Ruxolitinib in adult patients with secondary hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis

Goodbye etoposide? Taking the leap to ruxolitinib in haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis

Fang et al. report a retrospective analysis of paediatric patients with haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) associated with autoimmune/autoinflammatory disorders treated with ruxolitinib. Responses were impressive and rapid, and ruxolitinib was well tolerated. This study demonstrates that a subset of patients with HLH can be treated with JAK inhibition without the need for cytotoxic chemotherapy. Further work will be needed to better define patient selection for therapy, as some patient groups and HLH triggers, such as malignancy-associated HLH, may be better suited for etoposide-based therapy. Commentary on: Fang et al. Ruxolitinib-based regimen in children with autoimmune disease or autoinflammatory disease related hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis. Br J Haematol 2024 (Online ahead of print). doi: 10.1111/bjh.19803.

Ruxolitinib-based regimen in children with autoimmune disease or autoinflammatory disease-related haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis

For autoimmune disease (AD) and autoinflammatory disease (AID)-related haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) (AD/AID-HLH), there is still a lack of standardized treatment. Glucocorticoids (GCs) are the main treatment currently; however, 37.9% to 61% of patients fail to achieve effective control of HLH, making it urgent to find novel treatment strategies. We conducted a retrospective, single-centre study examining ruxolitinib (RUX)-based regimen in children with AD/AID-HLH. Patients were first treated with RUX monotherapy, and additional treatments including methylprednisolone and etoposide were added sequentially when the disease could not be controlled. The study included 26 patients with a median follow-up of 23.9 months, of whom 15 had prior treatments. The overall response rate at week 8 with the RUX-based regimen was 96.2%, with 92.3% attaining complete response (CR) and 3.9% attaining partial response. The 2-year overall survival rate was 96.2% (95% CI, 80.4% to 99.9%). During RUX monotherapy, 46.1% of patients achieved CR as the best response, with a median first response time to RUX of 2 days. Additionally, 53.8% of patients required additional GCs and 23.1% required etoposide chemotherapy. All observed adverse events were manageable and acceptable. Overall, our study supports the efficacy and safety of the RUX-based regimen in children with AD/AID-HLH.

Pathogenesis of Hemophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis/Macrophage Activation Syndrome: A Case Report and Review of the Literature

Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) is a life-threatening condition characterized by the uncontrolled activation of cytotoxic T lymphocytes, NK cells, and macrophages, resulting in an overproduction of pro-inflammatory cytokines. A primary and a secondary form are distinguished depending on whether or not it is associated with hematologic, infectious, or immune-mediated disease. Clinical manifestations include fever, splenomegaly, neurological changes, coagulopathy, hepatic dysfunction, cytopenia, hypertriglyceridemia, hyperferritinemia, and hemophagocytosis. In adults, therapy, although aggressive, is often unsuccessful. We report the case of a 41-year-old man with no apparent history of previous disease and an acute onset characterized by fever, fatigue, and weight loss. The man was from Burkina Faso and had made trips to his home country in the previous five months. On admission, leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, increased creatinine and transaminases, LDH, and CRP with a normal ESR were found. The patient also presented with hypertriglyceridemia and hyperferritinemia. An infectious or autoimmune etiology was ruled out. A total body CT scan showed bilateral pleural effusion and hilar mesenterial, abdominal, and paratracheal lymphadenopathy. Lymphoproliferative disease with HLH complication was therefore suspected. High doses of glucocorticoids were then administered. A cytologic analysis of the pleural effusion showed anaplastic lymphoma cells and bone marrow aspirate showed hemophagocytosis. An Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV) DNA load of more than 90000 copies/mL was found. Bone marrow biopsy showed a marrow localization of peripheral T lymphoma. The course was rapidly progressive until the patient died. HLH is a rare but usually fatal complication in adults of hematologic, autoimmune, and malignant diseases. Very early diagnosis and treatment are critical but not always sufficient to save patients.

Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis induced by nivolumab/ipilimumab combination therapy: A case of lung adenocarcinoma that responded to early steroid pulse therapy

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitors have been reported to have excellent therapeutic effects on various malignant tumors. However, immune-related adverse events can occur, targeting various organs.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 49-year-old male with lung carcinoma was started on carboplatin + pemetrexed + nivolumab (every 3 weeks) + ipilimumab (every 6 weeks), and nivolumab/ipilimumab was administered in the 3rd course. Subsequently, fever and fatigue developed, and grade 3 liver damage was also noted, so he was admitted to Kindai University Hospital. A bone marrow aspirate examination was performed on the third day of illness, and a definitive diagnosis of hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) was made. It was determined that immediate therapeutic intervention was necessary, and pulse therapy with methylprednisolone was started on the third day of illness. After 3 days of pulse treatment, a rapid recovery of platelet values, a decrease in ferritin levels, and a decrease in lactate dehydrogenase were observed. Subjective symptoms such as fever and fatigue also quickly improved.

