1
|
Meng YJ, Mankuzhy NP, Chawla M, Lee RP, Yorke ED, Zhang Z, Gelb E, Lim SB, Cuaron JJ, Wu AJ, Simone CB, Gelblum DY, Lovelock DM, Harris W, Rimner A. A Prospective Study on Deep Inspiration Breath Hold Thoracic Radiation Therapy Guided by Bronchoscopically Implanted Electromagnetic Transponders. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:1534. [PMID: 38672616 PMCID: PMC11048337 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16081534] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2024] [Revised: 04/03/2024] [Accepted: 04/13/2024] [Indexed: 04/28/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Electromagnetic transponders bronchoscopically implanted near the tumor can be used to monitor deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) for thoracic radiation therapy (RT). The feasibility and safety of this approach require further study. METHODS We enrolled patients with primary lung cancer or lung metastases. Three transponders were implanted near the tumor, followed by simulation with DIBH, free breathing, and 4D-CT as backup. The initial gating window for treatment was ±5 mm; in a second cohort, the window was incrementally reduced to determine the smallest feasible gating window. The primary endpoint was feasibility, defined as completion of RT using transponder-guided DIBH. Patients were followed for assessment of transponder- and RT-related toxicity. RESULTS We enrolled 48 patients (35 with primary lung cancer and 13 with lung metastases). The median distance of transponders to tumor was 1.6 cm (IQR 0.6-2.8 cm). RT delivery ranged from 3 to 35 fractions. Transponder-guided DIBH was feasible in all but two patients (96% feasible), where it failed because the distance between the transponders and the antenna was >19 cm. Among the remaining 46 patients, 6 were treated prone to keep the transponders within 19 cm of the antenna, and 40 were treated supine. The smallest feasible gating window was identified as ±3 mm. Thirty-nine (85%) patients completed one year of follow-up. Toxicities at least possibly related to transponders or the implantation procedure were grade 2 in six patients (six incidences, cough and hemoptysis), grade 3 in three patients (five incidences, cough, dyspnea, pneumonia, and supraventricular tachycardia), and grade 4 pneumonia in one patient (occurring a few days after implantation but recovered fully and completed RT). Toxicities at least possibly related to RT were grade 2 in 18 patients (41 incidences, most commonly cough, fatigue, and pneumonitis) and grade 3 in four patients (seven incidences, most commonly pneumonia), and no patients had grade 4 or higher toxicity. CONCLUSIONS Bronchoscopically implanted electromagnetic transponder-guided DIBH lung RT is feasible and safe, allowing for precise tumor targeting and reduced normal tissue exposure. Transponder-antenna distance was the most common challenge due to a limited antenna range, which could sometimes be circumvented by prone positioning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuzhong Jeff Meng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10021, USA; (Y.J.M.); (N.P.M.); (E.G.); (J.J.C.); (A.J.W.); (C.B.S.II); (D.Y.G.)
| | - Nikhil P. Mankuzhy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10021, USA; (Y.J.M.); (N.P.M.); (E.G.); (J.J.C.); (A.J.W.); (C.B.S.II); (D.Y.G.)
| | - Mohit Chawla
- Department of Medicine, Pulmonary Service, Section of Interventional Pulmonology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10021, USA; (M.C.); (R.P.L.)
| | - Robert P. Lee
- Department of Medicine, Pulmonary Service, Section of Interventional Pulmonology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10021, USA; (M.C.); (R.P.L.)
| | - Ellen D. Yorke
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10021, USA; (E.D.Y.); (S.B.L.); (D.M.L.); (W.H.)
| | - Zhigang Zhang
- Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10021, USA;
| | - Emily Gelb
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10021, USA; (Y.J.M.); (N.P.M.); (E.G.); (J.J.C.); (A.J.W.); (C.B.S.II); (D.Y.G.)
| | - Seng Boh Lim
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10021, USA; (E.D.Y.); (S.B.L.); (D.M.L.); (W.H.)
| | - John J. Cuaron
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10021, USA; (Y.J.M.); (N.P.M.); (E.G.); (J.J.C.); (A.J.W.); (C.B.S.II); (D.Y.G.)
| | - Abraham J. Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10021, USA; (Y.J.M.); (N.P.M.); (E.G.); (J.J.C.); (A.J.W.); (C.B.S.II); (D.Y.G.)
| | - Charles B. Simone
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10021, USA; (Y.J.M.); (N.P.M.); (E.G.); (J.J.C.); (A.J.W.); (C.B.S.II); (D.Y.G.)
