The combination of cyclosporine and mycophenolate mofetil is less effective than cyclosporine and methotrexate in the prevention of acute graft-versus host disease after stem-cell transplantation from unrelated donors

Cytomegalovirus gastroenteritis in patients with acute graft-versus-host disease

A pre-emptive strategy has successfully decreased cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). However, some recipients still develop CMV gastroenteritis, especially after acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD), and its incidence, risk factors, and prognostic impact remain to be elucidated. We retrospectively analyzed 3759 consecutive adult patients who developed grade II-IV aGVHD using a Japanese registry database. The cumulative incidence of CMV gastroenteritis was 5.7% by day 365 from the development of grade II-IV aGVHD. Advanced age (hazard ratio [HR], 1.60; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.16-2.22; P = 0.004), GVHD prophylaxis with mycophenolate mofetil and calcineurin inhibitor (HR, 1.73; 95% CI, 1.08-2.77; P = 0.024), lower-gut aGVHD (HR, 2.17; 95% CI, 1.58-2.98; P < 0.001), and the use of systemic steroids (HR, 1.78; 95% CI, 1.16-2.74; P = 0.008) were independent risk factors for CMV gastroenteritis. Development of CMV gastroenteritis was associated with an increased risk of nonrelapse mortality (HR, 1.89; 95% CI, 1.50-2.39; P < 0.001). Moreover, letermovir prophylaxis significantly reduced both the incidence of CMV gastroenteritis (HR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.25-0.99; P = 0.047) and the risk of nonrelapse mortality (HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.52-0.99; P = 0.043). In summary, CMV gastroenteritis is a life-threatening complication that sets the need for preventive strategies with letermovir and targeted surveillance.

A prospective single-center study on CNI-free GVHD prophylaxis with everolimus plus mycophenolate mofetil in allogeneic HCT

We report a single-center phase I/II trial exploring the combination of everolimus (EVE) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) as calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-free GVHD prophylaxis for 24 patients with hematologic malignancies and indication for allogeneic HCT after a high dose or reduced-intensity ablative conditioning. The study was registered as EudraCT-2007-001892-12 and Clinicaltrials.gov as NCT00856505. All patients received PBSC grafts and no graft failure occurred. 7/24 patients (29%) developed acute grades III and IV GVHD (aGVHD), 16/19 evaluable patients (84%) developed chronic GVHD (cGVHD) of all grades, and 6/19 (31.6%) of higher grades. No severe toxicities related to study medication were observed. The median follow-up of all surviving patients is 2177 days. The 3-year OS was 45.2% (95% CI: 27.4–61.4%), and the 3-year PFS was 38.7% (95% CI: 22.0–55.1%). The cumulative incidence of relapse at 1 year and 3 year was 25% (95% CI: 12.5–50.0%), and 33.3% (95% CI: 18.9–58.7%), the cumulative incidence of NRM at 1 year and 3 years was 20.8% (95%CI: 9.6–45.5%), and 29.2% (95%CI: 15.6–54.4%), respectively. The utilization of CNI-free GVHD prophylaxis with EVE+MMF resulted in high rates of acute and chronic GVHD. Therefore, we do not recommend a CNI-free combination of mTOR inhibitor EVE with MMF as the sole GVHD prophylaxis. In subsequent studies, this combination should be modified, e.g., with further components like post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) or anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG).

Minimum-Dose, Short-Term Methotrexate With Tacrolimus for Graft-vs-Host Disease Prophylaxis Following Unrelated Cord Blood Transplantation in Adults: A Retrospective Analysis at a Single Institution

BACKGROUND

Methotrexate (MTX) or mycophenolate mofetil with tacrolimus (TAC) is used for graft-vs-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis in unrelated cord blood transplantation (CBT). However, there is no consensus regimen for GVHD prophylaxis in CBT. We aimed to assess the efficacy and feasibility of minimum-dose, short-term MTX (MS-MTX) for GVHD prophylaxis in CBT.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated 35 consecutive adult patients who underwent CBT and received MS-MTX (6 mg/m² day 1; 3 mg/m² days 3 and 6, intravenously) with TAC for GVHD prophylaxis in our hospital between 2015 and 2019. Transplantation outcomes with respect to time to hematopoietic recovery, engraftment, incidence and severity of GVHD, adverse events, relapse, nonrelapse mortality (NRM), and overall survival were evaluated.

