Test of the month: The chromogenic antifactor Xa assay

Evaluation of the use of a heparin dose-response test in dogs to determine the optimal heparin dose during intravascular procedures and assessment of the in vitro heparin response in healthy dogs

BACKGROUND

No guidelines for administering and monitoring anticoagulants intraprocedurally are currently available in dogs, despite the prevalence of procedures necessitating systemic anticoagulation with heparin.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate an activated clotting time (ACT)-based heparin dose-response (HDR) test to predict the individual required heparin dose in dogs during intravascular procedures, and to investigate both the in vitro heparin - ACT and in vitro heparin - factor anti-Xa activity (anti-Xa) relationships in dogs.

METHODS

Blood was collected from eight healthy beagles undergoing a cardiac procedure and utilised to establish baseline ACT and for in vitro evaluation. Subsequently, 100 IU/kg heparin was administered intravenously (IV) and ACT was remeasured (HDR test). The required heparin dose for an ACT target response ≥300 s was calculated for each individual and ACT was remeasured after administration of this dose. For in vitro testing, a serial heparin blood dilution (0-0.5-1-2-4 international unit (IU)/mL) was prepared and ACT and anti-Xa were determined using whole blood and frozen plasma, respectively.

RESULTS

The HDR test overestimated the required heparin dose in 3/7 dogs. In vitro, ACT and anti-Xa increased significantly with increasing blood heparin concentration. Heparin - ACT was nonlinear in 4/8 dogs at heparin concentrations >2 IU/mL, whereas heparin - anti-Xa remained linear throughout the tested range.

CONCLUSIONS

The HDR test poorly estimated the required heparin dose in dogs. This is most likely attributed to a nonlinear heparin - ACT relationship, as observed in vitro. Anti-Xa is a promising alternative for ACT; however, unavailability as a point-of-care test and lack of in vivo target values restrict its current use.

Comparison of the Correlation Between Coagulation Indices and Rivaroxaban Concentrations

BACKGROUND

Rivaroxaban has predictable pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. However, monitoring rivaroxaban concentrations should be provided for special patients with hepatic insufficiency, high bleeding risk, and high thrombotic risk.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to correlate chromogenic anti-Xa assay, prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), thromboelastogram reaction time (TEG R-time), and rivaroxaban concentration measured by high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS) (MS-Riva).

METHODS

Peripheral venous blood was collected from recruited patients 30 minutes before and 2 to 4 hours after drug administration. High-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry and chromogenic anti-Xa assay measured rivaroxaban concentration. Different assays were compared by Pearson correlation coefficient and Bland-Altman analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 104 patients with 191 plasma were included in the study. Overall analysis shows that chromogenic anti-Xa assay, PT, APTT, and TEG R-time strongly correlated with MS-Riva (r = 0.986; r = 0.884; r = 0.741; r = 0.739; P < 0.001). Rivaroxaban peak concentration detected by HPLC-MS/MS (MS-peak) showed a very strong correlation with the chromogenic anti-Xa assay (r = 0.977, P < 0.001) and moderate correlation with PT, APTT, and TEG R-time (r = 0.670; r = 0.571; r = 0.481, P < 0.001). Rivaroxaban trough concentration detected by HPLC-MS/MS (MS-trough) correlated strongly with the chromogenic anti-Xa assay (r = 0.884, P < 0.001), weakly with APTT (r = 0.313; P = 0.043), and not significantly with PT and TEG R-time (P = 0.140; P = 0.341).

CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE

High-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry/MS is the preferred choice for monitoring peak and tough concentrations, followed by anti-Xa, while PT is only suitable for peak concentrations. This study can help the clinicians to better adjust the medication regimen and reduce the risk of recurrence of thrombosis as well as the risk of bleeding.

Evaluation of Initial Enoxaparin Dosing and Antifactor Xa Levels in Infants Admitted to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit

Introduction

Infants are at risk for thrombotic conditions due to multiple risk factors such as congenital heart defects and sepsis. According to the American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) 2012 guidelines, enoxaparin may be given for thrombotic conditions at a dose of 1.5 mg/kg/dose every 12 h for patients less than 2 months of age and 1 mg/kg/dose every 12 h for those older than 2 months. Several studies have reported that infants typically require a higher initial dose of enoxaparin to reach therapeutic antifactor Xa levels than what is currently recommended.

Methods

This is a single-center retrospective case-control study of hospitalized infants less than 12 months of age who received treatment with enoxaparin while admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) at a freestanding children's hospital. The primary objective was the difference between the initial enoxaparin dose (mg/kg) compared to the enoxaparin dose in which the patient first achieved a therapeutic antifactor Xa level of 0.5-1.0 units/mL.

Results

A total of 56 infants were included in this study. The median enoxaparin dose at initiation was 1.5 mg/kg/dose, and the median enoxaparin dose at the first therapeutic antifactor Xa level was 1.9 mg/kg/dose (z = -12.7, p < 0.0001). There was no correlation between gestational age and weight with the enoxaparin dose required to reach a therapeutic antifactor Xa level.

Conclusion

Infants admitted to the NICU, specifically those less than 4 months of age, require higher initial enoxaparin dosing to reach therapeutic antifactor Xa levels than what is currently recommended.

