1
|
Lin Y, Takano Y, Gu Y, Wang Y, Zhou S, Zhang T, Zhu K, Wang J, Zhao B, Chen G, Zhang D, Fu R, Seinfeld J. Characterization of the aerosol vertical distributions and their impacts on warm clouds based on multi-year ARM observations. THE SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT 2023; 904:166582. [PMID: 37634734 DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.166582] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2023] [Revised: 08/23/2023] [Accepted: 08/24/2023] [Indexed: 08/29/2023]
Abstract
Aerosol vertical distribution plays a crucial role in cloud development and thus precipitation since both aerosol indirect and semi-direct effects significantly depend on the relative position of aerosol layer in reference to cloud, but its precise influence on cloud remains unclear. In this study, we integrated multi-year Raman Lidar measurements of aerosol vertical profiles from the U.S. Department of Energy Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) facility with available Value-Added Products of cloud features to characterize aerosol vertical distributions and their impacts on warm clouds over the continental and marine ARM atmospheric observatories, i.e., Southern Great Plains (SGP) and Eastern North Atlantic (ENA). A unimodal seasonal distribution of aerosol optical depths (AODs) with a peak in summer is found at upper boundary layer over SGP, while a bimodal distribution is observed at ENA for the AODs at lower levels with a major winter-spring maximum. The diurnal mean of upper-level AOD at SGP shows a maximum in the early evening. According to the relative positions of aerosol layers to clouds we further identify three primary types of aerosol vertical distribution, including Random, Decreasing, and Bottom. It is found that the impacts of aerosols on cloud may or may not vary with aerosol vertical distribution depending on environmental conditions, as reflected by the wide variations of the relations between AOD and cloud properties. For example, as AOD increases, the liquid water paths (LWPs) tend to be reduced at SGP but enhanced at ENA. The relations of cloud droplet effective radius with AOD largely depend on aerosol vertical distributions, particularly showing positive values in the Random type under low-LWP condition (<50 g m-2). The distinct features of aerosol-cloud interactions in relation to aerosol vertical distribution are likely attributed to the continental-marine contrast in thermodynamic environments and aerosol conditions between SGP and ENA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yun Lin
- Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, Joint Institute for Regional Earth System Science and Engineering, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, United States.
| | - Yoshihide Takano
- Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, Joint Institute for Regional Earth System Science and Engineering, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, United States
| | - Yu Gu
- Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, Joint Institute for Regional Earth System Science and Engineering, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, United States
| | - Yuan Wang
- Department of Earth System Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States
| | - Shujun Zhou
- Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, Joint Institute for Regional Earth System Science and Engineering, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, United States
| | - Tianhao Zhang
- Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, Joint Institute for Regional Earth System Science and Engineering, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, United States
| | - Kuilin Zhu
- Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, Joint Institute for Regional Earth System Science and Engineering, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, United States
| | - Jingyu Wang
- National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore
| | - Bin Zhao
- Atmospheric Sciences and Global Change Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA 99352, United States
| | - Gang Chen
- Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, Joint Institute for Regional Earth System Science and Engineering, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, United States
| | - Damao Zhang
- Atmospheric Sciences and Global Change Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA 99352, United States
| | - Rong Fu
- Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, Joint Institute for Regional Earth System Science and Engineering, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, United States
| | - John Seinfeld
- California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, United States
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Xu W, Zhang Y, Mao F, Hu P, Wang Y, Gong W. Joint multiscale cloud detection algorithm for ground-based lidar. OPTICS EXPRESS 2022; 30:44449-44463. [PMID: 36522869 DOI: 10.1364/oe.473727] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2022] [Accepted: 11/01/2022] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
A ground-based lidar is a powerful tool for studying the vertical structure and optical properties of clouds. A layer detection algorithm is important to determine the presence and spatial position of clouds from vast lidar signals. However, current detection algorithms for ground-based lidar still involve substantial missing and false detections for tenuous layers and layer edges. Here, a joint multiscale cloud layer detection algorithm is proposed. The algorithm can effectively capture the tenuous layers and layer edges by using joint multiscale detection methods based on a trend function and the Bernoulli distribution assumption. Results show that the proposed algorithm detects 10.45% more cloud layers than the official cloud product of Micro Pulse Lidar Network (MPLNET) does. Specifically, 7.93% and 12.57% more cloud layers are detected at daytime and nighttime, respectively. The evaluation based on depolarization properties proves that the additional cloud layers detected by the joint multiscale algorithm are reliable. These additional detected clouds have important implications for cloud climatology and climate change research. The new algorithm remarkably enhances the cloud detection capability of ground-based lidar and potentially be widely used by the community.
