Impact of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant in patients with myeloid neoplasms carrying spliceosomal mutations

Impact of spliceosome mutation on outcomes of myelodysplastic syndrome and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation

INTRODUCTION

Allogeneic Hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) remains the only curative therapy for myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML). The impact of spliceosome mutations on allo-HCT outcome is unclear and further understanding is needed to assess the implications of this class of mutations on risk of relapse, overall survival (OS) and non-relapse mortality (NRM) in order to make decision regarding timing of allo-HCT. We examined the allo-HCT outcomes of MDS/CMML patients based on their spliceosome mutation profile to understand the impact of these mutations on transplant outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

To compare outcomes of MDS/CMML patients with and without spliceosome mutations undergoing allo-HCT.

METHODS

This is a single institution, retrospective study of MDS/CMML patients who underwent allo-HCT with myeloablative or reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) regimen at City of Hope from January 2016 to December 2021. Among them, patients who underwent molecular mutation profiling by NGS (Next Generation Sequencing) for a set of genes known to be mutated in myeloid neoplasms are included in this analysis. We compared OS, relapse free survival, NRM and acute/chronic graft versus host disease (GVHD) incidence between the spliceosome-mutated and unmutated groups.

RESULTS

We identified 258 consecutive MDS/CMML patients who underwent allo-HCT. Of these, 126 (48.8 %) patients had molecular profiling done among whom 57 (45.2 %) patients carried a spliceosome mutation. 84.9 % of patients had MDS and 55.6 % underwent a matched unrelated donor transplant. The median age for the whole cohort was 66 years (range 12-77).78.6 % and 73.7 % received RIC in the spliceosome and non-spliceosome groups, respectively. The 2-year OS for the whole cohort was 66.5 % (95 %CI 0.55-0.75) with a day 100 NRM of 7.1 % and 2-year cumulative incidence of relapse of 20 %. Grade II-IV acute GVHD at day 100 was 36.3 % (95 % CI 0.27-0.44) and any chronic GVHD at 2-years was 48.4 % (95 % CI 0.37-0.58). Patients who carried a spliceosome mutation had a significantly better 2-year survival of 83.8 % vs 55.9 % in the non-spliceosome group (P=0.002) and a better PFS of 73.7 % vs 50.0 % (P=0.007). There was no difference in the cumulative incidence of relapse at 2-years 15.9 % vs 18.5 % (P=0.59) between two groups but the spliceosome group had a significantly lower NRM at 2-years 10.4 % vs 31.5 % (P=0.009). There was no difference in incidence of acute or chronic GVHD between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with MDS or CMML who underwent allo-HCT, our study shows better OS for patients who have spliceosome mutations due to lower NRM compared to those carrying non- spliceosome mutations. This favorable outcome of the spliceosome-mutated patients could have implications for timing of allo-HCT, particularly for patients in the intermediate MDS prognostic risk groups.

Impact of bone marrow fibrosis on outcomes of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in acute myeloid leukemia

Bone marrow fibrosis (BMF) of unknown etiology was common in hematological malignancies, but its prognostic value for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is unclear. We interrogated data from 532 newly diagnosed subjects with AML receiving allogeneic hematological stem cell transplantation to evaluate the prognostic impact of BMF on transplant outcomes. Using the European consensus on the grading of BMF at diagnosis, 255 (48%) subjects were BMF-0, 209 (39%), BMF-1 and 68 (13%), BMF-2-3. Subjects with BMF-2-3 had poor overall survival (P < 0.001), disease-free survival (P < 0.001) and a higher incidence of relapse (CIR, P < 0.001). Multi-variable analyses in subjects achieving pre-transplant complete remission showed BMF-2-3 was an independent risk factor for CIR (Hazard Ratio [HR] = 2.17, (95% CI, 1.11, 4,24); P = 0.02). Furthermore, BMF-2-3 group showed delayed neutrophil and platelet engraftment and delayed B cell recovery post-transplantation. These findings demonstrate the significance of BMF in transplant outcomes and attract more attention to AML with BMF.