Laboratory Monitoring of Heparin Anticoagulation in Hemodialysis: Rationale and Strategies

Unfractionated heparin (UFH) and low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) are commonly used to prevent clotting of the hemodialysis extracorporeal circuit and optimize hemodialysis adequacy. There is no consensus on the optimal dosing for UFH and LMWHs during hemodialysis. In clinical practice, semiquantitative clotting scoring of the dialyzer and venous chamber may help to guide UFH and LMWH dose adjustment. Laboratory monitoring has not been shown to improve clinical outcomes and is therefore not routinely indicated in most hemodialysis patients. It might, however, be considered in select patients, such as those with extremes of body weight or history of repeated clotting or bleeding. Methods for laboratory monitoring include the activated partial thromboplastin time, activated clotting time, and antifactor Xa assays for UFH and antifactor Xa assay for LMWHs. Target ranges for anticoagulation in hemodialysis have been suggested but not clearly defined. When utilizing these tests, issues such as availability, standardization, interfering factors, and interpretation must be considered. In this narrative review, we discuss the rationale and methods of monitoring anticoagulation in hemodialysis.

Residual anti-Xa activity in plasma of patients presenting for electively planned neuraxial regional anesthesia

OBJECTIVE

To determine the incidence of increased anti-Xa activity within plasma levels 24 hours after administration of therapeutic dose low-molecular-weight heparin in patients presenting for elective neuraxial anesthesia.

BACKGROUND

Guidelines for neuroaxial regional anesthesia for patients with antithrombotic drugs recommend time intervals for waiting. There is scientific evidence to suggest that the recommended interval of 24 hours may be insufficient in patients treated with therapeutic dose low-molecular-weight heparin.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort analysis of 74 patients who received therapeutic dose low-molecular-weight heparin before planned neuraxial anesthesia between April 1, 2015 and April 1, 2020 at Freiburg University Hospital. Primary endpoint was the occurrence of elevated plasma anti-Xa levels in prophylactic range or higher (>0.2 IU/mL) 24 hours after the last application of the therapeutic dose.

RESULTS

24 hours after the last dose of therapeutic low-molecular-weight heparin, 18.0% of patients had elevated anti-Xa activity levels >0.2 IU/mL. A weak correlation between the time since the last administration of low-molecular-weight heparin and plasma anti-Xa levels could be found. No other risk factors were seen.

CONCLUSIONS

Relevant residual anticoagulant activity, as measured by plasma anti-Xa levels within a prophylactic range, is measurable 24 hours after the last administration of therapeutic dose low-molecular-weight heparin.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

German Clinical Trials Register DRKS00022099.

Current and future strategies to monitor and manage coagulation in ECMO patients

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) can provide life-saving support for critically ill patients suffering severe respiratory and/or cardiac failure. However, thrombosis and bleeding remain common and complex problems to manage. Key causes of thrombosis in ECMO patients include blood contact to pro-thrombotic and non-physiological surfaces, as well as high shearing forces in the pump and membrane oxygenator. On the other hand, adverse effects of anticoagulant, thrombocytopenia, platelet dysfunction, acquired von Willebrand syndrome, and hyperfibrinolysis are all established as causes of bleeding. Finding safe and effective anticoagulants that balance thrombosis and bleeding risk remains challenging. This review highlights commonly used anticoagulants in ECMO, including their mechanism of action, monitoring methods, strengths and limitations. It further elaborates on existing anticoagulant monitoring strategies, indicating their target range, benefits and drawbacks. Finally, it introduces several highly novel approaches to real-time anticoagulation monitoring methods including sound, optical, fluorescent, and electrical measurement as well as their working principles and future directions for research.

An Overview of Heparin Monitoring with the Anti-Xa Assay

Heparin remains a critical therapy in hospitalized patients requiring anticoagulation. Unfractionated heparin (UFH) mediates its therapeutic effect by binding to antithrombin (AT) and inhibiting thrombin and FXa, as well as other serine proteases. Because of its complex pharmacokinetics, monitoring UFH therapy is required, which is usually achieved with either the activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) or the anti-factor Xa (anti-Xa) assay. Low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) is fast replacing UFH, as it has a more predictable response, negating the need for routine monitoring in most cases. When required, the anti-Xa assay is used for monitoring of LMWH. The APTT has many notable limitations when used for heparin therapeutic monitoring, including biologic, preanalytical, and analytical issues. With its increasing availability, the anti-Xa assay is appealing as it is less affected by patient factors (e.g., acute-phase reactants, lupus anticoagulants, consumptive coagulopathies), known to interfere with the APTT. The anti-Xa assay has shown additional benefits, such as faster time to achieve therapeutic levels, more consistent therapeutic levels, less dose adjustments, and, overall, less tests performed during therapy. However, poor interlaboratory agreement has been observed among anti-Xa reagents, highlighting that further work needs to be done to standardize this assay for use in patient heparin monitoring.

Viscoelastic Testing in the Management of Adult Patients on Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices with Focus on Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation

Thromboembolic and hemorrhagic complications continue to remain frequent complications that significantly impact the morbidity and mortality of patients implanted with mechanical circulatory support devices (MCSDs). The severe acute respiratory syndrome caused by coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has resulted in a number of COVID-19 patients being supported by MCSDs, specifically extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), which in turn has created a crucial need for rapid assessment of hemostatic status in these patients to avoid bleeding and thrombotic complications. Currently, conventional plasma-based coagulation assays such as prothrombin time and activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) are used to assess hemostasis, and the activated clotting time (ACT) and aPTT are the most common tests used to monitor heparin anticoagulation in patients on ECMO. Unfractionated heparin remains the mainstay anticoagulation therapy for patients on ECMO. Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO) offers little guidance on the subject but does state that each institution should create its internal anticoagulation protocols. Viscoelastic assays (VEAs) are increasingly recognized by ELSO and ECMO community for their potential to assess hemostatic derangements in patients implanted with MCSDs as well as guidance for appropriate hemostatic therapy. This review focuses on the evidence for the use of viscoelastic assays to assess overall hemostasis and to guide the treatment of adult patients connected to an ECMO circuit. Limitations of the use of conventional assays, ACT, and VEA are also discussed.