Collapse
|
3
|
First Lidar Campaign in the Industrial Sites of Volta Redonda-RJ and Lorena-SP, Brazil. REMOTE SENSING 2022. [DOI: 10.3390/rs14071675] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
We report on the first aerosol profiling campaign in the Paraíba valley, a hub connecting the region between the two largest Brazilian metropolitan areas, São Paulo and Rio de Janeiro. São Paulo Sanitation Technology Company (CETESB) air quality and Cloud-Aerosol Lidar and Infrared Pathfinder Satellite Observations (CALIPSO) data show homogeneous behavior of the atmosphere throughout the region. A more detailed description of the particulate material in the local atmosphere, including its temporal dependence, can be obtained by using ground-based lidars. Measurements were carried out with a backscatter lidar system in two industrial cities, Volta Redonda and Lorena. The aerosol backscatter profiles present several peaks at different altitudes, indicating the presence of aerosol in several atmospheric layers. In addition, The Hybrid Single Particle Lagrangian Integrated Trajectory (HYSPLIT) air-mass back-trajectories indicate a possible detection of long-range aerosol transported from biomass burning areas of South America. The present study emphasizes the importance of investigating and monitoring the emission of particulate matter at this important hub connection between two dense populated regions of Brazil.
Collapse
|
4
|
Dust Lidar Ratios Retrieved from the CALIOP Measurements Using the MODIS AOD as a Constraint. REMOTE SENSING 2020. [DOI: 10.3390/rs12020251] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Lidar ratio for dust aerosols is retrieved from a synergetic use of the Cloud-Aerosol Lidar with Orthogonal Polarization (CALIOP) Total Attenuated Backscatter coefficients and the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) Aerosol Optical Depths (AODs) for 5 years from 2007 to 2011. MODIS AODs from the Dark Target (DT) algorithm over ocean and from the Deep Blue (DB) algorithm over land are used as a constraint for the retrieval. The dust lidar ratio is retrieved larger over land (46.6 ± 36.3 sr) than ocean (39.5 ± 16.8 sr) and shows distinct regional variation. Lidar ratio for Saharan dust (49.5 ± 36.8 sr) is larger than Arabian dust (42.5 ± 26.2 sr). Lidar ratios for dust aerosols transported to Mediterranean Sea (44.4 ± 15.9 sr), Mid Atlantic (40.3 ± 12.4 sr), and Arabian Sea (37.5 ± 12.1 sr) show lower values relative to their source regions. Retrieved dust lidar ratios for Taklamakan and Gobi Deserts region (35.0 ± 31.1 sr) and Australia (35.4 ± 34.4 sr) are slightly lower than the above-mentioned regions. AOD comparison between CALIOP and MODIS shows that the CALIOP AOD is biased low. When including clear air AOD for CALIOP, however, AODs from two sensors become more comparable.
Collapse
|
5
|
Jiang JH, Su H, Huang L, Wang Y, Massie S, Zhao B, Omar A, Wang Z. Contrasting effects on deep convective clouds by different types of aerosols. Nat Commun 2018; 9:3874. [PMID: 30250192 PMCID: PMC6155150 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-06280-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 68] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2018] [Accepted: 07/27/2018] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Convective clouds produce a significant proportion of the global precipitation and play an important role in the energy and water cycles. We quantify changes of the convective cloud ice mass-weighted altitude centroid (ZIWC) as a function of aerosol optical thickness (AOT). Analyses are conducted in smoke, dust and polluted continental aerosol environments over South America, Central Africa and Southeast Asia, using the latest measurements from the CloudSat and CALIPSO satellites. We find aerosols can inhibit or invigorate convection, depending on aerosol type and concentration. On average, smoke tends to suppress convection and results in lower ZIWC than clean clouds. Polluted continental aerosol tends to invigorate convection and promote higher ZIWC. The dust aerosol effects are regionally dependent and their signs differ from place to place. Moreover, we find that the aerosol inhibition or invigoration effects do not vary monotonically with AOT and the variations depend strongly on aerosol type. Our observational findings indicate that aerosol type is one of the key factors in determining the aerosol effects on convective clouds.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan H Jiang
- Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, 91109, CA, USA.
