Atypical chronic myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasm, not otherwise specified: 2023 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management

Distinct clinical profiles and patient outcomes in aCML and CNL

The classification of atypical chronic myeloid leukemia (aCML) and chronic neutrophilic leukemia (CNL) as a single disease entity remains a topic of debate. To elucidate the characteristics of both entities, this retrospective cohort study was conducted, encompassing 36 cases of aCML and 18 cases of CNL. We discovered that aCML and CNL presented distinct blood counts, genetics, molecular profiles and outcomes. Specifically, hemoglobin levels (P < 0.001) and platelet counts (P < 0.001) were significantly lower in aCML cases than in CNL cases, with no significant difference in mean white blood cells (P = 0.637). The proportion of abnormal karyotypes was higher in aCML cases compared with CNL cases (P = 0.010). Notably, we found that aCML and CNL showed distinct gene expression profiles by transcriptome sequencing technology. The median follow-up duration for the entire cohort was 8 months (rang 0.4 to 36.6 months), and the median overall survival (OS) was significantly shorter in aCML cases (7.3 months, 95%CI 5.4 to 20.5 months) than in CNL cases (median OS not reached). The one-year OS rate for aCML patients was 31.0% (9/29), compared to 92.9% (13/14) for CNL patients. In conclusion, our study supports the notion that aCML and CNL are indeed distinct disease entities characterized by unique hematological features and clinical outcomes.

Analysis of CSF3R mutations in atypical chronic myeloid leukemia and other myeloid malignancies

We report a series of patients with CSF3R-mutant (CSF3Rmut) atypical chronic myeloid leukemia (aCML), chronic neutrophilic leukemia (CNL) or other hematologic malignancies. We included 25 patients: 5 aCML and 4 CNL CSF3Rmut patients; 1 aCML, 2 CNL, and 2 myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasm, not otherwise specified patients without CSF3R mutation; and 11 CSF3Rmut patients with other diseases [8 acute myeloid leukemia (AML), 1 chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML), 1 myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), and 1 acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL)]. Patients with aCML or CNL were tested by Sanger sequencing and pyrosequencing to identify CSF3R T618I. Twenty-two patients underwent gene panel analysis. CSF3R mutations, mostly T618I (8/9), were found at high frequencies in both aCML and CNL patients [5/6 aCML and 4/6 CNL]. Two aCML patients in early adulthood with CSF3R T618I and biallelic or homozygous CEBPA mutations without other mutations presented with increased blasts and exhibited remission for >6 years after transplantation. The other 7 CSF3Rmut aCML or CNL patients were elderly adults who all had ASXL1 mutations and frequently presented with SEBP1 and SRSF2 mutations. Five AML patients had CSF3R exon 14 or 15 point mutations, and 6 other patients (3 AML, 1 CMML, 1 MDS, and 1 ALL) had truncating mutations, demonstrating differences in leukocyte counts and mutation status. In conclusion, CSF3R mutations were found at a higher frequency in aCML patients than in previous studies, which might reflect ethnic differences. Additional studies are needed to confirm these findings and the relationship between CSF3R and CEBPA mutations.

Managing Patients with Hypereosinophilic Syndrome: A Statement from the Italian Society of Allergy, Asthma, and Clinical Immunology (SIAAIC)

Hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES) encompasses a heterogeneous and complex group of different subtypes within the wider group of hypereosinophilic disorders. Despite increasing research interest, several unmet needs in terms of disease identification, pathobiology, phenotyping, and personalized treatment remain to be addressed. Also, the prospective burden of non-malignant HES and, more in general, HE disorders is currently unknown. On a practical note, shortening the diagnostic delay and the time to an appropriate treatment approach probably represents the most urgent issue, even in light of the great impact of HES on the quality of life of affected patients. The present document represents the first action that the Italian Society of Allergy, Asthma, and Clinical Immunology (SIAAIC) has finalized within a wider project aiming to establish a collaborative national network on HES (InHES-Italian Network on HES) for patients and physicians. The first step of the project could not but focus on defining a common language as well as sharing with all of the medical community an update on the most recent advances in the field. In fact, the existing literature has been carefully reviewed in order to critically integrate the different views on the topic and derive practical recommendations on disease identification and treatment approaches.

