Early and mid-term angiographic and clinical results after intracoronary duet stent placement

Use of heparin-coated stents in neurovascular interventional procedures: preliminary experience with 10 patients

OBJECTIVE

Currently, there is minimal published data on the use of heparin-coated stents in the neurovasculature; however, these stents have a proven clinical record in the treatment of coronary disease. This article details our experience with the safety and technical aspects of stent deployment in the first 10 patients who had heparin-coated stents placed in the intracranial and cervical vasculature and the preliminary follow-up in most cases.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the clinical history, intra- and periprocedural data, and imaging for the patients who received heparin-coated stents in the cervical and intracranial vasculature for cerebrovascular disease between October 2002 and October 2003.

RESULTS

Thirteen heparin-coated stents were placed in 10 patients. Seven out of the 10 patients had heparin-coated stents placed in the posterior circulation; the remaining three patients had stents placed in the anterior circulation. Four patients had stents placed intracranially. There was no acute or subacute in-stent thrombosis and no procedure-related complications. Follow-up was performed on most patients, with no clinical symptoms attributable to restenosis in any patient.

CONCLUSION

This small series suggests that heparin-coated stents are safe for use in the treatment of cervical and intracranial atherosclerotic disease. Longer-term follow-up is needed to study the heparin coating effect on in-stent restenosis rates and to assess the long-term durability and clinical efficacy of this stent. The use of drug-coated stents in the cerebrovascular circulation is an area that warrants further investigation.

A comparison of stent-induced stenosis in coronary and peripheral arteries

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Restenosis is a complication of interventional procedures such as angioplasty and stenting, often limiting the success of these procedures. Knowledge regarding the relative behaviour of different arteries after these procedures is limited, despite the extensive use of different vascular models. Although the results from studies using different vessels are analysed to predict the behaviour of coronary arteries and other vasculature, direct controlled comparisons between different arteries are necessary for a better understanding of the differential response to restenosis.

METHODS

This study examines the response to stenting in coronary and internal iliac arteries as characterised by intimal hyperplasia and restenosis. In a swine model of in-stent stenosis, coronary arteries exhibited higher levels of intimal hyperplasia and per cent stenosis than internal iliac arteries.

RESULTS

After normalisation for injury score, coronary arteries were found to undergo 47% more intimal hyperplasia (p<0.05), whereas per cent stenosis normalised for injury score tended to be higher (p = 0.01). Other measurements reflecting post-stenting intimal hyperplasia (maximal intimal thickness, medial area) did not exhibit significant differences between the artery groups.

CONCLUSIONS

These results show that coronary vessels are more prone to develop significant intimal hyperplasia and subsequent restenosis than internal iliac vessels. A better insight into how different arteries and arterial components behave is important in understanding and developing newer and better therapeutic measures for restenosis.

Acute and six-month clinical outcome after Helistent stent implantation in coronary arteries: results of the French Helistent multicenter registry

The purpose of our study was to determine the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of the new tubular (Helistent) stent (Hexacath, France) in patients with coronary artery disease. Patients were prospectively included in a multicenter French registry: acute results and 6-month target lesion revascularization rate were assessed. A total of 628 stents were implanted in 527 patients (616 lesions). Mean age was 64 +/- 11 years. Predilatation was performed in 77% of cases. The stent was successfully deployed in 99.4% of attempted lesions. Three patients died during the hospital stay and 10 patients developed myocardial infarction. Angiographic stent thrombosis rate was 1.1%. There was no need for urgent cardiac surgery during hospital stay. Six-month clinical follow-up was obtained in 95% of patients; target lesion revascularization rate was 8.3%. Eight patients (1.6%) (extracardiac death in three patients) died and three patients (0.6%) developed myocardial infarction. In conclusion, the Helistent stent appears safe and effective in minimizing acute complications of elective coronary interventions. Six-month major cardiac events were rare and clinical restenosis was low (< 10%).