Bosutinib efficacy and safety in chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia after imatinib resistance or intolerance: Minimum 24-month follow-up

Lipopolymer mediated siRNA delivery targeting aberrant oncogenes for effective therapy of myeloid leukemia in preclinical animal models

The clinical development of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) has led to great strides in improving the survival of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients. But even the new generation TKIs are rendered futile in the face of evolving landscape of acquired mutations leading to drug resistance, necessitating the pursuit of alternative therapeutic approaches. In contrast to exploiting proteins as targets like most conventional drugs and TKIs, RNA Interference (RNAi) exerts its therapeutic action towards disease-driving aberrant genes. To realize the potential of RNAi, the major challenge is to efficiently deliver the therapeutic mediator of RNAi, small interfering RNA (siRNA) molecules. In this study, we explored the feasibility of using aliphatic lipid (linoleic acid and lauric acid)-grafted polymers (lipopolymers) for the delivery of siRNAs against the FLT3 oncogene in AML and BCR-ABL oncogene in CML. The lipopolymer delivered siRNA potently suppressed the proliferation AML and CML cells via silencing of the targeted oncogenes. In both AML and CML subcutaneous xenografts generated in NCG mice, intravenously administered lipopolymer/siRNA complexes displayed significant inhibitory effect on tumor growth. Combining siFLT3 complexes with gilteritinib allowed for reduction of effective drug dosage, longer duration of remission, and enhanced survival after relapse, compared to gilteritinib monotherapy. Anti-leukemic activity of siBCR-ABL complexes was similar in wild-type and TKI-resistant cells, and therapeutic efficacy was confirmed in vivo through prolonged survival of the NCG hosts systemically implanted with TKI-resistant cells. These results demonstrate the preclinical efficacy of lipopolymer facilitated siRNA delivery, providing a novel therapeutic platform for myeloid leukemias.

Side effects of treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors in patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia and the occurrence of depressive symptoms

Introduction

The aim of the study was to check whether individual side effects of treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) in patients suffering from chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) contribute to the occurrence of depressive symptoms. In addition, it was decided to check whether there is any correlation between the age, sex, and duration of treatment and the intensity of depressive symptoms, in relation to the occurrence of individual side effects.

Material and methods

The study included 91 patients with CML treated with TKI. The following questionnaires were used: a questionnaire created by the author, David Goldberg's general health questionnaire-28 (GHQ-28), and the four-dimensional symptom questionnaire (4DSQ).

Results

Our research showed that fatigue (β = 0.27; p = 0.007), nausea/indigestion (β = 0.26; p = 0.008), bone and joint pain (β = 0.21; p = 0.033), and abdominal pain (β = 0.33; p ≤ 0.001) were the most common side effects of TKI treatment resulting in increased depressive symptoms. Age and duration of treatment had a significant impact on the severity of depressive symptoms in patients experiencing specific side effects of TKI treatment.

Conclusions

The results indicate the influence of the occurrence of TKI treatment side effects on the development of depressive symptoms. Patients' quality of life can be improved with the cooperation of medical staff in reducing/alleviating the side effects.

[Optimizing the use of bosutinib in patients with chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia: Recommendations of a panel of experts from the Fi-LMC (French CML working group)]

The treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia relies on orally available tyrosine kinase inhibitors targeting the BCR::ABL1 oncoprotein. Bosutinib is a second generation adenosine triphosphate-competitive inhibitor approved for use in frontline adult chronic phase-chronic myeloid leukemia and all phases-chronic myeloid leukemia in the second line setting or beyond. Its efficacy was demonstrated in several pivotal clinical trials at 400mg once daily in the first line context and at 500mg once daily beyond first line. Bosutinib-related adverse events frequently occur early after treatment initiation and include gastro-intestinal symptoms and cytolytic hepatitis. These drug-related adverse events must be properly managed in order to preserve safety, efficacy and treatment acceptability. The French chronic myeloid leukemia study group gathered a panel of experts in hematology, pharmacology and hepatology in order to elaborate practical recommendations on the management of bosutinib treatment. These recommendations aim at optimizing the short and long-term tolerance and benefit/risk balance of bosutinib, mainly focusing at gastro-intestinal and liver toxicities.

Cross-intolerance with bosutinib after prior tyrosine kinase inhibitors for Philadelphia chromosome-positive leukemia: long-term analysis of a phase I/II study

Not available.

Asciminib in the Treatment of Philadelphia Chromosome-Positive Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: Focus on Patient Selection and Outcomes

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have significantly changed the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) and improved outcomes for patients with CML in chronic phase (CML-CP) and accelerated phase (AP). Now armed with numerous effective therapeutic options, clinicians must consider various patient- and disease-specific factors when selecting the most appropriate TKI across lines of therapy. While most patients with CML expected to have a near-normal life expectancy due to the success of TKIs, emphasis has expanded beyond response and survival to include factors like quality of life, tolerability, and long-term toxicity management. Importantly, a subset of patients can achieve sustained deep molecular response and can attain treatment-free remission. Despite these successes, unmet needs remain related to CML treatment, including the persistent challenge of treatment resistance and intolerance, broadening treatment options for patients with resistance mutations or serious comorbidities, and focus on specific populations such as children and young adults. In particular, the only previously available treatments for patients with CML-CP with the T315I mutation were ponatinib, olverembatinib (exclusively approved for use in China at the time of this writing), omacetaxine, and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Asciminib has entered the CML treatment landscape as a new option for adult patients with CML-CP who have received ≥2 prior TKIs or those with the T315I mutation. Asciminib's unique mechanism of action, Specifically Targeting the ABL Myristoyl Pocket, sets it apart from traditional adenosine triphosphate-competitive TKIs. While asciminib may overcome unmet needs for patients with CML-CP and continues to be studied in other novel settings, guidance on how to integrate asciminib in treatment algorithms is needed. This review focuses on clinical data and how asciminib can overcome current unmet needs, discusses how to individualize patient selection, and highlights future directions to investigate asciminib in earlier lines of therapy and in children and adolescents.

Hepatotoxicity of Small Molecule Protein Kinase Inhibitors for Cancer

Small molecule protein kinase inhibitors (PKIs) have become an effective strategy for cancer patients. However, hepatotoxicity is a major safety concern of these drugs, since the majority are reported to increase transaminases, and few of them (Idelalisib, Lapatinib, Pazopanib, Pexidartinib, Ponatinib, Regorafenib, Sunitinib) have a boxed label warning. The exact rate of PKI-induced hepatoxicity is not well defined due to the fact that the majority of data arise from pre-registration or registration trials on fairly selected patients, and the post-marketing data are often based only on the most severe described cases, whereas most real practice studies do not include drug-related hepatotoxicity as an end point. Although these side effects are usually reversible by dose adjustment or therapy suspension, or by switching to an alternative PKI, and fatality is uncommon, all patients undergoing PKIs should be carefully pre-evaluated and monitored. The management of this complication requires an individually tailored reappraisal of the risk/benefit ratio, especially in patients who are responding to therapy. This review reports the currently available data on the risk and management of hepatotoxicity of all the approved PKIs.

Bosutinib-induced massive pleural effusion: Cross-intolerance with all tyrosine kinase inhibitors

BACKGROUND

The discovery of tyrosine kinase inhibitors provided a breakthrough in the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia. Nowadays, the management of tyrosine kinase inhibitor-related side effects is one of the important problems in chronic myeloid leukemia treatment. Grades 3-4 pulmonary toxicity; especially pleural effusion is mostly seen with dasatinib treatment but rarely seen with nilotinib and bosutinib. Development of cross-intolerance due to pleural effusion is not an expected situation. Pleural effusion related to tyrosine kinase inhibitors is mostly exudative in nature with abundant lymphocytes.

