A Narrowing Mortality Gap: Temporal Trends of Cause-Specific Mortality in a National Matched Cohort Study in US Veterans With Rheumatoid Arthritis

Use of Upadacitinib to Treat a Severe Flare-Up of Rheumatoid Arthritis During Anti-PD-1 Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy for Stage IV Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Lung

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy is becoming the standard of care for the treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. However, T-cell activation by ICIs frequently induces a flare-up of preexisting autoimmune diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors are increasingly used in the treatment of RA, but they could interfere with the efficacy of ICIs by inhibiting interferon signaling. Case Report: Here, we describe a case in which upadacitinib, a JAK1-selective inhibitor, was used to manage a severe RA flare-up occurring during ICI therapy with pembrolizumab, an anti-programmed cell death protein-1 antibody. A 54-year-old man with RA was diagnosed with grade IV lung squamous cell carcinoma. The patient had maintained RA remission for 4 years at the time of lung cancer diagnosis. After seven cycles of pembrolizumab therapy, the size of the primary tumor was markedly reduced, but a severe RA flare-up and organizing pneumonia (OP)-like pulmonary lesions occurred. Considering the severity of the flare-up, pembrolizumab was discontinued. Upadacitinib induced swift recovery from the RA flare-up and OP. Eleven months after the last pembrolizumab use, almost all metastatic lesions in the body had disappeared. We did not observe recurrence of lung cancer for more than 1 year during upadacitinib therapy. Conclusions: Upadacitinib could be a safe and effective option to treat severe RA flare-ups occurring during anti-PD-1 ICI therapy.

Antibodies to Malondialdehyde-Acetaldehyde Adduct Are Associated With Prevalent and Incident Rheumatoid Arthritis-Associated Interstitial Lung Disease in US Veterans

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study is to determine the associations of protein-specific anti-malondialdehyde-acetaldehyde (MAA) antibodies with prevalent and incident rheumatoid arthritis-interstitial lung disease (RA-ILD).

METHODS

Within a multicenter, prospective cohort of US veterans with RA, RA-ILD was validated by medical record review of clinical diagnoses, chest imaging, and pathology. Serum antibodies to MAA-albumin, MAA-collagen, MAA-fibrinogen, and MAA-vimentin (IgA, IgM, and IgG) were measured by a standardized enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Associations of anti-MAA antibodies with prevalent and incident RA-ILD were assessed using multivariable regression models adjusting for established RA-ILD risk factors.

RESULTS

Among 2,739 participants with RA (88% male, mean age of 64 years), there were 114 with prevalent and 136 with incident RA-ILD (average time to diagnosis: 6.6 years). Higher IgM anti-MAA-collagen (per 1 SD: adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.28, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02-1.61), IgA anti-MAA-fibrinogen (aOR 1.48, 95% CI 1.14-1.92), and IgA (aOR 1.78, 95% CI 1.34-2.37) and IgG (aOR 1.48, 95% CI 1.14-1.92) anti-MAA-vimentin antibodies were associated with prevalent RA-ILD. In incident analyses, higher IgA (per one SD: adjusted hazards ratio [aHR] 1.40, 95% CI 1.11-1.76) and IgM (aHR 1.29, 95% CI 1.04-1.60) anti-MAA-albumin antibody concentrations were associated with increased ILD risk. Participants with IgA (aHR 2.13, 95% CI 1.16-3.90) or IgM (aHR 1.98, 95% CI 1.08-3.64) anti-MAA-albumin antibody concentrations in the highest quartile had an approximately two-fold increased risk of incident RA-ILD. Across all isotypes, anti-MAA-fibrinogen, anti-MAA-collagen, and anti-MAA-vimentin antibodies were not significantly associated with incident RA-ILD.

CONCLUSION

Protein-specific anti-MAA antibodies to collagen, fibrinogen, and vimentin were associated with prevalent RA-ILD. IgA and IgM anti-MAA-albumin antibodies were associated with a higher risk of incident RA-ILD. These findings suggest that MAA modifications and resultant immune responses may contribute to RA-ILD pathogenesis.

