Respirovirus C protein inhibits activation of type I interferon receptor-associated kinases to block JAK-STAT signaling

Tailam paramyxovirus C protein inhibits viral replication

Jeilongviruses are emerging single-stranded negative-sense RNA viruses in the Paramyxoviridae family. Tailam paramyxovirus (TlmPV) is a Jeilongvirus that was identified in 2011. Very little is known about the mechanisms that regulate viral replication in these newly emerging viruses. Among the non-structural viral proteins of TlmPV, the C protein is predicted to be translated from an open reading frame within the phosphoprotein gene through alternative translation initiation. Though the regulatory roles of C proteins in virus replication of other paramyxoviruses have been reported before, the function of the TlmPV C protein and the relevant molecular mechanisms have not been reported. Here, we show that the C protein is expressed in TlmPV-infected cells and negatively modulates viral RNA replication. The TlmPV C protein interacts with the P protein, negatively impacting the interaction between N and P, resulting in inhibition of viral RNA replication. Deletion mutagenesis studies indicate that the 50 amino-terminal amino acid residues of the C protein are dispensable for its inhibition of virus RNA replication and interaction with the P protein.IMPORTANCETailam paramyxovirus (TlmPV) is a newly identified paramyxovirus belonging to the Jeilongvirus genus, of which little is known. In this work, we confirmed the expression of the C protein in TlmPV-infected cells, assessed its function, and defined a potential mechanism of action. This is the first time that the existence of a Jeilongvirus C protein has been confirmed and its role in viral replication has been reported.

Genetic Associations and Differential mRNA Expression Levels of Host Genes Suggest a Viral Trigger for Endemic Pemphigus Foliaceus

The long search for the environmental trigger of the endemic pemphigus foliaceus (EPF, fogo selvagem) has not yet resulted in any tangible findings. Here, we searched for genetic associations and the differential expression of host genes involved in early viral infections and innate antiviral defense. Genetic variants could alter the structure, expression sites, or levels of the gene products, impacting their functions. By analyzing 3063 variants of 166 candidate genes in 227 EPF patients and 194 controls, we found 12 variants within 11 genes associated with differential susceptibility (p < 0.005) to EPF. The products of genes TRIM5, TPCN2, EIF4E, EIF4E3, NUP37, NUP50, NUP88, TPR, USP15, IRF8, and JAK1 are involved in different mechanisms of viral control, for example, the regulation of viral entry into the host cell or recognition of viral nucleic acids and proteins. Only two of nine variants were also associated in an independent German cohort of sporadic PF (75 patients, 150 controls), aligning with our hypothesis that antiviral host genes play a major role in EPF due to a specific virus−human interaction in the endemic region. Moreover, CCL5, P4HB, and APOBEC3G mRNA levels were increased (p < 0.001) in CD4+ T lymphocytes of EPF patients. Because there is limited or no evidence that these genes are involved in autoimmunity, their crucial role in antiviral responses and the associations that we observed support the hypothesis of a viral trigger for EPF, presumably a still unnoticed flavivirus. This work opens new frontiers in searching for the trigger of EPF, with the potential to advance translational research that aims for disease prevention and treatment.

SeV C Protein Plays a Role in Restricting Macrophage Phagocytosis by Limiting the Generation of Intracellular Double-Stranded RNA

Macrophages play a central role in the innate immune response to respiratory viral infections through pro-inflammatory factor secretion and phagocytosis. However, as a countermeasure, viral pathogens have evolved virulence factors to antagonize macrophage function. In our recent in vitro analyses of murine macrophage cell lines, Sendai virus (SeV) accessory protein C inhibited the secretion of pro-inflammatory factors, and C gene-knockout SeV (SeVΔC) caused drastic morphological changes in RAW264.7 macrophages, similar to those observed after stimulation with Lipid A, a well-known activator of actin-rich membrane ruffle formation and phagocytosis. Hence, we sought to determine whether the C protein limits phagocytosis in SeV-infected macrophages through the suppression of membrane ruffling. Phagocytosis assays indicated an upregulation of phagocytosis in both SeVΔC-infected and Lipid A-stimulated macrophages, but not in SeV WT-infected cells. Further, the observed membrane ruffling was associated with phagocytosis. RIG-I is essential for Lipid A-induced phagocytosis; its deficiency inhibited SeVΔC-stimulated phagocytosis and ruffling, confirming the essential role of RIG-I. Moreover, treatment with interferon (IFN)-β stimulation and neutralizing antibodies against IFN-β suggested that SeVΔC-induced phagocytosis and ruffling occurred in an IFN-β-independent manner. A newly isolated SeVΔC strain that does not generate dsRNA further highlighted the importance of dsRNA in the induction of phagocytosis and ruffling. Taken together, the current results suggest that SeV C protein might limit phagocytosis-associated membrane ruffling in an RIG-I-mediated but IFN-independent manner via limiting the generation of intracellular dsRNA.