CASE REPORT

Massive pleural effusion developed in a 59-year-old male patient with chronic myeloid leukemia, who was being treated with bosutinib. In the past, the patient had experienced massive pleural effusion also with dasatinib and nilotinib. The evaluation for differential diagnosis of pleural effusion did not reveal any additional malignancy.

MANAGEMENT AND OUTCOME

After discontinuation of bosutinib and initiation of prednisolone, pleural effusion was totally resolved. Prednisolone was gradually discontinued and third-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor ponatinib was started. After 12 months of follow-up, massive pleural effusion occurred again, leading to discontinuation of ponatinib.

DISCUSSION

Cross-intolerance is an important problem in the tyrosine kinase inhibitor era. The significance of this case is the development of cross-intolerance to all second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors and furthermore to a third-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor. Management strategies for pleural effusion and close follow-up are important.

A review of the therapeutic role of the new third-generation TKI olverembatinib in chronic myeloid leukemia

Several tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have been developed as targeted therapies to inhibit the oncogenic activity of several tyrosine kinases in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), acute lymphoid leukemia (ALL), gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST), and other diseases. TKIs have significantly improved the overall survival of these patients and changed the treatment strategy in the clinic. However, approximately 50% of patients develop resistance or intolerance to imatinib. For second-generation TKIs, approximately 30%-40% of patients need to change therapy by 5 years when they are used as first-line treatment. Clinical study analysis showed that the T315I mutation is highly associated with TKI resistance. Developing new drugs that target the T315I mutation will address the dilemma of treatment failure. Olverembatinib, as a third-generation TKI designed for the T315I mutation, is being researched in China. Preliminary clinical data show the safety and efficacy in treating CML patients harboring the T315I mutation or who are resistant to first- or second-line TKI treatment. Herein, we review the characteristics and clinical trials of olverembatinib. We also discuss its role in the management of CML patients.

The Role of Bosutinib in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: An Indian Perspective

Management of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) has been transformed by the use of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Presently in India, five TKIs are approved for the management of CML with distinct safety profiles. The selection of TKIs for chronic phase (CP)-CML patients is based on treatment goals, underlying comorbidities, and specific TKI toxicity profiles. Bosutinib is one of five TKIs indicated for the first-line treatment of CP-CML and patients with intolerance or resistance to prior TKI therapy. It possesses a distinct safety profile among other TKIs, with less cardiovascular adverse events (AEs), albeit the liver-related and gastrointestinal AEs have higher occurrence. The safety and efficacy of bosutinib have been examined in clinical trials; however, there is a paucity of data from Asia. A virtual expert panel meeting was convened to gather expert opinion from India on the selection of bosutinib as a treatment choice for patients with CP-CML. This is a white paper document drafted with the help of an expert panel of 14 oncologists and hematooncologists from India on bosutinib use in CP-CML. The experts concurred that bosutinib has proven efficacy for CP-CML in global randomized clinical trials and is well suited for CP-CML patients with existing cardiovascular comorbidities. However, it was not recommended for patients with gastrointestinal, pancreatic, or renal abnormalities. This review aims to put forth expert opinion and guidance document on key considerations for CP-CML clinical decision-making in India.

Bosutinib in Japanese patients with newly diagnosed chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia: final 3-year follow-up results of a phase 2 study

Bosutinib has been evaluated for treatment of chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CP-CML) in several clinical studies, including in Japan. This open-label, single-arm, phase 2 study evaluated the efficacy and safety of bosutinib at a starting dose of 400 mg once daily in Japanese patients (n = 60) with newly diagnosed CP-CML. The minimum follow-up period was 3 years and median duration of treatment was 35.9 months. At study completion, 60% of patients were still on treatment. Cumulative rates of major molecular response (MMR), molecular response⁴ (MR⁴), and MR^4.5 at any time were 70.0%, 53.3%, and 48.3%, respectively. No patient who achieved MMR or MR⁴ had a confirmed loss of response. No patient experienced on-treatment transformation to accelerated/blast phase or died within 28 days of the last bosutinib dose. Any-grade treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) occurred in 100% (grade ≥ 3: 81.7%) of patients. The most common TEAEs were diarrhea (86.7%), increased alanine aminotransferase (55.0%), and increased aspartate aminotransferase (46.7%). No new safety signals emerged during the follow-up period. Bosutinib continues to demonstrate a favorable benefit/risk profile and is an important treatment option for Japanese patients with newly diagnosed CP-CML. Optimal management of TEAEs during initial treatment with bosutinib should be prioritized.

Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT03128411.

A retrospective observational research study to describe the real-world use of bosutinib in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in the United Kingdom and the Netherlands

Objectives

To describe the real‐world effectiveness and safety of bosutinib in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML).

Methods

This was a multi‐center, retrospective, non‐interventional chart review study conducted in 10 hospitals in the United Kingdom and the Netherlands.

Results

Eighty‐seven patients were included. Bosutinib was the third‐line tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) in 33 (38%) and fourth‐line in 44 (51%) patients. Median treatment duration was 15.6 months. Among 84 patients in chronic phase (CP) at baseline, 26 (31%) switched to bosutinib due to resistance and 57 (68%) due to intolerance to prior TKIs. Cumulative complete cytogenetic and major molecular response rates in CP patients were 67% and 55%, respectively. After a median follow‐up of 21.5 months, nine (11%) patients in CP died; estimated overall survival rates at 1 and 2 years postbosutinib initiation were 95% and 91%, respectively. Overall, 33/87 (38%) patients discontinued bosutinib due to either lack of efficacy/disease progression (17%), adverse events (14%), death (2%), or other reasons (5%). Eighty‐two (94%) patients experienced ≥1 adverse event possibly related to bosutinib, most commonly diarrhea (52%).

Conclusions

Bosutinib used in routine clinical practice in heavily pretreated patients with CML is an effective treatment for patients in CP and is generally tolerable.

Turkey real-life data: demographic features, treatment results and effects of comorbidities in chronic myeloid leukemia

Aim:

This study aimed to identify patient characteristics, treatment patterns and outcomes and to evaluate the effects of presence of comorbidities at diagnosis in chronic phase (CP)-chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients in Turkey.

Materials & methods:

Hospital records between 2005 and 2018 were retrospectively reviewed.

Results:

Of 861 CP-CML patients included, 31% had at least one comorbidity at diagnosis. Sex, cardiovascular disease status at diagnosis and molecular (at least major) and cytogenetic (partial and complete) responses were the independent predictors of survival.

Conclusion:

The response rates of CP-CML patients to the tyrosine kinase inhibitors were satisfactory. In addition to tolerability and side effect profiles of drugs, comorbidity status of patients should also be considered in treatment choice in CML patients.

This study aimed to identify patient characteristics, treatment patterns and outcomes and to evaluate the effects of presence of comorbidities at diagnosis in chronic phase (CP)-chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients in Turkey. Hospital records of patients between 2005 and 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Of the included 861 CP-CML patients, 31% had at least one comorbidity at diagnosis. The survival of the patients was affected by sex, cardiovascular disease status at diagnosis, and molecular (at least major) and cytogenetic (partial and complete) responses. The response rates of CP-CML patients to the tyrosine kinase inhibitors were satisfactory. In addition to tolerability and side effect profiles of drugs, comorbidity status of patients should also be considered in treatment choice in CML patients.