The Risk of Lung Cancer in Rheumatoid Arthritis and Rheumatoid Arthritis-Associated Interstitial Lung Disease

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to evaluate lung cancer risk in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and RA-interstitial lung disease (ILD).

METHODS

We performed a retrospective, matched cohort study of RA and RA-ILD within the Veterans Health Administration (VA) between 2000 and 2019. Patients with RA and RA-ILD were identified with validated administrative-based algorithms, then matched (up to 1:10) on age, gender, and VA enrollment year to individuals without RA. Lung cancers were identified from a VA oncology database and the National Death Index. Conditional Cox regression models assessed lung cancer risk adjusting for race, ethnicity, smoking status, Agent Orange exposure, and comorbidity burden among matched individuals. Several sensitivity analyses were performed.

RESULTS

We matched 72,795 patients with RA with 633,937 patients without RA (mean age 63 years; 88% male). Over 4,481,323 patient-years, 17,099 incident lung cancers occurred. RA was independently associated with an increased lung cancer risk (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.58 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.52-1.64]), which persisted in never smokers (aHR 1.65 [95% CI 1.22-2.24]) and in those with incident RA (aHR 1.54 [95% CI 1.44-1.65]). Compared to non-RA controls, prevalent RA-ILD (n = 757) was more strongly associated with lung cancer risk (aHR 3.25 [95% CI 2.13-4.95]) than RA without ILD (aHR 1.57 [95% CI 1.51-1.64]). Analyses of both prevalent and incident RA-ILD produced similar results (RA-ILD vs non-RA aHR 2.88 [95% CI 2.45-3.40]).

CONCLUSION

RA was associated with a >50% increased risk of lung cancer, and those with RA-ILD represented a particularly high-risk group with an approximate three-fold increased risk. Increased lung cancer surveillance in RA, and especially RA-ILD, may be a useful strategy for reducing the burden posed by the leading cause of cancer death.

Updates on interstitial lung disease and other selected extra-articular manifestations of rheumatoid arthritis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To discuss changes in epidemiology, recent advances in understanding of the pathogenesis and management of selected extraarticular manifestations of rheumatoid arthritis (ExRA).

RECENT FINDINGS

The incidence of ExRA overall and subcutaneous rheumatoid nodules in particular is declining after 2000. These trends reflect improved RA disease activity with early effective immunosuppressive treatments; changing environmental risk factors can be contributing. ExRA continues to carry a two-fold increased mortality risk. RA-associated interstitial lung disease (RA-ILD) is a major contributor to mortality, with no decline in incidence and scant therapeutic options. Individualized risk stratification for RA-ILD based on patient-level risk factors and biomarker profile is evolving with MUC5B as a major genetic risk factor. Clinical trials are underway to evaluate the benefits of novel antifibrotic therapies and targeted therapies for RA-ILD. The risk of cardiovascular disease in RA is generally amendable to treatment with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, although cardiovascular risk associated with JAK inhibition is not fully understood.

SUMMARY

Despite reduction in incidence of ExRA overall, the incidence of RA-ILD shows no significant decline and remains a major therapeutic challenge. The use of novel antifibrotics and immunosuppressive drugs shows promise in slowing the progression of RA-ILD.

Decline in Incidence of Extra-Articular Manifestations of Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Population-Based Cohort Study

OBJECTIVE

The focus of this study was to assess changes in the cumulative incidence of extra-articular manifestations of rheumatoid arthritis (ExRAs) and associated mortality risk.

METHODS

This study evaluated trends in occurrence of ExRAs using a population-based inception cohort that included all adult patients with incident rheumatoid arthritis (RA) from 1985 through 2014 meeting the 1987 American College of Rheumatology criteria. Patients were divided into two cohorts based on the incidence date of RA, 1985 to 1999 and 2000 to 2014. The occurrence of ExRAs was determined by manual chart review, and the 10-year cumulative incidence was estimated for each ExRA in both cohorts. Cox proportional hazard models were used to determine associations between specific demographic and RA disease characteristics and ExRAs and between ExRAs and mortality.