Discovery of U2AF1 neoantigens in myeloid neoplasms

BACKGROUND

Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) arise from somatic mutations acquired in hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells, causing cytopenias and predisposing to transformation into secondary acute myeloid leukemia (sAML). Recurrent mutations in spliceosome genes, including U2AF1, are attractive therapeutic targets as they are prevalent in MDS and sAML, arise early in neoplastic cells, and are generally absent from normal cells, including normal hematopoietic cells. MDS and sAML are susceptible to T cell-mediated killing, and thus engineered T-cell immunotherapies hold promise for their treatment. We hypothesized that targeting spliceosome mutation-derived neoantigens with transgenic T-cell receptor (TCR) T cells would selectively eradicate malignant cells in MDS and sAML.

METHODS

We identified candidate neoantigen epitopes from recurrent protein-coding mutations in the spliceosome genes SRSF2 and U2AF1 using a multistep in silico process. Candidate epitopes predicted to bind human leukocyte antigen (HLA) class I, be processed and presented from the parent protein, and not to be subject to tolerance then underwent in vitro immunogenicity screening. CD8+ T cells recognizing immunogenic neoantigen epitopes were evaluated in in vitro assays to assess functional avidity, confirm the predicted HLA restriction, the potential for recognition of similar peptides, and the ability to kill neoplastic cells in an antigen-specific manner. Neoantigen-specific TCR were sequenced, cloned into lentiviral vectors, and transduced into third-party T cells after knock-out of endogenous TCR, then tested in vitro for specificity and ability to kill neoplastic myeloid cells presenting the neoantigen. The efficacy of neoantigen-specific T cells was evaluated in vivo in a murine cell line-derived xenograft model.

RESULTS

We identified two neoantigens created from a recurrent mutation in U2AF1, isolated CD8+ T cells specific for the neoantigens, and demonstrated that transferring their TCR to third-party CD8+ T cells is feasible and confers specificity for the U2AF1 neoantigens. Finally, we showed that these neoantigen-specific TCR-T cells do not recognize normal hematopoietic cells but efficiently kill malignant myeloid cells bearing the specific U2AF1 mutation, including primary cells, in vitro and in vivo.

CONCLUSIONS

These data serve as proof-of-concept for developing precision medicine approaches that use neoantigen-directed T-cell receptor-transduced T cells to treat MDS and sAML.

Morphologic, immunophenotypic, molecular genetic, and clinical characterization in patients with SRSF2-mutated acute myeloid leukemia

OBJECTIVES

SRSF2 mutations are known to be associated with poor outcomes in myelodysplastic neoplasm, but studies on their prognostic impact on acute myeloid leukemia (AML) remain limited. In this retrospective study, we analyzed clinical and pathologic characteristics of patients with AML and correlated the outcomes with SRSF2 mutations.

METHODS

We characterized the morphologic, immunophenotypic, molecular, and clinical findings in AML with mutated SRSF2 and compared them with SRSF2 wild-type (WT) myeloid neoplasms (MNs).

RESULTS

Using next-generation sequencing, we identified 134 patients with MNs and SRSF2 mutations (85 with AML and 49 with MNs) in addition to 342 SRSF2-WT AMLs. Fifty-two (62%) patients with altered SRSF2 demonstrated a variable degree of morphologic dysplasia. The most frequent immunophenotypic aberrancies in SRSF2-mutant AML included diminished CD33 expression and overexpression of CD7, CD56, or CD123, similar to WT AML. More IDH1/2 (P = .015) and NPM1 (P = .002) mutations were seen in SRSF2-mutant AML than in SRSF2-mutant non-AML. Further, more IDH1/2, ASXL1, RUNX1, and STAG2 mutations were observed in SRSF2-mutant AML than in SRSF2-WT AML (P < .0001 to P = .001). Finally, patients with SRSF2-mutant AML showed a significantly worse overall survival (OS) than patients with SRSF2-WT AML (P < .0001), but this worse OS appeared to be rescued by allogeneic stem cell transplant (allo-SCT).

CONCLUSIONS

Acute myeloid leukemia with altered SRSF2 shows a variable degree of morphologic dysplasia without uniform immunophenotypic aberrancies. SRSF2 mutations appear to be independent poor prognostic factors, but allo-SCT has improved the clinical outcomes in patients with SRSF2-mutant AML.