Cross-Talk between Wnt Signaling and Src Tyrosine Kinase

Src, a non-receptor tyrosine kinase, was first discovered as a prototype oncogene and has been shown to critical for cancer progression for a variety of tissues. Src activity is regulated by a number of post-translational modifications in response to various stimuli. Phosphorylations of Src Tyr419 (human; 416 in chicken) and Src Tyr530 (human; 527 in chicken) have been known to be critical for activation and inactivation of Src, respectively. Wnt signaling regulates a variety of cellular functions including for development and cell proliferation, and has a role in certain diseases such as cancer. Wnt signaling is carried out through two pathways: β-catenin-dependent canonical and β-catenin-independent non-canonical pathways as Wnt ligands bind to their receptors, Frizzled, LRP5/6, and ROR1/2. In addition, many signaling components including Axin, APC, Damm, Dishevelled, JNK kinase and Rho GTPases contribute to these canonical and non-canonical Wnt pathways. However, the communication between Wnt signaling and Src tyrosine kinase has not been well reviewed as Src regulates Wnt signaling through LRP6 tyrosine phosphorylation. GSK-3β phosphorylated by Wnt also regulates Src activity. As Wnt signaling and Src mutually regulate each other, it is noted that aberrant regulation of these components give rise to various diseases including typically cancer, and as such, merit a closer look.

A phase 3, open-label, randomized study of asciminib, a STAMP inhibitor, vs bosutinib in CML after 2 or more prior TKIs

Patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase (CML-CP) resistant/intolerant to ≥2 tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are at high risk of experiencing poor outcomes because of disease biology and inadequate efficacy and/or safety of current therapies. Asciminib, a first-in-class BCR-ABL1 inhibitor Specifically Targeting the ABL Myristoyl Pocket (STAMP), has the potential to overcome resistance/intolerance to approved TKIs. In this phase 3, open-label study, patients with CML-CP previously treated with ≥2 TKIs were randomized (2:1) to receive asciminib 40 mg twice daily vs bosutinib 500 mg once daily. Randomization was stratified by major cytogenetic response (MCyR) status at baseline. The primary objective was to compare the major molecular response (MMR) rate at week 24 for asciminib vs bosutinib. A total of 233 patients were randomized to asciminib (n = 157) or bosutinib (n = 76). Median follow-up was 14.9 months. The MMR rate at week 24 was 25.5% with asciminib and 13.2% with bosutinib. The difference in MMR rate between treatment arms, after adjusting for MCyR at baseline, was 12.2% (95% confidence interval, 2.19-22.30; 2-sided P = .029). Fewer grade ≥3 adverse events (50.6% vs 60.5%) and adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation (5.8% vs 21.1%) occurred with asciminib than with bosutinib. The study showed a superior efficacy of asciminib compared with that of bosutinib, together with a favorable safety profile. These results support the use of asciminib as a new therapy in patients with CML-CP who are resistant/intolerant to ≥2 prior TKIs. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT03106779.

Management of Adverse Events Associated With Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Use in Adult Patients With Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase: An Advanced Practice Perspective

The tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) imatinib, dasatinib, nilotinib, bosutinib, and ponatinib have drastically improved the life expectancies of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase (CML-CP). While survival outcomes are comparable across first-line TKIs, each TKI has a unique toxicity profile that should be considered before starting or managing any treatment. Furthermore, the safety and tolerability of TKIs are particularly important in CML-CP, as the majority of patients remain on treatment for several years or for life. Management of adverse events (AEs) is critical to ensure adherence to treatment and to maintain efficacy and quality of life; management should also be considered in the context of the patient's molecular response to therapy to avoid switching TKIs unnecessarily. We present case studies examining pleural effusion occurring with bosutinib and dasatinib, cardiovascular events associated with nilotinib and ponatinib, and myelosuppression, which is common across all TKIs. We discuss the management of these AEs based on international guidelines and present our collective experience for advanced practitioners to consider.

Bosutinib-associated interstitial lung disease and pleural effusion: A case report and literature review

Bosutinib is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor approved for the management of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Interstitial lung disease and pleural effusion are pulmonary side effects of TKIs rarely associated with bosutinib treatment.

Third-line therapy for chronic myeloid leukemia: current status and future directions

Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is driven by the BCR-ABL1 fusion protein, formed by a translocation between chromosomes 9 and 22 that creates the Philadelphia chromosome. The BCR-ABL1 fusion protein is an optimal target for tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) that aim for the adenosine triphosphate (ATP) binding site of ABL1. While these drugs have greatly improved the prognosis for CML, many patients ultimately fail treatment, some requiring multiple lines of TKI therapy. Mutations can occur in the ATP binding site of ABL1, causing resistance by preventing the binding of many of these drugs and leaving patients with limited treatment options. The approved TKIs are also associated with adverse effects that may lead to treatment discontinuation in some patients. Efficacy decreases with each progressive line of therapy; data suggest little clinical benefit of treatment with a third-line (3L), second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor (2GTKI) after failure of a first-generation TKI and a 2GTKI. Novel treatment options are needed for the patient population that requires treatment in the 3L setting and beyond. This review highlights the need for clear guidelines and new therapies for patients requiring 3L treatment and beyond.

Dual Kinase Targeting in Leukemia

Simple Summary

A new option to treat cancer is based on the use of so-called multi-targeting drugs. This strategy can replace the standard treatment based on the co-administration of several drugs. An increased and uncontrolled activity of kinases (enzymes devoted to the regulation of several cell pathways) is often seen in hematological malignancies. The development of multi-kinase inhibitors is having a great impact on the treatment of this kind of cancer. Here, we review the most recent findings on this novel class of drugs.

Abstract

Pharmacological cancer therapy is often based on the concurrent inhibition of different survival pathways to improve treatment outcomes and to reduce the risk of relapses. While this strategy is traditionally pursued only through the co-administration of several drugs, the recent development of multi-targeting drugs (i.e., compounds intrinsically able to simultaneously target several macromolecules involved in cancer onset) has had a dramatic impact on cancer treatment. This review focuses on the most recent developments in dual-kinase inhibitors used in acute myeloid leukemia (AML), chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML), and lymphoid tumors, giving details on preclinical studies as well as ongoing clinical trials. A brief overview of dual-targeting inhibitors (kinase/histone deacetylase (HDAC) and kinase/tubulin polymerization inhibitors) applied to leukemia is also given. Finally, the very recently developed Proteolysis Targeting Chimeras (PROTAC)-based kinase inhibitors are presented.

Multikinase inhibitor-induced liver injury in patients with cancer: A review for clinicians

BACKGROUND

Multikinase inhibitors (MKI) are targeted molecular agents that have revolutionized cancer management. However, there is a paucity of data concerning MKI-related liver injury risk and clinical guidelines for the management of liver toxicity in patients receiving MKI for cancer are scarce.

DESIGN

We conducted a PubMed search of articles in English published from January 2000 to December 2018 related to hepatotoxicity of the 29 FDA-approved MKIs at doses used in clinical practice. The search terms were the international non-proprietary name of each agent cross-referenced with «hepatotoxicity», «hepatitis», «hepatic adverse event», or «liver failure», and «phase II clinical trial», «phase III clinical trial», or «case report».

RESULTS

Following this search, 140 relevant studies and 99 case reports were considered. Although asymptomatic elevation of aminotransferase levels has been frequently observed in MKI clinical trials, clinically significant hepatotoxicity is a rare event. In most cases, the interval between treatment initiation and the onset of liver injury is between one week and two months. Liver toxicity is often hepatocellular and less frequently mixed. Life-threatening MKI-induced hepatic injury has been described, involving fulminant liver failure or death. Starting from existing data, a description of MKI-related liver events, grading of hepatotoxicity risk, and recommendations for management are also given for various MKI molecules.

