World Health Organization-defined eosinophilic disorders: 2022 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management

Myeloproliferative neoplasm with eosinophilia and coexisting BCR::ABL1 and PDGFRB rearrangement: favorable and rapid response to imatinib

Here, we present a rare case of myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) with eosinophilia harboring both BCR::ABL1 and PDGFRB rearrangements, posing a classification dilemma. The patient exhibited clinical and laboratory features suggestive of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) and myeloid/lymphoid neoplasms with eosinophilia and tyrosine kinase gene fusions (MLN-TK), highlighting the diagnostic challenges associated with overlapping phenotypes. Despite the complexity, imatinib treatment swiftly achieved deep molecular remission, underscoring the therapeutic efficacy of tyrosine kinase inhibitors in such scenarios. Furthermore, the rapid attainment of deep remission by this patient in response to imatinib closely resembles that observed in MLN-TK patients with PDGFRB rearrangements. Further research is warranted to elucidate the underlying mechanisms driving the coexistence of multiple oncogenic rearrangements in MPNs and to optimize therapeutic strategies for these complex cases.

Red flags for clinical suspicion of eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA)

BACKGROUND

Eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA), is a rare ANCA-associated systemic vasculitis. Its overlapping features with other vasculitic or eosinophilic diseases, and the wide and heterogeneous range of clinical manifestations, often result in a delay to diagnosis.

OBJECTIVE

To identify red flags that raise a suspicion of EGPA to prompt diagnostic testing and to present an evidence-based clinical checklist tool for use in routine clinical practice.

METHODS

Systematic literature review and expert consensus to identify a list of red flags based on clinical judgement. GRADE applied to generate a strength of recommendation for each red flag and to develop a checklist tool.

RESULTS

86 studies were included. 40 red flags were identified as relevant to raise a suspicion of EGPA and assessed by the experts as being clinically significant. Experts agreed that a diagnosis of EGPA should be considered in a patient aged ≥6 years with a blood eosinophil level >1000 cells/µL if untreated and >500 cells/µL if previously treated with any medication likely to have altered the blood eosinophil count. The presence of asthma and/or nasal polyposis should reinforce a suspicion of EGPA. Red flags of asthma, lung infiltrates, pericarditis, cardiomyopathy, polyneuropathy, biopsy with inflammatory eosinophilic infiltrates, palpable purpura, digital ischaemia and ANCA positivity, usually anti-myeloperoxidase, among others, were identified.

CONCLUSION

The identification of a comprehensive set of red flags could be used to raise a suspicion of EGPA in patients with eosinophilia, providing clinicians with an evidence-based checklist tool that can be integrated into their practice.

An Unusual Case of Immune Complex-Mediated Membranoproliferative Glomerulonephritis as Renal Manifestation of Idiopathic Hypereosinophilic Syndrome: A Case Report and Literature Review

BACKGROUND

Idiopathic hypereosinophilic syndrome (IHES) is a disorder characterized by abnormal and persistent peripheral blood hypereosinophilia (eosinophil count ≥ 1.5 × 109/L and ≥10% eosinophils) with duration ≥ 6 months, associated organ damage, and/or dysfunction attributable to tissue eosinophilic infiltrate of unknown cause. IHES affects different organs such as the heart, lungs, nervous system, and skin, with renal involvement being rare in this condition.

CASE PRESENTATION

We present a case of a young patient with IHES and immune complex-mediated membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis with nephrotic syndrome, as a rare renal manifestation. We discuss the clinical, analytical, and histopathologic renal and hematologic features, comparing them with other reported cases in the literature.

Hypereosinophilia and Left Ventricular Thrombus: A Case Report and Literature Review

Left ventricular thrombus (LVT) has historically been reported as a complication of acute left ventricular (LV) myocardial infarction. It is most commonly observed in cases of LV systolic dysfunction attributed to ischemic or nonischemic etiologies. Conversely, the occurrence of LVT in normal LV systolic function is an exceptionally rare presentation and is predominantly associated with conditions such as hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES), cardiac amyloidosis, left ventricular noncompaction, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), hypercoagulability states, immune-mediated disorders, and malignancies. Notably, hypereosinophilia (HE) has been linked with thrombotic events. Intracardiac thrombus is a well-known complication of eosinophilic myocarditis (EM) or Loeffler endomyocarditis, both of which are considered clinical manifestations of HES. We present a case of a 63-year-old male with normal LV systolic function, HE, and noncontributory hypercoagulability workup, who presented with thromboembolic complications arising from LVT. Interestingly, the diagnostic evaluation for EM and Loeffler endocarditis was nonconfirmatory. Additionally, we performed a literature review to delineate all similar cases. This article also outlines the pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment approaches for hypereosinophilic cardiac involvement with a specific focus on LVT.

Severe hypereosinophilia in a patient treated with dupilumab and shift to mepolizumab: the importance of multidisciplinary management. A case report and literature review

Type 2 inflammation is a heterogeneous condition due to the complex activation of different immunological pathways. Rapid progress in research to evaluate the efficacy of biologics for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps and asthma has led to the availability of effective therapeutic options. These drugs are safe, but temporary iatrogenic hypereosinophilia may sometimes be associated with clinical symptoms or organ damage. Here, we describe a case of severe hypereosinophilia in a patient with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps and asthma treated with dupilumab and a subsequent therapeutic shift to mepolizumab that led to maintenance of symptom control and concomitant normalization of blood eosinophil count.

[Eosinophils in otorhinolaryngology: friend or foe?]

This article summarizes the essential aspects of current knowledge about eosinophils, classifies eosinophilia in terms of the dimensions healthy or harmful reaction, takes a specific look at eosinophils in the field of otorhinolaryngology, and gives recommendations for diagnostic workup and therapeutic intervention in case of proven eosinophilia, particularly as an adverse drug reaction. The thoughts are inspired by communications at the 29th Congress of the European Rhinologic Society in Sofia, Bulgaria, 2023.

Clinical and Therapeutic Intervention of Hypereosinophilia in the Era of Molecular Diagnosis

Hypereosinophilia (HE) presents with an elevated peripheral eosinophilic count of >1.5 × 109/L and is composed of a broad spectrum of secondary non-hematologic disorders and a minority of primary hematologic processes with heterogenous clinical presentations, ranging from mild symptoms to potentially lethal outcome secondary to end-organ damage. Following the introduction of advanced molecular diagnostics (genomic studies, RNA sequencing, and targeted gene mutation profile, etc.) in the last 1-2 decades, there have been deep insights into the etiology and molecular mechanisms involved in the development of HE. The classification of HE has been updated and refined following to the discovery of clinically novel markers and targets in the 2022 WHO classification and ICOG-EO 2021 Working Conference on Eosinophil Disorder and Syndromes. However, the diagnosis and management of HE is challenging given its heterogeneity and variable clinical outcome. It is critical to have a diagnostic algorithm for accurate subclassification of HE and hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES) (e.g., reactive, familial, idiopathic, myeloid/lymphoid neoplasm, organ restricted, or with unknown significance) and to follow established treatment guidelines for patients based on its clinical findings and risk stratification.

