Expanded Autoantibody Profiles for Subsetting of Native American, African American, and European American Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Systemic lupus erythematosus in American Indian/Alaska natives: Incorporating our new understanding of the biology of trauma

OBJECTIVE

To review the literature regarding systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in American Indian/Alaska Native (AI/AN) people and relate prevalence and/or disease severity to our emerging understanding of the biology of trauma and toxic stress.

METHODS

We conducted a search and review of the literature using search terms "lupus and American Indians" "ACEs and disease outcome" "Biology of Adversity" "lupus and ACE scores," " lupus and childhood abuse." These search criteria were entered into Google Scholar and articles retrieved from PubMed, NBCI. This approach yielded a small numbers of papers used throughout this review. We excluded articles that were not published in a peer reviewed journals, as well as editorial commentaries.

RESULTS

In the AI/AN population, SLE shows high prevalence rates and severe disease manifestations, comparable to the African American population. AI/AN populations also have high rates of childhood trauma. Toxic stress and trauma such as those catalogued in the Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACE) study have broad-reaching immunologic and epigenetic effects that are likely to be relevant to our understanding of SLE in AI/AN people.

CONCLUSIONS

AI/AN people have high rates of SLE. These high rates are likely to be driven by many complex factors, not all of which are genetic. Future research is needed to establish (or refute) a causal connection between the biology of adversity and SLE in socially marginalized and historically traumatized populations.

Ro52/TRIM21 - From host defense to autoimmunity

Ro52 (TRIM21) belongs to the ubiquitin ligase family. This protein plays a crucial role in many immunological processes, including antibody-dependent intracellular neutralization, synergy with the complement system, antiviral response, death mediation, oxidative stress response, and protein ubiquitination. Abnormal expression of TRIM21 can break immunological tolerance and lead to the production of autoantibodies against TRIM21. Antibodies against TRIM21 are detected in various autoimmune diseases, including Sjögren's syndrome (SS), systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), or myositis. However, anti-TRIM21 presence is not limited to autoimmune connective tissue disorders. It was observed in patients with malignancies, various cancerous processes, infectious diseases, and idiopathic interstitial pneumonia. The occurrence of TRIM21 autoantibodies is also associated with clinical features, such as the prevalence of interstitial lung diseases and cardiac or haematological involvement in connective tissue disorders. The purpose of this review was to summarize current knowledge of the immunological functions of TRIM21 and analyze the clinical implications of anti-TRIM21 antibodies in the disease course.

Unique Serum Immune Phenotypes and Stratification of Oklahoma Native American Rheumatic Disease Patients

OBJECTIVE

Native American (NA) populations have higher rates of rheumatic disease and present with overlapping disease symptoms and nontraditional serologic features, thus presenting an urgent need for better biomarkers in NA diagnostics. This study used a machine learning approach to identify immune signatures that more effectively stratify NA patients with rheumatic disease.

METHODS

Adult NA patients with autoantibody-positive (AAB+) rheumatoid arthritis (RA; n = 28), autoantibody negative (AAB-) RA (n = 18), systemic autoimmune rheumatic disease (n = 28), arthralgia/osteoarthritis (n = 28), or polyarthritis/undifferentiated connective tissue disease (n = 28), and control patients (n = 28) provided serum samples for cytokine, chemokine, and AAB assessment. Random forest clustering and soluble mediator groups were used to identify patients and control patients with similar biologic signatures. The American College of Rheumatology criteria specific for systemic disease and RA identified differences in disease manifestations across clusters.

RESULTS

Serum soluble mediators were not homogenous between different NA rheumatic disease diagnostic groups, reflecting the heterogeneity of autoimmune diseases. Clustering by serum biomarkers created 5 analogous immune phenotypes. Soluble mediators and pathways associated with chronic inflammation and involvement of the innate, B cell, T follicular helper cell, and interferon-associated pathways, along with regulatory signatures, distinguished the 5 immune signatures among patients. Select clinical features were associated with individual immune profiles. Patients with low inflammatory and higher regulatory signatures were more likely to have few clinical manifestations, whereas those with T cell pathway involvement had more arthritis.

CONCLUSION

Serum protein signatures distinguished NA patients with rheumatic disease into distinct immune subsets. Following these immune profiles over time may assist with earlier diagnoses and help guide more personalized treatment approaches.