CONCLUSION

Early diagnosis and treatment for HLH resulted in a positive response. The number of HLH cases may increase in the future due to the expansion of immune checkpoint inhibitor indications.

Salvage Therapy and Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for the Severe Cytokine Storm Syndrome of Hemophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis

Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) can be considered as a severe cytokine storm syndrome disorder. HLH typically manifests as a life-threatening inflammatory syndrome characterized by fevers, cytopenias, hepatosplenomegaly, and various other accompanying manifestations such as coagulopathy, hepatitis or liver failure, seizures or altered mental status, and even multi-organ failure. Standard up-front treatments do not always bring HLH into remission or maintain adequate response, and salvage or alternative therapies are often needed. For patients with genetic diseases that cause HLH, curative allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation is usually offered to prevent future episodes of life-threatening HLH. Here, we will discuss the options and approaches for salvage therapy and hematopoietic cell transplantation for patients with HLH.

Cytokine Storm and Sepsis-Induced Multiple Organ Dysfunction Syndrome

There is extensive overlap of clinical features among familial or primary HLH (pHLH), reactive or secondary hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (sHLH) [including macrophage activation syndrome (MAS) related to rheumatic diseases], and hyperferritinemic sepsis-induced multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS); however, the distinctive pathobiology that causes hyperinflammatory process in each condition requires careful considerations for therapeutic decision-making. pHLH is defined by five or more of eight HLH-2004 criteria [1], where genetic impairment of natural killer (NK) cells or CD8+ cytolytic T cells results in interferon gamma (IFN-γ)-induced hyperinflammation regardless of triggering factors. Cytolytic treatments (e.g., etoposide) or anti-IFN-γ monoclonal antibody (emapalumab) has been effectively used to bridge the affected patients to hematopoietic stem cell transplant. Secondary forms of HLH also have normal NK cell number with decreased cytolytic function of varying degrees depending on the underlying and triggering factors. Although etoposide was uniformly used in sHLH/MAS in the past, the treatment strategy in different types of sHLH/MAS is increasingly streamlined to reflect the triggering/predisposing conditions, severity/progression, and comorbidities. Accordingly, in hyperferritinemic sepsis, the combination of hepatobiliary dysfunction (HBD) and disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) reflects reticuloendothelial system dysfunction and defines sepsis-associated MAS. It is demonstrated that as the innate immune response to infectious organism prolongs, it results in reduction in T cells and NK cells with subsequent lymphopenia even though normal cytolytic activity continues (Figs. 30.1, 30.2, 30.3, and 30.4). These changes allow free hemoglobin and pathogens to stimulate inflammasome activation in the absence of interferon-γ (IFN-γ) production that often responds to source control, intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg), plasma exchange, and interleukin 1 receptor antagonist (IL-1Ra), similar to non-EBV, infection-induced HLH.

The 2022 EULAR/ACR Points to Consider at the Early Stages of Diagnosis and Management of Suspected Haemophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis/Macrophage Activation Syndrome (HLH/MAS)

OBJECTIVE

Haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) and macrophage activation syndrome (MAS) are life-threatening systemic hyperinflammatory syndromes that can develop in most inflammatory contexts. They can progress rapidly, and early identification and management are critical for preventing organ failure and mortality. This effort aimed to develop evidence-based and consensus-based points to consider to assist clinicians in optimising decision-making in the early stages of diagnosis, treatment and monitoring of HLH/MAS.

METHODS

A multinational, multidisciplinary task force of physician experts, including adult and paediatric rheumatologists, haematologist/oncologists, immunologists, infectious disease specialists, intensivists, allied healthcare professionals and patients/parents, formulated relevant research questions and conducted a systematic literature review (SLR). Delphi methodology, informed by SLR results and questionnaires of experts, was used to generate statements aimed at assisting early decision-making and optimising the initial care of patients with HLH/MAS.

RESULTS

The task force developed 6 overarching statements and 24 specific points to consider relevant to early recognition of HLH/MAS, diagnostic approaches, initial management and monitoring of HLH/MAS. Major themes included the simultaneous need for prompt syndrome recognition, systematic evaluation of underlying contributors, early intervention targeting both hyperinflammation and likely contributors, careful monitoring for progression/complications and expert multidisciplinary assistance.