Post-marketing safety of anti-IL-5 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs): an analysis of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS)

BACKGROUND

Anti-IL-5 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) targeting IL-5 or IL-5 R α (including mepolizumab, benralizumab, and reslizumab) are widely used for inflammatory diseases such as asthma, eosinophilia, and polyangiitis. However, real-world data regarding its safety in a large sample population are incomplete. So, we evaluated the safety of anti-IL-5 mAbs by pharmacovigilance analyzes based on related adverse events (AEs) from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS).

METHODS

In disproportionality analysis, four algorithms were employed to detect the signals of anti-IL-5 mAbs from the FAERS between 2016 and 2022. In addition, we also used MYSQL 8.0, Navicat Premium 15, and Microsoft EXCEL 2019 to analyze the signals of anti-IL-5 mAbs systematically.

RESULTS

There are 9,476,351 reports collected from the FAERS database, of which 22,174 reports listed anti-IL-5 mAbs as the 'primary suspected (PS)' drug. A total of 59 (20 new signals, mepolizumab) and 62 (19 new signals, benralizumab) significant disproportionality preferred terms (PTs) conforming to the four algorithms were retained synchronously. Finally, we detected that the anti-IL-5 mAbs-induced AEs occurred in 31 organ systems (mepolizumab) and 30 organ systems (benralizumab). For mepolizumab and reslizumab, unexpected and new significant PTs of AEs were found, such as asthmatic crisis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), pneumonia, COVID-19, pneumothorax, adrenal insufficiency and so on. Notably, the risk signal of asthmatic crisis for mepolizumab was stronger than benralizumab (ROR 108.04 [95%CI, 96.09-121.47] vs 26.83 [95%CI, 18.91-38.06]). Comparing with mepolizumab and benralizumab, we found the proportion of serious adverse events in mepolizumab was both greater than benralizumab in each age group (≤20, 20-65, and ≥ 65). The median onset time of mepolizumab was 280 days (interquartile range [IQR] 1-367 days).

CONCLUSION

Analysis of FAERS data identified anti-IL-5 mAbs-associated AEs, and our findings supported continuous clinical monitoring, pharmacovigilance, and further studies of anti-IL-5 mAbs. In addition, clinicians may be more aware of the limitations of use in package inserts of anti-IL-5 mAbs: Not for relief of acute bronchospasm or status asthmaticus. Because of some limitations in the FAERS such as self-reports from patients and other confounding factors, the safety of anti-IL-5 mAbs needed more studies in different dimensions, especially the risk of cancer.

Approach to Acute Myeloid Leukemia with Increased Eosinophils and Basophils

There is remarkable morphologic and genetic heterogeneity in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). In a small percentage of cases of AML, increased eosinophils and/or basophils are present in the bone marrow and sometimes in the peripheral blood. This is often a puzzling diagnostic situation but also an important finding that requires special investigation. Unique chromosomal rearrangements have been correlated with an increased number of eosinophils and basophils in AML. The identification of the underlying genetic lesion that promotes eosinophilia and basophilia can dramatically change both the prognosis and the treatment of the patient. Thus, clinicians must be vigilant in searching for the cause of eosinophilia and basophilia in patients with AML, since the different causes may lead to different treatments and survival outcomes. In this article, we examine the significance of increased eosinophils and/or basophils in the context of AML, provide guidance that simplifies the differential diagnosis, and give prognostic and therapeutic information about specific subtypes of AML associated with eosinophilia and/or basophilia. Evidence supporting personalized (molecularly targeted) therapy for these patients is also presented.

Pseudo-Meigs' Syndrome With Eosinophilic Pleural Effusion

We present a rare case of a 45-year-old woman with pseudo-Meigs' syndrome and eosinophilic pleural effusion (EPE). She experienced cough, sputum, and dyspnea with a large right pleural effusion. Laboratory tests showed eosinophilia in the blood and pleural fluid. An ovarian tumor and ascites were also detected. After left salpingo-oophorectomy, the tumor was diagnosed as a mature cystic teratoma of the left ovary. The right-sided pleural effusion gradually resolved. Pseudo-Meigs' syndrome is characterized by benign ovarian tumor, ascites, and pleural effusion. Typically, it is associated with exudate pleural effusion characterized by a predominance of mononuclear cells. The occurrence of eosinophilic pleural effusion in our patient may be exceptionally rare.

Eosinophilic Patterns in Patients with Seasonal Allergy Affected by Bronchial Asthma and Rhinitis/Rhinosinusitis: Efficacy of Benralizumab in Patients with the Persistent Pattern

BACKGROUND

Eosinophilia can be influenced by multiple factors. This study aims to set a protocol for monitoring blood absolute eosinophil count (AEC) in patients with seasonal allergy affected by bronchial asthma (BA), allergic rhinitis (AR), or chronic rhinosinusitis with or without nasal polyposis (CRSw/sNP).

METHODS

We planned a total of four annual blood samples to measure AEC in- and out-seasonal pollen exposure (i.e., one measurement every three months for one year).

RESULTS

We identified two distinct groups of patients (non-eosinophilic and eosinophilic). Patients in the eosinophilic group presented with four different patterns (episodic, transient, floating, and persistent). Most patients with episodic, transient, and floating patterns were affected by mild allergy and the increase in eosinophils was related to allergen exposure. In contrast, patients with the persistent pattern mostly presented with more severe allergy (i.e., severe BA and relapsing CRSwNP) and the eosinophilia was unrelated to allergen exposure. The subgroup of patients with severe BA, relapsing CRSwNP, and persistent eosinophilc pattern were treated with benralizumab, which induced a noteworthy improvement in both severe BA and CRSwNP.

CONCLUSIONS

Multiple AEC measurements in patients with seasonal allergy can better reflect patient's eosinophilic status and help define the relationship of AEC enhancement with allergen exposure.

Case report: Rare benign obstructive disease of the biliary tract-a rare case of eosinophilic cholangitis

Objective

Eosinophilic cholangitis (EC) is an uncommon form of benign biliary obstruction. It frequently eludes accurate clinical diagnosis, leading to inappropriate treatment methods. It is our aspiration that this clinical report will impart comprehensive insights into EC and, specifically, the critical role of tomographic examination.

Case summary

A 34-year-old man was urgently admitted to the hospital due to excruciating abdominal distress persisting for several hours. Following a six-day course of anti-inflammatory therapy, his symptoms displayed marginal improvement, prompting his discharge. He returned to the hospital a month later for re-examination on doctor's orders. Based on the results of the re-examination, the patient refused steroid hormone shock therapy and subsequently underwent laparoscopic left-lateral hepatic lobectomy in order to confirm the diagnosis. The preoperative absolute counts of eosinophils in the peripheral blood were documented as 2.3 × 109/L, 3.06 × 109/L, and 1.50 × 109/L consecutively; concurrently, the corresponding percentages of eosinophils were quantified at levels of 21.90%, 30.70%, and 19.20%. The subsequent postoperative pathological assessment unveiled EC as the definitive diagnosis. The patient has since remained free from disease recurrence and is presently alive.