- New York Proton Center, New York, NY 10035, USA; (C.B.S.II)
| | - Daphna Y. Gelblum
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10021, USA; (Y.J.M.); (N.P.M.); (E.G.); (J.J.C.); (A.J.W.); (C.B.S.II); (D.Y.G.)
| | - Dale Michael Lovelock
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10021, USA; (E.D.Y.); (S.B.L.); (D.M.L.); (W.H.)
| | - Wendy Harris
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10021, USA; (E.D.Y.); (S.B.L.); (D.M.L.); (W.H.)
| | - Andreas Rimner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10021, USA; (Y.J.M.); (N.P.M.); (E.G.); (J.J.C.); (A.J.W.); (C.B.S.II); (D.Y.G.)
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center—University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site DKTK-Freiburg, Robert-Koch-Strasse 3, 79106 Freiburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Cheng JC, Buduhan G, Venkataraman S, Tan L, Sasaki D, Bashir B, Ahmed N, Kidane B, Sivananthan G, Koul R, Leylek A, Butler J, McCurdy B, Wong R, Kim JO. Endobronchially Implanted Real-Time Electromagnetic Transponder Beacon-Guided, Respiratory-Gated SABR for Moving Lung Tumors: A Prospective Phase 1/2 Cohort Study. Adv Radiat Oncol 2023; 8:101243. [PMID: 37408673 PMCID: PMC10318214 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2023.101243] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2023] [Accepted: 04/03/2023] [Indexed: 07/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose Endobronchial electromagnetic transponder beacons (EMT) provide real-time, precise positional data of moving lung tumors. We report results of a phase 1/2, prospective, single-arm cohort study evaluating the treatment planning effects of EMT-guided SABR for moving lung tumors. Methods and Materials Eligible patients were adults, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group 0 to 2, with T1-T2N0 non-small cell lung cancer or pulmonary metastasis ≤4 cm with motion amplitude ≥5 mm. Three EMTs were endobronchially implanted using navigational bronchoscopy. Four-dimensional free-breathing computed tomography simulation scans were obtained, and end-exhalation phases were used to define the gating window internal target volume. A 3-mm expansion of gating window internal target volume defined the planning target volume (PTV). EMT-guided, respiratory-gated (RG) SABR was delivered (54 Gy/3 fractions or 48 Gy/4 fractions) using volumetric modulated arc therapy. For each RG-SABR plan, a 10-phase image-guided SABR plan was generated for dosimetric comparison. PTV/organ-at-risk (OAR) metrics were tabulated and analyzed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank pair test. Treatment outcomes were evaluated using RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours; version 1.1). Results Of 41 patients screened, 17 were enrolled and 2 withdrew from the study. Median age was 73 years, with 7 women. Sixty percent had T1/T2 non-small cell lung cancer and 40% had M1 disease. Median tumor diameter was 1.9 cm with 73% of targets located peripherally. Mean respiratory tumor motion was 1.25 cm (range, 0.53-4.04 cm). Thirteen tumors were treated with EMT-guided SABR and 47% of patients received 48 Gy in 4 fractions while 53% received 54 Gy in 3 fractions. RG-SABR yielded an average PTV reduction of 46.9% (P < .005). Lung V5, V10, V20, and mean lung dose had mean relative reductions of 11.3%, 20.3%, 31.1%, and 20.3%, respectively (P < .005). Dose to OARs was significantly reduced (P < .05) except for spinal cord. At 6 months, mean radiographic tumor volume reduction was 53.5% (P < .005). Conclusions EMT-guided RG-SABR significantly reduced PTVs of moving lung tumors compared with image-guided SABR. EMT-guided RG-SABR should be considered for tumors with large respiratory motion amplitudes or those located in close proximity to OARs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jui Chih Cheng
- Radiation Oncology, Max Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Gordon Buduhan
- Thoracic Surgery, Max Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | | | - Lawrence Tan
- Thoracic Surgery, Max Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - David Sasaki
- Medical Physics, CancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Bashir Bashir
- Radiation Oncology, Max Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Naseer Ahmed
- Radiation Oncology, Max Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Biniam Kidane
- Thoracic Surgery, Max Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Gokulan Sivananthan
- Radiation Oncology, Max Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Rashmi Koul
- Radiation Oncology, Max Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Ahmet Leylek
- Radiation Oncology, Max Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - James Butler
- Radiation Oncology, Max Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Boyd McCurdy
- Medical Physics, CancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Ralph Wong
- Medical Oncology, Max Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Julian O. Kim
- Radiation Oncology, Max Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