CONCLUSION

All MKIs can potentially cause liver injury, which is sometimes irreversible. As there is still no strategy available to prevent MKI-related hepatotoxicity, early detection remains crucial. The surveillance of liver function during treatment may help in the early detection of hepatotoxicity. Furthermore, the exclusion of potential causes of hepatic injury is essential to avoid unnecessary MKI withdrawal.

On the road to treatment-free remission in chronic myeloid leukemia: what about 'the others'?

INTRODUCTION

The treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) has been drastically changed by the approval of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). CML is now managed as a chronic disease requiring both long-term treatment and close molecular monitoring in the majority of patients.

AREAS COVERED

Evidence suggests that in a substantial number of patients who have achieved a stable deep molecular response (DMR), TKI treatment can be safely discontinued without loss of response. Therefore, treatment-free remission (TFR), through the achievement of a DMR, is increasingly regarded as a feasible treatment goal in about 20% to 40% CML patients. Nevertheless, a proportion of patients with chronic-phase CML treated with TKIs remain in stable MMR and do not achieve a DMR.

EXPERT OPINION

We provide prospective views on how it is possible to optimize treatment for patients in stable MMR but not in DMR in order to finalize the therapeutic strategy.

Bosutinib for pretreated patients with chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia: primary results of the phase 4 BYOND study

Bosutinib is approved for newly diagnosed Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph+) chronic phase (CP) chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) and for Ph+ CP, accelerated (AP), or blast (BP) phase CML after prior treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). In the ongoing phase 4 BYOND study (NCT02228382), 163 CML patients resistant/intolerant to prior TKIs (n = 156 Ph+ CP CML, n = 4 Ph+ AP CML, n = 3 Ph-negative/BCR-ABL1+ CML) received bosutinib 500 mg once daily (starting dose). As of ≥1 year after last enrolled patient (median treatment duration 23.7 months), 56.4% of Ph+ CP CML patients remained on bosutinib. Primary endpoint of cumulative confirmed major cytogenetic response (MCyR) rate by 1 year was 75.8% in Ph+ CP CML patients after one or two prior TKIs and 62.2% after three prior TKIs. Cumulative complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) and major molecular response (MMR) rates by 1 year were 80.6% and 70.5%, respectively, in Ph+ CP CML patients overall. No patient progressed to AP/BP on treatment. Across all patients, the most common treatment-emergent adverse events were diarrhea (87.7%), nausea (39.9%), and vomiting (32.5%). The majority of patients had confirmed MCyR by 1 year and MMR by 1 year, further supporting bosutinib use for Ph+ CP CML patients resistant/intolerant to prior TKIs.

Pulmonary complications of Bcr-Abl tyrosine kinase inhibitors

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) targeting the Bcr-Abl oncoprotein revolutionised the treatment of chronic myelogenous leukaemia. Following the success of imatinib, second- and third-generation molecules were developed. Different profiles of kinase inhibition and off-target effects vary between TKIs, which leads to a broad spectrum of potential toxicities.

Pulmonary complications are most frequently observed with dasatinib but all other Bcr-Abl TKIs have been implicated. Pleural effusions are the most frequent pulmonary complication of TKIs, usually associated with dasatinib and bosutinib. Pulmonary arterial hypertension is an uncommon but serious complication of dasatinib, which is often reversible upon discontinuation. Bosutinib and ponatinib have also been associated with pulmonary arterial hypertension, while imatinib has not. Rarely, interstitial lung disease has been associated with TKIs, predominantly with imatinib.

Mechanistically, dasatinib affects maintenance of normal pulmonary endothelial integrity by generating mitochondrial oxidative stress, inducing endothelial apoptosis and impairing vascular permeability in a dose-dependent manner. The mechanisms underlying other TKI-related complications are largely unknown. Awareness and early diagnosis of the pulmonary complications of Bcr-Abl TKIs is essential given their seriousness, potential reversibility, and impact on future treatment options for the underlying chronic myelogenous leukaemia.

Pharmacology of tyrosine kinase inhibitors in chronic myeloid leukemia; a clinician's perspective

OBJECTIVE

In this review, we have summarized the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and adverse effects of imatinib, dasatinib, nilotinib, bosutinib, ponatinib and radotinib with focus on pharmacogenomic studies with clinical end points. We have discussed the key phase 3 trials of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) comparing with each other, treatment free remission (TFR) and selection of TKI. Upcoming concepts and related trials in the management of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) along with future directions have been touched upon.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

PubMed, Embase, Google, Cochrane library and Medline were searched to identify relevant literature for the review. Clinicaltrial.gov was searched for upcoming data and trials.

RESULTS

There are lot of gap in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of TKI. Imatinib appears to be the safest TKI. Newer TKI's achieve better achievement of therapeutic milestones, deeper molecular response and less chances of progression of CML compared to imatinib. Newer TKI appears to be better choice for achieving TFR. When the objective is survival, imatinib is still the TKI of choice. Primary prophylaxis with antiplatelet drugs for TKI having cardiovascular and thromboembolic side effects should be considered.

CONCLUSION

Pharmacogenetic data of TKI is still immature to guide in therapeutic decision making in clinical practice. There is need for further research in pharmacology and pharmacogenomics of newer TKI's. Randomized controlled trials are required to decide the optimum TKI for TFR. Safe and effective TKI for targeting T315I mutation, CML accelerated phase and blast crisis are an active area of research.

Cost effectiveness of therapeutic drug monitoring for imatinib administration in chronic myeloid leukemia

BACKGROUND

Imatinib mesylate (IM) is a first-line treatment option for patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Patients who fail or are intolerant to IM therapy are treated with more expensive second and third-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Patients show wide variation in trough concentrations in response to standard dosing. Thus, many patients receive subtherapeutic or supratherapeutic doses. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) may improve dose management that, in turn, may reduce costs and improve outcomes. However, TDM also adds to the cost of patient care. The objective of this study was to determine the cost-effectiveness of TDM for generic IM therapy.

METHODS

We developed a microsimulation model for the trough plasma concentration of IM which is related to a cytogenetic or molecular response. We compared two cohorts: one with TDM and one without TDM (NTDM). The lifetime incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was calculated using quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) as the effectiveness measure. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed.

RESULTS

The lifetime cost and QALY of treatment with TDM were $2,137K [95% Ci: 2,079K; 2,174K] and 12.37 [95% CI: 12.07; 12.55], respectively. The cost and QALY of NTDM were $2,132K [95% CI: 2,091K; 2,197K] and 12.23 [95% CI: 11.96; 12.50], respectively. The incremental cost and QALY for TDM relative to NTDM was $4,417 [95% CI: -52,582; 32,097]) and 0.15 [95% CI: -0.13; 0.28]. The ICER for TDM relative to NTDM was $30,450/QALY. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed that TDM was cost-effective relative to NTDM in 90% of the tested scenarios at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100,000/QALY.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the impact of TDM is modest, the cost-effectiveness over a lifetime horizon (societal perspective, ($30,450/QALY) falls within the acceptable range (< $100k/QALY).

Complexity of chronic-phase CML management after failing a second-generation TKI

The treatment landscape of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) was radically changed with the introduction of imatinib in 2001. With the emergence of treatment failure with imatinib, more specific and potent second- and third-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) were developed. Currently, 6 TKIs and one protein synthesis inhibitor are available on the market for CML treatment. Despite the availability of these agents, it is not uncommon for some patients to experience treatment failure across several lines of therapy. Sequencing the available treatment options is a challenging task that becomes more complex after patients fail the more potent second- and third-generation TKIs. The ability to successfully salvage such patients is limited. In this paper, we will briefly review the mechanisms of treatment failure in chronic-phase CML (CP-CML) and focus on the complexity of managing patients who fail a second-generation TKI.