| | - Hui Su
- Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, 91109, CA, USA
| | - Lei Huang
- Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, 91109, CA, USA
- Joint Institute for Regional Earth System Science and Engineering, University of California, Los Angeles, 90095, CA, USA
| | - Yuan Wang
- Division of Geological and Planetary Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, 91106, CA, USA
| | - Steven Massie
- Laboratory for Atmospheric and Space Physics, University of Colorado, Boulder, 80309, CO, USA
| | - Bin Zhao
- Joint Institute for Regional Earth System Science and Engineering, University of California, Los Angeles, 90095, CA, USA
| | - Ali Omar
- NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, 23681, VA, USA
| | - Zhien Wang
- Laboratory for Atmospheric and Space Physics, University of Colorado, Boulder, 80309, CO, USA
- Department of Atmospheric Science, University of Wyoming, Laramie, 82071, WY, USA
- Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, 80309, CO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Zhao B, Jiang JH, Diner DJ, Su H, Gu Y, Liou KN, Jiang Z, Huang L, Takano Y, Fan X, Omar AH. Intra-annual variations of regional aerosol optical depth, vertical distribution, and particle types from multiple satellite and ground-based observational datasets. ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS 2018; 18:11247-11260. [PMID: 31068974 PMCID: PMC6501591 DOI: 10.5194/acp-18-11247-2018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/11/2023]
Abstract
The climatic and health effects of aerosols are strongly dependent on the intra-annual variations in their loading and properties. While the seasonal variations of regional aerosol optical depth (AOD) have been extensively studied, understanding the temporal variations in aerosol vertical distribution and particle types is also important for an accurate estimate of aerosol climatic effects. In this paper, we combine the observations from four satellite-borne sensors and several ground-based networks to investigate the seasonal variations of aerosol column loading, vertical distribution, and particle types over three populous regions: the Eastern United States (EUS), Western Europe (WEU), and Eastern and Central China (ECC). In all three regions, column AOD, as well as AOD at heights above 800 m, peaks in summer/spring, probably due to accelerated formation of secondary aerosols and hygroscopic growth. In contrast, AOD below 800m peaks in winter over WEU and ECC regions because more aerosols are confined to lower heights due to the weaker vertical mixing. In the EUS region, AOD below 800m shows two maximums, one in summer and the other in winter. The temporal trends in low-level AOD are consistent with those in surface fine particle (PM2.5) concentrations. AOD due to fine particles (< 0.7 μm diameter) is much larger in spring/summer than in winter over all three regions. However, the coarse mode AOD (> 1.4 μm diameter), generally shows small variability, except that a peak occurs in spring in the ECC region due to the prevalence of airborne dust during this season. When aerosols are classified according to sources, the dominant type is associated with anthropogenic air pollution, which has a similar seasonal pattern as total AOD. Dust and sea-spray aerosols in the WEU region peak in summer and winter, respectively, but do not show an obvious seasonal pattern in the EUS region. Smoke aerosols, as well as absorbing aerosols, present an obvious unimodal distribution with a maximum occurring in summer over the EUS and WEU regions, whereas they follow a bimodal distribution with peaks in August and March (due to crop residue burning) over the ECC region.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bin Zhao
- Joint Institute for Regional Earth System Science and Engineering and Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Jonathan H. Jiang
- Jet propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA
| | - David J. Diner
- Jet propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA
| | - Hui Su
- Jet propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA
| | - Yu Gu
- Joint Institute for Regional Earth System Science and Engineering and Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Kuo-Nan Liou
- Jet propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA
| | - Zhe Jiang
- Joint Institute for Regional Earth System Science and Engineering and Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Lei Huang
- Joint Institute for Regional Earth System Science and Engineering and Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Yoshi Takano
- Joint Institute for Regional Earth System Science and Engineering and Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Xuehua Fan
- Joint Institute for Regional Earth System Science and Engineering and Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Ali H. Omar
- NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, Virginia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Tackett JL, Winker DM, Getzewich BJ, Vaughan MA, Young SA, Kar J. CALIPSO lidar level 3 aerosol profile product: version 3 algorithm design. ATMOSPHERIC MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES 2018; 11:4129-4152. [PMID: 33510819 PMCID: PMC7840064 DOI: 10.5194/amt-11-4129-2018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/31/2023]