RESULTS

The median time to neutrophil, platelet, and reticulocyte recovery was 22, 38, and 32 days, respectively. Cumulative neutrophil engraftment was 91.4%. After a median 3.2-year follow-up, the 2-year overall survival was 64.3%. The 2-year cumulative incidence of relapse and NRM was 20.4% and 14.9%, respectively. The 100-day cumulative incidence of grade II-IV acute GVHD and 2-year cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD were 28.6% and 36.6%, respectively. No grade IV acute GVHD was observed. Sixteen patients experienced oral mucositis and/or pharyngeal pain (46%; grades 1-2, n = 15; grade 3 pharyngeal pain, n = 1). No patients suffered from human herpesvirus 6 encephalitis/myelitis.

CONCLUSIONS

MS-MTX with TAC is feasible and safe and yields lower rates of severe oropharyngeal mucositis and human herpesvirus 6 encephalitis/myelitis without increasing GVHD, graft failure, relapse, or NRM.

Comparison of mycophenolate mofetil and calcineurin inhibitor versus calcineurin inhibitor-based graft-versus-host-disease prophylaxis for matched unrelated donor transplant in acute myeloid leukemia. A study from the ALWP of the EBMT

The association of Cyclosporine A (CsA) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) has increased in the setting of reduced intensity conditioning (RIC). Nevertheless, the use of CsA or CsA+MMF has not been reported in a large and uniform cohort. We analyzed 497 patients with acute myeloid leukemia in complete remission (CR) who underwent matched unrelated donor (MUD) hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). All patients received a fludarabine busulfan RIC regimen and anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) with either CsA alone or in combination with MMF. The cumulative incidence (CI) of grade II-IV acute GvHD was 27% (95% CI 21-33%) for CsA and 33% (95% CI 27-38%) for CsA+MMF (p = 0.25). The 2-year CI of chronic GvHD was 38% (95% CI 31-45%) and 33% (95% CI 28-39%) for the CsA and the CsA+MMF group, respectively (p = 0.26). On multivariate analysis, no statistically significant differences with respect to relapse incidence (RI), non-relapse mortality (NRM), leukemia-free survival (LFS), overall survival (OS), acute and chronic GvHD were found between the two groups, also when conducting a subgroup analysis in peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) recipients. Our results support the importance of randomized trial to identify patients who could benefit from the addition of MMF in MUD HSCT.

Carfilzomib combined with cyclosporine and methotrexate for the prevention of graft-versus-host disease after allogeneic stem-cell transplantation from unrelated donors

Acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) is the major treatment-related complication after stem-cell transplantation (SCT) from unrelated donors. The proteasome-inhibitor bortezomib was added to GVHD prevention regimens with initial promise. However, two randomized studies failed to show efficacy. We explored the addition of carfilzomib, s second-generation proteasome inhibitor (20 mg/m², intravenously on days +1 and +2) to cyclosporine/methotrexate backbone in 26 patients after SCT from unrelated donors. We compared outcomes to historical group of 100 patients given cyclosporine/methotrexate alone. Median follow-up was 34 months. There was no difference between the groups in engraftment or toxicities. The cumulative incidence of aGVHD grade II-IV, 6 months post transplant was 11% (95% CI, 4-32) and 39% (95% CI, 30-50), respectively (P = 0.01). The cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD, 2 years post transplant, was 49% (95% CI, 32-75) and 41% (95% CI, 33-52), respectively (P = 0.98). Three-year non-relapse mortality was 11% (95% CI, 4-33) and 18% (95% CI, 12-27, P = 0.45) while 3-year relapse rates were 8% (95% CI, 2-29) and 26% (95% CI, 18-36), respectively (P = 0.06). Three-year survival was 81% (95%CI, 66-96) and 56% (95% CI, 46-66), respectively (P = 0.05). In conclusion, carfilzomib with cyclosporine/methotrexate is safe, may reduce aGVHD, and possibly improve survival after unrelated donor SCT. These initial observations merit further study in larger comparative studies. ClinicalTrial.gov NCT01991301.