Conclusion

When encountering a patient presenting with persistent elevation in absolute eosinophil count in peripheral blood, coupled with imaging manifestations suggestive of intrahepatic periductal inflammation, diagnosis of EC should be highly suspected. The most optimal diagnostic and therapeutic workflow for EC could entail CT-guided liver lesion biopsy, ensued by glucocorticoid pulse therapy, and finally, short-term monitoring utilizing CT or MRI (including T1WI, T2WI, DWI, CEMRI) techniques.

[Guideline of the diagnosis and treatment of eosinophilic disorders (2024)]

The eosinophilias encompass a broad range of nonhematologic (secondary or reactive) and hematologic (primary or clonal) disorders with potential for end-organ damage. Based on new clinical data and increased understanding of disease molecular genetics, the World Health Organization (WHO) and the international consensus classification (ICC) has provided updated criteria and classifications for eosinophilic disorders in 2022. This guideline represents an update of Chinese expert consensus on the diagnosis and treatment of eosinophilia published in 2017 and aim to provide Chinese hematologist with clear guidance on management for eosinophilic disorders.

Hematological Neoplasms with Eosinophilia

Eosinophils in peripheral blood account for 0.3-5% of leukocytes, which is equivalent to 0.05-0.5 × 109/L. A count above 0.5 × 109/L is considered to indicate eosinophilia, while a count equal to or above 1.5 × 109/L is defined as hypereosinophilia. In bone marrow aspirate, eosinophilia is considered when eosinophils make up more than 6% of the total nuclear cells. In daily clinical practice, the most common causes of reactive eosinophilia are non-hematologic, whether they are non-neoplastic (allergic diseases, drugs, infections, or immunological diseases) or neoplastic (solid tumors). Eosinophilia that is associated with a hematological malignancy may be reactive or secondary to the production of eosinophilopoietic cytokines, and this is mainly seen in lymphoid neoplasms (Hodgkin lymphoma, mature T-cell neoplasms, lymphocytic variant of hypereosinophilic syndrome, and B-acute lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma). Eosinophilia that is associated with a hematological malignancy may also be neoplastic or primary, derived from the malignant clone, usually in myeloid neoplasms or with its origin in stem cells (myeloid/lymphoid neoplasms with eosinophilia and tyrosine kinase gene fusions, acute myeloid leukemia with core binding factor translocations, mastocytosis, myeloproliferative neoplasms, myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasms, and myelodysplastic neoplasms). There are no concrete data in standardized cytological and cytometric procedures that could predict whether eosinophilia is reactive or clonal. The verification is usually indirect, based on the categorization of the accompanying hematologic malignancy. This review focuses on the broad differential diagnosis of hematological malignancies with eosinophilia.

Expert consensus on the use of systemic glucocorticoids for managing eosinophil-related diseases

Eosinophil-related diseases represent a group of pathologic conditions with highly heterogeneous clinical presentation and symptoms ranging from mild to critical. Both systemic and localized forms of disease are typically treated with glucocorticoids. The approval of novel biologic therapies targeting the interleukin-5 pathway can help reduce the use of systemic glucocorticoids (SGC) in eosinophilic diseases and reduce the risk of SGC-related adverse effects (AEs). In this article, a panel of experts from different medical specialties reviewed current evidence on the use of SGC in two systemic eosinophilic diseases: Eosinophilic Granulomatosis with PolyAngiitis (EGPA) and HyperEosinophilic Syndrome (HES); and in two single-organ (respiratory) eosinophilic diseases: Chronic RhinoSinusitis with Nasal Polyps (CRSwNP) and Severe Asthma with Eosinophil Phenotype (SA-EP), and contrasted it with their experience in clinical practice. Using nominal group technique, they reached consensus on key aspects related to the dose and tapering of SGC as well as on the initiation of biologics as SGC-sparing agents. Early treatment with biologics could help prevent AEs associated with medium and long-term use of SGC.

Myeloid/lymphoid neoplasms with eosinophilia and tyrosine kinase fusion genes: A workshop report with focus on novel entities and a literature review including paediatric cases

Myeloid/lymphoid neoplasms with eosinophilia (M/LN-eo) and tyrosine kinase (TK) gene fusions are a rare group of haematopoietic neoplasms with a broad range of clinical and morphological presentations. Paediatric cases have increasingly been recognised. Importantly, not all appear as a chronic myeloid neoplasm and eosinophilia is not always present. In addition, standard cytogenetic and molecular methods may not be sufficient to diagnose M/LN-eo due to cytogenetically cryptic aberrations. Therefore, additional evaluation with fluorescence in-situ hybridisation and other molecular genetic techniques (array-based comparative genomic hybridisation, RNA sequencing) are recommended for the identification of specific TK gene fusions. M/LN-eo with JAK2 and FLT3-rearrangements and ETV6::ABL1 fusion were recently added as a formal member to this category in the International Consensus Classification (ICC) and the 5th edition of the WHO classification (WHO-HAEM5). In addition, other less common defined genetic alterations involving TK genes have been described. This study is an update on M/LN-eo with TK gene fusions with focus on novel entities, as illustrated by cases submitted to the Bone Marrow Workshop, organised by the European Bone Marrow Working Group (EBMWG) within the frame of the 21st European Association for Haematopathology congress (EAHP-SH) in Florence 2022. A literature review was performed including paediatric cases of M/LN-eo with TK gene fusions.

Acute myeloid leukemia with LRRFIP1::FGFR1 rearrangement and a complex karyotype

We report a case of a 20-year-old man who presented with splenomegaly, hyperleukocytosis, anemia, and thrombocytopenia. A diagnosis of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with LRRFIP1::FGFR1 rearrangement with complex karyotype was determined. Chromosome analysis showed a male karyotype: 46,XY,i(1)(q10),t(2;8)(q37;p11.2),der(5)t(1;5) (p22;q13)[17]46,XY[3]. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis using the Cytocell FGFR1 break apart/amplification probe detected FGFR1 rearrangement with t(2:8) in 126/200 cells analyzed. Other FISH probes including 1p36/ 1q25 probes, del(5q) deletion probe, TLX3 break apart probe, and PDGFRB break apart probe were also utilized to confirm the other karyotypic abnormalities. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) SureSelectXT Custom DNA Target Somatic Detection detected RUNX1 gene mutation. NGS Archer FusionPlex (RNA) confirmed the LRRFIP1::FGFR1 rearrangement. This is the second reported case of AML with LRRFIP1::FGFR1 rearrangement and the first with a complex karyotype.

Lymphomatoid papulosis associated with myeloid neoplasm with eosinophilia and FIP1L1::PDGFRA rearrangement: Successful imatinib treatment in two cases

Lymphomatoid papulosis (LyP) is a benign condition, listed among primary cutaneous CD30+ lymphoproliferative disorders. Its typical picture consists of relapsing-remitting papular lesions and it can be encountered in the course of a hematologic disease, at times representing its first manifestation. Hypereosinophilic syndromes are a heterogeneous group of disorders characterized by persistent peripheral blood hypereosinophilia that may lead to life-threatening organ damage. Among eosinophilic disorders, the subtype identified as myeloid/lymphoid neoplasm with eosinophilia and tyrosine kinase gene fusions has aroused particular interest due to its excellent response to tyrosine kinase inhibitors, including imatinib. Here, we described the case of two 33-year-old men presenting with LyP and myeloid neoplasm with eosinophilia and FIP1L1::PDGFRA rearrangement who achieved complete clinical and molecular remission of both conditions a few months after starting imatinib.