- CancerCare Manitoba Research Institute, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Harris W, Yorke E, Li H, Czmielewski C, Chawla M, Lee RP, Hotca-Cho A, McKnight D, Rimner A, Lovelock DM. Can bronchoscopically implanted anchored electromagnetic transponders be used to monitor tumor position and lung inflation during deep inspiration breath-hold lung radiotherapy? Med Phys 2022; 49:2621-2630. [PMID: 35192211 PMCID: PMC9007909 DOI: 10.1002/mp.15565] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2021] [Revised: 01/22/2022] [Accepted: 02/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the efficacy of using bronchoscopically implanted anchored electromagnetic transponders (EMTs) as surrogates for 1) tumor position and 2) repeatability of lung inflation during deep-inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) lung radiotherapy. METHODS 41 patients treated with either hypofractionated (HF) or conventional (CF) lung radiotherapy on an IRB approved prospective protocol using coached DIBH were evaluated for this study. Three anchored EMTs were bronchoscopically implanted into small airways near or within the tumor. DIBH treatment was gated by tracking the EMT positions. Breath-hold cone-beam-CTs (CBCTs) were acquired prior to every HF treatment or weekly for CF patients. Retrospectively, rigid registrations between each CBCT and the breath-hold planning CT were performed to match to 1) spine 2) EMTs and 3) tumor. Absolute differences in registration between EMTs and spine were analyzed to determine surrogacy of EMTs for lung inflation. Differences in registration between EMTs and tumor were analyzed to determine surrogacy of EMTs for tumor position. The stability of the EMTs was evaluated by analyzing the difference between inter-EMT displacements recorded at treatment from that of the plan for the CF patients, as well as the geometric residual (GR) recorded at the time of treatment. RESULTS 219 CBCTs were analyzed. The average differences between EMT centroid and spine registration among all CBCTs were 0.45±0.42cm, 0.29±0.28cm, and 0.18±0.15cm in superior-inferior (SI), anterior-posterior (AP) and lateral directions, respectively. Only 59% of CBCTs had differences in registration <0.5cm for EMT centroid compared to spine, indicating that lung inflation is not reproducible from simulation to treatment. The average differences between EMT centroid and tumor registration among all CBCTs were 0.13±0.13cm, 0.14±0.13cm and 0.12±0.12cm in SI, AP and lateral directions, respectively. 95% of CBCTs resulted in <0.5cm change between EMT centroid and tumor registration, indicating that EMT positions correspond well with tumor position during treatments. Six out of the 7 recorded CF patients had average differences in inter-EMT displacements to be ≤0.26cm and average GR ≤0.22cm, indicating that the EMTs are stable throughout treatment. CONCLUSIONS Bronchoscopically implanted anchored EMTs are good surrogates for tumor position and are reliable for maintaining tumor position when tracked during DIBH treatment, as long as the tumor size and shape are stable. Large differences in registration between EMTs and spine for many treatments suggest that lung inflation achieved at simulation is often not reproduced. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wendy Harris
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065
| | - Ellen Yorke
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065
| | - Henry Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065
| | - Christian Czmielewski
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065
| | - Mohit Chawla
- Department of Medicine, Pulmonary Service, Section of Interventional Pulmonology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065
| | - Robert P Lee
- Department of Medicine, Pulmonary Service, Section of Interventional Pulmonology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065
| | - Alexandra Hotca-Cho
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065
| | - Dominique McKnight
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065
| | - Andreas Rimner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065
| | - D Michael Lovelock
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Li C, Lu Z, He M, Sui J, Lin T, Xie K, Sun J, Ni X. Augmented reality-guided positioning system for radiotherapy patients. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2022; 23:e13516. [PMID: 34985188 PMCID: PMC8906221 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13516] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2021] [Revised: 11/18/2021] [Accepted: 12/15/2021] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
In modern radiotherapy, error reduction in the patients’ daily setup error is important for achieving accuracy. In our study, we proposed a new approach for the development of an assist system for the radiotherapy position setup by using augmented reality (AR). We aimed to improve the accuracy of the position setup of patients undergoing radiotherapy and to evaluate the error of the position setup of patients who were diagnosed with head and neck cancer, and that of patients diagnosed with chest and abdomen cancer. We acquired the patient's simulation CT data for the three‐dimensional (3D) reconstruction of the external surface and organs. The AR tracking software detected the calibration module and loaded the 3D virtual model. The calibration module was aligned with the Linac isocenter by using room lasers. And then aligned the virtual cube with the calibration module to complete the calibration of the 3D virtual model and Linac isocenter. Then, the patient position setup was carried out, and point cloud registration was performed between the patient and the 3D virtual model, such the patient's posture was consistent with the 3D virtual model. Twenty patients diagnosed with head and neck cancer and 20 patients diagnosed with chest and abdomen cancer in the supine position setup were analyzed for the residual errors of the conventional laser and AR‐guided position setup. Results show that for patients diagnosed with head and neck cancer, the difference between the two positioning methods was not statistically significant (P > 0.05). For patients diagnosed with chest and abdomen cancer, the residual errors of the two positioning methods in the superior and inferior direction and anterior and posterior direction were statistically significant (t = −5.80, −4.98, P < 0.05). The residual errors in the three rotation directions were statistically significant (t = −2.29 to −3.22, P < 0.05). The experimental results showed that the AR technology can effectively assist in the position setup of patients undergoing radiotherapy, significantly reduce the position setup errors in patients diagnosed with chest and abdomen cancer, and improve the accuracy of radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chunying Li