Immunosuppressive Drugs Alter α1-Antitrypsin Production in Hepatocytes: Implications for Epithelial Gap Repair

Immunosuppressive drugs are an inherent component of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) for the prevention of acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). Circulating α1-antitrypsin (AAT), a serine-protease inhibitor produced predominantly by hepatocytes that rises during acute phase responses, is lost in patient's stool due to gastrointestinal GVHD, and its augmentation has been found to attenuate GVHD. Here we explored the effect of immunosuppressive drugs on hepatocyte production of AAT and intestinal epithelial gap repair. The effect of commonly used immunosuppressants on AAT production was examined in vitro using HepG2 cells and primary mouse hepatocytes, and their impact on human intestinal epithelial cell line gap repair was evaluated. Sera from 12 allogeneic HSCT recipients, obtained at 14 days post-transplantation, predating the diagnosis of GVHD (n = 6), were examined for reepithelialization, with added clinical-grade AAT. Rapamycin compromised AAT production under inflammatory conditions. Mycophenolate mofetil and cyclosporine A (CSA) inhibited reepithelialization; AAT minimized the effect of CSA. Patient sera displayed superior gap repair with exogenous AAT. Functional insufficiency in circulating AAT may be the result of drug toxicities leading to ineffective gut reepithelization and compromised gut lining. Taken together, our data strengthen the rationale for incorporating AAT augmentation therapy into immunosuppressive treatment protocols.

[Impact of mycophenolate mofetil prophylaxis duration on acute graft-versus-host disease after haploidentical stem cell transplantation]

Objective: To investigate the impact of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) prophylaxis duration on acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) after haploidentical stem cell transplantation (haplo-HSCT) using 'Beijing Protocol'. Methods: Adult patients (≥14 years) received haplo-HSCT in Peking University Institute of Hematology from Sep, 2016 to Mar, 2017 were retrospectively reviewed if they fulfilled the criterias: ①diagnosed with hematological maligancies; ②standard-risk status at haplo-HSCT. A total of 237 patients [including 102 patients with long MMF duration (defined as started on day -9 with 100 mg/d, adjusted to 500 mg/d from day +30 and discontinued on day +45 to +60 or occurrence of CMV/EBV reactivation or late-onset hemorrhagic cytitis), and 135 patients with short MMF duration (defined as started on day -9 with 500 mg/d and discontinued on the day achieved neutrophil engraftment)] were reviewed. The incidence of aGVHD, virus infection and overall survival (OS) were compared between the two groups. Results: The median durations of MMF prophylaxis of long and short duration groups were 27(7-71) and 15(9-24) days, respectively after haplo-HSCT. There were no differences of baseline characteristics (including sex, patient age, disease, mismatched HLA loci, donor-recipient relation, donor-recipient sex and donor age) between the two groups. The incidences of the grade Ⅱ-Ⅳ and Ⅲ/Ⅳ aGVHD in long and short duration groups were 31.1% versus 17.6% (P=0.018) and 7.4% verus 7.8% (P=0.900), respectively. The duration of MMF prophylaxis was not found to be associated with gradeⅡ-Ⅳ aGVHD by the multivariate analysis. There were no significant differences in terms of CMV viremia, EBV viremia, hemorrhagic cytitis and OS between the two groups. Conclusion: Prophylaxis with short duration MMF in the setting of 'Beijing protocol' haplo-SCT was not associated with increased acute GVHD with no impact on OS, which indicated that short duration MMF might be a feasible GVHD prophylaxis regimen.

Clinical potential of mesenchymal stem/stromal cell-derived extracellular vesicles

Within the last two decades mesenchymal stem/stromal cells (MSCs) emerged after hematopoietic stem cells as the second most investigated and applied somatic stem cell entity so far. MSCs mediate immunosuppressive as well as pro-regenerative activities. Against the initial assumption, MSCs may not primarily exert their therapeutic functions in a cellular but rather in a paracrine manner. Here, extracellular vesicles (EVs), such as exosomes and microvesicles, have been identified as major mediators of these paracrine effects. Meanwhile, MSC-EVs have been applied to an increasing amount of different animal models and were tested in a patient suffering from steroid-refractory acute graft-versus-host disease (acute GvHD) as well as in a patient cohort with chronic kidney disease. So far, the MSC-EV administration appears to be safe in humans and all tested animal models. Improvements were reported in all settings. Thus, MSC-EVs appear as promising novel therapeutic agents which might help to improve disease associated symptoms in millions of patients. Here, we review some of the milestones in the field, briefly discuss challenges and highlight clinical aspects of acute GvHD and its treatment with MSCs and MSC-EVs.