES We evaluated the association between sympathetic nerve function, oxidative metabolism, resting blood flow, LV efficiency and function in healthy diabetics, and assessed gender differences. METHODS Cross-sectional study of 45 subjects with T1DM, 60% females, age 34 ± 13 years, and 10 age-matched controls. Positron emission tomography (PET) imaging with [(11)C]acetate and [(11)C]meta-hydroxyephedrine was performed, in addition to cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. RESULTS There were no significant differences in LV function, innervation, or oxidative metabolism between T1DM and controls. Cardiac oxidative metabolism was positively associated with higher levels of sympathetic activation, particularly in women. Diabetic women had significantly lower efficiency compared with diabetic men. Resting flow was significantly higher in diabetic women compared with diabetic men, and tended to be higher in female controls as well. CONCLUSIONS Measures of myocardial function, metabolism, blood flow, and sympathetic activation were preserved in young, otherwise healthy, T1DM patients. However, T1DM women presented with greater myocardial oxidative metabolism requirements than men. Ongoing studies are evaluating changes over time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claire S Duvernoy
- Cardiology Section, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- Division of Cardiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - David M Raffel
- Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Scott D Swanson
- Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Mamta Jaiswal
- Division of Metabolism, Endocrinology and Diabetes, University of Michigan, 5329 Brehm Tower, 1000 Wall Street, Ann Arbor, MI, 48105, USA
| | - Gisela Mueller
- Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - El-Sayed Ibrahim
- Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Subramaniam Pennathur
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Cynthia Plunkett
- Division of Metabolism, Endocrinology and Diabetes, University of Michigan, 5329 Brehm Tower, 1000 Wall Street, Ann Arbor, MI, 48105, USA
| | | | - Morton B Brown
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Rodica Pop-Busui
- Division of Metabolism, Endocrinology and Diabetes, University of Michigan, 5329 Brehm Tower, 1000 Wall Street, Ann Arbor, MI, 48105, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Arezki NR, Williams AC, Cobb AJA, Brown MB. Design, synthesis and characterization of linear unnatural amino acids for skin moisturization. Int J Cosmet Sci 2016; 39:72-82. [PMID: 27380298 PMCID: PMC5244679 DOI: 10.1111/ics.12351] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2015] [Accepted: 06/29/2016] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This work aimed to design, synthesize and characterize replacement natural moisturizing factor (NMF) composed of modified hygroscopic linear amino acids to pre-empt or repair skin barrier dysfunction. METHODS Following synthesis and characterization, thermo-gravimetric analysis and quantum mechanics molecular modelling quantified and depicted water binding to the new compounds. Deliquescence relative humidity demonstrated the water-scavenging ability of the compounds, whereas snake skin moisturizing studies showed they increased water uptake into snake skin. RESULTS From thermal analysis, N-hydroxyglycine showed greatest water-holding capacity followed by N-hydroxyserine, l-homoserine and α-hydroxyglycine; coupled with quantum mechanics molecular modelling, between 8 and 12 molecules of water could associate with each molecule of either N-hydroxyglycine, N-hydroxyserine or l-homoserine. All of our modified amino acids were efficacious and induced similar or greater water uptake compared with the established moisturizing compounds hyaluronic acid, glycerine and urea in snake skin. Incorporated at 10% in Oilatum, N-hydroxyserine induced >200% greater moisture uptake into dry snake skin compared to treatment with water alone, with efficacy related to the molecule structure and ability to bind to 12 water molecules. Oilatum cream spiked with all our unnatural amino acid hydrotropes increased water uptake into snake skin compared with Oilatum alone. The compound series was designed to elucidate some structure - efficacy relationships. Amino acid chirality did not affect the water-holding capacity but did affect uptake into skin. Compounds with high melting points and bond energies tended to decrease water-holding capacity. With isosteric replacement, the more electronegative atoms gave greater water-holding capacities. CONCLUSIONS This work demonstrates the potential of unnatural amino acid hydrotropes as skin moisturizers and has developed some predictive 'rules' for further design and refinement of chemical structures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N R Arezki
- Department of Pharmacy, University of Reading, PO Box 226, Whiteknights, Reading, RG6 6AP.,MedPharm Ltd., 50 Occam Road, Surrey Buisness Park, Guildford, GU2 7AB, UK
| | - A C Williams
- Department of Pharmacy, University of Reading, PO Box 226, Whiteknights, Reading, RG6 6AP
| | - A J A Cobb
- Department of Pharmacy, University of Reading, PO Box 226, Whiteknights, Reading, RG6 6AP
| | - M B Brown
- MedPharm Ltd., 50 Occam Road, Surrey Buisness Park, Guildford, GU2 7AB, UK
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Brown MB. Book reviews : Efron B, Tibshirani TJ 1993: An introduction to the bootstrap. London: Chapman and Hall. 436pp. £29.99 ($49.95). ISBN 0 412 04231 2. Stat Methods Med Res 2016. [DOI: 10.1177/096228029500400108] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Morton B Brown
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Luke B, Brown MB, Spector LG. Validation of infertility treatment and assisted reproductive technology use on the birth certificate in eight states. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2016; 215:126-7. [PMID: 26945609 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.02.052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2016] [Revised: 02/23/2016] [Accepted: 02/24/2016] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
|
33
|
Affiliation(s)
- Linda Brubaker
- Loyola University Chicago Stritch School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
McAuley WJ, Jones SA, Traynor MJ, Guesné S, Murdan S, Brown MB. An investigation of how fungal infection influences drug penetration through onychomycosis patient's nail plates. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 2016; 102:178-84. [PMID: 26969264 PMCID: PMC4827374 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpb.2016.03.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2016] [Revised: 02/24/2016] [Accepted: 03/07/2016] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
The treatment of onychomycosis remains problematic even though there are several potent antifungal agents available for patient use. The aim of this investigation was to understand whether the structural modifications that arise when a patient’s nail become infected plates influences the permeation of drugs into the nail following topical application. It was hoped that through improving understanding of the nail barrier in the diseased state, the development of more effective topical treatments for onychomycosis could be facilitated. The permeation of three compounds with differing hydrophobicities, caffeine, terbinafine and amorolfine (clog D at pH 7.4 of −0.55, 3.72 and 4.49 respectively), was assessed across both healthy and onychomycosis infected, full thickness, human nail plate sections. Transonychial water loss (TOWL) measurements performed on the healthy and diseased nails supported previous observations that the nail behaves like a porous barrier given the lack of correlation between TOWL values with the thicker, diseased nails. The flux of the more hydrophilic caffeine was twofold greater across diseased in comparison with the healthy nails, whilst the hydrophobic molecules terbinafine and amorolfine showed no statistically significant change in their nail penetration rates. Caffeine flux across the nail was found to correlate with the TOWL measurements, though no correlation existed for the more hydrophobic drugs. These data supported the notion that the nail pores, opened up by the infection, facilitated the passage of hydrophilic molecules, whilst the keratin binding of hydrophobic molecules meant that their transport through the nail plate was unchanged. Therefore, in order to exploit the structural changes induced by nail fungal infection it would be beneficial to develop a small molecular weight, hydrophilic antifungal agent, which exhibits low levels of keratin binding.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- W J McAuley
- Department of Pharmacy, School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, College Lane, Hatfield, Hertfordshire AL10 9AB, UK.