Abstract
The CALIPSO (Cloud-Aerosol Lidar and Infrared Pathfinder Satellite Observations) level 3 aerosol profile product reports globally gridded, quality-screened, monthly mean aerosol extinction profiles retrieved by CALIOP (the Cloud-Aerosol Lidar with Orthogonal Polarization). This paper describes the quality screening and averaging methods used to generate the version 3 product. The fundamental input data are CALIOP level 2 aerosol extinction profiles and layer classification information (aerosol, cloud, and clear-air). Prior to aggregation, the extinction profiles are quality-screened by a series of filters to reduce the impact of layer detection errors, layer classification errors, extinction retrieval errors, and biases due to an intermittent signal anomaly at the surface. The relative influence of these filters are compared in terms of sample rejection frequency, mean extinction, and mean aerosol optical depth (AOD). The "extinction QC flag" filter is the most influential in preventing high-biases in level 3 mean extinction, while the "misclassified cirrus fringe" filter is most aggressive at rejecting cirrus misclassified as aerosol. The impact of quality screening on monthly mean aerosol extinction is investigated globally and regionally. After applying quality filters, the level 3 algorithm calculates monthly mean AOD by vertically integrating the monthly mean quality-screened aerosol extinction profile. Calculating monthly mean AOD by integrating the monthly mean extinction profile prevents a low bias that would result from alternately integrating the set of extinction profiles first and then averaging the resultant AOD values together. Ultimately, the quality filters reduce level 3 mean AOD by -24 and -31% for global ocean and global land, respectively, indicating the importance of quality screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jason L. Tackett
- Science Systems and Applications, Inc., Hampton, VA, USA
- NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA, USA
| | | | - Brian J. Getzewich
- Science Systems and Applications, Inc., Hampton, VA, USA
- NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA, USA
| | | | | | - Jayanta Kar
- Science Systems and Applications, Inc., Hampton, VA, USA
- NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Kim MH, Omar AH, Tackett JL, Vaughan MA, Winker DM, Trepte CR, Hu Y, Liu Z, Poole LR, Pitts MC, Kar J, Magill BE. The CALIPSO Version 4 Automated Aerosol Classification and Lidar Ratio Selection Algorithm. ATMOSPHERIC MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES 2018; 11:6107-6135. [PMID: 31921372 PMCID: PMC6951257 DOI: 10.5194/amt-11-6107-2018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/25/2023]
Abstract
The Cloud-Aerosol Lidar with Orthogonal Polarization (CALIOP) version 4.10 (V4) level 2 aerosol data products, released in November 2016, include substantial improvements to the aerosol subtyping and lidar ratio selection algorithms. These improvements are described along with resulting changes in aerosol optical depth (AOD). The most fundamental change in V4 level 2 aerosol products is a new algorithm to identify aerosol subtypes in the stratosphere. Four aerosol subtypes are introduced for the stratospheric aerosols: polar stratospheric aerosol (PSA), volcanic ash, sulfate/other, and smoke. The tropospheric aerosol subtyping algorithm was also improved by adding the following enhancements: (1) all aerosol subtypes are now allowed over polar regions, whereas the version 3 (V3) algorithm allowed only clean continental and polluted continental aerosols; (2) a new "dusty marine" aerosol subtype is introduced, representing mixtures of dust and marine aerosols near the ocean surface; and (3) the "polluted continental" and "smoke" subtypes have been renamed "polluted continental/smoke" and "elevated smoke", respectively. V4 also revises the lidar ratios for clean marine, dust, clean continental, and elevated smoke subtypes. As a consequence of the V4 updates, the mean 532 nm AOD retrieved by CALIOP has increased by 0.044 (0.036) or 52 % (40 %) for nighttime (daytime). Lidar ratio revisions are the most influential factor for AOD changes from V3 to V4, especially for cloud-free skies. Preliminary validation studies show that the AOD discrepancies between CALIOP and AERONET/MODIS (ocean) are reduced in V4 compared to V3.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Man-Hae Kim
- NASA Postdoctoral Program (USRA), Hampton, VA, USA
| | - Ali H. Omar
- NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Zhaoyan Liu
- Science Systems and Applications, Inc., Hampton, VA, USA
| | | | | | - Jayanta Kar