Moving toward a conceptualization of measurable residual disease in myelodysplastic syndromes

Approximately 90% of patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDSs) have somatic mutations that are known or suspected to be oncogenic in the malignant cells. The genetic risk stratification of MDSs has evolved substantially with the introduction of the clinical molecular international prognostic scoring system, which establishes next-generation sequencing at diagnosis as a standard of care. Furthermore, the International Consensus Classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemias has refined the MDS diagnostic criteria with the introduction of a new MDS/acute myeloid leukemia category. Monitoring measurable residual disease (MRD) has historically been used to define remission status, improve relapse prediction, and determine the efficacy of antileukemic drugs in patients with acute and chronic leukemias. However, in contrast to leukemias, assessment of MRD, including tracking of patient-specific mutations, has not yet been formally defined as a biomarker for MDS. This article summarizes current evidence and challenges and provides a conceptual framework for incorporating MRD into the treatment of MDS and future clinical trials.

Clinical and prognostic profile of SRSF2 and related spliceosome mutations in patients with acute myeloid leukemia

BACKGROUND

Mutations in splicing factor (SF) genes are frequently detected in myelodysplastic syndrome, but their clinical and prognostic relevance in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) have rarely been reported.

METHODS

A total of 368 newly diagnosed non-M3 AML patients were included in this study. Next generation sequencing including four SF genes was performed on the genomicDNA. The clinical features and survival were analyzed using statistical analysis.

RESULTS

We found that 64 of 368 patients harbored SF mutations. The SF mutations were much more frequently found in older or male patients. SRSF2 mutations were shown obviously co-existed with IDH2 mutation. The level of measurable residual disease after first chemotherapy was higher in SF-mutated patients compared to that in SF-wild patients, while the complete remission rate was significantly decreased. And the overall survival of SF-mutated patients was shorter than that of SF-wild patients. Moreover, our multivariable analysis suggests that the index of male, Kit mutation or ZRSR2 mutation was the independent risk factor for overall survival. SRSF2mut was associated with older age, higher proportion of peripheral blasts or abnormal cell proportion by flow cytometry.

CONCLUSION

SF mutation is a distinct subgroup of AML frequently associated with clinic-biological features and poor outcome. SRSF2mut could be potential targets for novel treatment in AML.

Clinical implications of SRSF2 mutations in AML patients undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplantation

The SRSF2 mutations are frequently found in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and mostly affect the P95 residue. Mutations in this splicing factor mediate abnormal splicing associated with exon skipping events, including EZH2 as a crucial target. While SRSF2 mutations are enriched in secondary AML and associated with worse outcomes following chemotherapy consolidation, very little is known about the associated biological and clinical implications in AML patients consolidated with allogeneic hematopoietic stemcell transplantation (HSCT). Here we retrospectively analyzed 263 adult AML patients who received an allogeneic HSCT regarding the biological and clinical implications of the SRSF2 mutation status at diagnosis and in morphologic remission at HSCT. We found 12.5% of the patients to be SRSF2 mutated at diagnosis. Mutated patients had increased EZH2 missplicing events with P95H likely driving this pathobiology most effectively. However, the amount of EZH2 missplicing events, as a functional surrogate marker did not associate with relevant biological or clinical characteristics. We observed a persistence of mutations in remission before HSCT in the majority (93%) of SRSF2 mutated AML patients. Importantly, the variant allele frequency (VAF) levels of SRSF2 mutations in remission at HSCT did not correlate with outcomes following HSCT consolidation, limiting the applicability of SRSF2 mutations as a marker for residual AML disease. Following allogeneic HSCT SRSF2 mutated AML patients experienced a 2-year overall survival of 77%, indicating that SRSF2 mutated AML patients may benefit from HSCT consolidation.

A clinical prediction model identifies a subgroup with inferior survival within intermediate risk acute myeloid leukemia

Intermediate risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML) comprises around 50% of AML patients and is featured with heterogeneous clinical outcomes. The study aimed to generate a prediction model to identify intermediate risk AML patients with an inferior survival. We performed targeted next generation sequencing analysis for 121 patients with 2017 European LeukemiaNet-defined intermediate risk AML, revealing 122 mutated genes, with 24 genes mutated in > 10% of patients. A prognostic nomogram characterized by white blood cell count ≥10×10⁹/L at diagnosis, mutated DNMT3A and genes involved in signaling pathways was developed for 110 patients who were with clinical outcomes. Two subgroups were identified: intermediate low risk (ILR; 43.6%, 48/110) and intermediate high risk (IHR; 56.4%, 62/110). The model was prognostic of overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) (OS: Concordance index [C-index]: 0.703, 95%CI: 0.643-0.763; RFS: C-index: 0.681, 95%CI 0.620-0.741), and was successfully validated with two independent cohorts. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT) reduced the relapse risk of IHR patients (3-year RFS: alloHSCT: 40.0±12.8% vs. chemotherapy: 8.6±5.8%, P= 0.010). The prediction model can help identify patients with an unfavorable prognosis and refine risk-adapted therapy for intermediate risk AML patients.