| | - S A Jones
- Pharmaceutical Science Division, King's College London, Franklin-Wilkins Building, 150 Stamford Street, London SE1 9NH, UK
| | - M J Traynor
- Department of Pharmacy, School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, College Lane, Hatfield, Hertfordshire AL10 9AB, UK
| | - S Guesné
- Department of Pharmacy, School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, College Lane, Hatfield, Hertfordshire AL10 9AB, UK
| | - S Murdan
- Department of Pharmaceutics, UCL School of Pharmacy, 29-39 Brunswick Square, London WC1N 1AX, UK
| | - M B Brown
- Department of Pharmacy, School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, College Lane, Hatfield, Hertfordshire AL10 9AB, UK; MedPharm Ltd, Unit 3 Chancellor Court, 50 Occam Road, Surrey Research Park, Guildford GU2 7AB, UK
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Luke B, Brown MB, Spector LG, Stern JE, Smith YR, Williams M, Koch L, Schymura MJ. Embryo banking among women diagnosed with cancer: a pilot population-based study in New York, Texas, and Illinois. J Assist Reprod Genet 2016; 33:667-674. [PMID: 26843393 DOI: 10.1007/s10815-016-0669-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2015] [Accepted: 01/24/2016] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of the present study is to estimate the proportion of women with cancer who return to use the embryos that they have banked and to compare this proportion to that of women without cancer who bank embryos. METHODS This is a cohort study of three groups of women from New York, Texas, and Illinois who used embryo banking in their first assisted reproductive technology (ART) treatment cycle: two groups with cancer (222 women without an infertility diagnosis and 48 women with an infertility diagnosis) and a control group without cancer (68 women with the infertility diagnosis of male factor only). Women were included only if their first ART cycle reported to the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting System (SART CORS) occurred between 2004 and 2009. Cancer cases were identified from each State Cancer Registry from 5 years prior to initiation of ART treatment to 6 months post-initiation; mean follow-up after the first ART cycle was 2.0 years. RESULTS Women with cancer without an infertility diagnosis returned for a subsequent ART cycle at a lower rate (10.8 %) than those with an infertility diagnosis (31.3 %, p = 0.0010) or the control group (85.3 %, p < 0.0001). Among those who returned for a subsequent cycle, women with cancer waited a longer time to return (14.3 months without an infertility diagnosis and 8.3 months with an infertility diagnosis, p = 0.13) compared to the control group (2.8 months, p = 0.0007). The live birth rate among women who did not utilize embryo banking in their second cycle did not differ significantly across the three study groups, ranging from 25.0 and 42.9 % for women with cancer with and without an infertility diagnosis, respectively, to 36.2 % for women in the control group. CONCLUSIONS Women with cancer without an infertility diagnosis are either less likely to return for subsequent treatment or will wait a longer time to return than women with an infertility diagnosis or those that do not have cancer. A longer-term study is necessary to assess whether these women return to use their frozen embryos after cancer treatment or are able to spontaneously conceive and if those subsequent pregnancies are adversely affected by the cancer diagnosis or therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Barbara Luke
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, 965 Fee Road, East Fee Hall, Room 628, East Lansing, Michigan, 48824, USA.