AMPK activation induced by promethazine increases NOXA expression and Beclin-1 phosphorylation and drives autophagy-associated apoptosis in chronic myeloid leukemia

Relapse and drug resistance is still major challenges in the treatment of leukemia. Promethazine, an antihistaminic phenothiazine derivative, has been used to prevent chemotherapy-induced emesis, although there is no report about its antitumor potential. Thus, we evaluated the promethazine cytotoxicity against several leukemia cells and the underlying mechanisms were investigated. Promethazine exhibited potent and selective cytotoxicity against all leukemia cell types in vitro at clinically relevant concentrations. Philadelphia positive chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) K562 cells were the most sensitive cell line. The cytotoxicity of promethazine in these cells was triggered by the activation of AMPK and inhibition of PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway. The subsequent downstream effects were NOXA increase, MCL-1 decrease, and Beclin-1 activation, resulting in autophagy-associated apoptosis. These data highlight targeting autophagy may represent an interesting strategy in CML therapy, and also the antitumor potential of promethazine by acting in AMPK and PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathways. Since this drug is currently used with relative low side effects, its repurposing may represent a new therapeutic opportunity for leukemia treatment.

Management of adverse events associated with bosutinib treatment of chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia: expert panel review

Bosutinib, a BCR-ABL1 tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), has been available for several years as a treatment for chronic-, accelerated-, and blast-phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), for patients with resistance or intolerance to prior therapy. In 2017, the BFORE trial demonstrated efficacy of bosutinib as first-line treatment in adult patients with newly diagnosed chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CP-CML). The most common adverse events (AEs) of any grade in bosutinib-treated patients in BFORE were diarrhea, nausea, thrombocytopenia, increased alanine aminotransferase, and increased aspartate aminotransferase, consistent with the most commonly reported AEs in earlier studies. To balance the efficacy and tolerability of treatment to optimize patient adherence with medications, treating physicians commonly use various strategies such as initiating treatment at a lower dose, dose reduction, or dose interruption, depending on the type and severity of the AEs and the clinical setting. In light of the recent data from first-line treatment, an expert panel of hematologists reviewed management strategies for the use of bosutinib in treatment of CP-CML and made the recommendations reported here. Although the panel focused on first-line treatment, the principles can be for the most part extended to bosutinib use in later lines of treatment. Recommendations include advice regarding prophylaxis and management for diarrhea. The panel also considered optimum timing for referral to a specialist for specific AEs. Across the commonly occurring AEs, the panel highlighted the importance of education and communication with patients about anticipated AEs.

Imatinib dose reduction in major molecular response of chronic myeloid leukemia: results from the German Chronic Myeloid Leukemia-Study IV

Standard first-line therapy of chronic myeloid leukemia is treatment with imatinib. In the randomized German Chronic Myeloid Leukemia-Study IV, more potent BCR-ABL inhibition with 800 mg (‘high-dose’) imatinib accelerated achievement of a deep molecular remission. However, whether and when a de-escalation of the dose intensity under high-dose imatinib can be safely performed without increasing the risk of losing deep molecular response is unknown. To gain insights into this clinically relevant question, we analyzed the outcome of imatinib dose reductions from 800 mg to 400 mg daily in the Chronic Myeloid Leukemia-Study IV. Of the 422 patients that were randomized to the 800 mg arm, 68 reduced imatinib to 400 mg after they had achieved at least a stable major molecular response. Of these 68 patients, 61 (90%) maintained major molecular remission on imatinib at 400 mg. Five of the seven patients who lost major molecular remission on the imatinib standard dose regained major molecular remission while still on 400 mg imatinib. Only two of 68 patients had to switch to more potent kinase inhibition to regain major molecular remission. Importantly, the lengths of the intervals between imatinib high-dose treatment before and after achieving major molecular remission were associated with the probabilities of maintaining major molecular remission with the standard dose of imatinib. Taken together, the data support the view that a deep molecular remission achieved with high-dose imatinib can be safely maintained with standard dose in most patients. Study protocol registered at clinicaltrials.gov 00055874.

Chronic myeloproliferative neoplasms in the elderly

This review focuses on the management of elderly patients with chronic myeloid leukemia and chronic myeloproliferative neoplasms, including polycythemia vera, essential thrombocythemia and primary myelofibrosis. Median age in these neoplasms is within the 6th decades of age. All new therapies can be done at any age without absolute contraindication. However, the selection of the precise therapy for the single patient is mandatory. For these reasons, an accurate definition of diagnosis and prognostication is necessary. Precision in disease definition and prognostication is definitively helpful for personalizing therapeutic approach.

A phase I clinical trial of ruxolitinib in combination with nilotinib in chronic myeloid leukemia patients with molecular evidence of disease

PURPOSE

Preclinical evidence indicates that the bone marrow microenvironment provides a protective niche for leukemic stem cells, allowing them to evade the effects of BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), but that targeting of the JAK-STAT pathway with the JAK2 inhibitor ruxolitinib increases TKI-induced apoptosis. A phase I clinical trial (NCT01702064) investigated the tolerability and safety of treating chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia patients with ruxolitinib in combination with the BCR-ABL TKI nilotinib and explored initial efficacy evidence.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Eleven patients already treated with single-agent nilotinib (300-400 mg twice daily) commenced combination therapy, and molecular responses were evaluated after 6 months. Three ruxolitinib dose cohorts were studied: 5 mg, 10 mg, and 15 mg twice daily.

RESULTS

One patient experienced a grade 3/4 adverse event (hypophosphatemia) and 36% of patients experienced grade 1/2 anemia. Of 10 patients who were evaluable for responses, 40% had undetectable BCR-ABL transcripts, as measured by quantitative RT-PCR after 6 months. Plasma inhibitory assay results revealed a decrease in phospho-STAT3 levels after treatment with ruxolitinib. The recommended phase 2 dose of ruxolitinib was 15 mg BID.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, this combination was safe and well-tolerated, and the molecular responses were encouraging, thereby warranting further investigation in a phase 2 trial.

Molecular biology as a tool for the treatment of cancer

Cancer is a genetic disease characterized by uncontrolled cell growth and metastasis. Cancer can have a number of causes, such the activation of oncogenes, the inactivation of tumor-suppressing genes, mutagenesis provoked by external factors, and epigenetic modifications. The development of diagnostic tools and treatments using a molecular biological approach permits the use of sensitive, low-cost, noninvasive tests for cancer patients. Biomarkers can be used to provide rapid, personalized oncology, in particular the molecular diagnosis of chronic myeloid leukemia, and gastric, colon, and breast cancers. Molecular tests based on DNA methylation can also be used to direct treatments or evaluate the toxic effects of chemotherapy. The adequate diagnosis, prognosis, and prediction of the response of cancer patients to treatment are essential to ensure the most effective therapy, reduce the damaging effects of treatment, and direct the therapy to specific targets, and in this context, molecular biology has become increasingly important in oncology. In this brief review, we will demonstrate the fundamental importance of molecular biology for the treatment of three types of cancer-chronic myeloid leukemia, hereditary diffuse gastric cancer, and astrocytomas (sporadic tumors of the central nervous system). In each of these three models, distinct biological mechanisms are involved in the transformation of the cells, but in all cases, molecular biology is fundamental to the development of personalized analyses for each patient and each type of neoplasia, and to guarantee the success of the treatment.

