1
|
Siegel P, Richardson M, Flores J, Poole JL. Retrospective chart review suggests patients referred to therapy following digit and partial thumb amputations have decreased pain and improved function. J Hand Ther 2023; 36:770-772. [PMID: 37596150 DOI: 10.1016/j.jht.2023.02.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2022] [Revised: 02/01/2023] [Accepted: 02/07/2023] [Indexed: 08/20/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Patricia Siegel
- Occupational Therapy Graduate Program, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico.
| | - Maxwell Richardson
- Occupational Therapy Graduate Program, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico
| | - Joseph Flores
- University of New Mexico Hospital, Albuquerque, New Mexico
| | - Janet L Poole
- Occupational Therapy Graduate Program, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Tuncay Duruöz M, Öz N, Gürsoy DE, Hande Gezer H. Clinical aspects and outcomes in osteoarthritis. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2023; 37:101855. [PMID: 37524622 DOI: 10.1016/j.berh.2023.101855] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2023] [Accepted: 07/11/2023] [Indexed: 08/02/2023]
Abstract
Osteoarthritis (OA) is the most prevalent type of arthritis worldwide, and its incidence significantly increases with age. It commonly affects the knees, hips, spine, big toes, and hands. OA can be identified through clinical examination, symptoms, and imaging methods. Its main symptoms include pain, stiffness, and limitations in joint movement. Examinations may reveal coarse crepitus, bony enlargement, and tenderness at the joint line. In severe cases of OA, rest pain, night pain, and deformity may occur. OA can lead to decreased physical activity, function, and quality of life due to symptoms such as pain and stiffness. To evaluate these impacts, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are necessary. Various generic, disease-specific, and joint-specific PROMs have been developed and used in clinical practice to assess the outcomes of OA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mehmet Tuncay Duruöz
- Marmara University School of Medicine, Physical Medicine, Rehabilitation Department, Rheumatology Division, Istanbul, Turkey; Eastern Mediterranean University, Faculty of Medicine, Famagusta, North Cyprus.
| | - Nuran Öz
- Marmara University School of Medicine, Physical Medicine, Rehabilitation Department, Rheumatology Division, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Didem Erdem Gürsoy
- İstanbul Prof. Dr. Cemil Taşçıoğlu City Hospital, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Department, Rheumatology Clinic, Istanbul, Turkeye
| | - Halise Hande Gezer
- Marmara University School of Medicine, Physical Medicine, Rehabilitation Department, Rheumatology Division, Istanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Davis AM, King LK, Stanaitis I, Hawker GA. Fundamentals of osteoarthritis: outcome evaluation with patient-reported measures and functional tests. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2022; 30:775-785. [PMID: 34534660 DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2021.07.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2021] [Revised: 05/26/2021] [Accepted: 07/02/2021] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
Evaluating outcome in osteoarthritis (OA) clinical research and practice requires reliable, valid and responsive patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and functional tests that reflect important problems experienced by people with OA. The goal of this work is to provide information to start to guide the reader in selecting measures for people with OA. In this narrative review, we begin by providing an overview of measurement properties that can help clinicians and researchers in making decisions about whether a measure might be appropriate for use in their research or clinical context. We then report evidence supporting the use of measures of pain (e.g., Pain Visual Analogue (VAS), Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), Intermittent and Constant Osteoarthritis Pain, PROMIS Pain Interference, and, for screening in research, the painDETECT and the Self-report Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs) and fatigue (e.g., PROMIS-Fatigue) at a group level in clinical research. Several multi-dimensional joint-specific measures (e.g., Western Ontario McMaster Universities' Osteoarthritis Outcomes Scale, Knee/Hip Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, Oxford Hip/Knee Scale) also have evidence for group-level use. Functional tests (e.g., timed walk tests, 30 Second Chair Stand, Timed Up and Go, etc.) have measurement properties supporting their use at the group level in clinical research and at the individual patient level as do the pain VAS and NPRS. Other generic and disease-specific PROMs have been used in or could be used in OA studies but their measurement properties require further evaluation in people with OA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A M Davis
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation and Department of Physical Therapy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
