Using electronic health data to explore effectiveness of ICU EEG and anti-seizure treatment

Survey of Continuous EEG Monitoring Practices in the United States

OBJECTIVE

Continuous EEG (cEEG) practice has markedly changed over the last decade given its utility in improving critical care outcomes. However, there are limited data describing the current cEEG infrastructure in US hospitals.

METHODS

A web-based cEEG practice survey was sent to neurophysiologists at 123 ACGME-accredited epilepsy or clinical neurophysiology programs.

RESULTS

Neurophysiologists from 100 (81.3%) institutions completed the survey. Most institutions had 3 to 10 EEG faculty (80.0%), 1 to 5 fellows (74.8%), ≥6 technologists (84.9%), and provided coverage to neurology ICUs with >10 patients (71.0%) at a time. Round-the-clock EEG technologist coverage was available at most (90.0%) institutions with technologists mostly being in-house (68.0%). Most institutions without after-hours coverage (8 of 10) attributed this to insufficient technologists. The typical monitoring duration was 24 to 48 hours (23.0 and 40.0%), most commonly for subclinical seizures (68.4%) and spell characterization (11.2%). Larger neurology ICUs had more EEG technologists ( p = 0.02), fellows ( p = 0.001), and quantitative EEG use ( p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

This survey explores current cEEG practice patterns in the United States. Larger centers had more technologists and fellows. Overall technologist numbers are stable over time, but with a move toward more in-hospital compared with home-based coverage. Reduced availability of EEG technologists was a major factor limiting cEEG availability at some centers.

Real-World Continuous EEG Utilization and Outcomes in Hospitalized Patients With Acute Cerebrovascular Diseases

PURPOSE

Continuous electroencephalography (cEEG) is recommended for hospitalized patients with cerebrovascular diseases and suspected seizures or unexplained neurologic decline. We sought to (1) identify areas of practice variation in cEEG utilization, (2) determine predictors of cEEG utilization, (3) evaluate whether cEEG utilization is associated with outcomes in patients with cerebrovascular diseases.

METHODS

This cohort study of the Premier Healthcare Database (2014-2020), included hospitalized patients age > 18 years with cerebrovascular diseases (identified by ICD codes). Continuous electroencephalography was identified by International Classification of Diseases (ICD)/Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes. Multivariable lasso logistic regression was used to identify predictors of cEEG utilization and in-hospital mortality. Propensity score-matched analysis was performed to determine the relation between cEEG use and mortality.

RESULTS

1,179,471 admissions were included; 16,777 (1.4%) underwent cEEG. Total number of cEEGs increased by 364% over 5 years (average 32%/year). On multivariable analysis, top five predictors of cEEG use included seizure diagnosis, hospitals with >500 beds, regions Northeast and South, and anesthetic use. Top predictors of mortality included use of mechanical ventilation, vasopressors, anesthetics, antiseizure medications, and age. Propensity analysis showed that cEEG was associated with lower in-hospital mortality (Average Treatment Effect -0.015 [95% confidence interval -0.028 to -0.003], Odds ratio 0.746 [95% confidence interval, 0.618-0.900]).

CONCLUSIONS

There has been a national increase in cEEG utilization for hospitalized patients with cerebrovascular diseases, with practice variation. cEEG utilization was associated with lower in-hospital mortality. Larger comparative studies of cEEG-guided treatments are indicated to inform best practices, guide policy changes for increased access, and create guidelines on triaging and transferring patients to centers with cEEG capability.

ICU-Electroencephalogram Unit Improves Outcome in Status Epilepticus Patients: A Retrospective Before-After Study

OBJECTIVES

Continuous electroencephalogram (cEEG) monitoring is recommended for status epilepticus (SE) management in ICU but is still underused due to resource limitations and inconclusive evidence regarding its impact on outcome. Furthermore, the term "continuous monitoring" often implies continuous recording with variable intermittent review. The establishment of a dedicated ICU-electroencephalogram unit may fill this gap, allowing cEEG with nearly real-time review and multidisciplinary management collaboration. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of ICU-electroencephalogram unit establishing on SE outcome and management.

DESIGN

Single-center retrospective before-after study.