Improving Outcomes in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Over Time in the Era of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors

Most patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) receiving treatment with BCR-ABL1 tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) will achieve favorable responses. Moreover, TKI therapy enables patients to experience long-term survival, with survival rates similar to those of individuals without CML. This enhanced survival has resulted from the availability of multiple BCR-ABL1 TKIs with efficacy, not only in frontline treatment, but, importantly, also in second- and third-line treatment. We have reviewed the changes in long-term outcomes in the era of TKI therapy and how these changes have affected treatment practices. We discuss the development of imatinib, the first BCR-ABL1 TKI, followed by newer TKIs, including nilotinib, dasatinib, bosutinib, and ponatinib. We consider the key studies that led to their development as frontline or later-line therapies, their safety profiles, and their effect on improving patient outcomes. With these improved outcomes, the definition of an optimal response has become more stringent, and treatment monitoring strategies have changed. Second-line patient populations have evolved from those with resistance to, or intolerance of, imatinib to those with moderate responses to, or low-grade adverse events with, imatinib. Although all TKIs are associated with high survival rates, newer TKIs have been associated with lower disease progression rates and, importantly, deeper treatment responses and, potentially, a greater chance of future treatment-free remission. Finally, we consider the unmet needs of patients with CML, including the challenges remaining for those without optimal responses during TKI therapy and new therapies and strategies to identify such patients at diagnosis.

Life after ponatinib failure: outcomes of chronic and accelerated phase CML patients who discontinued ponatinib in the salvage setting

Ponatinib is a pan-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) with efficacy in multirefractory CML patients who have failed other TKIs. Despite excellent response rates, resistance or intolerance may develop. We conducted a retrospective review of the outcome of patients with chronic (CP) and accelerated (AP) phase CML refractory to prior TKI who discontinued ponatinib for resistance or intolerance. Nineteen CP patients, discontinued due to resistance (n = 13), toxicity (n = 5) and to pursue stem cell transplantation (n = 1). At discontinuation, 14 were still in CP, three had progressed to AP and two to blast phase (BP). Three CP patients improved their cytogenetic response (CyR) to complete CyR (CCyR), two after SCT and one on omacetaxine. None of the 12 patients, without a major cytogenetic response at ponatinib discontinuation, including all patients treated with subsequent TKIs, responded to therapy. Seventeen AP patients, stopped ponatinib due to resistance (n = 15) or intolerance (n = 2). At discontinuation, 14 were still in AP and three had progressed to BP. Four patients were treated with SCT and one achieved major molecular response. None of the 12 patients treated with non-SCT approaches responded to subsequent therapy. Median survival for all patients was 16.6 months after ponatinib discontinuation (31, 9 and 13 months for patients in CP, AP and BP, respectively). Median survival was 60 months for patients who discontinued ponatinib for toxicity and 11 months for those who discontinued for resistance. Long-term outcome of patients with ponatinib failure are poor with estimated one-year OS and EFS rates of 54% and 40%, respectively. New treatment options are required for this subset of patients.

Safety and efficacy of second-line bosutinib for chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia over a five-year period: final results of a phase I/II study

Bosutinib is a Src/Abl tyrosine kinase inhibitor indicated for adults with newly-diagnosed Philadelphia positive chronic myeloid leukemia or with resistant/intolerant disease. We report the final results of a phase I/II study of second-line bosutinib in chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia patients after imatinib failure (n=284). Median follow up and treatment durations were 54.8 (range 0.6–96.3) and 25.6 (0.2–96.3) months, respectively. At years 2 and 5, 54% and 40% of patients, respectively, remained on bosutinib. Cumulative major cytogenetic response and complete cytogenetic response rates (newly-attained or maintained from baseline) were 58% and 46%, respectively, by year 2 and 60% and 50% by year 5. Kaplan-Meier probability of maintaining major and complete cytogenetic response was 76% and 78%, respectively, at year 2 and 71% and 69% at year 5. Cumulative incidence of on-treatment disease progression/death was similar at years 5 (19%) and 2 (15%); Kaplan-Meier overall survival was 91% at year 2 and 84% at year 5. Of 169 patients who had discontinued bosutinib by year 5, 38 did so after year 2, most commonly for disease progression (n=11). Most adverse events initially occurred within two years. Overall, gastrointestinal events were the most common (diarrhea 86%, nausea 46%, vomiting 37%); the most common grade 3/4 toxicity was thrombocytopenia (25%). None of the 4 on-treatment deaths in years 3–5 were related to bosutinib. Bosutinib demonstrated durable efficacy and manageable toxicity through year 5 confirming its importance in the treatment of chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia patients resistant/intolerant to prior imatinib. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov identifier: 00261846.

Correlation of plasma concentration and adverse effects of bosutinib: standard dose or dose-escalation regimens of bosutinib treatment for patients with chronic myeloid leukemia

Purpose

To investigate the exposure-toxicity relationship of bosutinib and to identify the target trough plasma concentration (C₀).

Methods

The toxicity and C₀ of bosutinib in Japanese chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients were monitored every 2 weeks for the first 3 months of treatment, and subsequently once a month during the 6 months after beginning 500 mg/day of standard dose (SD group, n = 10) or beginning 100 mg/day and increased by 100 mg every 2 weeks of dose escalation (DE group, n = 15).

Results

Nine of 10 patients (90%) in the SD group were not able to continue bosutinib therapy without interruption due to adverse events, compared to 2 patients (13.5%) in the DE group. The total duration of treatment interruption was 35 and 14 days in the SD and DE groups, respectively. The median time until liver dysfunction or diarrhea was day 28 and day 1 in the SD group, and day 53.5 and day 19 in the DE group, respectively. The cumulative dose of bosutinib was comparable between the SD and DE groups (51,700 vs. 53,550 mg, respectively). At 6 months, the median C₀ was 63.7 ng/mL and 63.0 ng/mL in the SD and DE groups, respectively. Liver dysfunction (all grades) and diarrhea (> grade 2) were prevalent in quartile 4 of C₀ (> 91.0 ng/mL), as calculated by the total C₀ distribution.

Conclusions

The DE regimen was better suited to avoid treatment interruption. The daily dose of bosutinib might be adjusted based on target C₀ to avoid adverse events by therapeutic drug monitoring in general practice.

Bosutinib in chronic myeloid leukemia: patient selection and perspectives

During recent years, the therapeutic landscape in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) has changed significantly. Since the clinical introduction of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) approximately 15 years ago, patients' concerns have shifted from reduced life expectancy toward long-term toxicities of TKI, depth of remission, and the probability of successful treatment discontinuation. Patients with newly diagnosed CML in chronic phase (at least with a Sokal score not exceeding intermediate) may now expect an almost normal life expectancy. However, even if almost 30% of all newly diagnosed chronic-phase patients might eventually be facing the prospect of a life without CML-specific treatment, based on current knowledge, most, if not all, patients would have to undergo an expected minimum of 5-8 years of TKI treatment and the majority would face a life-long exposure to the side-effects of TKIs. At present, 5 different TKIs are licensed for the treatment of CML, that is, imatinib, which is a first-generation TKI (including its generic derivatives); nilotinib, dasatinib, and bosutinib, which are second-generation TKIs; as well as ponatinib, which is a so-called third-generation TKI and is supposed to be used for patients harboring the T315I-mutation. One of the important, yet unanswered questions is the choice of the best possible TKI upfront for each individual patient. Bosutinib is currently licensed for patients with CML after failure or intolerance of at least 2 other TKIs. It can also be prescribed according to label if after failure of the first TKI therapy, another option does not seem feasible. This review focuses on the existing data on clinical efficacy, tolerability, and side effects of bosutinib treatment in CML patients with the aim to identify patient characteristics and treatment scenarios most suitable for treatment with bosutinib.