| | - Morton B Brown
- Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Logan G Spector
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Judy E Stern
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA
| | - Yolanda R Smith
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Melanie Williams
- Texas Cancer Registry, Cancer Epidemiology and Surveillance Branch, Texas Department of State Health Services, Austin, Texas, USA
| | - Lori Koch
- Illinois State Cancer Registry, Illinois Department of Public Health, Springfield, Illinois, USA
| | - Maria J Schymura
- New York State Cancer Registry, Bureau of Cancer Epidemiology, New York State Department of Health, Albany, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Abstract
The preferential localization of drug molecules in the epidermis of human skin is considered advantageous for a number of agents, but achieving such a delivery profile can be problematic. The aim of the present study was to assess if the manipulation of solvent supramolecular structuring in the skin could be used to promote drug residence in the epidermal tissue. Skin deposition studies showed that a 175-fold increase in the epidermal loading of a model drug diclofenac (138.65 ± 11.67 μg·cm(-2)), compared to a control (0.81 ± 0.13 μg·cm(-2)), could be achieved by colocalizing the drug with a high concentration of propylene glycol (PG) in the tissue. For such a system at 1 h postdose application, the PG flux into the skin was 9.3 mg·cm(2)·h(-1) and the PG-water ratio in the epidermis was 76:24 (v/v). At this solvent ratio infrared spectroscopy indicated that PG rich supramolecular structures, which displayed a relatively strong physical affinity for the drug, were formed. Encouraging the production of the PG-rich supermolecular structures in the epidermis by applying diclofenac to the skin using a high PG loading dose (240 μg·cm(-2)) produced an epidermal-transdermal drug distribution of 6.8:1. However, generating water-rich solvent supermolecular structures in the epidermis by applying diclofenac using a low PG loading dose (2.2 μg·cm(-2)) led to a loss of preferential epidermal localization of diclofenac in the tissue (0.7:1 epidermal-transdermal drug distribution). This change in diclofenac skin deposition profile in response to PG variations and the accompanying FTIR data supported the notion that supramolecular solvent structures could control drug accumulation in the human epidermis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Benaouda
- Institute of Pharmaceutical Science, School of Life Sciences & Medicine, King's College London , Franklin-Wilkins Building, 150 Stamford Street, London SE1 9NH, U.K
| | - S A Jones
- Institute of Pharmaceutical Science, School of Life Sciences & Medicine, King's College London , Franklin-Wilkins Building, 150 Stamford Street, London SE1 9NH, U.K
| | - G P Martin
- Institute of Pharmaceutical Science, School of Life Sciences & Medicine, King's College London , Franklin-Wilkins Building, 150 Stamford Street, London SE1 9NH, U.K
| | - M B Brown
- MedPharm Ltd. , Unit 3/Chancellor Court, 50 Occam Road, Surrey Research Park, Guildford, GU2 7AB, U.K.,School of Pharmacy, University of Herts , College Lane Campus, Hatfield, Herts AL10 9AB, U.K
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Luke B, Brown MB, Missmer SA, Spector LG, Leach RE, Williams M, Koch L, Smith YR, Stern JE, Ball GD, Schymura MJ. Assisted reproductive technology use and outcomes among women with a history of cancer. Hum Reprod 2015; 31:183-9. [PMID: 26577302 DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dev288] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2015] [Accepted: 10/23/2015] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
STUDY QUESTION How do the assisted reproductive technology (ART) outcomes of women presenting for ART after cancer diagnosis compare to women without cancer? SUMMARY ANSWER The likelihood of a live birth after ART among women with prior cancer using autologous oocytes is reduced and varies by cancer diagnosis but is similar to women without cancer when donor oocytes are used. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Premenopausal patients faced with a cancer diagnosis frequently present for fertility preservation. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION Population-based cohort study of women treated with ART in NY, TX and IL, USA. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS Women with their first ART treatment between 2004 and 2009 were identified from the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting System database and linked to their respective State Cancer Registries based on name, date of birth and social security number. Years were rounded, i.e. year 1 = 6-18 months before treatment. This study used reports of cancer from 5 years, 6 months prior to treatment until 6 months after first ART treatment. Women who only presented for embryo banking were omitted from the analysis. The likelihood of pregnancy and of live birth with ART using autologous oocytes was modeled using logistic regression, with women without prior cancer as the reference group, adjusted for woman's age, parity, cumulative FSH dosage, infertility diagnosis, number of diagnoses, number of ART cycles, State of residency and year of ART treatment. Results of the modeling are reported as adjusted odds ratios (AORs) and (95% confidence intervals). MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE The study population included 53 426 women; 441 women were diagnosed with cancer within 5 years prior to ART cycle start. Mean (±SD) age at cancer diagnosis was 33.4 ± 5.7 years; age at start of ART treatment was 34.9 ± 5.8 for women with cancer compared with 35.3 ± 5.3 years for women without cancer (P = 0.03). Live birth rates among women using autologous oocytes differed substantially by cancer status (47.7% without cancer versus 24.7% with cancer, P < 0.0001), and cancer diagnosis (ranging from 53.5% for melanoma to 14.3% for breast cancer, P < 0.0001. The live birth rates among women using donor oocytes did not vary significantly by cancer status (60.4% for women with any cancer versus 64.5% for women without cancer), or by cancer diagnosis (ranging from 57.9% for breast cancer to 63.6% for endocrine cancer). Women with breast cancer make up about one-third of all cancers in this cohort. Among women with breast cancer, 2.8% of the 106 women who underwent ART within 6 months of being diagnosed with cancer used donor oocytes compared with 34.8% of the 46 women who received ART treatment a longer time after being diagnosed with cancer (P < 0.0001). We conjecture that the former group were either unaware that they had cancer or decided to undergo ART therapy prior to cancer treatment. However, their live birth rate was only 11.7% compared with 28.8%, the overall live birth rate for all women with cancer using autologous oocytes (P < 0.0001). The live birth rate for women diagnosed with breast cancer more than 6 months before ART (23.3%) did not differ significantly from the overall live birth rate for cancer (P = 0.49). If this difference is substantiated by a larger study, it would indicate a negative effect of severe recent illness itself on ART success, rather than the poor outcome being only related to the destructive effects of chemotherapies on ovarian follicles. Alternatively, because of the short time difference between cancer diagnosis and ART treatment, these pre-existing cancers may have been detected due to the increased medical surveillance during ART therapy. In women who only used autologous oocytes, women with prior cancers were significantly less likely to become pregnant and to have a live birth than those without cancer (adjusted odds ratio (AOR): 0.34, [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.27, 0.42] and 0.36 [0.28, 0.46], respectively). This was also evident with specific cancer diagnoses: breast cancer (0.20 [0.13, 0.32] and 0.19 [0.11, 0.30], respectively), cervical cancer (0.36 [0.15, 0.87] and 0.33 [0.13, 0.84], respectively) and all female genital cancers (0.49 [0.27, 0.87] and 0.47 [0.25, 0.86], respectively). Of note, among women with cancer who became pregnant, their likelihood of having a live birth did not differ significantly from women without cancer (85.8 versus 86.7% for women using autologous oocytes, and 85.3 versus 86.9% for women using donor oocytes). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION Women may not have been residents of the individual States for the entire 5-year pre-ART period, and therefore some cancers may not have been identified through this linkage. As a result, the actual observed number of cancers may be an underestimate. In addition, the overall prevalence is low due to the age distributions. Also, because we restricted the pre-ART period to 5 years prior, we would not have identified women who were survivors of early childhood cancers (younger than age 13 years at cancer diagnosis), or who had ART more than 5 years after being diagnosed with cancer. Additional analyses are currently underway evaluating live birth outcomes after embryo banking among women with cancer prior to ART, cycles which were excluded from the analyses in this paper. Future studies are planned which will include more States, as well as linkages to vital records to obtain information on spontaneous conceptions and births, to further clarify some of the issues raised in this analysis. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS Since the live birth rates using donor oocytes were not reduced in women with a prior cancer, but were reduced with autologous cycles, this suggests that factors acting in the pre- or peri-conceptional periods may be responsible for the decline. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS The study was funded by grant R01 CA151973 from the National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, USA. B.L. is a research consultant for the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology. All other authors report no conflict of interest.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Barbara Luke
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology, College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA
| | - Morton B Brown
- Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Stacey A Missmer
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA Channing Division of Network Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Logan G Spector
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Richard E Leach
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology, College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA
| | - Melanie Williams
- Texas Cancer Registry, Cancer Epidemiology and Surveillance Branch, Texas Department of State Health Services, Austin, TX, USA
| | - Lori Koch
- Illinois State Cancer Registry, Illinois Department of Public Health, Springfield, IL, USA
| | - Yolanda R Smith
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Judy E Stern
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, NH, USA
| | | | - Maria J Schymura
- Bureau of Cancer Epidemiology, New York State Cancer Registry, New York State Department of Health, Albany, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Luke B, Brown MB, Spector LG, Missmer SA, Leach RE, Williams M, Koch L, Smith Y, Stern JE, Ball GD, Schymura MJ. Cancer in women after assisted reproductive technology. Fertil Steril 2015; 104:1218-26. [PMID: 26271227 PMCID: PMC4630138 DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.07.1135] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2015] [Revised: 07/08/2015] [Accepted: 07/17/2015] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the risk of cancer after assisted reproductive technology (ART) therapy. DESIGN Longitudinal cohort study. SETTING Not applicable. PATIENT(S) New York, Texas, and Illinois residents between 2004 and 2009, treated with ART, comprising cycles of 113,226 women, including 53,859 women without prior ART treatment, who were linked to their respective state cancer registries and whose cycles were reported to the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcomes Reporting System (SART CORS). INTERVENTION(S) None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S) Diagnosis of cancer, as reported to the state cancer registry; standardized incidence ratios (SIR) and their 95% confidence intervals, comparing the observed to expected cancer cases based on age-specific cancer rates in the general population of each state. RESULT(S) Among the cohort of women without prior ART therapy, hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for treatment parameters and reproductive history factors. The mean follow-up period was 4.87 years; among women without prior ART, 450 women developed 460 cancers. Women treated with ART had a statistically significantly lower risk for all cancers (for all women: SIR 0.78; CI, 0.73-0.83; women without prior ART: SIR 0.75; CI, 0.68-0.82), breast cancer, and all female genital cancers; a non-statistically-significant lower risk for endocrine and uterine cancer; and a non-statistically-significant higher risk for melanoma and ovarian cancer. Among women without prior ART, we found no statistically significant increased HR by parity, number of cycles, cumulative follicle-stimulating hormone dosage, or cycle outcome. CONCLUSION(S) Women initiating ART treatment have no greater risk for developing cancer after nearly 5 years of follow-up compared with the general population and with other women treated with ART.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Barbara Luke
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology, College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan.
| | - Morton B Brown
- Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Logan G Spector
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Stacey A Missmer
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Channing Division of Network Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Richard E Leach
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology, College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan
| | - Melanie Williams
- Texas Cancer Registry, Cancer Epidemiology and Surveillance Branch, Texas Department of State Health Services, Austin, Texas
| | - Lori Koch
- Illinois State Cancer Registry, Illinois Department of Public Health, Springfield, Illinois
| | - Yolanda Smith
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Judy E Stern
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, New Hampshire
| | - G David Ball
- Seattle Reproductive Medicine, Seattle, Washington
| | - Maria J Schymura
- Bureau of Cancer Epidemiology, New York State Cancer Registry, New York State Department of Health, Albany, New York
