WhiMSICAL: A global Waldenström's Macroglobulinemia patient-derived data registry capturing treatment and quality of life outcomes

Health-related quality of life in patients with Waldenström macroglobulinemia: results from the ASPEN trial

Aim ASPEN is a randomized, open-label, Phase III study comparing zanubrutinib and ibrutinib in patients with Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM).Materials & methods: Patient-reported outcomes were exploratory end points assessed using the EORTC QLQ-C30 and EQ-5D-5L VAS scores.Results: Overall, 201 patients (102 zanubrutinib; 99 ibrutinib) were enrolled. Clinically meaningful differences were observed in diarrhea and nausea/vomiting in both the intent-to-treat population and in patients attaining very good partial response (VGPR) in earlier cycles of treatment, as well as in long-term physical functioning and fatigue in patients achieving VGPR.Conclusion: Treatment with zanubrutinib was associated with greater improvements in health-related quality of life compared with ibrutinib in patients with WM and MYD88 mutations.Clinical Trial Registration: NCT03053440 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Advances in Treatment of Waldenström Macroglobulinemia

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The discovery of recurring somatic mutations, in particular MYD88 and CXCR4 mutations, in Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM), a rare B-cell lymphoproliferative disorder, led in the last decade to the development of several therapeutic agents with high efficacy. This review aims to provide an overview of available treatments in WM and novel agents, focusing on studies published over recent years.

RECENT FINDINGS

There is no international consensus on the best first-line option in treatment-naïve patients. Randomized clinical trials are rare in WM and there has been no prospective comparison of chemoimmunotherapy and BTK inhibitors in the frontline setting. Chemoimmunotherapy and BTK inhibitors, the two feasible and most widely used treatments in first-line treatment, represent very different options in terms of duration of therapy, route of administration, cost, and adverse effect. In addition to tumor genotype and patient comorbidities, choice of therapy in WM should take into account these parameters. Results of ongoing and future clinical trials evaluating fixed-duration combinations with BTK inhibitors and novel agents are awaited.

Frontline Management of Waldenström Macroglobulinemia with Chemoimmunotherapy

Despite the introduction of effective novel agents, chemoimmunotherapy (CIT), with its widespread use, retains relevance and is one of the 2 vastly disparate strategies to treat Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM), the alternative being the Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor (BTKi)-based approach. Considerable evidence over the past decades supports the integration of the monoclonal anti-CD20 antibody, rituximab, to the CIT backbone in WM, a CD20+ malignancy. Besides substantial efficacy, the finite duration of the treatment, coupled with lower rates of cumulative and long-term, clinically significant adverse effects and greater affordability, make CIT appealing, notwithstanding the lack of quality-of-life data with such an approach in WM. A phase 3 randomized controlled trial reported substantially higher efficacy and a more favorable safety profile of the bendamustine-rituximab (BR) doublet compared with R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone) among patients with WM. Subsequent studies reaffirmed its high efficacy and tolerability, making BR the mainstay of managing treatment-naïve patients with WM. High-quality evidence supporting the use of BR over Dexamethasone, Rituximab, and Cyclophosphamide (DRC), another commonly used regimen, is lacking, as is its comparison with the continuous BTKi-based approach. However, DRC appeared less potent than BR in cross-trial comparisons and retrospective series involving treatment-naïve patients with WM. Additionally, a recent retrospective, international study demonstrated comparable outcomes with fixed-duration BR and continuous ibrutinib monotherapy among previously untreated, age-matched patients exhibiting MYD88L265P mutation. However, unlike ibrutinib, BR appears effective irrespective of the MYD88 mutation status. CIT, preferably BR, is well suited to serve as the control arm (comparator) regimen against which novel targeted agents may be evaluated as frontline therapies for WM in high-quality trials. Purine analog-based CIT has been extensively evaluated in WM, although its use has waned, even in the multiply relapsed patient population, as effective and safer alternatives emerge.