SETTING

Neuro-ICU of a Swiss academic tertiary medical care center.

PATIENTS

Adult patients treated for nonhypoxic SE between November 1, 2015, and December 31, 2023.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENT AND MAIN RESULTS

Data from all SE patients were assessed, comparing those treated before and after ICU-electroencephalogram unit introduction. Primary outcomes were return to premorbid neurologic function, ICU mortality, SE duration, and ICU SE management. Secondary outcomes were SE type and etiology. Two hundred seven SE patients were included, 149 (72%) before and 58 (38%) after ICU-electroencephalogram unit establishment. ICU-electroencephalogram unit introduction was associated with increased detection of nonconvulsive SE ( p = 0.003) and SE due to acute symptomatic etiology ( p = 0.019). Regression analysis considering age, comorbidities, SE etiology, and SE semeiology revealed a higher chance of returning to premorbid neurologic function ( p = 0.002), reduced SE duration ( p = 0.024), and a shift in SE management with increased use of antiseizure medications ( p = 0.007) after ICU-electroencephalogram unit introduction.

CONCLUSIONS

Integrating neurology expertise in the ICU setting through the establishment of an ICU-electroencephalogram unit with nearly real-time cEEG review, shortened SE duration, and increased likelihood of returning to premorbid neurologic function, with an increased number of antiseizure medications used. Further studies are warranted to validate these findings and assess long-term prognosis.

Antiseizure Medication Use and Outcomes After Suspected or Confirmed Acute Symptomatic Seizures

Importance

Antiseizure medications (ASMs) are frequently prescribed for acute symptomatic seizures and epileptiform abnormalities (EAs; eg, periodic or rhythmic patterns). There are limited data on factors associated with ASM use and their association with outcomes.

Objectives

To determine factors associated with ASM use in patients with confirmed or suspected acute symptomatic seizures undergoing continuous electroencephalography, and to explore the association of ASMs with outcomes.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This multicenter cohort study was performed between July 1 and September 30, 2021, at 5 US centers of the Post Acute Symptomatic Seizure Investigation and Outcomes Network. After screening 1717 patients, the study included 1172 hospitalized adults without epilepsy who underwent continuous electroencephalography after witnessed or suspected acute symptomatic seizures. Data analysis was performed from November 14, 2023, to February 2, 2024.

Exposure

ASM treatment (inpatient ASM continuation ≥48 hours).

Main Outcomes and Measures

Factors associated with (1) ASM treatment, (2) discharge ASM prescription, and (3) discharge and 3-month Glasgow Outcome Scale score of 4 or 5 were ascertained.

Results

A total of 1172 patients (median [IQR] age, 64 [52-75] years; 528 [45%] female) were included. Among them, 285 (24%) had clinical acute symptomatic seizures, 107 (9%) had electrographic seizures, and 364 (31%) had EAs; 532 (45%) received ASM treatment. Among 922 patients alive at discharge, 288 (31%) were prescribed ASMs. The respective frequencies of inpatient ASM treatment and discharge prescription were 82% (233 of 285) and 69% (169 of 246) for patients with clinical acute symptomatic seizures, 96% (103 of 107) and 95% (61 of 64) for electrographic seizures, and 64% (233 of 364) and 48% (128 of 267) for EAs. On multivariable analysis, acute and progressive brain injuries were independently associated with increased odds of inpatient ASM treatment (odds ratio [OR], 3.86 [95% CI, 2.06-7.32] and 8.37 [95% CI, 3.48-20.80], respectively) and discharge prescription (OR, 2.26 [95% CI, 1.04-4.98] and 10.10 [95% CI, 3.94-27.00], respectively). Admission to the neurology or neurosurgery service (OR, 2.56 [95% CI, 1.08-6.18]) or to the neurological intensive care unit (OR, 7.98 [95% CI, 3.49-19.00]) was associated with increased odds of treatment. Acute symptomatic seizures and EAs were significantly associated with increased odds of ASM treatment (OR, 14.30 [95% CI, 8.52-24.90] and 2.30 [95% CI, 1.47-3.61], respectively) and discharge prescription (OR, 12.60 [95% CI, 7.37-22.00] and 1.72 [95% CI, 1.00-2.97], respectively). ASM treatment was not associated with outcomes at discharge (OR, 0.96 [95% CI, 0.61-1.52]) or at 3 months after initial presentation (OR, 1.26 [95% CI, 0.78-2.04]). Among 623 patients alive and with complete data at 3 months after discharge, 30 (5%) had postdischarge seizures, 187 (30%) were receiving ASMs, and 202 (32%) had all-cause readmissions.