Monitoring of heparin therapy beyond the anti-Xa activity assay: Evaluation of a thrombin generation assay

INTRODUCTION

Global coagulation assays may be of added value to the anti-Xa assay for monitoring heparin therapy. Unlike most testing methods, the thrombin generation assay (TGA) has the ability to assess the overall function of the hemostatic system, which provides information on the anticoagulation status of patients. We compared the TGA, measured with ST Genesia^® STG-DrugScreen^® reagent, with the anti-Xa assay for monitoring heparin therapy in inflammatory and non-inflammatory patients. We also determined reference values for STG-DrugScreen^® thrombin generation (TG) parameters.

METHODS

Reference values were determined on 120 healthy donors. Furthermore, a spiking experiment with unfractionated heparin (UFH) and low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) was performed, and samples of patients receiving UFH or LMWH were analyzed with ST Genesia^® and the anti-Xa assay.

RESULTS

High discrepancy between TG parameters and anti-Xa activity was observed for low LMWH anti-Xa levels. TG parameters were affected in 36/46 (time to peak) to 42/46 (peak height) patients during UFH therapy with sub-target anti-Xa activity levels.

CONCLUSION

TGA seems insufficiently sensitive for low concentrations of LMWH. There may be an added value of the TGA for monitoring UFH in so-called heparin-resistant patients. Therefore, the TGA has the potential to be introduced as an additional tool for monitoring heparin therapy.

Anticoagulation Monitoring in the Intensive Care Unit

Patients with critical illness often display variable hypo- and hypercoagulable sequalae requiring intense monitoring and anticoagulation pharmacotherapy to prevent or treat inappropriate clot formation. It is imperative to understand the various stages of the clotting cascade and where each pharmacotherapy agent exerts its therapeutic effect. Common coagulation tests are utilized to monitor the areas of the clotting cascade and the effects that anticoagulant pharmacotherapy exhibits. Many novel coagulation tests are also in development. The purpose of this narrative review is to evaluate commonly utilized coagulation tests that monitor anticoagulation while in the intensive care unit.

Intraoperative Management of Adult Patients on Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: An Expert Consensus Statement From the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists-Part I, Technical Aspects of Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is used to support patients with refractory cardiopulmonary failure. Given ECMO's increased use in adults and the fact that many ECMO patients are cared for by anesthesiologists, the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists ECMO working group created an expert consensus statement that is intended to help anesthesiologists manage adult ECMO patients who are cared for in the operating room. In the first part of this 2-part series, technical aspects of ECMO are discussed, and related expert consensus statements are provided.

Anticoagulation in syncardia total artificial heart recipients: anti-factor Xa or activated partial thromboplastin time?

Although the activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) has historically been the method of choice for anticoagulation monitoring in patients undergoing mechanical circulatory support with intravenous unfractionated heparin, it is being progressively superseded by the anti-factor Xa (anti-Xa) method. A retrospective single-arm, single-centre analysis of 20 patients who underwent total artificial heart implantation entailed simultaneous determinations of aPTT and anti-Xa. Agreement between these parameters was assessed using the Bland-Altman method. Despite a positive correlation between aPTT and anti-Xa, normal target ranges were poorly aligned: from 5th to 30th postoperative day, for anti-Xa values of 0.2 and 0.4 U/ml corresponding aPTT values were 52.1 and 65.2 s, 7.9 and 14.8 lower than predicted values, respectively. This was not associated with thromboembolic sequalae. It was not possible to demonstrate a significant relationship between the predictor variables (postoperative day; white blood cell count; C-reactive protein concentration; alanine transaminase and alkaline phosphatase level; bilirubin; haemoglobin; albumin and total protein concentration) and the agreement between aPTT and anti-Xa levels. In summary, when anti-Xa levels were used to guide anticoagulation therapy, corresponding aPTT levels were low with respect to target range. Methodology applied in this study is generalizable to other forms of mechanical circulatory support.

Intraoperative Management of Adult Patients on Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: an Expert Consensus Statement From the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists-Part I, Technical Aspects of Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is used to support patients with refractory cardiopulmonary failure. Given ECMO's increased use in adults and the fact that many ECMO patients are cared for by anesthesiologists, the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists ECMO working group created an expert consensus statement that is intended to help anesthesiologists manage adult ECMO patients who are cared for in the operating room. In the first part of this 2-part series, technical aspects of ECMO are discussed, and related expert consensus statements are provided.

Target Drug-Calibrated Anti-Xa Activity Assays and Expected Peak-Trough Levels in an Asian Population: A Multicenter Study

BACKGROUND

For patients taking factor Xa (FXa) inhibitors who have life-threatening bleeding, emergency surgery, drug interactions, etc., a rapid and precise assay is needed to monitor for potential medication failure, to assess safety during periprocedural anticoagulation management, and to manage the care of chronically anticoagulated patients. Anti-factor Xa (anti-Xa) activity assays have been recommended in guidelines, but the evaluation of different calibrations of anti-Xa activity assays and the data on the recommended range are still limited, especially in the Asian population.

METHODS

This is a nationwide multicenter methodology exploratory study in an Asian population, including nine hospitals from Beijing, Shanghai, Liaoning, Shandong, Jiangsu, Anhui, Henan, Chongqing, and Fujian. A total of 485 healthy volunteers and 219 patients taking rivaroxaban or apixaban (single dose) were enrolled in the study. High-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS) was employed to detect plasma rivaroxaban and apixaban. The prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), and levels of anti-Xa activity were tested as pharmacodynamic parameters in plasma samples. We evaluated the correlation of anti-Xa activity and blood concentration via HPLC-MS, and then compared the two methods of target drug-calibrated and low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH)-antithrombin-calibrated anti-Xa activity. Correlations between variables were examined using Pearson's correlation analysis. Logistic regression was applied to evaluate significant differences in anti-Xa activity and blood concentration, using models adjusted by baseline characteristics.