CONCLUSION

These 2022 EULAR/American College of Rheumatology points to consider provide up-to-date guidance, based on the best available published data and expert opinion. They are meant to help guide the initial evaluation, management and monitoring of patients with HLH/MAS in order to halt disease progression and prevent life-threatening immunopathology.

The 2022 EULAR/ACR points to consider at the early stages of diagnosis and management of suspected haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis/macrophage activation syndrome (HLH/MAS)

OBJECTIVE

Haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) and macrophage activation syndrome (MAS) are life-threatening systemic hyperinflammatory syndromes that can develop in most inflammatory contexts. They can progress rapidly, and early identification and management are critical for preventing organ failure and mortality. This effort aimed to develop evidence-based and consensus-based points to consider to assist clinicians in optimising decision-making in the early stages of diagnosis, treatment and monitoring of HLH/MAS.

METHODS

A multinational, multidisciplinary task force of physician experts, including adult and paediatric rheumatologists, haematologist/oncologists, immunologists, infectious disease specialists, intensivists, allied healthcare professionals and patients/parents, formulated relevant research questions and conducted a systematic literature review (SLR). Delphi methodology, informed by SLR results and questionnaires of experts, was used to generate statements aimed at assisting early decision-making and optimising the initial care of patients with HLH/MAS.

RESULTS

The task force developed 6 overarching statements and 24 specific points to consider relevant to early recognition of HLH/MAS, diagnostic approaches, initial management and monitoring of HLH/MAS. Major themes included the simultaneous need for prompt syndrome recognition, systematic evaluation of underlying contributors, early intervention targeting both hyperinflammation and likely contributors, careful monitoring for progression/complications and expert multidisciplinary assistance.

CONCLUSION

These 2022 EULAR/American College of Rheumatology points to consider provide up-to-date guidance, based on the best available published data and expert opinion. They are meant to help guide the initial evaluation, management and monitoring of patients with HLH/MAS in order to halt disease progression and prevent life-threatening immunopathology.

Diagnosis and Management of Adult Malignancy-Associated Hemophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis

Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) is a syndrome of severe, dysregulated inflammation driven by the inability of T cells to clear an antigenic target. When associated with malignancy (mHLH), the HLH syndrome is typically associated with extremely poor survival. Here, we review the diagnosis of secondary HLH (sHLH) syndromes in adults, with emphasis on the appropriate workup and treatment of mHLH. At present, the management of HLH in adults, including most forms of mHLH, is based on the use of corticosteroids and etoposide following the HLH-94 regimen. In some cases, this therapeutic approach may be cohesively incorporated into malignancy-directed therapy, while in other cases, the decision about whether to treat HLH prior to initiating other therapies may be more complicated. Recent studies exploring the efficacy of other agents in HLH, in particular ruxolitinib, offer hope for better outcomes in the management of mHLH. Considerations for the management of lymphoma-associated mHLH, as well as other forms of mHLH and immunotherapy treatment-related HLH, are discussed.

The Treatment Based on Ruxolitinib and Amphotericin B is Effective for Relapsed Leishmaniasis-Related Hemophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis: A Case Report and Literature Review

BACKGROUND

Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) is known as a life-threatening syndrome, and Leishmania is the most common protozoan that triggers infection-related HLH. It is thus important to find the root cause and treat it effectively.

CASE REPORT

This paper reports a 44-year-old man who developed antisynthetase antibody syndrome previously. The patient progressed rapidly to the extent of meeting the HLH-2004 diagnostic criteria, despite the unknown etiology. Although the patient was promptly treated in line with the HLH-1994 protocol to achieve remission, he still relapsed after glucocorticoid reduction. Afterwards, it was found out that HLH was secondary to Leishmania infection. The symptoms of HLH were alleviated quickly by the treatment with Ruxolitinib and Amphotericin B.

CONCLUSION

Etiological screening plays a crucial role in leishmaniasis-related HLH. An experienced pathologist and real-time PCR are essential for treating Leishmania. The treatment of Ruxolitinib and Amphotericin B proved effective in alleviating the relapse of visceral leishmaniasis-related HLH.

Case report: Ruxolitinib as first-line therapy for secondary hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis in patients with AIDS

Background

Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) is a fatal immunological syndrome resulting from excessive production of inflammatory cytokines. The conventional therapies for HLH, which are based on cytotoxic agents, are not always efficacious and safe, especially in patients with severe immunodeficiency. Ruxolitinib, a strong inhibitor of Janus kinase (JAK) 1/2, has already been evaluated as salvage and first-line therapy for HLH. Despite its promising efficacy and tolerability in the treatment of secondary HLH, the efficacy and safety of ruxolitinib in HLH patients with HIV infection remain to be investigated.