Mutational spectrum and prognosis in NRAS-mutated acute myeloid leukemia

The mutational spectrum and prognostic factors of NRAS-mutated (NRAS^mut) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) are largely unknown. We performed next-generation sequencing (NGS) in 1,149 cases of de novo AML and discovered 152 NRAS^mut AML (13%). Of the 152 NRAS^mut AML, 89% had at least one companion mutated gene. DNA methylation-related genes confer up to 62% incidence. TET2 had the highest mutation frequency (51%), followed by ASXL1 (17%), NPM1 (14%), CEBPA (13%), DNMT3A (13%), FLT3-ITD (11%), KIT (11%), IDH2 (9%), RUNX1 (8%), U2AF1 (7%) and SF3B1(5%). Multivariate analysis suggested that age ≥ 60 years and mutations in U2AF1 were independent factors related to failure to achieve complete remission after induction therapy. Age ≥ 60 years, non-M3 types and U2AF1 mutations were independent prognostic factors for poor overall survival. Age ≥ 60 years, non-M3 types and higher risk group were independent prognostic factors for poor event-free survival (EFS) while allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation was an independent prognostic factor for good EFS. Our study provided new insights into the mutational spectrum and prognostic factors of NRAS^mut AML.

Treatment of myelodysplastic syndrome in the era of next-generation sequencing

Next-generation sequencing (NGS) is rapidly changing the clinical care of patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). NGS can be used for various applications: (i) in the diagnostic process to discriminate between MDS and other diseases such as aplastic anaemia, myeloproliferative disorders and idiopathic cytopenias; (ii) for classification, for example, where the presence of SF3B1 mutation is one criterion for the ring sideroblast anaemia subgroups in the World Health Organization 2016 classification; (iii) for identification of patients suitable for targeted therapy (e.g. IDH1/2 inhibitors); (iv) for prognostication, for example, where specific mutations (e.g. TP53 and RUNX1) are associated with inferior prognosis, whereas others (e.g. SF3B1) are associated with superior prognosis; and (v) to monitor patients for progression or treatment failure. Most commonly, targeted sequencing for genes (normally 50-100 genes) reported to be recurrently mutated in myeloid disease is used. At present, NGS is rarely incorporated into clinical guidelines although an increasing number of studies have demonstrated the benefit of using NGS in the clinical management of MDS patients.

Genetically inspired prognostic scoring system (GIPSS) outperforms dynamic international prognostic scoring system (DIPSS) in myelofibrosis patients

A genetically inspired prognostic scoring system (GIPSS) that stratifies primary myelofibrosis (PMF) patients by genetic variants alone was recently proposed. While non-inferior to the dynamic international prognostic scoring system (DIPSS), the lack of overlapping prognostic variables between the models leads to increased risk for disagreement between two valid prognostic models and presents a challenging clinical situation. In an external cohort of 266 molecularly annotated myelofibrosis (MF) patients, we demonstrated that the GIPSS model significantly differentiated between four risk groups (low, int-1, int-2, high) with median OS that was not reached, not reached, 60.5 and 28.9 months, respectively. High-risk patients had significantly inferior leukemia-free survival (LFS) (P < 0.0001). We identified a cohort of prognostically ambiguous patients (n = 39) in which GIPSS and DIPSS models differed by ≥2 risk groups. Among these patients, a similar proportion were up-staged by DIPSS (n = 19) and GIPSS (n = 20). Patients upstaged by GIPSS (genetically high-risk) had a trend toward inferior OS compared with patients upstaged by DIPSS (clinically high-risk) (P = .08) and significantly worse LFS (P = .04). Patients deemed intermediate-2 and high-risk by GIPSS who underwent allogeneic transplant had improved OS compared with those that did not (P = .04). GIPSS is a valid disease-specific prognostic system and outperforms DIPSS in patients where the two models disagree. Additionally, while GIPSS was developed for PMF; the current study shows, however, that the contemporary genetic model performs equally well for both primary and secondary myelofibrosis.