Atypical chronic myeloid leukemia found in a patient with eosinophilia for six years: a case report

BACKGROUND

Atypical chronic myeloid leukemia (aCML) is a highly aggressive type of blood cancer that falls under the category of myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasms (MDS/MPN). In the fifth edition of the WHO classification of tumors, this category has been renamed MDS/MPN with neutrophilia. Although eosinophilia is commonly observed in blood cancers, it is rarely seen in aCML.

CASE PRESENTATION

This study presents a case of aCML that was diagnosed six years after the patient developed eosinophilia. The patient had undergone tests to rule out other primary and secondary diseases, but the eosinophilia remained unexplained. Treatment with corticosteroids and hydroxyurea had proven ineffective. Six years later, the patient experienced an increase in white blood cells, primarily neutrophils. After ruling out other possible diagnoses, a combination of morphologic and molecular genetic findings led to the diagnosis of aCML. The patient responded well to treatment with azacitidine.

CONCLUSIONS

This study summarizes the current state of aCML diagnosis and management and discusses the possible connection between eosinophilia and aCML.

miR-15a targets the HSP90 co-chaperone Morgana in chronic myeloid leukemia

Morgana is a ubiquitous HSP90 co-chaperone protein coded by the CHORDC1 gene. Morgana heterozygous mice develop with age a myeloid malignancy resembling human atypical myeloid leukemia (aCML), now renamed MDS/MPN with neutrophilia. Patients affected by this pathology exhibit low Morgana levels in the bone marrow (BM), suggesting that Morgana downregulation plays a causative role in the human malignancy. A decrease in Morgana expression levels is also evident in the BM of a subgroup of Philadelphia-positive (Ph+) chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients showing resistance or an incomplete response to imatinib. Despite the relevance of these data, the mechanism through which Morgana expression is downregulated in patients' bone marrow remains unclear. In this study, we investigated the possibility that Morgana expression is regulated by miRNAs and we demonstrated that Morgana is under the control of four miRNAs (miR-15a/b and miR-26a/b) and that miR-15a may account for Morgana downregulation in CML patients.

A case report of atypical chronic myeloid leukemia with complete hematological and major molecular response to Venetoclax/Azacitidine treatment

Atypical Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (aCML), a myeloproliferative neoplasm with poor prognosis, was reclassified as aCML by the ICC classification, and as MDS/MPN with neutrophilia by the WHO 2022 classification. Due to the heterogeneity of its clinical features and the lack of unique biomarkers, as well as limited treatment options, aCML currently lacks a standardized treatment protocol. In this case report, we reviewed a young man diagnosed with aCML who achieved complete clinical and hematologic remission subsequent to receiving a therapeutic regimen combining Venetoclax and Azacitidine.

Fifth Edition of the World Health Classification of Tumors of the Hematopoietic and Lymphoid Tissue: Myeloid Neoplasms

In this manuscript, we review myeloid neoplasms in the fifth edition of the World Health Organization classification of hematolymphoid tumors (WHO-HEM5), focusing on changes from the revised fourth edition (WHO-HEM4R). Disease types and subtypes have expanded compared with WHO-HEM4R, mainly because of the expansion in genomic knowledge of these diseases. The revised classification is based on a multidisciplinary approach including input from a large body of pathologists, clinicians, and geneticists. The revised classification follows a hierarchical structure allowing usage of family (class)-level definitions where the defining diagnostic criteria are partially met or a complete investigational workup has not been possible. Overall, the WHO-HEM5 revisions to the classification of myeloid neoplasms include major updates and revisions with increased emphasis on genetic and molecular drivers of disease. The most notable changes have been applied to the sections of acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic neoplasms (previously referred to as myelodysplastic syndrome) with incorporation of novel, disease-defining genetic changes. In this review we focus on highlighting the updates in the classification of myeloid neoplasms, providing a comparison with WHO-HEM4R, and offering guidance on how the new classification can be applied to the diagnosis of myeloid neoplasms in routine practice.