A Rare Presentation of Hypereosinophilic Syndrome With Loffler's Endomyocarditis, Encephalopathy, and Multiple Thromboembolic Strokes

Idiopathic hypereosinophilic syndrome is a disorder with a high eosinophilic count for which no identifiable cause is evident. Herein we report a case of a 47-year-old male with a background history of hypereosinophilia, who presented with sudden onset altered level of consciousness and drowsiness for 1-day duration associated with a gradual onset progressive memory loss for 1-month duration. Based on clinical, biochemical, and imaging studies, a diagnosis of Loffler's endomyocarditis was made for which he was treated with albendazole with diethylcarbamazine along with high-dose steroids. He made a successful recovery after 2 months of treatment.

FIP1L1-PDGFRA Clonal Hypereosinophilic Syndrome With Eosinophilic Myocarditis and Intracardiac Thrombus

A 45-year-old man from El Salvador with no past medical history presented with cough and chest pain. Investigations revealed 60% peripheral eosinophilia (absolute count 12.3 K/uL). Cardiac imaging was consistent with myocarditis with intracardiac thrombus formation. Endomyocardial biopsy confirmed eosinophilic infiltration of the myocardium, and bone marrow biopsy showed hypercellular marrow with 28% eosinophils. Cytogenetics/fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) confirmed positive FIP1L1-PDGFRA rearrangement. The patient was treated for FIP1L1-PDGFRA clonal hypereosinophilic syndrome with associated eosinophilic myocarditis and intracardiac thrombus. The treatment regimen consisted of a steroid taper, imatinib, and anticoagulation. Treatment was followed by normalization of the eosinophil count. At two-year follow-up, the patient was without recurrence of eosinophilia on maintenance imatinib and indefinite anticoagulation with warfarin.

Case Report: Off-label treatment of idiopathic hypereosinophilic syndrome with Omalizumab

Idiopathic hypereosinophilic syndrome (IHES) is a rare disease characterized by causeless persistent hypereosinophilia and eosinophilia-associated end-organ damage. Current treatment modalities don't meet the needs due to adverse events of steroids as first-line therapy and the limited efficacy of second-line treatments, underscoring the need for new therapeutic strategies. Here we presented two cases of IHES with different clinical manifestations that were both refractory to corticosteroids. Patient #1 experienced rashes, cough, pneumonia, and steroid-induced side effects. Patient #2 had severe gastrointestinal symptoms attributed to hypereosinophilia. They both had high levels of serum IgE, didn't respond well to second-line treatments of interferon-α (IFN-α) and imatinib, and Mepolizumab was not accessible. We then innovatively switched to Omalizumab, an anti-IgE monoclonal antibody approved for allergic asthma and chronic idiopathic urticaria. Patient #1 was treated with Omalizumab 600 mg per month for 20 months; his absolute eosinophil count (AEC) decreased significantly and has stabilized at around 1.0×10⁹/L for 17 months, with complete relief from erythra and cough. Patient #2 recovered promptly from severe diarrhea with a sharp drop in AEC after 3 months of treatment with omalizumab at 600 mg per month. Therefore, we concluded that Omalizumab may be a seminal therapeutic strategy for IHES patients who are refractory to corticosteroids, whether as long-term management of AEC or as an urgent intervention to address severe symptoms caused by eosinophilia.

Idiopathic Hypereosinophilic Syndrome: A Case Report

Idiopathic hypereosinophilic syndrome is a rare condition characterized by persistent severe eosinophilia and organ damage without any apparent cause. A 20-year-old male patient with no significant medical history was admitted to the Emergency Department with retrosternal chest pain, fatigue and asthenia. EKG showed ST elevation I, II, III, aVF, V4-V6 and blood tests showed elevated troponin levels. An echocardiogram was performed revealing severe global left ventricular systolic dysfunction. Further evaluations included cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and endomyocardial biopsy, confirming the diagnosis of eosinophilic myocarditis. The patient was started on systemic corticosteroid therapy, resulting in clinical improvement. The patient was discharged after 12 days of hospitalization, following a recovery of biventricular function and he was told to continue oral corticosteroid therapy at home. Further investigation ruled out other causes of hypereosinophilic syndromes, therefore the diagnosis of idiopathic hypereosinophilic syndrome was assumed. Despite the attempt to reduce corticosteroid therapy, the eosinophil count became elevated again, so the dosage was increased and associated with azathioprine with subsequent favorable analytical evolution. This case highlights the challenges in diagnosing and managing idiopathic hypereosinophilic syndrome and emphasizes the importance of prompt treatment initiation to prevent complications.

FIP1L1-PDGFRα-Positive Loeffler Endocarditis-A Distinct Cause of Heart Failure in a Young Male: The Role of Multimodal Diagnostic Tools

The presence of the Fip1-Like1-platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha (FIP1L1-PDGFRα) fusion gene represents a rare cause of hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES), which is associated with organ damage. The aim of this paper is to emphasize the pivotal role of multimodal diagnostic tools in the accurate diagnosis and management of heart failure (HF) associated with HES. We present the case of a young male patient who was admitted with clinical features of congestive HF and laboratory findings of hypereosinophilia (HE). After hematological evaluation, genetic tests, and ruling out reactive causes of HE, a diagnosis of positive FIP1L1-PDGFRα myeloid leukemia was established. Multimodal cardiac imaging identified biventricular thrombi and cardiac impairment, thereby raising suspicion of Loeffler endocarditis (LE) as the cause of HF; this was later confirmed by a pathological examination. Despite hematological improvement under corticosteroid and imatinib therapy, anticoagulant, and patient-oriented HF treatment, there was further clinical progression and subsequent multiple complications (including embolization), which led to patient death. HF is a severe complication that diminishes the demonstrated effectiveness of imatinib in the advanced phases of Loeffler endocarditis. Therefore, the need for an accurate identification of heart failure etiology in the absence of endomyocardial biopsy is particularly important for ensuring effective treatment.

The multidisciplinary approach to eosinophilia

Eosinophilic granulocytes are normally present in low numbers in the bloodstream. Patients with an increased number of eosinophilic granulocytes in the differential count (eosinophilia) are common and can pose a clinical challenge because conditions with eosinophilia occur in all medical specialties. The diagnostic approach must be guided by a thorough medical history, supported by specific tests to guide individualized treatment. Neoplastic (primary) eosinophilia is identified by one of several unique acquired genetic causes. In contrast, reactive (secondary) eosinophilia is associated with a cytokine stimulus in a specific disease, while idiopathic eosinophilia is a diagnosis by exclusion. Rational treatment is disease-directed in secondary cases and has paved the way for targeted treatment against the driver in primary eosinophilia, whereas idiopathic cases are treated as needed by principles in eosinophilia originating from clonal drivers. The vast majority of patients are diagnosed with secondary eosinophilia and are managed by the relevant specialty-e.g., rheumatology, allergy, dermatology, gastroenterology, pulmonary medicine, hematology, or infectious disease. The overlap in symptoms and the risk of irreversible organ involvement in eosinophilia, irrespective of the cause, warrants that patients without a diagnostic clarification or who do not respond to adequate treatment should be referred to a multidisciplinary function anchored in a hematology department for evaluation. This review presents the pathophysiology, manifestations, differential diagnosis, diagnostic workup, and management of (adult) patients with eosinophilia. The purpose is to place eosinophilia in a clinical context, and therefore justify and inspire the establishment of a multidisciplinary team of experts from diagnostic and clinical specialties at the regional level to support the second opinion. The target patient population requires highly specialized laboratory analysis and therapy and occasionally has severe eosinophil-induced organ dysfunction. An added value of a centralized, clinical function is to serve as a platform for education and research to further improve the management of patients with eosinophilia. Primary and idiopathic eosinophilia are key topics in the review, which also address current research and discusses outstanding issues in the field.

Eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis - Advances in pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment

Eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA) is a rare disease characterized by eosinophil-rich granulomatous inflammation and necrotizing vasculitis, pre-dominantly affecting small-to-medium-sized vessels. It is categorized as a primary antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitides (AAVs) but also shares features of hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES); therefore, both vessel inflammation and eosinophilic infiltration are suggested to cause organ damage. This dual nature of the disease causes variable clinical presentation. As a result, careful differentiation from mimicking conditions is needed, especially from HES, given the overlapping clinical, radiologic, and histologic features, and biomarker profile. EGPA also remains a diagnostic challenge, in part because of asthma, which may pre-dominate for years, and often requires chronic corticosteroids (CS), which can mask other disease features. The pathogenesis is still not fully understood, however, the interaction between eosinophils and lymphocytes B and T seems to play an important role. Furthermore, the role of ANCA is not clear, and only up to 40% of patients are ANCA-positive. Moreover, two ANCA-dependent clinically and genetically distinct subgroups have been identified. However, a gold standard test for establishing a diagnosis is not available. In practice, the disease is mainly diagnosed based on the clinical symptoms and results of non-invasive tests. The unmet needs include uniform diagnostic criteria and biomarkers to help distinguish EGPA from HESs. Despite its rarity, notable progress has been made in understanding the disease and in its management. A better understanding of the pathophysiology has provided new insights into the pathogenesis and therapeutic targets, which are reflected in novel biological agents. However, there remains an ongoing reliance on corticosteroid therapy. Therefore, there is a significant need for more effective and better-tolerated steroid-sparing treatment schemes.

Characteristics of patients with incidental eosinophilia admitted to a tertiary hospital in southern China

Background

The characteristics of patients with eosinophilia are heterogeneous and the outcomes can vary from asymptomatic to severe.

Objective

To describe the feature of patients with eosinophilia in a single center.

Design

Based on the electronic medical records from Yangjiang People's Hospital in China, the inpatients admitted between June 2018 and February 2021 with measured blood eosinophil counts were evaluated.

Methods

Eosinophilia was defined as a peripheral blood eosinophil count of ≥0.5 × 10⁹/L. Differences were compared by eosinophilia severity. The medical records of patients with moderate to severe eosinophilia were reviewed and summarized in terms of examination, diagnoses and management. And these patients were matched with patients without incidental eosinophilia by propensity score and the differences were compared.

Results

A total of 7,835 patients with eosinophilia were identified out of 131,566 total inpatients. All types of eosinophilia were most common in males (8.2%; 5,351/65,615), and in patients aged 0-6 years (11.6%; 1,760/15,204), and in the pediatric (10.8%; 1,764/16,336) department, followed by dermatology (10.6%; 123/1,162), Oncology (7.5%; 394/5,239) and Intensive care unit (ICU) (7.4%; 119/1,608). Patients with moderate to severe eosinophilia were more likely to admit to ICU (moderate: 1.3%; severe: 0.50%). In patients with moderate to severe eosinophilia, only 205/621 (33%) had eosinophilia mentioned in their records, and only 63/621 (10.1%) underwent investigations for eosinophilia. The majority of patients with moderate to severe eosinophilia (372/621, 59.9%) had an infectious disease, and little examination (7.4%; 46/621) was taken to identify the cause of eosinophilia, and only 39/621 (6.3%) of patients had a discrete cause of eosinophilia identified. Patients with moderate to severe eosinophilia (24.3%; 151/621) exhibited certain chance to have organ dysfunction.

Conclusion

Incidental eosinophilia in inpatients was frequently neglected and less investigated. Multidisciplinary consultation may improve outcomes of inpatients with moderate to severe eosinophilia.

French guidelines for the etiological workup of eosinophilia and the management of hypereosinophilic syndromes

Eosinophilic-related clinical manifestations are protean and the underlying conditions underpinning eosinophilia are highly diverse. The etiological workup of unexplained eosinophilia/hypereosinophilia can be challenging, and can lead sometimes to extensive, inappropriate, costly and/or invasive investigations. To date, guidelines for the etiological workup and management of eosinophilia are mainly issued by hematologists, and thus mostly cover the scope of clonal hypereosinophilic syndromes (HES). Here, thanks to an extensive literature review, and thanks to the joint work of a large panel of experts involving physicians from both adult and pediatric medicine and from various subspecialties (as well as a representative of a patients' association representative), we provide recommendations for both the step-by step diagnostic workup of eosinophilia (whether unexplained or within specific contexts) as well as the management and follow-up of the full spectrum of eosinophilic disorders (including clonal, reactive, lymphocytic and idiopathic HES, as well as single-organ diseases). Didactic prescription summaries intended to facilitate the prescription of eosinophil-targeted drugs are also provided, as are practical diagnostic and therapeutic algorithms. Lastly, this set of recommendations also includes a summary intended for general practitioners, as well as an overview of the therapeutic patient education program set up by the French reference center for HES. Further updates will be mandatory as new validated information emerges.

[Eosinophilia: hypereosinophilic syndrome vs. eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis]

Hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES) is defined as a peripheral eosinophil count of > 1500/μl (assessed twice at an interval of ≥ 2 weeks) and an eosinophil-induced organ damage. Idiopathic HES is differentiated from primary (clonal or neoplastic) HES and secondary (reactive) HES, depending on the etiology. Eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA) is categorized as a secondary form of HES and is characterized by hypereosinophilia and vasculitis of small to medium-sized vessels and can be associated with an antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA). The treatment of HES is dependent on the etiology. Clonal HES is treated according to the respective genetic aberration, e.g. with tyrosine kinase inhibitors or chemotherapy and allogenic stem cell transplantation. Secondary forms should be treated according to the underlying cause (e.g. parasitic infection). The treatment of EGPA is carried out with immunosuppressants depending on the disease stage and disease activity. Conventional drugs, such as glucocorticoids (GC), cyclophosphamide (CYC) and methotrexate (MTX) or biologics, such as the monoclonal anti-IL5 antibody mepolizumab are commonly used. Mepolizumab is also a good option for the treatment of idiopathic HES.