- Department of Radiotherapy, Changzhou Second People's Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou, China.,Laboratory of Medical Physics Center, Nanjing Medical University, Jiangning District, Nanjing, China.,Changzhou Key Laboratory of Medical Physics, Changzhou, China
| | - Zhengda Lu
- Department of Radiotherapy, Changzhou Second People's Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou, China.,Laboratory of Medical Physics Center, Nanjing Medical University, Jiangning District, Nanjing, China.,Changzhou Key Laboratory of Medical Physics, Changzhou, China
| | - Mu He
- Department of Radiotherapy, Changzhou Second People's Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou, China.,Laboratory of Medical Physics Center, Nanjing Medical University, Jiangning District, Nanjing, China.,Changzhou Key Laboratory of Medical Physics, Changzhou, China
| | - Jianfeng Sui
- Department of Radiotherapy, Changzhou Second People's Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou, China.,Laboratory of Medical Physics Center, Nanjing Medical University, Jiangning District, Nanjing, China.,Changzhou Key Laboratory of Medical Physics, Changzhou, China
| | - Tao Lin
- Department of Radiotherapy, Changzhou Second People's Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou, China.,Laboratory of Medical Physics Center, Nanjing Medical University, Jiangning District, Nanjing, China.,Changzhou Key Laboratory of Medical Physics, Changzhou, China
| | - Kai Xie
- Department of Radiotherapy, Changzhou Second People's Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou, China.,Laboratory of Medical Physics Center, Nanjing Medical University, Jiangning District, Nanjing, China.,Changzhou Key Laboratory of Medical Physics, Changzhou, China
| | - Jiawei Sun
- Department of Radiotherapy, Changzhou Second People's Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou, China.,Laboratory of Medical Physics Center, Nanjing Medical University, Jiangning District, Nanjing, China.,Changzhou Key Laboratory of Medical Physics, Changzhou, China
| | - Xinye Ni
- Department of Radiotherapy, Changzhou Second People's Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou, China.,Laboratory of Medical Physics Center, Nanjing Medical University, Jiangning District, Nanjing, China.,Changzhou Key Laboratory of Medical Physics, Changzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Boggs DH, Popple R, McDonald A, Minnich D, Willey CD, Spencer S, Shen S, Dobelbower MC. Electromagnetic Transponder Based Tracking and Gating in the Radiotherapeutic Treatment of Thoracic Malignancies. Pract Radiat Oncol 2019; 9:456-464. [PMID: 31283991 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2019.06.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2019] [Revised: 05/20/2019] [Accepted: 06/18/2019] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE This report details our institutional workflow and technique for use of the Calypso electromagnetic transponder system with respiratory gating for localization and tracking of lung tumors during stereotactic radiation therapy for early stage thoracic malignancies. METHODS AND MATERIALS Sixteen patients underwent bronchoscopic fiducial placement of 3 transponders in small airways in proximity to the primary tumor. Transponders were placed <19 cm from the most anterior skin location of the patient for appropriate tracking functionality. Patients underwent simulation with 4-dimensional assessment and were treated with transponder based positional gating if tumors moved >5 mm in any direction. Tumor motion <5 mm was not gated and treated using an internal target volume approach. A 5 mm uniform planning target volume was used. Before treatment, fiducial placement and tumor location were verified by daily kilovoltage (kV) and cone beam computed tomography image guidance. Tracking limits were placed based on the movement of the transponders from the centroid of the structures on the maximum intensity projection image. The Calypso treatment system paused treatment automatically if beacons shifted beyond the predefined tracking limits. RESULTS All 16 patients underwent successful implantation of the electromagnetic transponders. Eight patients exhibited tumor motion sufficient to require respiratory gating, and the other 8 patients were treated using a free breathing internal target volume technique. Difficulty with transponder sensing was experienced in 3 patients as a result of anatomic interference with the placement of the sensing arrays; each of these cases was successfully treated after making setup modifications. Triggered imaging of fiducials during treatment was consistent with real-time positioning determined by the Calypso tracking system. CONCLUSIONS Respiratory gated electromagnetic based transponder guided stereotactic body radiation therapy using the workflow described is feasible and well tolerated in selected patients with early stage lung malignancies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Drexell H Boggs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Alabama Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama.
| | - Richard Popple
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Alabama Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Andrew McDonald
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Alabama Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Doug Minnich
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Brookwood Baptist Health, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Christopher D Willey
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Alabama Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Sharon Spencer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Alabama Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Sui Shen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Alabama Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Michael C Dobelbower
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Alabama Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| |
Collapse
|