Application of Newly Customized Myeloid NGS Panel in the Diagnosis of Myeloid Malignancies

Purpose

Genetic mutations are major factors in the diagnosis and prognosis of leukemia, and it is difficult to assess these variants using single-gene analysis. Therefore, this study aimed to develop a fast and cost-effective method for genetic screening of myeloid malignancies using a customized next-generation sequencing (NGS) panel.

Patients and Methods

A customized myeloid panel was designed and investigated in 15 acute myeloid leukemia patients. The panel included 11 genes that were most commonly mutated in myeloid malignancies. This panel was designed to sequence the complete genome of CALR, IDH1, IDH2, JAK2, FLT3, NPM1, MPL, TET2, SF3B1, TP53, and MLL.

Results

Among the 15 patients, 14 actual pathogenic variants were identified in nine samples, and negative results were found in six samples. Positive findings were observed for JAK2, FLT3, SF3B1, and TET2. Interestingly, non-classical FLT3 mutations (c.1715A>C, c.2513delG, and c.2507dupT) were detected in patients who were negative for FLT3-ITD and TKD by routine molecular results. All identified variants were pathogenic, and the high coverage of the assay allowed us to predict variants at a low frequency (1%) with 1000x coverage.

Conclusion

Utilizing a custom panel allowed us to identify variants that were not detected by routine tests or those that were not routinely investigated. Using the costuming panel will enable us to sequence all genes and discover new potential pathogenic variants that are not possible with other commercially available panels that focus only on hotspot regions. This study's strength in utilizing NGS and implanting a customized panel to identify new pathogenic variants that might be common in our population and important in routine diagnosis for providing optimal healthcare for personalized medicine.

Atypical CML: diagnosis and treatment

Atypical chronic myeloid leukemia (aCML) is included in the group of myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasms by the International Consensus Classification and has been renamed as MDS/MPN with neutrophilia by the fifth edition of World Health Organization classification. It is always characterized by morphologic identification of granulocytic dysplasia with >10% circulating immature myeloid cells, 2 distinguished features that differentiate this disease among the others. Somatic mutations may help to diagnose but are not specifically pathognomonic of the disease, with the most detected including ASXL1, SETBP1, NRAS, KRAS, SRSF2, and TET2 and with low-frequency CBL, CSF3R, JAK2, and ETNK1. The genomic landscape of aCML has been recently unravelling, revealing that SETBP1 and ETNK1 are usually not ancestral but secondary events associated with disease progression. Unfortunately, until now, no consensus on risk stratification and treatment has been developed: Mayo Clinic prognostic score identified as adverse events age >67 years, hemoglobin level <10  g/dL, and TET2 mutations. Although some possible genetic markers have been identified, allogeneic transplant remains the only curative strategy.

Myelodysplastic Syndromes/Myeloproliferative Overlap Neoplasms and Differential Diagnosis in the WHO and ICC 2022 Era: A Focused Review

The myelodysplastic syndromes/myeloproliferative neoplasms (MDS/MPN) category comprises a varied group of myeloid neoplastic diseases characterized by clinical and pathologic overlapping features of both myelodysplastic and myeloproliferative neoplasms. For these reasons, these tumors are challenging in terms of diagnosis. The recent World Health Organization (WHO) 2022 classification and the International Consensus Classification (ICC) made changes in the classification of MDS/MPN compared to the previous 2016 WHO classification and improved the diagnostic criteria of these entities. The aim of this review is to describe the main entities reported in the more recent classifications, focusing on chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML), MDS/MPN with neutrophilia (or atypical CML [aCML]), and MDS/MPN with SF3B1 mutation and thrombocytosis/MDS/MPN with ring sideroblasts and thrombocytosis. A particular emphasis is given to the differential diagnosis and analysis of subtle divergences and semantic differences between the WHO classification and the ICC for these entities.