Ponatinib efficacy and safety in Philadelphia chromosome-positive leukemia: final 5-year results of the phase 2 PACE trial

Ponatinib has potent activity against native and mutant BCR-ABL1, including BCR-ABL1^T315I The pivotal phase 2 Ponatinib Ph⁺ ALL and CML Evaluation (PACE) trial evaluated efficacy and safety of ponatinib at a starting dose of 45 mg once daily in 449 patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) or Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) resistant/intolerant to dasatinib or nilotinib, or with BCR-ABL1^T315I This analysis focuses on chronic-phase CML (CP-CML) patients (n = 270) with 56.8-month median follow-up. Among 267 evaluable patients, 60%, 40%, and 24% achieved major cytogenetic response (MCyR), major molecular response (MMR), and 4.5-log molecular response, respectively. The probability of maintaining MCyR for 5 years was 82% among responders. Dose reductions were implemented in October 2013 to decrease the risk of arterial occlusive events (AOEs); ≥90% of CP-CML patients who had achieved MCyR or MMR maintained response 40 months after elective dose reductions. Estimated 5-year overall survival was 73%. In CP-CML patients, the most common treatment-emergent adverse events were rash (47%), abdominal pain (46%), thrombocytopenia (46%), headache (43%), dry skin (42%), and constipation (41%). The cumulative incidence of AOEs in CP-CML patients increased over time to 31%, while the exposure-adjusted incidence of new AOEs (15.8 and 4.9 per 100 patient-years in years 1 and 5, respectively) did not increase over time. These final PACE results demonstrate ponatinib provides durable and clinically meaningful responses, irrespective of dose reductions, in this population of heavily pretreated CP-CML patients. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01207440.

Practical management of toxicities associated with bosutinib in patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive chronic myeloid leukemia

Bosutinib (SKI-606) is an oral, dual Src/Abl tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) approved for treatment of patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph+) chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) that is resistant or intolerant to prior TKI therapy or for whom other TKIs are not appropriate choices. The objective of this review is to provide a longitudinal summary of toxicities that may arise during treatment with second-line or later bosutinib in patients with Ph+ chronic phase CML and to provide strategies for managing these toxicities. As bosutinib is not currently indicated for newly diagnosed CML, toxicities associated with first-line treatment are not reviewed. Recognition and optimal management of these toxicities can facilitate patient compliance and affect treatment outcomes.

Bosutinib Versus Imatinib for Newly Diagnosed Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: Results From the Randomized BFORE Trial

Purpose Bosutinib is a potent dual SRC/ABL kinase inhibitor approved for adults with Philadelphia chromosome-positive chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) resistant and /or intolerant to prior therapy. We assessed the efficacy and safety of bosutinib versus imatinib for first-line treatment of chronic-phase CML. Methods In this ongoing, multinational, phase III study, 536 patients with newly diagnosed chronic-phase CML were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive 400 mg of bosutinib once daily (n = 268) or imatinib (n = 268). Per protocol, efficacy was assessed in patients who were Philadelphia chromosome-positive with typical (e13a2/e14a2) transcripts (bosutinib, n = 246; imatinib, n = 241). Patients with Philadelphia chromosome-negative-/ BCR-ABL1-positive status and those with unknown Philadelphia chromosome status and/or atypical BCR-ABL1 transcript type were excluded from this population. Results The major molecular response (MMR) rate at 12 months (primary end point) was significantly higher with bosutinib versus imatinib (47.2% v 36.9%, respectively; P = .02), as was complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) rate by 12 months (77.2% v 66.4%, respectively; P = .0075). Cumulative incidence was favorable with bosutinib (MMR: hazard ratio, 1.34; P = .0173; CCyR: hazard ratio, 1.38; P < .001), with earlier response times. Four patients (1.6%) receiving bosutinib and six patients (2.5%) receiving imatinib experienced disease progression to accelerated/blast phase. Among treated patients, 22.0% of patients receiving bosutinib and 26.8% of patients receiving imatinib discontinued treatment, most commonly for drug-related toxicity (12.7% and 8.7%, respectively). Grade ≥ 3 diarrhea (7.8% v 0.8%) and increased ALT (19.0% v 1.5%) and AST (9.7% v 1.9%) levels were more common with bosutinib. Cardiac and vascular toxicities were uncommon. Conclusion Patients who received bosutinib had significantly higher rates of MMR and CCyR and achieved responses faster than those who received imatinib. Consistent with the known safety profile, GI events and transaminase elevations were more common with bosutinib. Results indicate bosutinib may be an effective first-line treatment for chronic-phase CML.

Bosutinib: A Potent Second-Generation Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor

Bosutinib is one of the five tyrosine kinase inhibitors which are currently approved for the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia. By its dual inhibition of Src and ABL kinase and also targeting further kinases, it creates a unique target portfolio which also explains its unique side effect profile. The approval of bosutinib in 2013 made the drug available for patients previously treated with one or more tyrosine kinase inhibitor(s) and for whom imatinib, nilotinib, and dasatinib are not considered appropriate treatment options. As initially the first-line clinical trial comparing bosutinib with imatinib in CML patients in chronic phase did not reach its primary endpoint and therefore the product was not licensed for first-line therapy, a second first-line trial, the so-called BFORE study, was performed and just recently the promising results have been published predicting a quick expansion of the existing label. In comparison with the other approved TKIs, bosutinib harbors a distinct side effect profile with only very few cardiovascular and thromboembolic events and minimal long-term safety issues with most adverse events happening during the first months of treatment. On the other hand, gastrointestinal side effects are very common (e.g., diarrhea rates in more than 80% of the patients) with bosutinib surprising some of the investigators during the early clinical trials evaluating bosutinib. Until then, several approaches have been used to face this problem resulting in extensive supportive efforts (such as early loperamid treatment) as well as new trials testing alternative dosing strategies with early dose adjustment schedules. This article reports preclinical and clinical data available for bosutinib both in hematologic diseases such as CML or ALL and solid tumours as well as other diseases and envisions future perspectives including additional patient groups in which bosutinib might be of clinical benefit.

Bosutinib versus Placebo for Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease

Overactivation of Src has been linked to the pathogenesis of autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD). This phase 2, multisite study assessed the efficacy and safety of bosutinib, an oral dual Src/Bcr-Abl tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in patients with ADPKD. Patients with ADPKD, eGFR≥60 ml/min per 1.73 m2, and total kidney volume ≥750 ml were randomized 1:1:1 to bosutinib 200 mg/d, bosutinib 400 mg/d, or placebo for ≤24 months. The primary endpoint was annualized rate of kidney enlargement in patients treated for ≥2 weeks who had at least one postbaseline magnetic resonance imaging scan that was preceded by a 30-day washout (modified intent-to-treat population). Of 172 enrolled patients, 169 received at least one study dose. Per protocol amendment, doses for 24 patients who initially received bosutinib at 400 mg/d were later reduced to 200 mg/d. The annual rate of kidney enlargement was reduced by 66% for bosutinib 200 mg/d versus placebo (1.63% versus 4.74%, respectively; P=0.01) and by 82% for pooled bosutinib versus placebo (0.84% versus 4.74%, respectively; P<0.001). Over the treatment period, patients receiving placebo or bosutinib had similar annualized eGFR decline. Gastrointestinal and liver-related adverse events were the most frequent toxicities. In conclusion, compared with placebo, bosutinib at 200 mg/d reduced kidney growth in patients with ADPKD. The overall gastrointestinal and liver toxicity profile was consistent with the profile in prior studies of bosutinib; no new toxicities were identified. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01233869).