RESULTS

There were 907 patients included, 296 in the 1985 to 1999 cohort and 611 in the 2000 to 2014 cohort. The 10-year cumulative incidence of any ExRA decreased significantly between the earlier and later cohorts (45.1% vs 31.6%, P < 0.001). This was largely driven by significant declines in subcutaneous rheumatoid nodules (30.9% vs 15.8%, P < 0.001) and nonsevere ExRAs (41.4% vs 28.8%, P = 0.001). Identified risk factors for the development of any ExRAs include rheumatoid factor positivity (hazard ratio [HR] 2.02, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.43-2.86) and current smoking (HR 1.61, 95% CI 1.10-2.34). Mortality was increased in patients with either nonsevere (HR 1.83, 95% CI 1.18-2.85) or severe ExRAs (HR 3.05, 95% CI 1.44-6.49).

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of ExRAs has decreased over time. Mortality remains increased in patients with ExRAs.

Re-evaluating the mythical divide between traditional and novel cardiovascular risk factors in rheumatoid arthritis

Cardiovascular (CV) risk factors for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are conventionally classified as 'traditional' and 'novel'. We argue that this classification is obsolete and potentially counterproductive. Further, we discuss problems with the common practice of adjusting for traditional CV risk factors in statistical analyses. These analyses do not target well-defined effects of RA on CV risk. Ultimately, we propose a future direction for cardiorheumatology research that prioritises optimising current treatments and identifying novel therapeutic targets over further categorisation of well-known risk factors.

Impact of combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema on lung cancer risk and mortality in rheumatoid arthritis: A multicenter retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE

Combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema (CPFE) is a syndrome characterized by the coexistence of emphysema and fibrotic interstitial lung disease (ILD). The aim of this study was to examine the effect of CPFE on lung cancer risk and lung cancer-related mortality in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

METHODS

We conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort study of patients newly diagnosed with lung cancer at five community hospitals between June 2006 and December 2021. Patients were followed until lung cancer-related death, other-cause death, loss to follow-up, or the end of the study. We used the cumulative incidence function with Gray's test and Fine-Gray regression analysis for survival analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 563 patients with biopsy-proven lung cancer were included (82 RA patients and 481 non-RA patients). The prevalence of CPFE was higher in RA patients than in non-RA patients (40.2% vs.10.0%) at lung cancer diagnosis. During follow-up, the crude incidence rate of lung cancer-related death was 0.29 and 0.10 per patient-year (PY) in RA and non-RA patients, and 0.32 and 0.07 per PY in patients with CPFE and patients without ILD or emphysema, respectively. The estimated death probability at 5 years differed between RA and non-RA patients (66% vs. 32%, p<0.001) and between patients with CPFE and patients without ILD or emphysema (71% vs. 24%, p<0.001). In addition to clinical cancer stage and no surgery within 1 month, RA and CPFE were identified as independent predictive factors for increased lung cancer-related mortality (RA: adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 2.49; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.65-4.76; CPFE: adjusted HR 2.01; 95% CI 1.24-3.23).

CONCLUSIONS

RA patients with lung cancer had a higher prevalence of CPFE and increased cancer-related mortality compared with non-RA patients. Close monitoring and optimal treatment strategies tailored to RA patients with CPFE are important to improve the poor prognosis of lung cancer.

Prevalence and clinical characteristics of patients with rheumatoid arthritis with interstitial lung disease using unstructured healthcare data and machine learning

OBJECTIVES

Real-world data regarding rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and its association with interstitial lung disease (ILD) is still scarce. This study aimed to estimate the prevalence of RA and ILD in patients with RA (RAILD) in Spain, and to compare clinical characteristics of patients with RA with and without ILD using natural language processing (NLP) on electronic health records (EHR).