Unmet needs and evidence gaps in hypereosinophilic syndrome and eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis

Hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES) and eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA) are rare systemic inflammatory disorders with overlapping symptoms, elevated eosinophil counts, and heterogenous clinical presentations. Although progress has been made in recent years, there are substantial gaps in our understanding of the pathologic mechanisms involved in these diseases, as well as numerous unmet needs relating to both diagnosis and patient management. For example, in most cases of HES, the underlying cause of hypereosinophilia is unknown, while in EGPA, although a polygenic genetic susceptibility has been found, understanding of the pathogenic mechanisms remains largely elusive. Delineating differences between certain disease variants may be challenging, and there are no reliable predictive markers of disease course. In addition, the current diagnostic criteria for HES and classification criteria for EGPA are not easy to implement in a nonspecialist setting, and specialist referral pathways need to be signposted more clearly. Furthermore, disease-specific activity scores need to be developed to aid the assessment of treatment effects, and improved biomarkers are needed to aid with treatment stratification. In this review, we outline the limitations of our current understanding of HES and EGPA and highlight areas for future work, which ultimately should help improve patient management and outcomes.

Eosinophilia in children: characteristics, etiology and diagnostic algorithm

Eosinophilia is common in children and may be caused by various disorders. Large-cohort studies, including mild cases, are limited in children. This study aimed to reveal underlying etiologies of childhood eosinophilia and to create a diagnostic algorithm. Children (< 18 years) with absolute eosinophil counts (AECs) ≥ 0.5 × 10⁹/L were reviewed from medical files. Clinical characteristics and laboratory values were recorded. Patients were grouped based on the severity of eosinophilia as mild (0.5-1.5 × 10⁹/L), moderate (≥ 1.5 × 10⁹/L) and severe (≥ 5.0 × 10⁹/L). An algorithm was formed to evaluate these patients. We included 1178 children with mild (80.8%), moderate (17.8%) and severe eosinophilia (1.4%). The most common reasons of eosinophilia were allergic diseases (80%), primary immunodeficiency (PID) (8.5%), infectious diseases (5.8%), malignancies (0.8%) and rheumatic diseases (0.7%). Only 0.3% of children presented with idiopatic hypereosinophilic syndrome. Allergic diseases and PIDs were the most common etiologies in mild/moderate and severe groups, respectively. The median duration of eosinophilia was 7.0 (3.0-17.0) months in the study population and was the shortest in severe cases (2.0 (2.0-5.0) months). Multiple logistic regression analysis demonstrated food allergy [OR:1.866, 95%CI:1.225-2.842, p = 0.004] and PIDs [OR:2.200, 95%CI:1.213-3.992, p = 0.009] as independent factors for childhood eosinophilia. A diagnostic algorithm including mild form was presented for childhood eosinophilia.    Conclusion: Eosinophilia was frequently determined due to secondary causes; allergic diseases in mild/moderate eosinophilia, PIDs in severe group. Etiology of eosinophilia was diverse, and an algorithm concerning the severity of eosinophilia would be practical and rational. What is Known: • In children, eosinophilia is common, and mild eosinophilia occurs frequently. • Malignancies presents frequently with severe eosinophilia. What is New: • Primary immunodeficiencies were not a rare cause of eosinophilia, especially in countries such as the Middle East and eastern Mediterranean countries, where the countries consanguineous marriages are common, and should be investigated in children with eosinophilia who do not have allergic or infectious diseases. • In literature, there are many algorithms about childhood hypereosinophilia. However, mild eosinophilia is extremely important in children. Because all patients with malignancy and most of the patients with rheumatic diseases presented with mild eosinophilia. Therefore, we proposed an algorithm for childhood eosinophilia that includes mild eosinophilia besides moderate and severe cases.

Hypereosinophilic syndrome presenting with gastrointestinal manifestations

Hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES) is a spectrum of diseases characterised by an elevated eosinophilic count causing end-organ damage. Differential diagnoses of hypereosinophilia are vast and include drug hypersensitivities, allergies, infections, cancers, autoimmune disorders and rare eosinophilic syndromes. Herein, we describe a case of a patient presenting with gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms including progressive dysphagia, abdominal distension, vomiting, diarrhoea and abdominal pain with significant peripheral eosinophilia who was found to have an overlap HES involving the GI tract. This patient's eosinophilia was rapidly corrected with intravenous methylprednisolone, and the patient experienced gradual resolution of clinical symptoms with maintenance oral prednisone. Due to the rarity and diverse presentation of HES, there are few large, longitudinal studies that describe disease progression and inform treatment guidelines. This case demonstrates the difficulty in designing a treatment regimen for these patients and emphasises the clinical need for improved understanding of HES.

Rare and potentially fatal - Cytogenetically cryptic TNIP1::PDGFRB and PCM1::FGFR1 fusion leading to myeloid/lymphoid neoplasms with eosinophilia in children

Myeloid/lymphoid neoplasms with eosinophilia (MLN-eos) are rare haematological neoplasms primarily affecting adults. The heterogeneous clinical picture and the rarity of the disease, especially in children, may delay an early diagnosis. MLN-eos are characterized by constitutive tyrosine kinase (TK) activity due to gene fusions. It is thus of importance to obtain a prompt genetic diagnosis to start a specific therapy. Here, we outline the clinical, genetic, and biochemical background of TK driven MLN-eos and report two extremely rare paediatric cases of MLN-eo, the used diagnostic methods, therapy and clinical outcomes. Our results demonstrate that, standard cytogenetic and molecular methods may not be sufficient to diagnose MLN-eo due to cytogenetically cryptic aberrations. We therefore recommend performing additional evaluation with fluorescence in-situ hybridization and molecular genetic methods (array-based comparative genomic hybridization and RNA sequencing) which will lead to the correct diagnosis. Following this diagnostic route we detected a TNIP1::PDGFRB and a PCM1::FGFR1 fusion in our patients. Thus, genetic diagnosis must be precise and quick in order to initiate adequate therapies with tyrosine kinase inhibitors or HSCT.

JAK inhibition for CD3- CD4+ lymphocytic-variant hypereosinophilic syndrome

Alternatives are urgently needed in patients with CD3^- CD4⁺ lymphocytic-variant hypereosinophilic syndrome (L-HES) requiring high-level steroids or who are unresponsive and/or intolerant to conventional alternative therapies. We report five L-HES patients (44-66 years) with cutaneous involvement (n = 5) and persistent eosinophilia (n = 3) despite conventional therapies, who successfully received JAK inhibitors (tofacitinib n = 1, ruxolitinib n = 4). JAKi led to complete clinical remission in the first 3 months in all (with prednisone withdrawal in four). Absolute eosinophil counts normalized in cases receiving ruxolitinib, while reduction was partial under tofacitinib. After switch from tofacitinib to ruxolitinib, complete clinical response persisted despite prednisone withdrawal. The clone size remained stable in all patients. After 3-13 months of follow-up, no adverse event was reported. Randomized controlled trials are now mandatory to optimize the use of JAKi in L-HES.

Biologic therapies for hypereosinophilic disorders: From tyrosine kinase inhibitors to monoclonal antibodies. Towards an increasingly customized management?