Long-term patient-reported outcomes from an open-label safety and efficacy study of bosutinib in Philadelphia chromosome-positive chronic myeloid leukemia patients resistant or intolerant to prior therapy

BACKGROUND

Health‐related quality of life (HRQOL) in patients with chronic‐phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is important because of the requirement for long‐term treatment. This study assessed HRQOL in bosutinib‐treated patients with Philadelphia chromosome–positive CML and resistance or intolerance to 1 (chronic‐phase second‐line [CP2L]) or more (chronic‐phase third‐line [CP3L]) tyrosine kinase inhibitors who had 264 weeks or more of follow‐up (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT00261846).

METHODS

Patient‐reported HRQOL was assessed with the EuroQol 5‐Dimensions Questionnaire (EQ‐5D) and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy–Leukemia (FACT‐Leu).

RESULTS

In total, 284 and 119 patients composed the CP2L and CP3L cohorts, respectively. At treatment completion, more than 50% of the patients in the CP2L and CP3L cohorts completed the EQ‐5D and FACT‐Leu assessments. The EQ‐5D and EQ‐5D visual analog scale scores were stable in both cohorts throughout treatment. The mean FACT‐Leu scores were generally stable over time but were lower in magnitude in the CP3L cohort versus the CP2L cohort. The FACT‐Leu scale scores of a subset of patients with chronic diarrhea (CP2L, n = 101; CP3L, n = 30) were similar to the scores of the larger cohorts. Minimally important differences (MIDs) from baseline for the FACT‐Leu scale scores were observed for the following: emotional well‐being (EWB), Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy–General (FACT‐G) Total, FACT‐Leu Total, and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Trial Outcome Index (FACT‐TOI) in the CP2L cohort and FACT‐Leu Total in the CP3L cohort. Among patients with chronic diarrhea, MIDs were observed for EWB, FACT‐G Total, FACT‐Leu Total, and FACT‐TOI in the CP2L cohort and for EWB, FACT‐G Total, and FACT‐Leu Total in the CP3L cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

HRQOL was maintained with long‐term bosutinib treatment for patients with CP2L and CP3L CML. Cancer 2018;124:587‐95. © 2017 The Authors. Cancer published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Cancer Society. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.

Health‐related quality of life (assessed with the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy–Leukemia) and the general health status (assessed with the EuroQol 5‐Dimensions Questionnaire) were largely maintained in chronic‐phase chronic myeloid leukemia patients receiving bosutinib for 264 weeks or longer. Health‐related quality of life was maintained by patients who receive bosutinib as a second‐ or third‐line treatment for chronic‐phase chronic myeloid leukemia.

Absolute Bioavailability of Bosutinib in Healthy Subjects From an Open-Label, Randomized, 2-Period Crossover Study

This study evaluated the absolute bioavailability of bosutinib and assessed its safety and tolerability after single-dose oral and intravenous administration. In this phase 1 open-label, 2-sequence, 2-period crossover study, healthy, fed subjects aged 18-55 years were randomized to 1 of 2 treatment sequences (n = 7/sequence): oral bosutinib (100 mg × 5) followed by intravenous bosutinib (120 mg in approximately 240 mL over 1 hour), with a ≥14-day washout, or intravenous bosutinib and then oral bosutinib. Results of plasma pharmacokinetics analyses demonstrated that exposure to intravenous bosutinib was 3-fold higher than for oral bosutinib (16.2 and 5.5 ng·h/mL/mg, respectively), and mean terminal half-life was similar (35.5 and 31.7 hours). The ratio of adjusted geometric means (90%CI) for the dose-normalized area under the plasma concentration-time profile (AUC_0-∞ /D) was 33.85% (30.65%-37.38%). Most treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) were mild in severity. Gastrointestinal (GI) AEs occurred in 9 of 13 subjects given oral bosutinib, whereas no subjects given intravenous bosutinib experienced GI AEs, suggesting bosutinib present in the GI tract had an effect. Bosutinib exhibited an absolute bioavailability of 33.85% based on the ratio of AUC_0-∞ /D. Both oral and intravenous bosutinib were safe and well tolerated in healthy, fed adult subjects.

Ponatinib in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML): Consensus on patient treatment and management from a European expert panel

Five tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are currently approved in the European Union for treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) and all have considerable overlap in their indications. While disease-specific factors such as CML phase, mutational status, and line of treatment are key to TKI selection, other important features must be considered, such as patient-specific comorbidities and TKI safety profiles. Ponatinib, the TKI most recently approved, has demonstrated efficacy in patients with refractory CML, but is associated with an increased risk of arterial hypertension, sometimes severe, and serious arterial occlusive and venous thromboembolic events. A panel of European experts convened to discuss their clinical experience in managing patients with CML. Based on the panel discussions, scenarios in which a CML patient may be an appropriate candidate for ponatinib therapy are described, including presence of the T315I mutation, resistance to other TKIs without the T315I mutation, and intolerance to other TKIs.

An economic analysis of high-dose imatinib, dasatinib, and nilotinib for imatinib-resistant chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia in China: A CHEERS-compliant article

BACKGROUND

The aim of the study was to test the cost-effectiveness of dasatinib compared to high-dose imatinib and nilotinib in Chinese patients who were diagnosed with imatinib-resistant chronic myeloid leukemia in the chronic phase (CML-CP).

METHODS

A Markov model combined with clinical effectiveness, utility, and cost data was used. The sensitivity analyses were conducted to determine the robustness of the model outcomes. The impact of patient assistance programs (PAPs) was assessed.

RESULTS

Treatment with dasatinib is expected to produce 3.65, 0.59, and 0.15 more quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) in comparison with high-dose imatinib (600 and 800 mg) and nilotinib, respectively. When a PAP was available, dasatinib yielded an incremental cost of $16,417 per QALY compared to imatinib (600 mg) and was cost-saving compared to imatinib (800 mg) and nilotinib.

CONCLUSION

When PAP is available in the Chinese setting, dasatinib is likely to be a cost-effective strategy for patients with CML-CP standard-dose imatinib resistance. The results should be carefully explained due to the assumptions and limitations used in the study.

Bosutinib as a fourth-line therapy for a patient with T315I-positive lymphoid blastic phase chronic myeloid leukemia: A case report

A 35-year-old male was diagnosed with chronic myeloid leukemia in the chronic phase and was prescribed 100 mg daily dasatinib. However, dasatinib was discontinued due to thrombocytopenia, and within six months, the disease progressed to the lymphoid blastic phase. Hyper-cyclophosphamide, vincristine, adriamycin and dexamethasone chemotherapy combined with 140 mg dasatinib or 600 mg imatinib was prescribed. The two inhibitors were soon discontinued due to severe thrombocytopenia and jaundice, respectively. Myelosuppression persisted subsequent to the nadir. Bone marrow (BM) aspiration and biopsy revealed hypercellular marrow filled with blasts. Sequencing of the leukemia cells revealed overlapping peaks for the wild-type sequence and the T315I mutant sequence. The patient was treated with 500 mg bosutinib (which was later reduced to 300 mg) for pretransplant cytoreduction. After 5 months, the patient's spleen exhibited a reduction in volume and the percentage of blasts in the BM decreased from 96.1 to 17.5%. The patient successfully underwent cord blood transplantation. The patient has been disease-free for 5 months subsequent to transplantation. This case suggests that bosutinib may be effective for cytoreduction prior to stem cell transplantation, unless the leukemia cells consistently harbor the T315I mutation.