Conclusions and Relevance

This study suggests that etiology and electrographic findings are associated with ASM treatment for acute symptomatic seizures and EAs; ASM treatment was not associated with functional outcomes. Comparative effectiveness studies are indicated to identify which patients may benefit from ASMs and to determine the optimal treatment duration.

Clinical Impact of Standardized Interpretation and Reporting of Multimodality Neuromonitoring Data

OBJECTIVE

Evaluate the consistency and clinical impact of standardized multimodality neuromonitoring (MNM) interpretation and reporting within a system of care for patients with severe traumatic brain injury (sTBI).

DESIGN

Retrospective, observational historical case-control study.

SETTING

Single-center academic level I trauma center.

INTERVENTIONS

Standardized interpretation of MNM data summarized within daily reports.

MEASUREMENTS MAIN RESULTS

Consecutive patients with sTBI undergoing MNM were included. Historical controls were patients monitored before implementation of standardized MNM interpretation; cases were defined as patients with available MNM interpretative reports. Patient characteristics, physiologic data, and clinical outcomes were recorded, and clinical MNM reporting elements were abstracted. The primary outcome was the Glasgow Outcome Scale score 3-6 months postinjury. One hundred twenty-nine patients were included (age 42 ± 18 yr, 82% men); 45 (35%) patients were monitored before standardized MNM interpretation and reporting, and 84 (65%) patients were monitored after that. Patients undergoing standardized interpretative reporting received fewer hyperosmotic agents (3 [1-6] vs. 6 [1-8]; p = 0.04) and spent less time above an intracranial threshold of 22 mm Hg (22% ± 26% vs. 28% ± 24%; p = 0.05). The MNM interpretation cohort had a lower proportion of anesthetic days (48% [24-70%] vs. 67% [33-91%]; p = 0.02) and higher average end-tidal carbon dioxide during monitoring (34 ± 6 mm Hg vs. 32 ± 6 mm Hg; p < 0.01; d = 0.36). After controlling for injury severity, patients undergoing standardized MNM interpretation and reporting had an odds of 1.5 (95% CI, 1.37-1.59) for better outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Standardized interpretation and reporting of MNM data are a novel approach to provide clinical insight and to guide individualized critical care. In patients with sTBI, independent MNM interpretation and communication to bedside clinical care teams may result in improved intracranial pressure control, fewer medical interventions, and changes in ventilatory management. In this study, the implementation of a system for management, including standardized MNM interpretation, was associated with a significant improvement in outcome.

How many patients do you need? Investigating trial designs for anti-seizure treatment in acute brain injury patients

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

Epileptiform activity (EA), including seizures and periodic patterns, worsens outcomes in patients with acute brain injuries (e.g., aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage [aSAH]). Randomized control trials (RCTs) assessing anti-seizure interventions are needed. Due to scant drug efficacy data and ethical reservations with placebo utilization, and complex physiology of acute brain injury, RCTs are lacking or hindered by design constraints. We used a pharmacological model-guided simulator to design and determine the feasibility of RCTs evaluating EA treatment.

METHODS

In a single-center cohort of adults (age >18) with aSAH and EA, we employed a mechanistic pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic framework to model treatment response using observational data. We subsequently simulated RCTs for levetiracetam and propofol, each with three treatment arms mirroring clinical practice and an additional placebo arm. Using our framework, we simulated EA trajectories across treatment arms. We predicted discharge modified Rankin Scale as a function of baseline covariates, EA burden, and drug doses using a double machine learning model learned from observational data. Differences in outcomes across arms were used to estimate the required sample size.