Hypereosinophilic syndromes (HES) encompass a wide range of disorders characterized by persistent peripheral blood hypereosinophilia (HE) (i.e., an eosinophil count ≥1.5 × 10⁹/L and ≥ 10% eosinophils preferably with a minimal duration of 6 months if documentation is available) associated with organ damage and/or dysfunction attributable to tissue eosinophilic infiltrate and release of granule contents. In most cases, HE is associated with atopic conditions/allergies, parasitic infections, medications, autoimmune disorders and/or solid tumors in most cases. More rarely, it can be one of the dominant manifestations of an underlying myeloid/lymphoid neoplasm. With regard to hematological forms, in recent decades the advances in understanding the pathogenic aspects of HES have led to a growing interest in these diseases, and in the 2016 WHO classification multiple subgroups were defined according to the molecular profile with the aim of better characterizing these syndromes and establishing which patients will benefit from specific pharmacological targeted therapies. This review article will provide a comprehensive overview of possible therapeutic approaches for HES in the light of each specific molecular alteration, considering both tyrosine kinase inhibitors and monoclonal antibodies, either implemented in clinical practice or currently still under development.

Hypereosinophilic syndrome in Europe: Retrospective study of treatment patterns, clinical manifestations, and healthcare resource utilization

BACKGROUND

The burden of hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES) in Europe is not well characterized.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate real-world patient characteristics, treatment patterns, clinical manifestations, and healthcare resource utilization for patients with HES from France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and the United Kingdom.

METHODS

In this retrospective, noninterventional study, data for patients with a physician-confirmed diagnosis of HES were abstracted from medical chart reviews. Patients were aged 6 years or older at the time of HES diagnosis and had 1 or more years of follow-up from the index date (first clinic visit between January 2015 and December 2019). Data on treatment patterns, comorbidities, clinical manifestations, clinical outcomes, and healthcare resource utilization were collected from diagnosis or index date to end of follow-up.

RESULTS

Data for 280 patients were abstracted from medical charts by 121 physicians treating HES, with multiple specialties. Most patients (55%) had idiopathic HES, and 24% had myeloid HES; the median number (interquartile range [IQR]) of diagnostic tests per patient was 10 (6-12). The most common comorbidities were asthma (45%) and anxiety or depression (36%). Most patients (89%) used oral corticosteroids; 64% used immunosuppressants or cytotoxic agents, and 44% used biologics. Patients had a median (IQR) of 3 clinical manifestations (1-5), most commonly constitutional (63%), lung (49%), and skin (48%). Twenty-three percent of patients experienced a flare, and 40% had a complete treatment response. Some patients (30%) were hospitalized with a median (IQR) stay of 9 days (5-15) for HES-related issues.

CONCLUSION

Patients with HES across 5 European countries had a substantial disease burden despite extensive oral corticosteroids treatment, highlighting the need for additional targeted therapies.

Diagnostic spectrum of hypereosinophilia based on bone marrow pathology: 10 years' experience at a tertiary care hospital

BACKGROUND

Hypereosinophilia (HE) is defined as peripheral blood (PB) eosinophil count exceeding 1.5 × 10⁹ /L. As the causes of HE can be diverse, the work-up of patients was complicated. In this study, we aimed to categorize the underlying diseases associated with HE and demonstrate minimum diagnostic approach.

METHODS

Cases presenting with HE within 7 days of bone marrow (BM) examination conducted between 2008 and 2019 were selected. Cases were classified by the revised 2022 WHO and ICC classification. We also assessed morphologic features of unclassified persisting HE (>4 weeks) patients according to the morphologic criteria suggested a previous study by Wang et al. RESULTS: A total of 364 patients were included. The work-up confirmed primary HE in 38.7%, secondary HE in 48.9%, HE patients with insufficient evaluation in 13.7%. When conducted a slide review of HE patients with sustained HE more than 4 weeks among HE patients with insufficient evaluation, the morphological features showed abnormal eosinophils in PB/BM (69.0%/81.0%), hypercellularity (26.2%), myelofibrosis (7.1%), increased M:E ratio (5.3%), and dysmegakaryopoiesis (4.8%). Of these patients, 14 patients who met all morphologic criteria were suspected of CEL.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that HE is associated with variable conditions. BM morphological assessment based on a robust criterion can help to confirm a MN irrespective of the presence of clonal markers. The work-up of patients in whom ruled out the common secondary causes of HE requires a systematic but sufficient approach including at a minimum BM karyotyping, PDGFRA testing, lymphocyte immunophenotyping and TCR gene rearrangement.

Development of Henoch-Schoenlein purpura in a child with idiopathic hypereosinophilia syndrome with multiple thrombotic onset: A case report

BACKGROUND

The incidence of pulmonary embolism (PE) in children is low, but its mortality is high. Hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES) is a group of diseases caused by an abnormal increase in eosinophilic granulocytes resulting in multiple-organ dysfunction. The urgent event of thromboembolism in the pulmonary region provoked by eosinophils in idiopathic HES (IHES) is relatively unusual. This article reports a case of IHES with multiple PEs and left leg venous thrombosis as the first manifestation. One month later, the patient developed Henoch-Schonlein purpura (HSP), which is very rare.

CASE SUMMARY

We report the case of a 12-year-old boy who was admitted to the hospital with dyspnea, left leg pain, and aggravation. He had bilateral PE and left leg venous embolism with mild eosinophilia. Low-molecular-weight heparin and urokinase were given. At the same time, the interventional department was contacted about filter implantation, followed by urokinase thrombolysis. The left leg thrombus was aspirated under ultrasound guidance. He was discharged from the hospital on rivaroxaban. One month later, he developed a rash on both legs and ankle pain consistent with HSP, with severe eosinophilia and motor and sensory disturbances. The patient was diagnosed with IHES with multiple embolisms complicated by HSP after excluding other causes of the eosinophil elevation. After glucocorticoid treatment, the symptoms were relieved, but the patient later developed purpura nephritis.

CONCLUSION

We report a rare and life-threatening case of IHES with multiple embolisms associated with HSP. A mild elevation of eosinophils early in the disease leads to difficulties in diagnosis and delayed treatment.

Eosinophilia attention, diagnosis, treatment, and awareness in physicians: a cross-sectional survey

Background

Patients with incidental eosinophilia is becoming increasingly common in clinical practice. But it remains challenging to diagnose and treat owing to its complex etiology. The awareness of physicians and the strategies of diagnosis and treatment toward eosinophilia are still unclear.

Objective

We aimed to evaluate attention, diagnosis, treatment, and awareness of eosinophilia among physicians, as well as factors influencing clinical practice, and to find ways to improve the efficacy of this disease.

Design

This is a cross-sectional survey.

Methods

A cross-sectional study was conducted from 1 to 4 June 2021 in a tertiary hospital. Self-administered and validated electronic questionnaire was used to investigate the attention toward eosinophilia, the strategies of diagnosis and treatment, and the awareness in physicians.

Results

A total of 607 valid questionnaires were collected, with a response rate of 84.5%. Among the responders, 65.4% of physicians claimed to be familiar with patients with eosinophilia but only 11.0% of them had read the relevant guidelines or expert consensus. Among 207 physicians who had ever diagnosed patients with eosinophilia, only 19.4% had performed detailed examinations. The accuracy of awareness questions was 1.6-53.5%, and only 26.5% of physicians had high levels of awareness. An increase in the awareness level of up to 2.82 folds was seen among physicians with factors such as job title, encountering patients with eosinophilia, linking patients' conditions to peripheral blood eosinophil count, and paying attention to guidelines.