RESULTS

The results suggested anti-Xa activity had better correlation with blood concentrations of apixaban and rivaroxaban than APTT and PT (p < 0.001). Target drug-calibrated anti-Xa activity had better correlation with HPLC-MS results at every dose level and blood collection time (p < 0.001). The expected concentrations (ng/mL) derived from rivaroxaban-calibrated assays of rivaroxaban 10 mg, 15 mg, and 20 mg were about 210, 330, and 270 at peak concentrations, and 28, 44, and 58, respectively, at the trough concentrations.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, we confirm that target drug calibration of anti-Xa activity is a better quantitative detection method for oral direct FXa inhibitors than LMWH-calibrated anti-Xa activity in clinical practice, and expected peak-trough levels are recommended for the Asian population.

Anticoagulation Monitoring for Perioperative Physicians

From preoperative medications to intraoperative needs to postoperative thromboprophylaxis, anticoagulants are encountered throughout the perioperative period. This review focuses on coagulation testing clinicians utilize to monitor the effects of these medications.

Quality performance for indirect Xa inhibitor monitoring in patients using international external quality data

Objectives Chromogenic anti-activated factor X (FXa) assays are currently the "gold standard" for monitoring indirect anticoagulants. However, anti-FXa has been shown to vary according to the choice of reagents. In the present study, the performance of anti-FXa measurement was evaluated in order to gain more insight into the clinical applications. Furthermore, the longitudinal coefficient of variation (CV) was studied to investigate whether there is improvement over time. Methods Laboratory tests results were evaluated for samples spiked with unfractionated heparin (UFH), low-molecular-weight-heparin (LMWH), fondaparinux and danaparoid sodium. External quality assessment (EQA) data from multiple years were used from more than 100 laboratories. Results Comparison of the results for all methods showed significant differences in measured values between the frequently used methods (ANOVA: p < 0.001). The largest differences were observed for LMWH and UFH measurements. These differences may be caused by differences in method composition, such as the addition of dextran sulphate. Substantial interlaboratory variation in anti-FXa monitoring was observed for all parameters, particularly at low concentrations. Our results showed that below 0.35 IU/mL, the CVs for UFH and LMWH increase dramatically and results below this limit should be used with caution. Conclusions Our study demonstrates that the choice of the anti-FXa method is particularly important for UFH and LMWH measurement. The variation in measurements may have an effect on clinical implications, such as therapeutic ranges. Furthermore, the longitudinal EQA data demonstrated a constant performance and, in at least 50% of the cases, improvement in the CV% of the anti-Xa results over time.

Anticoagulation and Transfusion Management During Neonatal and Pediatric Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: A Survey of Medical Directors in the United States

OBJECTIVES

To compare current practices within the United States of anticoagulation management and blood transfusion in neonatal and pediatric extracorporeal membrane oxygenation patients with a 2013 international report.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional survey distributed between August and December 2019.

SETTING

Extracorporeal Life Support Organization-registered neonatal and pediatric extracorporeal membrane oxygenation centers in the United States.

PARTICIPANTS

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation medical directors.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Eighty-three medical directors at 108 centers responded. After removing four duplicate responses, 79 surveys were analyzed. Seventy-nine percent (n = 62) report a written extracorporeal membrane oxygenation protocol for both anticoagulation and blood product management. Ninety-four percent (n = 74) report unfractionated heparin as their primary anticoagulant; the remaining use the direct thrombin inhibitor, bivalirudin. Ninety percent (n = 71) report measuring antifactor Xa levels. Most centers report using a combination of assays to monitor heparin therapy, either antifactor Xa and activated partial thromboplastin time (54%) or more commonly antifactor Xa and activated clotting time (68%). Forty-one percent use viscoelastic tests to aid management. Goal monitoring levels and interventions generated by out of range values are variable. Fifty-one percent will replace antithrombin. Platelet transfusion thresholds vary by age and center with ranges from 50,000 to 100,000 cells/µL. Eighty-two percent of respondents are willing to participate in a randomized controlled trial comparing anticoagulation strategies for patients receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with the 2013 pediatric population, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation center anticoagulation and blood transfusion approaches continue to vary widely. Most report continued use of heparin as their primary anticoagulant and follow a combination of monitoring assays with the majority using the antifactor Xa assay in their practices, a significant shift from prior results. Antithrombin activity levels and viscoelastic tests are followed by a growing number of centers. Platelet transfusion thresholds continue to vary widely. Future research is needed to establish optimal anticoagulation and blood transfusion management.

Evaluation of Heparin Anti-Factor Xa Levels Following Antithrombin Supplementation in Pediatric Patients Supported With Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation

OBJECTIVE

Thrombotic events are potential complications in patients receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) necessitating the use of systemic anticoagulation with heparin. Heparin works by potentiating the effects of antithrombin (AT), which may be deficient in critically ill patients and can be replaced. The clinical benefits and risks of AT replacement in children on ECMO remain incompletely understood.

METHODS

This single-center, retrospective study reviewed 28 neonatal and pediatric patients supported on ECMO at a tertiary care hospital between April 1, 2013, and October 31, 2014, who received at least 1 dose of AT during their ECMO course. The primary outcome of the study was the change in anti-factor Xa levels after pooled human AT supplementation. Secondary outcomes included the percentage of anti-factor Xa levels within the therapeutic range surrounding AT administration; survival to decannulation; 30 days after cannulation and discharge; time to first circuit change; and incidence of bleeding and thrombotic events.