Detecting Autoantibodies by Multiparametric Assays: Impact on Prevention, Diagnosis, Monitoring, and Personalized Therapy in Autoimmune Diseases

BACKGROUND

The introduction of multiparametric autoantibody tests has been proposed to improve the accuracy of the immunological diagnosis of autoimmune diseases (AID) and to accelerate time for completing the diagnostic process. Multiplex tests are capable of detecting many autoantibodies in a single run whereas a traditional immunoassay uses a single antigen to detect only a single specificity of autoantibodies. The reasons why multiplex tests could replace conventional immunoassays lie in the evidence that they allow for more efficient handling of large numbers of samples by the laboratory, while ensuring greater diagnostic sensitivity in AID screening.

CONTENT

This review aims to highlight the important role that multiparametric tests could assume when designed for defined profiles they are used not only for diagnostic purposes but also to predict the onset of AID to identify clinical phenotypes and to define prognosis. Furthermore, differences in the antibody profile could identify which subjects will be responsive or not to a specific pharmacological treatment.

SUMMARY

The use of autoantibody profiles, when specifically requested and performed with clinically validated technologies, can represent a significant step toward personalized medicine in autoimmunology.

Serological abnormalities that predict progression to systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases in antinuclear antibody positive individuals

OBJECTIVE

We investigated the auto-antibody (auto-Ab) profiles in anti-nuclear antibody-positive (ANA+) individuals lacking Systemic Autoimmune Rheumatic Disease (SARD) and early SARD patients, to determine the key differences between these groups and identify factors that are associated with an increased risk of symptomatic progression within the next two years in ANA+ individuals.

METHODS

Using custom antigen (Ag) microarrays, 144 IgM and IgG auto-Abs were surveyed in 84 asymptomatic and 123 symptomatic (48 undifferentiated connective tissue disease (UCTD) and 75 SARD patients) ANA+ individuals. Auto-Ab were compared in ANA+ individuals lacking a SARD diagnosis with ≥ 2 years follow-up (n = 52), including all those who demonstrated progression (n = 14) during this period, with changes over time assessed in a representative subset.

RESULTS

We show that ANA+ individuals have auto-Ab to many self-Ag that are not being captured by current screening techniques and very high levels of these auto-Abs are predominantly restricted to early SARD patients, with SLE patients displaying reactivity to many more auto-Ags than the other groups. In general, the symptoms that developed in progressors mirrored those seen in SARD patients with similar patterns of auto-Ab. Only anti-Ro52 Abs were found to predict progression (positive predictive value 46%, negative predictive value 89%). Surprisingly, over 2 years follow-up the levels of auto-Ab remained remarkably stable regardless of whether individuals progressed or not.

CONCLUSION

Our findings strongly argue that development of assays with an expanded set of auto-Ags and enhanced dynamic range would improve the diagnostic and prognostic ability of auto-Ab testing.

Autoantibodies spectrum in lupus nephritis in a cohort of Egyptian patients: relation to disease activity and prognostic value

Background

Specific autoantibodies are considered as an important marker in autoimmune rheumatic diseases and are of great value for the diagnosis and prognosis of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients. A total of eighteen autoantibodies were analyzed for their positivity in SLE patients and we evaluated the clinical relevance of the five most frequent autoantibodies: anti-dsDNA, anti-nucleosome, anti-histone, anti-Ro60, and anti-Ro52 on disease activity and renal affection in SLE Egyptian patients.

Results

Immunological profile and correlation of the five autoantibodies with disease activity and histopathological pattern of renal involvement were analyzed for 190 SLE patients. Lupus nephritis (LN) patients showed much worse constitutional and mucocutaneous manifestations than patients without nephritis. Autoantibody profile showed a significant increased frequency of anti-dsDNA, anti-nucleosome, anti-histone, anti-Ro-60, and anti-Ro52 antibodies in LN patients. The impact of the co-positivity of the autoantibodies on the renal function was obvious. Moreover, the disease activity increased by the increased frequency of autoantibodies positivity in LN patients. ROC curve analysis showed that anti-nucleosome had the highest sensitivity; 93% followed by anti-dsDNA 83.3% then anti-histone 73.8%, but anti-Ro60 and anti-Ro52 showed a humble sensitivity. Furthermore, the highest frequency of positivity for the five autoantibodies was found in class-III and class-IV LN patients.

Conclusion

Detection of anti-dsDNA, anti-nucleosome, anti-histone, and anti-Ro60 in SLE patients may be important for predicting disease progression and kidney affection. Moreover, anti-nucleosome and anti-dsDNA show high sensitivity and specificity for lupus nephritis, thus patients with four to five positive autoantibody panels should be kept under close monitoring as they may warrant considering aggressive therapy to control their disease and prevent renal damage.