RESULTS

Sample sizes ranged from 500 for levetiracetam 7 mg/kg versus placebo, to >4000 for levetiracetam 15 versus 7 mg/kg to achieve 80% power (5% type I error). For propofol 1 mg/kg/h versus placebo, 1200 participants were needed. Simulations comparing propofol at varying doses did not reach 80% power even at samples >1200.

CONCLUSIONS

Our simulations using drug efficacy show sample sizes are infeasible, even for potentially unethical placebo-control trials. We highlight the strength of simulations with observational data to inform the null hypotheses and propose use of this simulation-based RCT paradigm to assess the feasibility of future trials of anti-seizure treatment in acute brain injury.

Predictors of follow-up care for critically-ill patients with seizures and epileptiform abnormalities on EEG monitoring

OBJECTIVE

Post-hospitalization follow-up visits are crucial for preventing long-term complications. Patients with electrographic epileptiform abnormalities (EA) including seizures and periodic and rhythmic patterns are especially in need of follow-up for long-term seizure risk stratification and medication management. We sought to identify predictors of follow-up.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study of all patients (age ≥ 18 years) admitted to intensive care units that underwent continuous EEG (cEEG) monitoring at a single center between 01/2016-12/2019. Patients with EAs were included. Clinical and demographic variables were recorded. Follow-up status was determined using visit records 6-month post discharge, and visits were stratified as outpatient follow-up, neurology follow-up, and inpatient readmission. Lasso feature selection analysis was performed.

RESULTS

723 patients (53 % female, mean (std) age of 62.3 (16.4) years) were identified from cEEG records with 575 (79 %) surviving to discharge. Of those discharged, 450 (78 %) had outpatient follow-up, 316 (55 %) had a neurology follow-up, and 288 (50 %) were readmitted during the 6-month period. Discharge on antiseizure medications (ASM), younger age, admission to neurosurgery, and proximity to the hospital were predictors of neurology follow-up visits. Discharge on ASMs, along with longer length of stay, younger age, emergency admissions, and higher illness severity were predictors of readmission.

SIGNIFICANCE

ASMs at discharge, demographics (age, address), hospital care teams, and illness severity determine probability of follow-up. Parameters identified in this study may help healthcare systems develop interventions to improve care transitions for critically-ill patients with seizures and other EA.

Identifying inpatient hospitalizations with continuous electroencephalogram monitoring from administrative data

BACKGROUND

Continuous electroencephalography (cEEG) is increasingly utilized in hospitalized patients to detect and treat seizures. Epidemiologic and observational studies using administrative datasets can provide insights into the comparative and cost effectiveness of cEEG utilization. Defining patient cohorts that underwent acute inpatient cEEG from administrative datasets is limited by the lack of validated codes differentiating elective epilepsy monitoring unit (EMU) admissions from acute inpatient hospitalization with cEEG utilization. Our aim was to develop hospital administrative data-based models to identify acute inpatient admissions with cEEG monitoring and distinguish them from EMU admissions.

METHODS

This was a single center retrospective cohort study of adult (≥ 18 years old) inpatient admissions with a cEEG procedure (EMU or acute inpatient) between January 2016-April 2022. The gold standard for acute inpatient cEEG vs. EMU was obtained from the local EEG recording platform. An extreme gradient boosting model was trained to classify admissions as acute inpatient cEEG vs. EMU using administrative data including demographics, diagnostic and procedure codes, and medications.

RESULTS

There were 9,523 patients in our cohort with 10,783 hospital admissions (8.5% EMU, 91.5% acute inpatient cEEG); with average age of 59 (SD 18.2) years; 46.2% were female. The model achieved an area under the receiver operating curve of 0.92 (95% CI [0.91-0.94]) and area under the precision-recall curve of 0.99 [0.98-0.99] for classification of acute inpatient cEEG.

CONCLUSIONS

Our model has the potential to identify cEEG monitoring admissions in larger cohorts and can serve as a tool to enable large-scale, administrative data-based studies of EEG utilization.

How Many Patients Do You Need? Investigating Trial Designs for Anti-Seizure Treatment in Acute Brain Injury Patients

Objectives

Epileptiform activity (EA) worsens outcomes in patients with acute brain injuries (e.g., aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage [aSAH]). Randomized trials (RCTs) assessing anti-seizure interventions are needed. Due to scant drug efficacy data and ethical reservations with placebo utilization, RCTs are lacking or hindered by design constraints. We used a pharmacological model-guided simulator to design and determine feasibility of RCTs evaluating EA treatment.