Report of consensus panel 1 from the 11th International Workshop on Waldenstrom's Macroglobulinemia on management of symptomatic, treatment-naïve patients

Consensus Panel 1 (CP1) of the 11th International Workshop on Waldenstrom's Macroglobulinemia (IWWM-11) was tasked with updating guidelines for the management of symptomatic, treatment-naïve patients with WM. The panel reiterated that watchful waiting remains the gold standard for asymptomatic patients without critically elevated IgM or compromised hematopoietic function. For first-line treatment, chemoimmunotherapy (CIT) regimens such as dexamethasone, cyclophosphamide, rituximab (DRC), or bendamustine, rituximab (Benda-R) continue to play a central role in managing WM, as they are effective, of fixed duration, generally well-tolerated, and affordable. Covalent BTK inhibitors (cBTKi) offer a continuous, generally well-tolerated alternative for the primary treatment of WM patients, particularly those unsuitable for CIT. In a Phase III randomized trial updated at IWWM-11, the second-generation cBTKi, zanubrutinib, was less toxic than ibrutinib and induced deeper remissions, thus categorizing zanubrutinib as a suitable treatment option in WM. While the overall findings of a prospective, randomized trial updated at IWWM-11 did not show superiority of fixed duration rituximab maintenance over observation following attainment of a major response to Benda-R induction, a subset analysis showed benefit in patients >65 years and those with a high IPPSWM score. Whenever possible, the mutational status of MYD88 and CXCR4 should be determined before treatment initiation, as alterations in these 2 genes predict sensitivity towards cBTKi activity. Treatment approaches for WM-associated cryoglobulins, cold agglutinins, AL amyloidosis, Bing-Neel syndrome (BNS), peripheral neuropathy, and hyperviscosity syndrome follow the common principle of reducing tumor and abnormal protein burden rapidly and deeply to improve symptoms. In BNS, ibrutinib can be highly active and produce durable responses. In contrast, cBTKi are not recommended for treating AL amyloidosis. The panel emphasized that continuous improvement of treatment options for symptomatic, treatment-naïve WM patients critically depends on the participation of patients in clinical trials, whenever possible.

Born in the UK: A registry to improve and broadcast knowledge on Waldenström macroglobulinaemia

Registries constitute an interesting source of real-world data and bring complementary information to randomised controlled trials. They are of particular importance in rare diseases such as Waldenström macroglobulinaemia (WM), which can present with various clinical and biological features. In their paper Uppal and colleagues describe the development of the Rory Morrison Registry, the UK registry for WM and IgM-related disorders and highlight the profound changes in therapies both at first-line and relapsed settings in the recent years. Commentary on: Uppal E. et al. The WMUK Rory Morrison Registry for Waldenström Macroglobulinaemia: the growth of a national registry for a rare disorder. Br J Haematol. 2023 (Online ahead of print). doi: 10.1111/bjh.18680.

Patient reported outcome measures in Waldenström macroglobulinaemia: A real-world data analysis from the WMUK Rory Morrison Registry

Waldenström macroglobulinaemia (WM) is an incurable chronic B-cell malignancy, but highly responsive to treatment. Treatments include fixed-duration chemotherapy and continuous oral chemoimmunotherapy. In this expanding field, it is important to have reliable information on the impact of the various therapies on patients' quality of life (QoL). Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) are increasingly recognised as important to understand patient experience of disease beyond traditional clinical outcome measures. Four QoL questionnaires (EORTC QLQ-C30 [European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer quality of life core questionnaire], BIPQ [Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire], HADS [Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale], EQ-5D-5L [EuroQoL 5-dimensional descriptive system questionnaire]) are embedded in the UK national WM registry, the Rory Morrison Registry. We reviewed the results from a snapshot of PROMs. As of November 2021, 155 patients completed PROM data with 98% completion rate across all 58 questions. Complete clinical information was available for 52 patients. The majority of QoL questions (69%) failed to elicit a notable median response. Only four questions elicited statistically significant responses when comparing groups, and these were exclusively found in the EuroQoL-5D-5L and HADS questionnaires. Our data suggest that widely used questionnaires may not be suitable for patients with WM. We advocate the development of WM-specific outcome measures to overcome this.