RESULTS

A total of 78 doses of AT were administered during the study period. The mean increase in anti-factor Xa level following AT administration in patients without a ≥10% concurrent change in heparin was 0.075 ± 0.13 international units/mL. A greater percentage of anti-factor Xa levels were therapeutic for the 48 hours following AT administration (64.2% vs 38.6%). Survival and adverse events were similar to Extracorporeal Life Support Organization averages, with the exception of a higher incidence of intracranial hemorrhage.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients experienced a small but significant increase in anti-factor Xa level and a greater percentage of therapeutic anti-factor Xa levels following AT supplementation.

Impact of exogenous antithrombin on low molecular weight heparin anti-Xa activity assays in a pediatric and young adult leukemia and lymphoma cohort with variable antithrombin levels

BACKGROUND

Low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) remains the most commonly prescribed pediatric anticoagulant. There is debate whether LMWH anti-Xa assays with or without exogenous antithrombin (AT) best reflect anticoagulation effect, and how much discrepancy exists between assay types.

OBJECTIVES

We assessed the effect of variable AT activity on LMWH anti-Xa levels in plasma samples from anticoagulated pediatric and young adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia and lymphoma (ALL/L) patients, using two instruments and their commercial kits with and without exogenous AT (ie, four platforms).

METHODS

We analyzed LMWH anti-Xa levels on 60 plasma samples with known AT activity from 12 enoxaparin-treated ALL/L patients, using four commercial kits from Siemens and Stago containing AT or not, on Siemens BCS and Stago STA R Max, respectively.

RESULTS

Of 236/240 samples with interpretable results, mean AT activity was 80% (46-138%). Correlation was acceptable for published kit ranges of LMWH anti-Xa levels when comparing kits containing AT (r = 0.82, P < .0001), or not (r = 0.93, P < .0001), and within a manufacturer (Berichrom to Innovance, r = 0.92, P < .0001; Stachrom to STA-Liquid Anti-Xa r = 0.98, P < .0001). LMWH anti-Xa levels were lower in platforms without added AT (P < .0001). For Stago kits, this effect increased when AT < 70% (P = .001, n = 19, mean 56%). Assay variability, measured as mean percent difference, was less pronounced with Stago kits (14.7%, n = 49) than Siemens (41.9%, n = 50).

CONCLUSIONS

Although LMWH levels from anti-Xa assays with added AT trend higher than in those without, correlation was fairly good between platforms in pediatric ALL/L plasmas, even when AT activity was <70%.

Persistent Rivaroxaban Effect Due to Impaired Renal Clearance and Medication Effects

Rivaroxaban (Xarelto; Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc) is a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) that works by directly inhibiting the active site of factor Xa (FXa). Rivaroxaban is metabolized and cleared via the kidney and liver. The results of various studies have shown that patients with severe renal impairment should receive reduced dosages of rivaroxaban or another anticoagulant due to impaired clearance. Although it is not required, monitoring rivaroxaban is useful in some conditions; however, the assays required for such monitoring are not readily available. Herein, we present a case of a 68-year-old Caucasian male patient who was receiving rivaroxaban (20 mg/day) for atrial flutter and had mild renal impairment. The patient was found to have increased effect of rivaroxaban due to further impairment of renal clearance caused by several renally cleared medications. This case highlights the importance of closely examining the renal function of and medication list for a patient before starting DOACs such as rivaroxaban.

Erroneous Activated Coagulation Time During Atrial Flutter Ablation

When performing left-sided catheter ablation, anticoagulation is used to prevent formation of thrombi that might embolize. After heparin administration, appropriate anticoagulation is confirmed by measuring Activated Coagulation Time (ACT). We report a case during which ACT results were erroneous, and review alternatives to the ACT under such circumstances.

Dendrigraft of Poly-l-lysine as a Promising Candidate To Reverse Heparin-based Anticoagulants in Clinical Settings

By using a combination of experimental and computational experiments, we demonstrated that a second-generation dendrigraft of poly-l-lysine neutralizes the anticoagulant activity of unfractionated heparin, low-molecular-weight heparin, and fondaparinux more efficiently than protamine does in human plasma, making this synthetic polymer a promising surrogate of this problematic protein in clinical settings.

Comparison of three different anti-Xa assays in major orthopedic surgery patients treated with direct oral anticoagulant

Background

Measurement of edoxaban plasma concentration has been gathering attention in major orthopedic surgery patients receiving edoxaban for the prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE).

Methods

The anti-Xa activity was measured one hour after edoxaban intake using 3 different assays in 200 patients after major orthopedic surgery.

Results

The anti-Xa activities on Day 8 were significantly higher than those on Day 4 and those on Day 4 were significantly higher than those on Day 1. The anti-Xa activities in two assays closely correlated with each other, but the other anti-Xa assay did not correlated with other two assays. The anti-Xa activities as detected in the three Xa assays were significantly higher in the patients without deep vein thrombosis (DVT) than in those with DVT on Day 4. Additionally, there were no significant differences in the anti-Xa activities of assays A, B and C between patients with and without massive bleeding (MB) on Days 1, 4, 8 and 15.

Conclusion

The results of this study suggest that anti-Xa level could be predictive of the risk of VTE, but not of the risk of massive bleeding.