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Jaiswal M, Martin CL, Brown MB, Callaghan B, Albers JW, Feldman EL, Pop-Busui R. Effects of exenatide on measures of diabetic neuropathy in subjects with type 2 diabetes: results from an 18-month proof-of-concept open-label randomized study. J Diabetes Complications 2015; 29:1287-94. [PMID: 26264399 PMCID: PMC4656068 DOI: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2015.07.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2015] [Revised: 07/10/2015] [Accepted: 07/11/2015] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Experimental studies have reported potential benefit of glucagon-like peptide-1(GLP-1) receptor agonists in preventing diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN). We therefore performed a proof-of-concept pilot study to evaluate the effect of exenatide, a GLP-1 agonist, on measures of DPN and cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy (CAN) in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Forty-six T2D subjects (age 54±10years, diabetes duration 8±5years, HbA1c 8.2±1.3%) with mild to moderate DPN at baseline were randomized to receive either twice daily exenatide (n=22) or daily insulin glargine (n=24). The subjects, with similar HbA1c levels, were followed for 18months. The primary end point was the prevalence of confirmed clinical neuropathy (CCN). Changes in measures of CAN, other measures of small fiber neuropathy such as intra-epidermal nerve fiber density (IENFD), and quality of life were also analyzed. RESULTS Glucose control was similar in both groups during the study. There were no statistically significant treatment group differences in the prevalence of CCN, IENFD, measures of CAN, nerve conductions studies, or quality of life indices. CONCLUSIONS In this pilot study of patients with T2D and mild to moderate DPN, 18months of exenatide treatment had no significant effect on measures of neuropathy compared with glargine treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mamta Jaiswal
- Department of Neurology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Catherine L Martin
- Division of Metabolism, Endocrinology and Diabetes, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Morton B Brown
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Brian Callaghan
- Department of Neurology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - James W Albers
- Department of Neurology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Eva L Feldman
- Department of Neurology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Rodica Pop-Busui
- Division of Metabolism, Endocrinology and Diabetes, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to develop and validate a computer simulation model for coronary heart disease (CHD) in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) that reflects current medical and surgical treatments. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS We modified the structure of the CHD submodel in the Michigan Model for Diabetes to allow for revascularization procedures before and after first myocardial infarction, for repeat myocardial infarctions and repeat revascularization procedures, and for congestive heart failure. Transition probabilities that reflect the direct effects of medical and surgical therapies on outcomes were derived from the literature and calibrated to recently published population-based epidemiologic studies and randomized controlled clinical trials. Monte Carlo techniques were used to implement a discrete-state and discrete-time multistate microsimulation model. Performance of the model was assessed using internal and external validation. Simple regression analysis (simulated outcome=b(0)+b(1)×published outcome) was used to evaluate the validation results. RESULTS For the 21 outcomes in the six studies used for internal validation, R(2) was 0.99, and the slope of the regression line was 0.98. For the 16 outcomes in the five studies used for external validation, R(2) was 0.81, and the slope was 0.84. CONCLUSIONS Our new computer simulation model predicted the progression of CHD in patients with T2DM and will be incorporated into the Michigan Model for Diabetes to assess the cost-effectiveness of alternative strategies to prevent and treat T2DM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wen Ye
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Michael Brandle
- Division of Endocrinology and Diabetes, Kantonsspital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| | - Morton B. Brown
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - William H. Herman
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Baker VL, Brown MB, Luke B, Smith GW, Ireland JJ. Gonadotropin dose is negatively correlated with live birth rate: analysis of more than 650,000 assisted reproductive technology cycles. Fertil Steril 2015; 104:1145-52.e1-5. [PMID: 26297646 DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.07.1151] [Citation(s) in RCA: 90] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2015] [Revised: 07/17/2015] [Accepted: 07/22/2015] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the correlation between total gonadotropin dose and live birth rate. DESIGN Retrospective analysis. SETTING Not applicable. PATIENT(S) A total of 658,519 fresh autologous cycles of in vitro fertilization (IVF) reported to the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology from 2004 to 2012. INTERVENTION(S) None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S) Logistic regression models were fitted to live birth rates with the use of categorized values for total FSH dose and number of oocytes retrieved as the primary predictor variables. To reduce the effect of the most significant confounders that may lead physicians to prescribe higher doses of FSH, additional analyses were performed limited to good-prognosis patients (<35 years of age, body mass index <30 kg/m(2), and no diagnosis of diminished ovarian reserve, endometriosis, or ovulatory disorder) and including duration of gonadotropin treatment. RESULT(S) Live birth rate significantly decreased with increasing FSH dose, regardless of the number of oocytes retrieved. The statistically significant decrease in live birth rate with increasing FSH dose remained in patients with good prognosis, and regardless of female age, except for women aged ≥ 35 years with 1-5 oocytes retrieved. CONCLUSION(S) This analysis suggests that physicians may wish to avoid prescribing a high dose of FSH. However, the results of this study do not justify the use of minimal-stimulation or natural-cycle IVF.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valerie L Baker
- Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
| | - Morton B Brown
- Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Barbara Luke
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan
| | - George W Smith
- Laboratory of Mammalian Reproductive Biology and Genomics, Department of Animal Science, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan
| | - James J Ireland
