Clinical feasibility of a commercially available MRI-only method for radiotherapy treatment planning of the brain

Challenges and opportunities in the development and clinical implementation of artificial intelligence based synthetic computed tomography for magnetic resonance only radiotherapy

Synthetic computed tomography (sCT) generated from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can serve as a substitute for planning CT in radiation therapy (RT), thereby removing registration uncertainties associated with multi-modality imaging pairing, reducing costs and patient radiation exposure. CE/FDA-approved sCT solutions are nowadays available for pelvis, brain, and head and neck, while more complex deep learning (DL) algorithms are under investigation for other anatomic sites. The main challenge in achieving a widespread clinical implementation of sCT lies in the absence of consensus on sCT commissioning and quality assurance (QA), resulting in variation of sCT approaches across different hospitals. To address this issue, a group of experts gathered at the ESTRO Physics Workshop 2022 to discuss the integration of sCT solutions into clinics and report the process and its outcomes. This position paper focuses on aspects of sCT development and commissioning, outlining key elements crucial for the safe implementation of an MRI-only RT workflow.

Clinical implementation of a commercial synthetic computed tomography solution for radiotherapy treatment of glioblastoma

Background and Purpose

Magnetic resonance (MR)-only radiotherapy (RT) workflow eliminates uncertainties due to computed tomography (CT)-MR image registration, by using synthetic CT (sCT) images generated from MR. This study describes the clinical implementation process, from retrospective commissioning to prospective validation stage of a commercial artificial intelligence (AI)-based sCT product. Evaluation of the dosimetric performance of the sCT is presented, with emphasis on the impact of voxel size differences between image modalities.

Materials and methods

sCT performance was assessed in glioblastoma RT planning. Dose differences for 30 patients in both commissioning and validation cohorts were calculated at various dose-volume-histogram (DVH) points for target and organs-at-risk (OAR). A gamma analysis was conducted on regridded image plans. Quality assurance (QA) guidelines were established based on commissioning phase results.

Results

Mean dose difference to target structures was found to be within ± 0.7 % regardless of image resolution and cohort. OARs' mean dose differences were within ± 1.3 % for plans calculated on regridded images for both cohorts, while differences were higher for plans with original voxel size, reaching up to -4.2 % for chiasma D2% in the commissioning cohort. Gamma passing rates for the brain structure using the criteria 1 %/1mm, 2 %/2mm and 3 %/3mm were 93.6 %/99.8 %/100 % and 96.6 %/99.9 %/100 % for commissioning and validation cohorts, respectively.

Conclusions

Dosimetric outcomes in both commissioning and validation stages confirmed sCT's equivalence to CT. The large patient cohort in this study aided in establishing a robust QA program for the MR-only workflow, now applied in glioblastoma RT at our center.

Contouring practices and artefact management within a synthetic CT-based radiotherapy workflow for the central nervous system

BACKGROUND

The incorporation of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in radiotherapy (RT) workflows improves contouring precision, yet it introduces geometrical uncertainties when registered with computed tomography (CT) scans. Synthetic CT (sCT) images could minimize these uncertainties and streamline the RT workflow. This study aims to compare the contouring capabilities of sCT images with conventional CT-based/MR-assisted RT workflows, with an emphasis on managing artefacts caused by surgical fixation devices (SFDs).

METHODS

The study comprised a commissioning cohort of 100 patients with cranial tumors treated using a conventional CT-based/MR-assisted RT workflow and a validation cohort of 30 patients with grade IV glioblastomas treated using an MR-only workflow. A CE-marked artificial-intelligence-based sCT product was utilized. The delineation accuracy comparison was performed using dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and average Hausdorff distance (AHD). Artefacts within the commissioning cohort were visually inspected, classified and an estimation of thickness was derived using Hausdorff distance (HD). For the validation cohort, boolean operators were used to extract artefact volumes adjacent to the target and contrasted to the planning treatment volume.

RESULTS

The combination of high DSC (0.94) and low AHD (0.04 mm) indicates equal target delineation capacity between sCT images and conventional CT scans. However, the results for organs at risk delineation were less consistent, likely because of voxel size differences between sCT images and CT scans and absence of standardized delineation routines. Artefacts observed in sCT images appeared as enhancements of cranial bone. When close to the target, they could affect its definition. Therefore, in the validation cohort the clinical target volume (CTV) was expanded towards the bone by 3.5 mm, as estimated by HD analysis. Subsequent analysis on cone-beam CT scans showed that the CTV adjustment was enough to provide acceptable target coverage.

CONCLUSION

The tested sCT product performed on par with conventional CT in terms of contouring capability. Additionally, this study provides both the first comprehensive classification of metal artefacts on a sCT product and a novel method to assess the clinical impact of artefacts caused by SFDs on target delineation. This methodology encourages similar analysis for other sCT products.