Hypercoagulability progresses to hypocoagulability during evolution of acetaminophen-induced acute liver injury in pigs

Increases in prothrombin time (PT) and international normalised ratio (INR) characterise acute liver injury (ALI) and failure (ALF), yet a wide heterogeneity in clotting abnormalities exists. This study defines evolution of coagulopathy in 10 pigs with acetaminophen (APAP)-induced ALI compared to 3 Controls. APAP administration began at 0 h and continued to ‘ALF’, defined as INR >3. In APAP pigs, INR was 1.05 ± 0.02 at 0 h, 2.15 ± 0.43 at 16 h and > 3 at 18 ± 1 h. At 12 h thromboelastography (TEG) demonstrated increased clot formation rate, associated with portal vein platelet aggregates and reductions in protein C, protein S, antithrombin and A Disintegrin and Metalloprotease with Thrombospondin type 1 repeats–13 (ADAMTS-13) to 60%, 24%, 47% and 32% normal respectively. At 18 ± 1 h, INR > 3 was associated with: hypocoagulable TEG profile with heparin-like effect; falls in thrombin generation, Factor V and Factor VIII to 52%, 19% and 17% normal respectively; further decline in anticoagulants; thrombocytopenia; neutrophilia and endotoxemia. Multivariate analysis, found that ADAMTS-13 was an independent predictor of a hypercoagulable TEG profile and platelet count, endotoxin, Protein C and fibrinogen were independent predictors of a hypocoagulable TEG profile. INR remained normal in Controls. Dynamic changes in coagulation occur with progression of ALI: a pro-thrombotic state progresses to hypocoagulability.

A case that illustrates the challenges of managing pregnant patients with antithrombin deficiency: More questions than answers

Using an illustrative case of a patient with antithrombin (AT) deficiency who developed a recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) in pregnancy despite therapeutic low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH), we highlight what is known in the literature and address areas of controversy through a series of questions around the case. The questions we address include the role of anti-Xa monitoring for patients with past VTE on antepartum LMWH, what treatment regimen is recommended for pregnant patients who develop a recurrent VTE while on therapeutic anticoagulation, the role of antepartum AT concentrate prophylaxis, and the management of labor/delivery, epidural anesthesia and postpartum anticoagulation. We also describe practical considerations for use of AT concentrate, including teaching our patient to self-infuse AT concentrate at home with support of a hemophilia treatment center (HTC), and the direct and indirect costs of AT concentrate for secondary prophylaxis.

Comparison of three different anti-Xa assays in major orthopedic surgery patients treated with fondaparinux

Anti-Xa assays are useful for monitoring the effects of selective anti-Xa drugs, such as fondaparinux, in the prophylaxis of deep vein thrombosis. In the present study, anti-Xa activity was measured using three different assays, Testzym(®) Heparin S, STA(®)-Liquid Anti-Xa and HemosIL(®) Liquid Heparin. Anti-Xa activity in each assay gradually increased from day one after administration to day eight, and still remained on day 15. Although there were significant differences in anti-Xa activity among the three assays, the activity showed significant correlation across assays. There were no significant differences in the anti-Xa activity between patients with and without DVT or between patients with and without massive bleeding on day one before and after administration, day four, day eight and day 15. Anti-Xa activity in each assay was weakly correlated with antithrombin (AT) activity. The AT activity in patients were significantly higher on days four, eight and 15 compared with day one before and after administration, suggesting that AT activity increases following the administration of fondaparinux. The three anti-Xa assay kits tested are useful for monitoring fondaparinux treatment in orthopedic surgery patients.

Guidance for the practical management of the heparin anticoagulants in the treatment of venous thromboembolism

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a serious and often fatal medical condition with an increasing incidence. Despite the changing landscape of VTE treatment with the introduction of the new direct oral anticoagulants many uncertainties remain regarding the optimal use of traditional parenteral agents. This manuscript, initiated by the Anticoagulation Forum, provides clinical guidance based on existing guidelines and consensus expert opinion where guidelines are lacking. This specific chapter addresses the practical management of heparins including low molecular weight heparins and fondaparinux. For each anticoagulant a list of the most common practice related questions were created. Each question was addressed using a brief focused literature review followed by a multidisciplinary consensus guidance recommendation. Issues addressed included initial anticoagulant dosing recommendations, recommended baseline laboratory monitoring, managing dose adjustments, evidence to support a relationship between laboratory tests and meaningful clinical outcomes, special patient populations including extremes of weight and renal impairment, duration of necessary parenteral therapy during the transition to oral therapy, candidates for outpatient treatment where appropriate and management of over-anticoagulation and adverse effects including bleeding and heparin induced thrombocytopenia. This article concludes with a concise table of clinical management questions and guidance recommendations to provide a quick reference for the practical management of heparin, low molecular weight heparin and fondaparinux.

The Anti-Factor Xa Range For Low Molecular Weight Heparin Thromboprophylaxis

Low molecular weight heparins (LMWHs) are now the mainstay option in the prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism. In some patients receiving therapeutic doses of LMWH, activity can be measured by quantifying the presence of Anti-factor Xa (AFXa) for dose adjustment. However, currently there are no guidelines for LMWH monitoring in patients on thromboprophylactic, doses, despite certain patient populations may be at risk of suboptimal dosing. This review found that while the AFXa ranges for therapeutic levels of LMWHs are relatively well defined in the literature, prophylactic ranges are much less clear, thus making it difficult to interpret current research data. From the studies published to date, we concluded that a reasonable AFXa target range for LMWH deep venous thromboses prophylaxis might be 0.2-0.5 IU/mL.

Anti-factor Xa and activated partial thromboplastin time measurements for heparin monitoring in mechanical circulatory support

OBJECTIVES

This study investigated the relationship between anti-factor Xa (anti-FXa) and activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) for monitoring intravenous unfractionated heparin (IV-UFH) in patients with continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices (CF-LVADs).

BACKGROUND

CF-LVADs have become mainstream therapy for patients with advanced heart failure. Thromboembolic events, device thrombosis, and bleeding continue to be a challenge with this technology. Adequate anticoagulation is required to prevent these adverse events.