- Molecular Reproductive Endocrinology Laboratory, Department of Animal Science, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Herman WH, Ye W, Griffin SJ, Simmons RK, Davies MJ, Khunti K, Rutten GEHM, Sandbaek A, Lauritzen T, Borch-Johnsen K, Brown MB, Wareham NJ. Early Detection and Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Reduce Cardiovascular Morbidity and Mortality: A Simulation of the Results of the Anglo-Danish-Dutch Study of Intensive Treatment in People With Screen-Detected Diabetes in Primary Care (ADDITION-Europe). Diabetes Care 2015; 38:1449-55. [PMID: 25986661 PMCID: PMC4512138 DOI: 10.2337/dc14-2459] [Citation(s) in RCA: 182] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2014] [Accepted: 03/23/2015] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To estimate the benefits of screening and early treatment of type 2 diabetes compared with no screening and late treatment using a simulation model with data from the ADDITION-Europe study. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS We used the Michigan Model, a validated computer simulation model, and data from the ADDITION-Europe study to estimate the absolute risk of cardiovascular outcomes and the relative risk reduction associated with screening and intensive treatment, screening and routine treatment, and no screening with a 3- or 6-year delay in the diagnosis and routine treatment of diabetes and cardiovascular risk factors. RESULTS When the computer simulation model was programmed with the baseline demographic and clinical characteristics of the ADDITION-Europe population, it accurately predicted the empiric results of the trial. The simulated absolute risk reduction and relative risk reduction were substantially greater at 5 years with screening, early diagnosis, and routine treatment compared with scenarios in which there was a 3-year (3.3% absolute risk reduction [ARR], 29% relative risk reduction [RRR]) or a 6-year (4.9% ARR, 38% RRR) delay in diagnosis and routine treatment of diabetes and cardiovascular risk factors. CONCLUSIONS Major benefits are likely to accrue from the early diagnosis and treatment of glycemia and cardiovascular risk factors in type 2 diabetes. The intensity of glucose, blood pressure, and cholesterol treatment after diagnosis is less important than the time of its initiation. Screening for type 2 diabetes to reduce the lead time between diabetes onset and clinical diagnosis and to allow for prompt multifactorial treatment is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William H Herman
- Departments of Internal Medicine and Epidemiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Wen Ye
- School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Simon J Griffin
- Medical Research Council Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge School of Clinical Medicine, Institute of Metabolic Science, Cambridge, U.K
| | - Rebecca K Simmons
- Medical Research Council Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge School of Clinical Medicine, Institute of Metabolic Science, Cambridge, U.K
| | - Melanie J Davies
- Leicester Diabetes Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester General Hospital, Leicester, U.K
| | - Kamlesh Khunti
- Leicester Diabetes Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester General Hospital, Leicester, U.K
| | - Guy E H M Rutten
- Department of Primary Care, Julius Center, University Medical Center, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Annelli Sandbaek
- Institute of Public Health, Section of General Practice, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Torsten Lauritzen
- Institute of Public Health, Section of General Practice, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | | | - Morton B Brown
- School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Nicholas J Wareham
- Medical Research Council Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge School of Clinical Medicine, Institute of Metabolic Science, Cambridge, U.K
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Luke B, Brown MB, Wantman E, Stern JE, Baker VL, Widra E, Coddington CC, Gibbons WE, Van Voorhis BJ, Ball GD. Application of a validated prediction model for in vitro fertilization: comparison of live birth rates and multiple birth rates with 1 embryo transferred over 2 cycles vs 2 embryos in 1 cycle. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015; 212:676.e1-7. [PMID: 25683965 PMCID: PMC4416976 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.02.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2014] [Revised: 01/21/2015] [Accepted: 02/09/2015] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to use a validated prediction model to examine whether single embryo transfer (SET) over 2 cycles results in live birth rates (LBR) comparable with 2 embryos transferred (DET) in 1 cycle and reduces the probability of a multiple birth (ie, multiple birth rate [MBR]). STUDY DESIGN Prediction models of LBR and MBR for a woman considering assisted reproductive technology developed from linked cycles from the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting System for 2006-2012 were used to compare SET over 2 cycles with DET in 1 cycle. The prediction model was based on a woman's age, body mass index (BMI), gravidity, previous full-term births, infertility diagnoses, embryo state, number of embryos transferred, and number of cycles. RESULTS To demonstrate the effect of the number of embryos transferred (1 or 2), the LBRs and MBRs were estimated for women with a single infertility diagnosis (male factor, ovulation disorders, diminished ovarian reserve, and unexplained); nulligravid; BMI of 20, 25, 30, and 35 kg/m2; and ages 25, 35, and 40 years old by cycle (first or second). The cumulative LBR over 2 cycles with SET was similar to or better than the LBR with DET in a single cycle (for example, for women with the diagnosis of ovulation disorders: 35 years old; BMI, 30 kg/m2; 54.4% vs 46.5%; and for women who are 40 years old: BMI, 30 kg/m(2); 31.3% vs 28.9%). The MBR with DET in 1 cycle was 32.8% for women 35 years old and 20.9% for women 40 years old; with SET, the cumulative MBR was 2.7% and 1.6%, respectively. CONCLUSION The application of this validated predictive model demonstrated that the cumulative LBR is as good as or better with SET over 2 cycles than with DET in 1 cycle, while greatly reducing the probability of a multiple birth.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Barbara Luke
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI.
| | - Morton B Brown
- Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | | | - Judy E Stern
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, NH
| | - Valerie L Baker
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA
| | - Eric Widra
- Shady Grove Fertility Center, Washington, DC
| | | | - William E Gibbons
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
| | - Bradley J Van Voorhis
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA
| | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Herman WH, Taylor GW, Jacobson JJ, Burke R, Brown MB. Screening for prediabetes and type 2 diabetes in dental offices. J Public Health Dent 2015; 75:175-82. [PMID: 25662777 PMCID: PMC5053230 DOI: 10.1111/jphd.12082] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2014] [Accepted: 12/10/2014] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Objectives Most Americans see dentists at least once a year. Chair‐side screening and referral may improve diagnosis of prediabetes and diabetes. In this study, we developed a multivariate model to screen for dysglycemia (prediabetes and diabetes defined as HbA1c ≥5.7 percent) using information readily available to dentists and assessed the prevalence of dysglycemia in general dental practices. Methods We recruited 1,033 adults ≥30 years of age without histories of diabetes from 13 general dental practices. A sample of 181 participants selected on the basis of random capillary glucose levels and periodontal status underwent definitive diagnostic testing with hemoglobin A1c. Logistic models were fit to identify risk factors for dysglycemia, and sample weights were applied to estimate the prevalence of dysglycemia in the population ≥30 years of age. Results Individuals at high risk for dysglycemia could be identified using a questionnaire that assessed sex, history of hypertension, history of dyslipidemia, history of lost teeth, and either self‐reported body mass index ≥35 kg/m2 (severe obesity) or random capillary glucose ≥110 mg/dl. We estimate that 30 percent of patients ≥30 years of age seen in these general dental practices had dysglycemia. Conclusions There is a substantial burden of dysglycemia in patients seen in general dental practices. Simple chair‐side screening for dysglycemia that includes or does not include fingerstick random capillary glucose testing can be used to rapidly identify high‐risk patients. Practical implications Further studies are needed to demonstrate the acceptability, feasibility, effectiveness, and cost‐effectiveness of chair‐side screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William H Herman