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant overcomes the adverse survival effect of very high risk and unfavorable karyotype in myelofibrosis

The prognostic importance of genetic information in primary myelofibrosis (PMF) was recently highlighted in a study of over 1000 cytogenetically-annotated patients; 5-year survival rates were 8% for very high risk (VHR), 27% "unfavorable" and 45% "favorable" karyotype. The current study addresses the practice-relevant question of whether or not allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HCT) can overcome the detrimental survival effect of VHR or unfavorable karyotype. The study included 67 patients with PMF or secondary MF who received HCT at the Mayo Clinic and in whom pretransplant cytogenetic information was available. Dynamic international prognostic scoring system (DIPSS) risk distribution was 13% high, 66% intermediate-2 and 21% intermediate-1. Cytogenetic risk distribution was 11% VHR, 34% unfavorable and 55% favorable. At median post-HCT follow-up of 60 months for living patients (range 34-170), 28 (42%) deaths were recorded. Five-year survival was 62% and was not affected by VHR or unfavorable karyotype (P = .68). The salutary effect of HCT in patients with VHR or unfavorable karyotype was also apparent during analysis of a combined dataset that included a nontransplant cohort of 383 patients with PMF; multivariable analysis of the combined dataset (n = 450) resulted in HRs (95% CI) of 2.4 (1.6-3.6) for absence of transplant, 3.3 (2.2-4.8) for VHR karyotype, 1.6 (1.2-2.1) for unfavorable karyotype, 2.9 (2.0-4.2) for DIPSS high and 1.7 (1.4-2.2) for DIPSS intermediate-2. These observations were further confirmed by analysis of more stringently matched case-control subset cohorts and provide the evidence for the therapeutic preference of HCT in cytogenetically high risk patients with MF.

Mutations in DNMT3A, U2AF1, and EZH2 identify intermediate-risk acute myeloid leukemia patients with poor outcome after CR1

Intermediate-risk acute myeloid leukemia (IR-AML) is a clinically heterogeneous disease, for which optimal post-remission therapy is debated. The utility of next-generation sequencing information in decision making for IR-AML has yet to be elucidated. We retrospectively studied 100 IR-AML patients, defined by European Leukemia Net classification, who had mutational information at diagnosis, received intensive chemotherapy and achieved complete remission (CR) at Cleveland Clinic (CC). The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) data were used for validation. In the CC cohort, median age was 58.5 years, 64% had normal cytogenetics, and 31% required >1 induction cycles to achieve CR1. In univariable analysis, patients carrying mutations in DNMT3A, U2AF1, and EZH2 had worse overall and relapse-free survival. After adjusting for other variables, the presence of these mutations maintained an independent effect on survival in both CC and TCGA cohorts. Patients who did not have the mutations and underwent hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) had the best outcomes. HCT improved outcomes for patients who had these mutations. RUNX1 or ASXL1 mutations did not predict survival, and performance of HCT did not confer a significant survival benefit. Our results provide evidence of clinical utility in considering mutation screening to stratify IR-AML patients after CR1 to guide therapeutic decisions.

Individual outcome prediction for myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and secondary acute myeloid leukemia from MDS after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation

We integrated molecular data with available prognostic factors in patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) for myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) or secondary acute myeloid leukemia (sAML) from MDS to evaluate their impact on prognosis. Three hundred four patients were sequenced for mutations in 54 genes. We used a Cox multivariate model and competing risk analysis with internal and cross validation to identify factors prognostic of overall survival (OS), cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR), and non-relapse mortality (NRM). In multivariate analysis, mutated NRAS, U2AF1, IDH2, and TP53 and/or a complex karyotype were significant prognostic markers for OS besides age above 60 years, remission status, IPSS-R cytogenetic risk, HCT-CI > 2 and female donor sex. Mutated NRAS, IDH1, EZH2, and TP53 and/or a complex karyotype were genetic aberrations with prognostic impact on CIR. No molecular markers were associated with the risk of NRM. The inclusion of molecular information results in better risk prediction models for OS and CIR when assessed by the Akaike information criterion. Internal cross validation confirmed the robustness of our comprehensive risk model. In summary, we propose to combine molecular, cytogenetic, and patient- and transplantation-associated risk factors into a comprehensive risk model to provide personalized predictions of outcome after alloHCT.