Methods

In a single-center cohort of adults (age >18) with aSAH and EA, we employed a mechanistic pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic framework to model treatment response using observational data. We subsequently simulated RCTs for levetiracetam and propofol, each with three treatment arms mirroring clinical practice and an additional placebo arm. Using our framework we simulated EA trajectories across treatment arms. We predicted discharge modified Rankin Scale as a function of baseline covariates, EA burden, and drug doses using a double machine learning model learned from observational data. Differences in outcomes across arms were used to estimate the required sample size.

Results

Sample sizes ranged from 500 for levetiracetam 7 mg/kg vs placebo, to >4000 for levetiracetam 15 vs. 7 mg/kg to achieve 80% power (5% type I error). For propofol 1mg/kg/hr vs. placebo 1200 participants were needed. Simulations comparing propofol at varying doses did not reach 80% power even at samples >1200.

Interpretation

Our simulations using drug efficacy show sample sizes are infeasible, even for potentially unethical placebo-control trials. We highlight the strength of simulations with observational data to inform the null hypotheses and assess feasibility of future trials of EA treatment.

Association of Epileptiform Activity With Outcomes in Toxic-Metabolic Encephalopathy

The clinical significance of epileptiform abnormalities (EAs) specific to toxic-metabolic encephalopathy (TME) is unknown.

OBJECTIVES

To quantify EA burden in patients with TME and its association with neurologic outcomes.

DESIGN SETTING AND PARTICIPANT

This is a retrospective study. A cohort of patients with TME and EA (positive) were age, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE-II) score matched to a cohort of TME patients without EA (control). Univariate analysis compared EA-positive patients against controls. Multivariable logistical regression adjusting for underlying disease etiology was performed to examine the relationship between EA burden and probability of poor neurologic outcome (modified Rankin Score [mRS] 4-6) at discharge. Consecutive admissions to inpatient floors or ICUs that underwent continuous electroencephalography (cEEG) monitoring at a single center between 2012 and 2019. Inclusion criteria were 1) patients with TME diagnosis, 2) age greater than 18 years, and 3) greater than or equal to 16 hours of cEEG. Patients with acute brain injury and cardiac arrest were excluded.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Poor neurologic outcome defined by mRS (mRS 4-6).

RESULTS

One hundred sixteen patients were included, 58 with EA and 58 controls without EA, where matching was performed on age and APACHE-II score. The median age was 66 (Q1-Q3, 57-75) and median APACHE II score was 18 (Q1-Q3, 13-22). Overall cohort discharge mortality was 22% and 70% had a poor neurologic outcome. Peak EA burden was defined as the 12-hour window of recording with the highest prevalence of EAs. In multivariable analysis adjusted for Charlson Comorbidity Index and primary diagnosis, presence of EAs was associated with poor outcome (odds ratio 3.89; CI [1.05-14.2], p = 0.041). Increase in peak EA burden from 0% to 100% increased probability of poor discharge neurologic outcome by 30%.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Increasing burden of EA is associated with worse discharge outcomes in patients with TME. Future studies are needed to determine whether short-term treatment with anti-seizure medications while medically treating the underlying metabolic derangement improves outcomes.

The Past, Present, and Future of Tele-EEG

Tele-electroencephalogram (EEG) has become more pervasive over the last 20 years due to advances in technology, both independent of and driven by personnel shortages. The professionalization of EEG services has both limited growth and controlled the quality of tele-EEG. Growing data on the conditions that benefit from brain monitoring have informed increased critical care EEG and ambulatory EEG utilization. Guidelines that marshal responsible use of still-limited resources and changes in broadband and billing practices have also shaped the tele-EEG landscape. It is helpful to characterize the drivers of tele-EEG to navigate barriers to sustainable growth and to build dynamic systems that anticipate challenges in any of the domains that expand access and enhance quality of these diagnostic services. We explore the historical factors and current trends in tele-EEG in the United States in this review.