METHODS

Observational case-control, retrospective and multicentre study based on the secondary use of unstructured clinical data from patients with adult RA and RAILD from nine hospitals between 2014 and 2019. NLP was used to extract unstructured clinical information from EHR and standardise it into a SNOMED-CT terminology. Prevalence of RA and RAILD were calculated, and a descriptive analysis was performed. Characteristics between patients with RAILD and RA patients without ILD (RAnonILD) were compared.

RESULTS

From a source population of 3 176 165 patients and 64 241 683 EHRs, 13 958 patients with RA were identified. Of those, 5.1% patients additionally had ILD (RAILD). The overall age-adjusted prevalence of RA and RAILD were 0.53% and 0.02%, respectively. The most common ILD subtype was usual interstitial pneumonia (29.3%). When comparing RAILD versus RAnonILD patients, RAILD patients were older and had more comorbidities, notably concerning infections (33.6% vs 16.5%, p<0.001), malignancies (15.9% vs 8.5%, p<0.001) and cardiovascular disease (25.8% vs 13.9%, p<0.001) than RAnonILD. RAILD patients also had higher inflammatory burden reflected in more pharmacological prescriptions and higher inflammatory parameters and presented a higher in-hospital mortality with a higher risk of death (HR 2.32; 95% CI 1.59 to 2.81, p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

We found an estimated age-adjusted prevalence of RA and RAILD by analysing real-world data through NLP. RAILD patients were more vulnerable at the time of inclusion with higher comorbidity and inflammatory burden than RAnonILD, which correlated with higher mortality.

Autoantibody-negative rheumatoid arthritis: still a challenge for the rheumatologist

Increased research over the past 30 years has greatly improved the understanding of the pathophysiological mechanisms and clinical aspects of autoantibody-positive rheumatoid arthritis, resulting in improved management and outcomes. In contrast, the subset of rheumatoid arthritis that does not have autoantibodies (such as rheumatoid factor and anti-citrullinated protein autoantibodies) remains less well defined in its pathogenic mechanisms. Autoantibody-negative rheumatoid arthritis continues to pose diagnostic challenges, might respond differently to therapies, and appears to be burdened with different comorbidities and outcomes. The clear separation of rheumatoid arthritis according to serotypes is still a subject of uncertainty and controversy, and studies specifically focused on comparing rheumatoid arthritis and rheumatoid arthritis-like arthritides that do not have autoantibodies remain scarce. The purpose of this Review is to summarise the peculiarities that make autoantibody-negative rheumatoid arthritis different from its autoantibody-positive counterpart, with the aim of generating debate and stimulating further research on this challenging condition.

Ultrasonographic Presentation and Anatomic Distribution of Lung Involvement in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis

BACKGROUND

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic auto-immune disease, typically affecting the joints, which can also present with lung involvement (pleuritis, interstitial lung disease, pulmonary nodules, etc.). Lung ultrasound (LUS) is an upcoming tool in the detection of these pulmonary manifestations.

METHODS

We performed a 72-window LUS in 75 patients presenting to the outpatient rheumatology clinic and describe the abnormalities (presence of B-lines (vertical comet-tail artefacts), pleural abnormalities, pleural effusions, and subpleural nodules) on lung ultrasound. We created a topological mapping of the number of B-lines per intercostal zone.

RESULTS

We observed pleural effusions, pleural abnormalities, and pleural nodules in, respectively, 1.3%, 45.3%, and 14% of patients. There were 35 (46.7%) patients who had less than 5 B-lines, 15 (20%) patients who had between 5 and 10 B-lines, 11 (14.6%) between 10 and 20, 10 (13.3%) between 20 and 50, 1 (1.3%) between 50 and 100, and 3 (4%) of patients who had more than 100 B-lines.

CONCLUSIONS

LUS in patients with RA shows an array of abnormalities ranging from interstitial syndromes to pleural abnormalities, subpleural nodules, and pleural effusions. Hotspots for the presence of B-lines are situated bilaterally in the posterior subscapular regions, as well as the anterior right mid-clavicular region.