- Science Systems and Applications, Inc., Hampton, VA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Kim MH, Omar AH, Tackett JL, Vaughan MA, Winker DM, Trepte CR, Hu Y, Liu Z, Poole LR, Pitts MC, Kar J, Magill BE. The CALIPSO Version 4 Automated Aerosol Classification and Lidar Ratio Selection Algorithm. ATMOSPHERIC MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES 2018; 11:6107-6135. [PMID: 31921372 DOI: 10.1175/2009jtecha1231.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 159] [Impact Index Per Article: 26.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/28/2023]
Abstract
The Cloud-Aerosol Lidar with Orthogonal Polarization (CALIOP) version 4.10 (V4) level 2 aerosol data products, released in November 2016, include substantial improvements to the aerosol subtyping and lidar ratio selection algorithms. These improvements are described along with resulting changes in aerosol optical depth (AOD). The most fundamental change in V4 level 2 aerosol products is a new algorithm to identify aerosol subtypes in the stratosphere. Four aerosol subtypes are introduced for the stratospheric aerosols: polar stratospheric aerosol (PSA), volcanic ash, sulfate/other, and smoke. The tropospheric aerosol subtyping algorithm was also improved by adding the following enhancements: (1) all aerosol subtypes are now allowed over polar regions, whereas the version 3 (V3) algorithm allowed only clean continental and polluted continental aerosols; (2) a new "dusty marine" aerosol subtype is introduced, representing mixtures of dust and marine aerosols near the ocean surface; and (3) the "polluted continental" and "smoke" subtypes have been renamed "polluted continental/smoke" and "elevated smoke", respectively. V4 also revises the lidar ratios for clean marine, dust, clean continental, and elevated smoke subtypes. As a consequence of the V4 updates, the mean 532 nm AOD retrieved by CALIOP has increased by 0.044 (0.036) or 52 % (40 %) for nighttime (daytime). Lidar ratio revisions are the most influential factor for AOD changes from V3 to V4, especially for cloud-free skies. Preliminary validation studies show that the AOD discrepancies between CALIOP and AERONET/MODIS (ocean) are reduced in V4 compared to V3.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Man-Hae Kim
- NASA Postdoctoral Program (USRA), Hampton, VA, USA
| | - Ali H Omar
- NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Zhaoyan Liu
- Science Systems and Applications, Inc., Hampton, VA, USA
| | - Lamont R Poole
- Science Systems and Applications, Inc., Hampton, VA, USA
| | | | - Jayanta Kar
- Science Systems and Applications, Inc., Hampton, VA, USA
| | - Brian E Magill
- Science Systems and Applications, Inc., Hampton, VA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Toth TD, Campbell JR, Reid JS, Tackett JL, Vaughan MA, Zhang J, Marquis JW. Minimum aerosol layer detection sensitivities and their subsequent impacts on aerosol optical thickness retrievals in CALIPSO level 2 data products. ATMOSPHERIC MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES 2018; 11:499-514. [PMID: 33868502 PMCID: PMC8051137 DOI: 10.5194/amt-11-499-2018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/31/2023]
Abstract
Due to instrument sensitivities and algorithm detection limits, level 2 (L2) Cloud-Aerosol Lidar with Orthogonal Polarization (CALIOP) 532nm aerosol extinction profile retrievals are often populated with retrieval fill values (RFVs), which indicate the absence of detectable levels of aerosol within the profile. In this study, using 4 years (2007-2008 and 2010-2011) of CALIOP version 3 L2 aerosol data, the occurrence frequency of daytime CALIOP profiles containing all RFVs (all-RFV profiles) is studied. In the CALIOP data products, the aerosol optical thickness (AOT) of any all-RFV profile is reported as being zero, which may introduce a bias in CALIOP-based AOT climatologies. For this study, we derive revised estimates of AOT for all-RFV profiles using collocated Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) Dark Target (DT) and, where available, AErosol RObotic NEtwork (AERONET) data. Globally, all-RFV profiles comprise roughly 71% of all daytime CALIOP L2 aerosol profiles (i.e., including completely attenuated profiles), accounting for nearly half (45 %) of all daytime cloud-free L2 aerosol profiles. The mean collocated MODIS DT (AERONET) 550 nm AOT is found to be near 0.06 (0.08) for CALIOP all-RFV profiles. We further estimate a global mean aerosol extinction profile, a so-called "noise floor", for CALIOP all-RFV profiles. The global mean CALIOP AOT is then recomputed by replacing RFV values with the derived noise-floor values for both all-RFV and non-all-RFV profiles. This process yields an improvement in the agreement of CALIOP and MODIS over-ocean AOT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Travis D Toth
- Dept. of Atmospheric Sciences, University of North Dakota, Grand Forks, ND, USA
| | - James R Campbell
- Aerosol and Radiation Sciences Section, Marine Meteorology Division, Naval Research Laboratory, Monterey, CA, USA
| | - Jeffrey S Reid
- Aerosol and Radiation Sciences Section, Marine Meteorology Division, Naval Research Laboratory, Monterey, CA, USA
| | | | | | - Jianglong Zhang
- Dept. of Atmospheric Sciences, University of North Dakota, Grand Forks, ND, USA
| | - Jared W Marquis
- Dept. of Atmospheric Sciences, University of North Dakota, Grand Forks, ND, USA
| |
Collapse
|