First- versus second-generation Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors in Waldenström's Macroglobulinemia: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKi) are important treatment options in Waldenström's macroglobulinemia (WM). Whether second-generation BTKi are associated with improved outcomes and/or better safety profile remains unclear. We did a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials that reported data on the outcomes of patients with WM who received either first- or second-generation BTKi in the period between January 2010 and August 2021. Studies with twenty or fewer patients were excluded. The primary outcomes were efficacy measured by response and survival data. Eleven studies met the eligibility criteria and were included in the final analysis (n = 730 patients). A total of 298 patients received 1st-generation BTKi and 432 received a 2nd-generation BTKi. Pooled overall response rate (ORR) and major response rate (MRR) for both generations were similar (94.2% and 78.5% in 1st vs. 88.9% and 75.1% in 2nd, respectively). MRR for both generations was higher in MYD88 Mut/CXCR4 WT patients compared to MYD88 Mut/CXCR4 Mut patients (odds ratio [OR]: 3.9, 95% CI: 2.2 to 5.5). Pooled 18-mo progression-free survival (PFS) was similar for both generations (88.5% vs. 87.3%). Grade 3/4 atrial fibrillation was higher in 1st-generation BTKi (3.1% vs. 0.4%); however, grade-3/-4 infections and neutropenia were more frequent in 2nd-generarion BTKi (20.9% vs. 13.2%, 17.7% vs. 12%, respectively). The efficacy of 1st- and 2nd-generation BTKis is comparable. The 1st-generation BTKi were associated with a higher risk of atrial fibrillation, whereas infections and neutropenia occurred more frequently in 2nd-generation BTKi.

Reaching beyond maximum grade: progress and future directions for modernising the assessment and reporting of adverse events in haematological malignancies

Remarkable improvements in outcomes for many haematological malignancies have been driven primarily by a proliferation of novel therapeutics over the past two decades. Targeted agents, immune and cellular therapies, and combination regimens have adverse event profiles distinct from conventional finite cytotoxic chemotherapies. In 2018, a Commission comprising patient advocates, clinicians, clinical investigators, regulators, biostatisticians, and pharmacists representing a broad range of academic and clinical cancer expertise examined issues of adverse event evaluation in the context of both newer and existing therapies for haematological cancers. The Commission proposed immediate actions and long-term solutions in the current processes in adverse event assessment, patient-reported outcomes in haematological malignancies, toxicities in cellular therapies, long-term toxicity and survivorship in haematological malignancies, issues in regulatory approval from an international perspective, and toxicity reporting in haematological malignancies and the real-world setting. In this follow-up report, the Commission describes progress that has been made in these areas since the initial report.

Treatment paradigm in Waldenström macroglobulinemia: frontline therapy and beyond

Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM) is an indolent lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma. Recent strides made in the genomic profiling of patients with WM have led to the identification of many novel therapeutic targets. Patients with WM can present with asymptomatic disease and not all patients require treatment. When criteria for initiating systemic therapy are met, the choice of therapy depends on the tumor genotype (MYD88 and CXCR4 mutation status), patient preference (fixed versus continuous duration therapy, oral versus intravenous route, cost), associated medical comorbidities, and adverse effect profile of the treatment. In the absence of head-to-head comparison between chemoimmunotherapy and Bruton’s tyrosine kinase inhibitors in otherwise fit patients with a MYD88^L265P mutation, our preference is fixed duration therapy with four to six cycles of chemoimmunotherapy with bendamustine–rituximab. In this review, we discuss the role of MYD88 and CXCR4 mutation in treatment selection, and current data for frontline and salvage treatment options in patients with WM.

Two-year outcomes of tirabrutinib monotherapy in Waldenström's macroglobulinemia

The phase II study of tirabrutinib monotherapy at a daily dose of 480 mg under fasted conditions for treatment-naïve and relapsed/refractory Waldenström's macroglobulinemia (ONO-4059-05 study) demonstrated a promising efficacy and tolerable safety profile. We conducted an unplanned analysis with a median follow-up of 24.8 months to update the efficacy and safety results and to report patient-reported quality of life. Of 27 enrolled patients, 22 patients continued receiving the study drug. The major response assessed by an independent review committee was observed in 25 patients (93%), including 1 and 5 patients who newly achieved complete response and very good partial response, respectively, after the primary analysis. The progression-free and overall survival rates at 24 months were 92.6% and 100%, respectively. Serum IgM levels in all patients except one declined and were maintained at low levels although transient increases occurred after temporal interruption of the study drug. The disease-related symptoms including recurrent fever and hyperviscosity mostly disappeared. Health-related quality of life, assessed by cancer-specific questionnaires, was mostly maintained. Grade 3-4 neutropenia, lymphopenia, and leukopenia were newly recognized in three, two, and one patient, respectively. Grade 3 treatment-related hypertriglyceridemia was also recognized. Nine patients experienced grade 1-2 bleeding events (33%), one patient experienced grade 2 treatment-related atrial fibrillation, and one patient experienced grade 1 treatment-related hypertension. Treatment-related skin adverse events were observed in 14 patients (52%). Taken together, tirabrutinib has durable efficacy with an acceptable safety profile for treatment-naïve and refractory/relapsed Waldenström's macroglobulinemia.