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.,Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - George W Taylor
- School of Dentistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Jed J Jacobson
- Delta Dental of Michigan, Ohio, and Indiana, Lansing, MI, USA
| | - Ray Burke
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Morton B Brown
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Baraldi A, Jones SA, Guesné S, Traynor MJ, McAuley WJ, Brown MB, Murdan S. Human nail plate modifications induced by onychomycosis: implications for topical therapy. Pharm Res 2014; 32:1626-33. [PMID: 25416028 PMCID: PMC4381097 DOI: 10.1007/s11095-014-1562-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2014] [Accepted: 10/06/2014] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Through the characterisation of the human onchomycotic nail plate this study aimed to inform the design of new topical ungual formulations. METHODS The mechanical properties of the human nail were characterised using a Lloyd tensile strength tester. The nail's density was determined via pycnometry and the nail's ultrastructure by electron microscopy. Raman spectroscopy analysed the keratin disulphide bonds within the nail and its permeability properties were assessed by quantifying water and rhodamine uptake. RESULTS Chronic in vivo nail plate infection increased human nailplate thickness (healthy 0.49 ± 0.15 mm; diseased 1.20 ± 0.67 mm), but reduced its tensile strength (healthy 63.7 ± 13.4 MPa; diseased 41.7 ± 5.0 MPa) and density (healthy 1.34 ± 0.01 g/cm(3); diseased 1.29 ± 0.00 g/cm(3)). Onchomycosis caused cell-cell separation, without disrupting the nail disulfide bonds or desmosomes. The diseased and healthy nails showed equivalent water uptake profiles, but the rhodamine penetration was 4-fold higher in the diseased nails using a PBS vehicle and 3 -fold higher in an ethanol/PBS vehicle. CONCLUSIONS Onchomycotic nails presented a thicker but more porous barrier, and its eroded intracellular matrix rendered the tissue more permeable to topically applied chemicals when an aqueous vehicle was used.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Baraldi
- Department of Pharmaceutics, UCL School of Pharmacy, University College London, 29 -39 Brunswick Square, London, WC1N 1AX, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Hoch JS, Brown MB, McMahon C, Nanson J, Rozmovits L. Meaningful patient representation informing Canada's cancer drug funding decisions: views of patient representatives on the Pan-Canadian Oncology Drug Review. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2014; 21:263-6. [PMID: 25302034 DOI: 10.3747/co.21.2128] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
In this interview with the patient representatives on the Expert Review Committee (perc) of the Pan-Canadian Oncology Drug Review (pcodr), those representatives offer their views about how to be a valuable contributing member of Canada's national cancer drug funding recommendation committee. The article seeks to inform readers, and especially clinicians, about pcodr from the perspective of the patient representatives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J S Hoch
- Pharmacoeconomics Research Unit, Cancer Care Ontario; Canadian Centre for Applied Research in Cancer Control; Institute for Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto; and Centre for Excellence in Economic Analysis Research, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON
| | - M B Brown
- Department of Philosophy, University of Leth-bridge, Lethbridge, AB
| | - C McMahon
- Expert Review Committee, Pan-Canadian Oncology Drug Review, Toronto, ON
| | - J Nanson
- Expert Review Committee, Pan-Canadian Oncology Drug Review, Toronto, ON. ; Department of Psychology, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK
| | - L Rozmovits
- Pharmacoeconomics Research Unit, Cancer Care Ontario, and Qualitative Research, Toronto, ON
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Luke B, Brown MB, Wantman E, Stern JE, Baker VL, Widra E, Coddington CC, Gibbons WE, Ball GD. A prediction model for live birth and multiple births within the first three cycles of assisted reproductive technology. Fertil Steril 2014; 102:744-52. [PMID: 24934487 DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.05.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2014] [Revised: 05/09/2014] [Accepted: 05/12/2014] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To develop a model predictive of live-birth rates (LBR) and multiple birth rates (MBR) for an individual considering assisted reproduction technology (ART) using linked cycles from Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting System (SART CORS) for 2004-2011. DESIGN Longitudinal cohort. SETTING Clinic-based data. PATIENT(S) 288,161 women with an initial autologous cycle, of whom 89,855 did not become pregnant and had a second autologous cycle and 39,334 did not become pregnant in the first and second cycles and had a third autologous cycle, with an additional 33,598 women who had a cycle using donor oocytes (first donor cycle). INTERVENTION(S) None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S) LBRs and MBRs modeled by woman's age, body mass index, gravidity, prior full-term births, infertility diagnoses by oocyte source, fresh embryos transferred, and cycle, using backward-stepping logistic regression with results presented as adjusted odds ratios (AORs) and 95% confidence intervals. RESULT(S) The LBRs increased in all models with prior full-term births, number of embryos transferred; in autologous cycles also with gravidity, diagnoses of male factor, and ovulation disorders; and in donor cycles also with the diagnosis of diminished ovarian reserve. The MBR increased in all models with number of embryos transferred and in donor cycles also with prior full-term births. For both autologous and donor cycles, transferring two versus one embryo greatly increased the probability of a multiple birth (AOR 27.25 and 38.90, respectively). CONCLUSION(S) This validated predictive model will be implemented on the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Web site (www.sart.org) so that patients considering initiating a course of ART can input their data on the Web site to generate their expected outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Barbara Luke
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan.