Evasion of Host Antiviral Innate Immunity by Paramyxovirus Accessory Proteins

For efficient replication, viruses have developed multiple strategies to evade host antiviral innate immunity. Paramyxoviruses are a large family of enveloped RNA viruses that comprises diverse human and animal pathogens which jeopardize global public health and the economy. The accessory proteins expressed from the P gene by RNA editing or overlapping open reading frames (ORFs) are major viral immune evasion factors antagonizing type I interferon (IFN-I) production and other antiviral innate immune responses. However, the antagonistic mechanisms against antiviral innate immunity by accessory proteins differ among viruses. Here, we summarize the current understandings of immune evasion mechanisms by paramyxovirus accessory proteins, specifically how accessory proteins directly or indirectly target the adaptors in the antiviral innate immune signaling pathway to facilitate virus replication. Additionally, some cellular responses, which are also involved in viral replication, will be briefly summarized.

C Proteins: Controllers of Orderly Paramyxovirus Replication and of the Innate Immune Response

Particles of many paramyxoviruses include small amounts of proteins with a molecular weight of about 20 kDa. These proteins, termed “C”, are basic, have low amino acid homology and some secondary structure conservation. C proteins are encoded in alternative reading frames of the phosphoprotein gene. Some viruses express nested sets of C proteins that exert their functions in different locations: In the nucleus, they interfere with cellular transcription factors that elicit innate immune responses; in the cytoplasm, they associate with viral ribonucleocapsids and control polymerase processivity and orderly replication, thereby minimizing the activation of innate immunity. In addition, certain C proteins can directly bind to, and interfere with the function of, several cytoplasmic proteins required for interferon induction, interferon signaling and inflammation. Some C proteins are also required for efficient virus particle assembly and budding. C-deficient viruses can be grown in certain transformed cell lines but are not pathogenic in natural hosts. C proteins affect the same host functions as other phosphoprotein gene-encoded proteins named V but use different strategies for this purpose. Multiple independent systems to counteract host defenses may ensure efficient immune evasion and facilitate virus adaptation to new hosts and tissue environments.

Viral pathogen-induced mechanisms to antagonize mammalian interferon (IFN) signaling pathway

Antiviral responses of interferons (IFNs) are crucial in the host immune response, playing a relevant role in controlling viralw infections. Three types of IFNs, type I (IFN-α, IFN-β), II (IFN-γ) and III (IFN-λ), are classified according to their receptor usage, mode of induction, biological activity and amino acid sequence. Here, we provide a comprehensive review of type I IFN responses and different mechanisms that viruses employ to circumvent this response. In the first part, we will give an overview of the different induction and signaling cascades induced in the cell by IFN-I after virus encounter. Next, highlights of some of the mechanisms used by viruses to counteract the IFN induction will be described. And finally, we will address different mechanism used by viruses to interference with the IFN signaling cascade and the blockade of IFN induced antiviral activities.

Viperin protein inhibits the replication of caprine parainfluenza virus type 3 (CPIV 3) by interaction with viral N protein

Caprine parainfluenza virus type3 (CPIV3) is a newly identified member of Paramyxoviridae family. CPIV3 is highly prevalence in China and showed pathogenicity to goats; in addition, CPIV3 infection causes severe clinical disease under stress and/or co-infection conditions. Viperin is one of the hundreds of interferon-stimulated genes (ISGs), and possesses a wide range of antiviral activities. The aim of this study was to systemically explore the anti-CPIV3 activity of ruminants' Viperin. CPIV3 infection up-regulated Viperin transcription but not protein expression in MDBK cells. Bovine and caprine Viperin genes (bVi and gVi) were amplified and analyzed by BLAST and multiple alignment. The obtained bVi/gVi amino acid sequences showed 99.5%-100% identity with previously submitted sequences and has variants at N-terminal domain (1-70aa) between each other. The pcDNA3.1 plasmids containing bVi and gVi genes were constructed to over-express the target proteins. CPIV3 was inoculated in MDBK cells over-expressing bVi/gVi and viral load was detected by qRT-PCR, virus titration and Western blot. Both of the bVi and gVi significantly inhibited CPIV3 genome copy numbers and viral titers at 24 and 48 hpi (P < 0.01); and viral N protein expression was also decreased, comparing with those of mock transfected group. The last 50aa C-terminal region was crucial for its anti-CPIV3 activity. In addition, the over-expression of bVi/gVi did not influence CPIV3 binding, entry and release in the cells. These results indicated the anti-CPIV3 activity occurred in viral RNA/protein synthesis progress of the viral replication cycle. The Viperin also showed similar inhibitory effect on different CPIV3 strains. The potential interaction of Viperin with viral proteins (N, P, C and V) was determined by confocal laser scanning microscopy and Co-IP assay. Co-localization of Viperin with N, P or C, but not V, was observed; while only N protein direct interacted with Viperin in Co-IP test, no matter using viral protein expressing plasmids transfected or CPIV3 infected cell samples. In conclusion, the bVi and gVi Viperin effectively inhibited CPIV3 replication potentially via the interaction of Viperin with viral N protein. The present results gave more information about antiviral activity of ruminants Viperin and provided foundation for further studies of the interaction of Viperin with CPIV3 and other related viruses.