METHODS

A prospective study of consecutive patients implanted with a CF-LVAD was conducted. Paired samples were considered concordant if aPTT values fell into expected ranges for subtherapeutic, therapeutic, and supratherapeutic anti-FXa levels. Heparin dosing was on the basis of anti-Xa levels.

RESULTS

A total of 340 paired values from 38 patients were evaluated. Anti-FXa and aPTT were discordant in 253 samples (74.4%), with a high degree of variability in aPTT for any given anti-FXa level (r(2) = 0.57). Results were discordant in 104 samples (63.8%) from patients undergoing bridging therapy with warfarin and in 149 samples (84.2%) from patients with device obstruction and/or hemolysis (p < 0.001). The most common pattern of discordance was a supratherapeutic aPTT value despite a therapeutic anti-FXa level (49.1% for bridging vs. 75.8% for device obstruction and/or hemolysis; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Levels of aPTT were disproportionately prolonged relative to the corresponding anti-FXa levels in CF-LVAD patients, particularly those with device obstruction. Hemolysis and warfarin administration may falsely elevate aPTT, resulting in overestimation of heparin concentration and under-anticoagulation. Use of aPTT and anti-FXa to guide heparin therapy may lead to different estimates of heparin concentration in the same patient.

Generic versus branded enoxaparin in prophylaxis and treatment of vein thrombosis

Objectives: to compare the biological efficacy of generic enoxaparin (HeptronTM) versus branded Sanofi-Aventis enoxaparin for prophylaxis and treatment of lower-extremity deep venous thrombosis (DVT) in a prospective, randomized, open-label study. Methods: patients with diagnosed lower-extremity DVT (therapeutic branch, n=57) and patients requiring venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis after arterial vascular surgery or major lower-extremity amputations (prophylactic branch, n=57) were randomized to receive generic or branded enoxaparin for up to seven days. Enoxaparin activity was measured by estimating blood anti-factor Xa levels at the peak plasma concentration. As secondary outcomes, development or progression of VTE events, major adverse events and major bleeding events were considered for efficacy and safety comparisons. Results: DVT therapy: twenty-five patients received generic enoxaparin while 32 received branded enoxaparin (subcutaneous, 1 mg/kg BID). Mean percentages of anti-factor Xa levels within the target ranges were 62 ± 35.4% and 67.5 ± 24.7%, respectively (p= .035 for non-inferiority). No patient presented DVT progression, clinically detectable pulmonary embolism, or major bleeding events in any subgroup. DVT prophylaxis: Thirty patients received generic enoxaparin and 27 received branded enoxaparin (subcutaneous, 40 mg/day). Mean percentages of anti-factor Xa levels within the target ranges were 77.9 ± 30.9% and 77.8 ± 32.9%, respectively (p = .009 for non-inferiority). There were no cases of VTE or major bleeding events in any subgroup. Conclusion: generic and branded enoxaparins exhibited similar in vivo responses as measured by the anti-factor Xa activity, as well as similar clinical efficacy and safety outcomes.

Measuring anti-factor xa activity to monitor low-molecular-weight heparin in obesity: a critical review

BACKGROUND

The choice of whether to monitor anti-factor Xa (anti-Xa) activity in patients who are obese and who are receiving low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) therapy is controversial. To the authors' knowledge, no systematic review of monitoring of anti-Xa activity in such patients has been published to date.

OBJECTIVE

To systematically ascertain the utility of monitoring anti-Xa concentrations for LMWH therapy in obese patients.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE (1946 to September 2014), the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Embase (1974 to September 2014), PubMed (1947 to September 2014), International Pharmaceutical Abstracts (1970 to September 2014), and Scopus were searched using the terms obesity, morbid obesity, thrombosis, venous thrombosis, embolism, venous thromboembolism, pulmonary embolism, low-molecular weight heparin, enoxaparin, dalteparin, tinzaparin, anti-factor Xa, anti-factor Xa monitoring, anti-factor Xa activity, and anti-factor Xa assay. The reference lists of retrieved articles were also reviewed.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

English-language studies describing obese patients treated with LMWH or reporting anti-Xa activity were reviewed using a 9-step decision-making algorithm to determine whether monitoring of LMWH therapy by means of anti-Xa activity in obesity is warranted. Studies published in abstract form were excluded.

DATA SYNTHESIS

The analysis showed that anti-Xa concentrations are not strongly associated with thrombosis or hemorrhage. In clinical studies of LMWH for thromboprophylaxis in bariatric surgery, orthopedic surgery, general surgery, and medical patients, and for treatment of venous thrombo embolism and acute coronary syndrome, anti-Xa activity can be predicted from dose of LMWH and total body weight; no difference in clinical outcome was found between obese and non-obese participants.

CONCLUSIONS

Routinely determining anti-Xa concentrations in obese patients to monitor the clinical effectiveness of LMWH is not warranted on the basis of the current evidence. Circumstances where measurement of anti-Xa concentration may help in clinical decision-making in either obese or non-obese patients would be cases where elimination of LMWH is impaired or there is an unexpected clinical response, as well as to confirm compliance with therapy or to identify deviation from predicted pharmacokinetics.

Intravenous warfarin and heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: making the diagnosis, management, modern monitoring, and multidisciplinary care

OBJECTIVE

To describe the diagnosis, management, and monitoring of a patient with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) with thrombosis and simultaneous bleeding risk treated with argatroban and transitioned to intravenous (IV) warfarin secondary to the inability to administer enteral medications.