| | - Morton B Brown
- Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | | | - Judy E Stern
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, New Hampshire
| | - Valerie L Baker
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California
| | - Eric Widra
- Shady Grove Fertility Center, Washington, District of Columbia
| | | | - William E Gibbons
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - G David Ball
- Seattle Reproductive Medicine, Seattle, Washington
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Luke B, Brown MB, Wantman E, Stern JE. Factors associated with monozygosity in assisted reproductive technology pregnancies and the risk of recurrence using linked cycles. Fertil Steril 2014; 101:683-9. [PMID: 24388206 DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.11.034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2013] [Revised: 11/02/2013] [Accepted: 11/22/2013] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate factors associated with monozygosity (MZ) (number of fetal heartbeats on early ultrasound greater than the number of embryos transferred) and the risk of recurrence in subsequent pregnancies using a national assisted reproduction database. DESIGN Historical cohort study. SETTING Clinic-based data. PATIENT(S) 197,327 pregnancies (including 2,824 with evidence of MZ) from cycles reported to the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting System (SART CORS) between 2004 and 2010. INTERVENTION(S) None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S) Evidence of MZ, adjusted odds ratios and their 95% confidence intervals computed from logistic regression models. RESULT(S) In the univariate analysis, the risk of MZ was increased with ovulation disorders, donor oocytes, gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) suppression, assisted hatching (AZH), and day 5-6 transfer, and was decreased with higher follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) doses (≥3,000 IU). In the multivariate analysis, the risk of MZ was increased with GnRH-a suppression, AZH, and decreased with intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) and higher FSH dose. The interaction showed that although MZ was more likely with day 5-6 embryos, AZH had a minimal nonsignificant effect, whereas in day 2-3 embryos, AZH had a substantial statistically significant effect. Only one woman had a recurrence of MZ in a subsequent assisted reproduction pregnancy, which is consistent with randomness. CONCLUSION(S) The risk of MZ was higher with fresh day 5-6 embryos, donor oocytes, GnRH-a suppression, lower FSH doses, and AZH (particularly with day 2-3 embryos).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Barbara Luke
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan.
| | - Morton B Brown
- Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | | | - Judy E Stern
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, New Hampshire
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Stern JE, Brown MB, Wantman E, Kalra SK, Luke B. Live birth rates and birth outcomes by diagnosis using linked cycles from the SART CORS database. J Assist Reprod Genet 2013; 30:1445-50. [PMID: 24014215 DOI: 10.1007/s10815-013-0092-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2013] [Accepted: 08/29/2013] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE This study uses linked cycles of assisted reproductive technology (ART) to examine cumulative live birth rates, birthweight, and length of gestation by diagnostic category. METHODS We studied 145,660 women with 235,985 ART cycles reported to the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcomes Reporting System during 2004-2010. ART cycles were linked to individual women by name, date of birth, social security number, partner's name, and sequence of ART treatments. The study population included the first four autologous oocyte cycles for women with a single diagnosis of male factor, endometriosis, ovulation disorders, diminished ovarian reserve, or unexplained infertility. Live birth rates were calculated per cycle, per cycle number (1-4), and cumulatively. Birthweight and length of gestation were calculated for singleton births. RESULTS Within each diagnosis, live birth rates were highest in the first cycle and declined with successive cycles. Women with diminished ovarian reserve had the lowest live birth rate (cumulative rate of 28.3 %); the live birth rate for the other diagnoses were very similar (cumulative rates from 62.1 % to 65.7 %). Singleton birthweights and lengths of gestation did not differ substantially across diagnoses, ranging from 3,112 to 3,286 g and 265 to 270 days, respectively. These outcomes were comparable with national averages for singleton births in the United States (3,296 g and 271 days). CONCLUSION Women with the diagnosis of diminished ovarian reserve had substantially lower live birth rates. However, singleton birthweights and lengths of gestation outcomes were similar across all other diagnoses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Judy E Stern
- Obstetrics and Gynecology, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, NH, 03756, USA,
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
Pop-Busui R, Stevens MJ, Raffel DM, White EA, Mehta M, Plunkett CD, Brown MB, Feldman EL. Effects of triple antioxidant therapy on measures of cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy and on myocardial blood flow in type 1 diabetes: a randomised controlled trial. Diabetologia 2013; 56:1835-44. [PMID: 23740194 PMCID: PMC3730828 DOI: 10.1007/s00125-013-2942-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2013] [Accepted: 05/02/2013] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS We evaluated the effects of a combination triple antioxidant therapy on measures of cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy (CAN) and myocardial blood flow (MBF) in patients with type 1 diabetes. METHODS This was a randomised, parallel, placebo-controlled trial. Participants were allocated to interventions by sequentially numbered, opaque, sealed envelopes provided to the research pharmacist. All participants and examiners were masked to treatment allocation. Participants were evaluated by cardiovascular autonomic reflex testing, positron emission tomography with [(11)C]meta-hydroxyephedrine ([(11)C]HED) and [(13)N]ammonia, and adenosine stress testing. Markers of oxidative stress included 24 h urinary F2-isoprostanes. Diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) was evaluated by symptoms, signs, electrophysiology and intra-epidermal nerve fibre density. Randomised participants included 44 eligible adults with type 1 diabetes and mild-to-moderate CAN, who were aged 46 ± 11 years and had HbA1c 58 ± 5 mmol/mol (7.5 ± 1.0%), with no evidence of ischaemic heart disease. Participants underwent a 24-month intervention, consisting of antioxidant treatment with allopurinol, α-lipoic acid and nicotinamide, or placebo. The main outcome was change in the global [(11)C]HED retention index (RI) at 24 months in participants on the active drug compared with those on placebo. RESULTS We analysed data from 44 participants (22 per group). After adjusting for age, sex and in-trial HbA1c, the antioxidant regimen was associated with a slight, but significant worsening of the global [(11)C]HED left ventricle RI (-0.010 [95% CI -0.020, -0.001] p = 0.045) compared with placebo. There were no significant differences at follow-up between antioxidant treatment and placebo in the global MBF, coronary flow reserve, or in measures of DPN and markers of oxidative stress. The majority of adverse events were of mild-to-moderate severity and did not differ between groups CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION In this cohort of type 1 diabetes patients with mild-to-moderate CAN, a combination antioxidant treatment regimen did not prevent progression of CAN, had no beneficial effects on myocardial perfusion or DPN, and may have been detrimental. However, a larger study is necessary to assess the underlying causes of these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Pop-Busui
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|