Case presentation

Two men (ages: 45 and 58 years) both presented at our hospital with a high fever. They were found to be HIV-positive with severe immunodeficiency and opportunistic infections. Their laboratory tests showed severe pancytopenia, hypofibrinogenemia, hypertriglyceridemia, and increased levels of inflammatory factors and ferritin. Hemophagocytosis was found in the bone marrow, and abdominal computed tomography or ultrasonography showed splenomegaly. Both patients were diagnosed with infection-induced HLH due to severe immunodeficiency. Given they were both highly immunocompromised, we chose ruxolitinib as a first-line treatment alternative to cytotoxic chemotherapy. Rapid remission of clinical symptoms and normalization of laboratory parameters were achieved after ruxolitinib therapy. Neither patient had any associated adverse drug reactions or other laboratory abnormalities. Both patients were eventually discharged and ruxolitinib was discontinued as their disease alleviated, and they did not show signs of relapse during the 3- and 5-month of follow-up examinations.

Conclusion

We described two cases of AIDS-related secondary HLH treated with ruxolitinib. Our cases highlight the feasibility of using ruxolitinib as a first-line therapy in patients with HIV infection and secondary HLH. Nevertheless, the safety and efficacy of this novel treatment need to be evaluated in large clinical trials in the future.

Practice patterns and outcomes of hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis in adults: a 2-decade provincial retrospective review

Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) is a heterogeneous, life-threatening clinical syndrome. There are scarce data on the quality of care in HLH or data comparing treatment patterns and outcomes between different triggers. We aimed to examine quality-of-care indicators and outcomes in adults with various HLH triggers. In this multi-centre retrospective cohort study of adult HLH in the province of Alberta, Canada (1999-2019), we examined quality indicators including diagnostic testing, time to diagnosis and treatment and trigger identification. We also compared treatment regimens and outcomes across HLH triggers. Logistic regression was used to identify predictors of etoposide use. Overall survival (OS) was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. We identified 97 patients; 66 (68%) were male. Triggers included malignancy (36%), infection (35%), autoimmune disease (21%) and idiopathic/others (8%). Specialized tests such as sCD25 (53%) and natural killer degranulation assay (19%) were under-performed, as were testing for infectious triggers. Etoposide was administered in only 33 (34%). Neutropenia, hyperbilirubinemia and hyperferritinemia, but not age, sex and comorbidities, were significant predictors of etoposide use. At median follow-up of 32 months, median OS was 18.8 months. Worse OS was seen in malignancy-associated and idiopathic HLH (log-rank P < 0.001). Our study showed low rates of specialized testing such as sCD25 and a low rate of etoposide use. Development of a standardized provincial protocol has the potential to improve quality of care in adult HLH.

Clinical Management of Relapsed/Refractory Hemophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis in Adult Patients: A Review of Current Strategies and Emerging Therapies

Introduction

Haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) is a severe disorder with high mortality. The aim of this review is to update clinical management of relapsed/refractory HLH in adults, with a focus on current and new therapies.

Methods

We searched relevant articles in Embase and PUBMED with the MESH term “hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis; refractory; relapsing; adult.”

Results

One hundred eight papers were found; of these, 22 were retained for this review. The treatment of HLH in adult is based on the HLH-94 regimen. The response rate is lower than in pediatric patients, and 20–30% are refractory to this therapy. DEP regimen and allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) are associated with complete response and partial response in 27% and 49.2%, respectively. However, many patients fail to achieve a stable condition before HSCT, and mortality is higher in them. New drugs have been developed, such as emapalumab, ruxolitinib, and alemtuzumab, and they may be used as bridges to the curative HSCT. They are relatively well tolerated and have few or mild side effects. With these agents, the rate of partial response ranges from 14.2% to 100%, while the rate of complete response is highly variable according to study and medication used. The number of patients who achieved HSCT ranged from 44.8% to 77%, with a survival rate of 55.9% to 100%. However, the populations in these studies are mainly composed of mixed-age patients (pediatric and adult patients), and studies including only adult patients are scarce.

Conclusion

Relapsed or refractory HLH in adult patients is associated with poor outcome, and consolidation with HSCT may be required in some cases. Mortality related to HSCT is mainly due to active HLH disease before HSCT and post HSCT complications. New drugs, such as empalumab, ruxolitinib, and alemtuzumab are interesting since these agents may be used as bridges to HSCT with increases in the numbers of patients proceeding to HSCT and survival rate.