| | - L K King
- Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
| | | | - G A Hawker
- Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kroon FPB, van der Heijde D, Maxwell LJ, Beaton DE, Abishek A, Berenbaum F, Blanco FJ, Conaghan PG, Dziedzic K, Hill CL, Haugen IK, Ishimori M, Ritschl V, Stamm TA, Wittoek R, Kloppenburg M. Core outcome measurement instrument selection for physical function in hand osteoarthritis using the OMERACT Filter 2.1 process. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2021; 51:1311-1319. [PMID: 34538514 DOI: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2021.08.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2021] [Revised: 08/04/2021] [Accepted: 08/24/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Physical function is one of the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) core outcome domains for hand osteoarthritis studies. Our aim was to select appropriate instrument(s) to measure this domain, as part of the development of a core outcome measurement set. METHODS Following the OMERACT Filter 2.1 instrument selection process, the (function subscale of) the Australian/Canadian Hand Osteoarthritis Index (AUSCAN), Functional Index for Hand Osteoarthritis (FIHOA) and Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHQ) were assessed for domain match, feasibility, truth and discrimination. Data gathered from available literature, working group and patient surveys, and additional analyses in two hand osteoarthritis cohorts were used to inform a consensus process. Results were summarized in Summary of Measurements Properties tables and reviewed by the OMERACT technical advisory group. RESULTS MHQ passed the assessment of domain match and feasibility by the working group and patient research partners. For AUSCAN important limitations in feasibility were noted, but domain match was good. FIHOA did not pass the assessment and was not taken through the follow-up assessment. Based on published literature, reliability and construct/longitudinal validity of both MHQ and AUSCAN fulfilled OMERACT standards. While clinical trial discrimination and thresholds of meaning were good for AUSCAN, results for MHQ were ambiguous. CONCLUSION MHQ was provisionally endorsed as OMERACT core outcome measure for the core domain physical function. While AUSCAN may have better metric properties than MHQ, it received provisional endorsement as a second measure of function due to important feasibility issues. A research agenda to merit full endorsement was set.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Féline P B Kroon
- Department of Rheumatology, and Department of Rheumatology, Zuyderland Medical Center, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Heerlen, the Netherlands.
| | | | - Lara J Maxwell
- University of Ottawa, and Centre for Practice-Changing Research, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Dorcas E Beaton
- Musculoskeletal Health and Outcomes Research, and Department of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, St. Michael's Hospital and Institute for Work and Health, Rehabilitation Sciences Institute, and the Institute for Health Policy Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Abishek Abishek
- Academic Rheumatology, University of Nottingham, and National Institute for Health Research, Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | - Francis Berenbaum
- Department of Rheumatology, Sorbonne Université, INSERM, Saint-Antoine hospital AP-HP, Paris, France
| | - Francisco J Blanco
- Grupo de investigación en Reumatología. Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de A Coruña (INIBIC). Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de A Coruña (CHUAC), Sergas. Universidade da Coruña (UDC). As Xubias, 15006. A Coruña, España
| | - Philip G Conaghan
- Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, and National Institute for Health Research, Leeds Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Krysia Dziedzic
- Impact Accelerator Unit, School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, United Kingdom
| | - Catherine L Hill
- Discipline of Medicine, Adelaide, and Rheumatology Department, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University of Adelaide, Woodville South, South Australia
| | - Ida K Haugen
- Division of Rheumatology and Research, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Mariko Ishimori
- Department of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, United States of America
| | - Valentin Ritschl
- Institute of Outcomes Research, Centre for Medical Statistics, Informatics and Intelligent Systems, Medical University of Vienna, and Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Arthritis and Rehabilitation, Vienna, Austria
| | - Tanja A Stamm
- Institute of Outcomes Research, Centre for Medical Statistics, Informatics and Intelligent Systems, Medical University of Vienna, and Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Arthritis and Rehabilitation, Vienna, Austria
| | - Ruth Wittoek
- Department of Rheumatology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Margreet Kloppenburg
- Departments of Rheumatology and Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|