The Use of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Radiation Therapy Treatment Simulation and Planning

Ever since its introduction as a diagnostic imaging tool the potential of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in radiation therapy (RT) treatment simulation and planning has been recognized. Recent technical advances have addressed many of the impediments to use of this technology and as a result have resulted in rapid and growing adoption of MRI in RT. The purpose of this article is to provide a broad review of the multiple uses of MR in the RT treatment simulation and planning process, identify several of the most used clinical scenarios in which MR is integral to the simulation and planning process, highlight existing limitations and provide multiple unmet needs thereby highlighting opportunities for the diagnostic MR imaging community to contribute and collaborate with our oncology colleagues. EVIDENCE LEVEL: 5 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 5.

Clinical feasibility of a commercially available MRI-only method for radiotherapy treatment planning of the brain

BACKGROUND

Advancements in deep-learning based synthetic computed tomography (sCT) image conversion methods have enabled the development of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-only based radiotherapy treatment planning (RTP) of the brain.

PURPOSE

This study evaluates the clinical feasibility of a commercial, deep-learning based MRI-only RTP method with respect to dose calculation and patient positioning verification performance in RTP of the brain.

METHODS

Clinical validation of dose calculation accuracy was performed by a retrospective evaluation for 25 glioma and 25 brain metastasis patients. Dosimetric and image quality of the studied MRI-only RTP method was evaluated by a direct comparison of the sCT-based and computed tomography (CT)-based external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) images and treatment plans. Patient positioning verification accuracy of sCT images was evaluated retrospectively for 10 glioma and 10 brain metastasis patients based on clinical cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging.

RESULTS

An average mean dose difference of Dmean = 0.1% for planning target volume (PTV) and 0.6% for normal tissue (NT) structures were obtained for glioma patients. Respective results for brain metastasis patients were Dmean = 0.5% for PTVs and Dmean =1.0% for NTs. Global three-dimensional (3D) gamma pass rates using 2%/2 mm dose difference and distance-to-agreement (DTA) criterion were 98.0% for the glioma subgroup, and 95.2% for the brain metastasis subgroup using 1%/1 mm criterion. Mean distance differences of <1.0 mm were observed in all Cartesian directions between CT-based and sCT-based CBCT patient positioning in both subgroups.

CONCLUSIONS

In terms of dose calculation and patient positioning accuracy, the studied MRI-only method demonstrated its clinical feasibility for RTP of the brain. The results encourage the use of the studied method as part of a routine clinical workflow.

Geometric evaluations of CT and MRI based deep learning segmentation for brain OARs in radiotherapy

Objective.Deep-learning auto-contouring (DL-AC) promises standardisation of organ-at-risk (OAR) contouring, enhancing quality and improving efficiency in radiotherapy. No commercial models exist for OAR contouring based on brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). We trained and evaluated computed tomography (CT) and MRI OAR autosegmentation models in RayStation. To ascertain clinical usability, we investigated the geometric impact of contour editing before training on model quality.Approach.Retrospective glioma cases were randomly selected for training (n= 32, 47) and validation (n= 9, 10) for MRI and CT, respectively. Clinical contours were edited using international consensus (gold standard) based on MRI and CT. MRI models were trained (i) using the original clinical contours based on planning CT and rigidly registered T1-weighted gadolinium-enhanced MRI (MRIu), (ii) as (i), further edited based on CT anatomy, to meet international consensus guidelines (MRIeCT), and (iii) as (i), further edited based on MRI anatomy (MRIeMRI). CT models were trained using: (iv) original clinical contours (CTu) and (v) clinical contours edited based on CT anatomy (CTeCT). Auto-contours were geometrically compared to gold standard validation contours (CTeCT or MRIeMRI) using Dice Similarity Coefficient, sensitivity, and mean distance to agreement. Models' performances were compared using paired Student's t-testing.Main results.The edited autosegmentation models successfully generated more segmentations than the unedited models. Paired t-testing showed editing pituitary, orbits, optic nerves, lenses, and optic chiasm on MRI before training significantly improved at least one geometry metric. MRI-based DL-AC performed worse than CT-based in delineating the lacrimal gland, whereas the CT-based performed worse in delineating the optic chiasm. No significant differences were found between the CTeCT and CTu except for optic chiasm.Significance.T1w-MRI DL-AC could segment all brain OARs except the lacrimal glands, which cannot be easily visualized on T1w-MRI. Editing contours on MRI before model training improved geometric performance. MRI DL-AC in RT may improve consistency, quality and efficiency but requires careful editing of training contours.