CASE SUMMARY

A 71-year-old man was admitted to the surgical intensive care unit (SICU) following aortic valve repair, coronary artery bypass, and ascending aortic aneurysm repair. On postoperative day 9, he was found to have a pulmonary embolism, and therapeutic heparin was started. The following day, his platelet count was found to have dropped precipitously. HIT was diagnosed, heparin was discontinued, and argatroban was initiated. On postoperative day 22, anticoagulation was discontinued because of massive gastrointestinal bleeding. On postoperative day 35, multiple venous thromboses were found, and argatroban was restarted. The patient developed a high-output enterocutaneous fistula, eliminating the option of enteral route of medication administration. The multidisciplinary SICU team transitioned the patient from argatroban to IV warfarin for long-term anticoagulation. The international normalized ratio was monitored and remained therapeutic throughout his admission without further thrombotic complications.

DISCUSSION

HIT occurs when antibodies develop to heparin-platelet factor 4 complexes, causing simultaneous hypercoagulability and thrombocytopenia. It is diagnosed based on both clinical factors and laboratory testing. Treatment includes discontinuation of all forms of heparin; initiation of a nonheparin anticoagulant, such as argatroban; and transition to warfarin.

CONCLUSIONS

IV warfarin is a therapeutic option for patients with malabsorption issues. A multidisciplinary team in an intensive care setting optimizes cost-effective, patient-centered, and safe care.

Pathology consultation on anticoagulation monitoring: factor X-related assays

OBJECTIVES

To review various anticoagulation therapies and related laboratory monitoring issues, with a focus on factor X-related chromogenic assays.

METHODS

A case-based approach is used to review pertinent published literatures and product inserts of anticoagulation drugs and to look back on clinical use of factor X-related chromogenic assays.

RESULTS

The number of anticoagulants available to clinicians has increased greatly in the past decade. Whether and how these anticoagulants should be monitored are areas of uncertainty for clinicians, which can lead to misuse of laboratory assays and suboptimal patient management. Factor X-related assays are of particular concern because of the similar and often confusing test names. Based on a common clinical case scenario and literature review regarding anticoagulant monitoring, an up-to-date discussion and review of the various factor X-related assays are provided, focusing on the differences in test designs and clinical utilities between the chromogenic anti-Xa and chromogenic factor X activity assays.

CONCLUSIONS

Anticoagulation therapy and related laboratory monitoring are rapidly evolving areas of clinical practices. A good knowledge of relevant laboratory assays and their clinical applications is necessary to help optimize patient care.

The relationships among hemostatic markers, the withdrawal of fondaparinux due to a reduction in hemoglobin and deep vein thrombosis in Japanese patients undergoing major orthopedic surgery

BACKGROUND

The relationships among the hemostatic markers, the development of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and the withdrawal of fondaparinux due to a reduction in the hemoglobin levels were examined.

METHODS

Two-hundred twenty-one Japanese patients who underwent major orthopedic surgery and were treated with 1.5mg of fondaparinux instead of 2.5mg of fondaparinux were studied. Forty-seven of 221 patients discontinued fondaparinux treatment (withdrawal group) and 37 patients developed DVT.

RESULTS

The age, frequency of total knee arthroplasty (TKA), withdrawal of fondaparinux, reduction of hemoglobin and the plasma levels of soluble fibrin (SF), D-dimer and fibrinogen and fibrin degradation product (FDP) on day 1 after the operation were significantly higher in the patients with DVT. Elevated SF, D-dimer or FDP levels were associated with the risk for DVT. The age, frequency of TKA or DVT, anti-Xa activity and the creatinine, FDP and D-dimer levels were significantly higher in the withdrawal group. An anti-Xa level >0.33 mg/l and an elevated D-dimer or FDP level were associated with the risk of withdrawal.

CONCLUSION

The age and SF levels, TKA and withdrawal of fondaparinux were related to the risk of DVT, and the anti-Xa activity, creatinine level and DVT were related to the risk of withdrawal of fondaparinux due to a reduction in hemoglobin.

Activated partial thromboplastin time and anti-xa measurements in heparin monitoring: biochemical basis for discordance

We examined the concordance of heparin levels measured by a chromogenic anti-Xa assay and the activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) during unfractionated heparin therapy (UFH) and the biochemical basis for differences between these measures. We also investigated the endogenous thrombin potential (ETP) as a possible measure of anticoagulation. Paired measures of anti-Xa and APTT were performed on 569 samples from 149 patients on UFH. The anti-Xa values and the APTT were concordant in only 54% of measurements. One hundred twelve samples from 59 patients on UFH were assayed for APTT, anti-Xa, factor II, factor VIII, and ETP. Supratherapeutic APTT values but therapeutic anti-Xa results had decreased factor II activity. Subtherapeutic APTT but therapeutic anti-Xa values had high factor VIII activity. ETP correlated with anticoagulation status and UFH dose. In conclusion, factor II and VIII activity contributes to discordance between APTT and anti-Xa results. ETP measurements may provide an additional assessment of anticoagulation status.

[Stereophotography of the ocular fundus. 2. Observation method]

Traditional anticoagulant agents such as vitamin K antagonists (VKAs), unfractionated heparin (UFH), low molecular weight heparins (LMWHs) and fondaparinux have been widely used in the prevention and treatment of thromboembolic diseases. However, these agents are associated with limitations, such as the need for regular coagulation monitoring (VKAs and UFH) or a parenteral route of administration (UFH, LMWHs and fondaparinux).

Several non-VKA oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are now widely used in the prevention and treatment of thromboembolic diseases and in stroke prevention in non-valvular atrial fibrillation. Unlike VKAs, NOACs exhibit predictable pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. They are therefore usually given at fixed doses without routine coagulation monitoring. However, in certain patient populations or special clinical circumstances, measurement of drug exposure may be useful, such as in suspected overdose, in patients experiencing a hemorrhagic or thromboembolic event during the treatment’s period, in those with acute renal failure, in patients who require urgent surgery or in case of an invasive procedure. This article aims at providing guidance on laboratory testing of classic anticoagulants and NOACs.