Conclusion

This study highlighted the importance of raising awareness and knowledge of eosinophilia among physicians in China. More works on education about eosinophilia guideline are needed, which may help physicians make decision with more benefits to patients.

Updates on eosinophilic disorders

This review addresses changes and updates in eosinophilic disorders under the International Consensus Classification (ICC). The previous category of myeloid/lymphoid neoplasm with eosinophilia (M/LN-eo) and a specific gene rearrangement is changed to M/LN-eo with tyrosine kinase gene fusions to reflect the underlying genetic lesions. Two new members, M/LN-eo with ETV6::ABL1 fusion and M/LN-eo with various FLT3 fusions, have been added to the category; and M/LN-eo with PCM1::JAK2 and its genetic variants ETV6::JAK2 and BCR::JAK2 are recognized as a formal entity from their former provisional status. The updated understanding of the clinical and molecular genetic features of PDGFRA, PDGFRB and FGFR1 neoplasms is summarized. Clear guidance as to how to distinguish these fusion gene-associated disorders from the overlapping entities of Ph-like B-acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), de novo T-ALL, and systemic mastocytosis is provided. Bone marrow morphology now constitutes one of the diagnostic criteria of chronic eosinophilic leukemia, NOS (CEL, NOS), and idiopathic hypereosinophilia/hypereosinophilic syndrome (HE/HES), facilitating the separation of a true myeloid neoplasm with characteristic eosinophilic proliferation from those of unknown etiology and not attributable to a myeloid neoplasm.

Proposed refined diagnostic criteria and classification of eosinophil disorders and related syndromes

Eosinophilia and eosinophil activation are recurrent features in various reactive states and certain hematologic malignancies. In patients with hypereosinophilia (HE), HE-induced organ damage is often encountered and may lead to the diagnosis of a hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES). A number of known mechanisms and etiologies contribute to the development of HE and HES. Based on these etiologies and the origin of eosinophils, HE and HES are divided into primary forms where eosinophils are clonal cells, reactive forms where an underlying reactive or neoplastic condition is detected and eosinophils are considered to be "non-clonal" cells, and idiopathic HE and HES in which neither a clonal nor a reactive underlying pathology is detected. Since 2012, this classification and the related criteria have been widely accepted and regarded as standard. However, during the past few years, new developments in the field and an increasing number of markers and targets have created a need to update these criteria and the classification of HE and HES. To address this challenge, a Working Conference on eosinophil disorders was organized in 2021. In this conference, a panel of experts representing the relevant fields, including allergy, dermatology, hematology, immunology, laboratory medicine, and pathology, met and discussed new markers and concepts as well as refinements in definitions, criteria and classifications of HE and HES. The outcomes of this conference are presented in this article and should assist in the diagnosis and management of patients with HE and HES in daily practice and in the preparation and conduct of clinical trials.

Chronic Eosinophilic Leukemia Presenting as Cardiac Failure

Chronic eosinophilic leukemia (CEL) is a rare chronic myeloproliferative disorder characterized by sustained eosinophilia. Although the incidence of CEL is uncertain, it can be clinically devastating as it has a propensity to affect several important organ systems. This is of particular significance in Sub-Saharan Africa where helminthic infections are a more prevalent cause of eosinophilia. To the best of our knowledge, we present the first reported case of CEL complicated by cardiac disease in a Ghanaian. He presented with a history of orthopnoea and dyspnoea on exertion, and examination revealed a pansystolic murmur over the mitral region and moderate splenomegaly. Good symptomatic control was achieved using hydroxyurea after which haematologic and cytogenetic remission was achieved after 12 weeks on a tyrosine kinase inhibitor. Physicians working in low resource environments should exclude clonality in patients presenting with eosinophilia and end-organ damage.

Available and emerging therapies for bona fide advanced systemic mastocytosis and primary eosinophilic neoplasms

The historically poor prognosis of patients with advanced systemic mastocytosis (AdvSM) and primary eosinophilic neoplasms has shifted to increasingly favorable outcomes with the discovery of druggable targets. The multikinase/KIT inhibitor midostaurin and the highly selective KIT D816V inhibitor avapritinib can elicit marked improvements in measures of mast cell (MC) burden as well as reversion of MC-mediated organ damage (C-findings) and disease symptoms. With avapritinib, the achievement of molecular remission of KIT D816V and improved survival compared with historical therapy suggests a potential to affect disease natural history. BLU-263 and bezuclastinib are KIT D816V inhibitors currently being tested in trials of AdvSM. In the new World Health Organization and International Consensus Classifications, the category of "myeloid/lymphoid neoplasms with eosinophilia and tyrosine kinase (TK) gene fusions" is inclusive of rearrangements involving PDGFRA, PDGFRB, FGFR1, JAK2, FLT3, and ETV6::ABL1. While the successful outcomes with imatinib in FIP1L1::PDGFRA-positive cases and PDGFRB-rearranged neoplasms have become the "poster children" of these disorders, the responses of the other TK-driven neoplasms to small-molecule inhibitors are more variable. The selective FGFR inhibitor pemigatinib, approved in August 2022, is a promising therapy in aggressive FGFR1-driven diseases and highlights the role of such agents in bridging patients to allogeneic transplantation. This review summarizes the data for these approved and investigational agents and discusses open questions and future priorities regarding the management of these rare diseases.

Approach to the patient with suspected hypereosinophilic syndrome

Hypereosinophilic syndromes (HES) are a heterogenous group of rare disorders with clinical manifestations ranging from fatigue to life-threatening endomyocardial fibrosis and thromboembolic events. Given the broad differential diagnosis of HES, a comprehensive approach is needed to identify potential secondary (treatable) causes and define end-organ manifestations. Classification by clinical HES subtype is also useful in terms of assessing prognosis and guiding therapy. Corticosteroids remain the mainstay of initial therapy in the setting of acute, life-threatening PDGFR mutation-negative HES. Whereas the recent availability of eosinophil-targeted therapies with extraordinary efficacy and little apparent toxicity is changing the treatment paradigm, especially for idiopathic HES and overlap syndromes, questions remain unanswered regarding the choice of agent, impact of combination therapies, and long-term effects of eosinophil depletion. This review provides a case-based discussion of the differential diagnosis of HES, including the classification by clinical HES subtype. Treatment options are reviewed, including novel eosinophil-targeted agents recently approved for the treatment of HES and/or other eosinophil-associated disorders. Primary (myeloid) disorders associated with hypereosinophilia are not be addressed in depth in this review.

The hypereosinophilic syndrome - an unusual cause of myocarditis and cardioembolic strokes

Hypereosinophilic syndrome is a rare disorder characterized by excessive peripheral eosinophilia and eosinophil associated end-organ damage. Clinical presentations are heterogenous and can involve skin, pulmonary, cardiac and neurologic dysfunction. Eosinophilic myocarditis is a life-threatening complication that increases the risk of cardiac microemboli, which can subsequently lead to embolic strokes. Secondary to changes in blood viscosity, impaired clearance of microemboli, impaired cerebral blood flow, and pro-thrombotic conditions in the setting of hypereosinophilia, infarcts often present in vascular border zone regions. Here we present two cases of cardioembolic strokes involving borderzone regions in the setting of hypereosinophilic syndrome.